Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: NATO & Deep State Plan WW3 QUAGMIRE Before Election
|
Time
Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
They have pledged to carry out the largest deportation, a mass deportation, in American history.
Imagine what that would look like and what that would be.
I'm Donald Trump, and I approve this message.
Welcome to the Millstone Report.
Thanks so much for being with us.
My name is Paul Harrell.
We can't do the program without you, and you guys know the drill.
We really, really appreciate it.
We can only hope, right, in the mass deportations.
43 days until the general election, things are about to move at a lightning's pace.
Apologies for my absence on Thursday and Friday of last week.
Special thanks to National Files Frankie Stocks for filling in while I was away.
So as we speed toward the election, a couple of things may be on the horizon.
At least that's what I think is about to happen.
One of them might be World War III. On Wednesday of last week, I warned about the dangers of World War III. I think I probably do that pretty much every show.
Bloodthirsty NATO continues to provoke Russia by allowing Ukraine to fire missiles deep into Russia.
Yeah, it's Ukraine.
Of course, Russia knows this is just a proxy fight with the West.
He's not stupid.
And they probably suspect the military-industrial complex, Putin probably suspects, the military-industrial complex would like nothing more than to escalate this war to a level that cannot be walked back in the nightmare scenario, well, nightmare scenario for the intel oligarchs, not the American people, that Donald Trump is re-elected on November 5th.
And that's because Trump is at least pledging to end the war.
Trump is pledging to stop the bloodshed, which would be great if you're a young man in Ukraine who's being sacrificed, oftentimes against your will, so the CIA can preserve the money laundering depot that is Ukraine.
But because Trump wants peace, the possibility for a false flag attack right now has probably never been higher.
And we've all seen how this plays out before.
We've seen this in real time if a false flag does actually happen.
We remember the Nord Stream pipeline.
NATO hubris and pride runs deep.
And we may very well wake up to headlines one morning very soon that Russia nuked itself to own the West somehow.
Then, a month or so later, we'll probably read a Seymour Hersh article about how it was really America, and no surprise, nothing will happen to anyone at the top of our government who lies to the American people constantly.
And while NATO is trying to escalate the war with Russia, Israel and the Middle East conflict is also kicking into high gear.
And I think it's for the same reason, really.
Trump wants peace, so if you're going to do something, you better do it now.
He wants peace in Ukraine and he wants peace in the Middle East, is my thought.
Last week it was remote controlled exploding pagers and over the weekend, according to reports, Israel bombed Lebanon.
The explosion was massive.
This, according to Western reports, is in response to Hezbollah rocket attacks in the northern part of Israel.
And by the way, I would like to take this opportunity to urge everybody out there listening to pray for fellow Lebanese Christians who are in harm's way.
Did you know that according to a 2022 Pew Research poll or study, Lebanon is 43% Christian?
Now, you won't hear that on the news.
A majority Muslim country allows Christian communities to exist.
So pray for the Christians in Lebanon.
According to recent reports, Israel is telling the civilians to evacuate because more bloodshed is pretty much imminent.
All of this means that the Muslim countries in the Middle East, the rest of them, are going to seriously consider getting involved in this war.
And the longer the leaders of Egypt or Jordan stay out of the conflict, the more their people, the people that they govern, are going to become uneasy.
And who knows, maybe succumb to nagging thoughts of coups and revolutions.
The whole situation is a powder keg.
And we really are on the cusp of World War III. And another thing, and I haven't heard too many people talk about this, but I think it's going to be irresistible.
They're going to do this.
In my opinion, once the next global crisis commences, let's assume it's some sort of military attack, something to galvanize everybody.
It'll be right up, right before the election, so in the run-up to the election, it would be perfect timing from a theatrical standpoint to claim Dementia Joe is incapacitated or even dead and install Kamala Harris with all the pomp and circumstance you would expect.
The first woman president.
Was appointed, not elected.
But don't worry about that.
Can you imagine the media gaslighting as the newly sworn in Kamala Harris walks to the podium, picture it, in front of the White House, somber, walks to the podium to address the nation in the wake of some trumped-up false flag attack meant to galvanize the nation into voting for her and supporting World War III. Get ready, because it may very well happen.
Mark this episode down.
And if it does, it'll probably sound something like this.
Or this.
We love our country.
I love our country.
I know we all do.
That's why everybody's here right now.
We love our country.
We...
We take pride in the privilege of being American.
And this is a moment where...
We can and must come together as Americans, understanding we have so much more in common than what separates us.
Let's come together with the character that we are so proud of about who we are, which is we are an optimistic people.
We are an optimistic people.
