Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 6, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

56:05

Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Mustached Woman Argues For Castrating Children In Front of SCOTUS

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the show.
	Thanks so much for being with us as always.
	My name's Paul Harrell.
	This is the Millstone Report.
	We can't do the program without you watching every single day.
	Wow.
	One of the things I missed yesterday on the program is actually diving into the fact that there is a mustached woman pretending to be a man who is arguing in front of the Supreme Court of the United States on why men, boys, should be Be castrated.
	It's so ironic, right?
	It's like the very definition of irony that you have a woman pretending to be a man.
	She's never actually had the male anatomy in question here, and she is arguing in the highest court of land that children should be chemically castrated or physically castrated.
	It's quite interesting.
	This, of course, is in response to the Christian red states, as I call them, who have been passing laws across the land, I think at least 16 of them, to protect children.
	Now, in my opinion, I don't even think these laws are necessary.
	I'm glad, don't get me wrong, I'm glad that they are Being passed in response to this barbarism that's sanctioned by medical professionals who should be in jail.
	The truth of the matter is, last time I checked, child abuse was illegal in all 50 states.
	It's already illegal.
	We don't really even need these laws.
	We just need law enforcement to start arresting these doctors for abusing children and calling it health care.
	And we had a long conversation yesterday about, you know, neutrality and the culture and how neutrality is a myth.
	You're either a Christian nation or a pagan nation.
	And, you know, the live and let live mentality that many of us, as I used to, you know, have very much libertarian views, but it's a self-evident truth now that those views mean that if...
	It means that we have to just accept that a parent has the right to take a kid to a drag show or a parent has the right to abuse their kids via the medical system and there's nothing we can do and I reject that.
	A lot of people across this country are rejecting that and that's why there's really a complete realignment now on what's permissible and what's not.
	All that being said, the conservative makeup of the Supreme Court is...
	Likely, at least for now, it looks like it's actually going to uphold these laws.
	This is how the mainstream media is reporting it, though, and I think we need to take...
	We just have to kind of bask in just the absolute...
	Well, it's just we need to observe the absolute wickedness and devilry of the mainstream media.
	This is from Axios.
	Headline, Supreme Court seems likely to uphold ban on gender-affirming care.
	So they're still using this terminology.
	Not uphold ban on chemical castration or the castration of kids, but they want to call this gender-affirming care.
	Just the inversion here is something satanic.
	They have control of the language.
	I don't know who said it, but even if we talk about the slippery slope, which we love to talk about here on the program...
	I can't remember who it was, and maybe it's been said multiple times, but if you just take the word homosexuality, there's some people on the right that have said the fact that we even adopted that word, we lost.
	Once we adopted that definition or started using that word, we...
	We had already lost.
	So this really is a war.
	It's an information war, but it's also a war on terminology and the definitions of terms.
	And we lose that.
	We've lost that for decades now, and we've got to reclaim that.
	So listen to this write-up here.
	Who is this guy?
	Sam Baker.
	So, he writes, the Supreme Court seemed inclined Wednesday to uphold laws that ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth.
	The big picture, medical authorities.
	Now, see, this is the thing.
	This is what I can't...
	I still, even though I know things are getting worse and worse and worse, just on a societal scale, on the slippery slope, more and more depraved, inventors of evil, it is incredible to me that medical authorities in the U.S., Are testifying, are writing these papers, I mean, that are saying that this is good.
	Puberty blockers, hormone therapies, that these are good things for kids.
	I still can't wrap my mind around this level of evil and dysfunction.
	That these doctors, who we saw in COVID were very much regarded as a new modern day priestly class.
	The white coats, right?
	Basically, not all doctors, but a lot of them, they kind of acted similarly like the priests of Baal.
	By their word, they're moving the entire society in whatever direction based on intentional deception at the top.
	Not all doctors.
	A lot of doctors were deceived, and they realize that now, but still some of them still haven't come to grips with what they did during COVID. That's why That's why you're hearing news, we'll talk about this later in the show, about, you know, Joe Biden potentially pardoning Anthony Fauci before Trump is sworn in for a second term.
	Why would he need a pardon?
	Anyway, medical authorities in the U.S. largely agree that treatments like puberty blockers and hormone therapy are safe.
	No, they're not.
	No, they're not safe.
	And you're actually, not only are you putting kids on a path, hell, you're putting kids on a path of, you're robbing them of drugs.
	You're robbing them of being parents themselves, robbing them of their own normal sex life.
	You're stripping these kids, you're totally sacrificing who they would have been for the woke sex religion of today.
	Also, bear with me.
	My voice is a little better, but man, I'm still coughing.
	I did bring in some tea this morning, so forgive me.
	I'm still battling the post-Thanksgiving respiratory infection, but I am getting better.
	The court's conservative justices indicated they do not want to overrule state laws banning them for children.
	Driving the news, the court heard oral arguments Wednesday over a Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming care for minors.
	Roughly half the states have similar laws on the books.
	Again, they shouldn't because child abuse is already illegal.
	I guess I would, even to clarify, I guess I would support, and this needs to happen, because we're fighting the culture war.
	I think there needs to be laws in states where they literally open up the child abuse statutes and specifically add this underneath it.
	And I think people would absolutely lose their minds on the left.
