Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: One & Done Strike or Regime Change? Iran May Target U.S. Bases
|
Time
Text
All right, folks, welcome to the show.
Thanks so much for being with us today.
Happy Monday to everybody out there watching.
We really appreciate it.
As always, we can't do the program without you watching.
And so I'm very, very thankful to be here.
I hope everybody had a blessed Lord's Day yesterday and were able to worship in spite of what's going on in the world and how really honestly, I mean, if you look at it from a, it'd be very easy to blackpill if you're not a Christian right now.
I would definitely say that.
That's not to say that we don't need to criticize where things need to be criticized.
I got to tell you, it was wild.
It was a wild course of events on, I guess, Saturday afternoon is when the news comes in that the U.S. does these strikes on Iran.
And what was fascinating is, I mean, I'll be honest here, I was on Friday, the news that we brought you was what had happened Thursday afternoon, which was the press secretary, Caroline Levitt, she goes out there and she says, you know, I've got this message from President Trump and going to make my decision about whether or not to bomb Iran within the next two weeks.
So that kind of led everyone to believe, or, you know, people that were just taking it at face value that Iran had another two weeks, that once again, we were going to give diplomacy a try and that sort of thing.
But I mean, if you read it, it also could mean that he could strike at any moment within the next two weeks could mean, you know, 15 minutes after she makes that announcement, right?
And that's why people like Alex Jones and, you know, people heard from their sources, 80-year-old reporter Seymour Hirsch was claiming, I think even days before that, I could be wrong on the timeline there, that the United States was going to strike Iran sometime after the markets closed on Friday.
And of course, you know, basically about 24 hours after the markets closed on Friday, boom, we get these strikes on Iran.
This, of course, is not something that a lot of people within MAGA, myself included, voted for.
Just from the basis.
I mean, you know, we can have this debate back and forth, you know, targeted strikes.
Is this one and done?
Is this regime change?
Trump is now mentioning regime change.
Excuse me.
So it's extremely frustrating because one of the things that kind of made Donald Trump's first term stand out is that we didn't start any new wars.
And now we're in this zone where we very well may have started a war.
You know, the idea that we're not at war with Iran or what we did wasn't an act of war.
It was a war, as J.D. Vance said on one of the Sunday shows.
It was a war against not a war against Iran.
It was a war against Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
I think we're really parsing words now at this point.
And a lot of people are very disappointed.
And then, of course, you do have a lot of people that, you know, don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
So now the question is, because right at, this is my main question.
I've got a lot of questions today, as a matter of fact.
Number one would be the top gun Maverick plot.
We'll get to that here in just a minute.
But does this now mean Iran's nuclear capabilities are over?
That'd be my main question.
Because that's what we heard right after the attack.
That's what we heard.
Iran's been decimated.
Those were the headlines I saw.
Now we've got others where the goalposts are now being moved.
And this is why you don't do it in the first place because one step leads to another.
There are responses.
Will the Strait of Hormuz be shut down?
Will the U.S. military intervene to try to open them up?
Will then the U.S. military be attacked, which will draw us into this war even more?
This is the question, and this is why when you take one of these steps, and a lot of people were saying, sorry, I'm getting choked up here.
A lot of people were saying, well, Trump was boxed in.
Well, that happens based on the type of intelligence that you listen to.
It happens based on who Funds your campaign.
A lot of people, Tucker Carlson included.
*Pewds*
Sorry, I don't know what's going on in my voice right now.
A lot of people, Tucker Carlson included.
Cite the Miriam Adelson endorsement.
A lot of talk, thanks to Tucker, quite frankly, about Ted Cruz, you know, with that Ted Cruz interview about AIPAC and that sort of thing as well.
But it was a fascinating turn of events.
I actually went to bed early on Saturday just because I was tired of looking at it all and just wanted to get some sleep, actually.
But yeah, let's start there.
Well, before we go any further, let's remind everybody, this segment brought to you by Red Vive Health.
The great people over at Red Vive Health want you to have clinical strength red light panels in your home.
I've got one in my home.
It's incredible.
I sat in front of it this morning, although apparently I guess I should have put it right on my throat so I could talk today.
We'll tell you more about the healing power of red light coming up later in the broadcast, but they are incredible.
And it's technology.
The medical industrial complex, big pharma, they do not want you to know about.
That much is true.
That much I know.
So here was kind of my experience when I got the news about Iran and the U.S. striking Iran.
And this is what's nuts.
So there's this guy named Mike Benz who I didn't follow before.
I've heard about him before, former State Department cybersecurity, I guess, author of the unpublishable monstrosity weapons of mass deletion.
He's the executive director at FFO Freedom.
He posted this at 5.06 on Saturday, June 21st, this video where he writes, we're living through the exact plot of Top Gun Maverick, scene for scene.
And the implications are more than a little bit concerning for the higher need to keep the MAGA coalition together.
So I watched this whole thing.
It's 20 minutes long.
We're going to watch a little bit of it, but I'm not going to watch a lot of it because he has a lot of, I don't know if we'll get a copyright strike because he does play a few clips from the movie recorded off of a laptop.
But I honestly think for these purposes, I mean, it's, if there's ever a fair use of reason for something to use under the fair use statute, this would be it.
So I watched this clip, I don't know, about 6 o'clock.
I mean, he posted it at 5.06, and less than two hours later, the news comes in that the United States bombs Iran.
That's why my head hurt after this when I saw this part.
