All Episodes
Previous Next
April 11, 2025 - Stew Peters Show
01:01:19
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Intel Traitors Frame Trump for Treason
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the show.
My name is Paul Harrell, this is the Millstone Report, and it's always great to be with you.
As always, we can't do the program without you watching every single day or listening every single day.
For those of you who don't know, you can get this program in an audio-only format if you go to Apple or Spotify.
Just search my name or Millstone Report or what have you.
Intel traders, they framed Trump for treason.
We now know this.
I mean, we've known this for a very, very long time.
But there is, you know, some irony here.
They tried to frame Trump for treason, and in so doing, they themselves are now guilty of treason, as far as I'm concerned.
For those who don't know, the crossfire hurricane documents were released by Kash Patel's FBI.
I gave them to John Solomon over at Just the News, and those documents, you know, there was some talk they were unredacted.
There were portions of documents that had been redacted that are now, from my understanding, no longer redacted, but there are still redactions in them.
People are explaining this by saying...
They're documents that had been redacted for a while and they don't know if they can ever recover the original documents.
I don't know.
I don't know exactly what all of that means.
But we're going to try to make sense of it here today on the program.
Because we've got a great show for you.
We also have...
We're going to talk a little bit about Robert Kennedy Jr.
And everything that's going on with him.
Also have some more Doge corruption that we're finding.
Also there was this interview with Joe Rogan.
With comic Dave Smith and another gentleman who I really had never even heard of before.
Never even heard of Douglas Murray.
But yeah, we're going to talk a little bit about that podcast appearance because it was extremely difficult to watch.
I admit I haven't watched the entire thing, but...
It was very cringe, at least from Douglas Murray's perspective, talking about arguing from a position of authority and credentialism.
That if you don't have the right credentials, then you don't really need to talk on a subject.
That was the message that I got from him.
And in this day and age, when thanks to the internet, we have better ways of communicating than ever before.
And there's some cons to that, by the way.
Yeah, for the most part, right now, people on the internet are wanting to uncover the truth.
And there is a prevailing idea that I think is true, that we've been lied to by our leaders.
We've been actively deceived by our leaders for a very long time by the experts.
The experts themselves are the ones who've been actively deceiving us, trying to get us to make decisions based on lies that ruin and destroy our lives.
And so, yeah, the very definition, like the self-evident truth, we have governments that literally hate the people they claim to serve.
And people are figuring this out, and there's a lot of people that don't have the credentials that are speaking on these things, and they're just giving the people documents, they're giving opinions, but they're also giving evidence about the lies that the elites have told us for so long,
and the gatekeepers don't like it.
So I think this whole thing is an attempt to try to combat the new media, right?
I'm a forever, you know, you had the networks that did this for you, or you had CNN or MSNBC or Fox News.
But now with the explosion of the Internet, with the explosion of podcasts, with the, you know, the ability with the Internet to broadcast a show like this, even, you know what I mean?
Like it's it's everybody has a voice.
Everybody can have a platform if they want to have a platform.
And this.
So I see Douglas Murray coming on this Joe Rogan podcast and debating Dave Smith as an attempt.
I mean, he started out from the very beginning asking why Joe Rogan didn't have more people who were supportive of the war in Gaza.
I mean, it was very clear that's what his mission was, that's what his assignment was.
And so we'll talk about that.
Also, William Wolfe, the director from the Center for Baptist Leadership, really did a great job, I guess, demonstrating being a good example for what we should all do in our own communities.
He took to his local city council, I believe, and spoke out against these, quote, child-friendly drag shows that are being performed in his community.
And he did a very, very good job.
He acquitted himself well in that endeavor, so we're going to listen to that as well if we have the time.
But first, tonight, or I'm sorry, not tonight.
It is 12 o'clock.
It is 12 o'clock noon central where I am.
So I guess this afternoon, first this afternoon, it's 12.05, we're going to start talking about a guy by the name of Chris Krebs.
That's right, Chris Krebs.
Krebs was the former head of CISA, who worked with the FBI and big tech to censor the truth.
This is according to a guy named George.
Censor the truth about the 2020 election.
He went on CBS, got interviewed by Anderson Cooper.
Let's just take a listen.
This is Donald Trump earlier this week signing this executive order.
Take a listen.
Christopher Krebs, the former head of CISA.
This is a man who weaponized his position against free speech in the election context, in the context of COVID-19.
Presidential memorandum to the one you just signed.
It looks like we're having some buffering problems.
This is another one.
I don't know that I met him.
I'm sure I met him, but I didn't know him.
And he came out right after the election, which was a rigged election, a badly rigged election.
We did phenomenally in that election.
Look what happened to our country because it had opened borders, millions of people coming into our country.
Russia and Ukraine, that would have never happened.
October 7th would have never happened.
Afghanistan, the way that they withdrew with 13 dead, but so many killed, actually.
I mean, so many killed outside of the 13 soldiers.
Hundreds of people killed.
And maybe, I don't know, never mentioned, but I mentioned it, 42 or...
43 people, so badly injured.
The legs, the arms, blown off, the face.
And this is all because of an incompetent group of people that preceded us.
And that would have never happened.
And this guy Krebs was saying, oh, the election was great, it was great.
Well, it's been proven that it was not only not great, when you look at all these lawyers and law firms that are signing.