Americans, by character, are people who have dreams and ambitions and aspirations.
We believe in what is possible.
We believe in what can be.
And we believe in fighting for that.
That's how we came into being.
Because the people before us understood that one of the greatest expressions For the love of our country, one of the greatest expressions of patriotism is to fight for the ideals of who we are,
which includes freedom to make decisions about your own body, freedom to be safe from gun violence, freedom to have access to the ballot box, freedom to be who you are and just be, to love who you love openly and with pride, freedom to just be.
And that's who we are.
We believe in all that.
And so this is a moment where we stand knowing what we are fighting for.
We're not fighting against.
It's what we're fighting for.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Okay, so, you know, the sad part about this is, I mean, there are, I mean, you heard the audience clap, but there's people that listen to that and they're like, oh, that's so deep.
I mean, you know, playing to the emotional arguments, and this is always a struggle when you play to the lowest common emotional denominator.
But everything she just said there is nonsense.
It doesn't even make sense.
Really, it doesn't even make sense on a platitude basis.
What is she even talking about, right?
I mean, to hear the beginning of it, I thought, well, maybe...
Maybe she's going to talk about, well, this is how America came into being.
Oh, you mean the fact that we got our guns and we went to war and actually fought for our freedom?
We fought the most powerful military on Earth at that time?
You know, the British Empire?
That's how we came to be.
We came to be because men got together and actually did something about tyranny.
But no, of course, she's not going to go there.
She can't go there.
Because now that, by the way, is really the whole American origin story of the 18th century is so divorced from the modern Democrat progressive and really in many aspects the Uniparty, unless they want to use it to To try to justify some sort of foreign entanglement.
Anyway, we've got, again, 42 days until the election and things are going to get just absolutely really quick from here.
A lot of moving parts.
And speaking of the moving parts, we have, according to the Liberty Daily, they have a post that I saw this morning.
And here it is.
So this kind of goes into my talk about, you know, peace, right?
The idea that we've got to stop the wars, right?
And it's wild when you think about it because the left in this country, if you'll remember, you don't have to think that far back to remember when the left didn't automatically believe everything the government and the FBI told them and didn't believe in wars, right?
But now, in many cases, they do.
This headline, it's actually over at the Liberty Daily, but it's by Publis.
It says, Democrat mayor of Muslim governed Michigan City endorses Trump.
This headline here.
In a surprising twist that rattles the political establishment, Amir Ghalib, the mayor of Hamtrak, A city representing a Muslim majority demographic has publicly endorsed Donald Trump for the 2024 presidential election.
Ghalib boldly declared as, quote, the right choice for this critical time.
The endorsement made via a Facebook post on Sunday isn't just a casual nod.
It's not just one of those.
It reflects a significant shift in the narrative.
Ghalib, while acknowledging that he and Trump don't agree on everything, by the way, who does, still regards the former president as a man of principle.
This is the post.
Ladies and gentlemen, let me be clear.
Our expectations are realistic.
Again, this is a Muslim-controlled city within the United States in the swing state of Michigan.
President Trump and I may not agree on everything, but I know he is a man of principles.
Though it's looking good, he may or may not win the election and be the 47th President of the United States.
But I believe he is the right choice for this critical time.
I'll not regret my decision no matter what the outcome would be, and I'm ready to face the consequences.
He says, for this and for many other reasons, I announce my support and endorsement of the former and hopefully the next president of the United States, Donald Trump.
Now let the caravan begin its journey.
This is just a starting point.
And again, Amir Ghalib.
He's the, again, the city mayor of Hamtramck.
I'm getting the pronunciation wrong, I'm sure.
Anyway, it goes on.
Trump, the ever-saving politician, wasted no time in amplifying Ghalib's message, sharing it on his true social account.
This is more than just an endorsement.
It's a strategic alliance that could resonate deeply within the Arab-American community.
You know, it's fascinating because you really hear this narrative a lot.
Alliances, alliances, alliances.
People, you know, and it started with we've got some elements of Silicon Valley that are at least, you know, appear to be aligning.
You have Robert Kennedy Jr.
also aligning.
And it's very interesting that the political times that we're living in are very, very interesting.
And again, this is the backdrop here.
All of this taking place, happening when the world is a powder keg right now.
And you've just got to wonder...
How desperate are our people, you know, the intel oligarchs that are running the country?
And you have no guarantee that if somehow Donald Trump beats the fraud, if somehow Donald Trump is elected, we have no guarantee that Trump is actually going to handle the intel oligarch problem that we have in this country because he didn't do it the first time.
So we have no guarantee, right?
That this is actually going to happen.
In my opinion, one of the key pillars, one of the key problems is the fact that the intelligence apparatus built in the wake of September 11th has been turned and weaponized against the people and the color revolutions that the CIA has run in other countries was turned against us and run against us.
Can that actually be stopped?
Can it actually be reformed?
Who can you even trust, right?
That's just a skeptic in me.
But yeah, that's fascinating, right?
So we've got Kamala.
I think that was in Michigan, by the way, the Oprah clip.
By the way, we have another clip of Kamala on the Oprah show.
And this is her just totally failing to answer a basic question from one of the audience participants.
We really would love to know what your plan is to help lower the cost of living.
Yeah, first of all, thank you both for being here.
And yours is a story I hear around the country as I travel.
In terms of both rightly having the right to have aspirations and dreams and ambitions for your family and working hard and finding that the American dream is for this generation and so many recently far more elusive than it's been.
And we need to deal with that.
Oh my goodness.
Yeah, again, can you imagine in a World War III scenario, you know, her taking the reins from Joe, and then this is the woman we have to listen to?
Yeah, it really is a nightmare scenario.
And it's wild because, you know, the other side, the idea of Trump getting re-elected, you know, it's a nightmare for them.
It's a nightmare for the media.
It's a nightmare for people that don't want war.
And why are we fighting these wars?
Why do we have these skirmishes breaking out?
Well, in my opinion, it all comes down to the financial system.
It all comes down to the fact that the United States is bankrupt, but we're in the middle of, I don't know, we basically live in a financial iron curtain where the people, you know, very small group that actually understands how the Federal Reserve System works.
You know, it's...
It's not really going to matter.
There's a chance that it doesn't really matter until they want it to matter.
I go back and forth on this all the time.
We're going to talk just briefly about the national debt here in a minute with John Cornyn.
Senator John Cornyn of Texas recently got brought up at a Tucker Carlson live event, which was interesting.
But you go back and forth, right?
Because right now, because we have this printing press, and we basically are fighting over, well, we have the world's reserve currency.
We spent $12 trillion.
I'm sorry.
When I first started in talk radio, the national debt was at $12 trillion.
Now it's at $30 trillion, and there's no consequences, really.
There really isn't any consequences.
So somebody knows something that we don't know.
You used to hear people, you used to hear conservatives, myself included, talk about the national debt or talk about...
When's the last time you ever heard anybody talk about the deficit as being like a key talking point?
Oh, the national debt.
I mean, you heard it in the Tea Party days, you heard it in 2010, but you rarely hear it these days.
And I quit talking about it because I realized something.
If you owe $12 trillion, there's really no difference.
If you understand how much $12 trillion is versus 30, it's so insane how much money that is.
$1 trillion, $27 million a day for 100 years with money still left over after the 100 years.
$27 million a day for 100 years.
That's how much $1 trillion.
And we owe, if you can visualize in your head, we owe $30 trillion.
So this problem, this debt problem, I've long suspected, isn't going to be a problem until somebody wants it to be a problem.
We have an emergency that has been perfectly crafted in its behind-the-glass case because the Western-backed financial system that is corrupt is still, for the most part, in control.
But then now you have these wars because...
What about Russia?
What about Brazil?
We have the BRICS countries, right?
China and Russia and this idea that we're going to have a competing economic system.
And we're not going to go, you know, just based off of the U.S. dollar has value because somebody says it does.
Can you imagine?
I mean, people tried this back in the medieval days, according we're told.
You know, people tried to be able, you know, we're going to create gold, right?
People wanted to, alchemists, right, like they wanted to figure out a way to create gold because they knew they would basically be creating wealth.
Well, you don't have to create gold if you've convinced people to put faith in the U.S. dollar, right?
And then you can just print as much of it so you can create essentially the gold of our time.
And people have had enough of it.
People have had enough of it.
Hence the conflict.
Hence the wars.
I think that's a huge component of it as well.
And we're right on the cusp.
And...
We're still waiting.
I mean, what else is going to happen?
We're still waiting for some shoe to drop.
I'm telling you, we are.
And it could be as easy and simple as, hey, we stole it in 2020.
We're just going to steal it again, so who cares?
But too big to rig is also a possibility, right?
We'll have to wait and see what happens.
In the meantime, I saw this from Sputnik about Kamala Harris.
And I found it interesting, maybe you will too, here it is, that Kamala Harris suffers from imposter syndrome, so she rarely gives interviews, according to a psychiatrist.
Since the U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democrat Party's presidential candidate, feels anxious under questioning, psychiatrist, and body language expert Carol Lieberman told the New York Post, which may be the reason why she rarely gives media interviews.
