All Episodes
Previous Next
July 26, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
01:00:29
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Feminist Influence Over GOP Must END, Kamala Embraces DRAG QUEENS
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Welcome to the show.
Thanks so much for being with us.
It is the Bill Stump Report.
And we can't do the program without you watching every single day.
You guys know that by now.
Happy Friday, everybody out there.
We've got a great show for you.
So, I guess just some historical perspective here before we get started.
A world where Roe vs.
Wade was abolished used to be considered a pipe dream by most.
I know I certainly...
Considered it something that would never happen.
The tyrannical decision by SCOTUS in 1973 robbed the states of a vigorous debate that was ongoing, and it spelled doom for millions of babies over the next 50 years.
In response to sacrificing babies, the pro-life movement was born, no pun intended.
It got to work in the states, trying to save babies incrementally by chipping away at the Supreme Court's genocidal precedent.
Various groups did this by relying on scientific advancements which increased the viability of children at younger and younger gestation periods.
The goalposts, though, of political engagement on this issue were set.
The Overton window dictated that babies were going to be murdered in America.
That much was assumed.
The only question was, how many and when?
At what age?
This framework lasted for decades, and it gave birth to phrases like, life begins at conception, my body, my choice, abortion is murder, hands off my uterus.
But then, praise the Lord, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.
Wade in the Dobbs decision.
And now, thanks to some forward-thinking states with trigger laws, many state laws went right back to the way they were before 1973.
In response, baby murderers everywhere seethed and shrieked.
And those of us who actually believe that abortion is murder, those of us who actually believe that life begins at conception, were invigorated to throw the ring into the fires of Mount Doom and destroy the beast once and for all.
However, pro-life Republicans had other plans.
The feminization of America still has quite the grip on this land, and secular Republican politicians didn't have the stomach to tell purple-haired feminists back home that not only should you not murder your babies, but if you do, you should be prosecuted for it.
Apparently, polling shows that if Republicans don't disavow a national abortion ban and allow the pink and purple haired women in blue states to murder their children, then they won't win any more national elections.
This all culminated a couple of weeks ago at the RNC when Republicans confirmed a new party platform that removed a national abortion ban from the platform while at the same time claiming they still stand for life and they stand for healthy American families.
And what made this even more awkward is that this affirmation of evil and electoral capitulation happened after President Trump survived the assassination attempt which resulted in him giving credit to Almighty God and him alone For saving his life.
So don't get me wrong, no one is completely consistent all the time.
The world is populated full of hypocrites.
But the secular bosses at the RNC made clear what many Christians have suspected for a very long time.
They hate their base.
And they hate what we stand for.
Ben Ziesloft over at the Sentinel recently took notice of this story.
He chronicled pro-life groups that twisted themselves into knots, releasing statements praising the new platform.
Quote, major pro-life abortion groups endorse new Republican platform despite weakened stance on abortion.
End quote.
Ben Ziesloft is here and we welcome him.
Ben, welcome to the Millstone Report, sir.
Thank you so much for being a guest.
Great to be here.
Thank you for having me.
So, I mean, what are your thoughts on everything that I just talked about up to this point?
It is, I mean, it really was, the RNC was very demoralizing if you are an abolitionist and a Christian.
Yeah, absolutely.
Couldn't agree more.
I mean, you did a good job chronicling the past, you know, 40, 50 years of abortion policy in the United States.
And I think a lot of us thought that after Roe v.
Wade is overturned with the Dobbs decision, we go to a state where abortion was actually legal in a lot of states.
states.
But the reality is that every single state has abortion legal in some way, shape, or form, even the 14 states that claim to have banned abortion because they have blanket allowances for mothers to murder their babies.
It's actually written into their pro-life laws.
But we actually saw at the RNC, as you mentioned, now the National Republican Party has codified into their own platform saying that we're actually fine with most forms of abortion.
I think the only type of abortion that was mentioned and condemned in that platform was late-term abortions, which is only like less than 5% of all abortions that happen in Meanwhile, they fully affirmed IVF and All forms of birth control, some of which are of course abortifacients.
So we're in a pretty bad spot right now, even after Roe in the Republican Party in terms of opposing abortion.
And I know you've talked a lot about on Twitter, on X, the abortion pill.
I mean, this is a huge deal.
And I believe, I think the statistics is something like two-thirds of the abortions now are being done with these abortifacient drugs.
And so that was kind of the response.
I mean, after the overturning of Roe versus Wade, not only did the Biden administration, you know, everybody was shrieking.
They wanted the Biden administration to act in some sort of executive order.
I think they didn't do that.
Instead, they just kind of responded by, you know, going after pro-life Christians and I mean, they basically made the FBI Joe Biden's personal police force to go after these people to punish them for, you know, praying or singing outside abortion clinics.
But they did essentially make every CVS and every Walgreens on every corner, small town in America, essentially the new Planned Parenthoods because these girls can now just go in there and they can get their abortion pills.
That's exactly right.
So essentially what we've seen in the United States is we've gone from a blockbuster model where you go into a store analogous to an abortion clinic and get your abortion there, to more of a Netflix model where you can do a DYI abortion at home You just go online and you order a pill through the mail and some nonprofit or some group like Aid Access or Mayday will send you an abortion pill and now nobody will ever know that you murdered your baby.
You don't have to go outside your home and schedule an appointment at an abortion mill and maybe encounter Christians who try to persuade you to stop.
Now you can murder your child in the comfort of your home.
So what we've done is we made every single living room, bedroom, bathroom, dorm room for college students into an abortion mill in this country.
The blood of pre-born children continues to flow, including again in those states that plan to have banned abortion because those protections are not strong enough.
They don't condemn everybody who does willfully partake in an abortion.
Yeah, so I mean, I was, you know, in my monologue, you know, condemning the purple hair, you know, in the blue states, we got to let them murder their babies, we got to let them sacrifice if we want to win elections.
But we also have to remember, because of the abortion pill, you have red states, and I call them Christian red states on this program, you know, the ones that are You know, passing laws that, you know, ban the genital mutilation of children, kids from drag shows, that sort of thing.
And I also say that because in my home state of Arkansas, like I've heard people read scripture from the floor when they're passing these bills.
I mean, it's encouraging.
It really is.
But you have girls, young girls in these Christian red states who now have to face this temptation because it's legal and because now both parties think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I mean, in terms of we need to give access, we need our young girls and daughters to have access to this drug that, let's be honest, it makes them murderers.
I mean, that's what we're talking about here.
That's right, yeah.
And unfortunately, you had both Donald Trump during the first presidential debate and J.D. Vance a few days later come out and explicitly endorse the legal status of abortion pills.
So again, like you said, two thirds of abortions in the United States now happen through this specific method.
Now you have Republican officials at the highest possible level actively encouraging the legality of these poison pills, essentially.
So it's a pretty bad state.
It makes it so that any state in the country can have legal abortion because these things are almost impossible to track through the mail.
And again, there's no meaningful penalties to oppose them.
So I have seen, I've said on this program that we're watching, especially in the In the wake of the Dobbs decision.
So we're watching the pro-life movement become the new pro-choice movement.
And I think we've definitely seen that.
But why do you think that is?
Why are pro-life groups...
In your piece over at the Sentinel, let's throw it up on the screen here.
In your piece over at the Sentinel, major pro-life groups endorse new Republican platform despite weakened stance on abortion.
Why do you think these pro-life groups are doing this?
Is it a question of access?
They don't want to completely condemn...
Where they may have influence in the future, or is it something worse than that?
I think the Axis is a big part of it.
They want the seat at the table.
They want the ability to influence people like Donald Trump on abortion policy.
And again, it's not completely worthless, but it can never come at the expense of your actual goal of ending abortion or stated goal.
So I think a lot of these groups started from a really good standpoint.
If they did sincerely want to end abortion and take a lot of the incremental wins as they came along, any regulations they could pass in the meantime.
But unfortunately, that compromise has worked against them We're good to go.
We're groups like Susan B. Anthony, Pearl Life, American Principles Project, a lot of these groups that a lot of people would just assume are actually wanting abortion to end.
And then there are other groups like Students for Life Action, National Rights of Life that are covered in this piece that came up with their own separate statements, commending the statement as well, saying that this is actually thanking the platform for completely gutting their only priority from the Republican platform.
So it's really disappointing to see.
And, you know, again, These groups are not, unfortunately, a lot of them, not every single group, but a lot of them are not existing to end abortion, but to basically give cover to Republicans as they do less than ending abortion.
I've seen the same thing happen back when I was trying to get or helping a pro-gun group in my home state try to basically get constitutional carry, which we did eventually get, by the way.
But you had the NRA and their guy, you know, they sent their guy down to Arkansas, and they wanted the permit model.
They wanted the permission slip model.
That's what they wanted, right?
And we're saying, no, we've got the political will to actually have a constitutional carry open, concealed, without having to get a permission slip from the government.
And they didn't want that.
And it dawned on me that if constitutional carry is the law of the land, what do we need the NRA for?
So there's got to be some of that going on here with some of these pro-life movements.
If abortion actually was abolished, what do we need to donate to the national right to life for anymore?
Right.
Unfortunately, a lot of the incentives work against the actual goal of any abortion.
There's a saying that I've heard recently where you can never convince a man to see something if his salary depends on him not seeing that.
So I think it's the case with a lot of these pro-life lobbyists who maybe started with good intentions, but now...
You know, they have every incentive to not actually end abortion.
And one of our co-founders at The Sentinel is Zach Lautenschlager.
So he also came from the gun world.
He was the vice president of the National Association for Gun Rights.
So you're right.
I've heard that exact same thing where, you know, when they go into states and they try to establish constitutional carry, at first it was the NRA itself that opposed them.
So people were surprised to hear that.
They assume NRA is the big pro-gun group.
Why would they be opposing an actual constitutional pro-gun policy?
And sadly, the NRA had been worked into the establishment structure in a lot of those states.
It's just incredible how this happens.
Okay, so there's some people out there, abolitionists, right?
And I consider myself an abolitionist.
I mean, I want to see abortion criminalized, right?
And so I certainly do.
I also look at the self-evident truth of abortion.
You know, the getting rid of Roe, and I know people talk about incrementalism versus, you know, just hard-lined abolitionism.
I'd love to know your thoughts on that, you know, where we are, where we want to go, and some people say that because of this betrayal by the RNC, that people just need to withhold their vote.
What are your thoughts on that?
Yeah, so I'll start with the abolition versus incremental question.
So I'm not convinced there's a way to actually abolish abortion if you bake into the structure of your movement, this pragmatic approach of taking whatever wins you can get.
I think you need to actually have a clarion call to go for the whole thing.
I think right now we're seeing the fruit of that approach, which has been the case under Roe for the past 50 years, where these groups would chip away at abortion.
There was no willingness to defy or nullify the Supreme Court on the Roe decision, but they were just taking any wins that he could get along the way.
And I think what you're seeing now is a growing desire to actually say, no, we're not going to settle for anything less than actually abolishing abortion, because that's what needs to happen.
All murder of all forms, whether born or pre-born, needs to be illegal.
So on the voting question this year, so I voted for Trump in 2020.
On the voting question, I'm not going to vote for Trump this year because I do think the Republican platform is functionally pro-choice, and I don't think my conscience would allow me to vote for a pro-choice lawmaker at this point.
So, my vote has been lost, unfortunately, by the Republicans.
The only person to say that.
And it's not just abolitionists either.
I have very, you know, normal pro-life Roman Catholic friends who say, wow, this is pretty bad this year.
So I want to vote for Donald Trump.
I like him on the vast majority of issues, whether it's immigration, whether it's trade, whether it's economics.
But, you know, child sacrifice is a non-negotiable for me.
I completely understand that position.
And obviously, when your conscience is bound, I mean, this is where you have to go.
Um, what, what would you say?
So here's my, feel free to, um, you know, to push back on this, but what would you say?
I'm worried.
One of the things I'm worried about, again, is the Supreme Court.
Um, and again, this is all assuming that the elections aren't just going to get rigged again and totally stolen.
So like assuming that if you vote, it actually matters.
Which is a big assumption these days.
I'm worried that we may have a situation.
I mentioned earlier the Christian red states, Ben, who are pushing back against trans and kids.
And right now, the debate that I described that was going on pre-1973 over the abortion issue It's now raging in Christian red states and other states.
People are trying to push back against transing kids, you know, drag shows, all this stuff.
You know, whether or not they even are going after insurance.
The insurance companies say, look, you can't reimburse for these procedures.
I mean, they're going after doctors.
They're doing things to protect kids.
I actually think they should, you know, get rid of the whole idea of transing, whether you're a kid or you're an adult.
And that's another, you know, topic for another day.
But I'm worried that the Supreme Court, especially if it's makeup changes, could very well do the exact same thing that they did with the abortion issue and essentially rob the states of the debate, rob the states of the ability of having this patchwork of laws, that I actually think are going to do two things.
I think along the books, criminalizing, making transitioning kids child abuse will stop it, but I also think It will force the crazy people to actually leave.
And I think that's also a net positive.
So what would you say to that concern?
Yeah, so I think, obviously, nobody wants a Supreme Court that, I assume you're alluding to packing the Supreme Court and then forcing down abortion on the rest of the states once more.
But I think there is...
And trans and kids.
Like, you know...
And trans and kids.
Right, right.
Yeah.
Certainly, yeah.
So I think you mentioned the political will in a state like Arkansas that the people there do actually want abortion to end and to be abolished and so forth.
Maybe it's an education issue on the total and immediate abolition elements, but I think if it really does come to where the Supreme Court has a new row or something, I think the states are perfectly allowed to nullify the decision.
So a lot of states, for example, are nullifying federal law on marijuana.
Technically, Marijuana is still a schedule one drug.
That might be not correct, but it's basically an illegal drug at the federal level.
But a lot of states just have legal marijuana now because they don't care what the government says because the federal government will have to come in and enforce whatever they want to happen with marijuana.
And this happened throughout U.S. history where You had Andrew Jackson pushing his policies and saying things like, you know, the Supreme Court made their decree, now let them enforce it, right?
Like them and what army, essentially?
So if it really does come down to that, you know, I would say that state magistrates have not only the right but the duty to oppose the federal government when they're trying to force abortion.
And I think if states start to push back in that way and if voters start to see that it's actually possible, we're going to see not only a much less tyrannical federal government on the abortion issue, but really on all issues, right?
Because if states have the spine to actually stand up to the federal establishment, they're going to have a lot less tyranny shut down their throats.
That would mean that the litmus test, especially if you're in a Christian, I'm sorry, a red state with a closed primary, it would mean that in the Republican primary, you've got to start asking your candidates questions like this.
How would you act to nullify federal law?
How would you act to nullify overreach?
You mentioned the marijuana.
That's a great point.
I don't know what schedule it is, but I know it's still regulated to the point where these marijuana growers out in California are They have to hire private security to guard warehouses of cash because the banks...
Won't take the money because of the classification of marijuana right now as a drug.
You also saw in the Civil War era, you know, you had the fugitive slave laws, right?
And the northern states said, no, we're not going to abide by these laws, right?
So there's a history.
And then if you tell somebody, you know, if you tell somebody that who's, you know, really into the system or has been brainwashed by going to law school, they'll tell you, oh, well, jurisprudence is way beyond that.
It's like, no, no, it's not.
What we need are people that are, they know what time it is and they're And they're ready to do what's right.
They're ready to do the moral thing based on God's character that we find in the Bible and to stand on what's right and to protect the people from evil and from wickedness.
We want a government.
I know you agree with this, Ben, that punishes evil and rewards good.
We don't have that right now.
Right.
Exactly, yeah.
And I think you saw a lot of people cheering Greg Abbott on, I think it was several months ago, when he was starting to enforce border security, even though the Biden administration didn't want to.
People were saying, yes, defy the federal government.
This is excellent.
Praise God.
Keep doing it.
And if we're not willing, of course, if the federal government won't guard the borders, then the border states absolutely should do that, and the other states should support them in that.
But if we're not willing to do that for baby murder as well, then who are we as a people?
If we're not willing to just say, no, we're not going to have baby murder in my jurisdiction, then who are we as a people?
Maybe we deserve those open borders.
I actually agree with you, and I think that's part of the slippery slope.
Sometimes people don't like slippery slopes because they say that you can make correlations.
But I love making the broad correlations.
I love saying, look, a nation that murders 50 million babies, even more than that if you think the babies the babies would have had in terms of a population decline.
Nations that do that tend to get conquered by third world barbarian hordes.
And we're literally importing the third world right now.
And they're violent.
They are violent people.
Yep, I'm reading Deuteronomy right now, and one of the punishments that God has for nations that reject Him is domination by foreigners.
He says, you know, the foreigners will rise above you and above your own children and you'll be vexed by it, something to that effect.
So it doesn't mean that we can't do anything on the border until child sacrifice is completely done away with, but these things are related, as you said.
So it really boils down to whose law do we respect more?
Do we respect, you know, the Constitution or do we respect the people who say they represent the Constitution?
And really, ultimately, we have to respect the higher moral law of God, which says, you shall not murder.
And we know that all federal officials, state officials, local officials will stand before God and give an account for themselves into the oath they swore not to, you know, President Joe Biden or Kamala Harris or Donald Trump.
But to God Himself and to uphold the Constitution.
So the question is not whether they, you know, fit into this system of jurisprudence, but do they do what was right before God in protecting the innocent and punishing the evildoers?
Alright, so switching gears here, Ben, while I have you, there is a little new controversy going on out there, you know, surrounding the nomination of J.D. Vance as the Vice President, right?
So, Tommy Lahren, there's a viral clip of her going around criticizing, you know, J.D. Vance, saying that because of J.D. Vance and because he said these other things about, he recently said that, hey, look, if you've got kids, you should have more of a say in the electoral process because you have more investment in the future.
This has triggered people.
He's called, I think, you know, 40-year-old women, childless cat ladies.
And so you've got Tommy Lahren who's saying, this is going to make it really hard to Well, I think that's true.
I think that's probably why J.K. Rowling wrote that character into Harry Potter, Dolores Umbridge.
Because those types do tend to be insufferable.
I'm also recalling a C.S. Lewis quote from one of the Narnia books where essentially he's jabbing at one of the kids' teachers for being kind of like a Dolores Umbridge and saying she'd fit great into Parliament.
But there is this trope of this mother figure who doesn't have children and needs to mother everything around her.
So I think even during COVID this happened a lot where you had a lot of female bureaucrats who emerged as some of the most strangely severe tyrants over everybody around them.
And, you know, I think broadening out to J.D. Davis' point, which by the way was taken out of context in the original clip, he's trying to draw attention to a really important problem that we're facing, which is that, you know, a lot of women have been duped into buying the feminist live, becoming a girl boss, becoming a career lady.
And not, you know, basically ignoring the drive toward having children and families and husbands and so forth, which, you know, God designed all those things for reasons because it's good for women.
And it's good, by the way, for men to have men to have wives as well.
But we're seeing a mass rejection of that.
And as a result, mass misery, unfortunately, among a lot of females in our culture.
So I think JD Vance is absolutely right on that point where You know, it's bad to have a lot of childless cat ladies, as he said, running the show.
And it'd be better to have godly men who have firm convictions about things running the show.
I think that's what God really intended in both leading the church, the state, the family, all the institutions he established.
He seems to want men to run those things.
And I think that's better for everybody else involved.
Yeah.
So, I mean, this is connected with what we're talking about.
Obviously, abortion and feminism is totally, totally connected.
I have a working hypothesis that women are very much so an idol in this country.
You can see the evidence of this in the feminization.
People call our country a gynocracy.
Even in some of our churches, the language that a pastor would use is geared towards what I would call the lowest common denominator, which is how is the average American woman Who has been brought up, you know, indoctrinated in the first, second, and third waves of feminism.
You know, how are they going to take what it is I'm going to say?
But I would think, going back to the abortion issue, there really is no better evidence to, you know, at least to convince me that we worship women in our society, and that's the abortion issue.
We've given a class of people, women, the ability to murder Without being prosecuted for it.
People love to talk about privilege, Ben, in our society.
That's a privilege.
You've given half the population the ability to murder without the state being able to do anything about it.
And then that leads to everything else that we've seen with feminization.
And then, shocker, All that work to fight the patriarchy actually means nothing in the end because now, like all idols, they fail us and we don't even know what a woman is anymore.
That's right.
Yeah, a friend of mine, T. Russell Hunter, who started a group called Abolicious Rising, has a phrase, special murder rights for women.
So...
Essentially articulating what you just said, where, you know, our states, our federal state local authorities have decided that women have the absolute right to murder their babies, period, end of sentence, as long as it happens before they're born.
And again, that's not just California, it's not just New York, but it's also Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana.
Charlotte Laws, your institute, a leading pro-life group, has an entire list of statutes where...
There's provisions in them saying this should not be construed to say that women can ever be prosecuted for murder.
So they're openly boasting about it.
They're bragging about how, quote-unquote, pro-woman they are.
Well, the question is, what are the little babies in the womb who their mothers now have license to murder?
So you're absolutely right.
Unfortunately, the feminism issue has bled into even the conservative circles.
People like Tommy Lahren, who I recall is pro-choice, or at least had pro-choice comments a few years ago.
Yeah, sure.
Yeah, for whatever reason, we're not willing to just say, no, we need to protect pre-born babies, and women are just like the rest of us.
They have rights, but they're also sinners, and the laws should treat them equally as men.
And for whatever reason, even the Republicans are starting to buy into those lives, too.
They absolutely are.
And I do think, though, that when you get people telling everybody about feminism and, hey, this is a lot of what we're doing is the result of feminism, and we were this close.
I mean, we were a few centimeters away where our two choices were going to be Nikki Haley or Kamala Harris.
And what is it the Bible says about women leaders and being a judgment on a nation?
Right.
Exactly.
Yeah, it's a judgment when infants and women rule over our people.
Yeah.
Man, we certainly live in interesting times.
Ben's Eyes Loft, where can people find more of your work?
Obviously, we have your Twitter post up here.
Obviously, you're at Ben's Eyes Loft on Twitter, but tell us a little bit about the Sentinel.
Absolutely.
We are a conservative news and commentary outlet owned and operated by Christians, so we're striving for the best possible conservative news, all informed by a Christian worldview, so you can follow us at RepubSentinel on Twitter, and our website is RepublicSentinel.com.
All right.
Ben Zieseloff, we really appreciate it, sir.
Thank you so much.
We'll do it again sometime.
Absolutely.
Thanks for having me.
All right, folks.
We're going to take a break and we're going to reset here.
And we're going to, when we get back, we're going to play a little bit of Left Wing Will because it is Friday.
And we'll tell you about that.
But don't go anywhere.
We really appreciate it.
And happy Friday back here in just a moment.
Thank you.
First it was inflation, then another housing market bubble, banks started crashing, and now the Fed is laying the groundwork for a digital currency.
So you could bury your head in the sand or protect your wealth while you still can.
So visit GoldCo, the only company that I recommend, and get up to 10% instant match in bonus silver.
Head over to Paul4Gold.com or call 844-905-GOLD to learn how you can get up to 10% instant match in bonus silver.
That's paul4gold.com or call 844-905-GOLD. Breaking news!
Gold hits an all-time high.
The gold boom could skyrocket to over $7,000 an ounce.
Silver could reach over $30 an ounce.
Gold and silver buyers, including the central banks, are ready to buy more.
Are you?
Today my partner Goldco is offering up to 10% instant match and bonus silver with a qualified account.
Plus, visit paul4gold.com or call 844-905-GOLD now to see if you qualify before the next gold rush.
That's paul4gold.com or call 844-905-GOLD. Welcome to the show, or welcome back to the show.
Breaking news.
Uh, it is...
I'm sorry about that.
Uh, it is the Milk Dumb Report.
Not that you guys care, but I will say...
I have to, uh...
Mark and Chris, a new computer mouse, because this mouse, I don't know, I think I've clicked it so hard that now some things are not registering as I'm running the show here.
Before we go any further, though, I want to tell you about the Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company.
The Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company, this is a veteran-owned coffee company.
And I want you to try what they have.
I mean, it's really great coffee.
They donate a portion of the profits of every bag sold to Homes for Our Troops, which is a 501c3 that works to build specially adapted custom homes to veterans nationwide so they can rebuild their lives.
But it's Costa Rican coffee.
It's very delicious.
A lot of people don't think of coffee beans having like acidic or tropical fruit notes, but this one does.
And you need to give it a try, so you go to beardedsergeant.com slash millstone.
If you use my name, Paul, when you check out beardedsergeant.com slash millstone, you will get 15% off.
So please do that, and we would very much appreciate it.
Beardedsergeant.com slash millstone, 15% off when you use my name, Paul.
So it's Friday.
Okay.
And a lot of times on Friday we try to play this game just a little bit.
Just give you a preview.
Left Wing Wheel, this is my game.
I made it.
And this is the game.
The game that laughs at the left.
And it's meant to bring us together.
Because there's a lot of gaslighting out there.
This is the anecdote to all of the gaslighting.
All of the gaslighting that you get from the mainstream media telling all of us that we're crazy and the people on the left, they're totally normal and we should all want to be like them.
This is the anecdote to that.
If the left wing makes you ill, play left wing will and the red pill.
And so we're going to do that here briefly.
I think we've played this card before.
But for those of you who don't know, you play the game by playing Left Wing Will Story.
So you have a deck of red cards.
You see the deck of red cards.
This isn't the whole deck.
I've got the box over here.
You've got white cards.
This is how you end the game.
When you're ready to end the game, you're going to play a white card and then blue cards.
So mainly you're going to tell the story with a blue card and then you're going to fill in the blank with a red card.
You play with a bunch of people around a table and then you pick the funniest combination and It's a pretty simple concept.
It's been done before, but we did it with the leftists, the stereotypical leftists.
So, you've got to tell Leftwing Will's story.
Will he get red-pilled?
We don't know.
But to fight gender stereotypes, Will paints his fingernails.
People actually do this, by the way.
There are those out there, there are straight men who paint their fingernails to fight gender stereotypes.
They say they're straight, but they say they're straight.
But they...
They want to take on this burden so that people will see somebody with painted fingernails and, oh, but I'm not gay.
I like women.
Yeah, I'm telling you.
They really consider themselves martyrs.
Doing the work for their cause.
To fight gender stereotypes, Will paints his fingernails the color of blank.
So we can do...
Let me pick a random one here from the deck.
Okay.
Okay, so to fight gender stereotypes, Will paints his fingernails the color of red meat consumed to further colonialism and misogyny.
Excuse me.
Okay, well, so eat red meat.
To fight gender stereotypes...
To fight gender stereotypes, Will paints his fingernails the color of Lee Harvey Oswald plus Watergate Hotel plus Iran Contra plus Monica Lewinsky equals the 2020 election.
That one doesn't fit as much, but it would fit in another card.
Let's see.
He paints his fingernails to fight gender stereotypes the color of a flaming member of the Alphabet Mafia.
And then we'll get to the last one.
Does he get red-pilled?
Ah, nuts.
I guess not.
Ah, nuts.
Poor Will was recruited to take the fall for a false flag assassination attempt and now resides at blank mental institution.
You're taking a white cup of prescriptions now, Will, but none of them is a red pill.
So what's the name of the mental institution?
A pedophile mental institution.
At this point, what difference does it make?
Mental institution.
The Rothschild's Benevolent Goals of Global Domination Mental Institution.
I think that would be the winner if I were playing the game.
So go to leftwingwill.com.
That's leftwingwill.com.
And you can save 15% when you use My Name Paul at checkout.
15% off leftwingwill.com.
Always great to play that game.
Okay, so Kamala Extract Harris, she decides to kick off her presidential campaign on a show for degenerates, a drag queen show.
RuPaul.
We are all in this together, and your vote is your power.
So please make sure your voice is heard this November and register to vote at vote.gov.
Can I get an amen?
Amen!
Now on with the show.
And remember, you better vote.
Wow, okay.
So you've got to hold the sign right side up, lady.
That's that Leslie lady from SNL who was known, by the way, for making terrible mistakes during their live show all the time.
Couldn't get her lines right.
She could hardly deliver her lines most of the time.
So I'm just making an observation.
As unfunny as SNL is, when she was on it, you would watch to see what mistakes she was going to make today.
And you talk about a diversity, equity, inclusion hire.
I don't know if there's anyone less talented than Leslie Mann.
Or is that her name?
Leslie Jones?
Is it Jones?
Sorry, I'm getting any celebrities mixed up.
Jones, I think, is her last name.
And so she...
Anyway, she holds her sign upside down, man.
I mean, what are you going to do?
But no, this is just a taste of what we have to look forward to.
They're going to make this election, assuming that Kamala is the nominee.
They're going to make it, honestly, they're going to try to make it as much as they can.
It's going to be the degenerates, the LGBTQ, RST, L&E, which elect to buy a vowel enclave, versus Christians.
That's what they're going to try to do, which is really odd because, you know, we just spent the first half of the show telling you about how, in many respects, Christians feel betrayed about them taking the pro-life, really the abolition, the national abortion ban language out of the party platform.
By the way, again, thanks to Ben Zieslaw for coming on the show.
We appreciate it.
But yeah, so this is just a taste of what we have to look forward to kicking off the show.
I mean, it really is.
You can say what you want, but I mean...
And it's just tough when you've got the other side that has embraced.
You can't get around it.
They've embraced our side, our side, the...
You know, has embraced the pluralism, has embraced, like, the Tommy Larins that are now upset that J.D. Vance dared to say something that a suburban woman that wasn't going to vote for Trump in the first place, that might offend the suburban white women out there.
Anyway, it's just, it's ridiculous.
But we still have Kamala out there trying to act like she's president already.
She thinks that we have an alliance with North Korea.
So the United States...
shares a very important relationship which is an alliance with the Republic of North Korea and it is an alliance that is strong and enduring.
A strong and enduring relationship with North Korea, she says.
Okay, all right.
Strong and enduring relationship with North Korea.
The Trump campaign has dropped this ad against Kamala Harris.
Take a watch at this.
I am Kamala Harris.
My pronouns are she and her.
You're considered the most liberal United States Senator.
Well, actually, the nonpartisan GovTrack has rated you as the most liberal Senator.
Do you have any plans to visit the border?
We are going to the border.
We've been to the border.
You haven't been to the border.
And I haven't been to Europe.
I am in favor of saying that we're not going to treat people who are undocumented and cross-border as criminals.
That's correct.
That is correct.
A lot of the signs at the rally you just held were people standing there saying, abolish ICE. Yeah.
Is that a position that you agree with?
We need to probably think about starting from scratch.
So you support giving universal healthcare and Medicare for all to people who are in this country illegally?
I'm opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human being public health, period.
Are you for defunding the police?
How are you defining defund the police?
It's actually wrong and backward to think that more police officers will create more safety.
We need to get rid of money bail.
Convicted, in prison, like a Boston Marathon bomber.
On death row, people who are convicted of sexual assault, they should be able to vote?
I think we should have that conversation.
I am prepared to get rid of the filibuster to pass a Green New Deal.
I have all the support of Medicare for All.
I was very happy to sign onto Bernie's bill, and I give Bernie, frankly, a lot of credit.
There's no question I'm in favor of banning frack.
Do you ban plastic straws?
I think we should.
So, I mean, you know, for all...
For all of the fake polls out there that are going to show Kamala within striking distance or leading as we covered the other day.
By the way, yesterday I was under the weather, so forgive me.
It really is, in my opinion, it should be a slam dunk if you have a fair and free election.
But we know they're going to try to steal it.
Because that's what they did in 2020.
Kamala Harris, as we talked about the other day, has one of the most really embarrassing, mediocre political rises in American history.
And she is clearly just there to represent the interests of powerful people.
And we talked about that, by the way, with Patrick Howley over the National File and the Kamala Files.
But in the meantime, before we get to this, actually, we need to cover the...
Oh, what is it?
Not the border czar thing.
We're going to get to that here in just a second.
Where is my clip on...
Oh, here it is.
So we have a Twitter...
Hang on one second.
I want to find the actual clip.
Is it...
It's not...
Well, here it is.
Yeah.
So Robbie Starbuck.
Here it is.
Okay.
My apologies here.
So...
So we have Anton Daniels.
Anton Daniels is on some sort of group chat.
Looks to be some sort of black podcast.
And there's a woman in there that says, Hey, look, I'm going to vote for Kamala because she's black.
That's why I'm voting for Kamala.
She is a black woman, and that's why I'm going to vote for her.
And then this happens.
So for all of the talk right now over Tommy Lahren and her saying, I don't think J.D. Vance...
And you know what?
There's people saying that there's a contingent of the right that's now attacking J.D. Vance...
Because they want Trump to dump him and replace him with Nikki Haley.
Which would embolden other assassination attempts.
I think it would, even more so.
I know there's a lot of questions about J.D. Vance and everything else.
I get it.
I get the having to pledge allegiance to the foreign nation state of Israel.
I get all of that.
I understand.
But Nikki Haley, I mean...
If she's president, we're going to war.
There's no question about it, right?
There's no nuance about it.
That's the truth of the matter.
And at least in the verbiage of Trump, Trump doesn't want to go to war, wants to end these wars in both Ukraine and the Middle East.
To the dismay of somebody like Benjamin Netanyahu.
So anyway, there's a lot of stuff going on, but there's people that are now saying that this Tommy Lahren clip is actually designed.
I think it was Larry Schweickart who's out there saying that this Tommy Lahren clip is now designed to say, oh, we can't get the white suburban woman.
We can't get that vote.
We need to ditch J.D. Vance as the insinuation, replace her with Nemarata Nikki Haley.
Okay, right.
But in the meantime, you've got in the black community, which is supposed to be absolutely invigorated by this idea of a black woman being the first president of the United States, first female president of the United States.
Anton Daniels not having any of it.
I'm going to just be real honest with this.
is she's a black woman. - Also, just view your discretion is advised.
This isn't just littered with profanity, but there's some profanity in here.
I'm going to go back to what somebody was saying, where it's not voting for someone, but majority vote for someone.
Hold on, hold on.
Let me mind this out.
Is it only because she a black woman?
Yeah.
Do you not see how that's a bad idea?
Elaborate.
Okay, so we're in three proxy wars with some of the most powerful leaders in the world.
She failed at the...
Real quick, what are the three proxy wars?
We know we're in the proxy war in the Middle East.
We know we're in the proxy war with Russia and Ukraine.
Is the other proxy war Taiwan and China?
Or is it the proxy war the US government is using the Mexican cartel against the American people?
So by that, by those numbers, you could say we're in four proxy wars.
In which we have an estimation of 15 to 20 million people illegally into this country.
That is literally overtaking and bankrupting Chicago to the tune of over 400 million dollars per year.
And they are in a deficit.
Oakland is going out of business.
San Francisco, ditto.
California, 65 billion dollar deficit.
New York, they're literally cutting trash in which they are the rattiest, dirtiest city.
And they've taken up resources as far as free health care, free hotels to the tune of six hundred dollars a day.
They're literally taking over your schools.
Your taxpayer dollars are going to fund the migrant crisis.
She was supposed to be in charge of this.
We have a failing economy.
Every single day, I see people getting on the internet talking about $30 an hour is the new minimum wage because inflation is fucking out of control.
At one point, it was at almost 10%, depending on what city that you were in.
She has no policy, no record to stand on.
One of the biggest things that she did in her career was lock up more black men than ever before, but we sit here and vote her in office on identity politics.
The very person that she was under as far as the president of the United States of America, she called him racist during a debate, which shows you how fake she is.
And the only thing that we can stand on from a policy perspective is whether or not she's black and she's a woman.
We did that during the Obama administration and he didn't do anything for black people.
As a matter of fact, y'all complain because the only person that he did or the only group of people that he really stood for is the alphabet community.
And that's his landmark thing that he's still standing on today.
So the only thing that we have to stand on is identity politics.
That shit didn't work with Tiffany Henyard in Dalton, Illinois.
It didn't work with Karen Bass.
It didn't work with Lori Lightfoot in Chicago.
It didn't work with Brandon Johnson that then took over her position in Chicago.
It didn't work with Andre Dickens in Atlanta.
It didn't work with Eric Adams in New York.
It doesn't work across the country.
Every single Democratic city is a hellhole.
And we...
Anton Daniels, everybody.
Yeah, he's exactly right.
Who knows how much that actually is going to resonate with the black community as a whole.
I have no idea, but that's certainly interesting.
People right now, leftists, are in the process of scrubbing Kamala Harris's record on Wikipedia.
They're trying to say that she was never the border czar.
Even the press is now having an issue with that.
They're now trying to say, they're putting out articles saying she was never the border czar.
Even though we do have, let's see, yeah, here it is right here.
The Wikipedia removed Kamala's name from the list of official government.
Yeah, let me throw this up there.
Yeah, the dank night.
Wikipedia just this second removed Kamala's name from the list of official government border czars.
Not joking.
I checked two minutes ago.
Now it's gone.
Soviet Russia would be impressed with the left's speed.
Peter Doocy asking Kareem Jean-Pierre about this contract.
Democrats on Capitol Hill are being handed this card with talking points.
about the vice president and the border.
Do you know who's handing this out?
I have no idea.
You probably should ask for a campaign.
So the first one says, Vice President Harris was never appointed border czar.
There has never been such a position.
It doesn't exist.
Why are Democrats so sensitive about the vice president and the border?
Why are Republicans so sensitive about actually not owning up to them getting in the way of a border deal?
Why?
Why won't they own up to that?
Why won't they own up to what the last president told them not to move forward?
It was a bipartisan deal just right there, available to them, and they voted twice against it.
Obviously, so she's lying and obfuscating here.
Here's a House resolution.
Obviously, resolutions are not binding.
But House Resolution 253 in 2023, it actually references that in 2021, whereas on March 24, 2021, Vice President Kamala Harris was named the border czar in charge of leading efforts to stem migration across the United States-Mexico border.
Whereas Vice President Harris visited the southern border Once since President Biden appointed her, you know, it's just, come on.
Come on, guys.
It's all over there.
We all know the truth.
But what that shows you is, you know, if you go back to that Anton Daniels clip, and, you know, there are more and more black people who are aware that their neighborhoods are being invaded and being made more dangerous by third world barbarians.
I mean, there's no other way to say it.
So there's that.
And in the meantime...
President Biden, who the media told us over the last three weeks, the media has been turning on Biden, suggesting he's unfit to run for a second term, and there's something wrong with him.
All of the meltdowns, the people claiming that, oh, on the night that I watched the debate, we had to put certain Democrat congressmen on suicide watch.
People were thinking about jumping out of the building.
They couldn't believe he was doing so bad.
We've got to do something.
Now those same people and those same media personalities, those same media companies are now trying to tell us that Joe Biden is now mentally fit because they don't want him to resign.
They just wanted him to not run for re-election.
Here's CNN having a meltdown at somebody just suggesting that, hey, Joe Biden has no business being president right now.
Somebody says he had to.
They don't understand the presidency.
If he if he were investigated and he was about to be impeached and maybe removed.
So obviously false that it's not so obviously false.
I'm telling you, he did not have to give it up.
He's still there for six months when he's manifestly incapable.
Tell me how, you know, he's manifestly incapable.
I'm sorry to say that this is a sensitive matter where there are a lot of folks who have been talking about this for some time.
Oh yes, I've heard them too.
My doctor tells me he thinks he might have something, but he also says, but he's not my patient.
And look, the deeper problem, the deeper question is, who is actually in charge at any given time?
You know, this notion that he's only sharp for six hours a day.
Who is actually in charge?
I've been saying this.
If the warmongers wanted to start a nuclear war with Russia tomorrow, no one, not one person on that panel would think it was Joe Biden that decided to drop the bomb.
That's a problem.
And so all of us would be like, well, who was it?
Was it Tony Blinken?
Was it the Secretary of Defense?
You know, who actually was it?
Was it the White House Chief of Staff?
Was it Jill Biden?
Was it Hunter Biden?
Was it Barack Obama?
You know, trying to work the Bidens like a puppet?
No one would know and that is a tyrant's dream.
That is a dictator's dream where they can do whatever they want and no one person can be held responsible for it.
This is an incredibly volatile moment in part because of his failures.
Everything you're saying, I'm sorry, is speculation.
Let me tell you what is not speculation.
It's not speculation.
It is speculation because actually, unlike you, I've actually seen the guy at 9 o'clock at night.
I have seen him after he has had five different events in 24 hours.
Might that cloud your judgment?
What?
Do you think that makes you more objective?
Well, I think the fact that I have actually seen him when I was just reading gossip, and speculation gossip...
We all saw the debate.
We all saw the debate where Joe Biden was clearly incompetent, unable to address questions that he should have been able to address.
We know that Robert Herr, America...
Enough of that.
These same people, I mean, they have no credibility left.
You guys already know that.
Let's talk about something that I want to talk about, which is woke preacher clips.
Woke preacher clips with this gem that I think this is really good, and this really kind of shows you how people...
There's this urge on the left with leftist churches.
They want to try to separate the God of the Old Testament.
From the God of the New Testament, which is, I shouldn't even say it that way, because there's one God in the Bible.
He's the same and unchanging in the Old and in the New Testament.
He's the same.
But they want to try to somehow explain it away to make it conform to our 21st century sensibilities about death, about who has authority over death, and who has authority over their own creatures, okay, as God does, because He's our Creator.
So there's this preacher with a really bad take.
And we've got this for you.
Woke preacher clips.
He doesn't cite exactly where this is.
Maybe he does over on this one.
Do we have it?
No, we don't.
We don't actually have it.
But here is...
Just listen to this, and I'm going to tell you where this guy's totally wrong.
Final plague was every firstborn son was going to die.
Now...
Do you see the irony of that?
Because God sent his firstborn son to die for them.
But it says the angel of death goes through Egypt.
And we instantly put our minds that see God killed those people.
No, the angel of death is from Satan, not God.
God did not kill the firstborn.
He went like this.
You want death?
You got it.
So tie this in, tie this in to Romans 12, 18.
Oh, excuse me, not yet, not yet.
This is why I've hammered this for years, guys.
You have to take Jesus to the Old Testament.
You can't take the Old Testament to Jesus.
Okay, so that's ridiculous, and I see why they've got, I mean, this is a padded room.
This looks like a padded room.
I think this guy belongs in a padded room, because what he's saying is actually nuts.
Jesus is the perfect final word of God.
So here's what Jesus said in John 10.
The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy.
The thief.
I have come so that they may have life and may have it abundantly.
So that angel of death in the Old Testament...
Was not God killing them.
It was them getting what they wanted.
And God went like this.
Okay.
No.
First of all, the Egyptians didn't want to die and they didn't want their unborn children to die.
This is just an example of a really bad shepherd that doesn't want to admit That God is who he says he is in scripture because he's afraid it's going to offend people.
Literally, Moses declared, this is in Exodus 11, this is what the Lord says about midnight, I will go throughout Egypt and every firstborn son in the land of Egypt will die.
So he's literally saying, then you will know that I am the Lord, makes the distinction between Egypt and Israel.
Oh, is that the, that's, anyway, this is clear.
Okay?
It's clear.
No, this was the Lord.
But why does this guy, why does a guy like this feel so uncomfortable?
I mean, is he going to say that it wasn't God that destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah as well?
No, here's the deal.
It was God.
It was God that killed all the firstborns in the land of Egypt.
And here's the kicker.
He was fully justified in doing so.
Fully, totally good and righteous to do that.
And what's interesting, if you take the whole story of the Exodus and you go all the way back to the beginning of the story...
Where Pharaoh decides to kill all of the firstborn Hebrew children.
And this is the whole reason why Moses gets sent down the river.
The whole reason that he did it is because Pharaoh assumed that he had the righteous authority to kill all of the firstborn children.
And he killed.
He spilled a lot of blood.
But he didn't actually have that authority.
And he wasn't righteous.
He had the authority, but he wasn't righteous in doing so.
However, the Lord, the Lord God Almighty, was righteous in enacting the angel of death to go through the Egyptian civilization and kill all the firstborn children, except in the land of Goshen, where people had lamb's blood smeared on their doorposts.
And with that, that's all the time that we have.
Let me know what you think about all of that in the comments.
I mean, we've got to combat stuff like this.
This is an easy one.
This is a softball.
But on the Millstone Report, yeah, we're going to combat stuff like this.
Because, you know, there are kids in the audience as well that they need to know who God really is, not who this guy wants God to be to try to, again, comport with the so-called evolved sensibilities of our civilization where we are still murdering children, by the way.
We're not any different from those past civilizations.
So this is the part where I tell you that you need to go to church.
Okay, if you're not going to church, please find a church that preaches the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ and go worship Him on the Lord's Day for all of you who do go to church.
I hope that you have a wonderful weekend, a restful weekend, and that you enjoy the Lord's Day.
And unless I'm providentially hindered, I will see you back here on Monday.
Thank you so much for being with us.
▲
Export Selection