All Episodes
Previous Next
July 9, 2025 - Stew Peters Show
01:02:26
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: DOJ Investigates Comey to Distract from Epstein Outrage
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thanks so much for being with us.
My name is Paul Carroll, and once again, you have found the Millstone Report, and we can't do the program without you watching every single day.
We're really happy to have you with us.
You're broadcasting live on X America News and across other platforms as well.
Anyway, greetings, salutations.
Thanks for being with us.
I want to remind you, this portion of the program is brought to you by Redvivehealth.org.
That's redvivevihealth.org slash Paul, where you'll get the 15% discount and experience the healing power of red light.
We'll tell you more about that here in just a moment.
Matter of fact, I was just, I believe tomorrow we're going to be talking with Dr. Raul Desai once again about the healing power of red light, but specifically talking about long COVID and brain fog.
I think many of us have experienced brain fog.
Some people attribute it to long COVID or those pesky little spike proteins that are still, and if you took the shot, your cells become spike protein manufacturers or spike protein little factories, I guess.
So we're going to talk about that tomorrow on the program, but we've got a lot to get to today.
The last couple of, I mean, what I'll say this is I have not changed this lower third.
Some people might call this lazy the last three days, this lower third here.
I really can't think of anything better to write.
That's continuing to be the case.
The DOJ, the FBI, gaslight the American people over Jeffrey Epstein.
We just got word last night, though, that the FBI is now investigating James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey.
They're now under investigation for essentially framing Donald Trump for treason.
But I think this is a distraction.
I mean, I think it's a timely distraction.
I think it's one that the administration understands they desperately need right now.
But investigations, where do those lead?
Well, Jeffrey Epstein's, those files are being investigated.
His purported client list that exists but then doesn't exist, that's being investigated.
And where did it lead?
It leads to nowhere.
We've got this White House soundbite from both President Donald Trump and Pam Bondi.
And it is discouraging to say the least.
And it's more gaslighting.
And we're going to dissect it.
One of the things that President Trump said yesterday when a reporter asked Pam Bondi about Epstein, about the client list, about the missing one minute in the videotape they released that Dan Bongino said was going to assuage all of our fears.
And I'm putting words into his mouth, but come on, that's exactly what came across in that interview.
Donald Trump says, are we still talking about Epstein?
Are we still talking about that?
What are we still talking about Epstein for?
Oh, I don't know.
He's been one of the main reasons many people have suspected their politicians don't do what they say they're going to do when they run for office because of blackmail.
And so likewise, what I can say today is, as much as I believe that James Comey deserves to be charged, John Brennan deserves to be charged, but that happened almost 10 years ago.
They framed Donald Trump almost 10 years ago.
Are we still talking about James Comey and John Brennan?
Are we really still talking about them?
You see how that works?
But no, not this time.
This time we're told that we have to move on from Epstein, but here's the thing.
The people aren't going to be moving on from Epstein.
And yes, there are people out there that claim that this is all part of some 5D chess.
I don't know, man.
I just am skeptical about that at this point.
I will say this.
Donald Trump kind of saying, I will say that, yes, the mainstream media is now clamoring for the Epstein files.
And so some people are saying, some people are saying that that's caused to say, see, this is part of a way to get people clamoring for the Epstein files, and they're still going to release something about it.
I don't know, not based on Pam Bondi.
And here's the thing.
Heaping all of the blame on Pam Bondi.
While I think how she's handled this is completely ridiculous, it's, I mean, she's...
either she was either lying then or she's lying now.
Both are terrible, you know, from a public official.
But she works for Trump.
President Trump could fire her at any moment, right?
So we have to take stock here, but we have to be as vocal as you want to be.
Be as vocal as you want to be.
If you think this is all a bunch of BS, then say it.
Don't listen to the people out there that are calling you a pannikin, you know, because as I continue to say on the show, the Republican Party is now a coalition party where we debate things and we call out our officials when they don't do what we perceive to be, you know, the right thing.
We call them out when they do the wrong thing.
We praise them when they do the right thing.
And for people saying, you know, don't criticize this.
I mean, come on.
I mean, we haven't been living under a rock.
We know the allegations of blackmail.
We are well within our rights or reasonableness, you know, having a reasonable state of mind here to entertain the idea that people in the Trump government are compromised because they're now a part of what looks to be like yet another cover-up where the uniparty is protected at all costs.
We've got a meme towards the end of the show where, hey, I found the Epstein list, and it's just a photo of people in Congress.
It's just a photo of people sitting at their desks in Congress.
Like, is this actually the Epstein list?
So, I mean, you know, we can tie ourselves in knots and, you know, do all kinds of mental gymnastics to not believe our ears, you know?
And I'm not going to do that.
And we're going to forever shatter this idea that people who voted for Trump or people who like a lot of the stuff that Trump does or like a lot of the stuff that Trump says, we're going to forever shatter this idea that it's just a cult and everybody just tamps down their objections and is just some sort of worshiping this idea of some sort of messianic figure.
Men are not perfect.
Everyone is a hypocrite at one point or another in their life.
And we're going to analyze this video, though.
Let's get to it, shall we?
This is President Trump.
After shortly I got off the air on this broadcast yesterday, this news broke.
Liz Wheeler saying President Trump snaps at reporter who asks him Epstein question.
Trump is massively misreading his base on this.
Epstein left some lingering mysteries.
One of the biggest ones is whether he ever worked for a American or foreign intelligence agency.
The former labor secretary, who was Miami U.S. Attorney Alex Kostick, he allegedly said that he did work for an intelligence agency.
