All Episodes
Previous Next
July 14, 2025 - Stew Peters Show
59:34
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: MAGA Not Ready to Move On from Epstein—Despite Trump’s Insistence
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the show.
Happy Monday, everybody out there watching.
This is the Millstone Report.
And as always, we can't do the program without you watching every single day.
A crazy set of events really transpired.
Just a lot of stuff happening over the last two days over the weekend.
Unbelievable.
I think the first thing that happened was there appeared to be a groundswell of support for the firing of Pam Bondi.
That was obviously, there was cold water thrown on that by President Trump with this post on Truth Social that essentially tells us all to move on from our Epstein obsession.
This is also echoed by talk radio hosts like Mark Levin now calling people who care about the Epstein files, or really when we're talking about the files, we're talking about the criminals surrounding Epstein, many of whom we suspect to be our leaders, calling us kooks now.
Mark Levin calling us Epstein kooks.
And so it's quite a fascinating time to be alive, isn't it?
So this all kind of came to a groundswell, came to a head, I guess, at Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA event that he had over the weekend, which by itself was a fascinating event.
A lot of very interesting conversations.
Epstein came up a lot.
Pam Bondi came up a lot.
Talk or podcast host Megan Kelly, you know, former Fox News host Megan Kelly, slamming Pam Bonnie for how she's handled all of this.
And I don't, you know, whether you're one of these people who is MAGA and thinks we just need to, you know, not be critical of the president when he messes up, or whether you're somebody like me or others that think, hey, we should praise the administration when they do good and we should call them out when they do terrible stuff like this.
I don't see how you can look at what's transpired over the past six months with Bondi and then the binder gate and think that she's done a good job.
She absolutely hasn't done a good job, specifically with this issue and specifically with the fact that she is on Fox News all the time.
I mean, this whole, at this point, I mean, I'm being hypercritical here, but I mean, you know, this is, I mean, you're a public official, so you open yourself up to that.
It just seems like so far her tenure as Attorney General has been just to, I don't know, audition for a future Fox News show.
That's what it feels like.
Now, at the same time, over the last several days, the DOJ has announced several things, I think, trying to mitigate the bleeding here.
One of those being that Pam Bondi's DOJ dropping the charges against what I think is a doctor who's a hero who basically destroyed a bunch of the vaccines and was trying to save people's lives during COVID.
We have that story for you as well.
We also now have this news story from John Solomon.
John Solomon now telling us, hey, I mean, there's now a massive investigation that's about to be assembled.
There's going to be grand juries.
It's going to encompass so many people.
And it's finally going to get to the bottom of the weaponization of government and Russia gate hoax and all of that stuff.
And I'm on board with that 100%.
Yes, I want these people that weaponized the government against President Trump and framed him for treason.
I want all that exposed.
I want those people to go to jail just like you do.
But again, what I said last week, Trump's saying, you know, that Epstein stuff happened a long time ago.
Well, so did you being spied on and framed for treason.
That was 10 years ago now, 2015, 2016.
It was a decade ago.
And yeah, we still care about that as well.
There's a lot of moving pieces here.
Obviously, last week we were told that, you know, Roger Stone over on Alex Jones' show was speculating that, hey, maybe there's countries all across the world begging these files not to be released.
We talked about on this program the spiritual implications behind that.
If there's entire governments, if entire nation states are threatened by the release of this material, the spiritual warfare aspect of this obviously has to be addressed.
Obviously, I still encourage this audience to pray that the light would expose the darkness, to pray that the Lord would expose these people and bring them to justice, bring them to, you know, in demands courts and justice so that we can have a government that's not run by secret pedophiles.
But That's the reason why that's obviously better for our populations, our Americans, and really the populations of people all over the world.
Interestingly enough, though, what's fascinating about this is I got to listen to a sermon from the book of Nahum yesterday while he was in church.
By the way, I hope everybody out there had a blessed Lord's Day.
And the book of Nahum could also be described as the book of Jonah part two, right?
Jonah, you know, in Jonah, the book of Jonah, he has to go to Nineveh.
Jonah doesn't want to go to Nineveh, so he flees.
He doesn't want to go to Nineveh because he knows Nineveh is going to repent and that the Lord is going to grant them repentance because the Lord wants this generation of Ninevites as his people.
And so, but, you know, Jonah doesn't want to do it.
And so, of course, he gets swallowed by the whale or the fish, whichever one, you know, mammal or fish, whichever, I don't know which camp you guys are in.
And so then, of course, Jonah, you know, gets vomited up on the shore.
He goes back to Nineveh.
They do repent.
And it's quite miraculous.
As a wicked of a city as Nineveh was, they were granted repentance.
And it's a really, really fascinating story.
And there's many different ways to look at it that show the Lord and how he can be merciful.
And there's all kinds of stuff, all kinds of layers, right?
Then you get to the book of Nahum, and it's kind of Jonah chapter 2 or part 2.
And now it's time for Nineveh to be judged.
And the language in there, some terrifying language, you know, thus saith the Lord, I am against you.
And I'm paraphrasing here with the Lord coming out saying, I am against Nineveh.
And everything that's going to happen.
Of course, historically, what did happen to Nineveh?
But what, you know, in the context of just, you know, everything that has gone on the last week with the idea that these wicked people at the tops of organizations who have an incredible amount of power being blackmailed and also, you know, participating in this and wanting to cover it up, everything in between.
The encouraging thing is, whether or not we get justice, and maybe we do get justice now, maybe we do get justice.
There is going to be justice.
There is going to be a reckoning.
Whether the Lord wills it with our earthly courts and systems or whether we have to wait until Jesus returns, there is going to be justice.
And in the meantime, we're still in the fight.
We still have voices.
And we're going to continue.
I'm going to continue as best I can speaking the truth.
And again, we're going to be critical of people who are doing things in our name, or in this case, not doing things in our name.
I want to remind everybody this portion of the program brought to you by Red Vive Health.
Life-saving red light panels.
That's my description of them.
They're going to greatly, let's just say life-enhancing if you'd rather that.
We'll tell you more about the healing power of red light and why it may be more important than ever to get a clinical strength red light panel in your home today.
And I'll tell you more about that here in just a minute.
Let's start it off.
This was the tweet that kind of threw cold water on everything.
Best I can tell.
Hang on one second.
There is a malfunction.
There appears to be some sort of malfunction in my desktop right now, and I have no idea why.
All right, hang on one second.
It's going to be difficult for me to share you, for me to share.
Let me see if I can fix this.
Because I am not at all sure what exactly is going on here.
Huh.
Well, I may just have to read it.
I'm having technical difficulties, and this is very, very frustrating.
And we're live right now on X-American News, and I have no ability to actually show you guys the truth for some reason.
It's like my software has frozen in time, which is extremely odd, and I'm not really sure why.
All right, so here we go.
Maybe it'll correct itself at some point in the future.
We're just going to have to go with what I've got.
And maybe in a break, I can figure this out.
So anyway, so the tweet in question, or this was the post on Truth Social.
Donald Trump saying, what's going on with my boys?
What's going on with my boys?
And in some cases, gals.
Some people think that was a direct shot.
The gals there was a direct shot at Lara Loomer, who has been calling, you know, she's been hammering Pam Bondi.
There's a really amazing amount of factions right now in MAGA.
And that's why I've been saying it's a political coalition, a fragile one at that.
But I think my take on that is that we should encourage debate and not just totally dismiss other voices that we disagree with here or there.
He goes on, they're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who's doing a fantastic job.
We're on one team, MAGA.
And I don't like what's happening, he says.
We have a perfect administration.
The talk of the world and selfish people are trying to hurt it all over a guy who never dies.
Now, some conspiracy theorists, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.
Some conspiracy theorists are saying this is Trump telling us that Jeffrey Epstein actually didn't kill himself and is still alive.
I don't know.
I can't go down that path, but that's what some people are saying.
He goes on, for years, it's Epstein over and over again.
Over and over again, why are we giving publicity to files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the losers and criminals of the Biden administration who conned the world with the Russia-Russia-Russia hoax, 51 Intel agents, the laptop from hell, and more?
Now, that's incredible.
That was an incredible piece.
Like, when he said that, I had to read it several times because what he's essentially saying here is that Obama, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, and John Brennan wrote the Epstein files.
He goes on, they created the Epstein files, just like they created the fake Hillary Clinton, Christopher Steele, dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called friends are playing right into their hands.
So people have speculated that this is Donald Trump saying that they have edited the list, that they've doctored the list, and maybe even they've put Trump on the list.
I don't know, but if that is what he's saying here, the rest of this, parts of this still don't make any sense.
Let me tell you why.
He says, why didn't these radical left lunatics release the Epstein files?
If there was anything in there that could have hurt the MAGA movement, why didn't they use it?
Well, that's a question.
So if they edited the files or created the files and put bad stuff for MAGA on it, why didn't they release it?
They would have released it.
So which is it?
I guess that's my question.
Which is it?
Did they edit the files and now they're no longer accurate?
Why wouldn't they have released them then?
So this makes me have more questions than answers about this one.
Then he goes on, and he says, they haven't even given up on the John F. Kennedy or Martin Luther King Jr. files.
No matter how much success we have had, securing the border, deporting criminals, fixing the economy, energy dominance, a safer world where Iran will not have nuclear weapons, it's never enough for some people, he says.
We are about to achieve more in six months than any other administration has achieved in over 100 years, and we have so much more to do.
We are saving our country, he says.
We're making America great again, which will continue to be our complete priority.
The left is imploding.
Cash Patel and the FBI must be focused on investigating voter fraud, political corruption, Act Blue, the rigged and stolen election of 2020, and arresting thugs and criminals instead of spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old radical left-inspired documents on Jeffrey Epstein.
Then he goes on and he says, let's see here.
I lost my place.
Okay, let Pam Bondi do her job.
She's great.
The 2020 election was rigged and stolen, and they tried to do the same thing in 2024.
That's what she's looking at into as AG and much more.
One year ago, our country was dead.
Now it's the hottest country anywhere in the world.
Let's keep it that way and not waste time and energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Again, if you're just joining us, forgive me.
My screen is frozen, and I don't think there's any way I'm going to be able to fix it.
I know exactly what happened now.
I started a piece of software and then closed it right before I came on the air.
And for whatever reason, it tried to update.
And when it updated, it's frozen my desktop capture.
So there's no way I can share with you any of the stories that I pulled today.
So it's just me.
So you'll have to forgive me for that.
We'll be back up and running tomorrow like normal.
So, yeah, this is just factually not acting.
This is the gaslighting.
The gaslighting that's been going on.
We talked about the gaslighting all last week, and for Donald Trump to say that nobody cares about Jeffrey Epstein is just devastating to a lot of people.
And you can point to the successes.
You can point to the border.
You can point to the Big Beautiful Bill if that was your thing.
You can point to the deportations or trying to ramp them up and that sort of thing.
The weed farm getting raided, by the way, the left freaking out about that and ignoring the fact that there are children, literally unaccompanied children that were working at the weed farm in California.
But look, the idea that this has not been ingrained, people are saying, oh, well, it just doesn't poll very well.
Actually, Scott Rass Musson says, or not Scott Rasmussen, but Mark Mitchell from Ras Musson Reports is now saying Trump's approval rating took another three-point dive.
Now he says it may be bottoming out, so maybe they recover from this.
I don't know.
But they did a poll, and two-thirds of people thought it was important, that the information needs to be released.
So I just don't think this is going away.
I saw Steve Bannon say over the weekend, Steve Bannon says, hey, I think that Congress could lose 30 to 40 House seats because of this Epstein debacle.
By the way, I was saying that exact same thing all last week.
My first reaction, actually, this has been my position since January, that if they don't go after the Epstein stuff and if it leads to a Republican donor, so what?
Like, that would be the biggest thing to restore confidence in the justice system in the justice system, that they're not biased, that they're going to go where the facts lead.
If it leads to a Republican, then that's where it's going to lead.
And that would do the biggest thing to not only keep the House, but grow the House majority.
But they're not going to do it.
And I've been saying that since January.
So, you know, there's a long time between now and November of next year, 2026.
There's a long time.
And voters do habitually have a really terrible long-term memory, and they only think in the short term.
But I do still think that that's what a big deal this is.
The idea that Epstein was blackmailing our politicians and our leaders, and there was this giant conspiracy to do it, has been ingrained in the political right for 10 years now.
And again, it is the explanation many of us have thought is likely true.
Like, this is why, let's just take a Republican, for example.
This is why a Republican can run for office based on a platform of they're spending too much, they're taxing too much, or we need a balanced budget, or name any social issue.
The social issues are the big ones under the sun.
But then they come back and they vote with the swamp.
They come back with excuses.
You just don't know how the system works.
I mean, there's just countless examples of that.
Probably about, you know, 435, probably about 535 examples of this happening all across the country right now.
So the fact that we're just being told to move along here and just only focus on the good stuff I'm doing.
And that's the thing.
That's what's frustrating.
Like, we're now going to send weapons to Ukraine or NATO is going to buy weapons from us to send more to Ukraine.
Earlier this morning, the president told us that there's going to be 50%, no, 100% tariffs on Russia if they don't agree to a ceasefire within the next 50 days.
And look, we'll see what happens with all of that.
But the one thing I know is that Lindsey Graham is the most excited person about all of this going on the Sunday news shows talking about this, right?
And I've said it from the beginning.
You're either going to have peace between Israel and the Middle East and peace between Ukraine and Russia or you get no peace.
Because I actually think both of these wars are backed by the same forces in the military-industrial complex that want to fight a proxy war against Russia.
Europe specifically wants to fight a proxy war, if not a direct war with Russia, because their economy, their birth rates are collapsing, their economy is contracting, and they need minerals and they need natural resources and they want to take it from Russia.
Also, Russia doesn't play along with their globo homo agenda of degeneracy and questioning the basics of civilizations prior about male and female roles.
And they don't back any of this modern liberalism.
They don't back that.
And so for that, they're the pariah.
And honestly, if you really don't think that their issues on social or their stances on social issues doesn't really play a huge part in this conflict, then I don't know what to tell you.
Maybe we need to do a whole show on that.
It was in 2013 that Vladimir Putin passed his law against LGBTQ RSTLNE.
Would you like to buy a val propaganda?
And then in 2014, Victoria Newland, led by Obama, issued a coup because we wanted a friendly Western president of Ukraine instead of the one the people there actually elected.
I don't know.
I think those two events are a big part of it.
Obviously, it is more complicated than that, but gay marriage, that sort of thing.
It's really important to the West.
Which should make us ask the question, like, who has the real moral high ground here?
I know we love to claim that we do.
Ivan Rakelin, again, I apologize if you're just joining us.
I've had a malfunction, and I'm not able to share my desktop screen with you today.
Ivan Rakelin says, anyone who causes these little ones to stumble, it would be better for a millstone to be hung around their deck and be drowned in the depths of the sea.
He goes on, if it were my kids, I would instantaneously deliver capital punishment to the perps and eagerly await a jury of my peers.
Now, this was in response to a tweet by Lieutenant General Michael Flynn.
He says, President Trump, please understand the Epstein affair is not going away.
If the administration doesn't address the massive number of unanswered questions about Epstein, especially the abuse of children by elites, by the way, I was watching a video of a deposition of Epstein and him addressing the allegations that for his birthday, he was given three 12-year-old French girls who didn't speak any English, and he had his way with them and then sent them back home the next day.
That's just one instance.
And if there's anybody else involved in that, like, oh, I don't know who sent the 12-year-old girls from France.
Who sent them?
So Lieutenant General Michael Flynn is saying, especially the abuse of children by elites, it's very clear that abuse occurred.
Then moving forward on so many other monumental challenges our nation is facing becomes much harder.
Trust was deeply violated by both Joe Biden and Barack Obama that your administration must be above reproach.
And never forget anyone who causes these little ones to stumble.
And he gives the verse there in Mark or Matthew.
It's in two places.
We cannot have pedophiles to get away.
I don't personally care who they are or what a leader-powerful position they hold.
They must be exposed and held accountable.
These are some of the reactions.
Also, people are going back.
People are going back, and they're listening to what people like Donald Trump Jr. said.
Now, you're only going to be able to hear this because I can't share the screen with you, but I think you'll still be able to hear this.
This is Donald Trump Jr. in June of 2024, so a little over a year ago.
How is it that my father can be convicted of 34 crimes, but no one on Epstein's list has even been brought to light?
How is it?
I'm trying to figure out How that's possible, right?
It's almost like they're trying to protect those pedophiles for some reason.
I can't imagine why, right?
Why is the FBI protecting the greatest pederist, the largest-scale pederist in human history?
Simple, because of who's on that list.
Everybody in politics has a vice that's much worse than alcoholism, is the way that I put it.
But we release the list.
Seriously, we need to release the Epstein list.
That is an important thing.
The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
Will that really happen?
It's sitting on my desk right now to review.
That's been a directive by President Trump.
In this case, in Epstein's case, it is incredibly disturbing.
We have flight logs, we have information names that will come out.
I'm not ever going to let this story go because of what I heard from a source about Bill Clinton on a plane with Jeffrey Epstein.
I'm not letting it go ever.
Ever.
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
This guy's been talked about for years.
You're asking, we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things.
And are people still talking about this guy, this Creep?
That is unbelievable.
Yeah, it's pretty.
Well, I tell you what's crazy is I'm having flashbacks to my radio days because it's really bugging me that you guys can't actually see the video because of this technical problem.
But whatever.
Makes me feel like I'm back in radio.
So, man, the reports were over the weekend that Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi had a shouting match in the White House.
That was the first report.
Then there was another report that said, no, actually, it was Dan Bongino and Susie Wiles, okay, the chief of staff, you know, President Trump's White House chief of staff.
And then Bongino was allegedly going to resign.
Now Trump says he's talked to him.
Laura Loomer broke the story that he was going to, you know, he took a day off or something to blow off some steam.
That turned out to be correct.
And everybody was saying, hey, look, if it's going to be between Bondi or Bongino, we want Bondi gone.
We want Bongino all day long.
You know, if you're a Bongino, if you're, look, you had to know, if you're Bongino or Cash Patel, you had to know that if you took this shot, and I'm assuming that these guys are not part of, you know, that they're not part of the cabal.
Okay.
Now, you may disagree with me on that, and there's now strong evidence, but hear me out.
Assuming that they weren't a member of the cabal, they had to know if they're going to go in the DOJ and FBI, they would have to know, look, if I go in here and I don't do it and I don't deliver the goods, I don't deliver arrests, everyone's going to think that I'm in on it.
They had to know this.
Now, I know some people are out there saying, well, look, the FBI's hands are tied here.
The DOJ's hands are tied here because this is really a CIA matter and they're not going to allow this stuff to be released.
You know, again, it doesn't matter.
You signed up for it.
You took the job.
You guys had to know that if you don't deliver, people are going to assume you're in on it.
So this idea that MAGA, the portion of MAGA that is asking honest questions and playing people in their own words are somehow now part of the problem because we're not praising Trump enough this week is just intellectually insulting.
Come on, guys.
Again, the Republican Party is the only party that is an actual coalition party.
There are different factions and there are different issues that matter more to some and less to others and blah, blah, blah.
Let's not tear each other's heads off.
Let's just welcome the debate and let's have it out.
And you know what?
If this is some sort of 5D chess move, fantastic.
Like in six months or whatever, like let's absolutely.
Like I'm fine with that.
I just don't understand why we're afraid of other people.
Like people are saying, I think Clandestine is one of them, who I really like.
Like I loved clandestine's exposing of the Ukraine biolabs and everything else.
But he's out there, you know, accusing, he probably doesn't even know who I am, but he's out there accusing people of, oh, this is for clicks, or there's other people like him.
I don't want to, I don't, maybe I have the tweet pulled up that I can't show you because I'm having technical problems, but I just don't understand.
Like, more debate is good.
Let's have the debate out.
Let's have the, you know, do the criticism.
But to dismiss, to dismiss this section of MAGA that's outraged by this and just telling us to get over it.
Come on.
I mean, like, I'm willing to say, like, hey, look, here's some influencer that I don't agree with on everything, but man, this person makes a great point concerning this news of the day, and I put it on the show.
I put it on my show because I am not, I'm not afraid of this, you know, you're going to promote somebody that is then going to cover this story in a way that you disagree with.
I've tried that, by the way.
I've tried that in the past to try to just become some sort of jot and tittle.
Like, you're going to conform to every little view that I believe in, or I don't want to have anything to do with you.
First of all, that's just impossible.
It's actually personally exhausting when you try to do that or run a show like that.
And it's also just not good for coalition building or building bridges and actually moving the ball forward.
This is what I have found to be the case, whether it was my exhaustive coverage of Arkansas politics from 2009 to 2020 or, you know, and over the last five years.
So just food for thought there.
So, yeah, then we have, let's see, this story.
Let's see if I can get this window to load for whatever reason.
Yeah, then we've got people playing Donald Trump back in their own, you know, back in his own words when Sean Hannity asked him about Clinton, and Trump comes out and says, yeah, Clinton's got some problems.
You know, he's got an Epstein Island problem.
He's got some issues.
Here's an old tweet.
Again, you can't see it.
I apologize.
Tomorrow we'll be back up technologically.
Donald Trump Jr.
This was back on July 8th of 2023.
So two years ago, Donald Trump Jr. says, Show us all the Epstein client lists now.
Why would anyone protect those scumbags?
Ask yourself this question daily and answer.
And the answer becomes very apparent.
There you go.
Then we have this, Megan Kelly about Pam Bondi, writing, there are really only two options.
There's no huge undisclosed there there on Epstein.
Bondi misled on it until she didn't, and Trump is quick to forgive a loyal soldier for being desperate to get on TV.
Oh boy, that's a burn.
Or, Megan Kelly says, number two, there is a scandal that's being covered up, and it's all at his direction.
Because we know what Bondi said, and we know we had a phase one binder.
She messed this up beyond recognition.
She's actually ensured that, like, let's say there is no there with Epstein, which I don't believe.
She's actually ensured that this is going to continue even further and become a real problem.
And the biggest thing, and I think this is why Bongino had his blow-up, Bongino was the one that said, I've seen the tape.
He killed himself.
He killed himself.
I've seen the tape.
He was the one.
That was Bongino.
Okay.
And so then they release the tape, and it's got a minute missing from it.
And by the way, the tape shows you nothing because the cell is actually down and around the corner.
But the tape is not conclusive at all.
It certainly doesn't satisfy a moderate Epstein skeptic is not going to be satisfied with that video.
But then when the minute is missing and Bondi's response is, and I think Trump was trying to get her to not answer the question, by the way, because he knows what a huge misstep this was.
Bondi says, well, you know, it was from the 90s, that despicable Jeffrey Epstein, that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein.
It was from the 90s.
And they have to change the tape out every night or blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
And that's why it's missing.
And it's missing from all of the dots.
Any tape that we show you would have this minute missing.
Well, now there's a problem.
Wired magazine says that that tape was edited with Adobe and that it's been cut out and spliced together and saved four different times.
Okay.
Because there's digital footprints on it and people can figure it out.
And so it's not the same tape.
It's not the same tape.
And I have a feeling that if Bongino had it out with Bondi or Bongino had it out with Susie Wiles, whatever it was, I bet you it was the handling of this tape because it's the tape more than anything that makes Dan Bongino look like he's part of this.
And we are all within our rights to speculate that he may very well be.
You took the job.
You're not delivering on arrests.
Not yet.
Maybe.
I hope you do.
I hope you do.
What's left?
I mean, what's left to do?
You know, the Russia gate.
They framed Donald Trump for treason.
That certainly needs to be addressed.
I certainly hope it is.
But my goodness, now you're going to have a lot of people that question whether or not we really root out all of that corruption.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, let's say that we get this massive trove of accountability of Comey and Brennan and Clapper and all these guys and Clinton and frame Donald Trump for treason.
How are we going to really ever know that that's it?
You know?
This is an asterisk that's going to...
It's...
It's not complicated.
There may not be a proper list, but there are court proceedings.
There are grand jury documents.
There are things that are now currently under seal that could all be released.
So the most transparent administration in history needs to do everything they can to be the most transparent administration in history and not gaslight the American people.
So there's a few nuggets that we've been getting.
Bondi has been under such scrutiny that now, in the midst of all of this, two days ago, Eric Daughtery reports that Attorney General Pam Bondi has fired 20 DOJ personnel who worked with Jack Smith anti-Trump documents case and January 6 cases per Axios.
So Axios is now reporting.
Axios, you know, Axios, the people that got the memo a week ago that started all of this mess, the leaked memo, Axios is now reporting positive stories for Pam Bondi.
Axios is once again reporting a positive story.
Oh my goodness.
It's ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Speaking of that, here's another positive story for Pam Bondi.
Breaking.
Attorney General Pam Bondi dismisses charges against Dr. Kirk Moore, who faced years in prison after destroying COVID vaccine vials, giving his own patients vax cards who were not vaccinated.
What a hero.
I would say this about if we needed to smuggle Christians out of some Middle Eastern country for their safety, there's nothing sinful about providing them with fake papers so that they can get out of a murderous situation.
Likewise, the vaccine tyranny, the vax passports, all of that stuff was completely unconstitutional.
It's completely liberty-killing.
And it was actually, if you want to take a scriptural view, Just like King George back in the 18th century was in violation of Romans 13 by not adhering to his legal commitments to the colonies and to the individual legislatures in the colonies.
All of these governors, all of these tyrannical folks in 2020 that were putting all this stuff out, the government, Fauci, all of it, they were in violation of the law.
They were the ones that were actually violating Romans 13 and not obeying the law.
We have a system of law.
Our government says you can't just make up a law from an executive branch and then enforce it on people, even in an emergency, unless, of course, you actually declare something like martial law, of course.
So, Dr. Kirk Moore is free.
Pamboni has dismissed the charges against him.
He was destroying COVID vaccine vials.
He was giving his own patients vax cards who were not vaccinated, and he was giving children saline instead of the vax for parents who wanted to avoid the side effects.
Pamboni writing, quote, Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so.
He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing.
It ends today.
So Pam Bondi has dropped these charges because she had a very good, very terrible, no-good week last week.
Can you imagine if you're Dr. Kirk Moore, how grateful you are personally that the Lord has used the circumstances and Pam Bondi's incompetence?
This was my first thought when I saw this.
I thought, if you're Dr. Kirk Moore, you are so happy right now, or you're just so humbled that the good Lord would use the circumstances of men, specifically the incompetence of Pam Bondi, bringing out the conservative influencers, giving them a binder that says phase one, promising that the list will be released.
There will be a phase two, saying the list is on your desk.
Then she, of course, somebody leaks the memo.
She gives her ridiculous answer.
That's it on Epstein.
She creates a straw man in that Oval Office or White House briefing where she says, that's child's porn.
It'll never be released as if we're asking to actually see the sexual assaults of children.
No one is asking to see that.
That gets rejected.
That's an embarrassment.
Then the tape gets released.
That's rejected by the public.
That's an embarrassment.
Then you have the missing minute.
Now you have wired saying that the video's been edited.
And so if you're Dr. Kirk Moore and for whatever reason, you're scratching your head like, why in the world am I still on trial for doing the right thing and fighting COVID tyranny and refusing to harm my patients?
And the good Lord in heaven uses the circumstances of men and Pam Bondi's terrible week and Pan Bondi needs anything to give herself some good press.
So Pam Bondi and the Justice Department decide to drop the charges against Dr. Kirk more.
I just, I just, I bring all that up because, you know, the Lord works in mysterious ways.
Doesn't he?
And he is working.
And that is an encouraging thought.
If you know anything today, you get anything from the show today, the Lord is moving, the Lord is working, and that is an encouraging thought.
And cling to that today in the face, in the face of gaslighting and people telling us that up is down and black is white.
There's the tweet about the footage, Jeffrey Epstein cell that was released.
It was edited.
According to Wired magazine, that footage was edited with Adobe Premiere Pro.
It was stitched from two different clips and was saved four times.
That's the forensic analysis from the tape, according to that report.
Colin Rugg, following up on that, saying metadata from the raw Jeffrey Epstein prison video was likely modified.
According to a new report from Wired, the outlet says they analyzed the 10-hour prison video with independent video forensics experts who concluded the raw footage was modified.
The outlet emphasized that at the moment there's no evidence the footage was deceptively manipulated in any way, but says it was modified to some extent.
Quote, rather than being a direct export from the prison surveillance system, the footage was modified, likely using professional editing tool Adobe Premiere Pro.
Now, technically, okay, Bongino said they were going to enhance some color.
Bongino did say they were going to edit it and enhance some color, okay?
But there were two videos released, okay?
So they released the enhanced one and then they released the raw one.
This report is saying it's the raw one.
It's the one that's supposed to just be the, you know, the one that doesn't look as good.
Something to think about.
Again, it all came to a fever pitch at Turning Point USA with Charlie Kirk and Megan Kelly, and Megan Kelly slamming Pam Bondi.
I would say watch, but my screen's malfunctioned, so listen.
And so from a media standpoint, Megan, you know the media better than anybody else.
You've been in the media.
You've been outside the media.
What's this Sunday night thing?
What is that?
So you have a July 4th weekend after the Big Beautiful Bill and you leak it on a Sunday night?
To Axios.
What is that?
If you want to leak it and you want conservatives to see it, you leak it to the Daily Caller.
You leak it to Fox News.
You leak it to Daily Wire.
You don't leak it to Axios.
Our people don't read Axios.
We read Axios under protest just to see what the left is saying.
So it was like, you saw it appear.
It was like, this must be bull.
there's no way this is real there's no way that Zero.
And cash.
So, And yet today, as we came here, there's a piece in Axios that reflects very poorly on Dan, alleging Dan only freaked out once he saw in this memo that people weren't responding well to the missing minute of the tapes of Jeffrey Epstein's cell.
Do you guys know this piece of the story?