Giving us hundreds of millions of dollars.
It was proven by so many different ways and so many different forms, from the legislatures not approving to the...
That worked from all of the different scamming operations.
It was a very corrupt election.
They used COVID to cheat.
And we're going to find out about this guy, too, because this guy's a wise guy.
He said, we've been proved this is the most secure election in the history of our country.
Now, this was a disaster.
And frankly, we should go to paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and one other thing, you should get a little certificate that says you're a citizen of our country.
You get a citizen piece of paper that says you're a citizen before you can vote.
But you want voter ID and you want...
Paper ballots.
And you really want same-day voting.
If you don't have same-day voting, they decide to change the air condition.
Oh, we're fixing the air condition.
Let's move all these boxes.
We'll bring them back in a few days.
And then they don't bring back those boxes.
We've got to have safe elections.
We have to have borders.
Ideally, we have to have a free press, which we don't have.
We don't have a free press.
We have a very dishonest press.
This is an honor.
We're going to find out whether or not He was right.
This was a disgraceful election.
And this guy sat back saying, well, I'm a member or like he's a Republican or something.
And right, almost right from the beginning.
And he he's tried to make the case that this election was a safe election.
I think he said this is the safest election we've ever had.
And yet.
Every day you read in the papers about more and more fraud that's discovered.
He's the fraud.
He's a disgrace.
So we'll find out whether or not it was a safe election.
And if it wasn't, he's got a big price to pay.
He's got a big problem.
Incredible. So comprehensive.
They're talking about using COVID to cheat the ballots.
But it also led, one thing he didn't mention is, he talked about the wars.
He didn't mention J6.
Interestingly enough, Democrat Senator Mark Kelly asking questions in a Senate hearing the other day about the idea that it was a fedsurrection and it was a false flag set up to squash populism.
He didn't exactly say that, but to squash populism.
We've got that clip, and we're going to play that here in just a moment.
But before we go any further, I just want to let you know this portion of the program brought to you by Red Vive, redvivehealth.org.
Go to redvive, V-I-V-E.
Health.org slash Paul and check out the healing power of light in the great red light panels.
We'll tell you more about the science behind all that here in a minute.
In keeping with this story, this guy, Chris Krebs, the man who went on a media gaslighting tour, this is a portion of what he said during, and again, now he's going to be investigated and his security clearance has been revoked.
Here he is on 60 Minutes with Anderson Cooper back in the day.
It's completely and utterly surreal.
None of these lies have been substantiated to any extent.
Every single one of them has been debunked.
Chris Krebs was director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, charged with protecting the 2020 election.
He called it the most secure election in American history, and days later it was fired by President Trump.
How secure was the 2020 election?
Let me put it this way.
It was the most litigated.
It was the most scrutinized.
It was the most audited.
This election was put through the wringer from so many different directions.
There's no evidence that any machine that I'm aware of has been manipulated by a foreign power.
Period. Communist money from China and Cuba used to influence the election.
Look, I think we can go on and on with all the farcical claims alleging interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots.
The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected and the American people should have.
100% confidence in their vote.
So propaganda outlets are going to propaganda.
But here's the interesting, people have gone back, Liz Harrington has gone back and found the same Chris Krebs talking about the 2016 election and how that was influenced by Russia.
2016 is what I've described at times as Kind of the Sputnik moment for cyber security and foreign interference in the US.
So nothing was particularly interesting or innovative or novel about what they did from a cyber perspective or really a disinfo perspective, but it was the first time that cyber disinfo hacking leaks intersected domestically with democracy.
When Sputnik was launched into low earth orbit, The reason that it resonated, at least with the national security complex, but also the American people, was not so much that we got beat to space by the Russians.
I don't think that was it.
It was the fact of how they did it and how they got it there.
I mean, what is a rocket that sends a satellite to space?
It is an intercontinental ballistic missile.
And so the geographic isolation of the Atlantic, the Pacific, and the polar ice caps So this man said that 2016 compares...
The election of Donald Trump to a Sputnik moment, oh no, it was the Russians.
The Russians put Donald Trump in office, is essentially what he's saying.
And briefly going back to this post, who says, ladies and gentlemen, we're getting him.
Talking about Chris Krebs and now this executive order.
The man who went on a media tour gaslighting the nation about the stolen 2020 election will now be under investigation by the Justice Department.
Thank you, President Trump, for ordering the investigation and stripping his security clearance.
As someone who's been banned on YouTube for four years for correctly stating that the 2020 election was rigged, I feel like this is the beginning of vindication.
Well, yesterday during the cabinet meeting, I'm loving that they're having these, by the way.
They seem to have a cabinet meeting every couple of weeks, the Trump White House does, and they televise it, they let the media in, and you actually can see this roundtable discussion and hear them report to the president about what's going on.
I find it very transparent and eye-opening considering the...
I don't know, the total blockade we had on this for the previous four years.
Barely any press conferences or anything.
Here is the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, disclosing what she's found about the electronic voting machines and how they are vulnerable to basically being manipulated.
Listen to this.
We're investigating.
We have the best of the best going after this.
Election integrity being one of them.
We have evidence of how these electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a very long time and vulnerable to exploitation to manipulate the results of the votes being cast, which further drives forward your mandate to bring about paper ballots across the country so that voters can have faith in the integrity of our elections.
