All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 13, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
57:22
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Christian Lawyers Refuse Fight to Stop Chemical Castration of Boy
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Music Music Music Music Thank
Thank you.
Thank you.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the show.
Thanks so much for being with us as always.
We can't do the program without you.
This is the Millstone Report.
Welcome to the show.
Happy Friday to everybody out there.
We've got a great show for you.
Great in that it's going to be informative, but I can't promise it's not going to be frustrating.
Of course, those of you who have been watching live, we've been teasing this.
We're going to talk to Jeff Younger here in just a moment.
But yesterday, over at the American Thinker, there was an article that was posted The headline, Castrating Boys Symbolizes the Castration of America.
Let me fly this in here.
So, this is, here it is yesterday.
This by Stephen Bakersville talks about Jeff Younger and his sons are suffering an evil of unfathomable proportions at the hands of crooked government officials.
All who hear of the case, and this is important, all who hear of the case, the court-ordered castration of young boy and the criminalization of his father by feminist judges are filled with horror and revulsion.
How can such things be happening here in America?
But the main crux of the article, as far as I am concerned, is this.
As we scroll down, we get to this.
The decline of the family, right here.
The decline of the family has become a cliché because organizations claiming to defend marriage and family values, in fact, do nothing.
And some are part of the problem.
They sensationalize homosexuality and transgenderism, which are more symptoms than causes.
Because icky things are what bring in donations.
That's why we've all heard about it.
Because this is outrageous.
But what's actually being done about it by those who claim to be on the front lines?
It goes on, yet they also ignore what really destroys families directly and led to the homosexualist and transgenderist assent.
Divorce, welfare, and family courts.
These pro-family groups exist not to rescue families, he writes, but to build lucrative organizational fiefdoms.
So for more on this now, we're going to turn to Jeff Younger.
He joins us now.
Jeff, welcome back to the Millstone Report, sir.
Thank you so much for your time.
Howdy, Paul.
Good to be here.
So, I guess, you know, I heard about this story first thing this morning, and I'm glad we were able to get you on.
What can you tell us?
Okay, so we all know your protracted legal battle in California.
We know what the Texas Supreme Court did in essentially allowing your ex-wife to, you know, kidnap your son to a trans sanctuary state in California.
We know you lost, but I know there's other options, right?
I'm sure you're trying to think of how you can appeal this in the courts.
And so then there are these different, kind of an amalgamation of different legal defense funds, supposedly pro-family, pro-Christian.
I'm not going to name any of them right now unless you want to.
What are you hearing from these organizations?
Well, here's the deal.
We don't have any conservative foundations, legal or otherwise, that go into family court.
And unfortunately, it's really just an inexcusable lapse because, I mean, how do we get gay marriage?
The left went into family courts.
How are we in the Skirmetti case at the US Supreme Court right now?
It's because they went into family courts over an issue with the transgender child.
The left is all over family courts and our guys just aren't there.
And the main reason that they're not there Is that the family courts are, I mean, they have a valid concern.
The family courts are the Wild West.
They don't follow the law.
The rules of evidence are not followed.
And it's very easy to get crossways with the judge and family court in a situation where, you know, it could affect a lawyer's ability to argue cases with other judges.
Because there's a lot of judicial corruption.
And I'm just going to say this.
Look, the bar associations are essentially a mafia.
Correct.
They have a special status.
They're private organizations that the government grants legal authority to govern a profession.
No other organization has that.
The American Medical Association doesn't govern the practice of medicine in the States.
There's a separate medical board for that.
But the Bar Association is a private association that has been set up to govern public officials because a lawyer is an officer of the court.
That means they're a public official.
And I'll tell you how bad it's gotten in California where my case is right now.
An appeals court in California has ruled that the California Bar has sovereign immunity just like a government organization.
It can't be sued.
So there's a huge problem there, a structural problem in the judiciary.
But there's also another problem.
That, frankly, nobody wants to challenge these fundamental causes because you're going to wind up going smack up against feminism when you do it.
The gynocracy.
Yeah.
When you challenge family courts, what you find is that feminists really push the idea that men should pay child support and men should not have access to their kids.
So when you go up for equal custody for parents in an attempt to reduce the incentives for divorce, you're going straight up against feminism.
And I'm going to tell you straight up.
Every year that I've been involved in politics in the state of Texas, feminist Republican women in Texas have attempted to remove from the Texas Republican Party platform equal shared parenting because they don't want fathers to have equal access to their children in divorce.
So there's a huge problem there.
Where all these interest groups kind of collude to prevent these foundations from going in.
And I'll tell you, it's even worse.
I've had foundations proactively call experts in transgender medicine and tell them not to work with me.
They don't want me to win.
And I remember that.
Matter of fact, we've talked about that before on a previous interview.
Yes.
But I guess my first question, what is the nature, what is the legal nature, the approach that you would like to see these lawyers taking specifically?
What would you like for them to do?
And then follow-up question, with all the lawyers that you've spoken to so far, what seems to be their approach?
What do they want you to do?
Okay, so here's the basic issue.
Lawyers don't want to go into family court and make arguments based on fundamental rights.
They don't want to argue based on your constitutional rights to parent your children.
They don't want to argue on your state constitutional rights.
