Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 4, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

01:58:48

Logos Academy Episode 10: Propaganda

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Alright, ladies and gentlemen, we are live.
	Welcome, everybody.
	Episode 10 of Logos Academy.
	It is a beautiful Friday.
	I just got done doing a show with my good friend G-Man.
	And I have this show going on now.
	We got another show coming up tonight.
	I'll promote that a little bit later.
	I think that'll be an interesting show.
	Welcome, everybody.
	It's nice to be here.
	I do apologize.
	We did not have a show on Wednesday at our regular scheduled time.
	We had a cancellation last minute about two hours before start time, so I didn't have any kind of material prepared or anything like that, so we just went with no show.
	I don't like bringing some kind of weird dry content where I don't have anything of value to talk about.
	We have a topic for today that's going to be propaganda.
	Much like very often on this show, the title is a little bit ambiguous and can be taken very many ways.
	So we'll go into detail a little bit as to what we mean by propaganda, and we'll talk about it.
	We've got a couple things planned out for that.
	I see we've got Pavlov coming into the chat room.
	Welcome, brother.
	Nice to see you.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, I got a couple things that I'm going to pull up later.
	I see you over on Rumble, too.
	Thank you, my friend.
	Alright, so we are live on the usual platforms.
	We're live on Odyssey.
	We're live on the Stu Peters Network.
	We're live on My Personal Rumble.
	We're live on Twitter, on both of our channels.
	And we are live on ftjmedia.com.
	So make sure that you guys are following on all those platforms if you could.
	Additionally, I have a new website.
	It's very similar to Linktree.
	It is not the exact same thing.
	But it functions in basically the same manner.
	So I'll link you guys that.
	It's called bio.site.
	Let me throw a link in the chat rooms here so you guys can check that out.
	This is a very good way for you to get connected with all of my channels.
	It's Again, it's just like Linktree.
	I mean, there's really not much more to say about it.
	It just kind of provides all of my links to each channel that I have.
	So we've got my Twitter on there.
	It says, I'm muted on Odyssey, huh?
	It must be the Odyssey.
	Hold on, we'll fix that.
	Sometimes Odyssey can be like that.
	Just go ahead and refresh on the Odyssey.
	If you guys are having problems over there, this should fix it.
	Anyway, this bio.site, we've got my Twitter on there, my Odyssey, Rumble, FTJ, all the platforms you can follow me on.
	Additionally, there are two options to support the show.
	I figured I would do that instead.
	We've had this very bulky description underneath all of my streams and whatnot.
	I had a couple crypto wallets in there, as well as other platforms for people to...
	Donate and support my work.
	So I decided it would be easier and more efficient to put it all into one bio site where you can find it all in one place.
	So let me actually screen share with you guys really quick and show you what exactly this looks like.
	Which one are we at here?
	Yeah.
	Softer to Smash.
	Welcome.
	Nice to have you in the chat.
	Welcome.
	Okay, let's see.
	Here we go.
	Why is that so big?
	There we go.
	It's a little better.
	It's still kind of big.
	So here's the bio site.
	So when you click on the link, it's just bio.site slash logos revealed.
	This will give you all of my different stuff.
	So we've got, obviously, a little logo at the top.
	This is a way to directly email me.
	So if you click on this, it'll take you to a fresh page where you can create an email.
	We've got the link to my Twitter.
	That'll take you straight to my Twitter page.
	Odyssey and Rumble, same deal.
	FTJ Media, which is the newer website by Dave Kahari.
	Do recommend that you guys make an account there.
	It's a non-censorship type of website.
	Very good to work with.
	We've got Entropy, which is the best way if you guys want to do a super chat or some kind of donation to the show.
	Entropy is the best way to do that with cash, unless you guys obviously support via the Rumble chat room through the, I think it's called Rumble Rants system.
	And then you can also do the same on Odyssey as well.
	And again, like I said, we had these like...
	We had like three or four different crypto wallets in my descriptions, which was very bulky and kind of ugly looking.
	So they're all on this new platform.
	It's called Cointree.
	It's a really simple way to just straight up invest cryptocurrency.
	It seems to be pretty beneficial.
	And then we've got my most renowned series at the bottom here, the initial Logos Academy series.
	I've changed the title of that to Logos Academy Lectures.
	And I have...
	I have a setup to start doing these again.
	I will do them very soon.
	I just have to work on material.
	That's the thing.
	I'm so crowded with different stuff that I'm working on.
	I'm reading books and I'm preparing for shows.
	It's just hard to find the time to wrap up new material for this series.
	I try to do a lot of research, so I'm really hammering things home.
	I might...
	I might do one on pornography and the Jewish influence behind pornography.
	I just had a very big Twitter thread that kind of blew up.
	Posted it two days ago.
	We got like 3 million views on the Twitter thread.
	Went very viral.
	So I think I might...
	I think I might do that.
	Maybe I'll make a video explaining that, kind of drawing those connections there.
	Because I covered a little bit in the thread, but dude, it goes so deep.
	It's ridiculous.
	I mean, there's just mountains and mountains of information specifically on that topic.
	So that is the new bio site.
	If you guys want to check out all my platforms over there, that's the way to do so.
	In the meantime, you guys can enjoy the show.
	We're just going to hang out today.
	It's a pretty simple show.
	Going to be a pretty monologue-y type of show.
	The topic today is propaganda.
	Everybody that I think is in these chat rooms has experienced propaganda in some way or another, whether you came across that negatively or positively.
	That in itself is actually a very important point to kick us off with, is that propaganda is not, in essence, a good or bad thing.
	It is much like the term dictatorship.
	Dictatorship, if you grab yourself an old dictionary from 1920, I don't have it with me, but I do have one.
	If you grab yourself an old dictionary from 1920, 1930, that kind of era, or even older, and you read the definition of the word dictator, it is simply just a ruler who rules over a sole ruler, an individual ruler.
	Kind of like a monarch in a sense.
	And this does not imply good or bad.
	This doesn't mean that that ruler is a good ruler or he's a bad ruler or he's a mean one or a nice one.
	There is no...
	It's a neutral term, the term dictator.
	Now, what's really interesting about this term and many others, as you know, vaccine, for example.
	During COVID, they distorted the word vaccine and they changed the...
	The meaning of the word.
	So let me show you guys really quickly.
	If you go on Google yourself and you look up the word dictator in the modern age, Show you this.
	You can see here, in the definition, is a tyrant or a despote.
	Now, a tyrant is an oppressive ruler, one that rules over people in a crude or awful way.
	So, that's...
	You understand that that's not a...
	Now, the definition is no longer neutral, right?
	They're putting a negative connotation to the word dictator.
	And there's a reason behind this.
	Because a dictator...
	Cannot allow their country to be subverted by things like propaganda or mass media or whatever the case may be.
	A dictator, if they don't like what's happening in society, they can look at it and say, that that you're doing right there is bad.
	No, we're not doing that anymore.
	And it's done.
	That's it.
	Now, when you have a society like this, where it's free market and it's democracy, which is fake and gay, in a democracy, they can push anything, do anything, and you have to play this kind of like...
	corporate red tape kind of a game in order to get anything fixed or passed.
	And then when you do, they can renegate it and come up with all kinds of different lawsuits and stuff and call it unconstitutional and play games around it.
	So the term dictator is in essence a neutral term.
	If you look back, think about men like Marcus Aurelius.
	He's probably the best example here in this case.
	He was the benevolent ruler, right?
	He was a wonderful man.
	He was well put together.
	He was a stoic.
	He cared a lot about the people.
	He was not self-interested.
	So Because he was a dictator, does that make him bad by default?
	I don't think so.
	There's such thing as a good ruler.
	Frederick the Great, Alexander the Great.
	There's plenty of examples throughout history of this exact scenario.
	So that is the key here is propaganda.
	One of the main things that they do is they manipulate words, right?
	And the word propaganda itself has been manipulated with propaganda.
	So we have been led to believe that propaganda is always a bad thing.
	It's always evil.
	A lot of people hear the term propaganda and instantly they think of the Third Reich and they think evil, awful, terrible things.
	We have to look, though, at who originally came up with propaganda.
	Where does this come from?
	We'll step into that in a second.
	I see we've got a lot of people coming in the chat.
	Let's say hello to some people.
	We've got Fight for Freedom.
	Welcome.
	Doing well.
	Doing well.
	Ubermensch.
	Liking the name.
	Yeah, you're right.
	You're definitely right.
	We've got 1488.
	White is right.
	Sack of possums.
	Ended Jewish Privilege.
	Collatz.
	Welcome, guys.
	It's nice to see everybody in here.
	I see we got some people, not too many on the Rumble chat, so I'll keep it open though.
	I got to get better at, I have so many chat rooms at once.
	So where does propaganda come from?
	And we made a thread on this as well, not long ago.
	But propaganda, actually the term in the common usage of it, comes from Edward Bernays.
	Edward Bernays was a Jew, and he was actually the nephew of Sigmund Freud.
	Now, if you guys are familiar with Sigmund Freud, Sigmund Freud was a Jewish psychologist who came up with this theory of psychoanalysis.
	And he has some weird twisted theories that most people in life are unhappy or angry because of sexual repression.
	They just basically need to have more sex.
	It's very sick and perverted stuff.
	Well, his...
	His nephew, Edward Bernays, lived in America, and Edward Bernays came up with propaganda, roughly.
	He wrote a book entitled Propaganda in the 20s.
	And actually, the National Socialist took some inspiration from this Jewish propagandist.
	They recognized the tactics that Jews use through psychology and mass manipulation.
	And they said, hey, you know, this is really important to understand, right?
	I'm in civilization.
	I see these people are mass manipulating things around me and making civilization worse.
	So maybe we can mass manipulate the same people and make the situation better.
	And And that's what they did.
	So propaganda doesn't have to be good or bad.
	You can have a propaganda campaign that actually is very good for people.
	For instance, if you create a propaganda campaign for...
	Let's say you have a...
	Christian church, and you want to support Christian businesses with said church.
	You can create a propaganda campaign to get people to donate to give money to those businesses, right?
	That is a good form of propaganda.
	It's got a positive goal in mind.
	Propaganda can also be extremely negative.
	It can also be based on fear, and it's very manipulative in ways.
	A really good example of this is atrocity propaganda.
	You look at World War II and that era, and you look at the Holocaust propaganda that you get all over the place.
	So this was a pure and brazen atrocity propaganda, and this was done in many ways.
	So a couple examples from this.
	Number one would be the lampshade thing.
	They wrote this article, and they put this lampshade on a table, and they said this is made out of a Jew's skin.
	Came to find out, that wasn't true.
	It was actually made of goat skin.
	So...
	That was an atrocity propaganda to make you look at it and go, oh, oh, it's so evil.
	It's so bad, right?
	It's meant to repulse you or disgust you, right?
	And then instantly anybody that's associated with that item or that behavior, you're disgusted by them in essence through that, right?
	It's kind of like guilt by association.
	They're associated with that concept.
	Therefore, anything that associates with that must be evil or terrible in that regard.
	So they do this with symbols as well.
	The swastika is a really good example.
	Swastika was an ancient Aryan symbol.
	It's been used for thousands of years in every civilization that Aryans have ever come across.
	Every single one.
	There's not a civilization in existence that didn't use them.
	We have even non-Aryan civilizations like China has this symbol everywhere.
	It's a universal symbol of peace.
	The aboriginals in America had that same symbol.
	The ancient Greeks used the swastika.
	Apollo actually has it on his belt buckle in some circumstances, in some early depictions of Apollo.