We're investigating.
We have the best of the best.
So there we go.
I think Ivan Raiklin tweeted something like, in response to this, or maybe it was part of this Hannity interview she went on, the angel of retribution.
Talking about the angel of retribution.
Which brings us to the Russia collusion hoax.
This is more of Tulsi Gabbard in an interview with Hannity over on Fox.
Losing power to that level?
Well, that's the goal, Sean.
That's the goal is to...
Find the evidence, find the documentation that proves this to be true.
We've seen little bits and pieces of it that have been released publicly so far, but not anywhere near the extent of what the intent was behind this whole Russia collusion hoax.
Obviously, the president was their number one target.
And there were also many other people around President Trump who were also targeted simply because they were friends of his or family members of his.
We are digging deep to find everything that has been related to this.
And I guarantee you there are some U.S. attorneys who are eager to see what we are finding and in some cases are already working their own cases to bring about that necessary accountability.
If no one is ever held accountable, we are going to continue to see this weaponization, politicization of the intelligence community, our law enforcement, the Department of Justice.
And as you know, Sean, it completely undermines the rule of law and the American people's ability to have any trust whatsoever in these foundational principles.
All right, so Tulsi Gabbard is exactly right.
If no accountability, that's really the main portion of the clip I wanted to focus on.
If there is never any accountability for all of the things that are being uncovered, currently being uncovered, there just will continue to be a cascading failure of confidence in these government institutions that were run or are being run by people that hate.
Average Americans that believe that they are above the law, everything they claim Donald Trump is, meaning a scoff law or a convicted felon, they themselves are guilty of that and much, much worse.
That's why the documents being released are so interesting, even though some people are saying there's not a lot new in these documents that have been released.
I guess last night, John Solomon was reporting this.
America's Voice fans and you watched just the news.
Earlier today, the FBI under Kash Patel turned over to Congress.
700 pages of Crossfire Hurricane documents unredacted and declassified.
These are the documents President Trump intended to be released in January 2021, but the FBI scooped them up, kept them from going to public release.
We sued, tried to fight for them.
Donald Trump came back into office, and he released them a second time.
And today they got to Congress, and then they ended up in the hands of Just the News.
And in just an hour, you're going to see our first story.
I'm going to give you a timetable.
7 p.m.
Our first story is going to come out on justinnews.com.
At 8 p.m.
we're going to give all the documents one by one and post them onto the website so you have a sort of Wikipedia, Wikimedia wiki to go look through the documents yourself.
You find some good stories, let us know.
So, again, 700 pages.
There's the story.
Read the Russia collusion memos President Trump declassified and Kash Patel gave to Congress.
I think we're good to go.
I think we're good to go.
C3 on X reminding us with this declassification of Crossfire Hurricane, here's a video of Peter Strzok testifying under oath that the entire 7th floor brass at the FBI is guilty of sedition, implicating all of them.
Remember when he did this?
People actually said this interview, it seemed like Peter Strzok was demonic in this.
He was so angry.
Remember this.
At every step, at every investigative decision, there are multiple layers of people above me, the assistant director, executive assistant director, deputy director and director of the FBI, and multiple layers of people below me, section chiefs, supervisors, unit chiefs, case agents and analysts, all of whom were involved in all of these decisions.
At every step, at every investigation...
It's kind of like a Jack Nicholson, did you order the code red moment, in hindsight, in a way.
Here's Paul Sperry.
He writes, We heard about the special counsel,
Robert Mueller.
Remember Mueller?
Remember all those liberals back in the day?
It's so crazy.
It doesn't feel like back in the day.
I'm talking about the crazy liberals that were singing Christmas carols.
Have yourself a Mueller little Christmas.
Do you remember that?
They were worshipping Robert Mueller.
Mueller, Mueller, whatever.
And they were...
They were thinking, this is the guy that's going to bring down Trump.
Part of what we now know, thanks to these documents being released, is that they were going to do a special counsel regardless of whether or not James Comey was fired by Donald Trump.
Then we have this.
We have part of a memo.
You see there are still some redactions here.
But we have Penka.
Penka spying on Trump during his defensive briefing.
So this was a briefing that the intelligence oligarchs gave to then-candidate Trump.
I don't know if you can read this.
The document briefed to Republican candidate for United States president, national intelligence manager for Iran.
And so what this essentially means is they were sending this guy in there to spy on So the writer is Panetka.
Trump actively listened for topics or questions regarding the Russian Federation.
During Mulligan's brief, he stated the U.S. is the world leader in counterterrorism.
Trump then asked, Russia too?
During the discussion regarding nuclear testing, Russia and China were brought up as cheating on the nuclear test ban treaty.
Trump asked, who's worse, meaning Russia or China?
Trump and Christie turned toward each other and Christie commented, I'm shocked.
So, they were actively reporting back.
Brian Cates mentions John Durham here in this tweet.
I mean, Durham had this in his report, but reading the actual memo that Penka wrote afterwards brings out how bad this really was.
Comey McCabe tasked Penka with this briefing so he could spy on Trump and Flynn and look for anything to use against them, the 100% weaponization.
Again, we already knew a lot of this.
We certainly knew, but to see the specifics
It's evidence.
It's 100% evidence.