They don't want to argue on your rights to free speech.
They don't want to argue on those grounds.
They want to argue on a factual basis about who's the better parent to parent the child.
Now, here's the thing.
Family courts pick a winner and a loser child.
I mean a winner and a loser parent.
One parent pays child support and the other parent raises the kids, rather than the parent sharing the duties of raising the children.
So, they do that because they get massive reimbursements from the state.
I mean, from the federal government.
The state of Texas gets half a billion dollars from the federal government for issuing child support.
So, there's a massive subsidy program for this, alright?
So, what they want to argue is over how much time you get.
They want you to be obedient to unconstitutional orders.
For example, a legal foundation I recently talked to just a couple of days ago wants me to participate in supervised visitation where I have to affirm my son's a girl in the hopes that in a couple of years of doing that, the judge might give me more visitation time.
Now, my point to them was very simple.
I don't want you to argue that.
What I want you to argue in court is that I have a constitutional right to parent my children.
I have a constitutional right to parent my children as I see their best interests, not as a judge does.
And I want you to go and make that argument and I want us to go exhaust our state remedies and go into federal court on a basic rights argument.
And they will not do it.
They absolutely will not do it out of family court because it's going to alienate so many of their donor constituencies and it's going to upset the feminists in the Republican Party.
That is absolutely insane.
They want me to affirm my son's a girl for years in order to get more time on my kid.
They're asking you to lie.
They're asking you to essentially bear false witness and also support.
And then again, I know we've talked about this as well, that even agreeing to supervise visits psychologically is going to tell your children that you're a danger.
That there's something wrong with you.
And so at some point we have to say, and by the way, I think there's plenty of parents out there thinking, wow, the fact that you're even willing to say, no, I'm rejecting all of it, and I'm not even going to be, it's a sacrifice.
I mean, 100% is a sacrifice, but at some point we've got to put our foot down and say, we're not going to play by these rules because the whole system is corrupt.
Right.
I've said this many times.
You're not going to get change on the three fundamental things that Dr. Stephen Baskerville outlines.
The family courts, welfare programs, and the feminist nature of so many of our private organizations, right?
You're not going to get any change on that until fathers particularly start disobeying the system.
I'm not obeying any unconstitutional order from the government, ever, under any circumstances.
I don't have to follow them, and I'm not going to follow them, and I don't want to teach my sons that you have to follow them.
I want to teach my sons to resist them, and I'm not going to morally miseducate my son and tell him he's a girl.
I'm not going to morally miseducate my son and let them teach him that I'm a threat to them, because I'm not.
And this is the thing.
Fathers have to stop obeying the judges.
The judges are illegitimate.
You have to stop obeying them.
Here's what fathers fear.
And this is what attorneys fear.
You know, family court judges are crazy.
Okay, they'll jail attorneys who make fundamental rights arguments.
They'll get really upset with them and find reasons to find them in contempt.
I have seen it personally, okay?
They will definitely jail fathers.
But I got news for you.
There's a lot worse things in prison.
A lot worse things in prison.
And morally miseducating your children and having your resources used to hurt your child is a lot worse than being put in a cage and given three square meals a day.
You know, that's one of the whole bases for the name of this particular program.
The Millstone Report is based on the Bible verses about essentially causing little kids to stumble.
It would be better for a millstone to be hung around your neck and thrown into the sea.
So are you saying right now that there are supposed Christian pro-family legal defense funds that are refusing to work with you?
Because they don't agree with your strategy.
They're refusing to represent you because you want them to make fundamental, principled arguments about your right as a father, and they want you to play by the rules of this corrupt family court.
That's what you're saying.
I'm saying that, but I'm saying something that may surprise you.
Every conservative legal foundation in the United States, every major one, Has told me the same thing.
It's not just one or two or three.
It's all of them have told me this.
And all of them refuse to help if I don't go along with these unconstitutional court orders.
And I've told them, I'm perfectly willing to go to jail.
You can get rid of habeas corpus and get me into federal court.
And you can challenge the constitutionality of these things.
And you can bind these courts from ever doing it to another father or to another child.
They don't want to do it.
They won't do it because they're afraid of their donors.
So the donors in this question are essentially wanting to promote...
I call it the gynocracy.
You're saying it is rooted in this feminist poison that has essentially not just taken over parts of the Republican Party, but it's the entire Western civilization is about worshipping women, essentially.
It's the base assumption of everything, right?
It's a very bizarre condition where basically we say that women have all the freedoms, actually more freedoms than men have, but they have none of the responsibilities that men have.
They're not even responsible for their own decisions.
You know, that's the problem.
And the donor class that funds all of these nonprofit organizations, you know, the whole donor class for the Republican Party is left liberal.
You know, we've talked about this before.
Paul Singer, the largest donor to the Republican Party, founded the transgender movement.
James Pritzker, the third largest donor to the Republican Party, founded the child transgender movement.
These rich elites literally created a market in the sexual mutilation of children.
And these are the same people that fund all these non-profit organizations.
Let me give you an example.
Paul Singer funds the Manhattan Institute, widely thought to be very conservative.
Manhattan Institute has all kinds of interviews with Paul Singer about why he supports transgenderism for kids.
Okay, so the problem is fundamentally the donor class is left liberal.