Imposter syndrome is a psychological condition where a person lacks confidence in their competence and feels they don't deserve to succeed.
Lieberman added that Harris may be suffering from the condition.
They talk about the Democrat candidate's constant giggling, grimaces, and wide-arm movements are all signs of the anxiety felt by a person with the syndrome, Lieberman explained.
Kamala was able to stifle her cackling during the election debate against Donald Trump on September 10th.
It almost started up one time.
Kamala had a moment in that debate.
It was like the beginning of a lawnmower pool.
You know, you got to pull the string a few times before it starts.
So she started in.
She started in.
It was like one pull.
And then she composed herself.
I was told one thing.
I had one job.
Do not laugh.
Which is tough when they had a whole convention about joy.
Oh, this is about joy.
Yeah, here it is.
We can't listen to the whole thing.
Let me tell you something.
I listened to the whole thing before we came on air.
And it's too long, but...
I mean, we're familiar with that.
Poor hubby.
Poor hubby.
It never ends.
No.
It never ends.
Alright, that's enough of that.
Look, you know, you've got to think of our audio-only viewers, our listeners.
By the way, Apple, Spotify, if you want to check out the Millstone Report, you can do so audio-only if you want.
What else do we got?
Okay, yeah, so John Cornyn, right?
The larger problem here is interesting.
So on this program, we talk a lot about Christian red states, and we also give away rhetorical millstones to heretical pastors, which we will do in this program coming up.
I've gotten away from that because of, you know, all the election, but I want to make a note.
I mean, you know, the namesake of the show, Millstone Report, it's, you know, we call it that for a reason.
Anyway, that's coming up after the break.
But so Tucker Carlson's doing these live events, and a guy by the name of media personality by the name of Jesse Kelly, who lives in Texas, goes off on the notion, on this concept, that we have these red states.
And I call them Christian red states.
And I call them that because, at least in my home state of Arkansas, I know we have legislators who are Christian, who are being voted on by a largely Christian evangelical population.
And they're going to the Capitol and they're passing laws.
based on the principles that you can find in the Bible and they're even citing scripture and and us needing to protect kids you know we got to quit the transient kids we had to quit the drag shows we don't we don't want insurance companies to fund these procedures we got a block chemical castration right we like all of this stuff we're trying to protect kids and and this is this is all coming from a good place From the voters, right?
So that's why I call them Christian red states, and I think as long as we don't have a new Roe versus Wade on these issues, limiting the ability of our local governments to actually govern ourselves, I think there's a way out of this, even if the federal and national stuff doesn't go our way.
But that's a conversation for another time.
We do have a problem, though.
One of the reasons why the federal government is in the shape that it's in is because, in many cases, red states are being held captive by elected officials who are more loyal to the RNC or more loyal to the Uniparty than they are their own people.
And it doesn't take very long for them to become co-opted.
It doesn't take very long for them to become owned.
And this is a huge problem.
Jesse Kelly at this Tucker Carlson event highlights it, I think, perfectly.
I don't know if I've ever heard it articulated better.
But we have a primary voter problem because the reddest states, they are sending the most putrid losers to Washington, D.C. John Thune, John Cornyn, Mitch McConnell, a What is that?
James Lankford, Naked Ken Doll Lankford out of Oklahoma.
These people are from our Red Estates.
Wait, what did you call him?
Naked Ken Doll.
Have you ever seen a Naked Ken Doll?
There's nothing there.
No, I'm not bragging.
I've never taken off Ken's pants, but it's just...
Okay, so specifically he talks about Lankford.
So I was like, Naked Ken doll, Lankford.
I don't even know what this guy looks like.
So I went ahead and looked him up.
Here is Senator Lankford.
Is that him?
I'm going to make sure.
Yeah, so James Lankford from Oklahoma.
This is what he looks like.
He does...
He looks like...
You guys know Bizarro Superman in the comic books?
He looks like Bizarro Ken...
That's what this guy looks like.
He looks like Bizarro Ken.
Jesse Kelly calls Senator Lankford a Ken doll insulting his manhood because he's essentially sold out and he's not actually representing the people that he claims to.
He's representing other interests.
Believe me, that's what you're going to find if you ever disobey James.
I'm stealing that.
The point is, we have this red state, and because it is red, look, I moved here on purpose.
My wife and I, we had two kids.
I moved here without a job because I love Texas people so much, because that's what we do.
But that niceness can also burn us as well because you move to a safe place.
I'm in a neighborhood without crime.
I'm in a state that's Republican.
I have this.
I have that.
And you think to yourself, we're fine.
We're not fine.
The demons come for what is good.
