All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 1, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
55:43
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Rasmussen's Mark Mitchell: Trump Leading In Battleground States
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
And my prayer is this.
I asked God for 19 years to put me in a position where I could end the chronic disease epidemic and bring health back to our children.
And in August, God sent me Donald Trump.
Thank you.
Welcome to the Millstone Report.
Ladies and gentlemen, happy Friday.
Thank you so much for being with us.
We can't do the program without you.
You guys know the drill.
Depending on when you are watching or listening to this broadcast, we're either five or four days away from the 2024 presidential election.
This morning, Rasmussen Reports ran this headline, quote, The piece goes on and says that a new telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports and American Thinker finds that if the election were held today, 49% of likely Pennsylvania voters would vote for Trump, while 47% would vote for Harris.
2% say they would vote for some other candidate, and another 2% are still undecided.
It says here, in 2020, President Joe Biden beat Trump, we all know, by a slender margin in Pennsylvania.
So, joining us now to talk more about that, we have the top pollster of Rasmussen Reports.
Mark Mitchell is with us.
Mark, welcome to the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for your time.
Yeah, happy to be here.
I'm actually the only pollster, in fact, at Rasmussen Report.
Small, independent company.
We're not like these big, scummy, mainstream media pollsters with 50 people on the team.
Well, you guys do incredible work, and I've been following some of the, really all of everything you've been saying, certainly the last week or so.
We have one of your tweets, you know, you talk about the last two cycles, the margin of the swing states was about three to four points to the right in the final NPV. The current RCP aggregate shows Trump up nationally.
Early voting trends look favorable to Republicans.
Can you shed some more light on that?
Because there are some people that think we are cannibalizing our Election Day vote, but I think your figures dispute that.
Let's start with the first part of that, because I think it's a really great way to look at the race without even really looking at individual pollsters.
Clinton won the national popular vote by like two and a half points, yet she lost.
So she lost most of the battlegrounds.
So they're roughly tied.
Joe Biden in 2020 did four and a half points national popular vote, but he won every battleground narrowly.
So there the national popular vote was Four points-ish to the left of the battlegrounds.
Right now, everybody pretty much agrees that Donald Trump is roughly tied.
That's what the RealClearPolitics aggregate, the entire polling industry, says for the national popular vote.
So if history is a guide with Trump on the ballot, he should be doing about three to four points better than the national popular vote in the battlegrounds, which means he sweeps them all.
The problem is is that everybody's kind of statistically hurting and showing that the race is tied.
But we all know that left-wing media pollsters underestimate Trump performance.
And I think the big question mark is, is the national popular vote polling too right or is the state polling too left?
In my opinion, all of the early data points that the state polling is again too left.
So now we're talking about a situation where Trump probably sweeps all the battlegrounds and maybe picks up some of the close ones like New Hampshire or Virginia.
And we also had this narrative yesterday where people were trying to say that the Trump campaign is nervous.
There were, quote, you know, internal leaks, people on CNN saying that they were nervous that there were more women turning out.
But here on the screen here, you debunk that new fake narrative as well.
Yeah, there's a lot of fake COPE narratives.
Twitter's great, it's a good conversation, but what you're seeing is people glom on to some pretty ridiculous stuff.
I can tell you, based on connections I have, that Donald Trump is absolutely not confident, and that's why he's going to visit places like New Mexico.
And New Hampshire.
He's not doing a daily gamut in every single city in North Carolina and Pennsylvania.
And my polling shows that North Carolina and Pennsylvania are not close.
We have Trump up two or three points in Pennsylvania and five and three points in North Carolina.
So those are, again, pretty safe considering All of the early voting results show that Republicans are doing better.
Now, the cope is, oh, Republicans are doing better because Donald Trump told them not to vote on Election Day.
People can go to RasmussenReports.com and fact check me themselves.
All of this polling was sponsored by American Thinker, so everybody can get it to cross tabs.
And we ask, well, when do you plan on voting?
And still a really large portion plan to vote on election day, depending on the state, it's like 50, 55, 60%.
Donald Trump wins between 7 and 12 points with people who plan to vote on election day.
So it's not like some outlier I found in one state.
It's a signal, a pattern that happens in every single one of the battlegrounds.
So my take on that is, yeah, maybe Donald Trump cannibalized some of his Election Day voters, but what they've been focused on is low propensity first-time voters, which the polls are not geared towards picking up.
I can tell you that right now.
And all of the polling shows that Republicans still have gas in the tank for Election Day.
Do you think come Tuesday morning, based on the final early voting totals, that, I mean, assuming there's not chaos, we have the intel oligarchs telling us that they're warning of domestic terrorist threats that are going to happen on Election Day.
I think, you know, I've been saying, creating for themselves a buffet of potential false flag options.
But barring that that doesn't happen, do you think with the data that we're going to have...
Trump should have, we should basically, some people have said we should know on election day, you know, if the Republicans have still, if they're still outperforming the early vote in places like Nevada, that things should look very good for Trump, that he's basically a shoo-in according to the data.
Would you agree with that or would you push back on that?
I'm a polling truther, and I definitely have a bead on how cynical and power crazy the Democrat Party is.
They never would have done the switcheroo if they actually respected democracy.
And the polling has always shown, my polling has always shown Donald Trump winning.
So I've always thought, well, a lot of stuff could happen.
But if you look at the list of potential black swan events that the Democrats could count on, they're running out of time.
I mean, it's like...
Biden could have resigned.
That might have given them the win.
Carter could have died.
That might have given them the win.
They could have gotten into World War III. That could have maybe given them the win.
But we got like four or five days left, like you said, and it looks really bad for Democrats.
So what they need is something, anything, to suppress Democrats.
The Trump turnout, and I think they got to a point where literally nobody trusts the media, and so any October surprise they drop is not going to work, and you're right.
They're like, now we're talking about false flags.
That might sound conspiracy theorist, but when you take anything that is a conspiracy theory, like Mockingbird Media, 64% of voters do think that our intel agents are giving political news to the news media to pass on to people.
That's how corrupt everybody thinks.
The government is.
So, listen, we may be in a situation where Donald Trump's doing better in the polls than he ever has.
The popular vote, he's winning.
And yet, for some reason, the critical state that Kamala Harris needs Just like, decide to stop voting, hang out, find stuff, wait for the overseas ballots.
That's going to be really bad for the country, because I think the signs do, any rational data-driven person can show that the signs are really bad for Kamala Harris, even like Harry Anton on CNN is telling us.
So, I think if Trump does flip Virginia, I think if the returns are so good for Trump in Pennsylvania that they can call it that night, I think it would be healthy for the country.
Hey, listen, even if Harris somehow does way better than the polls and the polls were all wrong, like, fine, call it on election night.
Actually count the votes.
Because people are, I mean, the level of people that think there's going to be a civil war in the next couple years is...
Here's the thing, though.
You showed the Fabrizio brief.
I'm pretty sure that that was prepared for public release, and I'm pretty sure that Their internal polling is to the right of mine, because I'm trying to put out a base case, and they're probably sharpening the pencil and putting out what they really think is going to happen, and I'm sure that it's better for Trump than my numbers show.
What you're actually seeing is a lot of discussion on Twitter about things that people have found from an election integrity standpoint, so I think those are all actually really good signs.
This is a ton of caveats.
I mean, I guess this is my long way of saying I do think we're going to know that Donald Trump won on election night.
Wow.
You mentioned, and I saw you tweet this, I guess, I don't know if it was yesterday or the day before, that half of the country...
I mean, I expect violence whether Trump wins or whether Trump loses.
Now, it could be federal agent provocateur violence disguised as Trump violence.
But yeah, I expect that.
I mean, I feel like the nation right now is a powder keg.
Yeah, here's what we asked.
How likely is it that there will be a violent reaction after the election if Kamala Harris is elected?
26% say very likely, 25% say somewhat, so a majority 51% say it's likely.
And this was taken like two weeks out.
So it's not like we took it six months ago.
People are like, yeah, violence is gonna happen in two weeks.
How likely is it there will be a violent reaction after the election if Donald Trump is elected president?
47% at least somewhat likely.
So basically within spitting distance, roughly half, irregardless of who wins.
But what is funny and crazy And I think shows that there's a deeper, darker issue is that the biggest number by party was Democrats who think there will be violence if Kamala Harris is elected.
36% say very likely.
64% say at least somewhat likely.
So almost two-thirds of Democrats think that if Harris is elected, there's going to be violence.
And that's because MSNBC is telling them that MAGA extremists are itching for war or are ready to follow their orange Hitler into the new Third Reich.
And like Republicans, only 53% of Republicans think it's likely if Donald Trump wins.
So I think, and we've been following this for a long time, MSNBC and CNN have been radicalizing the left as part of their business model.
It has not been healthy for the country.
And it's like there are two different Americas.
They have two totally different issue sets.
You hear a lot of people talk about the issue sets and how economy and the border are number one and number two.
They are, but if you throw abortion and threats to democracy into the mix, that's like a red flag for CNN and MSNBC viewers and threats to democracy is their number one answer.
Right now, they're essentially lying about what Donald Trump said about Liz Cheney the other night at a Tucker Carlson event.
They're saying that Trump's calling for her to be executed.
To your point, CNN, we've got the clip.
We're going to play it later in the show.
They are just actively deceiving.
Of course, that's what they exist to do now is to actively deceive the people that listen to them.
They actively lie all the time.
You mentioned Virginia, and I saw that you have this, and you mentioned the idea of flipping Virginia.
I thought Trump could have flipped or probably did flip Virginia the last time.
Yeah.
But here we go.
So here's a different poll saying that Kamala is up a huge 10 points, but you're saying, no, this is eight points to the left of us.
So your polling is showing that it's actually a very close race in Virginia.
Yeah, I had a Harris plus three and a Harris plus two.
So I actually got to sample Virginia twice, and that gives me a lot more confidence, and I'm at least directionally correct.
And again, these are state polls.
State polls are hard.
There's a 3% margin of error.
Caveat, caveat, caveat, right?
But who thought we'd be talking about Virginia when everybody in the media is saying that this race is too close to call?
And then it's like, okay, well, Rasmussen says that Trump's within striking distance of Virginia, and fine, and everybody dismisses us.
And then it's like, oh, Republicans are leading in the early ballot, right?
And then somebody puts out, like, a Harris plus 8 or 10 or whatever.
And it's like, okay, it's a poll.
It's not an interpretation of the early data that's out there, but they have to look and have to know.
And so, you know, there have been a lot less outliers, I will say, This time, there have been a lot less people just throwing ridiculous numbers out there like Quinnipiac does.
So that's good.
I think the polling is better, and yet you still kind of see these suppression polls dropped, and I'm not sure if this one got into the RealClearPolitics aggregate or not, but I'll give you a really good example of a suppression poll that was dropped in New York Times-Siena, which is like 538's number one ranked pollster, and I actually do think they're pretty good at polling.
What they've been doing is they've been putting out swing states in kind of two or three state sets.
And you'll see one that's like Arizona Trump plus four, and then you'll see one that's like Pennsylvania Harris plus three.
And so on the aggregate, those two kind of cancel each other out.
And New York Times is putting out a battleground poll that shows the race tide.
But if you look in their cross tabs, you see that, well, the Arizona 2020 recall vote is about even.
So that's about right, Trump plus four.
But then in Pennsylvania, they oversample Biden 2020 voters by eight points.
And so that's really a Trump plus four return in Pennsylvania, the farthest right poll that's ever been put out yet this cycle.
I mean, like anybody in the industry can read those crosstabs, anybody can, and look at them and say, wow, these are wrong.
I mean, it's a good sample.
They did all their weightings.
They literally just didn't correct for their oversample of Biden supporters because they wanted to show that Trump wasn't winning the most important battleground state.
That's a suppression poll.
Let me ask you this last question, okay?
Last question.
I have this tweet.
So this was the CNBC headline, S&P 500, Nasdaq suffered their worst day in over a month, led lower by tech live updates.
You say stock market voted early in person this year.
What did you mean by that?
What are the financial markets telling us?
What do they think is going to happen?
Well, first off, I think there are a lot of powerful economic interests that want to see a continuation of the kleptocratic oligarchy in D.C. Let's just put it that way.
And how I know is that every other institution is seemingly weaponized against a change of any kind in government.
That's why the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago.
That's why multiple leftist prosecutors went after Donald Trump.
That's why literally over 60% of Americans think that January 6th was a fedsurrection provoked by federal agents.
And that's why 60% of people in the country now think the media is the enemy of the people.
So everything has been weaponized.
And what we've been showing time after time, every month they drop the unemployment report.
They put out a number that says 4.1.
Well, we ask people what their work status is every day of the month, and we put out a result that shows that the unemployment rate is 8.7.
So powerful economic interests, in my opinion, are lying about the state of the economy to maintain the status quo.
And what we know is that the stock market reacts when there's a shock to the status quo.
I don't think that people suspect that Donald Trump's presidency will be worse from an economic standpoint, but it will certainly be a change, and there will be winners and losers.
And I think that's what...
If you see a shock to...
The stock markets had a really great run.
A lot of inflation actually drives the numbers higher, and we can argue about how much inflation there is, but the rich seem to be getting richer, and there seems to be a stock momentum play to pile in after just...
Continual growth, continual inflation, and maybe Donald Trump's deflationary, or maybe he rebalances the credit system, or maybe the taxes come in, or maybe tariffs rejigger who's the winner and who's the loser.
I think there's probably going to be some chaos if Trump gets elected, but it's, I guess, growing pains, right?
I really appreciate your time, Mark Mitchell.
And I will say, you said the enemy of the American people.
The first person, because you're a pollster, the first person I ever heard say that.
You know, publicly was the late pollster, the Democrat pollster, Pat Cadell, I believe.
Back during the Obama Benghazi, they blamed it on a tape.
That's when he called the American media the enemy of the American people.
And we have come, we've gotten way worse on this slippery slope since then.
I'll give you the last word, sir.
Pat Cadell.
Where have I heard that name?
Oh, that's right.
I heard that name in a 1980 article in Times Magazine called How the Pollsters Got It Wrong.
And he was in there proposing that, well, last week or two of the 1980 race is everybody just had a gut check and decided, no, I can't vote for Carter.
I've got to vote for Reagan.
But now having been a pollster...
And gone through a cycle like this before.
It's like, no, the pollsters were lying, and I think we're going to see that again.
And luckily, Rasmussen Reports was there as a nice, steady basis for everybody to understand, well, this is really what's happening in the race.
So maybe I help the industry, and maybe we'll see whether the polls are too wrong to the right or too wrong to the left again.
But I do think it looks like a solid Trump win at this point.
Mark Mitchell, really appreciate it, sir.
Thank you so much for your time and get some rest because I know you're going to be busy here in the next few days.
Yeah, I'm taking the weekend off, actually.
Yes, thank you.
Well, good.
Thank you so much, sir.
We appreciate it.
Love your work.
Best of luck to you.
Folks, before we get on with the rest of the program, I do want to tell you about Cortez Wealth Management before we go any further.
So what is an America First investment strategy?
Well, first of all, you have to know if you do have money, if you're lucky to have money to invest somewhere, the conventional, traditional places to invest your money, you're going to be funding companies, you know, that are owned by BlackRock.
What can you say, BlackRock?
They basically have the woke mind virus.
They're committed to the woke sex religion.
So your money is going to fund the things that actually are against your interests, actually against the interests of you, your family, this country, traditional American values, however you want to square it.
That's why you need to call Carlos Cortez or go to CortezWM.com 813-448-3446 Find out what an America First investment strategy looks like.
What is an America First retirement plan?
He's put it together.
It doesn't cost you anything to call him.
Have a conversation.
And I think you're going to be, I know you're going to be very impressed with the returns and what he gets.
Again, CortezWM.com, 813-448-3446.
And mention my name, Paul, when you call, so he knows where folks heard about his American First Investment strategy.
Okay.
Again, special thanks to Mark Mitchell.
really appreciate him coming on the program um and shedding some light on everything that's going on right now the situation is extremely fluid as i mentioned yesterday and i mentioned today it is a powder keg there's no way around that um everybody is bracing for impact as we careen towards november 5th we are five days away and it is not looking good the
The media grasping at straws, as I told you earlier, and they've got a lot to work with.
All they can do is lie at this point.
So we have this other report, headline, U.S. economy added just 12,000 jobs in October impacted by hurricanes and Boeing strike.
Well, that's going to be their spin on it, right?
They can't possibly run a headline like this and make it a negative on the Biden-Harris, or I guess I should say the Harris-Biden regime, right?
Can't possibly do that.
And we also have this.
Okay, so to lighten the mood before we transition into some real hard hitters.
I'm not a fan of Halloween, okay?
Yesterday was Halloween, or as I affectionately refer to Halloween as Reformation Day, 1517, Martin Luther nailing the 99 Theses.
I get it.
Some of our audience are Catholics, and that's not your jam.
I understand, but to me, yesterday was Reformation Day.
I don't like Halloween.
I certainly don't like how dark it's gotten.
I don't like the terrifying blood, the gore, the death, people putting up Halloween decorations in their yard.
Now, I don't get it.
That's not something that happened when I was growing up.
When I was growing up, people didn't dress up as vampires.
They might have dressed up as a ninja turtle.
Things are different now, right?
It's just totally different, but whatever, to each his own.
Some people still want to do Halloween, and I think I've found, I think, I know, I've found, I think my favorite Halloween costume ever, and this is coming again from somebody who doesn't like Halloween, but you gotta have a little political institutional memory.
So here at the Trump rally, was this the Trump rally in Arizona last night?
There's so many rallies going on, I may get it wrong, but listen to this.
So that is an impression of this famous.
When Donald Trump won the first time, we have this lady that went home.
Donald J Trump is now president of the United States that's always in for the great order to be able to introduce for the first time ever anywhere the 45th president of the United States of America Donald I mean, I don't know about you.
I actually think that's a pretty good impression.
Let's play it again.
That made me laugh.
That made me really laugh.
Okay, so that made me laugh, but not as hard as what I'm about to show you.
Hugh Hewitt walked off the set of Washington Post Live.
Jack Posobiec tweeted this out.
This is something that you have to behold.
Because this is fantastic.
Me, or does it seem like this week Donald Trump is laying the groundwork for contesting the election by complaining that cheating was taking place in Pennsylvania by suing Bucks County for alleged irregularities?
And this is on top of his continual assertion that if he loses, it's because of cheating.
Yeah, he's been laying the groundwork for this just not in the last week, but in the last No election can be fair in Donald Trump's mind unless Donald Trump wins it.
And I think we are going to see him both rev up his supporters to contest elections.
Outside of courtrooms and go to every courtroom he can in America where it's relevant to make whatever arguments he can, no matter how far-fetched.
We saw how that worked out last time, but it didn't work out this time.
That may not happen this time.
And now I'll let you go, Hugh.
Well, I've just got to say, we're news people, even though we're at the opinion section.
It's got to be reported.
Bucks County was reversed by the court.
And instructed to open up extra days because they violated the law and told people to go home.
So that lawsuit was brought by the Republican National Committee and it was successful.
The Supreme Court ruled that Glenn Youngkin was successful.
We are news people, even though we have opinions, and we have to report the whole story if we bring up part of the story.
So yes, he's upset about Bucks County, but he was right and he won in court.
That's the story.
I'll let you keep going, Jonathan.
No, I'm just, I don't appreciate being lectured about reporting when, Hugh, many times you come here saying lots of things that aren't based in fact.
I won't come back, Jonathan.
I'm done.
I'm done.
This is the most unfair election ad I have ever been a part of.
You guys are working.
That's fine.
I'm done.
So, Ruth, you wrote a column this week ending with this line.
And actually, I think this is perfect.
Wait.
We're going to put it on the screen.
It gets worse.
You wrote, you want to know the stakes of this election?
Not only democracy, but decency.
Talk more about that, Ruth.
Okay, I'm collecting myself.
Oh, Ruth froze.
We lost Ruth.
Ruth is frozen.
So hang in there, everyone.
We're going to see if we can try to get Ruth back.
This man is a haughty little poodle.
This man is a haughty little poodle.
Back to this very...
We're going to get Ruth back in a moment.
This is First Look, Washington Post Live's nonstop shop for news...
News and analysis and Ruth is back.
So I'm going to read that quote back again from your column, Ruth, where you wrote, you want to know the stakes of this election?
Not only democracy, but decency.
Oh, we lost Ruth again.
Everybody, if you've been watching First Look, you know that these conversations can be interesting, contentious.
Oh, fantastic.
But boy, he did not like Hugh Hewitt with the facts.
The fact of the matter is they were cheating in Bucks County.
They are trying to protect the Democrat early vote firewall.
And they were telling people to go home.
They were working half days at Bucks County.
They were sending people away at 1.30.
They were closing down.
They were saying, we quit.
If you're not in line, if you're not in line at 1.30, then we're not taking anybody.
People were showing up at 3.
They were showing up at 4.
They were complaining.
And guess what?
The Trump campaign sued.
A judge sided with them.
You were violating election law.
And so now they've got to be open until 5, and they extended the days for people to vote in Bucks County.
Hugh Hewitt brings that up, that this is not about...
You know, this whole thing was, one of their key arguments was, well, there was no cheating in the 2020 election because every court that heard it, of course the courts are corrupt, we get one court that actually reverses it, says that it is fraud, and now, oh, they don't even want to report on it.
So, you know what?
Good for Hugh Hewitt.
Good for Hugh Hewitt for walking off that stage because it's a total joke.
Everybody knows it.
But the media is not going to stop.
The media is actively deceiving their audience.
Lips of TikTok.
Every media outlet is reporting on the new Liz Cheney hoax.
Trump did not call for her to be killed.
For those of you who don't know...
This is what Reuters is saying.
Reuters, Trump suggests Liz...
This is Reuters news agency.
Trump suggests Liz Cheney should face firing squad for her foreign policy stance.
Of course, that's not at all what Donald Trump said.
Is it weird?
Let's listen to what Donald Trump said and you be the judge.
...for you to see Liz Cheney, that'd be Dick Cheney's repulsive little daughter, running against you with Kamala Harris.
Well, I think it hurts Kamala a lot, actually.
Look, she's a deranged person.
But the reason she couldn't stand me is that she always wanted to go to war with people.
I don't want to go to war.
She wanted to go.
She wanted to stay in Syria.
I took them out.
She wanted to stay in Iraq.
I took them out.
I mean, if it were up to her, we'd be in 50 different countries.
That's right.
She's a radical war hawk.
Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay?
Let's see how she feels about it.
You know, when the guns are trained in her face.
You know, they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee, Will, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.
But she's a stupid person.
And I used to have meetings with a lot of people, and she always wanted to go to war with people.
This is...
This is a basic point.
This is a basic point.
You know, what's the song?
I ain't no senator's son.
Meaning, it's the senator's son's not going to go to war.
Right?
It's not the senator's son that's going to go to war.
It's the average person who's not connected that's going to get drafted and go to war.
He's talking about Washington, D.C. He's talking about the fact that Lindsey Graham and Liz Cheney, people like that, they love to sit in Washington, D.C. while they sacrifice American soldiers for what?
For the military-industrial complex?
For some sort of profit money laundering scheme that we...
We don't quite know the facts of, like, what exactly is their risk?
And it's a classic point that used to be made, by the way, by the left all the time.
I remember when the Democrat Party was anti-war.
I remember when they did not want more bloodshed.
They wanted peace.
And now the Democrat Party does everything that the Uniparty wants it to, the military-industrial complex wants it to, and they believe everything the FBI says is the gospel truth.
And so they're taking this and they're trying to say at the last minute, grass-minute straws.
Now, it's not really, I don't think it's going to work.
The people that it's going to work on are already voting for Kamala Harris anyway.
Here's CNN lying about it.
I don't think you even need to call it fired upon.
He's saying quite explicitly and unambiguously that Liz Cheney should be shot, should be executed by firing squad.
Four days out from election day.
That is a complete and total lie.
You just heard the context.
But these people are desperate.
And former President Donald Trump is escalating his violent rhetoric, suggesting one of his most prominent critics, the former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, should be fired upon.
A reaction to what Donald Trump said about Liz Cheney.
Yeah, well look, I mean, it was completely inappropriate, dangerous, and unbecoming of a leader.
Mr.
Trump was literally going after someone who doesn't.
It says, CNN's lower third, Trump, Liz Cheney should be fired upon with guns trained on her face.
That is not at all in the context in which he said it.
These people really are, as Mark Mitchell said from Rasmussen Reports earlier, these people really are the enemy of the American people.
...agree with him, so you shouldn't be a surprise when people come on TV and feel the need to agree with him.
This is intel.
You've got to understand, you know, this is CIA television, and so this is part of the buffet operation.
They're laying out a buffet, they're seeding a narrative that things are going to get violent and they're going to blame Trump supporters on it.
And this is especially if they decide to steal the election, which they most certainly are going to try.
They most assuredly are going to try.
The question is, have there been efforts made?
What's going to go on behind the scenes?
We do have cameras everywhere now.
I will say that.
The whole Bucks County thing is, well, it's certainly not a black pill.
I mean, the Bucks County thing is a white pill.
Are they catching them all?
No.
You know, so it's a silver lining, I guess, right?
They were cheating.
They were trying to suppress Republican voters from, you know, the Democrat early vote lead in 2020 in Pennsylvania was over a million people.
And now it's significantly smaller.
Last night, I saw it was 300,000, 400,000, something like that, maybe less.
I can't remember exactly.
But it's significantly smaller, which means you have, and again, according to Mark Mitchell of Rasmussen, they're not cannibalizing their election day vote the way some people think they are anyway.
Republicans are still expected to turn out and beat Democrats on election day in Pennsylvania.
More on the lies.
Nine barrels.
When he says nine barrels shooting at her, that obviously evokes images of a firing squad.
It evokes images of an execution.
Let's execute a political opponent who happens to be a woman.
Oh my gosh.
A political opponent that happens to be a woman.
Go back and listen to what he said.
He's actually talking about arming Liz Cheney.
Well, I think it hurts Kamala a lot, actually.
Look, she's a deranged person.
But the reason she couldn't stand me is that she always wanted to go to war with people.
I don't want to go to war.
She wanted to go.
She wanted to stay in Syria.
I took them out.
She wanted to stay in Iraq.
I took them out.
I mean, if it were up to her, we'd be in 50 different countries.
She's a radical war hawk.
Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her.
Let's put her with a rifle and nine barrels shooting at her.
Okay, that's clearly a war scenario.
And, like, does that pull more low-propensity voters in his coalition to the polls?
I honestly don't think so.
And I don't blame him for sticking with his daughter.
Speaking of haughty little poodles, who is this guy?
Let's see, do we have this?
Who is this guy?
I honestly don't.
Yeah.
Why are there so many effeminate men being put on news shows these days?
It's ridiculous.
Of course, this event happened.
You said another Tucker Carlson event.
Or it's a...
Is it?
Yeah.
I mean, he's been doing these events all over the country.
But speaking to Tucker Carlson...
Oh, no, no, no.
Before we get to Tucker, even Joe Walsh...
Joe Walsh is a never-Trumper.
Even Joe Walsh is standing up for Donald Trump right now.
He says Trump did not call for Liz Cheney to be executed.
This is what's so wrong with our politics today.
Look, you know how I feel about Trump, and I've been out there every day for two to three months campaigning my expletive off to help get Kamala Harris elected.
Okay, so he's for Kamala Harris.
Joe Walsh is, right?
He's for transing kids.
He's for abortion up until birth.
But this short clip is so deceptive.
Trump is not calling for Liz Cheney to be executed in front of a firing line.
He's not.
Listen to the entirety of what he said.
Now, so he retweeted and commented on Aaron Rupar's post, who says, Trump on Liz Cheney.
Let's put her with a rifle standing with nine barrels shooting at her.
Let's see how she feels about it.
You know when the guns are trained on her face.
And, of course, I remember when the Democrat Party, they were against going to war.
J.D. Sharp writing, Reality is Trump said Cheney should go to war herself if she loves it so much and then desired a wartime scenario in detail or described a wartime scenario.
This propaganda should be punished.
But then Aaron Rupar chimes in, Honestly, Joe, WTF? I don't appreciate being called deceptive when the clip is literally a direct quote of something Trump said.
Get out of here with this contrarian nonsense.
He says, Erin Rupar.
The entirety, the entire context needed to make sense of the clip is right there.
She's a radical war hawk.
Some of us are choosing to sound the alarm and others of us are making excuses for Trump.
You are the latter category.
I don't even know how this guy sounds.
I'm just assuming he's...
I don't even know who that guy is.
Anyway, fascinating stuff going on.
And speaking of Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson says that one of the things, if not the thing, that drove him to open his Bible and read the Bible was the fact that he was attacked by a demon or some sort of spiritual apparition in his sleep.
And we're going to talk about that, but we're going to break for just a second.
And I'm going to tell you about Man's Edge from Neutronics Labs.
Just got a little feedback on this.
People in this audience, thank you so much for purchasing this and using the promo code Paul and going to NeutronicsLabs.com slash Paul.
I really appreciate it.
I got some feedback from Neutronics Labs the other day.
You guys are buying, and I'd love for you to continue to buy.
Because it only helps the show out.
But this is a great product.
This isn't just your run-of-the-mill nutritional supplement or your testosterone booster.
And there's also other great products out there, IGF-1 Plus and everything else.
Glutathione.
All kinds of stuff.
They've got stuff for women as well.
But I have been on this now for...
I think it'll be four weeks.
Four weeks on Monday.
And it's fantastic stuff.
I feel better.
I have more energy.
Recovering quicker from workouts.
And just everything else that...
I'm 40 now.
I'm 40 years old.
And the other day, my wife...
She caught a hair growing out of my ear.
I'm not kidding.
It was great.
It's like clockwork.
I turned 40 and I have a hair now growing out of my ear.
It's just incredibly, it's just, you know, it's one of those things.
You're getting older.
So this is why I decided to start using this, and I love it, and I'm going to keep using it, and I'm going to keep telling you what the results are.
This is fantastic, and you need to try it.
NeutronicsLabs.com slash Paul.
Use code Paul.
Save 10%.
And at the same time you're doing this, you're helping keep this show on the air.
And allowing me to continue to deliver the news from a biblical worldview.
So we really appreciate all the support out there.
Okay, next.
This is incredible.
So we've got Pastor Jamie Bambrick from across the pond.
He's a pastor over there in the UK area.
He says, this is an incredible story of how Tucker Carlson was attacked in his bed at night by demons.
The enemy used to hide behind scientism and secularism, but that is no longer the case.
It's now open war.
If you don't yet follow Christ, now is the time.
Now, I'm going to play this for you because I found this whole story fascinating, mainly because Tucker Carlson has been such a force in destroying the spell that is over this country for many, many people.
And bucking the system and exposing a lot of lies, specifically in the mainstream media, in the news media.
And this episode, if you listen to him, it says that this drove me to start reading the Bible.
And if you look at the conversations that Tucker has had, if you look at the stuff that he has said in public now about God, about good versus evil...
About one thing that the Bible is clear on is that we're being acted on by outside forces.
It's been a very positive contribution to the spiritual warfare that is going on right now.
That this is not just flesh and blood.
That there are other things going on behind the scenes.
And this really is a fight of good versus evil.
Do you think the presence of evil is kick-starting people to wonder about the good?
That's what happened to me.
Now, the presence of evil kick-starting somebody towards good.
I know people who came to faith in Jesus Christ.
They were part of the New Age movement, this new age, you know, this paganism, this really what it is, this Satanism, but it's obviously not presented as that.
But it's the New Age, and it operates on this idea of, you know, you do you, or that's your truth, and that sort of thing.
But you know the one thing that they couldn't understand that led them on the journey towards Christ?
It was the fact that human trafficking, sex trafficking, pedophilia is evil.
And the fact that it was rampant, the fact that it was, you know...
That it's a huge industry, a billion-dollar industry.
This didn't comport with their new-age way of thinking of, well, there's different types of truth.
And once that was shattered, once that was shattered, and you could clearly identify something as evil.
This is evil.
This is bad.
This is not good.
Well, then you ask, well, based on what standard?
Well, based on the standard of God, based on the character of God, based on His standard, His holiness, is how we figure out what's right and what's wrong in this country or in this world.
And that set them on.
So that set them on the path where they eventually were given faith and repented and turned to Christ.
Praise the Lord.
Listen.
Do you think the presence of evil is kick-starting people to wonder about the good?
That's what happened to me.
That's what happened to you?
Oh yeah.
I had a direct experience with it.
In the milieu of journalism?
Nope.
In my bed at night and I got attacked while I was asleep with my wife and four dogs in the bed and mauled.
Physically mauled.
In a spiritual attack by a demon?
Yeah, by a demon.
Or by something unseen that left...
Is that right?
...claw marks on my sides, on my...
So it left physical marks?
Oh, they're still there.
Yeah, yeah.
A year and a half ago.
Was your wife terrified?
I know you were.
I wasn't.
I was totally confused.
I woke up and I couldn't breathe and I thought I was gonna suffocate and I walked around outside and then I walked in and my wife and dogs had not woken up and they're very light sleepers.
And then I had these terrible pains On my ribcage and on my shoulder and I was just in my boxer shorts and I went and flipped on the light in the bathroom and I had four claw marks on either side underneath my arms and on my left shoulder.
And they're bleeding.
Wait, they were bleeding?
They're bleeding, yeah.
No actual claw marks.
And I sleep on my side so I wasn't clawing myself.
I don't have long nails.
And they didn't fit my hands anyway.
But yeah, that happened.
So, I'm not from a world where things like that happen.
I never heard of anything like that happening before.
I had no idea what that was.
I knew it was spiritual immediately.
You did?
Okay, that was going to be my question.
Yeah.
Well, I don't understand to this day.
I'm not going to put it...
You didn't try to refute the spiritual part in your own mind.
You went right into the idea.
Well, it didn't make any sense, and it doesn't now.
So, but I'm not from a, what do they call it, faith tradition that talks about things like that or even acknowledges their existence.
Like, there's nothing like that.
I've never heard anybody say anything like that in my whole life.
What was the next day like?
Well, the next morning I woke up and I thought that was the weirdest dream I've ever had.
And then I saw blood on my sheets and I realized that was not a dream at all.
I was like, oh, my assistant was like the only evangelical Christian I know, you know, well enough to call with something bizarre like that, totally bizarre like that.
And she said, oh yeah, no, no, that happens.
Yeah, people are attacked in their bed by demons.
What?
What are you even talking about?
Yeah.
So, I mean, I'm not leaving anything out, and I'm not pretending to understand that I can only say what happened to me, and that did happen to me.
And then I was seized with this very intense desire to read the Bible.
Which I then started without any study aids or anything.
I bought a Bible that didn't have any.
I'm not interested in editorializing in the Bible.
I just want to read it and see what's in there myself.
I have very low levels of trust for Christian pastors, most of whom, you know, I'm just not a fan at all.
And sorry to say that, but that's how I feel.
And so I just didn't...
I don't want to hear other people's opinions.
I just want to see what's in there.
And so I spent a year and a half reading it, and then I started rereading it.
And it was just a transformative experience for me, but I'm not...
You know, holding myself out as someone from whom you could get theological advice because I'm not.
Sure, of course.
I don't know.
I don't understand any of it, but yeah, that happens.
That's actually good, you know.
To be a Christian, you don't have to be a theologian.
Not everybody is a theologian.
The demon?
I have no idea what happened.
All I know is I was dead asleep with my wife and dogs and I woke up with claw marks on my ribcage underneath my arms.
And it didn't even make sense.
My arms would...
Anyway, whatever.
I'm not...
No one has to believe me.
I don't care.
But that happened to me.
And so I just was like, wow, that's real.
Whatever that is, I'm not even sure what it is.
It's very real.
And so then that presence of that evil launches something.
The presence of that evil launches something.
Thank you.
So as this is happening all over, I would imagine...
As things get more and more wicked, evil exposes itself and it causes people to wake up, right?
And I think the transiting of kids, the child abuse of children, but calling it good when everybody can tell that it's child abuse, that's one of the big things that's waking people up.
The question is, once you recognize evil, what do you do with it, right?
What do you do with it?
Because there still are, there are people out there who are Let's just use the word red-pilled, but are also now full of anger because they've been lied to.
What do you do with that, right?
What do you do with that?
There really is no fruit in it unless you bring it to the feet of Christ.
Because that's the real reconciliation.
And from there, you can go forward and do good works for the kingdom.
Fascinating story, but speaking of people who don't do that, or I guess the contrast, speaking of evil, speaking of wicked and evil, Jennifer Lopez is stumping for Kamala.
He has consistently worked to divide us.
At Madison Square Garden, he reminded us who he really is and how he really feels.
It wasn't just Puerto Ricans that were offended that day.
Okay?
It was every Latino in this country.
Latino!
Every Latino.
Okay, so here is J-Lo with Puff Daddy at a party.
You see that right there?
She's one of the Diddy parties, right?
And allegedly, there are allegations of Diddy, of Lopez being there while Diddy sexually assaulted a minor.
There are allegations floating around out there.
So, you want to know why a lot of these celebrities are coming out there?
You've got to look at what do they have in common.
How many of the celebrities out there endorsing Kamala Harris have been to a ditty party?
But, Nicole Shanahan, with the truth.
Recently, Jill Biden, for Halloween, decided to dress up as a panda.
Look at that.
Dresses up as a panda.
This had a lot of people wondering, hmm...
Some people are very familiar with what that means in an esoteric fashion.
Some people think it has to do with child sex trafficking, massive satanic ritual child abuse.
And apparently Nicole Shanahan, RFK's vice presidential candidate who just voted for Trump on stage, failed at her ballot, voted for Trump on stage and endorses Trump, this is what she said.
Right in front of our eyes.
Right in front of our eyes.
The parading of Jill Biden in a panda suit yesterday.
Right in front of our eyes.
What the hell is this mockery?
No more.
I'm telling you, the suburban essential oil mom is a sleeping giant.
MJ Truth Ultra, Nicole Shanahan just called out Jill Biden for wearing a panda suit.
The parading of Jill Biden in a panda suit yesterday right in front of our eyes.
What the hell is this mockery?
No more, says Nicole Shanahan knows.
What does she know?
Well, the disturbing news out there, the disturbing reports that are out there about ritual satanic abuse of children, that's what's out there.
And the world in many ways is actually run with this sick symbolism.
Man, we're not going to have time.
Okay, so I'm running out of time.
So let's just do this.
And let us confess our faith today in the words of the Sparkle Creed.
I believe in the non-binary God.
And now it's time for I'm Already Against Women Clergy.
You don't have to convince me.
Alright, so for this week's segment of I'm Already Against Women Clergy, you don't have to convince me.
It comes from Protestia's Twitter account.
This is the Reverend Deborah McKnight talking about what is a Jezebel spirit.
What is a Jezebel spirit?
And then Jezebel sent a messenger to Elijah saying, So may the gods do to me, and more also, if I do not make your life like the life of them by tomorrow.
Then he was afraid, and he got up, and he fled for his life.
For the complicated word of God.
Thanks be to God.
I'm going to invite you into the story of Jezebel.
You may see it on my shirt.
I dug a little further, and there is this sense...
I didn't spend enough time in, like, culty Christianity to know this on my own, but there is this notion of a Jezebel spirit, this very clear sense of the Jezebel spirit.
And you can get all kinds of articles if you Google the Jezebel spirit, And how to, like, get rid of the Jezebel spirit or how to know that you're encountering a Jezebel spirit.
And I can pretty much sum it up in this way, that a Jezebel spirit is any potential woman who has essentially three attributes, like competent, attractive, and smart.
All right, there you go.
Jezebel spirit, not something bad.
Jezebel spirit is just competent, attractive, and smart.
Calvin Robinson, Father Calvin Robinson quoted as saying, Jesus Christ might not be on the ballot, but a Jezebel is.
And that's a wrap.
This has been I'm Already Against Women Clergy.
You don't have to convince me.
Alright, that's all the time that we have for this edition.
It's been a great five days of broadcasting.
We're going to be back here on Monday unless I'm providentially hindered bringing you the news.
Pray for this country.
The election is under the control of Almighty God.
Remember that.
We're going to stay on top of it.
God bless everybody out there watching.
Pray for the Tower of Babel 2.0 to come crashing down.
And we'll see you on Monday.
▲
Export Selection