I want you to listen to a little bit of this and sound off in the comments here on X American News.
Tell me what you think.
What is happening right now is unbelievably identical to the plot of Top Gun Maverick, the Oscar-nominated best picture of the year in 2022.
This has been an obsession of mine all week.
I've been meaning to make this video all week, and I just saw Fox News reference it last night.
So let me give you the proper treatment.
We're going to go through this scene by scene.
We're going to do a movie watch chronologically through the movie.
And as you watch these scenes, remember that the whole plot is to use bunker buster bombs using stealth bombers through the mountainous region of a Middle East country in order to blow up its nuclear plant.
Here's what the final scene looks like at the climax of the film, for example.
Bullseye, bullseye, bullseye!
Now, something troubled me when this movie first came out, and I'm just going to play this scene.
It's at the 19-minute mark of the movie where they're setting out the whole plot of why they're doing this operation.
The target is an unsanctioned uranium enrichment plant built in violation of a multilateral NATO treaty.
The uranium produced there represents a direct threat to our allies in the region.
Now, when I first watched this on an airplane in 2022 as just something to do to kill a direct threat to the allies.
We're not going to name who those allies are or one particular ally.
We're not going to name them, but it's uranium enrichment, unsanctioned, under a giant bunker in a mountainous region.
Benz points out later that the actual Ford facility that was the main target, it does snow on those mountains in the winter.
I thought that was a very strange plot choice because this whole operation to use bunker buster bombs and risk American lives to blow up a nuclear plant in the Middle East was because the nuclear plant represented a direct threat to our allies.
Like the military generals did not even say it was a threat to the United States.
The operation was because the plant was a threat to our allies.
The uranium produced there represents a direct threat to our allies in the region.
So again, the plot of the movie is because the nuclear plant in the mountains of an undisclosed Middle East country represents a direct threat to our allies in the region.
They don't say it's to the United States.
I thought that was very, very strange to come at the 19-minute mark of a two-hour movie as they're setting up the whole plot.
The uranium produced there represents a direct threat to our allies in the region.
The Pentagon has tasked us with assembling a strike team and taking it out before it becomes fully operational.
So again, the plot is the Pentagon has been tasked to set up a strike force to launch a preemptive strike against this facility to take it out before it becomes fully operational.
So this is without a war being declared.
This is presumably without this country having launched an attack.
This is a preemptive strike against a facility that is doing nuclear uranium enrichment to take it out before it becomes fully operational.
That video has 2.8 million views.
I will say, you know, what's interesting about this is that Pete Hegseth, after the attack, talked about the operation security, and he talked about how that it was so good, right, that the planes on the way in and on the way out never took any fire from the missiles and the defensive capabilities of Iran.
Obviously, that doesn't happen in the movie.
I mean, if you watch the movie, which I've watched it, and I enjoyed it a lot just because of the nostalgia of the whole Top Gun franchise and everything else.
Completely oblivious to this.
I mean, I feel so stupid.
I know those of you out there, well, you know, Paul, it's Hollywood.
This is predictive programming.
They do this all the time.
I get all of that.
I certainly believed in the predictive programming of that movie, Civil War, the fact that that came out last summer, and then President Trump was supposed to be assassinated.
And I think that would have potentially triggered a Civil War.
It's not like I'm not hip to the idea of predictive programming, but on this particular movie, I guess I just was a little too captivated.
I was a little too behind it all, ensconced in the movie, I guess.
Well, it was weird.
It's like one of my family members, you know, a teenager, actually, you know, came out of the movie feeling incredible.
Wow, that was a really great movie.
And then it was one of those things.
This is why it did so well the box of it because the response was from old millennials like me or Gen Xers was, yeah, that used to be how all movies made you feel.
So that's why it was such a success because it wasn't bogged down with PC political correctness, wokeness, and that sort of thing.
It was just a movie about Tom Cruise who flies airplanes and miraculously survives and does the patriotic thing for the country.
But it never dawned on me that this is actually potentially predictive programming.
And it's even creepier.
The three-week to two-week thing, he talks about this.
Let me see.
I don't know if we're not going to play this whole thing.
It's 20 minutes long, but let me see if he talks about that.
That is where the Ford Row nuclear enrichment site is in the mountainous region just north of Iran's capital.
Here is a Google Earth view of the Ford Row Nuclear Enrichment Facility, Iran's secretive nuclear site that only a U.S. bomb could hit.
You will notice it's the same setup with these same valleys and slopes in a giant mountain range, which is snowy in winter, the same as you'll see in the final scene of the movie.
Let's go into it.
All right, so what he says is, is another key plot point.
This is what was really eerie to me.
So there's another key plot point where they have three weeks to do this mission.
They have three weeks to train for this mission.
They have three weeks to go in, you know, three weeks to train and to actually complete the operation.
But then something happens in the middle of the movie and they get new intelligence, good intelligence, not like bad intelligence from Team America, but good intelligence that says, oh no, they're now two weeks away.
So we don't have three weeks.
We only have two weeks that they're going to have the bomb in two weeks.
And I watched this video the day after Trump says, I'll decide within the next two weeks what to do.
And then about an hour and a half after I watch this video, we get the news, scroll, you know, comes across Twitter and everywhere else that America has successfully, we're told successfully obliterated the nuclear program of Iran, and the ships are still in the air.
They're back home.
They've entered U.S. airspace and everything is hunky-dory.
