All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 15, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
54:58
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: MSM Will Blame Musk If Trump Wins, Intel Oligarchs Hate Free Speech
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
My name is Paul Harrell, as always.
We can't do the show without you watching, so we really do appreciate it.
You guys know the drill.
Always great to have you guys.
So, as the Democrats get geared up for the DNC next week, the World Health Organization conveniently has decided that monkeypox is the next viral emergency that, if they have their way, will require more lockdowns, more face diapers, I'm sure, and you guessed it, more mail-in ballots.
Will America comply if they try and run COVID 2.0 all over again?
Another plandemic?
I don't think so.
Some will, but certainly not as many as last time.
Average Americans have been ready for the next election year manufactured crisis since January.
I've been talking about it since January, speculating on what it could be, what was in store for 2024.
A plandemic, another one.
Economic collapse, World War III. Now, In fairness, I did not have assassination on my bingo card, failed or successful.
Praise God, it failed.
The year 2020 was traumatizing for most of us.
Not because of the man-made spike protein, although that was a thing, but because we realize that our government lies to us constantly.
They never tell us the truth because they look at us like cattle, like livestock, to be herded and culled.
Still, with only months until the 2024 election, everyone is on high alert.
What will the intel oligarchs do this time to stay in control and to stay in power?
Yesterday, I got to interview former CIA intel officer Pedro Orta about his upcoming documentary, Deep State Gangsters.
And that reminded me of something.
It reminded me about how the intel community, again, they love to call themselves that, They banded together in a successful attempt in 2020 to diminish an October surprise by writing a letter condemning the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation.
Remember that?
Remember how Twitter, back when it was controlled by Jack Dorsey, banned the New York Post's account, banned them from tweeting, blocked their story, censored their story about Hunter's laptop and his devious sexcapades?
Now, to be clear, I don't believe the narrative.
I don't believe the narrative that the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop is what swung the election for Biden.
I think the 2020 election was just stolen.
Through mail-in ballots, through machines, however, it was stolen.
But the fact that the intel oligarchs were weaponized against the American people by lying to us was almost certainly a red pill moment for a ton of people.
After Biden was installed as president, we remember, the mainstream media confirmed that the laptop was real and Jack Dorsey tried to apologize and claimed that censoring the story was all just a big mistake.
The New York Post of all outlets put it this way.
Quote, Jack Dorsey says blocking Post's Hunter Biden story was total mistake but won't say who made it.
So it's a mistake but we're not going to tell you who actually made it.
So a lot's changed on Twitter since the days of censorship with the goal of rigging an election.
Obviously the name is now different.
Elon Musk is now at the helm.
And while there are still many cases of censorship, it's a much more friendly place for free speech.
That's why European tyrants penned a letter threatening Musk right before his massive ex-space with President Trump a couple of nights ago.
A space, by the way, that has now reached one billion people.
And the bottom line is this free exchange of ideas truly horrifies People over in Europe and the intel oligarchy.
They're terrified.
They're afraid.
And they're angry.
Or both.
Now, they're angry because Twitter used to be theirs.
And while we don't have all the Twitter files, the ones that we do have show that the U.S. government was in control of what was seen and what could be said on Twitter.
Jack Dorsey was clearly not in charge.
He was just a puppet.
He was just a figurehead.
He was a fake, though.
No, the government subverted any notion that Twitter 1.0 was a private company.
And now that appears to no longer be true.
And people are taking notice.
Recently, billionaire Mark Cuban has been critical of Elon Musk.
No doubt he is extremely jealous of his fame and notorious intellect.
Cuban recently went on Jon Stewart's show to warn the public about the danger Elon Musk poses because he now controls X. Now keep in mind, too, that Jon Stewart was Brought back to his old job at the Daily Show, in an act of desperation, Stewart used to propagandize young people for decades by disguising left-wing propaganda as comedy.
The fact that Elon is now in control of X and having such an impact on young people everywhere may have been the deciding factor in bringing Jon Stewart back so that he could at least attempt to counter the uncensored truth so freely exchanged on X by, I don't know, making fun of it?
Listen to the lamentations of Mark Cuban and Jon Stewart.
I mean, look at Elon, right?
Elon, in being one of those powerful people, he's trying to be the most influential man in the world.
It sounds like a commercial, but literally that's what Twitter has given us.
I've gotta say, I think he might be that.
I don't even think he's trying to be.
When you talk about somebody who is setting up satellite links for war zones and also controlling discourse in the most important media platform, I would think he is the most powerful.
Because Twitter is in almost every country, right?
And so Twitter gives him the ability to connect to the prime minister, the head of every country in the world.
That's right.
And that person, whoever's in charge of that country, has an interest in what happens on Twitter.
And what happens on Twitter, because of the control of the algorithms being the biggest user, is all dependent on Elon Musk.