	Big corporations might as well, although the pendulum might be swinging back the right way.
	But yeah, we should classify this as child abuse.
	The Tennessee laws, what stuck out to me was I was reading this story Preparing for it.
	Can you see that?
	Yeah, okay.
	The Tennessee law.
	There's a lot of people that believe that the trans-terrorist Audrey Hale, the woman pretending to be a man that went into the Presbyterian school there in Nashville to kill Christians.
	There's a lot of people that believe.
	Of course, we've got the manifesto now.
	Do we have the whole thing?
	That laws like these are actually triggering the trans people to...
	To commit these acts, right?
	And we've seen it.
	A lot of terrorists, domestic terrorists, have actually been trans over and over again.
	And it's not surprising, when you look at the statistics, obviously the left says that if you don't give the gender-affirming care, then the suicide rates increase.
	But the real statistics are that these people are miserable, and even after the surgery or the chemical, they end up killing themselves anyway because they are miserable.
	And they didn't get the relief.
	You know, their idol failed them.
	You know what I mean?
	They didn't get the relief that they were promised by the medical community.
	There are going to be, in the next 10 years, lawyers are going to be made multimillionaires over class-action lawsuits.
	from kids who are now trying to detransition and they've robbed these people Absolutely robbed these people of their lives, right?
	Absolutely have.
	There was a point I was going to make, but it escapes me.
	Maybe it'll come back to me in just a minute.
	I did not spend enough time on this yesterday.
	We kind of got this towards the end of the show.
	But here's the mustache man.
	Here he is.
	National File has, I think, the best take on this.
	This is a woman with a mustache.
	She's pretending to be a man.
	She's never actually been a man before.
	And she's arguing in the United States Supreme Court that it should be legal to castrate minor children.
	Think about that.
	Never actually had the equipment that she's advocating be taken away from young boys who are either being lied to by their parents, they're certainly being lied to by the media, being lied to by schools that have been infiltrated with the LGBTQ RSTL, any would-you-like-to-buy-eval mafia, Whose entire movement depends on demographic success because they're demographically dying.
	They have to have new converts.
	They have to convert the children of normal people in order for their ideology to continue.
	But anyway, here he is.
	Or I'm sorry, here she is.
	Forgive me.
	See how I was talking about we lose when we adopt their language.
	Take a listen to this.
	...Chase Strangio.
	Chase, thanks so much for being here.
	Really appreciate it.
	So the case comes at a time when 26 states have passed laws restricting health care treatments for transgender youth, according to a CNN analysis of data from the nonprofit think tank Movement Advancement Project.
	So how do you plan to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that could have wide-ranging implications beyond the state of Tennessee?
	Well, thank you for having me, Jake.
	And obviously, this is a critical inflection point for transgender people across the country.
	We're coming off of an election season where transgender people played an outside role in people's consciousness in terms of the way in which we were situated as a threat to others.
	And when we look at the map of states that ban this type of evidence-based health care, we went from zero states that had these bans in 2020 to now more than half the country.
	It's incredible.
	I mean, this is nuts that this, I mean, you know, in the olden days, Back when we had decency laws on the books, back when we had blasphemy laws on the books, Texas had an anti-sodomy law that was not overturned until the 21st century, by the way, the Supreme Court.
	A judge would just totally dismiss this out of just pure moral standards, just biblical standards.
	They wouldn't even, especially, I mean, this is just insane that this is allowed to happen in our country, in my opinion.
	But we're not in those times anymore.
	But this is...
	I just want all the...
	You'll hear some Christians who...
	They really want to push back on those of us who are abandoning this idea that live and let live is fine.
	They want to push back on us who say cultural neutrality has failed us.
	A pluralistic society has failed us.
	They push back on that and they say...
	Even the David French's of the world, the New York Times, what did he call...
	The blessings of liberty.
	He calls all stuff like this, this degeneracy, just, you know, you got to put up with it.
	It's a blessing of liberty.
	Behold, your blessing of liberty.
	The question is really a simple one as I see it.
	This is a law that bans medical treatment only when it is prescribed inconsistent with an individual's sex.
	Our argument is that that treats people differently because of their sex and therefore the court has to treat it like all other forms of sex discrimination and that's why it's unconstitutional.
	So, the justices are not convinced.
	Here is, I guess Matt Walsh posted this clip.
	Where Judge Alito pulled up a 195, page 195 of the case report showing that child sex changes don't actually prevent suicide.
	Let's take a listen.
	Actually, well, we'll do this and then get to the constitutional question.
	I got these out of order.
	True in every respect, but on page 195 of the case report it says, there is no evidence that gender affirmative treatments reduce suicide.
	What I think that is referring to is there is no evidence in the studies that this treatment reduces completed suicide.
	And the reason for that is completed suicide thankfully and admittedly is rare and we're talking about a very small population of individuals with studies that don't necessarily have completed suicides within them.
	However, there are multiple studies, long-term longitudinal studies, that do show that there is a reduction in suicidality, which I think is a positive outcome to this treatment.
	Now I know the point I was going to make.
	Because that's ridiculous.
	It doesn't reduce suicide rates.
	I know that's what the ACLU lawyer who's pretending to be a man, who's really a woman, says.
	But this goes directly back to the trans-terrorist comment.
	Statistically, again, forgive me.
	Statistically, if you are...
	Suicide is considered an act of violence.
	Suicide is considered an act of violence against yourself.
	And statistically speaking, if you are willing to...
	Commit violence against yourself.
	You are more likely than other people to commit violence against others.
	That's the point I was trying to make earlier that it escaped me.
	But here's Clarence Thomas.
	Roger Severino.
	And we don't have the audio of this.
	We just have a description of it.
	That Justice Clarence Thomas sprung a killer question on the ACLU lawyer.
	What remedy are you seeking?
	Strangio, flummoxed by such a seemingly simple question, said an injunction.
	Justice Thomas then asked, practically, you would get different treatment based on sex?
	And the trap was laid.
	Strangio said, by the way, the fact that this guy, this woman who pretends to be a man, is named Strangio...
	I mean, you know, you can't get more of a descriptive name.
	I mean, it's like the only thing that could be more of a descriptive name would be like Bizarro Superman.
	Like, why do they call him Bizarro Superman?
	Well, I mean, have you ever seen the comic book character?
	He looks bizarre.
	So, Strangio said that the plaintiff, a girl who identifies as a boy, would be allowed to get drugs for, quote, a typical male puberty despite having a birth sex of female.
	That was the answer.
	That answer made clear that girls who identify as boys would get a right under the Constitution to testosterone, but boys who identify as boys would not, which is sex discrimination.
	So, I mean, I find that stuff interesting.
	I'm not a lawyer.
	I do find the legalese maneuvering interesting, though.
	But bottom line is, you don't need those arguments, right?
	This is child abuse, okay?
	And I know the way the judiciary works, they've got these certain ways they've got to parse out the arguments, but...
	It shouldn't even be...
	You shouldn't even go down that path because what you're dealing with is altogether evil.
	All of it.
	Altogether evil.
	And it should be rejected just based on the fact that...
	Well, the whole idea of this program...
	The Millstone Report.
	It would be better for a millstone to be hung around your neck and drowned into the sea than to cause a little one from stumbling.
	And we as a society don't want to become the Millstone Nation.
	Right now, we're so debauched, you could make a lot of money by just going into the Millstone business.
	A friend of mine says we need to build a factory.
	Millstone factory.
	Let's take a quick time out and let's get to one of our sponsors.
	I want to tell you about Cortez Wealth Management.
	Carlos Cortez.
	Folks, don't give your money to people who are going to invest it in stocks and mutual funds that essentially are owned by BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, all of these people that actually hate you.
	And they actually work these DEI policies.
	Even if they're changing, it doesn't matter.
	They've shown themselves to be who they are.
	These ESG policies, environmental social governance policies, Don't trust your money to these people.
	Don't go to make them more wealthy so they can continue with their anti-Christian bigotry.
	That's my opinion.
	That's why I want you to call Carlos Cortez.
	I want you to ask Carlos what an America First retirement plan is.
	There are ways to invest and grow your wealth without having to fund BlackRock.
	America First Investment Strategy.
	Ask Carlos Cortez what it is.
	Go to CortezWM.com.
	That's CortezWM.com.
	Cortez Wealth Management.
	Or you can call 813-448-3446.
	That's 813-448-3446.
	Back to the show.
	We have...
	One moment.
	Here we go.
	Let's see here.
	Next up.
	So, we do have this audio.
	So, in court proceedings yesterday, Katanji Brown Jackson, who rose to fame among conservatives when she famously couldn't answer Senator Marsha Blackburn from Tennessee, again, Tennessee, her question, what is a woman?
	We remember that.
	I've remarked that this was a...
	Before we get to the audio, I just want to remind everybody, this was such a key data point on the slippery slope.
	Because the gynocracy that, you know, started in the 60s, whether it's the CIA funding women's lib magazines, whether it's that they wanted to destroy the family, whether they wanted to double the tax base by getting women into the workforce, I think it was both.
	But whatever the case may be, the gynocracy has always been about destroying the patriarchy and advancing women's rights.
	Women's rights, women's rights, women's rights.
	Of course, this comes to its zenith really in 1973 when we give an entire class of people the right to murder their babies without being prosecuted for it.
	And again, if aliens were looking down at the planet and they wanted to know, and of course they're interdimensional demons, but let's just accept the little green men from Mars for a second for sake of argument.
	If aliens are looking down at the planet and they want to know who's in charge, the old joke was...
	I don't know, was it Seinfeld?
	Somebody made a joke and they'd see, you know, you're walking your dog and somebody, it wasn't Seinfeld.
	You know, the people that pick up the dog poop in the bags.
	The aliens would assume the dogs were in charge because the humans are, you know, I mean, you would assume.
	Likewise, who has the right to murder and can't be prosecuted for it?
	Women.
	So the aliens would assume, well, women are in charge.
	And they'd be correct because they actually are in many ways.
	The entire idea of women's rights depended on men diminishing, men kowtowing.
	We wouldn't have human resource departments in corporations if it wasn't for women in the workforce.
	All of these things happened because of the gynocracy.
	But all that changes when Katanji Jackson-Brown A Supreme Court Justice refuses to identify what a woman is because of her adherence to the woke sex religion.
	Obviously she could have, but she refused to give Marcia Blackburn the win.
	She also didn't want to make her base mad, right?
	These people are playing for blood.
	They're playing for keeps, right?
	She's not going to give an inch.
	But it's a key data point because it shows you that eventually the idol fails.
	So if women in the current place that they are now just generally is an idol, or if they've been put up on this pedestal where they don't belong, I believe it's very much an idol, right?
	That's one of our idols of the West.
	Women are women themselves.
	That's why everything's so feminine.
	That's why, you know, your churches are more feminine.
	Your sermons are more feminine.
	I mean, there's some pastors that won't even, that gear their entire sermon at how women are going to interpret the words and how it's going to make them feel.
	And that's why men are actually, in many cases, fleeing churches like that because they realize, well, they see the rotten fruit of it, right?
	And again, women clergy.
	We're going to talk about that here in a minute.
	Why were women made to be clergy in some of these mainline Protestant denominations?
	Well, I mean, how are you going to tell a woman who's been given the right to murder their child that they can't be a pastor?
	That would be stupid.
	Of course, it's not stupid because it's in the Bible, but you get my point.
	The fine print in the contract was changed if there was some sort of demonic contract, right?
	We're going to topple the patriarchy and we're going to give women rights.
	And that all depends on there being two distinct sexes.
	Not anymore.
	Because it was never about empowering women.
	It was always about destroying the image of God.
	Us as image bearers of male and female.
	And that's exactly what women's lib led to.
	Women's lib has led to transing kids.
	I mean, women's lib has, you can do this with a lot of things, but that's where we are.
	And so Catanzi Jackson Brown, though, has to see everything through race.
	So this is what she said in oral arguments yesterday at the court.
	Being drawn by the statute.
	That was sort of like the starting point.
	The question was whether it was discriminatory because it applied to both races and it wasn't necessarily invidious or whatever.
	But, you know, as I read the statute here, excuse me, the case here, You know, the court starts off by saying that Virginia is now one of 16 states which prohibit and punish marriages on the basis of racial classifications.
	And when you look at the structure of that law, it looks in terms of, you know, you can't do something that is inconsistent with your own characteristics.
	It's sort of the same thing.
	It's interesting to me that we now have this different argument, and I wonder whether Virginia could have gotten away with what they did here by just making a classification argument the way that Tennessee is in this case.
	Yes, I think that's exactly right, that there is absolutely a parallel between any law that says you can't act inconsistent with a protected characteristic and in all other...
	...being drawn by...
	So, you heard that right.
	That's a kid.
	Tangi Brown-Jackson compared bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage.
	It's funny.
	I never thought about it before because she is a woman and she's on the Supreme Court.
	And I know she's not the first woman on the Supreme Court, but her not defining what a woman is.
	It's her getting into a position, climbing the ladder, and then pulling the ladder up where nobody else can get told.
	Just joking.
	I can't define what a woman is.
	What do you mean?
	William Wolfe.
	Head of the Center for Baptist Leadership, Executive Director of Center for Baptist Leadership, former Trump administration official in his first term, or worked for the Trump administration.
	I mean, I see that's an official.
	Anyway.
	Katagi Brown Jackson compared the physical and chemical mutilation of children to interracial marriage.
	Stottamayor compared the risks of transgender treatments to taking a Tylenol.
	This is what you get from DEI appointments on the Supreme Court.
	Exactly right.
	This is a long thread, and I'm here for it, because we're going to revisit Mark Juhasz and Jeff Younger.
	This is a comprehensive thread on media manipulation.
	And we're going to talk about it here in just a second.
	But before we do, we're going to get a word from Mike Lindell.
	Because of your overwhelming support, our 1488 MyPillow has been one of the biggest sales in MyPillow history.
	I couldn't think of a better way to say thank you than to extend our wholesale pricing through Christmas.
	Get a classic standard MyPillow for only $14.88.
	Upgrade to a queen size, just $18.88.
	King size, only a dollar more.
	Get my body pillows for only $29.88.
	And ready?
	Multi-use MyPillows, only $9.88.
	It's perfect time to stock up for Christmas gifts for everyone on your list.
	Go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
	Use your promo code to take advantage of our wholesale pricing, including my classic standard MyPillows, only $14.88.
	But that's not all.
	I'm so confident you're going to love our classic MyPillows that I'm going to extend my 60-day money-back guarantee until March 1st, 2025. Plus, orders over $75 ship absolutely free.
	Alright, so remember, you're going to want to make sure to use that promo code PH when you shop at MyPillow.com I'm very grateful to partner with MyPillow because...
	They've got great products.
	I already had their pillows.
	But I went on and I got, for the wife, some slippers, which are fantastic.
	I got some as well.
	I wanted to try them out.
	I got the slip-ons.
	She got the moccasins.
	It's like walking on a pillow or walking on a cloud.
	Then you've got the bath mats, which are good.
	The towels are fantastic.
	The sheets, though.
	We got the Giza sheets.
	They're good.
	Make sure you use the promo code PH when you go to MyPillow.com, please.
	Alright, back to the show.
	Check this out.
	National File.
	This is a fantastic thread, and we're going to get into it.
	National File writing, How a Texas Court and Con Inc., Conservative, Inc.
	actively thwarted efforts to end child genital mutilation in America in the first U.S. test case.