So then we have this.
Let's see here.
About the Steele dossier.
Lee Smith writing, It's a very useful report insofar as it confirms that Danchenko was not a source.
There were no sources, but simply another buffer to protect Comey's FBI, which was effectively the author of the Steele dossier.
And that's when we have another clip here between Admiral Rogers.
Not a clip, but a memo.
detailing Admiral Rogers and how he did not want the Steele dossier included in some of these intelligence assessments.
I'll read from this.
Admiral Rogers decided that he would make the final analytic call on the NSA's input to the ICA.
As he knew there would be a lot of pressure and attention on the final draft and he felt strongly his career analysts shouldn't have to be responsible for something under such political pressure.
In one draft of the ICA, Admiral Rogers noted the contents of the Steele dossier in the body of the product which he did not recall seeing in previous drafts.
In early January, the four principals met and Admiral Rogers told the group he was unclear why the ICA needed to focus on the dossier as it was considered So we have,
again, evidence that they knew that this was uncorroborated, and it was made up.
There really was no source on it.
The FBI was the source.
They made it up out of whole cloth, just like the media makes up off-the-record sources, which is what they did all during the Trump administration, as people like James Comey were leaking details to the media, making the stories,
as Nancy Pelosi would call it, the wrap-up smear.
Jim Ferguson kind of has a good summary on these documents.
He calls it the FBI's dirty secrets.
He says they're out.
Crossfire hurricane files have been released and it's worse than anyone imagined.
One name keeps appearing over and over.
Stephen Halper, the quote, informant paid to spy on Donald Trump.
Paid by who?
Jim Ferguson says, the FBI, your tax dollars.
For decades, it wasn't about Russia.
This wasn't about collusion.
This was about political espionage, character assassination, taking down Trump by any means necessary.
And then he mentions, remember General Michael Flynn.
Halpert was the one who spread the lie.
Flynn left a conference alone with a Russian woman.
Fake, fabricated, debunked by the FBI themselves, but the damage was done.
Flynn, General Michael Flynn's life was destroyed.
They not only framed Trump for treason, but they also framed General Flynn for treason as well.
The deep state has walked away to this point, to Tulsi Gabbard's point, totally untouched.
No one has been held accountable for any of this.
What does all this mean?
Ferguson writes, the FBI didn't investigate Trump.
The FBI targeted Trump.
They paid informants.
They planted lies.
They weaponized the intelligence community against a sitting United States president.
The swamp isn't just real.
It's documented.
And now 700 pages prove it.
The Russian hoax wasn't just a scam.
It was treason.
Time for the truth.
Time for accountability.
Time for justice.
That's a very good summary by Jim Ferguson.
I would completely agree with that.
And then lastly, on this particular story today, we have somebody on X named Draza Smith.
I pulled this because she ran a question through Grok, the AI that's available on Twitter, about crossfire hurricane documents.
And she asked Grok to give it a scan and just to tell which laws were broken by whom.
Potentially, which laws were broken by whom.
Number one, you look at FBI officials, the falsification of evidence.
Who would that be?
Kevin Clinesmith.
I think that guy is one of the few ones that edited the email and he actually was prosecuted.
FISA abuse.
Who abused the FISA system?
James Comey.
Andrew McCabe.
Conspiracy to violate civil rights.
That'd be also James Comey.
Andrew McCabe.
Peter Strzok.
Then you look at Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS.
False statements to federal authorities.
Christopher Steele.
Conspiracy to defraud the United States.
Again, this is just an AI summary of it.
But they're saying Steele, Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie, DNC Clinton campaign officials, Foreign Agent Registration Act, a FARA violation, Steele, Fusion GPS.
Then we have campaign finance violations, the DNC Clinton campaign.
Those have already been out there and just been slaps on the wrist.
The intelligence community, misuse of classified information, FBI officials, the ICA authors, James Clapper, John Brennan.
The ICA is what we were just talking about where Admiral Rogers was like, I don't think this dossier needs to be prominently featured in here.
And again, that's just the AI version, but there's going to be more and more people combing through these documents trying to figure out exactly what's going on.
All of these far right-wing conspiracy theories are once again being proven true.
And I'll tell you another one that's being proven true right now, and that goes to January 6th.
I had mentioned that earlier in the segment.
January 6th, looking at the fedsurrection instead of some organic insurrection where no one coordinated like an actual armed insurrection.
I'm going to play this clip for you just as soon as I tell you about Red Vive Health and the great folks over at redvivehealth.org.
That's redvivehealth.org.
Elevate your game.
Enhance your athletic performance.
Get better skin collagen, which has anti-aging properties.
Stimulate your cellular energy at the mitochondria level, ladies and gentlemen.
That's the benefits and the healing power of red light therapy, and you get the best quality, superior strength if you buy the red light panels from Red Vive.
We're talking two different wavelengths in these panels, the red light and the near-infrared light, and you need both of these things to work together for maximum health benefits.
Two different wavelengths, they're naturally emitted by the sun, but in targeted doses, the waves have a healing effect on the body.
Red light is absorbed by the skin, which leads to enhanced skin health and anti-aging.
The near-infrared light penetrates deeper into the body, though, which reaches your bones, muscles, tissues, and even organs, and again, stimulating the mitochondria of your
Wherever the light goes, like all of your cells, you know?
