Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 18, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

01:59:00

Logos Academy Episode 13: National Socialism

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Alright ladies and gentlemen, we are live.
	Welcome everybody.
	Sorry, a little bit late, like two minutes or so.
	I'm having a hard time setting up the chat room here.
	I think we're good now.
	Welcome, everyone.
	It is episode 13 of the Logos Academy.
	Welcome, Austin.
	Yeah, I have a schedule that I'm on three days a week, so I'm live at this time every time.
	Thank you, though.
	I appreciate that.
	We are live with episode 13 of Logos Academy.
	This is going to be the actual final show of the week.
	I know you guys only got two shows this week, but...
	I've had a bit of a busy week, moving things around in the house, on the physical side of things, getting stuff done online.
	Had some family stuff come up this week, so just a couple moving mechanisms, but we should be back in gear now.
	As you can see, the setup has changed quite a bit.
	I got some things moved around.
	We got a new microphone, new web camera.
	I've got the whiteboard here.
	I'm going to see...
	If I can incorporate the whiteboard into some shows, it's going to be a little bit difficult because these markers don't...
	They just don't show.
	They don't show up very well.
	I'm going to have to get, I guess, thicker Expo markers, and then maybe that'll make a difference.
	These are kind of thin, so I don't know.
	We'll see.
	We'll see if that makes a difference.
	Even the darkest one...
	The darkest one I have is purple because my black has ran out, but even the purple doesn't really show up all that good, so...
	We'll have to reformat that a little bit and see if we can possibly get this working.
	There's also a very odd glare right in that area, as you can see.
	It's a pretty bad glare.
	I have all of my shades closed, so if I open them, it would only get a lot worse.
	I guess it kind of looks the same.
	I just don't know what section it is that the glare is coming from.
	I'll try to figure it out.
	We'll get it working.
	We'll try to incorporate that into some shows.
	I think that would be a really good little addition.
	Otherwise, this is the regular program.
	Nothing special today.
	We're going to talk about, as you can see in the title, National Socialism.
	And this is to break down this mysticism and the occult accusations that are commonly leveled against National Socialist Germany, which occult as a word is a very tough word.
	Again, we talk about linguistics a lot on the show and occult can mean anything.
	It can mean esoteric.
	It can mean mystic or supernatural or whatever the case may be.
	It's a very ambiguous word that depending on who you say it to or what context you use it in, it can have many different meanings.
	Typically when people talk about National Socialism and they talk about the Third Reich and they use the term occult, they mean it in some kind of mystic, satanic kind of sense.
	That's how most people take it right away when they hear that.
	But occult simply means esoteric or not known to many, right?
	It's very synonymous with the word esoteric.
	So it's a poor word to use, and I think it's intentional that they use that word because you can also call...
	Actual Satanists that are, you know, like Weishaupt and things like that.
	You can call them occultists.
	And what does that mean, right?
	It means that they're digging into the hidden, the esoteric, right?
	So they could be doing this in some weird, kooky, black magic sense, or they could just simply be looking into hidden information that not many people know things about.
	So the word itself is...
	Not a great word to use.
	However, it's used frequently.
	You get characters like Alex Jones and many other in the mainstream or even mainstream alternative because Alex Jones would be maybe not mainstream, but he's definitely well known to say the least.
	So you'll get characters like this that use terms such as occultist and things like that in order to demean what exactly it was that they were looking into.
	So I was actually tagged in a tweet the other day directly in regards to this where Alex Jones said...
	Something about Hitler looking for the Spear of Destiny and that he was an occultist and was looking for magical superpowers or something of the sort.
	For those who are not familiar with the Spear of Destiny, that is considered the spear that is the one to have pierced Jesus Christ.
	So...
	This would be a historical artifact, right?
	There's nothing occultish or satanic about looking for a historic artifact.
	And he also referenced them doing archaeological digs, which they also did through the Anurnbe, however you say that.
	And through this organization, they did archaeological digs of what they believed were ancient Aryan This was a goal to try to figure out what our roots are, where does our culture come from, where do our people originate.
	That was the main goal behind these archaeological digs.
	Again, there's nothing mystic or supernatural about that.
	It's simply Historical understanding, right?
	This is something we referenced not long ago from Heinrich Schliemann in his book, Troy and Its Remains.
	He did something very similar.
	He went to the ancient civilization of Troy, did an archaeological dig, and found hundreds and hundreds of pots that were loaded with swastikas, which obviously gave him the impression that it was an Aryan civilization.
	This is far before the time of Hitler.
	This is in the late 1800s that this book was written.
	This doesn't have to have some kind of weird satanic mixture into it, but people know that not many understand the origins or the reasons behind these things, and they give it that association in an attempt to discredit what exactly it is that they're doing.
	There's nothing wrong with Traveling the world to search for your origins or the roots of your people.
	I think that's a very noble and historic endeavor.
	It would be like us in America today traveling around the states and looking for ancient artifacts from the colonial period from 400 years ago, seeing what our forefathers brought here, what they left behind, finding the time capsule things and things like that.
	That's not a satanic or mystic endeavor.
	It's a historical one.
	You're trying to set a historical understanding of the situation, gain more knowledge about your ancestors.
	Nothing wrong with this at all.
	So, along with those accusations of these things being a cultist, did my rumble stream not start?
	Really?
	Oh, you know what?
	Oh, it says failed to connect stream.
	Hold on.
	Very odd.
	Thank you for letting me know that.
	Why would that be?
	Give me one second, folks.
	A little bit of technical difficulties.
	Yeah, I'm on the Stu Peters Network.
	I'm live streaming on Rumble Studio, but I also typically do a show on my Rumble as well, and it seems it's not up on there.
	Okay, I guess we're just not going to have a Rumble stream on my channel today, guys.
	I can't figure it out, and I don't want to make things worse.
	So we're just going to leave it go.
	So if you guys are watching over on the Rumble, or if you see people are watching over there, shoot them my way, because I don't know...
	Actually, I'm just going to...
	Hold on.
	I'm going to delete that stream, because I really can't figure out why that would be.
	I'm not too sure about that.
	Maybe I can try one more thing.
	If this doesn't work, I'm just going to close it out because I'm not tech savvy.
	I'm too confused on how to do this already.
	I don't understand why that would be the case.
	JJ, welcome and thank you.
	August, no.
	I would not interview Martinez, no.
	I don't think he has anything insightful to bring to the table.
	I've debated him, which I think was a waste of my time, and I didn't even really do very well on that.
	But I would never interview the guy.
	Okay, I can try one more thing.
	Let me try this.
	No, that's not going to work either.
	Okay, we should be live on my Rumble channel now.
	Welcome, everyone.
	Sorry about that, if you are on the Rumble.
	On the Logos Revealed Eye Rumble.
	We're live on Stu Peters Network.
	That's working fine.
	That's functioning great.
	But maybe it's working on my end now.
	Should be.
	Hopefully.
	If we're lucky.
	Okay.
	Anyway.
	Back to the topic at hand.
	So we're kind of talking about national socialism very broadly, explaining that we get these terms like occultism, Satanism, things like that to associate this with something very negative in order to discredit any of the ideas that are laid out and not have people look into them.
	So today I want to break down some of these accusations.
	I want to work us into a true understanding of what National Socialism is.
	I have some books I want to reference for you guys.
	Actually, quite a few books that I want to reference so that if you are a curious individual yourself who hears these things and you're thinking, I don't know.
	I don't know much about National Socialism.
	Because this is something you have to ask yourself.
	What do you know about We're good to go.
	And people said, stoicism.
	Oh, stoicism says you can't have any pleasure.
	It's evil.
	Well, this is a gross misrepresentation of what stoicism is, right?
	Stoicism preaches against sensational pleasures, right?
	Things that are, you know, these like dopamine hits of smoking weed or playing video games all day or drinking alcohol.
	These kind of pleasures that actually harm you in the long run, right?
	So it does preach against pleasures, right?
	But against sensational pleasures.
	We have to look at If you grow up and you only hear that Stoicism preaches against pleasures, and you never actually read into Stoicism yourself, you never look into the doctrine or the philosophy of Stoicism, you're never going to have an appropriate understanding of what exactly Stoicism is.
	You're going to have a misrepresentation of it.
	And therefore, you're going to have what, I hate the word, right, because it's been used in a very Jewish fashion, but prejudice, right?
	Pre-judging a situation, a person, a doctrine, prejudice.
	You might have a prejudice towards this doctrine of Stoicism because you might not have a full understanding of it.
	It's the same with National Socialism.
	I challenge pretty much everyone in here to think very closely.
	What is your understanding of National Socialism or Nazism as a doctrine?
	What is your understanding of it?
	Do you have a Hollywood level or American education system level understanding of what National Socialism is?
	Have you actually read into what these people had to say themselves?
	Have you looked at the origins of the sources?
	And if not, We're good to go.
	into it.
	I read Mein Kampf.
	I started reading some of the things they had to say.
	And let me tell you, I mean, if you replace the word Germany with America in most circumstances of their writings, pretty much fits what we need done today.
	I mean, it's extremely on par with the same problems that we have.
	Therefore, we have to look at the solutions that these people had laid out themselves.
	These people laid out some extreme solutions to an extreme problem.
	No doubt.
	This is a very revolutionary and fanatical ideal.
	But that doesn't mean it's a satanic one.
	It doesn't mean it's a bad one.
	And that's why it's our duty as individuals to look at this, analyze this.
	And we should already question when people tell us this is the essence of evil, it leads to genocide, you can't look into this.
	This implies something...
	Very stupid.
	It implies that you as an individual are too stupid to look into this doctrine yourself and gauge if it's right or not.
	Imagine someone telling you, hey, here's a worldview you can't look into because if you look into it, it's going to lead to genocide.
	It's going to lead to murder of millions of people, persecution of millions of people.
	well, doesn't that kind of imply that you're a little bit retarded?
	If someone tells you that you can't look into this because it's going to lead to something awful, that means they're already judging you.
	They're judging your character and saying, you're not smart enough to look into this.
	You're just going to get brainwashed or manipulated down some weird rabbit hole.
	Right?
	So this implies that you yourself are actually stupid.
	So, let's break down that.
	Let's get away from that.
	Let's look into it ourselves.
	Let's ask ourselves some questions.
	First off, why did national socialism come about?
	What was the reason for it?
	Obviously, if it's a philosophy and a worldview, it's an ideology, why did they come up with this?
	Did they come up with this because they were bored?
	Were they trying to create some mass psychosis to kill a bunch of people?
	Because that's the conception that we're given, which doesn't make much sense.
	Imagine I'm a serial killer, a psychopath, and today I sit in my house and I think...
