All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 1, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
59:33
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Child SEX CHANGE In California, Courageous Paralegal SPEAKS OUT!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Transcription by CastingWords
Transcription by CastingWords
Thank you.
Thank you.
Alright folks, here we go Welcome to the program.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much for being with us.
As always, this is the Millstone Report.
We cannot do the show without you, and we really do appreciate you guys being with us.
Female boxing is in the news.
Female boxing in the news because the globalist trans agenda, otherwise known as the globo-homo agenda, is alive and well at the Olympics in Paris, France.
The video is making the rounds of an Algerian man pretending to be a woman, pummeling an actual woman.
The fight lasted a mere 46 seconds.
We have the video and we'll cover this story in more detail later in the show.
I'm sure many of you have already seen it at this point.
But this gives us an opportunity to expand on the segment I did a few nights ago.
For all of the outrage surrounding the satanic Olympic ceremonies, it's important to note that the public celebration of evil isn't just something that is an abstract.
It's not something to dismiss either as something only being a France problem.
As I said earlier in the week, this trans ideology has a real-world cost for the people who are living under the rainbow boot of genital mutilation.
Our leaders, most of our leaders in power believe that a male boxer beating a woman to a pulp is just part of living in a free society.
It's just part of freedom and democracy.
They likewise believe that sexualizing kids and transitioning them before puberty is a noble and good endeavor.
They advocate for the right of parents and doctors to abuse children and sacrifice who they would have become to the gods of the collective West's woke sex religion.
And again, one of the most disturbing stories in America is the story of Jeff Younger and his son James.
We spoke with Jeff on this program earlier in the week and got an update on his ex-wife's plans to have his son castrated against his will.
The whole thing is currently tied up in a California court.
The judge in the case, a man by the name of Mark Juhas, has attempted to keep the proceedings as secret as possible and has indicated he's going to make a ruling that would likely give sole custody of James to his mother.
The judge is refusing to allow evidence and submissions to the court that would show that James does not suffer from gender dysphoria.
On Tuesday, we learned that California doctors are already talking to James about bottom surgery, which is a fancy way of saying cutting one's genitals off.
The doctors assure him that they'll take some of his sperm and freeze it should he ever want to have a child someday.
This boy is 12 years old.
Twelve.
Thanks to a brave man named Alex Baker, we have audio and court documents that have been posted online.
To be clear, this goes directly against the judge's orders, and because of this, the opposing counsel has filed a motion asking for the judge to arrest the father, Jeff Younger, who on this show said he had nothing to do with anything that was published online.
The man who did publish this information joins us now.
Alexander Baker is with us.
Alex, welcome to the Millstone Report, sir.
We really do appreciate you being with us.
Thanks, Paul.
Good to be here.
So, first of all, I'd like to know where were you when you first heard about this case and how did you get involved?
When did you start following this case?
I know you've got some great articles up at pmjmp.org.
Well, so I became involved in this case professionally.
So my day job, so to speak, is what I call being an independent litigation paralegal.
I'm more than a paralegal who might answer the phone, make coffee, and fill out the occasional court form.
I hold a jurist doctorate, which means I went to law school.
And so I regularly research and draft law papers professionally.
And the younger case is one that that came to me.
I got to know Jeff and I learned all about the eight-year ordeal in the in the Texas courts and then it got transferred to Los Angeles and I along with this attorney named Tracy Henderson we we took on Jeff's case and and it's You know, there's just so much about this case that is just so unbelievably wrong.
It's hard to know really even where to begin, but that's how I got involved.
So I also have a website for a non-profit that I started a few years ago.
It's called Postmodern Justice Media Project, and I am busy trying to expose what I call judicial postmodernism, which is just, you know, it's judicial corruption.
I mean, you just would not believe What's going on in these courts?
And the Jeff Younger case is just an example of the evil, the satanic evil that has somehow become mainstream.
Well, I'm glad to hear you describe it that way because I completely agree with you.
And I think we have to define it as such.
You know, we have to actually define who the enemy is.
And that's what we have.
We have just open Satanism in so many different aspects of our society.
I'm glad you're picking the judicial aspect of this to try to fight it.
So is it the blatant corruption?
I mean, you released these court documents.
We also have, again, audio of the proceedings and video from what I saw.
Why did you release that?
Why did you go against and publish this stuff?
The judge says that he doesn't want that out and you did it anyway.
Is it because you just felt compelled because it's the right thing to do?
That's the short answer.
It's the right thing to do.
My father, who was a World War II vet, when he was trying to teach me to pick your battles, he had a favorite expression.
He would say, Son, now is that the hill you want to go fight and die on?
Well, I want to say right now to both my late father, my earthly father, and also to my heavenly father, yes, exposing what's going on In the Los Angeles Superior Court right now, in the Jeff Younger case, is exactly the hill that I want to go fight and die on.