	The Romans used the swastika.
	There is actually a fantastic book, by the way, if you ever get time to look into it.
	It's a wonderful read, very interesting read on this exact topic.
	It's by a man named Heinrich Schliemann.
	And he wrote a book called Troy and Its Remains.
	Those that are not familiar with Troy, Troy is the ancient civilization prior to ancient Rome and ancient Greece that is spoken of in the Odyssey.
	Is it the Odyssey or the Iliad?
	I think it's the Odyssey.
	And they talk about the ancient civilization of Troy and the Trojans.
	This is where the Trojan horse comes from, right?
	That famous story that everybody is familiar with.
	And Heinrich Schliemann did an archaeological dig on what he believed was the ancient civilization of Troy.
	And in this archaeological dig, he uncovered hundreds, maybe even thousands, of old fragments of pottery.
	And these fragments of pottery were loaded with the swastika.
	So this is an ancient symbol.
	The symbol...
	It's not some kind of inherently evil symbol.
	It's actually the opposite of that.
	It's always meant peace, good luck, good fortune, things of that sort.
	And When National Socialist Germany came to power, they used that symbol for exactly that reason, because what they were trying to awaken the people to was a sense of their own heritage and roots and culture.
	And that symbol, the symbol of the swastika, is a perfect representation and depiction of that.
	It brings all of that together.
	The word swastika itself, it comes from Sanskrit, which is the earliest Indo-European language that we have.
	So this has always been a sacred and holy, unifying type of symbol.
	And now, modern media has portrayed this in an entirely different light via Hollywood.
	Throughout the 50s, the 60s, the 70s, you get these depictions of what they call neo-Nazis, which is really a...
	A complete subversion of what a National Socialist actually was.
	When you look at these men in Germany, they were well put together.
	They didn't have tattoos or anything like that.
	They dressed very nice.
	They held a good posture.
	They were well spoken.
	They're very articulate, very intelligent.
	When they did the Nuremberg trials, they actually did IQ tests of everybody inside of that trial, all of the National Socialists that were put on trial.
	They had an average IQ of 128 out of all the people that were at the Nuremberg trials.
	They did these IQ tests in order to determine or make the bold and brazen claim that these people were not insane, so therefore they are guilty now.
	Guilty of what is nonsense.
	You look at these trials, there was torture that went into play.
	Most of the men on trial had their testicles smashed beyond repair.
	And actually, what's really interesting for those that do not know...
	It's when the National Socialists were hung at the Nuremberg Trials.
	They were actually hung on Purim Day.
	Now, Purim Day, if you're not familiar, I think we've talked about this before.
	This originates from the Book of Esther, which was a Jewish Old Testament situation.
	And the Book of Esther states that the Jews came into this kingdom.
	They subverted the kingdom.
	I'm making it very long story short here.
	And when they took over this kingdom, they ethnically slaughtered 75,000 Persian people.
	Now, side note, Persia today, modern Persia, is Iran.
	You see Jews are doing the same thing.
	We're experiencing the same situation.
	The term Iran actually comes from the word Aryan.
	That's the stem root of the word Iran.
	So, they get in this civilization, they kill 75,000 Persians, and they accuse one of the men of being anti-Semitic, essentially.
	This is 2,500 years ago, maybe longer.
	And their way of killing him was hanging him on the gallows, him and his nine brothers.
	It was brothers or sons, was it?
	I think it was brothers.
	So they kill and hang this man, and this is exactly what they did to the National Socialists.
	They hung them all, and they hung them on Purim Day.
	Now, this is not a coincidence.
	This is a very, very obvious and, you know, exploitative thing that they're doing.
	It's almost a celebration of sorts.
	So, back to the point.
	They have done their best to demonize this symbol of the swastika, which again is an ancient holy symbol for our peoples.
	You can go look on a map in Japan on Google Maps.
	They have businesses that have swastikas as the logo on Google Maps.
	This is not an evil or bad symbol.
	But they've made it out to be such through Hollywood.
	And you get, when people see the swastika, the common man, they see it and they get depictions of, in their mind instantly, they see a guy with red suspenders and the Doc Martens ready to like stomp somebody's face in, right?
	With a shaved head and the tattoos all over.
	You know, it looks like some violent, you know, psychopath, right?
	So they've kind of painted people out to be this way or that ideal out to be this way.
	Which is absurd, right?
	When you really look at it on its face, it's insane, actually.
	Because it's not at all what the National Socialists in Germany were.
	And none of the things that they accused them of, you know, racism, which is, you know, a Jewish coined term from the Soviet Union.
	But racism as a term, it's a...
	First off, again, going back to language, okay?
	Propaganda here.
	Going back to language.
	Racism.
	Ism, okay?
	What is an ism, folks?
	It's an ideology, right?
	If I am racist, ist, that suffix ist, it means of or pertaining to, of or pertaining to race, right?
	If I'm a theologist, It means I have a passion, a love for theology.
	So if I'm a racist, I have a love or a passion for my race.
	It has nothing to do with a dislike of another race.
	By the meaning of the word, by the actual etymology of the word.
	It's a nonsensical word.
	So they used things like racism and racist to smear what national socialism is.
	When you look back at what these men had to say, they had no racial hatred towards any particular group at all whatsoever.
	They had a disdain for Jews, and they give reasons why.
	When they list out these reasons, they talk about how they were pushing pornography on the populace.
	They were bringing drugs into civilization.
	They were pushing essentially a multicultural agenda in civilization.
	They were completely against the fabric of German society.
	They were completely anti-German in their sentiments and writings, which is paralleled today, by the way.
	Go read any article that's anti-white or it talks about how white privilege needs to be stopped and we have to end whiteness.
	Look at the author.
	You're going to see a Goldstein or a Rosenberg or something.
	You'll always see that.
	So it's the same exact example here.
	And we have the same problem.
	So they've manipulated what it exactly means to be a national socialist.
	And this is what propaganda is, right?
	They did this.
	They even said themselves that the national socialists, when they were using propaganda, it was an evil manipulation.
	They somehow were able to convince every single person in society that Jews are a problem, and they didn't give a reason.
	They just manipulated everyone into believing that.
	Now, that's absurd, right?
	Who would really think something like that?
	And what would motivate, think about this logically, what would motivate an individual to decide one day to wake up and mass manipulate millions of people against Jews specifically?
	Why would someone ever want to do that?
	What would be a motive for something like that?
	This is an alleged crime that they're accusing this guy of, right?
	So what's the motive?
	There's always a motive for a crime.
	I can't see the motive.
	The only motive that would be there is seeing what they were doing to his civilization.
	We're seeing the same thing here today, right?
	So it's a fair indictment when you point out the behaviors of these people and the things that they're doing and the gall they have to rub it in your face in real time.
	So we got a super chat over on Odyssey.
	White is right.
	Thank you, my friend.
	With a $3 super chat, he says, the swastika is in the nose cone of the spirit of St.
	Louis.
	Guess who put it there?
	It is now hanging in the Smithsonian.
	LOL. Yeah, that's Lindbergh's plane, right?
	Is that correct?
	I know he had a swastika in the nose cone of his plane.
	Dardanian, thank you.
	Very kind comment over on Rumble.
	He said, Zach is brilliant.
	He realized the truth about World War II and became an expert on national socialism in just two years.
	Perfect timing.
	Yeah, I mean, look, you have to...
	When you learn something that is fundamental, anybody who looks into World War II with a fair and honest inquiry becomes very evident that the...
	Black and white story that was painted to us is exactly propaganda.
	It is just a massive manipulation tactic to make you think one certain way about this group of people.
	And you have to think about why.
	Why...
	Knowing that our media and Hollywood both are incredibly overrepresented with Jews, it's completely Jewish industry, both of these things, why would they want to manipulate the public into thinking that those people were evil?
	Well, it's because these are two fundamentally opposing worldviews, right?
	One of these worldviews cares about exploitation and self-interest, right?
	It's greed.
	It's based on this pursuit of material desire.
	The other worldview is the polar opposite of that.
	It's a community-driven worldview that wants to lift everybody up, not pull everybody down.
	This is a big key difference here.
	You'll get a lot of people that equate national socialism with communism, and they say, these are one in the same.
	They're both socialism.
	They're both socialistic ideals.
	Okay, well, what does the word social mean?
	If I'm a socialite, is that bad?
	Is that evil?
	If I like to talk to people and get to know people and I'm friendly and likable because I'm a socialite, is that bad?
	No.
	So socialism simply means pertaining to the populace, helping those around you, right?
	It's a community-driven exercise.
	That's what social means.
	So, socialism is the ideology behind that.
	It's to pertain to that specifically.
	It's the theory of it.
	So, when you get socialism, you can get a same thing.
	The word itself is neutral.
	It's a neutral word.
	You can have somebody adopt a form of socialism that is bad, and you can have somebody adopt a form that is good.
	It's the same with socialism.
	Berries, right?
	We don't go, oh, berries are disgusting.
	I don't like blueberries, right?
	So to say berries are disgusting, well, what about raspberries or strawberries?
	Are berries just disgusting?
	Are berries all one in the same?
	No, there's different shapes and sizes and colors and forms, right?
	So each one you take, you might get something a little bit different out of it.
	So to just paint everything as negative without looking at it with an honest thought already shows you kind of like a lack of genuine nature in the understanding of things.
	So when you look at the difference between a Marxist or communist form of socialism and national socialism, a Marxist or communist one wants to bring everybody down.
	It wants to drag everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
	This is the term equity.
	Everybody knows about DEI, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
	Equity is exactly that.
	So inclusion...
	Let's talk about how this works.
	Inclusion means we include everybody, okay?
	Doesn't matter where you're from, what you do, who you are, how skillful you are.
	Everyone is included.
	We all get to come in the tent.
	Doesn't matter if you have a 50 IQ, 150 IQ. Doesn't matter if you're short or tall, fat or skinny, straight or gay.
	Everybody gets to come in.
	We're all included, right?
	This is already problematic.
	We'll talk about why in a second.
	Then you've got diversity, which means every single group has to...
	We have to do this for everybody.
	We have to include all of the groups as well.
	Okay?
	And then we have equity, which equity says you all get the same.
	You all...
	You get this.
	He gets this.
	He gets this.
	It's an even handout.
	It's like when you go to prison and everybody gets one scoop on the tray, right?
	One scoop on the tray or the cafeteria.
	One scoop on the tray.
	That's what equity is.
	Now...
	Let me tell you something.
	If I'm an engineer and everybody, all 500 of you in this chat are engineers, right?
	And everybody on my Odyssey are engineers.
	We're all engineers, okay?
	And I'm 150 IQ and I've been in the engineering business for 20 years and I'm a great, fantastic engineer and you are a rookie.
	You just joined the force.
	Brand new to engineering.
	You're still making mistakes and stuff.
	You're going to get the same pay as I am in an equity-based society.
	We all get the same.
	Doesn't matter.
	Doesn't matter who you are, what you do, how well you function.
	Everybody gets dolled out the same, right?
	So we get to live in the same size house.
	We get the same income.
	Now, where is there incentive for me to be a better engineer than you?
	If you're going to get the same results, same rewards, right, for shittier, lazier work, less professional work...
	Why would I have any incentive to be a good engineer if I could just slack off and lazy half-ass it just like you do and make the same amount of money anyway?
	There's no incentive.
	So this drags everybody down naturally to the lowest common denominator.
	When you de-incentivize someone lifting themselves up and becoming a talented individual in fields of work or fields of thought or philosophy, If I de-incentivize you from doing that...
