Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 16, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

01:48:46

Logos Academy Episode 4: Racial Consciousness and the Best Form of Society

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, ladies and gentlemen, we are live.
	Welcome, everybody.
	It is episode four of Logos Academy.
	This is the second week on the Stu Peters Network, and the second week of having an organized schedule.
	As you guys know, the regular watchers of the show, I'm pretty sporadic with my shows.
	It's kind of all over the place.
	It changes day to day.
	But now that we are on the Stu Peters Network, I'm keeping a little bit of a better schedule.
	So if you'll bear with me one moment here, folks.
	I'm actually just getting the stream posted up.
	I did not get that done yet.
	I'm running a little bit behind here.
	Hold on.
	Okay, there we go.
	All right, please let me know that the audio is functioning well for you guys.
	I hope that's the case.
	It seems good on my end, but I know Odyssey can be a little bit silly sometimes with the audio.
	Okay.
	All right, for everybody that is coming in, again, this is episode four of the Logos Academy.
	Obviously, those that have been watching for a while know that Logos Academy used to be the name of my other series, where we did kind of whiteboard-style lectures.
	That is changing.
	That's becoming Logos Academy Lectures, and the overall show itself is going to be called Logos Academy.
	Let me pull the chat up here on the Rumble, and we've got the Odyssey chat, and then I just got to pull up the Twitter chat, and we're good to go.
	Okay, so the topic for today is racial consciousness and the best form of society.
	So we'll go into that.
	I'll kind of explain what that means because it's a very ambiguous title.
	That can mean a lot of things.
	So we'll go in depth and explain that and we'll use it as our topic for today.
	So we got some people filling in.
	We got Chain Reaction in here, Walther.
	We got Pavlov, welcome brother.
	And Sven, welcome everybody.
	It's nice to see some people in here.
	Audio is good.
	Okay.
	Audio looks good on both.
	All right.
	Great.
	Awesome.
	Vivian, welcome.
	Welcome.
	Okay.
	So we have two different topics I want to cover today.
	So the first hour, I want to cover the first topic.
	And the second hour, we're going to cover the other one.
	So the first topic I want to talk about is racial consciousness.
	And the second topic that I want to talk about is the best form of society.
	And the best form of society has a lot to do with circumstance.
	It has to do with the race that hosts that society.
	It has to do with the circumstances of the society itself.
	What kind of an economic place is it in?
	What kind of a...
	Social buildup is in that society, and all these things kind of factor into the best form of society.
	So, you know, the best form of society for one country might be different than it is for the others.
	So that's why we want to talk about that on the second half, because I think the first piece talking in will kind of lead it into that.
	If you don't see the stream on Rumble, it looks like it's on for me.
	You might be looking on the wrong channel.
	I'm on the Stu Peters Network on Rumble, and we're on...
	Odyssey at Logos Revealed.
	We're on Twitter at Logos Revealed Eye.
	And we are also on ftjmedia.com.
	That is Dave Geharry and G-Man's website.
	They're very good dudes.
	They've been in this movement for a long time, both of them for decades.
	So I do recommend if you guys don't have an account on ftjmedia.com, please take a moment, make an account over there and...
	And start spreading the message over there.
	It's a really good platform.
	They're not going to censor anybody.
	They are 100% our guys.
	So as long as you're not posting tranny videos or gay porn or something weird, you're not going to get banned off of there.
	So it's definitely a good platform to get yourself involved on.
	Okay, so let's start with the first topic and Obviously, my original audience, you guys know my takes on racial consciousness, and you're very familiar with everything that I've laid out for that.
	And if you're new, and you're on the Stu Peters Network, and you're watching via that channel, you've probably seen Arthur Kwon Lee.
	He is...
	The Korean fella who is on Stu Peter's network and he talks about racial consciousness quite often.
	It seems like aside from art, it seems to be the majority of his content is revolved around racial consciousness, which is a very important factor.
	This actually seems to be making the rounds in the...
	Public sphere, quite a bit.
	The mainstream is starting to pick up on it just a little bit, not fully yet.
	Race is a very polarizing topic, and it's something that a lot of people are afraid to discuss for reasons of social backlash, for reasons of not having the knowledge behind it, or having some kind of emotional investment.
	So racial consciousness can be very hard for some people.
	There's also people Who are racially ambiguous.
	And they're half white and half Korean.
	Or they're half white and half black.
	And because of that, they have a hard time discussing any kind of racial consciousness.
	Because it's essentially, once you are a mixture of the two, you're kind of...
	It's almost impossible for you to have that racial identity.
	You see this with quite a few individuals.
	And then they'll try to substitute it for something else, such as faith or something of the sort.
	So, racial identity is a very tough topic to discuss for a lot of people, and we're going to try to brush on that topic as conflict-free as possible.
	It's not exactly easy, but we'll do our best with that.
	Judy, welcome.
	It's nice to see you.
	Tom, hello.
	I see we got some people filling in.
	Walter, I see you on both streams.
	That's awesome.
	Thank you, my friend.
	So, the first thing I want to talk about before we go into racial supremacy itself, or not racial, racial consciousness, sorry, I'm already mixing my words.
	But before we talk about racial consciousness itself, I want to talk about this concept of white supremacy.
	This is something that is very modern.
	It kind of spawned up in America in the 50s and 60s, post-World War II era, and It has a lot of implications and connotations to it before anybody actually knows what it means.
	When someone says, he is a white supremacist, well, what does that mean?
	A lot of people, when they hear that term, they hear someone say, that guy is a white supremacist, they say, Okay, so he wants to kill everybody else.
	He thinks white people should be ruling over the entire earth and mass murdering anybody that's not in their race, right?
	That's what a lot of people think when they hear the term white supremacy.
	However, that's not what white supremacy actually means, right?
	It's been made to mean that through media and all of this Hollywood kind of, we'll call it fear porn, I guess.
	They've tried to make it out to be something like that.
	But if you really think about it, white supremacy, if I'm a white individual and I live in the United States of America or I live in England or Ireland, and I say I want Ireland to be white because it was white Irish people that founded the country.
	If I say I want America to be white because it was white Europeans that founded the country.
	That in itself is what we would call white supremacy.
	Let's look at the word supreme.
	Again, etymology of word.
	You're going to hear this a lot on my show, so I hope you enjoy it.
	I talk about the etymology of words very often, and I talk about what the actual definition is, because if you use a word and you have a different definition or conception of what that word means aside from myself, we're going to have a whole different understanding of what we're talking about here.
	So when we talk about the word supremacy, the word supreme is simply an overruling authority.
	Okay.
	So when you think about government, for example, we have the legislative, the executive branches of government, and then we have the court systems and we have the Supreme Court, right?
	So that court is above all others.
	It's the overruling one.
	The decision that the Supreme Court makes has more authority than any of the other courts.
	That doesn't mean that the other courts don't matter, and it doesn't mean that they're not a function, but it means that that one has the highest authority, right?
	Right.
	So if we talk about America being a white supremacist country, that simply means that the white peoples that founded that land have the most authority in that land.
	Right.
	And this was always the case.
	This is kind of common sense.
	The fact that most people kind of get turned off by this is because they have a different preconceived notion of what exactly that means when we talk about white supremacy.
	Let's think about let's take this to other races.
	Let's.
	Let's say Vietnamese supremacy.
	Let's say Asiatic supremacy.
	Do we not agree that if you go to Vietnam, Vietnamese people should be ruling in that country?
	It shouldn't really be white people ruling in Vietnam.
	If you go to the Congo, it shouldn't be white people ruling in the Congo.
	You would expect Congolians or Congonese people, whatever the hell you'd call them, people from the Congo to be ruling that country, right?
	You would expect Vietnamese people to be ruling their country.
	So by definition, by logical explanation, that makes them Vietnamese or Congo supremacists, right?
	Because they are supremacists in their own nation.
	They have the authority.
	They have the control over their own country and And their own sovereignty.
	That's common sense.
	That shouldn't be a foreign or difficult concept to understand.
	So when we talk about white supremacy, it simply means that white people want to have a control over their own sovereignty and have a homogenous nation where they have the full say in what they do.
	And this is why the media spins this term.
	I want you guys to understand this.
	They conflate the term and they make it out to be...
	So white people say, hey, I want control of my nation.
	I want to have my own sovereignty.
	That is...
	White supremacy, right?
	Because we would be supreme in our own country.
	So by definition, yeah, sure, that's what it is.
	But the media takes it and they pull it up like this and they conflate it and they say, no, white supremacy is mass murder, mass genocide.
	They want to kill everybody that's not white.
	They want to take over the whole world, right?
	They did the same thing with the National Socialists in World War II, right?
	They made them out to be these psychopaths who wanted to kill everybody.
	You can't find documents that even explain this, right?
	The only document that's anything close and they misquote it and misinterpret it intentionally is from the Goebbels diary where he talks about how they want to liquidate the Jews in Europe.
	Well, liquidation, that's a financial term.
	It's a business term, right?
	I'm going to liquidate my assets, right?
	I have a million dollars in physical assets and I want to liquidate those assets so I have cash, right?
	That's what liquidation means.
	It means get rid of the assets.
	It's not a term for extermination.
	They've conflated it out to mean something like that.
	But if you really look, there's almost no documents whatsoever from National Socialist Germany advocating mass land grabs taking over the world or killing anybody that isn't German.
	It's nonsense, right?
	So they've conflated it out like this, so that's what people hear and see themselves, right?
	So when the average person in America hears the word white supremacy, again, they instantly, they get these images of some, you know...
	Trailer Park kind of roaming white guy with a swastika on the side of his head, and his head's shaved off, and he's all buff, and he's angry and ready to beat the shit out of somebody and kill someone.
	That's the depiction that most people get when they hear the term.
	But if you look at what the term actually means, logically...
	It simply just means having control and sovereignty over your own country, being the ruling authority of your own country.
	It's a lot like the term dictator.
	A lot of people today, when they hear the term dictator, they go, oh, that's evil, it's terrible, authoritarianism is awful, and it's tyrannical, and it's bad.
	Well, that's not true.
	Dictator's a neutral term.
	We've had plenty of good dictators in history.
	We look at Marcus Aurelius, the writer of Meditations.
	Marcus Aurelius was known as the good ruler, the good emperor, right?
	He was a dictator.
	He was an authoritarian leader.
	But he was a good guy.
	He was a great guy, actually.
	He was a fantastic person.
	So the idea that a dictator has to be evil is a very modern concept.
	The term dictator, for example, if you look in a dictionary from the 1900s, the term dictator actually in the definition just states a ruling authority with all omnipotent power.
	It doesn't mean they're good or they're bad.
	It just means that they have full authority.
	So today, if you look up the same definition, you go on Google and you look up dictator definition, In the definition is the word tyrant or oppressor.
	So they're conflating a neutral term to mean something negative, and this is exactly what they've done with a term like white supremacy.
	White supremacy is a very neutral term, and they've conflated it to be this negative thing that has all these false and extra connotations to it that are not true.
	So...
	That's a very important piece to understand when we talk about racial consciousness, because anytime white people try to advocate for themselves, anytime they try to say, hey, I believe that we should have the ability to control our own country, that shouldn't be a horrible thing to say.
	That shouldn't even be a foreign thing for anybody to hear.
	Actually, I'll give you a great example.
	In the United States of America, there's plenty of colleges in the U.S. that are all black, literally all black.
	You have to be black to get into the college.
	They have a strict line.
	They won't let non-blacks into the college.
	We have colleges like that.
	Well, why is that?
	Why is it that one group is capable of having a fully...
	Racially homogenous group or society or foundation or organization or schooling system, why are they allowed to do it and another group is not?
	Which shows that there's a double standard.
	And we have to figure out where does that double standard stem from?
	Why is that double standard existent?
	You have to look at who makes those, who wraps those ideas into the populace.
	Again, we talked about this a couple episodes ago when we talked about the control of media in our country and the over-representation of Jews in our media.
	So we look at whites and blacks.
	First off, the media says white supremacists rule this country.
	Well, if white supremacists rule this country, do you think that they would advocate for blacks to have a homogenous schooling system and not whites?
	And they would say it's hateful when whites do it?
	Obviously not.
	Blacks don't control our media and Chinese people don't control the media and Muslims don't control the media.
	So there's a clear motive here from the media to smear white people and not allow them to have some kind of homogenous group.
	And that's our duty to get to the source of that and figure out why exactly that is the case.
	I see we got a question in the chat.
	This is a very important question.
	I like this question.
	Someone asks, why would it ever be necessary to organize on the basis of skin pigmentation?
	This is very, very important.
	And it's not just about skin pigmentation.
	This is another problem that we'll go into right now.
	Skin pigmentation is just a sign of a larger collective racial body, right?
	So, for instance, there's pretty much...
	we'll say like four or five major racial bodies.
	And these also are in connoisseurs with the four or five main race, uh, main religions on the earth.
	So, uh, white people are a collective, the European peoples, right?
	Are one collective racial group.
	Now they've dumbed this down.
	And they said, this is white people.
	White is simply a physical descriptor for more of a genetic and spiritual buildup, right?
	It's a completely, You're kind of putting a physical label on a racial unit.
	So I don't put the label white myself, typically.
	I'm doing this simply as an introductory kind of explanation.
	We actually have to look at the genetical groups and genetical buildups themselves.
	For instance, using the term brown people.
	Well, that doesn't really mean anything, right?
	Because you can be Asian and brown, you can be Arabic and brown, you can be black and you're actually kind of brown.
	So that doesn't necessarily even make any sense.
	The reason that this happened, this is a deliberate distortion, is they pull race into these big conglomerates and just kind of dumb them down into skin colors.
	And there's a couple of reasons for this.
	One is a simplification.
	And two is, again, you wrap up this ability for Jews to now pose themselves as white.
	And you'll see this with guys like Michael Kimmel is probably the best example that I can think of off the top of my head.
	He's a Jew who goes to TED Talks, and he calls himself a white middle-class man because he wants to identify with the skin color.
	But then the second that...
	The second that he sees that Trump is coming into office, he says, well, oh, I'm scared of Trump because he's a white supremacist and I'm Jewish.
	So it's like an identity shield for these people.
	So you're correct.
	Race is not a color.
	Or rather, when we speak of the color, it's a very simplified way of describing a collective body of people.
	So the Asiatics, for example, we could call them the yellow people.
	We don't do that, though.
	So why is it?
	Just think about this.
	Think about this very hard.
	Do we call Asiatics yellow people?
	Do we call Arabics brown people?
	Typically not, right?
	Typically we say, oh, like the Muslims or the Arabs over there.
	Or we say the Asiatics or the Asian people over there.
	The reason that this has been dumbed down into black and white, there are absolutely sinister motives behind this.
	And this goes into what we talked about in our show earlier.
	Where we discussed communism the other day.
	And we discussed how racial tensions are how these people benefit and how they destabilize society.
	So race has nothing.
	Skin color is one factor of a race, right?
	Just like eye color is a factor of the race.
	Maybe length of eyelashes could be a factor of a race.
	Culture is a factor of a race.
	Language is a factor of a race.
	Religion is a factor of a race.
	There's all of these different categories of physical representations of a genetic group of people.
	And again, that's why the five major races and there's five major religions.
	So we have Christianity, we have Islam, we have Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism.
	And all five of those have a different race of people.
	And each race of people, and again, we're speaking on the rule and not the exception, There might be, you know, some white Muslims or some white Buddhists or some Asian Christians, right?
	That's the case, but it's not a mass scale thing.
	So, and this is important that you understand this.
	Yeah, sure.
	We are all human.
	I understand that.
	That's not the argument here.
	We're not saying, again, this is kind of the argument that we're kind of putting across here.
	it's the same thing when we talk about white people having some kind of a homogenous society for themselves and why this is important.
	Anybody who's been to a high school that's very multicultural knows exactly how race works or anybody who's been to prison.
	I haven't been to prison, but I've heard this from people that have been to prison.
	Anybody who's been to prison also knows exactly how this works.
	And the way it works is if you go to prison, your skin color is your uniform.
	That's the way it works.
	If you go to a high school, it's typically exactly the same.
	The black kids hang out with the black kids.
	The white kids hang out with the white kids.
	The Chinese people hang out with the Chinese people.
	They go in groups.
	They like to be with their own group.
	It's the same thing when you go to the animal kingdom.
	This is not a foreign concept.
	This isn't anything crazy.
	The antelopes hang out with the antelopes.
	The bison are with the bison.
	Right?
	The lions stay with the lions.
	They're different animals.
	They're all animals.
	We could say, oh, well, they're all animals.
	Why can't they intermingle?
	Well, yeah, they're all animals, but they have different traits.
	They have different characteristics.
	They have different buildups genetically.
	So because of that, they stay apart from each other, right?
	We don't see lions trying to mate with antelopes.
	We don't see antelopes trying to mate with drafts.
	Yeah, they're all animals, but they're different buildups, and they have different traits about them, and they have different personality types.
	And you can see this in birds.
	The best example is, you look at Darwin with the finches.
	Well, the finches are very similar, right?
	They're all finches, but there's some finches that have a fat beak, and there's some that have a skinny beak, and there's some that have a long beak.
	And all of those finches have...
	Different buildups, right?
	So the finches with the fat beak, they only eat walnuts.
	So they live in the area where all the walnuts are.
	And somehow intrinsically, those finches know not to intermix with the finches with the short beak, right?
	It's very interesting how that works.
	This is natural, okay?
	Unbreakable, I don't know exactly what that means.
	I don't know how you're wording that.
	No, Hassan, I disagree with you.
	you know race is a very real concept and it must be discussed if you don't see that i'm i'm sorry that you don't see it but it's a it's it's very much it needs to be explained i'm not i'm not Again, when people talk about this subject, they have instant connotations, and we can see it from basically the reaction to the chat already.
	Sure, humans are humans, but just like we said with the finches, he says, finches are still finches.
	Finches, yes, they are.
	But again, they don't intermix with each other.
	Why is that?
	It's because naturally they can recognize that they have different traits.
	Why do you want a purebred horse at a race?
	Can anybody answer that?
	Why do we want a purebred horse?
	For your race.
	Why are purebred horses more expensive than a mixed breed horse?
	Because they're more genetically pure.
	They have a different capability, right?
	It's the same thing with purebred dogs.
	Everybody's like, oh, I want a purebred German Shepherd.
	No one looks past that.
	No one looks by that and goes, or no one stops on that and goes, oh my God, that's evil.
	No, your German Shepherd should be mixed with a Dalmatian.
	No one says that.
	We want purebred things.
	That's not a bad thing to say.
	And this is all-encompassing.
	Sure, we want purebred black people.
	We want purebred white people.
	We want purebred Asian people.
	Otherwise, their cultures wouldn't exist.
	They wouldn't physically have a cultural basis.
	The reason that Norway is Norway is because there's Norwegian people there.
	The reason that China is China is because there's Chinese people there.
	So all of these people have their own build-ups.
	I'm not covering their agenda, Hasan.
	I'm sorry, you don't understand at all.
	Yes, we are humans, and we also breed the same way that animals do.
	We can't give ourselves a higher characteristic than animals can.
	That's not the piece here.
	By that logic, we should adhere to a strict code of incest.
	That's conflation.
	no one said that yeah that's that's nonsense yeah We know that inbreeding causes genetic problems, right?
	And so does racial admixture.
	It causes genetic problems.
	And again, this doesn't matter what race it is.
	The fact that people...
	Instantly, the second that anybody hears a white person talking about the concept of race, they get very emotional and they try to conflate it as if somehow I'm saying, whites are too much...
	We're better than everybody and no one should be mixing with us.
	That's not what I'm saying.
	I'm saying this is all encompassing for everybody.
	No one should mix with anyone for the sake of their own kind.
	Now, again, if you want to have some exceptions to that rule and people want to do that, okay, whatever.
	But...
	On a mass scale, if we do this over time, what people aren't recognizing is you're going to lose every original culture that's on Earth right now.
	Give it 10 generations and all of these original cultures are going to be gone.
	Anyone who doesn't understand that, look at America.
	It's the best example of it.
	We had...
	What is America?
	What is an American?
	This is the problem.
	And most of the people that are probably having issues with these statements are most likely American people or live in America.
	In America...
	Everybody's lost this concept because what is the American race?
	There's no such thing, right?
	There's no such thing.
	But there's a German race, right?
	There's a Korean race.
	Well, there's no American race, and that's because we don't have a genetic group built up yet because there's so much admixture that there can be no such identity as American other than a physical passport that states, I'm a citizen of this place, right?
	So There's no American race.
	It's not a race.
	This is the exact issue.
	I can be an American citizen.
	I can be a person that has rights here, but it's not a racial buildup.
	And this is the only case where that's the problem.
	Canada is also anywhere in the New World, right?
	If you look over at all of Europe...
	Those are racial units.
	When you look at Ireland, you can look at an Irish person and say, that guy is Irish.
	I don't even need to know he's from Ireland.
	I can look at him and I know he's Irish.
	You can look at a German person and say, that guy's German.
	I know that.
	You can look at a Korean person, and a lot of Asiatics can do this.
	You can look at a Korean person or a Japanese person or a Chinese person, and you can differentiate between which one is which just by looking at them.
	That's because they have their own racial buildup.
	Now, again, this idea that it's about skin color has nothing to do with skin color.
	Japanese people have white skin color.
	Are they white people?
	No.
	No.
	White is just a dumbed-down term.
	It's a stupid term, to be honest, and I don't like the term itself.
	I think it's a very bad term.
	I think European is better.
	Aryan would actually be probably the most accurate term, but most people, yet again, have negative connotations with the term and are incapable of understanding what it actually means.
	They conflate it with other things, and they automatically kind of put the preconceived notions on it that have been put into their minds.
	Yes, white is a color.
	We've been over this.
	Yeah, it has nothing to do with, it has nothing to do with skin color.
	Skin color is just one trait of it.
	We use skin color as a description just because it's a simplified piece.
	Like I said, when I say white people should have control over America, white people should have sovereignty in their own nation.
	Does that mean I want white Japanese people here?
	It's like if Japanese people say, they wouldn't say it because they don't do that shit over there.
	Some people don't understand.
	This is only an American thing.
	If Japanese people were to say, oh, this should be a yellow country, well, they're not yellow.
	You understand?
	It's not about color.
	It has nothing to do with color.
	Color is just a dumbed-down variant that we use.
	Okay, I'll say European peoples, if that helps.
	European supremacy, European power in their own nation.
	Let's put it maybe in those terms.
	So, yeah, Mr.
	Elrow, that's a little bit of a different piece.
	The point is, The people that have an original genetic buildup should have a specified different area that they're entitled to, and they don't have to have other people in there.
	So the problem with this is when we look at America, for example, America was a predominantly white country, and it was an only white country in its founding, and it was predominantly white throughout its inception.
	The Naturalization Act of 1790, or whatever it was, stated that it was only for white peoples to emigrate here and be citizens.
	So, whites have only been integrated with other races in this country for maybe 60 years, 70 years.
	This isn't that long.
	We're testing something that's pretty foreign.
	When we look at ancient civilizations, ancient civilizations collapsed when they let a different race or a different tribe or a different nationality of people come in, and they slowly intermixed with each other, and they lost their essence.
	They lost their origins.
	Yes, he has on again. he has on again.
	I never said that whites were superior.
	That's kind of exactly the point.
	You're actually adding to my point because that's what I said in the very beginning.
	I said white supremacy has negative connotations with it.
	People insinuate that it means that whites want to kill everybody or they think they're superior genetically to everyone.
	Whatever.
	Look, look, if white people have their country, look, look, here's white land and here's Arab land and here's Africa land.
	Right.
	Everybody has their own little place that they can all live in.
	If the people in the Arabic world want to think they're superior to me, they stay in their homeland.
	I don't care that they're more than entitled to think that if the Asians want to think they're superior to me, they're more entitled to think that.
	As long as they're not pushing it on me, why do I give a shit?
	Why do I care if they go live in their homeland and they say that they're superior to everybody?
	Whatever.
	If they want to think that they're entitled to think it.
	Right.
	It doesn't mean it's true.
	It doesn't mean it's false.
	And if white people want to think that, sure, as long as they're not trying to kill anybody else or dominate over anybody, let them think it.
	It's it's this is a this is all like a personal take.
	It's an opinion.
	We're kind of basing off of opinion.
	Obviously, if I'm white, I'm going to look at my heritage and culture and think that it's better than others because that's my heritage.
	That's my culture.
	It's the same as being Christian or Muslim.
	If I'm Christian, I'm going to say, hey, being Christian is way better.
	My God is the real God.
	Well, yeah, sure.
	That's your opinion.
	You can think that.
	And as a Muslim, you can think that your God is the real God.
	And as a Jew, you can think that yours is the real God.
	As a pagan, you can think all of your collective gods are the real gods, but it's all opinion, right?
	So as long as they keep that opinion in their category, in their area, there's no problem.
	Well, that's a shame, Hassan. Hassan.
	That is.
	Yeah, well, that's a good point.
	Someone says America is a giant boiling pot of heritage.
	Yeah, this is the issue.
	This is the issue with America.
	And let's talk about that giant boiling pot.
	Who came up with the giant boiling pot?
	Where did this theory even come from?
	This comes from Israel Zangwill.
	Was he white?
	No.
	His skin was white.
	But genetically, he's not white.
	He's Jewish.
	And this is exactly what we're saying.
	It's not about skin color.
	Sure.
	Yeah.
	Israel's angle has got white skin, but he's not a European person.
	He's not genetically the same as somebody like myself.
	And you can look at him and you can look at me and you can tell a genuine racial difference.
	All you have to do is look at him.
	So the guy is different.
	There are different racial buildup.
	And because of that, Because of that different racial buildup, these people are going to have different opinions on how the world works, right?
	So Israel Zangwill came and he creates this melting pot theory.
	And you have to recognize, if I'm a...
	Let's say I want to rule the world, right?
	I want world dominion, right?
	Which is quite literally, if you read the Talmud, if you read Jewish scripture, it's exactly what they want.
	If I want to rule the world, the best thing I can do is the good old-fashioned Sun Tzu divide and conquer.
	That's how you rule the world.
	I would set this guy against this guy, neighbor against neighbor, race against race.
	I'm not advocating for races to be against each other.
	I don't know why what I'm saying is inflammatory or even confusing.
	No one's advocating for them to be against each other.
	We're advocating for a separation of each other so that our issues with each other don't intermix.
	Just the other day, I was talking about this, and again, someone conflates things.
	I said, if we have a white country, America, everybody knows that white America is a big farming country.
	Farming is a huge thing in America, in the States.
	It's always been.
	And, uh, obviously in America, the greatest or most, uh, populist farm animal is the cow, right?
	So I'm a farmer.
	I've got all these cows and everybody, all these farmers have all these cows, right?
	So burgers are like the staple of American food.
	Everybody wants a good old American burger, right?
	And tomorrow, Indians decide to move in and they are Hindu.
	So they worship the cow as their god.
	I said this yesterday.
	Someone said, I'm shitting on Hindus.
	I'm not shitting on them.
	I'm saying that's what they do.
	It's a fact.
	It's logical.
	So they come in and they worship the cow.
	They're going to say, hey, I don't want farmers killing cows because cows are a holy animal.
	So if they're to take power in our country, if Indians are to gain some kind of leave way into our legal system, they're going to make laws that would enact that we can't kill cows.
	Well, now, you realize how much this would hurt the native peoples of America because a lot of them are farmers and a lot of them, their main profit comes from cows.
	A lot of people, all the burger joints are going to have to shut down.
	So McDonald's, Wendy's, Burger King, every fucking restaurant you've ever been to will all have to stop serving burgers.
	So you understand how just one thing like this can have such a societal impact?
	Because our cultures are different.
	We have different things that we agree upon, right?
	So this isn't a crazy thing to say.
	This is nonsense, right?
	They revere it.
	They don't worship it.
	They think the cow is God.
	So yeah, they worship it.
	I mean, that's kind of nonsense to debate that.
	We mince words here?
	The point still stands.
	Whether they revere it or they worship it, they don't think it should be killed.
	So when they come here, they're going to want to pass legislation if they get into power that states that we can't kill them, which would change the fundamentals of our society.
	They'll make impossible for it.
	Yeah, we'll start having veggie burgers.
	Right.
	Hassan, I've been having these conversations for two years, my friend.
	I've never stopped these conversations.
	And I won't, because race is a very important thing to be discussed.
	Like I said at the beginning of the show, I know it's a hard thing for most people to talk about.
	A lot of emotions get riled up.
	Just recognize I'm not being emotional.
	I'm not advocating anything other than people having sovereignty over themselves.
	And that shouldn't be a crazy thing to advocate for.
	for.
	Probably Carl, probably.
	So anyways, the point, the point remains.
	That recognizing what your racial heritage is and what your culture is, is a...
	It's very important.
	I am curious to understand your point here, Hassan, because you said your examples lack logical base, and I really respect you.
	What point of my examples lack logic?
	I don't understand.
	I understand.
	Groyper73, thank you, my friend.
	Bo Hunter, I agree.
	Yeah.
	And this is why, again, this is why sovereignty is very important in any country.
	Again, I don't want white people flooding into Vietnam and taking control over Vietnam and starting.
	Imagine tomorrow if white people, 10,000 white people went to Vietnam on a boat and they all start buying, creating their own newspapers and saying the Vietnamese press.
	They title their newspaper Vietnamese Press.
	So a white guy who's literally never even been to Vietnam before goes there, creates a newspaper in the country and says, Vietnamese press and says, the Vietnamese people are oppressive to the white man and will not allow white man to have control in their society or will not allow white man to be mayor.
	Well, don't they have the right to do that?
	Don't they have the right to say that these people who are foreign to my land and who have never been to my land before shouldn't control my country?
	I think that's common sense.
	It's like, think about this on a micro scale.
	Let's take it out of the macro.
	Maybe it'll help for people to hear it.
	See, now, alright, see, one squid, that's the problem.
	Now you're just, one squid, sorry.
	Now you're just, you have your own preconceived notions, right?
	You would be what we would call prejudice.
	You think I'm prejudice, but you're the one that's prejudice.
	You said, I don't give a fuck about what happens in Vietnam.
	No, I do.
	I care about what happens in every country.
	Right?
	So, it's kind of absurd here to state that you have a preconceived notion about me that you want to have in your own mind.
	Anyways, so let's look at that example of Vietnam.
	They should have control over their own country.
	That's a logical thing.
	And if you want to put it on a micro scale, which will help some people to conceptualize this, if you have your home, okay, I'm Zach, I own a house.
	This is my house.
	I can invite people to my house.
	They can be a guest in my house.
	Let's say tomorrow, I want to invite one quid squid into my house because he seems like a really reasonable guy.
	I invite him in and I say, hey man, why don't you come stay for a week?
	The first day he comes in, he's like, oh, thank you for your hospitality.
	I appreciate it.
	Then he comes in and he unpacks his stuff.
	All of a sudden, after one day...
	He's kicking his feet up on the coffee table.
	You know, he's got his muddy shoes and he kicks them up on the coffee table.
	I say, oh, hey man, just out of respect, no feet on the coffee table.
	Actually, we take our shoes off at the door.
	It's part of my culture, right?
	And he comes in and he just keeps his work boots on.
	He starts walking through the house, right?
	Well, my culture is I keep my shoes on in the house, right?
	Well, we got different views.
	We have different views.
	So he's walking through now, okay?
	And I have to deal with that.
	Then he says, well, actually...
	I have a dog.
	I discipline my dog the way I discipline my dog, right?
	So I say, hey, you know, you're in timeout.
	You go over there.
	And then he says, no, no, you're not in trouble, buddy.
	Come here.
	And he gives the dog all kisses and love and stuff.
	And he counter signals the way I'm trying to raise my dog and discipline my dog, right?
	And then he tells me how to raise my children.
	And then he tells me how to cook my food.
	Now, eventually I'm going to say, all right, As a guest, you're no longer welcome here.
	And this is exactly what we're talking about.
	We're just putting it onto the macro scale.
	When you own a country, a group of people founds a country.
	It's a tribe that finds a country, whether it's the Romans of the ancient world, whether it's the Germanics of the ancient world, whether it's the Arabs of the ancient world, they find a country.
	They create that country, and anybody that comes into that is a guest.
	And when a guest comes in, if they don't respect the law of the country and they want to control that country and change the law of that country, they're no longer welcome.
	This is common sense.
	This should not be foreign to anybody.
	The reason we're even explaining this from a white perspective is because right now, in all white lands, this is exactly what's happening.
	This isn't happening in Africa.
	No one's mass flooding into the Congo and telling those people how to run their country.
	No one's mass flooding into Japan and telling them how to run Japan.
	No one's mass flooding into Vietnam and telling them how to run Vietnam.
	But every single white country in the world right now has people flooding into it on mass scale and telling them how they should run their country, whether that's on a religious basis, a racial basis, a moral basis, a cultural basis, whatever the case may be.
	People are telling others how they should control their country.
	So whites are obviously upset with that.
	This is a logical thing.
	Anybody would be upset with it, and I would expect anybody to be upset with it, whether it's whites, Vietnamese, whatever the case may be.
	Everybody should be upset with that.
	No one shouldn't be.
	I wasn't mixing race with religion.
	I was using religion as a different example.
	It's another example of the same circumstance.
	Races are going to have differences.
	religions are going to have differences.
	It is a shame that people can't understand this concept because I do think it's a very...
	Common sense concept, again.
	And the reason I bring animals into the equation is because we're talking about genetics then, right?
	Like, everyone says, oh, hey, why do you call a dog that's got two different breeds of mutt?
	Because it doesn't have that pure...
	It doesn't have that nature to it, that pure-bredded nature, right?
	So, everybody wants...
	Look, one of my favorite dogs is a Belgian Malinois.
	I don't want a Belgian Malinois that's mixed with a poodle.
	I don't want a Belgian Malinois that's mixed with a Rottweiler.
	I want a Belgian Malinois.
	That's the dog I want.
	I want it to be its own breed.
	I want it to have its own characteristics and its own traits.
	Because anybody that has a mixed breed dog, you know exactly how this works.
	If you have a German Shepherd that's mixed with a Beagle, The German Shepherd's going to have some of the characteristics that a beagle has, and some of those characteristics might be a little bit worse than the characteristics that a German Shepherd has, like size.
	For example, my dog is a great example.
	My dog is a mutt, and he is a German Shepherd mixed with a Basenji, so he doesn't have the stature of a German Shepherd.
	He's a small dog, right?
	He's got the intelligence of the German Shepherd, which is a good trait, but he's real small, so he lost the big...
	Being a tall and stocky dog, he lost that trait.
	So there is a mixture that causes these things.
	Yeah, Hassan, I'll gladly have a conversation.
	I'm not like an overroaching authority.
	I will discuss.
	We can certainly discuss.
	Whenever you see me in a space, just request.
	I don't really host spaces personally, but I will discuss.
	The original citizens of the United States were fleeing religious persecution.
	That's not true.
	That's not true.
	Unless you think the original citizens were Jews or something.
	That's not true.
	I don't understand that.
	Yeah.
	up.
	And by the way, folks, when you look at Jews as an example, because this is one of the most important pieces, no one gets upset with Jews for having these exact same ideas.
	Israel, they want open borders for the United States, but they don't want it for themselves.
	Why is that?
	What's the reason for that?
	Because they recognize the reality of keeping your bloodline pure.
	They highly recognize that and they take it very seriously.
	And the only time that you'll see Jews kind of intermixing, and even them to an extent have degenerated and lost that purity to a slight extent, but still have.
	They're marrying into aristocratic families and massive powerhouses of wealth, like the Trump family or the Biden family.
	They start to intermarry into these families in order for power.
	Because they look upon money as essentially their god.
	Capital is the most important thing to them.
	So when they marry into an aristocratic family or a very wealthy family, in their eyes, they're increasing their genetic bloodline because they're increasing their wealth.
	That's the way they see it.
	They care a little bit less about physiognomy and regular genetic characteristics, although their characteristics seem to...
	psychologically be a lot stronger than a lot of the other races.
	Hassan says, by the way, are you aware that the current rulers of the West aren't Europeans nor white of what you have in mind, nor Roman?
	Yeah, yeah.
	I mean, they're...
	I guess, because it depends on what you're saying here, what you mean by rulers.
	I don't think Donald Trump, when he was president, was ruler of the country.
	I don't think Biden rules the country right now.
	It's Jews, unequivocally.
	They have gained an enormous amount of power.
	Anybody who controls the finance controls the country, and they control the finance right now.
	John, I agree with that.
	He says, multiculturalism has never worked and never will, and they know it and are using it to destroy the West.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	And they'll use it to destroy any country.
	Multiculturalism will harm any place.
	It doesn't matter where it is.
	It will harm any place.
	We all have different ideas on how the world should function.
	Again, let's just think, or take everybody else to the equation.
	Let's just say, for instance, America was...
	Only a white place.
	We're running a hypothetical.
	Say America was only a white European place.
	And one day, Jews decided to move in.
	And we let them in.
	This is actually history, right?
	This is exactly what history was.
	Ancient Persia is a good example, right?
	Ancient Persia was only Persians.
	This is in the book of Esther, in the Bible.
	You want to read the Old Testament, read the book of Esther and read exactly the story that we're talking about right here.
	In ancient Persia, it was only Persian people.
	There weren't Africans in Persia.
	There weren't Chinese people in Persia.
	It was only Persia, right?
	Only Persians.
	So, Jews lived outside of the kingdom.
	And eventually, one Jew, she was like a half-mixed Jew, Named Esther.
	Weasels her way into the society.
	They weren't allowed in society because they were recognized as a foreign people.
	And this is why they were recognized as a foreign people.
	Esther comes into the civilization.
	And she sleeps with the king.
	The king, his name was Asaph, Asaphirius, or something of the sort.
	They call him Xerxes, though.
	I don't know how that equates, but whatever.
	King Xerxes.
	So this woman, Esther, she sleeps with the king.
	And she obviously, once she sleeps with the king, he's got some incentive to listen to this woman.
	So he says to her, okay, Esther, what do you want?
	What can I do for my woman?
	And she says, you should let Mordecai, who was her Jewish uncle who wanted to get Jews into the civilization.
	That's why she even came in in the first place.
	She said, you should let Mordecai and the Jews into the civilization.
	So the king said, well, I'm getting some good pussy, so sure, let's do it.
	So he lets them in.
	They all come in.
	And Haman says to the king, he says, this is quoted, this is in the Old Testament, it's in the Book of Esther.
	He says, there are a group of people in the kingdom, he says this to his king, there's a group of people in the kingdom who hold not the king's laws, But their own laws.
	Now, this is really important.
	It's extremely important.
	What he's saying is...
	They're a group of people.
	They're different than us.
	They're foreign from us.
	And they have a different moral system than us.
	They have a different legal system than us.
	So when they come here, they're not paying attention to what we feel is right and wrong.
	They're paying attention to what they feel is right and wrong.
	And what they feel is right and wrong says, we can kill anybody that's not us.
	We can abuse anybody that's not us.
	We can use anybody that's not us.
	So it's a problem.
	That creates an instant problem.
	So Haman tries to mourn the king.
	And...
	And these Jews start getting into civilization.
	They get a lot of power in the civilization.
	In the story, it states that they went from basically wearing rags to wearing purple.
	Now, if you know what purple means in the ancient world, purple was a sign of royalty.
	It's a very hard cloth to come across.
	Because purple dye was a rarity.
	So, they get this...
	Yeah, Chain, obviously.
	So they get this power in the civilization, and they proceed to murder 75,000 of the ethnic Persians.
	Now, if Persia remained homogeneously Persian, and they didn't let anybody that was non-Persian into the civilization, that wouldn't have happened.
	There would be no circumstance of that.
	So they let them in, they were mass murdered, and the Jews celebrate this today, because they're very conscious of their history.
	As a white individual with Germanic history in me, I'm not conscious of my history, unfortunately.
	I wish I was.
	I wish I knew more about my history, and I'm trying to learn that right now, and I'm in the process of doing so.
	But if I look back at my history...
	To have that same understanding of my traditions and whatnot, I would still hold those things dear.
	That's how they remain.
	Jews do this.
	They celebrate Purim every year.
	P-U-R-I-M. Purim.
	You can look this up.
	And when they celebrate Purim once a year, they celebrate the mass murder of 75,000 ethnic Persians.
	They're still celebrating that today.
	They actually hung the National Socialists on Purim Day, which when you look at the Book of Esther, that's how they killed Haman.
	They hung him on the gallows.
	Symbolic.
	It's symbolic.
	These people have a serious culture that they pertain to very strongly.
	Okay.
	So they follow this idea.
	and when they celebrate Purim, they actually eat a cookie.
	It's called a hamantaschen.
	We talked about this the other day.
	A hamantaschen is a triangular cookie.
	It's shaped like an ear.
	Let me actually see if I can just pull it up really quick.
	And hamantaschen physically means Haman's ears.
	Okay, so I'll show you guys this just so you can understand what we're dealing with here.
	We're talking about a group of people that literally celebrates the slaughter of others and poses as a...
	Essentially, it's like cannibalism that they're symbolizing.
	It's really gross.
	So here's the cookie.
	It's a hamantash.
	In Israel, they call it a hamantashin, which translates to Haman's ears.
	So it's a cookie that they eat that literally symbolizes eating a man's ears that they killed thousands of years ago.
	So they hold their traditions dear.
	They hold their traditions very close to their heart.
	And because of that, they're essentially racially conscious, right?
	Their religion is very bound up with their race.
	And this is where they create that intentional confusion.
	They try to make it seem like every time somebody says something negative about them or just calls out the things that they're doing, you get called anti-Semitic and they call it religious persecution.
	But none of it is...
	Religious persecution.
	We're not persecuting them on account of their religion.
	We're persecuting them on account of their actions.
	So that's racial consciousness in a mix.
	We're at the one hour mark on the show here just about.
	So we're going to kick into the other half of the show.
	I'm just going to fill up my tea really quickly, so if you guys will excuse me.
	I'm going to fill my tea.
	I'm going to take a quick bathroom break.
	I'll throw you guys a little bit of intermission music.
	As you guys know, I'm a classical junkie.
	I really like classical music, so we'll throw some of that on for a little bit.
	And I'll be back in about two minutes to touch up on the second part of the show.
	I think I've had to do that.
	I think I've had to do that.
	I think I've had to do that.
	I think I've had to do that.
	I think I've had to do that.
	I think I've had to do that.
	I think I've had to do that.
	Thank you for your patience.
	I appreciate that.
	I just wanted to fill my tea up.
	I've been really thirsty today.
	I don't know why.
	Okay.
	Alright, so we're coming up on the second half of the show.
	For everybody that's just coming in, we are on Logos Academy Episode 4.
	We are obviously streaming...
	Three times a week.
	We stream on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays at 4pm Eastern with the Logos Academy series.
	And then we'll run some interviews on the sideline from time to time.
	We just interviewed Joel Davis on Saturday at 9pm Eastern.
	If you guys want to watch that rebroadcast, that got a lot of traction.
	Joel's a very intelligent guy.
	Speaks very well.
	Very articulate.
	Extremely articulate.
	And he's a cool dude.
	He...
	He joined us for a show.
	We had a really good conversation.
	People really seem to enjoy that.
	So I highly recommend that you guys check that out.
	It was a good show.
	I really like Joel.
	He's a good dude.
	I'll probably be having him on again in the future.
	And we got some interviews that are coming up this week.
	Let me actually pull my schedule out.
	I'll recommend you guys catch these certain shows.
	Give me one second here.
	Bag of books.
	Really should organize this a little better.
	Yeah, I should organize it way better because I don't know where the hell my schedule is.
	Here it is.
	Here we go.
	Okay, let me catch you guys up on the schedule for this week.
	I don't have the topics set up for the three shows of the week yet.
	I've been kind of winging it a little bit.
	I've got a lot of research I've got to do.
	I've got to get back into reading some books.
	I haven't read enough lately.
	So today is Monday the 16th.
	We're obviously live for Logos Academy episode 4.
	Tomorrow we are going to be doing a space with Gentile News Network and Ian Malcolm.
	And we're going to be talking about the Twitter algorithm.
	How to work Twitter.
	How to start spreading our message to a larger group of people on Twitter.
	Really important space.
	Make sure you guys catch that.
	That's going to be a really good one.
	It's going to be at 8 p.m.
	Eastern tomorrow.
	I'll be live again on Wednesday with episode 5 of the Logos Academy.
	Don't have a topic yet, but I will have one as soon as I can.
	I'm going to be live on Thursday with Blonde Tweets.
	She goes by Blonde in the belly of the beast.
	I'm not entirely too familiar with her or her work.
	I've heard very good things about her, though.
	She's going to be interviewing me, so that's why I'm not crazy familiar yet.
	Typically, if I have somebody on to interview them, I will try to learn a little bit about the person, so that way I can write up a good questionnaire.
	But since she's interviewing me...
	I'll let her kind of do that and I'll learn who she is from that.
	So that's going to be at 4pm Eastern this coming Thursday.
	On Friday, I'm going to have an interesting...
	I have two shows going on Friday.
	I have one at 1pm Eastern with my good friend Giuseppe Vafangulo.
	It's going to be on Odyssey and FTJ. He's a really good fellow.
	And then right afterwards, I have a show at 4 p.m.
	Eastern with a guy named Aquarius Fabrications.
	He is a pretty interesting guy.
	He's a fabrications guy who builds projects.
	He does all kinds of welding and stuff.
	And he's got a new product that he has come out with that I'm going to help him promote and discuss.
	So I'm really interested in that.
	And then Saturday, I am going to have Laurent Goyne on.
	For those who are not familiar with Laurent, Laurent wrote The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, which was a book that kind of goes over the Jewish influence of the Kennedy assassination.
	They go through the motive, they go through the facts, and all the nitty-gritty details.
	It's a really good book.
	Probably the most conclusive book I've read so far on the subject, so I really recommend that you guys catch that show.
	It's going to be 4 p.m.
	Eastern on Saturday.
	And then Sunday, I'm not 100% sure.
	I'm not 100% sure.
	We'll see.
	But I'm thinking I'm going to do another 12-hour marathon show on Sunday.
	I haven't done one in a while.
	It's been like a month and a half, two months maybe since I've done a marathon – No, it's maybe more actually.
	It might be almost three months.
	Yeah, I think it's closer to three months since I've done the 12-hour marathon show.
	So I'm going to do another 12-hour marathon stream, I think.
	Don't hold me on that.
	We'll see.
	And I'll pick a topic of great importance that I can cover for 12 hours because it's going to have to be something very important if I'm doing that.
	But if we are going to do that show, I'm actually going to have it as a hybrid show.
	It's going to be 12 hours of a very important topic where I'm educating.
	But I'm also going to have it as a fundraiser stream.
	And I'm going to have that fundraiser stream to try to improve some of the quality for this show.
	Because...
	Since we're now on the Stu Peters Network, I want to make sure I have the best quality possible on my shows.
	So I want to get a camera with a little bit of better quality.
	I want to change.
	I need to buy a program here for video edits.
	I need to do a couple other things.
	I'll map it out and we'll discuss so everybody knows exactly what it is that I'm looking at.
	But we've done two 12-hour marathon shows in the past.
	This will be the third one.
	And I think this one, if I do do it, I will have half subject and half of it turn into a fundraiser as well.
	I don't really like doing fundraisers.
	I feel like it's really gay and Jewish.
	But I had a couple people recommend it.
	And I do really need to upgrade my setup quite a bit.
	I need to get a new camera for sure.
	There's a couple other things that we could definitely use.
	So it would be better to just...
	Cave in and allow people, if they want the stream quality to improve, they can support and we can do that.
	I hate doing it.
	I'm not the kind of guy that likes asking for money.
	I think it's gay and weird.
	It's very Jewish.
	But unfortunately, we do live in this satanic system where money is absolutely required.
	So I have to kind of have to have it at some point.
	Yeah.
	Okay, that's the schedule for this week.
	It's a very active schedule this week.
	I think next week is going to be a little bit easier, a little bit more dumbed down.
	We won't have that much going on next week, which is good because I'm...
	Gonna need a couple break days here and there to get some reading in and stuff.
	It's really hard when I got all the other stuff going on to spend some time reading.
	I do want to mention one thing really quick as well, just because it is important.
	On the very last day of the month at 4 p.m.
	Eastern, I'm going to be having Converse on this show.
	He'll be on the Stu Peters Network, Odyssey, and all the other things.
	He is the organizer of the JP Conference.
	Really...
	Really wise individual.
	Put a lot of effort into organizing that.
	If you guys aren't familiar with that, just look into the JP conference.
	It was a really good conference that he did.
	And I wish I could have physically been there.
	I participated online.
	But he'll be doing another one in the future and I'll be participating in that.
	So, that is the schedule for the next coming week or so.
	We do have other things going on next, the week after that, but we'll tell you guys about that later.
	So now let's get back into the show here.
	We're coming on to the second half.
	Please don't forget, if you guys don't already, follow me on all my different platforms.
	We are on Odyssey.
	That's my main platform where I have the bulwark of my stuff, a large archive with over 250 videos on it.
	Which is a very extensive level of education and interviews and things of the sort.
	So please take your time to follow me on Odyssey and check out some of the work I have over there, especially the Logos Academy Lectures series.
	That's my most prolific series, most widely appreciated.
	So follow me over on Odyssey.
	It's LogosRevealed on Odyssey, and that's O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
	Follow me on Twitter.
	I have a lot of unique things that I post up on Twitter.
	You can find me there.
	It's LogosRevealedEye.
	I have an I at the end of it.
	LogosRevealed was taken.
	Follow me on the Stu Peters Network on Rumble.
	You can watch me again on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays at 4 p.m.
	Eastern.
	And follow me on my Rumble at LogosRevealedEye.
	I think that's pretty much everything except for ftjmedia.com.
	I do want to promote that one more time.
	I want to promote their website too because they're doing a lot of really good stuff.
	So give me one second.
	Let me pull this stuff up for you guys.
	And then we'll get into the last topic of the show for about 45 minutes after we do this.
	So FTJ Media is run by Dave Geharry.
	Dave Geharry has been in this movement for two to three decades, exposing Jewish power.
	He was one of the first guys to really help get the true story of the USS Liberty out there.
	Um, Israel, uh, bombed the USS Liberty and most people did not know about that at the time.
	And they definitely didn't know that it was intentional.
	So Dave Gehari is one of the key factors in exposing that he interviewed a lot of the original survivors of the, uh, of the attack.
	So let me pull this down.
	This is FTJ Media here.
	So it's ftjmedia.com.
	As you can see, I'm live on here.
	Lucas Gage is live at the moment.
	We've got Tim Murdock from White Rabbit Radio is live.
	We've got Josh Hu on there.
	He's the editor who helped create the website.
	Got a lot of different characters over here on FTJ. So make sure that you guys join the platform.
	Shoot a follow to my account, which is here.
	Shoot a follow to some of the other guys.
	There's a lot of other really good creators on here.
	So take your time to follow some of those guys.
	And in addition to FTJ Media, we have Money Tree Publishing.
	Money Tree Publishing is Dave Gahari's publishing website, which is closely linked to FTJ Media, but not directly.
	Over here, he has a link to FTJ where you can go straight there.
	They have a shop, so you've got a lot of books on here, a lot of videos, movies, really educational stuff.
	Synagogue of Satan is a really good book.
	Obviously, Mein Kampf is a must-read.
	International Jew is very solid.
	And here's a Holocaust book, Six Million Factor Fiction.
	You can go into learning the truth about the Holocaust and it proves it unequivocally that it did not happen.
	So definitely breaks down to a science.
	I really recommend you get that book.
	But when you decide to get a book, let's say you want to learn about the Holocaust.
	So you hit buy now.
	You go choose option.
	I want this book.
	It's going to be $40.
	So you add it to your cart.
	And when you add this to your cart, you got a little option here underneath the book for a coupon code.
	So you're going to type in code logos, L-O-G-O-S. That's my code.
	You apply that code and you're going to get 10% off the book.
	So you see I saved $4 on my $40 purchase.
	So you get 10% off the book.
	So you'll be supporting me.
	I get that little contribution.
	You'll be supporting Dave, who is, again, one of our guys who's really helping to build some community over there on FTJ. So you'll be supporting him financially.
	And you'll be supporting yourself with some education.
	So it's like a win-win-win.
	I definitely recommend, especially if you guys are going to be interested in any of those books, that you buy them there.
	Use the coupon code.
	Get a little bit of money off of it.
	Save some money for yourself.
	Help me a little bit.
	Support my show.
	Help Dave and support his thing.
	And additionally, learn some as well.
	Hasan, yeah, Dave Gahari is looking to expand that library in the future.
	It's a slow process, kind of getting things connected through a publisher, but he'll be expanding that library very shortly.
	So time will tell.
	Time will tell.
	We just got to wait for him.
	Could I link FTJ? Yes, certainly I can do that.
	I'll put it in all the chats right now if you guys want to go ahead over there.
	Make an account and shoot me a follow.
	Shoot everybody a follow on there.
	There's a lot of really good streamers.
	Okay, there it is on all the chat rooms.
	It's just ftjmedia.com.
	Okay.
	With that being said, we got about 45-ish minutes left of the show.
	So we're going to go into the second half.
	We're going to talk about the second topic of the show, which is the best form of society, which just like racial consciousness, well, more so than racial consciousness, is a very ambiguous thing.
	It could mean a lot of stuff, right?
	It's very up for interpretation.
	So we're going to go into exactly what we mean by that.
	Excuse me.
	When we talk about the best form of society.
	So...
	I want to clarify here in the beginning.
	Best form of society is very different depending on who controls that society.
	What group is there?
	Is this a white Christian society?
	Is this an Asian Buddhist society?
	Who's controlling this society and who controls it will determine what kind of makes it better for them, right?
	So, for instance, genetically speaking, Asians are a very...
	I want to use the term robotic, but it is probably the most accurate.
	I can't think of another good term that kind of describes it in such a way.
	They're very kind of like fallen line, right?
	And this comes from a culture of being very...
	Their militaristic style is very much in that way of kind of following suit, right?
	So they follow suit into a line.
	And because of that, a country for them might be more of a social or...
	Not social, communal kind of a governance, right?
	One that is under one single authority and they kind of all fit in that own little box, right?
	They would not function as well in a free market capitalistic society.
	It's not as appealing to that group of people as it is to us in the States or wherever we have capitalistic societies.
	I think you know what I mean by that.
	So their societies are very collectivist, if that makes sense.
	American Beam, you said that well.
	Or Bream, rather, sorry.
	So because of that, they would work better in a communal society.
	Now, communal societies...
	For most of the European nations are very repulsive.
	We really don't fit well with these communal type of societies.
	Look at communism as a really good example of this.
	It's one of the worst forms of society for us.
	And I want to go into that actually.
	Sorry, my neck is really messed up.
	Sorry if you guys hear those pops.
	It's kind of gross.
	I want to go into a communistic society a little bit in specific and explain exactly why it is that a communist society is really unappealing for our civilization.
	So when you look through...
	And again, I'm going to speak through a European lens here.
	Being a European person makes the most sense for me.
	When you look through a European lens...
	All of our history has this individual spirit that will spawn up from time to time.
	And we really look at a very slim amount of individuals as really excessive, meaningful people in history.
	We've got Julius Caesar, we've got Marcus Aurelius, we've got Leonardo da Vinci, we've got Michelangelo.
	You look at all these people in history and Essentially, the way we see it is individuals stand the strongest in civilization.
	What shapes a civilization, what changes the culture of civilization is the individual, not the collective.
	A mass group of people have never changed a society.
	It's always individuals that lead that mass group of people or lead some kind of cultural revolution.
	When you look at the Renaissance period, it wasn't the whole civilization doing the Renaissance.
	It was a few special, very talented individuals that set that bar and reshaped and remorphed what exactly society was culturally.
	And when those people came and did these things...
	We look at them.
	We revere them greatly in our history.
	Now, when we look at a communistic society, this is essentially the antithesis of that individual spirit.
	Now, we don't want to take individualism too far.
	There's like a combination here, or maybe a happy middle ground, a gray area, where you want individualism to sit.
	So you can be an individual...
	Let's put on this side.
	You can be an individual that's really intelligent, really talented, really professional, and that's your individual spirit, which is kind of like above the rest, right?
	And then you can be an individual over here, which is someone who just only cares about themselves.
	They're only focused on self-interest.
	They don't care at all about the rest of society or the collective or...
	providing anything of value for them, right?
	Those would kind of be like the degenerates and the dregs of society, right?
	The individual that is here, the creative, talented individual, they create things that uplift the civilization, they create the betterment of the rest of society, like Marcus Aurelius, think about him.
	Him ruling over society was so beneficial for the rest of all the people there.
	It set so many guidelines, so many really fantastic examples.
	So that one individual, he's not an individualist.
	But his individual spirit is so salient, so important, that we have to focus on that, that we have to recognize the magnitude of that.
	Meanwhile, these other individuals who only care about themselves, they don't really give a shit about the rest of people that are individualistic, and they say, ah, that's not my problem.
	Their individual spirit is so repulsive and self-interested that we want to outcast that to the bottom.
	So there's two forms of individualism, right?
	You have one that you want to succeed and you have one you want to get rid of.
	So in a communist society, the problem with this specifically is the individual spirit as a whole is completely erased.
	And it all goes into a collective mindset.
	And you see this, we saw this in Russia as an example, when the Soviet Union came to power, which again, the Bolshevik Party was like 90% Jewish.
	They come to power, and they start ruling over society.
	Well, if you look at capitalistic doctrine, first off, it's the abolition of private property, which already hurts the individual.
	Now the individual is beholden to the government.
	But they place no value on the individual.
	Everything has to stoop down to that lowest common denominator.
	So you see this with schooling system today, right?
	People are held back.
	They have to go with the lowest.
	I guess maybe DEI would probably be the best modern example of exactly what we're saying here.
	When you look at DEI, diversity, equity, and inclusion.
	So diversity means everybody's included, right?
	Everybody gets put a part of this.
	Equity is everybody gets the exact same and inclusion is all inclusive to anybody.
	It doesn't even matter if you're like a complete shit show or you only have one leg or you have like a 20 IQ, you're just included, right?
	So this is really problematic.
	And I'm going to tell you why this is problematic.
	So...
	With this policy of diversity, equity, and inclusion, we now have to set the bar for the lowest common denominator.
	So if a guy with a 20 IQ comes in and he says, I want to work here, every single company has to allow that guy in as a quota, right?
	And now they have these quotas.
	You have to have a certain amount of blind people, deaf people.
	You can't discriminate, they say.
	Again, another word that has been conflated into some evil thing.
	The definition of the word discriminate is to recognize the difference in things.
	So let's say I see an antelope and we'll go back to the same analogy.
	I see an antelope and a lion in the desert, right?
	If I don't discriminate between those two animals and create a difference and recognize which one is which, and I go try to hug both of them, I'm going to die on one of those circumstances.
	So I have to discriminate and recognize which animal I'm capable of hugging, right?
	If I really want to hug an animal.
	So I can go hug an antelope.
	I can't go hug a lion.
	It's not going to go over too well.
	So you have to discriminate.
	Discrimination is important.
	It's like a fundamental to keeping things clean and healthy in society.
	So they created this idea to not discriminate in the workplace, which is a communistic and Jewish in essence policy.
	And this policy, what it does is it creates this circumstance in the workplace where if I'm a corporate guy, I'm Zach and I own...
	All of these franchises around the town.
	And people want to come work for me.
	And they have, you know, a guy comes in and my job is a warehouse.
	And the guy has no legs.
	And he's like, I want to work here.
	Well, I can't discriminate.
	I have to let him work here.
	So now I have to find some kind of post that this guy fits into.
	Or if a guy comes in with a 10 IQ and he can't figure out how to put things on the shelves and he keeps making mistakes, well...
	Because of his either racial buildup or his religious background, I'm not allowed to discriminate, so I have to let him in.
	I have to have a quota of a sort.
	Now, this is exactly communism, okay?
	It lowers everybody down to that lowest common denominator.
	So anybody who's real talented...
	Anybody who's an exceptional individual, they're not getting picked first based on their exception.
	They're getting picked last based on the principle of inclusion.
	So they have to include everybody else and then we'll pick some of the higher quality people, right?
	So what this does is this lowers the overall standard for society and it de-incentivizes being a talented individual because if, excuse me, Because if I want, let's say, I want to be an engineer, you want to be an engineer.
	And I am super talented in the field.
	I've been studying it my whole life.
	It's bred into me.
	My parents were engineers.
	They taught me everything about being an engineer.
	I'm a super smart, naturally gifted person, and I'm really good at being an engineer.
	Now, I go for that job, and you go for that job, but you happen to be an Asian person or a black person or whatever the case may be.
	Now, when you go for that job because of the quotas that they have to reach, you're going to get accepted first.
	It doesn't matter if you're as genius as the other guy or if you're as well-rounded as him.
	You're just going to get in for the inclusion factor.
	Now, what this ends up doing is...
	Me, as an individual, if I don't fit into that inclusion category or that minority group that gets put into place, what's the incentive for me to be a really, really good engineer?
	Why would I care?
	For what reason would I want to be a good engineer when I know they're not really looking at my skill?
	They're just looking at Inclusion.
	They're meeting quotas.
	They're meeting kind of like this baseline.
	And then we got equity as another example.
	So let's say we do both get the job.
	Let's say both of us get the job.
	And I'm a 10 out of 10 engineer, and he's a 5 out of 10 engineer.
	We both have the job.
	Well, in equity, in a society that preaches equity, equity and equality are very different things.
	Equality is you have equal rights, you have equal kind of We each have the ability to climb that corporate ladder the same way.
	That doesn't mean we're both born equally with the same ability to climb it.
	It means we both have the same free roam to try to climb it.
	So essentially, equal rights is this.
	We use a literal ladder as the example.
	We got a five-story house.
	We put a massive ladder up on the wall.
	And we say, equal rights is, you guys both have the opportunity to climb it.
	Go ahead.
	Go ahead.
	You take a 550-pound obese guy, and you take a 150-pound very jacked, good-looking dude, and you say, you guys both have the ability to go climb that ladder.
	Go ahead.
	That's equal rights, okay?
	Now, those guys aren't going to have the equal ability to climb that ladder.
	So when our founding fathers said, in quotes...
	All men are born equal.
	You have equal rights.
	They're not saying everybody's born with an equal ability.
	Obviously, that's not the case, but that would completely negate nature.
	So sure, you have the equal right to climb that physical ladder or the corporate ladder, however you want to see it, but that doesn't mean those people are going to have the same ability to do that, the equal ability.
	So that's equality.
	That's what equality means.
	Now, equity is completely different.
	Equity is an equal distribution towards everyone.
	So if Fatty McGee gets two steps up the ladder and can't make it up any further...
	He still gets the same amount of pay as the guy who climbs all the way up the ladder and gets the job done.
	You understand how that works?
	That's equity.
	You're including everybody in with it.
	So, oh, well, you tried.
	It's your participation trophy.
	That's another kind of version of equity, is these participation trophies.
	It's like, oh, hey, you tried.
	You might have gotten eighth place, but you tried.
	Here's a trophy.
	That's equity.
	So if 8th place gets a trophy and 1st place gets a trophy, what encourages 1st place guy to be 1st place when everybody gets the fucking trophy?
	Who cares?
	Why would he care?
	If I got 1st place, I put all that effort in, all that hard work, all that effort.
	To get myself into first place, to have the ability to win that race, and the guy in eighth place is going to get the same size, the same color, the same type of trophy I am, why am I fighting?
	Why am I putting all that effort in?
	Why am I trying to be this exceptional individual?
	So communism, by definition, with DEI, kills the individual spirit.
	It literally drains it out of the soul, the life force of the country.
	And it kills the spirit.
	So now no one wants to put effort in anymore.
	And this is why communistic societies are absolutely inherently terrible.
	And they will never function for any group of people.
	Again, maybe Asiatic countries, they might see this as okay.
	But in the long run, it won't be beneficial for them either.
	This will always hurt the exceptional individuals.
	Take a little brief breather here.
	I'm going to take a sip of my tea.
	I'm going to take a sip of my tea.
	Yes.
	So these concepts absolutely hurt the talented, naturally gifted, or not even naturally gifted, but the hardworking individual.
	They harm these people inherently.
	So, it de-incentivizes the individual spirit in society, and it kills that healthy form of individualism.
	The one we were talking about earlier, right?
	That unhealthy form still remains.
	People are still going to be self-interested.
	That's not going to change.
	But it kills that healthy form of individualism.
	It just completely destroys it.
	Okay?
	So, communistic societies are off the table.
	Now we can talk about democracy.
	Democracy is the other big one.
	Everybody, you hear it all the time in America.
	We must defend our democracy.
	We have to defend democracy.
	We have to go destroy this country because we need to defend democracy over there.
	Here's the thing.
	First off, America was never a democratic country.
	Never was meant to be one.
	It was meant to be a Republican country, a constitutional republic.
	So, if someone says, I'm a Democrat, that means I want America to be a democracy.
	If someone says, I'm a Republican, that means they want America to be a republic.
	Do you understand that makes sense?
	That's exactly what it means.
	Now, in the beginning, in the inception of our country, there was never even supposed to be political parties.
	Our founding fathers weren't a fan of that.
	But they also were specifically all, unequivocally, all of them were against democracy.
	John Adams famously said, democracy, there has never been a democracy that has not killed itself.
	And this is the truth.
	We're seeing this today.
	And the reason for this is democracy takes society and it says, yet again, everyone has the equal right to vote.
	Everyone has the equal say in things.
	And here's the problem with that.
	I want to vote.
	I'm a guy who's read a lot of works.
	I've read a lot of books.
	I've educated myself on a lot of different topics.
	I care a lot about the political atmosphere.
	I'm deeply invested into my society and want to make sure that things go well for everybody, not just myself.
	So my standard of voting is very high, right?
	Because I want to make sure I'm achieving all those things we just discussed.
	Now, I'm sure everyone's seen it.
	Who hasn't seen a video of a girl online saying, oh yeah, I'm voting for Biden because he's going to cut the school debt.
	Or I'm voting for this guy because he's cute.
	Or I'm voting for this guy because he's funny.
	Well, that's insane.
	That's literally insane.
	That's not appropriate voting.
	So in democracy, everybody has the opportunity to just do that.
	They can just vote.
	And the problem is, then, if there's enough of those simpletons, which, by the way, in a society, we just talked about individuals, how the talented individual, the mass never ruled society, only the talented individual did.
	Well, the talented individuals are far and few in between.
	You might get a dozen of them in a generation that are so exceptional, right?
	So...
	If we allow the simpletons to vote on behalf of the talented individuals, they're now forced to sway with the mob.
	I have to lower my standards with the mob.
	Socrates talks about this 2,000 years ago in his book, The Republic.
	He talks about that democratic browbeating from the mob.
	There's a really good scene in the very beginning of the book.
	If you guys read The Republic, the first line of The Republic, Socrates says, I went down into the city.
	What is meant by that is, this is a philosophical statement.
	Symbolism, right?
	Or analogy, going down into the city.
	When they're going down, what he means is they're not physically walking down the hill, right?
	Like the city is south, right?
	Or it's lower.
	What they mean is they're going down with the simpletons, the people who are of lower intellectual ability, lower capabilities in society.
	They're going down to kind of mingle with the jetsome.
	And when they go down with these people, he has this conversation, and in the dialogue, he's going to leave the city, and he gets stopped by this guy who's a simpleton.
	His name is Glocken, and he's got a group of buffoons behind him.
	And he says, stop.
	We want you to come with us.
	This man wants to have a discussion with you.
	We need to court your favor.
	And Socrates is like, I'm not really interested in doing this.
	It's kind of a waste of my time.
	And the guy says, well, there's three of us and there's one of you.
	It's a little bit of a threat, right?
	But that threat holds more symbolism inside of it.
	It's not just there's three of us and one of you.
	We can beat you up.
	It's showing you this is what a democracy is.
	The majority gets the rule.
	The majority tells you what goes.
	It doesn't matter how much more valuable you are.
	Socrates was 10 times a man of the other three guys, but they have the say.
	You see, that's the symbolism of democracy.
	You can have 50 guys that are brilliant, like way above the mass, but the mass has the say.
	So it doesn't matter.
	They can be as brilliant as they want.
	So in a democracy, who controls the mass then?
	The people that are able to control the minds of the mass, right?
	If you can tell the masses this is reality, this is what's good, this is what's bad, you can get them to vote in whatever way you'd like them to.
	So democracy is a bad society because the mass is capable of making mistakes.
	Democracy is an inherently emotional society.
	It goes based upon human emotions.
	How people feel one day can be voted into existence the next day.
	And the week after that, if they feel different emotionally, they can vote for something different emotionally.
	There's no logic in that form of society.
	Now, this is where, talking about Socrates in his book, The Republic, we get into a different kind of state form, what our country was supposed to be founded as.
	An American republic, a constitutional republic.
	Now, a constitutional republic, you can vote...
	You can vote for your state delegates.
	You can vote for your representatives.
	But those representatives are personally responsible for what happens to your country.
	And each state has its own sovereignty.
	And the only reason that bigger government exists is to keep those states in check.
	make sure they're not doing anything that is unconstitutional.
	Now, at this point, that big government over top is doing everything unconstitutional and the states don't even have any individual power anyway.
	So we've lost all of that.
	It's gone.
	It's completely, it's eroded entirely.
	So now we're in a circumstance where in this constitutional republic, what you're supposed to do essentially is you can vote...
	Yeah, sure.
	We've got equal rights to do whatever the hell we want to do.
	But at the end of the day, if any of those votes go against the Constitution, it's a null.
	It doesn't matter.
	The Constitution is logical, okay?
	And the Constitution decides what we do moving forward.
	That's the legal standard.
	So, to clarify this, if we're in a democracy, and tomorrow...
	If 51% of the populace votes that it's okay to have sex with dogs, having sex with dogs will be legalized because the mass voted on it.
	Popular opinions said it's okay.
	That's a democracy.
	In a constitutional republic, if 80% of people vote that it's okay to have sex with dogs, we look at the Constitution and And we say, oh, right there on that line.
	No, we said that's unacceptable.
	We're not doing that.
	This is the overruling authority.
	This document that was made by those impressive individuals, those dozen impressive individuals, says that that's a no-go no matter what.
	So we're not doing that.
	So you understand?
	That's how this works.
	It's the same with gun rights.
	In a democracy, that's why they want to subvert our country into a democracy.
	If they subverted into a democracy, they can get the mass populace to vote against having guns.
	They can emotionally manipulate them and convince them that guns are terrible and evil and inherently bad and deadly.
	And all those people will vote to get rid of guns, and then we get rid of the guns.
	In a constitutional republic, if you vote to get rid of guns, and 10% of the population wants to keep their guns, guess what?
	Your vote doesn't matter.
	It doesn't matter if 90% of people say, no more guns.
	Because when you go to the Constitution, we say, oh, right there, line number two, Second Amendment.
	We have the right to bear arms.
	You can't change that.
	It's a Constitution.
	That is our Constitution.
	That constitutes the legal setup of our state.
	This is our country, rather.
	This is the problem with our society today.
	They're trying to subvert it.
	When's the last time you heard anybody called a republic?
	You have republicans standing on stage talking about how much we have to defend our democracy.
	Well, are they republican then?
	If Donald Trump comes up on stage and says it's of the utmost importance we defend our democracy, or we defend Israel because it's the only democracy in the Middle East, is he a republican?
	Because it doesn't sound like it.
	Because a Republican is supposed to want a Republic.
	That's not exactly Republican.
	So...
	This is the problem.
	He's not a Republican.
	I see a good quote in the chat.
	This is actually from Benjamin Franklin.
	Someone said, Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting what's for dinner.
	It's a really good quote.
	And that's by Benjamin Franklin.
	So...
	Now, here's the thing that people have to understand.
	Now, when people hear authoritarianism or they hear dictatorship, as we discussed earlier, they instantly get these negative preconceived notions about it.
	It's evil.
	It's terrible.
	We can't talk about it.
	If we're in a circumstance like we're in today, where we had a really good state forum, we had a constitutional republic, it got diverted and subverted, rather, into a democracy.
	And that democracy is slowly decaying into a state of anarchy.
	On our show on Friday, we talked about how our capitalistic democracy has turned into an oligarchical tyranny.
	And it really was a capitalistic republic at one point.
	But it turned into an oligarchical tyranny.
	Now, when it's turned into that, an oligarchical tyranny is eventually going to turn into anarchy.
	Okay?
	Again, this whole process...
	I want to reference this book.
	I think it's very important people read this.
	this.
	Hold on.
	This whole process is laid out in the Republic by Plato, which is essentially spoken through Socrates.
	Okay?
	Very good book.
	One of the most educational books you'll ever read in your life.
	The Republic by Plato.
	I got the Penguin Classics version.
	Get whatever one you want.
	They're all pretty good.
	There's nothing...
	No one's subverting this word.
	When you read this book, he lays out this exact process.
	And he says, a country goes from a constitutional republic or a monarchy...
	It degenerates into a democracy.
	And then when it degenerates into a democracy, it turns into an oligarchical tyranny after.
	This one strata that rules over top of that democracy with all their finance and their abilities to mass manipulate the public.
	They control the nation now.
	So now it's an oligarchical tyranny.
	And then, eventually, because lawlessness becomes apparent in these countries, which you see it today, right?
	How many times have you seen some hoodlum black dude rape or murder or steal something or rob somebody and get out like two days later, right?
	So we're in a lawless society at this point.
	It's not all the way there, but we're getting damn close.
	And when that lawlessness ensues, now you have an anarchy.
	And when you have an anarchy, here's the issue, and this is what people don't understand.
	Where do you go from anarchy?
	Do we say, hey guys, wait, wait, wait, guys, stop rioting.
	Look, look, the Constitution.
	Guys, guys, look, look, the paper.
	Wait, wait, wait.
	It doesn't work.
	That doesn't work.
	You can't do that.
	When the state of affairs of a society becomes so bad, the only way to fix that state of affairs is through an authoritarian government.
	So that could be a dictatorship, that could be a monarchy, that could be an aristocracy, but it has to be some form of authoritarian government.
	It has to step in and say no more.
	Folks, in this society, do you think we're ever going to vote these faggots off the street who are walking around in public naked in front of children?
	Do you think you're going to vote them off the street?
	Are you going to vote the criminals back over the border?
	Are you going to vote the drag queens out of the schools?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think so.
	So, an authoritarian government needs to step.
	This is a historical cycle.
	This has always been the case through all of history.
	Eventually, an authoritarian government needs to step in and fix the decay.
	And if they don't step in fast enough, The decay will get so bad that the society collapses entirely, and then a new society forms.
	So we have a choice.
	We're at the crossroads right now.
	We're right there.
	We are literally at the edge of the canyon here.
	Everybody can see that.
	We see the moral decay.
	We see the decrepit way that people live today.
	We're this close to the edge of the canyon.
	So you have a choice now.
	We can keep playing the game of let's try to vote this out, which will never happen.
	Be realistic, folks.
	It's not happening.
	Or we can all collectivize and create some form of authority like a father figure that steps in and says, no, that's not happening anymore.
	This is enough.
	Sorry, that's a jailable offense.
	Don't forget, guys, 70 years ago, if you were gay, they'd throw you an Alcatraz because you had mental illness.
	Now if you're gay, you're entitled to walk around the street naked in front of children.
	Think about that.
	Think about it.
	They used to send fags to Alcatraz.
	You went in the stony lonesome on an island in the middle of nowhere because you're gay.
	Now it's like, hey, put the flag out, man.
	Sure.
	Yeah.
	Go put your dick in front of a bunch of children.
	That's great.
	You're not voting out of this.
	It's too far degenerated.
	And our founding fathers said the exact same thing.
	They said, a society that is so far morally decayed is beyond reform.
	You cannot reform this.
	No amount of reform can fix this.
	Because every single time you reform one thing, 10 other disgusting things are being insinuated back into society.
	You cannot reform this.
	We're beyond the point of reform.
	So you've got a choice.
	We go into some form of authoritarian government, which most people are very adverse to due to the media propaganda that has taught them that it's inherently evil, which it is not.
	Or we collapse.
	And America's gone forever.
	We lose this empire, one of the greatest empires that's ever existed.
	It's gone forever.
	And we have to find a substitute.
	And hopefully we can build something out of the ruins of what's gone.
	So that's the choice.
	That's the crossroads that we are at.
	You have that choice as an individual, what you think is best.
	But I can assure you, we are not voting out of this.
	And I can assure you, we are not reforming this.
	If you want to understand that on a deeper level, please, I highly recommend this book.
	It is one of the greatest books that you can physically read to understand this concept.
	Plato's The Republic.
	This was written 2,400 years ago, and it's just as relevant today as it was then.
	Nothing has changed.
	This is human nature.
	Read this book.
	Very good book.
	So that's our choice.
	Or if we want, we can let this degenerate into a communist society, which is a form of authoritarian government.
	But that's not an authoritarianism that we want, right?
	Because that's a oppressive authoritarianism.
	Again, authoritarianism is neutral.
	Okay?
	Dictatorship is neutral.
	It's not good or bad.
	Who rules it is good or bad, right?
	Stalin was bad.
	Yes, we know that.
	We watched what happened.
	Mao Zedong was bad.
	We know that.
	Marcus Aurelius was good.
	He was a dictator as well.
	So does that mean all dictators are bad?
	No.
	No.
	Nope.
	It can be bad or good.
	It's our idea on how that is ruled.
	We have to put the correct person in play.
	And that's our job as individuals.
	So, I hope that makes sense for everybody.
	Just as a recap, we talked about racial consciousness.
	We talked about the best form of society.
	And I think the best form of society is essentially a constitutional republic when times are good.
	When times are good, right?
	When you have control and sovereignty.
	When times are bad, the only reasonable form of government is some form of authoritarian government, whether that's a monarchy, an aristocracy, a sole dictatorship, you name it.
	We have those choices.
	We have to make those choices and we have to make them fast.
	Because things are decaying faster and faster every single day.
	And if we don't step in before that decay turns into a collapse, well, we're going to either get communism or we're going to have complete anarchy and chaos, and then we're going to have to find something in its stead.
	White Wing, thank you very much.
	A very kind investment with a super chat.
	He says, $20 super chat.
	Thank you, sir.
	Very much for that.
	He says, new setup fund.
	Keep up the great work, Zach.
	Thank you very much, my friend.
	I appreciate you.
	Folks, don't forget, if you do want to support this show, if you want to keep this show going, if you find this information entertaining, informative, appreciative, whatever the case may be, please Feel free to take some time if you have a little bit of extra money this month.
	As Stu says, if you buy a coffee every day, get rid of that coffee for a day and support the show.
	All of the options to support the show are down below in the description.
	You can support via Entropy.
	Entropy will give you a live super chat on the top of the screen.
	We haven't gotten one of those in a while, so no one's seen that yet.
	You can support via Odyssey directly in the chat room on Odyssey.
	You can support with crypto wallets as well, especially for those people over on Rumble that are only watching on Rumble.
	You can support with those crypto wallets, but you can also take your time to click on the Entropy link and you can support straight through Entropy.
	That'll give you the ability to super chat and say whatever you see fit.
	You can add a question in, you can add a point, a comment, whatever you want to put.
	And all of that All of your support in any way, shape or form, whether it's a dollar or a trillion dollars, all goes right back into what I'm doing here.
	It's either going to turn into more books, or it's going to turn into a better webcam, or it's going to turn into more markers for my whiteboard, whatever the case may be.
	Every dollar that I make doing this goes straight back into the work.
	You have my word on that.
	So I want to thank you, folks.
	It's been a very good show today.
	We had some pretty good viewership over on Rumble.
	I see we got some solid viewership over on Twitter as well.
	And I want to remind everybody one more time, please take a moment to follow me on all of my platforms.
	You can find me on Odyssey.
	It is O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
	You can find me on there at Logos.
	You can find me on Twitter at LogosRevealedI.
	You can find me on Rumble at LogosRevealedI.
	And you can find me on ftjmedia.com.
	I'm LogosRevealed on there.
	Also on the Stu Peters Network, we're live every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 4 to 6 p.m.
	Eastern.
	That will continue for the rest of this week.
	We will also be live next week with the same schedule and indefinitely every single Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
	So we're on a little more of an organized schedule at the moment.
	A lot of these will be monologue streams, much like today, where I try to stick more on information and education.
	And some of the streams will also be interviews or guest hosts, things of that sort.
	So you guys can catch any of it that you would choose to catch.
	If you want to see all of my old videos, my old archive, all of that is on Odyssey.
	You can see every single thing I've done on Odyssey.
	I'm actually going to link my Odyssey in all the chat rooms right now, except for Odyssey, because that would be kind of dumb, right?
	So I'll link my Odyssey channel right now in the Rumble and Twitter chat rooms if you guys want to follow me over on Odyssey.
	Take a moment to do that.
	I've got a really large archive of like 1,500...
	No, I'm sorry.
	250 videos.
	I don't know why I said 1,500.
	I'm reading something else.
	250 videos archived on my channel.
	Some are interviews, some are monologues, some are philosophical streams, guest streams, all kinds of different things going on.
	So if you guys look in the Twitter chats and the Rumble, you will see the link to the Odyssey channel.
	I'm trying to put it in the other Twitter chat, but my Twitter's loading a little bit slow here.
	Bear with me.
	It's very slow, actually.
	Why is it not loading?
	Oh, there we go.
	Okay.
	All right.
	There is the Odyssey link for anybody that wants to check that out.
	And with that being said, I think we're going to close the show for today.
	So thank you, folks, for taking the time to watch.
	Don't forget to follow on everything and support the show if you want.
	It really does help me continue to do this content long-term.
	And I guess we'll say essentially full-time.
	Thank you folks.
	I appreciate everybody for tuning in.
	I appreciate everybody watching and sharing.
	And I will see you guys Wednesday at 4pm Eastern with the next show in the series at Logos Academy episode 6 at 4pm Eastern.
	I also will be on a Twitter space tomorrow that I recommend at 8pm Eastern with Gentile News Network and Ian Malcolm discussing the Twitter algorithms and how we can use those for our own Devices in the future.
	Thank you, folks.
	Appreciate all the comments.
	A lot of very positive support.
	Have a wonderful night.
	Enjoy yourselves.
	Thank you, Beth.
	Did I get in contact with Roberts?
	No, I did not.
	I still have not seen him tweet at me.
	I have to figure out why that is.
	It's something with Twitter.
	A lot of times, new, fresher accounts, you don't get notifications when they tweet you.
	All right.
	Thank you, guys.
	I will see you guys tomorrow at 8 p.m.
	Eastern for The Space and Wednesday at 4 p.m.
	Eastern for the next show.
	I really appreciate everyone.

▲