So when I was initially processing this information and then all day yesterday, my thought was, okay, so because I've looked at the satellite photos, or at least, and how do we even know, by the way, but I've looked at the satellite photos and I, you know, the before and the after, supposedly the before of Ford and the after of Ford.
And it really doesn't look like it's that damaged.
They're, you know, there's conflicting reports, but let's just go with the initial headlines that we obliterated the program.
My question was, okay, so war's over, right?
I mean, obviously, assuming Iran doesn't respond, let me just, instead of war's over, let me amend what I said.
Let's say, okay, so no more nuclear weapons.
So, I mean, is America's part in this done?
Is that what this was?
Matt Gates is out there saying that Donald Trump is trying to pull another Solomani, you know, when the United States killed Soleimani and then Iran ceremonially or theatrically said that they got to attack back.
I mean, Trump said that himself, by the way.
I think we have that clip.
So, yeah, here's Matt Gaetz.
Matt Gaetz says, in response to a guy on Twitter named Mohammed Ali Shabani, he says, big, high-ranking Iranian source.
And again, this was back on the 21st, so a lot of this is old at this point.
High-ranking Iranian source tells Amwanj Media that Trump team gave advance notice of bombings of nuclear sites and insisted they're intended as a one-off signs of Trump seeking a repeat of January 2020, the Solemani killing versus the symbolic Iranian retaliation.
First of all, this whole thing, my initial, I'm so all over the place here, but you'll have to forgive me.
If that is true, then this is fake.
I mean, what kind of real, what kind of an actual strike do you telegraph to your enemies beforehand and vice versa?
I'll give you another example of this.
Let me see here.
Where do we have this?
I've got several of these here.
Nope, nope, nope.
That's not it.
I'm trying to find the actual clip where Trump says, and I may not have it.
I thought I had it towards the front here.
But Donald Trump, he said, you know, he gave a, I think he gave a talk to Maria Bartiromo.
This was, you know, a long time ago at this point.
He says that Iran called him, called him up and said, hey, we have to strike you back for what you did to us, but, you know, we're not going to actually kill anybody.
Don't do anything.
And for the life of me, just people saying that that's what's going on here, but I'm not so sure at all, actually.
Especially since now we have Donald Trump on Truth Social mentioning regime change.
Says that it is politically incorrect, but regime change, maybe that is what needs to happen.
Does that mean U.S. boots on the ground?
I don't know.
Let me just give you a few more takes here.
Lord Babo on X says that Iran's nuclear facilities were evacuated and equipment moved out days in advance.
U.S. publicly announced and made the upcoming strikes visible.
We all saw the bombers moving in place and news coverage predicting the strike.
The U.S. hence struck an empty Iranian nuclear facility since the Iranians knew and evacuated it.
U.S. satellites.
Now, that would be consistent with Trump's aversion to taking lives unnecessarily.
You can go back and look at the Iranian drone that, or when the U.S. drone that Iran shot down when he called off those strikes.
But we're going to get to the more critical aspects of all this here in just a minute, so bear with me.
The U.S. hence struck an empty Iranian nuclear facility.
U.S. satellite showed the evacuation of the facilities by the Iranians, hence the Americans knew the facility.
You also had a Russian scientist component at some of these facilities as well.
U.S. and Iran held secret talks in Oman days before.
No one knows what was agreed upon.
Trump essentially explained that such a deal was done previously.
Oh, this is the video right here.
Duh.
Okay.
So I couldn't see it.
So this was Trump explaining what has happened in the past.
Listen.
Before you go too far, would have never happened with me.
I had Iran in check.
Do you know we hit them very hard for something that they did, and they had to hit back.
They feel they have to do that, and I understand that.
Do you know they called me to tell me we're going to hit a certain location, but we're not going to hit it.
It's going to be outside of the perimeters.
Who called you?
Iran called me.
Iran called me, called for me.
And they let us know, and we had 16 missiles went off.
I believe it was 16. Six or seven failed in the air.
When was this?
This was prior to the attack on a fort that we had where they hit back.
Do you remember when they sent 18 missiles or 16 missiles?
Five failed.
They let us know, don't move.
We're going to have to hit you back.
Psychologically, we have to do that because we hit them on something.
You remember?
They sent 16 or 18 missiles and we knew they weren't going to hit inside the fort.
And the media was going, and now I reveal it, the media was going wild because they say it's strange.
They're very accurate missiles.
How come they all missed?
Nobody was killed, if you remember, with all of those missiles.
Nobody was killed.
You know, they had to do it because they have people and they have to show strength.
So they aimed the missiles, but they said, please don't attack us.
We're not going to hit you.
That was respect.
We had respect.
Okay, so what's interesting about that clip, as I just checked my feed here just a moment ago, is that I've got a few stories here.
Hang on, I'm going to pull these up.
Apparently, Iran has just launched six missiles toward U.S. bases in Qatar.
That's from Axios.
American Patriot missile defense systems.
Hang on one second.
I'm pulling all these up right now.
Okay.
I think I have them now.
So let me throw this up here for you guys.
This is Colin Rugg.
Breaking an attack on U.S. base at Al UDID in Qatar from Iran is imminent, according to Fox News.
Significant intelligence warnings focused on Qatar right now, where the U.S. has its largest air base in the Middle East.
Concerns that Iran will fire short or medium range cruise missiles and ballistic missiles or swarming drones at the U.S. base.
Let's go here because I think, according to Axios, Iran launches six missiles toward U.S. bases in Qatar.
The first comment, pure theater, the illusion of a retaliation, but not actually meant to escalate.
Next, we have, again, the same one.
Is that the same one from Dottery?
Yeah, okay, I pulled both.
And then Nick Sorter, six Iranian launched at America's airbase in Qatar.
What else do we have?
Allegedly, American Patriot missile defense systems activating as Iran launches six missiles toward U.S. forces in Qatar.
Um, we'll see you.
Madam, Madam.
Come on!
Oh, no, yeah!
Oh, no!
So are those the missions I don't know what we're actually seeing here.
Again, I'm seeing this for the first time.
This is originally from somebody named Global Military Info.
Let me go to that actual video.
How do they describe it?
Footage captures.
Okay.
So allegedly, this says footage captures the launch of Patriot interceptors and cutter engaging incoming Iranian ballistic missile targets at the air base there that I'm not going to try to pronounce again and butcher it.
So man, wow, that happening as we're kind of on the air here is kind of fascinating.
What is this going to mean?
So, at this point, because we take step one over the weekend, which is launching into Iran, now that they have apparently attacked a U.S. base, whether we actually intercept these missiles or not, you could use this.
I'm sure Lindsey Graham is getting very flush with excitement over the idea of getting the U.S. more involved because he, of course, wants regime change and boots on the ground.
So this is, according to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, they've announced that this is called Operation Fatah's Blessing against the U.S. base in Qatar.
Okay, so that's what we've got going on right now.
If anything else happens, it's difficult.
I'm a one-man operation here.
I don't have a producer or anything like that.
I don't have anybody handing me things about what's going on in real time.
But for those of you who are watching on X-American News Live, this is what I can report to you.
But if we go back a couple of days ago, Eric Daughtery saying the United States contacted Iran diplomatically today before the strikes, telling them regime change is not planned and that the strikes were all that was planned.
Again, that is according to CBS news.
Dominic Michael Trippi saying regime change not planned yet.
Officials are already talking about the replacement.
Emily Schrader, multiple sources.
There are discussions ongoing with the United States and Crown Prince Riza Pahlavi for the day after the Islamic regime falls.
Matt Gaetz maintained a couple of days ago that President Trump basically wants this to be just like the Solomani strike, one and done, no regime change war.
Matt Gaits says Trump the peacemaker.
There's a problem with that, though.
I mean, there's a problem.
You say that when Donald Trump comes out and says, so the initial statement on Truth Social after the strikes, I'm sure you've seen it by now, but I'm going to read it.
We've completed our very successful attack on three nuclear sites in Iran, including Ford, Natans, and Esfahan.
All planes are now outside of Iranian airspace.
A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, Fordot.
All planes are safely on their way home.
Congratulations to our great American warriors.
There is not another military in the world that could have done this.
Now is the time for peace.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
But then he comes right back, and last night on Truth Social, Donald Trump says it's not politically correct to use the term regime change.
Now, what does he mean by that, first of all?
Is that Trump acknowledging that the MAGA Base doesn't want a regime change war in the Middle East.
We just got sold this propaganda for the last month about Iran can't have a nuclear weapon.
And then we were told the headlines told us, although I don't know how accurate it is, the headlines told us, you know, at first, you know, the nuclear sites have been obliterated.
That's what the headlines told us.
Is that true or not?
I don't know.
I'm very skeptical based on other reports.
But he says it's not politically correct to use the term regime change, but if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change?
And then he says, MIGA, make Iran great again, which is interesting because a lot of people use that term MIGA as a replacement for MAGA, but not for Iran, but they put Israel in there, that MAGA has been turned into making Israel great again.
So that certainly has triggered a whole lot of people online.
Let me tell you, Scott Ritter, who's a he's a frequent guest over on Redacted with Clayton and Natalie Morris, says that this was an act of theater.
He says Trump's big mouth had him boxed into a corner.
Iran wouldn't play his game, so he had to bomb Iran to save face.
He bombed two empty facilities that had been previously struck by Israel, and he bounced six bombs off an indestructible facility, claiming destruction, despite the opposite being the case.
That's it.
A contained strike, a nothing burger.
And this is the man who supporters call the greatest leader in the world.
And then Ritter says he's a national disgrace.
So that's one take that is out there.
Here's Pisobic earlier today on Bannon's war room.
And he says he believes the president when the president says that the program was obliterated.
Listen.
We've always been very clear about this, that President Trump has been focused on the nuclear program, but the upsell was to try to suck the United States in to say, well, you know, maybe it's just going to be a special operations rate.
Maybe it's just going to be a little bit, a couple of boots on the ground.
Not too many, just a couple of units, get some CAG in there, Delta Force, SEAL Team 6, get the boys out of DevGru, get a little black squadron go down.
It'll be fine.
It'll be totally fine.
That was always the upsell.
Now, hold on a second, because President Trump told me, obliterated completely.
That's what my president said.
So if President Trump says it's obliterated completely, and the New York Times is pushing for all this, and we got a lot of questions about what actually went down here, because I'm going to take the word of my president who says obliterated completely.
So perfect strike, et cetera, et cetera.
What they're trying to push for, and all these guys, Jack Keene, the Institute for the Study of War, which has been completely wrong about everything in Ukraine, by the way, the ISW, which Jack Keene runs, those are the guys telling you, oh, it's going to be one fell strike.
No, well, here we are three years later.
And by the way, nobody's paying attention.
Russia is advancing in Ukraine right now while no one's looking.
So, you know, people have said before, politics, and this is, I think, political is politics is the art of the possible.
So at this point, I mean, what happened happened.
And so the question is, does this result in this whole, does this thing totally spiral out of control into World War III?
You know, I noticed right after the strike, the people who really don't like, you know, those who are very worried about a third world war, and I'm certainly one of them, there was immediate, immediately people were like, well, World War III is over.
Like, you know, they were mocking, they were making fun of those of us on the right who don't want to go to war.
And I just think, how in the world could you possibly make a tweet like that when you have no idea what's coming?
Iran is now attacking our base in Qatar, according to reports.
So that gives us every, you know, at least from the neocon war side of the country, they're going to be clamoring for more war.
They're going to be clamoring to get involved again.
Pesobic here mentioning, you know, getting Delta force involved, getting SEAL Team 6 involved.
There have been reports over the weekend that talk about how a bomb, a bunker busting bomb could never have really worked in that scenario, and that the only way to really do it is to put forces on the ground and assault these facilities and actually go underground inside them.
I don't know, man.
The question is, you know, me trying to be an optimist, which is, again, I don't want to blackpill, but me trying to be an optimist is like, okay, that happened.
Is that a way to extricate the United States out?
But then that theory is totally shattered, in my opinion, when President Trump then comes out.
Well, totally shattered.
President Trump comes out after that and he says, you know, it's politically incorrect to use the word regime change, but, you know, maybe regime change needs to happen.
If Iran doesn't make Iran great again, then regime change will happen.
You know, for people in your base, they look at that and they think that they automatically assume, many people assume you're talking about boots on the ground, you're talking about another Iraq, you're talking about another Afghanistan, you're talking about another 20 years of war, a partitioning of Iran, you know, 20 years of sectarian violence, of terrorism.
And by the way, in all of these wars, Christians get slaughtered.
We've got a New York Post story about, you know, and I think in response to what the United States did, there's an Orthodox church in Syria that suicide bomber went in yesterday and murdered a lot of people.
We have this church up in Michigan as well.
I got to stop for a second, and I got to tell you about Red Vive Health.
Red Vive Health.
This is, you want to look better, you want to feel better, you want to get off the hamster wheel that is the medical industrial complex and the big pharma wanting to make you a lifetime customer or slave, as I would say.
I want to tell you about the healing power of red light from redvivehealth.org slash Paul.
That's the link where you get the discount.
This is their superior quality, high strength.
These are clinical strength red light panels.
They're in doctor's offices across the country.
You can have one in your own home.
We're talking about, I mean, stop right there for a second and just go back and look at this for a second.
All the things it does.
Anti-aging, hair regrowth.
I've actually noticed that one.
I obviously, you can look at me and you can tell that I don't have like a hair loss issue.
Like I'm not losing hair.
I'm 40. But I have noticed that my hair is actually gotten thicker and I have these little sprouts of hair that are like kind of on my widow's peak here that are growing.
So maybe I was losing and I just didn't really realize it.
It says relieve eye fatigue, 100%.
Improve smooth, 100% does that.
Improve cognitive function, weight loss.
It actually can burn fat, improve your sleep, increase testosterone, improve sexual performance.
That is on the list, and you can go on their website and look into what that means.
Boost energy and immunity, improve bone density.
And that's because of the near-infrared light.
So you've got two spectrums on these panels.
You've got the red light, which is going to tighten the skin because it produces collagen.
That's the anti-aging.
You get rid of blemishes and things like that.
Then there's the near-infrared light.
The near-infrared light on these panels is what actually penetrates deeper into the body, stimulating the mitochondria of your bones and your organs and things like that.
And it's, folks, it's absolutely incredible.
And I firmly believe that this is technology that can help you if you're dealing with inflammation or if you're dealing with pain or if you're dealing with just a general feeling of unwellness and you can't figure out what it is.
I know there's a lot of detoxes out there that are really good and you should do them.
But I really suggest that you consider you're not getting what is naturally emitted by the sun, but you can get that in these targeted doses.
It's redvivehealth.org slash paul.
That's redvivehealth.org slash paul.
And you'll get 15% off.
And you also help keep what we're doing here on the Millstone Report alive and well.
We're going to take a quick break and hear from our good friend Mike Lindell back in 60 seconds.
I hear every day about the products you all wish my pillow carried.
Well, guess what?
We probably do.
Slippers, bathrobes, pet beds, blankets, mattresses, sleepwear, loungewear, duvets, comforters, potholders, aprons, oven mitts, and so much more.
And they're all on sale.
For example, get our best-selling standard MyPillows for only $14.98.
Body pillows, $29.98.
Six-piece bath towels or kitchen towel sets, just $29.98.
Multi-use MyPillow 2.0s with pillowcase, $9.98.
Save $40 on our spring per kilo and Giza Dream bedsheet sets.
Any size, any color, and so much more.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to save up to 80% on all my pillow products.
And I've never done this before.
When you spend $100 or more, you're going to get two standard MyPillows absolutely free.
So don't forget their summer sale.
The code is pH.
Make sure you use pH on checkout, mypillow.com.
And they've got, again, summer sale, 80% off.
You don't want to miss that.
Make sure that you check that out.
So, JD Vance says that he empathizes with us.
Take a listen to this.
With Americans who are exhausted after 25 years.
I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East.
I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives.
So this is not going to be some long-drawn out thing.
We've got in.
We've done the job of setting their nuclear program back.
We're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program over the coming years, and that is what the president has set out to do.
Simple principle.
Iran can't have a nuclear weapon that has animated American policy over the past 130 days.
It's going to continue to be a driving force of our policy in the Middle East for the next three and a half years.
So pay attention to the verbiage there.
We have.
So you just heard Pasovic on Bannon's War Room earlier saying, well, Trump said we obliterated their nuclear program.
I believe the president.
J.D. Vance here is saying that we went in and we set their nuclear program back.
And then, and it's not going to be 20. I mean, don't get me wrong.
I mean, I'm glad, certainly I'm glad to hear him say this is not going to be another Iraq 25 year.
That's what he's saying.
Okay.
I mean, I'm glad to at least hear you say that.
But call me skeptical.
And then at the same time, he says, we've set their nuclear program back, but we're going to work in the years to come to, does he say set it back further?
Let me listen to this again.
So this is not going to be some long-drawn out thing.
We've got in.
We've done the job of setting their nuclear program back.
We're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program.
So we're going to now work over the years to permanently...
Does that look like more strikes?
It's...
It is...
It is.
I mean, it's a gut punch.
It is.
There's no getting around it.
So speaking of J.D. Vance, so there were reports circulating right before the attack that Vice President J.D. Vance reportedly pushed back against Israeli officials during an intense phone call saying the United States should not be directly involved in the war and suggesting that the Israelis were going to drag the United States into war.
So I hope that that's true.
I saw some people out there not believing it.
One of the people, though, in a Spanish Inquisition, a very Spanish Inquisition of Mark Levin, he says, is this report about Vance accurate?
It's very important that we know either way at some point.
So there is still a movement on to purge any dissenting voices about more war in the Middle East.
And Mark Levin wants to know.
Wants to know.
For you younger people out there, we're talking like Ministry of Magic type stuff from the Harry Potter films, if that's a little bit easier than something like the Spanish Inquisition.
Mike Benz, the guy who posted the video exposing this whole thing as a pre-programmed psyop from Top Gun Maverick, this is the exact plot of Top Gun Maverick.
He says, it's hard for me to put into words how catastrophically awful the optics of this post are.
And if the friends around this 8 p.m.
Fox News host have not staged an intervention yet, now might be a good time.
Then he goes on, if messaging like this keeps up from people seen as dominant in the U.S. foreign policy decision-making, 20 to 50% of MAGA's base will feel run roughshod over, become jaded, sit out 2026 and 2028, and the DNC will arrest everyone and install a much more pro-Iran foreign policy.
No one wins.
That is interesting to talk about what the stakes really are.
But you have to understand, somebody like Amark Levin, I firmly believe, would be all for true America-first populism, obviously going away.
The idea that you even have a story suggesting that J.D. Vance was pushing back on this to him is super triggering and it just has got to be anathematized, has got to be purged from his version.
You know, it's crazy.
We've got people out there claiming that real MAGA now are people like John Bolton and Nikki Haley.
Well, I mean, you know, they're excited about what happened.
They're cheering on what happened over the weekend.
By the way, this portion of the program brought to you by Curable Premium Health and their incredible CBD products that are on their website.
We're going to tell you more about Curable here coming up in just a moment.
There's some talk now, you know, in terms of sitting out 2026 and the idea of the House flipping to the Democrats.
Trump's going to have to worry about another drummed-up impeachment.
People are talking about this action in Iran being unconstitutional.
Mark Lynch, who's actually primary warmonger Lindsey Graham, says that the president does have the authority to order limited military actions without immediate approval from Congress.
Democrats know this.
It's why they stayed quiet while Obama bombed so many during his two terms.
Yeah, so the precedent has been set.
And even if I did think, and maybe it is unconstitutional, it just goes to show you that the Constitution is, in many situations, a meaningless document, and it only is worth what the people in power, it only has the authority of what the people in power at a given time want to grant it to use as a tool to get what they want done or a bludgeon on their enemies.
That's where we are.
That's where we've been for a very, very long time, and that's why this is so frustrating, because this is a time when America should be winnowing its, I would say that the Trump administration should be winnowing its enemies, political enemies, and actually not allowing them to do what they will do to us.
We saw what they did to Jay Sixers.
That's just the beginning.
What they will do to Americans and Christians and people on the right if they get back in power is going to be absolutely very extreme.
Let me put it that way.
Let's see here.
What else do we have?
So, yeah, Tulsi gabbered, I guess, on Friday into Saturday.
You know, she said people were taking her comments when she testified that Iran back in March wasn't ready to have the bomb yet.
She claimed that people were taking that out of context.
And the full testimony reveals other things.
She got a lot of flack for that.
But then there were people that immediately, people like Laura Loomer were attacking Tulsi over the weekend.
At one point, some even claimed that Tulsi was left out of the strikes on Iran and was not allowed in the situation room.
And so that's what this post by Nick Sorter is about, saying that Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was in the situation room during the strikes on Iran.
So just to set the record straight there.
Harrison Smith, who's a good follower during all this, as well as Owen Schroer, is a good follow during all of this.
He posted this on X, hard to tell what's really going on, but what everyone thinks is going on isn't what's going on.
This sums up my feelings as well.
It is very difficult to actually tell what's going on right now, but what everyone thinks is going on isn't what's going on.
100%, whatever you're hearing on Fox News and MSNBC, you will be able to find the same narrative, the same thread in Fox News or MSNBC about what's going on.
So you can guarantee that is not what is actually happening.
If COVID taught us anything, you can just believe the opposite of what you're being told.
And like 90% of the time, you'll actually be correct.
Now, Smith was responding to somebody named Lebanon John who says that Israel has a biological weapons lab in Tel Aviv that Iran destroyed today for world terrorism.
He goes on, word on the street is Iran's nuclear material wasn't in the base at all.
Arab Street is saying Trump put on an act so Israel Mossad doesn't kill him.
So that's what Harrison Smith was responding to, which, again, it just doesn't seem...
We tell them we're coming.
We drop the bombs.
Harrison Smith...
Harrison Smith writes, they didn't even have the courtesy to do a false flag first.
I saw that post and I said, well, that comes later now.
Oh, that's what comes after now.
Because now that we've done this, America is vulnerable to get sucked in even further.
And maybe that's the plan all along.
But now that we've done this, we've got these missiles that are being shot at our military bases in Qatar.
They're being intercepted.
But now really, I mean, there's any number of scenarios can unfold where Donald Trump is in between Iraq and a hard place.
And now, at least in his mind, he's between Iraq and a hard place and has to commit troops on the ground in Iran or to regime change or to more strikes or what have you.
So I would say, though, yeah, there wasn't a false flag that brought us in.
Sometimes maybe you don't need false flags if you have cooked up intelligence or that sort of thing.
And that situation is very fluid.
I don't know who to believe.
I don't know what to believe.
Alex Jones, U.S. Intel, Iran about to pull trigger on total war.
NBC News reports Iran told President Trump days before he decided to strike their nuclear sites that they'd activate sleeper cell terror inside the United States if attacked.
You see what I mean?
False flags don't come before, they can come after.
Because here's the thing.
Iran very well could activate the sleeper cells.
I have no doubt they have sleeper cells.
But whatever happens domestically here at home, if Americans die because Israel started a war and then the United States came in and at the very least theatrically finished it, and if that results in dead Americans on U.S. soil, every one of us should be absolutely outraged.
Every single one of us.
And here's the thing.
I don't think if there are dead Americans in terror attacks on U.S. soil because of this, it's going to be very hard to actually know the truth about the motivations behind it because we're at the point now where, I mean, yeah, Iran can be this theocratic madman regime and they want revenge on Americans.
But from Israel's standpoint, we just have to be honest about it.
I mean, they want the Americans to come and they want America to topple the regime of Iran.
They want that.
That's what they want.
So if we're going to start listing incentives, you have to list the incentives on both sides.
Mark Levin, speaking of Iranian sales, he's broadcasting this wide and far.
The New York Times, the U.S. has obtained intelligence indicating that Iran-backed militias are planning attacks on American military bases in Iraq and Syria in retaliation for recent U.S. strikes on Iran.
The report highlights growing concerns within the Pentagon that proxy forces may attempt to open new fronts against U.S. assets in the region.
Washington is now bracing for asymmetric retaliation.
Who would have ever guessed that?
I agree.
Who would have ever guessed that the U.S. would retaliate?
I'm sorry, that Iran would retaliate.
And again, with each escalation, you will have people like Lindsey Graham.
You will have people like Mark Levin saying, We got to do more.
We got to do more.
We got to go.
We got to go.
Speaking of attacks on U.S. soil, this broke yesterday.
An attacker in Wayne, Michigan rammed his truck into a church, stepped out with a rifle, and opened fire on the congregation.
An armed security guard shot and killed the attacker.
And this was back in, this was at 1219 yesterday.
So this happens immediately, or we have this.
Luckily, there was a parishioner of this church that ran the guy over with his truck with an F-150.
And then the security guard, I believe the security guard was shot in the leg and then took the guy out with the rifle.
From what I can tell, police have not released, at least up to this report, police have not released who the killer, who the attacker was.
Then we have this, Israeli media, channel 13, the Iranian nuclear program cannot be destroyed with bombs.
Wait, what?
The Iranian nuclear program cannot be destroyed with bombs.
Huh.
Torba rightfully points out that the goalposts are going to be moved.
That's what happens with each step that we take.
There's going to be people within Trump's orbit that are going to move the goalposts.
Or Trump himself can remove the goalposts, as he did with this tweet.
It's not politically correct to use the term regime change, but if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change?
Stuff like this is certainly not what I voted for.
John Bolton, huge fan.
John Bolton, these guys who have been rejected by the American people and rejected by Donald Trump himself, these guys are like they're all on the MAGA wagon now.
They're back on the team.
They're back on Team Trump.
John Bolton praising President Trump.
President Trump did the right thing for America in striking Iran's nuclear weapons program now onto regime change.
Guys like John Bolton having the best 48 hours of their lives right now.
This is a guy Trump fired, by the way.
Tim Poole, John Bolton, finally welcome back in MAGA.
Welcome back, John Bolton.
Suicide bomber strikes Syrian church near Damascus during Mass.
New York Post writing, a suicide bomber in Syria opened fire, then detonated an explosive vest inside a Greek Orthodox church filled with people praying on Sunday, killing at least 22 and wounding 63 others.
The attack took place in Diweles on the outskirts of Damascus inside the Mar Elias church.
According to state media, let's see here.
The attack on the church was the first of its kind in Syria in years and comes as Damascus, under its de facto Islamist rule, is trying to win the support of minorities.
As President Ahmad al-Sharra struggles to exert authority across the country, there have been concerns about the presence of sleeper cells of extremist groups in the war-torn country.
That's tragic.
Pray for Christians in Syria.
Pray for Christians in Iran.
There are Christians in Iran right now, believe it or not.
Obviously, it's an underground church situation over there.
But it is growing.
It is growing slowly.
So pray for Christians in Iran.
Pray for them.
Pray for them.
Pray for everybody.
Pray for the Lord to have mercy on everybody in these situations and in these conflicts.
And for us to not have the spirit of Jonah when he was so upset when Nineveh actually repented.
So this goes for Israel.
This goes for Iran.
To actually legitimately pray for the Lord to have mercy and to change people's hearts.
Right?
The mercy comes with an actual heart change in repentance.
That's what I would encourage everybody to do.
And I don't do it enough.
And you could easily end up like the wayward prophet Jonah, who the Lord himself also saved, obviously.
But even that, anyways, it's kind of fascinating the story of Jonah.
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene.
What time is it?
We're going to end with this.
She writes, my thoughts on bombing Iran.
I don't know anyone in America who has been the victim of a crime or killed by Iran, but I know many people who have been victims of crime committed by criminal, illegal aliens, or murdered by cartel and Chinese fentanyl drugs.
This really does sum up what I feel.
She says, almost everyone in our country can relate to this fact.
I know someone.
I have a family member who died of fentanyl.
A relative.
She goes on, however, America has not dropped bunker busters.
America has not dropped bunker busters on the cartel-sophicated drug tunnels, launched tomahawks on massive cartel-poisonous drug operations, or gone to war against the cartel's international terrorist networks.
Neocon warmongers beat their drums of war and act like Billy badasses, going to war in countries most Americans have never seen and can't find on a map, but never find the courage to go to war against the actual terrorists who actually do kill Americans, invade our land, and make billions doing it day after day, year after year.
She writes, I'm 51 years old.
I'm Gen X. I've watched our country go to war in foreign lands for foreign causes on behalf of foreign interests for as long as I can remember.
I was in 10th grade when Desert Storm started, and my father before me was sent to Vietnam another senseless foreign war.
America is $37 Trillion in debt, and all of these foreign wars have cost Americans trillions and trillions of dollars that never benefited any American.
American troops have been killed and forever torn apart physically and mentally for regime change, foreign wars, and for military-industrial base profits.
I'm sick of it.
I can easily say I support nuclear-armed Israel's right to defend themselves and also say at the same time, I don't want to fight or fund nuclear-armed Israel's wars.
Israel has nuclear weapons, nor any other country for that matter.
I'm sick of funding foreign aid and foreign countries and foreign everything.
I want to fund American interests and issues.
I want great trade deals so American businesses and people can afford goods and be successful.
I want low inflation and low interest rates.
I want American construction, housing, and manufacturing to boom.
I want Americans to be rich and have security in their future.
I want my children's generation to have a great future.
My kids are 22, 25, and 27. She writes, quote, it pisses me off beyond comprehension that my children's generation can't afford to buy a house, can't afford insurance, and have little hope for their future.
Americans are exhausted by all this, and rightfully so.
I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things that they're doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started.
That's not disloyalty.
Critical thinking and having my own opinions is the most American thing ever.
Because contrary to what brainwashed Democrat boomers say, Trump is not making, is not a king.
MAG is not a cult.
And President Trump is surrounding himself with people who once disagreed with him and even ran against him for president.
So anyway, it goes on, and she's spot on.
I saw she's certainly spot on with all of the domestic issues we're facing now.
They feel like they've been put on hold so that we have to deal once again with another war in the Middle East.
And it's quite frustrating.
Folks, I want to tell you about Curable Premium Health.
At Curable, they actually monitor the entire process.
They're intricately involved in the process of growing the hemp.
So they plant, first they till the soil, which is a toiling thing.
Then they plant the seed.
They watch it grow.
They water.
They don't use harmful pesticides, harmful chemicals, anything like that.
And then they send it off to third-party testing so that they can verify everything that they say.
The third party verifies that this product is the best CBD that you can buy on the market.
And you're not going to find 2,000 milligrams of CBD in that bottle for that price point.
Do not buy your CBD at a gas station, okay?
You need to buy your CBD from people who really understand it.
And if you've never heard what it can do to your body, how it can fight inflation, how you have a cannabinoid system that actually is designed to accept the molecular structure of CBD, then you don't really know what it can do and all the benefits.
There's a ton.
And they've got stuff on there for pets as well.
So I want you to try, get your CBD from Curable Premium Health.
And when you do, make sure you use the promo code PAL20.
It'll save you 20%.
Go to curable.com.
That's K-U-R-I-B-L-K-U-R-I-B-L dot com.
Promo code PAL will save you 20%.
Folks, that's all the time that I have for this edition of the Milsen Report.
I'm so glad that you've been with me.
I really appreciate it.
Trying to tackle the news.
Latest I can give you is that it looks like Iran did send a bunch of missiles to our base in Qatar, and I'll have more developments on that unless I'm providentially hindered.
I'll be back here tomorrow.
Have a great rest of your Monday.
God bless everybody out there watching, and we'll see you soon.