And so...
This is really great stuff.
It is the medicine of the future, but it's here now.
And you can have these clinical strength red light panels in your own home.
If you go to redvivehealth.org slash Paul, that's redvivehealth.org slash Paul.
There's two different panels.
Let me see if I can't freeze the video here.
I want to show you the panels here.
Because I want you to know there's two different sizes.
There we go.
Two different sizes.
You see, that's the Red Vive 60 and then this is the Red Vive 300.
I have the Red Vive 300 and it's incredible.
And I, you know, sit in front of it and it really kind of gets your entire body.
This one is a little bit, this is a little smaller kind of for a tabletop.
So if you wanted to, you know, if you were working in front of a screen or something and you wanted to have this on, and you do want to get quite close to it, by the way, because the closer you are, the better the penetration and, you know, the better you're going to take advantage of the red light, you know, getting all of your cells and stuff.
So, I mean, when we've talked to Dr. Desai about this, you know, we talk about how it's like it does, when you actually read the literature on it, it appears too good to be true.
But as somebody who's actually tried this stuff, I've tried, I've used it, and you feel incredible.
You get a giant energy boost from this stuff.
So, again, redvivehealth.org.
That's redvivehealth.org.
And experience the healing power of light today.
All right, now back to this.
We've got Mark Kelly.
This is a Democrat senator from Arizona.
He is not one of the good guys.
And this is him questioning.
Ivan Ranklin, the deep state marauder, constitutional attorney, national security consultant.
He tells us that we need to listen very carefully to this exchange.
Take a listen.
This concerns January 6th.
Do you believe that the violence on January 6th was intentionally organized or directed?
Still under investigation.
We're looking into whether elements of the government could have enhanced the criminal acuity of some of the rioters that day.
So you've said on Twitter that the FBI and the intelligence community were involved in planning And directing the riot.
Is that correct?
Sounds like something I said, yeah.
And what evidence do you have for that claim?
So we've already identified that there were multiple confidential human informants ran by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies that were present in the crowd that day, directing, removing barriers, those types of things.
This has been investigated widely.
We're continuing to look into it.
The intelligence, I would say the FBI and other elements of the law enforcement apparatus attempted to suppress the fact that there was undercover confidential human informants that were part of these different groups.
We also had intelligence leading up to January 6th that there was going to be violence that day.
So that speaks to some degree of intelligence infiltration in the world.
We're looking into that right now.
Which departments of the FBI?
Probably the Washington field office.
So you believe the Washington field office was involved in the planning of the violence in the building next door on January 6th?
It's being looked into.
I mean, look, we had...
And who was looking into it?
That we are in the intelligence community.
Yeah, we're looking into it right now.
And do you believe that the IC conducts actions of this nature against Americans?
Does the IC Well, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies and trapping individuals, if you look at who was running the Washington field office during January 6th, it was Stephen DeAntuano.
He was also running the field office in Michigan where many of the defendants were let go after they were accused of attempting to kidnap the governor because the vast majority of them were undercover FBI confidential informants.
So unfortunately, this behavior does happen.
Mr. Kent, would you be willing to share this evidence of this investigation with this committee?
I look forward to it, Senator.
Pretty incredible exchange there.
Again, Mark, that's Senator Mark Kelly.
It's nuts.
And again, that was Joe Kent talking with Senator
Kelly there in a hearing.
His Twitter says he's the father of two amazing boys, husband, retired Green Beret combat veteran, gold star husband, ran for Congress, wrote a book.
And he's now obviously working in the Trump administration.
Pretty fascinating stuff.
We look at all of the things that are going on right now and things are not moving as fast as I would like them to.
I know they're not moving as fast as you would like them to.
And I know what that means.
I know what that conjures.
Because everybody out there is waiting for all of these...
Everybody out there is waiting for all of this stuff to never actually come to fruition and everybody be let down and everybody be lied to once again.
You know, more lies to cover up the lies, to avoid accountability, to avoid charges, investigations, to avoid arrests.
And all we can do is pray that our government, well, I mean, it's one of the things, one of the most important things that we can do, is that we pray that our government will be a terror to the evildoer and will reward good behavior, righteous behavior,
and punish the wicked.
And that's what I am praying for.
In the country that I live.
Also, Doge.
We've got some interesting situations with Doge.
New findings.
I want to report on that.
But before we do, I want to remind everybody that Curable.com is the place to get your CBD products, tinctures, bath soaks, muscle cream, as well as their CBD gummies for sleep.
And they now have added melatonin to them.
We'll tell you more about Curable Premium Health.
Go to Curable.com.
Use promo code PAUL20.
Tell you more about that here in just a moment.
So, according to the vigilant Fox, Doge just uncovered three findings so outrageous that even Elon Musk said that he had to read it several times to believe it.
First, they found that 24,500 people listed as over 115 years old somehow claimed $59 million in unemployment benefits.
Then you have 28,000 toddlers between the ages of 1 and 5 were paid out a staggering $254 million.
He writes, the wildest part, 9,700 people with birth rates more than 15 years in the future managed to claim $69 million.
In one case, someone with a birthday in 2154 claimed $41,000, according to Doge.
Musk reacted on X saying, your tax dollars were going to pay fraudulent unemployment claims for fake people born in the future.
This is so crazy that I had to read it several times before it...
Sank in.
I'm just wondering here.
What conspiracy theorists are going to start saying time travel is real?
I'm sorry, I went there.
In a separate post, he wrote, the oldest living American is 114 years old, so it's safe to say that anyone 115 or older is collecting unemployment due to being dead.
He added that there were no sanity checks at all, nothing to catch claims from people who were impossibly young or impossibly old from cashing in on unemployment benefits that should have never been approved in the first place.
You know, the birthday, your birth date, at least I thought, it's like a key identifier in almost anything you do, almost anything you apply for, anything you sign up for.
You're going to have to give your birthday.
And you say you give your birthday because you think, oh, well, there's got to be some sort of algorithm that's running the system that would flag a birthday that is impossible or doesn't actually work in terms of logic and reason.
But anyway, it's crazy stuff.
By the way, that's Maria Z. She does a great show.
Big fan.
Okay, and then we have another instance here.
So yesterday during the cabinet meeting, we had the Department of Labor giving shocking numbers about this very thing.
Take a listen.
Accountability matters.
That's what we're recognizing.
With our partners at the Department of Labor for government efficiency, just a few weeks ago, we realized there's about $4.4 billion.
In COVID funds that were not used, that the state coffers were just holding on to.
Out of that, we've returned 1.4 billion back to the state treasury, so essentially to the American people, and we'll go back and claw the rest of those billions of dollars back.
And on the heels of that, last night, late last night, we're understanding unemployment insurance fraud.
That trust needs to be whole for the American people.
When we need it, we need it for who deserves it.
That's not what we're seeing.
And the numbers that we saw last night, again, exposed by our partners at DOGE, at the Department of Labor, since 2020, over $400 million of payments have gone out already.
And when you hear these numbers, apparently in the United States, we have over almost 25,000 people who are over 115 years old who are collecting 50,000.
Talk about fraudulent behavior.
Yeah, so she's going to list these statistics that I just listed.
But yeah, it's absolutely insane.
Totally insane.
All right, so it's Friday.
We tried to make a point on Friday to talk a little about MAHA.
Make America Healthy Again.
Yesterday during the cabinet meeting, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has taken a lot of heat lately, especially from those...
In the Maha movement, because of what he said, sticking by the government's official stance on measles, mumps, and rubella, and that shot that many people think hurts their children, he's saying it's still the best.
He has said multiple times it's still the best way to combat measles as we've had these measles outbreaks.
But I'm going to give you more information on that here in just a second.
So hang with me here.
Here's Robert Kennedy yesterday in the cabinet meeting talking about...
We're trying to refocus the press to get them to pay attention to the chronic disease epidemic as you've asked us to.
We have now 38% of American youth are pre-diabetic.
This was unknown 30 years ago.
Every child that becomes diabetic, there should be a headline about them.
We have 100 million adults who are pre-diabetic or diabetic.
And we have, as you, we have now the autism rates have gone from now most recent numbers we think are going to be about 1 in 31, 1 in 12, so they're going up again, from 1 in 10,000
when I was a kid.
And we are going at your direction, we are going to know by September we've launched a massive testing, And research effort that's going to involve hundreds of scientists from around the world.
By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic, and we'll be able to eliminate those exposures.
Think of that.
So it was one in 10,000 children had autism, and now it's one in 31. Not 31,000, 31. That is a horrible statistic, isn't it?
And there's got to be something artificial out there that's doing this.
So you think you're going to have a pretty good idea, huh?
We will not by September.
There will be no bigger news conference than that.
So that's it.
If you can come up with that answer where you stop taking something, you stop eating something, or maybe it's a shot.
But something's causing it.
It can't be from 10,000 to...
Can you imagine that, Marco?
That's a big number.
Thank you very much.
So Donald Trump here, obviously intuiting what we all know, that it is that vaccines...
Many people believe vaccines are having something to do with causing the spike in autism.
Says that we'll know by September.
Donald Trump says there will be no bigger news conference.
And so this would be a huge development.
We'll see.
They're testing it right now.
Matter of fact, Robert Kennedy was interviewed by CBS.
Talked about the current measles outbreak down in Texas.
Says that they're in the middle of testing these vaccines right now.
I guess get official studies out there to where, you know, people are still not going to agree with it, though, because it flies in the face of their God, which are people in white coats.
But there was something interesting here.
The media has been pushing this idea that children are dying from the measles.
And in this one clip, Kennedy, according to American values here, dropped a bombshell.
The child who passed away did not die of the measles, despite what the media claimed.
And this is that exchange.
You know, there's only three deaths from measles in 20 years.
And they're all people with extreme complications.
That's how you die, from measles, because of the complications.
Yeah, it's people who are already sick.
But there was no evidence with, for example, these two children that they were sick before, and they got sick from the measles, right?
Well, no.
Daisy Hildebrand, whose funeral I attended this week, was hospitalized three times from other illnesses.
She had extreme tonsillectomy.
She had mononucleosis that she could not kick.
And then she got measles.
She got over the measles, according to her parents.
And according to the medical reports, and I saw a report on it today, the thing that killed her was not the measles, but it was a bacteriological infection.
So the media, of course, this guy pushes back on that.
Oh, you know, but the bacteria was from the measles.