So could you resolve whether or not he did?
And also, could you say why there was a minute missing from the jailhouse tape on the night of 7?
Yeah, sure.
Captain, could I just interrupt for a second?
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
This guy's been talked about for years.
You're asking, we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things.
And are people still talking about this guy, this creep?
That is unbelievable.
Do you want to waste the time?
Do you feel like answering?
So it's gaslighting because, you know, Trump's been asked multiple times in the six months of his second term about the Epstein files.
He's even said, I'll talk to Pam Bonni about it.
So the idea that President Trump doesn't know that this is a, and some people point to this as 5D chess, I don't buy it.
The idea that President Trump doesn't know that this is a big deal.
Okay.
Now, Alex Jones says that when Trump said that, he's now created the biggest Streisand effect that you can possibly, and that may be true.
The Streisand effect, I think, is, we're witnessing that right now.
And we'll go over the headlines to prove it here in just a moment.
But is that intentional?
I mean, yeah, I guess possibly it could be.
I'm not on that train.
I'm not buying it.
But anyway, listen to Pam Bonte's answer here because this is the one we really need to dissect.
Don't mind answering.
I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas.
It just seems like a desecration.
But you go ahead.
Sure.
First, to back up on that, in February, I did an interview on Fox, and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said, I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file.
That's not what she was asked, though.
She was asked, you know, are you going to release the Epstein list?
She said, it's on my desk.
Along with the JFK MLK files as well.
That's what I meant by that.
Also, to the tens of thousands of video.
All right.
We could give her the benefit of the doubt.
Just for the sake of argument, she was talking about what Caroline Levitt said.
By the way, some people have noticed that Caroline Levitt, when she went out for that particular press conference, wasn't wearing her cross because she was clearly spending for the...
I'm just telling you what the internet's noticed.
But, okay, Pam Bonnie.
I wasn't talking about the specific list.
I was talking about MLK, RFK, JFK, and Epstein.
We're reviewing it all.
Now, at this point, though, I will say, like, I don't really believe that those other files were really actually on her desk either, by the way.
But anyway, let's let her finish here.
They turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein.
That disgusting Jeffrey Epstein.
That disgusting Jeffrey Epstein.
Bad intelligence.
Very bad intelligence.
Disgusting Jeffrey Epstein.
Child porn is what they were.
Never going to be released.
Never going to see the light of day.
Now, this is a deflection.
None of us Are asking to see the victims and Jeffrey Epstein engaged with underage girls or children.
None of us are asking for that, Pam Bondi.
None of us are.
You are, this is a straw man.
Pam Bondi is creating a straw man just in order to find a way to filibuster and answer this question, again, about Epstein really being for intelligence and the missing minute of the video.
But let's continue.
To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that.
We can get back to you on that.
And the minute missing from the video.
Now, this is absolutely gaslighting at the height.
I have no knowledge of this.
Pam Bondi, the idea that Pam Bondi has never heard the allegation that Jeffrey Epstein was a CIA asset or a Mossad asset or just, let's say, an intelligence asset.
The idea that she has never heard that allegation is preposterous.
Okay, and she's acting like, oh, I don't know.
I'll get back to you on that.
This is Pam Bondi gaslighting the American people.
And this is why Jack Pasovic says that she's basically, at this point, sounds a lot like Hillary Clinton in the Benghazi hearings when she says, at this point, what difference does it make?
But let's continue.
We released the video showing definitively.
The video was not conclusive, but the.
Hang on.
We released the video showing definitively.
I mean, the video wasn't conclusive.
Which is it?
Was it definitive or was it conclusive?
Which one is it, Pam?
Evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide.
And what was on that, there was a minute that was off the counter.
And what we learned from Bureau of Prisons was every year, every night, they redo that video.
It's old from like 1999.
It's Trump's body language here.
He's not happy with her answer here at all.
And what we've learned from Bureau of Prisons was every year, every night, they redo that video.
He's either frustrated with the question again, which is probably the most likely scenario, or he's frustrated with her.
So every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing.
So we're looking for that video to release that as well.
So now the explanation for the missing one minute of the videotape that Dan Bongino told us was going to prove that Epstein killed himself.
Now we're told that the minute of missing video is because of old systems from the 90s that require them to change out the tape or restart the tape.
And so there's always going to be a minute missing, which, by the way, if true, okay, if that's true, which I don't know if I believe it, but if that's true and there is a, every single night, there is a minute window at midnight.
Now, not at noon, you know, not at 10 a.m., not at 3 p.m., but at midnight.
There's always going to be a missing minute of the tape.
Well, that would be a very valuable piece of intelligence if you wanted to kill a billionaire who has dirt and blackmail on the most powerful people that control our societies that don't want everybody to know that they actually are diddlers.
So actually, like, if her answer, it's just going to fuel even more conspiracy theories.
It's literally, like, the idea of this being the most transparent administration in history at this point in time has become a joke, a joke in the last 72 hours, a complete joke in the last 72 hours.
Because now we have this missing minute and we also have this bogus or whatever explanation that's only going to make people think and not trust this government even more.
We're going to restore confidence to the FBI.
We're going to restore confidence to the DOJ.
Showing that a minute is missing every night.
And that's it on Epstein.
And that's it on Epstein.
Look at that smile.
That's it on Epstein, everybody.
That's a wrap.
We have covered for the people that we're supposed to cover for.
And that's it on Epstein.
Killene Maxwell-trafficked kids to no one.
Well, Jeffrey Epstein, I guess.
But there was nobody.