And that he went into a meltdown like a little child and then threw a hissy fit.
So my point is not to weigh in on the truth or falsity of that.
It's false.
But it is to point out that's clearly a Bondi leak.
Very clearly, that's a Bondi leak.
So what's clear to me from this, as a member of the media, is Bondi leaked the memo to Axios and Bondi's doubling down by trying to get Axios to dump on Dan and trying to make him be the fall guy and or cash be the fall guy.
And she will not face the cameras.
If she means what she says, fine.
Come out and defend it.
To Dan's credit, he went on Fox a couple of weeks ago and he got beaten up pretty good for this and said, I think Epstein killed himself.
And the base went nuts.
The base doesn't believe that.
But he's like, if you got other proof, show it to me.
If he faced the cameras and did it, she hasn't.
So, I mean, it went on from there.
Let's see if we've got another clip here.
Well, let's go to Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch saying FBI Director would have released Epstein files months ago if able.
According to a source, quote, a source close to the White House told News Nation on Wednesday that FBI Director Cash Patel and FBI Deputy Director Bongino would unseal evidence related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein if their department had the ability to do so.
If they had the ability to do so.
So I've seen some of this out there, and people are using this to say, hey, look, there's an issue here because basically the Intel oligarchs are freezing out the FBI and they're not going to let this information be released because it'll make the CIA or Israel's Mossad look really, really bad.
Speaking of that, here is more of Charlie Kirk and Megan Kelly talking about that very thing.
Listen.
Do you think there's any Intel community involvement in this?
I wouldn't be surprised one bit.
I am convinced, based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours.
So he was an American, which leads basically three options.
MI6, Saudi, or Mossad?
Yep.
Which one would you choose?
I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghelane Maxwell.
So what does that mean?
Pretty incredible that this is turning point USA.
This is an audience for young people, and there's a sizable portion of the audience that agrees with this statement that is very controversial, not on programs like this, but within the normy conservative circles.
it's controversial.
Well, I mean, it's possible that that's the reason everything's getting buried, that there is some treasure trove and it's getting buried because...
Raise your hand.
Okay, I'd say about half the hands think that it's being buried because of an Israeli thing.
It could be.
I really don't know.
And I have no evidence to suggest that.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, no, me neither.
I did think it was very odd.
You've got to...
You got to quantify and you've got to clarify.
How look, Kevin, you raised your hand because you've heard that theory.
You've heard it debated.
You have questions.
But the one time Pam Bondi was asked a question about this at the cabinet meeting on Monday, she was like, and as for whether he was an agent, that I don't know.
I haven't looked into that.
That was crazy to me, too.
I said that last week.
I was like, what do you mean you don't know?
I think she said, I haven't heard that.
What do you mean you haven't heard that?
You're the Attorney General of the United States.
Like, this is an Epstein story.
It's been going on for 10 plus years.
It's been going on for 30 years.
I mean, you know, they got people trying to pin RFK Jr. to this because he was on the plane with his kids in 1992.
What do you mean you've never heard that he may be an Intel agent or a spook or it was a blackmail operation?
That's where I lost it.
Like that's the issue here.
The issue is the children.
It is the victims, but it's the fact that this was clearly a Hugh Hefner 2.0.
You know, I believe Hugh Hefner was working for Intel Agents.
It was back at a time where if you got caught cheating on your wife, or if you got caught being gay, but let's just, you know, it was a Playboy mansion.
If you got caught cheating on your wife back then, your career was over.
That could be used to manipulate you.
But we've gotten sicker and sicker and sicker as a society.
And now infidelity doesn't necessarily kneecap your political career like it used to.
So what do they have to get you?
They got to get you on something statutory.
They got to get you on something that they can throw the book at you and use that as the blackmail.
That's the real story here.
And so for Pambody to say, nah, I haven't heard that is absolutely ridiculous.
And this is why they've lost credibility.
And you know what?
It'd be a lot better if Donald Trump would just come out here and say, I don't have control over the intelligence agencies.
And, you know, I was listening to the Last Refuge on this, and I think that is why Putin is so hesitant to do peace.
I don't believe that Putin believes that Donald Trump can really bring the Intel agencies to heal, specifically in Ukraine.
And until Trump does something to demonstrate that he can bring the Intel agencies to heal, I think that's why Putin is so hesitant here.
I really do.
It's one thing to have a phone call with President Trump, but then when you've got the Intel oligarchs that don't necessarily agree and they don't listen and they want the war to continue, we still have real problems in this country.
And this Epstein thing doesn't solve any of that, right?
Putin in His speeches for years.
I don't mean to harp on Russia.
I didn't mean to, but I'm just spitballing here.
Putin in his speeches for years has said that the West are a bunch of pedophiles.
That Russia stands out because they're not about pedophilia and they're not about transing the kids and calling it health care.
He's put this into his speeches.
And how could you prove him wrong?
That doesn't mean I'm a Putin fan, but how could you, he's right.
These are our values.
Our values are transing kids and calling it healthcare up until this last election.
Our values were transing kids and calling it health care.
And our values are not releasing the Epstein list because we don't want the world to know that powerful intel agencies are being run by pedophiles and DCs run on blackmail.