	What is a doctrine I can come up with in order to manipulate millions of people to kill other people in the world?
	I mean, that's just insane to think that they sat and did that for, what, 12 years until they came to power?
	And then another eight years until these supposed mass killings?
	I mean, come on.
	You think they plotted like...
	Two decades worth of mass psychosis in order to get people to kill someone?
	I mean, come on.
	That's ridiculous, right?
	This is like the craziest implication of all time.
	So why did they come up with this idea?
	Why did they create something like National Socialism?
	We have to look at the situation in Germany at the time, and this is where we talked about this before on our show, Weimar Conditions.
	Stu Peters talks about this on his network.
	Many people talk about this.
	Most people know We are in some psychotic, shitty, degenerate society that's transgressing into the lowest form of human living that's physically possible.
	I mean, this is one of the worst ways of life humans have ever lived.
	I mean, we're literally talking about like Sodom and Gomorrah here.
	It's pretty much the exact same scenario, right?
	So this is what the Weimar conditions are, okay?
	And we're living in them now.
	We're right back in that same spot.
	So, Hitler and the people that were around him.
	And it wasn't really that many people around him, right?
	So, you have to understand the situation at the time.
	Hitler sees this and he's like, look, I hate this.
	I don't like it.
	It's really bad.
	And there's probably some people in civilization that were like, just like they are today.
	No, it's great.
	Everybody should be having sex with whoever they want.
	I don't care if you're gay.
	I don't care if you're a tranny or you push it on your children.
	Right?
	It's the same kind of apathetic, weird...
	This is where liberty becomes this actual suicidal endeavor, right?
	Like the liberty...
	Sure, you've got liberty, right?
	You've got freedom, physical freedom, not spiritual freedom, but you have physical freedom to an extent.
	So liberty can go off the rails, right?
	Liberty has to be controlled.
	And this is...
	Our founding fathers understood this.
	They wrote this out.
	That's why they said exactly.
	They said that it is necessary.
	The only way this constitution will function in our country is if it's upheld by a good moral people, a moral, moral people.
	This is very important because liberty doesn't work with immorality.
	These two are not compatible with each other.
	If you take liberty, which is this level of freedom, this level of free expression of things, and you mix it with an immoral message, it's not going to last very long because that liberty becomes literally suicidal.
	We're seeing this today.
	And this is not hyperbole.
	This is not exaggeration.
	Suicide rates in this country are the highest they've been in history.
	It's literally suicidal because when you get a civilization that lives so much in liberty that they're harming themselves in the name of liberty, now we get in a really big predicament, right?
	This is a civilization that's bound to decay.
	It's bound to collapse.
	Liberty has to have this level of discipline to it.
	It has to have a moral comp.
	Let's say you have liberty as a doctrine.
	I should be writing on the board today.
	That should be great.
	If you guys could see it, I would do it.
	Let me just try.
	I don't think it's going to be visible.
	If I put the word liberty here, see if you guys can see it.
	Bad handwriting because I'm sitting with my earbuds in, but yeah, there's too much glare.
	I'll have to get that figured out.
	You're not going to be able to see anything.
	So we'll take liberty as a concept, okay?
	And liberty itself, it has to have a moral compass, right?
	So picture liberty as this ball here, okay?
	And the ball has a compass around it, right?
	And the compass tells people where to go.
	Compass always points north, right?
	Points to something higher, something better.
	So, liberty has to have that moral compass that tells you what direction to go with your behavior, right?
	And if it is a bad behavior, you just don't do it naturally.
	Even though you have the liberty to do it, you don't do it, right?
	For instance, 40 years ago, everybody had the liberty to watch pornography or do heroin.
	However, not many people were doing these things because they had that moral compass that told them, sure, I have the freedom to do that.
	I have the liberty to do it, but I probably shouldn't do it.
	It's not good for me.
	So now, today's society, the moral compass has been smashed.
	We know the culprit.
	It's international Jewry.
	It's the same as it was in the Weimar Republic.
	So that moral compass has been smashed.
	It's thrown out the window.
	So now we have a people that has maximum, ultimate liberty.
	They can do whatever the hell they want, but they have no moral compass telling them what direction to take those behaviors.
	So they take them into these routes that are literally suicidal, right?
	Drug usage, overindulgence in alcohol to an extent where it's actually killing the person, right, through liver damage or, you know, whatever the case may be, or drug driving, you name it.
	All of these things are the extremes of liberty without some kind of moral compass attached to it.
	Now typically in a society, religion is the moral compass, right?
	So for instance, in the United States of America, Christianity was the moral compass for 200-300 years.
	It was the moral compass in Europe for a very long time.
	The problem we have today is that Christianity has been completely subverted to such a level that it's no longer a moral compass.
	And some might say, well, no, I'm a Christian and I have a moral compass.
	Well, you might as an individual Christian, but the structure itself, the institution of Christianity has lost its moral compass.
	And if you have any question about that, go to a church where they have pride flags hanging up inside the church, where the Pope is advocating for homosexual marriage.
	That's a subverted institution.
	That's an institution that has lost its initial moral groundings.
	Christianity has and always will be in its correct form against homosexual marriage.
	But it's lost that.
	It's gone, right?
	This is diluted.
	And this is, again, it's a smashing of the moral compass.
	And now that you've lost that moral compass, again, repeating ourselves, but your liberty becomes suicidal.
	So this was the case in Weimar, Germany.
	This is exactly what they were living through at their time period.
	Therefore, national socialism arises.
	Hitler comes and he says, hey, you know, I see the situation.
	I don't like this.
	I don't like what's going on.
	We're living in a very immoral society.
	I want that moral compass to come back.
	And his way of bringing that moral compass back to the people was through a philosophy, a doctrine.
	This is something that you have to understand.
	The Republican Party can't bring morality back to the populace.
	It's not possible.
	The Democratic Party, not only can't they, they don't want to.
	They want to bring the opposite of a moral compass.
	They want to tell people, do whatever you'd like.
	It's a free country.
	Cut the balls off your children.
	Please, by all means.
	It's good for you.
	That's what the Democrats The Democratic Party.
	I'm not going to say Democrats.
	This is very conservative rhetoric.
	That's what the Democratic Party wants to do.
	The sides of the left.
	The sides of the right, they might want morality, they might want a moral compass, but they're never going to convince people to join the moral compass because they themselves are morally compromised.
	It's this good old-fashioned lead by example.
	Most of the people in the conservative apparatus are taking money from a group of people through AIPAC. That literally want us dead.
	They don't care about us whatsoever.
	They're cowards.
	They're sellouts, right?
	So someone who's a coward and a sellout, how can they preach morality to you?
	And how can you ever trust them that they're actually preaching a good morality?
	If their morality states, I'm going to make a shitload of money by selling my people out, changing my worldview and my doctrines, that's not a morality.
	That's no moral structure.
	You're building foundation on sand, right?
	So we'd be insane to trust these people.
	So Hitler arises and he says, look, this is a problem.
	We need something.
	And he comes up with this idea of national socialism.
	So this is why national socialism came about.
	It came about specifically and purely as a cure to an illness.
	Think about the decay of society.
	It is an illness that we are experiencing.
	National socialism comes about and says, I want to cure this illness.
	I want to fix the problem that we have right now.
	And that is through two avenues.
	Nationalism and socialism, hence the name.
	So nationalism, what is nationalism?
	This is very important.
	And I made a video about this on my Twitter roughly three or four months ago.
	And we have to understand the difference between nationalism and patriotism.
	These are wholly different concepts.
	So you will have your right-wing conservative party.
	They will say that they are American patriots.
	We love America.
	I am a patriot.
	What is patriotism?
	A patriotism is a love or a zeal for one's country.
	Well, what is a country?
	A country is a physical area with boundaries that has a state name to it that says this is a one political body.
	Now, What is nationalism?
	Nationalism is a love for one's nation, hence the ism.
	It's the same thing with racism.
	What is that?
	That is a love for one's race.
	This is not a hatred for other nations, a hatred for other races, a hatred for other patriots.
	That doesn't make any sense.
	So we have to look at this and say, nationalism is a love for one's nation.
	Now, what is nation?
	Look to the center of the word here.
	Nation comes from the word nadio, which means race, birth, tribe.
	So this is actually a love for your people, not your country.
	You are people.
	There's a huge difference in this concept because you can have a country, right, that is multicultural, which has Mexicans and blacks and Asians and whites and Jews and all these different people in it mixing and having this big, you know, melting pot theory, which is, again, created by a Jew, even the concept of it itself.
	Or you can have a nation.
	A nation cannot be multicultural.
	Because it's a tribe.
	What tribe has ever been multicultural?
	It doesn't work like that, right?
	Rome, the Roman Empire, it was in essence a multicultural state.
	Right?
	However, the tribes were separated amongst each other.
	So Rome itself, it wasn't multicultural.
	It was multinational.
	It had different nations that had their respective bodies.
	This is the problem.
	We don't have this in America.
	We live in a multicultural society, which all of the nations are breaking down and intermixing with each other.
	Therefore, these tribes that are existent in America are They're not whole and homogenous anymore, right?
	You might have like your little Chinatown and your little black neighborhood and whatnot in Section 8, but for the most part, there is very little homogeneity in this society anymore.
	It's very infrequent.
	So this is the importance of the word national.
	When Hitler says we are nationalist, he doesn't say we are patriots.
	He never says we are German patriots.
	We love the country of Germany.
	No, because that's an allegiance to a state, to a political institution, which doesn't make sense because political institutions, they're susceptible to failure.
	They're susceptible to make mistakes, right?
	And it's not an eternal thing.
	The country of America could collapse tomorrow and no longer be a thing.
	So can you be a patriot anymore?
	No.
	But you could still be a nationalist for the people that created and founded that and made that into existence.
	This is the essence of nationalism.
	Because nationalism recognizes your literal, where you come from, your roots, right?
	Any traditions you have, the language you speak, the culture you practice, the food that you eat.
	All of this comes from your nation.
	None of it comes from your country, right?
	Because country is a political body.
	That's all it is.
	The country does not mandate what your language is.
	States, this is the language that's most common here, and this is what we're going to use for the most part on our documents and things of the sort, but it's not mandate these things.
	It doesn't mandate your traditions or your culture.
	That's why living in America today, we are watching that moral compass, that religious moral compass.
	It's breaking down because it's no longer mandated upon the people.
	It's not encouraged into the people.
	Same with, you're seeing just general human behavior is degenerating, right?
	Just like this...
	Jesus.
	This very common human behavior that people had with each other, right?
	Hello, how are you?
	You know, caring for each other, wanting to get along with each other.
	Even that is breaking down, right?
	Because it's not encouraged.
	When in school, do people encourage, like, social skills to you?
