All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 7, 2025 - Stew Peters Show
56:08
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Mom FIGHTS Medical Tyranny in Texas, Zuckerberg Makes Deal
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thanks so much for being with us.
This is the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
And as always, we can't do the program without you watching every single day.
We really appreciate it.
We've got a great show lined up for you.
So on Friday, I told you about a story out of Texas.
I told you how a medical tyranny was actually alive and well in the state of Texas.
We talked about a little boy named Samuel who's trying to get a kidney.
Interestingly enough, National File broke this story.
You can find out more over at NationalFile.com.
It's a fascinating tale of a mother trying to fight for her son.
And, of course, we're still in a time where doctors are grappling with the medical tyranny that they enacted across this entire country during COVID and really over the last...
Four years concerning the vaccine, remdesivir.
You know, there's just so many avenues we could go down.
But specifically, there are now people that don't want vaccinated blood if they need blood for a procedure.
And they also want to know the vaccine status of potential organ donors.
In this case, Samuel needs a kidney.
His mom, Rochelle, wants to know if the donor will be vaccinated.
They prefer an unvaccinated organ donor.
The whole situation has got very complicated at this point because we are in a situation where if you have the wrong political opinion, the medical-industrial complex will treat you like a second-class citizen, will treat you like you are less than human.
For more on this, as we promised, we reached out to Rochelle Suzanne, the mom of Samuel, and she joins us now to talk more about this story.
Rochelle, welcome to the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Thank you for having me.
So what can you tell us?
Let me just ask you this.
At what point, and we're going to get, there's ways to support Samuel.
There's a Give, Send, Go.
We want to talk about that.
But can you just kind of start from the beginning?
Can you tell us how this all started?
And why do you not want your son to have a kidney from somebody who's taken the vax?
Yes, absolutely.
So the story is very complex, but specifically to answer your question about the vaccine issue, my son received it.
Deceased donor kidney in April of 2023. This is after I was approved twice to be his kidney donor, but because of delays with my son or with myself, they continued to not take my kidney as a living donor for him.
And instead, we ended up having to get a deceased donor.
At the time, I was adamant about finding a hospital that was not requiring the vaccine for him, which caused other delays.
But we finally were able to get the donor on April of 2023. The kidney looked great.
It was a great match.
Unfortunately, after 48 hours, the kidney aggressively started to clot in both the veins and the arteries.
The surgeon specifically said he had never seen anything like it.
It was so aggressive.
He took the kidney out, flushed it, restarted, put it back in, and it did it again.
And we had four surgeries and finally took it out completely, and the graft was a failure.
Anyone in your audience that has seen the warnings about the COVID vaccine and thrombosis would know that that...
Does sound highly suspicious, and I think we have a right to know if that donor was vaccinated or not.
And doing that due process of trying to figure that out, I've been receiving so much pushback from the hematologists, from the nephrologists, from the transplant team, just from UNOS themselves.
They don't even have a place on the forum to put if the donor is vaccinated.
There's no regulations about it.
There's nobody that's overseeing these people that are intaking deceased donors or living donors to ask that question, and I think it needs to change.
I completely agree with you.
Who is Dr. Albert Kwan, and what can you tell us about him?
Thank you.
That is Samuel's current nephrologist that we just left after the 104-day prolonged hospital stay without medical necessity that he just went through.
Okay, so you say it was a prolonged stay.
So were they preventing Samuel from being discharged?
Were they preventing you from taking him out of the hospital?
A hundred percent, yes.
And we've called everybody we could think of.
I've called CPS, I've called the state, Medicare, things like that.
And we were not able to get him out until just this last Friday.
And we're now displaced five hours south.
What was the reason why they were not allowing him to leave?
We went in for an emergency surgery on September 21st.
He had an emergency with his PD catheter.
I've been his home dialysis nurse for seven years doing PD dialysis at home.
And that has been infected for the last few months over and over repeatedly.
And so that needed to come out to save his life.
That came out and they put him on hemodialysis, which is an outpatient dialysis service that that hospital does not provide.
And that hospital failed system.
I mean, just grossly, grossly failed him and myself.
Put most of the care management on my shoulders and did not help us get a care of plan and a timely discharge to get him out to another facility.
Okay, so on Friday on the program, we played the recording.
It was a conversation between you, Samuel, and this Dr. Albert Kwan.
And, by the way, Samuel seems like just a very bright young man who is asking questions and is standing up for, you know, asking critical questions.
You know, he's a critical thinker.
You can tell he's challenging this doctor and saying, well, you know, we basically want to...
You know what?
Let's just listen to it, okay?
I've got it pulled up right here, because I want people to understand this.
I'm going to throw this up on the screen.
And let's just go ahead and listen to this video.
I think it's worth exploring it.
I think patients have the right to know if the donor...
If you don't know, isn't it your job as doctors to investigate what went wrong so it doesn't happen again?
To us, it's relevant because we need to know what to do with his next decision.
Even if you don't think the vaccine is a relevant factor in the failure of my transplant, for the patient's peace of mind, you should still look into it and get definitive proof that that was not the cause.
Even if I found that the patient, the donor was vaccinated, that's no proof that it caused the cause.
All right.
So that's what I'm talking about, Rochelle.