He literally, wherever his thumb wants to go, he gets to push as hard as he wants.
And certainly, I mean, he's transparent about where he wants things to go.
I think he's very clear that civil war is inevitable.
Right.
And that white people are under the government.
Concerning.
Right.
It's, you know, it'll be like civil war.
You see what they're setting up here?
They're actually setting up to make Elon Musk the Russia 2.0 collusion hoax.
Like, if Trump were to win, if Trump can win somehow, they're now going to blame Elon Musk.
You see where this is headed?
They're setting it up.
Oh, he's very dangerous.
I mean, he's a very powerful man.
Powerful.
You know, he sets up, you know, satellite links in war zones, and then he also controls the discord.
A real threat.
And it's all because they don't like what he's allowed.
They don't like that he's allowed people to, you know, freely or more freely exchange ideas with one another.
They don't like it.
They would rather their guy be in charge, Jack Dorsey.
And Jack Dorsey, of course, wasn't really in charge, as we've just demonstrated.
So they're going on about how afraid they are about this potential threat.
And not one of them has thought about what Twitter did.
I guarantee you, not one of them has actually thought of what Twitter did the last election cycle, where they suppressed the truth in an effort to get Joe Biden elected.
They literally protected the truth.
The intel oligarchs that controlled Twitter, you know, they censored the story.
They banned the New York Post from being able to tweet.
And yet, they're now trying to pile on Elon Musk.
It's inevitable, and then he'll write underneath there, hmm, you know.
Kind of an understatement on there.
But...
I can't decide whether or not it's better to know exactly where he stands and know where he's going to be put the thumb on.
Because he's clearly a very bright guy, and he has a media empire that has the largest reach and most influence of anything on the face of the earth, and there's no question he's going to leverage it in this election.
No question.
But the crazy part is he has more impact globally than he does domestically, in my opinion, right?
Because when you go on X, you see a preponderance of right-leaning people.
You don't see a lot of...
They're all over my for you.
I've never clicked on any of these f***ing things.
That's the whole thing.
That's the way algorithms work, right?
What?
Yes!
Or, or, maybe there's just a lot of people out there.
There's more of us than there are of you.
I mean, maybe that's what it is.
Maybe we really are, you know, being governed by a minority of people that they think a certain way and they want everybody to...
I've said this for a while.
I mean, he's talking about internationally versus domestically.
But, I mean, if you look...
I mean, especially if you understand that the 2020 election was stolen I mean, the vast majority is just not down with clown world.
The vast majority of this country is not down with clown world.
When I say clown world, I'm talking about I would just classify it as anti-Christian bigotry, but let's just say clown world is men showering with women because that's their right.
Parents taking their kids to drag shows, abusing their kids with chemical castration drugs.
People aren't down with that, and that's what the left stands for now.
You've got a bunch of right-wing people.
They're right-wing people because they believe men are men and women are women.
That's a real right-wing idea these days.
That's, in all likelihood, that's really what they're observing.
Because, you know, there's plenty of left-wing people.
I think the algorithm, certainly on Twitter, like when I engage, I have engaged a whole lot over the last two weeks with these people that have been attacking Christian journalist Megan Basham's book.
About the woke infiltration.
We've talked all about it.
I've engaged a lot of those people.
And I have noticed that since I've done that, I've noticed that I'm seeing more posts from woke evangelicals.
And I think the algorithm knows.
I've been commenting on a lot of these.
So they're showing me more of these woke evangelicals.
Either they think I like it or they're trying to draw me in to comment more and to, you know...
I don't know, embarrass them with the truth.
Although, has anyone's mind ever actually been changed because of a Facebook comment or a Twitter post?
I don't know.
Probably more now because free exchange of ideas or it's a more free platform than ever, right?
Probably more.
There's more opportunity for that to actually happen now than ever before.
Red pills all over the place.
But no, the intel oligarchs want to kill free speech, and they are very worried about...
You heard Jon Stewart there.
He will use it.
He will leverage it all.
He will leverage his influence this election.
Well, yeah, I mean...
Yeah, it's his right to do that.
I mean, he owns the company, so...
There you go.
Right?
I'm reminded, I know a lot of times, like early in Musk's career, they wanted to compare him to the...
And again, I don't fully trust, let me caveat, I don't fully trust Elon Musk.
I don't like that he wore the devil's armor for Halloween and everything else.
You know, he's not a Christian.
He said the other day that he identifies as a cultural Christian, which I certainly think that's a better...
Better than not identify it as a cultural Christian, right?
But, you know, he was compared to the comic book character Tony Stark for a long time, and I'm reminded in that one movie where the government wants the technology for the weapons and stuff, and he says, no, it's mine, you can't have it.
Well, now he controls one of the largest, you know, platforms.
He's the richest man in the world.
He's got all these satellites.