	For instance, let's say you have five children.
	I have five kids.
	I send them all off to school.
	And I know one of them's a little slow.
	You know, he's a bad learner.
	He wasn't born good.
	He's got just a short fuse, right?
	Something wrong up there, okay?
	His gears aren't turning right, right?
	And I always give him the same as I give the rest.
	And, you know, all the others are, like, kind of basic except for one.
	One really excels, man.
	He's just super intelligent.
	He's getting straight A's.
	Very smart.
	Aces all of his tests.
	And, you know, every single time...
	All the other kids do terrible.
	They get C's and D's.
	And they all come home and he's got straight A's and he's on the honor roll.
	I give him the same reward as I give them, just like these participation trophies in a race, right?
	That's another example of this exact same phenomenon.
	The participation trophy.
	Hey, you took eighth place.
	You took last place, but here's a trophy.
	At least you tried, right?
	Well, this de-incentivizes the person who wins the race because they go, wait a minute.
	I did better than them, and they're getting acknowledgement, too, for not accomplishing anything?
	What the hell?
	What is that?
	So it de-incentivizes people to be exceptional in all fields, whether it's athletics or intelligence, whatever the case may be.
	It de-incentivizes that.
	So naturally, those people that are not encouraged to be talented, they're going to shrug it off and say, why do I care?
	Why do I care to try?
	And all of those people are going to slowly work down to lowest common denominator because that is what the standard of society is.
	Because if everyone's included, that means we have to include the lowest common denominator.
	The obese people have to be in the race.
	The man who's 455 pounds, he has to be included in the race.
	Inclusion, guys.
	Equity.
	OK, a national socialist society is the polar opposite of this.
	It's social in an entirely different sense.
	It says, yes, we want everybody to be one in the same, but we want to lift them up.
	So we want to take those low people that are the lowest common denominator, and we want to give them every single possibility to pull them out of that category.
	We would like every man.
	So in American society today, the lowest common denominator is here.
	Go to Walmart.
	Go walk around a Walmart.
	You're going to see the lowest common denominator everywhere you go.
	Every aisle, you're going to see it.
	You got people that are like 500 pounds, leg braces on, they're in the wheel scooters.
	They're down here.
	This is the lowest common denominator in Walmart.
	In America, rather.
	You have to bring yourself down to that level in an equitable society.
	One that's diverse with equity and inclusion.
	You have to bring yourself down to that level.
	In a National Socialist Society, they say, here is the lowest common denominator, or it's here originally, right?
	Germany was, in the Weimar Republic.
	It was down here, right with America, just like we are right now.
	And they said, let's lift everybody up.
	Let's pull up the bar for what the lowest common denominator is, right?
	Why would you want your lowest common denominator here if you could pull it up to here?
	Now, if the lowest common denominator is here and everybody is in line with the lowest common denominator, guess what?
	There's some serious incentive there because it's something to thrive for.
	It's something of value.
	And it's productive for society, which is why it's social.
	Social means it's for the betterment of society.
	It pertains to society.
	It helps society.
	Society is socialism's profession.
	So this Marxist form of socialism is the opposite.
	It's destructive for society.
	So it's not socialism.
	It's not social in any way, shape, or form.
	Have you ever seen any of these batshit crazy trannies or Antifa Marxists?
	They're not social.
	They're anti-social to the fullest extent.
	They're rebellious.
	They're completely against any form of civilization or authority or rule or moral code.
	That is not social.
	It's the opposite of social.
	In fact, if you try to socialize with them, you're more likely to get attacked than not.
	So that's not social.
	There is nothing social about it, right?
	It's emotional, sure, but it's not social.
	So that's a key difference to understand.
	And again, propaganda has ruthlessly taught us otherwise.
	It's just broad brush this in the exact same sense.
	And they're both one in the same.
	And this is very dangerous.
	Because now...
	We're not adequately looking at options that can fix the circumstance that we're living underneath.
	We're not looking at them because we're saying, ah, that's the same as that other thing I know I hate already, right?
	We already know.
	It's been demonstrated.
	Marxism and communism are fucking terrible.
	Everybody knows that.
	That's common knowledge, right?
	But now we're broad-brushing and we're painting over the same thing something that is actually fantastic and could be really beneficial for society to look at.
	And we're saying, oh, it's the same as that thing that I already know I hate.
	That's dangerous, right?
	Again, it's the same thing as dictator, the word dictator.
	They go, oh, Stalin, he was an evil dictator, and Mao was an evil dictator.
	Therefore, everybody that wants to be a dictator has to be evil.
	Well, again, was Marcus Aurelius a dictator?
	was that this is this is the problem dictatorship does not have to be bad or good right uh if if we're in a society right now okay a democracy that's supposed to be so moral and so well grounded we have fags walking in the street naked in front of children i cannot stress this enough there are homosexuals butt naked in the street in front of your children okay bragging about it and sexualizing your children okay
	if a dictator was in power a good moral benevolent dictator they would say that's not going to happen anymore You know what happens in a democracy?
	We go, I really don't like that.
	It's terrible.
	I'm going to try to vote and see if we'll get rid of that.
	And then the person gets in that you vote in that says they're going to stop that, and then they run into the red tape, right?
	And they got to get against the House, and they got to go against Congress, and they got to go against the voting blocs.
	And by the time that they're out of office on their four-year term, nothing has gotten done.
	Nothing can get done because there's so much corporate tape, right?
	So just to go back to this term propaganda, words are heavily manipulated in modern society, and it's very important that we denote or figure out what the source of those words are, what they actually mean.
	See, we got another super chat from White is Right.
	He says, the spirit of St.
	Louis is the plane he crossed the Atlantic in.
	Okay, I thought so.
	Thank you again for the second super chat.
	Greatly appreciate it, my friend.
	Thank you.
	Axel will do my friend.
	Will do.
	I see we got a lot of chats.
	Let's try to catch up with these a little bit.
	Anko, welcome.
	I haven't seen you in a bit.
	You got to message me somewhere other than Gab.
	Every time I see you in the chat room, I think about it.
	I'm never on Gab anymore.
	anymore I really don't use it.
	Nimajun I don't know what you mean by that.
	30 million dead.
	I guess you're talking about COVID? Uh...
	Yeah, well, again, what does the word dictate mean?
	Right?
	If you live in a household and your father is the head of the household and...
	The children are running around and doing bad things and they're not behaving well.
	He dictates to them how to behave.
	Does that mean he's evil?
	He's a dictator, right?
	He's dictating to them.
	Does that make him evil?
	No.
	He's helping them.
	He's pushing them in the right direction.
	I see.
	I see.
	Misunderstood what you were saying to Majun.
	Makes sense.
	Yeah, I totally agree with you.
	Yeah, breakdown of the family unit is a really big piece of this, which, you know, was another propaganda campaign, you know, through feminism.
	Feminism was a way of manipulating women with propaganda, teaching them that they need to liberate themselves from the evil patriarchy.
	And they did.
	They did.
	They've actively done so.
	And I'll tell you what, we see the results.
	If we look at depression rates, suicide rates, anxiety rates, mental illness rates amongst women, they're at an all-time high.
	They're skyrocketing.
	Look at childbirth decreasing rapidly.
	So women are not happy.
	Sure, they freed themselves from the patriarchy.
	They're not happy.
	So clearly the patriarchy was good.
	It was keeping them in line.
	It was helping them.
	But instead, they've freed themselves from said patriarchy, and it wasn't free.
	That's the thing.
	They're not free.
	Think about our founding fathers.
	Really interesting case here.
	If you guys are familiar, Thomas Paine...
	Was it Payne or Jeffrey?
	I think it was Payne.
	Towards the end of his life, he started writing.
	He became very anti-Christian.
	Towards the end of his life, he decided he didn't want to be Christian anymore.
	He didn't think it was a good idea.
	And he started writing articles against Christianity.
	And him and Benjamin Franklin had letters back and forth with each other.
	And Thomas Paine was like, look, you know, this Christianity thing, I don't think it's good.
	I don't think it's necessary.
	I'm not doing it no more.
	And Benjamin Franklin wrote him a letter back and he said, in the letter he said, well, Thomas, you are, you know, an educated man.
	You might not need Christianity to give you moral grounding, right?
	An intellectual who's well studied on philosophy and morality and things of the sort and virtue.
	They might not need religion to kind of give them that direction, right?
	Or the appropriate path forward.
	However, as you see in democracy...
	80-90% of civilization does.
	They need something to guide them appropriately.
	They need a father figure, so to speak, to guide them.
	So...
	Setting that moral code or guideline for people is a necessity in many cases.
	And that was exactly what we did for women.
	We set a civilizational standard, right?
	We weren't like, hey, you know, women suck and we hate them, right?
	That's not why women were revoked from voting.
	It had nothing to do with not liking women.
	Look, I'm an advocate.
	Repeal the 19th.
	I don't think women should be voting.
	Is that because I hate women?
	No.
	I love women.
	And in order for them to be in society and be protected by said society, people need to be voting the right way.
	And if we look at how or why women vote in the modern age, you can see very clearly they're emotional creatures.
	They vote on an emotional scale.
	Men are more...
	Thank you.
	They're more regulated.
	They're more reasoned individuals.
	They focus on the logical side of things.
	So a man is going to say, if I vote on this guy, how is that going to help in the future?
	Is he going to be better for the economy?
	Is he going to be better on immigration?
	Is he going to be better on not getting us into foreign wars?
	When women vote, they go, oh, he's got a cute haircut.
	Oh, I saw his wife in that one movie.
	She was awesome.
	Oh, Hillary had that really funny clip on TikTok.
	That's how women vote.
	So, if you allow that over a long enough period of time, what the hell is going to get voted into office?
	Right?
	Nothing good.
	Ever.
	Because nothing of value is going to be sought out, nor recognized, even if it is sought out.
	So...
	We're not saying, hey, women can't vote because I fucking hate women.
	I'm saying women shouldn't vote because if they do vote, they're going to make worse decisions in the long run with voting.
	And through that, civilization will be worse off.
	We're going to be unable to protect them against these horrors that are modern civilization.
	It's like letting children vote.
	Right.
	Do we let do we let children vote?
	No.
	Do we hate children?
	No.
	But we know that they're not ready yet.
	They're not capable of making the appropriate decision to vote.
	Right.
	So you don't let them vote.
	You say, well, no, actually, you have to wait.
	You have to learn more.
	You have to take it seriously.
	Now, again, there's always exceptions to the rule.
	I have met, not many, but there are some phenomenal women out there who are so well-educated.
	It shocks me.
	They're more intelligent than some men in many ways.
	But how many women do you know that are taking an extreme interest in philosophy or history or...
	Economics or things of that sort.
	It's not a category that's becoming to a female mind.
	They don't have this drive for climbing the corporate ladder like a lot of men do.
	Men have that drive.
	It's a drive to conquer.
	It's a drive for power.
	Women are submissive creatures.
	They don't have that drive to power.
	Again, exceptions.
	But for the most part, women are submissive creatures.
	They're born and bred that way.
	That's how nature has made them.
	So, that's kind of the key here is we need standards, right?
	We need to have some kind of authoritarian ideal that says, look, this is the ideal.
	This is how it's done.
	If you disagree with this, you're welcome to disagree, but you're not participating in what we're doing over here, right?
	So, you can either leave or you can go to jail.
	Pretty simple, right?
	Like, be normal.
	Behave.
	If a true moral authoritarian government, again, if they came into power tomorrow, they would go to the fag parades where all the trannies are dancing in front of children and shit, butt naked, and they would say, no more.