	So why are we here as we're talking about what SCOTUS is adjudicating right now?
	This is a case study in Conservative, Inc.
	media subversion.
	Here is Los Angeles Judge Mark Duhas, who recently ruled against Jeff Younger.
	And enabled his ex-wife, who kidnapped him, those are my words, from Texas, took him to California, which is a transgender genital mutilation sanctuary state, so that his ex-wife now can chemically castrate their 12-year-old boys.
	National File, you may have heard the story of Jeff Younger and his son James.
	First things first, Jeff is fighting for the rest of his son James' life.
	Into crypto, help.
	If you're into crypto, you can help James fight there.
	On Facebook, save James' Zuckface page.
	And if you want to know how to save James, this thread is vital.
	Please read it till the end.
	There's James and his boys.
	We've interviewed James Younger several times on this program.
	This is one of the most tragic, heartbreaking stories, and it's finally getting national attention, but only after the judge did what he did, really.
	There was some national attention, but...
	The state of California, along with ten other states, is guilty of conspiring to kidnap minor children from their home states for the express purpose of procuring gender transition surgeries for the children in the new destination state.
	These 11 liberal states are accepting the child genital mutilation tourists in violation of originating state custody orders, despite the fact that 25 states have already banned trans surgeries for children.
	Look at those Christian red states.
	Look at them.
	Even the red states like Montana and Texas are at risk, though.
	This minor child sex change operation tourism is even happening in supposedly conservative states.
	Montana parents...
	I remember this story, say they lost custody of their daughter after opposing 14-year-old gender transition.
	Matter of fact, I think they took her to some clinic in Wyoming to try to, you know, start the drugs.
	The Texas Supreme Court did not believe that Jeff's ex-wife wanted to move James to California in order to transition James into Luna.
	So they let the woman take the child in 10 years of age to California, even though Jeff Younger repeatedly said, they want to trans my kid.
	Texas Supreme Court refused to believe him because, you know, I don't know what their motivation was.
	I feel like, what would it take for you as a judge, if you were a judge, what would it take for you to not be convinced?
	What would it take for you to not err on the side of the benefit of the doubt of the dad who's saying she wants to trans my kid?
	What would it take?
	I only highlight that because I think there's some actual malevolence involved on the part of these judges on the Texas Supreme Court.
	I think they wanted this to happen.
	There, I said it.
	I think somebody on that court wanted this to happen.
	National File, so the Texas Supreme Court ruling reads, neither parent may treat a child with hormonal suppression therapy, puberty blockers, and or transgender reassignment surgery, if any, without the consent of the parents.
	It continues.
	Neither parent has the authority to consent unilaterally to gender transition therapy for their son, whether that therapy takes place in California, Texas, or elsewhere.
	That was the order, but it didn't mean anything.
	Younger and his team argued that SB-107 would allow Georgulus, the ex-wife, the space for an end runaround and any Texas court orders.
	Unbelievably, this one Justice Blaylock disagreed.
	So you've got Jeff Younger here pleading this order.
	She's going to get around it.
	She's going to find a way.
	You're going to have to do something more.
	Justice Blaylock, who needs to hang his head in shame and resign from the Texas Supreme Court...
	Father believes that California enactment of Senate Bill 107, which goes into effect on January 1, 2023, will enable mother to evade the Texas court order prohibiting her from unilaterally consenting to gender transition therapy.
	Father misread California's new law.
	Father did not misread California's new law.
	It just happened.
	Where's Judge Blaylock?
	There needs to be a massive call for a resignation.
	We should make shame great again in this regard.
	He should hang his head in shame and resign and apologize and repent for him being a party to this evil, being a facilitator to this.
	There's a boy whose life is never going to be the same again because of a Texas judge and his arrogance, I'm assuming.
	In his opinion, Judge Blacklock even admits that SB 107 does what Younger said it would do.
	He says SB 107 is a trans refuge bill designed to respond to executive and legislation action in Texas.
	The bill cast a wide net in pursuit of its objectives and contains several provisions barring enforcement in California, a law of another state or another state law that prohibits gender affirming health care.
	Younger argued that the prohibitions of the enforcement of another state's law against gender transition therapy should be seen as a prohibition on enforcement in California of court orders limiting access to such therapy.
	Then Blacklock replied, it is not.
	cut.
	Justice Blacklock says that California law does not supersede the Texas Family Court Order.
	His reasoning?
	A court order allocating the parental rights of divorced parents about the best interest of their child is in no way a law of another state.
	There's just one problem.
	A custody order, also known as a conservatorship order in Texas, is considered legally binding and is considered law in Texas.
	And that's not just Texas law.
	It's the U.S. Constitution.
	The U.S. Constitution's judicial proceedings in every other state shall be given full faith and credit by each state, Article 4, Section 1. That means that Younger's reasoning that prohibitions on the enforcement of another state's law against gender transition therapy should be seen as a prohibition on enforcement in California of court orders limiting access to such, quote, therapy.
	He's 100% correct.
	Historically, in family law, judges have the widest discretion in all areas of law in the U.S. to rule in the best interest of the child.
	The Texas Supreme Court decided it was in the best interest of James to move him to a jurisdiction where it was mandatory to provide him with sex change therapy after the age of 12 if he expressed any dysphoria.