He controls, you know, speech on Twitter, and he's like, no, you can't have it.
It's very similar.
I mean, if you really think about information being one of the most, you know, valuable commodities, it certainly is becoming more and more valuable by the day.
All right, and so Andrew Torba, okay, he's a guy, the founder, CEO of Gab, he put it this way, as this clip was making the rounds, he says, look, when Trump wins, he's very optimistic, and He says, when Trump wins, they are going to come after Elon big time.
Watch how they seethe in this clip.
They will blame the election and whatever comes after on him and attack X like they did to Facebook after 2016 and Gab and Parler after January 6th.
Yeah, you know, I forgot about that.
I forgot about the fit that they threw after Trump was elected in 2016.
They tried to blame it on Mark Zuckerberg.
And they tried to blame it on Facebook.
I forgot about that.
Facebook was, back in the 2016 race, you could still get information to people on Facebook without getting banned.
I hardly even go on the platform anymore now.
I don't know.
I mean, is it still that way?
Are they still ban-happy over there?
Do they still censor in the way that they were, you know, in the Trump administration and during COVID? I'm not sure exactly.
Because, again, I don't really go on the platform.
I don't post anything.
I mean, I don't post anything controversial or not controversial because I simply don't post, so I have no idea what the status of Facebook is right now.
Yeah, I mean, it's just fascinating.
It's like the left's like, well, they've got a billionaire?
Well, let's put our billionaire out there.
We'll go talk to Jon Stewart of The Daily Show.
The media really has lost the grip on things.
And we'll give you an example of how everybody, this is another clip, Caitlin Collins going on Stephen Colbert.
Again, Networks.
So you've got The Daily Show.
It's on Comedy Central.
It's on cable.
They're trying to use these old mediums when the newer mediums are just outpacing.
I mean, the Elon Musk Trump space was a billion people.
A billion people?
Do you have any idea how much, how many people that is?
A billion people.
That's a lot.
Okay, that's a lot.
When we try to talk about what a billion dollars is.
When we try to conceptualize a billion dollars, it's $27,000 spent every day for 100 years with money still left over at the end of the 100 years.
That's how much a billion is.
It's a lot of people.
But anyway, just to kind of give you another example of how desperate they are, the media's jig is up.
Here's Stephen Colbert, another Daily Show, got his start at the Daily Show, interviewing CNN's Caitlin Collins.
Trump has kind of been thrown on his heels by this, and he's not really sure how to go after...
Vice President Harris, he knew his attack lines on President Biden.
He really has struggled with how to go after someone who's 20 years younger than him, who is a different gender, a different race.
It's kind of been this moment where he has not been able to coalesce around a single attack line.
I know you guys are objective over there that you just report the news as it is.
Oh, I know.
CNN makes a...
Was that supposed to be a laugh line?
It wasn't supposed to be, but I guess it is.
I know that you guys are objective over there.
I mean, so here's the thing.
Did they think that he was actually joking there?
He wasn't joking.
Maybe some people thought he was joking.
Or, the simplest explanation is, people think CNN is a network of liars.
It's a network full of liars.
I'm going with that option.
That's what I think is going on here.
They're not buying it.
They're not buying it.
That's why you're seeing this panic...
That's also why Kamala Harris isn't doing any press conferences.
I mean, it's because they've got to...
Look, there's a few things happening here.
There's a few things happening here.
One of the things happening is that Kamala Harris and all this AstroTurf and all the polling, and you can make a poll, show whatever you want it to show, everything that's showing that the race is close or that Kamala Harris is leading and all of that, it's two things.
It's being done to make a steal plausible, okay?
Or it's being done to make a Trump victory seem implausible on the other side so they can whip every major city up and riot if Trump wins.
Don't think that that's not in the cards, okay?
And again, back to the Torba post here.
Let's say Trump wins.
Let's say the cities burn.
Let's say we have the return of the Summer of Love and the burn, loot, murder, and everything else comes right back.
They're going to blame Elon Musk.
They're going to say, Musk, this is your fault.
And Musk will be like, I mean, I can put a Star League satellite above this blue city that's burning to the ground right now because people are...
I can give them their internet back.
So yeah, the media's lost its grip.
And so, you know, more on this.
As I said yesterday, I told you we would cover this.
Gateway Pundit saying a new low for CNN. Far-left host Dana Bash lies about Trump and Musk's conversation on Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.
But she got caught.
So here is the actual clip of Dana Bash taking this audio totally out of context to make it seem like...
Trump and Musk were like, eh, nuclear weapons, they're not a big deal.
Don't worry about it.
Nuclear weapon here or there, not that big of a deal.
So listen to this clip.
I want to play one exchange that was kind of classic.
Well, there were a lot of exchanges that were classic Donald Trump, but this one really stuck out to us.
And Nagasaki were bombed, but now they're like full cities again.