	This is enough.
	It's done.
	I'll give you a good example of this, actually.
	I made a thread yesterday, or two days ago, that has gone incredibly viral.
	It blew up very fast.
	It's got like 3 million views on it.
	And in that thread, I talk about the Jewish role in the porn industry.
	I'm not saying Jews suck.
	I didn't say I don't like Jews.
	I didn't say anything about Jews.
	I just said what they did in the porn industry with factual information.
	I actually quoted them in many circumstances.
	Logic, fact-based, no emotion.
	I'm not saying how I feel about them.
	None of my opinions are put in the thread.
	And a lot of people are unfortunately upset about that.
	They thought it was anti-Semitic or whatever the case is.
	Again, it's that programming through propaganda.
	But, interestingly enough, I am being bombarded with tranny porn.
	Trannies are mass sending me porn on that post.
	Literal transgenders shoving stuff up their asses.
	It's repulsive.
	It's absolutely disgusting.
	In an authoritarian world, that would be gone.
	No.
	We should not have to see that.
	And they're doing it specifically to harass me.
	It's a way that they know they can disgust me.
	This is absurd, right?
	So, in a world where we have free speech, right, where people are getting banned for saying, hey, that behavior of those Jews is criminal and very bad.
	Banned, right?
	Banned, censored on all kinds of platforms just for simply laying out these facts.
	In that same world, okay, these trannies can go around and send unsolicited porn to people that they don't like to try to, like, discuss them.
	That's repulsive, and it's messed up, right?
	I mean, who knows how many children are scrolling through that thread and learning about that?
	You know, teenagers are learning about these things and seeing that nonsense underneath.
	So, this is...
	It's...
	An authoritarian government needs to step in and say no more.
	It has to happen.
	It's the only way that things get fixed.
	You're not reforming this.
	You can't...
	It's not...
	Non-reformable.
	Yeah, they are approving my point.
	Absolutely.
	They're sick in the head.
	And, you know, we have to recognize a civilization like this can't last long.
	The American empire is not long for this world.
	We're going to have a collapse.
	It's inevitable.
	So the goal is, it's not to hit the brakes super hard and try to stop the collapse.
	I gotta say, you know what?
	Thomas Sewell said this really well in a clip.
	I actually wish I could play it.
	It was a fantastic clip.
	And he gives an analogy and he says, this is the circumstance we're in.
	We are experiencing a civilizational death.
	Civilization is dying in front of us.
	It's dying.
	And we have a choice in that death.
	When you have a cell that is cancer, it's dying, and it's terminally ill, you're not going to fix that cell.
	Instead, we need to break away, we need to duplicate a second cell that doesn't have any of the bad, any of the toxic connected to it.
	All of the cancer is out of that.
	And this new cell, this new form, the group of people in society that have a moral compass, That see things for what they are.
	That want things to be better for everybody.
	Those people need to break away.
	Because you can't reform the cancer cell.
	You can't fix the cancer cell.
	It's gonna die.
	You have to let that...
	Again, we're talking about civilizational death here.
	You have to let that die.
	You can resuscitate it, sure.
	You can put it on chemo.
	You can try to make it last a couple years longer.
	But it's gonna die.
	And when it dies, do you want to die with it?
	Do you want to keep yourself attached to that?
	Or do you want to have something secondary that's set up for after the death, right?
	Life is a cycle, right?
	It's a cycle that continues.
	And that cycle is birth, death, birth, life, death, birth, life, death, right?
	That cycle goes on and on and on.
	So if you want something to...
	If you want to survive, if you want any kind of survival...
	You need to be acknowledging the cycle, right?
	And playing by the game of the cycle.
	And that means that if this civilization is dying, if we're experiencing a civilizational death, in order to keep that cycle going, we must birth something new to create more life on this planet.
	So therefore, instead of looking at reform, which again would be illogical and insane and counterproductive, You have to create something new.
	Again, this is very adequately displayed in National Socialist writings.
	Hitler puts this in a speech and he says it very eloquently.
	He says that this big, massive oak, it's going to fall.
	It's dying from the root.
	So again, I've used the same analogy very often, which is actually quite coincidental because when I read the passage, I had made that analogy before reading the passage.
	And I read it and I was like, oh, wow, it's great.
	So, in the analogy of this oak tree, all of the tree has branches.
	It's got 50 branches, 100 branches.
	And all of those branches are starting to die and decay.
	They're crippling all these branches.
	They're starting to kind of become rotten and break off.
	If you've ever seen a tree that's infected at the root, there's something wrong with the tree.
	It'll start to get all these kind of algae growths on it and whatnot, like dead-looking algae, not the, you know, like lush stuff.
	It's kind of got this dead look to it, and the branches will become so feeble and dead that they'll just, at the poke of a finger, they'll just fall right off the tree.
	That's where we are.
	Civilization is dying in such a way that anything is viable to collapse at any moment.
	The police force is viable to collapse.
	The fire departments, because there's more tension Through the sickness that is inside of the tree, inside of the root, there is more tension and sickness coming from that root than the branches can handle.
	Okay?
	That's the circumstance that we're in.
	And Hitler says that when this tree falls, when it dies from the root, We need to have the fern planted next to it already because the fern takes a long time to grow.
	If you plant a new tree in your lifetime, you might not see that tree grow.
	You might not see it in two lifetimes from now.
	Depends on what kind of tree you're planting.
	So we need to plant that tree now before the other one dies and falls over.
	Otherwise, when that one dies and falls over, we're not going to have anywhere to go.
	We have no home, right?
	Think about like a squirrel in this circumstance.
	The squirrel has no home until that fern grows up.
	Well, guess what?
	If the squirrel doesn't have a home in the time that it takes that fern to grow into a luscious tree, the squirrel's going to die.
	It's going to be left out cold.
	So we need to create that new fern, something that is separate from what we have right now, that is for the betterment of ourselves.
	Because we don't have that right now at all.
	And these people that want to advocate reform or dictate reform to you, they don't know what they're talking about.
	They have no idea.
	Or they are incapable of seeing the bigger picture.
	These conservative commentators like Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon, these are the squirrels at the very top of the tree.
	And those squirrels are the ones to get the nuts first, right off the top as they grow.
	And we know that because all the branches are dying, the nuts are running thin.
	So all the other civilian squirrels like you and myself, as we're coming up that tree, by the time we get there to get any second helpings, there's nothing left because guys like Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon and all these establishment conservatives have already stolen it all from us.
	They've already taken all of it.
	So they benefit off of this tree standing still.
	They don't want the fern because they like to sit comfortably at the top of the oak and grab the nuts as they grow.
	You understand?
	So they don't want to see a fern built.
	That's why they preach reform.
	They say, oh, oh, well, you little squirrels at the bottom of the tree, why don't you just start chipping away at the bacteria that's on the bark of the tree?
	And so we go and we're working, we're breaking off the dead branches and we're trying to fix everything, hoping that if we do it all, we're going to be able to sit at the top of the tree and get some nuts too.
	But guess what?
	It's beyond reform.
	The tree's so sick.
	The nuts are going to stop growing eventually, right?
	So this is the problem that we have, okay?
	And In that speech we read the last time when we talked about Weimar conditions on the show, he talked about the left.
	And the left is going to constantly push towards Bolshevism.
	So what the left is doing, these squirrels in the analogy, what they're doing is they're slowly picking all of those nuts off the tree and they're putting them in a side basket.
	Because they're waiting and when the tree falls, then they're going to say, hey guys, we have this big basket with all the nuts in it.
	You got to come to us.
	We'll tell you who gets how many nuts and when and how, right?
	So they're creating a monopoly.
	This is what Bolshevism is, is they slowly Bolshevize things.
	They're collecting all of the resources into one pool, and you get them if we say you get them, right?
	So we need to build that new fern so that that way, when that other tree collapses...
	People like Steve Manning and Charlie Kirk, who are no longer relevant, because they're no longer a part of that system, because we have a new system that's in play.
	When that tree collapses and the new one is built, they're going to come over and they're going to say, hey, hey, we've been with you guys the whole time.
	We want to be a part of your tree.
	But we'll never forget all that time that all we wanted was to climb up and have a couple nuts for ourselves, and they didn't want to share.
	Can't forget that.
	These people are benefiting.
	You and I are not.
	So, that is why you see these guys propping up narratives of reform, and they play the game, the system game, right?
	We gotta vote in Trump, we just gotta vote a little bit harder, it's gonna work, I swear this time, I swear this time, because they need you to have faith in that system.
	Because the longer you have faith in that system is the longer that you're picking bark off of a dead tree.
	It's insanity.
	There's no direction in it.
	It doesn't go anywhere.
	It's stupid, right?
	But they need you to do that because that's how they get to keep sitting up top comfortably.
	They don't want to see something new be placed in.
	Because if something new gets placed in, guess what?
	They lose their power.
	They have to regain power the right way.
	And they don't want to do that.
	These guys are cowards in essence.
	A little monologue there.
	Take a second.
	I'll take a sip of my tea here.
	Get a little bit of a breather.
	Does anybody have any thoughts in the chat room?
	Any points of interest?
	And then we're coming up on the one hour mark.
	We'll probably take a little...
	Breather.
	And then we'll hop into the second half of the show and talk about the next piece that I wanted to discuss in regards to propaganda.
	Okay, one second, folks.
	one second, folks. folks.
	Thank you.
	Uh, yes, Nimajun, I do.
	Sorry, there's a lot of chats.
	It's hard to keep up.
	So...
	We are at the one hour mark.
	We'll take a little brief kind of intermission here and promote some stuff again.
	It is the last show of the week today.
	However, I do want to promote this.
	I'm going on a show tonight at 8 p.m.
	Eastern.
	So it's going to be two hours after this show closes out.
	I'm joining a young fellow.
	He's a...
	Well, actually, he's...
	I can't say young.
	He is young in the scheme of things.
	He's older than me, though, by quite a bit.
	But he is a very nice guy.
	He's a Christian nationalist.
	And I'll be going on his show this evening to discuss these exact problems with him and educate his audience on some of these concepts.
	He has slowly been awakening to these things and doing some reading himself.
	So I will be I'll be jumping in there to try to kind of extrapolate on the things that he's already been saying to them.
	Uh Alex thoughts on Jordan Peterson's recent article on anti-Semitism I have not seen that.
	I would be interested, though, if you want to link it, I'll take a look at it.
	Maybe we can analyze that a little.
	I'm not familiar with that article.
	I'm sure it's awful and gay.
	But I'll read it.
	Yeah, Nimajun, I agree with everything laid out.
	Yeah, I'm familiar with Bezmanov.
	Yeah, he talked about this pretty well.
	He talks about the demoralization process, which we've adequately seen, and then that goes into normalization, where people kind of, that's where you get the apathy piece, right?
	Where people just shrug their shoulders and they go, okay, whatever.
	As long as they don't do it to my kids, right?
	So, I'm trying to find...
	Let me see.
	Here's a link.
	This is the Young Fellows podcast that I'm going to be on tonight.
	I gotta stop saying Young Fellow.
	He's older than me.
	What the hell am I... I gotta stop saying that.
	Here's a link in the chat, guys, if you guys want to follow his channel.
	He's a very nice guy.
	I had a nice private conversation with him for like an hour and a half.
	Good dude.
	I'll be going on there tonight at 8 p.m.
	Eastern.
	I don't know if it's going to be live or not.
	Maybe it's not live.
	Maybe it's going to be pre-recorded.
	But yeah, make sure that you guys check out his channel.