This is a big deal, but it does expose what the media is doing here.
That's the point of this.
The media is sensationalizing what's going on in Texas, and they're claiming children.
Apparently are passing away from the measles when in fact they're passing away from other things.
He says that this child got over the measles and died of something else and was already very sick on top of that with a lot of other chronic conditions that led to her tragic death.
All that being said, it is still extremely disappointing that And they're wondering what's going on.
Some people have even speculated, like Candace Owens, that there's blackmail involved here.
And that's the reason why.
I guess I say this because you have a situation where many mothers out there, many families out there, learned about the potential dangers of vaccines from Robert Kennedy himself and his organization.
And so that's why there is some frustration and it feels like the MAHA movement is getting dragged down.
However, if you take these two clips, You know, together, maybe, just maybe, we'll get some sort of justice out of all this.
And maybe, and yes, if you want to criticize me as being too optimistic, I take that criticism.
I get it.
I 100% understand.
Before we go any further, I want to tell you about Curable Premium Health and the great CBD products that you can get at curable.com.
And when you check out, you want to make sure to use the code, promo code PAUL20, and you'll save 20%.
And you've got to check out their Facebook.
There's the CBD gummies.
You see them there.
Okay, and if we scroll down a little further...
We see a few things here.
We've got the tinctures on the left.
We've got muscle recovery.
This is the pain stick, the roll-on.
Then you've got the cream.
Also, the sleep gummies there that now have melatonin in them as well.
Look, they've got stuff here for pet support.
They've got dog treats with CBD.
There's studies out there that show that you can actually decrease your dog's joint inflammation with CBD.
So those of you that have pets, They're getting up in age.
This could be a solution for you.
There's no doubt.
And then we can go to the muscle cream.
This is my favorite product that they have.
I would highly encourage that you get it.
Try it if you're remotely active.
If you do anything physical at all and you're getting old like me, this stuff is amazing and gives you the relief in your joints and your muscles.
You know, when you're just not as young as you used to be.
And then finally we've got, again, the CBD gummies.
We got the 3 milligrams of melatonin to 10 milligrams.
300 milligrams total in this box for a price point that you're not going to find anywhere else.
And remember, they don't use harmful chemicals and pesticides like industrial farms do when they grow this hemp.
They really take care of the product and they send it off to a third party to test it to make sure that it doesn't have a bunch of garbage in it.
And it assures the quality of the CBD that you're getting.
I want you to check it out right now.
Curable. Premium health.
Curable.com.
Use promo code Paul20.
Alright, I told you we were going to go over this portion of the program.
We're running out of time on this Friday.
But this was incredible.
Jeff Younger writes, It's hilarious to watch the coordinated social media campaign to bolster Douglas Murray's awful performance on Joe Rogan.
He's not wrong.
There is clearly an astroturf movement out there trying to say that Douglas Murray basically owned I
do also think that one of the bigger...
Kind of the bigger picture dynamics to all of this is that we have, at least since 9-11, been in a state of perpetual war.
And all of these wars have been disasters.
There have been so many lies involved in selling all of them.
The whole Iraq war, the whole war in Afghanistan, just lying the whole way through.
I mean, I remember literally having conversations with Green Berets in the middle of the war in Afghanistan, and they're like, George W. Bush is telling you that the army we're building up there is really successful?
This thing's going to fall in a week without us.
And then all through the Obama administration, it's just like lie after lie after lie with disastrous wars.
And so this does create a fertile...
Ground for people to say, I wonder if they were lying about all these wars.
Sure. Again, I'm not really trying to argue about World War II.
I'd rather argue about these wars today.
I think the interesting question is whether you're busy watering it.
Well, should you not talk about mistakes that were made overall?
You should.
Absolutely. Okay, you should.
Absolutely. Right.
All for going back and looking at mistakes.
So what is your argument then?
It's a very weird thing to go back, zone in on a man, say this one thing.
Is a mistake and should characterize him.
And you ignore everything else.
You're taking him out of context when you're talking about Daryl, who's done...
What was it, 30-plus hours?
So they're talking about Daryl Cooper.
So we have this guy, Douglas Murray.
He doesn't like Daryl Cooper, who's been on Joe's show and was critical of Winston Churchill.
And so he doesn't like that.
So that's who they're talking about here.
You're talking about Daryl, who's done, what was it, 30-plus hours?
So what?
30-plus hours of podcasting.
You'd do that in a week.
Yeah, it's a very different thing.
He's not doing a podcast like talking to people.
Okay, nor is he doing scholarly work, nor is he working in the archives clearly.
Come on.
I mean, this is...
He is not the historian of our era.
He's not complaining to me.
This is a thing, Joe.
This is like punching jelly.
No, but you don't consume his work.
Because I don't need to consume endless versions of a revisionist history I understand.
But it's not revisionist history.
If you listen to his work, it's not revisionist history.
He's basing it on historical work.
Okay, so this is my point about jelly.
It's a shape-shifting thing.
Comedian or historian?
He's not a comedian.
Historian or podcast?
Would-be historian or actual historian?
You say he doesn't claim to be a historian, but he's pumping out tens of hours of history.
It's Dan Carlin.
He doesn't claim to be a historian either.
You see my point about the move?
It's like some weird jiu-jitsu move where you say, hang on, you know all about this as well.