So that's the short answer.
Well, I thank you for your courage.
Thank you for your humility.
Thank you for doing this.
I have your article right here.
We're going to put it up on the screen.
Again, Postmodern Justice Media Project.
That's what the PMJMP stands for.
This article here, Jail Time for Jeff Younger, and we talked about this earlier when we interviewed Jeff earlier in the week.
The opposing counsel...
I guess the opposing counsel is Alana Chazin, lesbian attorney.
And then this is the ex-wife, Georgioulis, who is wanting to castrate Jeff's son, wanting to castrate her own son.
And they're now filing a motion trying to get Jeff Younger thrown in jail.
What are your thoughts on this?
Why are they doing this?
Well, they don't want the truth to be known.
Really, we can...
I think we might want to wonder why we have a tradition and a right in this country or this ex-country To a public trial in the first place.
And there's a bunch of Supreme Court opinions on the subject.
I could actually quote the California Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court.
The California Supreme Court has said, an individual involved as a party to a civil case is entitled to a fair trial, not a private one.
But everything that they want to do, which is why they brought the motion for this Star Chamber order in the first place.
So it was back on May 30th in the case, before there had even been a hearing whatsoever, they brought an ex-party emergency order to seal the entire case and to deem the entire case confidential.
And a different judge, actually, a judge named Michelle Cazadi, issued that order with no explanation as to why there was no justification, no rationale given whatsoever.
Just said, okay, this is now a top secret proceeding.
And they deleted the public record in the first place.
But the reason we have public trials It goes all the way back in history to medieval England when they had what came to be known as the Star Chamber.
And it was a top secret tribunal.
And we just figured out that this leads to tyranny.
The judge becomes the law.
There is no law.
The law is just whatever the judge says.
They can do with you as they will.
And in today's situation, that means we're going to, you know, convince boys that they can become girls and girls that they can become boys.
And, I mean, it is just...
I mean, I'm a word guy, Paul, but when it comes to just the sheer madness of this, words kind of fail me, right?
So that's kind of it.
They issued this order, and we knew it was wrong.
We bought a motion to overturn this Star Chamber order.
And of course, that got denied at the secret hearing that took place.
Summarily denied.
They didn't oppose it.
None of that, right?
So just no part of what's going on.
I mean, even leave the whole transgender thing out of it, just from the pure point of what is supposed to be civil procedure in a California court, no part of this is in any way legal whatsoever.
So I do want to say, before I forget, I want to say in unequivocal terms that I acted alone.
Yes, I recorded a court hearing on June the 5th.
It was like a screen recording, basically, of a virtual hearing that was taking place.
And yes, I'm the one who published these court documents.
And I acted alone.
Neither Jeff Younger nor attorney Tracy Henderson had anything to do with it whatsoever.
Had they known about it, they didn't know about it, but had they known about it, if they would have told me, hey, don't do that, In fact, Jeff actually did at one point say, hey, don't release anything.
And I'm like, I'm sorry.
I'm going to do what I'm going to do.
But neither of them had anything to do with it.
I stand 100% responsible.
And I can only imagine what they might try to do to me now.
But we will cross that bridge when we come to it.
I, again, want to commend you for your courage in doing this, because what you've essentially done is, you know, sunlight's the best disinfectant, all of the cliche things, but we have to know what's actually going on.
This is a child, okay?
This is the child's life at stake.
I mentioned in the monologue, this really is a different form of human sacrifice.
Yes.
Elon Musk the other day said the reason it's called dead naming is because you're actually killing who the person was.
So it's a form of human sacrifice.
You are sacrificing who this boy would become growing up to be a man and essentially mutilating them and basically making eunuchs a thing again.
Right.
And it's absolutely evil.
It's satanic.
It's disgusting.
This judge is about to okay this.
He's about to...
He doesn't want to rule on whether or not James Younger is actually gender dysphoric.
Instead, he is just going to say...
Because that's the clip that you...
One of the clips he released.
He says, I'm not going to talk about his medical condition.
I'm just going to rule who the more fit parent is or who I believe is the...
A more fit parent.
And of course, we know what happens in family court when that happens.
It almost always favors the mother.
Is that right?
Well, I mean, you make a good point.
So I'm big on issue framing, and that's a very important part of law of litigation is before you answer the question, You should take a step back and say, well, is this the right question to ask, right?
So the way Ann Georgilis wants to frame the question is, yeah, who's the better parent?
And let that parent make all the decisions, which we already know.
There's no decision to make.
We know she wants to castrate and give a penectomy to this poor child, right?
But the right way to frame the issue is, So there's an injunction that's in place.
The Texas court did one thing almost right, and they said they awarded Ann Georgilis full custody.
But they put in place an injunction that says, you know, no hormones, no surgery, right?
We call it the no hormones, no surgery injunction, without either both parents' consent, which, you know, Jeff will never ever consent to this, of course, or a further court order, okay?
So the right way to frame the question to the court is to say, Is it in the best interest of the child to lift this injunction?
Which necessarily means you've got to first ask, as you pointed out, does this child really have gender dysphoria?
Which even the papers that they're filing from these pro-trans psychologists and stuff say that he's not distressed.
Okay?
Yeah, they say he identifies as a girl.
They do say that.
But he's not stressed out about it, and that is an absolute requirement under the DSM-5 that they use.
The child has to be experiencing extreme distress about all this, and by all accounts, he doesn't, right?
So he doesn't even have gender dysphoria.
But secondly, we're saying, OK, assuming for the sake of argument that he does, is it safe and effective to do puberty blockers, wrong sex hormones, and bottom surgery, which, as you mentioned, is just this euphemism for castrating and slitting open the penis?
And I hate to be graphic, but I think we have to.
What they're literally doing They slit the penis and they scrape out the erectile tissue and then they carve a hole in under where your testicles used to be and then they take part of your stomach lining for crying out loud.
And they work that into this hole somehow, and then you have to use a dilator to keep it open because, of course, this is a gaping wound, right?
But meanwhile, they're telling people, oh, if you were born with the wrong body parts, we can give you the right ones.
We can make you a vagina, which is, of course, just absolutely ridiculous to even think this, right?
It's a lie.
You cannot actually become a different sex.
Right.
But the point being is that we think the court, a fair court, should consider whether doing this is going to help this child.
And there's no evidence that it will.
So gender dysphoria is a psychological condition.
And it's not a medical condition at all.
It's completely self-diagnosed.
There's no measurement.
There's no any kind of objective test that anybody, any doctor or anybody can perform.
So the question would be, okay, if we do all this stuff, if we block their puberty, if we castrate them, does this make them happier?
And there's no evidence that it does.
None.
Zero.
We're also teetering with the question, Alex.
We have basically psychological abuse going on.
This child is being psychologically abused.
There's no question.
I know Jeff has said on this program before that his son is going along with this because he believes it's the only way His mother will love him.
That if he were to say that I actually don't want to do this, that he's somehow going to lose.
I mean, think about it.
She's got all of this invested.
She's going to court.
Her very much of who she is apparently is tied up in getting her son to accept this trans sex religion, which she has very much accepted as well, and she's fortunate on a kid.
But what we're dealing with here is, is the psychological abuse that this child is clearly going through, is it going to go into actual physical abuse?
And that's what's at stake here, right?
I mean, he's already being mentally abused, and will the court okay this child being physically mutilated?
Right.
And of course, the judge is just going to say, well, I'm not even going to speak to that.
I'm just going to award custody and let the custodial parent do whatever they want to do, right?
But you make a good point.
So this is called social transitioning.
When you have the young child who maybe they do have some, you know, a boy, let's say, that has feminine qualities.
I mean, we know that such kids exist.
But then, nowadays, we're supposed to socially transition them and affirm them in their identity as if a three-year-old.
And Ann Georgilis has said, oh, she knew from age three that little James was really a girl named Luna trapped in a boy's body, right?
But you have them wear dresses, and you do something with their hair, and you give them sparkly shoes, and you give them a new name, and you use their pronouns, and you call them she, And it's just a complete lie.
And one thing that often gets left out of the conversation about transitioning, quote-unquote, is that this social transition is itself...
A very, very heavy part of treatment.
It's not neutral, right?
It's not like you can, you know, call a boy, a girl and use the pronouns and the dresses and all that for years.
And then all of a sudden, oh, we'll just stop and everything will go back to like how it would have been.
That is not true.
That is not true.
And the fact that social transitioning is itself a psychological intervention on this child that's going to have profound psychological consequences later on is a point that very often doesn't get enough attention, right?
And there are studies that show If you socially transition the child, they're much more likely to start puberty blockers.
And once they start puberty blockers, they're much more likely to do the wrong sex hormones.
And once they do the wrong sex hormones, they're much more likely to consent or be talked into all these ghoulish surgeries, right?
So, you know, we have to see the consequences and understand this.
Well, yeah, and, you know, you hear from the left, oh, well, you know, if you don't give them the gender-affirming care, you know, they'll be more suicidal and no one's ever started to think that, you know, puberty, well, a lot of people say, I mean, look, puberty is naturally a time of, you know, no pun intended, transition.
But then you're going to put all these extra hormones, puberty blockers, or wrong sex hormones, and then you wonder why you're chemically imbalanced and you feel depressed.
And then, of course, when you go through with the surgery, if you go through with the surgery and you have to dilate yourself for the rest of your life, and you can go and you can read about the people who are trying to detransition or read about the people who are absolutely miserable, because guess what?
You can't really become a girl from a boy or a boy from a girl, and the depression is now even worse.
And this is a great time also, Alex, to really bring up the fact that this whole psychological warfare, this propaganda, this transsex religion that is being...
You know parroted and disseminated on the global stage every corporation it's it to me is really about population control I think I mean because you're either going to have more suicides or if you you know somehow you're going to recover from all of this psychological trauma and physical trauma you're now sterilized and you're not going to be having any any kids and so that that I think population control is something That's a big,
whether it's the intentional act or it's a side effect, it's certainly happening.
Anytime you have one of these big projects, it's going to solve multiple problems for multiple different groups of people.
And so, obviously, this is a gravy train for the doctors and big pharma, right?
I mean, I know in another case that I'm working in is Ted Hudako's case, also in California, similar to Jeff Younger's, where They took custody of his son away from him solely because he opposed transitioning, right?
And they did an implant, a Suprelan implant, on the boys.
And this was completely against court orders.
They did it in secret.
But they charged $209,000 For this Suprellin implant.
So it's a gravy train for big pharma and for these doctors.
But another aspect of this is that I believe that one of the goals is to Create a population of people who are chronologically adults.
They turn 18, 19, or 20 years old.
But both physically and mentally, they are still children or adolescents because we No, and have strong reason to suspect that another effect of these puberty blockers,
besides all of the cancers and the sterility and the osteoporosis and all of these things, Is that it suspends brain development at a critical, crucial time, right?
So we know that when you go from being a child to being a teenager to an adult, you transition from sort of either-or decision-making to more nuance, right?
The way adults can take a lot of information in.
Well, that's what children do not do.
And that's what well-developed adults can do.
And so they're really breeding this population of people who are legally old enough to consent to sex and drugs and whatever.
But mentally and physically, they're not.
That just sounds like pedophilia.
Correct.
That's exactly where I was going with that.
I think they're getting real, real paid in order to create this population for the pedophiles and the perverts.
It hurts me to even talk about this, but we've got to.
We have to talk about this.
I know it's uncomfortable.
No, we do know.
I mean, this is about normalizing sex with kids, ultimately.
And the reason why, so to the point about sterility and population control, the people that are subscribing and succumbing to this woke sex religion are not going to have children.
And so they have to have new converts.
They have to take the offspring of normal people, okay, normal people, and we should fully embrace that term.
They have to take the offspring of normal people and convert them, which is why the school systems are becoming these indoctrination centers for.
And, you know, this is incredible.
And I know we've got to wrap things up here in a minute, but, like, psychologically, there's also just, we have a situation where they are obsessed with, I think a lot of the people in the LGBT enclave, they are obsessed with sex and they see it as, okay, this is how I view everything in life.
Everything in life is sexual.
Well, a child is not a sexual being.
So there's this disconnect.
Everything's about sex because everything I am is defined about my personal lusts and my personal proclivities, sexual proclivities.
But I look at a child and then I don't see that.
And so we're now forcing...
I think this is the desire.
Psychologically, we're going to force sex on these kids because it's the only way that we can...
Make sense of the world, if you will.
I mean, I think that's a part of it.
It's also just straight up satanic.
Like, I don't want to, I'm not trying to nuance our way out of this or excuse it, but I do think that's part of it as well, is that we as a society, I mean, the sin of the age at this point is sexual sin.
Absolutely.
I agree with you when you say that we have become a communist country.
Now, we don't need to guess about what Karl Marx believed and taught and figured out.
And let's make no mistake, Karl Marx was a genius, an evil genius.
And he said what he needs to abolish private property and to bring in communism As a central bank, well, we already got that.
Public education, so we can indoctrinate and brainwash everybody.
They already have that.
Income tax, which is slavery.
Property tax, which is rent.
But the other key element of Marxism is destroying the nuclear family as the building block.
Of society.
And they're having a lot more trouble doing that.
But that's, you know, even 50, 60 years ago, that's what the welfare, the expansion of the welfare state was really all about.
But another benefit as far as these global Satanists are concerned...
Is that this transgenderism further just breaks down the family.
You don't need to trust your father.
They don't understand who you really are on the inside.
So you need to leave your family and you need to go off with these adults.
They'll tell you how to get hormones, how to transition, all of this.
But they're just undermining the family.
And so that's it.
I've got the give, send, go of James up there.
So it's savejames.org.
This is Jeff Younger.
If you want to help fund Jeff Younger's legal battles as he's tied up in California court.
Also on the show the other day, he said, you know, Gavin Newsom, even though he's a leftist, He could end this with a phone call.
He could end what this judge is fixing to do.
Let me ask you this.
As a legal expert, Alex Baker, if the judge goes ahead and okays the child sex change, which practically that's what it'll do if it'll just give sole custody to the mother, what other options are there?
Is there a way to appeal this or is that the final decision?
Well, that's actually a really good question.
So if they construe this as simply a modification of legal custody, that's not even an appealable order.
Whereas if they construe it right, which is we're challenging this injunction, that is an appealable order.
So, either way, if it goes against us, we can go up to the Court of Appeal, and we will, either with an appeal or with what's called a writ of mandamus, right?
But, you know, look, we're strongly suspicious that this kid is already on puberty blockers because they still, and Georgilis, will not disclose the supposed treating physician Right?
And we're strongly suspicious that she herself is the treating physician because she is, after all, a pediatrician.
You know, that's interesting that you say that because in the monologue and as I was writing it, I said, you know, this is a 12-year-old boy.
But then I started thinking, hang on, wait a second.
Wait a second.
You know, nature may start doing its thing here where if puberty kicks in and all of a sudden, hey, wait a second, I like girls.
Like, I'm actually attracted to girls.
So there's a clock here.
And so, yeah, there is certainly an incentive by the mother to delay the puberty.
Because if you let it last too long, all of a sudden we're going to have a 12-year-old, 13-year-old kid who is actually interested in girls.
Right.
And that's, you know, it's called desisting, and there's a lot of good studies on that, too, that they want to not have you be aware of, right?
If you just let the child go through puberty, then somewhere between 65 to 98 percent Of these supposedly gender dysphoric children, they desist, which means they figure out what they're about, and they start liking the opposite sex.
So you're absolutely right.
That's why they need to do this now.
That's why they need to get them young.
You know, it's unbelievable.
So I also want to plug your website.
Again, for people to go there, it is the post.
Let me go all over to the top so I can remember.
Postmodern Justice Media Project.
So you see it, pmjmp.org.
Alex Baker, really appreciate your time.
You've spent a lot of time with us.
You've given us a lot of insight.
And I think we're going to have to have you back on.
to give us more updates, especially if the worst happens if Jeff Younger gets tossed in jail.
So please let me know if they actually arrest Jeff Younger like they're threatening to do now.
We want to have you back on to talk about it as soon as possible.
Or me, right?
So, I mean, if they...
Look, I'll tell you, if they order me to take down any of this stuff, I'm not going to.
If they find me in contempt, good luck with that.
But I will tell you, if they succeed in capturing me and putting me in jail, I don't know what I'm going to do.
I won't eat their jail food.
I mean, yes, this is the hill that I want to go fight and die on.
Thanks for having me on, Paul.
Yes, everybody in this audience is going to be praying for you, or at least that's my encouragement, because, yeah, you're standing on this hill.
You're exposing evil, child abuse.
Literally, this is the government calling evil good and calling good evil.
And you are exposing that, sir.
So thank you so much.
I really appreciate it.
You're welcome.
We'll talk again real soon.
Absolutely.
Alex Baker, everybody.
We're going to have to take a break.
We've gone way over here.
So I'm going to reset.
I really appreciate you guys watching and listening.
and we'll see you here in just a second.
What can be, what should be, unburdened by what has been.
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be?
Unburdened by what has been.
See what can be unburdened by what has been.
What can be unburdened by what has been.
Unburdened by what has been and knowing what can be.
Have a sense of vision.
To see what can be unburdened by what has been.
What can be unburdened by what has been.
What could be unburdened by what had been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
Where we can be unburdened by where we've been?
What was possible unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
can be unburdened by what has been.
There are those who are unable to see what can be, but there are many more who are able to see what can be unburdened by what has been.
At White House Senior Living, our residents feel right at home.
Our vibrant facility offers delightful activities and outings, round-the-clock professional care, and exquisite house-made meals.
I've been eating everything that's put in front of me.
I've been eating all Italian food, basically.
And ice cream.
And ice cream.
Chocolate chip ice cream.
White House Senior Living, where residents feel like presidents.
Fascinating interview with Alex Baker.
Really, really good stuff.
Feel free to go back and watch it if you're just joining us.
We got a little bit more in-depth into the whole Jeff Younger, James Younger, California judge, trying to okay a sex change for a child.
But we've got a great rest of the show for you.
We mentioned at the top of the show the Olympics.
And we've got this Italian female boxer getting pummeled by this Algerian man pretending to be a woman.
And here we have the play-by.
We've got the beginning of this.
Angela?
Mm-hmm.
That's the team.
So that's the actual biological woman in the blue.
And the guy in the red is literally a guy pretending to be a woman.
And this is going to last about how you'd think.
According to reports, it lasts all but 46 seconds.
46 seconds.
Here we go.
Alright.
The size advantage here, the wingspan, the reach, unbelievable.
Unbelievably unfair.
This is the height of feminism.
Is this the result of feminism?
A man gets a trophy after beating a woman on global TV? Time's out.
She's asking to get her head guard tightened in.
Alright, she's gonna try this one more time.
Boom.
And she's out.
She says, no, I'm not doing this.
I'm not gonna risk my life fighting a man.
So, we're going to have a conversation here in a minute about female boxing in general.
But this woman has likely trained.
She's from Italy.
She's trained her whole life to be a female boxer.
She's at the Olympics.
A dream of hers, you would imagine.
And she has to retire because...
They've allowed a man to beat her up on international television.
Look at that.
Look at this dude.
That is a man.
That is a man.
Clear as day.
What a...
By the way, I mean...
When you see this, does this not make...
You wonder if, like...
Like, I mean, you know, there's a protective instinct When you see a man beat up a woman, other men want to get involved and, like, you know, stomp him into the dirt.
It's just an instinct because we want to protect the innocent women.
And in this case, this is just now totally acceptable.
This is part of a pluralistic society and freedom and democracy.
Get away from me. - As Karini advantage.
And now she's overcome with emotion, as women tend to be.
Because, yeah, it's like her whole life's work.
And, oh, get away from me, get away from me, dude.
I don't want anything good.
And that's all she wrote.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is...
We're supposed to think...
By the way, I mean, the Uniparty, in many cases, is totally for that.
Obviously, people like Kamala Harris, they're totally for that.
That's a product of freedom and democracy.
And when the warmongering Uniparty speaks up and tries to get us into World War III and they talk about exporting democracy, that's the democracy they're talking about.
That's the degeneracy that they are talking about.
That's the Globo homo agenda on display at the Olympics.
Absolutely disgusting.
I know.
Do we have some hot takes?
Yeah, here's OutKick's coverage of this.
Fly that in.
Olympic boxer pretending to be a woman pummels opponent in 46 seconds and makes her cry.
Algeria's Iman Khalif, an Olympic boxer who was caught last year pretending to be a woman after a series of DNA tests, entered the ring for the first time in Paris today.
And the fight lasted all of 46 seconds.
Khalif disposed of opening round opponent Italian Angela Carini so quickly that if you blinked, the fight was over.
Just like that, poof, done.
Like it never happened.
Carini forfeit the fight after taking two shots to the head in the opening seconds.
So her whole life's work.
Now, just to be clear, to have just a brief conversation, this isn't really the time, in my opinion, I don't think, when this is a moment of national outrage.
But just to be clear, I don't think women should be boxing at all, and I would even suggest that if there's anybody out there that enjoys watching two females bludgeon each other, there's just something wrong with that, in my opinion, because it's just not what women were created to do, okay?
Okay.
So I don't like the female boxing at all.
I mean, if it was up to me, it wouldn't even be an event.
However, it is an event.
And so we're going to argue where the Overton window allows us to.
And the fact is, this is a product of Western democracy.
When people talk about democracy, this is what they're meaning.
They're meaning stuff like live and let live.
Hey, yeah, you want to say that you're a man?
Or you want to say that you're a woman, but you're really a man?
No problem.
Get in there and just beat the tar.
Out of an actual woman.
This is the world that they envision.
This is it.
Yeah, the Olympics have died.
This is the moment...
This is where I first saw this.
Someone named Bill Moon.
The moment the Olympics died.
You see that clip?
Then we have National File Twitter.
Peak feminism is men winning prizes for beating up women on TV. 46 seconds and out.
Transgender boxer makes female Italian opponent quit at Paris Olympics.
What an embarrassment.
What a disgrace.
It's important to know that I think the International Boxing Association or whatever that international organization is, they don't allow the trans...
They don't allow men to compete against women.
But the Olympics, because they enjoy mocking Jesus and talking about the pale horse, one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse, and putting up a golden calf, because they enjoy all of that satanic devilry, they're all obviously down with the trans agenda.
So they're all for it.
Riley Gaines, men don't belong in women's sports.
Stand with Angela Carini.
So again, here's this woman who trains, an actual woman, who trains her entire life and she's no longer able to compete in her Olympic dream because they put a man with her.
This is where we are.
In other news, Donald Trump in the news for...
Some people say...
Some people have said that Donald Trump may have just ended Kamala Harris' presidential campaign hopes.
I don't know.
But what I will say about this...
What I will say about this is that this felt very much like 2016 Donald Trump.
I don't know about you, but to me, this felt very much like 2016 Donald Trump...
And it gave me a laugh.
I mean, if you needed a laugh, this was it.
I think I tweeted something about it.
Do you believe that Vice President Kamala Harris is only on the ticket because she is a black woman?
Well, I can say no.
I think it's maybe a little bit different.
So I've known her a long time indirectly, not directly very much.
She was always of Indian heritage, and she was only promoting Indian heritage.
I didn't know she was black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn black, and now she wants to be known as black.
So I don't know, is she Indian or is she black?
She has always identified as a black woman, she went to a historically black college.
I respect either one, but she obviously doesn't.
Because she was Indian all the way, and then all of a sudden she made a turn, and she became a black woman.
Just to be clear, sir, do you believe- I think somebody should look into that, too, when you continue in a very hostile, nasty town.
It's a direct question, sir.
Do you believe that Vice President Kamala Harris is a DEI hire, as some Republicans have said?
I really don't know.
I mean, I really don't know.
Could be.
Could be.
There are some, and there are plenty.
It's fantastic.
By the way, Kamala, Kamala.
It's better to just pronounce it Kamala, because that's how I've always pronounced it.
Interesting thing.
Do you get a little 2016 Trump out of that?
Because she decided to become a black person.
So this is an event for black journalists.
It's a lot of black people in the audience and black journalists.
It's a forum.
Kamala was supposed to be there, but she wasn't.
Donald Trump roasted them on that.
But everybody immediately decided to start bringing the receipts.
Because, of course, you had Jake Tapper was like, she went to a historically black college.
You have the reporter that you just saw.
She's always identified as a black woman.
No, she hasn't.
That's a lie.
It's a complete lie and it's easily verifiable as many people online have now taken to their ex-feeds and they are saying, actually, here she is claiming to be Indian.
So, I don't know.
Is she Indian or is she black?
She is always identified as a black.
I respect either one.
Okay, so what we're going to cook today is an Indian recipe.
Yes.
Because you are Indian.
Yes.
So, we're both Indian.
Yes.
But actually, we're both South Indian.
Yes.
You look like the entire one half of my family.
Can we watch that one more time?
Let's do it.
So I don't know, is she Indian or is she black?
She is always identified as a black woman.
I respect either one.
Okay, so what we're gonna cook today is an Indian recipe.
Yes.
Because you are Indian.
Yes, yes.
So we're both Indian, but actually we're both South Indian.
Yes.
You look like the entire one half of my family.
Do you believe that Vice President Kamala Harris is only on the ticket because she is a black woman?
Well, I can say no.
I think it's maybe a little bit different.
So, I've known her a long time indirectly, not directly very much, and she was always of Indian heritage, and she was only promoting Indian heritage.
I didn't know she was black.
Until a number of years ago when she happened to turn black and now she wants to be known as black.
So I don't know, is she Indian or is she black?
She has always identified as a black when she went to a historically black college.
I respect either one, but she obviously doesn't.
Because she was Indian all the way and then all of a sudden she made a turn and she went...
She became a black person.
Just to be clear, sir, do you believe that she is a- I think somebody should look into that, too, when you ask, continue in a very hostile, nasty tone.
It's a direct question, sir.
Do you believe that Vice President Kamala Harris is a DEI hire, as some Republicans have said?
I really don't know.
I mean, I really don't know.
Could be.
Could be.
There are some.
It really will be interesting, and quite honestly, hilarious, if somehow Kamala doesn't get the Democrat nomination this month.
That's going to be really interesting.
Because it is August, right?
Yeah, it's August 1st today.
Here's a new update on the assassination, the failed assassination attempt of Donald Trump that more and more evidence coming out shows that it was an inside job.
This is a video where D.C. Drano is saying, hey look, everyone can clearly see the Trump assassin sitting on his rifle on the roof.
You see him there, he's kind of I'm sure you've seen it by now, but you can kind of see him going across the roof there.
But then John Cullen, who I've been following for a while, they're now saying, and they made a separate video, they're saying, and look, I don't know, this is not verified.
I don't know that this is 100% verified.
Look, I'm just telling you what some people are saying.
They are claiming that the video that is now making the rounds of Crooks, his head bobbing right over the pitch of the roofline there, they're now making the allegation that at the very last minute, Crooks actually is shot well before any of the shots rang out.
That's what this video is claiming.
I'm going to throw it up on the screen here.
And again, this is just an allegation that But this is what happens, okay?
If this is what happens when the government just continues to blatantly lie to us about what happened that day, people are going to come up with their own theories.
Here's one of those theories.
Watch this.
See, a shadowy figure that appears to be moving on the roof across from the stage where former President Donald Trump was speaking back on July 13th.
We know from the FBI would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks traversed on roofs that were about 150 yards away from the rally stage.
So perhaps this is Crooks who was captured in this video.
In the meantime, though, we know there were communication failures.
Some people are saying that he got shot.
Would be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks.
What you know about rolling down.
So the idea is that, okay, and again, this is just a theory out there.
Um...
The idea, some people are now saying they believe that that little snippet of him peeking his head up and then going down was actually him being shot.
And yet this was still a while before the shots rang out.
Which would, and I'm just spitballing here, that would indicate that they already have taken out the Patsy.
We're going to take out the Patsy and we're going to let the other guys, the professionals, attempt to take the shot.
Again, this is just a theory, but it's one of those that's been making the rounds on the internet.
And the reason people are entertaining this is because the government is lying to us.
The FBI, the Secret Service, they are lying to us.
FBI the other day straight up lied, tried to make this guy a left-wing extremist.
I'm sorry, try to make him a right-wing extremist instead of the left-wing extremist that the Gab account reveals that he was.
Again, special thanks to Andrew Torba of Gab for actually revealing the disclosure document that the FBI sent to Gab demanding all the account information on, I think it was Epic Microwave.
We covered that a little bit yesterday.
Anyway, just a little update on the assassination.
Interesting video there for sure.
More and more people are going to More and more people are going to be looking into this, and we're going to have more and more camera.
The reason that camera angle, I think, took so long to get out is probably because it was being sold to Fox News, because Fox News is the one exclusively obtaining it.
There's probably a lot of people in the audience that have videos that they'd like to make a little money off of.
Douglas McGregor, U.S. deploys 12 warships to the Middle East.
So it looks like the situation in the Middle East, you know, you have the ethnic cleansing that is going on in Israel, between Israel and the Palestinians, but now you have Israel saying that they want to get in a direct confrontation.
I mean, they bombed Beirut.
They're wanting to get a direct confrontation with Hezbollah.
Iran is now thinking about getting involved.
You had the Prime Minister of Turkey, Erdogan, saying that they've got no problem invading Israel.
They would invade Israel just like they've invaded other countries in the past.
And everything is barreling towards more bloodshed in the Middle East and not peace, the absence of peace.
And this is a travesty and it has to stop.
It's going to literally...
If we let this happen and if we let this blind allegiance...
To Israel that is very much in control of our foreign policy in this instance, it's going to end up costing American blood, just like it did in Iraq, just like it did in Afghanistan, and that is a huge problem that's potentially facing the world.
Likewise, you have the meat grinder in Ukraine as well.
So we need to pray for peace, ladies and gentlemen.
Pray for peace.
Because this is actually madness.
Okay, now, lastly, as we wind things down, and tomorrow I'm going to do a little bit more of a deep dive into Megan Basham's new book, Shepherds for Sale.
It very much interests me.
I'm two chapters in now, three chapters in now.
It's very, very good.
It's exposing Big Eva.
It's exposing those pastors throughout many Big Eva denominations who have accepted the lies of the left.
They've taken the money from the left.
They've accepted their false presuppositions.
Some of them have been duped.
Some of them are complicit.
Some of them are intentionally, you know, leading their people down the wrong path.
I think that's clear.
But a lot of them, just to give the benefit of the doubt, have been completely duped.
You know, the ones that think climate change is real and is a gospel issue.
I will tell you, this is fantastic that...
Right now, as we speak, those in their Big Eva ivory towers are having a complete and total meltdown about Megan Basham's new book, Shepherds for Sale.
It is now, at the moment, this was yesterday, number 17 on the Amazon bestsellers list.
There's people trying to review Bomb It because Megan Basham actually names names in this book.
And it is extensively sourced.
I think the last eighth of the book is nothing but sources.
This is exposing these big EVA parachurch, you know, organizations like the ERLC, like the, what was it, the immigration table.
These people that are, you know, trying to work to make, well, you got to love your neighbor and let all the immigrants in.
Or you got to love your neighbor and You know, fight climate change because it's a gospel issue.
Never mind the fact that she documents in this book how the policies to fight climate change that have been enacted in first world European countries as well as third world countries actually result in poverty, object poverty and starvation in some cases.
And then American Christians are like, we got to love our neighbor and embrace climate change and cap and trade policies.
And it's the inverse.
So it's actually the opposite, and it's evil.
You're advocating for something that is going to be worse for your neighbor, not better for your neighbor.
And it's all happened.
Some of it's George Soros money, you know, but it's happened over the last, you know, 10, 15, 20 years.
And it's all documented in this book.
And they're having a conniption fit because they don't want to be held accountable.
It's a fantastic book.
I'm going to bring it.
I keep meaning to bring it in studio, but I keep leaving it in my house.
I keep forgetting it, but I'm going to bring it in studio tomorrow.
Shepherds for sale.
We're going to go in a little bit further detail in this book because it's absolutely fantastic.
Absolutely fantastic.
All right, that's all the time that we have.
So unless I am providentially hindered, I am going to be seeing you tomorrow, tomorrow evening for another episode of the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for being with us as always, and we will see you tomorrow night.
▲
Export Selection