	Let's see.
	Let me pull up this article about Jordan Peterson.
	And then we'll go into the second half of the show.
	Let me see how long the article is.
	If it's not too long, I can follow or I can, I can read it.
	it let's see uh yeah it's a little long uh I'll tell you what, though.
	I will bookmark this and possibly cover it on the next show.
	That might be a good topic to cover for next show.
	Let me just kind of pull a tab over here and save it, and we'll probably cover that on the next show.
	It's just going to cut too much into the time of the show tonight, and I'm not going to be able to finish the points I want to make.
	So I do appreciate the link and I will certainly bookmark that for the next time.
	Did I see the Nick Fuentes and Andrew Tate speak about white genocide on Aiden Ross stream?
	Yeah, I did see that.
	It was actually pretty good.
	I don't agree with everything that they lay out, but the more that these things are explained to the populace, the better.
	Especially white people.
	Unfortunately, some of these people are so manipulated against this racism shit that they need somebody who's brown to tell them, wake up, care about yourself for being white, you fucking idiot.
	They're too scared to do it on their own.
	They're worried someone's going to hate them for it.
	It's pathological altruism.
	Altruism can be fantastic.
	It really can, but...
	When you're living in a hostile environment, altruism is fucking terrible, and it's so destructive.
	So, back to a couple of promotions.
	Make sure that you guys are following all my channels.
	I want to show you guys this BioSite thing one more time, since it's a brand new platform that we're on.
	Let me pull this up again.
	So BioSite, it's a lot like Linktree.
	It gives you a link to all of my different shows and my channels, as well as ways to support my show.
	So let's pull this up one more time, and then we'll go into the second half of the show.
	Okay, so here is my bio site.
	I'll link this to you guys as well.
	Here it is in the chat rooms again.
	So please take a second, click on this, check it out, browse around, like some of my stuff, follow all my channels if you're not following me on the stuff already that I have on there.
	So again, we've got Twitter, Odyssey, Rumble, and FTJ. Those are the four platforms that you guys can follow me on.
	At the very bottom here, we have my Logos Academy Lectures series.
	It used to be just a Logos Academy, but that's what this is now, so we've changed the name of that.
	That's the Lectures now.
	That is my most popular series.
	I've got like 4,000 views per video on there, on Odyssey, which is very good for Odyssey.
	I've gotten a lot more on Twitter when I post them up on there, but...
	Definitely recommend that you guys check that series out.
	It's an educational series focused on bringing these things in very layman's terms to people.
	Really good series to share around with normies.
	If you are trying to wake somebody up to some of this stuff, this is a really good series.
	I covered the JFK assassination and the Jewish involvement in that.
	I covered 9-11 and the Jewish involvement of that.
	I covered the Holocaust in one and the lies behind that.
	I also covered the difference between Jewish versus Gentile law.
	Really recommend you guys check that one out.
	That's episode number one.
	That's a really, really good one.
	It's gotten a lot of fantastic feedback, so...
	Then the final thing is we have options to support this show.
	And I hate to be Jew-y sounding, right?
	And kind of sounds shilly.
	Maybe like Alex Jones a little.
	But nothing in the world is free.
	So I do need support at some point.
	And I really do appreciate everybody that helps in that regard to keep this show running.
	Uh, so if you want to help support, we've got a couple options here.
	You can do a super chat straight through my rumble, uh, which is a logos revealed.
	I I'm on that chat right now.
	So if you would want to, uh, super chat on there, you can do that at any time and I will read them in real time.
	Uh, we've also got, uh, Odyssey.
	If you want, you can put a super chat on Odyssey and we have entropy, which is the link right here.
	On Entropy, it's specifically like a payment platform, so you can donate straight cash through that, rather than my other options, which are crypto wallets.
	I know we have a lot of crypto users who prefer to be a little more anonymous in the things they do.
	We have a new platform called Cointree, where you can open that up, and I have a bunch of different options.
	You can send Monero, Bitcoin, Solana, Litecoin, Ethereum, you name it.
	All the options are on there.
	And you guys can support through there.
	So just a reminder, if you guys do want to support the show, it is greatly appreciated.
	It helps me keep this running and do this as full-time as I am doing it.
	Whether it's a dollar or a hundred dollars, every little bit helps.
	Something else I wanted to say.
	Oh, we actually had a very kind offline investment via Entropy from a fellow named Rich.
	I don't know if you're watching this right now, but I wanted to thank you personally for the $50 support towards the show.
	Really appreciate that.
	It did not happen while I was live, so I wasn't able to thank you for that appropriately.
	So I just wanted to do so now in hopes that you're watching.
	Maybe you are, maybe you are not.
	But thank you very much for that.
	I really appreciate it.
	Okay, that is everything.
	Make sure that you guys, again, do create an account on FTJ Media.
	Very good website.
	Up and coming.
	And let's kick back into the show.
	Second half.
	Dracula, I agree with you.
	Thank you very much for your comment.
	Going into the second half here, I want to talk about the other piece of propaganda that we need to discuss as a group or as a people that are figuring these things out.
	We're waking up.
	So we talked about how propaganda was engineered by Jews like Edward Bernays.
	They mass manipulated women into smoking cigarettes.
	It was a literal bad propaganda.
	And the National Socialist Party in Germany saw what they were doing and they took inspiration from this, to say the least.
	And they used these methods for themselves, right?
	They said, okay, the enemy that hates us and hates our people is using a propaganda to destroy that people.
	Now we need to use a propaganda to lift that people up.
	So this is a strategy that we have to follow ourselves.
	And this is probably one of the biggest problems we have historically on...
	I don't want to say the right wing because I don't really care about the wing system, right?
	So of the truth movement, this is the biggest problem that we've had is most people want to relay the message of truth via logical avenues.
	They want to...
	They want to sit...
	I do this, so I'm not saying it's completely bad in a sense, but they want to lay everything out very logically.
	I do that.
	That's exactly what I do.
	They want to recommend people literature and write a book about it and teach people through that book.
	I had somebody come to me with actually, quite frankly, a good idea.
	They had an idea for a weekly magazine that we could come out with, but the idea is good.
	But the method was bad.
	So the person said, in this weekly magazine, what I want to do is I want to bring people in through the magazine, okay?
	And then bring them onto, like, Twitter spaces and stuff via the magazine.
	Well, this is the opposite of how this functions.
	Like, I don't know who's not paying attention here.
	Magazines, when people read magazines...
	Only the people that already know what's going on are going to want to read a magazine that's more in-depth on the topic.
	So, for instance, if you join a Twitter space and you hear somebody talking about Jewish over-representation in the media for the first time ever, you'll look at that and go...
	Oh, wow, that's really interesting.
	And maybe a couple people will say, I'm kind of interested in that.
	I want to check that out.
	Then someone will pick up magazines and read further into the situation.
	It's kind of like Hollywood magazines, right?
	People don't pick up a magazine to get into Hollywood.
	They're already into Hollywood, and therefore they pick up magazines that update them on all things Hollywood, right?
	So if you are into the truth, then you'll pick up a magazine that pertains to all things truth.
	But you're not going to search for the truth via a magazine.
	So it's a matter of, this is propaganda.
	This is how we learn how to wake more people up.
	And this is the problem with the right.
	They want to do this in a logical way.
	They just want to write books and put out the data and the facts to people.
	And that can be good.
	There's a place for that.
	Because there's certain people that need to hear that.
	But there's also a method in delivery and in behavior.
	To go towards that emotional side.
	To win the hearts of people.
	When people hate the evil Nazis from all the Hollywood propaganda that they've been taught.
	That neo-Nazis are terrible and bad and awful and evil.
	Those people...
	That hate that.
	Do they hate it logically?
	Do they say, oh, I don't like national socialism because I think X, Y, and Z are just not appropriate for civilization?
	No, they hate it on an emotional level.
	Oh, it's evil.
	It's awful.
	Holocaust, right?
	Terrible.
	They hate it emotionally.
	So how are you going to win somebody over with a logical argument when their whole premise of belief is on emotion?
	You have to wake them up emotionally, and that's how they were manipulated there in the first place, right?
	They were manipulated through emotions.
	No one logically put out a pamphlet and a fact sheet to all these people that we're talking about and said, hey guys, did you know that they did this, this, this, and this, and this in National Socialist Germany, and we don't like that?
	Here's how they did this in this area, in this town.
	No, of course not.
	They made a movie.
	They made the boy in striped pajamas and the boy's crying, right?
	And it's sad and it's awful, right?
	It's emotional manipulation, right?
	And then people will repeat that because they're essentially emotionally scarred through it.
	Entropy donated.
	uh let me see uh we've got uh aquarius uh with a 15 dollar entropy He says, what you describe is precisely what I intend to help create.
	One thing I didn't ask of the audience was to kindly put Aquarius Fabrications LLC in your Google and leave a five-star review to show that white power is real and white power products are what you prefer going forward.
	Thank you, Aquarius.
	Yeah, for those who are not familiar, we had Aquarius Fabrications on the show.
	About two weeks ago, I think it was, two weeks ago.
	Wonderful guy, up-and-coming entrepreneur who cares a lot about this movement.
	He's a great dude.
	I highly encourage you, if you didn't watch that show, go watch it.
	And yeah, please give him a five-star review.
	It's Aquarius Fabrication LLC. Type it into Google and pop a five-star review on there for the guy.
	Ian, nice to see you, my friend.
	Infinity Stone, is that you?
	Are you Aquarius?
	I'm not used to you having that name.
	That was very interesting.
	That's the only entropy that I see on my end, so I think that must be you.
	Yeah, so this is an emotional manipulation tactic.
	Now, we need to do the same in order to win people over.
	This is the mistake that the right has always made.
	Conservatives, whether it's the Birch Society or Steve Bannon's War Room or Turning Point USA, they want to wake people up with logic.
	They don't know how to emotionally get to the people.
	Charlie Kirk is not winning anybody's hearts, right?
	You never see Charlie Kirk through some passionate speech and, oh guys, we gotta stop the radical left, right?
	There's no essence of soul in the things the guy says.
	It's all fucking slogans and buzz labels and, oh, the radical left are at it again, folks.
	We gotta stop the radical.
	What the hell is the radical left?
	What's the radical left, right?
	Well, the radical left, who constitutes the radical left?
	Who is making the ideologies from the radical left?
	You can't blame an entity.
	You got to blame the people that made said entity or constitute said entity.
	There's no passion in that.
	So no one is ever going to be won over by a guy like that because they can feel there's a fakeness.
	It's like an advertisement, right?
	Oh, we gotta stop the radical left, folks.
	Ladies and gentlemen, they're destroying our Christian republic.
	It's so terrible.
	How do we stop it?
	We need to vote for Trump.
	If we don't get Trump in, we're gonna lose for sure.
	They're sending you down a back alley to get mugged He's a gatekeeper absolutely right So this is where Alex Jones is a little different.
	I'm not huge on Alex Jones.
	I don't think he's a bad dude.
	I don't know what to think of the guy.
	I don't know if he's...
	I don't know if he is subversive or if he's really just out there.
	I don't know.
	I have no idea, really.
	It's so hard to tell with him.
	But regardless, his rhetoric is not good.
	However, his demeanor and delivery is.
	There's a passion when he's getting fired up.
	It's like, we need to stop these fucking globalists.
	Look, he's right.
	Again, you've got to go a little further.
	What are the globalists?
	What is a globalist?
	Well, a globalist is someone who wants international world rule, right?
	Well, I don't know any Indians that are advocating for international world rule.
	I don't know of any black people, or at least not, you know, on a serious note, right?
	I don't know of any Mexicans.
	I don't know of any Chinese people.
	I don't really know of any white people.
	So what's the only group of people that writes in their scriptures that they want world rule, world dominion?
	Jews.
	So...
	You need to point to that source.
	That's what the globalist is.
	The Jew is the only group of people in history that has been, in essence, international.
	They're the only ones.
	Global, in the truest sense of the word.
	So, again, globalism.
	Does that mean you hate everything that isn't on the globe?
	What the hell does it even mean?
	Right?
	Globalism means they want everything to be intertwined in one thing, ruled by one force, one world governing.
	Now, first off, it's a terrible concept in the first place.
	It's bound to cause problems.
	Excuse me.
	It's bound to cause problems because different peoples of different cultures are going to want to be ruled in a completely different way.
	And it provokes people of their ability at sovereignty.
	So globalism would never work anyway, even if it was like a moral force that was controlling a globalist country.
	It still wouldn't work.
	But globalism, again, this was pointed out exactly by Hitler.
	He said it's an international conspiracy, the international clique, he called these people.
	What does international mean?
	It means you are among all of the nations, right?
	He says they're the same whether they're in Brussels or London or Vienna, they're the same.
	They see things the same.
	This is globalism, in essence.
	So you got guys like Alex Jones who want to say that, but they don't want to say where it comes from.
	They don't want to say who's doing it, why they're doing it.
	And this is the problem.
	If he's not going to do that, you can feel a fakeness to the things he's saying.
	He's at least got...
	Augusto in his speech, which kind of gets you excited about it, right?
	But he's not honest in his delivery.
	Yes, Mr.
	Mr. X Navy, I agree totally.
	So what we need is someone who has a real message, a true message, and has passion behind what they're saying in order to express and display that message in a way that people can relate with.
	It has to be relatable.
	Can you relate with a guy like...
	Charlie Crook tries to make himself relatable, right?
	I'm a Christian American.
	I love America.
	I'm an American patriot.
	Now, this is a problem.
	I don't like the term patriot, to be honest with you.
	I really don't like the term.
	It's a subversion of the word nationalist.
	Nationalism and patriotism are very different concepts, and we've replaced the word nationalism with patriotism.
	There's a very important reason for that.
	So, uh, in world, pre-World War II, Charles Lindbergh would have called himself an American, America first nationalist, right?
	Rather than American first patriot.
	And the reason for that is a nationalist again, is as the suffix nationalist means it's someone who loves a nation pertains to the nation cares for the nation.
	Well, what's a nation?
	Nation comes from the word nadio.
	It's a Latin word.
	The definition of the word nation, which has also been subverted in the modern age, if you look it up, it's no longer the case.
	But the definition of the word nation is tribe or race.
	So every civilization throughout all of time has been a nation, meaning that it's one tribe that rules a civilization.
	They have subverted that.
	We're no longer nationalists.
	Now we're patriotic.
	That just means a love for a country, which is a state.
	A country is a state.
	So you have a love for the political body itself, the concept of the country, rather than the people of the country.
	You understand that?
	That's a problem.
	That's a big problem.
	So a guy like Charlie Kirk, oh yeah, he's an American patriot.
	He's not an American nationalist, though.
	Not at all.
	He doesn't care about you, the people.
	He cares about his pockets, and he cares about keeping up that system that keeps his pockets fat.
	So yeah, sure, he's a patriot.
	He's not a nationalist.
	Correct.
	So this is the essence of things, right?
	Again, language has been the most heavily subverted thing that you can possibly think of.
	Everything you can think of has been subverted in the modern age linguistically, whether it's even invented terms, homophobe.
	Homophobe.
	Does anybody in the chat room know who coined the term homophobe?
	Without looking it up, does anybody know who coined the term homophobe?
	Let's see if anyone knows.
	Well, age of inversion, yes.
	Yes.
	Yep.
	A couple people know the nation or identity of the person, but they don't know his name.
	So the term homophobe was coined by the Jew George Weinberg.
	And this was put in Screw Magazine, which was made by Al Goldstein.
	I'm going to quote Al Goldstein.
	Every time I bring up Al Goldstein, I have to quote the guy.
	It's impossible to bring him up and not quote him.
	Because this quote needs to be well known by every American citizen that is alive.
	It's a quote from Al Goldstein.
	Al Goldstein was asked in an interview, Why are Jews overrepresented in the porn industry?
	This is Alex, uh, Al, Al Goldstein's direct quote.
	The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think Christ sucks.
	Catholicism sucks.
	We don't believe in authoritarianism.
	Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture.
	Direct quote.
	I lost my shirt.
	Oh, that was first printed in his magazine.
	He had a magazine called Screw Magazine, which was extremely subversive.
	And the word homophobe was for the first time ever printed in that magazine.
	Homophobe.
	Well, again, what does that word mean?
	What does it mean?
	Well, homophobe, it's phobia, right?
	It means you're scared of something.
	Arachnophobia, right?
	I'm scared of spiders.
	Does that mean I hate spiders?
	Because that's what they say, right?
	When you say, I don't like gay stuff, I think it's wrong.
	Oh, you're a homophobe.
	No, I'm not afraid of gays.
	Trust me, they're not scary at all.
	They're disgusting and repulsive.
	I'm not scared of them.
	I'm disgusted by them.
	Big difference.
	No homo twink scares me.
	Maybe psychologically a little bit.
	They don't scare me.
	They disgust me.
	So this term homophobia doesn't make sense.
	It's like Islamophobia.
	I'm not scared of Islam.
	I don't agree with it.
	I'm not scared of it.
	So this phobia means fear.
	Philia means attraction.
	So Like, if you're a homophile, sure, that makes sense.
	You could be attracted to being gay.
	You could be attracted to gay people.
	That's a thing.
	But I don't know anybody that's scared of homosexuals.
	I've never seen a guy, like, scared, cowering, running away.
	Some straight white male with high testosterone, like, being terrified of some weird twink dancing around the street.
	He's disgusted.
	He's not terrified.
	So...
	This is the point.
	Words are so important in society because whatever you perceive to be the meaning of a word is exactly how you use that word in conversation.
	So...
	If you think homophobe means hateful, and you call me a homophobe, when I know it doesn't mean hateful, it means to be afraid of them, I'm going to say, no, what the hell are you talking- what?
	Doesn't even make sense, right?
	It's- this is- it's- it's a manipulation so deep and so twisted, it's almost impossible to believe that it's- it's that deep.
	And it's a made-up word!
	It's a- it's just made- I just make it up.
	It's like transphobe, or, uh, or- I know there's another one I'm missing.
	Xenophobe, right?
	They're taking the beginning of another word.
	The suffix they're putting on it doesn't make sense.
	It doesn't pertain to what the situation is.
	Yeah, very well said.
	I see we've got Red Pilled over on the Rumble with a $10 Super Chat.
	He says, great information, great show.
	Thanks, brother.
	Thank you very much, my friend, for the support.
	Really appreciate that.
	Don't forget, folks, we do want to support the show.
	Absolutely helps keep this show up and running.
	Thank you very much for the support.
	And I'm glad you're finding the show informative.
	I try my best to bring some kind of value to every show.
	Again, that's why we did not go live on Wednesday, and I do apologize for that.
	Homos are heterophobes.
	Yeah, probably.
	That's actually pretty accurate, I think.
	I think they actually are scared of.
	They're manaphobes.
	They hate manliness.
	They hate masculinity.
	August says, Logos, I think that especially in America nowadays, people don't care about being called homophobic, anti-Semitic, I think that especially in America nowadays, people don't care about being Oh, I'm sorry, sexist, but most still care about being called a racist.
	What do you think?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, I think race is probably the biggest piece of contention in America.
	So it does seem to be the one that people have the biggest cognitive dissonance on and maybe the most fear of being called.
	They're like wordophobes.
	They're scared of the word homophobe or racist.
	They're wordophobes.
	They're terrified to be called something.
	Which is way worse, by the way.
	It's actually better to be repulsed and disgusted by faggots than it is to be afraid of being called scared of faggots.
	Think about that.
	These people are more worried about being offended or being offensive than they are about the people offending them.
	Right?
	Again, I got trainees dancing around in public in front of children butt naked.
	And then I call it out because it's offensive.
	It's offensive and repulsive behavior.
	So I call out the offensive and repulsive behavior.
	Now I'm a transphobe and I'm supposed to feel bad for offending you?
	I don't give a fuck how you feel about my words.
	You're dancing naked in front of children.
	You can kiss my ass with your words.
	I really don't care.
	Sack Opossums with a $5 super chat on Odyssey says, Glad this is the topic today.
	Propaganda has to be emotion first.
	Emotional impact equals effectiveness.
	That we have the truth on our side is only more to our benefit.
	The feelings are the hooks to get the people in.
	The data and community is how we keep them.
	Very well said.
	Extremely well said, my friend.
	Thank you very much for the super chat.
	Thank you, sir.
	And very well said.
	Absolutely.
	That is exactly...
	How propaganda has to work.
	You have to emotionally drag them in.
	All of the data, all of the extra information, that is how you keep them involved.
	That is how you get them further understanding what they've already been dragged into.
	Very well said.
	Extremely well said.
	It's the same thing with the...
	Jewish Marxist propaganda, right?
	They don't propagandize people with...
	They're not walking around going, communist manifesto, read it, read it, read it, read it.
	That's how we all have to wake up.
	Read it.
	This is the communist revolution.
	No.
	A couple intellectuals might read the communist manifesto, right?
	Intellectuals, if you can even call them that.
	And then, for the most part, it's sloganeering, right?
	Right?
	We're against fascism, down with fascism, right?
	Down with whiteness, down with the patriarch.
	It's sloganeering.
	They're not waking people up through some logical process, right?
	Excuse me.
	Got a pretty hoarse throat.
	Davis, welcome.
	I was actually just about to touch on that, so perfect.
	He says, tell us about the link between propaganda and persuasion.
	Ethos, logos, pathos.
	I see your Cicero book back there.
	Yes, Cicero book.
	Very good book, by the way.
	On the Good Life by Cicero.
	Very good book.
	I have a few of his.
	This is like a collective work.
	It's got a couple different works in it, but very good work.
	I should try to put more books on that shelf so people can see more books.
	That shelf right there, aside from the Republic, is my shitty bookshelf.
	My good bookshelf is up here, so it's kind of hard to see what I got in there.
	And then over here on the right side, these are all my previously read books, the ones that I've already read.
	They're up on two, three shelves up there.
	I have to reorganize the bookshelf for the show.
	You guys can see a little more.
	So yeah, when it comes to propaganda, this is really important.
	This comes from the Greeks.
	The Greeks came up with three concepts of, we're not going to say manipulation, but persuasion.
	How to persuade somebody of your point or your argument.
	And these three methods are pathos, Logos and Ethos.
	Now, all Greek terms.
	As you can see, my name is Logos on my shows.
	Logos Academy.
	Logos Revealed.
	I'm revealing the Logos.
	What is the Logos?
	Well, if you ask Christians, they have a very certain perspective as to what Logos is.
	They call it the Word, which is like the Eternal Truth.
	I don't prescribe it as that because I don't believe it's a Christian concept.
	I believe it is a Greek concept because it comes from the Greeks.
	And a lot of the Stoic philosophers before the time of Christianity used these terms.
	And logos simply means logic in this equation.
	It's the logic, the correctness, the true essence of things.
	That's what logos is.