And so what the the foundations, the legal foundations and other foundations all do the same thing.
They pretend to be going after conservative causes, and they'll pick something the donors don't care about, like a cake baker in Colorado, and they'll spend all their money on a cake baker.
And won't spend any money trying to stop the chemical castration of children in this country.
They won't spend any money stopping the fact that half of all children in America, over half, are now being raised in single mother homes.
And single motherhood is the greatest threat to the republic right now.
They won't spend any money on that.
But they'll help a cake baker.
For like a decade, by the way.
That took a long time.
Yeah.
I mean, they spent tens of millions of dollars on that case.
And they didn't give one dollar to this transgender issue in family court.
And it's very simple.
Their donors want them to worry about trivial issues like that, and they don't want them to worry about things that actually matter.
Family courts, the welfare system, and feminism.
Where we could permanently, as you said, we get a federal ruling here, we can bind this and prevent this from ever happening again.
Okay, so, you know, I know we've got a big live audience right now, but I'm hoping this clip will get out, this particular interview.
I'm going to do my best to make sure it does, because I would hope, and maybe, you know, maybe this is, you know, maybe I need a black pill and not white pill, but I would hope there...
Are some of these organizations that are going to see this and realize, we've got to do something.
We've got to work with Jeff Younger.
They need to be shaken out of their apathy.
They need to think outside the box.
That seems to be what's going on here.
They want to work within the parameters of family court.
And they need to be shamed.
And they need to be publicly shamed.
So maybe there's a time where names need to be named.
But I think right now...
I think we're good to go.
I had a lawyer in California who called me.
She said, I work for a Christian organization and I would like to represent you.
I know this court very well.
I've argued before the judge before in California and so forth.
And I said, well, that's great.
I could use the help because I'm pro se and I don't know California law super well.
And she said, yeah, it's only $750 an hour with a $50,000 retainer.
This is what our Christian organizations are doing in Family Court.
Why?
Because her donors won't let her work on this with their money.
So it's just horrible what's happening.
And I think Mark Twain was right.
You can't get a man to change his opinion when he's being paid to hold that opinion.
That's exactly right.
And that's the fundamental problem that we have with these foundations.
It's a fundamental problem we have with our elected officials in the legislatures.
The donor class holds them to these liberal policies.
I think what we need is a fundamental grassroots movement against the donor class.
And we need to start going after them more than we go after policy people because they're the ones really directing all this and paying people to have these awful opinions and to take all this ineffective action.
One of the great things about Stephen Baskerville's book, Who Lost America, is it doesn't just stop at describing the problem.
It's a really unusual book because it gives a program for how we can change it, what we can do to change it.
And he calls for grassroots action in local communities to go after donors and judges.
And that's one of the things you never hear people talk about.
I want to get your reaction to this.
This is Billboard Chris talking about Trump's pick for Surgeon General.
People are, you know, outraged by her positions on the transgender issue.
Take a listen to what she said.
When you have a child who's suffering from gender dysphoria, this is a disconnect, a mismatch between how they feel and what a doctor assigned them as a gender at birth.
And it's a very serious and sensitive issue that has to be taken very seriously.
Because, specifically, there's a very high suicidal rate among transgender adolescents.
They are almost eight times more likely to commit suicide than their cisgender peers.
And so when we see the AAFP only wanting to push drugs and hormones and other types of surgical interventions, rather than taking a conservative approach, like such as psychotherapy, they're making a mistake.
It's unethical, it's immoral, and it's inappropriate.
They need to be open-minded to looking at the big picture.
No, we don't need to be open-minded.
Jeff Younger, what is your take on that?
I don't know what puberty is if it's not coming to grips with the physiological, psychological, and social changes as you grow into the gender roles of your society.
That's what puberty actually is.
Basically, all she's bought into...
Is the idea that puberty itself is something that has to be medicated or taken to psychotherapy.
Let kids be kids.
Let them grow up.
Let them go through puberty and figure it out.
We know that 98% of these kids just grow up with no problem.
They eventually identify with their biological sex.
They become productive men and women in society, and they're happy.
Why do we have to put into psychotherapy a child who's going through normal puberty development and normal psychological development?
It's insane.
This is a grift.
We hear a lot about grifters and everything else, but the same donors that are funding these so-called Christian legal defense funds and the ones that are obviously funding big parts of the Republican Party, that's how you get inaction in your case, saying, we can't work with you, Jeff, because you won't play by the family court rules.
Those are the same people that put somebody like this Surgeon General nominee in.
It's just pathetic.
It's pathetic.
I've had lawyers refuse to come on air with me because for a long time I was under an unconstitutional gag order.
That gave me a lifetime ban from doing any podcasts, radio interviews, television interviews, writing any newspaper.
Imagine giving me a lifetime ban from writing any newspaper articles or blog posts or any social media posts.
And then it banned me from three political topics.
Anything about transgenderism, gender expansiveness, or gender dysphoria.
And it banned me for life from telling you whether my son was a boy or a girl.
So I just told the judge to go take a long walk off a short pier.
I'm not following your stupid order.
I don't follow illegal orders and mandates from the government.
Put me in jail if you have to.
We'll go into a criminal court and we'll see who's right.
And she never did that.
Instead, she took my kids away from me because in family court, you can do things like that without any due process.
But you can't put a guy in jail without due process yet.
And that's where it's going next, by the way.
If we don't fix it in family courts, it's going to go into the criminal courts.
But lawyers wouldn't appear on podcast interviews and on news interviews, you know, because they were like, oh, we can't be there with Jeff Younger violating an unconstitutional court order.
That might affect me as an attorney.
Well, what kind of attorney are you?
What good are you then?
Alright, so here's the deal.
Let's assume that these Christian legal defense funds refuse to see the light, refuse to represent you as you are requesting to be represented.
Where do you go from here?
Do you try to chart this course without them and, you know, the money that's been raised supposedly to fight stuff like this?
I mean, I know the big donors, but the grassroots donors, I'm sure, would be pretty outraged to learn all of this.
But are you just going to try to fight this in federal court on your own?
I'm never going to stop fighting this.
I mean, these people don't understand.
They could give me 50-50 custody of my son, and I would go away and stop causing trouble for them.
But if they keep doubling down on me, I'm doubling down on them.
Yeah, I'm going up on appeal.
I'm going to exhaust all my state remedies.
I'm going to go into federal court, and I'm going to make these judges go on record that they want this boy castrated.
And every judge that goes on record, I'm going to go after them.
I'm going to try to impeach them.
I'm going to try to get them out of office if they're elected.
I'm going after the Texas Supreme Court justices who let my son move to California and be put in this position.
You can bet your bottom dollar every single one that voted against my son is going to have a primary challenger.
And I'll be very surprised if half of them survive.
Justice Divine, who voted to protect my son, he'll probably help me against these evil justices.
But it's time we normalize going after judges.
Judges are not some high and mighty, you know, academic geniuses.
They're elected officials, just like anybody else in government.
They're subject to oversight by the people.
And so are these nonprofits, by the way.
Who owns a nonprofit?
I'll tell you who owns a non-profit at law.
It's the people served by the non-profit.
The board does not own the non-profit.
The people that are served by a non-profit actually own the non-profit.
And if these people running these non-profits don't understand that we have legal recourse against them, if they're not fulfilling their mission and they're doing it for personal reasons of cowardice, we can bring that to trial and we can expose that.
You know, I want to get your take on a tweet that you posted about Joe Biden pardoning this pedophile.
But I really want to echo what you're saying, and I heard this on a podcast the other day, kind of, in a sense, a reverse cancel culture.
And I know some people on the right may be afraid of that.
But, you know, if you say the wrong thing, the apparatus is such and totally controlled by the left that if you say the wrong thing, your entire career can be ended.
You can be blackballed and everything else.
And I would say we're going to reverse that.
That's the goal.
We're going to reverse that.
And we're going to say these judges that vote or rule to do these types of things to children, their careers need to be over.
You're right.
Likewise, with people eventually that blaspheme the triune God in public, that should be a career-ending move.
And that's what I want to see.
I want to bring back shame and make shame great again.
Because the wickedness of this country is to the point...
Where it is putting kids on a path to hell and somebody's got to stop it.
Respond to that and then I want to get your take on this tweet.
Look, there's no reason that a restaurant should serve a judge who has put a child on the path to chemical castration.
There's no reason a gas station should sell gas to a judge who's done this.
You know, there's no reason that anybody should give to a legal foundation that has assisted a cake baker to the tune of tens of millions of dollars, but has done nothing in family court to help save children from being sexually mutilated.
These people don't deserve your donations.
So you gotta just like take responsibility for yourself and tell your friends not to donate to them.
You know, when judges come around to be elected in your local community, right, ask them these hard questions.
How many fathers get 50-50 custody in your court?
Have you ever put a child on the path to chemical castration?
Has it ever happened in your court?
You know, ask them the tough questions and put them on the spot.
Judges routinely, when they're in election phase, refuse to answer these questions.
And if they won't answer the questions, then you need to not vote for them.
Derek Evans posting this.
Joe Biden has just provided clemency to a Chinese national who was convicted of having 47,000 child pornography images in his possession.
Plano police stopped going through Shan Lin Jin's computer after confirming 1,338 images slash videos including infant rape.
You responded to this presentation.
President Biden pardoned a man who trafficked thousands of children.
Democrats are a party of child abusers.
Again, this is what's so wild to me for those on the right that may have an issue with anything we just said in the last two minutes.
It's a binary choice.
We're either going to have a government that punishes evil and rewards good, or we're going to have a government that promotes evil and says that evil is good and that good things are evil.
That is the choice.
We're either going to have a Christian nation or we're going to have a pagan nation Yeah, these tweets are interesting.
So the first one that you mentioned of the child pornography, he pardoned that guy.
What is it that these elites are always pardoning or creating sweet deals for people who sexually abuse children?
And this is a pattern that goes back to the 1970s, even in the 1960s.
Like, what's going on here?
Well, what's going on here is that the elites that run this country are a bunch of perverts.
The second one, the one that I tweeted to, was actually to a family court judge.
I believe it was in Pennsylvania or New Jersey.
And this judge was receiving money from a private prison.
He was being bribed by a private prison to take children in divorce and send them to these correctional institutions for money.
This is a family court judge, right?
He pardoned this guy that put thousands of children into prison who had come into the system through divorce.
Think about how evil you have to be to do this.
Excuse my ignorance on that.
These are two separate stories, which is just even more...
It's worse than that.
It's crazy.
He pardoned a child rapist and a guy who produced pornography for child rapists, and he pardoned a judge who literally imprisoned children doing untold harm to these kids.
Can you imagine spending four years in prison when you're a kid?
Just because your parents got divorced, and he gets cash payments from the private prison.
That's how corrupt family court judges are.
I'm so glad that you have brought to light all this corruption.
I had no idea.
I want to reiterate this, and I know you have to go, but I want to reiterate this.
In family court, when a judge is going to sign...
It's child support payments, right?
Yes.
They get matching funds from the federal government or some percentage of matching funds.
That's right.
66%.
It gives the judge the incentive, and I'm just going to use a hypothetical here, but it gives the judge the incentive to give the custody to the mother who may have a drug problem, has no income or very little likelihood of having any income because the state has no income or very little likelihood of having any income because the state
So we give it to the unfit parent in this hypothetical scenario, let's say it's the mother, because we know the father is out working and will actually be able to make the court-ordered payments, and then the federal government comes along and says, yeah, good judge, now the state gets more money.
That is so disgusting.
That that's the state of family court, the perverse financial incentive.
And once again, it all comes down to the love of money and greed.
And we are destroying our families, and the families need to be the bedrock of society.
And so these legal defense funds, like you said, they don't want to touch the real problems, the real issues, where it all stems from is the attack on the family that's been going on since the rise, really the rise of feminism and the gynocracy.
Yeah, I mean this is the genius, actually, of our evil elites.
They create massive financial incentives to do evil, and they know for a fact that commercial processes will be created to do that evil.
That's exactly what they did with transgenderism.
Obama made insurance companies pay for these transgender procedures, and in order to do that mandate, he gives government reimbursements and subsidies to the insurance companies to make these payments.
So your taxpayer money indirectly is subsidizing these transgender surgeries.
Then the hospitals make all this money because each child is a four and a half million dollar lifetime income stream to the hospitals when they go on to puberty blockers and on to cross-sex hormones.
And so what you have is they create these massive financial incentives to do the wrong thing and destroy the family.
And they know that over time it's going to take effect.
You know, even Democrats know this.
Back in the 1960s, during the Great Society programs, Democrats were writing books.
Guys like Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote a book about how these welfare programs were going to destroy the Black family.
And everything he said came true because it created financial incentives to remove fathers from the homes.
You couldn't get a welfare check if there was a working father in the home.
The only way you could get a welfare check is if the father was out of the house and it destroyed the black families.
They just came in with Title IV-D and did the same thing to white middle class families.
That's all it is.
They create financial incentives to destroy families.
And so what you have to do is you need to get your legislators to change these laws.
But how are you going to do that when the donors are paying them off?
You need to get judges that will interpret these laws in ways that are beneficial to the human and constitutional rights of the parents that appear before them.
How are you going to do that when they are also beholden to the same liberal donors and they have massive financial incentives for the states?
We've got serious problems here that demand immediate attention from the best minds, the best foundations in this country, and nobody's addressing it.
Because they're afraid of upsetting donors and afraid of upsetting feminists.
So I want to shake these so-called Christian legal defense funds out of their apathy, or we need to start naming names.
So I want everyone to stay tuned because I am going to name the names if getting the news out and shaming these people doesn't bring them to essentially repentance, honestly.
That's the only thing I know to say about it.
But let's talk about SaveJames.org.
I know that's still up, right?
This is the Give, Send, Go where people can go and donate to the Legal Defense Fund.
And I know you're going to go forward regardless of whether or not these so-called Christian legal foundations help you.
Yeah, I mean, you can't rely on these defense funds, so I rely on the people.
You know, I'm trying to set a precedent in federal court.
That's where I'm trying to get to.
I got to go through.
I went through the Texas courts.
Now I got to go through the California courts.
I got to go all the way up to California Supreme Court and exhaust my state remedies.
Then I can get into federal court.
And it's going to take a lot of money.
I mean, if these law firms that look at this, they're saying it's going to take a million dollars, you know?
It's not going to take me a million dollars because I'm not expensive like a lawyer, but it's going to take a lot of money.
If you want a legal precedent against this stuff and you want somebody who's going to fight to do it, I'm your guy.
Back this horse.
Yep, savejames.org.
I know Elon Musk has retweeted about this story, the plight of your sons, a few times.
I know he could write a check and fund this whole thing.
He certainly could, and he could probably get lawyers that would actually do the right thing.
The issue for him is he's in the Atlantic Council, he's in some sense embroiled with some of these donors, and he's got to worry about his position and standing with Trump, who has a lot of donor influence.
You know, so there's some very complex stuff these guys have to deal with.
That's why I rely on grassroots people.
I think we're never going to get elites to change this.
It's got to change because people on the ground at the bottom revolt.
Wow.
Jeff Younger, appreciate it, sir.
Praying for you, praying for your sons.
Everybody else needs to do the same.
Keep us posted, and we'll do this again soon.
Thank you, Paul.
Alrighty, thank you.
Folks, we're going to take a quick break and be back here and finish out the rest of the program.
Before we go any further, we're going to have a word from Mike Lindell.
I'm excited to announce our Christmas extravaganza is finally here.
Get this season's flannel sheets for as low as $59.98.
They won't last long, so get them while you can.
Our famous MySlippers, they haven't been on sale for over a year.
Regularly $119.98, now leave $59.98.
Our six-piece towel sets are back in stock with extremely limited quantities, only $29.98.
With hundreds of MyPillow products, there's something for everyone on your Christmas list.
Bathrobes, duvets, quilts, down comforters, and so much more.
So go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to save on all MyPillow products.
For example, flannel sheets for as low as $59.98.
For our six-piece towel sets, just $29.98.
But that's not all.
I'm extending our 60-day money back guarantee until March 1st of 2025.
Plus, all orders over $75 or more ship absolutely free.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, you know, I...
The grift is disgusting.
And I've seen this.
This is just, you know, these organizations.
Why would you need Christian legal defense organizations to the degree that we, you know, need them now if we were to actually restore the republic to what it was?
Right?
So, as the American Thinker article talked about, you know, they're just creating these fiefdoms.
That's exactly right.
And I've seen it, you know, you see when a lot of others, you see with the pro-life movement, right?
We saw in the wake of Roe versus Wade being overturned, the Dobbs decision, you see the pro-life movement becoming the new pro-choice movement.
I saw it in my home state of Arkansas when I was working with grassroots activists to get constitutional carry realized, because the law actually was passed in a really funny way.
It was signed by a Democrat governor, didn't even know what he was doing.
Didn't know he was decriminalizing the position of firearms.
But anyway, to get that out there.
And then you had the NRA come in.
Because they were so beholden to this permit system where we've got to have a concealed carry permit.
And we're saying, no, it's already been decriminalized.
We don't need the permit.
And then you had to fight the state police who wanted people to be permitted.
And you had the NRA that was essentially beholden to this permit system, and they were trying to undercut those of us who were clarifying, no, actually, you have constitutional carry.
And the only reason I thought, I mean, at the time was, well, I mean, if constitutional carry was the law of the land, you wouldn't need the NRA as much, would you?
If we actually went back to the way, you know, the system that our founders put in place originally, which to many on the left would seem like a total overthrow of the American government because it's so different than it was, you wouldn't need these organizations.
You wouldn't have to fund them.
You could keep your own money.
So there is an incentive to essentially work on the problem and never actually do anything to make the problem go away and to solve the problem.
And you see this in all sorts of different industries, different issues along the conservative landscape.
And it's just so frustrating.
Like, what are we doing this for?
What are we doing this for?
And we could talk about the Second Amendment, or you could talk about abortion.
Obviously, it's a huge one, but We're staring down, like we're staring into one of the most evil eras in American history where you mutilate the genitals of children and they look you in the face and they tell you that it's healthcare and it's good for them.
And we've got people that'll drag their feet and not actually go at the root cause of the problem because they can't, because of their, I don't know, maybe it's the law school, the legal system, like they can't think outside of the box.
And that's being charitable to them, that they just are having trouble thinking outside the box.
Maybe there's a brave attorney out there who wants to actually make history and fight the fight where they don't want you to fight it, where you might be the most effective, where we can also, you know, swing this guy, you know, end the gynocracy.
You know, one of the things that Younger said in that interview, we talked about how women have all of the rights and none of the responsibilities.
That's 100% true.
My analogy about, you know, aliens, that would really be demons, but aliens looking down, well, who's in charge?
Well, one section of the population has the special right to murder and cannot be prosecuted for it.
Oh, those people are obviously in charge then.
That class, obviously in charge.
That's where we are today.
Forgive me, we went up with a long-form interview with Jeff Younger.
I wish we could have gone longer, but I only have 56 minutes for this particular broadcast every day.
Before we go any further, I have to tell you about Cortez Wealth Management.
Cortez Wealth Management.
This is Carlos Cortez.
Just like we were talking about all the corruption in Family Court, the stock market is corrupt as well.
At least that's my opinion.
My opinion is that the stock market is corrupt and you can't trust it.
And even if you do participate in it, you're going to end up funding companies like BlackRock and Vanguard, or companies owned by those companies that go against our interests.
The very thing we're talking about.
Thank you.
So if you contact Carlos Cortez, I just want you to ask him about an America First retirement plan, America First investment strategy.
He's got other vehicles that are not going to fund people that actually hate traditional Christian values.
So CortezWM.com.
You can click right there.
You see it on the screen.
If you just go to that website, CortezWM.com.
Or you give him a call.
Mention my name.
You heard it on my show.
813-448-3446.
That's 813-448-3446.
Also, I want to make sure that we also tell you about Man's Edge from Neutronics Labs.
This is another great way you can support the work that I'm doing here at the Millstone Report as well as the Paul Harrell Program.
Man's Edge Natural Testosterone Booster.
I've been taking this.
I've been taking that.
I've been taking the IGF-1 made of the deer antler velvet.
Also been taking the...
IGF-1 +, which has got the glutathione in it, which glutathione is great to detox your body.
It's good for your liver and everything else.
I would try all those combinations, but Man's Edge is also great.
Speaking of the gyneocracy, I'm a firm believer.
If we're going to defeat the gyneocracy, we've got to have men with testosterone.
Right now, there's a testosterone crisis.
We've got less testosterone than our parents did, our grandparents did, our grandfathers, rather.
And then lastly, I want to make sure I mention Pet Club 24-7.
Pet Club 24-7.
We've been playing you the testimonials of this all week, but the mush puppies, we're talking about dogs that have rashes, they scratch all the time, or dogs who are at their end of life.
I had to put down my German Shepherd three or four years ago.
It was tragic.
He was fine mentally.
If I would have used the mush puppies based on these testimonials, if I would have used the products at Pet Club 24-7, I am a firm believer we would have gotten another year or two out of him before we had to put him to sleep.
And so if that's you and you're in that situation and the vet's saying, ah, it's getting close to time, you owe it to yourself to try.
This is a mushroom that is good for the immune system.
And the testimonials, we've been playing you the testimonials all week.
Check it out and sign up.
And the discount is built into that link.
So if you go to paulherald.petclub247.com, you can help make pets and people healthy again.
And you can do that.
What I mean by that is they have stuff for humans as well.
Alright.
We've got to get to the rest of the program.
Here we go.
This was a big story.
Mainly because Michael Cassidy, the Christian hero who beheaded the Baphomet statue a year ago.
I think it's a year ago.
As a matter of fact, I think the Millstone Report has now been on a year as well.
A year ago, Michael Cassidy...
Went into the Iowa State House and did what the Republican Iowa State Representatives, some of them defending this, well, this is just, I'm a Christian, but we've got to have a pluralistic society.
I'm a Christian, I know, but we've got to, and you know, the whole thing was a troll.
It's Christmas time in Iowa and everywhere else, and the Satanists want to put up a statue of Baphomet.
Which, by the way, if you look at some of these drawings of Baphomet, not that particular statue, but some of these drawings of Baphomet, when you've got the goat head, the male body, the feminine breasts, as well as a phallus, doesn't that encapsulate this whole transgender devilry that we're in the midst of witnessing right now, where children's minds are being poisoned, they've been groomed to believe this?
That's the goal.
The goal was never about women's rights anymore.
In order to have women's rights, you have to have a distinction between men and women, but now that distinction is blurred because that was always in the fine print of whatever this demonic deal was.
We don't even know what a woman is anymore, so we just wash away all of the feminist gains that they have supposedly made.
This is all about destroying the image of God as us, as image-bearers, male and female.
That was the goal here.
Anyway, another Baphomet statue, or a satanic statue, has been destroyed.
And Michael Cassidy, who is, again, the Christian hero who...
Chopped it down.
In Iowa, he's saying, I will raise money for the legal defense of whoever did this if they are found slash charged.
So this is in New Hampshire, Concord, New Hampshire.
We had a satanic statue there.
The Postmillennial has a piece on it.
Baphomet statue erected by satanic temple at New Hampshire Statehouse was destroyed.
This was the original image you see there, that disgusting image there.
And that's what somebody thought of it.
So yeah, there is not a constitutional right in this country, in my opinion.
And this is just based on the Founding Fathers.
I'm confident in saying this.
When the Founding Fathers were sitting around writing the First Amendment, they were not writing that with the idea, oh, well, this is going to give Satanists the right to erect demonic statues in public places.
You don't have a constitutional right to be a Satanist in this country.
Well, I mean, according to jurisprudence, maybe you do today, but you shouldn't.
Let me just say that you shouldn't.
We should not worship, we should not erect false idols in our society, specifically ones that worship the devil.
So Michael Cassidy, who's a friend of the program, also his lawyer Davis Yountz as well, a friend of the show, we've been interviewing them, because Michael Cassidy is actually being targeted now by the Navy.
Now, we interviewed him before the election, and we were kind of weighing the different potential paths forward.
If Trump got in, we were hoping the Navy backs off, because the Navy's now targeting him.
Michael Cassidy was charged with a hate crime for Destroying the Baphomet statue.
But then the Iowa prosecutors dropped it.
And they made it into a misdemeanor that will eventually go away.
Well, Michael Cassidy is a Navy pilot instructor.
And they're now relieving him of duty.
And they're targeting him.
They're putting him under investigation.
They want to throw him out of the Navy for doing what he did.
Because there are people in the Navy that are standing up for the rights of Satanists.
There are people in the Navy who are standing up for the rights of Satanists.
Believe it or not.
So that was in the news.
That was pretty good.
That's pretty good stuff.
We're going to skip that because we do not have time.
And I missed the show yesterday, so I didn't get to get to a lot of this.
But isn't it interesting that we have Christopher Wray resigning?
We remember this report.
But FBI Director Christopher Wray has announced that he is going to be ending his tenure as the FBI director earlier than the end of his tenure term, which, again, is not surprising.
Okay, so the news of this...
Triggered the likes of, let's see, do we have Andrew McCabe?
No.
Anyway, but the next day, so after he resigns, the next day...
Hey, Sandra, I'm John Roberts in Washington.
The report reveals that there were a total of 26 confidential human sources in the crowd that day.
David Spunt, his life.
So, we now know that the FBI, we all, this is not news, as we'll get to in a minute, but what's interesting is that all of this happened.
On Wednesday, when I did the show on Wednesday, we played for you the Joe Rogan clip, where Joe Rogan, to his massive podcast audience, says, eh, the J6 narrative is bogus.
It says that there were people in the crowd, says that there were instigators, says that it wasn't an insurrection because there weren't any actual guns or weapons.
And that was a huge victory because this whole thing was a false flag set up.
It was a false flag set up so that they could attempt the deep state, the intel oligarchy, to squash populism and prevent Donald Trump from running again or anybody else like him from ever running again.
And it failed.
It failed.
Just their narrative never worked.
And thanks to just people not buying it, the free exchange of ideas or, you know, semi-free exchange of ideas on X and everything else.
And now the narrative is officially dead.
Even though people like Politico are not going to, they're not going to get on, you know, they're not going to come and actually report the truth.
They're reporting the opposite, which is pathetic.
But this is frustrating.
Congressman Jim Jordan, an FBI confidential human source entered the Capitol on January 6th.
The FBI never asked him to enter the Capitol.
The confidential human source didn't get arrested.
The FBI paid for his travel to D.C. and the CHS was tasked by the FBI to return for the inauguration of Joe Biden.
National File rightfully noting pretending this is news is an insult.
And so that's the thing is we've all known this.
All of us.
All of us have known this.
And now people are acting like it's news.
Now, will it help to wake up more normies?
I certainly hope so.
But it is pathetic.
It is pathetic.
And at some point, I mean, will anything be done about it?
Even if Cash Patel does get in there, is Cash Patel going to release the Epstein list?
I hope so.
Is Cash Patel going to release the full trans manifesto out of Nashville where the trans terrorists went in there and shot up the school of Christians?
I hope so.
But will anybody actually, will there be any consequences for what they did to this country, the color revolution, that the intel oligarchs so successfully have used these tactics against other people, other countries, whether it be Ukraine or Syria or whatever, and they weaponize that and they turn it against the American people?
Will anybody go to jail?
Will anybody be prosecuted?
These are things that have to happen if you really truly want to restore any sort of confidence in these institutions.
Because yes, Trump has been re-elected, but my goodness, we are still in the midst of a cascading failure of confidence in every institution in America, from the White House all the way down to your local dog catcher, because nothing means anything anymore.
Nothing means anything anymore.
Case in point, the corrupt United States Senate that in the wake of Trump's amazing comeback from everything that they did to him to now are trying to thwart his cabinet picks.
They don't care about you and me.
They hate you and me.
I say all that to say We have a ton of work to do, and anybody out there that says, be patient, hold on, wait for the first hundred days, I'm sorry, that person needs to just, you need to just...
Is he getting in the back of the bus?
We're not listening to you.
We're not going to listen to this first 100 days talk.
Don't get me wrong.
I hope a lot of great stuff's done in 100 days, but we have to be vocal now.
Just like we were vocal on X when he nominated that sheriff to be head of the DEA, and the sheriff was so shamed because he was arresting pastors during COVID that he withdrew his name.
Likewise, this Surgeon General pick that's buying into all this trans rhetoric about kids and being good for them and assigned gender at birth, that is total nonsense.
And she should never be put in a position of power.
And yet she's the nominee.
Neshowit or whatever her name is.
It's pathetic.
Oh, here's Andy McCabe.
Andrew McCabe was very worried that Christopher Wray stepped down early.
He's stepping down, not today, but before January 20th.
Do you think he did the right thing?
Or do you think he should have made Trump fire him?
You know, I think Director A did an honorable job of leading the FBI through some very tough times.
And I'm sure he has his own reasons for going in the way that he announced it.
You know, that's one thing we haven't talked about ever on this program.
During all of this, the plight of the FBI. You know, you don't understand this, folks, but the FBI, they're actually victims in all of this.
Oh, the FBI's gone through some tough times.
You know, it was really difficult raiding Mar-a-Lago, framing President, after we already framed him for treason with the Russians.
And we're going to frame him again, and we're going to actually set-dress the evidence.
It was really tough, really tough work when the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago and went in and found the classified documents and had the printed sheets all ready to go to place on each folder that said in big red letters, classified, so that we can then take the photo of, here they are, just strewn out on the floor. so that we can then take the photo of, here You know, Trump's essentially bathing in classified documents like Scrooge McDuck dives into his gold pit every day.
Here they all are.
He's got all the classified documents, and they're all labeled classified.
and we're going to take a photo of that And then we're going to leak it to the media.
And then they're going to run with the story and say, Oh my gosh, this guy.
He's just...
What a tyrant.
What a fascist.
What a traitor.
Yeah, yeah.
Through all of this, we haven't considered the plight of the poor.
FBI. What a joke.
Okay, just a quick aside.
Oh my goodness.
We are out of time, though.
We gotta go.
Alright, I'll save this for later, folks.
We gotta go.
That's all the time that we have.
God bless.
This is the time where I tell you to go to church.
If you don't go to church, go to church.
Find a church that preaches the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
For those of you who do go to church, I hope you have a blessed Lord's Day, and we will see you on Monday.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, I don't plan to be.
God bless each and every one of you.
▲
Export Selection