Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 9, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

01:46:57

Logos Academy LIVE! Episode 1: Why has America Become So Gay?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to the first episode of Logos Academy.
	This is going to be a new series.
	We're going to be doing this on several different platforms.
	This will be done on Rumble via the Stu Peters Network.
	This is going to be done on Odyssey via my own channel at Logos Revealed.
	And it will also be streamed to both my Twitter and Stu Peters Twitter as well.
	So bear with me as I kind of get set up here.
	This is the first show that I'm actually doing on Rumble Studio or Rumble Live.
	So I do have a little bit to learn here as to how this is formatted and what I have to do.
	So let me...
	Let me set this up here.
	If I can just get an audio check in the chat room on...
	Rumble and on Odyssey as well.
	That would be really nice so that I'm ensured that we're live and everything is set up correctly.
	I believe I have my settings correct.
	I just want to double check here.
	I'm going to pull up the chat room right now.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	I guess that is the Rumble chat room right there, huh?
	Okay.
	All right.
	Never mind.
	It's actually right next to me.
	So it should be good.
	Okay.
	All right.
	I think we're live and we're good.
	Everything seems to be set up okay.
	All right.
	So welcome, everybody.
	It's episode one.
	This is going to be a series entitled Logos Academy.
	For those who are familiar with my show in the past...
	I had a series that was already titled Logos Academy, which was a whiteboard lecture-type series where we would discuss historical events that most people don't actually know the true fundamentals of or understand how they actually came to be.
	So we're going to go into those as much as we can.
	Additionally, we're going to start a...
	New series kind of branching off away from that original Logos Academy series, and we're going to name that Logos Academy Lectures, and that's going to be the actual whiteboard series.
	We'll have some guests on for interviews.
	We're going to be doing regular chat-type streams, which is basically what today will be.
	I don't have a name yet for that.
	This is the first show.
	It's kind of very quick, very spontaneous, so bear with us as we kind of get organized with it.
	The topic for today, though, since I don't have exactly a title for the show, The topic at least is why is America so gay?
	Why has America become so gay?
	I'm sure everybody in the world sees how homosexual America has become.
	And how detrimental this is.
	And we're going to talk about some of the Jewish influence that's been behind the scenes that has caused a lot of this.
	And additionally, how they've stifled honest and critical debate of this.
	I think that's a really important piece.
	Obviously, when you try to talk against homosexuality and you make any kind of remark against it in the modern age, the first thing that's leveled against you is that you're homophobic.
	And...
	This term has actually been created as a bit of a...
	It's an obstacle, right?
	It creates an emotional reaction out of the recipient of the word.
	So the idea is to kind of stop you in your place and stop you from actually discussing why homosexuality might be actually immoral or bad as a thing or unnatural.
	We talk about nature, right?
	Look at the animal kingdom.
	How many species of animal actually have homosexual intercourse?
	Typically intercourse is specifically for breeding, right?
	That's the whole meaning of intercourse is to actually bear children, create offspring.
	And this does not happen in homosexual marriage or homosexual intercourse, obviously.
	So this has been pushed on America.
	If you go back to the 1940s, America was not a very gay nation at all, actually.
	It's become very gay over decades and decades of indoctrination and propaganda.
	So I want to talk a little bit about that propaganda itself, the indoctrination aspect behind it, and then we're going to talk about, again, how they stifled that.
	So I actually almost want to kick off with discussing how they stifled it.
	Let me see how I can get...
	I have some things I want to pull up.
	I just have to figure out how to actually pull them onto my screen here.
	I guess it would be...
	It would probably be presentation.
	Yeah, it's not changing anything though.
	I will have to get a little bit used to Rumble here.
	We might actually have to kind of ballpark it and go without visuals today.
	It might just be kind of more casual and just myself kind of monologuing for this first show, I think.
	We've got media here.
	Okay, it's a little bit different.
	Yeah, I think we're just going to have to wing it today, and we'll just go with some monologues.
	And everything that I describe will be read off, and you guys can research this on your own time.
	I will work on having visuals moving into the future so that these things are a little more understandable.
	So for those who saw, I was just on Stu Peter's show today, live, to discuss the Tucker Carlson issue.
	And how he was removed from the Tucker Carlson event or essentially banned from the Tucker Carlson event while being on the VIP list.
	And in our discussion, we discussed the Magnus Hirschfeld and the Frankfurt School.
	And we talked about some of these disgusting things that were happening over in Weimar, Germany.
	And this is a...
	This kind of sets the precedent for how these things came here.
	So, you know, in the 40s, in the 30s, no one heard of transgenderism in the United States.
	Nobody heard of people even being openly homosexual, right?
	This was very much in the closet.
	It was kept and refined into the closet and not allowed to come out of it for fear of social backlash, something that in society, social backlash is a very healthy practice.
	They've marked it as bullying.
	They've used other kinds of words and descriptors over social backlash in order to, again, stifle actual debate or actual critiques of things.
	So when you went to high school, someone might make fun of the gay kid in school or make fun of the fat kid in school.
	And this was children have this.
	They do not have this social filter that adults do.
	When you've been appropriately socialized into society, you have now a social filter amongst you.
	So a lot of people are scared to go out and talk about Jewish power because they don't want to be called a Nazi or an anti-Semite.
	So they hold that social filter inside of them that does not allow them to actually say the things that they want to say or say the things that they think.
	So children don't have this social filter.
	And due to the fact that they don't have the social filter, they have an ability to say things like they see it.
	And when they're in school and they see somebody that is morbidly obese or they see somebody that is just not ordinary, not normal, they're going to blurt it out.
	I'm sure everybody's seen this.
	Someone's wearing a pair of sunglasses and the kid will say, oh, those sunglasses are ugly.
	Normal people don't do that because it's not the best way to kind of put that across to somebody.
	However, a child doesn't have that social filter.
	So when children...
	Not having that social filter critique these behaviors or these body types or personalities of other people.
	They're doing this with a specific thought in mind and that's because they see this as unnatural.
	To them, that is not something that is correct.
	And this is why, you know, you never see the jock in school getting made fun of for being a jock.
	You never see the super funny kid being made fun of for being the really funny guy or the really charismatic guy that gets all the girls.
	He doesn't get made fun of for being the charismatic guy because these are normal, good, positive behaviors.
	So children point out these negative and bad behaviors and homosexuality being one of those that in the 40s and 50s in the United States, people remained in the closet because they were fearful that people were going to say, hey, this is wrong.
	This isn't right.
	It's not natural.
	It's not okay.
	You look at how much of a percentage of child molestation is by homosexuals.
	It's overwhelmingly higher than non-homosexuals.
	So we see these as collective negatives for society.
	And a child can recognize that, and they'll say that right away.
	Now, if you are a child and you're grown up and taught, as you age, you're taught in school and by the media and people around you that, you know, hey, it's actually not good to say those things.
	That's bullying, right?
	They put out, I remember when I was in school, they put out this campaign that was against cyberbullying.
	Cyberbullying was the big thing, and you're not allowed to bully people.
	That was the big thing.
	Peace here.
	And as kids get socially programmed into holding back on those natural, healthy instincts and those natural, we'd call them high testosterone, masculine behaviors, much of which is also being broken down with these more phrases like toxic masculinity.
	All of these words are talking about homophobia, toxic masculinity, anti-Semitism.
	These are meant to take We're good to go.
	Industrial society and its future.
	And he discusses over-socialization.
	And he points directly to the left as a culprit of this over-socialization.
	They try very hard to push people into this box and this framework.
	You've seen this through anybody on the radical left.
	They will push against anything that is normal and healthy.
	If a man opens a door for somebody...
	It's toxic masculinity now.
	You think I can't open the door myself?
	And what this does is this breaks down the fabric of society.
	It makes people hold back from saying and doing things that are healthy and natural.
	Imagine if, you know, every time you go to hold open a door for a woman, she starts insulting you and saying, you know, oh, you think I can't do that myself?
	Instead of being grateful and saying, oh, thank you very much, sir.
	I appreciate that.
	And that's what you expect.
	That's what historically women always did.
	Now this has changed.
	And this is through that over socialization process.
	So one of the main words that they've used to stifle honest debate or honest critique of homosexuality is homophobia.
	Now, for those who are not familiar with the origins of the word homophobia, homophobia was actually coined by a Jew by the name of George Weinberg.
	He coined the term homophobia.
	He was a psychologist.
	And as we were just discussing before with the Frankfurt School and how all of these Jews that were kicked out of the Weimar Republic once the National Socialists came to power, whether they removed themselves or they were actually physically removed, which it varies is a lot of these people recognized the wave coming when they started to see the National Socialists come to power and start to have this truthful rhetoric about what was actually happening in society and pointing to the actual culprits.
	Well, the culprits themselves went, oh God, I'm found out, I have to go, right?
	That's kind of what the bank robber does when he finds out people know where he's at.
	He flees the country, goes to somewhere else.
	You see this time and time again.
	So they fled.
	They left the country.
	A lot of them did actually early before Hitler actually came to power.
	And when these people fled, a lot of them took refuge at the Columbia University, which is in New York City.
	For those who are not familiar, it's a very, very popular and well-known university.
	And through this university, they came up, not came up with, because really they were bringing them from the Weimar Republic.
	They brought all of these ideas that were being propounded into people's minds over in Weimar, Germany.
	homosexuality, transgenderism, pedophilia, all of these things which are inextricably bound with the same kind of doctrine.
	It's to destabilize society, ruin the fabric of society, which preps a healthy and moral upright society for a collapse.
	And then when the collapse happens, then the next move that they take to further gain control over that collapse is a full-blown communist revolution.
	We saw this specifically in Russia.
	We have the best example of it.
	In Russia, we saw the communist revolution happen, but before it happened, all of the rhetoric, You have to look at the rhetoric of the communists at that time.
	And the rhetoric was, down with the bourgeoisie.
	We need to bring down the bourgeoisie, right?
	The wealthier class of people are oppressing the unwealthy people, the peasantry.
	And this is the same rhetoric you hear today.
	It's just changed itself.
	It's slightly formed into something different.
	They've changed it into a racial rhetoric.
	And we'll go into how this has changed.
	But the racial rhetoric is now...
	Or the rhetoric, rather, itself is now transformed from one of class warfare to a new one of racial warfare.
	It's to pit white against black and pit minority group against minority group.
	And this is where we take things like homosexuality.
	They actually create them as a class group.
	That's what LGBTQ is.
	It's a...
	It's an identity that these people take up for themselves.
	So when someone you see all of the time, you go on Twitter or you go on these social media platforms and people have their pronouns in the bio, that means that they're taking this as an identity.
	Their literal identity is now their sexuality.
	And then they're convinced by these same provocateurs that that identity that they have makes them a minority group and they're oppressed for being in that minority group.
	You see how this kind of holds itself.
	Now, with all of this happening over in Russia, as they've changed the methods, they've brought those methods here.
	All of the methods have stayed relatively the same.
	They've just changed kind of the branding of it and the strategy behind it.
	So the strategy is to create some kind of massive divide in a civilization.
	Again, whether that's a racial divide, a gender divide, a class divide, a Actually, you could even look at a party divide.
	We saw this during the COVID pandemic, or COVID as they call it, this pandemic that happened.
	They actually had the right and the left completely polarized to a point where, as an individual, a free thinker who doesn't consider themselves on the right or the left wing, I'm not on either spectrum, I have my own free independent thoughts, if I say to somebody, I'm not getting vaccinated.
	I don't trust that thing.
	Oh, I bet you're a Trump supporter, they would say.
	It shows how polarized things had become, right?
	Same thing.
	If you're a Democrat, it's automatically assumed that you support gay marriage and you support the browning of America, right?
	These are just assumptions that are driven.
	There's not actually any inquiry as to what your independent thoughts are.
	It's a label that gets put onto you.
	It throws you into an identity group and a category.
	And once you get into that identity group, It's so easy to divide you amongst one and the other.
	We've seen this with religious divides in America, between Protestant and Catholic.
	You see this with racial divides.
	In early America, the Italians were heavily persecuted.
	They were not seen as people that were relevant to a European society.
	And a lot of Italians faced a lot of backlash.
	You see it all throughout history.
	You see these divides that get created.
	And this is why we have to look at the dangers of a multicultural society, which is another thing that communist agenda pushes.
	So to go back to our original point here, talking about how they brought these ideals to us.
	So at the Frankfurt School, they had all of these over-sexualized, sexually deviant ideas, which again, fundamentally destroy the fabric of society.
	And they brought these here in very specific ways.
	So So they came to the Columbia Institute, and this is where critical theory was spawned.
	And maybe people don't know what critical theory is.
	If you don't know what critical theory is, it's an idea as to how you can essentially make class warfare happen through economics and through the social apparatus in society.
	Well, today, everybody has heard of the term Critical race theory.
	Now, critical race theory is they've now taken it, okay, and they've changed it into a racial theory.
	Now, it's not about class anymore.
	It's about race.
	So, again, it's critical theory.
	They just threw the word race in between.
	And then they get groups to actually propound these things into civilization.
	You saw this with Black Lives Matter.
	It's a perfect example of it.
	Black Lives Matter was co-founded by Alicia Garcia or Garzia.
	She was a she's half black and half Jewish.
	OK, and she openly they state that they're a Marxist organization.
	The other co-founder, Patricia Cullors, she stated on an interview that they are trained Marxists.
	So that means that somebody is training them.
	Wonder who's training them.
	Well, if we look at who came to the Columbia University and brought the ideas here, it's pretty evident that there's a Jewish hand in this training.
	There's also quite a few Jewish hands in the founding of Black Lives Matter and in the funding of Black Lives Matter.
	Again, if you don't believe that they're a Marxist organization, what is the logo for Black Lives Matter?
	It's simply a communist fist and they painted it black to appeal to black people, right?
	So they're taking one of the identity groups, which is now broadly black, and they're pushing it against white.
	And that's why you hear this rhetoric that we need to tear down whiteness.
	We need to destroy whiteness.
	Very common proponent of this, who brought these ideas to the forefront in the 60s and 70s, was Noel Ignatieff.
	He was a Jewish communist who created, he actually had a magazine entitled Race Trader.
	And in this magazine, he discusses how we have to abolish the white race, how it's actually a moral good thing to abolish the white race.
	Now, for somebody who doesn't understand what we call the Jewish problem on a full scale, you might look at that and go, why is a White Jew talking about abolishing the white race.
	Isn't he white?
	Well, this is exactly the problem, and this is why we have to understand this issue the way it is.
	Jews are a foreign genetical group, and they recognize themselves as such.
	Otherwise, they wouldn't say, we have to abolish white people if their skin is white.
	So white isn't about skin color.
	Races are not about skin color.
	There's far more that defines something as a race.
	your culture, your language, your heritage, your traditions, all of these things are offsprings and products of a race of people.
	That's why when you look at the five monolithic religions in civilization in all of the world, you've got Buddhism, you've got Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
	All of these different religions have one specific racial group that predominantly follows them.
	Christianity is overwhelmingly a white religion.
	Islam is an overwhelmingly Arabic religion.
	Hinduism is overwhelmingly Indian.
	Buddhism is overwhelmingly Asiatic.
	And Judaism is overwhelmingly Jewish.
	And you can look at this and say, well...
	When you're a Jew, doesn't that mean you're religious?
	Well, that's simply not the case.
	And we'll go into that a little bit, and we'll actually quote some people on this.
	But there's a difference between being racially Jewish and being religiously Jewish.
	You have many of these Jews that we're talking about today that are radically destabilizing society.
	They are secular Jews.
	They're not religious.
	Most of them actually will openly state they don't believe in God.
	They don't follow any kind of religious doctrine.
	However, they follow the Talmud.
	And the Talmud, the reason that they follow this is because it's law.
	It's a racial law.
	It has nothing to do with religion.
	You don't have to be religious to follow the Talmud.
	So think about it like this.
	If a Jewish society has a Talmud and a Torah, the Torah is their religious document.
	The Talmud is their legal document.
	When you look at Gentile civilizations, and this is the case all across the globe, in Gentile civilizations, we have the law of the land.
	So in America, that would be the constitution.
	Germany has their own constitution.
	Greece has a constitution.
	Everybody has their own constitution and their own legal standards.
	So something that is illegal in one place can be legal in another.
	For instance, In America, pretty much almost collectively, the age of consent is 18.
	Well, in a lot of places in Europe, it's actually 16.
	The drinking age in America is 21.
	A lot of places in Europe, it's 16 or 18.
	So depending on where you live, the law of the land changes.
	That means the law of the people changes.
	So a people follows the law of their land, typically.
	Now we have a group of people, when we talk about racial Jews, that since they, for 2,000 years, didn't have their own land, they didn't have Israel, they didn't have anywhere that they...
	Specifically lived.
	They were very nomadic in a sense.
	So because of that, they would take their law with them, with their book, their Talmud.
	And now when this law is very contrary to our laws or the laws of the host civilization, again, advocating for things like eight genders, advocating for things like pedophilia, well, every civilization they come across, they don't agree with these things.
	So when you don't agree with these things, what are you going to do?
	You're going to have disputes.
	And this is where you get into expulsions.
	We see these expulsions all throughout history.
	So to reel back a little bit, because we're getting a little off topic, one of the things that they've done to start pushing homosexuality into society, which again is intrinsically of their ideals.
	For a Jewish society, this is very natural, actually.
	Homosexuality is a very normal thing for them.
	They have very effeminate men and very masculine women.
	They have reverse gender roles from Gentile society.
	That's why you hear things like down with the patriarchy.
	This is a more communistic Marxist forms of rhetoric.
	Down with the patriarchy is a way of saying, we don't want men to rule society.
	And the reason they don't want men to rule society is because their women are essentially, their lineage is traced by their women.
	If you're Born to a Jew and a non-Jew, what determines if you're Jewish is if your mother is Jewish, right?
	Which, again, proves it's a genetical thing and not a religious thing.
	But when you look at Gentile societies, any child that's born to two people, what last name do you keep?
	You keep your father's last name.
	That becomes your lineage, your heritage, right?
	So we have the great names in history, the Kaisars and...
	I mean, there's many great names in history, right?
	But you have all of these lineages that kind of get passed down.
	And through those lineages, that's how we determined aristocracies in our society.
	Our ruling class was determined fundamentally by those lineages.
	So since Jews didn't have their own society that they had a foundation in, What they had to do, if they wanted to get their laws to be the rule of the land or the legal standard for things, or even the moral standard, they have to trick the host nation into agreeing with their way of life, which again is completely opposite of ours.
	So they push things like homosexuality.
	And...
	Then they use these communist buzzwords to stop any debate.
	So racism is one of these.
	You get homophobia, transphobia, sexism, misogynistic, toxic masculinity.
	I mean, there's hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of them.
	And when you are able to break yourself away from these terms and no longer have an emotional connection to them, and you're able to kind of look from the outside and recognize them for exactly what they are, you realize this is a strategy.
	This is just a tactic.
	And when you can recognize that, you can obviously stop what's happening to you.
	But the strategy that they use is to shut down that honest debate.
	So we have a term like homophobia, which was again coined by George Weinberg.
	Well, George Weinberg, the first place he ever actually coined the term homophobia, the first time it was ever in print.
	Was in the Screw Magazine.
	Now, for those who aren't familiar with Screw Magazine, Screw Magazine was an extremely degenerate, and I really wish I could actually pull up a photo here.
	I really do have to figure out how to get that set up.
	I'll do a test tomorrow in my free time and make sure that the next Rumble show I can pull stuff up as I wish.
	But Screw Magazine was an extremely degenerate magazine that was all about sex, and it literally wrapped the American culture up into a sexual culture.
	So the very first front cover of Screw Magazine was the American flag, and all of the stars on the American flag were replaced with vaginas, and all of the stripes on the American flag were replaced with penises.
	And this was made by Al Goldstein, for those who aren't familiar with Al Goldstein.
	He is a secular Jew who was very fundamental in the early stages of pornography in the United States of America, this oversexualization.
	So we have one Jew who is stifling honest debate about homosexuality.
	And then we have another Jew printing that stifling of debate in his very overly sexualized magazines, which also wants to push sexualization on society.
	And now some might say, well, maybe that guy was just a pervert.
	He was just an individual Jew.
	He was just a pervert.
	That doesn't mean that there's a conspiracy here.
	Well, I'm going to quote you from Al Goldstein.
	This is a direct quote from Al Goldstein.
	He was interviewed by a man by the name of Luke Ford.
	And Luke Ford asks Al Goldstein why Jews are dramatically overrepresented in the porn industry.
	And if you're not familiar with that fact, it's very factual.
	We can go into that a little bit as well.
	And Al Goldstein responds, and I quote, The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think Christ sucks.
	Catholicism sucks.
	We don't believe in authoritarianism.
	Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream, its subversive character becomes more charged.
	So he's openly stating himself that the whole idea behind Pornography and the over-sexualization of our societies is to subvert our culture, right?
	To change our culture into one that they accept, one that they like.
	And we see this on a larger scale today as they've gotten more financial power and they're more overt and brazen about this through companies like Disney where they're openly...
	Doing weird transgender videos on cartoons and pushing this on our children.
	Trying to over-sexualize our children.
	They had the WHO with some video teaching literally an adult woman sitting down and teaching like a five-year-old kid about masturbation.
	This is insanity.
	This is an over-sexualization of society.
	And if you can get somebody to only care about their sexuality, they're never going to focus on real things in society.
	We see this again time and time again.
	OnlyFans is probably one of the better examples of this.
	OnlyFans was actually founded by a Gentile.
	His name was Thomas.
	And he sold out to a Jew named Leonid Ridvinsky.
	And Leonid Ridvinsky turned OnlyFans...
	It wasn't a porn site when it was originally founded.
	A Gentile founded it.
	And it was more so a site if, say, I'm a streamer and I have my show that runs three days a week.
	On the back end, when I'm not streaming, I might have some behind-the-scenes content that people might want to know more about me as an individual.
	And when they come and they go to watch me, they might want to go find some inside stuff.
	So I'll say, hey, subscribe to my OnlyFans.
	I have some more private stuff on there.
	And it was never a sexual thing.
	It was behind-the-scenes footage of how my show is created or how I research these things or what kind of books I like to read, recommendations, things like that.
	And this was all geared towards...
	Basically, creating a little kind of secret group that you could check out and learn more about the people that you really look up to as influencers or celebrities, which that culture in itself is already bad enough.
	But it wasn't a subversive or disingenuous thing.
	It was just a natural occurrence.
	And now you have Al Goldstein.
	You have Leonid Rudvinsky take over OnlyFans and instantly turn it into a porn site.
	And now, I mean, we all are seeing the repercussions of this.
	And you have to think about how damning this is going to be on society as a collective.
	We're in the first generation of this, by the way.
	The first generation of women selling themselves online.
	This is the first generation that's done that.
	Online, mass scale, women making a living selling their body.
	Okay?
	Now, obviously, people have done prostitution.
	It's like the oldest business in the world, right?
	However, selling your body online is so simple.
	It's so intriguing.
	That a lot of women who don't want to work in a society that's forcing them to work, which that in itself is already incorrect.
	A lot of women that don't want to work, what are they going to do?
	They're going to look for this easy outlet.
	And they take this easy outlet of a place like OnlyFans.
	And then they sell themselves online.
	So first off, they're never going to have appropriate respect for a man.
	Anybody who's watched some of these podcasts like Fresh and Fit or the whatever podcast, which I believe is actually run by a Jew, any of those podcasts that you watch, You'll see the women on there.
	They have no respect for men.
	They have no respect for authority of men.
	You get these interviews on the street.
	Everybody's seen them where they ask, would you rather a man or a bear?
	And they're like, oh, I'll take the bear.
	And this is a, this is how they've defiled that natural family unit, right?
	When a woman thinks I can be wholly independent by taking advantage of other men, all the men she sees, all the men she interacts with when she has an OnlyFans account are these pathetic, effeminate, lackadaisical, lazy, do nothing creeps, right?
	So because of that, who cares, right?
	Who cares?
	Who cares what men think?
	Why would I care about their opinion?
	And who would?
	If every guy you interact with is some neck-bearded 40-year-old virgin who's paying to see you naked and begging to see you naked every day, what woman would respect those men?
	So, naturally so.
	These women completely disrespect men.
	They don't care about them whatsoever.
	And this creates far-reaching problems for society.
	So now women, maybe some of them might change their ways, right?
	Maybe they'll hit 30 and they'll go, you know, this isn't going to work anymore.
	I should probably have kids.
	Well, by that time, they're used baggage and most men aren't going to want anything to do with a woman that when their child goes to school, every kid in school knows exactly what their mom's genitals look like because she put them all on the internet for money.
	So those women have destroyed a natural, healthy, cohesive family unit for themselves forever.
	There will never be a natural, healthy family in their lifetime.
	It's not possible, actually.
	So they're kind of trapped themselves.
	And you have to feel for them, in a sense, because they were born into something like this.
	They had no idea that something like this is foreign or wrong.
	And that's where we have to look at, as much as I'm not necessarily a fan of some of these Manosphere or Red Pill podcasts, it's not really my kind of content because I'm not an over sexualized person.
	I have a wife and I'm comfortable without it.
	I don't need to constantly be seeking women's advice or what they think.
	But a lot of men do.
	A lot of young men want to hear what women have to say, or they want to understand the psyche of women.
	So all of these men are watching these podcasts.
	And these podcasts are actually pretty helpful in this regard at bringing awareness to this problem and shaming the women.
	Because what will happen is hopefully other women will see it and go, oh man, I don't want to be treated like that.
	I I don't want people to think of me like that.
	And they might kind of second guess themselves before...
	Literally ruining their life.
	Again, you can't come back from selling your body out onto the internet, online especially.
	I mean, it's there forever.
	It's never going to go away.
	It will forever be known what you've done.
	So there really is no going back from that.
	Maybe one second.
	second i'm gonna take a brief sip of water and then we'll kick back in okay Okay.
	Excuse me.
	I wasn't expecting to do such a monologue.
	I was hopefully having to break videos and stuff in between to kind of analyze things, but I am...
	This is my first time on Rumble Live, and for those that are Just kicking in and are not familiar with the show or not familiar with me, especially if you're just watching for the first time on the Stu Peters Network and you're like, who the hell is this young guy?
	I've never seen him before.
	I'm Zach and this is Logos Academy.
	It's an educational show that is going to be running on the Stu Peters Network on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays from 4 to 6 p.m.
	Eastern.
	And I do want to give a shout out to Stu Peters for offering me this platform today.
	And giving me an ability to spread a message that I believe is fundamentally important to fixing and helping our civilization today.
	I want to give him a massive shout out and thank you for that, for taking his time to do that.
	So for those that are watching my show on my regular channels, if you don't already follow the Stu Peters show or the Stu Peters network on Rumble, I would appreciate if you did that.
	And anybody who...
	Likes what they see here and is a first time watcher via the Stu Peters Network.
	Feel free to follow me on my other channels.
	You can follow me on Odyssey, which has a complete archive of every video I've done in the last two years.
	You can find all of my stuff on there.
	It's just Logos Revealed on Odyssey.
	And you can also find me on Twitter.
	It's at Logos Revealed I. There's an I at the end of it.
	And then you'll find a lot of content that I post on there.
	I post some clips from my shows.
	I'll post some unique clips that you can't find on my actual shows.
	So I do highly recommend that you follow me over there.
	You'll get a lot more content.
	So with that being said, I was going to have a little video promotion for Stu's documentary, Occupied, which is...
	Looking, it's shaping up to be something quite special.
	I'm very interested to see it.
	The trailers have been quite interesting.
	I'm actually familiar with some of the voices used in the trailers.
	I know some of the people directly, so I'm very interested to see Occupied.
	I think it's going to be something pretty good.
	I don't have the video to play.
	And even if I did, I don't think I'd be able to figure it out right now because this platform is very confusing to me and it's very new.
	So I do apologize for not fully understanding these things.
	You just suck with me for two hours with nothing in between.
	It's just you and I, folks.
	So hopefully you don't think I'm too ugly or annoying.
	Otherwise, you're really trapped here.
	So...
	Let's kick back to the discussion.
	I just need to take one more sip of water.
	I'm monologuing quite hard here.
	Okay, went down the wrong tube.
	ahem Okay, back on topic.
	So we're talking about the over-sexualization of society.
	We talked about Al Goldstein and his role in the porn industry.
	We talked about people like George Weinberg.
	George Weinberg himself actually came from the Columbia University.
	He was essentially ideologically bred out of the Columbia University.
	And he coins these terms like homophobia to stifle any debate and basically force all these awful things into our civilizations.
	So I also want to talk about how pornography actually became a thing in our civilization.
	Because a lot of people don't know that in the 40s, in the 50s, in the United States of America, pornography was illegal.
	If you would go to your local store...
	And you had a magazine in your hands, a nude magazine where, like, you know, everybody's seen him with the biker chick on the front cover of a magazine and she's, you know, all naked on top of a motorcycle.
	was to like really appeal to, you know, men that are car guys or whatever.
	If you were seen in public with one of those magazines, it was actually a punishable offense.
	It was illegal.
	It was, it was considered paraphernalia the same way that if you're caught with a bag of cocaine, you would go to jail because it's paraphernalia.
	It was the exact same circumstance.
	However, in the early sixties in the United States of America, a Jew by the name of Samuel Roth sued the government and said, well, pornography is free speech.
	So you should allow us to have our free speech.
	It's unconstitutional for you to have pornography as an illegal thing.
	Now that's not I don't know what subversion would be.
	So he sued the government and used a loophole via the Constitution to get pornography legalized as free speech.
	Now, I don't know about you folks, but I don't agree that porn is speech, let alone that it should be considered free speech.
	I think that's very wrong.
	So he passes this free speech bill, which then legalizes pornography.
	And then you have a lot of Jews such as Ruben Sturman is a really good example.
	He's coined the Walt Disney of the porn industry.
	And he was a guy in the early 60s, early 50s, before it got legalized, who actually went to jail several times for selling nude magazines and having them in stock.
	And the modern Jewish media makes it out as if he was persecuted for that.
	Right.
	It was so evil.
	Our evil authoritarian government was being so mean to the poor guy who just wanted to push pornography on society.
	I mean, come on, just let him do it, right?
	So he got arrested a couple times for this.
	He was unfortunately released, and he was able to make a pretty large splash in the porn industry, creating...
	All kinds of degenerate sex toys and, again, these lewd magazines, such as Screw Magazine, which we talked about earlier, which was made by Al Goldstein.
	This one was horrendous.
	I mean, it was literally disgusting.
	They were taking American politics and overly sexualizing them.
	I mean, they had photos of People like Eisenhower, you know, completely naked, like drinking alcohol and being naked.
	They actually took, and I wish I, again, I wish I could show a physical photo.
	But for those who are watching and want to see a physical representation of just how subversive this is, I encourage you to look up Screw Magazine, The Last Supper.
	They took, Al Goldstein took an animated photo of The Last Supper.
	And takes all of the characters, Jesus and everybody sitting around him, and they're all doing degenerate acts.
	They're drinking, they're playing cards and gambling, they're smoking cigarettes.
	One of them has their cock out.
	It's the most subversive and disgusting thing in the world.
	And this became allowed as free speech.
	So through legalizing pornography as free speech, they were able to actually, as Al Goldstein himself said, He says exactly this.
	I'll quote him again.
	He says, pornography becomes a way of defiling Christian culture.
	And as it penetrates into the very heart of the American mainstream, its subversive character becomes more charged.
	That's exactly what he was doing, right?
	He was purposefully subverting society and Christian culture directly with overly degenerate pornographic imagery, right?
	And again, all because Samuel Roth got this legalized.
	Now, Samuel Roth is an interesting figure because he has a little bit in history if you look at him If you look at his other actions and the other things that he wrote and said and did, there's quite a bit more to the story.
	It's not just as simple as him legalizing pornography.
	He did some other quite damning and interesting things that I also highly encourage people to look into.
	And one of which was he wrote a book by the name of Now and Forever.
	And it's about the future for the Jewish people.
	And in this book...
	It's a dialogue between Samuel Roth and Israel Zangwill.
	And for those who are not familiar with Israel Zangwill, he is the Jew who created the melting pot theory.
	He was a Russian Jew.
	And they have actually movies that are framed off of this.
	And they actually have propaganda videos that they played to children in school.
	Anybody here that watched Schoolhouse Rock, if you're familiar with Schoolhouse Rock, it was heavily pushed on my generation when I was in high school.
	And middle school, more so middle school, I would say.
	Schoolhouse Rock was heavily pushed on children.
	And they actually have one where they talk about the melting pot theory.
	And they say, you know, lucky lady liberty with all of her diversity, right?
	So pushing this multicultural society that we're talking about, right?
	The browning of America.
	And Israel Zangwill was the founder of that play called The Melting Pot and created that whole theory for us.
	And that goes a lot deeper.
	We'll try to go back to that because that is another part of that communist infiltration that we were talking about before.
	of creating racial divides.
	Well, if you live in a homogenous society and there's not a lot of people in that society, how can you create a racial divide in it?
	It's not possible.
	So we'll go back to that.
	But through this document now and forever, and I really highly recommend that everybody in the chat room look this up in your own time.
	Look up Now and Forever PDF on Google, and you'll be able to actually view this book.
	It's kind of hard to find.
	And again, I wish I could pull it up.
	I'm too stupid with technology.
	I'm not very good.
	I might be young, but I am very old when it comes to technology.
	I'm very not well-versed in it.
	So When you read this document, they have a conversation.
	Again, it's Samuel Roth and Israel Zangwill.
	And they play a game of good Jew, bad Jew.
	And Israel Zangwill in this book or in this dialogue is stating that, you know, Jews deserve to rule the world and that World War Two and all of the Europeans that died was punishment.
	And we deserved that.
	And then you have Samuel Roth kind of playing good Jew.
	And he says, no, you know, they didn't necessarily deserve that.
	It is a tough thing.
	And it's great that we have the power that we have now.
	And I mean, they talk about the amount of institutional power that they have and they kind of essentially brag about it via this work.
	And interestingly enough, they actually invoke Baal as their ancient god in the same work.
	Now, that's that's quite interesting for those who are familiar with Baal or Moloch or all of these older gods that are being worshipped.
	So, it's a very interesting document and I highly recommend that people read it because they refer to the collective Gentiles as their enemy, their sole enemy.
	Which, again, if Gentiles understood this problem on the same scale that Jews understand this problem or through the same light...
	I think there would be quite a difference in the perspective of things and how people actually view this.
	Right now, many of our American citizens and especially those of the older generation who are more trusting of the magazine and they're very confident in Donald Trump and the system itself and they've been indoctrinated thoroughly with the Schofield Bible.
	A lot of them are Well, they're essentially duped into thinking that what's happening right now is some kind of natural occurrence or it's something that is just by mistake.
	And they're unable, because of their Schofield Bible, to recognize...
	Jews as an actual foreign entity to themselves.
	So again, this is where we go into the racial piece of this circumstance.
	Many of these people, they will see...
	If you start pointing to Jewish power and these very subversive actions that we see in society, many of these people will say, well, that's just my white brethren, my fellow American, who has a different...
	He's got a different religion than I do, and it's just a little bit of a different ideology.
	It's weird, it's not my thing, but it's just a little bit different.
	And that's just not the case here.
	So they're actually a foreign element that also has a different religion, but that religion, again, is a product of their ancient historical tribe, right?
	Which is their raise.
	And they've brought that religion and that ideal, which again, is not analogous to the rest of mankind.
	It literally does not match up with the rest of mankind.
	At no country...
	No country, if you take the Talmud and you take it into Africa, all of Asia, any continent in the world, if you take the Talmud into those countries, every host group that read that book would disagree with things laid out in there.
	No country is okay with pedophilia openly or has laws that are literally protecting it on a moral standpoint.
	No country has Laws that are okay.
	Well, actually, unfortunately, this is not the case anymore.
	If you looked 40 years ago, no country had laws that were okay with transgenderism.
	Unfortunately, that's not the case anymore.
	This has become legalized in our societies and heavily normalized.
	So it's starting to become...
	Again, a normal thing, right?
	Children are growing up in a society that is overwhelmingly pushing this transgender agenda onto them.
	You go into Target, and you go into Walmart, and all these different places, and they're pushing all these agendas.
	You watch Disney, you watch any of these mainstream media platforms, and it's all pushing children towards over-sexualization and changing their gender.
	So they're indoctrinated with this, and that's caused a lot of problems.
	Now our children are They're falling into it, right?
	And again, this is where we get into the mindset of people who have healthy sentiments.
	And you see this on the conservative side.
	And I really don't like the term conservative because they don't really conserve anything.
	We've been calling them conservatives for 40 years, and nothing has been conserved, right?
	First, it was we have to have a stand against gay marriage.
	Well, that wasn't conserved.
	That got changed, right?
	Then we had to have a stance against transgenderism.
	Well, that wasn't conserved.
	Now we got Lady Maga.
	Then we had to have a stance against pedophilia, right?
	Now that is starting to slowly work itself.
	And it's one of the few things that they're unable to fully subvert into society.
	The two things that everybody will have a moral foundation on, and this will never change, is pedophilia and bestiality.
	These are the two things that every single normal morally driven person will never be able to be indoctrinated into.
	And the reason for that is children and animals we view as specifically innocent.
	We want to protect innocence.
	It's kind of human nature to protect innocent things.
	And with that...
	of protection or with that drive for protection, it's pretty evident that things like pedophilia and child abuse.
	That's why, for instance, when we look at the transgender agenda, when they push it on children, that's when people start to stand up and complain about it, right?
	Most people say, I'm not for it.
	I don't think it's that great.
	Whatever.
	But then they see the drag queen story hour where they're teaching it to children and they see it being pushed on their kids and now they get upset.
	The thing is, the problem that we have is...
	The people should have been upset beforehand.
	The real conservatives, the people that should have had a backbone and stood up and said, no, this is wrong no matter what.
	I don't care if you're pushing it on children or you're pushing it on grown men.
	Transgenderism is wrong.
	It's completely unnatural.
	It's destructive.
	And it's not just destructive to society, which it is.
	It's very destructive to society as a whole.
	But it's primarily destructive to the individuals doing it themselves.
	I mean, the suicide rate, the depression rate in these people is skyrocketing, right?
	And this is a very manipulative and disgusting thing that's happening because most of the reason that these people are going through this identity crisis with transgenderism is they don't have any of their own identity.
	They're in a society that is...
	Destructive.
	Everything around them is collapsing.
	Everything is demoralizing to them.
	And they're looking around and they're going, wow, man, something isn't right.
	I don't know what it is, but it's not right.
	So they look for solutions.
	And society tells them, well, the solution is you're in the wrong body.
	You just have to cut your penis off.
	And somehow that's going to fix things.
	Now that people go, oh, maybe that's the case.
	And especially if you're young, it's really easy to fall into that.
	And if you're a very emotionally open person, it's also extremely easy.
	So these people fall for that, and these people jump in full force into these ideas, and once they get that sex change, they look back and they realize, oh my god, this is irreversible and this didn't fix the identity crisis.
	I still feel the same way.
	I still feel depressed.
	I still feel lost.
	I still don't feel right.
	Because our society is not actually looking at what's wrong with people.
	And saying, oh, hey, look forward and you're doing this wrong.
	You're doing that wrong.
	You're doing this wrong, right?
	A good example, depression.
	Depression is probably one of the best examples.
	When you look at depression, in the modern age, they all say, depression is a chemical imbalance.
	Take this drug and you'll be good, right?
	That's how the system makes a drug addict out of any child.
	And I know this directly from growing up.
	I had children all around me.
	Who were literally 15, 16.
	They were the same age as me at the time.
	And they were being prescribed antidepressants, anti-anxiety medication like Zoloft, Prozac.
	For a child, that is very strong stuff.
	You understand?
	These things, you have to literally wean off of them.
	That's how strong they are on your brain.
	And all these kids get tricked into this because...
	Sometimes kids get depressed.
	I mean, naturally, when you're growing up as a child, when you're starting these teenage phases, you go through radical mood swings, right?
	You go through all these different, especially boys that go through this testosterone kind of starts flaring up and they can be very angry, very vitriolic.
	They can be very kind of hard to deal with.
	Women too.
	You see this on both sides.
	And On both of these sides, if you're a child and you're depressed and society tells you, oh, well, who cares about what the root of your depression is?
	How many doctors say, what's the cause of your depression?
	Where does this come from?
	Why are you depressed?
	What's causing it?
	And can we remedy this?
	Can we look at why it's there?
	Without medicating you, all of them want to medicate you.
	They want to completely keep you directly underneath this tyrannical system.
	It's a psychological enslavement at this point when they're over-medicating people.
	I'm going to reference back actually to Ted Kaczynski in a second here specifically about that.
	They start medicating these people at the age of 15.
	When you grow up and you go through your literal growing phases and your maturing phases in your mind, You become completely reliant on these drugs.
	And when you're an adult, you don't even realize that the drugs are completely in control of your psyche, right?
	And if you don't believe that, talk to any person who's in their 30s, who's in their 40s, who started antidepressants or antipsychotics at a very young age and tried weaning off of them 10 years after starting or 15 years after starting.
	Every single person, without an exception, had a very hard time quitting.
	You can't cold turkey just get off of anti-psychotics or anti-depressants.
	It's not possible.
	It is so damaging on your psyche.
	People will have serious withdrawal effects.
	This is a very powerful drug.
	So kids become completely addicted to this.
	And they're told by this society that, well, you know, that's just the way it is.
	You just need to take this medication and it'll fix it.
	And this is a problem because if society really cared about the youth, if our government was not corrupt and it was not beholden to these corporate interests, our government would say, well, why are you depressed?
	They look at this naturally, right?
	A kid, their father just passed away.
	They're 15 years old.
	And now they go into a state of depression.
	Don't you think that's normal?
	Don't you think it's normal for a kid to become seriously depressed losing a father that young?
	You don't think that's a normal thing to happen for a child?
	So work them through it.
	Talk them through it.
	Don't medicate them.
	Now they're a slave to that system for life.
	They're a slave to the medication.
	They'll never really be themselves.
	And Ted Kaczynski talks about this.
	We referenced him earlier in his book, The Industrial Society and Its Future.
	And in the book, he describes how as modern society becomes more and more entrapped in all of these, the hustle and bustle of the modern life, right?
	You go to For instance, if you go to Montana, you go hang out in rural Montana with some of the people out there, some of the nicest people in the world, they'll spark up conversation with you, they'll chat with you all day, and it's genuine, right?
	They want to know how your day is.
	It's like, howdy stranger, how are you?
	Where are you from?
	How's it going?
	You don't look like you're from here, right?
	And when you go into the city, everybody's angry.
	You can feel a tension.
	People are so...
	They're all rushed.
	They're all ready.
	They want to get where they have to go.
	Everybody else is kind of an inconvenience to them.
	And they see so many people all the time.
	And they deal with people all the time.
	You walk into these stores.
	You walk into the grocery store.
	And you get this, hi, how's it going?
	And they start scanning your stuff.
	They're barely even acknowledging you.
	They don't actually care how it's going.
	They don't care how your day is.
	They don't want to know who or how you are.
	It's just...
	How you doing?
	Have a good one.
	These are just buzzwords that they throw in.
	It's trained into them.
	They don't actually mean these things.
	And Ted Kaczynski theorizes that the more socialized we become and the more those things start to happen and the more damaging this becomes on the human psyche, now We're coping by taking medications, right?
	So again, you look at anti-anxiety medications, anti-depressions, depression medications, and all of these medications that we're taking as a coping mechanism, the problem is this is a band-aid.
	So the depression is still there.
	You never actually looked at the source of where that depression was coming from and addressed it yourself.
	Instead, you took a pill.
	The pill...
	Gave a chemical blockage in here to literally block the feeling of depression.
	So you're blocking it.
	You're putting an obstacle there and you're saying, okay, no more for a little bit.
	It's not going to happen for now.
	And then the next day you wake up and the depression is still there.
	And you got to take that pill again.
	You have to put the barricade up again.
	And then the next day and the next day.
	And this goes on and on and on and on, right?
	You see the same thing with like sleeping medication.
	Some people, they take a sleeping pill.
	They start and they take a quarter of a sleeping pill.
	And then their body becomes accustomed to it after like six months.
	Then they take a half of one.
	Then after a year, their body becomes more accustomed to it.
	Then they're taking a full pill.
	And then three years later, they're taking two or three pills just to go to sleep because their body has become so reliant on the drug.
	So the problem is, is this is just a band-aid on society and it's not an actual cure for the illness.
	You know, imagine...
	Somebody cuts your finger off.
	You get your finger cut off and you go to the doctor and you're like, hey, I need my finger sewed back on.
	They're like, oh, we'll just put a plastic finger on it for a little bit until the wound heals over.
	Okay, well, you put a bandaid on it, but now my finger is not there still when it's done.
	I still don't have the finger.
	You never cured the finger.
	Now I have this fake thing.
	It's artificial and it's not actually beneficial to me.
	So it's a matter of we have to actually point at the source of things and try to fix them from the inside.
	And again, this society doesn't want to do that.
	And again, I highly recommend Ted Kaczynski and reading his works because he talks about this pretty well.
	He goes pretty in-depth.
	Now, the one thing Ted Kaczynski missed, I think, is the culprit behind all of these actions.
	Again, as we see, people are starting to wake up to this overwhelming Jewish influence that we have in our society, whether it be in the sector of Hollywood, the sector of finance, the sector of pornography, politics, medicine, you name it.
	You can see this overwhelming representation, over-representation of this specific group.
	And we want to be clear here because a lot of people get confused and they say, well, when you point at Jews, that's hateful.
	Again, it's another one of those buzzwords to shut down the debate.
	But to break down that argument, let's word it like this.
	I don't care if it's purple people in power.
	I don't care if it's Chinese people in power.
	I don't care if it's white people in power.
	I don't care if it's Germans or Irishmen or...
	Africans in power, if they're doing something wrong with that power, that's where I have a problem.
	So it's a duty.
	It's a moral obligation for every single person who starts looking at who's in power and how much power they have.
	It's an absolute duty for those people...
	To call out the source of that power and educate others as to why that power is negative, a net negative for society.
	Again, if this power structure, which again is predominantly Jewish, wasn't pushing things like multiculturalism, transgenderism, homosexuality, pedophilia, if it wasn't pushing all these things, I would probably not even know, right?
	I never...
	Never in my mind would I have even looked at the government in an ounce of distrust.
	I would have just lived like a normal American citizen.
	I would have said, I love my country.
	I'll fight for my country.
	I'll do everything I can for my country.
	But instead, I watched this power structure that claims to care about its people and claims to want to help its people.
	I look around and I watch it not helping its people.
	It's actually doing the contrary.
	It's incentivizing the worst behaviors possible.
	Every single person that's in Hollywood, that's in major...
	Huge positions of mass attention in the media.
	All these people are morally compromised.
	They're either extremely overly sexualized and degenerate, or they're extremely violent and degenerate, or they have some kind of blackmail up against them because they've done degenerate things in the past.
	There's no literal incentive in modern society to be a good person.
	There's actually the opposite.
	If you're a good person, you say, hey, I think transgenderism is dangerous.
	Society attacks you.
	They go after you.
	If you say, hey, I think all of this, the power that AIPAC has over our politicians is pretty dangerous and it seems like there's some serious conflicts of interest here.
	You're hateful.
	You're an anti-Semite.
	If you say, hey, I don't think multiculturalism is a good idea.
	I think this should be a majority white country because that's who founded it.
	You're racist.
	So to actually call out anything that's wrong with civilization or that's harmful to it as a whole just gets labeled with an emotional slap it on there and now that's what you are and no one has to hear you out anymore.
	So there's no incentive to actually be good or do what's right.
	Right?
	So This is where we have to encourage others.
	A lot of people, and I get this question a lot in Twitter spaces.
	I get it on my live streams.
	I get it from people in my messages.
	People say, what can I do?
	As an individual, what can I do in society to help push this message out there?
	I just found out that Israel bombed the USS Liberty.
	I found out that they had complete ties and connections to 9-11 and the JFK assassination.
	I'm finding out all of this stuff.
	What can I do?
	I'm just a 9-5 working man.
	I do my thing.
	I love my family.
	I love my kids.
	I just want to take care of my family.
	What can I do to just help?
	Because a lot of these people, if you're a 9-5 family guy and you have a life set up, It's not exactly easy for you to go on and do a show like this and just put it all out there because you risk losing your assets.
	You risk being smeared and fired and all these things.
	You risk these things.
	Therefore, a lot of these people don't want to go out and do that.
	So if you're one of those people that is worried to risk those things and you don't want to lose your status in society or you don't want to lose your income or be essentially persecuted by this system, the best thing you can do as an individual right now is support those that are pushing this message.
	There's a lot of ways you can support.
	This isn't to say, oh, hey, just throw us all your money.
	Give everybody all your money.
	Throw all your money to the Stu Peter show.
	Throw all your money to Myron Gaines.
	That's not what this is about.
	You can support in so many ways.
	Think about you look at a woman like Candace Owens, for example.
	One of the ways that she was pushed to start talking about this message on her show, and that this came to her attention, was Nick Fuentes employed his community called the Groypers.
	He employed them to go mass attack her channels.
	And say, hey, hey, by the way, did you know that that was actually a Jewish guy that you're talking about that did that thing?
	Hey, did you happen to know that Israel was actually involved in that thing that you're talking about?
	Oh, did you know that Magnus Hirschfeld was actually Jewish?
	And they start pushing all of these things.
	And eventually, when you're a woman like Candace Owens, and you're running your own independent little platform, and you start looking at the comments section, every time they're laying out these very important facts, these fundamental facts, eventually you're going to go, Wow, maybe there's something to this.
	And they're going to look into it.
	But now, a woman like her, you have to think about the position she has in society.
	She was already a part of the system.
	She's already financially beholden to the system.
	She has most of her life and social status intrinsically bound up within the system.
	So for her to start naming the true culprits of things, when she knows you're going to get labeled as anti-Semitic and hateful, and they're going to try to take all your money and your platforms and stuff, which they did.
	They took her Daily Wire platform.
	They tried to demonetize her on things.
	So a woman like that knows.
	Now, given the situation I'm in, There's not a lot of incentive.
	What's the incentive for me to go out there and actually say these things?
	I'm going to lose my money.
	I'm going to lose my social status.
	I'm going to be completely smeared.
	They might attack my family.
	They might attack me, my friends.
	They're going to attack everybody around me.
	What's my incentive?
	What's my motivation?
	And a lot of people have none.
	The only motivation that really is there is a completely genuine and moral motivation.
	And a moral obligation that tells you, if I don't do this, who's going to do this?
	And this is where you can fit in as an individual, as a person who's anonymous and you're watching and you want to help out in some way, shape or form.
	You can help out by pushing those people and incentivizing them.
	If they see that, if somebody like Candace Owens sees that when she goes out and talks about this thing, that everybody under her comments section, everybody around her is fully supporting, fully backing everything that she has to say, she's going to be incentivized to do this.
	A guy like Dan Bilzerian.
	He's got a lot to lose.
	He's got a lot more to lose than he has to gain in this situation.
	This guy's lost millions.
	We're talking millions of dollars from naming this culprit, this problem.
	What's the incentive for a guy like that?
	You can lose all that money, all that fame, all that status.
	The guy's lived a hedonistic lifestyle his whole life.
	And he's putting that aside.
	He's giving that up.
	And he's saying, hey, you know, I think this is a serious problem for our country and I want to talk about it.
	So you got to commend these people.
	You have to give them some kind of support.
	And again, I'm not saying you have to throw them all your money.
	That's not what support entails.
	Give them moral support.
	Give them social support.
	Show them that if they do what is necessary, if they say the things that should be said in society, that they have legions of men behind them backing them up and supporting what they have to say.
	That is the greatest incentive an individual can have.
	No one's going to do it if they feel alone.
	And the people that have done it while feeling alone also deserve a tremendous level of respect.
	You have to at least acknowledge to those people the amount of respect you have.
	The worst thing we can do right now is counter-signal these people and attack them because they're not perfectly in line.
	Again, a lot of people are upset with Candace Owens for saying it's the Frankists.
	Guys, you have to realize how much she is bound up in Jewish academia.
	They're going to throw her these curve balls and these traps to trick her into not pointing to the full culprit.
	Right.
	And to dumbing the picture down.
	That's why Jews will come in and co-opt these conversations so they can change the framework of how it's being discussed.
	Or they can change it to their own framework and show.
	No, no, this is actually what the problem is.
	You'll have a lot of Jews come in and say, no, no, it's not.
	It's not Jews.
	It's actually Zionists.
	And that's the real problem, right?
	And then that frameworks it so that if you're an individual and you start discussing this, anytime you say anything further than Zionist, now you're still an anti-Semite, right?
	They're trying to co-opt the conversation and framework how it's to be said, right?
	And well, as I stated on the Stu Peter show, the last time I was on, when he had me on, the first time actually, When I was on the Stu Peter show, I said exactly this.
	Zionism wasn't kicked out of 109 countries.
	So how can the problem be Zionism?
	If all the actions that we're looking at and all the problems that we see, we look at history and we have a precedent that it's already happened before and they were actually removed from countries for these behaviors, it can't be Zionism because Zionism came after the behaviors.
	Right?
	So it can't be communism.
	Communism came after the behaviors.
	Right?
	It can't be the Kazarians because the Kazarians came after the behaviors and the expulsions.
	By the way, the Kazarians is another one of these co-ops.
	The Kazarian theory comes from the 13th tribe.
	Let me actually pull this up.
	I have a book with me.
	The Kazarian theory actually comes from a communist Jew by the name of Arthur Kolsler.
	Here's the book that he wrote.
	It's called The 13th Tribe.
	We got some...
	There we go.
	A little bit of glare.
	Okay.
	The 13th Tribe by Arthur Kolsler.
	Okay.
	And when you read something like this, what his method is, as a Jew who's trying to protect the narrative, right, and co-op the narrative to kind of pull it away from the actual thing that's happening...
	He has to pull it to the side and say, well, it's actually the Kazarians, right?
	And this is a distraction.
	This is where we get into the rabbit holes.
	It's the Freemasons.
	It's the Illuminati, right?
	These are distractions in order to waste your time.
	It's like a cat toy, right?
	So that all of the Gentiles, all the Goy can sit there and go down the rabbit hole.
	Ooh, ooh, who started the Illuminati?
	Oh, what's the Illuminati doing?
	And they can look for hand gestures and symbols that people are doing in the celebrity circles, right?
	Yeah.
	It's kind of like, it's almost like clickbait for the Jewish problem, right?
	It's giving people something to distract themselves with.
	It's like a gatekeeping method that you can't go, oh, that's actually what it is.
	It's to pull you away from things, okay?
	And you'll see them co-op these things very often.
	They actually did it directly to Candace Owens when she hosted her Twitter space discussing the truth behind Zionism, as she called it.
	And when she had that space, her whole audience was ready to hear about the truth behind Zionism, and then you have this Jew come in, Andrew Meyer is his name, and I've had a conversation with him two or three times, and he's very subversive.
	And in his conversations, he co-ops the narrative, right?
	So Dan Bilzerian was calling him out about the Talmud and the things that are written out in the Talmud.
	Again, historical precedent for this.
	For those who aren't familiar, in, I believe it was 1240 AD, they had the Disputation of Paris.
	And the Disputation of Paris was actually a mass burning of the Talmud in France.
	And they kicked a lot of Jews out for this.
	Because the Pope got a copy of the Talmud translated into English from a Jewish convert by the name of Nicholas Donan.
	And Nicholas Donan Took this Talmud and said, dude, I don't like what's written in here.
	I think it's really wrong.
	I think it's actually disgusting.
	And I think the other people that this is harmful to should know.
	And he went to tell everybody about this.
	And when he went to tell them, they were surprised and they put it on trial.
	And they found on trial that the Talmud was dangerous to society and they kicked them out.
	So Dan Bilzerian...
	Many people are starting to figure out some of these quotes in Talmud, many of which are damning.
	They talk about how Jesus is burning in hell and excrement and filth.
	They talk about how it's okay to have sex with a nine-year-old or under nine.
	They talk about how it's...
	Again, we have eight genders.
	The treatment of the Gentiles.
	They talk about how it's okay to use usurious practices against Gentiles and not their own.
	They talk about all of these different narratives.
	And through all of this...
	Dan Bilzerian starts bringing this to the forefront and talking about it.
	And then you have this Jew who's obviously very familiar with their works and can spin some stories around them because of how familiar he is.
	You'll have him slowly subvert this and start to pull it in these directions and Well, actually, that's just an interpretation, and that's actually more of a, I think he said it was like an analogy, right?
	So it's to divert this away from the real, what's really happening, right?
	They pull the topic away again, and they pull you into something, a completely different interpretation.
	And that's why they want to control that narrative.
	They want to co-opt it.
	Again, they create that framework.
	They say, this is what you can talk about.
	Anything outside of that is hateful.
	It's bigoted.
	It's anti-Semitic.
	It's homophobic.
	It's racist.
	Anything outside of it.
	Well, the thing is, this, again, stifles debate.
	It makes it impossible for us to have a conversation.
	If you say, hey, let's say I make a statement.
	I say, I think homosexuality is a mortal sin, and I think that it's unnatural for society.
	That's a statement.
	Now, in America, where it's supposed to be a free country with free speech, I should be able to have that conversation with you as an individual.
	And if I'm wrong, you should be able to tell me why I'm wrong.
	And if you're wrong, I should be able to tell you why you're wrong.
	We use logical arguments, and that's how we come to a conclusive reason.
	This is a dialectic.
	We see this through...
	All of Socrates, they talk about this in all of Socrates' works.
	They use this dialectic of back-and-forth dialogue to create the...
	Best truth that they can find through a situation through a reason.
	So when you throw in these emotional buzzwords at people, it stifles that debate and it creates an inability to actually have the dialogue.
	So if I make that statement and someone says, oh, well, you're homophobic.
	No, because homophobic, phobia is a fear.
	It's an irrational fear.
	I'm not scared of homosexuals.
	I'm telling you, I think it's immoral.
	I'm not telling you I'm scared of them.
	I'm not afraid of them.
	I'm definitely not afraid.
	They're more effeminate than the average man by far, right?
	So I'm not afraid.
	I'm disturbed, right?
	And for their own sake, I'm disturbed.
	So I want to talk about it.
	And if you can't talk about these things, if you can't have these conversations, you bet your bottom dollar that the person that's throwing these buzzwords at you and calling you these names doesn't have a genuine interest at heart.
	They're protecting something, whether they're protecting their own preconceived notions or emotions, or they're protecting a more subversive narrative.
	This is a method that they will use to stifle your speech, stifle your ability to talk.
	And this is how you can subvert free speech without actually banning free speech.
	Give me one second, folks.
	I'll take another water break.
	I see the chat.
	I'm looking at them a little bit.
	I'm very heavily monologuing today, so I'm not looking at the chat as much as I could.
	And I do see we have some very kind support investments that came in through the chat.
	I will thank all of those at the end of the show.
	Just bear with me, folks.
	folks.
	I do appreciate them.
	Okay.
	So we're about an hour and 20 minutes into the show.
	So we're like three, two thirds into the show here.
	For those that are tuning in late, you're just coming in.
	This is my first show on the Stu Peters Network.
	It's my regular show on my original streams for anybody that's watching over on my Odyssey channel.
	You guys know I'm always doing this same kind of...
	Monologue-style shows.
	Typically, I have visuals with me.
	Again, unfortunately, I am too stupid to figure out Rumble Studios.
	So I will...
	Tomorrow, while I'm offline and I don't have a show running...
	I'll be kind of figuring out and researching a little bit how to run Rumble Studios so I make sure I'm using it correctly and actually can pull some of these things up.
	Because I would be able to, all of these things that we're discussing, I could have some seriously good references and physical representations of them on the stream so you guys could see them.
	I could even pull up videos with some of this stuff.
	But unfortunately, I don't have the ability because I'm not smart enough.
	So bear with me.
	I will try to get that figured out for the next show.
	I should definitely have it.
	But in the meantime, I hope you guys are enjoying the monologue so far.
	I see we got quite a bit of good feedback in the chat.
	I do appreciate you folks.
	So again, for those that are not familiar with my show, and this is the first time you're watching, especially if you're on the Stu Peters Network, this is Logos Academy.
	So I go by the handle LogosRevealed online.
	That's my tag.
	And this is a series I run where I try to be as educational as possible on some of these subjects.
	I know this style, today at least, is a little bit...
	It's kind of all over the place.
	I'm trying to keep on the topic of the show.
	It's not exactly easy without being able to pull up references and whatnot.
	So in the future, I'll be a little more organized.
	You can expect the show to get a little more concise and have some more format and style to it.
	There'll be like a thing on the bottom of the screen, some thumbnails and stuff.
	Things will be a little bit better.
	I just don't have the apparatus to do this at the current moment.
	This is my first show.
	I didn't have a lot of time to get set up.
	I was actually just a couple minutes late, so I do apologize for that as well.
	But thank you.
	I'm glad that some people are enjoying the show.
	It's nice to see.
	Let me take one more drink of water and then we'll go into the last third of the show.
	We'll probably close up around 5.55.
	I know Stu runs a show after this one, so I do recommend that once I finish up, everybody does go and check out his show.
	He's been doing a lot.
	He's been really trending after this whole situation with this Tucker Carlson event, which I think maybe we should talk about that for the last third of the show here.
	I think that's a pretty important subject.
	When we look at what happened there, how and why that transpired, we can kind of discuss the occupied film a little bit.
	If you guys didn't catch the show or Stu's show right before what we're doing now, I was on there very briefly to talk about this.
	So maybe we'll talk about that a little more in depth and then we'll probably end with that.
	that.
	That's how we'll close out the show.
	I talk a lot, but I'm not, I'm not used to monologuing as much as I am today.
	This is quite unusual for me.
	Trying to keep the information as boxed in as I can.
	So for those who aren't familiar, I'm sure everybody is.
	It was like the number one trending thing on Twitter for the entire last month on the timeline.
	Stu Peters had VIP tickets to go to the Tucker Carlson event.
	And he had a very personalized invite, a very good setup.
	And he was going to go into this event.
	And they told him at the door actually that he had to turn around and he couldn't go in.
	And This kind of labels off a few things.
	So the reason that Stu was there was he wanted to have a private sit-down with Tucker Carlson and ask him if he'd be interested to participate in his upcoming film, Occupied.
	For those who aren't familiar, the trailers have been on Stu's show quite a bit.
	They're very interesting.
	The documentary is going to be about the Jewish control over our government, the overwhelming representation of it, and how much foreign affair is driven by this specific group of people.
	So, uh, with this documentary, obviously it's, it's a hot subject, right?
	As we just described earlier, uh, with figures like Candace Owens and others, you talk about this subject, you're most likely to get some, some serious labels put on you, right?
	Probably going to have some, some real big problems.
	Uh, Just one other historical precedent for this is Kanye.
	We saw this with Kanye, what, three years ago?
	And Kanye had the same problem.
	He goes, he talks about this, and the whole world labels him as crazy and a psychopath and out of his mind.
	There's no incentive for people to do these things.
	He lost millions of dollars, potentially billions, on just saying fundamental truths that he's experienced in his life.
	We saw this with Richard Nixon as well.
	For those who don't believe how serious this problem is, how much influence they have, and how they can slander you, Richard Nixon, if you look up the private Richard Nixon tapes, he talks about getting the Jews out of the government.
	He says, they're everywhere in the government.
	And he says, they all work together against us, against America's interests.
	He says, what the hell is going on here?
	And he vows in these private tapes to remove their influence from office or from the government in his second term of office.
	Well, everybody knows what happened to Richard Nixon.
	They framed him with Watergate.
	And the guy that pushed that story, that slammed that story out there into all the news apparatuses, was Carl Bernstein.
	He was a communist Jew.
	Again, you're catching the same pattern time and time again.
	Also, if you guys are not familiar, I recommend if you want to look into that subject on Watergate and how much of a fraud that was, look into Spiro Agnew.
	That was Richard Nixon's vice president.
	And he actually wrote letters and wrote private messages to the Saudi Arabian president talking about how the Zionist mafia was smearing him and actually pressured him out of office so that when they got Richard Nixon out of office, his vice president, who knew the same problems, couldn't just take over and start doing it himself.
	So again, you speak out against the bull, you get the horns, right?
	Just goes to show how much power is genuinely present in this situation.
	So you don't have much opportunity to talk about these things.
	I lost my train of thought here a little bit.
	Let me just take another sip of water.
	So we look today and now a guy like Tucker Carlson, who's, you know, well embedded in the system.
	He's, you know, been in the news apparatus.
	He's been in politics his whole life.
	Like the guy knows his history of America.
	He knows how America functions.
	He knows how our politics function.
	So he also knows to have this conversation with Stu is a little risky for himself.
	And he knows that that's probably not the most strategic thing for him.
	So They look at it and they say, I'm sure my thought process is, and this is speculation, but it seems like this would be the case.
	My thought process is that Tucker Carlson, who's got a marketing team and a PR team, said, you know, that Stu guy, he talks about this stuff and that stuff, and there's going to be quite a bit of media backlash if you have a conversation with him.
	So I think that's why he shut that down, because...
	If he really was this advocate for free speech and cared as much as he says he does about free speech, he would have just sat and had a private conversation with Stu.
	It can't hurt to have a conversation.
	If Stu's wrong, it'd be easy to say, hey, you're wrong.
	But he cut that off.
	He didn't want that to happen.
	You can kind of see the motive behind this.
	It's dual-sided.
	Part of it is it's a bit of cowardice because he doesn't want to have all these problems.
	And then a little bit of it is this Self-interest that you can somewhat understand on a human level, right?
	As an individual, you're going to have to stand for yourself in some way, shape, or form.
	I'm sure you would take a pretty large financial hit from this, but as things are progressing, everybody's going to have to start coming out and describing these things and talking about it.
	If they don't, Everybody needs to know.
	This should be dinner table talk.
	Israel's influence and the collective Jewish influence of our country, this should be dinner table talk.
	When you go and you have dinner with your family, you should be able to talk about this with anybody.
	Instead, it's not.
	It's very foreign to talk about.
	Again, you're labeled as hateful or anti-Semitic or a white supremacist when you try to talk about these things.
	To stifle that debate.
	There's such a programming inside of people.
	So I think Tucker Carlson was a little bit scared.
	But this is people that, again, this is where you have to put pressure on these people.
	So as much as you need to kind of push people that are Waking up and you have to support them, give them that moral support, constantly tag them on things and give them the information that they need.
	When you see people like Tucker Carlson, who had a very serious opportunity to be a big help to our country and the narrative right now, and he turned that offer down in a very rude way at that.
	He didn't say to Stu in advance, like, hey, I'm really not too sure on that.
	Let's save this for another time.
	This isn't really my thing.
	I don't want to get involved in this.
	No, he just literally blew him off.
	That's very messed up, especially when this guy flew out to go see you.
	So He shuts this down.
	Somebody like this now, it's a duty for everybody to put pressure on him.
	And I'm not saying like fucking send the guy threats or harass him.
	Don't do that.
	But you have to go and you have to comment under his stuff and say, hey, why didn't you have Stu on?
	Why aren't you talking about Israel?
	Why aren't you talking about these problems?
	And eventually the pressure will become so strong that he's going to have no choice but to address these issues.
	And as we all know, the truth prevails.
	So once people start finally talking about this issue...
	It's going to come out, right?
	It's going to be quite obvious who the heavy players are in this and what's exactly going on behind the scenes.
	So we need people like Tucker Carlson with these large platforms and a lot of respect in the media apparatus of society.
	We need them to start talking the truth, the real truth, right?
	Not this kosher truth.
	They say things like, it's the radical left.
	Okay, that's an entity.
	So if it's an entity, it's a body, who controls it?
	It's like saying, oh my god, a bulldozer just ran over five people in New York.
	Did the bulldozer do that or did a person do that?
	The news doesn't say bulldozer drives over five people in New York.
	No, the news says radical lunatic in a bulldozer drives over five people in New York.
	You don't blame it on the bulldozer.
	The bulldozer is an entity that is not an animated object.
	It's not a living organism.
	You can't blame the bulldozer.
	So how are you going to blame the radical left?
	What does that mean?
	Who is that?
	If you blame the Democrats, if you blame the whole Democrats, who is that?
	Who takes responsibility for that?
	Who is punished for that?
	You can't punish the whole party.
	It's impossible in this two-party system to do that.
	Every party, they get to power and they say, oh, it's the other party's fault.
	And the second they get to power, they don't do anything to stop them or to punish them.
	And if there's no punishments for your actions, who cares about being a good person?
	Who cares about doing the right thing?
	It doesn't matter.
	There's no point, right?
	So it's a duty of everybody to start talking about these problems in the real way.
	Because time and time again, we're seeing it co-opted with blaming symptoms of the problem and not the problem itself.
	People talk about transgenderism being a problem.
	Absolutely.
	Of course, everybody agrees.
	That's certainly a problem.
	But where is it coming from?
	Someone had to come up with the idea of it.
	It's not a natural thing, right?
	Why weren't there transgenders running around our society in the 1940s?
	In the 60s, 70s, 80s, why weren't there transgenders running all around?
	Why are they so prominent in society today?
	Well, someone's got to be pushing that into the minds of the people.
	It's got to be coming from somewhere.
	The idea has to be being spread somewhere.
	So there's got to be a source.
	Someone's got to be spreading it.
	It's not a wildfire.
	It's not spreading itself.
	Someone's doing it.
	Someone came up with it.
	Someone brought it here.
	Well, who did it and why?
	We have to point to these things.
	We have to be investigative on these subjects and look and learn and ask ourselves these fundamental questions.
	Okay, yes, the radical left is corrupt.
	Yes, transgenderism is bad.
	Yes, pedophilia is bad.
	The COVID vaccine was terrible, right?
	We can't blame the things.
	We have to blame those who make the things, those who create the things and bring the things to fruition.
	That's the only way you can ever solve the problem.
	Because...
	Again, say a guy in a bulldozer drives five people over in the street.
	And you go, oh my god, a bulldozer drives five people over in the street.
	Make a big news article about it.
	And then Tucker Carlson goes on a show and says, oh man, those fucking bulldozers are just killing people left and right, man.
	Just killing people left and right.
	But no one points at the guy that did it.
	Then the guy goes off and now he steals a garbage truck and he runs over five people with a garbage truck.
	And they go, oh my god, these fucking garbage trucks.
	They keep running people over with the garbage trucks.
	And then he goes and he steals an 18-wheeler.
	And they go, oh my god, these tractor trailers keep running people.
	So they're only pointing at the symptom.
	They're pointing at the physical thing that's doing it.
	They're not literally pointing at the source itself.
	So if you never point at the criminal that's behind the axe, you can point at the axe all day.
	You can do it all you want, but you're not going to get anywhere.
	You're not going to make any progress.
	It's nonsensical.
	And this is what all the conservatives are doing right now.
	They're pointing at the symptoms.
	They're talking about inflation sucks.
	It's terrible.
	Yeah, sure.
	I agree.
	Transgenderism.
	Agree.
	All the things that they talk about, we agree that they suck.
	No one's disputing that.
	I'm not sitting here saying these things that they talk about aren't true.
	They're true.
	But they're speckles.
	They're half-truths.
	And that's dangerous because it keeps people, again, distracted.
	And If they're distracted on these things, they can't fix the problem, right?
	There's no way to actually fix it.
	So the real people and the people that you have to be devoting your time, your effort, your energy into are those who are pointing at the source.
	Those who are saying, yeah, you know what?
	Transcendermis is terrible.
	It is.
	It's absolutely awful.
	Here's who's bringing it here.
	Did you know that Magnus Hirschfeld started that up over in Germany?
	Right before those big evil Nazis took it over and stopped it?
	And stopped all that moral degeneracy and filth?
	Right?
	Did you know that?
	So...
	We have to point at these things.
	And those that are pointing at them, those are the people that need to be uplifted in society.
	They need to be given the utmost respect.
	And that's the problem.
	Our society is backwards.
	The people who are hiding things and not pointing at the source, all of those people are being protected by the system.
	Rightfully so, right?
	Well, rightfully so on behalf of the system.
	Not morally right, but rightfully so because the system knows in order to keep the shit that it's trying to do going, it has to do everything in its power.
	In order to keep people away from recognizing the source doing it.
	So that's my encouragement to those watching when you see this Tucker Carlson situation.
	How to determine who is right and who is wrong here.
	A lot of people might say, oh, I can see why Tucker Carlson doesn't want to have Stu on or whatnot.
	Sure, you can make a case for that, but who's right and who's wrong here?
	Who's the good person and who's the bad person?
	The analogy we used earlier with the bulldozers, you see this with actually firearms.
	This is actually how they're trying to get rid of our Second Amendment right in America.
	They use firearms.
	The same problem with firearms.
	Someone goes and shoots up a school.
	Look at the mass majority of school shooters.
	If you look, mental illness is extremely high on these people.
	It goes right back to the problem we were talking about earlier.
	These people are on antidepressants, antipsychotics.
	I mean, all of them.
	You look at literally 80% of them, at least, are on antipsychotics and antidepressants.
	So it goes to show you these people are not mentally sound.
	And if they're not mentally sound, if our government, if our society cared enough to fix the problem, right, and say, hey, why are these people not mentally sound?
	What's causing this?
	Is it in the water?
	Is it in the food they're consuming?
	Is it in the vaccines they're taking?
	What's causing it?
	Right?
	What is causing all of these?
	What is causing them?
	So our government doesn't look at it.
	They don't say it.
	No one's talking about it.
	I'll give, you know, RFK maybe some props.
	He's been doing it pretty well lately.
	He's actually been talking about, you know, autism in society, how it's on an uptick and all these things.
	But If we're not fixing these problems, now we have these people go out and they cause these mass shootings.
	And then you have these creeps try to politicize it and destroy our country further by trying to take the guns out of the moral insane people in society.
	And they say, oh my goodness, the...
	The ARs.
	Oh, the AR-15s.
	That's the problem.
	It's the rifles, right?
	Oh, we can't have long rifles.
	We can't have big magazines on the firearms.
	It's the guns.
	It's the guns.
	Well, is it the guns or is it the psychopaths that are getting a hold of the guns?
	It's the psychopaths.
	The gun didn't shoot itself.
	The gun didn't pick itself up.
	There's plenty of people out there who own a gun and aren't doing things like that.
	Plenty of American citizens own a firearm to physically protect themselves, which, again, by the way, if you own a firearm and if you care about the Second Amendment, The whole point of the Second Amendment, when you read the Constitution, is specifically to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government.
	So if you want to protect yourself from a tyrannical government, you have to have the means to protect yourself.
	And if you've only got a handgun and the government's rolling in with tanks and rifles and hand grenades and tear gas, good luck.
	Good luck defending yourself.
	That's why they want to take these things away from the people.
	That's the first thing a tyrannical government will do its best to do, is disarm its people.
	if they can disarm its people, they can disarm any kind of, uh, dissidents or people that are, uh, are talking against these things.
	Take a brief, uh, We've got about 20 minutes left on the show, folks.
	I'm curious for some feedback from those in the chatroom.
	On a scale of 1 to 10, what do you think about the first show so far?
	Any critiques in the chatroom?
	I'm always open to critiques to see how the audience is interacting with the chat, how they feel about it.
	You guys want to just give me a scale of 1 to 10, what you guys are thinking of the show so far?
	That'll help guide me to know what I should change and what I should continue or not continue moving forward.
	Okay, good.
	A lot of tens.
	Okay, I'm glad people are enjoying.
	That's great to hear.
	Wonderful.
	I appreciate the feedback, folks.
	Just wanted to make sure I'm not giving anybody stuff that sucks.
	That's good to hear.
	I'm glad people are finding it productive.
	And again, in the future, I will do my best to have some Sources to pull up on the screen.
	I have the sources.
	I physically have them actually tabbed.
	I just can't pull them up on the screen because of what's going on here with this Rumble stuff.
	stuff.
	I'm very new to it.
	Thank you guys very much for the feedback.
	I'm happy to hear that.
	Someone said, tell Stu Peters to get you a new camera.
	I'll start investing in some better equipment.
	I think the microphone's okay.
	I could invest in something a little bit better with the earbuds.
	These are just cheap dollar store earbuds.
	I could definitely use a better camera.
	Now that I'm on the Sue Peters Network, which is a far more high production value and professional show than my typical shows are, I'm just a guy in my house who reads a lot of books and is figuring things out and wants to tell people about it.
	You know, not everything I say in all of my monologues is going to be 150% spot on and completely, perfectly calculated, right?
	There might be some mistakes I make here and there.
	I do my best to source everything that I say as best I can.
	Most of the stuff I'm saying, I can guarantee you, especially when I'm naming names, is definitely factual.
	As I look through history and source these things.
	But I will certainly start to upgrade my setup in the coming weeks to make sure that I'm meeting the standards of having such a high audience.
	And again, I do want to say one more time, it's very important that it's said.
	A major thank you to Stu Peters for platforming my show.
	Again, like I said, I really am.
	I'm just a random guy in my home who...
	Started finding this stuff out two years ago.
	Started reading books and trying to figure these things out and bringing it to as many people as I possibly could.
	So it's amazing to have a guy like Stu give me such a large platform and ability to reach more people with these messages and fundamental truths that I believe, again, are truly fundamental.
	If we're not talking about this, we're not going to fix it.
	And if we don't fix it, I don't think we have a very good future ahead of us if we don't actually work on fixing these things and trying to create something that is not this satanic, disgusting system that we're living underneath.
	Good.
	Thank you, folks.
	Again, I'll promote a couple things.
	We've got about 10 more minutes on the show.
	I want to close at 5.55 to give Stu some time to set his thing up, because I know he does a show at 6, and there's a thing where I can't be live while he's setting up, so to make sure he has enough time, I want to close out like 5 minutes before 6.
	So we're going to close around 5.55.
	So a couple things I just want to say.
	Concluding the show, kind of getting away from the topics and whatnot.
	A few things about the show itself and some promotional things about Stu and myself as well.
	So, for starters, number one, Uh, in the future, you're going to see some more, uh, there will be like a footer underneath the show.
	There's going to be some thumbnails and some intros and whatnot on the shows.
	So the production value is going to go up quite a bit.
	This is again, the first show I've ever done.
	Um, and I'll take any kind of constructive criticism on that as well.
	Uh, Secondly, the schedule for this show moving forward is going to be Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 4 to 6 p.m.
	Eastern.
	Now, I also have my own Odyssey channel, and I will still be running my own Odyssey shows from time to time.
	For instance, there might be somebody I talk to who wants to do an interview with me, and they want to come on the show, and they literally can't do a Monday, Wednesday, or Friday, or they can't fit into that time slot.
	I'd have to do it on just my show.
	I'll have them on on a Saturday on my show.
	There is going to be stuff that you guys can catch over on my other platforms.
	And just video content, just clip content, things like that that are unique and not connected to live streams.
	So I do recommend if you guys do want to catch all those things or you want to see some of the stuff I've done in the past to give you a better introduction of me and how I think and what I do, I recommend that you follow me on Odyssey.
	I have an Odyssey channel.
	It's odyssey.com, O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com slash logos revealed.
	And you can find me on there.
	I have a large archive.
	I think it's like 240 videos on there.
	I've done interviews.
	I've done monologues much like this.
	I've done roundtables with people.
	I've done all kinds of different things.
	There's a lot of different content that I've done on there.
	Lastly, if you guys want to support this show, I don't have any advertisements or anything like that.
	I don't have any sponsorships myself.
	So if you guys want to support this show and help keep it going, I leave links in the description below in order for people to support.
	Whether it's $1, $1,000, $1,000, $1,000, whatever you have to support.
	Don't push yourself out of your own financial means.
	But if you like what I'm doing and you find it valuable and you want to help me keep this going, you can do that via the links in the description down below.
	It's always helpful.
	And finally, I want to promote Stu Peters.
	Again, one more time, I cannot thank him enough for giving me this platform.
	Make sure Stu goes live at 6 p.m.
	Eastern.
	I believe on the same days that I go live, I'm almost certain.
	I'm not fully in line with the schedule yet.
	I got a little bit to learn yet.
	But I want to make sure that I'm promoting his show.
	So go watch his show.
	If you have not already, set yourself a reminder to do that.
	Make sure that you do so.
	It's going to be live at 6 p.m.
	Eastern.
	And I'm sure he's going to be talking about this Tucker Carlson event some more.
	It's a really big thing and it's massive.
	It's honestly massive that that went trending and number one on Twitter because that message needs to get out there.
	It's going to get a lot of people thinking, wait, why did Stu Peters get kicked out of that?
	What's the reason for that?
	It'll get some people really thinking about it.
	So make sure that you guys catch that show.
	Support Stu Peters whatever way you can.
	Support my show in whatever way you can if you'd like to.
	I think that's pretty much everything except for my Twitter account.
	If you guys want to follow me on Twitter, I host a lot of Twitter space.
	I actually co-host them more than I host them.
	I don't really like hosting, but I co-host and participate in quite a bit of Twitter spaces.
	You can find me on Twitter.
	It's at LogosRevealedI.
	There's an I at the end of it.
	So you guys can find me over there.
	I recommend that you guys get on there.
	I talk to anybody and everybody.
	So if you have questions, if you have thoughts, as long as you're polite, you know, don't come in like attacking me.
	But if you come in with a question, just shoot up a question in my messages.
	I know my messages are closed, but if you want me to open my messages to you, just tweet me on Twitter.
	I'll open my messages and I'll talk to anybody about anything.
	If you want to contact me about getting on the show or doing something with me in regards to my show, it's logosrevealed88 at gmail.com.
	That's where you can email me, and I check all my emails.
	It might take me a little long to get back to emails.
	It's the hardest platform for me to keep up with, but I will get back to them when I can.
	Excuse the train in the background.
	Again, I'm just a guy in my house, so you'll hear some of these background noises from time to time.
	I think we're going to close up here.
	I know it's a little bit early, but I have a lot to set up with this Rumble stuff in the future.
	So I was not fully prepared for this first show.
	It's kind of winging it.
	That's why I was a little bit all over the place.
	But I do appreciate everybody for watching.
	We had quite a few people watching on Rumble.
	We had my pretty typical audience on Odyssey, and I always appreciate you guys over on Odyssey.
	Thank you, my friends.
	You've been following me for quite a long time.
	I am going to close the show on Rumble.
	I'm actually going to stay live just for a moment and thank all of the investments individually that we've gotten over on Odyssey because I do appreciate that.
	Yeah, I should probably get a Proton account.
	I've been told that that's probably a good idea.
	What time is Stu on Locals?
	I believe 6pm Eastern.
	I believe.
	Again, I'm not fully in line with his schedule yet.
	I have to learn it.
	This is very spontaneous.
	Stu came up with this idea on Friday to have me on for some shows and we're kicking it off on Monday right away.
	We're getting all kinds of things set up in the meantime.
	It's been very fast.
	I already had other things planned that I was doing too.
	I'm not fully aware of his schedule yet, so I'm sorry.
	I think it's 6 p.m.
	Eastern, I think.
	That's kind of what he told me before, but hopefully that works.
	Thank you, folks, to everybody that watched the show.
	Be sure that you catch me on Wednesday.
	I'm going to be live at 4 p.m.
	Eastern with Dominic Trippi.
	If you watched Stu's show earlier, he had Dominic Trippi on as well to discuss the Tucker Carlson situation.
	Dominic is a...
	A very bright guy, and he's going to be coming on for Wednesday.
	Wednesday is 9-11, so I know there's a lot of stuff going on for Wednesday, but I'm going to have a show with Dominic Trippi on 9-11.
	We're going to be analyzing some of Israel's influence in that and doing our best to educate everybody on that.
	Most people know a lot of the stuff about this, but we'll do...
	We'll do as much as we can to inform everybody of some things that maybe are lesser known.
	We'll try to see if we can do that.
	Maybe talk about PNEC and stuff.
	So, thank you guys again for watching the show.
	I will catch you all at 4pm Eastern over on the Stu Peters Network as well as my Odyssey channel.
	And I appreciate all of you for tuning in to the first show.
	This was definitely very fun, and I think I did okay.
	I feel a little bit iffy about my performance just because it's so sporadic and not organized, but it'll definitely be organized in the future.
	Thank you guys again.
	I'm going to close it up on the Rumble.
	I'm going to just kind of close out on my Odyssey separately to thank the guys that sent some investments.
	So thank you for the folks on Rumble, and have a wonderful day.

▲