	Yes, you read that right.
	It is mandatory once the child arrives in California.
	In Texas, it is illegal to chemically castrate a child, but in California, when a kid reaches 12 and says they're gender dysphoric, it's mandatory to provide chemical castration care as long as they have one parent that is giving consent, as it is with younger.
	Even the Tampa Bay Times PolitiFact fact-checkers had to admit that California can steal kids to give them transition surgery, though they somehow conclude with a mostly false verdict with respect to DeSantis' original claim.
	Despite all of this, Justice Blacklock, the judge who wrote the majority opinion against Younger, Allowed Georgioulis to take James to California, which brings us to the absolutely complicit drive-by conservative and corporate media establishment.
	The gatekeeping, subversive Bolshevik frauds, and con-eek media landscape work insidiously to enable evil and prevent good.
	That's a strong claim.
	He goes on, we won't allege their motives here, we'll just detail that and how this happens.
	Do you remember the drive-bys that Rush Limbaugh warned us about?
	At the time, the drive-by media, we presumed, were corporate MSN members of the press, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, etc.
	Wrong.
	It's now most of conservative media.
	Here are a few examples.
	On November 19th, Younger tweeted about this tragic court result in L.A. County.
	Judge Mark Juhas ruled that L.A. Children's Hospital can go ahead and chemically castrate Jeff's 12-year-old son, James.
	Elon Musk retweeted Jeff.
	Thank you, Elon.
	That post garnered nearly 17 million impressions.
	And we remember this.
	We interviewed Jeff the day after he posted this tweet.
	And then we got this.
	Afterward, Jeff did a few interviews with the more dedicated conservative outlets.
	Paul Harrell's Millstone Report, Owen Schroyer's War Room, and a few others still waiting on Bannon's War Room show.
	Most of Con Inc. press waited a week to cover.
	Then, Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee and Not the Bee kick into high gear, grifting for traffic off of Jeff's tragic story.
	Does Seth link to Jeff?
	No.
	Now, that's the first question.
	Why not?
	Seth cites the Daily Mail screenshot for their coverage.
	Seth's tweet gets 36.1 million impressions, and it does not link to Jeff Younger, the father who actually tweeted the story.
	The next day, Seth's rag not-to-be reports out a news article containing Seth's tweets and the Daily Mail article.
	Musk also retweets this second B tweet.
	This one gets 36.5 million views on X. Do they link to Jeff Younger?
	No.
	Dylan included screen grabs of Jeff's story, being very careful not to link to Younger directly.
	Seth pitches himself as a Christian.
	Let's see.
	I think I just lost where I was.
	Let me go back then.
	Yeah.
	So, then, Bruce Caitlyn Jenner shares a Libs of TikTok post to X. This one garners 68.7 million views.
	Libs of TikTok also does not link to Jeff's original tweet.
	Why?
	I just, I don't understand why.
	It's odd.
	Isn't it?
	Isn't that odd?
	There's a lot of news pertaining to Younger's case these reporters could have reported on.
	Back in the summer when U-Haas threatened Jeff with prison, they were nowhere to be found.
	The state of California sealed the court files in L.A. County Superior Court.
	U-Haas' court-imposed gag order, refusing to allow even observers into the courtroom to witness the happenings in the Star Chamber, Judge U-Haas openly defied California statutes.
	To his credit, Tyler O'Neill, managing editor at the Daily Signal, covered the story over the summer, so it did get some coverage.
	Uhas' court was threatening to arrest Jeff.
	After earlier in the trial, a reporter leaked some of the proceedings.
	National File covered that.
	Nearly zero of the drive-bys covered the California case, not until Uhas' ruling a few weeks ago.
	Nearly zero of them bothered to cover the news much when Jeff and National File and a few good friends worked to pass the child genital mutilation ban in the Texas State House.
	Only two outlets that might be considered anywhere near mainstream Connick covered the story as the saga played out in California.
	GB News' Ben Chapman and Newsbuster's Tyrion Rose Mandelberg.
	Thanks to them.
	The Connick frauds were only there for the couple of flare-ups in court in Dallas County, Texas back in 2020 and a bit in 2021. Here today, gone tomorrow.
	Once they got their internet traffic, they were gone.
	So then there's this report here.
	While National File covered the gender transition clinics that funded virtually all of the statewide elected officials in Texans.
	That's crazy.
	Thank you.
	He says, It took us two sessions to pass the ban in the Texas legislature.
	This headline, Texas Abbott Patrick Phelan received $1.7 million from PAC linked to transgender clinic for Central American immigrants.
	Yes, GOP leadership in Austin opposed, listen to that, GOP leadership in Austin opposed the child tranny ban.
	So much so, they killed the bill.
	Republicans killed the child trans surgery ban legislation in Texas in the year 2021. And it's all about the money.
	This is an excellent thread, and it's something that we all need to be aware of so that we all have a healthy skepticism of where we get our media, where we get our news, and really just everything.
	Not to say that there aren't people out there.
	I'm not going to say that.
	There are people out there in so-called conning that don't do good work.
	I'm not going to say that, but you do have to understand, you have to take everything, everything with a grain of salt.
	And you also have to see previous tweets about which media outlets are actually being funded by international sovereign wealth.
	You know, from other countries and that sort of thing.
	So that's a fascinating thread, and I wanted to get into the weeds on that on purpose because I thought it was, you know, very useful, useful thing to talk about.
	Before we go any further, I'm going to take a quick break here, and I want to tell you about Man's Edge.
	That's right, from Neutronics Labs.
	Never been a better time, as we were talking about the gynocracy, never been a better time for you to get some more testosterone.
	I turned 40 this year, so I started taking Neutronics Labs, a man's edge testosterone booster to rebuild, repair, rejuvenate.
	Also, I've been taking IGF-1 Plus with glutathione.
	I've also been taking IGF-1, which is derived from a deer antler velvet from New Zealand, one of the fastest regenerative substances on the planet.
	This is something that my body needs at this stage in life.
	But you don't have to be 40 or older to take it.
	You can take it as you're younger.
	A lot of people love this stuff.
	Younger guys who are bodybuilding because the IGF-1 helps you recover faster.
	Glutathione is great for detoxing.
	Our environment is more and more poisonous around us.
	If you want to support the work I'm doing here at the Millstone Report and other places, I want you to go to NeutronicsLabs.com slash Paul.
	Use my name, Paul.
	Save 10%.
	And you save even more if you sign up for AutoShip.
	NeutronicsLabs.com slash Paul.
	Save even more.
	Sign up for AutoShip.
	Use my name, Paul.
	And get 10% off.
	Alright, back to this.
	What else we got here?
	Yeah, this is a weird story.
	The update here, the New York Police Department has released a photo of the UnitedHealthcare CEO murder suspect without a mask.
	So this is a photo the NYPD has released.
	A lot of people are wondering.
	Here's the blurred image of the shooting.
	Shipwreck, which is always a great follow on X. Watch the person who shot Brian Thompson.
	He was calm as a cucumber.
	100% a hired hit.
	He just walks away.
	Now, there's some debate over this.
	Some people think that this was a professional job.
	Others think that it wasn't.
	He definitely is calm as a cucumber.
	Some people say he's a professional because he's catching the shell casings.
	Other people say he's gun jammed.
	I don't know.
	He definitely was using the suppressor.
	Gun control in New York City is not working out too good for him, by the way.
	Just an observation.
	But who is this guy?
	Here's the latest...
	Actually, I pulled this shipwreck video because here's the latest.
	Deny, defend, and depose.
	For the words that were encrypted on the shell casings that were found at the unaliving scene of Brian Thompson...
	It's eerily similar to Delay, Deny, and Defend, which is a book written about how insurance companies do certain tactics so that they don't have to pay your claims.
	These tactics include delaying the process to frustrate claimants, denying coverage by citing policy terms, and defending against claims in court to avoid payoffs.
	He still ain't caught the guy, even though he did what he did in broad daylight during the busiest time of downtown New York City.
	He did what he did in front of multiple witnesses.
	He did what he did in front of multiple CTV cameras.
	And then after he was done doing what he did, he got on a city bike, which can be tracked by the city, and rode away.
	Alright, so obviously they have released, again, the photo now at this point, since she made that video.
	They're claiming that this is who he is.
	Now, who's the guy that died?
	UnitedHealthcare CEO. First of all, UnitedHealthcare, the largest healthcare insurance and services provider in the world, ranks number eight on Fortune's Global 500. UnitedHealthcare, one of the main pushers of the COVID vaccine and tests and pioneered the use of AI to determine who should be denied healthcare coverage.
	A lot of people have said they've been upset with the reaction to this guy's death.
	Obviously he was a father, he did have children, and there is a tragic component to all of that.
	There's no doubt about it.
	However, when you take into consideration how corrupt the medical-industrial complex is, How insurance companies and hospitals have essentially carved out for themselves.
	I can only compare it to organized crime.
	That's what it is.
	And that's before we even talk about remdesivir.
	That's before we even talk about the COVID shots.
	That's before we talk about all of the corruption and the entire scandemic that was used.
	Against the American people.
	This stuff, I mean, you know, there are people that are not sorry.
	They don't feel sorry for this guy because of the corruption that he represents and his company represents.
	Now, there are people, and I couldn't confirm this.
	I know he has testified before Congress before.
	People were saying he was about to testify before Congress before being shot.
	I didn't spend a lot of time on it, but I couldn't actually find...
	That confirmed.
	I do know he has testified in front of Congress before.
	I don't know if he was about to.
	He was actually on his way to a shareholders meeting in New York.
	He doesn't even live in New York.
	He lives in Minnesota.
	But it is something to think about.
	But it brings up kind of this next piece here.
	R. Davis Yountz, friend of the program, this is the attorney of Michael Cassidy who chopped the head off of the Baphomet statue in the Iowa Statehouse.
	This is his attorney.
	Really good guy.
	Responding to the leading report saying that the Biden White House is reportedly considering preemptive pardons for Adam Schiff, Liz Cheney, and Anthony Fauci.
	Why would Anthony Fauci need a pardon unless he lied to Congress, participated in illegal research, hid the danger from the American public, personally profited from the COVID jabs, etc.?
	But purely none of that is true, right?
	None of that is true, right?
	I don't know.
	We've got to wait and read between the lines on this thing here, on the hit.
	I mean, it's clearly a hit.
	It's a targeted hit.
	We know that.
	We'll wait and see.
	And then we got this guy, Peter Hotez, part of the medical industrial complex, propaganda complex.
	He's warning that after Trump gets into office, we're going to have more viruses.
	Here's the reason why we need to care about this stuff, Nicole, is that we have some...
	Big picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st.
	Mr. Bloomberg mentioned H5N1. That I'm really worried about.
	It's all over wild birds on the western part of the United States and going up in the north.
	It's getting into the poultry.
	We're seeing sporadic human cases, no human-to-human transmission yet, but that could happen.
	It's in the cattle, it's in the milk, and that's just the beginning.
	We have another major coronavirus likely brewing in Asia.
	We've had SARS in 2002, SARS-2, COVID-19 in 2019, and we know these viruses are jumping from bats to people thousands of times a year, but there's still more.
	Big stuff.
	Big picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st, the day after Trump gets inaugurated.
	These people, they tell you what they're going to do before they do it.
	There is absolutely no question about that.
	All right, we got another one for you.
	And let us confess our faith today in the words of the Sparkle Creed.
	I believe in the non-binary God.
	And now it's time for I'm Already Against Women Clergy.
	You don't have to convince me.
	Alright, so for this episode's I'm Already Against Women Clergy, it comes to you again courtesy of Protestia.
	Great follow.
	We've got lady preacher Savelle Foy claiming that the reason Zacharias could not speak for nine months following the encounter with Gabriel is because God knew that if you let him talk, you'll mess up the whole plan.
	Again, speaking of the gynocracy...
	Fight the patriarchy, right?
	Here it is.
	If you want to know where your life is headed, listen to the words that are coming out of your mouth.
	Well, you know, there's a scripture in the Bible that says we are snared by the words of our mouth.
	You know what a snare is?
	It's a trap.
	So when you're saying things like, no matter what I do, my business won't grow, you just trapped yourself in the business not growing.
	When you're saying things like, I guess at this rate I'll be in debt forever.
	You just trapped yourself into staying in debt.
	Your words are powerful.
	There's a story in the Bible and there was this angel who appeared to Zachariah.
	He said, Zachariah, you're going to have a baby and I want you to name him John.
	And Zachariah said, are you kidding me?
	Do you know how old I am?
	And do you know what the angel did?
	He zipped his lips.
	He literally zipped the man's lips.
	He could not talk for nine months.
	You know why?
	Because God knew, if I let you talk, you will mess up my whole plan with your negativity.
	So what the Lord said to me was, if you're not going to speak faith, don't speak at all.
	I got nothing for you.
	I got absolutely nothing for you.
	This has been I'm Already Against Women Clergy.
	You don't have to convince me.
	I mean, what are you going to do with that?
	Really?
	I mean, can you imagine sitting under that teaching?
	Had props.
	Had props and everything.
	Unbelievable.
	Unbelievable.
	I couldn't believe this, but this just shows that there's still work to do to kind of get all of this DEI woke stuff out of our culture.
	The Harry Potter series, you guys know how they can't stand the author of those books, Rowling, J.K. Rowling, because she doesn't go along with the trans agenda.
	This broke, that there is a person of color, Papa Isidou, Has been offered the role to play Severus Snape in the Harry Potter TV series.
	So this is what Severus Snape looked like in the movies.
	So they've got to race-swap him for diversity, equity, inclusion.
	Nerdrotic, who's a great follow.
	Make some of the best YouTube content out there fighting the culture war, at least, you know, in Hollywood and just the woke agenda and pointing out how ridiculous it is and how people are going bankrupt.
	The studios are, you know, miss after miss.
	You know, they want to make it the fans' fault when we don't like this nonsense.
	Yeah, the resemblance is uncanny.
	But this is the thing.
	The memes out there, the memes that are out there about...
	The race swapping that goes on when they do these reboots are some of the funniest stuff that I think I've seen in a long time.
	We have some good news.
	Not all appointments have been great, some of them better than others.
	This is a good appointment.
	This is a good appointment.
	President Donald Trump saying he's pleased to announce that Peter Navarro A man who was treated horribly by the deep state, or whatever else you would like to call it, will serve as my senior counselor for trade and manufacturing.
	During my first term, few were more effective or tenacious than Peter in enforcing my two sacred rules, buy American, hire American.
	He helped me renegotiate unfair trade deals like NAFTA and the Korean-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, and he moved every one of my tariff and trade actions fast.
	Navarro also went to jail because of Congress and their, you know, sham J6 trial, you know, or the J6 hearings.
	You remember that?
	Peter Navarro is one of the guys who has come out and blown the whistle on Anthony Fauci and how he yelled at him in the White House during the entire COVID scandemic.
	Folks, that's all the time that we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
	Follow me on x at real Paul Harrell.
	We're not doing a Paul Harrell program later today.
	I've got some stuff I've got to do in the afternoon, so I won't be on the air this afternoon.
	I'm also just going to try to recuperate a little bit better from this ongoing post-Thanksgiving respiratory illness.
	I don't think it's a virus.
	Anyway.
	But I'm going to be back here tomorrow.
	Unless I'm providentially hindered, I'll be back here tomorrow.
	Wishing you a happy Friday.
	God bless everybody out there.

▲