All Episodes
Sept. 30, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
01:55:33
Logos Academy Episode 9: Call-in Show
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, everyone.
Episode 9 of the Logos Academy.
Today's going to be a pretty relaxing Monday.
We're doing a call-in show today, so feel free to call into the show with any kind of questions, thoughts, or concerns that you guys might have.
I will be providing the links for people to call in in roughly 10 minutes or so, maybe 15.
I'll let some people fill in first, get comfortable, and then we'll start with the call-ins.
Please let me know how the audio is on my end right away, and then we'll also see if you guys can hear, especially on Rumble Studio, the audio of anyone that calls in.
I hope you should.
I think I've got it set up.
I spent 45 minutes testing different circumstances, so I should have it set up, I hope.
I'm really bad with this tech stuff.
So we're gonna find out in a minute here.
But in the meantime, welcome everybody.
We've got a pretty bland week this week.
I don't have a crazy amount of shows or anything really special.
Actually, I guess that's a lie.
We have the show today.
It's 4 o'clock Eastern, as usual.
We're going to be doing our three shows for the Stu Peters Network this week, which is Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 4 to 6 p.m.
Eastern.
On Wednesday, we're actually going to have Converse on.
He is the organizer of the JP Conference.
Very smart guy, definitely knows a lot about the Jewish problem, and I think sees it in probably the best light out of anyone I've spoken with so far in the Muslim world.
He's really got a good grasp on these things, which is a very white-pilling situation.
So we're going to have him on at 4 p.m.
Eastern on Wednesday to promote his show a little bit and try to promote the things that he does.
Well, I guess it's not really a show.
I think he has a podcast that he's kind of a part of, but for the most part, he's just doing the JP Conference, which is his big project right now.
So we're going to let him promote that a little bit.
We somewhat participated in the first one.
If you guys saw on the website of the JP Conference when the whole thing was broadcast, I was unfortunately not able to physically go there in person because I didn't find out that it was happening until the day before.
But I was able to put in a last minute video.
They played that on the website.
So I kind of participated in that one and I anticipate when they do the next one that I will be there.
On Tuesday, which is tomorrow, I'm going to have a Twitter space with Ian Malcolm at 9pm Eastern.
We're going to be discussing National Socialism and demystifying it.
So teaching people about what it really meant, what the ideals really were, some of the policies that people might be unfamiliar with, just the things that they stood for.
You get a lot of these very confused and We're good to go.
Again, in our last show, when we discussed Weimar conditions, which is certainly what we're living in right now, again, could probably argue maybe even worse than they had in the Weimar Republic.
But with Weimar conditions comes Weimar solutions, right?
So when you look at National Socialist Germany and them coming to power, you look at the process of them waking up the people to this problem, which is the exact same problem that we experience today.
And they were able to slowly work their people in the right direction.
You saw this social boom, this cultural and economic boom.
Everything just kind of flipped on its head for the better.
So we need to have basically a social revolution in the same way in this country.
There are many social ills today that are very wrong.
Whether it's the, you know, trannies running around rampant complaining about bathroom signs or the drag queens in the schools or the homos dancing naked on the street in front of children or the hordes of blacks violently beating the shit out of innocent old people in the street. trannies running around rampant complaining about bathroom signs or the Whatever the case may be, we have a lot of socialills today and a lot of these things need to be stamped out, redirected and fixed in our society.
So that is obviously something to analyze as an appropriate way.
Well, national socialism, that being.
It's something to analyze where we can learn from how that worked in Germany and see what of that we can take today and use and what we have to let go of.
We have to understand that no political ideology or movement is copy and paste and it's going to work exactly the same.
It's like taking...
The Constitution that the Founding Fathers wrote and throwing it in the Middle East and saying this is now the law of the land.
It doesn't really work like that.
You have to maneuver things based upon the people that live there, the time period they're living in, the social atmosphere around them.
There's a lot of things that have to be edited in that process in order to ensure that you're getting good results.
So, that's going to be the Tuesday's Twitter space.
And then on Thursday, we're doing another Twitter space.
Actually, I'm not sure if that's going to get postponed, so maybe I won't promote that yet.
We're...
We might be postponing that one and putting it to another date.
So we'll wait on that one.
But then Friday we have our third show, weekly scheduled show, which is going to be at 4 p.m.
Eastern again.
I don't have a topic set up for Friday yet.
We'll figure something out.
But Wednesday is going to be probably the most important show with Converse coming on at 4 p.m.
And then I think that's pretty much it.
We might try to do the fundraiser show over the weekend.
I'm not going to set a date on it because I have so much stuff on my plate right now.
I have to really get things organized before I try to set some kind of a date on that.
I keep wanting to do a day and then physically not having the time to do said day.
So I'm just going to wait a little bit, let myself get settled in a little more, and then we'll go from there.
I think that's the best way to handle it.
So, with that being said, today is a call-in show.
So if you guys want to call into the show, I'm going to throw you guys the link to the StreamYard for you guys to call in on Twitter, Rumble, and Odyssey.
Odyssey.
So you guys can call in wherever you'd like.
Okay.
Okay.
Let me throw it in on my Rumble as well.
Since I am live on Rumble.
And we're live on Rumble.
We're live on Twitter.
We're live on FTJ and Odyssey.
And we're live on both my Rumble and the Stu Peters Network Rumble.
so you guys can be watching on either one.
Got a lot of chat rooms opened up here, We're also live on FTJ Media as well.
I need to figure out how to get a pop-out chat going on the FTJ thing here.
It's very confusing.
We got Jack-O-Lantern, Walther, we got Burt.
Welcome in, everybody.
Once we get our first caller, I do want to test out and see if we've got audio on the Rumble Studio on the Stu Peters Network.
I hope we do, but I really don't know if we will.
Like I said, I sat for a while and tried to figure it out, so it should be working, but...
Yeah, I got you, Walter.
No problem.
Okay.
So we've got Bill over on the FTJ chat.
Welcome, my friend.
All right, looks like we got our first caller.
Phil, welcome.
Can you hear me?
Phil, looks like you're muted on your end.
It shows that your mic is muted.
oh there you go that's good how are you Yep.
Could you mute the stream in the background?
I do have a little bit of echo.
echo i hear myself replaying yep take your time Thank you.
That's good.
That sounds really good.
All right, so you got a question, a thought?
What's up?
And so for those that are on the Rumble, we do not have audio, so this is great.
I don't understand.
I spent 45 minutes setting this up, and it still doesn't seem to be right.
For those that are in here, he was talking about Europa, which was on the Stu Peters Network.
It was being discussed and how this kind of relates to the circumstance that we have today, which is absolutely true.
We're in a...
You know, Weimar conditions, right?
We're certainly living through that at the current moment.
And pretty much everything that we experience today is absolutely a result of the, we'll say, the loss of World War II, right?
And obviously, like, we as maybe Americans or English people didn't necessarily lose the war, but essentially the entire citizenry lost the war, right?
These elite and powerful Jews were the winners of this conflict.
Um, um,
and everywhere else It's just on the Stu Peters Network because it's through Rumble Studio.
So I'm presenting the screen via Rumble Studio and it says that you should have audio as well, but it doesn't seem like that's the case.
Yeah, I'm technologically inept, so it doesn't exactly help here.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yeah, I think it's a very fair assessment, and I'll try to answer this, and then I think we're going to have to close the call-ins for today because I can't get the audio on Rumble Studio, which is annoying because I spent 45 minutes setting it up today.
So for those that...
Go ahead.
Yes, I'd love to have you when I can make sure that it's working fine.
So I will make sure I'd set up better next time.
But in the meantime, for those that didn't hear his question or his thought, he said, you know, it seems like, you know, right and left are the same wings or two wings of the same bird.
And that you have this left wing, which is Bolshevism, and the right wing, which is Zionism, which are both these Jewish ideologies that are kind of vying...
Essentially, they're both vying for world power, right?
Zionism just wants maybe a more conservative world power, and Bolshevism wants a homo globo world power, right?
So...
It's a matter of, this is why I actually argue against using terms like Zionism or communism, right?
A lot of people want to, you see this a lot actually coming from the Muslim perspective.
We're hearing a lot of people start to say, oh, it's the Zionists.
The Zionists are the problem.
This is an issue because this ignores a fundamental fact here.
And that's that, just like you were saying, that's just one political ideology, political offset of what they're trying to do.
This is, in essence, a Jewish problem.
But these are these political identities that they take.
So if we blame the political identity rather than the source of that identity, then sure, maybe we'll overcome Zionism, but then something else will spawn right after.
So it's kind of like a fallacy that we're going about.
I totally agree with you.
And Phil, I appreciate you calling on it.
I just don't want to keep it going.
And then the chat room feels like kind of left out because they can't really hear you.
But you've had good questions and thoughts.
and I hope to have you on again when I'm sure that the audio is fixed.
Okay, thank you, Phil.
You as well.
Really nice chatting with you.
Alright, that's unfortunate, folks.
I'm sorry on the Rumble Studio.
I can't get this thing to work for the life of me.
I sat for almost an hour before the show started manipulating things and changing settings and doing screen share stuff.
There is one option that I have on Rumble Studio here.
It's the only option I see, which is a screen share option that's supposed to allow me to share the audio as well, but it doesn't seem like that audio is actually sharing to you guys.
So, apparently that's not going to work, and we can't do a call-in show today, because obviously no one would be able to hear the callers.
So, it's a shame that you guys missed that.
Phil was a really good caller.
He had some really good points.
So, what we will do is change the subject and monologue, I guess.
I don't really have any material prepared, so we're going to have to monologue as best we can.
I'll start with the point.
That he had made in the call there, and I'll kind of extrapolate off of that.
And if anybody has any thoughts or questions in the chat room, I will gladly take thoughts and questions in the chat and allow that to direct the conversation.
So it's kind of like a text call in, right?
A text in, since we can't really get the audio set up.
But on his point that he was making, which is...
It is a very fundamentally important point.
I actually made a video about this on my Twitter account, which again, you know, I'd play the video, but I fucking can't because there's no audio.
So it's getting kind of exhausting here.
We got to get this figured out.
So...
I made a video about it explaining why Zionism is an issue.
And the last time I was actually on Stu Peter's show, when he had me on as a guest, I talked about this exact same problem.
And that problem is that when we look at Zionism as an issue, again, Zionism is just a political ideology.
It's like calling feminism an issue.
It's an issue.
It's a symptom.
But it's not the source.
Who's creating feminism?
Who's bringing feminism to the forefront?
You look at a lot of the early feminist movements, some of the largest figures are Jewish women.
Some of the communist movements, they're Jewish women.
So you have to start to look at the source of where these ideologies come from.
And they say it themselves in these sources.
They openly state that we are their enemy and they want to get rid of us.
Again, that Noel Ignatieff, who we brought up not long ago, was literally a communistic Jew whose end goal, in his own words, was the abolishment of the white race.
Now, this is quite something, right?
Uh...
Nick, yes, Rumble Studio does offer a guest like StreamYard does.
However, I'd have to...
I wouldn't like that format for a call-in.
I think that would be a little bit complicated because I'd have to put the link in the chat.
And then, like, with StreamYard, I can see when someone comes in and I can pull them up on my own volition.
On Rumble Studio, you can't really do that.
I'll have to just get the audio fixed in general because then I could play videos and stuff as well, which I currently can't do at the moment.
I don't know.
no, I'm going to, I'm going to shoot a, Stu a message and see if he can help me out with that somehow.
So we got Pavlov and Callahan in, Welcome, guys.
So going back to the point here, So Zionism being a product of a Jewish ideology, essentially, or Jewish ambitions, I think would be maybe the best term, right?
Because when you read their documents, the Talmud, things of the sort...
Where it talks about them having their Messiah come and them achieving this world dominion of theirs.
This is just a kind of an avenue to reach that point, right?
It's the same with Bolshevism and communism.
This is an avenue for them to reach that point.
So it's kind of like...
It was kind of like the gun thing in America.
Someone takes a gun and shoots up a school.
Some complete psychopath.
And the media says, we've got to ban guns because guns keep killing people.
No.
Let's look at the source.
There's millions of Americans that own guns and Aren't killing people.
They have it for self-defense or they go to the shooting range or they just own it as a collector's item, whatever the case may be.
It's not the guns that are killing the people.
It's the psychopaths that are getting a hold of those guns, right?
So we have to look.
I mean, a lot of these times when you look at these school shooters specifically, they're on all these weird medications and shit.
A couple instances, they're actually Jews themselves as well, whatever the case may be.
So you look at this and you say, okay, well, it's not the gun doing it.
The gun isn't killing anyone.
The person's doing it.
So you go to the source.
If we were to blame the guns, those people that are psychotic, that are doing these actions and behaviors, would just find another way to do it.
They'd make a pipe bomb, or they'd grab a shiv, or they'd make some kind of explosive device.
So it's a matter of Pointing to the source of the problem rather than pointing at the symptom.
You point at the symptom and the problem will never get solved.
Ever.
You can take their guns.
You can take their shivs.
And then they'll find something else.
And they'll find something else.
And it'll keep repeating itself, right?
So you have to find the source of the problem.
We always use...
Philosophically, it's always wise to use medical analogies in these circumstances because it's very accurate.
When you have stage three cancer and because of the cancer, you have a cough, a bloody cough, they don't go, oh my God, this bloody cough is a huge problem.
You got to fix this bloody cough.
No, they go, oh, this is a symptom of a greater issue.
We have to fix that greater issue and maybe that will relieve itself.
Well, it probably won't at that stage, but you get the point.
You can't be pointing at the symptoms.
Yeah, that would be nice, Nick.
I'll have to do it really late at night.
It's going to have to be like 2 o'clock in the morning or something.
Because that's the biggest part with Rumble Student.
Well, I guess I could do it on my Rumble Student.
Yeah, we'll get it figured out.
We'll get it figured out.
Should try to get it...
If you have time tonight, Nick, that would be nice.
If not, we'll find some time.
We'll get it figured out.
Uh, yes, Photonic, I entirely agree.
He says, point at the hand-wielding, not the tool being well-wielded.
So, folks, does anybody have any questions or thoughts in the chat?
Any topics of interest that you guys would like to discuss?
Again, we'll do kind of like a text-in stream, since I can't take the audio on the call-ins.
That way, at least, uh, I'm interacting with the chat entirely.
Uh, so it's kind of the same thing, it's just less vocal.
I know that might be a little less entertaining, and I do apologize for that.
I'm just technologically retarded.
Can't seem to figure that out.
It seems to get worse every, every day.
It was hard enough to actually get the video on the screen and then the audio on top of it is even more confusing.
I actually wonder if I... I'm not going to do it now.
I'm going to mess things up if I do it now.
I see a button that might work, but I don't want to...
It's like when you're watching a really important show or something, and someone starts messing with the fucking controller, right?
I'm not going to touch it.
We'll just wait.
You said holding court about the JP yesterday.
I hit on the points of Martin Luther and what he had to say.
Um, what do you mean by holding court?
I don't fully understand what that means.
Um...
Jeannie says, any thoughts on Donald Trump promoting the death penalty for anti-Semitism?
Yeah, this is not good.
It's not surprising, but it's not good.
This is like a replication of what we saw in the Soviet Union, right?
One of the first things when they came to power over there, this Jewish revolution that we saw over there, was making anti-Semitism punishable by death, right?
So, I don't know...
I don't know if it'll ever get to that point in the States.
I think it's going to be very hard to implement in a place where everybody is locked and loaded.
Okay, Nick, I can think about that.
We'll have to try that.
You know, in a country where everyone has the right to bear arms and a lot of American citizens own some serious firearms, I actually think it would hurt them if they passed, like, serious laws against anti-Semitism because the second five to ten people got persecuted underneath that law for, you know, saying something very simple, like, there's a lot of Jews in Hollywood.
That's a factual statement.
That's not hateful.
It's not...
I don't know if you guys saw that bill they were trying to pass about antisemitism being a form of hate speech.
They give the IHRA, International Holocaust Remembrance Association, IHRA. They gave their, in quotes, working definition of what anti-Semitism is.
Now, if you don't understand legality, working definition means that definition is subject to change.
So imagine if I created a law that said, if you talk shit about Zach, that's a punishable offense.
Or if you say something...
Hurtful.
That's a punishable offense, right?
With the working definition of the word hurtful, right?
And right now the word hurtful means...
Actually, this is a really bad example.
Let me give a better example.
Let's say if you say something terroristic, okay?
That's a punishable offense.
Now, terroristic under a definition now would be to cause great amounts of fear or terror, right?
So like, you know, death threats, like some kind of bombing threat, something like that.
That would be like a terroristic statement.
Now, tomorrow, I could then change the definition.
We say, okay, it's based on the working definition of terrorism.
Tomorrow, I could change the definition of terrorism to say anything that hurts someone's feelings.
Well now it's punishable by death to hurt somebody's feelings.
You see how like working definitions are extremely dangerous.
They should never be under any kind of legal circumstance.
That's a terrible situation and it can only get worse.
Never ever should there ever be a working definition as law.
It's a fallacy.
It doesn't even make sense.
That means the law is susceptible to change at any time.
Jeffrey says, what are your views on American troops being sent to the Middle East?
I think it's very simple.
America first, right?
And I don't mean that in a griper sense of the word.
But I am, what in World War II they would have called an America first isolationist.
We have no reason to be going anywhere outside of our own country at all, really.
We shouldn't be meddling in the affairs of any other country.
It's not good for the other countries and it's certainly not good for us.
So there's no reason for it.
Doc Jake, yes, some of them are.
He says some of those people are locked and loaded for the Jews.
Yeah, unfortunately, there are a good amount of older American evangelists who are locked and loaded on behalf of Israel, that's for sure.
Holding court means semi-formal judgment gathering.
Usually Italians say it.
Okay.
So you held a semi-formal judgment gathering about the JP. Hit on the points of Martin Luther and what he had to say.
Yeah, Martin Luther said some really...
Well, he said some strong things, right?
He would be jailed today for the things that he said because he was...
I mean, literally inciting violence, right?
But...
He had a lot of honest takes and points.
And this is kind of important.
The things that sound extreme to people today were very normal not long ago.
And to say that these people are absolutely demonic and psychopathic is not an overstatement.
I mean, the things that we see today.
Somebody...
Stu Peters yesterday actually posted on Twitter that...
He posted an article about Trump talking about Israelis should not be beholden to international criminal law, so they should have their own legal status that's immune to international law.
And Stu posted the article and said, oh, for fuck's sake.
And I replied, and sarcastically, I said, oh, you don't think Jews should be allowed to rape, kill, and pillage anywhere they go?
What are you, anti-Semitic?
Some Jew actually replied to me and said, we are going to wipe out every man, woman, and child, and there is nothing you, Goyim, can do about it.
That's what they replied.
Then they wonder why they receive this extreme backlash from every civilization that they come across.
It's because of the behavior.
I know it's an age-old meme at this point, but this 109 countries thing, we say, oh, if you were a child and you got kicked out of 109 schools, are the parents going to continue to think, oh, it's just the schools that are mean to my child?
Or are they going to eventually say, you know what?
It's starting to seem like my kid might be a piece of shit.
Yeah, you're right, August.
He says they're beyond evil.
We can't understand it.
And this is kind of the biggest problem that we have, actually, is that the reason most people don't understand this problem yet is because most average citizens in the States, in the West, wherever it may be, they cannot wrap their mind around somebody being so vitriolically manipulative, right?
So deceptive.
They can't wrap their mind around it.
I came across this YouTube channel the other day, and it's this Jewish-owned channel.
His name is Moses.
And he flips watches in New York City.
It's like what he does for a living, right?
Because, again, they're never going to do some kind of hard manual labor.
And every video is him walking around, buying a watch that's $30,000 and reselling it for $34,000 or something.
And to watch every jeweler he goes to, it's like nine times out of ten, they got a yarmulke on their head.
And when you watch these guys interact with each other, the way they haggle and hassle each other, this merchant thing that they're doing, this is what they did in the ancient world.
This is exactly why everybody else looked at them and they're like, what the fuck?
Imagine you go to your average jeweler and you're just trying to...
You just want to get a watch for your wife or you want to get a ring for your wife.
They're playing all these weird haggling games.
They put these pressures on you.
They were doing this in the market.
Back in ancient Rome, they were doing this in the marketplace just casually with everything, not just jewelry, with literal goods that people need to survive, like fruit and all kinds of...
Tools and weapons and things like that that people would need to survive.
And you got these Jews haggling and trying to reflip it and make an extra three coins on it, right?
It's a way of life that is completely foreign to us.
We don't live like that.
Jay tells this topic, the importance of hammering back into the American psyche, the significance of a revolution, why it is our right and our duty as per the Declaration of Independence and what a revolution why it is our right and our duty as per the Declaration of Independence Really good topic.
Yeah, it's absolutely important.
We need to reawaken that American revolutionary spirit, right?
So one of the ways we can do that is to...
Re-uplift our American founding fathers.
Not many people talk about that a lot.
Even myself, I'll talk about them sometimes.
I don't have a massive interest in the time period personally.
But to reawaken that American spirit, you have to re-instigate a sense of knowledge of the time period.
You have to teach these people what exactly it was that made our founding fathers so great or what made this country great.
And we have to go into that American Revolution.
A really good example, every individual here...
When you go work your 9 to 5, you pay what?
40% of your income total in taxes at this point, right?
You're paying a social security tax, you're paying federal tax, state tax, all these taxes that you're paying, right?
Our founding fathers got like a 1% tax on their tea and started flipping the tea barrels off the boat, right?
Because they were being taxed.
Again, remember the good old phrase, no taxation without representation?
Folks, where are you being represented on your taxes, especially as a white male in the United States?
Are you being represented via your taxes at all?
Like at all?
Do they ever say like, oh, we have to help white communities?
Right?
Poor white communities, suffering white communities.
You ever hear that?
No, actually it's the opposite.
You're being persecuted in your own country that your ancestors built for you to live on.
You're being persecuted in that same country.
Okay?
So...
We have to point back to what our founding fathers did, what they stood for, what they put up with, right?
And what they didn't put up with.
And we have to have that same kind of guideline for ourselves.
The problem is, back then...
Those men, this is a really good point, actually.
This is a really important point.
So those men back then did not have materialistic desire, the founding fathers, right?
That's why they came here.
They came to the new world.
They left all material in the past.
They left all their shit, all their belongings.
They brought nothing but themselves, the clothes on their back, a little bit of food and some supplies in order to recolonize a new area.
They left all of that behind.
So these are not materially attached people.
So when a non-materialistic people that has a higher spiritual ideal, and that higher ideal was America, when a non-materialistic people with a higher spiritual ideal, when you try to persecute a people like that, or you try to put the thumb down on top of a people like that, they will or you try to put the thumb down on top of a people like that, they will have the revolutionary spirit because Now think about it today.
It's the opposite, okay?
People have been given bread and circus.
They've become apathetic.
Now we have American citizens that they see all the shit going on, right?
They But oh, I've got my house and my car and my job and my workplace with all my friends, my co-workers, and I got that really nice collectible over here and my couch, and I don't want to lose those things, right?
So I'm not going to speak out.
So I'm just going to stay quiet, right?
Those people, most Americans today can't imagine a radical change so much so that everything around them is at risk.
They don't understand the key of sacrifice because they are attached to material, right?
This is the problem that we have is our founding fathers were not attached to that material.
This is what creates a fundamental difference between us and them right now.
The reason that people are taking 40% tax on their shit because they're comfortable.
They're comfortable and they have materials around them that make them feel comfortable, right?
So when you have all of a, when you have like a hopeless circumstance in a country, the problem is people will turn even more towards material, right?
Which will make them even less likely to want to sacrifice something and leave things behind for a greater cause.
So this is why the only way to do this is to create a new ideal in the minds of the people in which they are willing to sacrifice everything on behalf of that ideal, right?
Material and all.
And this is actually well described by Hitler in a very fantastic speech.
I wish I knew the date on it.
I think it was August 1st or August 27th, 23 maybe, or 24.
Good speech, if you guys can find it.
I linked it at derfjord.org, which is the archive for speeches.
I'm sure you can find it somewhere, but he talks about exactly this.
And Every movement in history, when people were not materialistic, was when they had a higher ideal to replace that materialism with.
So a couple examples.
The American Revolution is a really good example.
National Socialist Germany, right?
There was so much strife, so much going on in that country.
So many downtrodden, awful circumstances of living that a man comes up and he says, hey, here's a higher ideal.
I want this for our people.
I want this, this, this, and this for our people.
Let's do it.
Let's fight for this.
That ideal gave them a goal.
It set a goal for them moving forward.
So because of that, they were able to say, hey, you know what?
That sounds way better than what I'm living now, so I'm willing to fight for that.
And this was done in ancient Rome.
In ancient Rome, when people went and fought on the battlefield, they were risking everything.
They didn't care.
They weren't like, oh, I don't want to die.
I got a family and kids at home.
Oh, I'm kind of worried about who's going to get my house.
Well, what about my truck?
They weren't thinking like that, right?
The ideal was Rome.
Rome was the higher value, right?
It was the ideal of Rome.
And this is something that is so unique in history.
Two civilizations have done this.
No other civilizations have, as far as I'm aware.
Ancient Rome did this very well.
When people went and fought in the battlefields, no matter what they did, they were fighting for the idea of Rome.
Germany, after pre-World War II, when Hitler came to power and they had the National Socialist Revolution, people were now fighting for the ideal of Germany.
This is a whole different concept.
When we went to war in Vietnam, the Americans, were we fighting for the American ideal?
Or were we fighting for other ulterior interests that our government had?
When we went and fought Germany in World War II, were we fighting for the American ideal?
No!
Germany wasn't threatening America.
Germany wasn't even near American soil.
Germany wasn't threatening the state form of America.
They weren't meddling in America's affairs.
There were no Nazi spies in America.
It's insanity, right?
So we weren't fighting for the American ideal.
For, well, realistically, a Jewish ideal, right?
But ulterior motives in general, right?
We had a lot of traders and sellouts.
yeah Cicero has a very good quote uh on them as well yeah yeah JTEL I agree with that uh He says, technically, people are voluntarily giving them their taxes.
You're right, yeah.
Yes, and the common populace was entirely against going to war pre-World War II. Charles Lindbergh is a great example of that.
Charles Lindbergh was the original creator of the idea of the concept of America First.
He said, look, We don't want to go into war in America.
Again, I wish I could play audio right now because there's a beautiful speech by him.
If you guys want to look it up, it's called the Des Moines speech.
It was a city he did it in, a town or whatever.
That was done by Charles Lindbergh, and he talks about World War II, right?
What's getting us into World War II? And he says...
When you look at this, there are ulterior motives.
This upper class of people, they want to drag us into the war for their own benefit.
It doesn't help the American people.
It doesn't affect the American people at all.
Instead, it's It fills their pockets, right?
It helps them.
And fun fact that probably not a lot of people actually know, Charles Lindbergh, his plane, one of the famous planes he flew, the nose cone on the inside was signed by quite a few people, and it had a massive swastika in the center of the nose cone.
Very, very interesting fact there.
And, you know...
This is an issue, is that most Americans today don't really know what an American ideal is.
If you are a black immigrant who came to America 40 years ago, what's the American ideal to you?
If you're a Puerto Rican immigrant that came here 60 years ago, what's the American ideal to you?
Actually, Puerto Ricans are a fantastic example of this.
I live in an area where they're everywhere.
And I'll tell you this.
You can test this theory yourself.
Drive around any area that has a large Puerto Rican populace.
You will see almost 90% of Puerto Ricans have a Puerto Rican flag hanging off of the rearview mirror in their car.
Or they have it hanging off the side somewhere.
They have it in the front windshield of their car.
Almost every single one you come across.
You never see them with an American flag.
I've never seen a single one of them have an American and a Puerto Rican flag next to each other.
It's always just a Puerto Rican flag that they have, right?
So, again, this is the essence of the problem here, is that in a multicultural society, the American ideal is something completely different to everyone.
It becomes a materialistic, self-interested endeavor, right?
The American dream is, how do I get rich and have a better material lifestyle than everybody else?
That's the American dream.
So that ideal itself is not a spiritual ideal.
So it's not really an ideal.
It's just a material desire, right?
It's this sensational desire of, let me get that dopamine rush.
Let me get that nice car.
I want to show myself off over everybody.
And why do you want the nice car?
For status?
Because then it makes you better than the other people.
So it's a self-interested desire.
Well, you can't build community and a great civilization off of self-interested desire.
When the Founding Fathers came here and they wrote up the Constitution, were they like, was Thomas Jefferson saying, how can I... How can I put something here that really benefits me?
How can I reword this so that I benefit from it?
No.
None of them were self-interested.
They were selfless.
They didn't care at all about their individual selves.
Otherwise, they wouldn't have risked leg and limb coming over here on a boat, leaving all their material possessions behind and trying to create a new civilization.
That's not a self-interested person at all.
So this is what we need in America.
We need a sense of belonging to something greater, and this has to come through homogenous culture.
It can't come any other way.
It doesn't work.
Muslims, when they come to America, what's the American ideal for them?
Material gain, right?
The American dream.
I want to be rich.
I want to be wealthy in this society.
When Jews come here, they have the same exact concept, right?
All the Jews are in power today.
It's the same thing for them.
The American dream to them is, how can I lord over the goyim?
How can I get myself all the way up in the higher echelons of society and control things for my own self-interest?
And they're doing it.
So it's extremely important that we pay very close attention to that one specific concept, is that self-interest and material desire are always going to collapse.
A country, a nation, whatever you want.
This isn't really a nation.
It's not a nation, okay?
Because a nation is a tribe.
The word nation comes from the Latin natio, which means tribe.
We're not a nation because if we were a nation, we would all be one racial group of people, racially homogenous group.
We're not.
So we're not a nation.
We're a country.
And that ideal, obviously, is not a nationalistic ideal.
You can't be a nationalist in America unless you're a racial nationalist because otherwise it doesn't make sense.
If I was to say I am an American nationalist, well, America is a multicultural melting pot.
What nation do I advocate for in that?
Am I advocating for the white nation, the black nation, the Arab nation?
It doesn't make sense.
That's why you get the conservatives on the television.
They will tell you, I am an American citizen.
Patriot.
That's why they use the word patriot and not nationalist, because patriot, well, what does that mean?
That means a love for your country, right?
A nationalist means a love for your nation, and your nation is your racial bloodline, right?
Right.
So it's a very different concept between these two different things.
Julian says our own governments blew up our own to muster up hate towards Germany.
They told us a pack of lies.
Absolutely, you're right.
Stone Trader says, do you believe Jews own the Fed through ownership and the membership banks, or is that nonsense?
yes yes see uh pelagius i i disagree uh because when you when you put it down to something like that it's it's it's just it's silly it's It's an oversimplification and then we lose track of the true meaning of things.
So he says, my color of my skin is my uniform.
It's as simple as that.
Don't overthink this.
I'm not overthinking it.
I'm putting very important concepts to it because...
Let's say you're correct here.
It's just about the skin color, right?
Well then, I guess Japanese people should mass import themselves into America and we can all live together, right?
I'm obviously being a little bit facetious here with my argument.
But they have white skin, right?
Jews have white skin, so should we allow them to live with us and play the same game?
No, there are fundamental racial differences, and if we just boil this down to skin color, it gets very confused for the mass populace.
You might understand it, right?
Because you can look at a Jew and understand there's a difference between Jew and white, right?
But the average person can't understand that concept.
So it can't be put into that kind of a layman's terms if we want other people to start to understand these things.
So for someone that is educated on this problem, you might look at it in that framework.
And as someone who is educated, I agree with the concept you're saying.
I understand what you're saying entirely.
And I agree with the concept because you're advocating racial consciousness, which I completely agree with.
However, most people won't understand that concept.
It's kind of like...
I won't go into it.
to it, but most people don't understand that concept yet.
Yes, I agree.
We have to be detailed, right?
I'm also...
I'm a little more...
We'll say extreme in this circumstance.
And that being that you've got Irish people and you've got Russian people.
Both of them are white.
But their cultures are completely different.
They're radically different, right?
Their civilizations are radically different.
So to just kind of blanket that as the same peoples, I understand the concept of uniting under a race, right?
White being maybe a collective race.
But these subcategories of Irish and Russian and all these different categories, these need to be acknowledged and they need to be Essentially, we need to draw those lines on those, right?
I think that was one of the very few mistakes that our founding fathers made in America, is that when they all came here as European peoples, and they were French, and they were British and German, they didn't have...
They had natural sectors that they kind of just conglomerated to.
The Germans made a huge Dutch community in Pennsylvania, right?
And the Italians made super Italian communities in New York, right?
But then what ended up happening over time is because this wasn't consciously set in stone and it was more of a natural occurrence that they were doing that, the people started to forget those things over time.
And when they forgot them, now we're reaping the consequences of that.
Their original culture that they had, their thousands-year-old traditions, have been replaced by what is American culture.
And again, to an extent, American culture is okay.
It's not bad.
But...
When American culture has now been subverted by Jewish Hollywood, which has convinced us of the American dream, and now the American culture is the American dream, which is, I have to have a nice house and a nice car and a nice material life and be in that upper class.
It's a hedonistic, aggressive, self-interested capitalism, which is just super dangerous.
Capitalism can be...
Okay, if it's built on some kind of moral fundamental principles, but when capitalism goes unchecked and it becomes unhinged, like it is now, right?
It actually goes from a free capital market to what we described before, which was an oligarchical tyranny, right?
It's completely backwards, right?
America First PHL, welcome, says Logos, third time here.
So glad you're with Stu.
Can you confirm?
I heard this correctly.
Candidate Trump said he will jail anyone who speaks against Israel.
Yes, he did state that, yeah.
Yeah, a difference between Nationalist versus Patriot is extremely important.
And I also made a, again, this is why I recommend you guys follow me on Twitter.
I make videos about these concepts as concise as I can very often.
So I do have some videos on my Twitter explaining exactly that.
Good.
Yeah, I'm very close to a lot of people in the Pennsylvania Dutch community.
Yeah, this is a place.
This is a good point, right?
And this is why Jews like the term white.
I really don't advocate for the term white.
I don't think it's a good term to use.
I prefer Aryan.
I think it's much more fundamentally sound, right?
If we say English, right?
Or if you say European, again, you got blacks living in Germany right now that say they're European.
Well, that's not exactly true, right?
So, they're not racially European, right?
They might live in the country, so they might be a European countryman, but they're not a European national, right?
Again, it's why we have to go to that difference between nation and state, right?
There's a really big difference between these two.
When you look at Germany, actually, pre-World War II, the Habsburg monarchy, right?
The Habsburg state, the Austrian state, rather.
This wasn't a nation.
It was a conglomeration of all these different nationalities, living under one state.
So you couldn't call it a nation.
You had to call it a state or a country.
You can't call it a nation because it doesn't have one nationalistic character.
America did at one point.
Hey, relax, man.
When America was founded, it was a national state.
It was a nation.
One nation under God.
What does that mean?
One nation under God.
Well, it means one tribe under God, right?
So when you bring in five other tribes, now it's six nations under God.
You understand?
It's lacking in concept.
And I also agree because Jews will say, oh, well, I'm British or I'm German, right?
So white is a mask for them.
It's a very comfortable mask that they can put on.
Again, I would love to play a clip right now.
Michael Kimmel is my favorite example of this.
Michael Kimmel wears a mask, okay?
And he goes on stage, he goes, plays a TED talk, and he says, I'm a white middle-class male, and let me tell you about racism in America.
We, as white men, need to stop being racist and hateful, and we need to let women control society, okay?
He's a self-proclaimed Jewish male feminist, okay?
But he calls himself a middle-class white man when he has these talks.
Then, two months later, He goes to a speech and he talks about Donald Trump and he goes, Donald Trump is a white supremacist.
And as a Jew, that terrifies me.
Well, wait, I thought you were white.
So shouldn't that benefit you if that's what he is?
So it's a game.
It's a mask that they can put on when it benefits them.
They take it off when it doesn't, right?
They put the mask on.
They go, oh, as a white man, I've experienced all this white privilege.
I'm such a terrible person.
It's so awful.
You black people should kill us all, realistically.
And then the second the black people pick up the pitchforks and get mad because they've riled them up with this rhetoric, then they go, wait, wait, I'm Jewish.
What are you talking about?
Not me.
I'm the good white guy.
It's a game.
We can't fall for that game.
people have to stop falling for the game uh jilly says who are the real americans because whites are not What do you mean by that?
They absolutely are.
Yes, August.
I agree with you.
He says, schooled persons know that when we say white, we mean Aryan.
Hitler said a white race in Mein Kampf once, too.
Yeah, he actually said it a couple times, but he says it very slimly, right?
He uses the term Aryan far more frequently.
And again, because...
It's actually denigrating to ourselves to call ourselves white and just say, hey, my skin color is all that I stand for.
It ignores your culture, your history, your genetical buildup.
I don't want to be described just by my skin color.
I want to be described as what I am.
I'm German and Welsh, right?
And I want to be described by my genetical background and look at my history.
So when I whitewash, no pun intended, when I whitewash myself into just saying, hey, I'm white, I ignore all of those older concepts and I kind of just put myself in that broader category.
Julie says, there was a tribe here already.
Yeah, you're right.
But when that tribe was here, it wasn't America, right?
It became America when the white peoples came and created this civilization and named it America.
So it wasn't America before that.
So therefore, America is fundamentally a white country.
America First PHL says apparently the Jew religion, not a people, been double masking since World War II when they with the Nazis realized the.
Benays of brainwashing us all.
Thank you.
I don't know exactly what that means.
They are certainly a people, Jews.
That's very important to understand.
They absolutely are a genetical people.
That is why we have a distinction between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jew.
It's a different genetical structure.
They use religion as a coded mask for things.
I'll give you the best example that we can think of here.
Karl Marx, he was a Jew, right?
He was a genetical Jew, but he was also an atheistic, secular Jew.
So that means he doesn't believe in God and he's not religious.
So if he's not religious and doesn't believe in God, in what fashion could he possibly be Jewish other than genetically?
Right?
And he states it himself.
He states that he actually wrote an article about how he despises Judaism.
And most people just fundamentally don't understand this.
And they say, well, every time I bring up the fact that he's a Jew, they go, well, he wrote an article against Jews, so he wasn't really a good Jew, was he?
No, he wrote an article against the religion, right?
He was racially and genetically Jewish.
So it's not about...
It's not about his religious.
When I say he was a Jew, I'm not saying he was religious.
I'm saying that he was genetically Jewish, and they are genetically opposite of us.
They truly are, fundamentally and ideologically.
Yeah, it's very important that people understand that this is a racial concept, not a religious concept.
Squeak says, when was Germany founded?
Well, that's a good question.
I mean, that's a really hard one because before Germany was necessarily a thing, they had rough Germanic tribes, right?
And there was quite a few different Germanic tribes.
So Germany as a nation...
It's kind of more broad, right?
There are the Germanic peoples.
You can be of a couple different bloodlines and still be under the broad category of Germanic, right?
Which again, if America had more time being fundamentally an all-white European country for, you know, 300 years, the 300 years that America has been around, if it was all-white that whole time and we had that time to create ourselves a...
You know, genetic buildup, right?
We could start to have what would be considered an, like, Americana, Americanic tribe, right?
Which would be all American white peoples that have similar genetical structure and cultural background.
There's some differences, like, you know, here and there, but they all have, like, a similarity to them.
But the reason we don't have that is because we allowed all these other tribes to come in as well.
And this, again, the melting pot, right?
Which, literally, the theory itself, melting pot.
Yeah, America first.
So one other thing I'll say on that, to get an understanding of what it means to be, how this is a thing that you can be genetically Jewish, because some people still, for some reason, think that...
That Jews are not a race.
When you go and take a test on 23andMe, you can come back 10% Ashkenazi Jew or 50% Sephardic Jew or 2% Sephardic Jew.
So if you're coming back with Jew on your DNA test, that means it's a genetical strand.
So there certainly is a genetical category.
And people have to understand that category.
It's fundamental that people start to understand that.
Because that's how you understand the difference between white and Jewish, right?
For instance, big schnoz, right?
Everybody knows.
It's the stereotype about Jews, right?
Big schnoz.
Is that a religious trait?
Is that a religious trait?
When you convert to a different religion, does your nose grow?
Is that a thing?
It's not a religious trait.
It's a They'll get some big dumpy ears sometimes.
Is that a religious trait?
It's a genetical trait.
So people have to understand that.
And behaviors are also genetical traits.
So them being known as thieves and deceptive, this is a genetical trait.
That's not a religious trait.
The religious doctrine might accelerate that and accelerate maybe the gall that they have to do that.
However, where does the religion come from?
Where does that group of morality come from?
Well, it comes from the original peoples that founded that religion, right?
Elle says, I've had awful woman bosses...
I don't want us in charge of anything.
I've had two that were really nice.
The rest were a nightmare.
Yeah, you know, realistically, women should be out of the workplace.
And not because, again, you know, the instant assumption is, oh, so you hate women, right?
This is the emotional browbeat that people will try to throw on you.
I hate women.
I love women.
That's why I want them out of the workplace.
I don't think they belong there.
I don't think they're happy there.
I think fundamentally, society is far worse for them.
For men, for everybody.
Everybody suffers when women are forced into the workplace.
And they might not be forced in right now, like forced physically, we're throwing them in there.
But they're forced in the sense that they have been psychologically manipulated into thinking that's a better way of life than having a child.
Yeah.
Julie says, how long does the Jew control America and its history, not manipulated by them, meaning the founding fathers?
I mean, there's Jewish influence all the way back.
It's very hard to say when it started.
I mean, the egregious level of control basically started in 1913.
That's when it got overboard.
That's when the Federal Reserve was created.
It's when the amendment was passed for...
I don't know how to word it.
I think it was the...
I want to say the 17th Amendment, which was...
It was the one that made it so that there was direct voting for senators or whatever, or they took that away.
I don't remember exactly how that works.
Sam Parker is much more educated on that.
He talks about that very well.
And additionally, it's also the same year that the ADL was founded.
So...
Al said, and the ears...
Way too low below the eyes and the attached earlobes.
It's very distinctive and once you see it, you never forget.
That is a very common Jewish trait as well.
Attached earlobes is a super common Jewish trait.
Many people, you see my earlobe is not attached to my neck.
It's a very common genetically Jewish trait to have your earlobe actually being attached like this.
Maybe a guy like...
Let me try to look up an example for you guys.
His aren't attached.
Okay.
I'm trying to think of a good example of one that has attached ears.
Henry Kissinger, he has those big dumpy ears, but they're not attached.
Marxism and communism, in my honest assessment, are just the political...
Political pipelines for them to achieve the Talmud, right?
It's a political expression of the Talmud.
Fashi, sorry, I just saw your message.
He says, I'm not taking money from anybody.
I do not advocate for a multicultural cesspool.
Again, I'm very clear.
Diplomatic relations are doable.
However, no group of people should have authority over any group, realistically.
So I am white, we'll say white nationalist in essence.
Although that's a very vague term, which doesn't have a lot of description to it.
However, I believe that we could certainly work with characters like Ayo Kamathi or Arthur Kwan Lee or whatever the case may be.
But it's very clear from the get-go that as much as we are going to work together, our goal is us having control and sovereignty in our own nation again.
And that sovereignty only comes with no other group of people having authority over us.
So it's a very clear point.
That's a good one.
Holocaust says, the lower the ears from the eyes, the greater the increase in the lies.
That's a really good one.
Natalie Portman.
I don't even know who that is.
I'll look it up.
Apparently she has a good...
Oh, wow.
Yeah, it's an incredible example.
Holy fucking attached earlobe.
That's insane.
Okay, let me show you guys that.
If I can figure it out.
There we go.
Okay, so you see her earlobe?
That is majorly attached.
So she doesn't have the very clear...
Wrong earbud.
See how mine is...
Okay, hers is like...
Like that, right?
Very important.
That's a genetical trait, right?
That is not a religious trait.
Fashi says, I was defending you and said those were lies.
Glad you cleared it up.
I think most of the people talking crap about you never watch your videos.
Just ALOG drama streams.
Thank you for clearing it up.
Yeah, no problem.
Very common.
Most of the things...
I know there was some drama that happened like a month ago or something.
And it accelerated with people saying a lot of lies.
Not a single thing that's been said of me is true.
All you gotta do is ask me.
I'm a very open book.
I'm not taking money from anybody.
I've been very clear.
Whatever I do moving forward, if anybody would try to control my message or my narrative, I would be removing myself from anyone that would try to do that to me.
I'm very stern about the truth.
And I am not a civic nationalist at all.
I think Ashkenazi Jews, if you look at them as well, a really common, uh, genetical trait is the black beady eyes.
They very, very rarely have any kind of blue or green eye color.
And if they do, it's a sign of high European or Aryan admixture in them.
They would not have that eye color without it.
That's why they fomented this whole...
Like, oh, Hitler wants to create the master race and they want to poison anyone that doesn't have blue eyes and blonde hair, right?
Which is nonsense.
Like, again, it was never advocated for.
You never actually even really see them mention blue eyes and blonde hair at all in their texts.
I mean, maybe like once or twice in passing, but it's never like, oh, everybody needs to have those traits or they're inhuman and inferior.
Like, That was never advocated for, right?
This is a Jewish atrocity propaganda to make people literally just hate you because you have a different eye color.
It's crazy.
It's insane.
Yeah, the more admixture they have, the more likely they are to have the colored eyes, lighter colored eyes.
And you'll see that actually in the wealthiest Jews above any.
So if you look at like a lot of Orthodox Jews, you'll notice you don't really see that because Orthodox Jews...
They all remain in the Jewish community, right?
The very wealthy Jews that have pushed themselves into reigns of power, all of those Jews marry into very wealthy Gentile families in order to kind of put themselves up into the aristocracy, right?
So then their children end up having blue eyes, green eyes, whatever the case may be.
They start to take on more Aryan features.
Yeah, again, so it just, uh, to go back to the main point, it has to be understood that this to go back to the main point, it has to be understood that this When you are Jewish, one more example of this.
If two people have a child, right?
One's a Jew and one's not.
If the mother is Jewish and the father is not, the child is considered biologically Jewish.
Okay, that's their, they do a Matrinial, I guess that's how you say it, matrinial lines.
They're also a matriarchal society.
Yeah, it's well said.
Blanchiani says national socialism advocates for the pursuit of ideals.
The whole blonde, beauty, strength, healthiness, etc.
were simply ideals to strive for, not a requirement.
Very well said.
Very well said.
There was always a requirement of...
I'm sorry, an ideal of you want to achieve this level, right?
When you look back at ancient Greece, right?
When they have these statues of these ripped guys and they're doing this, the thinker position, right?
Which is supposed to symbolize intelligence and deep thought.
When you look at that, you're not like...
You don't go, oh my god, anybody in ancient Greece that didn't have that structure was instantly murdered, right?
Only buff people were allowed to live in that society.
No, it was just an ideal to strive for, right?
They were saying, look, look at this.
It's the essence of beauty.
Are redheads supreme beings?
No, I don't even understand.
I don't understand.
I think it's a joke, but.
Yeah, I guess you could kind of call it like a, Even when you look at how our government is run, it really is just one big Jewish family, right?
Let's use...
If you aren't familiar with this, this one is probably the most absolutely important one you can possibly understand to understand that this is a nepotistic family all functioning together, okay?
So everybody knows Suzy Wojcicki.
She's the one that passed away not long ago.
She was the founder, or not the founder, she was the CEO of YouTube for quite some time.
The founder and owner of Google, it was two Jews actually, it was Larry Page and Sergey Brin.
They created Google out of Susan Wojcicki's garage.
Okay?
That's the story here.
They rented her garage and created Google.
Then...
Years later, she comes to be the CEO of YouTube.
Do you think this is a coincidence?
Right?
Or is it that maybe they got full monopoly over Google and they wanted a full monopoly over YouTube, so they threw her a little bit of cash?
Now, you might say, well, how do you know they're connected that well, right?
Just because they worked in a garage together.
Well, get this.
Sergey Brin's wife is Ann Wojcicki.
That is Susan Wojcicki's sister.
So literally, the family that owns Google, or the Jews that own Google, and the Jews that were running YouTube for how long and censoring people with COVID, right?
They were literally one family, okay?
Now, Susan Wojicki's sister, Ann Wojicki, not only is she married to Sergey Brin, she owns 23andMe.
She's the founder and CEO of 23andMe, which is a genetical testing company.
So now you give your DNA to 23andMe.
Now they have your DNA. They have...
Listen to the information farm that they have on you, okay?
They have your DNA. They have a massive backlog on every single thing you've looked up on Google.
So everything you like and admire or want to look into or are interested in, they know that.
They have your whole YouTube history.
So they know every single video that you take interest in, what your hobbies are, what kind of things you are taking interest in.
And they literally know your genetical buildup, okay?
They know everything about you, all right?
At the same time, it goes further, Susan Wojcicki and Sergey Brin, they have a foundation, much like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, it's the Brin Wojcicki Foundation, where they donate a shitload of all their money that they're robbing from the guy.
Through that foundation, they've funded millions of dollars to the HIAS. The HIAS is the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.
It's a group that brings immigrants over the borders.
So they are using the money that they're making, data farming you and scamming you through ad revenue and all these things.
And when you don't comply, then you just get banned off the platforms.
So they're using the money, data farming you.
And then they're using that money to now bring immigrants into your country to demographically replace you in said country.
And it gets even deeper because the Department of...
What the hell is he called?
I don't remember his position.
He controls the border.
Mayorkas.
What the hell is that called?
Department of Homeland Security.
I was going to say that.
Department of Homeland Security, which is run by Mayorkas, who's a Cuban-born Jew, He sat on the board of the HIAS. So, explain that.
This is so clear-cut, you'd be absolutely stupid to not say that this is a literal, in-real-time conspiracy that is displayed right in front of us.
If you don't see that, you're an idiot.
I mean, genuinely, you're just stupid.
You have to be blind, or you're willfully ignorant.
There's no other way around that.
If you can't, that's clear-cut, dry, as it possibly gets.
Same deal.
We were talking about this on the last show very briefly.
OnlyFans, one of the most disgusting things that's ever happened to society, it was founded by a Gentile, and when OnlyFans was founded, it was just this company, OnlyFans.
If you were a fan of a celebrity, or a YouTuber, or a gamer, or whatever the hell the case is, or an artist, or a writer...
They would make an OnlyFans account that would give you, as a fan of them, some behind-the-scenes stuff on, you know, maybe if they're a writer, like, what some of their rough drafts look like, right?
Or if they're a movie star, like, some behind-the-scenes footage of, like, how they did some of their takes in a movie.
Or if they're a YouTuber, like, how they start to, you know, set up their videos, right?
So that's what OnlyFans was for, right?
So you pay, like, $5 a month just to get to know more about the people that you really are interested in, right?
Instead, Leonid Radvinsky is a Ukrainian Jew.
He buys up like 75% stake over OnlyFans.
And overnight, it turns into a porn site.
And now, the porn site becomes this massive thing where all these women are selling off their bodies.
They're whoring out our women.
And these women then, this creates much more societal implications over time, like way more, right?
Over time, this is going to become so problematic, it's not even funny because now those women aren't creating children.
They're not creating a solid nuclear family kind of like household.
Instead, they're just running that American dream, right?
The material desire.
I want to be rich and famous, so I'm just going to...
Put my body parts, my genitalia online for people to see.
That woman that does that, by the way, will never respect a man again ever in her life.
Until she's like 40 and depressed and life's miserable and people don't want to buy her content anymore.
Then maybe she'll be running to a guy for attention.
But prior to that, those women will never respect men because the only men they interact with all day are these effeminate You know, neck-bearded freaks who are sitting in their house all day, morbidly obese, with nothing better to do but beg for the attention of some random woman online that they have no idea who they are, right?
So, that is larger, you know, societal implications beyond just what it's doing to the woman herself.
Get this, though.
The guy, Leonid Radvinsky, who owns OnlyFans, also, again, stealing all this money by whoring off our women, never actually working, He also is the top donor to AIPAC, right?
So, they're literally using the money from OnlyFans to buy your politicians.
Think about this.
So, men driven by vice, okay?
Effeminate men, materialistic, dopamine-driven men driven by vice donate money to these women, right?
Only Fans gets a cut.
The guy from Only Fans goes, oh, thanks for the cash, Goy.
And he gives it to AIPAC, okay?
And then AIPAC now says, they look for a politician, right?
And they go, oh, I'll pay that guy.
He looks like a coward and a sleazeball.
I'll pay him $500,000 to support Israel.
Okay.
This is, I mean, this is a top-tier corruption that cannot be matched by any other.
The fact that this information is even public is mind-blowing.
And you can look it all up.
Every single thing that I just laid out is one Google search away.
It's all open information.
It's not a conspiracy.
It's not crazy.
It's all there.
So, how are we allowing this?
Like, seriously, how are we allowing this?
It's insanity.
Our founding fathers, remember, 1% tea tax.
They were tipping the fucking tea barrels over the boat.
Okay?
What are we doing?
What are we doing?
We're sitting there accepting all of this.
Squig says, is Trump Jewish?
I read he is.
Why do they all kiss the wall?
Trump might not.
I don't think he's actually Jewish.
But he's absolutely pawned his family off to these Jews.
He's beholden to them.
So he would be more so considered like a shabbo skoy.
You don't have to actually be Jewish to be beholden to Jews.
So what happens is they can get blackmail on you or they can have full control over how you make your money.
You have to think Trump has a lot of money caught up in businesses, buildings, companies, things like that.
So if they were to take away his real estate, because I'm sure they have stake in a lot of these things, if they were to take away his real estate, it would be...
He loses everything, right?
So they have ultimate leverage over top of him.
So I thought he converted in 2017.
I don't know.
I really don't know.
I can't say for certain.
I know they love him.
That's all that matters, right?
right they love the guy Fashi says all my normie friends and family live in complete denial and think I'm hateful I don't care anymore.
I'm leaving America to Eastern Europe.
Look, I disagree with leaving America.
I think this is where the fight is.
I think if we're going to win this, it has to be done here.
I don't think any country has a chance at fighting this in the way that we do.
However...
This is common.
People will think you're hateful.
Again, we'll go back to The Allegory of the Cave by Plato.
It's so important.
If you guys have not read The Republic by Plato, I'm going to recommend this book.
I have to recommend this book all the time, especially now we have this newfound audience because this book is the essence of European or Western culture.
This is Occidental Culture 101.
Cornerstone of Western Philosophy.
Republic by Plato.
In this book, very important book, probably one of the most important books out there.
I would rank it number two.
Mein Kampf, I put it as number one, specifically because of the modern issue that we have.
And number two would be this book.
Actually, I think if we got rid of our number one issue and we lived in a homogenous state that was untampered by Jewish supremacist control, this would be the number one book in the world.
This one.
And in this book, they have the Allegory of the Cave, which is one of the most famous allegories in philosophical history.
And the Allegory of the Cave states, it's a story that states this, there's 10 people chained to a wall in a cave.
And all their lives, there's a flame behind them in the background.
So it puts up this artificial light on the wall in front of them.
And all their life, all they ever see, from birth to the age of 30, all they ever see is shadowy figures walking by the flame, posting a shadow onto the wall, making puppets on the wall, or putting a bird stick so they can see the shadow on the wall.
So all they ever see, It's this artificial light with these shadows on the wall.
And one day, one of them breaks free.
Just one.
He gets free.
He breaks out of his chains.
And he climbs up out of the cave.
When he gets out of the cave, he goes into the light, the light of the day.
And at first, now this is, by the way, this is symbolic.
What it's trying to say is it's talking about enlightenment.
When we use the term enlightenment, what does that mean?
What does it mean?
It means you're learning the truth, the real essence of things.
Okay.
So he breaks out of the cave and he gets up into the real world.
He's on ground level.
And the light is so bright.
The truth is so tough for somebody like this, right?
This is such a good symbolism.
The light is so bright that he can't look directly at the sun right away.
He can't see the whole truth yet.
So first he has to look down at a puddle and look at his reflection in the puddle.
Then he can slowly start to gaze up and start to see the trees and the grass and all the animals around him.
And then finally he can eventually accustom himself to looking directly at the sun, directly at the truth.
This is exactly what we're experiencing today.
People are waking up.
Everybody's getting out of the cave right now.
America is the Jewish cave.
You're in the Jewish cave.
And people are starting to wake up.
They're crawling out of the Jewish cave and they're going, holy shit, this is what things really are.
This is what the world could really be like if this stopped.
So the man in the allegory, he goes back down into the cave.
And when he goes back down into the cave, as you would expect, he wants to tell the people about what he just saw.
Because he knew these people his whole life.
They're his family, essentially.
So he's excited to tell them.
And I'm sure every single person in this chat room who has woken up to these problems has been through this exact same process.
You're excited.
You figure this stuff out.
You start to see these things, right?
At first, you're skeptical, right?
You're looking at the light and you're going, oh my God, there's no way it could just really just be Jews.
I was thinking Illuminati or Freemasons or something.
No way it's just Jews.
No way.
No way, right?
Then you adjust and you can slowly start to look right at the sun and you go, oh my God, it's got a huge nose and big ears.
What the hell?
Right?
And then you go, I got to tell people about this.
So you go down into the cave and in the allegory, when the man goes down and he's excited to tell these people about it, what do they do?
They want to kill him.
They hate him.
They think he's crazy.
They want to kill him.
Well, is this not exactly what we experienced today?
You wake up, you find out what's happening, right?
You've adjusted yourself to the true light of things.
You come back down, you come to your family, you come to your friends and you say, hey guys, look at this.
I mean, look at, look at this Jewish over-representation in the media.
What the hell is that?
Wait, wait, did you see how much they did in, in, in the porn industry?
Did you know that they actually got it legalized?
Right?
Did you know this?
And the people go, oh God, oh, oh, you're a bigot.
Oh, I don't want to hear you.
Oh, you're anti-Semitic.
No, I'm, what?
I'm analyzing this, honestly.
What do you mean?
Right?
So then you question your own sanity.
You're like, what the, how am I alone in this?
Right?
And this is what creates the higher man.
The man that's capable of breaking out of the cave, going up into the real world, and seeing things for what they are.
So this allegory is so important because this was written 2,000 years ago, like 2,300 years ago.
And in the allegory of the cave, it explains exactly what people experience today, which goes to show you that this is a problem of human nature.
So if you want to break human nature, you have to then, you know how you fix this?
The people in the cave, now this isn't described in the allegory, alright?
But this is the way you fix this.
This is the only logical way you can fix this.
If they won't hear you out, they don't want to hear what you have to say because they don't believe you and think you're crazy because they've only ever seen the artificial light.
Then what you have to do is go back into that cave, stand in front of the fire.
And you have to play gay puppet games in front of the fire to put shadows on the wall so they can finally be convinced to take the goddamn shackles off and leave the cave.
So what does that mean?
It means you have to adopt the understanding of propaganda.
That is the only way that you can mass convince people into a better way of life for themselves.
When you use propaganda on the wall, so the people that are originally putting the shadows on the wall, In the cave, when they're doing all of that and they're tricking these people to stay in the cave for their whole life, right?
That's bad propaganda.
It's evil, right?
However, if you go back down into that cave and you go and you start making the shadow puppets and convincing them to break free and go out and enjoy life and see it for what it really is, right?
Feel the fresh air.
Is that an evil propaganda?
Are you manipulating them in an evil way?
Are you manipulating them for their own benefit, for their own good and helping them?
You're helping them.
So this is what we have to do.
You can't just run in.
We can't all expect to, and this is the problem I see with a lot of people out there that are, you know, I get their sentiments.
I get their sentiments, okay?
But they run out and they're like, oh, shit, white power, it's the Jews, it's the Jews, right?
Look, you're right, okay?
But people can't understand that.
You're running back into the cave With a flashlight and blinding everybody, right?
So this is what National Socialist Germany did.
They went back into the cave and they put the shadows on the wall and they said, look, those shadows, okay, the people that were originally putting the shadows up, they've been doing something wrong to you.
We have to go out of the cave.
It's for our better good, right?
And they'll believe the authority of the shadow on the wall that they've seen their whole life.
Okay?
Instead of believing the simpleton that came down and told them.
I have this exact same experience.
I have family that watches Steve Bannon all day.
That guy's a fucking sellout piece of shit.
He took like a massive loan from Epstein.
That guy is a coward.
I hate him.
I despise the guy.
Right?
Well, my family, they trust everything the guy says.
When this whole vaccine shit started during COVID, I begged him.
I said, please don't take it.
You don't understand what this thing is.
Don't do it.
My grandfather did it.
Didn't listen to me.
He did it.
Took it.
Okay?
Week later, he has a stroke.
I told him, vaccine did that to you.
Vaccine caused it, my friend.
He's...
Nah.
Bullshit.
Four months later, Steve Bannon goes on television and says, yeah, these vaccines are causing heart attacks, strokes, heart failure.
Now all of a sudden he believes it.
Why?
Because it came from the shadows on the wall.
The television is the propaganda.
It's the shadows on the wall.
It's the modern day shadow on the wall.
It's not the reality of things.
But they don't want to see the reality of things.
They would rather see the shadow on the wall because it's more comfortable.
It's what they're used to.
It has now taken authority in their psyche.
So, if you want to take authority into their psyche, you have to play the fucking game.
You have to play it a little bit.
I see we got Chain Reaction with a very kind of $5 investment.
Thank you, my friend.
He says, I've been waking people up for over three decades since I was a child.
The thing that works the best is the Socratic method.
We'll go into that next.
Instead of screaming like a loon that it is the Jews, I just keep asking questions that make people think for themselves till it clicks.
Very well said, brother.
Thank you very much for the investment.
And by the way, if anybody else does want to support this show, help keep this running so I can continue to get more books and bring this knowledge to more people, all of the links to do so are in the description below.
Every penny helps.
It doesn't matter if it's a dollar or a hundred dollars, whatever you guys want to do to support this show.
We've got Odyssey.
You can support straight through Odyssey and I'll read your chat off right away.
You can also support through Entropy, which will give you a live super chat right there.
And I'll read that off right away as well.
So thank you very much again, Chain Reaction.
I appreciate that.
And I want to talk about that because it's very important.
So we just got Plato's allegory of the cave, right?
So he says, okay, here's how people are mass manipulated.
Okay, that's the nature of mankind.
They're incapable of understanding some higher concepts.
It has to be given to them in a very certain way.
So, in this book, they also lay out the Socratic method.
The Socratic method is a form of dialogue in which you question the logic of people.
So, let me give you an example.
Let's say I have a family member who's been duped.
They watched Schindler's List and The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, and they've read all the newspapers from the New York Times, and they think, oh, the poor Jews.
Now, if I come downstairs and I go, the Holocaust didn't happen, you dumbass.
What are you talking about?
The Holocaust obviously didn't happen.
It's bullshit.
There were no gas chambers.
Look, it's so obvious, it's not even funny.
You really believe in the lampshades?
You know that's proven false, right?
Have you seen how many testimonials have been proven to be fake?
Okay?
You're an idiot.
Well, guess what?
You're challenging their worldview, okay?
It doesn't force them to think.
They feel challenged, right?
So what does someone do when they feel challenged?
If you bring a sword on somebody and you go, I'm going to battle you, what do they do?
They defend themselves, right?
They bring up the shield and they defend themselves.
That's what they're doing psychologically.
When you come and you say to somebody, hey, the Holocaust didn't happen, dumbass, they go, whoa, whoa, whoa.
They get defensive, right?
Holy shit, what are you doing, right?
Because their whole life, they were taught that that's the case, so they believe it.
So you're challenging a belief, a firm belief that this person has.
So when you challenge it, they're going to naturally be defensive.
Now, The Socratic method, you don't challenge them on their views.
You ask them, what are your views about the Holocaust?
And when they say, oh, it was the terrible death of six million Jews.
And then you say, really?
Six million?
Yeah, yeah, six million.
That's crazy.
Then you say, how did they get to that number?
How did they find out that that was the case?
Well, now the person has to think.
They have to come up with an answer to support their belief system, right?
And they'll think about it, and maybe they'll say, oh, well, you know, they had documentation.
And you say, oh, where is that documentation?
Can I see that?
Well, I saw Schindler's List, or I saw an article on New York Times.
Well, now, guess what?
As you start to challenge them eventually, because their views are based in emotion and not logic, they're going to come to a logical fallacy at some point, right?
And they won't be able to answer the question anymore when you say, do you really think that they could have done that that fast?
That seems really difficult, right?
Eventually, they're going to start to start questioning, right?
You're forcing the brain to think, okay?
So now they're going to logically question the process.
They might give you a little bit of backlash.
And then that conversation ends.
And when the conversation ends, now they're going to sit in their home by themselves.
They're going to think about it.
And they're going to think, and they're going to think, and they're going to go, wow, how, how is that possible?
Wait a minute.
How could it be 6 million?
Were there really gas chambers?
What was that lampshade?
The, the only one lampshade they have.
Was that really real?
They're going to start asking themselves the same questions now in their own time.
Now, however, if you come and we start with the first method without using the Socratic method, and you say to them, hey, dude, the Holocaust didn't happen.
You're a fucking idiot, man.
Come on.
What is this shit?
There was no 6 million.
What do you thought?
There was only 15 million Jews total in the world, like 500,000 in Germany maybe, right?
And most of them fled.
And the census actually went up after the war.
So how is that possible?
There's no way 6 million died, right?
Now, again, you're attacking their views.
So they're going to get defensive.
And they're going to say, no, that's not true.
I saw the documentaries.
I saw the lampshade.
Oh, they were cutting their hair off and lining the walls with it, right?
Because you're challenging their views.
So now they get emotionally defensive.
So now guess what happens when that conversation's over?
Now when that's done, Is that person gonna sit and think about the things you said?
Are they gonna think about their views?
Or are they gonna think about how much of an asshole you were with your crazy views?
Instead of thinking to themselves, oh, how could that have happened?
Now they're gonna think to themselves, oh man, fuck that Zach guy.
He's such an asshole.
Wow, he seems so angry.
He seems so hateful.
I'm not talking to that guy anymore.
So this is psychology 101, right?
And again, to think that in the ancient world, these people had it down that well, it's pretty impressive.
It's extremely impressive, actually.
So I am an absolute advocate of the Socratic method.
If you use the Socratic method, I guarantee you will see an 80% higher success rate than with whatever other method you're using.
It's the only method to convince somebody of an argument appropriately without getting into that cognitive dissonance that people will inevitably receive.
Yeah.
Alright folks, does anybody else have any other thoughts or questions in the chat?
Anything they wanted to discuss?
Any topics of interest?
We've got about 20 minutes left on the show.
I can handle one more monologue and then I think we're going to close it up.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I just saw this.
Jacobine says, does the Republic have the speech of Socrates on which he won't flee his death sentence?
Which is Crito.
I don't know if my copy does.
No, so this copy that I have, it does not.
However, I have this copy, which I don't know the...
This one has The Republic.
It has all of the dialogues as well.
So The Republic is only one section of it.
It's a much larger book, obviously.
So this one is just physically the Republic, and this one is the Republic as well as all of the speeches or dialogues.
Yeah, well, for those that have been watching all my Odyssey for a long time, you guys know I'm an avid Plato slash Socrates lover.
I think it's very important, like so fundamental, it's not even funny.
It's like the essence of our people's psychology, right?
Like Jewish psychology functions entirely different, right?
Like you can argue with a Jew in a whole different way than you can argue with our own people.
So it's like super, super important.
Oh, that's a really good point.
Pavla Puppy says you should recommend.
So if you guys want to learn more about Plato's Republic, the best analysis of this book out there, his name is Michael Segrew.
Unfortunately, Michael Segrew has passed away on us roughly four or five months ago.
He was a brilliant man, a great philosopher.
He has some of the best analytical critiques you will ever see in your life.
Let me link this to you guys in the chat room here.
Here's the link.
This is Michael Segru's YouTube channel.
And you can also find...
I mean, there's a lot of videos.
He analyzes Nietzsche.
He analyzes Greek philosophy, Roman philosophy.
He talks about Kant and Heidegger, Machiavelli.
I mean, you name it.
He talks about all of it.
But he has a very long series where he analyzes specifically the Republic, which...
I highly recommend.
I am very big on The Republic.
I think it's the most important one for us to be analyzing.
So please do take some time to read that or watch those videos rather.
Read the book too, please.
But if you're not a reader, I know some people, you can't force them to read.
If you're not one to read, you can watch those videos and they'll give you a really good psychological analysis of that.
And I'll tell you, it's good food for thought.
It's incredible food for thought.
It's a good question.
Squig says, is Atlantis real?
If Plato and Socrates are to be taken seriously, surely it is real.
Yeah, I mean, there's some good theories there.
I can't say anything concrete.
It's impossible to say anything concrete, but in the dialogue Timaeus, that is where this reference of Atlantis actually comes from.
It comes from Plato.
So, not the kind of guy that seems like a liar.
I'll say that much.
I'll say that much.
Gabby Hayes, thank you.
Thank you.
I appreciate that.
Thank you, Fashi.
I appreciate it.
And just trying to give a little bit of an uplifting white pill.
You know, don't give up on people.
I know it can suck.
I know a lot of people take these conversations very poorly.
It's very much possible.
So...
Just think about redefining your methods.
Right.
A brilliant man should be able to convince a stupid man.
And that's proof.
I, I had somebody in my chat room the one day say that my bookshelf behind me is fake.
So there's some proof.
It's so stupid.
Alright, so we're coming on the last 15 minutes of the show.
We'll do a little bit of an outro here, guys.
Don't forget to follow me on all my platforms.
We are on Odyssey.
Odyssey is the big one.
That's where my whole archive is, so please follow me on Odyssey.
I have over 250 videos on Odyssey.
I've got interviews, whiteboard lectures, interviews, You name it.
Everywhere.
I've got all kinds of stuff on there.
Don't forget to follow me on my Rumble channel.
My direct Rumble.
So let me link that in the chat rooms as well here.
If you guys look in the chat, I'm linking everything right now.
My Odyssey is just Logos Revealed.
And that's O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com for Odyssey.
Oh, very, very kind.
I'm sorry.
I didn't even realize I had Super Chats on Rumble.
That is very kind.
Someone on Rumble...
Sticks sent me here with a $20 investment on Rumble.
I did not realize there was a Super Chat option on Rumble.
So apparently that's another way that people can support the show.
I had no idea.
Thank you very kindly for that.
They said thank you for what you do.
Thank you very much for supporting what I do.
Really appreciate you for that.
So make sure you guys follow me on my Rumble.
It's Logos Revealed Eye on Rumble.
And we just got our first ever investment on Rumble.
So thank you very much.
Follow the StuPeters Network.
You can find me there Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 4 to 6 p.m.
Eastern.
And if you guys want to follow along with Styx and support this show financially and help me keep this running, all of the options to do so are in the description below.
You can...
Do it through Entropy, which will give you a live Super Chat there.
You can do it through Odyssey, which will be a direct in the chat, kind of like Super Chat.
And you can also now do it through Rumble.
I did not know that, so it's really good to know.
So you can do it on Rumble as well.
So thank you very much.
And we also do have crypto wallets.
The only thing I ask is if you do support through a crypto wallet, that you please do so on...
What's it called?
Let me know.
Sorry.
Just inform me that you did so.
Squigs, I see, with a $5 Super Chat over on the Stu Peters Network said, good show.
The only thing I will say, I don't think I will get any of the investments or donations that would come through the Super Chats via the Stu Peters Network.
I think that would all go to Stu.
So if you do want to support me directly, I don't mind you guys supporting him, please continue to support him as well.
But if you do want to support me directly, you would have to do so via my Rumble channel or my Odyssey channel to ensure that I will get some.
No, I've never seen a Super Chat in Rumble.
No, I have not.
It's my first time, so.
Okay, I think I promoted everything.
Also, my Twitter as well.
Twitter's the big one.
I've been growing very fast on Twitter.
We're nearing 12,000 followers on Twitter, which is insane.
I was aiming for...
Actually, my goal was 10,000 by the end of the month.
Well, it's the end of the month, and we're well past that.
There are the links to my Twitter in all of the chat rooms.
And again, all the platforms that we are live on, folks, we are live on Rumble, Odyssey, FTJ Media, which is a brand new platform.
You guys can check that out.
I'm actually in the process of making like a link tree thing so that I can start to just link the link tree and then everybody can find whatever they want via that.
That would be perfect.
We've got Sojourn with a $6.66 donation says, here's some Jewish devil dollars.
Thank you, my friend.
I appreciate that.
That's a very interesting investment.
Thank you, my friend.
That's very funny.
Stick sent me here with another $14 Super Chat on Rumble.
Says, you can support on Rumble, but it has to be through the website, not the app.
Okay, that's very good to know.
I will make sure to start promoting that.
And thank you very kindly for supporting the show.
I really do appreciate everybody that supports in every way.
I mean, whether you're supporting physically by just being around in the chat rooms, whether you support financially financially, Every little bit helps.
Again, whether it's a dollar or a hundred dollars, whatever you want to invest in the show.
You have my word that everything goes right back into this.
This is my life.
I live for this to spread this message.
Okay, thank you.
And wake up as many people as I can.
It's my sole interest in life.
I spend all of my time reading and studying and learning as much as I can about the subject.
So every single thing that gets invested into the show goes directly back into it.
And you have my word on that.
Okay, folks, I think that's it.
I think that's everything for today.
I'm going to try my best to get set up on Rumble.
I'm sorry, on Rumble Studio so that I can get this audio coming through.
I don't know why I can't get the audio through.
It's very frustrating to me.
So I have to get that figured out.
I'm going to do my best to do that.
Squigs, thank you very much.
That's very odd that you got...
Thank you very much for the support.
Again, I don't think I will get any of that support on the Stu Peters Network.
So again, if you want to support him, that's A-OK. I'm not saying you can't do that.
But if you do want to support me directly, it would have to be through my Rumble or through my Odyssey channel.
And then I see Divinas says, what is your attitude towards Catholics and the church?
What is your opinion on the eugenics in National Socialist Germany?
I'll try to be brief here.
I don't have a problem with the Catholics in the church.
My only real problem that I have is specifically geared towards this...
This evangelical type of Christianity, which is playing the whole God's chosen people and stuff.
It's very hard to put a judgment on specifically one denomination of Christianity.
Rather, it's about the ideological or moral framework that that denomination follows.
And when I see a church throwing up a gay flag in the church and stuff, I can't really support that.
It's really tough.
I try not to get too much into theological things or talk too much about religion.
I think it's more of a personal endeavor.
I'm not a fan of the church itself, the foundation, right?
But beyond that, I try not to get too far in those things.
When it comes to eugenics in National Socialist Germany, I entirely agree with eugenics.
I don't think eugenics is a bad thing at all.
Actually, in essence, even definitively, it is not bad.
The word eugenics stems from Greek eu and genus, which means good creation by definition.
So it's just a concept of creating better stock.
It's a really simple concept.
A lot of people wrap up eugenics with euthanasia.
Those are two completely different concepts.
Which euthanasia, depending on how it's done, is not exactly immoral either.
Like if you euthanize a dog that's dying, that's not immoral.
It's not a bad thing.
So eugenics is a very interesting concept that I think a lot of people have a misunderstanding on.
And maybe I can go into that sometime on the show.
We can talk about eugenics and start to kind of list off what exactly eugenics is for people.
Because I think a lot of people have some serious misunderstandings about eugenics and what they are and how they function.
Or what it even means, the title of it.
People are calling Bill Gates a eugenicist, which doesn't make any sense, right?
Bill Gates being a eugenicist.
Because Bill Gates wants to mass exterminate a shitload of people.
That would actually be the opposite of eugenics, right?
Because he doesn't care who he's killing.
Yeah.
Bill Gates and all these weird globo-homo liberals literally promote morbidly obese people.
That's the opposite of eugenics, right?
Eugenics is good creation, not bad, fat, obese creation.
Yes, Jews have absolutely weaponized the word eugenics big time.
Same with dictatorship, even liberalism.
I'll tell you what, Divinus, come into the show on Friday.
Ask that same question and I will absolutely do that, okay?
Maybe I'll make it some of the topic on Friday as well.
We can talk about...
What exactly the difference is between eugenics and euthanasia?
How they function?
What is the purpose behind these things?
Are they moral or immoral?
How about ask that on Friday?
I'm ready to close up here.
I got seven minutes left.
Make sure that you guys stick around on the Stu Peters Network.
Stu will be live in about seven minutes here so you guys can watch his show for a little bit.
Yeah, I think that's everything, guys.
So I'll be live on Wednesday with Converse on the Stu Peters Network at 4pm Eastern.
I'll be live on all of my other channels as well.
And you guys can see me then.
So I won't be able to answer questions in the chat because it'll be an interview format with a guest.
However, on Friday, I should be able to take some questions from the chat room again.
So just go ahead and make sure that you guys catch the show on Friday if you got any more questions or thoughts.
We can certainly get into another topic again.
And thank you guys for the viewership today.
It's been like over 1,400 people On Rumble, we've got 50-60 watching on Odyssey.
We've got a bid on FTJ. We've got a good 1,000-2,000 total on Twitter.
Pretty good numbers, guys.
I really appreciate the support here.
It's very nice to see that many people listening into the show today.
Actually, we've got a lot more on Twitter.
Twitter we have like 4,000 total so it's a lot uh Holocaust with the 1488 bits he says uh both Bill Gates and his daughter are mud sharks one is as black as new Gates knocker I don't even know what that means And I didn't know that was a thing.
I guess I'll have to look into that too.
Great.
All right.
All right.
Thank you guys so much.
Really appreciate it.
I'm going to have a link tree set up as well on Friday for you guys so that you guys can kind of get all the links really easily where I don't have to keep going down the list like every time we do a show.
Alright, thank you all.
It's been a wonderful show, really good discussion, a lot of really nice topics.
I do apologize if we couldn't do the call-in show.
It's my fault for being technologically inept.
I'll probably change the title of this show if I can manage to do that, since it obviously was not a call-in show.
Yeah, I'll figure it out.
All right.
Thank you, folks.
Really appreciate you all.
And I'll see you guys on Wednesday at 4 p.m.
Eastern with my next show.
I will also see you guys on Twitter.
If you guys follow me on Twitter, I'll be in a space tomorrow at 9 p.m.
Eastern, demystifying National Socialism, really giving people a true understanding of what exactly National Socialism was and is and can be in the future.
So thank you, folks.
I appreciate you all.
It was a great show.
Export Selection