Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 21, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

01:56:59

Logos Academy Episode 14: Moral Decay

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are live.
	Welcome, everybody.
	It is episode 14 of Logos Academy and the first show of the week.
	I'm a little bit under the weather today, so I apologize if I sound a little bit eh.
	Fighting, it's like a small head cold, nothing crazy.
	So it's our first show of the week.
	Today is going to be, we're going to discuss moral decay, hence the title.
	We'll go into morality as a concept and maybe have a deep philosophical analysis today of that.
	It's the first show of the week.
	We're going to be live Wednesday and Friday, as usual.
	Thursday is Halloween, for those that are not familiar.
	One thing to mention is coming up starting, I think, next week, I should be actually joining Stu Peters on his show weekly on Tuesdays.
	I'm not 100% sure if we're starting next week or not, but we'll talk with him and we'll get that set up very soon.
	So you guys can expect to see me on his show a little bit more often, as well as obviously on my three times a week show.
	I don't know a better way to say that than three times a week.
	Okay, so I don't really have anything special in the schedule this week.
	I don't have any guests set up yet.
	I'm working on trying to get a guest set up for Friday, but I'm not entirely sure if that's going to happen or not.
	So we'll just have to wait and see if he's on board or not.
	His schedule is a little bit different.
	He's from Europe.
	So I'll talk with him.
	We'll see if he's going to join us.
	And if not, then you'll have another monologue show for me, as usual.
	So we got Holikoff over in the Odyssey chat.
	We got Logos Lifta in the Twitter chat.
	Nice name.
	Just wait a little bit.
	We'll let some people fill in.
	And then we'll get into the topics.
	You know what?
	Actually, while we wait for people to fill in, if you'll give me one moment, I'm just going to be right back.
	I'm just going to feed my dog really quick.
	I can tell he is very hungry.
	It's a little early, but he's being kind of goofy.
	So just give me one second, folks.
	Thank you.
	All right, folks.
	Sorry about that.
	Just a little brief intermission.
	So, today I want to talk about moral decay, which, broad term, but we'll go into it a little bit.
	So, this is a big problem that we have in society.
	We're living in a society that is degrading on a lot of levels.
	It's morally degrading.
	It's physically degrading.
	It is spiritually degrading.
	But I think we need a new morality.
	I think we need to start talking about why it is that so many people are losing their way, so to speak.
	And I think this has to do with the fact that there is a lack of appropriate morality in society.
	Morals can come from a lot of places.
	For many people, it comes from religion.
	A lot of people get their moral code or their moral doctrine from religion.
	A lot of people get it just from society and their government, which is probably one of the biggest problems.
	Because a lot of people are following...
	They're following what is considered legal as what is considered moral.
	And this is a really big problem because we know there are many immoral things that are legal, and we know that there are many legal things that are immoral.
	So...
	I'm trying to think of a good example here.
	I know...
	I'll give one example I can think of off the top of my head.
	I was watching a show.
	This was not long ago.
	For those who are familiar with Sneeko, he had a debate with this guy named Charlie.
	He's like a gamer dude who kind of sits in his house a lot.
	And they were debating the age of consent on a moral basis.
	And They were using the term adult and child to debate when it is okay to give consent.
	And the argument that Sneeko was providing was that being a child or an adult, we have to use the definition of the word.
	The definition of the word adult is you've reached puberty.
	The definition of the word child is essentially that you have not reached puberty.
	And he was arguing with this guy about what should the age of consent be.
	And this guy's had a firm stance on 18.
	And in his stance on 18, he said, this is when you become an adult.
	And Sneeko was trying to describe to him that, well, that's very vague because you can become an adult at 17, at 18, at 19.
	Everybody's different when you grow up.
	Not everybody ages in the same fashion.
	You get some guys you go to high school with and they're like 16 and they have a fucking full beard.
	Becoming an adult is a very different age for everybody.
	So that was his primary argument.
	But this other guy could not wrap his mind around the fact that he's being asked for his own moral sentiments rather than for a legal code.
	And this is a really big problem.
	A lot of people framework things based on what others say is legal.
	That's how they decide if it is good or bad.
	And in modern society, when we have a society that is legalizing terrible things, for instance, pornography.
	Pornography is completely legal.
	You can go and watch it anywhere, at any time, free of charge.
	And this is naturally an immoral thing.
	It's bad for society.
	But if you ask the average person in modern society, they would probably tell you that they don't think that porn is bad or immoral or an illegal thing, or a bad thing, rather, because it's not illegal.
	So their morality is actually shaped around what the laws of their civilization are.
	And this is really problematic because, as we said, our civilization is not pushing out good laws.
	It's not pushing morality into its legal structure.
	It has no incentive to do that.
	It's actually doing the opposite right now.
	It's incentivizing as much bad behavior as physically possible.
	So morality is...
	Very ambiguous in modern society.
	As religion is beginning to break down, as most people are...
	I mean, even the family unit is breaking down, which is a smaller contribution to the problem, but it is also still present.
	Because if you're born into a family that is not kind of that nuclear family unit where they're teaching you proper behaviors, proper discipline, that's going to be a problem as well.
	So...
	As we experience this moral decay, we're going to see society fall backwards further and further and further.
	And morals, by definition, are essentially good behavior, good character.
	Well, go to your local grocery store, go to your local gas station, restaurant, you name it, anywhere you go pretty much.
	You can see the general...
	The mood, the general energy of the average person that you come across is slowly dwindling.
	It's not like it was 10 years ago.
	10 years ago, people were much more bubbly.
	They were much more happy.
	Now there's almost like this odd tension in the air with a lot of people.
	They're very on edge, whether it's because life sucks or they're not living life with good standards or they're vice-driven or whatever the case may be for individuals.
	They're not happy, simply.
	And without a moral code or a moral structure, it's very hard for a populist to be happy.
	You're not going to see this very often.
	So we need to re-implement morality back into our civilization.
	Obviously, our government is not going to teach people morality.
	Religion is faltering for many people.
	And both of these things can be solutions to that problem if done in their own right.
	However, like I said, our government is not going to do that, so we have to have some kind of a replacement, something to put in its stead.
	And this is where we need to start talking about our ability as individuals to start shaping some form of grassroots community, some form of grassroots ideology or organization that people can start to put themselves behind as a moral code or moral structure.
	Without this, we're going to see depression skyrocket, anxiety is skyrocketing, suicide rates are plummeting, or not plummeting, raising through the roof, drug usage, every kind of vice you can think of.
	These are all coping mechanisms for living in a bad, disorganized, disharmonious society.
	And these coping mechanisms are, they're a band-aid, right?
	It's a slap-on band-aid.
	And without solving these problems, which is what instituting a better morality would do, without solving these problems and just throwing a band-aid on it, they are going to continue to get worse.
	They're going to rapidly increase in their level of problem-causing.
	And we're going to see a worse case for civilization.
	I mean, this is what leads to civilizational collapse, right?
	I see we got a couple comments.
	Yeah, this is a really good point as well.
	Holikoff says, imagine how messed up they will be if the antipsychotics and SSRI med supplies run out.
	Yeah, this is a really big issue.
	You know, people are crazy enough when they have their medicine.
	So imagine if tomorrow our civilization was to collapse legitimately.
	All these people would be essentially cold turkey off of their meds.
	We would see a lot of problems.
	You would see quite a big backlash from this.
	That's a good point as well.
	Someone says, sadly, in the present day, morals are like beauty.
	They're in the eye of the beholder.
	Many will compromise as they see fit for self-gratification.
	Yeah, this is a problem.
	There is no solid standing moral structure anymore.
	So everybody's kind of forced to their own moral belief system.
	And again, it's vague.
	Everybody has their own...
	I feel this way or I feel that way.
	They find cop-outs for themselves.
	You have a lot of people tell you, I'm a hardcore Christian.
	I really care about Christianity.
	But at the same time, they're alcoholics or they're sexual degenerates.
	They don't follow the moral code of the doctrine that they claim that they care deeply about.
	Morals are not as strong as they used to be.
	And people don't have the discipline to follow a moral structure.
	Excuse me.
	In the fashion that they used to.
	So, again, there needs to be authority.
	This is why we advocate some form of authoritarian government.
	I know a lot of people, especially in America, are very, very adverse to this idea.
	It's a scary sounding idea for them.
	You know, we live in a country where everything is about freedom and liberty.
	But I think we've adequately seen from experience in this country that untampered liberty, when you allow it to go for too long, look what it causes.
	I mean, it just causes complete chaos and anarchy.
	And this is where you get quotes from founding fathers like John Adams.
	He said, there never was a democracy that didn't kill itself.
	What was he talking about?
	He's saying that when you're just allowed to do whatever you want, free reign, I can vote for what makes me happy.
	I have full liberty.
	People make bad decisions with the liberty.
	Discipline is an authoritative value.
	Man Before Time says, if the Jews didn't run the music industry, movie industry, what would be your take on downloading albums via torrent and what would be your take on downloading albums via torrent and what have It's immoral, but I think in a healthy white society, those methods wouldn't exist.
	It's immoral to pay for any Hollywood movie right now.
	Yeah, so that's a really good point.
	So...
	In the modern framework, what is moral and what is not moral has drastically changed.
	For instance, if you lived in America 50 years ago and income tax and social security tax were 5% of your paycheck total, and with those taxes, you were actually going to get a guarantee that you'll have 100% of what you pay into social security back.
	You are also going to get projects and programs through your tax dollars that actually help your civilization and you.
	Then it's immoral to not pay taxes.
	However, if you live in a society like today and your government is literally anti-white and your government isn't fixing the roads and your government isn't fixing the border and they're not building infrastructure and they're not coming out with good art.
	Is it immoral for you to not pay taxes or is it actually moral?
	I think it has flipped on its head, the equation.
	It's actually now immoral for you to pay taxes into a system that wants to kill you.
	And it's pretty open about it, right?
	Like, I mean, we've got Joe Biden on stage bragging about whites being a minority in our own homelands.
	That's insanity.
	This is a civilizational suicide.
	So at this point, what was once moral becomes immoral and vice versa.
	And that's a hard thing for people to wrap their minds around, especially in the conservative camps.
	A lot of people in these conservative camps say, well, hey, I'm a good upstanding citizen.
	I pay my taxes.
	Well, being an upstanding citizen in a society that wants to kill its citizens...
	Well, that's not really anything to be proud of, right?
	right?
	It's, it's actually, it's the contrary.
	This is a really good comment by Camps Lindbergh.
	He says, a good basis for morality is that that which affirms life is good, that which degenerates life is not.
	I'll have to watch that talk as well.
	Yeah, so Nietzsche had a really good concept when it came to morality.
	And he talks about...
	Not only morality itself, but values.
	What do you value?
	What is a value to you?
	And I'm not talking about physical values, like, oh, this is my favorite pencil.
	That's not the kind of value we're describing.
	I'm talking about moral values.
	What is a valuable behavior or standard for you to want to achieve?
	And this is something that Nietzsche talks about quite a bit, is...
	He writes the work The Antichrist, where he talks about Christian morality and Christian values.
	And he negates the value system and says that we need what he calls a re-evaluation of values.
	So we've talked about this before, but a really good example of this is we look at...
	A homeless group of people, for example.
	If you go into Chicago, every hood in Chicago has homeless people on the streets somewhere.
	Or Philadelphia, or Detroit, or whatever.
	I'm not getting a lot of sleep last night.
	I can't stop yawning.
	This is where we talk about a re-evaluation of values.
	All of these areas have all these homeless people.
	It's everywhere.
	It's a big problem.
	So, the current value system that people have is they think that it is a moral good to give charity to the homeless people, to give them clothes or give them water or food or money or whatever the case may be.
	Gifted charity.
	To them, that is a good moral value.
	This is a simple-minded view of a good moral value.
	This is a momentary good with a long-term harm, right?
	Because you're not actually helping the person when you give them this or give them that.
	You might be helping them in the moment, but you're not helping them change their ways or change their lifestyle.
	And if they don't change their ways or lifestyle, they're going to need that water bottle handout again, and they're going to need the food handout again and again and again and again and again.
	And there will always be a leech on society, a mooch.
	So you have to actually discipline people and force them to experience the hardship themselves in many cases, especially when it comes to talking about a homeless person or whatever the case may be.
	These are people that need to experience some kind of responsibility for themselves.
	And if they're incapable of that responsibility, giving them handouts is just simply a drain on the system for people that matter.
	And this is a hard line of morality to understand because essentially what you're doing is you're allowing harm to the individual for the betterment of the collective.
	So it's a morality that states, look, one person might have to suffer if that means that 50,000 people succeed, right?
	Or on the vice versa scale, we say, hey, we're going to slave away.
	2,000 people are going to go on a trip down to Haiti to go fix Haitian infrastructure.
	We're going to slave away to go help them and waste our time and effort and abilities.
	And then when we go down there and we fix everything, they seem grateful.
	And then in like five years, all that infrastructure is gone again.
	And then we need to go on another trip and do it again and another trip and do it again.
	And it's like a repeated process.
	This is a twisted and backwards morality.
	Rather, what we should be doing is implementing things that would fix these people, right?
	Or essentially fix their behaviors.
	It's the same with the jailing system in our society.
	Jail is really supposed to be a rehabilitation center.
	Well, it's not.
	I mean, look at your average jail in the United States.
	It's just a bunch of hoodlums.
	They go to jail.
	They don't care, by the way.
	They look upon going to jail as an achievement.
	It's like street cred for these people.
	So they go to jail.
	Then they give each other tattoos in jail.
	And they play basketball.
	And they watch TV. And they play cards.
	And they throw dice.
	And they live exactly like they would live at home.
	The only difference is that it's free and the food is free and they don't have to actually make or do anything for themselves.
	So that's not rehabilitation.
	That's actually just like, okay, we're just pulling them out of society for now because we don't want to deal with them at the moment.
	Well, this is a problem because...
	When you do this, the second they come back out into society, they're not fixed.
	They're actually probably worse than they even were before they went in.
	So what we really should...
	I mean, if we cared, if we really cared about our civilization, we would have...
	We would have drill instructors, drill sergeants in every single prison.
	It would be like a military boot camp where people are being disciplined to a very high extent.
	And they'd come out like men.
	What guy have you ever known that went to a military academy or went to boot camp and came out like a degenerate or a complete piece of shit?
	It's very rare.
	You typically get some really upstanding individuals and changes even from people that were not upstanding individuals into such.
	from going into these things.
	Someone said, Jews steal your material value and sell you degenerate morals either.
	Yeah, it's, it's a, it's a twofold attack.
	Well, it's, It's really like an eight-fold attack when you look into all of the functions and factors.
	But yeah, it's not just one thing.
	Yeah, that's good.
	Actually, that's a really good...
	So, this is actually laid out pretty well in Mein Kampf.
	When you read...
	It's in the very beginning of chapter 2.
	Well, not the very beginning, but it's in the first half of chapter 2.
	Learning and Suffering in Vienna.
	Hitler describes walking around and seeing all of the people that are struggling and suffering.
	He sees men that are alcoholics and homeless people and degenerates.
	This is very well exemplified in a German film...
	What the hell was the name of it?
	Hold on.
	Try to find the name of it.
	This film exemplifies it extremely well.
	It's called Der Vorlorn Son.
	And it's a German film about a man who is a lumberjack in Germany who lives in the mountains.
	And he goes and he moves to New York City.
	And he stays in New York for a couple months.
	And while he's in New York City, he gets a job at first and then the job runs out.
	And then he doesn't have any money.
	And he's looking for more work and he's looking for more work.
	And then he finds something else.
	And it's a really hard manual job, but it's the only thing he can find.
	He works there for a little bit.
	Then he gets out again.
	He gets laid off again.
	And then he's sleeping on a park bench.
	And he meets some gypsy that's sleeping on a park bench next to him.
	And the gypsy guy teaches him how to steal and teaches him how to avoid the police.
	And when you watch this, you come to realize that...
	And Hitler describes this in Mein Kampf, this exact process, well before the movie was made.
	The movie was probably based on it, actually.
	He describes how, in this exact same process, time and time again, people come into the city from the farmlands, and they flow to the city for work, and they go through the same process.
	They get some work, it lasts for a little bit, then they get fired.
	Then they get another job, it lasts a little bit, then they get fired.
	And they get to this point where they hit a wall, and they say, you know...
	It kills the human spirit.
	It kills the human enthusiasm and the drive, the will to power.
	It absolutely decimates it.
	When you're constantly in this state of anxiety, am I going to be able to make it by tomorrow?
	Am I going to be able to make it to the next day?
	How am I going to survive and feed myself over the next week or so?
	And as this process repeats itself, it kills the human spirit.
	And this is where you get mass levels of apathy from, I mean, all sectors of society.
	I mean, we live in the most apathetic society you could physically imagine.
	It's very bad.
	We have a society that is so apathetic.
	Again, I use this phrase all the time because it's so...
	It's just so exemplary of how apathetic our society is.
	When you get conservatives that say, I don't like the tranny stuff, but as long as they don't push it on my kids, this is like this individualistic, I don't really care, just don't do it to me, as long as I'm not bothered or it's not intrusive on me.
	This is not community-driven.
	This is not helpful to large groups of people.
	This is a very self-centered mindset.
	And it's a very problematic one that we see a lot in modern society.
	Self-interest over anything else.
	And there's a difference between being individualistic and individualism.
	As a whole, this is a really big thing.
	Sure, we want people to have individual value.
	We want people to be capable of being their own individual self with their own unique qualities and traits to them.
	However, we don't want them to be individualistic in a way where they are actually Looking out only for themselves at all corners indefinitely.
	This is our biggest problem.
	It's not that people can't be individuals.
	This is another thing that people have a hard time understanding.
	When we say, look like you need a collective organization, individualism is bad.
	They say, I like being my own unique person.
	And they take it kind of out of context or they misunderstand where we're coming from.
	There's no problem being an individual.
	It's a great thing, actually.
	We need that, that this is where the greatest inventions and achievements have come from in history, is from the individual.
	However, individualism, when we are literally setting aside everybody else, setting aside the whole world for our own personal benefit, this is where caring for the individual becomes problematic.
	It becomes almost suicidal.
	I very much agree.
	Austin says, libertarianism has no solutions.
	Yeah, you're right.
	It has absolutely no solutions.
	It has utopian pipe dreams.
	I get it.
	If I was in a libertarian group or I went to a meeting that these people were having, I totally understand what they say.
	Yes, I would agree with them.
	In an ideal, unique, utopian world, libertarianism would be fucking amazing.
	They're like, we want little government and we want...
	We don't want any big brother breathing down our back and all these things.
	And they're all nice sentiments, but they're not realistic.
	It's just not realistic.
	It's not possible.
	You can't implement the things that these people say they want.
	And one of the things that I think libertarianism fails to understand is libertarians don't like the trannies.
	A lot of them.
	They don't like the trannies.
	They don't like the globo, homo bullshit.
	However, when you talk to them about Authoritarian government or a dictator or all of these different things.
	They cringe and they get, eh.
	Well, I like free choice.
	I like democracy.
	Libertarianism is a lukewarm stance because you want things fixed, but you also want people to have full freedom.
	This is an oxymoron.
	If people have full freedom, it's their full freedom that has allowed things to come to this level.
	We're giving people the freedom to go to drag queen story hour and take their fucking children there.
	We're giving people the liberty and the freedom to change their genders and their God-given body parts.
	This is insane.
	You can't say, hey, I want those people to have all that freedom, but at the same time, I don't want them to behave that way.
	It's a lukewarm stance.
	It's one that can't get the job done.
	I do not like libertarianism for specifically that piece.
	Noticer Six Million says boot camp wouldn't work because the outcome of non-participation would be jail.
	I disagree.
	I think they would have to have harsher punishment within jail.
	Solitary confinement for not participating.
	Interesting.
	He says, I came out of the sovereign movement for just this reason.
	It was too much rabid individualism.
	And there was no real goal.
	It was just to shed the state.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, well, this is...
	Again, I think libertarians have a good heart.
	I think they have good sentiments.
	I just think they're short-sighted.
	Austin says libertarianism is literally Jewish.
	Four out of five of the main philosophers are Jews.
	Yeah, I agree with that.
	I agree with that.
	They've co-opted it, much like they've co-opted many other things, right?
	Even socialism.
	Socialism, or actually, no, no, not...
	Let's say liberalism.
	Even liberalism.
	Liberalism is not inherently Jewish.
	We had a lot of liberal philosophers in the Renaissance period and in Europe However, Jews co-opted liberalism and used it for their own means, and now liberalism is inherently Jewish.
	It's changed.
	Being liberal does not mean what it meant 300 years ago.
	Being liberal now is dangerously suicidal, right?
	Yeah, that's a good point.
	Holocaust says the problem with libertarians is they complain about individualism and collectivizing, but they have no solutions to their adversaries collectivizing against them.
	They're vulnerable.
	Absolutely.
	It's an individualistic and vulnerable stance.
	I spoke with a guy, he's a libertarian, and he moved himself up into the mountains in the middle of nowhere with his family, and he's kind of just living off the land and doing his own little thing.
	And he's like, you know, we all just got to move into the mountains, man, and collectivize in the mountains and be individuals and no more government.
	And it's like, yeah, look, again, sure.
	I mean, to an extent, I agree with you, but it's just not realistic.
	Like, If the government doesn't like you and they want you done, going out to a village in the middle of nowhere in the forest is certainly not helping you.
	they've got quite a bit of equipment they can bring up to take you out.
	Yeah.
	Total freedom will never work.
	Thank you.
	People don't understand this.
	Having total freedom in a civilization is like having total freedom in a household as a child.
	It doesn't work.
	That kid will make mistake after mistake after mistake after mistake.
	They have to learn.
	And there are plenty of men in civilization that are children, in essence.
	And they will continue to make mistake after mistake after mistake after mistake.
	And they need to learn.
	And they can only learn through a rough discipline.
	And a lot of those men have not had a rough discipline in their households.
	Or maybe they did.
	And it just didn't work on them.
	And now they don't have societal guidelines that they care enough to follow.
	So they go out and they do their own thing.
	And It's especially problematic with women, especially women being able to vote.
	I think it was the 19th Amendment.
	This has become extremely problematic because women being completely free to make these decisions...
	Well, women are always going to sway towards what their emotions feel is right.
	And that's something that's very easy to manipulate.
	Emotions are the easiest thing to manipulate.
	You can't manipulate hard facts and logic as easy as you can manipulate emotions.
	You can manipulate emotions...
	Any way you choose.
	All you have to do is put out a little bit of atrocity propaganda, pull on someone's heartstrings a little bit, and voila, you've manipulated somebody adequately.
	This is why you need authoritarian governments, and authoritarian governments need to instill morality.
	Because if our government was authoritarian, if our government really cared about us, If our government really cared about us, they wouldn't be allowing all of the degenerate stuff that's happening in society to even happen.
	They would enforce a moral structure.
	And additionally, to the libertarians that have a problem with too much government, they say they don't want Big Brother breathing down their neck, but they hate the multicultural society, they hate the tranny stuff, they hate all these things.
	Well guess what I agree with you I don't want Big Brother breathing down my neck Because I know Big Brother wants to Fucking kill white people However I do want Big Brother breathing down their neck I want Big Brother stepping in When a bunch of faggots go out in the street Butt naked dancing in front of children I absolutely want Big Brother to step in But they don't because it's a free country So The idea that You don't want any kind of government At all
	which is what a lot of libertarians have as a stance, they want a completely decentralized, almost non-existent government, it's insane.
	No civilization historically has ever functioned without a government.
	Ever.
	So it says a church is the authority of morals in a good authoritarian society.
	Yeah, yeah, it can be.
	Absolutely.
	That's again, it goes back to the same problem with our society is that it's not a good or authoritarian society.
	Church is actually the opposite today, I think.
	I don't think it's moral at all.
	I think going to church is immoral in most cases.
	There are very few churches left that teach a good moral structure or even a good history of the of the religion.
	Yes, Tony, I agree.
	It's too individualistic.
	Libertarianism will always fail because of that.
	And libertarians also go at the third party approach wrong.
	You have a lot of libertarians or green party people that will run as a third party, and their way of doing it is wait until election year, start up a small campaign with very little money they have, Run for office, get 5% of the votes if they're lucky, and then they're done, and then they move on.
	This is what almost every libertarian has done, and this is a massive blunder.
	They're taking it at a wrong angle or a wrong approach.
	What they really should be doing We're good to go.
	What you saw with National Socialist Germany, it was the opposite of that.
	They built something first, then they ran as a third party after, and it worked.
	They're doing it wrong in America.
	A really good example was John McAfee.
	He was running for a libertarian third party.
	He was a pretty interesting guy, a little bit degenerate, but he had decent sentiments.
	And if more people knew who he was running, he probably would have got a lot more votes.
	He was actually running on a platform with what he called the ghost phone.
	And it was this cell phone that he wanted to release to the populace that could not be monitored by the government.
	He was like a mass hacker, a very intelligent guy.
	He came up with the McAfee antivirus software.
	For those who don't know how he did that, he was one of the first people to actually hack people's computers.
	He hacked people's computers and then told them, hey, see, your computer is easily compromisable.
	Here, let me sell you the software, the firewall to avoid this.
	Brilliant idea, by the way.
	No, I have not been to an Orthodox church.
	I'm talking about the majority.
	I'm not saying every single church.
	I'm sure there are good churches out there.
	I don't disagree with that.
	but there's also for every two good churches there's a dozen bad ones interesting Interesting.
	Yeah, churches architecturally are amazing buildings.
	I agree with that.
	John Tyndall's The Authoritarian Stage.
	Sure, it sounds interesting.
	I'll give it a read.
	So you got a couple people in the, uh, in the rumble chat.
	Mainstream dissident, welcome, welcome.
	Uh, Christian, hello.
	Yeah, I gotta give, I gotta give Crito another read.
	I haven't read that in a very long time.
	It's been probably a year and a half, more.
	I need to give it another read and fair analysis.
	Especially if it's a good critique against libertarianism, I would definitely like to give it another read.
	I have too many books open at once.
	That's forever my biggest problem.
	I have like five books open at a time that I read intermediately.
	I just pick one up, pick the other one up.
	I can't seem to stick to one.
	Christian with a $1 super chat on Rumble for...
	Thank you, my friend.
	He says, don't forget your Logos chat.
	No, I have four chats open.
	Well, five, actually.
	The one's not very active at the moment.
	But yeah, I have a lot of chats at once.
	It's hard to keep up.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Yeah, don't forget, folks, we are live on Rumble on the Stu Peters Network.
	We're live on my own personal Rumble, which is Logos Revealed Eye.
	We're live on Odyssey, which is Logos Revealed Eye.
	And we're also live on ftjmedia.com.
	New website.
	Definitely do recommend that you guys make an account over there.
	It's slowly growing.
	It's becoming a lot bigger over time.
	Really good way to support, by the way, if you want to support a content creator.
	FTJmedia.com is a really good platform to do it.
	They have the lowest fees out of any website.
	The lowest fees.
	So if I was to...
	Let's say you are to send a $100 super chat to somebody on...
	Rumble, I think it's 20%, I think is what they take.
	I think Odyssey takes like 8.5%.
	And I think Entropy takes like 15%.
	FTJ Media takes 3%.
	That is it.
	Very, very low fee.
	Definitely a good place to support creators where they'll get the best of it.
	Are we talking about moral decay?
	Yeah, we've been intermediably.
	We started on it.
	We branched into libertarianism a little bit.
	We're going to rotate back around here in a moment.
	Having a bit of a wave of kind of exhaustion.
	I don't know what's going on today.
	So we talked about libertarianism as a poor form of government because it's incapable of doing what is necessary for the people.
	It will not ever implement the authoritarian dictates that are necessary in order to fix the ills that we live through today.
	So I'm a firm believer that That we are not going to fix moral decay without some form of authoritarian power.
	Body of some kind.
	Even our founding fathers in the United States of America, they were, in essence, an authoritarian body.
	That is what the Declaration of Independence was.
	The Declaration of Independence wasn't, here's my vote, or, hey, by the way, Britain, this is how I feel.
	It was, no, we're not playing your game anymore.
	We're not beholden to you, and we're never going to be beholden to you.
	We're declaring ourselves independent of you.
	It's authoritarian.
	They dictated a decision.
	Thank you, Christian.
	I appreciate that.
	It's actually pretty decent on Rumble, the ad revenue.
	I'm surprised.
	It's better than most places.
	Yeah, I'm the kind of person, I think I need eight hours of sleep.
	i don't think six does it so when we talk about uh morality being implemented back into society Most people are not going to follow a moral code on their own volition.
	They need somebody to implement it for them.
	They need somebody to provide it for them.
	Again, much like a child needs a father in the household to tell them, this is good and this is bad, this is right and this is wrong.
	The average person needs this as well.
	We actually need a breakaway.
	If we can't create some kind of power structure that is able to overcome the power structure that exists today and stamp it out with authoritarian dictates, then we are going to need instead some form of breakaway or alternative to the very immoral system that we live in now.
	For instance, Hollywood is...
	Probably the most poisonous, insidious thing that's ever been introduced into a civilization in history.
	And with that, what other options do people have if you want to watch films or television or get entertainment of some kind?
	You don't have very many alternatives to a place like Hollywood.
	Now, certainly, we do have these live streams, and this is something that is picking up in civilization.
	There's a lot more people coming to the internet, coming to watch, we'll call them alternative live streams, away from this...
	Degenerate apparatus that exists around us.
	So we need to start giving people a better alternative.
	And I think Stu Peters Network is actually a really good example of this.
	Because it's built like something people are used to seeing.
	A lot of people are used to seeing the news through this very specific lens of Fox News, CNN, things like that.
	They have a very specific...
	Build up on the show, like when you go watch any kind of news network, there's the framework, the format, everything that they're doing, it's very specific.
	And I think the Stu Peters Network is kind of mimicking that, but putting an actually good message behind it.
	I think that's kind of what we need.
	We need those alternatives where people can get it in the same fashion that they're used to it, but they're getting something actually that's good or better.
	Yeah, it's good.
	I advocate no one watches TV. I don't watch any television at all.
	At all.
	Like, ever.
	He said, I don't think we gain political power.
	We only have balkanization.
	I disagree.
	I think, well, maybe it's worded a little bit differently, but...
	There is a time when we are going to have to have political power at some point.
	I mean, this is just inevitable.
	No civilization functions without political power, and no group of people or populists will ever follow a government or will ever go in the right direction without some kind of political power.
	They need political power to guide them.
	Political power is a necessity at some point.
	Running civilization is, in essence, what politics means.
	So I think at some point we're going to have to get there.
	Yeah, Hollywood is discussing...
	There's a very good example of...
	I forget what year this came out.
	I think it was 2012.
	Let me look.
	It was an episode of 60 Minutes.
	I'm sure you guys are familiar with that terribly awful, very Jewish show.
	Let's see if I can find it.
	So 60 Minutes was created by Don Hewitt, who changed his last name from Hurowitz.
	Okay.
	And 60 Minutes, the main woman that was doing all of the, I guess you would call them intros or monologues or voiceovers, was Barbara Walters, who is obviously Jewish.
	I think they're both Russian Jews.
	Let's see if we can find this video.
	This is a really good example of just how early the moral decay started.
	So there was this kid...
	Wow, this wasn't actually 60 Minutes either.
	Holy crap.
	There was this child, his name is Jazz Jennings.
	This is a boy whose parents at the age of 11 tried to change its gender into a girl.
	The boy is Jewish.
	The parents are Jewish.
	Barbara Walters, who did the voiceover of this and covered the situation, is also Jewish.
	So was the film editor.
	His name was Goldberg.
	He was also Jewish.
	So they prop up in front of everybody this video guy.
	12 million views.
	I mean, this was a big thing in its time when this first happened, this transgender thing for a child.
	This was unheard of in 2012 when this came out.
	And this was 100% just this Hollywood Jewish plan to normalize, and not only normalize, but...
	To emotionalize you towards this.
	It was to get into your sentiments and your feelings and make you feel bad for this child that has got gender dysphoria and is trying to change their gender.
	It's very clear when you watch this, it's at the direction of their parents.
	Their parents were trying to manipulate them into this.
	The kid turned out to be completely depressed and want to go back to its original gender or whatever.
	It's a terrible situation.
	Thank you very much.
	I see we got Rebel Science with a $25 super chat.
	He says, Zach, I thank you for your continued work in educating our people, and I support your fight against your detractors and enemies.
	Brother, thank you.
	That's a very, very, very kind, first off, super chat and comment.
	I really appreciate hearing that.
	Thank you very much.
	I will continue on the good path as best I can.
	We're always going to have disagreements and Enemy combatants, right?
	But thank you, brother.
	I really appreciate your support and your words.
	It's very kind of you.
	No, no, the kid did not kill itself.
	Jazz Jennings got like a reality TV show after this whole thing, and they made her like a him.
	It's a him.
	It's a dude.
	They made him a media sensation.
	It's sick, man.
	It's just sick.
	They will manipulate and fuck up the head of their own child in order to push an ideology onto a populace.
	Listen to this.
	This is just off of their Wikipedia page.
	The mother of the family...
	I was interviewed and she said, regarding the last name, she explained that Jennings is our pseudonym.
	That's the last name that they have.
	It's our pseudonym to sort of make life easier.
	We try to hide our real last name as much as possible.
	Our last name is a very Jewish, long last name.
	That's in quotes.
	That's...
	Okay.
	Why would you be hiding your Jewish...
	You've no reason to not want people to know you're Jewish unless your Jewishness is connected to some kind of bad behavior.
	Awful.
	Yeah, Mike is right.
	That's a really important concept.
	I believe we talked about that on our last show.
	Might is right is a very important concept.
	I see over on FTJ as well, we got a super chat for Man Before Time with a $10 super chat.
	Thank you, my friend.
	I greatly appreciate that.
	I think it's just a super chat.
	I don't see a message with it.
	It might be only on my end.
	But thank you, my friend, very much for your support.
	And again, I do recommend if anybody...
	Does want to do superchats.
	FTJ is a really good place to do it.
	Lowest fees out of anywhere on the internet for processor fees.
	So the way a lot of these work is like Odyssey, for example.
	if you get like a super chat of $10, Odyssey's super chat is really odd.
	They take a fee from the processor, but then they also take a fee for themselves.
	So you get like double feed on your money.
	So the way that Dave Geharry has set it up over on a FTJ is it's only a processor fee, which is something you'll never be able to avoid because it's how the money physically comes from one place to the other.
	Like that's like a bank thing, right?
	So it's only the processor fee, which is a very commendable on Dave's behalf that he's not taking any money from the creators.
	Jenningsburg?
	I don't know what their actual last name is.
	minutes let me see if I can find it okay this
	is disgusting When you look it up, it says...
	Imagine caring about privacy and discrimination while you're putting your boys who you cut his penis off and turned him into a female at the age of 11.
	Imagine putting your child out there on this massive broadcast with 12 million views and then saying you care about his privacy.
	Yeah, I can't seem to find the last name.
	Thank you.
	The kid's real name is Jared.
	They changed it.
	I'm going to call it...
	Essentially, it has no real name.
	Not only does it not have a gender to identify behind, but it has no real name.
	How does that even function?
	Born Jared, now your name is Jazz.
	Born a boy, now you're a girl.
	Your last name isn't even your last name.
	How could you ever have an identity?
	Really Christian?
	Jeez.
	That's really bad.
	Yeah, man, before time, that would be nice.
	It's good to legitimize the website a little bit.
	Get more people using it.
	So, anyway, back to the topic.
	This is the problem, is we live in a society that's just okay with letting things like that broadcast to 12 million people.
	And they put it out in this way where, again, it's more like, oh, we feel bad for the kid.
	He's got gender dysphoria.
	And, you know, he's just a person, too.
	And they try to, like...
	They try to make you feel for the child.
	And they're literally using this child as a medium...
	To degenerate society and normalize one of the most disgusting behaviors known to man.
	How are we allowing stuff like this?
	No normal upright moral society would ever allow these behaviors.
	Bolshinsky is the real last name.
	Truly.
	That's very interesting.
	Jared is often Jewish.
	Well, there's a lot of names that they pick up on, to be honest.
	You'd be amazed the amount of names that they...
	There's also, if you look, it's quite shocking, but Ludwig is also a very common Jewish name.
	A lot of Jews took the name Ludwig.
	That's a good point.
	That's a very good point.
	Adam says that's actually a perfect example of a Jewish identity.
	That's very true.
	They are...
	Very much in that camp of...
	Their identity is only their Jewishness.
	Everything else is just vague.
	Even their name, their gender, whatever.
	Doesn't matter to them.
	Jewishness goes above everything else.
	And that also does not necessarily insinuate religiousness either.
	there.
	All right, folks, we're at the halfway hour mark.
	We're going to take a brief little intermission.
	I'm going to stretch my legs a little bit.
	I think I might just really quick toss on a pot of coffee.
	I feel fucking tired.
	I don't know what it is.
	I need to get some energy in me.
	Give me one second, folks.
	We're going to take a brief intermission.
	I'm going to throw the screen up, and we'll be back in three to four minutes.
	Three to four minutes, something like that.
	I'll be as quick as I can here.
	All right, stay tuned.
	We'll go back into the topic once we get back in about five minutes.
	Thank you.
	And we're talking about moral decay today and talking about why we need to uplift the morality in civilization so we can have a better way of life for everybody.
	And I do want to recommend, since he's been mentioned kind of roughly a couple times in the chat room, I would like to recommend the book The Genealogy of Morals by Nietzsche.
	He talks about this exact concept pretty in-depth, and he definitely has a...
	I don't want to say a more extreme take, but it's a take that people are not exactly used to hearing.
	It's good to analyze.
	It's really good to see what he had to say.
	Oh, wow.
	Christian, yeah, good link.
	I wonder how people found out what that last name was.
	It's very interesting.
	I find some of these things so difficult to find.
	Okay, so we are coming up on the second half.
	Again, we're live on Twitter, Odyssey, Rumble.
	We're on Rumble on the Stu Peters Network and on my own Rumble page.
	And we're live on ftjmedia.com.
	I see we also got Always Honest with a $10 super chat on FTJ. Thank you so much, Always Honest.
	It's very nice to hear from you and receive some support.
	Thank you.
	I really appreciate you.
	And I hope you're doing well.
	We'll have to...
	Catch up sometime.
	We haven't had a roundtable in quite a bit.
	I want to give you guys really quickly the link to my bio sites page.
	It's a lot like Linktree, but it's not Jewish.
	So I'm going to link this for you guys in all of the chat rooms.
	Here we go.
	If you guys click on this page, this will take you to...
	All of my links.
	All of my channel links.
	It'll take you to my Logos Academy lectures series.
	And it will also take you to support pages where you can help support my work.
	I don't...
	I gotta put it in the rumble chat.
	Give me one second.
	Thought I could put it in that way, but it won't let me.
	Here it is.
	Okay, so that's the link for everybody.
	By the way, I will be on the Stu Peter show tonight.
	He has a broadcast running, I think it's going to air at like 5 or 6.
	It might be like 5 central time, which would be 6 our time, if you're East Coast.
	I'll be on the Stu Peters show tonight for a little bit.
	I also want to promote, we will be live tonight on a Twitter space at 9pm Eastern.
	We're going to be talking about Hitler, the true story behind Hitler, getting away from all of this nonsense.
	He was a crazy boogeyman type stuff.
	Uh, we need to, uh, we need to break that down.
	Yeah.
	Reach Olympics.
	I I'll get around to it.
	I get a lot of messages a day, so I will always get back, but it will take me a while.
	Definitely takes me some time to get these things back.
	I'll get it back to you as quick as I can.
	Yeah, question everything.
	We had a falling out with her, unfortunately.
	I tried to have a space with her, and she took it as a personal attack and stuff, and it went really bad.
	She blocked me on Twitter.
	She's one of the only people that asked me to block.
	She felt like I was, for some reason, attacking her or setting her up for something.
	I don't know.
	It's weird.
	Can I draw a happy face on the whiteboard?
	I don't think it's going to be very visible.
	I'll tell you what, I'll draw you a happy face.
	face why not that is how you make civilization happy folks There's your happy face.
	Wow.
	The glare is so bad.
	Maybe it looks...
	Actually...
	It looks worse on my OBS screen than it does on my Rumble screen.
	Maybe it's actually not that bad.
	Let me try one more thing.
	Yeah, see, the glare is pretty bad at the bottom there.
	I'd have to do it pretty high up, I guess.
	Whatever, we'll get it fixed.
	I would really like to start implementing the whiteboard into some shows.
	I'll figure out how we can do it in time.
	I would probably want to pull it a little closer to me.
	I guess if I pulled it up like this, I could essentially do that.
	I also have a raising desk, so what I would do is I would raise my desk Let's just try it right now.
	Let's test it out.
	You guys will get some behind-the-scenes footage.
	Because if I could ideally stream like this, I would really like to I guess I could right That's not bad.
	How bad is the...
	See, the glare is bad.
	I would have to...
	I'd have to somehow see the spots that the glare is on and avoid them.
	So, I need a bigger pen that makes thicker lines.
	Yeah, I agree with that.
	So I guess, realistically, I could do this.
	It's not terrible.
	It's just not that great either.
	Let's just test one thing out really quick.
	See if you guys can see this.
	If you guys can see this, then I will use this in the future.
	I'll use the whiteboard a little more.
	more.
	I don't have my, uh, lav mic plugged in today.
	I can't tilt the board.
	I, It's on a rotational thing.
	If I tilt it, I'd have to click this up and then I'd have no...
	it wouldn't be able to hold it.
	Can you guys see that?
	It's terrible handwriting.
	My handwriting is not good, especially on a whiteboard.
	So ignore that.
	All right.
	I guess we could do that.
	Thank you.
	I have really, really dark curtains over my windows and still the glare is terrible.
	It's really odd because on my Rumble Studio, that looks pretty visible.
	On my OBS, it does not look visible at all.
	Maybe it's because I'm not full screen.
	Maybe that's why.
	Maybe if I do.
	Let me just see.
	Oh, you know what?
	Yeah, it is.
	Okay, so it is pretty visible.
	I'm just on a smaller screen.
	Alright, so we'll start implementing the whiteboard into the shows.
	I think that will make the shows a little bit better.
	Give a little more character to the shows.
	Because sometimes if I go into a specified lesson and I have...
	A big time monologue that I'm doing, this can get really helpful for things like that.
	Yeah, these are not lights that you're seeing.
	On the reflection, these are...
	This is my window.
	And that is my other window.
	And this is my computer screen.
	You can literally see the blue that's from my computer screen.
	So, I'll have to get it fixed.
	But I really would like to...
	Implement the whiteboard into some more episodes.
	Now that we have all this better setup, we've got the better webcam.
	The one thing I do like about this webcam a lot is the width.
	It's a lot wider.
	You can see my whole arm span on this webcam.
	You certainly could not do that on the other one.
	We'll implement that in the future.
	So I'm actually running out of material on today's topic.
	I didn't really have a lot prepared for today's topic specifically.
	Morality is a little bit of a tough one.
	I do want to pick back up on national socialism a second time, probably on Wednesday.
	Okay.
	you Actually, maybe I'll do it on Friday.
	Since we did it last Friday, I'll do it this Friday again to double down on that and pick up on National Socialism again.
	Let me just type that in.
	So that's what we'll do.
	This coming Friday, we'll do another video on National Socialism going into the pieces that we didn't get to go into.
	So we'll go into the economics.
	We'll go into some of the racial policy.
	We went into a little bit of it, so I'm not going to go too crazy on it.
	Do I know if Hitler went to Mass on Sundays?
	I don't think so, no.
	Really hard to say.
	Get shades?
	I mean, I have literal blackout curtains.
	These curtains are dark.
	You shouldn't be able to see this at all.
	I don't fully understand it.
	That's a very interesting statement.
	Someone says, I notice the right weaponizes morals like the left weaponizes virtues.
	What exactly do you mean by that?
	It's kind of a confusing statement.
	I don't fully understand what you're putting across.
	Yeah, question everything's She definitely is.
	100%.
	Her follower count doesn't make sense compared to the interactions that she gets on Twitter.
	It's a thing you guys got to pay attention for.
	They boost a lot of these subversive accounts intentionally.
	Oh my god.
	This is a terrible take.
	This guy says, I listened to a space with you and some others and E. Michael Jones.
	E. Michael Jones said that misgeneration isn't a sin, but it is a sin when you do it out of impiety.
	He's really bad with the racial question.
	He's extremely bad with the racial question.
	He is like a Christian scholar who just knows about the Jews, to be honest with you.
	I don't really think he's...
	I think people are looking for things out of him that he's not.
	That's kind of what I think the problem is.
	A lot of people want E. Michael Jones to be this racialist, intellectual philosopher who is also very moral and Christian.
	But that's just not him.
	It's in his blood.
	He is a Christian scholar.
	Devout Christian, and that's always going to be what his main focus is.
	Uh, and he just can't reach into those other realms of philosophy at all.
	Uh, I cannot get, uh, audio, so I can't play videos at the moment.
	I'm still having problems with the Rumble Studio end of things on that.
	But yeah, this...
	Leon DeGrel was really good.
	He actually wrote a very good book called The Burning Souls.
	It's a really good book.
	Leon DeGrel was pretty good on morality.
	It's a good question.
	uh, I do appreciate some of these moral questions.
	These are good, always.
	Someone says, I had someone ask me when I said Europeans are the only ones who care about animals.
	They said, why do you eat them?
	I told them in a perfect world, all would be treated humanely, etc.
	But how would you answer that as far as morally?
	I don't think it's morally wrong to eat animals.
	I think it's morally wrong to harm them in the process of making food of them.
	So for example, if you were to...
	Slaughter cattle.
	Actually, let's go to chickens.
	Perfect example.
	Yom Kippur just happened.
	They just had their little cop rot ceremony.
	Perfect example.
	So...
	Chickens, when a farmer, a European farmer, kills chickens.
	Christian, we'll do it.
	Thank you.
	When a European farmer kills its chicken, how does it do it?
	Anybody to chat know, when they kill a chicken, how do they do it?
	When a European farmer says, boy, my chicken is done for.
	It's time to put them on.
	What do they do?
	How do they kill it?
	When they need food.
	And they don't kill it for fun, by the way.
	Very important.
	They kill it specifically for the usage of sustenance.
	Good.
	August says they cut the head off.
	Chop it with an axe.
	Cut the head off as quickly as they can.
	Right?
	Chop it off.
	It's done.
	That's the quickest process they could possibly do.
	They're not poking it with needles or boiling it alive.
	It's a reality.
	If you want the food, the sustenance that comes from the creature, you have to kill it.
	You have to do it in the most moral way possible.
	This is very important.
	So, now, if you look at Jewish tradition, we covered this in a thread.
	I'm actually going to link the thread in the chat room.
	This is very important that people understand this, if you don't understand this or know this.
	On Yom Kippur, Jews have a ritual called Kaparos or Kaparat.
	There's two different spellings.
	I don't know why.
	And in this ritual, they believe that, excuse me, That was a big one.
	Okay.
	In this ritual, it's an atonement and repentance ritual.
	So they want to atone for their sins.
	Now, you know, when Christians want to atone for their sins, they like repent and they stop their sin.
	And then like, that's how you atone.
	Well, Jews during this ceremony, and I'm going to link the thread here if you guys want to read into it, I very recommend you do.
	And take the time to share it if you can, please.
	That would be really nice.
	In their ceremony of atonement and repentance, what they do is they take a live chicken, they grab it by the wings, and they swing it over their head in a circle in the belief that all of their yearly sins are being drained out of themselves and into the chicken.
	That's the thought process here, okay?
	And then...
	They kill the chicken in what is called kosher fashion.
	Now, if you guys are familiar with kosher slaughter, it's extremely disgusting.
	It's repulsive.
	It's awful.
	It's terrible.
	I mean, there are not enough words to describe how bad it is.
	When you look at kosher slaughter, the act of kosher slaughter is done in a very intentionally...
	Evil manner.
	For instance, when they kill a cow, what they'll do is they bind all four of the cow's legs with a rope so that it cannot move or struggle, and they slit its throat with a blade that's called a shishida.
	A shishida is a very thin...
	It's almost like a cleaver, but it's extremely thin.
	Think of a cleaver that's shaped like a razor blade at the end.
	And they slit the throat of the cow.
	Now, what you have to understand is there's a difference between chopping a head off and slitting a throat.
	When you slit a throat, the creature will choke on its blood.
	It will struggle.
	This is a longer process.
	This takes five minutes, ten minutes in some cases for the animal to appropriately bleed out.
	This is the process of kosher slaughter.
	This is how Jews kill animals.
	And this was actually depicted in a National Socialist film called The Eternal Jew.
	They brought this to fruition and showed the populace what these people were doing.
	Obviously, people were disgusted.
	The Jewish media wrote a hit piece against National Socialist Germany and said that this is the most humane way for us to slaughter cattle and that we're hateful for not being okay with that.
	If you go look at that thread that I linked, you'll see it's brutal treatment of these chickens.
	When we talk about morality of eating animals, there's nothing wrong with eating animals.
	I don't say...
	Hey, when a snake eats a mouse, that's morally wrong.
	We should kill the snake.
	Right?
	That's how they survive.
	They need the food to live.
	They need that sustenance.
	However, if the snake was, you know, like, well, you ever see a cat eat a mouse?
	Has anyone ever seen a cat, like, catch a mouse?
	They can be kind of fucking cruel about it, right?
	They'll pick the mouse up, they'll slash it a little bit, then they'll leave it there, and they'll let it, like, bleed a little and suffer, and then when it starts to move away, they start to bat at it again, and they cut it up some more, right?
	And then at the end, they'll finally, like, rip its head off with their teeth or something.
	Cats can be kind of, they're a little bit Jewish in the way that they kill mice.
	Snakes are more...
	They've got an Aryan mice killing facility.
	They're very...
	They strangle it until it's done and then they just eat it.
	But cats are very crude in a way that they kill mice.
	So essentially, we as humans being conscious individuals with the ability to choose if we want to harm that creature or not is very important.
	Because we can choose that.
	We have conscious facilities.
	We have the ability to make a guillotine.
	We have the ability to make a euthanasia needle, right?
	We have many different abilities and many different avenues we can use to properly execute livestock for the sake of consumption.
	Animals don't really have that option, right?
	So morality is something that has to be linked with nature to some degree.
	And that nature is animals are innocent creatures, and the harming of anything innocent is always immoral, especially if you can choose not to harm that innocent being.
	It's the same with pedophilia.
	It's why everybody hates pedophilia.
	It's the one moral foundation that's still persistent in society.
	People see a pedophile, they see a pedophile getting beat up in the street, and they go, good.
	Good.
	It's the one moral thing that's left.
	And the reason for that is because it's the worst thing an individual can do, is the harming of innocents.
	Everybody is in agreeance that harming the innocent is wrong.
	That's one moral foundation that is still present in society.
	Yeah, halal slaughter is definitely the same.
	Fun fact, in case people don't know, Hitler was actually the first person in European history to come out with animal rights laws.
	And this was actually a reaction to Jewish kosher slaughter.
	So it's literally why we have, you know, organizations like PETA today and things like that and legal structures against animal harm and animal abuse.
	That's where it comes from.
	Yeah, I'm not, I'm not a, I don't, I don't want to speak on the vegan question.
	Cause I don't really have the same thought process in that regard.
	I am a meat eater.
	I strongly believe in the consumption of specifically red meat.
	I think it's very necessary for a healthy male diet.
	This guy says, have you ever considered doing a short series, short series, where you go through every time the Jews were kicked out of a country?
	Yeah, that would have to be definitely a 12-hour marathon show.
	That's a really tough one.
	I mean, I would consider doing it, but it's hard to research a lot of them.
	That's the thing.
	And they haven't...
	It's not really 109...
	Times they were kicked out of a country, they were really kicked out in the thousands.
	It just happens to be that a few of the times were from the same country.
	So we boil it down to 109 total countries with many different occurrences per country.
	And it's hard to cover.
	It's really hard to cover because there's a lot of cases.
	And some of them are so historically old, it's hard to get any kind of factual information on it.
	I believe I spoke with Cultured Thug.
	He's in the process of writing a book that lays all that out.
	So keep in touch with him.
	Follow him and hopefully he'll write a book on it.
	I'll tell you what, when he writes his book with his permission, I will read the book and I will use it as a reference point in order to do a series like that.
	I just don't have enough of the information on hand and I don't have the time to research 109 removals or more.
	Lovely, lovely, lovely quote here.
	Gaelic Lord quoted David Lane and he says, Nature doesn't recognize concepts of good and evil in interspecies relationships.
	If the lion eats the lamb, it's good for the lion and evil for the lamb.
	If the lamb escapes the lion and starves, and the lion starves, it's good for the lamb and evil for the lion.
	David Lane.
	That's a very good quote.
	And this is a really important one, right?
	It goes actually very close to that.
	Excuse me.
	Very close to that analogy that I use quite frequently when discussing Hitler in regards to our people.
	So when you hear the Jewish media constantly say, Hitler's evil, Hitler's evil, Hitler's evil, Hitler's evil.
	Well, yeah, for them, he is.
	Sure.
	Like, if you're a Jew, Hitler probably is evil in your eyes.
	Even if you're a Jew that's conscious that he didn't do the Holocaust and he never advocated the mass murder of your people, he's still evil.
	Because if every European nation was to accept his state form, Jews would have no place to leech off of other peoples, and that's how they get by.
	That's how they make their sustenance.
	So it is inherently evil to them.
	It's evil to the parasite.
	And I use the analogy of, think about the flea collar on a dog.
	A dog has a flea collar, and that flea collar keeps the fleas off.
	The fleas are a parasitic body.
	They need to feed off of the dog.
	But they make the dog itchy, so the dog thinks fleas are evil.
	Right?
	So this dog collar for a flea is evil.
	The flea says, that keeps me away from my sustenance.
	But for the dog, the flea collar is good.
	It's great.
	Because the flea collar keeps him comfortable.
	It keeps him safe.
	It protects him.
	So it's the same with Hitler.
	When you look at Hitler as a figure and his ideology...
	It's evil for Jews.
	It's good for Europeans or Aryans.
	This is why morality is tough because it's susceptible.
	It's susceptible to different people.
	Good and bad is different depending on who you ask.
	If you ask Jewish porn website owner Leonid Radvinsky if porn is good or bad, he'll say good.
	If you ask somebody who was a lifelong porn addict and it ruined one of their marriages, is porn good or bad, they're going to say it's bad.
	So these things are very tough because morality can be extremely subjective, which is why someone made a good point earlier about essentially what is good is what is good for life or productive to healthy living.
	And what is bad is what degenerates life.
	I think evil and good are direct antonyms.
	Yeah, I think so.
	Maybe not.
	I think I understand what you're saying.
	Evil might be a different word than bad.
	Good and bad are antonyms.
	Evil would be...
	It's almost more like an intentional bad.
	Like an inherent bad.
	It's like an extreme of bad.
	It's like using holy as good, right?
	right it's like an extreme of good that's a that's that's that's a that's a tough linguistical case but yeah i understand what you're saying totally um Well, this is why, again, another book I highly recommend.
	See if I have it.
	I don't know what that was.
	Another book I recommend is Beyond Good and Evil by Nietzsche.
	This is a very good book where he talks about this exact concept.
	And he talks about the difference between the two sides.
	Beyond good and evil.
	So he states that morality is more than just this black and white of good and evil.
	Which, by the way, this is really important.
	I've talked about this before, but I've never talked about it at the Stu Peters Network, so I'll say it now.
	And I want to make a thread on this and touch into this because I've never seen anybody ever.
	I've never seen anybody talk about it.
	And it's so clear as day when you read this work and you analyze appropriately.
	So in his book, Beyond Good and Evil, this is where he discusses the Ubermensch theory.
	And he discusses Ubermensch can translate to two separate things in the English language.
	It can translate to either overman or superman.
	So, Nietzsche comes up with the Ubermensch theory, and he says that this is a man that's essentially above man, right?
	He's the overman, the higher man, the superman, okay?
	And he is not tarnished by this petty good and evil mentality that a lot of people are stuck in, right?
	So, for instance, some people will say that if you have Ten children and one of them is born blind with an extreme mental incapability that they can't even feed themselves.
	What's that disease where people's arms are stuck?
	I don't know what it's called.
	If they're born in that fashion and they physically can't take care of it, they can't even feed themselves because they can't move their arms appropriately to grasp a spoon.
	If that's the case, in nature, we say we have to let that thing go.
	You have to let that go because that's going to be a drain on it.
	First off, it's never going to live a high quality of life.
	And secondly, it's going to be a drain on the rest of the family, of the people, of the civilization, so on and so forth.
	Now, what's very important is the animal kingdom recognizes this.
	The animal kingdom recognizes Birds are a perfect example.
	If a bird has 10 babies, and one of those babies is born with a broken wing, and it's a little bit diseased, and they go to fly south, not only do they leave that bird behind, they additionally kick it out of the nest.
	They physically kick it out of the nest in order to allow it to die.
	Right?
	So, this is what we're saying.
	The morality system here is beyond good and evil.
	Okay?
	It's not a matter of, is this nice or mean, which is what that good and evil kind of framework is.
	Rather, it's, is this for the benefit of life or of the detriment to life?
	So it's a higher framework of morality.
	Maybe not even higher, it's outside of that typical realm of morality.
	It's more of an esoteric viewpoint on morality.
	Now, The Superman.
	Everybody knows the comic book character Superman, right?
	I'm sure.
	One, in the chat room, if we're familiar with the comic book character Superman.
	We've maybe seen like a comic or a movie.
	Something like that.
	Two of you guys just have no idea.
	I'm sure everybody knows.
	But let's just...
	Just to make sure everybody's on the same page here.
	One, if you guys are familiar with the comic book character Superman.
	if you are not.
	Question everything.
	I am as well.
	Okay, good.
	It's all at once.
	All right.
	Thought so.
	Just making sure.
	Making sure everybody's on the same page because it's very important.
	So, Superman is a comic book character.
	He was made by Joe Schuster and Jerry Siegel.
	Two Jews made Superman.
	Okay?
	And now when you pay very close attention to the comics, the cartoons, the movies, what is Superman?
	First off...
	First off, okay, he is an alien.
	He doesn't come from Earth.
	And this is symbolic.
	It's not necessarily...
	I'm not saying that Jews come from fucking Saturn.
	What I'm saying is it's symbolic of the Jew.
	The Jew is an alien to our civilization.
	They don't belong to our civilization.
	So what does the Jew do?
	They wear a suit.
	They dress up all Hollywood-esque, right?
	And they try to fit in.
	They try to look like business casual.
	They try to look like a Gentile.
	And this is exactly what Superman Clark Kent does.
	He comes as a, he's an alien.
	He's a Superman, but he wants to fit in.
	So he goes and he works at his little press job and he wears the glasses so he can fit in and look like a normal average Joe.
	Now, Superman brings a morality to the people that is exactly in the framework of good and evil.
	Everything he does is in the framework of good and evil.
	Bad guy does this, that's bad.
	Superman, good.
	Superman, stop bad.
	Superman, good.
	It's caveman-style morality for retards, mostly for children.
	It's geared towards children in order to literally shape their psychological apparatus to accept morality specifically into that framework.
	This is a moral subversion of our historic morality, right?
	So when you read Nietzsche and his explanation of our morality via Beyond Good and Evil, and he talks about the Ubermensch, which again can be roughly translated to Superman, they are taking his philosophy of a man that is above men.
	He's still of men, but he's above men.
	Okay.
	They take it and they invert it.
	And he's now a man that is not from men, but is above men.
	Okay.
	And on the opposite side, Nietzsche says that his morality is Beyond Good and Evil.
	It's not in that framework.
	It doesn't operate in that framework, the man that is above men.
	Well, the Jews take the same philosophy and they say, no, no.
	That upper man that's above men, who's not even literally from the men, the alien man, right?
	When he comes in, His morality is directly bound to good and evil.
	And all people must follow that good and evil.
	And he is the best.
	What makes him super is the fact that he is good.
	Well, this is a direct inversion of Nietzsche's philosophy because Nietzsche says that the super, the overman, the superman, the ubermensch doesn't recognize good and evil in the same way that the average man does.
	He doesn't see morality through that framework.
	Therefore, he's not susceptible to that good and bad paradigm.
	This is really important.
	This is one of many, by the way.
	There's a lot of other subversions this tackles onto.
	Another really good example, and it doesn't have to do with good and evil or morality, but another Jewish subversion is Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.
	Wanted to chat if you guys are familiar with Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.
	I'm sure almost everybody is.
	Two if you are not.
	One if you're familiar with it.
	Two if you are not.
	Because this is massively subversive if you're not familiar.
	Let's let the chats catch up a little.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Good, all once.
	Good.
	Well, this one's really important, so a lot of people don't know this.
	Does anybody know?
	Let's see if anyone knows.
	Actually, I doubt it, but let's see if anyone knows off the top of their head.
	Who created Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer?
	Surely it was a nice religious Christian man, wasn't it?
	Anybody know?
	No, yes. yes.
	Yep.
	I figured most people do not.
	So his name was Robert May.
	Not only is he Jewish, he's a secular Jew.
	Not religious.
	Secular Jew who wrote the story of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.
	Now, if you're familiar with the song, I'll pull the lyrics up.
	up hold on yeah most christmas songs were created by jews which is uh already in itself a problem
	Okay, now, looking at it through this lens, now that you know this, this was written by a Jew.
	Your Christmas story as a child was written by a Jew.
	Now let's look at it.
	Okay.
	So...
	So, here it is.
	Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer had a very shiny nose.
	So, obviously, everybody knows the good old-fashioned trope about Jews is that they have large noses.
	So, it's his nose that separates him and makes him so different from all of the other reindeer, right?
	If you ever saw him, you'd even say, Claude, all the other reindeer used to laugh and call them Ames, right?
	So, they're going right back into the good old Jewish persecution narrative, right?
	We love that one, always hearing that.
	They never let poor Rudolph join in any reindeer games.
	So he's not allowed to be like the rest of the reindeer because he's got a different nose.
	That's the consensus.
	Then one foggy Christmas Eve, Santa came to say, Rudolph, with your nose so bright, won't you guide my sleigh tonight?
	Now remember, Santa is a Christian figure, right?
	He's old Saint Nick.
	He's a Christian figure.
	And Santa's saying, hey, you know what?
	You're Jewish.
	Why don't you head this light?
	Why don't you be the chosen reindeer today?
	Why don't you go ahead and be the chosen reindeer?
	Okay?
	Then all the reindeer loved him and shouted out with glee, Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, you'll go down in history.
	So now all the reindeer that originally hated him because he was an alien reindeer, different than the rest, did not belong to Now, good old Saint Nick says, oh, he's good.
	He's a good Jew.
	He's just like us.
	No different.
	Ignore the nose.
	Now, all of a sudden, all the other reindeer love him.
	They want to follow him.
	And he's the chosen reindeer that they all care about more than their own.
	So, this is really, and this is one of many, okay?
	All the Christmas songs are like this.
	All the other ones are pushing materialism or all these different things.
	So, this is, again, in essence, what these people do.
	They create entertainment under the guise of Entertainment.
	And realistically, it is a subversive way for you to slowly accept these people and their behaviors and their traits into your life.
	And they rub it in your face every chance they get.
	That's exactly what Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer is.
	Another big one for those that are around for 40 years or so, maybe, maybe.
	Maybe 50 years or so.
	Okay.
	One in the chat, if you guys are familiar with Q-Bert.
	It's an old arcade game.
	Very old arcade game.
	Two if you're not familiar with One, if you know who Q-Bert is.
	two if you don't.
	Thank you.
	Okay.
	So Qbert was an old arcade game.
	It has very Dada-ist type of art style to it.
	Very chaotic and weird different colors.
	No symmetry.
	Very odd looking game.
	This was made by Gottlieb that was the developer.
	And they had some guy named Bernstein who worked on the design for the second game they came out with.
	So, Qbert was, he's this little thing with a big fucking nose.
	And the people, when you win, let's say you win on Qbert, you get a high score, and you type your name in, the scoreboard, they're called nosers.
	The players of the game are called nosers.
	And the goal of the game is to change the colors of the shapes and whatnot.
	When you look at the art style, you don't even need to analyze very far to realize it's Jewish.
	They have a very, there's a very specific art style that comes out of Jews.
	This is where this, uh, this whole like Dada art and all this weird kind of anarchistic type of art comes from.
	It's lacking in symmetry.
	Which again goes hand in hand exactly with we talked about morality being subjective and someone said it earlier, but beauty is also extremely subjective.
	And what Jews consider beautiful compared to what we consider beautiful is polar opposite.
	It's not even close.
	When you look at all European Aryan architecture, symmetry, symmetry is beautiful for us.
	We care a lot about symmetry.
	That is the essence of beauty.
	The more symmetrical it is, the more beautiful it is for us.
	they're the opposite.
	If you look at any of the modern art or any of the modern architecture that comes from a lot of Jewish designers in the modern age, it's completely lacking in symmetry.
	There's almost no symmetry in any of it.
	This comes a lot from this Dada art thing, which there was, there was unfortunately a lot of Gentiles that did the Dada art as well, but it was very Jewish in its creation.
	Symmetry is absolutely beautiful.
	Our people, for all of history, have always viewed symmetry as beautiful.
	Especially in architecture.
	You look at the Colosseum in Rome.
	Symmetry has always been our thing.
	Yes, yes, very good point.
	Someone said it's demoralizing art.
	Yeah, the goal of a brutalist, cubist, da-da type art is specifically to be unsymmetrical.
	It's a demoralization tactic.
	Art is a very important thing in society.
	be.
	Art is a very uplifting endeavor.
	It gives you this thing to strive for when you look at art.
	Well, folks, we are coming up on the last five minutes of the show, so we're going to do some outros, promote the rest of the shows for the week, and don't forget to follow me on all my platforms.
	So, first things first, we have a show...
	Tonight we're going to be doing a Twitter space at 9 p.m.
	Eastern, so about three hours after we close here.
	We're going to be joining Ian Malcolm for a Twitter space to discuss the true story of Adolf Hitler and break down some of the lies that have been told, some of the many lies.
	I don't think we're going to be able to cover all of them for sure.
	But we'll break down as many as we can in the time frame that we have.
	Additionally, I'm going to be on the Stu Peters show tonight.
	I believe tonight.
	If not, it's going to be tomorrow.
	I think it's going to be tonight, though.
	I'm not sure.
	So, Stu's going to be live either way tonight at 6.
	I might be on tonight.
	If not, I'll be on tomorrow.
	I'm going to start being on his show weekly on Tuesdays at 1 p.m.
	Central, 2 p.m.
	Eastern.
	We're going to be live on Wednesday and Friday this week, as usual, with our usual weekly programs at 4 p.m.
	Eastern.
	I'm also going to be live on Friday at 1 p.m.
	Eastern.
	I have three shows on Friday.
	You guys are going to get a lot of me on Friday.
	So, Friday at 1 p.m.
	Eastern, I'm going to be on...
	My own show on G-Man's show.
	We run a weekly show on Fridays.
	Then I'm going to run my show.
	We're going to talk about national socialism on the Stu Peters Network.
	And then I have another show on just my channels at 7 p.m.
	Eastern with an Australian guest.
	His name is Jack Brady.
	He does some intellectual TikToks analyzing Jewish power and their behaviors.
	So be sure to catch me on Friday.
	We've got a lot going on on Friday.
	Don't forget, folks, if you guys do want to support this show and help me keep this going, which the support has been lovely lately, and I cannot express enough how much I appreciate you guys, you can super chat on my Odyssey channel, which is Logos Revealed.
	You can super chat on Entropy.
	It's entropystream.live slash Logos Revealed.
	The super chats there are the ones that come up on the screen when it's functioning.
	For some reason, it doesn't seem like it's working today.
	You can Super Chat on ftjmedia.com.
	Again, the lowest fees out of any website around at the moment.
	And you can also super chat on my personal Rumble channel, which is Logos Revealed Eye.
	There's just an eye at the end of it.
	Additionally, please make sure that you guys follow me on all of my platforms.
	I'm going to send you guys the link one more time in the chat rooms here.
	This is the bio site link.
	If you click on this, it's going to take you to a page that will show you all of my stuff.
	It's going to have all of my channels on there for you to follow and network with.
	It even has my email on there.
	If you want to reach out to me personally, if anybody has a question, an inquiry, a thought, a project, an idea, whatever the case may be, I'm open to all emails.
	It's just logosrevealed88 at gmail.com.
	If you guys want to reach out to me personally with any kind of private endeavor, whether, again, it's a question or a thought or an idea or Anything.
	I'm open to pretty much anything.
	So there's the bio sites link in the chat there.
	Please make sure to click on that and check all my stuff out.
	And don't forget again to support the show.
	Help me keep this running.
	The more support I get for the show, the more seriously I can take this, more books I can get, bring you guys as much knowledge as possible.
	I love doing this.
	Very passionate about it.
	So everything I get in support on this show goes straight back into it.
	I can assure you that much.
	With that being said, folks, we're coming up on the last three minutes here.
	So we're going to close out.
	Do not forget to follow Stu Peters.
	He is going to be live in about three minutes here.
	And my dog is ready for me to end.
	So thank you, folks.
	Really appreciate you guys watching.
	And I will see you guys at 9 p.m.
	Eastern tonight.
	I might see you guys on the Stu Peters show tonight.
	And I will definitely see you guys Wednesday at 4 p.m.
	Eastern with our next weekly show.
	Have a wonderful night, guys.
	Thank you.

▲