No, it's not a weird jiu-jitsu.
It's not weird jiu-jitsu.
It's just not controllable anymore.
This is the problem.
They don't have control over the narrative and no longer does credentialism or authority.
Well, I have the credentials to speak on this.
Well, other people can read.
People are so arrogant and they think so highly of themselves.
But I have their credentials.
Well, the people with credentials have shown us and the world that they hate us.
People without credentials...are essentially enslaved to people with credentials in the elite.
And that's what people have realized.
And so they don't trust people with credentials anymore.
They don't trust them.
And this is not our fault.
This is not the underclass' fault.
This is their fault because they've been exposed as having no clothes on and everybody has pretended forever that the emperor, you know...
It just doesn't want to point out that the emperor has no clothes.
And this is a problem for them to deal with.
And instead, they're going into the right-wing podcast scene and they're now trying to gatekeep it.
They're now trying to figure out, well, how do we control this?
This is why AOC is trying to start a podcast.
Okay? Because they realize how badly they have lost the plot.
You say, I'm not a historian, but I'm going to spend my time talking about history.
I'm not a journalist, but I'm going to spend my time talking about this thing.
I'm not an expert on this, but I'm going to spend my time talking about this thing.
It's a weird move, yeah?
No. You don't think?
No, I'm a free American.
I can talk about what I like to.
You can talk about what you want.
So what is the point here?
I've noticed you can.
But what's the point?
The point is, what are you pushing?
What are you watering?
What am I pushing?
Liberty, free markets, peace, prosperity, not getting in another stupid catastrophic war which we're on the precipice of right now.
That's what I'm pushing.
What are we on the precipice of?
Well, I think you, weren't you just talking about it the other day?
Everyone I hear on the inside says we're about to attack around.
I think you just said something about that the other day.
Am I wrong about that?
I thought I saw in one of your interviews that you did.
Possibly. That doesn't mean we are on the verge of a war.
I mean, you keep referring to we being in wars.
There's a very big difference between a country having a military that's engaged and a country being at war.
This country has not been at war for 25 years.
You have not been fighting for the American homeland for 25 years.
Yes, that's true.
We haven't had a war on our shores.
We've been picking on third world countries halfway around the world.
Well, you haven't been randomly picking on them.
I mean, Afghanistan, you went...
I didn't say it was random.
Yeah, right, okay.
It wasn't like you suddenly decided to...
We went to Afghanistan to find bin Laden.
Literally, this is the perfect definition of the word pretentious.
And take revenge for 9-11 and stop an attack like that happening again on the American homeland.
That is very different from a country being at war.
Yeah, but that's a total mischaracterization of the war in Afghanistan.
It's one thing to say, that might be an accurate characterization of the special operations mission in late 2001, but then we fought a 20-year regime change war against the Taliban.
Because you got dragged into the quicksand of war.
Oh, okay, fine.
So it is a war.
I don't get your argument.
No, I said it was a war.
It's your use of we.
As if you're personally, like, suffering this war.
Yeah, you're a taxpayer.
We're taxpayers, so we pay for it.
Okay, fine.
Douglas, if I went back and corrected you on every time you've used the term we to refer to your government or something like that, like, if I were to say, oh, we just imposed tariffs on China, would you point out that I didn't and it was the Trump administration?
You take it, obviously, very personally, and that's your right to do so, of course.
I'm just trying to make sure we're accurate here.
What do you think I'm taking personally?
Just that, the American wars.
Sure, yeah.
I think they've killed hundreds of thousands of people and cost my country eight trillion dollars and degraded my country very much.
And there's a very good argument to make on that.
I'm still slightly bemused about this move from "I'm an expert on this and I have views" to
I've never claimed to be an expert on anything.
This is the problem, Joe.
I mean...
If somebody says...
Wait a minute, you have to claim to be an expert on something to have an opinion on something?
No, you don't have to be.
You don't have to be.
So what's the issue?
I'm not a historian, but I'm pumping out history.
I'm not an expert, but I'm talking all the time about this thing.
But you're not even talking about specifically on what he just said.
No, I'm saying, this is my point about this.
You say, I'm not an expert.
So what's the solution?
To not talk about it?
No, it's to have more experts around.
Look at his face.
It's just going in circles, man.
Going in circles to have more experts around.
The credentialism.
We've got to have authority.
This guy doesn't want to believe any sort of nuanced takes on history unless he hears it on CNN and Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper say, you know, this is what really happened.
Then he'll believe it.
The experts have failed us.
You see this?
We're out of time for the day.
Oh, man.
I didn't get to this Alex Jones-Tucker Carlson thing on 9-11.
Didn't get to this.
Yale study quietly confirms COVID vaccine nightmare.
Talking about the experts failing us.
Maybe we'll get to more of this.
We've got this official in Greenland fired.
And we didn't even get to William Wolfe.
I apologize.
William Wolfe did a great job at a town hall the other day.
But that's all the time that we have for this edition of the Millstone Report, but this is Friday, and so this is also where I tell you to go to church.
If you don't go to church, find a church that preaches the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
If you do go to church, I hope you have a blessed Lord's Day, gathered with God's people, worshiping the Lord as we are called to do.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, I'm going to see you guys back here on Monday.
We'll be wishing you a happy Monday.
Have a great weekend.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection