All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 14, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
55:54
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Deep State GANGSTERS Documentary Coming In September
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
All right, folks, welcome to the program.
Thanks so much for being with us as always.
We can't do the program without you watching every single day.
We've got a great show lined up for you today.
It's no secret, though, America is facing a ton of problems.
And, you know, that statement, that's not really news.
Whether it's the economy, whether it's the possibility of World War III, or the security of our national elections, whether or not our vote actually matters, we got a lot on our minds as Americans right now.
But if I had to pick just one, if I had to pick one problem I think is the cause of all of the others, I would start with the intel oligarchs who are the real rulers of our nation.
So when I was growing up, I thought the CIA were the good guys.
I came to this belief because my heart always swelled with pride when James Bond got a little help from Felix Leitner in the movies.
You guys know.
As I got older, I always enjoyed a good portrayal of Jack Ryan, whether it was Harrison Ford or even Ben Affleck.
The CIA analyst turned field agent was inspiring and communicated to the masses that America had its best out there putting their lives on the line to keep our great country safe.
I'm not naive to the fact that my opinion of the CIA, or the intel community as they like to refer to themselves, was directly informed by Hollywood.
I have or had this high lofty opinion of the CIA because getting control of the writing in Hollywood and what kind of stories they could tell was clearly a priority for the spooks at Langley.
Even still, some movies slowly let the public in on the freedom-killing surveillance state they were building right under our nose.
The government's been in bed with the entire telecommunications industry since the 40s.
They've infected everything.
Get into your bank statements, computer files, email, listen to your phone calls.
Our wife's been saying that for years.
Every wire, every air wave.
The more technology used, the easier it is for them to keep tabs on you.
It's a brave new world out there.
At least it better be.
Fort Meade has 18 acres of mainframe computers underground.
You're talking to your wife on the phone, you use the word bomb, president, Allah, any of a hundred keywords.
Computer recognizes it, automatically records it, red flags it for analysis.
That was 20 years ago.
They've got over a hundred spy satellites looking down at us.
That's classified.
So, I mean, I'm sure the keywords are probably a little different today, like apple pie, American flag, patriot.
That'll get you spied on for sure.
That was a clip from the movie Enemy of the State.
It was made way back in the year 1998.
After watching that, I kind of had the idea, someone needs to make a line graph that shows how the more Americans, including CEOs and politicians, the more of us become dependent on technology, the less and less Congress actually represents the American people.
I'm talking about blackmail, of course.
America is being governed by an occupied force, and that much is clear to me.
But the question has to be asked, are they all bad?
Surely there are some brave souls left out there that want to stop the intel oligarchy from destroying the freedoms of Americans.
I fear they're few and far between and that's because when a brave whistleblower does come forward to root out and expose national security corruption, the deep state makes their lives a living hell.
Now this is done obviously to keep other witnesses to their criminal actions quiet and afraid.
In fact, the only time a whistleblower matters, seems to matter, is when the deep state wants it to matter.
Remember Alexander Vindman?
He was the guy who was spying on President Trump when he had the infamous phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a guy at the time we didn't know a lot about.
We know a lot more about him now because we've given him billions of dollars.
The media told us the call was scandalous because Trump asked about the Biden crime family corruption in that country.
However, Trump also asked about the company CrowdStrike and the DNC server which holds the keys to blowing up the bogus narrative that the DNC was hacked by Russia.
The server is essentially the Rosetta Stone and the genesis of the Russia collusion hoax which saw the deep state frame Donald Trump for treason.
All that to say that the media, which is run by the intel oligarchs, don't care about brave whistleblowers unless they are useful in crushing a sitting president of the United States and leading to his impeachment, which is what happened.
So can you imagine...
Right now, I mean, the latest scandal, we have Secret Service whistleblowers coming out according to reports.
Can you imagine what the Secret Service whistleblowers are going through right now if, in fact, they have evidence that proves the CIA wanted Trump dead, just like John F. Kennedy?
Next month, a groundbreaking documentary will be released entitled Deep State Gangsters.
The film will highlight the plight of whistleblowers from the CIA and FBI and how the deep state worked to destroy their lives, all for telling the truth.
The film was produced by a former CIA intelligence officer named Pedro Orta.
And Pedro is also the author of a book called The Broken Whistle, The Deep State Run Amok.
And Pedro Orta joins us now to share more about who's really in control of the American government.
Mr.
Orta, thank you so much for coming on the Millstone Report, sir.
We appreciate it.
Thank you, Paul.
It's a pleasure and an honor to be on your show this day.
I mean, you know, feel free to disagree with me here.
I have not read your book.
I've read up on what it's about.
I've also read up on, you know, what this new deep state gangster documentary is going to be all about.
But are the intel agencies actually the ones in control of the American government, in your opinion?
What happens here is The intel agencies, particularly the political appointees and the high-level civil servant bureaucrats, have so much power that it's incumbent upon the legislature, Congress, legislative branch to do oversight to ensure that they don't abuse their powers.
Historically, we've seen significant abuses of power by these high-level intelligence bureaucrats and civil servants, political appointees, J. Edgar Hoover, Alan Dulles, 50s, 60s.
I mean, new evidence that's out, you know, clearly indicates serious abuses of power by the CIA in the 50s, the 60s, even into the 70s.
And that led to the Church Committee.
The Church Committee instituted more robust oversight powers for Congress, the Senate Select Committee of Intelligence, and the House Permanent Select Committee of Intelligence.
But if Congress fails to do their oversight, These agencies can run amok.
And what I mean by that is they can break the law.
They can abuse their powers.
They can basically inflict serious harm and damage to individuals like they did to General Flynn, President Trump with the Russia hoax.
Because the one lever that needed to be enforced was that lever of congressional oversight.
And they did not.
I mean, you had one man standing alone, Devin Nunes, who basically took actions to combat the Russia hoax.
The entire Senate Select Committee of Intelligence, including Republicans, were part of the investigation.
And they did inquiries, they called people to testify, and they were responsible for perpetuating that Russia hoax.
So, yes, we do have a serious problem.
And what happens here is No oversight.
No oversight empowers these rogue individuals to continue to act with more impunity and we've seen basically that their level of impunity has just increased more and more.
I mean, I would agree with that.
Congress's role is certainly the oversight, but I mean, and I agree that they're not doing that.
They're not actually, and I think it's because, I think it's because they think, number one, they either think that the intelligence surveillance state, they need to have this unchecked authority, meaning they just agree with it, or they're potentially being blackmailed.
I mean, there's a lot of people, a lot of average Americans at this point just think that everybody, that D.C. kind of runs on blackmail.
Even Chuck Schumer, he goes on Rachel Maddow's show and says, look, the intelligence community has three ways to Sunday to make you hurt, talking about Donald Trump.
That's why I say I think they're in control of the country, because they know everything.
I mean, we played that old clip, but I mean, we know the Edward Snowden disclosures.
We know, I mean, you know, we know about the Utah Data Center.
We know all of these things that we have constructed this technology to enslave ourselves.
And so, you know, if you know anything about, I know you know about the human condition.
The question isn't Why would somebody with power do this?
The question is, why wouldn't they do it?
If they can do it and get away with it scot-free.
I mean, power corrupts.
Basically, what I witnessed was it is as if people lose their conscience.
It gets to the point that they can no longer see right and wrong.
And to them, what they want to do, they see it as right.
And they see those who oppose them as a threat.
So it basically leads to a kind of a chain reaction where they will start trying to find a way to abuse their powers more and more and more to enforce their agenda and their ways.
And we saw that with the Russia hoax.
How basically they perpetuated this lie using every lever possible.
It's a pretty simple matter.
It's a crisis of conscience.
Well, let me ask you this.
I know it says in your Twitter bio, you're an ordained Christian minister.
That's right.
Is that correct?
That is correct.
Okay, so did your Christian faith, did that play a big role in you having to come out and tell the truth about the corruption?
And what corruption have you witnessed within the agency?
I mean, absolutely.
I had a strong moral foundation where, you know, right is right, wrong is wrong.
You know, certain things are black and white.
Certain things are, you know, just absolutely evil.
It all started with rather small things, although serious matters of life and death in a war zone base where I was the deputy chief of base.
By the time I got out there, I had had already eight exceptional performance awards.
I had almost six years of Warzone experience.
I was highly qualified, highly trained, knew what I was supposed to do, was given direct instructions on what to do in this space.
I get there and they had We put in place an individual who was way out of their element, incapable of doing the job, in constant fear, couldn't handle the rocket attacks, started basically creating a big social club in the base.
We weren't meeting our functions of meeting with the military.
She was sending us out of the base for food, for yoga classes during intensified times of rocket attacks.
And yes, there were rocket attacks that basically almost impacted where we drove over.
So I reported that.
That ended up causing me to be sent home short of tour, lost my job, and then all of a sudden I'm the bad guy.
Back at CIA headquarters with every single office at CIA being just a big bad bully, bureaucratic bullying at its finest.
You know, EEO trying to kill the case, Inspector General not wanting to investigate human resources, basically trying to chase me out of the CIA, and so forth.
And eventually what happens here is, yeah, I get chased out of the CIA. I end up working for the Office of Inspector General for the Intelligence Community.
And in this capacity, I end up being on a team that we evaluate whistleblower protections.
And we find out that they're not enforcing the whistleblower protections.
The IGs don't know how to enforce it.
They don't even know the standards, policies, and procedures.
And so the bottom line was there were no whistleblower protections, just paper with letters on it.
So eventually, you know, I end up going back to CIA for what I call round two and three with the devils, in which they continued their reprisals against me, denying me jobs, trying to chase me out.
And I end up having to blow the whistle on the broken whistle Two high-level officials, Director Pompeo, his number three, Brian Bulatow, Daniel Coates, the director of DNI, his number two, Susan Gordon, and eventually some to Congress.
And in all this fiasco, nobody does anything about this except they allow the CIA Office of Security to come after me like a big-bag bully to threaten me and chase me out of the CIA. And eventually they fired me with not a single person getting involved to do anything to help And throughout this entire process, I used the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act process to report these serious failures that I encountered in that war zone base and also with the broken whistle.
And Congress reportedly may have gotten some of the disclosures, But the reality is that they suppressed them.
They as in the CIA and the Office of Director of National Intelligence.
And whatever little got to Congress, Congress had no interest in hearing anything about it.
So my ICWPAs suppressed.
And then you brought up Bindman.
All of a sudden, The ICWPA process is working and you have a stellar whistleblower, but the reality is that there's no such thing as a stellar whistleblower unless you're using that whistleblower as a weapon to basically push their agenda.
Yeah, so it sounds like the whistleblower laws were only written when the deep state, when the intel agencies, when they want to use them, then they'll use them.
but if it's actually there to hold the people in high positions of power accountable, they want nothing to do with them.
And so this is what you saw.
Can you walk us back to when you were overseas?
Because I want people, I want to focus on what you said.
You filed a complaint.
What kind of started all this was you filed a complaint because there was, was it a woman that was trying to get you guys to do yoga classes instead of actually do things that a military would do?
Is that what you just said?
There's more to this, but the bottom line is, yes, the base was supposed to be a base where we were doing liaison, contact, exchange of information, meeting with the military, helping the military, the military helping us, and we weren't doing that.
We were having basically parties to cook or, you know, focused on adopting sons, as she said, picking up military guys, low-level guys.
We're talking about sergeants, maybe privates, taking them to yoga classes.
So what happened here is in this base, there was an incident and one of the officers had been marginalized and harassed.
I had to speak up for him and defend him.
And in this process, she falsely accused this officer of drawing a weapon, which he did not, so I had to defend him on that matter.
And I standing up for this officer saved him, but it led to me being sent home.
When I get home, we're talking about this all started in December 2014.
And when I go home, it's basically towards the end of February of 2015.
When I get home and I get called to the CIA headquarters in early March, and they told me that you're not going back to Afghanistan.
And they wouldn't tell me why.
So when I finally go back to CIA headquarters in early April, that's when I officially filed the whistleblower reprisal complaint with the CIA IG. Prior to that, I had communication with the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity because there were some serious EEO issues there and harassment in the war zone.
The authority there is the CIA EEO. They knew of the information in February before I left that base.
When I got back in April, all these various offices were trying to kill every complaint, every allegation.
They were trying to basically bury it in the ground And find a way to get me to either be silenced or to quit the agency.
And it's basically what they do.
They bully and beat a whistleblower until they either kill themselves, they quit, they resign, or they're basically silenced where they retire in place.
And I mean, this is just one story.
This documentary that's coming out next month, again, Deep State Gangsters.
You guys highlight a lot of stories.
You talk about your own.
I know you're a producer on the film.
But you also have John Kirikow, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly.
It's a former CIA officer who became a whistleblower after exposing the agency's use of torture during interrogations.
They certainly didn't like that one.
So you talk about the film covers a lot of this whistleblower persecution, doesn't it?
Yeah, John Kiriakou, his story is very unique because he blew the whistle in the CIA torture during the Bush administration.
He was already outside of the CIA. Immediately, the CIA files a crimes report.
The Department of Justice opens an investigation.
A year later, the Department of Justice basically gets back to John Kiriakou's attorney.
There's no crime committed.
You know, there's no classified information.
Everything is basically overt, and it's well known.
I mean, there's all kinds of press reporting on this.
There's the Red Cross, you know, Amnesty International, so forth, had reported on torture of detainees, so case closed.
What happens next is Obama wins the presidency and he appoints John Brennan as a high-level security official at the White House.
John Brennan tells the FBI and the DOJ, I want this guy, John Kiriakou, to be prosecuted.
Open an investigation, go after him.
So they go after John Kiriakou and they creatively find a way to charge him with numerous crimes that he had not committed.
And his attorney said, this is bogus.
You know, you didn't commit any crime.
But ultimately, the tactics that they use is they do a stacked indictment, which forces you to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, to defend yourself with attorney's fees that will either bankrupt you or you don't have the money.
So he had to mitigate the damages, and he basically took a plea to a lesser crime, literally a misdemeanor kind of crime.
It didn't do any damage to national security.
It was just a gross abuse of power.
And you're right, we do bring in Garrett O'Boyle, an FBI whistleblower, and then Nate Kane, the Uranium One whistleblower, again on the FBI and Hillary Clinton.
So I want to circle back to Garrett O'Boyle, but Nate Kane I find very interesting because to the point about...
Uranium-1 and whether or not a whistleblower is useful or not.
So the uranium-1 goes back to the Hillary Clinton scandal, right?
So once again, you have Alexander Vindman.
This is a good whistleblower.
You have somebody that's going to blow the whistle on Hillary Clinton.
That's a bad whistleblower.
I mean, if you Google whistleblower uranium-1, the first hit that comes up is the Democrats...
That's a CNN headline saying the Democrats, you know, they didn't find it.
This whistleblower is not credible.
They'll just attack your credibility if you're on the wrong side.
Tell us more about Uranium One.
Refresh our memory and tell us about Nate Kane.
Briefly, he was an insider in the FBI technical computer.
He came across information that Hillary had basically done some really wrong things financially with uranium that went to Russia.
And the FBI had hundreds of crime reports on financial shenanigans by Hillary Clinton in her campaign.
You know, their foundation and so forth.
And he heard that they were going to cover it up and do nothing about it.
So ultimately what happens in this process, you know, the email scandal was being investigated and Comey basically just decided to give her a pass, which if I would have done what she did with the emails, I would have probably been prosecuted and been in jail.
We wouldn't be talking today.
But they gave her a pass.
So he took that information and he had to report it.
Now, in this particular case, he had to take it directly to Congress because he couldn't report it to The inspector general of the intelligence community, because at that time, the inspector general, Michael Atkinson, had a role in this scandal.
So he couldn't allow his disclosures to go to someone who played a part in it.
So he took it to The Department of Justice Inspector General eventually, and it got to Congress.
And in this process, you know, nothing really came about it except that ultimately when the Democrats took over the House Permanent Select Committee of Intelligence, it only took a few months later.
For Nate to be basically viciously harassed, attacked, stormed his home, raided by the FBI. And his identity was always protected.
Nobody knew his identity.
So it's quite obvious that the Democrats got ahold of his identity and sent the FBI after him.
Wow.
And so, you know, to the average American who's listening to this, what's the solution?
I mean, if Congress isn't going to do their job for whatever reason, either they agree with it or they're being blackmailed, what do we do?
I mean, what are your thoughts on how we get out of this mess?
I mean, you know, the mess I pinned is on Congress.
As long as we have political theater, grandstanding, and showmanship by our Republican congressional leaders, we're never going to fix anything.
So the fallback to that is we do have some states where finally the governors and attorney generals are rising up To fight back against federal overreach.
I'm talking about predominantly Texas and Florida.
Attorney General Paxton, Governor DeSantis, Governor Abbott, In Texas have done quite a bit.
Then you also keep in mind that Missouri, the Attorney General there, we need the red states, the governors and the legislatures in those states, to begin to push back against this federal overreach.
That's the only way that we can counterbalance the weak congressional actions at a federal level.
If we don't do that, it's just going to continue to spiral downward to the point that, you know, We just recently learned about Tulsi Gabbard being put on a terrorist watch list.
She is a military member and a former congresswoman, and she has no terrorist ties whatsoever.
We need Republicans in Congress to step up and begin to do their due diligence as far as oversight, defund some of these institutions, Not necessarily entire institutions, but certain government programs begin to dock the pay of some of these leaders that have gone rogue, that they do have the ability, use their ability to imprison some of these people.
If not, it's going to continue to get worse.
Yeah, I've got this.
I had this pulled up, you know, as kind of a related story.
So it's interesting that you bring up Tulsi Gabbard.
She's now going to take legal action against Biden's DOJ after being put on this watch list.
We covered this story briefly last week when it broke, or maybe the week before.
Whenever it broke, we covered it pretty quickly because it was just outrageous.
Pedro, how all she did apparently was give an interview on Fox News that the government doesn't like.
And so now she's got air marshals following her around on all of her flights.
I mean, it's absolutely insane that we live.
I mean, we're not a free country.
This is communism.
This isn't America.
We're a communist country.
And I believe that we're being controlled by these intelligence agencies.
I think they're the ones running the show.
They're certainly the ones that have the most to lose if the people actually got a representative in there.
I mean, can you tell us a little bit about the CIA? I heard you say this on Tucker Carlson.
When he interviewed you, but I want people to hear it.
When you were at the CIA and Trump gets elected, you know, they normally have got to put the president's picture up somewhere and there was some hesitancy.
The CIA didn't want to do this.
They were so traumatized by the idea that the people actually elected Donald Trump.
Can you tell us about that?
Yeah, this is just hilarious.
I mean, what happened here is You're right.
Every time, you know, there's an election, there's a new president.
Well, you know, there's an official presidential portrait.
You've got the vice president portrait.
So they take out the old portraits and they put in the new portraits.
Well, in this particular case, after Trump won, I mean, it's like I will go in every day, walk in and check, okay, well, I still see Obama-Biden up there.
I still see Obama-Biden up there.
You know, the weeks go by and it's like, what's going on here?
You know, it took him, I don't know, a month, two or three, maybe three months to finally put President Trump's official portrait up there.
I mean, they can say the excuse that we don't have a portrait for him.
It's possible.
But the other side to this story is, yeah, there were individuals in the office severely distressed over Trump's victory.
Kind of mimicking that famous photo when Trump first visited the White House and you saw all the Obama appointees basically with their hands crossed.
You know, prune faces.
Kind of the same attitude.
And we had a senior leader in the office say, look, we have to respect the chain of command here.
You know, we have a new president.
If you don't like this new president and you're having some psychological issues, you need to go get some psychological counsel.
But we have to respect the chain of command.
And that's true.
We do.
We swear an oath to the Constitution, not to the institution.
We swear enough to defend and protect the United States, regardless of who was the political leader.
So what you're describing is, I mean, you're describing the deep state.
I mean, there's all these people in this apparatus, technically supposed to answer to the executive, but doesn't.
I mean, they're going completely against it.
If, and this is a big if, Trump can overcome what I think is going to be the planned fraud to try to steal the election in 2024, how much confidence do you actually have that he'll be able to change this giant administrative state that hates him and really by extension hates people like you and me?
There are a couple key factors.
Republicans must maintain the House.
Republicans will need to regain the Senate because the Senate is the one that will confirm appointees into administrative positions.
Those are critical factors.
The Senate being extremely critical or else the Senate can sabotage all his appointees.
Now, even if he gets to the point that he can appoint and have confirmations, he has got to make sure that he appoints and confirms individuals who are going to go into these institutions And begin to effect change.
If not, we'll run into the same situation as his first administration.
Unfortunately, for example, in the case of Pompeo, you might as well have kept Brennan there because it was as if Brennan continued running the CIA. In the case of the Director of National Intelligence, Coates, he might as well have kept Clapper there because the reality was it was Clapper's personnel running the DNI with Coates being there.
So President Trump cannot make that mistake again.
Okay, so last question, and I really appreciate your time coming on the program.
But as a former CIA intelligence officer, I'd love to get your thoughts on the failed assassination attempt of President Trump.
And mainly, and feel free to disagree with me in anything I'm going to say, but I'd like to know what your thoughts are on this.
My opinion is...
The official narrative just doesn't make any sense to me.
The one that we're being fed by the mainstream media.
And I think that was by design, but I think Trump was supposed to be dead.
And I think it was designed to trigger some sort of civil war, some sort of civil unrest.
Whether from actual Trump supporters or agent provocateurs, like we saw in some instances on January 6th, which would have essentially given the state the authority, all of the indication they would need to basically bring in some sort of martial law, maybe even cancel the elections.
Do you agree with that assessment?
I mean, that's kind of how I see things.
Well, I mean, I'll tell you what I saw and what I see.
The big issue has been the security force was significantly stretched with so many events, so much going on that complacency set in and apparently they had replacements.
The best way I can put this is, every time Trump has an event, His security team has to be like if it was the Super Bowl and it's the Super Bowl team playing their best players every single play.
Every play counts.
Every play can lead to either winning or losing the game.
In this particular case, for security, no mistakes can be made.
A simple mistake Even if it's just complacency can be catastrophic and that's what happened here.
They had like the C team, the replacements, they were very shoddy, sloppy, they became very complacent and that allowed An individual to be able to take the shot.
Now, there are a lot of things that are still unanswered, but you're right.
There's other things like, for example, who at the Department of Homeland Security, which they would not have acted alone, they would have acted upon basically guidance from the White House, who was basically diminishing the protection for Trump.
Are they purposely trying to get him killed by giving him less protection, like they've done with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Robert F. Kennedy Jr., they kept denying him protections.
Hopefully that, you know, he would have to either spend millions of dollars in security, which he has, or potentially get killed.
Well, I mean, it's an interesting theory.
There were clear security gaps, but only focusing on the gaps I feel like is not, I don't know, I feel like that may be a red herring.
For example, I read the other day where the counter-sniper team, that that event was the first, and I could have read wrong or maybe the story was erroneous, but that event was the first time Trump even had a counter-sniper team in years.
And again, if that's true, that's very odd that the counter-sniper team was there on the same day that CNN decides to carry the rally live, and you've got somebody down there, you know, with a lens, a photographic lens with a shutter speed, you know, that's so slow, that's able to capture bullets going you know, that's so slow, that's able to capture bullets going through the
I mean, the whole thing stinks to high heaven, and I look at the circumstantial evidence, you know, of these people in the CIA that are emotionally distraught when Trump was elected, I imagine the idea of him getting reelected is even more psychologically troubling to them.
And I'll give you the last word.
Yeah, absolutely.
Absolutely.
I mean, we already have on record, you know, I think it's Raskin trying to say that the House is going to find a way not to certify a Trump win should he win.
You know, and this is why I say Republicans need to win the House.
You know, potentially we could have a situation here where Trump wins the Electoral College vote.
But for some reason, if the Republicans don't have the House and the Senate, you know, you will find Democrats in the Senate and the House ganging up together to deny Trump a victory.
I also think there's a possibility that all of this astroturfing for Kamala Harris and all the fake polls that are making it seem close, if Trump wins, it's going to be used to tell the other side that Trump must have stolen it, which will whip them up into a frenzy as well and they'll start rioting and everything else.
It's going to be very, very interesting to see what happens as everything unfolds.
So the film, the documentary, Deep State Gangsters, it's coming out next month.
Do we have an exact date yet?
I just saw on the website it was September 2024.
Do we have an exact date for when this documentary drops?
We are shooting for September 17, Constitution Day.
We may do it earlier.
We may do it later.
It depends on distribution.
For now, Salem has agreed to carry it, but we're looking to get other venues like Amazon, Apple, And, you know, possibly theaters, if it's possible.
All right.
We really appreciate it, Pedro Orta.
Great to meet you, sir.
Thank you for being the whistleblower that you are and, you know, being willing to, you know, put yourself on the line and talk about this corruption.
We really appreciate it.
Thank you, Paul.
God bless you.
Yes, sir.
Folks, we're going to take a break.
Don't go anywhere.
We'll be back here in just a moment.
Where have the Bible believing Christians been?
We shouldn't be surprised.
The liberal theologians have been no help.
But where have we been as we have changed to this other consensus and all the horrors and stupidity at the present moment has come down upon our culture?
We must recognize that this country is close to being lost.
Not, first of all, because of a humanist conspiracy.
I believe there are those who conspire, but that is not the reason this country is almost lost.
This country is almost lost, not because of a humanist conspiracy, but because the Bible-believing Christians, in the last 40 years, who have said that they know that the final reality is this infinite personal God, who is the Creator and all the rest, They said they have known it and they've done nothing about it as the consensus has changed.
There's been a vast silence.
The Christians of this country have simply been silent.
Much of the evangelical leadership has not raised a voice.
Spirituality, after you're a Christian and have accepted Christ as Savior, It means that Christ is the Lord of all your life and not just your religious life.
And if you make a dichotomy in these things, you are denying your Lord, His proper place, and I don't care how many butterflies you have in your stomach, you are poor spiritually.
True spirituality means that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Lord of all of life and except for the things that are specifically told as in the Bible are sinful, we set them aside, except for that all of life is spiritual and all of life is equally spiritual and that includes As our forefathers did,
standing for these things of freedom, and standing for these things of human life, and all these other matters that are so crucial, if indeed this living God does exist as we know that He does exist.
I think the church has failed to meet its obligation in these last 40 years for two specific reasons.
The first is this false truncated view of spirituality that doesn't see true spirituality touching all of life.
And the other thing is too many Christians, whether the doctors, lawyers, pastors, evangelists, whatever they are, too many of them afraid to really speak out because they did not want to rock the boat for their own project.
And I'm convinced that these two reasons, both of which are a tragedy and really horrible for the Christian, both of the two together are an explanation why we have walked the road we have walked in the last 40 years.
You must understand it's going to cost you to take a stand in these things.
There are doctors who are going to get kicked out of hospitals because they refuse to perform abortions.
There are nurses who see a little sign on the crib, do not feed, and they feed and they're fired.
There's a cost.
There's a cost.
But I'd ask you, I'd ask you, what is loyalty to Christ worth to you?
What is loyalty to Christ worth to you?
How much do you believe this is true?
Why are you a Christian?
Are you a Christian because for some lesser reason?
Are you a Christian because you know this is the truth of reality?
And then how much do you love the Lord Jesus Christ?
How much are you willing to pay the price for loyalty to the Lord Jesus?
Christ must be the final Lord and not society and not Caesar.
Now repeat the final sentence again.
Christ must be the final Lord and not Caesar and not society All right, here we go We are back.
Before we go any further though, I do want to tell you about the Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company.
They are a veteran-owned coffee company that imports coffee beans from around the world and then they roast them back home here in the United States.
They donate a portion of the profits of each bag sold to Homes for Our Troops.
which is a 501c3 that donates and builds specially adapted custom homes for severely injured post 9-11 veterans but at the Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company they are all about selling you a great cup of coffee and also improving the lives of other people It's Costa Rican coffee.
It's got a bright, pleasant acidity, tropical fruit notes.
A lot of people don't realize that, you know, coffee beans can taste like that.
So give it a try.
The Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company.
You can go to beardedsergent.com slash millstone and you use my name, Paul, and say 15%.
That's beardedsergent.com slash millstone.
My name, Paul.
Use 15%.
Also, obviously, Left Wing Will and the Red Pill.
You know, we want you to buy this game.
It helps support the Millstone Report.
It is the game that I created, and it's on sale now at leftwingwill.com.
It's going to, you know, it'll make you laugh, and you get to talk about stereotypical leftist politics, and you guys have all seen a guy that looks like this walking down the street, you know?
He's a leftist.
Leftwingwill.com.
My name, Paul, gives you 15% off of that as well.
Alright, so as we were talking with Pedro Orta a second ago, again, former CIA analyst talking about all of the whistleblower corruption, actually all of the corruption that whistleblowers try to point out, but then of course nothing really happens because the deep state goes after them and destroys their lives.
I did mention that we had this story over Tulsi Gabbard.
We mentioned this briefly while he was on.
She is going after the Biden administration for basically putting her on a terror watch list for going on Fox News and talking about the deep state in a way that they didn't like.
Where was she at?
She's over at Jay Sekulow Show.
We're going to pipe this in here and take a listen to what she had to say, why she's filing the lawsuit.
The closest word that I could think of that can begin to describe what I felt and what I feel in learning that actually, according to these whistleblowers, that I am on this Quiet Skies list, that my own government, my president, my commander-in-chief, Is targeting me as a potential domestic terrorist, the closest word that comes to mind is a complete sense of betrayal.
And it's betrayal because I, like so many Americans, enlisted because of the Islamist terrorist attacks on 9-11, enlisted to serve in our country's military, to ensure the safety, security and freedom of the American people, to go after and defeat and destroy those Islamist terrorists Who pose, continue to pose, the greatest short and long-term threat to us, to our security and to our freedom.
And so now, after serving over 21 years and continuing to serve in our nation's military, my own government has labeled and is targeting me directly now as a domestic terrorist, as they are many others.
I'm not alone in this.
Of course, this list is not being made public.
But we can look to what the Biden-Harris administration has done in multiple cases of how there have been leaked conversations, leaked files, leaked documents, and even statements they've made in public saying that this threat of domestic terrorism and extremism is so great and often very likely it is those in the military or military veterans who are these potential threats.
So they've weaponized.
All the systems they've built in the name of the Patriot Act, in the name of stopping Mohammed, have now been turned.
It's what everybody said.
Everybody said this was going to happen, and it's exactly what's happened.
They've now weaponized it.
They've weaponized these systems that they built to keep America safe.
And now the new threat is us.
Ron Paul was right.
Now the new threat is us.
The people that don't like to be ruled.
The people that don't like communism.
The people that don't like endless wars.
The people that don't want unchecked illegal immigration.
We are now the threats to their power and these goals.
And so we're weaponizing and we're going to turn this giant national security safety apparatus against the American people.
I'm not telling you anything new.
I'm not telling you anything that you don't already know.
But it's real.
I mean, it's every single day now.
It's not just, you know, it's not just, oh, Snowden leaks, and then a few years later you get something else.
It's every day the government is weaponized against the people it's supposed to serve because the government actually hates the people who live here.
They hate us.
And it doesn't matter.
I mean, here's Tulsi Gabbard.
She's a Democrat.
Okay?
A former Democrat.
Now an Independent.
And they're going after her because she goes on Laura Ingraham's show and talks about...
Talks about the military industrial complex or whatever she did.
It's absolutely insane.
Check this out.
So if you're just joining us, we played for you this old clip.
This is a 1998 movie called Enemy of the State and it's just a little snippet of it where they talk about the capabilities of the NSA, you know, 30 years before 1998.
The government's been in bed with the entire telecommunications industry since the 40s.
They've infected everything.
Get into your bank statements, computer files.
Now that's actually true.
I mean, I think it was William Binney, he was an NSA whistleblower that talked about the telecommunication stations, the different substations across and how the government has had that all wired for a very long time.
Email, listen to your phone calls.
Our wife's been saying that for years.
Every wire, every airwave.
And now it's so much worse, isn't it?
I mean, you'll be talking about something with your family, and all of a sudden you see an ad for this something on YouTube or Facebook.
And you know what's even the creepier ones are when you haven't said anything to anyone, but you've thought about it.
You've thought about, oh, I need to get this or I need to get that.
And then all of a sudden you see it.
There's some sort of predictive AI program that's already running in the background, apparently.
Some people think this.
I think there's ample evidence.
I don't know how many times it's happened where you've thought something and then it shows up.
And some people think that they've created artificial intelligence versions of everybody out there who uses the internet.
There's basically like an AI doppelganger out there.
And that AI is somehow predicting what it is you're going to think.
And that's why they put the ad in front of you.
It's kind of a gamble.
And then obviously when it hits, you're like, wow, I was just thinking of that.
Now, if you are not sentient enough to realize, hey, this is weird.
I didn't tell anybody what I was thinking.
Then it actually makes you not want to buy the product, honestly.
It makes me not want to buy it.
So I don't know, but it's scary how crazy the technology has gotten.
And the more technology we use, the more they spy on us and the more they control us.
The more technology you use, the easier it is for them to keep tabs on you.
It's a brave new world out there.
The more technology you use, this was in 1998, the easier it is for them to keep tabs on you.
So, we are going to get to a point, my prediction is, we're going to get to a point where those of us on the Christian right are going to have to reject it.
I don't know what the line is going to be.
I really don't.
But when we do, we're going to be looked at like the Amish, the way we look at the Amish today.
You know, they don't want electricity.
They don't want light bulbs.
People say, well, you know, why did they do that?
I think, I don't really know.
I've never actually looked into exactly why they rejected, you know, electricity.
But I can certainly see the argument of why somebody would reject this at this point in time, at this day and age.
It's a catch-22 because right now I'm speaking into a microphone going through the internet.
Many of you may be watching this on a phone.
You're certainly watching this on the internet.
You're listening to it via podcast.
By the way, we're on Millstone Report now.
Paul Harrell is on Apple and Spotify.
So you're either listening to it.
The technology itself can be very beneficial and useful to transmit information, but it's all of the other stuff.
It's like, right, this is keeping your attention so that we're broadcasting to an NSA server near you.
At least it better be.
Fort Meade has 18 acres of mainframe computers underground.
You're talking to your wife on the phone, you use the word bomb, president, Allah, any of a hundred key words.
So to what Tulsi Gabbard said in this video when she was on Seculo Show, what did she say?
She's like, I joined up to fight the Islamists, to fight the radical Muslim terrorists, and now this stuff has been turned on me.
What does Gene Hackman here say in this movie, Enemy of the State?
If you use the word bomb, terrorist, or Allah in 1998, boy, the programming was great back then, right?
I mean, the predictive programming, right?
98, not 2001, 98.
By the way, I just want to take this time in the program to remind you that if you'd have told anyone on September the 12th, 2001, that seven years later we're going to elect a man named Barack Hussein Obama, everybody would have told you that you're crazy.
The fact that we elected...
In quotations, because who knows anymore?
Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 really should prove once and for all that America is the least racist country on the face of the planet and the least racist country in the history of planet Earth.
If anyone tells you this country is racist, you remind them this country elected Barack Hussein Obama seven years after 9-11 when the narrative was Islam knocked down the towers.
Just FYI. Just food for thought.
But here we have Tulsi Gabbard saying, hey, I joined to fight the Islamists and now this apparatus is being turned on me and I'm on a no-flyer.
I'm on a terror watch list all because I went on Fox News and said something the government doesn't like.
And again, this movie...
Enemy of the state.
You're talking to your wife on the phone.
You use the word bomb, president, Allah.
Any of a hundred key words.
Computer recognizes it, automatically records it, red flags it for analysis.
That was 20 years ago.
And that was 20 years ago.
This movie was in 1998.
But the words are different now.
I got a feeling if you say the word Allah now, you don't get flagged.
But if you say something like, in the Federal Reserve, if you say something like, hmm, what else would get you flagged?
There's a lot, right?
Patriot.
You call your friend up.
Hey, what are you doing for the 4th of July?
Uh-oh, these people celebrate the 4th of July.
These people are going to shoot fireworks.
This person likes to grill fireworks.
This person likes to eat meat.
I mean, you know, the words now can easily change.
Patriot.
Hey, my friend, you're a patriot.
Oh, now the NSA is going to analyze it.
Maybe.
Maybe this is something.
Maybe this is the next terrorist.
It's really scary when you think about it.
It really, truly is.
Really scary.
I've been sitting on this clip all week, so I'm going to go to it.
This is Nancy Pelosi signaling that Joe Biden's resignation dropping out of the presidential race in a letter form, Nancy Pelosi wasn't buying it.
I didn't accept the letter as anything but a letter.
I mean...
There are some people who were unhappy with the letter.
Some said that some people were unhappy with the letter.
I'll put it in somebody else's now.
Because it didn't sound like Joe Biden to me.
It really didn't.
Huh.
It didn't sound like Joe Biden to me.
Yeah.
Weekend at Bernie's.
Put the pin in his hand.
Did they even put the pin in his hand?
Try to make him draw, you know?
I mean, did they even attempt...
Or did they just sign it themselves?
These are things.
Of course, the letter was just...
I mean, it was an official letterhead.
The one that was released on X is actually totally different.
Totally different scenario.
Unbelievable.
Tomorrow on the program, we're going to highlight...
Let's see.
We got this story here.
We ran out of time, though.
We don't have it.
But the Gateway Pundit has it.
A new low for CNN. Far-left host Dana Bash lies about Trump.
And Musk conversation on Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.
They were talking about nuclear energy and they literally cut and played it totally out of context to make them act like they're crazy and that nuclear weapons being dropped on countries are no big deal.
They tried to make that by just taking it completely out of context.
That interview is still breaking the internet, by the way, over a billion views.
And the mainstream media just doesn't know how to process being this irrelevant.
And that's, again, kind of full circle.
That's why they work for the intel agencies, which are, again, theme of the show, actually in control of the American government.
I will see you tomorrow, unless I am providentially hindered.
I'll be wishing you a happy Thursday.
That's all the time that we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
God bless everybody out there listening and watching.
▲
Export Selection