	Or manners?
	Do schools teach manners anymore, folks?
	Do they ever talk about manners?
	No, they don't.
	Not really.
	So, that's what nationalism means, okay?
	That's concept number one.
	Let's set that aside.
	Now we understand where nationalism comes from.
	Now we understand why they chose that instead of patriotism or conservatism, which, again, hasn't conserved anything.
	The term is fucking nonsensical.
	It shouldn't even be a thing.
	Now let's look at socialism.
	What is socialism?
	This is a really hard one because we've got this Jewish Marxist socialism, which is entirely different.
	It holds a far different concept to it.
	And we have to understand that national socialism in its founding, it was actually a contradiction of Marxist socialism, of communistic socialism.
	It was saying that form of socialism is not functional.
	It doesn't make sense.
	It's not good.
	We don't want it.
	Okay.
	For instance, communistic socialism is international.
	It's globalist, right?
	They want a global society.
	Well, isn't that the exact antithesis of nationalism?
	Because if everybody's global, everybody works together.
	No, no one is reliant on themselves, but all are reliant on each other, all mixed with each other.
	There's no nations left over time.
	This is going to take a long time.
	Don't get me wrong.
	This isn't going to be like tomorrow all of a sudden the Germanic peoples are gone or the Korean people go extinct.
	That's not going to be tomorrow.
	But give it some generations.
	This will happen.
	So that is the concept of internationalism.
	That's what happens with internationalism.
	And this is where we get this very big problem between the common understanding of socialism.
	I'm already seeing it in the chat room here.
	Many people don't fully understand what exactly socialism means as a doctrine.
	So what does the term social mean?
	It's pertaining to the community, for the benefit of the community.
	So let's look at the difference here between communistic socialism and national socialism, because there's a huge fundamental difference that people fail to recognize in most cases.
	So it goes into the ideology.
	It's not necessarily the structure itself.
	It's the ideology behind the structure.
	So if we look at national socialism, National socialism is in favor of a thing like private property, right?
	But further, let's talk about the concept of work, because this is really important in our society today.
	The working...
	The working ability of most people is gone.
	Same with the moral compass.
	The motivation to work, the motivation to provide for others is definitely lacking.
	And this is a product, again, of multicultural society.
	That's inevitable.
	If you live in a society with people that are not the same as you, they don't get along with you, they don't agree with you, they're not anything like you, It's very hard for you to have a zeal to work hard and be a good citizen that provides for everybody else.
	Because when you go and you drive 15 minutes to your local gas station and there's a bunch of degenerates in there with loudspeakers on blasting their fucking music and you know they don't have a job...
	It kills your enthusiasm to be a working and functional member of society.
	It absolutely does.
	When you're watching other people that are not functioning, not working members, and then they walk out of the gas station and they get into this 2023 fucking Lexus that they bought with government assistance money or drug money or whatever the case is.
	You know they're not a working citizen.
	It's very obvious.
	And you're watching them drive this fucking $40,000 car.
	We're living in a backwards society.
	So it kills your enthusiasm.
	But what does work mean?
	What is the concept of work?
	So, National Socialism preaches that work is that which benefits the community.
	So, let's give an example here.
	We've talked about this before, but let's give an example here.
	Leonid Rudvinsky, he's the Jew who bought 75% stake of OnlyFans and turned it into a porn site.
	So, all of these women that are making millions upon millions of dollars doing OnlyFans, Are any of these people working?
	Let's ask the chat for this.
	One in the chat, if you think a girl selling herself on OnlyFans, okay, for monthly memberships of people looking at her naked, one in the chat if you think that is work, two if you don't think that would be defined as work.
	One if you define that as work, two if you do not.
	Let's get a gauge from the chat room here.
	Very curious.
	Canaanist, while we're waiting for everybody to type.
	Yes, I did say that.
	And I hold firm on that.
	Okay, good.
	Good.
	All twos.
	Not work.
	Good.
	I'm glad everybody's on the same page with that.
	Because it's not work.
	So this is what National Socialism explains, that it has to benefit the community.
	This is what is work.
	So now let's go further.
	Let's look who owns OnlyFans.
	Leonid Rudvinsky, who is managing all of these women, selling themselves online.
	Is he working?
	Is that work?
	Now, some might say, well, he's crunching paperwork, right?
	He's crunching numbers and organizing things and keeping the website running.
	That's work, man.
	It's work.
	It's not work because it doesn't benefit the community.
	It harms the community.
	It destroys the community, right?
	Look at how OnlyFans is wreaking havoc on society.
	This is very important because under a national socialist definition, this is not work.
	Now, in a capitalistic society that we live in today, this is considered work.
	Sure, he's doing a good job.
	He's an American citizen.
	He's doing the American dream, trying to make as much money as he can.
	Do you understand what the problem is here?
	We're living in a society that doesn't have a moral compass.
	There's no moral compass behind your endeavors.
	Therefore, all of the people, the most degenerate people in society are the richest people in society.
	This is exemplified everywhere you look.
	Look at all of Hollywood.
	Druggies, alcoholics, degenerates of all kinds, sexual deviants.
	They rule our society.
	Right.
	And even the people that are not druggies, alcoholics and degenerates like these big Jewish business financiers, the bankers.
	Well, they're still immoral because they don't care how much they exploit others at the benefit of themselves.
	So this isn't work.
	This does not conceptualize its work.
	If it harms others in the fashion of you getting it, it's not work.
	It might be work for you, but it's harm for everybody else.
	Therefore, it's not social.
	It's antisocial.
	Usury is antisocial because it harms everybody else in the process of helping one.
	It's like calling a school shooting work.
	No, you're harming everybody at the benefit of one psychopath.
	There is no work in that.
	This is not moral.
	This is not grounded in correct principles.
	This is the problem that we have.
	So, National Socialism says we need to nationalize our people.
	We need to bring everybody to a concept of understanding of where they come from, what their roots are, who they are, and why they need to care for that, right?
	Because they literally owe their existence to it.
	You are a link in a chain, an ancestral chain, okay?
	And further...
	Socialism is what is social.
	It's how you help those people in that community, within that chain.
	Now you have to understand this, because socialism only works in a homogenous scenario.
	You have to understand that.
	Because socialism for me and my culture is a lot different than socialism for a person in Kenya with his culture or a person in Asia with their culture.
	These are very different concepts for very different people.
	Right.
	So socialism for me.
	Is that which benefits my community means DEI does not go.
	I don't.
	DEI does not benefit my community or my people in any way, shape, or form.
	Actually, it does the contrary.
	It ensures that less of them get hired.
	It ensures that there's a quota for people that are worse in society to get a job before people that are better.
	So DEI is actually not social at all, but in a communistic worldview where we're in a melting pot and everybody gets along together, that's the most social thing you can do, right?
	Is allow everybody an opportunity, even if they suck, even if they're stupid, even if their IQ is 40 and they're incapable of holding the job.
	We have to be social.
	This is insane.
	This is the inevitable collapse of civilization.
	You understand that.
	This is why doors are falling off of airplanes, and it's why the products that you have in society are shit and need to be replaced in three to five years.
	This is the reason for all of that, is because the quota, the people that are being hired to do these things, are of such low value, they are incapable of creating high-value products.
	Let's give a good example here.
	Furniture.
	Furniture.
	Let's do another exercise with the chat room.
	One in the chat, if you have one single, and I'm anticipating there's going to be quite a bit in the chat that's going to say one.
	One in the chat, if you guys have a piece of antique furniture somewhere in your house, authentic made antique furniture.
	One if you have one, two if you do not.
	What if you have some antique furniture in your house, whether it's a coffee table, a dresser, a bed frame?
	Two of you do not.
	Nice.
	Someone said all one.
	I love to see that.
	That's great.
	Good.
	A lot of ones.
	A lot of ones.
	I was hoping to see that.
	If you have a two, don't be ashamed.
	Not a problem.
	But I hope you get one, because it's great.
	You'll see a massive difference.
	So, for those who have put a one, and you know...
	What antique furniture is like, compare your antique dresser or your antique desk to your average Amazon or Ikea dresser or desk.
	It's cheap.
	It dents easy.
	It's flammable.
	It's pliable.
	It's shitty.
	The desk I have right now, this desk I bought on Amazon, it's a piece of shit.
	It's terrible.
	I only bought it because you're not going to find an antique lifting and lowering desk.
	It's not a thing.
	You can feel it.
	When you scrape the wood, when you touch the surface, it's like fake wood.
	It's like cardboard wood.
	I could snap this shit over my knee.
	Try snapping an old antique desk over your knee.
	You're not going to do it.
	It's hard.
	It's oak.
	It's serious.
	It's handcrafted.
	There's a level to it.
	This...
	It's the essence of what a civilization used to be like.
	When people were making their furniture 200 years ago or 100 years ago, their thought process in mind was, as I make this desk, I want to ensure that this desk can be given to a person and they can give it to their kids and their kids and their kids, kids, kids, kids, kids, kids, kids for 15 generations.
	That was the idea when they made furniture.
	Now when they make furniture, what's the idea behind it?
	Is it to keep forever?
	Is it to ensure that people keep this going?
	No.
	The idea now for furniture when it's created is, how do we get this out as fast and cheap as possible so as many people can have it as possible?
	I don't care if they have to replace it in three years.
	That just means more money for me.
	Let's get it out.
	Go, go, go.
	Churn, churn, churn.
	This is the problem.
	Again, capitalism...
	Can function in a homogenous, moral society.
	It cannot function in a disharmonious, morally unsound melting pot.
	It's not possible.
	It can't function.
	Physically.
	This is why your furniture sucks.
	This is why everything you buy, the TV you buy, lasts three years.
	And it kicks on you and you need another one.
	The fridge you get.
	It's got a three-year warranty on it.
	Do you know what a warranty on a fridge was in the 1980s?
	They would give you like a 20-year fucking warranty on your fridge.
	Now you're lucky if you get a five-year warranty on your fridge.
	You are completely lucky.
	Like, out of this world lucky.
	If you go to Best Buy and they give you a five-year warranty on your fridge, you're typically going to get a three or four.
	And it's mostly three.
	It's not made to last.
	It's not made to help people.
	So is it work?
	Are they working when they're making these products?
	A guy that runs Amazon and churns out cheap bullshit that he sent to overseas labor, is he working?
	Or is he taking advantage of the populace at the benefit of himself?
	These are questions we have to ask ourselves.
	Okay?
	So, this is why National Socialism was created.
	This is the premise for it.
	We haven't even gone into the doctrine yet.
	But this is the premise for it.
	Exemplified through the ills of our society today.
	And this is overreaching.
	There's far more.
	The shitty situation we have, the lack of good items in society, we understand that now.
	We understand why that is.
	The lack of morals in society, we also understand why this is.
	The disharmonious nature and the skyrocketing depression and tension in society, we understand why this is.
	And now we see that National Socialism as a doctrine in its creation seeks specifically to fix exactly these things, each and every one of them, and a step further.
	It seeks to actually not only alleviate these ills, but after these ills are gone, to uplift and make even better the original moral compass that was in play beforehand, to polish that moral compass altogether.
	Right?
	Played it in gold, one might say.
	Let's take a break.
	Take a breather.
	Monologue in a little bit here.
	Catch up with the chat rooms.
	I see we got two super chats from Holocoff.
	We've got a $1 super chat.
	He says, O slash Logos Revealed.
	Hope all is well.
	It is.
	Thank you very much for the support.
	I appreciate you.
	And then he also says, I have oak furniture at Logos Revealed that's 200 years old and it is better than my stuff from just a year ago.
	Absolutely.
	And this is always the case.
	You are never going to get a piece of furniture today that is anything like what was made 200 years ago.
	Not a single thing.
	Look at Victorian furniture or Victorian home designs.
	Have you seen what that looks like?
	You can't mimic it.
	Look at Victorian silverware.
	Now you go to your average store and it's fucking rainbow, cheap, pliable silverware.
	You can just snap it in half.
	It's not made of steel anymore.
	It's a joke.
	Seriously, it's a joke.
	What are we working with here?
	We have so much to fix.
	Thank you very much for the Super Chats.
	I appreciate it.
	And don't forget, folks, if you are watching and you want to support the show, Super Chats are the best option to do so.
	You can do so on my Rumble channel at LogosRevealedi.
	You can do so through my Odyssey at LogosRevealed.
	And we are also on Entropy.
	It is EntropyStream.live slash LogosRevealed.
	You'll find me on there, and you can support that way.
	All of it will be a super chat that I will read within a certain amount of time.
	If I'm on a monologue, I try not to interrupt the monologue too much.
	Cars are a good example of this as well, yes.
	Look at American-made cars in the 40s, the 50s.
	Ignore, first off, they function better.
	They're built to last, right?
	But ignore that piece, okay?
	Ignore the functionality.
	Actually, just look at the car itself, the image of the car.
	The character to the car, right?
	Each car was made with this unique, special design that says, hey, I want to appeal to this specific...
	If you lived in the 40s and you bought a car, the odds, or 50s we'll say, 50s and 60s we'll say, the odds of your neighbor having the same car of you is slim to none.
	And at least in look.
	If you buy a car today, your neighbor's car probably looks very similar.
	Very similar.
	Unless you bought a car that's like pre-2005, pre-2008, right?
	It's very unlikely that you have a car that looks anything different from most of your family and things of the sort.
	Davina says, best place to buy antique furniture?
	Well, there's a couple places.
	I would highly recommend...
	That you get antique furniture from antique shops.
	If you live in a more rural area, there's a lot of antique shops.
	Go to Pennsylvania, man.
	Pennsylvania is the capital of antiques in the United States.
	And you can find really good stuff for very cheap.
	You can actually find an antique desk in good shape that's cheaper than a desk on Amazon.
	You can find a dresser that's cheaper than an Amazon dresser.
	So I would encourage you to try antique shops.
	I don't know how to say this name.
	I'm going to try my best.
	Agramo White?
	Am I saying that right?
	I hope I'm saying that right.
	With a $10 super chat, says O slash.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Just a heads up, though, if you guys are going to super chat on Rumble to support me, again, I don't mind if you support Stu.
	If you do it on the Stu Peters Network, that will go to Stu.
	That doesn't go to me.
	So if you want to support me directly, you would have to do it through my Rumble chat, which is Logos Revealed Eye.
	But nonetheless, I do appreciate the support, and that will go to Stu.
	So thank you very much for doing that.
	Yeah, archive.org is down.
	That's a really big problem.
	I hope that comes back up because there's a lot of really, really good books on there.
	Even books, folks, even books that were written 100 years ago.
	Look at how people spoke and wrote 100 years ago compared to how they do now.
	It's worse.
	It's so much worse now.
	Everything we do today is worse than it was 100 years ago.
	Everything.
	There are very few exceptions.
	Yeah, one of the most cultured things in the world you can do is walk around an antique shop.
	And this is really important too.
	There's a very important piece to this.
	When you talk about When you talk about antique shops and you talk about antiques in general, it's kind of like if you go to an Amish community and there's this trust process, it's a high-trust altruistic process where they just put out vegetables or eggs or something on the street and they say, hey, drop $5 in the basket and take a thing of eggs.
	You can just do that in these high-trust communities.
	And these are always homogenous communities.
	You have to understand that.
	Antiquing is one of the most cultured things you can do.
	When my friend Tony Tris, for those that are familiar, when he came and visited me for a week, one of the first things we did, we went to an antique place, just walked around.
	We only got like one or two things maybe.
	And we even went to other ones and didn't get any.
	It's a cultured activity.
	And you're not going to see a lot of other groups of people doing this.
	This is a very white thing to do.
	Because historically, all of those things, all of those pieces, were made by your people.
	That's why they appeal to you, specifically.
	That's why you don't see a lot of Mexicans or Blacks or Asians in antique shops.
	Because it doesn't appeal to them because these things weren't made by their people.
	They don't have like an ancestral link to this.
	It's why as like a natural person, naturally you look back at like ancient Rome and ancient Greece, like almost all white people.
	I don't know a single white person that looks at ancient Rome and goes, oh, that architecture was...
	I don't know anyone.
	They all love it.
	They all look back and they say, wow, magnificent.
	It's amazing.
	Call it a blood memory.
	It's in your past.
	It's from your people.
	Agrama White, thank you.
	I do appreciate it.
	In the future, just if you ever want to support, make sure you do so on the Logos Revealed Eye Rumble channel.
	That's my personal rumble.
	We're live on there at the same time.
	But yeah, any support that's done through the Super Chats on the Stu Peters Network will go to Stu Peters.
	I don't think I'm going to be able to delineate which ones are for him and which ones are for me.
	I do appreciate it.
	Thank you, nonetheless.
	In the future, we can certainly go that route.
	Why did I decide to go with straight up National Socialist instead of renaming to appeal to more and not scare any away?
	Well, because I think people are ready for this conversation, and I think it's time people have this conversation.
	People need to start talking about what exactly National Socialism is, right?
	Because I could have been talking about National Socialism in a negative light, right?
	I could have been in a positive light.
	So...
	Very ambiguous title, realistically.
	But people need to start hearing what this is.
	Because, again, this doctrine is not bad.
	There's nothing evil about the doctrine, right?
	Let's just say you're still under the impression that Hitler was evil.
	Well, it just doesn't make sense.
	It's dumb.
	It's just retarded.
	But let's just say you're under that impression.
	It has nothing to do with the doctrine itself.
	Let's say you think the Holocaust was the worst thing in the world, which, again, 270,000 roughly.
	No gas chambers.
	But let's just say you believed all those things.
	What does that have to do with the doctrine of National Socialism?
	It's not written into the doctrine of National Socialism that we're going to create gas chambers or we're going to mass murder people.
	That's not a doctrine.
	None of that is in the doctrine.
	So when you look at the doctrine, what is the philosophy?
	A gas chamber has nothing to do with philosophy.
	A world war has nothing to do with philosophy.
	So what is the philosophy?
	What did the people say?
	What were their thoughts?
	Where are they coming from?
	That is the important piece here.
	That's what we have to ask ourselves.
	And I think that's what most people are stuck on, is when they hear national socialism, they're not thinking about the ideas of.
	They're thinking about the emotional atrocity propaganda that's been kind of rife around it, right?
	That have nothing to do with the actual doctrines of it.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Old books are really important.
	I have a very old, from the 1700s, copy of The Merchant of Venice.
	It's a very, very interesting book.
	Yes, I'm aware, Mark.
	Absolutely.
	Will I go into the actual racial doctrines they had?
	Yeah, certainly.
	I don't know if we're going to get to it today.
	I'm going to try.
	Because we're monologuing.
	I have to go kind of like one step at a time.
	Because it has to be a slow process.
	For everybody to fully understand.
	Okay, so the first half, we talked about why National Socialism came to be about.
	Now we understand what the origins of it are, why they created it.
	It wasn't just this random hell-spawn idea of we want to start killing people.
	It was an idea of we see ills in society, we see problems with society, and we want to release a remedy for it.
	So that's what they did.
	So...
	Before we get into the next half, I do want to recommend a couple books.
	And I want to recommend that you guys go into these books yourselves if you have any interest in learning more about these doctrines, learning more about what people had to say, what they were thinking.
	So there's quite a few things here.
	Let's start with this book.
	This book was gifted to me by a wonderful fellow in our movement who unfortunately has disappeared on us.
	We are a little bit concerned that he might have passed away.
	His name is Carl Hamers.
	He's a great man.
	Hopefully he's not passed away, but no one has heard from him in quite a long time, and there was already health concerns, so we're a little bit worried about that.
	But nonetheless, he was nice enough to gift me this book from his personal library.
	This is called Hitler's Revolution.
	This is by Richard Tador.
	Richard Tador has done, I think, one interview on this book.
	I actually want to try to see if I can come across him and interview him myself.
	This is a very good book.
	So this book goes into a lot of things.
	This goes into the philosophy of National Socialism.
	This goes into some of the economic things that they did, how they...
	Reshaped society economically, the labor-backed currency, the different social programs that they used to help people economically in the country.
	A lot of family-based economic policies, which is really, really cool.
	Not something that we see, really, in our society today.
	Policies that financially encourage marriage and having children.
	That's a really good governmental program.
	Something we need to grasp on ourselves.
	There's a lot to learn from that.
	I want to recommend this book.
	It's a really good book, especially when you want to talk about the economics and some of the policies that they did economically.
	This is a very good starting point.
	It's very...
	It's very neutral and unbiased.
	So Richard Tator physically just went and grabbed a few copies or different documents from National Socialist Germany, translated them, read through the actual authentic documents, and then read into this or created this as a product of all of that.
	So this is a very good work.
	You'll learn a lot about the economic side of things, some of the policies that they made, actions that they did, things of that sort, legislations.
	A lot of that can be learned through this book.
	Additionally, we have this work.
	This was also gifted to me through Carl Hamers and his personal library.
	Again, lovely individual.
	This is Germany Speaks.
	By Ribbentrop.
	So this is actually from National Socialist Germany.
	This is documents that they were sending out to the British and the Americans in the form of English in order to let the populace know actually what they were doing in National Socialist Germany.
	Because again, there was a lot of wartime propaganda, a lot of lies that were being spewed about them, even at the time itself.