	So when you're manipulating or persuading somebody, rather, with logos, in your rhetoric, Aristotle wrote a really good book on this called Rhetoric.
	And in Rhetoric, he talks about these concepts.
	And logos is a one to...
	Is essentially persuading people with logic and facts.
	What we have to realize is maybe 5-10% of the population is persuaded in that manner.
	I'm one of them.
	I was persuaded through logic and facts, right?
	Someone said to me, it's the Jews.
	I said, what are you talking about?
	You're crazy, but I'm not a pussy and a faggot, so I'll look into it.
	I'll see what you have to say.
	I read it.
	It's indisputable.
	You can't dispute it.
	Once you've read enough, you get confirmed after source, source, source, source, source, source, source, source, the greatest men in history, Cicero, Schopenhauer, you name it.
	They've all talked about it.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	So, you come to the conclusion.
	That's logic.
	Not many people are won over that way.
	There's very few people that are going to go, oh, you just said Jews are bad?
	I'm going to go read a whole 500, 600-page book to figure out if that's right or not.
	Most people are going to go, oh, you said they're bad?
	You're evil.
	You're anti-Semitic.
	You're going to get an emotional reaction.
	Which brings us to pathos.
	Pathos is emotional persuasion.
	It appeals to the emotions.
	It wins over the hearts of the people.
	So, pathos is about You know, bringing some kind of sad thing into play, or again, like that atrocity propaganda, right?
	That is pathos.
	It is appealing to your emotions.
	You see the boy in his striped pajamas, and you go...
	Oh, the Holocaust was so evil.
	Oh my God.
	Nazis are terrible.
	I love Jews.
	Oh God, I love them so much.
	It's so terrible what happened to you.
	That's pathos.
	It's pathos.
	It's not logical at all.
	There's no facts or explanation as to how or why it happened.
	It's not grounded in reality.
	It's grounded in emotions.
	And then you have the final one, which is ethos.
	Ethos is probably the rarest form of persuasion.
	And it only works kind of almost in combination with the other two forms of persuasion.
	And that is an appeal to authority.
	Ethos is an authoritative standpoint.
	So you're speaking from authority.
	So, as an example, a military veteran...
	Might become a drill sergeant.
	And that drill sergeant will tell his troops, this is how you must behave.
	This is how you must do things.
	I know because I've been there.
	I was on the field.
	I know how this works, motherfucker.
	You're going to die if you don't do this.
	He's not appealing to your emotions.
	He's not trying to logically convince you.
	He's saying, I know shit.
	Trust me because I have the authority here.
	I know more than you here.
	Your elders will come with ethos.
	You get this actually a lot from older boomers.
	You will get an ethos argument many times, which can be very abrasive in many cases, and it's not very convincing for most people.
	Most people are actually repulsed by an ethos argument.
	Me specifically.
	I don't like when someone comes to me and they say, I know more than you.
	I'm educated in this field.
	Therefore, listen to me.
	Ethos is a very hard thing to master without being egotistical.
	It's very difficult.
	I do not recommend Ethos as a form of persuasion or propaganda, but I definitely recommend Pathos is number one.
	Pathos is going to wake up the 89%.
	Logos is going to wake up the 10%.
	And Ethos is going to wake up that little 1%.
	Maybe a little more.
	Maybe like 4 or 5.
	I don't know.
	but there's not a lot of people that are won over by ethos.
	And it goes hand in hand, by the way, Ethos goes hand-in-hand with pathos, right?
	So if you go to a meeting and there's a group, right, in this meeting, and let's say there's 50 people in a room, and one person sees some guy do something gay and they stand up and they go, that guy's a faggot, right?
	Normal.
	Okay, just...
	Did his thing.
	Now, if 45 of the people in the room attack that guy and say you're crazy, like you're homophobic, right?
	That other guy, the other four people that are not a part of the equation...
	The ethos of that situation, all of the people putting the social pressure on the one will kind of make them follow suit.
	That's kind of what the whole COVID scam was, right?
	Everybody's wearing the mask.
	They don't know why.
	They don't know why.
	They were emotionally manipulated into it, right?
	Through fear, atrocity, propaganda, okay?
	And then authority said, because we've scared you with this, you have to appeal to our authority and follow what we say.
	So they got pathos that led into the ethos.
	Uberman says, nothing is waking up 89% of our society.
	I disagree.
	Wholeheartedly disagree.
	If Jews were able to manipulate them in one way, we would be crazy to think that we're not capable of manipulating them in another way.
	That's better for them.
	If Jews were capable of persuading your people to cut their penises off, okay, and cut the penises off of their children, I think we can persuade our people to do something better.
	I think it's very easy.
	It's going to take a little bit of study and a little bit of effort from some people that understand what they're doing.
	Sack of Possums with another $5 super chat.
	Thank you, brother.
	Appreciate you.
	He says, we need to set up a resource repository to collect videos, studies, data, etc.
	to give our folk an easy barrier to entry to create propa?
	Oh, propaganda.
	The workers of our group don't have the time to hunt down the perfect clips to put out effective and quality propaganda rapidly and en masse.
	Currently working on it.
	Great!
	That's awesome.
	Very, very good, my friend.
	Very good.
	Totally agree.
	Thank you again for the Super Chat.
	Don't forget, if you guys do want to support the show, Super Chats are open.
	You can do it via my Odyssey or Rumble.
	If you're going to do it on Rumble, make sure that you do it on my Rumble channel, which is Logos Revealed Eye.
	Let me see what I missed there.
	Devinis, welcome back.
	You told me to ask you this about eugenics.
	Explain the difference between eugenics and euthanasia.
	Yes, certainly.
	Monica Ursula, I like the name.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate you.
	Yeah, so eugenics and euthanasia are very different concepts.
	So euthanasia is...
	They're actually on the opposite side of the spectrum, right?
	We talked earlier about the cycle of life and death.
	So you have life here and death here, okay?
	Euthanasia is death, okay?
	It's the...
	Typically, it's mercy killing.
	It's killing people that are mentally ill, super sick, incapable of taking care of themselves, like a dog.
	We euthanize a dog that is extremely ill and can't even feed itself anymore, get up and eat, or it's sick and it's in a lot of pain.
	Eugenics, on the other side, it's creation.
	It pertains specifically to the creation of more things, more life.
	Okay, so...
	Eugenics, etymology of the word.
	It comes from the Greek eu and genus, which is essentially good creation.
	Okay?
	So...
	Eugenics is simply, if I'm a farmer and I have three cattle, and one is a female and two are males, and one of the males is a high stock cattle, it's well built, it's not sickly, it's not overweight or anything of the sort, and the other one is an obese cow, it's diseased, it's filthy, it's just not a good stock cow.
	I'm planning on probably butchering the thing very soon.
	I don't want the poor stock cow to mate with the female because it's going to create more poor stock.
	So instead, as the farmer, I want the good, strong cattle, the really good, healthy, vibrant one to mate with the female to create more healthy offspring.
	This is eugenic.
	It's good creation.
	Euthanasia would be That sick cow is so sick, it's actually threatening the rest of the stock with its diseases and illnesses.
	We have to euthanize it.
	We have to put it down and butcher it.
	That is euthanasia.
	So these are two good different concepts.
	But remember this.
	Euthanasia.
	It's got the same suffix or prefix on it.
	You, right?
	Which is good, right?
	For the benefit.
	So if you're euthanizing someone, you are doing it for a benefit.
	You're killing for a benefit, right?
	It's a good killing.
	Whether it's mercy killing or it's Say a mass serial killer who has killed 40 or 50 people, right?
	Or a child rapist who's raped several children, right?
	When you euthanize them, you're not doing them a good service, but you're doing society a good service, right?
	So it's a good form of killing.
	That is what euthanasia is in essence.
	I hope that helps.
	If you have any other questions, let me know.
	We've got dot dot dot with a three dollar investment on entropy.
	The super chat says, speaking of propaganda, you will love watching the documentary The Century of the Self.
	Jew Edward Bernays turned a whole country into consumers in the age of democracy because the elites see the mass as dangerous to turn their natural impulses into consumerism.
	They don't mention Jews, but it's great.
	Yeah, I'll definitely I've actually I think I've heard of that documentary.
	I'll consider watching it.
	I can't remember the last time I watched a documentary.
	I don't seem to have time to do it anymore.
	I'm so booked on things.
	I need a damn secretary.
	I really do.
	That's the number one thing I really need.
	I wish my wife had any inclination or understanding of like technology because she would be my secretary.
	I always said, I think eugenics is more of a general concept rather than a specific prescribed set of rules, like most interpret it to be.
	Yeah, yeah, totally.
	I agree.
	Eugenics absolutely is just a general concept.
	Look at, as an example...
	Well, actually, if you read Plato, in Plato's original...
	The Republic.
	He advocates for eugenics in the Republic.
	No one was like, ah, Plato is evil and hateful, terrible.
	No, it's not a terrible concept.
	He talks about the three types of individuals.
	He says the bronze individual, the silver individual, and the gold individual.
	And he says that they're born with these traits.
	What does that mean?
	It means that they're genetically better or bred better in one way or another than others, right?
	Whether it is they have a higher IQ or they're naturally stronger or they have naturally better stamina, right?
	These are all the different concepts that someone can be better as.
	And he says that the gold should not mix with the bronze, and the bronze should not mix with the gold, and the bronze should not mix with the silver.
	Otherwise, if bronze mixes with gold, it's more likely that that gold will be diluted into bronze, right?
	It's common sense.
	When you melt precious metals, you don't throw copper and gold in the same pot and melt them together, right?
	You keep them separate because that would dilute the value of the gold.
	Diminis says, regarding eugenics, would you sterilize the bad cow or segregate it?
	Also, is positive and negative separation of eugenics bullshit?
	Seems like negative eugenics is really just euthanasia.
	I don't think there's such a thing as negative eugenics.
	That's like...
	An oxymoron, right?
	Negative eugenics would be...
	It just doesn't make sense.
	Because again, eugenics physically means good creation.
	So that's like asking, is there negative good creation?
	Is there a negative way you can create a better baby?
	It just doesn't make sense, right?
	So there is no negative eugenics.
	Eugenics is purely positive.
	Purely positive.
	We have been manipulated with a mass propaganda campaign to make eugenics seem like it's some kind of terrible concept.
	It's not.
	It literally just means good creation.
	So, uh, regarding, would you sterilize the bad cow or segregate it?
	Well, it depends on, this is where we get into kind of the nitty gritty of things and where morality starts to get a foothold in these conversations.
	But, well, it depends how sick is the cow, right?
	Does the cow have mad cow disease that's going to give to all the other cows and they're all going to be sick and the whole stock is going to die from that?
	Then you got to euthanize it, right?
	You have to euthanize it, get rid of it.
	Yeah.
	If it's just sickly and it has really bad traits that you don't want to pass on, then you would sterilize it.
	And if it's just got a cold that you don't want the other cows to get for now, then you separate it for a little bit.
	Then you can bring it back once it's better.
	So it's always good to use animal analogies because people don't put a higher morality onto animals.
	So think about the same thing with humans.
	If you have somebody that's got schizophrenia and autism, you don't want them breeding with other people.
	We're going to create more schizophrenics in society.
	It's a genetic trait that's passed down.
	So you don't want to create more schizophrenic people.
	Why would you do that?
	That's...
	That's literally an immoral thing to do to the person being created.
	You're bringing a miserable life form to this planet for what reason?
	Other than your own empathy that you can't control.
	You're allowing empathy to get in the way of morality.
	So, that's where you talk about things like sterilization.
	Then when you have somebody that's sick, you're not like, oh, we gotta put this guy down.
	He's fucking sick, right?
	He's got a head cold.
	Get him out.
	Get him out.
	He's sick, right?
	Kill him.
	We don't do that.
	Oh, you separate him for a little bit, right?
	You let him get better.
	And you could also be spiritually sick, too, right?
	You could be an alcoholic, right?
	That's a spiritual sickness.
	You have a psychological sickness.
	You can't help yourself.
	So separate them.
	Put them in a rehab.
	That's a separation.
	You put them in a rehab for a bit and you pull them back.
	How are you doing, buddy?
	It's been six months.
	Are you doing better?
	Did you quit that?
	And then you do have people that are so sick and so twisted that they're going to harm the rest of society with their behavior.
	And that's where euthanasia has to come into play.
	We talk about, again, like a child predator who's raped several children.
	Should that guy even be in jail, draining society's resources?
	What does someone like that benefit society?
	They're an overall net negative in such a way that it's unfathomable, right?
	Every child that they torment will be brain damaged, traumatized psychologically for life, right?
	So they're a net negative for society.
	They're terrible.
	So you can't have those people around.
	It's not right.
	So that's where euthanasia has to come in.
	Lila, I don't know.
	That's a good question.
	I wish more people would see that.
	Divinus, I gave a brief opinion last time.
	I really don't like going too much into the church or theology.
	The last time you asked, I did give a brief one.
	I think that'll suffice.
	I really just don't.
	It's not a topic I'm super interested in, nor am I extremely well-versed in personally.
	How does one differentiate between gold, silver, and bronze?
	I can't tell if that's a rhetorical question.
	If it's not, each mineral has a different outside appearance and a different inside appearance when you test it.
	So that's how I do apologize, folks.
	I can't see the Odyssey chat.
	My mouse has unplugged on me, and it's not working.
	I just plugged it in and it's not even lighting up.
	It's dead.
	I'll have to...
	Oh!
	You know what?
	Sorry.
	I don't know.
	I missed what you were asking.
	Yeah, in the analogy.
	Okay.
	He says, okay, how does gold, silver, and bronze differentiate?
	Okay, you mean like, how do you differentiate the class?
	If you were to put that to people, how do you differentiate?
	Okay, I see, I see.
	So gold would be naturally talented, naturally endowed individuals.
	These are easy to find, right?
	Because they're rare.
	So a guy like Leonardo da Vinci, right?
	He would be gold tier.
	Marcus Aurelius would be gold tier.
	I'm trying to think of a rare and impressive individual in modern society.
	That's like a mass example.
	If you're familiar with him, I would consider Thomas Sewell in those ranks.
	He's not like a universally known individual, so it's kind of a hard one.
	You know them when you see them.
	They're a very rare specimen.
	Silver are people that are valuable.
	They're working class people.
	They do what they're meant to do.
	They provide for society.
	They're beneficial to society.
	That's a silver person.
	And the bronze people are the ones that are Complete degenerates, you know, peasantry who haven't worked a day in their life.
	They feed off of the system.
	They got the food stamps and the welfare and they don't take care of their children, right?
	That's the bronze people.
	They're not a value to society.
	When you see a penny on the ground, more times than not, you literally leave it.
	You go, that's made of copper.
	It's bronze.
	I'm not really interested in that.
	You might pick up a dime.
	You might pick up a dime.
	Someone might pick up a dime.
	Maybe a quarter.
	You probably see it on the ground and go, yeah, I'll pick that up.
	That's worth having.
	That's worth it.
	Then you see a gold $1 coin.
	You go, oh shit.
	That's nice.
	I'm going to pick that up.
	That's cool.
	Simple.
	Simple.
	Dom!
	Hello, brother.
	He says, Logos is on fire, the gem of Stu Peters Network.
	Oh, thank you, brother.
	That's very nice.
	I appreciate you.
	All right, folks, we're coming up.
	We got about 10 minutes left on the show here.
	Like I said, I have a little bit of a problem with my thing here.
	My...
	Mouse, I'll have to try to get that figured out.
	I don't know how I'm going to end the stream if I don't.
	I'm going to have to just turn the computer off and end it that way.
	That's a good question.
	Divinus says, so a bronze can become gold, silver can become gold, and if you kind of fall off as gold, you can become bronze?
	No, no.
	So these are naturally endowed traits, like a naturally talented individual, like Leonardo da Vinci.
	He couldn't just become bronze one day, right?
	He's just naturally endowed with those special abilities and talents, right?
	So he is naturally gold, right?
	Now, what is possible, and Plato describes this very well, is two silver people can miraculously breed a gold.
	It is possible.
	It's rare, but it's possible, right?
	A good example, you look at Adolf Hitler, right?
	His parents were what?
	They were, you know, working class nobodies.
	They weren't anybody of super high value.
	You know, his father was in politics a bit in the state, but they were, you know, this was very average, right?
	Very normal people.
	They birthed a very unique genius, a golden individual, one of such value to society, it's unfathomable how valuable one person could have actually been to society.
	So there is cases where a silver and a bronze can breed a gold somehow, or two silvers can breed a gold.
	It's rare, but it exists.
	However, There are very few cases where two golds will create a bronze.
	It's even more rare.
	It's almost impossible.
	It's very rare that you will see a gold and a silver create a bronze.
	Sounds like a class system.
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	He says, so the elite are good middle class or silver.
	No, no, I think you're seeing it wrong.
	This is a genetical thing.
	We're not talking about economics or anything like that.
	People that are literally in the elite and high class of society today are not golden people.
	They're actually terrible.
	Actually, in this society, it's a backwards and distorted morality where you have to be a degenerate and a complete scumbag in order to get to the higher echelons of this modern society.
	So no, no, this is not a class system.
	Not at all.
	It's a hierarchy.
	It's a hierarchy.
	It's a natural genetic hierarchy.
	Okay, I got two more questions in chat.
	We're going to address both of these, and then we're going to have to close up because we've got about eight minutes left.
	Divinis asks one more.
	He says, you talked about some degenerate people.
	Some degenerates become people of value.
	Does that mean they were always silver?
	Absolutely, yeah.
	It means they had that silver value in them.
	Look, I was a degenerate at one point.
	I don't think I'm a bronze individual.
	I don't think I'm a net negative on society.
	Maybe you think differently, but I certainly don't think so.
	I'm not golden.
	I'm not doing fantastic things.
	Maybe it's in me.
	Maybe I have that gold deep down inside, and I can harness that, and we'll see.
	Certainly going to try.
	But some are just not capable.
	There's some people that aren't capable of being gold that just can't do it.
	So, you're born with that natural ability.
	Some can harness it, some can't.
	Some people are born with a really good natural ability.
	They're a silver person.
	They could be a very good person for society, and they fall down the wrong path.
	They start using drugs and stuff.
	That doesn't make them a degenerate in essence.
	It doesn't make them a bronze in essence.
	But it simply means that they're starting with a chipped coin.
	Maybe pun intended, if you know what that's about.
	You're born with a very specific worth, and you know that worth inwardly.
	I think everybody knows their worth.
	Uh, so we'll answer Sovereign's question and then we're going to, uh, we're going to have to get going here.
	He says, does Logos have an opinion on the top three actions that people should take to rid us of the cancer that has taken hold of society?
	Could it be usury, mainstream media, all politicians?
	Uh, so yeah, so number one, uh, I gave you the top three actions.
	We're going to, we're going to speed run this because I got five minutes here.
	So number one, we have to spread the message.
	This is a common sense one.
	Everybody knows this.
	It's rhetorical.
	I barely even have to say anything about it.
	Spread the message.
	The more people know, the more likely it is that we can have assets pulled into the movement that can help us in this field.
	Yada, yada.
	Common sense.
	Number two, once you have people that understand the information, you must create an authoritative body.
	I'm not saying like we're creating like a fucking militia here, but you have to have an authoritative body of intellects, of marketing, people with marketing abilities, people with propaganda abilities, people with cultural abilities, social abilities, artists.
	That's that you have to get all those goals we're talking about and put them into a little category together.
	Right.
	One big authoritarian elite.
	OK, and they have to tell the bronze and the silver who are sitting here going, man, I hate this society.
	It's terrible.
	What do we do?
	What do we do?
	The gold people have to point and say, this is where you go.
	Do this now.
	Do this now.
	We're going to mobilize you here.
	We want you to infiltrate that school board.
	We want you to go here and stop that drag queen show.
	We want you to go here and mass report this account.
	We want you to go here and spread the message over on that channel.
	That's what the authoritative body needs to do.
	It needs to direct the people.
	Right now, we're a people in limbo with no direction.
	That authoritative body needs to step in and direct the people.
	That's step number two.
	Step number three is gain power.
	We have to pull those people into some kind of collective that is able to gain serious institutional power.
	Again, this does not mean we're going into the system, playing the system game.
	You do have to infiltrate it to some extent.
	The only reason you should be infiltrating the system is to weed resources out of said system, to break down said system.
	We shouldn't be in the system to participate in it and keep it going.
	We don't want to help the system.
	We want the system to go away.
	We want the system to be done.
	It's immoral.
	It's spiritual death.
	We need that system to stop.
	That's the three steps.
	Number one is spread the message.
	Number two is create an authoritative elite that can direct the people who now have said message.
	And then number three is to actually gain power through said message and start to use that.
	So almost, if we're going to use the...
	Three persuasion tactics.
	First, it's the pathos.
	We emotionally grasp the people.
	Second is the logos.
	We bring the people to a higher understanding.
	We take that logical greater upper body and we start using their direction.
	And then third is the ethos.
	It's the appeal to authority.
	Now that we have a group of people that's organized and well put together, now they start to dictate how we grow.
	We start to pull things together and exert power through numbers.
	Right?
	Three steps.
	It's a three-step process.
	It's quick.
	I know it's very fast.
	Sorry.
	But I gotta go.
	I got someone coming on right after me here.
	Okay.
	All right.
	So we gotta get going, folks.
	Thank you guys so much for watching the show.
	Really appreciate it.
	I see we got one more thing on Odyssey, but my mouse is broken, so I can't scroll down and see what you said.
	I'm sorry.
	Whoever...
	It was a $5 tip because we were at $19.
	Whoever just invested $5 on Odyssey, thank you, my friend.
	I really appreciate the super chat.
	I'm sorry I couldn't read it.
	I'm...
	Broken mouse.
	So I have to try to unplug and plug this in and get my stream to close.
	If you guys want to support this stream, please consider whether it's $2, $10, a million dollars, whatever you've got to spare.
	If you're going to get yourself a...
	I like what Stu says.
	You're going to get yourself a coffee.
	Hey, hold off on the coffee one day and support the show a little bit.
	Help me get some more books so I can teach you guys some more stuff.
	Bring it to a larger amount of people.
	You can support me through Odyssey on a Super Chat, through my Rumble on a Super Chat.
	You can support me through Entropy.
	It's entropystream.live slash logosrevealed.
	And you can also support me...
	Crypto wallets, which are on my bio sites link on my Twitter.
	I can't put it in the chat because, again, I don't have my mouse right now.
	So thank you, folks, so much for watching.
	Really appreciate it.
	I'm going to try to fix this mouse really quick, and then we're going to get out of here.
	So you might see my camera turn off or something because my computer sucks.
	So good night, folks.
	Thank you, guys.
	I really appreciate you all.
	It's been a wonderful show.
	Stick around if you're on the Stu Peters Network.
	Stu will be live in two minutes, okay?
	Thanks, folks.

▲