What is good.
It's not an accident.
If you've ever sat at home and you watched any of this child tranny stuff or anything like that before, and you've ever said something to yourself like, why the kids?
Why can't they just leave the kids alone?
People love saying that on the right.
I don't understand why they can't leave the kids alone.
The kids are where they went first!
Because the kids are the most good.
Because the kids are the most innocent.
They're not gonna come after me.
I'm a horrible human being.
The kids are the most innocent and so that's why they went after them.
Whatever is good, whatever is right, that's what the devil goes after first.
And if you think, if you think your state of Texas is safe, It's the most unsafe because these people look at you and your family and your values and your guns, and it's a reminder of everything they're not, and it's a reminder of everything that can stop them.
So we're not safe, and we have to start getting more involved locally and in primaries.
It is a disgrace that John Cornyn is a senator from this state.
That should never happen again.
Disgrace.
Wow, that is...
Primaries, get involved in local elections.
Yeah, I mean, he's exactly right.
That is what needs to happen.
And again, that's assuming that even local elections are safe and secure, and that's a whole can of worms.
He mentions John Cornyn, so I was just like, okay, well, what about John Cornyn is so bad?
And why does a red state like Texas...
Oh, by the way, he's also right that they're coming for, you know, places like Texas.
And when he talks about, when Jesse Kelly there talked about, they look at you, they look at your family, they look at your, you know, they look at, I would say, your Christianity, your Christian values.
To me, that's a very similar narrative to what we talk about here, about putting Christians in boxcars and how that is the goal.
There are two types of people on the right at this point, in my opinion.
How I would classify it as is you have those that believe that they're wanting to put Christians in boxcars and those who aren't really convinced.
They're still...
They're still believing in this pluralistic society that promises to have rooms for Christians in it when it really doesn't.
They still believe in neutrality, which is a lie.
You're either going to be a Christian nation or a pagan nation and promote satanic devilry.
It's one or the other.
It's a binary choice.
It's a sheep or goat choice, which will be...
That's when God sorts it out at the end, right?
It's his decision.
So, Senator John Cornyn, what actually makes him so bad?
So I went on just, you know, okay, let's take a heritage action.
Let's go to, you know, it's kind of a boilerplate, you know, D.C. think tank.
And they've given him this session, okay, so this Congress, they've given him a 35%, lifetime of 64%.
He's a Considered according to them right there, you see 62%.
He's an average Senate Republican.
So Senator John Cornyn from the state of Texas is an average Senate Republican.
So I wanted to look at some of his voting record.
So Heritage Action supports the Kids Online Safety Act, and so did John Cornyn.
Heritage Action opposed the Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act And he supported it.
Okay, so that is a Intel Oligarch Military Industrial Complex.
That's what that is.
Okay?
Intel Oligarch Military Industrial Complex.
Bill, Heritage didn't like it.
The congressperson did like it.
You see there.
Okay, with the thumbs.
Okay.
Should I back it out a little bit more?
This is an awkward website.
It's not really working the way I want it to.
Yeah, that may be a little bit better.
Okay, so on that, let's just go ahead and call that Military Industrial Complex He's for it.
Heritage is against it.
Okay, alright.
What else do we have here?
The Durbin-Kramer Amendment Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act.
Heritage was for this amendment.
John Cornyn was against that amendment.
Okay, so now that's two things.
We've got trying to rein in the intelligence agencies and trying to rein in the national security apparatus, which again has been weaponized against the people.
Okay, Cornyn's in there.
He's right there.
Okay, what about this one?
A vote to dismiss the articles of impeachment against Mayorkas.
Heritage Action opposed it.
So did Cornyn.
So Cornyn, he's not going to, you know, he's on a border state.
He's in Texas.
So he had to vote that way.
Then we'll have this one.
The second fiscal year, minibus or omnibus, Heritage was against.
So he's for the national.
So he's for continuing to spend in oblivion.
There's two bills like that.
Let's see.
He's for the Senate foreign aid.
So he's for foreign aid, which is part of the money laundering problem that we have.
Heritage action was against the Senate foreign aid supplemental appropriations package.
But John Cornyn, all for giving your taxpayer dollars to foreign countries.
Do you see how the, and by the way, the Uniparty, so the Democrats on the other side of this would agree with him.
They would agree with him on most of these things.
National security, intel, oligarchy, foreign aid, so we can money launder, we can launder the money and send it back to, you know, who knows, who knows who, who knows where it comes.
The Zuckerbergs.
Let's see.
What else do we have?
And then the last thing here.
Okay.
Conference report to the National Defense Authorization Act.
Another national defense.
And then there's one more here.
Let's see.
There was one on Ukraine that I saw.
Yeah.
Senator Josh Hawley to create a special inspector general for Ukraine aid.
Heritage supported that.
Why?
Because, I mean, you know, it was at least...
Accountability, or at least a glance at accountability on this money and where it's going to Ukraine.
And we have John Cornyn was against it.
He's against that amendment.
So, why is John Cornyn such a bad senator from the state?
It's because he agrees with many things that the people of Texas don't agree on, but It's the big stuff.
It's the kumbaya.
It's the moments where the Democrats and Republicans lock arms and are unified on the big policies.
The major policies that could actually change things and put Americans first, we know that the Democrats and Republicans agree on.
Like the Ukraine war.
Like the intel oligarchs that are running D.C. by blackmail.
And, you know, the National Defense Authorization Act that's been weaponized against the American, they agree on all of that stuff, right?
Because coincidentally, not coincidentally, all of those things also work to make sure that somebody like John Cornyn stays in power.
We're going to take a break.
This is the Millstone Report.
Don't go anywhere.
We'll be back here in just a moment.
We are in a situation where the markets will correct itself.
The bulls will continue to die down very, very quickly.
My question to you is, what are you doing right now to protect yourself?
We have accounts that can grow with the S&P 500, sometimes even better, that have a rotator index that can go to commodities, treasuries, S&P and NASDAQ. Not quarterly, not monthly, but daily.
And right now, interest rates lowering.
I can't offer this for a long time, but right now they're still offering a 20% sign-on bonus within a guaranteed environment, insurance-based product.
That's why it's guaranteed.
It's out of the stock market, out of the woke agenda, anti-CBDC, anti-DEI, anti-communism, private insured account.
We can get a 20% bonus for a 0.95 annual fee.
The only bad part is you only have access to 10% a year, but typically your money is going to double within 4 to 6 years on average because it's going to average about 7 to 14% a year depending on the index, on the growth.
Past performances is not indicative of future results.
But it doesn't matter because you have principal protection.
You don't have principal protection right now.
If you're just stuck in the stock market, you know you need to make a change in 2024.
then give us a call, 813-448-3446, or visit us at CortezWM.com, and let's just have a conversation.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the show.
Thanks so much for being with us.
This is the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
I want to remind everybody to pick up your copy of Left Wing Will and the Red Pill.
This is the card game that laughs at the left's expense, and it's the card game that I created.
It's proudly made in the USA, and you'll love it.
But if you go to leftwingwill.com, leftwingwill.com, and promo code Paul, so just use my name, Paul, it'll save you 15%.
And you'll be laughing in no time.
Stereotypical leftist will.
You've heard of it before.
Anyway, give it a shot.
Leftwingwill.com.
All right.
It's time to hand out some millstones tonight on the Millstone Report.
Here we go.
I want to introduce you to, and by the way, hat tip to Protestia.
I mean, they've always got the best takes.
They and woke preacher clips.
So here we go.
This is a Presbyterian pastor.
And his name is Reginald Avant.
And he's giving a sermon, if you can call it that, about the parable of the prodigal son.
Many of you may or may not know the parable of the prodigal son.
I'm sure many of you do out there.
Of course you do, right?
There's still some, like, the last vestiges of a Christian society are still, you know, out there.
The parable of the prodigal son, you know, the son comes to his dad and says, hey, I want my inheritance now.
Great insult, right?
Great insult.
You want your inheritance?
So you're basically saying you want me dead?
The father says, okay, here's your inheritance.
And he goes and he squanders it and he eventually is eating the food of pigs.
And he says, wow, I'd be better off, better taken care of if I was even a servant in my father's house.
That's what I'll do.
I'll go back and I'll just ask to be a servant in my father's house.
And then the father, okay, the father sees the son and he runs to him and he hugs him and he Kills the fattened calf and he puts his best robe on him and he says, I was just wanting to be a servant in your house.
And he says, no, my son was dead and now he's alive.
And it's this picture of what God the Father does for us as wayward sinners.
This parable, it's pretty clear on this side of the cross.
It's pretty clear what that parable is meant to do.
And then, of course, you have the older brother who's been there the whole time and who gets upset.
That essentially the sinner was forgiven, that the love of the Father was able to forgive in the way that he did.
And this is, you know, there's different aspects of this.
There's different ways to look at this, you know, and dissect it.
But, you know, there's clearly a right interpretation of what that parable means and a wrong interpretation of what that parable means.
Would you ever imagine that an impastor, I would call this person, this Presbyterian pastor, an impastor, would you ever imagine preaching this parable and claiming that the father in this parable actually needs to repent?
That the father did something wrong?
Again, hat tip to Protestia for finding this.
I feel sorry for the children in the congregation.
That's why this pastor, Reginald Avant, gets a millstone.
The parable of the prodigal son has always had this ending that appeared to be like a happy ending.
Okay, okay.
First of all, I don't know if we were expecting the voice.
The parable of the prodigal son is mostly known to be a happy ending.
For those of you who are not able to watch the program right now and you're just listening, so this is Reginald Avant.
He's a black man that talks in a, well, certainly not a masculine voice, and he is in a robe, but he's draped himself with a rainbow shawl, right?
So he is all in for the rainbow.
In case you couldn't tell by the voice, he's all in for the rainbow, right?
Okay, so what's he going to tell us about the prodigal son?
With his father and his sons.
But I have always felt this parable included with a lot of leftovers and unfinished business that needed to be done.
Why was the father not more reluctant in this decision with his sons?
Why did he give in so easy and not hesitate about what he felt or thought in this situation?
Maybe the father did not want to discourage his son.
Maybe he did not want to be thought of as a dream killer for his son's dreams or to take this opportunity away from his son.
The son returns to his father.
He does repent what he has done.
I think there is more than just the son that needs to repent here.
I think the father needs to repent as well.
All right, so this guy's saying that the Father, who is clearly a representation of God in the parable, he is saying, and I think this is so consistent with this man's theology, I mean, he's literally wearing the rainbow, okay, the sign of God's judgment, or the sign of actually a I guess the reprieve of God's judgment by water.
He's wearing God's sign, the rainbow, in a perverted way.
So it's no surprise, and it's actually quite consistent, that this man, this impastor, would preach to his congregation that God, in the parable of the prodigal son, needs to repent as well.
For what?
For giving his son what he asked for in the first place?
Knowing what it might do?
Knowing that it might corrupt him?
Knowing?
You see, the whole thing is really a struggle with who God is and who is not God.
It's no surprise that a guy who is embracing sodomy, embracing the rainbow, as what it means today, it's an attempted middle finger to heaven.
Ha ha ha, you won't judge us in our sodomite ways.
Um...
It's no surprise that this impastor has this issue, has this problem with God orchestrating and allowing certain things to come to pass.
You could take this pretty deep.
Here's the father.
Son comes to him.
I want my inheritance now.
Which, by the way, that was a great insult.
That's essentially saying, I wish you were already dead so I'd already get my inheritance.
I don't want to wait for you to die.
I want it now.
So he gives the younger brother the portion of the inheritance and he goes out and he squanders it.
What you just heard the guy say is that the father in this situation needs to repent because he allowed the son to take the inheritance.
As if we're not going to hold the son accountable for what he did and the inclinations of his heart.
The inclinations of his heart towards evil.
The inclinations of his heart to not worship God, but to be your own God.
And that's exactly the problem with this guy.
He wants to be his own God.
He wants to set the terms of the character of God based on what's acceptable to him.
Not who actually God is as revealed to us in the scriptures.
The character of God.
The one who punishes sin and the one who also can save sinners from themselves and forgive sin.
I think the father needs to apologize to his son for letting him go, for not fighting for him, for not being reluctant in that moment and pausing to think and sound and ask him, why do you want to go?
The father has had the opportunity to...
So the father needs to apologize to the son for allowing him to go, for not being more inquisitive, for not...
You know what's interesting about parables is that Jesus actually told his disciples about parables.
Well, he taught in all kinds of parables, right?
Different stories.
And if you go to the book of Matthew, chapter 13, Jesus told the story of the parable of the sower.
And then after he told that, the book of Matthew records in verse 10.
So chapter 13, Matthew 13, chapter 13, verse 10.
He says, Then the disciples came and said to him, Why do you speak to them in parables?
And he answered them.
He said, Indeed, in their case, the prophecy of Isaiah is filled.
Now this is specifically talking about the Pharisees.
You will indeed hear, but never understand, and you will indeed see, but never perceive.
For this people's heart has grown dull, and with their ears they can barely hear.
And their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and turn, and I would heal them." And then it concludes in verse 16, And then he goes on to explain the parable of the sower.
It's just fascinating to me because I guess what I would say is this, as we watch this impastor lead his sheep down the path to hell, it's fascinating to me.
The prodigal son is a very well-known parable, and I don't think anybody has ever heard it and thought, oh, the father is in the wrong here.
Maybe some people have struggled with it from the older brother situation, where the older brother gets kind of upset because they've killed the fatted calf for a guy who was not loyal to his father, right?
So maybe people have had trouble with understanding the care for God on that aspect of it.
But the idea that the father needs to repent...
How blind do you have to be, right?
Clearly, clearly, this man has eyes that do not see, and he has ears that are just not able to understand and comprehend.
The plain and obvious teaching of the parable of the prodigal son.
And for that, all of the people in the audience, especially the little ones, if there are, a lot of times Presbyterian congregations like this are drying up and And dying, right?
They're full of people that are not very youthful, I guess.
But if there are little kids in there, it's even worse because you're putting the rainbow shawl on.
You're basically proclaiming lies as truth, and you're proclaiming that, thus saith the Lord.
Like, this is the word of the Lord when you're twisting Scripture to make it fit.
What a coincidence, right?
I mean, seriously, when we live in a world today, in the 21st century, where there's always an excuse for evil, we have people making excuses for pedophiles.
We have people, you know, who are making excuses for every kind of evil.
Well, you need to see it their way.
Well, we need to put ourselves in their shoes.
Remember the Sleeping Beauty, the live-action Maleficent, okay?
Sleeping Beauty, the original Disney cartoon, Maleficent, she literally was like one of the most evil, if not the most evil Disney character witch ever created.
She's got demon horns literally growing out of her head, right?
And Disney comes along and says...
Man, we need to humanize her.
I wonder why.
I wonder what happened.
What made Maleficent evil?
She can't just be evil.
Regardless of the fact that in the movie, in the original Sleeping Beauty movie, the prince is given the sword of truth and is given the shield of faith with a cross on it.
She turns into a dragon and says, now you will deal with me, Prince Philip.
I watched the show a lot when I was little.
And all the powers of hell.
She turns into a dragon and then...
And then the prince throws his sword of truth, sword of righteousness, into the dragon's chest, kills it, vanquishes evil, kisses the princess, and everything else.
And Disney comes along and says...
Well, I wonder what made her that way.
And so they did a live-action remake, and they blamed it on a man.
They blamed it on a man, that a man seduced Maleficent when she was a fairy and had wings and stole her wings, and then she became evil and angry because of that, right?
And she became the most evil villain in the Disney catalog because of a man.
Like, that's the story of that movie.
And what a coincidence that our 21st century ideals happen to perfectly comport to what Scripture teaches about the world around us and the heart of man today.
That really, yeah, the prodigal son was bad, but you know, the father should have repented too.
The father should have repented too.
It's just such a coincidence that this type of fake Christianity doesn't require you to stand for anything that would cost you in this society.
Our society comports perfectly.
Our values, our fake evil values, like our evil values, they're not fake, they're evil values, comport perfectly to a sermon like this.
It's pretty sad.
It's very sad.
Tomorrow on the program, if we have time, we're going to get to this article.
I know Frankie Stocks and Noel Fritch did this.
They covered this when I was gone.
Let me throw it up on the screen.
You can't see it.
This headline, how Texas Ken Paxton and Twitter's move to the Lone Star State could save the American Republic.
Check this out.
It's over at NationalFile.com.
I think you'll enjoy it.
Yeah, and that kind of ties in directly with, you know, now that X is a Texas company, people are dredging up this quote from Elon Musk that when he took over the country, he said, Twitter is both a social media company and a crime scene.
So that brings up the mother of all Twitter files.
We've interviewed Ivan Raiklin on this program, the Milstom Report before, so it's a big deal.
And I would say, probably on a lighter note, the funniest thing I saw while I was away from this chair and this microphone over the weekend is this ad from a realtor.
A realtor by the name of Michelle Blackwell from the Heritage Real Estate Group.
And she says this, Leaving the country, if Trump is elected president, give me a call and let's get your home sold.
Ha ha ha ha!
I certainly think that is good.
It's good stuff.
We've got to have more of that.
We've got to have more humor just like that, especially when we don't know what's waiting us between now and November.
42 days!
Again, things you're going to pick up.
It's going to be a lightning pace between now and November the 5th.
Anyway, that's all the time that we have.
I want to remind you, please go follow me over on X, at RealPaulHarrell.
That's at RealPaulHarrell.
You see it on your screen there.
And also, feel free to sound off in the comments.
I know we're going to put the beginning of the show.
Most of the time we put it up on Twitter.
Thinking of adding some additional content, thinking of adding, making this program longer, and want your input on that and maybe what that would look like.
Because I've always got more content every day than I have time to cram into an hour slot.
Anyway, stay tuned for that.
We're going to have some announcements on that.
Anyway, that's all the time that we have.
We will see you tomorrow, unless I'm providentially hindered.
I don't plan to be, but that's the whole point of being providentially hindered.