	This is an interesting book.
	This one is a little more in-depth.
	So if you have a base understanding and you want to get a little bit deeper in your understanding of what exactly National Socialism is, you want to learn a little bit more, get a better understanding of these things, this is a very good book for that.
	National Socialism, its principles...
	We're getting a shitty glare here.
	It's Principles and Philosophies by Carlos Videla.
	This is a very good book.
	This goes into the actual ideals themselves.
	Where the philosophies come from.
	He actually goes into Nietzsche and things of the sort.
	He goes into the Übermensch or Overman theory.
	Quite a few other things in here.
	So it's a very interesting work.
	This is for someone who already has a base level understanding and they want a little bit more.
	Mike the Rapper, I never said that.
	Never said that even once.
	So thank you for the facetious endeavor.
	What do I think about Aristotle?
	I'm not big on Aristotle personally.
	Aristotle, I just don't like his philosophies.
	He's got more of this worldly, grounded philosophy.
	I'm not really too big on him.
	I do like his work on rhetoric.
	I think that's a very important work.
	Aside from that, I'm really not too big on him as a philosopher.
	I really almost barely consider him as such.
	Where can one get such books?
	Uh...
	That's a really good question.
	For the first two, I really don't know.
	This one, you can actually get on Amazon.
	I hate supporting Amazon, but I don't know where else you could get it.
	It's the only place I could find it.
	It's a good work, nonetheless.
	I'm surprised you can actually find it on Amazon.
	The other two books, Hitler's Revolution in Germany Speaks.
	I don't know where you can get these.
	You might be able to get Hitler's Revolution on Amazon.
	Maybe.
	I would rather get them from an authentic source that actually holds the ideals themselves and is not just selling the work for money.
	I don't know, though.
	I'm not sure.
	Definitely not sure.
	So I do apologize for that.
	I don't know where you can get these physical copies.
	Again, the first two were gifted to me, and I did get the other one physically from Amazon.
	And then obviously, I think it goes without saying, Mein Kampf is a big one.
	Obviously get yourself a copy.
	If you really truly want to understand these doctrines, get yourself a copy.
	Please do not make the mistake of getting a Mannheim translation or a Murphy translation.
	I wouldn't even go with the Ford translation.
	If you're gonna get Mein Kampf, you have to get either the Stalag edition, which is the only authenticated one by the NSDAP. It's the only translation the NSDAP ever gave authentic confirmation over.
	Or you can get the Thomas Dalton edition.
	Thomas Dalton is a good researcher who did a good job and he doesn't have any kind of ulterior motive in translating the work, like you'll see from a lot of the other people that have translated it.
	You know, a good example.
	I think it's...
	It's either the Murphy or the Mannheim.
	It actually has an ADL hate warning in the very beginning of it.
	So they're already subverting the work in the very beginning preface of the work.
	Warning, it's hateful stuff.
	If you read this, you're going to be brainwashed and mass manipulated into hating everybody or something.
	It's really dumb.
	It's gay.
	It's just gay.
	Let me actually see if I can...
	See if I can find Abraham Foxman's intro.
	Read it to you guys so you know.
	They label him as the author of Mein Kampf.
	What a joke.
	It's the Mannheim edition that this is in.
	Let's see if I can find it.
	Thank you.
	Unfortunately, the archive is down, so I'm not going to be able to find it there.
	I might be able to find it somewhere else though.
	I really would like to read this to you guys so you guys can see this.
	Okay.
	It's also, just as a heads up, it's the only one that you can get on Amazon.
	Amazon doesn't sell the good editions that you actually want.
	I can't find a PDF. It's so hard now that they took away the archive.
	I don't know if that's going to be back up or not.
	I don't know if it's just being momentarily attacked or what.
	I guess we'll find out.
	Okay, someone says that eBay is selling Hitler's Revolution for like $20.
	Okay.
	So you can get it there.
	That's a good source.
	20 bucks is pretty good.
	Would I ever do a show with Nick Fuentes?
	And do I think it's possible?
	Yeah, I would do one with him.
	I'm not sure.
	Might not be possible right now.
	Maybe in the future, yeah.
	I don't think I have a big enough name yet for him to want to do a show with me.
	So there's not a lot of incentive for him.
	I will say his rhetoric has been improving quite a bit.
	So those are the four main texts that I want to recommend you guys.
	There's also a couple I would like to recommend you of only PDFs.
	You cannot physically get these any other way other than a PDF. Let me...
	Okay, we'll do this one first.
	You would like to hear some discussion about the differences between the various translations Well, I'll tell you what I'll do.
	I'll read the back of Mein Kampf on the Stalag Edition.
	And this will kind of hammer out why it's important that you get this one specifically.
	Okay.
	This is the back of the Stalag Edition.
	This is why I recommend this edition.
	This is the only complete, unabridged, and officially authorized English translation ever issued by the National Socialist Party and is not to be confused with any other version.
	Translated by an unknown English-speaking National Socialist Party member, it was printed by the Franz Eher Verlag in Berlin for the central press of the NSDAP in limited numbers during the years 1937 to 1944.
	So it was done in that time period.
	Most copies were distributed to the camp libraries of English-speaking prisoner-of-war camps and became known as the Stalag edition because they all carried a camp library rubber stamp on the title page.
	Only a handful of copies survived the war, and the text contained in this edition has been taken directly without amendment from one of these extremely rare editions.
	This official translation is not to be confused with the James Murphy or Ralph Mannheim translations, both of which were edited, abridged, and ultimately unauthorized.
	The Murphy and Mannheim editions both left out major sections of text and contained long, clunky, badly translated, and almost unintelligibly long sentences.
	In sharp contrast, the only authorized Stalag edition contains none of these complicated and unnecessary confused constructions and is extremely easy to read, as anyone familiar with the other versions will immediately notice.
	Most importantly, this only authorized edition contains the full text of the original German and none of the deliberately inserted racial pejoratives used in the Murphy and Mannheim translations.
	In parentheses it says, words which never were used by Hitler in the original.
	Contrary to post-war propaganda, Mein Kampf does not contain a plan for world domination, and instead consists of a short autobiography, the effect of the First World War upon Germany, and a discussion of race and the Jewish question, the constitutional and social makeup of a future German state, and the early struggles of the NSDAP up until 1923.
	So, that is why I recommend this one.
	You're not going to get a better edition.
	Mine, as you can see, is well-loved, like falling...
	A part well-loved.
	The spine is barely on the book anymore.
	I've read this quite a few times.
	It travels in my bag a lot and stuff.
	Most of my books are in good condition.
	That one, not so much.
	Yeah, triangle whip.
	Good recommendation.
	He says Money Tree Publishing.
	Check them out.
	They have good books.
	Yeah, if you want to get a book on Money Tree Publishing as well, folks, when you do so, use the code.
	There's coupon codes when you check out.
	Use the code LOGOS. L-O-G-O-S. You'll save 10% on the order.
	What do I think about Nick Fuentes?
	I'm getting a little off topic.
	I guess we're at like an hour-long intermission, so we'll get back on topic in a minute.
	I think he's good.
	I mean, I don't have a problem with him.
	I think he's a lot smarter than a lot of people think he is.
	I really do.
	I think there's a deep strategy behind what he's doing.
	And I think he's actually a lot closer to a white nationalist worldview than people think he is.
	I think people think he's like a Sivnat.
	I don't think he really is.
	I think he portrays that in order to get a larger audience, push his message out there to a grander group of people, kind of get himself a little bit closer to the mainstream in order to get his message on a larger platform.
	That's my thoughts.
	I could be wrong, but I think he's a lot smarter than most people think.
	I think there's a method to the madness, if that makes sense.
	So brief intermission.
	We'll catch up with the chats a little bit here, and then we'll go back into some more stuff.
	I got...
	Got a yawning problem today.
	today.
	I can't stop.
	Let's continue with these book recommendations.
	Let me try to pull this up.
	Uh...
	Yeah, I think so.
	Not exactly the same.
	It's definitely on a different scale.
	His goes for more of a mainstream appeal, right?
	But there definitely is a comedic approach.
	Where is my thing?
	Oh, here it is.
	Okay.
	I have a couple...
	I have a couple PDF books that I want to recommend.
	You can get these on freepdf.info.
	It's the website you can get this on.
	Myth of the 20th Century is a really good book that explains racialism, the importance of racialism, what exactly their racial theories were.
	Actually, it's stated that Hitler was not extremely fond of this book.
	He thought it was actually too extreme.
	I don't know how true that is or not.
	I don't know what the source is for that, but that's the statement.
	On the same topic of racialism, we have SS race theory and mate selection guides.
	This is a really good document if you want to understand what their thoughts on racialism was.
	It's 30 pages.
	It's short and sweet, and it's very explanatory.
	So they go into mating processes, why you should be mating with certain people, what you should be looking for in a partner.
	They talk about race, hereditary traits.
	They talk about species, culture, tribe.
	They kind of break this down into smaller categories.
	Very good book, very concise, and very short.
	You're going to get a lot of info out of that one if you want that one.
	Again, free pdf.info.
	You'll find it on there.
	There's also the Goebbels work.
	Well, it's supposed to be Der Nazi Sozi.
	Questions and Answers for National Socialists.
	So he lays out Ten Commandments for what they're supposed to be following.
	And then he answers common questions that come from people at the time about what their ideals are and what their...
	What their meaning is behind things.
	So they talk about class struggle, which is really important.
	Again, this is also a thing that's commonly spoken of in communist rhetoric, which again, we're not to be confused between the two.
	Just because it's spoken about in communist rhetoric does not mean that the solution is even nearly the same.
	They're actually very different.
	So, take the time.
	Read those works.
	Those are my seven recommendations for today.
	If you guys are interested in National Socialism, after hearing why it came to be, what its meaning is, or why it was incepted, those are some really good books to further your understanding of it.
	Let me just put the chair up a little bit.
	Okay.
	John, thank you.
	Thank you for stopping in.
	I appreciate you.
	you.
	You have a good evening as well, my friend.
	Okay.
	So, now we know why it came about.
	Now we can talk about some of the doctrines.
	I don't want to go too crazy deep because I only have 45 minutes to discuss this.
	So I'll start with racialism.
	I think that's maybe an easier one to conceptualize and understand.
	Because yet again, there is these wartime, atrocity-esque type of narratives that have been created around what their racialist policy was.
	So a lot of people think National Socialist Racialism was this hateful thing where they just wanted to...
	Kill everybody that was black and brown and Jewish or something.
	Not the case at all whatsoever.
	Racialism.
	Right?
	Ism.
	Suffix ism.
	Very important.
	Right?
	It's like the suffix all.
	A-L. All.
	Right?
	Of or pertaining to.
	For all.
	Ism is a...
	A very important suffix.
	Look at nationalism.
	Racialism.
	Socialism.
	It simply means social-ism.
	It's an ideology that pertains to all things social.
	Racialism is an ideology that pertains to all things racial.
	So when someone says, oh, that's racism.
	All they're saying is that means it pertains to race.
	That's it.
	It's not an insult.
	It's a neutral word.
	Literally a neutral word.
	Right?
	So...
	If I say I'm an economist, does that mean I hate things that aren't economic?
	No.
	I love things that have to do with the economy.
	I'm interested in the economy.
	I want to learn more about the economy.
	So if I'm a racist...
	Does that mean I hate everybody that's not my race?
	No.
	It means I like my race.
	I'm interested in race, the concept of race.
	I think it's very important, and I want to look further into it.
	Same exact thing.
	So this is a big misconception, a big misunderstanding that a lot of people have around this term racialism.
	Now, we have to understand what exactly racialism is.
	So I grew up in a family...
	I'll kind of push this a little bit further, but I grew up in a family.
	I had a family that was what they call inherently racist, which again, racist, it's a gay term.
	It doesn't mean anything, as we just described.
	Uh, so, uh, they did, they did not, they were a prejudiced family against other, other people, right?
	Which is fine.
	I think it's a great thing.
	I don't think it's a problem.
	However, I did not grow up in a racialist family.
	And this is really important to understand.
	So my family, it was always, you know, don't be around blacks, blacks are bad, yada, yada, right?
	However, there was no racialism.
	There was no, hey, by the way, also, your race, where you come from, is important.
	It's important to understand that concept.
	So this is what National Socialism preaches.
	It doesn't preach, hey, just hate Blacks and Jews and everything.
	There was never any of this.
	Instead, what they were stating with their doctrine of racialism was simply...
	Race is a physical and fundamental thing that is real and natural, and it's fundamental in the life of people.
	And we have to recognize that, right?
	So, the idea is race is God-given.
	It's created by God.
	You can't create race, right?
	You can't create water, and you can't create blood.
	Very important natural concept.
	Race is not a man-made construction.
	If it's a natural construction that's made by God, whatever you perceive God to be, that means that race is something that once you lose it, you cannot get it back.
	So, racialism states, God gave us 8 races, 10 races, 45 races, 3 races, whatever it is.
	I don't know the number.
	But there's a lot.
	Quite a few.
	But because he gave us these races...
	It is our duty to keep those races pure.
	Now, people hear the word pure and they get scared.
	They go, what does that mean?
	That sounds hateful.
	No, this is very logical.
	If you have a glass of water, I have a cup of water.
	I want to be hydrated from the water.
	Therefore, I have to keep the water pure.
	If I put oil in the water...
	Is that water pure?
	Oil is also a natural substance.
	Man doesn't make that.
	It comes from the ground.
	Water and oil are both natural.
	Do I want to mix them together and then have a drink?
	No.
	I'm going to dilute the water.
	You're going to physically see them mixed together.
	And now that water has lost its initial inherent value.
	What is the value of water?
	It's the source of life.
	It gives you hydration.
	Everybody needs hydration to live.
	You don't need oil to live.
	Actually, on the contrary, if you drink oil, you'd probably die.
	So you need that water to live.
	Its purpose is hydration.
	So if I take it and I mix it with something else, it loses its initial inherent unique value to it.
	It's gone forever.
	That water that has the oil in it, you can scython it.
	You can put it through a condensation machine.
	You can do whatever you want.
	That water is never going to be hydrating again.
	Ever.
	It's done.
	So, this is the problem with race mixing.
	This is why they say we have to keep our race pure.
	Because if you are to take, say, 50 of one race and 50 of another race and mix them all together, just like that water and oil mixture, All of it will be diluted and they will lose their inherent unique value that is God given to them.
	They lose it forever.
	It's gone.
	It's never coming back.
	So, as we see in a multicultural society, the more you mix that and the more people become more and more ambiguous, the worse it gets.
	I mean, you have many children that are products of race mixing and they have no identity.
	They might have had a Mexican mother and an Irish father, and they physically don't have an identity that they can go behind.
	They're identity-less.
	So this is a big problem.
	But aside from that, because that's more of a virtue signaling...
	We're not having an emotional argument here.
	We're laying out an important understanding.
	Much like the analogy with the water...
	If you mix the blood, again, blood is a liquid that is God-given.
	Who chooses their blood type?
	Anybody in here?
	Has anyone in here chose their blood type?
	Did you choose your blood type?
	Anyone?
	No, it was given to you.
	It's God-given.
	You don't choose that.
	You don't choose your ancestors.
	You don't choose any of that.
	You're a product of it.
	Therefore, being a product of it, you have to recognize the nature of that.
	You have to respect the nature of that.
	Remember this old-fashioned term, respect your elders?
	You remember that term?
	It's the same exact scenario when we talk about ancestry.
	Respect your ancestors.
	Respect the fact that you were given that.
	And you can respect that on a higher level.
	By respecting your blood.
	Because that's something that your ancestors didn't give that to you.
	Your elders didn't give it to you.
	Not necessarily.
	Not directly.
	Not on purpose.
	But God gave it to you through them.
	That is why you have to respect something like that.
	It's a very simple concept.
	So, this is what their racialism taught.
	Exactly that.
	It's simple as that.
	Hitler has a very important quote that really hammers into this.
	Let me actually just pull it up, because it's a good quote.
	It's important that people understand this.
	Because again, it breaks down all of this atrocity propaganda of Hitler being some kind of psychopath who just wanted to kill everybody that wasn't German.
	It's nonsense.
	It's serious nonsense.
	Oh, wrong wrong one.
	Thank you.
	Alright, let me read you this quote, folks.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Can I get this on the screen?
	Probably not, no.
	Okay, that's fine.
	We'll just read it.
	I can't get it on the screen, but we're going to read it.
	There's a quote directly from Adolf Hitler.
	He says, Now,
	question, does that sound like a guy who wants to kill everybody that's not German and rule the world with German culture?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think so.
	They belong to ancient civilizations.
	I'm sorry, I just read that.
	They have the right to be proud of their past, just as we have the right to be proud of the civilization to which we belong.
	Indeed, I believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I shall find to get along on with them.
	Differentiation of treatment is not motivated by the difference of value of the two races, but of the fundamental difference of their respective natures.
	Now, that's a really big quote that not a lot of people understand.
	I'm going to read that one one more time.
	Differentiation of treatment is not motivated by the difference of value of the two races, right?
	But of the fundamental difference of their respective natures.
	Okay?
	So we don't say that this race is less valuable than this one, therefore you treat them worse.
	Rather, we say this race prefers this way of living.
	Therefore, you change your treatment of their people and their culture to that fashion.
	You work to that ability of those people.
	That's important.
	That's really important because this goes on a smaller scale.
	We talk about the white race, which is goofy because it's just ambiguous.
	It doesn't really have a full meaning.
	It's just a fucking skin color.
	I don't like it.
	I don't like the term.
	We should really be using the term Aryan.
	It's much more encapsulating.
	It actually talks about a genetic haplotype and stuff.
	Anyway, we talk about this collective Aryan race.
	Well, there's different cultures.
	There is the Irish.
	There are the Germans.
	There are the British.
	These are three different races amongst themselves.
	They're different cultures.
	So therefore, each of those people have a different way of life for themselves.
	The Germans are natural farmers, something that's always been with them, blood and soil.
	It's less for the British.
	There are British farmers, yeah, sure.
	I'm not saying there isn't.
	But it's not as heavy of a piece of their culture as it is for the Germans.
	Therefore, it's kind of like birds.
	Birds are of different racial aspects.
	Let's use finches.
	Finches, it's the perfect scenario.
	Darwin did the study with the Finches.
	Everybody knows this study.
	Just to clarify, one in the chat if you're familiar with the Darwin study of the Finches, two if you're not.
	If you aren't, I'll go into it.
	But one if you're familiar with Darwin's Finch studies, two if you are not.
	one if you're familiar two if you are not okay mostly ones All right, we got a couple twos.
	All right.
	Okay, all right.
	Since there's twos, we'll go into it a little bit.
	So we learn about...
	Most people learn about this actually in school.
	Probably elementary school, which is a bad time to learn about it.
	You should learn about it a little bit later.
	But yeah, it's a good one.
	Birds of a feather flock together.
	Very good one.
	However, in Darwin's finch studies, he went to this group of islands...
	I want to say it was the Galapagos Islands, I think.
	Maybe.
	Anyway, he did a Finch study.
	And in these islands, there are a bunch of people.
	Katie, most of the chatters are on Odyssey and Rumble.
	Not many people chat on Twitter.
	It's a very uncommon thing.
	I don't know why.
	I don't know if it's just the way Twitter works, but...
	Yeah, I think it was the Galapagos.
	Anyway, he does this finch study on these islands.
	And let's say the islands have eight different sectors of them.
	And when he goes to these eight different sectors, he finds that there's eight different types of finches.
	And he determines that they're different.
	Much like if you were to come to America and go to the Italian sector...
	Where there's all kinds of Italian stores and Italian shops.
	And you were to go to a Polish sector or a Pennsylvania Dutch sector.
	You would find that they're all different.
	Right?
	So he goes and he sees that all these finches are different.
	They're different breeds.
	And he says, they're extremely similar.
	They look exactly, they're all finches.
	Just like we're all white.
	Right?
	But they have differences amongst them.
	And he says, some of them have a fat beak.
	Some of them have a really skinny pointy beak.
	And now what that is, is it's an adaptation to their way of living.
	So the one with the very scrawny beak, that one lives in an area where it needs to get worms out of a tree.
	So it has to have a little tiny beak to pick in there.
	The one with the fat beak lives in an area where all of the trees produce walnuts.
	So it has to crack the nut open and eat the nut.
	So these different finches have different characteristic traits.
	Based on what he calls an evolutionary theory.
	So they all come from the same source.
	They all come directly from a source of...
	They come from a direct source of what it is to be a finch.
	Now, understand, a finch is a different type of bird than an ostrich.
	It's a different type of bird than a crow.
	They're all birds, right?
	Just like we're all humans...
	But whites are a different type of human than black.
	Again, I hate the term white.
	We're going to say Aryans are a different type of people than Asiatics.
	It will say something like that.
	Or Europeans are different than Asiatics.
	They're a different type of people.
	But now even further, in that different type, the Asiatics have different groups just like the Finches do.
	There's Japanese Asiatics.
	There's Chinese Asiatics.
	There's Korean Asiatics.
	There's Taiwanese Asiatics.
	And guess what?
	They don't very much get along with each other.
	They're different.
	Their cultures are different.
	Their behaviors are different.
	Their languages are different.
	Just like the finches, beaks are different.
	Now what's really interesting is Darwin in his studies of the finches comes to the realization that these finches don't intermix with each other.
	The ones with the fat beaks, for some reason, don't mate with the ones with the skinny beaks.
	Is that because they're racist and prejudice?
	Or is there a different reason behind that?
	Is it that they realize their offspring will lose those inherent values that each one has and be incapable of living further in those areas?
	So, humans, we don't have those natural instincts anymore.
	We used to.
	They've been very much browbeat out of us.
	So, we're now in a situation where people don't think about these things.
	They don't think about their cultures or their racial groups.
	And therefore, they forget these common facts.
	And they lose all of this.
	All of it.
	It dilutes.
	They lose it all.
	We're seeing it in America.
	It's what the melting pot is.
	So, imagine if the Finches had a melting pot.
	After, like...
	Five generations of finches.
	We'll say five.
	All of them intermixing with each other.
	Fat beaks and the skinny beaks and the wide beaks and the long beaks.
	All of them intermix with each other.
	Eventually you would have one type of finch left.
	After all of it, all of those eight different types of finches, now we only have one left.
	We got rid of God's beauty of all these different finches.
	We've got one left.
	And now that one group that's left We're good to go.
	Well, the IQ, the average IQ of certain groups is 110.
	The average IQ of others is 70.
	Imagine if they all intermix, every single one of them.
	Now the average IQ is going to be a mix of in-between, right?
	It's going to hit the in-between.
	So we're going to go from 110 and 70, we're going to go, bam, right in the middle here, and we're going to hit like a 90 average.
	Okay?
	Now, isn't that bad if all of society just goes back down to this much lower average?
	Right?
	Right?
	So we have to recognize these things and realize that it's not something that you can get rid of.
	You physically can't get rid of it.
	Or you could get rid of it, but it's a mistake.
	Because it's God-given.
	Hitler talks about this in a speech.
	He says, National Socialism, the fundamental pillar of National Socialism, is the recognition of race.
	And race...
	It's something, it's the only thing in this world, dilution of the blood, mixing of the races, is the only thing in this world that is not temporal.
	It's the only mistake that is not temporal.
	What does that mean?
	Temporal means temporary, fixable.
	It's something you can fix afterwards, right?
	It's the only thing.
	You can fix a religious doctrine.
	You can fix a moral doctrine.
	You can fix a philosophy.
	You can accidentally spill soda on the rug and you can fix that.
	You can fix all these things.
	You can even fix a society that's collapsing, as exemplified.
	But you cannot fix the loss of your original racial values or traits, unique racial traits.
	You can't fix it.
	It's gone.
	It's gone forever, indefinitely.
	You cannot get that back.
	It's really important to understand.
	Look, that's not saying you can't do it.
	Sure, you want to be an individual and you want to do that.
	But recognize what you're losing.
	Pay close attention to what you're losing.
	And understand that if you did it and everybody else followed you, we'd all lose it.
	It's gone for everybody forever.
	And it's an insult to God.
	to God, it's an insult to nature.
	Katie Betts.
	Yeah, Odyssey is a little bit less censored.
	Yeah, I would say.
	It's O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
	If you want to make an account, I'm logos revealed on Odyssey.
	Yeah, it's a good theory.
	with Darwin's theory of the Finches.
	Yes, correct.
	Species and race are not the same thing.
	Yeah, human species is...
	Yeah, it's the species.
	Right.
	And there are different races, right?
	There's the Asiatics, and there's underneath that.
	It goes even deeper, right?
	So, underneath race, there's a...
	I forget the term.
	I guess it would be tribe.
	Let me look.
	This is explained pretty well in this SS race guide.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Yeah, so there's species, and then there's race, and then it would be tribe underneath that.
	Tribe or folk.
	Which goes underneath.
	Uh...
	Okay, I see we got two more Super Chats.
	JJ with a $3 Super Chat.
	Thank you very much on Odyssey.
	Says, great talk logo.
	So slash, thank you.
	Glad you're enjoying.
	And then we've got Holocaust with a $1 Super Chat.
	Again, he says, check the link.
	You'll like the meme.
	What?
	Oh.
	It's a good one.
	Yeah, the Finches is a very important theory because it takes this racial concept that we're explaining or talking about, and it puts it into less emotional terms.
	It puts it into the animal kingdom, which is even more natural than we are, right?
	So people don't make the same mistake of getting an emotional prejudice over the circumstance, and they actually think about it a little bit harder.
	Because if it's true of animals, why would it not be true of us?
	History and animals, thank you.
	I appreciate that.
	Thank you very much.
	Yeah, like I said, I do want to start implementing the whiteboard into these live streams, if I can.
	It's just this glare.
	I mean, look at this thing.
	You can see this is one of my monitors.
	This is another one of my monitors.
	This is, like, I don't know.
	I guess it's from the window.
	I have the blinds closed, and then I don't know what that real big one's from.
	I have no idea what that is.
	But with the glare, I can't do shows with a glare like that.
	I can't write on this whiteboard.
	You guys physically won't be able to see it.
	I wonder if I was to...
	This would probably make it worse, actually.
	Let's just try it.
	I guess it's no different.
	Okay.
	makes my lighting a little better but it definitely makes it doesn't do a difference there
	uh yeah divinish I'm not sure.
	Maybe I was wrong there.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	It's just what I've read.
	Okay.
	Yeah, the Logos Academy.
	I've changed the name of the series.
	It was just originally Logos Academy.
	Now it's my regular show.
	So I've changed that series to Logos Academy Lectures.
	So if you want to watch me do the whiteboard series, it's Logos Academy Lectures.
	You can find it on my Odyssey channel.
	It's up on my Rumble.
	It's the first videos that I put up on my Rumble.
	You can find it everywhere.
	I can try August.
	I've actually had the whiteboard there with the camera here.
	That didn't help either.
	I don't know.
	We'll keep brainstorming.
	We'll see what we can do.
	So, folks, we've got about 20 minutes left on the show.
	I don't want to go into another topic and not have time to finish ourselves.
	So...
	What we'll do is we'll just kind of interact with the chat a little bit here.
	We'll do some outro and we'll just hang out for the rest of the show.
	We'll kind of slow it down, slow down the pace.
	I do appreciate everyone that's been in here.
	It's been a pretty active chat today.
	We will be live on Monday, as usual, with our 4pm Eastern start every day of the week.
	I have another interview that might be coming up soon.
	I'll let you guys know if we're going to be doing that or not.
	I've got quite a few things, actually, on my plate.
	I'm also going to be in a space next week on Monday at 9pm Eastern.
	We're going to be talking about National Socialism, actually, and the truth about Hitler.
	So that's a very important one.
	And then we'll be live on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
	Typical.
	I don't have anything else crazy scheduled for next week, but I'll keep my eye on it in case anything else comes up.
	In the meantime, anybody else in the chat room have any questions, thoughts before we leave?
	Any topics that you guys wanted to bring up that I can be pretty brief about?
	I'll certainly talk to something if it's not a super long endeavor.
	I'm also always open to take guest host ideas.
	If you guys want to see me interview somebody, if you want to see someone come on the show as a guest, always open to recommendations.
	Definitely open to have pretty much anybody on as long as they're not like insane or annoying, which isn't very many people.
	There's a couple people I've actually had a decline because they were a little over the top.
	But for the most part, I'll talk to pretty much anybody.
	A debate with Ryan Dawson.
	I would actually...
	I would welcome that.
	He's good on...
	You know...
	Israel.
	He's very bad on the overall Jewish problem.
	and he's extremely bad on race.
	He made some...
	Bullshit...
	Nonsense about how nation and race are different.
	This is modern retardation working into the minds of people.
	This is a massive manipulation.
	Nation and race are the exact same thing.
	There's no difference.
	Again, the word nation literally has the word race in the definition.
	Except for in modern dictionaries.
	because they want to subvert the meaning.
	You should have Sigmar Academy on again.
	Yeah, he was good.
	I enjoyed him.
	I'll think about it.
	Yeah, I need to have some more reoccurring guests.
	The only thing I don't like, and it's nothing against him, he doesn't have a camera.
	I really like interacting with people who have a camera on.
	I think we need to stop being afraid of this system.
	It's not going to get us anywhere.
	So I try to only have guests on that have cameras.
	Camera, there's a couple things.
	When you have a camera on, it shows me that you're serious about this.
	It's I always use this analogy.
	Blacks, in their rap music, they always brag about how they're loaded up with tattoos all over their face so they can never hold a job because no job would hire them.
	It's like, I'm dedicated to the rap game, Maine.
	It's kind of the same thing with putting your face out there when talking about the Jewish question.
	You're dedicated.
	You're not going to get a job.
	You're dedicated.
	You're dedicated to the Jewish problem.
	You're dedicated to exposing this.
	It gives me 150 times the amount of respect because Look, it's not that I don't respect people that don't have their camera on, but I can never know if they're serious.
	I've had a lot of people in this movement that I've gotten close with, I've made serious acquaintanceship with, and I've been very friendly with, and they are...
	Decent people, but they pussied out of this movement, and none of them had cameras.
	And it goes to show that that's why they're never putting their face out there, because they're inherently pussies.
	And they will never get to that level of fanatical confidence in a worldview.
	They're not revolutionaries.
	And I'm not being rude by saying that.
	It's just not in their nature.
	I associate with revolutionaries.
	I'm a revolutionary.
	I'm a revolutionary.
	My interest is in revolution.
	I associate with revolution.
	I don't like speaking to people that are like lukewarm and gay and like, eh, my wife said the, eh.
	Like, no, I don't like it.
	I don't like it.
	Yeah, a lot of manipulation of linguistics.
	Very important piece.
	Jews are very well studied in this category.
	Mark, you'll come on camera correctly.
	Great.
	That's awesome.
	That's awesome.
	No with a $5 super chat.
	Thank you very much.
	Highest one of the night.
	Appreciate you, my friend.
	He says, so it'd be a no for Devin Stack then.
	LOL. Blackpilled is the best in the business.
	Oh, he does great work.
	I would definitely have an interview with him.
	I just don't like the fact that he doesn't have a camera on.
	And to be honest with you, From him specifically, and again, this is no shade towards Devin Stack.
	I really do.
	I think he does great work and he's a good dude.
	But it's pathetic.
	To be honest, it's absolutely pathetic.
	That guy's making like $60,000 a year.
	He's making a full-time job doing his show, exposing Jewish power, and he's not putting his face out there.
	He's a thought leader in the movement.
	And as a thought leader, you really should have your face out there.
	If you're just a guy who's throwing flyers or doing activism or you just spread the message on Twitter a little bit, you don't have a real serious name out there where you're a thought leader, I'm less angry at you for not having a face out there.
	But dude, when you've been in this movement as long as he has and you've put as many hours in and you have as many people behind you respecting you and donating to you as you do, you should have your face out there.
	I mean, it's really ridiculous.
	He doesn't have a 9-5.
	He's not, like...
	What are the social backlashes of him putting his face...
	there is none.
	Well, that's what you have to assume.
	He's hiding something.
	I mean, I'm not saying the guy's a Jew or something like that, or he's brown, but my point is he's...
	Maybe he's ashamed of the way he looks.
	Maybe he's worried about people not liking him.
	I don't know.
	I don't know if it's a personal, like, he's just nervous or something.
	But you should have your face out.
	I mean, you just should.
	I just don't think there's an excuse.
	Not for him.
	For others?
	Sure.
	Maybe you've got a big family.
	You work a 9-to-5.
	You're really in the corporate lifestyle.
	Your boss finds it.
	He's definitely going to fire you because he's Jewish.
	I don't know.
	That's a different scenario.
	From what I understand, I don't know the guy personally, but from what I understand about him, he is living on his own.
	He makes a fine living doing...
	I know he makes a fine living doing this because the SPLC did a fucking hit piece on him because he makes like $60,000 a year just on Odyssey.
	So the guy is making a killing doing this.
	There's no reason.
	No reason.
	It's a good assessment, Mark. Mark.
	Yeah, I can't disagree.
	Are the working class workers of bronze or silver?
	Divinus, the way you worded that, it's very hard.
	I don't fully understand what you're asking me.
	If you could maybe reword that.
	Yeah, I don't want to go into ad hominem about Devin Stack.
	Again, I appreciate his work.
	I think he's a good dude.
	From what I understand, he seems like a good dude.
	But I don't like the not face thing.
	I just don't.
	We're talking revolution here.
	We're talking about the extinction of our people.
	And we're playing fucking games behind a camera.
	I don't like it.
	I just don't.
	When someone puts their face out there, it shows me that they're fully serious.
	Only someone who's completely 100% serious.
	Well, actually, even that.
	I mean, that's not even the full litmus test, because there's plenty of people who have their face out there, and they're not serious, and they're actually idiots.
	But someone who is serious, it's like a prerequisite that you have to have your face.
	That's at least one step of it.
	It's revolutionary.
	Like, what...
	Hitler and all his, like, main guys, when they created a revolution over there, Julius Caesar, when he made a revolution, right, over in Rome, was he like, were they wearing, like, masks when they were going into the town?
	Like, no.
	They're putting themselves out there, man.
	Holocaust with a $1 investment thing.
	Thank you very much, my friend.
	Again, he says, I'll probably do one with you and...
	And can teach a set of tech topics useful to our people.
	For the time being, I have to be off camera as I'm in the UK, have full custody of my kid, and have to keep it that way.
	Again, I can understand that.
	I can understand that.
	And you're not, like, respectfully, you're not a thought leader.
	And I don't mean that as an assault to you, but you're not a thought leader.
	You don't have, like, a massive following of people where you do a show every night and are constantly changing the way that people think with your rhetoric.
	You're not a thought leader.
	Thought leaders, if you want to be a thought leader, if you want to be somebody that's literally shaping how this movement functions...
	You should have your face out there.
	I mean, that's not a hard ask.
	That's really not.
	I know you always get these people that are like, oh, he's face-toxing.
	He's face-toxing.
	He wants people to face-tox so the Jews can get him.
	Guess what, dude?
	If we all do it, like, first off, there is a time when eventually everybody's going to have to be out there, right?
	I mean, if this is ever going to happen, everybody's going to have to be out there at a time.
	Certainly.
	So when we get to that, the faster we get there, the better this goes.
	We want to get there as quick as I'm tired of living in the gay, degenerate cesspool.
	I'm really over it.
	Seriously.
	So the faster we get there, the better.
	But what we have to understand is, if we play the game of, hey guys, Logos today, really good show.
	Let's talk about national socialism, folks.
	How do you know who I am?
	How do you know I'm serious?
	How do you know?
	And additionally, understand that this is a very important piece, is...
	Let's look at the Bolshevik Revolution as our example.
	When the Jews took over over there and started throwing people in gulags.
	That's what's planned here.
	That's what they would like eventually.
	It's why they want to make laws against anti-Semitism.
	So, okay, I can do this.
	I can put my thing here and I can talk and I can be all private.
	And then one day...
	One day, Mr.
	Logos, who's been hiding behind the camera because he's a fucking pussy, one day he can say, oh man, they're starting to arrest people for anti-Semitism.
	Well, now I really need to talk about it, right?
	And now they know who everybody is because they have a mass surveillance state over top of us.
	So now, no matter what you do, now it's too late to talk out because now if you talk out, you're going to get arrested.
	You're going to go straight to jail.
	Look, there's a time.
	It's going to have to happen eventually.
	So do it on your own volition, like a fucking man, instead of waiting For the Jews to take full control and start taking your children away from you, and then you say something.
	And then you put your face out there and have conviction behind your words.
	Be a man.
	Be a revolutionary.
	Be fanatical.
	Show us you matter.
	And I'll tell you what.
	I've had a lot of people come on my show in the past.
	For the first time ever, they face revealed on their show.
	For the first time ever.
	Five or six different people, for the first time ever, put their face on my stream.
	And guess what?
	None of them lost their families.
	None of them lost their jobs.
	None of them are hurt.
	No one got doxed.
	No one got shot.
	They're fine.
	Amen.
	And the more we all do it, the more we all put our face out there and set that example that this is not something to be frowned upon, the quicker this is done.
	Rip the band-aid off.
	Right?
	Like, people that are still, in my mind, people that still have the anonymous face cam ordeal, they're the people that when they get a cut, a boo-boo, and mommy puts a Band-Aid on it, when they take the Band-Aid off, they go, uh, uh, uh, uh, real slow, right?
	And they slowly rip the Band-Aid hair, the hairs off with the Band-Aid because they're going super slow.
	Uh-huh.
	Uh, no, rip it off.
	Rip the fucking thing off.
	Be done with it.
	That's what we need to do.
	Sorry for that rant.
	That's something I have a very serious stance on.
	I think it's bullshit.
	I think it's cowardly.
	Again, there are people out there.
	I can understand their circumstance.
	If you're well endowed in the system, you're very deep in that system.
	You're infiltrating it, right?
	And you know that if you're found out, you're going to get fired.
	You're going to lose that position to be able to infiltrate in that manner.
	Okay.
	But...
	As an excuse for that, I want to see effort on your end in another way.
	Are you financing the people that do have their face out there?
	Are you helping them financially?
	Are you backing these people?
	What are you putting back into this?
	That's another important piece.
	If your excuse is, I want to keep my job and work in the system, well, then you should also be financing the people that are helping to destroy the system.
	You should be working towards helping those people.
	I see a lot of people that aren't doing that either.
	They're comfortable.
	And comfortable people aren't going to fix our situation.
	Not at all.
	Little rant.
	Sorry.
	Little rant.
	Well, folks, we are coming up on the two-hour mark.
	We're going to get ready to close the show out here in a minute.
	Don't forget, everybody, please follow me on all of my different platforms.
	We are on Twitter, Odyssey, Rumble, Twitter.
	I'm drawing a blank.
	FTJ Media.
	We're on the Stu Peters Network on Rumble, and we're also on my Rumble channel at Logos Reveals.
	Make sure you follow me on both of those.
	Follow the Stu Peters Network.
	Stu will actually be live in three minutes here.
	So once I'm finished up, Stu's going to go live.
	So stick around.
	Catch his next show that's going to come up afterwards.
	So for those that are in the Stu Peters chat.
	Holocoff with another $1 investment.
	Thank you, my friend.
	Throw him around.
	He says, none of us are hiding from the state anyway by being mask on.
	There was a well-known streamer who was anon.
	A troll said, you think the NSA or M16 doesn't know who you are?
	He replied, no.
	I'm hiding the chat.
	I'm hiding from them.
	I can't.
	I'm hiding from the schittos in my chat.
	Yeah, I mean, you can't hide.
	You just can't hide from anybody.
	It's going to get out there eventually.
	And here's another important piece as well, for people to understand.
	If You are putting a mask on.
	I'm going, who goes?
	Logos revealed here.
	I'm a Nazi, right?
	If you do that, you're telling the system, I'm scared of you.
	You're giving them the leverage.
	You're saying, yeah, I'm fearful of your persecution.
	Yes.
	I don't want you to put me out there.
	I'm scared of you.
	Yes.
	Why would you do that?
	By the way, this is the only leverage they have over you.
	It's fear.
	What other leverage do they have?
	What leverage does Antifa or all these ABC corporation groups like the ADL and shit, what leverage do they have over you unless you show them that you're scared and you're, yes, yes, master, please don't expose me.
	I don't like it.
	Personal opinion.
	Personal opinion.
	Liberator of the Occident.
	Yeah, Pavlov, if you send me some links to his stuff, I'll check them out.
	I'll give them a look.
	I've never heard of them, but I'll look.
	All right, folks, that's the outro.
	You can find me on a biosite.com.
	That's a really good way to link to all my stuff.
	It's a way for you to follow all of my channels, help support the work.
	We take investments via Entropy, Odyssey, and Rumble Super Chats, as well as crypto.
	We have a crypto wallet where you can support through there.
	It is bio, B-I-O, dot site, S-I-T-E, slash Logos Revealed.
	It's got all of my stuff on it.
	Highly encourage you to check out that link.
	That'll help you find everything very fast and easy for me.
	Alright.
	Thank you, folks, for watching.
	It's been a great show.
	Very monologue-esque type show, but I hope you guys enjoyed it.
	We'll definitely go into this topic again on another point.
	There's a lot more to cover.
	You can't cover all this shit in two hours.
	There's just no way.
	We covered a good amount.
	We got a good chunk.
	Can I enable DMs on X? No, I will not do that.
	But if you message me on Twitter, if you tweet me on Twitter and ask me to message you first, that will open my DMs to you specifically.
	I'm not going to open them, though.
	I don't want fucking Jews messaging me.
	You're hateful!
	Oh, God!
	I'm not in the mood.
	I get enough annoying messages from people that I actually like.
	All right, folks.
	Thank you again for watching.
	Stay tuned on the Stu Peters Network for Stu Peters.
	He'll be live very shortly.
	And I will see you guys Monday at 4 p.m.
	Eastern.
	We're going to have our three-show week next week.
	All right.
	Thanks, guys.

▲