You know, and what would be a great question for Pam?
Okay, Pam.
It was all child porn.
Was it only Epstein with these kids?
Was it only Epstein?
Was there anyone else in the videos that Epstein had?
I want a straight answer on that.
I want a straight answer.
I mean, we're not going to get it, I don't think.
Here's the Alex Jones tweet I was referencing, but Trump says there are no files.
Then he says, stop talking about it.
47 just triggered the mother of all stry-sand effects.
This was in response to Elon Musk, who says, how can people be expected to have faith in Trump if he won't release the Epstein files?
Here is Pesobic on his human events show comparing what Pam Bondi just said to Hillary Clinton.
The United States Attorney General that the Epstein case is closed.
There's no more information on Jeffrey Epstein.
Why do you guys keep asking about Jeffrey Epstein?
She says that we don't need to hear about Jeffrey Epstein ever again.
You know what this sounds like?
I'm going to tell you exactly what this sounds like.
Pam Bondi sounds like Hillary Clinton right now saying at this point, what does it even matter when she was talking about Benghazi?
All right.
This is not how you treat the American people.
This is not how you treat basic communications.
This is not how you treat your voters and your supporters.
And certainly, by the way, myself personally, I feel very angry, upset, used, every word you want to know from having gone to the White House and receiving this binder full of baloney that was completely publicly available information already that we were told was new information on Epstein.
It wasn't.
We were told that more information was coming.
There wasn't.
You claimed that you had the list on your desk.
You didn't and none of it came out.
And now, when people have the obvious, the obvious response of asking a question about it, you get in their faces and you tell them to stop asking.
No, you sound like Hillary Clinton right now, and this isn't what you promised the American people.
You know, it's just interesting because, I mean, like, I don't expect the President of the United States to scour Twitter and X or whatever and understand how outraged his base is over that.
But I don't think he would have to know that, again, for the last 10 years at least, Jeffrey Epstein and the blackmail operation that is well documented, this story, this concept, this convention has been used to wake a lot of people up as to why our government is so corrupt,
as to why seemingly good men go to Washington, D.C. and then come back with excuses as to why they can't do what they were sent there to do.
And so blackmail was, you know, is something that a lot of, you know, the whole system is corrupt, right?
Like, and the currency in D.C. is blackmail.
And so to just think, are we still talking about Epstein?
Again, we could say the same thing about, are we still talking about Comey and Brennan that framed you for treason?
That was nine years ago.
That was 10 years ago at this point.
Are we going to still talk about Russia collusion?
Are we still talking about the hoax and holding people accountable for it?
Are we still talking about it?
And unfortunately, I am under the opinion that, yeah, we actually may just continue to talk about it.
We're talking about the investigation that they just launched, a much-needed distraction from this fumbling of the Epstein.
But I have a feeling we're just going to talk about it, right?
It would have been much better to just go arrest them.
Like, go do your investigation.
Don't tell anybody about it.
And, you know, call me when there's actual arrests.
Call me when James Comey's being perp walked and CNN's getting tipped off at the 3 a.m. arrest, like they did to Roger Stone.
So here's Laura Loomer's take.
She says, so many people are so quick to abandon President Trump.
It's sad to see.
Once you understand how much gatekeeping happens around Trump, you understand he's not the problem.
The gatekeepers are.
It's hard to see unless you get to see it up close in person multiple times.
Ivan Rakelin here, in response to that, is asking for names.
Do you have any names?
Please, please give us some names.
Here's the thing.
Like, just, I voted for Trump both times, okay, just because we are calling out this very huge story, and it is gaslighting.
That doesn't mean people are abandoning President Trump.
That doesn't mean we still don't like the secure border.
We want the mass deportations.
We want, you know, that doesn't mean that you're abandoning him.
It just means that you're not going to put your head in the sand and just ignore when there are blatant problems.
Yeah, and yeah, I get it.
The people around him are anxious, just like any leader, the people around you are anxious to mislead you to get what they want, or they want to get what they want, and they'll mislead you if they have to.
Arin McIntyre writes, the video, which didn't exist, now does, just with key parts missing.
The client list, which was being reviewed by the AG, now never existed, and she says, well, I wasn't.
It wasn't actually on my desk.
I was talking about the whole file.
The evidence, which was exhaustive and damning, can't lead us to a single client.
The man who received a slap on the wrist for raping minors because he was an intelligence asset now had no connections to the intelligence community.
Bad intelligence.
Very bad intelligence.
Men who were clearly behaving as if they were being blackmailed were never being blackmailed at all.
And he goes on, he says, the women, the woman who is spending 20 years in jail for trafficking minors, trafficked them to no one.
This is interesting.
Yesterday on the Glendeck program, they analyzed, they made a diagram.
I want you to see this diagram very clearly because this is incredible.
They made a diagram of the camera and what it is we're actually seeing.
Okay, so do you see this is the camera angle that we have that has the missing minute of video?
You see it right there.
Now, earlier in the week, I was pointing out that this cell, number 46, I was assuming this was supposed to be Epstein's cell because we pulled up old photos that were released by the DOJ when he killed himself in 2019.
I'm sorry, let me use the air quotes.
When he killed himself in 2019 that showed a completely different cell with a different, the cell looked completely different.
Well, so I think I've got a little bit more information now that they're not saying that these two doors are Jeffrey Epstein's cell.
They're saying that we're obviously on an elevated position.
There's a set of stairs there.
There's a balcony there.
You see it.
They're saying that the cell that Jeffrey Epstein was in is actually around this corner.
It's down at the lower level and around the corner, which is why they made this diagram.
Here's the camera.
Here are these other cells that you can see in the camera.
The camera is totally obscured to where Epstein actually was.
That was Epstein's cell.
So, I mean, if you look at this, this is absolutely an incredible diagram, and I'm glad that Glenn Beck has put this out because this does shed an incredible amount of light of just how stupid they think we are.
I mean, aside from the fact that Pam Bondi is now saying that the minute of missing audio or the minute of missing video just happens every day, which would be, again, a key piece of information to know if you wanted to get in there and kill somebody and avoid, you know, if all the other cameras were off and you only had to worry about this one, then you can go in in the minute and kill them.
And this even looks like a way to escape.
Like this, this appears to be, unless that's a wall, maybe that's a wall or maybe that's a balcony.
I don't know.
If that's a wall, then no.
But regardless, this is the video angle that convinced Dan Bongino.
I know he says there's other evidence, but this is the video that, oh, I've seen the video.
We're going to be releasing the video.
This is the video.
And then the minute of missing a video, it's like, can you fumble this anymore?
Can you be any more obvious?
I mean, when, okay, so, when the auto-pin president was serving, and they took a shot at Trump in Butler, which, again, at a bare minimum, was a Secret Service stand-down order, and you'll never convince me otherwise.
I think it was a lot more coordinated than that.
But Donald Trump was supposed to die that day, and he didn't.
He turned his head, and miraculously, the Lord demonstrated that he decides how long we have on this earth, and he is sovereign over that.
But the story we got after he survived was going to be the same story if he had been killed.
Crook's body would have been cremated the same.
We would have gotten the same explanation from the Secret Service.
Why wasn't the roof secured?
Well, it was sloped.
All of that story would have still been the same, and it still doesn't make sense, and we know it.
They were gaslighting us then.
Now, I think they were gaslighting us because they wanted to trigger a civil war and cancel the elections.
And if our candidate was on the ground dead, that certainly would have done it, and the country would have never been the same again, and it still may not.
But you get the point.
Like, everybody would have given up.
And when that happens, nature abhors a vacuum, and things would have gotten really bad really fast.
Okay.
That is gaslighting, and it's gaslighting to this day.
We have a new administration that are engaging in the exact same level of gaslighting, and maybe even more.
You could argue that this is even crazier.
Because we've got two guys with Bongino and Cash who have been on the podcast circuit telling us that there is a black book, that Epstein has a black book, or Ghislaine has a black book, that the FBI has it.
And now these guys get in there, and then they go on national TV, and their body language is screaming that they are, it's like they are hostages of their own previous statements, and they're hostages of the apparatus now.
They're hostages of the deep state telling us Epstein, he killed himself.
I've seen the file.
I've seen the file that somebody else prepared for me.
And all of this could have been avoided.
All of this could have been avoided had they had just, I mean, if you're going to lie to our face, are there not better lies?
This is what I don't, this is honestly what I don't understand.
Pam Bondi boxed herself in with that whole binder stunt, and then the letter to Cash, and then the trove of documents and videos and stuff that were allegedly with the Southern District of New York.
She boxed herself in because you could have easily have just said, hey, they're gone.
It's all gone.
All the evidence is gone.
And while we would have been like, okay, there would have been people that wouldn't have believed you, they would still be people that think you're part of the cover-up, as they do now.
But there would also be people that say, yeah, you know, that makes sense because, you know, the previous administration would have done everything they could to destroy all of this evidence.
But that's not what they did.
Instead, they fumbled this, and it's just absolutely a catastrophe, a total catastrophe.
Here is Cash Patel on Glenn Beck's show a while ago, obviously before he was the head of the FBI, saying this.
So who has Jeffrey Epstein's...
Black book?
Black book.
FBI.
But who?
That is...
I mean, there's...
Well, that's under direct control of the director of the FBI.
Just like the manifesto from the Nashville school shooting of the Catholic school.
We still haven't seen that, right?
It's a Presbyterian school, but okay.
It's not the Nashville police or PD saying, we don't want this out.
The FBI airmailed into that operation and said, this is not getting out.
Because they do that because they...
This is another government gangster operation.
All these local law enforcement communities get funding from the DOJ and FBI for local programs.
And if you don't cooperate, dollars for this and you're not getting your and that's a lot of money to these local districts that's how they play the game that's why you don't have a black book or the black book it's not just sitting i mean that's that's that's just december 13th 2023 10.
And to me, that's a thing I think President Trump should run on.
On day one, roll out the black book.
And not just that.
On day one, roll out all of the text messaging communications we were told were deleted.
On day one, play the rest of the video of the pipe bomber.
You know, he needs one of the reforms I talk about in government gangsters is you need a central node to be continuously declassifying.
This is another thing they do.
They overclassify.
And I'm telling you, as a former number two in the IC, they overclassify 50 percent of the stuff there to protect the deep state.
Oh, no, you can't see that.
Nothing to see here.
Gina was a master at it, of doing it.
And we still haven't seen half of the Russiagate report that we wrote.
Still under lock and key.
On how the ICA was originally constructed, we went we put 10,000 man hours against John Brennan's team that did it.
And we found out why they came up with their bogus conclusion.
But we couldn't sell it to the world because we couldn't talk about it.
And the government gangsters came in and buried it.
All of these things, there needs to be a continuing central power, whether it's the White House or offsite, that says every request that comes in, just right out the door, as long as it's not a major threat to national security.
So a reasonable man is well within their mind and reason to say what happened.
What is the difference then and now?
Patrick Bet David went on with Jesse Walsh.
Waters to talk about this entire debacle, asking some serious questions and good questions.
The number one trending hashtag right now on X is Epstein.
Two million people have tweeted with the topic of Epstein.
Number two is Nikki Minaj at 100,000.
Comey's at 42,500.
There is a reason why people are asking about this.
This is by far, and I'm a supporter.
Three times I voted for this man.
This is by far the biggest fumble of the administration they've had thus far.
And here's a reason why.
If you remember pre the president winning, he had a conversation with Fox News, the great Rachel Campos Duffy, and she asked, Mr. President, 9-11, yes.
John F. Kennedy, yes.
Epstein, ah, he didn't say yes.
He was a little bit hesitant of bringing that information out.
Why?
So why does his leadership team go out there and are like, we have this information and we're going to release this and cash.
And let me tell you what we have with Pam Bondi out of the state of Florida.
She knew everything about Bondi, about Epstein.
Why are you fumbling this?
Why are you not having an emergency meeting together to conversate and say, hey, we're going to be on the same page with messaging on this?
All you have to do is send a message to everybody, say, God, let's have a conference call.
Here's what we're going to be saying about this, because this was a very important issue to not 80% of the voters that voted for President Trump, but I think 20% of the voters wanted to know what's going to happen with Epstein, and it's a big letdown.
He's exactly right.
Absolutely.
Elon Musk, they arrested and killed Peanut the Squirrel, but have not even tried to file charges against anyone on the Epstein client list.
Steve Days responding, saying, I finally say here now what I've said the last two days on my show, this is the kind of galvanizing populist issue that gives Elon Musk's new party rocket fuel, not debt, when the people themselves want most of what causes it, and especially when he owns the most powerful platform to drive the message.
And we haven't even talked about Elon Musk much as of late and what happened over the weekend and him trying to start this new political party and everything else.
And we will get to that.
But to Dace's point, yes, this could possibly, I don't know.
I really don't think his third party is really going to be.
I don't know.
People have tried it before.
It's just the two-party system.
And, you know, you could say that it's the same party.
I guess I was talking to a friend last night, as a matter of fact, being like, this third party would really be potentially a second party.
But then again, that's assuming that you trust everybody who's behind it and everything else.
Anyway, something to think about.
Here's Liz Wheeler recounting on Chris Cuomo's show what happened when she went to the White House and was given one of those bogus binders.
I was at the White House that day when Pam Bondi gave out those white binders.
I was one of the ones who received that binder.
So when you say before I'm invested in this, yeah, I am invested in this because what she did made me look like I was adding to some kind of clickbait weirdo influencer thing online, which I don't do.
People that watch me know I'm very prudent.
I don't engage in hot takes.
And I gave her the benefit of the doubt.
You give the benefit of the doubt to people on your own side.
I thought, okay, I don't know why she gave us those binders if she didn't have good stuff in those binders.
But she said there was another story.
A whistleblower told her there were truckloads of documents.
Hopefully she'll produce.
And I gave her time.
I was patient.
I gave her the benefit of the doubt.
But here's the thing, Chris.
That day in the White House, Pam Bondi bragged about making that cover sheet on that binder that you're showing on the screen.
That cover sheet that reads the most transparent administration in history.
Epstein files phase one.
She told us she made that.
She printed it.
She put it in that binder.
How can you square that behavior with what she posted on the Department of Justice website on Sunday saying, actually, there's nothing here?
Either she was lying then or she's lying now.
That's the way I look at it.
Here's some more takes.
Mike Benz went on a stitch field tonight, and he has been the guy that is saying, look, there is an intelligence component to this, and we're not going to let that just be memory holding.
The main issue is that they have not showed their work.
We have not had a document dumped like Tulsi Gabbard provided with the JFK files.
We could say, at least with the JFK files, look, no one expected to find some random cable or paper laying around saying, I killed JFK, signed confession, this is the guy.
But what we learned was a tremendous amount through those declassifications about the internal thought process of the intelligence world as it pertained to matters relating to JFK.
And the issue with the Epstein case here is Epstein is a part of a much bigger network.
And it is my contention that the CIA has had tabs on Jeffrey Epstein since at least 1983.
It would be almost impossible for the CIA to not have been keeping tabs on Jeffrey Epstein because Jeffrey Epstein was the money fixer and money launder for Adnan Khashoggi, the CIA's main illicit arms trafficker during the Iran-Contra affair.
And dating back 30 years, Adnan Khashoggi was the largest arms dealer in the world.
So what Benz is saying here is that if you pull at this thread, it exposes everything.
It not only exposes the human trafficking and the sex trafficking and exposes our leaders, but I mean, it's going to expose, essentially end the CIA.
Let's just say that.
And we have people in power that apparently don't think that it should be ended.
they're not willing to allow the, uh, the corruption to be on full display, uh, and actually, uh, do away with these, with these networks that, uh, are not in the interest of the American, the American people, like, uh, the people who are being blackmailed, um, by Jeffrey Epstein do not have the best.
If we really talk about making America great again, one of the Key components of that is getting a government that doesn't just say they love us in name and then go behind our backs and make our lives worse, but we actually want a government that loves us, loves the people they claim to serve with their actions, and actually makes our lives better.
Having our politicians under blackmail is not going to get you that kind of government.
It's going to get you the kind of government that continues to lie, cheat, and steal from the American people.
And so we need officials in power that are willing to say, which, you know, at this point, you can make the argument that you don't get anywhere in those upper echelons of government unless somebody has something on you, which is why the Uniparty thrives.
And the grassroots have so much trouble.
But this is the real question about all of this.
None of this, none of the last 72 hours in news would have happened if somebody at Bondi's DOJ, Cash Patel's FBI, or Trump's White House hadn't leaked this DOJ memo that was not dated and not signed.
You can argue that this was a draft, that they then came out and said, yes, it's real.
Someone in Bondi's national file writing this, someone in Bondi's DOJ, Cash's FBI or Trump's White House, leaked the cooked up Epstein clientlist memorandum to a disreputable deep state news outlet calling itself Axios.
Axios, for those of you who don't know, pushed the Russia hoax for years and is owned by the family that owns the liberal Atlanta Journal Constitution.
This actually is a very interesting question, and the answer to this would give us a lot of other answers elsewhere as to what the goal of all of this really is for all of you people still holding on to 5D Chess out there.
And speaking, so this is, so Liz Cronkin, she's kind of, I think, in the 5D Chess category.
She writes, how do you get the media to cover Jeffrey Epstein?
How do you get both your MAGA base and Democrats, including top House Democrats, LOL, see below, righteously pissed off and fired up about Epstein so they demand justice and release of the files for his child sex trafficking ring and blackmail operation?
Guess what?
The whole world now knows that Epstein was not just running the sex trafficking ring.
He was also running a blackmail operation and working for or with, well, I mean, according to Pam Bondi, though, no, like she said, I don't know about, I don't know anything about intelligence assets or CIA or Massad.
But to her point, she has got a few screenshots here.
CNN Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and there's no client list, Justice Department says.
New York Times, Trump administration acknowledges lack of evidence for Jeffrey Epstein client list.
Axios, Trump shuts down Jeffrey Epstein.
Question, are we still talking about him?
The Guardian, top house Democrats demand release of Epstein files that mention Trump.
The Hill, Bondi explains missing minute of Epstein video.
Fox News, Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein client list.
The Independent, J.D. Vance's old tweets show why the Epstein client list is becoming such a problem for the administration.
NPR, DOJ says no evidence Jeffrey Epstein had a client list or blackmailed associates.
NBC News or MSNBC News, despite earlier stoking, Trump officials faceplant with Epstein conspiracy theorists.
And then the AP, Epstein client list doesn't exist.
Justice Department says walking back theory Bondi had promoted.
Top House Democrats demand the release of Epstein files that mention Trump, exclusive.
Jamie Raskin and 15 others accuse Justice Department of withholding Epstein files to protect Trump.
The Hill, Raskin demands release of any Epstein files mentioning Trump.
Jack Smith Report.
So these are the headlines that are out there now in response to this.
You can clearly see that this is a bipartisan outrage.
And then here is even CNN's Jake Tapper.
So what's really going on here?
I mean, what's really going on?
Well, experts such as our friend Julie Brown from the Miami Herald, who has been covering Epstein for years, say that the notion of Epstein having an easy-to-access client list is likely a red herring.
And that's what the Trump administration is relying on, that there likely isn't a list per se.
But they are also now relying on the fact that because it's MAGA influencers who often put forward so many falsehoods, legacy news media won't push the point, that while there might not be a list, there are certainly files that can be released.
There's a trove of information that the Trump administration is right now refusing to release.
No, Jake, no, Jake, no, Jake.
Pam Bondi says it's all child porn.
Oh, so you want to see child porn?
You see the straw man that Pam Bondi's setting up here.
Strangely enough, Jake Tapper's right.
Yes, there are going to be documents out there that don't have to do with child porn that should be released.
But you never know.
You can't really trust anything CNN says.
CNN is famous for putting out CII talking points and creating limited hangouts all the time.
But we'll listen to the rest of this just for information.
To share information that could well point to the powerful folks who availed themselves of the sex trafficking victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
If you go, for example, to the FBI vault online, you can see that there are 22 files containing thousands of pages.
Most of them are heavily redacted.
Now, sure, of course.
Redact the names and identifying characteristics of the victims.
But why not make the victim and witness testimonies public?
As Julie Brown points out, there's still so much we don't know from the investigations by U.S. attorneys in Miami and in New York, witness interviews in the U.S. Virgin Islands and New Mexico.
Brown writes that there's still more evidence that hasn't been published, including, quote, Epstein kept video cameras in most of his residences, and Epstein's autopsy, nor the report of the investigation into his death, has ever been made public.
So Benz, Mike Benz has even said, hey, look, they raided the New York mansion, but they never raided West Palm Beach and the New Mexico compound.
And the New Mexico compound apparently had some really weird stuff going on at the New Mexico compound.
So that brings me to this.
News alert: the FBI has just launched criminal investigations into two former Obama officials, former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey, for their involvement in the Russia hoax.
Sources say Director Brennan is under investigation for lying to Congress, and that Brennan and Comey were involved in a conspiracy.
Brennan apparently told Congress that he didn't have anything to do with the steel dossier.
But we're hearing that Brennan's two top CIA officers warned the director not to touch it and called it an internet rumor.
But Brennan pushed it hard anyway.
Both Obama's FBI director and CIA director basically knew the Trump-Russia hoax came from Hillary Clinton's campaign, but they both used it to smear and investigate Donald Trump.
Comey and Brennan's security clearances have both been stripped by the sitting president, and Comey just had a sit-down with the Secret Service over seashells.
This is the beginning of a major confrontation.
News alert.
Is it really, though?
I don't know, man.
This comes out.
Nobody's been arrested.
It's just another investigation.
Right is a lot of the MAGA base that goes to bat for Trump every single day online feels like we've all been thrown under the bus.
And again, are we still talking about Epstein?
Trump says.
Well, right back at you.
Are we still talking about James Comey and John Brennan?
That was 10 years ago.
They framed you for treason 10 years ago.
Are we still talking about that?
And the honest answer is, yeah, we should.
These people should go to jail for treason.
These people are criminals of the highest order.
These people have weaponized the Justice Department.
Likewise, Jeffrey Epstein didn't do this alone.
There were people with him.
There were people that participated in this level of debauchery.
and many of them are probably walking through the halls of Congress as we speak.
Thank you.
I don't know.
Let me take a pause here because I'm going to reset mentally here for just a second.
And I'm going to tell you while I have you about the healing power of red light from the great folks at Red Vive.
I want you to go to red5health.org and I want you to do the research for yourself if you haven't already.
At Red Vive, they have incredible information there for you to understand the science behind this, which we're going to talk about tomorrow with Dr. Desai, specifically long COVID and brain fog and how red light can help.
There's still millions of people out there that experience long COVID symptoms.
But I want you to go to the website.
If you haven't been to the website yet, you've seen me talk about these panels and the healing power of red light.
I just would like for you to take a moment and go to the website yourself, not necessarily to buy, although I would encourage that, but to go and read about this yourself.
Go look at the specs on these individual panels, which they publish so you actually understand the power.
Not all red light panels are created equal.
The power behind these red light panels is substantial.
And they've got enough power there to penetrate your body to where you're stimulating the mitochondria of not just your skin cells, but your bones and your organs, your deep tissues, your subcutaneous fat, all of it.
Okay.
And so that's what I ask you to do today.
That's what I'll ask you to do today.
And if you do decide you want to buy, just know that there's 0% financing available and that you also can get your money back within 60 days.
So if you buy this thing and you hate it, which you're not going to, you're going to love it.
But if you buy it and you hate it, you can get your money back within 60 days.
Just make sure you keep the box.
I will say this.
So my normal routine with red light is that what I do is I go to, I do it in the morning.
I try to do it in the evening, but I do it in the morning.
But Dr. Desai says, hey, look, you really need to do it the first thing you wake up.
Well, that's like tough for me.
Like when I roll out of bed, like the first thing I want to do is get the coffee ready so I can have a cup of coffee.
And then, you know, I do the French press thing.
So I've got an electric kettle.
I've got to heat the water up.
I've got to do all this stuff.
And so I'm waiting on that first sip of coffee like many of you are.
Well, so that can turn into 30 minutes or an hour.
So now I've been up.
They claim that you really need to roll out of bed and go right to the red light panel.
So that's what I started to do today.
I went against my better judgment.
I said, I'm going to wait on the coffee.
I rolled out of bed, immediately went and sat in the red light panel.
And what I can tell you of that is that I was more awake after that immediate session than I was when I would wait an hour and a half before I would go do it.
So I really think there's something to that.
I was awake.
I was alive, alert, awake, enthusiastic.
Alive, alert, awake, enthusiastic.
Anyway, I feel like I could tell a difference.
Maybe it was psychosomatic.
I don't know.
But just try Red Vive Health or just mention my name and call them at that number, 866-726-8483.
And they'll give you the discount there as well.
Okay, so back to this.
James Comey, John Brennan, under investigation.
Meanwhile, the DOJ and the FBI continue to gaslight, now President Trump continue to gaslight the American people over Jeffrey Epstein.
But here's Caroline Lovitt.
What we have seen is corruption at the highest levels against President Trump.
The deep state threw everything at him to prevent him from coming back to this big, beautiful White House behind me.
And he prevailed, and the truth must come out.
And this administration is totally committed to transparency and to justice and to Accountability.
And we must have a rule of law in this country.
We can't be a nation without law and order.
That's what the president believes in.
And I'm glad to see the Department of Justice is opening up this investigation.
So, this level of gaslighting and hypocrisy is insane.
Okay?
It's absolutely insane.
We've got to be a country of law and order, but not for clients of Jeffrey Epstein.
As a matter of fact, there were no clients.
There were no clients.
And he killed himself.
I don't know, man.
This is one of those things.
It's like you can't just not believe your lying eyes here.
You really can't.
And I'm going to continue to praise the Trump administration when they do good things, but this is a huge problem.
And I don't think it's going away.
I don't think little distraction stories like this are going to allow.
People are not going to forget.
They're going on Fox News.
I think this announcement is actually a panic.
I do.
I am wrong a lot.
I can be wrong a lot about politics, a lot about trying to Predict things.
So I'm not some necessarily expert.
I'm just giving you my opinions, my intuition.
That's all I'm doing here.
But I think this is not going away.
And again, I think this will cost Trump the House and the Senate.
I really do.
That's where I'm at with it now.
And if Trump loses the House and the Senate, there's going to be an impeachment because they can't stand it.
They will find a way to impeach President Trump over something else.
That's why I'm most concerned because I think the biggest issue that we face is securing the border and deportations.
It's the one thing that can have the most long-lasting consequences for this country is our demographic and trying to correct our demographic demise, trying to repel the third world invasion of, frankly, barbarians in a lot of instances.
And I think that's the number one issue, and that's what we need to do.
And so that's why I wouldn't want necessarily the Republicans to lose control of the House or Senate because all they're going to try to do is derail Trump and all of the deportations.
That's going to be what they're going to do.
And I think fumbling Epstein is just a huge, huge mistake.
And now Levitt's going on Fox News, continuing to spend this, that we're the most transparent administration in American history when they just laid a goose egg over Epstein.
And in the meantime, you've got MAGA support, some MAGA supporters out there that are trying to still argue that this is somehow 5D chess.
And I, you know, I hope that's true if it were to actually get results.
So far, 5G chess hasn't put any of these guys in handcuffs, including Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
But, like, yeah, oh, man, how amazing would it be if that were the case and there was, you know, this 5G chess that was actually going on when it comes to – because here's the deal.
If they get back in power, they are coming for Christians like never before.
That much I know.
They will come for Christians like never before.
For sure.
So skipping forward, we got all these.
So yeah, even D.C. Drano, he was one of the ones that got one of those binders in response to the news from the New York Post.
FBI launches criminal investigations of John Brennan, James Comey, and Trump.
He says, I wish I could get excited about this, but if the DOJ will cover up for Epstein pedophiles, how can we trust them to go after these guys?
That's exactly right.
And, you know, this is something that Trump, this has been one of Trump's pet peeves.
He's always called James Comey a traitor.
He's always talked about, you know, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok and them being lovers.
That's what's all in this video right here I have pulled up.
But again, are we still talking about Lisa Page and Peter Strzok and James Comey and John Brennan?
Are we still talking about them?
Like Trump said, are we still talking about Epstein?
Come on, man.
It's just exhausting.
Absolutely exhausting.
And so then that leads me to this.
Now, this is actually potentially a big deal.
So Mike Benz goes on own and says, a lot of this Epstein stuff are really Republican donors, which is something I've been alluding to for a while now.
I do think the intelligence theory explains this better than any other.
In fact, it's really hard to account for the whole Jeffrey Epstein saga without the intelligence story thread connecting it all.
Now, obviously, I think there are other considerations, donors.
I don't think Trump himself was implicated necessarily, but I think that there are many conservative and MAGA donors who may be as well.
I do think the intelligence theory explains this.
Conservative and MAGA donors implicated in a lot of this.
And again, I said the biggest thing that you could do to secure the midterms, by the way, I know I keep bringing it back to that, would be to go after wherever the breadcrumbs lead.
If it leads to a MAGA donor, you go after them as well.
You start applying the law equally.
That would go a lot.
That would do a lot for the independence and restore the confidence that we don't have in our government.
But alas, that would be too straightforward.
So, yeah, I found the Epstein client list.
Here it is, ladies and gentlemen.
And this is a perfectly reasonable thing to believe based on everything that we know.
This is a perfectly reasonable thing to believe that this may be the Epstein client list.
You may be looking at it right now.
A joint session of the United States Congress, all of them sitting down.
Could this be the Epstein client list?
Perfectly reasonable thing to think and assume.
That's all the time that I got for this episode.
Although, oh, I do want to celebrate this.
This is a huge deal.
Okay, this is a positive deal.
Do you guys remember Douglas Mackey?
Douglas Mackey was sentenced to prison for posting a meme, which was a really good joke.
Under the Biden administration, he was sentenced to prison because in 2016, he started posting memes like this.
Avoid the line, vote from home.
Text Hillary to 59925.
Vote for Hillary and be part of history.
And it's a picture of a black woman.
And all this had the left so upset because obviously you can't vote via text.
You have to show up.
Well, so then this guy was prosecuted over the meme.
Here was another one.
Vote for her and vote from home.
All you have to do is post Hillary using the hashtag presidential election.
On November 8th, type the word Hillary and post it to Twitter or Facebook using the hashtag hashtag presidential election between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. Eastern to cast your vote for Hillary from home.
Stronger together.
Powered by Microsoft HillaryClinton.com.
So he was convicted.
Here it is in October 18th of 2023.
Social media influencer Douglas Mackey sentenced after conviction for election interference in 2016 presidential race.
So he was convicted during the Biden administration over this.
This was a huge blow to free speech.
It was a huge blow.
Most people thought these were jokes.
Only the weak-minded actually thought that this cost Hillary the election.
But the good news is this.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has now thrown out the conviction of Douglas Mackey for lack of evidence.
The case has been remanded to the district court with orders to immediately dismiss.
Hallelujah.
He says, praise God.
God is good.
Now we sue.
Unanimous decision by both Republican and Democrat judges.
And then he also says, I can finally get my guns back.
And he's also taken to X and he's reposting the memes now.
Ladies and gentlemen, government exhibit number 720.
Avoid the line, vote from home.
Text Hillary to 59925.
This guy, Douglas Mackey, was treated absolutely horribly.
He will now likely sue.
But I just wanted to end the show on a happy note.
Even though the government has abused him, the old saying is, you may beat the charges, but you're not going to beat the ride.
The ride has probably, understandably, been absolutely brutal for Douglas Mackey.
Anyway, but praise the Lord that he's now been basically the ruling, the conviction has been overturned on appeal, and he's going to be a free man very, very soon.
So praise the Lord for that.
That's all the time that we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Follow me on X at RealPaul Harold.
Don't forget to follow X American News as well.
And tune in later this afternoon.
The Paul Harrell program at 4 p.m. Central will be broadcasting on X American News with my co-host Rob Spencer and also good friend Jacob Holloway going to be right back with us.
We had a great conversation yesterday with Arkansas State Senator Dan Sullivan along with Jacob Holloway over the library indecency and everything that's going on with that and what states are doing to remove the indecent pedophile books out of the libraries where little kids can get them or, I guess, relocate them.
That was a big portion.
We're going to talk about that later today as well, though.
That's all the time I have.
God bless.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, I'll be back here tomorrow at 12 Central delivering you the news.
Happy Wednesday.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection