All Episodes
Previous Next
June 27, 2025 - Stew Peters Show
01:02:50
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: SCOTUS Rules Against National Injunctions & Judicial Tyranny
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And this is the Millstone Report.
And we've got a great show for you.
We're going to talk about all kinds of things.
What a great Friday.
Happy Friday, everybody out there.
We're now one week away from Independence Day, so that's a lot of fun.
I'm going to be out all next week.
But anyway, we're going to get to the news here in just a minute.
Incredible stuff.
Before, I mean, it's nuts just to see.
Right now, what I just watched with Donald Trump and in front of the press, he took over the White House press briefing room, and everybody was essentially just, it was incredible.
It was like at one point he asked, hey, should I keep this going?
And the press just joyfully says, yes, yes, please stay.
Please take our questions.
It's pretty fascinating everything that's unfolding right now with the Supreme Court.
But before we get into that, I just want to remind you this portion of the program is brought to you by Redvivehealth.org.
And I want you to get these Clinical Strength Red Light panels.
And we're going to be talking with Dr. Rahul Desai coming up here in just a little bit.
I'm going to tell you more about the healing power of red light, how it helps with anxiety.
We've talked about what it does with the body, you know, aches and pains, inflammation.
But it can help with anxiety.
It can help with depression.
It can even help with addiction.
We're going to tell you that.
And we're going to tell you about Red Vive Health's Independence Day sale that they have on.
That's right.
They're launching a sale from now until Independence Day.
If you use my promo code, my link, redvivehealth.org slash Paul, and then you add it, check out USA 5.
You'll get another 5% off for a total savings of 20%.
And we'll tell you more about that and the healing power of red light here in just a moment.
I think this is the headline, really.
The Supreme Court of the United States somehow has ended judicial tyranny.
I think, and you've seen those memes out there where you'll see Donald Trump's going to resign the presidency to become an even more powerful U.S. District Court judge.
The idea of nationwide injunctions is a tyranny and has been a tyranny over this country for a very, very, very long time.
And so let's dive in, shall we?
This was the take over at Red State this morning.
We have hot takes Amy Coney Barrett's stinging rebuke of Katangi Brown Jackson in injunctions ruling lights up X. I think this may be the most caddy opinion of all time.
And I'll show you what I mean here in just a little bit.
Red State writing, as we reported, it has been a great day for the Trump administration so far with the Supreme Court ruling 6-3 with the liberal justices dissenting, surprise, surprise, in the birthright citizenship case concerning nationwide injunctions that governments' applications for partial stays of the preliminary injunctions are granted, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff withstanding to sue.
The liberal media, of course, fretting politico breaking the Supreme Court in a 6-3 vote just handed Trump a major win by limiting judges' ability to block his birthright citizenship order nationwide.
The court's opinion was written by Coney Barrett, who took the time to include a pretty stinging rebuke to the opinions of her colleague, Justice Katanji Brown Jackson.
The comments have lit up Twitter slash X, where many are cheering ACB for slapping down KBJ's flimsy arguments in a way that only she can.
Quote, Justice Jackson chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to the sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever.
Barrett is tired of pretending KBJ knows what she's talking about.
Amazing.
Justice Barrett goes straight after Justice Jackson's inability to do law.
Jackson wants to, this is according to May Mailman, Jackson wants to tell the entire executive branch what to do and refuses to comply with constitutional limitations, insanely dangerous, and Barrett is right to call it out.
What did she say here?
Let's actually, I want to look at this actual photo.
The principal dissent, meaning Jackson's dissent, focuses on conventional legal terrain, like the Judiciary Act of 1789, in our case is on equity.
Justice Jackson, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever.
Waving away attention to the limits on judicial power is a mind-numbingly technical query.
You remember, I think one of the things I think we can predict right now, remember how Rush Limbaugh used to say, the Reverend Jackson, I think that if Rush Limbaugh were still alive today, every time he said Katanji Brown Jackson's name, he would do the Jesse Jackson voice.
I really do.
And I think you all agree with me.
I think you know that I'm right on that.
For sure.
What was President Trump's take with all of this?
What does he think about this?
Very big win for him today.
Why?
Some of the cases we're talking about would be ending birthright citizenship, which now comes to the fore.
That was meant for the babies of slaves.
It wasn't meant for people trying to scam the system and come into the country on a vacation.
This was, in fact, it was the same date, the exact same date, the end of the Civil War.
It was meant for the babies of slaves, and it's so clean and so obvious.
But this lets us go there and finally win that case because hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for that reason.
It was meant for the babies of slaves.
So thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship, ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries, and numerous other priorities of the American people.
We have so many of them.
I have a whole list.
I'm not going to bore you, and I'm going to have Pam get up and say a few words, but there's really, she can talk as long as she wants because it's a very important decision.
So you heard it there.
So now all of these injunctions, like ending birthright citizenship, like ending funding for sanctuary cities, like suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary federal funding, stopping taxpayer funds for trans surgeries.
A little later in the show, we're actually going to talk about it.
The Democrats posted a memorial about the, I guess, is it the 10-year anniversary of Obergfeld, the decision on gay marriage?
So we're going to talk about that, where we were, where we are, where we're going when it comes to all this.
But yeah, this was the part I was talking about.
No, no, no, this is actually a little different.
So Trump gets a question in this press conference.
We're going to stick with this press conference line for a little bit about his tariffs.
And listen to this.
Mr. President, a leading global economist just did a 180 and says your tariff plan, you may have outsmarted everybody with it.
What is your message?
I love this.
I love this question.
This is the favorite.
This is the best question I've ever been asked because I've been going through abuse for years on this.
Because as you know, we're taking in hundreds of billions of dollars, no inflation whatsoever.
But Mr. President, what is your message to critics who think your tariff plan will cause a recession?
I think they should go back to business school.
It's so obvious.
It's so obvious.
I mean, we're taking in billions and billions of dollars from China and a lot of other countries.
We took in, I had a call from somebody in the House and high official, sir, we have a problem.
We don't know what to do.
The books are a mess.
I said, what do I mean by the books?
The books, the money coming in.
It's so terrible.
I figured, oh boy, what's this?
I don't like this question.
I said, so what seems, there's so much money coming in, and there must be some kind of an accounting mistake because we have hundreds of billions of dollars more money than we thought.
I said, do me a favor, go check the, call me back.
You have to call me back.
Check the tariff column.
Calls me back two hours later, says, you're right.
We took in $88 billion in tariffs.
They have so much money coming in.
But more important than the money coming in, we have companies coming in, factories coming in, auto plants being built.
Go back to business school.
And then we have this clip.
This was with Trump teasing the press.
Almost like has him eating out of the palm of his hand.
Watch this.
This was remarkable to me.
By the way, so many questions.
Should we keep this going, Pam?
This is the opposite of Biden.
Biden would take a half a question and he'd leave without answering it.
Go ahead.
You tell me when it gets boring.
What's crazy is it's like you can't really see it.
Maybe you can't see it from here.
How many smiling reporters there are in that room?
I mean, they're literally, it's quite, it's just not as glib as it normally is.
It's just, I don't know, just an observation.
I don't know.
It just seems a lot of smiling faces, a lot of smiling faces in there.
6-3 ruling.
Supreme Court has effectively nuked the universal injunctions used by rogue district court judges.
The opinion was written by Amy Connor.
We know all that.
A few other takes here.
So what this means practically is that the executive order that Donald Trump signed ending birthright citizenship is in effect across the country.
It is only blocked for the specific parties in the case.
Only blocked for the specific parties in the case.
And so part of this opinion, one of the things in this opinion that stood out to me was when Cony Barrett writes that basically she says the answer to potential executive overreach is not judicial overreach.
Or I think the actual phrase was executive supremacy.
The answer to executive supremacy is not judicial supremacy.
And I thought that was A very good way of putting it.
That just because somebody thinks that the executive branch is acting outside its bounds, that doesn't give the courts the right to act outside their bounds, its bounds, as an institution, separate but equal branch of government.
I thought that makes sense to me anyway.
Now, our friend Charles Haywood from The Worthy House, which is a website where he reads a lot of books and does really good book reviews, you should check it out.
And we need to get him back on the show.
As a matter of fact, I think it's been over a month.
He says, in response to J.D. Vance, so, well, first of all, I guess we'll go with Donald Trump on Truth Social.
Giant win in the United States Supreme Court.
Even the birthright citizenship hoax has been indirectly hit hard.
It had to do with the babies of slaves same year.
Not the scamming of our immigration process.
Congratulations to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Solicitor General John Sauer, and the entire DOJ news conference at the White House, 1130 Eastern.
J.D. Vance, Vice President Vance, a huge ruling by the Supreme Court smacking down the ridiculous process of nationwide injunctions, our system.
Everyone has to follow the law.
Under our system, everyone has to follow the law, including judges.
Now, Charles Haywood, our friend, says they will defy this.
And I thought that was interesting.
So this is a good prediction here of what else the courts may do because these judges are so arrogant and so full of hubris and pride that they're not just going to take this sitting down.
I think that much is clear.
He writes, they will defy it, and their first vehicle will be judges creating massive, open-ended, nationwide classes on their own initiative and declaring class relief.
Interesting prediction by Charles Haywood, which if this is true and this is what the courts would do, it kind of puts us kind of back in the same spot that we were in, which is kind of like careening off of a cliff to where you get to the point where, I mean, this is why people say that the executive branch, that Trump should just ignore some of these courts.
And there's more and more of a push to do that.
Now that we've got this decision, though, will the courts do what Charles Haywood is saying?
Say, look, they're going to find a legal way around to keep doing exactly what it is they're doing.
So then you would have to have either Congress step up and impeach these judges and do the right thing, which I don't think they will.
So it's a very, it really is a great day from a legal standpoint, for sure, for the president.
And really just for the American people.
I don't think we can't get over this whole point, like the whole point of these activist judges doing what they were doing is because they're mad that they lost the election.
They're a bunch of liberals, progressives, you know, they're wokists.
And they fundamentally can't stand that the American people re-elected Donald Trump after the government, you know, did everything they tried to do to him, you know, and persecute him and everything.
They thought this guy, after January 6th, right, they think it's just as bad as 9-11.
I mean, they think this guy is evil.
And so they think they have the moral high ground because they firmly, some of them, some of them firmly believe they're fighting somebody that's evil.
And of course, the media, they clap like seals and, you know, they've told everybody that, you know, Donald Trump is the evil incarnate for the last 10 years, really.
And so here we are.
So does this, will we still find ourselves on a course where Donald Trump has to, what's it called?
Now that we've got Haywood up on the screen, Cromwell Maxine.
Remember?
Oliver Cromwell Maxine.
But yesterday we also had this, a lot of wins coming out of the Supreme Court.
So yesterday, and we didn't cover this in my afternoon show with Rob Spencer, and I didn't have a Millstone report yesterday.
I was providentially hindered, so forgive me on that.
Supreme Court allows states to block Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funding.
South Carolina had argued that no one's rights were violated when it decided to exclude Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program.
Obviously, South Carolinians don't want taxpayer dollars to fund an organization like Planned Parenthood that murders babies and is also increasingly getting involved in their new business model, which is transing kids and calling it health care.
The U.S. Supreme Court on June 26 ruled that South Carolina, according to the Epoch Times, may stop abortion provider Planned Parenthood from taking part in the state's Medicaid program.
The majority opinion in the 6-3 decision in Medina, v.
Planned Parenthood, South Atlantic, was written by Justice Neil Gorsuch.
The new ruling reverses a federal appeals court decision that blocked South Carolina from excluding Planned Parenthood from the program.
The court majority held that federal law does not permit health care providers or patients to sue a state if it runs afoul of a federal law requiring that Medicaid patients be allowed to use their preferred provider.
Although the case does not center on abortion, it was being closely watched because a ruling in favor of South Carolina could encourage more states to boot the organization from their Medicaid networks.
Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Texas have already removed Planned Parenthood from state Medicaid networks, the organization reported.
Medicaid is a joint federal-state program that offers health insurance coverage to low-income Americans.
We know that.
So, this is a big deal.
The author of Shepherds for Sale, Megan Basham, says SCODIS ruling today that states have the right to defund Planned Parenthood will have tremendous implications going forward.
The culture of life is taking large strides forward, but there is much work to be done.
We must not take our collective foot off the gas.
Yeah, there is much work to be done.
You know, the Dobbs decision, while it was great in terms of sending the issue back to the states and reversing, you know, Roe versus Wade, it was great, but there's actually been an increase in abortions now because under the Biden administration, they basically were so upset, you know, they started, obviously his personal police force started targeting people protesting abortion clinics.
So he made people pay in that way because the left was so.
Do you remember when the Dobbs decision came out?
It was in the middle of Pride month.
We were in the middle of Pride month.
And all of a sudden, Roe versus Wade is overturned.
Something that I never thought would ever happen.
I mean, I've covered politics for a long time.
I never, in my wildest imagination, ever actually believed that something like that would happen.
Not in my lifetime.
And yet it did.
Well, so the Biden administration, obviously they used that ruling as a rallying cry, a way to raise money, a way to fight the Republicans.
But they also got mad, and they basically turned, with the deregulations of the abortion pill, Plan B, they basically turned every CVS in Walgreens into a planned parenthood in response.
And so the abortion pills are a problem.
They're a huge problem.
There's still a ton of people in towns and cities all across, even if you're in a state like my home state of Arkansas, even if you're in this state, which is abortion's illegal here, you still have this medication that people are taking.
Let's be honest, oftentimes, after maybe on a Sunday morning, shuffling in disheveled into a CVS or to a Walgreens, these things happen, right?
And so there's still some real issues with the fact that we've got people taking the lives of unborn children, and they're just doing it in private now by taking a pill.
So I think when Megan Bashman says there's a lot of work to be done, I think that's probably what she's referring to.
That's what comes to mind when I think about it is murder is wrong, right?
And this has been an American genocide since 1973.
It truly has.
And it's been even worse than that if you think of the babies that the babies would have grown up to have had.
Does that make sense?
The children would have grown up and had other children.
So it also is really sad in terms of the population because I'm not one of these people that believe there's too many people on planet Earth.
I actually think that's a lie.
I think it's a myth.
I think we don't have enough people on planet Earth.
And I think we should go forth and multiply and not listen to these climate doomstayers and those people that say that the human race is somehow a virus or a mistake and we've got overpopulation problems.
That gives them their excuses in their mind to, you know, when the World Economic Forum wants to blot out the sun or I don't know what they want to do, terraform planet Earth so orcs can move freely in the daylight.
But it's all in this, I think it's Malthusian type beliefs that are really at their core satanic and anti-human, in my opinion.
But I think that's why some love abortion, because they see it as a population control.
That's what Margaret Sanger loved about it.
That's for sure the eugenicist.
So here's the question.
In light of the Supreme Court allowing the ban, essentially allowing the ban of birthright citizenship to take effect, can we expect more riots from the left soon?
People have kind of forgotten about the L.A. riots.
And remember on the No Kings Day, there was going to be all these protests.
It really kind of fizzled out.
It really kind of fizzled out.
But C3 here over on X says the exact moment the L.A. riots ended, the moment the FBI and IRS announced they are investigating whoever is funding the riots.
The riots stopped just like that.
Weird how that works.
There's a video posted this morning.
Listen to this.
Hello, I'm Bill Asaley, United States Attorney for the Central District of California.
And I'm Mikhail Davis, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office.
And I'm Tyler Hatcher, the special agent in charge of IRS criminal investigation here in Los Angeles.
The right to assemble and protest peacefully is protected by law.
Unfortunately, we have seen individuals whose intentions are to cause damage and to assault law enforcement.
For example, last week we arrested an individual who is charged with conspiracy to commit and aiding and abetting civil disorders.
These violent agitators put peaceful demonstrators at risk.
The FBI and our federal partners will continue to investigate individuals and organizations who are knowingly funding and committing acts of violence against law enforcement, as well as the destruction of property.
We are currently tracing money to determine who is providing funding for these riots.
Tracing.
Funding crime doesn't just affect the criminals, it also disrupts entire communities.
Each dollar funneled into illegal operations fuels violence, undermines law and order, and perpetuates fear.
Make no mistake, we will identify and disrupt financial networks supporting these criminal activities.
Think before you act.
The legal consequences for financing or aiding and abetting these crimes are harsh.
They include imprisonment and fines.
If you have any information regarding individuals and or organizations providing financial support to commit acts of violence or destruction of property, please dial 1-800-CALLFBI or visit tips.fbi.gov.
So what I would like, what I want to know, I mean, like, I want to actually see the purpose.
Who financed this last riot?
Who was dropping off the Fave Shields?
Who was leaving, you know, were there pallets of bricks in this one?
I feel like there were.
I feel like there was, maybe it wasn't as widespread as it was during the Summer of Love and the Burn, Murder, Loot Summer of Love.
I thought I saw.
But anyway, who financed all this or who was paying these people to be there?
That's the question.
And when they find out, the American people want to know about it.
I'd like to know.
I'd like to know.
And I'd like to see some perp walks With that.
So, yesterday, the Senate had a briefing behind closed doors about the Iran nuclear capability, whether or not it was obliterated or not.
So, apparently, Lindsey Graham comes out of there convinced it's obliterated, but he was warning.
He's warning that we haven't done enough.
Listen.
Here's where we're at.
The program was obliterated at those three sites, but they still have ambitions.
I don't know where the 900 pounds are.
The program was obliterated at those three sites, but they still have ambitions.
That's what he said.
If you couldn't hear it, they still have ambitions.
Here's where we're at.
The program was obliterated at those three sites, but they still have ambitions.
I don't know where the 900 pounds have not been rich.
You know, it's wild.
A country.
Can you believe it?
Can you believe that Iran has ambitions?
A country with ambitions?
How dare they?
Obviously, he's claiming they still have nuclear ambitions.
I get it, but it's just so strange when you actually kind of try to analyze what they're saying and take it out.
It's kind of ridiculous.
It exists, but it wasn't part of the target set.
When the administration is saying it's obliterated, it suggests that they're not able to build a weapon.
You're saying it's several of yours, but you're not said to be able to.
That's what I'm saying.
They're obliterated today, but you can reconstitute them.
So they're obliterated, everybody.
Lindsey Graham is convinced they're obliterated.
This kind of shatters his plans here.
If they are, in fact, obliterated, Lindsey Graham says he's convinced they are, well, then that removes the whole talking point off of the chessboard, right?
So instead of terrifying the world with this idea of Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, which really, if you think about that, is kind of just like a gun to the head of the world that can be utilized for regime change.
But now regime change seems to be off the table.
Although, my goodness, did I just see that come across?
Breaking.
Trump says he saved Khomeini from very ugly and no, no, there you go.
Wow.
So as I'm seeing here, look down at my phone and Donald Trump just posted this.
Why would the so-called supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khomeini, of the war-torn country of Iran, say so blatantly and foolishly that he won the war with Israel when he knows his statement is a lie?
It's not so.
As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie.
His country was decimated.
His three evil nuclear sites were obliterated, and I knew exactly where he was sheltered and would not let Israel or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the greatest and most powerful in the world, terminate his life.
I saved him from a very ugly and ignominious death.
And he does not have to say thank you, President Trump.
Anyway, that's crazy.
Anyway, so it looks like, again, so the regime changes off the table.
People like Lindsey Graham are not happy about it.
Not happy about it.
Old Lindsey here, he's not happy.
I was talking to a buddy this morning, and he thinks that the ceasefire is not going to hold.
He thinks in six months we're going to be right back where we are.
And maybe that's the case.
I certainly hope not.
You can talk about how the situation played out.
It might not have played out the way I would have gamed it out, but I'm happy at least for now.
It doesn't look like we have an Iraq 2.0.
Doesn't look like we have an Afghanistan 2.0.
Doesn't look like we have a Libya Muammar Gaddafi 2.0.
Looks like for the time being that that's off the table.
People like Lindsey Graham are upset about that.
We need to continue to pray for peace.
We need to continue to pray for the bloodshed to stop, specifically with this report about Gaza and Egypt and the UAE basically going to take over the government of Gaza.
Might not be how I would game it out, but if it actually means that the bloodshed stops, the shedding of blood stops of innocent blood, in many cases, I'm all for that.
I think that would be a blessing to the world.
Likewise, in Ukraine, we need to continue to pray for peace in Ukraine, whatever that looks like.
And for this maniac Zelensky to understand that he has literally no chance of ever defeating Russia.
So that's where we are.
So now that war seems to be off the table, is it really?
I saw this Alex Jones post, emergency alert.
Now, just think about this for a second.
I just described a scenario where they've taken the war, the long, protracted war, off of the chessboard from an Overton window standpoint.
And so Alex Jones posted this yesterday.
Was it yesterday today?
Yesterday.
Emergency alert.
Same groups behind COVID-19 drills prepare false flag bioterrorism attacks slated for 4th of July to be blamed on China and Russia.
So we need a new boogeyman.
Who else are we going to hate?
Well, I guess Russia and China wouldn't be new boogeymen.
So we need to be reminded of the other boogeymen that are out there.
Now that it's a Ron's off the table, we're going to shift gears here.
We're going to start the psychological operation, the trauma-based mind control, where we turn on the news and we have to hear terrible things.
We have to hear about who we need to hate, who we need to be afraid of next.
He writes, the national blueprint for biodefense is a direct attack on Trump's agenda to stabilize the U.S. Economy, stop World War III, and end the globalists' plan for a new dark age.
So that sounds, I mentioned World Economic Forum earlier.
That sounds very familiar.
It sounds very familiar to me.
So I guess the point is, peace is just not profitable.
Is it as simple as that?
It's just war makes more money.
War makes people rich.
Peace?
Peace.
Peace.
Peace makes people more difficult to control.
Fear makes us more easily controlled.
That's where we're at.
That's where we're at right now.
The national blueprint for biodefense.
The national blueprint for biodefense.
Anyway, we'll get to that more here in just a minute.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, it's now time to talk about red light therapy.
The great folks at Red Vive, considering that we're now a week away.
This is a week away from the 4th of July or Independence Day where we celebrate the founding of this country and our victory over King George the Tyrant.
So the great folks at redvivehealth.org, they're offering a giant, I think it's giant, Independence Day sale when you combine the codes.
Similar to what we did with Father's Day.
So to talk more about this, we've got Dr. Raul Desai is back with us.
Doc, welcome back to the show.
Thanks so much for being with us.
Yeah, thanks for having me, Paul.
Absolutely.
It's always great to have you.
So we're going to talk, I mean, we've talked a ton about the benefits of red light therapy, the different aspects, and there's so many.
There's literally so many.
So today, we're going to talk about a new one, that red light therapy can actually help with things like anxiety and depression, which, by the way, if you go to the doctor, you know this, if you go to the doctor and you say I'm depressed, there's a pill for that.
So this would be yet another way you can get out of this big pharma cycle, red light for the win once again.
Yeah, it's pretty amazing.
There's emerging research and data, and every day more is coming out.
It's becoming more and more compelling that it can help our body energize.
And so if you think about it, the brain is one of the most, if not the most energy-hungry organ in our body.
And so we're really, we're putting a ton of metabolic demand on brain to function properly.
And so, you know, the red light therapy, instead of kind of masking it, chemically altering it with drugs and medications, we're empowering, you know, our brain's recovery and with a simple device.
Like we talked about, you know, red light and near-infrared light therapy, and especially the near-infrared, you know, it penetrates a little bit deeper.
It goes through structures a little bit more easily.
And so there's a ton of research and data, and it's extremely compelling on any disease process that's affecting the brain's biochemistry and any energetics.
So if we have low energy, we have toxins in the brain, we have poor blood supply, any of those factors are going to cause a diminished brain function.
And there's different manifestations such as Alzheimer's or neurocognitive decline, anxiety, depression, depending on what parts of the brain are affected.
And by simply, it sounds pretty amazing, but simply shining a light, this specific light, red and near-infrared, on the head, and especially area where there's not a lot of hair, I don't have to worry about that.
Hair is a big blocker of that photobiomodulation or the light therapy getting to the brain.
It has to go through the skin, the skull, and into the brain tissues.
So that's one that's called transcranial.
So you can actually apply that, sit in front of the device.
They have studies that are going through lighting up the forehead.
So that's an easy pathway.
You can put it in the back of the head.
And if you don't have any hair like me, then it's much easier.
But by simply shining the light on the brain, we're providing energetics into the brain tissue.
That's increasing mitochondrial function.
So the brain, the neurons are getting affected.
They're working better.
It's reducing neural inflammation.
So inflammation in the brain is really toxic.
It can inhibit processes.
And then it's increasing blood flow.
So there's more blood nutrients getting to the brain tissue.
And there's actually studies now showing that the neuroplasticity, the way our brain works and develops connections, so the plasticity of the brain, how plastic and malleable it is, and how we can learn new information is actually changing.
So it's really exciting by using this simple device, five, ten minutes, once a day, a couple of times a day, shining it on the head and even in the body can affect the brain's health.
And their studies have been shown, I was just looking at some really promising studies, that they treated patients with major depressive disorders using transcranial near-infrared light.
And there were significant improvements in depression scores over the placebo.
They're using this for generalized anxiety disorder and emotional dysregulation.
We're going to talk about some other applications here, but really fascinating and extremely safe.
That's the beauty of it.
It's just wild that something like this, something as simple, would help with things like anxiety and depression, which are things that have plagued a lot of people.
And I mentioned earlier, a lot of times it's all about medicine.
It's all about taking these pharmaceutical drugs that cling to certain receptors.
And sometimes, I mean, there's some studies that these medicines, these drugs can actually do long-term damage when it comes to, you know, when you come off of them.
You know, sometimes people have withdrawal symptoms.
I mean, it can be really, really destructive to the body.
And yet here is yet, here's another example of something that red light can fix that is not.
I want to see this go so much more mainstream than it is.
I mean, I know people are figuring it out and they're buying the panels, but man, I just want the I want medical, the medical industrial complex to accept that there are other remedies than just being on this big pharma hamster wheel.
Yeah, the medications, you know, they may have their role, but a lot of time you're trading one problem for another, right?
And this is a very natural way of addressing these problems and at least should be tried or attempted.
Because if you can use this, it's simple, you can use it at home, it's extremely cost-effective, and it works relatively quickly.
Within a few weeks, you should start noticing significant changes.
There was a study, really fascinating one, done with memory.
They were testing memory, and they did a single session of this red and near-infrared light on the forehead, and they noticed dramatic changes in memory and executive function.
So it doesn't take huge long-term dosing.
There's no side effects.
I mean, there are, you know, we talked about some of the issues.
You can't do it too much or too often.
It could definitely have, you know, some effects on the skin and the tissues by overdoing it, but it's really hard to hurt yourself, right?
This is a class two medical device, meaning you can have it at home and use it safely.
It doesn't need to be prescribed.
But the way of using it, the right medicine, that's what we're, you know, our passion is at Red Vive, is that, you know, we want to make sure that you're getting the right device, the right amount of energy, and you're using it the right way.
So that's why we talk about these things and really want to educate our providers and the folks out there to use it.
Yeah.
So I want to remind everybody, so it's an Independence Day sale.
I'm actually going, I'm going to be off all next week, going out of town over the 4th.
And I'll be making some posts in the interim there just because I want people to know about this.
This is the 4th of July Independence Day sale.
So when you use my code, redvivehealth.org slash Paul, you're going to save the 15% like you always do.
But then at checkout, you're going to enter this other code, USA5.
That's going to give you another 5%.
So total of 20% off from now until through the 4th of July, through Independence Day, which will be a week from today.
So this is incredible stuff.
Now, I want to ask you about addiction because not only can the red light help with anxiety, help with depression, but also there are studies about addiction.
What can you tell us about that?
Yeah, addiction, it's something that also is close to my family in life.
We've unfortunately been affected by alcoholism, runs in my family.
I've dealt with it myself, and so it's something, you know, I'm in recovery for years now, but I had a problem with that.
And so it's very compelling to me, and it's a deep connection.
So something that has been studied with alcohol is the area, alcohol and addiction, both behavioral and chemical, there are certain areas in the brain, especially the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system, that are affected chemically.
So this is a disease.
And by energizing that tissue, studies have shown that this metabolic dysfunction, this low energy state, this inflammation, this reduced blood flow, if you treat those areas and get them to heal, then there is an actual effect on behavior.
So this is almost a treatment for addiction or it can be another level.
I mean, it's a multi-pronged approach, but by treating those areas in the brain that are affected, you can much better affect addiction, relapse, and it's very supportive in recovery.
The studies have been shown both in like opioid addiction that there's much less drive or need for medications.
And then if patients are using this, the recovery is much more prolonged than effective.
And it's, again, it's such an easy way of helping patients with this dramatic problem.
And something that's been fed by pharma.
And we look at the opioid crisis, Purdue, pharmaceuticals, what has happened to our society.
And it's really compelling that we can use this same technology that can help a tendon heal, a bone heal, make your skin look better.
It's pretty amazing that you can actually help the brain heal and treat patients with addictions and other problems.
It really is.
I mean, this is why we say, you know, it sounds like a catch-all, but it is, but it's not too good to be true.
It actually, it's real.
It's legit.
It really does do all of these different things.
And you need this.
So I want you to share with me what you shared with me before we came on the air, if you don't mind.
Number one, praise the Lord that your wife, she took a fall.
She was on a hike.
She took a fall.
And praise the Lord that she's okay.
But you showed me a photo earlier, and she is now recuperating and trying to get as much red light as she can.
Yeah, so she is a super tough woman and loves hiking, backcountry, 40-pound backpack, was in the Olympic National Forest, and it rained the night before, and they were climbing out of a ravine with ropes and slipped and tumbled about 30 feet, dislocated her elbow, fracture.
We just found out there's another fracture in the leg.
You know, thank goodness none of these are going to require surgery, but it's something that, you know, as soon as she was back home, she's been under that red light, getting that healing energy.
And it's helped tremendously with the swelling, with the pain, and stimulating that healing.
Obviously, the body needs time to recover, but it's incredible how it's become part of our family.
It's in our home.
If somebody gets hurt, they're going to get in there and it actually feels there's that analgesic benefit that we talked about that almost immediately it helps with pain.
We see that in almost all the settings.
It works on those capsacentrophy 1 receptors.
So it's nice to give that relief, but it's actually then stimulating blood flow, stimulating healing.
And it was kind of funny.
She was using it.
And then our son, our seven-year-old, had multiple cavities and had to get a tooth pull.
And when that anesthesia wore off, he was howling.
And we got him in front of that red light for about 10, 15 minutes, calmed him down.
He went to sleep and recovered and got up.
And that pain had gone away.
But it's just amazing how we can use this simple tool in our home for almost everybody.
Clinical strength red light panels.
You can have them in your home.
And it does so many things, like we've talked about today, addiction, anxiety, depression, but also can help you avoid orthopedic surgery, which we've also talked about in the program before.
And of course, we interviewed Charlie Lawrence, who's a world record holder for a 50-mile ultramarathon.
And he uses this technology, and he has a Red Vive panel.
It's the huge, tremendous Independence Day, 4th of July sale.
Redvivehealth.org slash Paul.
Make sure you use that promo code USA5 at checkout to stack the codes, to save your 20%.
Do it now.
It runs now through Independence Day.
Dr. Desai, it's always great to have you on the program, sir.
Thank you so much, and happy Independence Day, sir.
Happy Independence Day to you.
Thanks, Paul.
Yes, sir.
Folks, we'll be back here in just a moment.
I hear every day about the products y'all wish my pillow carried.
Well, guess what?
We probably do.
Slippers, bathrobes, pet beds, blankets, mattresses, sleepwear, loungewear, duvets, comforters, potholders, aprons, oven mitts, and so much more.
And they're all on sale.
For example, get our best-selling standard MyPillows for only $14.98.
Body pillows, $29.98.
Six-piece bath towels or kitchen towel sets, just $29.98.
Multi-use MyPillow 2.0s with pillowcase, $9.98.
Save $40 on our Spring Perkilling Keys of Dream bedsheet sets.
Any size, any color, and so much more.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to save up to 80% on all my pillow products.
And I've never done this before.
When you spend $100 or more, you're going to get two standard MyPillows absolutely free.
Life can be pretty unpredictable, filled with good days and not-so-good days.
And sometimes, the only difference between the two is your level of preparedness.
The Jace Case lets you be better prepared for whatever comes your way.
It contains antibiotics and other prescription medications so that you aren't caught unprepared.
With a Jace Case, you are able to get your prescription medication before the unpredictable happens, allowing you to turn those not-so-good days into great ones.
Go to jace.com now and get your own Jace Case.
Welcome back to the show.
Thank you so much for being with us.
I want to thank Dr. Desai for being with us.
I want to remind you that if you go to jace.com, you can use that promo code, Paul.
You'll save some money.
Also, the MyPillow promo code is PH.
And then again, it's a huge sale.
The Independence Day sale for redvivehealth.org.
If you guys have been putting it off, because I know, look, I know the price point of these things.
I know that it's not cheap, but it works.
And anyway, if you guys have been kind of putting it off, now's the time.
You got a week.
You have a week to get an extra 5% off for a total of 20% off of these clinical strength red light panels.
All right, let's get back to it.
Very interesting news day, considering it's a Friday, right?
I saw National Files tweet something basically like, you know, a lot of the MAGA base just simply still doesn't get it that the GOP in Congress, they just hate, they still hate Donald Trump.
Eric Daughtery wrote it, it's official, the Senate Democrat-appointed parliamentarian is here to stay, and she won't be overruled.
In the name of tradition and optics, John Thune has declined to set her aside as she strikes down numerous MAGA items from the big, beautiful bill.
Now, GOP senators are scrambling to work around her rulings to get the certain things back in, but the time to pass the bill is about to be here.
This should have been handled way sooner.
Why is a 2012 Harry Reid appointee still holding her position in a Trump trifecta government?
That's a great question.
And one of the potential answers is that the GOP hates Donald Trump.
That is certainly something to think about.
Again, John Thune, Eric Goddardy writing, just said that he's still opposed to overturning the ridiculous rulings of the Democrat Harry Reid appointed parliamentarian after she decided to remove any MAGA items from the big, beautiful bill per CNN.
I think you guys know I've made my position clear on that, he said.
Ridiculous.
Ridiculous that we're having to go through this.
Wonder why.
Wonder why we're having to go through this.
Now, Charlie Kirk has a little bit of a different take.
He writes on X, the Senate parliamentarian is one of the most powerful people in the country, but there are calls to fire her after she blocked a BBB provision barring illegals from getting Medicaid.
That's what we're talking about here.
We're talking about the American people wanting to take the country back, wanting mass deportations, wanting things to be different.
But one of those things would also be like disincentivizing, not letting these illegals come over here and get signed up on all of this free stuff.
One of those being Medicaid, one another being Social Security, you know.
But Charlie Kirk says, one of my jobs is to tell you when to get angry.
The answer, not yet.
Let the process play out.
So Charlie Kirk saying here, look, maybe there's a way to figure this out.
But we'll wait and see.
But it is really depressing.
The Democrat Party, I told you this at the top of the show.
The Democrats tried to memorialize yesterday on the 26th of June.
They wrote, 10 years ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled that marriage equality is the law of the land and love is love.
And then here we have the famous photo.
Here's two gay guys with the rainbow on the White House, that Obama projected a rainbow on the White House.
We all remember that.
Somebody by the name of Dale Partridge on X, who says he's a pastor, he said, when this dam broke, so when an Obergfeld, when the Supreme Court made the decision about gay marriage, it was a dam that broke.
He says, when this dam broke, it flooded America with vile depravity and perversion.
Really, if you're looking, he's right.
If you're looking at data points, when our country made it the official position and made up a right to marriage that's nowhere even in the Constitution, when they made this up, it opened the floodgates.
And I remember I actually got to interview shortly after this decision.
So the 26th of June is when the decision came out.
And I remember on this same year, I'm pretty sure on the same year, on the 29th of June, I interviewed David Barton from Wall Builders.
This was back when I was on radio.
And he told me in that interview, he says, Paul, you don't understand what's actually going to happen from this.
Or most people don't really understand what's going to happen because of this decision.
He was like, you're going to have people now changing the law when it comes to, if there's a law that references a mother and a father, you're going to have people now say we have to get rid of gender distinctions when it comes to parents.
And I remember thinking, wow, that's an oddly specific thing to say three days after the gay marriage ruling.
But if you go read former Supreme Court justice, the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, before she was a Supreme Court justice, she wrote about that.
She wrote this crazy, crazy stuff about gendered language and how we needed gender-neutral language in our codes when we're talking about families, moms, dads, fathers, mothers, husbands, wives.
But that's what Barton said all those years ago.
10 years ago.
And I guess I believed him, but honestly, maybe I didn't because it's actually just wild to me to think about what actually was unleashed on us.
Because make no mistake about it.
If gay marriage, here's the deal.
I think I would challenge anyone to argue.
I'd debate anybody on this fact.
If gay marriage hadn't been legalized, there would not be people, there would not be men competing in women's sports today.
If gay marriage hadn't been legalized, we would not have doctors transing kids and looking at us in the straight face and saying that it's healthcare.
If gay marriage hadn't been legalized, you would not have parents taking their children to drag shows for kids or drag queen story hour for that matter.
If gay marriage had not been legalized, we would not have what we have now.
The slippery slope is real.
It's just a fact.
So this pastor, Dale Partridge, says, when this damn broke, it flooded America with vile depravity and perversion.
It was a sewer of immorality that drained into the American culture.
This law must be repealed, and it will be repealed, he says.
Well, Clarence Thomas has already opened the door for that with the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v.
Wade because he says this is something that, you know, clearly there's no mention of abortion in the Constitution.
That's why the states are going to regulate it under the 10th Amendment.
He says the same thing.
He even mentioned it in, I think, a concurring opinion that you could also apply that to, you know, to Obergfell and what we did with gay marriage.
He was on that court.
Obviously, he disagreed with it.
But where has all this led?
So in keeping with my slippery slope argument, Derek Evans posts a really interesting video from Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought, who's a good man.
This is what he said testifying up in Congress.
That many foreign aid programs use benevolent-sounding titles to hide truly appalling activity that is not in line with American interest.
For example, under the guise of so-called preventative care within PEPFAR program, Americans have been funding the following, $5.5 million to LGBTQ advocacy in Uganda, $800,000 for transgender people, sex workers, and their clients in Nepal.
3.6 for LGBTQ activism, free training in pastry, cooking, psychosocial counseling, a cyber cafe, and the dance focus groups for male prostitutes in Haiti.
And $1.1 million to produce gender transformation in diverse social and behavior change report, which advocates against, quote, gender blindness.
Most Americans would be shocked and appalled to learn that their tax dollars, money they thought was going to medical care, was actually going to far-left activism, population control, and sex workers.
To be clear, no life-saving treatment will be impacted by this resistance package.
Anyone currently receiving life-saving treatment will continue to receive that treatment.
It is crazy.
So he's testifying here on $9.4 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting spending cuts.
So they're cutting this spending.
Did you notice that everything is really, I mean, if you really get down to it, whether it's the prostitutes or it's the LGBT, all of it is based on sex.
You know, it's just, it's all basically sexual in nature.
That that is what we were spending our money on.
That's what we're obsessed over as a country.
So that's where it leads.
And we're trying to reverse this.
That's one of the reasons why Pete Hexeth stripped the name of the USNS Harvey Milk and is now renaming it to the USNS Oscar V. Peterson.
The Department of the Navy is renaming the Fleet Replenishment Oiler, formerly known as the USNS Harvey Milk, to the USNS Oscar V. Peterson.
We are taking the politics out of ship naming.
We're not renaming the ship to anything political.
This is not about political activists, unlike the previous administration.
Instead, we're renaming the ship after a United States Navy Congressional Medal of Honor recipient, as it should be.
People want to be proud of the ship they're sailing in.
And so we're renaming it after a chief, a Navy chief.
during the Battle of the Coral Sea in May of 1942, Chief Watertender Peterson led a repair party on the USS Neosho.
The ship was severely damaged by Japanese dive bombers, and the entire repair party was either killed or severely wounded.
Peterson himself was gravely wounded, yet he managed to single-handedly close the bulkhead stop valves, thereby helping to keep the ship operational.
In performing his historic actions and heroic actions, Peterson received additional injuries and burns which tragically resulted in his death.
But his spirit of self-sacrifice and concern for his crewmates was in keeping with the finest traditions of the Navy.
And for his heroic actions, Oscar Peterson was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor.
So I would like to officially welcome the USNS Oscar V. Peterson to the Navy's vessel registry.
Taking wrongs and making them right.
It's incredible.
Folks, I am out of time on the show today.
Now is normally the time.
It's a Friday, and again, I'm going to be off all next week, so I'm not going to see you till July the 7th, although you can keep up with me.
I'll be making some posts over on X and other social media accounts as well.
YouTube, Facebook, even TikTok now, believe it or not.
But yeah, it's at RealPaul Harrell on X, and I need to post some of the other social links as well.
But this is the time when I tell you to go to church.
If you don't go to church, go to church.
Find a church that preaches the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ and his mighty ability to save sinners.
And for those of you who do go to church, have a blessed Lord's Day.
I'm actually going to leave you guys with this clip, old clip on mercy from the late R.C. Sproll.
We need to understand the difference between justice and mercy.
The minute you think that God owes you mercy, a bell should go off in your brain that warns you and tells you that you're no longer thinking about mercy.
For by definition, mercy is voluntary.
God is never obligated to be merciful to a rebellious creature.
He doesn't owe you mercy.
As he has said, I will have mercy upon whom I will have mercy.
And I'll close with this.
A holy God is both just and merciful, never unjust.
There is never an occasion in any page of sacred scripture where God ever, ever punishes an innocent person.
God simply doesn't know how to be unjust.
I thank him every night that he does know how to be non-just because mercy is non-justice, but it is not injustice.
And so I'll leave you with this.
When you say your prayers, don't ever ask God to give you justice.
He might do it.
And if God were to deal with us according to justice, we would perish as swiftly as Nadab and Abihu and Uzzah and Ananias and Sapphira in the New Testament.
But we live, beloved, by grace, by his mercy.
And let's never forget it.
Let's pray.
▲
Export Selection