Anyway, more from Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk.
Megan, remember, Alexander Acosta in 2007, he said he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an Intel asset.
That was one of Trump's cabinet secretaries who was literally a U.S. attorney three hours from here in Florida.
He said that himself.
Well, and let me tell you the consequences of that.
His subpoena, his search warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's residence was very narrow.
It was not the kind of like, let's get everything.
Let's see everything inside this guy's dressers and so on.
It was very, very narrowly tailored.
And to this day, that's what the FBI is stuck with.
So it really is possible that Dan and Cash got in there and in like a Geraldo and Al Capone's vault situation opened it up and we're like, oh my gosh, there's nothing in here.
Like we did not find the magic documents or photos or evidence of anything.
And why not?
I don't know.
We'll ever know why not.
So I'm going to cover this later this afternoon with my co-host of the Paul Harrell program, 4 o'clock, 4 p.m.
Central, 5 p.m.
Eastern.
And that'll be on X America News Live.
So go to X and then search for at X America News.
Make sure you subscribe.
Make sure you follow me at RealPaul Harrell.
I'm going to be live in studio with Rob Spencer.
We're going to go over this in more detail.
I'll have my screens fixed by then and actually be able to show you more of that.
But before we go today, I do want to tell you about a story that is also very disturbing.
Alex Jones is reporting that the EPA, HHS, and basically these agencies headed by Robert Kennedy Jr. are for the removal of fluoride, this neurotoxin, from our water in an effort to make America healthy again.
But Pam Bondi's DOJ is now trying to stop it.
They're now trying to stop the idea of banning fluoride in our water supply.
This is a huge problem.
It's another huge letdown on this when it comes to make America healthy again.
And so that is why, hear me out, we have to take every advantage we can to overcome the toxins in our water, the toxins in our environment, everywhere, air, whatever's being sprayed.
We told you about the EPA admitting about the dangers of geoengineering.
Lee Zeldin saying that one of the ways you geoengineer is you aerosol metal particles in the sky that reflect the sun.
We have got to take every advantage we can, and I'm just telling you, one of those advantages to fight this is red light therapy, and you're not going to find a better red light panel than the folks at Red Vive.
Okay?
We've told you about this a lot.
The fact that you got this story with the DOJ stepping in, trying to push RFK out in terms of not allowing us to ban fluoride.
These are incredible clinical strength, red light panels you can have in your home.
60-day money-back guarantee.
0% interest financing is available.
These devices emit red light, of course, you see it there, but also emits near-infrared light.
And that is designed to reduce muscle and joint inflammation, pain, stimulate cellular energy, speed up recovery, boost skin collagen, strengthen your body, and boost your mood.
The red light, okay, two different wavelengths, red and near-infrared.
You can toggle between the two or you can use them both at the same time.
I use them both at the same time.
I get about 6 to 12 inches from the panel and you feel incredible.
I had some back issues this weekend after doing a little weed eating and lawn maintenance.
Sat in front of the red light machine, knocked it out.
Two treatments, knocked it out, felt fantastic afterwards.
Scientifically proving anti-aging benefits, reducing wrinkles, color patches, hyperpigmentation.
So it's great for your skin, and that's what the red light does.
The red light is really good for your skin.
But the near-infrared light is what penetrates deeper into the body.
That's what activates your mitochondria.
That's what reaches your bones.
That's what reaches your muscles and tissues and even down to your organs.
You've got to try this.
I want you to do this.
You're supporting me and this show and other shows like it, like the one we do in the afternoon.
It's redvivehealth.org.
That's redvihealth.org slash Paul.
Or you can give them a call at 866-726-8483.
That's 866-726-8483.
Mention my name, Paul.
They know who I am.
These are great folks.
They want to help you.
That's redvivehealth.org slash Paul or call the number on your screen, 866-726-8483.
That's all the time that I got.
I apologize for the technical difficulties.
I really, really do.
And I'll get those worked out.
And we're going to be back here again, X-American News, 4 o'clock, Paul Hurrell program, co-host Rob Spencer.
We're going to break down this and so, so much more, everything to do with this Epstein stuff.
As well as there's this story out of my home state of Arkansas.
Did you hear about this?
Where you had a 13, 12-year-old girl that was basically kidnapped by a 60-year-old man who already had a protected order, had already molested her in the past.
And he gets her to come out of the house and then takes off with her.
Dad wakes up, knows what's going on, calls 911, tracks the car down, runs it off the road.
According to him, the man in the car, again, who already had a protective order because he had messed around with this girl before, was not letting her leave the car.
The guy gets out of the car, had something in his hand.
Father shoots him dead.
Shoots him once in the chest, once in the abdomen, once in the arm, dead to door.
You know, he's dead.
Calls 911, tells him what happened.
Now this guy's being charged.
We're going to talk about this because I think we need to have an honest conversation.
What would you do in that situation if you were the father?
What would you do?
So unless I'm providentially hindered, I'll see you at 4, and I'll also see you tomorrow at 12 noon on X American News.
Can't do the program without you.
God bless everybody out there.
Hope you have a great rest of your Monday.
▲
Export Selection