So it's not as scary as people think, basically.
So that was more Elon Musk than Donald Trump talking about, sort of suggesting that what happened almost 80 years ago, I think 80 years ago next year, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, now it's okay.
Kind of trying to blow off the impact of it.
Okay, yeah, I mean, you heard it there.
You heard it there.
You heard it from Dana Bash right there.
I mean, they were blowing off the impact of nuclear bombs being detonated in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I mean, these men are just idiots.
I mean, how dare they?
How dare they minimize what happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Yeah, that's the thing.
That's not the full context of what they were saying, though.
That's not the full context of what they were saying.
Here's the full transcript, or we can just play it for you.
This is what they actually said.
Take a listen.
Yeah, actually, there's the bad side of nuclear, which is a nuclear war, a very bad side.
But there's also, I think, nuclear electricity generation is underrated.
Absolutely.
You're right.
And it's actually, you know, people have this fear of nuclear...
Nuclear electricity generation, but it's actually one of the safest forms of electricity generation.
It's just a huge misunderstanding.
And if you look at the injuries and deaths, you know, caused by, say, I mean, I'm not going to try to pick on coal mining, but just any kind of mining operation.
And there's a certain number of injuries and deaths per year.
You compare that to nuclear, nuclear is actually way better.
So it's underrated as an electricity source, and I think it's something that's worth reconsidering.
But there's so much regulation that people can't get it done.
Maybe they'll have to change the name.
The name is a rough name.
There are some areas, like when you see what happened.
Bad branding.
We'll have to rebrand it.
We'll have to give it a good name.
We'll name it after you or something.
Hey, it has a branding problem.
When you see what happened in Japan, where they say you won't be able to go on the land for about 3,000 years.
Did you ever say that?
And in Russia, where they had the problem, where there's a lot of bad things happened, and they have a problem.
And they say that in 2,000 years, people will start to occupy the land again.
You know, you realize it's pretty bad.
No, that's not true.
You're right about it.
It's amazing.
It's actually not that bad.
So after Fukushima happened in Japan, people were asking me in California, are we worried about a nuclear cloud coming from Japan?
I'm like, no, that's crazy.
It's not even dangerous in Fukushima.
I actually flew there and ate locally grown vegetables on TV to prove it.
And I donated a solar water treatment system for a water treatment plant.
Yeah, but you haven't been feeling so well lately, and I'm worried about it.
No, no.
It's fine.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed, but now they're full cities again.
It's not as scary as people think, basically.
So that is your full context.
They weren't talking about nuclear bombs being, you know, not devastating, not a big deal.
They're talking about radiation and nuclear energy.
They're talking about nuclear power plants, electricity that you would get from...
The technology of, you know, nuclear technology.
That's what they're talking about, not what Dana Bash trying to make.
How desperate, I mean, in the age, how do they even do this?
Like, in the age of the internet where you're going to be found out, how do you even do this?
I mean, is that just from a CNN producer who didn't actually take the time to watch this?
Or listen, didn't want to listen to it and just, you know, listen to a little bit of it and pick that up.
I don't know, but it's just...
It just lets you know.
I mean, CNN, their viewership, way down.
They're not able to actually reach the people that they want to reach.
And that is why you have, again, people like Mark Cuban being rolled out there.
And, you know, Jon Stewart trying to regain his audience...
Because they don't have the reach, they're losing control of their censorship machine.
I mean, look at Elon, right?
Elon, in being one of those powerful people, he's trying to be the most influential man in the world.
It sounds like a commercial, but literally that's what Twitter has given him.
I've got to say, I think he might be that.
I don't even think he's trying to be.
When you talk about somebody who is setting up satellite links for war zones and also controlling discourse in the most important media platform, I would think he is the most powerful.
Because Twitter is in almost every country, right?
And so Twitter gives him the ability to connect to the prime minister, the head of everything.
Every country in the world.
That's right.
And that person, whoever's in charge of that country, has an interest in what happens on Twitter.
And what happens on Twitter, because of the control of the algorithms being the biggest user, is all dependent on Elon Musk.
He literally, wherever his thumb wants to go, he gets to push his heart.
It's all the dangerous Elon Musk now.
They're going to make this guy...
We're going to make this guy the focus of evil in the modern world, especially if Donald Trump somehow gets back into the White House.
That's what they're going to do.
So I open the show talking about monkeypox.
We know that that's their plan, or at least one of their plans.
They assemble these little emergency boxes and glass cases in case of emergency, break open glass.
The monkeypox thing, you know, or the disease X or whatever the next, you know, they've got a plandemic box ready to go.
They've got an economic crisis box.
They've got a war box.
Okay, which one are we going to use?
That's at least the way I compartmentalize it.
That's the way I see it.
But, you know, Kamala Harris, if she goes off script, it's very, very bad for her.
Okay?
That's why she's not doing press conferences.
Okay?
But I actually think if she, you know, the DNC, when she starts talking, even in a planned speech, it's going to be very, very bad for her because she's just so cringed and everybody's going to be watching the DNC. Wouldn't it be great if the DNC just canceled the DNC? Just give her the nomination, cancel the DNC, and then we don't have to see the spectacle?
Because I can promise you the spectacle and the dumpster fire that the DNC is going to be next week will be...
I actually don't think it's going to be good for Kamala Harris at all.
And even though it's supposed to be a rallying point, I mean, it'll look good, and the media will certainly try to tell everybody it's good.
Anyway, Wall Street Silverstein health officials have put out a warning that the Democrat National Convention in Chicago next week, the 19th through the 22nd, is a potential super spreader event for the virus.
Now, there's a couple of things that you could say here about that.
Monkeypox is a disease that is spread more easily amongst the homosexual enclave, the sodomite community, if you will.
So, you know, there's that.
Not that the RNC, you know, the RNC had its problems.
I'm not necessarily with monkeypox, but there were people noting, because of the log cabin Republican contingent, there were some people noting that at the RNC, you could, you know, the gay dating apps or whatever were active in that area.
Mm-hmm.
So anyway, just trying to report on both sides.
Anyway, you know, can you imagine if they canceled the DNC over monkeypox?
And then Kamala can run this campaign similar to the way Joe ran it in the basement in 2020?
I definitely think that's something that they are thinking about for sure.
Joel Berry tweeting, this is the same path Hugo Chavez took in Venezuela.
This will make food shortages worse and make prices go up.
For the love of your neighbor, pray this woman doesn't get elected.
Kamala Harris to announce Soviet-style price controls on food under guise of gouging ban.
So she wants to stop the price gouging.
So it's not her fault, not the Biden economy's fault.
Not the Biden-Harris economy.
It's not inflation.
No, it's the greedy corporations.
That's what she's going with.
It's the greedy corporations' fault.
We'll have more on this here in a minute.
We're going to take a break.
I'm going to listen to a little bit more of Francis Schaeffer from 1981.
Don't go anywhere.
We'll be back here in just a moment.
Where have the Bible-believing Christians been?
We shouldn't be surprised.
The liberal theologians have been no help.
But where have we been as we have changed to this other consensus and all the horrors and stupidity at the present moment has come down upon our culture?
We must recognize that this country is close to being lost.
Not, first of all, because of a humanist conspiracy.
I believe there are those who conspire, but that is not the reason this country is almost lost.
This country is almost lost, not because of a humanist conspiracy, but because the Bible-believing Christians, in the last 40 years, who have said that they know that the final reality is this infinite personal God, who is the Creator and all the rest, They said they have known it and they've done nothing about it as the consensus has changed.
There's been a vast silence.
The Christians of this country have simply been silent.
Much of the evangelical leadership has not raised a voice.
Spirituality, after you're a Christian and have accepted Christ as Savior, It means that Christ is the Lord of all your life and not just your religious life.
And if you make a dichotomy in these things, you are denying your Lord, His proper place, and I don't care how many butterflies you have in your stomach, you are poor spiritually.
True spirituality means that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Lord of all of life and except for the things that are specifically told as in the Bible are sinful, we set them aside, except for that all of life is spiritual and all of life is equally spiritual and that includes As our forefathers did,
standing for these things of freedom, and standing for these things of human life, and all these other matters that are so crucial, if indeed this living God does exist as we know that He does exist.
I think the church has failed to meet its obligation in these last 40 years for two specific reasons.
The first is this false truncated view of spirituality that doesn't see true spirituality touching all of life.
And the other thing is too many Christians, whether the doctors, lawyers, pastors, evangelists, whatever they are, too many of them are afraid to really speak out because they did not want to rock the boat for their own project.
And I'm convinced that these two reasons, both of which are a tragedy and really horrible for the Christian, both of the two together are an explanation why we have walked the road we have walked in the last 40 years.
You must understand it's going to cause you to take a stand in these things.
There are doctors who are going to get kicked out of hospitals because they refuse to perform abortions.
There are nurses who see a little sign on a crib do not feed and they feed and they're fired.
There's a cost.
There's a cost.
But I'd ask you, I'd ask you, what is loyalty to Christ worth to you?
What is loyalty to Christ worth to you?
How much do you believe this is true?
Why are you a Christian?
Are you a Christian because for some lesser reason?
Are you a Christian because you know this is the truth of reality?
And then how much do you love the Lord Jesus Christ?
How much are you willing to pay the price for loyalty to the Lord Jesus?
Christ must be the final Lord and not society and not Caesar.
May I repeat the final sentence again?
Christ must be the final Lord, and not Caesar, and not society.