Obviously, you hear your son there standing up for his own medical rights, and this doctor, this arrogant doctor that I'm sure believes he's a critical thinker.
He's not.
He's an analytical thinker.
He's getting the two confused.
He can only operate his medical practice within probably the goalposts that Anthony Fauci gives to him.
Obviously not directly, but maybe.
Who knows?
But that's what I'm talking about.
You've got a really bright sun there, and I'm so sorry that this is happening to you.
Thank you.
And that's honestly made this more complex because he is highly intelligent.
He came out of the womb a deductive reasoner that's beyond anyone in our family.
And that's made it even more complex because he does ask critical questions.
I ask critical questions, common sense questions, you know, that everybody should be able to ask as well.
We have patients' rights, you know, that we're given at every hospital.
We sign the form that says we have patients' rights, and we've done nothing outside of those rights.
But even so, we are being deemed as noncompliant.
He's been deemed as noncompliant.
His record has been tainted, which is prevented from other hospitals in Texas from taking him as an outpatient.
They're discriminating based on what the records state as being non-compliant.
But the point that I want to make sure that we are clear on is this is a pediatric child.
This is a child.
And as a parent, I should have the authority to help make medical decisions for him.
And he and I both should be able to, as patients of the system...
Ask questions and get answers to those questions without retaliation.
So do you think that you're being treated like this because of your opinion about the vaccine and it not being safe?
Do you kind of feel this...
I mean, it's almost like there's some people in the medical world that are just...
They're still super...
They recoil at the idea that...
Maybe it's their egos, but they recoil at the idea that they've been part...
Of really, you know, putting out something that's poison on the American people?
A hundred percent.
It is one factor.
There are multiple factors.
Just asking questions, bringing the research from, you know, scientific studies that I want to help my son, that also labels me as a problem parent, you know, asking too many questions and questioning their authority.
But I want to share a quick story, if I could, that I'm thinking of.
We went to Oklahoma City Children's Hospital in 2022 to get, hopefully, this transplant that Dr. Pond is withholding from my son for years.
And I thought it was a great meeting, and we went through everything, the testing, the transplant team.
My last meeting was with the nephrologist he was going to meet, and we spent 50 minutes with her in her office talking to her, and everything looked like a go.
And at the very last minute, I asked the question.
I said, I just want to make sure, is the COVID vaccine required here, or is it a recommendation?
And she stood up, offended, walked out, and looked at me and said, if you have to ask that question, clearly I'm not your doctor for you.
I'm not your doctor, and we're not going to work well together.
And she walked out of the room.
Wow.
And I just knew that it was not going to work.
And so there's just been roadblock after roadblock where I've really tried to seek second opinions, third opinions, go to different hospitals, go to different transplant centers.
At Children's Hospital in Dallas, we tried to get the transplant there.
That's the only way I found to get Samuel to be a nephrology patient there was to get a transplant there.
And when we called, they wouldn't even give us the application unless he had the COVID vaccine as proof to even get the application to apply.
That's what ended up.
Forcing us to go to Medical City, which obviously we now know has been a failure.
Okay, so, and I want to reiterate, we haven't really talked about this.
You, as Samuel's mother, you have offered your kidney.
I want to give my son the kidney.
You are a match.
You've been confirmed a match.
And no one has done this.
Are there any plans?
First of all, what reason are they giving you?
And then...
Are there any plans to actually make that happen?
Yeah.
First, the reasons they're giving me, there's been two different times.
So 2019 is when we first applied for the kidney transplant with me, the living donor.
I was approved as his living donor.
But at the last part of the process, which is a lengthy process to get everything worked out, Samuel was put in a room by himself with a psychologist.
And she put in the record that he had said at 12 or 13 years old that he did not want the transplant and that he was not going to take the post-transplant medication.
So they canceled the entire thing for over two years because of his non-compliance with Dr. Kwan coming in every month for appointments, giving my child the power to say no and empowering him to think he had more control than he did by saying, have you changed your mind about the transplant yet, Samuel?
Okay.
And just made it a whole circus for two years.
That's why I went to Oklahoma City to try to get out of that mess and children to try to get out of that mess.
So that was a disaster that they were, Undermining me as the parent, undermining me as the ability to help manage this for my child and creating too much empowerment with him.
He is, like I said, highly intelligent.
His IQ is very high.
And he is also a child and doesn't have the wisdom and the emotional capacity to handle these decisions.
So it's really been difficult for him to be compliant.
After that, they forced the vaccines, all the CDC vaccines on Samuel, which he already knew the pharmaceutical companies corrupt.
He already knows that our country's in a total mess with the food supply and things like that.
Our family is very self-conscious about that stuff.
And I've raised my children.
Thinking that they needed to know these things.
Unfortunately, it's hurt us in this situation because he has too much information for his ability to navigate the system.
And so he was very, very hurt by getting those vaccines.
We didn't want to get them.
We had to in order to get the transplant done.
We went to counseling.
We did detoxes.
It was a horrible situation.
People can look at my Instagram and see a video that he made.
When he was young, crying that he wanted medical freedom.
But back then, it was before COVID, people hadn't woken up yet.
And so we didn't know how to get this to happen.
We went ahead and complied and got those vaccines, which were to his detriment of his health.
And it also further exasperated his lack of trust in the system.
You know, so we've got this doctor that's empowering my son to say he can choose this transplant if he wants it or not, which is false.
And we also have my son, who's highly intelligent, getting forced and mandated to do vaccines that were causing him harm.
And he was very aware of the harm that was causing him.
And he no longer has trust in the medical system.
So the first transplant got canceled because of his lack of trust and him telling that psychiatrist in a private room without me present that he did not want the transplant.
He did not want to take the medication.
He tells me he doesn't want to take a shower.
He tells me he doesn't want to brush his teeth.
You know, we do it anyway.
You know, that's my job as a parent.
The second one was in 2023. Are you good?
The second one was, go ahead, was in 2023. And again, they start pushing him through to get the transplant.
And then I'm getting tested a second time because my first testing expires.
You've got to go through it a second time.
At this point, we get all the way to the end.
At this point, my son is completely compliant.
He's ready to go.
He's actually...
Understanding finally why he needs it.
He's more mature mentally.
And we get to the very last...
Test day of me as a four-hour appointment and they now have changed the script and said, you know what?
We don't think as a single mom that you're really emotionally ready to do this.
We're here to advocate for your best interest and we don't think you know what your best interest is and now we're going to delay it further and have you go to a psychologist and blah blah blah blah.
And I'm just like, this is not your choice.
We've been working on this for years.
My son is finally agreeing to it.
Take my kidney.
I had a full-time employee that I had paid for the last two years to make sure our family was fully ready for what we needed to do.
I had friends.
People lined up.
We had the finances.
We were debt-free.
It was time to get it done.
It was about the same.
It wasn't about me.
They still would not let me do it for my best interest.
Talk about medical tyranny.
That is a total circus.
And forgive me, and feel free to disagree with me if I'm conflating issues, but this idea that they're going to use what Samuel said with that psychiatrist years ago, it sounds like the same ideology that they're applying.
A kid can decide to trans themselves or decide that they're a boy or a girl.
And it's very odd.
And then the psychological protection from you is the complete opposite.
We want to make sure you're ready, but they wouldn't do that when it comes to this.
Highly charged political topic that's now all the rage and is also very lucrative, by the way.
I don't know.
To me, it just seems like the mentality of allowing kids to choose, you know, the kid's going to choose, even though they're not an adult, to end their life.
We're now going to apply that to, well, the child said he doesn't want to have the kidney transplant.
Even though that's what he needs in order to have a healthy life.
The medical system is...
I mean, the word evil comes to mind.
Rochelle, what do you think?
Well, at least there's very little accountability and oversight, and I think we need more discussion about these things, and we need more accountability and oversight.
I definitely agree with you.
There's a complete hypocrisy here.
You know, even Samuel has tearfully said to me, it doesn't make sense they let children choose to change their gender, but they won't let me choose to get a kidney, you know?
And it doesn't make sense that they're letting parents, like, they're prioritizing my mental health.
Over my sons.
And they're also negating parents that are trying to save their children from hurting themselves with the gender transition, but yet they're refusing from him.
I'm not saying that clearly, but there's not consistency across the board with the thinking and theology.
And it's completely unaccounted for.
And I will say...
I've called multiple transplant centers across this nation from 2019. And this is very common.
You know, nobody will show you a written rule that your kid has to get all these vaccines before transplant.
But everybody knows if you tell them you're not going to do it, they won't put you on the list.
They won't talk to you.
And that needs to change.
People need to have bodily autonomy.
People need to have the right to choose for their children what they think is in their best interest and their health.
That's incredible.
So where do you guys go from here?
You guys have been, you're now at a new facility, and what are they saying?
Yes, we were blessed that University Health System in Texas and San Antonio was the only hospital out of all the hospitals and facilities in Texas that said, what is going on here?
There's so many red flags.
Bring him down.
We'll make room.
And they've done that.
And we did our first treatment yesterday.
It's five hours drive without stopping straight from our house, which is...
Not ideal for us to have to relocate.
We're taking it one day at a time.
Right now, I'm thankful that it went well.
Yesterday, the team was very receptive, and they're just giving Samuel a fresh start and giving him, you know, just looking at everything from the get-go, and I'm very impressed so far.
So we're in a good spot today and this week, and we're just looking at this week and next week, honestly.
They know it's a temporary solution.
We're hoping that Something just becomes clear that we have a transplant team that sees our story and just wants to cut through all of this, you know, clutter and just get my son what he needs.
I still would hope that I'm still a viable living donor option for him.
Ideally, I would like to preserve my kidney as long as I can if we could find another deceased donor that is unvaxxed so that I could be single second kidney.
Or if the transplant team decides that that's in his best interest to give him mine, let's just get it done.
Wow.
We've got the Give, Send, Go.
I know it's been set up.
You can see it on your screen there.
The website, givesendgo.com slash SavingSamuel.
That's givesendgo.com slash SavingSamuel.
Saving Samuel.
And so if you see right there, help Samuel get a kidney.
Samuel, an exacerbated 16-year-old, has spent over a decade fighting kidney disease failure and facing endless systemic barriers to receiving a life-saving transplant despite his mother, Rochelle, being a...
Perfect kidney donor match.
Medical bureaucracy and inexplicable decisions have left him confined to a hospital, delaying critical care with time running out.
Samuel will lose pediatric transplant priority when he turns 18. This family is in urgent need of support.
Rochelle, his 24-7 caregiver and advocate, has faced mounting financial strain while fighting for a son's life.
So you can give there at givesendgo.com slash saving Samuel Rochelle.
If there's anything else that I haven't covered, I want to give you the floor, the opportunity to say the last word.
And so I really appreciate your time, but I'll give you the last word.
Thank you.
I think the thing that comes to mind is, I'm not meaning to be emotional, I apologize.
All the families that are in very similar situations, I had no idea that I wasn't just the only one.
I've been quiet for seven years just in the name of getting my son care because I have been threatened with CPS multiple times.
CPS has been called multiple times.
Misunderstandings are rampant in the medical community.
And when you just want your son to get the best care, you don't want to do anything that's going to jeopardize that.
And so it's sad and unfortunate that it's come to the point that I have had to now say.
It doesn't matter the outcome at this point because it's so bad that I have to speak out.
But I'm also thankful for that because in speaking out, I've had so many other families nationwide in our country reach out to me that they face very similar trials and struggles behind closed doors and they're being silenced.
And so I'm thankful for the opportunity to be the voice to the voiceless.
And I just hope that people will take this and the Lord will do what he can with it to help make change for us and for the other families struggling.
Rochelle, Suzanne, God bless you.
Give my best to Samuel and keep in touch because if anything happens with this story, I'd like to cover it more and get it out to as many folks as we possibly can.
So thank you so much for your time.
God bless.
Thank you.
We really appreciate the support.
Appreciate you guys.
Well, once again, it's givesendgo.com slash saving Samuel.
That's givesendgo.com slash saving Samuel.
Before we go any further in the program, I want to tell you about Carlos Cortez.
Cortez Wealth Management.
You can give your retirement savings, invest your retirement savings, your hard-earned money to a lot of different, you know, there's a lot of different places.
A lot of different people want to invest your money.
But if you're going to use conventional means, a lot of times people don't know this, you're going to end up investing in companies that are owned and influenced by BlackRock and these companies that push their DEI. They push policies that actually are anti-American, anti-traditional American values, anti-Christian values.
But you're not going to get that with Carlos Cortez.
You're going to get different options, options that are not going to support companies that actually hate you.
Find out what an America First investment strategy is and what it can do for you by going to CortezWM.com.
That's CortezWM.com.
Or call 813-448-3446.
That's 813-448-3446.
The consultation is free.
Mention my name, Paul.
Tell Carlos that I sent you.
I would very much appreciate it.
We got a great rest of the show for you.
And a lot of stuff has happened.
I am absolutely flabbergasted.
I'm still processing this Mark Zuckerberg story.
I mean, if you...
I guess, what was it?
Was it in the summer or the early fall where Mark Zuckerberg penned a letter to Congress essentially confessing to his crimes?
Confessing, I think, to allowing, you know, this was after the assassination, so it was the first assassination attempt.
That's really when Mark Zuckerberg started changing his tune.
Well, now he's come out and Zuckerberg is saying, they're backpedaling.
He's going to do away with all the censorship.
He's going to make Facebook a free speech platform once again.
Derek Evans of the show that you just heard on X-American News, the insurrection, posted this.
Justin, Mark Zuckerberg announces he is eliminating so-called fact-checkers and bringing X-style community notes to Meta.
He also said he's going to restore free expression on Facebook.
Do you believe that?
What actually is going on here?
First of all, we need to...
Let's actually watch this video.
This is incredible to me.
When I woke up this morning, this was the first thing that I saw was this video.
I could not believe it.
Hey, everyone.
I want to talk about something important today.
Now, first of all, I just have to say, there was a few years there where Mark Zuckerberg did not look human.
He had what I call dead shark eyes.
Hey, those of you, you guys know I'm telling the truth here.
Now, I don't see that now.
He still sounds like a robot, but he doesn't look as much like a robot.
But there was a few years there that he looked like he had dead shark eyes.
I don't know if his pupils were dilated or what, or he was doing drops or something.
I don't know, but it was very noticeable.
Anyway, that's my first observation.
It's time to get back to our roots around free expression on Facebook and Instagram.
Oh man, this guy's so relatable.
I started building social media to give people a voice.
I gave a speech at Georgetown five years ago about the importance of protecting free expression, and I still believe this today.
But a lot has happened over the last several years.
There's been widespread debate about potential harms from online content.
Governments and legacy media have pushed to censor more and more.
A lot of this is clearly political, but there's also a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there.
Drugs, terrorism, child exploitation.
These are things that we take very seriously, and I want to make sure that we handle responsibly.
So we built a lot of complex systems to moderate content.
But the problem with complex systems is they make mistakes.
Even if they accidentally censor just 1% of posts, that's millions of people.
And we've reached a point where it's just too many mistakes and too much censorship.
The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech.
So we're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes.
Simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms.
So the recent elections, the election of Donald Trump, means that the country wants to prioritize speech.
Which would likewise mean that if the election had gone the other way, Mark Zuckerberg would have leaned in or back into his totalitarian censoring ways.
I mean, what this shows, there's a lot of things going on here.
But fundamentally what this shows is people like Zuckerberg and others are going to do whatever the person in power, whoever the person in power is, they're going to bend the need of whoever's in power.
That's the type of person that this is.
This is a person without principles.
Of course, I think we already know this.
No one's shocked by this.
However...
You know, you can kind of piece together what's going on.
A little while back, I think before Christmas, the news was that Mark Zuckerberg went to Mar-a-Lago and met with Donald Trump.
And if you take that letter, which we'll get to here in a minute, from last year, which is essentially a confession, if not Mark Zuckerberg trying to defect from the left, it's clear that Mark Zuckerberg made a deal.
Mark Zuckerberg has made a deal.
Mark Zuckerberg does not want to go to jail.
I believe Mark Zuckerberg thought he was going to jail And I think it first crossed his mind when Trump survived the first assassination attempt, he realized, well, Trump's probably going to win.
And I said this, you know, the day after the election.
I mean, you know, history will record that him surviving the assassination attempt and going from icon to legend, American legend, is, you know, one of the reasons.
One of the reasons he won, I mean, if not the, I mean, that was a huge data point, and he goes on to win, right?
He gets shot in the air, survives, goes on to win.
Zuckerberg knew that the tide had shifted then.
Then he writes the letter to Congress confessing what he had done in 2020, as well as suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop.
Then Trump wins.
Then he has a meeting with Trump, says, hey, I really don't want to go to jail.
And then we find out, I guess about a day or two ago, that Trump ally UFC president, Ultimate Fighting Championship president, Dana White, has now been put on the board of Meta.
And now we get this video.
More specifically, here's what we're going to do.
First, we're going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes, similar to X, starting in the U.S. After Trump first got elected in 2016, the legacy media wrote non-stop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy.
We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth.
But the fact-checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the U.S. So over the next couple of months, we're going to phase in a more comprehensive community notes system.
We're going to simplify our content policies and get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender that are just out of touch with mainstream discourse.
Immigration and gender.
Get rid of restrictions on immigration and gender.
Does that mean that we can talk about trans terrorists?
Does that mean we can talk once again about how transing kids is child abuse?
Is that what we can talk about immigration and how mass deportations need to happen to make this country safer?
I mean, it's fascinating, but specifically him citing the fact that the public doesn't want them.
Let me back up real quick.
We're going to phase in a more comprehensive community notes system.
Second, we're going to simplify our content policies and get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender that are just out of touch with mainstream discourse.
Now it's out of touch with mainstream discourse?
This is huge.
I mean, just in terms of even hearing him say it, it's now out of touch with mainstream.
It was always out of touch with mainstream discourse, but you were being a totalitarian freak, suppressing the opinions of a majority of Americans.
You were censoring millions of people.
You were shadowbanning millions of people.
People then got ridiculed and humiliated.
You have these, you know, bogus fact-checkers that are, you know, are just populated with liars or people that have been duped with the left-wing brain rot.
And now he's essentially, he's coming out and he's saying, yeah, the woke sex religion, the dogma, the woke sex religion, orthodoxy that we, you know, we've tried, we've got to be in, we've got to make sure we dot every I and cross every T when it comes to this.
We don't want to offend the LGBTQRSTLNE. Would you like to buy a vowel community?
We don't want to do any of that.
And so we're going to create this artificial system, this world that is totally detached from reality, and now he's abandoning the woke sex religion.
That's what that says.
We're no longer going to restrict topics about gender.
That's him, at least he's saying it.
The translation is, hey, we're bailing on all this nonsense because the American people don't want it.
Well, we've never wanted it.
We've never wanted it.
Corporations have wanted it.
The DEI ESG people have wanted it.
And it's incredible to me.
What started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and it's gone too far.
So I want to make sure that people can share their beliefs and experiences on our platforms.
Third, we're changing how we enforce our policies.
All right, I'm not going to waste any more time on this.
You can watch the rest of it.
We've spent enough time on it.
Matt Gaetz isn't buying it.
Are we all in on the Zuck transition, or like many modern transitionists, is it phony?
I'm not all in.
This is true.
I mean, I'm not all in either, but it is...
This guy made a deal.
Mark Zuckerberg was going to be prosecuted.
Or at least Mark Zuckerberg believed that he was going to be prosecuted.
Here's the letter.
Just so you know, this was the letter that was back in August.
Okay, so Trump survived assassination in July.
And then August 26th, Mark Zuckerberg pens a letter to Jim Jordan confessing.
I said at the time, this is huge.
It's like a defector in the middle of a war.
We were in the middle of a war in 2024. And then Zuckerberg essentially comes out.
And defects in the middle of the war from the side he's on and confesses.
He says, Died.
Here's my question on the COVID-19.
How many people died because they suppressed the effectiveness of ivermectin?
How many people died because they suppressed people saying that, hey, the remdesivir, that they're giving patients as they walk into hospitals, they're sick, but they are walking into hospitals, they never come out.
How many people didn't refuse the remdesivir?
Because what Mark Zuckerberg suppressed during COVID. Not to mention the vaccine.
And he has made a deal.
100% my belief is, I'm convinced that he made a deal, and that's why he's doing this.
He says, I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it.
Skipping down, in a separate situation, the FBI warned us about the potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family in Burisma in the lead-up to the 2020 election.
That fall, when we saw a New York Post story reporting on corruption allegations involving the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's family, we sent that story to fact-checkers for review and temporarily demoted it.
While waiting for a reply.
It's since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn't have demoted the story.
We changed our policies and processes to make sure this didn't happen again.
And then lastly, I think he actually saves the most damning part of his confession for last.
Apart from the content moderation, I want to address the contributions I made.
What was it, $400 million?
The contributions I made, the Zuckerbucks, I made during the last presidential cycle to support electoral infrastructure.
The idea was to make sure local election jurisdictions across the country had the resources they needed to help people vote safely during a global pandemic.
I made these contributions through the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
They were designed to be nonpartisan, spread across urban, rural, and suburban communities.
Still, despite the analysis I've been showing otherwise, I know that some people believe this work benefited one party over the other.
My goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or the other, or even to appear to be playing a role.
So...
I don't plan on making a similar contribution this cycle.
It was more of a, I know I'm caught, although I'm not confessing to anything, but I'm not going to do it again.
Please, please, Trump, if you win.
Please, please, do not prosecute me.
That is the Mark Zuckerberg story.
It is an interesting day, though.
We've got an interesting week.
Trudeau resigns.
Zuckerberg announces the return of free speech because he made a deal.
We have the Trump delegation is now in Greenland.
Donald Trump, Charlie Kirk is even there.
Corporations are shedding DEI. They're saying elections matter.
Well, we'll see if elections matter.
There's a lot of things that Donald Trump has promised.
And let's be clear here.
You're going to start, I've been saying this for weeks, you're going to start to hear a lot of people say, hey, we've got to give Trump the first 100 days, give Trump the first 100 days.
Look, and I know it's going to take, you know, things are going to materialize over the next 100 days, but don't let the 100 days people, don't let that be an excuse to not criticize an incoming administration to make sure they do what they say they're going to do, which we'll talk about here in just a moment um there's a lot of promises that donald trump has made national file
uh x account has a great thread on all of the things that trump has said and a lot of it has to do quite frankly with prosecutions over the campaign trail a lot of that has to do with it so yesterday we were uh in the middle of uh january 6th uh celebration some people celebrations right some people were decorating lecterns in honor of the lectern guy with christmas lights and everything else uh we got sarah gonzalez though interviewing um
An interview yesterday where, it's fascinating, we have a report that General Mark Milley used direct energy weapons and the implication, now correct me if I'm wrong, but the implication here would be that they potentially used direct energy weapons to whip the J-6 crowd up into a frenzy.
You keep coming up with these scoops regarding January 6th.
Do you have anything else that's coming up?
Yeah, I'll pay very close attention to probably, I thought it was going to be out today, but we've got a couple little things we've got to clean up on a new article.
And we know for a fact now that General Mark Milley, who is the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Back under the previous Trump administration, we know that in June of 2020, during the riots in the Summer of Love here in DC, he actually directed and ordered and authorized the use of both heat and sound directed energy weapons to be used against the protesters in that event.
And we have the photography now to prove it, to back it up.
And we're going to be coming out with that story tomorrow.
And then we'll be launching a series off of that first article that will lead us to January 6th as well.
Heat and sound, which would do what?
Well, it depends upon which switch is used.
It depends if they are using sound energy weapons.
They can be super audible or they can be sub audible.
If they're set to super audible that's supposed to scare people away from a riot.
If they're set to sub audible it can make people go crazy in their head and force them into violence.
They call those agitation weapons.
I'm going to go back and I'm going to rewind about 10 minutes ago when I said that I believe that January 6th was total entrapment by the United States government in order to weaponize their own agencies against their people.
I'm just going to go ahead and rewind and I'm going to say that again and I'm going to go ahead and double down on that at this point, Steve.
You probably have valid reasons to feel the way you feel.
It's incredible.
So essentially...
Direct energy weapons that can make people disperse or heat raise.
I've seen that before.
Make people, ow, my skin and they run away.
Or a subsonic direct energy weapon that makes people turn violent.
Boy, that would have totally different implications as well for what happened during the Summer of Love with George Floyd.
That's what he was talking about there, right?
Yeah.
But what about January 6th?
What about...
January 6th.
We already know it was federal entrapment.
We know there were federal agent provocateurs and that Ray Epps is really just the tip of the iceberg.
We already know that.
Damning information now about the pipe bomber that's coming out.
The Gateway Pundit surprise House releases bombshell report on January 6th.
Pipe bomber revealing FBI engaged in massive cover-up and refuses to cooperate with investigators.
That's incredible.
Actually, before we cover this story, I want to tell you about Man's Edge and Neutronics Labs.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's a new year.
People are trying to get in shape.
If you want to give your body the best chance to get back into shape, I want you to try Man's Edge Natural Testosterone Booster with NO2 and IGF-1.
IGF-1, obviously, is harvested humanely.
It's deer antler velvet that's harvested, I think, out of New Zealand.
And it's one of the best regenerative substances on the planet Earth.
It helps you recover from your workouts.
It reduces inflammation.
You need to check this out, but you need to go to NeutronicsLabs.com slash Paul.
Use my name, Paul.
Save 10%.
Sign up for AutoShip to save even more.
It's Man's Edge Testosterone Booster.
And I will tell you this, there's also other great products that I'm taking as well.
I'm taking the...
The IGF-1.
I'm taking the IGF-1 Plus that also has the glutathione in it.
I highly recommend this product.
It's working great for me.
I've been taking it now for three months.
I feel fantastic.
And I think you should try this, especially if you're trying to get in shape for the new year.
This is, I think, an integral substance, an integral supplement that will help you achieve your goals.
And I want to stress this part.
This is a way to support what I'm doing here on the Millstone Report and keep this show on the air as I'm trying to deliver you the news from a biblical perspective, a truth perspective, a Christian perspective, and do so unapologetically.
So now, back to this story.
We have this.
Surprise, House releases bombshell report in massive cover-up and refuses to cooperate with investigators.
There's a new report released by the committee on the House Administration Subcommittee of Oversight on the January 6th pipe bomber that shows the FBI stopped looking into the suspect in 2021 and covered up the evidence.
The FBI is now refusing to cooperate with congressional investigators.
This is a great piece by Christina Layla.
Now, Liz Wheeler over here, she summarizes it as well.
I thought this was good.
She says that the content of this new House report on the J6 pipe bomber is shocking.
She says the FBI tracked phone data and narrowed the suspects down to 186 phone numbers.
And then they narrowed it down to one number.
And then the FBI suddenly stopped the case and just ended it.
Nothing to see here.
Why do they do that?
Who is that one person that they did not want to reveal?
Who really planted the bomb?
The FBI agent in charge, Stephen D'Antuano, DeAntuano then told Congress that the phone data from a major telecom company was corrupted.
That's why they didn't pursue it.
But the telecom company then comes out and says, hey, the data was not corrupted.
So the FBI lied.
They covered it up.
Now the FBI and other agencies are stonewalling Congress over why this investigation and what we're told is the biggest domestic terror attack attempt in recent history just stopped.
It just stopped.
Oh, and the two people who found the pipe bomb, she writes, on January 6th, were a woman carrying a basket of laundry, who is actually a swamp creature who works in an intel-connected org where she works on disinformation.
And the other bomb was found by a plain-closed Fed.
And both bombs sat in plain sight, undetected for 15-plus hours, until both were found independently of each other within 15 minutes.
Also within 15 minutes of the first breach of the Capitol.
And then she writes that the frame rate of one of the videos the FBI released of the pipe bomber, which came from the DNC, was 1.2 frames per second, which is lower than any security camera on the market by eight times, which implies that the video was tampered with.
Why did they stop this investigation?
Because it pointed right back to the false flag, a fedback false flag.
And we all know that now.
And when Donald Trump pardons the J6ers, as I hope he does, I hope he gives a blanket unconditional pardon to all of them because it was entrapment.
But that's what he needs to say.
He doesn't even have to bring up direct energy weapons, you know, if that actually comes out and when it comes out, yeah.
But he doesn't have to do any of that.
All he has to do is say, hey, we know there were federal agents in the crowd.
We know they were there to incite.
And he could even cite Ray Epps.
And based on that, it was entrapment.
And so I'm pardoning everybody based on that, right?
But can you imagine that claim that Sarah Gonzalez, if it's proven that Mark Milley was involved in putting direct energy weapons on the J6 crowd?
That's what they're insinuating.
The low subsonic frequencies that actually provoke people to violence?
That's a whole other ballgame.
Incredible.
So we have this.
Got a couple more things to get to.
I don't know if we're going to have time, but this is a great thread.
And so, for all of you, give it 100 days, people.
Let's actually talk about what we need to be talking about.
Here are some of the promises that Donald Trump has made over the campaign.
Trump has made at least 40 separate, distinct promises about what he wants to do on day one as president.
The top promises, prosecute the Biden crime family.
Initiate mass deportations.
Do away with perks for electric vehicles.
Let's see here.
Yeah.
Impose a complete ban on transgender women, read men, from women's sports and ban child genital mutilation federally.
Really, all they should do is say, hey, we already have federal child abuse statutes.
I'm assuming they do.
This is child abuse, and if you do it, you'll be prosecuted as a child abuser.
That's all that needs to happen with this.
Doctors, parents, you are a child abuser if you go through with this.
The president-elect has mentioned those promises over 200 times on the campaign trail.
National File has compiled a select list of at least 200 mentions, according to media analysis of Trump's speeches, beginning on the day his campaign launched in November of 2022. Prosecute the Biden crime family.
Trump, quote, I will appoint...
I don't know why is this still doing this.
Every time I click on this, it's going to be frustrating.
Yeah, Trump, I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America, Joe Biden, and the entire Biden crime family.
Trump often called Biden corrupt.
Then we have this.
In September...
And we have this.
Prosecute Barack Obama and the FBI. Let's see here.
Prosecute Barack Obama and the FBI. In 2020, then-candidate Trump accused Obama of treason for the Obama administration's FBI surveillance of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and for its efforts to falsely characterize deep ties between Russia and the Trump camp, the FBI's email snooping was aimed at former foreign policy advisor to the campaign.
Trump calls for military tribunals.
In August of this year, Trump reposted a message on Truth Social calling for public military tribunals.
Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's inquiry found no criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign.
Trump characterized the failed investigation as a witch hunt.
The fact is, the FBI spied on my campaign and they got caught, and you will be hearing more.
We all eagerly await hearing more.
Prosecute former FBI Director James Comey.
Trump has long pushed behind the scenes for Comey to be prosecuted over his interactions with journalists.
He's a leaker.
He leaks classified data.
It's proven at this point.
Also, Trump has said he wants to prosecute Liz Cheney.
Liz Cheney worked for the Democrats as Vice Chair of the House Select.
Well, he said Liz Cheney should be in jail, I guess.
That's what he said.
Liz Cheney worked for the Democrats as vice chair of the House Select Committee that investigated J6. Cheney, who opposed the entire America First movement and Donald Trump in her effort to elect Kamala Harris, was also one of the most prominent Republican figures to publicly endorse Harris.
Trump said in March on Truth Social that Cheney should go to jail.
In June, he doubled down, reposting a message calling Cheney guilty of treason.
And then, of course, later in the campaign, you know, because Cheney was such a war hawk and wants American soldiers to die in the Middle East.
Or in Ukraine.
He said, let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her.
Trump was clearly highlighting Cheney's hypocrisy for supporting the war in Iraq and endless wars everywhere.
Then, of course, there's Jack Smith.
Arguably no man is more directly responsible for the weaponization of the federal government against Trump than Special Prosecutor Jack Smith.
Last year, Trump reposted a social media message from neocon war-mongering talk show host Mark Levin saying Smith must go to prison.
In August, Trump reposted a truth social message calling Jackal Smith a career criminal and saying he should be prosecuted for election interference and prosecutorial misconduct.
Then we've got Alvin Bragg.
There's stuff on that.
This is just a very comprehensive thread.
But I'd love to focus on this for a second because this is a huge, huge...
Trump has promised as many as 82 times to cut funds to schools that teach critical race theory and transgender insanity on day one.
Trump also repeatedly promised to keep men out of women's sports.
Also, you've got Peter Strzok.
He's talked about that.
Adam Schiff, who's now senator.
I saw one headline where he seemed to be trying to change his tune.
Halting illegal immigration.
Let's talk about this.
Trump mentioned starting the largest deportation operation in American history over 20 times.
Trump also vowed to close the southern border.
Trump openly promised to terminate every open border policy of the Biden administration at least 20 times.
Five times Trump promised to restore the Trump travel ban on entry from terror-played countries.
Three times Trump promised to sign an order to end automatic citizenship for the children of illegal aliens.
Another day one promise Trump has made on immigration is to end birthright citizenship.
Trump will have significant leeway when it comes to rolling back executive actions on immigration, such as Biden's protections for the...
The office of the president affords broad power to shape immigration policies under the Constitution and federal immigration law.
That Trump has made such large promises on the issue isn't a surprise, especially given the issue's importance to voters.
Then we have energy independence promises.
We've got Fauci's Pfizer mandates.
Hopefully RFK Jr. will be involved with that.
Veterans issues, ending taxes on tips, and you can read all of this, more on this over at NationalFile.com, keeping score here, the executive actions Trump has promised to enact.
I wanted to cover that because it's just very important that we keep our eye on the ball.
I'm actually very interested in what's going on, by the way, in the United Kingdom and trying to save part of Western civilization.
I get it.
Excuse me.
But it's important that we as Americans don't get distracted with the state of our own country and the real things that have to be done starting January 20th.
And so all of us, many people may say, you've got to give it 100 days.
I think there's some truth to that, but that does not mean that we can keep...
It's very important for us to be vocal.
It's very important for everybody, just like with the HB1 or H-1B visa debate.
Right?
Where, you know, it kicks off and you have this back and forth between MAGA and then other people and Elon Musk and everything else.
And, you know, it ends up saying, well, I mean...
Yeah, the HB1 visa isn't for the most elite talent in the world.
You've got companies that are putting applications out there to hire plumbers and janitors.
Those are American jobs.
And so it's important that we be as vocal as we possibly can, I think, at this time.
And really push the advantage.
The election is really only just securing a secure footing to where we can actually send...
You know, rhetorically speaking, send fire down raids.
You can't do that unless you have a secure footing.
Anyway, we're out of time today.
I don't think I even have time to do the...
Well, we were going to do...
We'll have to get to that.
I had another...
I'm already against women clergy, but you don't have to convince me.
We'll end with this.
Oren McIntyre has an interesting point.
Liberals spend most of their life dismantling the safeguard that prevented the problem.
And this is a true statement.
That's what they do.
That's what liberals have done.
They subvert institutions, morality.
But then liberals move to the right to complain about the problem they created.
And then liberals spend all their time policing the right to prevent any solution to the problem they've complained about.
And I can give you one really good example.
There's a lot of leftists that have come to believe that transing kids is child abuse and wrong.
But if you tell them that transing kids, what led to transing kids, was rejecting the definition of man and woman in the Bible and rejecting the definition of marriage found in the Bible, if you tell them that, that, hey, if we would have left that alone, we wouldn't be transing kids and calling it health care.
They don't want to admit that.
They still have some idols out there that they're not willing to admit are wrong and have led to the problems and where we are right now.
Folks, that's all the time that I have.
Follow me on X at RealPaulHarrell.
You see it there on your screen.
Thank you so much for being with us.
As always, we can't do the program without you.
And unless I'm providentially hindered, I'll see you tomorrow.
God bless everybody out there watching.
▲
Export Selection