I mean, we played that speech yesterday as well. . we played that speech yesterday as well. .
And I just have to say, I mean, I absolutely love it.
Again, that was Francis Schaeffer, late theologian Francis Schaeffer.
Wrote great books like The Christian Manifesto, How Should We Then Live, The God Who Is There.
Love all of his stuff.
I think it's absolutely fantastic.
We were just talking about Kamala Harris.
She is now floating stuff like this.
Price gouging.
You're going to say, oh, they're gouging, so we've got to put price controls in place, is what she's going to say.
Which, of course, is communism, right?
The Biden economy, though, what about the Biden economy?
Is it the Biden economy, or is it the Biden-Harris economy?
When did you guys learn that Vice President Harris wants to distance herself from Bidenomics?
Why do you think that?
Axios is now reporting that she is hoping to distance herself from President Biden's unpopularity on the economy.
Can you blame her?
Do you know this is the Biden-Harris administration?
Are you aware that this is the Biden-Harris administration?
And she is indeed the vice president.
Now, somebody on Twitter said that that's an ad right there.
Like, they need to take that clip of Kareem Jean-Pierre saying, you know, you do realize, like, this is the Biden-Harris administration, right?
How is she going to distance herself from Biden-omics?
This is the Biden-Harris administration.
She is, in fact, the vice president.
Why do you think that?
Axios is now reporting that she is hoping to distance herself from President Biden's unpopularity on the economy.
Can you blame her?
Do you know this is the Biden-Harris administration?
Are you aware that this is the Biden-Harris administration?
And she is indeed the vice president.
But if the president's policies on the economy were working, or if they were popular, wouldn't he still be the candidate?
You literally just had the chair of the CEA here who laid out a pretty robust point by point about the economy and what has happened under the Biden-Harris administration.
And I thought it was pretty convincing.
Look, As far as anything that the Vice President wants to do...
All right, all right.
Get that out of here.
We don't want to listen to any more of that.
All right, so that brings me to Evangelicals for Harris.
It's not only that.
You have Evangelicals for Harris.
Listen to what they say about themselves.
Faithful, compassionate evangelicals exercising our God-given citizenship by voting for someone who better reflects Christian values.
Kamala Harris and the Democrats, these evangelicals claim that she's for Christian values.
Faithful and compassionate.
No, they're unfaithful, and they're actually not compassionate.
As Joel Berry was just tweeting around, Kamala Harris in the White House will be a terror to your neighbors.
He really will.
Even the ones, even technically, I'll say this, even the ones who are down with the leftist causes and they're down with the transitions, they're down with the transgenders, they're down with all of the debauchery, it's actually still not good for them, even if that's what they want.
It's still not good for their souls.
Right.
And again, that's...
You know what?
I don't have to caveat it, right?
I mean, the lesser of two evils here is obvious.
It is absolutely obvious.
So there's not only Evangelicals for Harris, Evangelicals for Harris, then there's also a group led by somebody named Paula Stone Williams, who is a man pretending to be a woman, and he has founded a group called Christians for Kamala.
And this is what he sounds like.
Okay, so if you didn't hear that right, she's lamenting the fact that we have Christian red states standing up to protect kids from child abuse.
Okay, so they're passing laws saying that parents can't abuse children by...
Transing their kids with chemical castration or, you know, even there's drag shows.
They're saying that insurance companies will not be reimbursed for the surgery.
So they're also trying to make sure doctors don't go ahead and do this.
Now, case in point, I will say, you know, because I like the phrase child abuse here.
Really, we got to focus on that hammer down.
According to Ken Paxton, who was asked, the Attorney General of Texas was asked about Whether or not transing kids under existing Texas law, this is before they passed some of these new laws, if transing kids under existing law would be considered child abuse.
And he wrote a lengthy opinion and had historical documents and cited the laws going back a long, long time, and he said, yes, actually, right now, right now, This stuff is child abuse right now.
So theoretically, these Christian red states, they really don't need to pass new laws.
I'm for them passing the new laws, but they really don't need to pass new laws.
They really just need law enforcement to enforce existing child abuse laws on parents who are doing this to their kids and the doctors, quite frankly.
In the meantime, you know, the state legislatures are going to continue to try to restrain wickedness and try to restrain this evil and protect children, which is a good thing.
Anyway, back to this man here talking about evangelicals, and she's very upset about the new laws that are being passed in Christian red states.
Who was driving those laws?
Well, of course, it was Republican legislatures, but people assume it was Republicans.
Well, two studies show us it was not Republicans per se driving those laws because 61% of Republicans believe transgender people should have the same civil rights as everybody else.
So who was driving those laws?
Who is still driving those laws?
Tell us, who?
It is the people I grew up with.
It is the people who taught me about Jesus.
It is the people to whom I preached.
It is evangelical Christians, 87% of whom believe that gender is immutably determined at birth.
67% of them believe we already give too many civil rights to transgender people.
I don't worry about myself.
I mean, whatever happens, I'll be fine.
I'm older than dirt and I will not live long enough to lose my white male entitlement.
That's the truth.
I serve as mayor pro tem here in Lyons, Colorado.
I have no difficulties here.
I'm not concerned about me.
All my friends, it's the kids.
It's the kids.
Deal with transgender children.
We are at a societal impasse because this man, who thinks that he's a woman, thinks that he has the moral high ground concerning children thinks that he has the moral high ground concerning children and what's best for them.
Thank you.
We are at an impasse.
There's no negotiating with that.
We'll come together and figure out our differences, and we'll solve our tax problems, and we'll solve the national debt.
How?
How do you do that when the other person believes they have the moral high ground and that kids need to be transed, kids need to be on puberty blockers, kids need to have their genitals removed because they feel like they're trapped in the wrong body?
And our solution as a society is to affirm that, the delusion, and to put people like this in, I don't know, she said she was a, did she say she was a mayor or something?
He said, he said, excuse me, he said that he's a mayor.
Anyway, it's the kids.
It's the kids.
Yeah, it's the kids.
It's the kids.
This is the dividing line.
And yet this person is leading up an organization called Christians for Kamala.
They have a suicide completion rate 13 times higher than their peers.
She's citing these suicide statistics and they refuse to admit that people still kill themselves after they have the surgery because guess what?
It doesn't fix the problem.
So just yesterday I got a call from grandparents in New England asking if I would talk to their daughter in Tennessee about her child who needs medical care and cannot receive it in Tennessee.
My co-worker, a licensed counselor, just today saw two transgender children who came here because of the medical care that's available to them here in Colorado that's not available where they came from.
Okay, so this is why...
Okay, all right.
This is why the Christian Red States have got to go further and they've got to actually classify this stuff as child abuse.
So if a parent takes the kid to Colorado and thinks they're going to come back to Tennessee or wherever...
They're now guilty of child abuse.
This is going to accomplish two things.
Number one, it will restrain the wickedness and it will protect children.
It just will.
Number two, it'll force the people that are really diehard about it and they really want to put their kids through this process, they're going to move.
They're going to move.
They're going to flee the red states and stay there.
Now, this is why we also need a national ban on this type of stuff, because, again, how are you going to really be the United States of America when, you know, California mutilates children's genitals and Tennessee decides, ah, we don't think that's health care.
One calls it health care, gender-affirming care, and the other doesn't.
How are you going to be united with that?
Likewise, that's why we also need a federal abortion ban, in my opinion.
But obviously, that ship has sailed.
That plank in the Republican platform has floated away for the time being.
This is just awful.
It's just sick stuff.
Evangelicals for Harris, Christians for Kamala, no thanks.
And then we have this, which was, I mean, you know, you talk about a cult.
This is very, this reminds me of a cult.
Dr.
Debra Fosche, I've never come across her on Twitter.
She says, childless cat people have come out with a real winner of a song.
It's a It's a hymn from the Church of Kamala.
Let's see if we can't pipe this in directly.
What does it sound like here?
We're not going, we're not going back We're not going, we're not going back Just like a tree that's planted by the water We're not going back Alright, so they're holding Harris for President signs.
It's certainly a lot of old people, mostly white, mostly women, a few men scattered in there, and they're not going back.
They mean they don't want to go back to the Trump presidency.
The reason I was describing that for you guys, because I was describing that for the listeners of the show.
Anyway, we're not going back.
I just think about, also, I think about Pedro Orta, what he said on the program yesterday about how the CIA didn't want to change photos from Obama to Trump when Trump won, and they took their time.
How many of the people in the CIA today are just like these people?
Voting for our freedoms, we're not going back.
Control of our own bodies, we're not going back.
Just like a tree planted by the water.
I don't even know whatever that means.
How many CIA Langley boys feel the exact same way as these Kamala for Harris people writing their hymns?
So Christians for Kamala, Evangelicals for Kamala, hymns for Kamala.
Unbelievable.
Protestia with a win.
This is a great story that I have got to talk about this.
There's a Lutheran church called King of Kings that has decided...
Before I go any further...
Every Friday, and I know it's not Friday yet, but every Friday I try at the end of the show to encourage all of you guys out there to go to church.
Specifically, if you're not going to church, I encourage you to not neglect the assembly of the brethren.
Get together.
Worship the Lord on the Lord's Day.
I feel like that's important.
It's important in my life, and I think that's the way forward.
That's the real path forward to try to save this country.
It's to worship God because He calls us to worship Him.
And I say, you know, if you've got to find a church, keep looking, because you can get discouraged.
Find a church that preaches the death, burial, resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Preaches not from a woke cultural standpoint, but from the idea that the Bible is true and Jesus saves sinners, right?
And we want to worship God.
There are churches out there I would not recommend, and churches like this would be one of them.
Very seeker-sensitive, where we're trying to not just preach the Word of God, but we're going to have to take something cultural, like video games, Frogger and Tetris and Mario Kart.
And try to figure out a way so that we can grab your attention to get you in the door, and then we'll try to figure out some way to make that a biblical lesson.
It's just pathetic.
And there are churches all across the country that are doing this.
And it's because they think they have to imitate the world.
And what they don't know is the church just needs to do what the church does best, which is worship the Lord.
Not try to imitate the world, because you'll never do it better than the world.
You're never actually going to do it better than the world because the world does what the world does.
Alright, so Lutheran Church puts on video game themed service plus Christian principles from Tetris.
It's the King of Kings Lutheran Church.
it's one of the largest churches in the Lutheran church, Missouri Synod, conservative Lutheran denomination that stands in stark contrast and, um, contradistinction to the filthy minstrel rags, uh, that is the progressive ELCA.
Okay.
All right.
So, uh, it's a big church and this protest is saying, look, there are worse churches to go to.
You could go to some other Lutheran churches that drape themselves in rainbows.
I will say, I didn't see any rainbows.
But this is kind of on a slippery slope.
Church services like this, in my opinion, are just kind of On that same path, right?
Because you're trying to get to culture.
So at one point, does somebody say, well, hey, what if we just, you know, what if we were more open to the LGBTQ enclave?
And that's kind of how it starts, right?
Claiming 3,500 members led by a guy by the name of Greg Griffith, they're several weeks into the video game sermon series Game On, which asks, have you ever wondered how some of the most popular video games can teach you about your faith?
Have you ever wondered, have you ever wondered, how some of the most popular video games can actually teach you about your faith?
Have you ever wondered...
I can say I have never wondered that in my life.
Never.
Naturally, they've...
Let's see.
They've decorated up the lobby.
There it is.
Game on.
Do we have...
Let's see.
Do we have this?
Yeah.
Here's the trailer.
Yeah, that's right.
Churches have trailers now.
Have you ever wondered how video games can teach you about faith?
Join us this August for Game On.
We're exploring Christian principles in Minecraft.
Mario Kart, Tetris, and Frogger.
Discover insights into faith, community, and more.
Invite a friend today at kingofpings.org slash gameon.
And you got to run with belief, right?
And so one of my favorite races is DK Summit.
I just love it.
You're kind of going.
And here's what's happening.
You're racing on this DK Summit trap, and you're like bumping, and you're beaten and battered, and you're going, and you're speeding and cruising, right?
And you're getting bombarded, and you're outlasting.
You're just going, going, going in this race.
And it's a race that happens that you're just going and flying through.
All these things.
And the truth of the matter is, that's what life's like.
Like, have you ever gone through life and you're thinking about this in this life and you're just going and you're bumping and you're beating and you're speeding and you're cruising, right?
And you're blasting and trying to outlast.
And that's what sometimes it feels like in this life.
Sometimes I find myself in this life, in this race that we're going, and I'm like, I'm tired.
Like, do I really believe that I can win this race?
I mean, I kept waiting for the biblical principle.
Where's the biblical principle in that?
Does anybody know?
Where exactly would it be?
I mean, it's the most infantile, elementary presentation.
No mention of Jesus.
Just, yeah, life's rough.
It's kind of like Donkey Kong on a go-kart in a video game.
With banana peels and question mark boxes.
Yeah, you know, life feels this way.
You're just kind of going along and you're getting all beat up.
So what you just saw there is it's a gimmick.
That's not church.
That's a gimmick to try to hold your attention.
It's trying to get people that really care nothing about God, really care nothing about sitting still for an hour, an hour and a half, Really care nothing about a liturgy or reading the scripture, reading God's word, and worshiping the Lord.
That service isn't geared for those types of people.
That service is geared for people that have to be entertained through some sort of gimmick.
Maybe that's how you fill a church.
Maybe that's how you fill a 3,500-person church.
Maybe people like you and me, maybe we're not meant to go to a church that holds 1,000 people.
I don't know.
Food for thought.
Tell me what you think.
Sound off in the comments.
You can follow me on X at RealPaulHarrell.
Excellent job, once again, by Protestia.
Always great to read Protestia.
They're a great follow on Twitter, so I would encourage you to...
Give them a follow if you haven't.
Also, Woke Preacher Clips is really good, but it's just at protestia.
This is where I get the content like this.
It's really good stuff.
All right, that's all the time that we have for today on this edition of the Millstone Report.
I'm going to be back unless, tomorrow, unless I'm providentially hindered, I'm going to be back.
So please, please join me tomorrow.
Don't forget to check out the podcast, Apple, Spotify, and we'll see you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection