Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 9, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

56:35

LIVE: Woke Feminist Judges REBUKED By SCOTUS, Deep State GATEKEEPERS Fight Over TRUMP's VP Pick

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I'm on a very specific mission.
	We have to identify who the real enemy is.
	We have to know where does this infiltration come from.
	The American people need a warrior that's unafraid to point out the real enemy.
	The American people are deserving of truth, exposure and extreme accountability for the crimes against humanity that are being committed.
	We're on the brink of the complete collapse of America, while at the same time at the precipice of an amazing victory.
	If we want to prevent our children from facing a future bloodbath, I mean, I'm talking mass amounts of bloodshed, we need to step up and fight this war, and we need to fight it now.
	Uncensored.
	I refuse to be silenced or muzzled.
	Unafraid.
	No man will intimidate me.
	Unstoppable.
	So it's no secret, it's really no surprise to anyone that over the past several years and really over the course of, I don't know, several decades, our government, our fake government at all levels, our supposedly elected our government, our fake government at all levels, our supposedly elected officials and representatives, all of their minions, they've made some boneheaded and at times actually treasonous decisions in regards to how this country is how our civil liberties are handled.
	And while our system of checks and balances allows the judiciary to rein these people in when needed, for years everyone knows that around the country there's these various courts and federal districts or judges that are very out of touch with that principle.
	So instead of safeguarding our Constitution, they've actually encouraged its destruction.
	Quite often they've actively participated in that destruction.
	Most of the time these judges lean very far to the left.
	They're called activist judges.
	It's extremely rare for any of these activist judges to be some kind of right-wing zealot because most of the time people would classify themselves as right-wingers or conservatives.
	They take the Constitution and take our system of law and order very seriously.
	Or at least they claim to.
	They try to abide by it.
	But on the left, there's always been an issue with these left-wing judges legislating from the bench.
	Taking advantage of our system, bypassing the legislature, holding up blatantly illegal legislation written by corrupt legislators.
	But because the way our system is structured, these rulings, even the very worst ones, can eventually work their way up to the Supreme Court where they can be corrected.
	Now for years the Supreme Court has been unreliable at best.
	They legalized gay marriage all over the country.
	They spent decades making landmark decisions that have flown in the face of everything that we believe America stands for.
	But over the past few years, that has started to change a little bit, in large part because President Trump was able to appoint three Supreme Court justices during his first term.
	The justices that he appointed, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, they haven't been without fault.
	They've all made very poor decisions at different times as far as their rulings go, but they've also joined forces with the likes of Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito to issue groundbreaking rulings like the overturning of Roe v.
	Wade.
	So if you ask most people, they'll tell you the Supreme Court at its current count has five conservative judges, three liberal judges, and one toss-up.
	Toss-up, of course, is the infamous John Roberts, who was appointed by George W. Bush, was supposed to be the next great constitutionalist to run the court, but he's been a complete and total disaster.
	He's actually a fraud.
	He's a traitor.
	But knowing what we know about George W. Bush, that should come as no surprise.
	But regardless, under its current structure, the court has been able to make some extremely meaningful decisions, and recently there's been two really big ones.
	They just took a baseball bat to the persecution of many J6 patriots when they deemed that the DOJ's treatment of these people is a violation of their constitutional right to a speedy trial, among other things.
	There are people who have been held in federal custody for upward of three years now with no trial.
	Three years, no trial.
	An obvious violation of their constitutional rights.
	No law-abiding government is allowed to arrest people and then just hold them indefinitely until they can come up with a way to convict them and keep them in jail under torturous conditions.
	It's disgusting.
	And on the heels of that ruling, the court made another big one with regards to President Trump, and really all U.S. presidents for that matter.
	They ruled that the president is immune to prosecution when executing his official duties.
	So once again, the ruling takes a baseball bat to the Biden DOJ and all of these left-wing persecutors and their attempts to take down President Trump and the America First movement by rigging the justice system and perverting our courts so they can cling to power.
	And this Trump ruling, you know, it's been reported in the media like the Supreme Court just moved to allow Trump to become a dictator or something, which of course is completely false.
	It's not true at all.
	Yet, just another hyperbolic, ridiculous talking point that's been picked up and regurgitated over and over again by psychopaths like Joy Reid.
	Our friend Kurt Doolittle has been following along very closely with the recent Supreme Court rulings, including the Trump ruling.
	He posted a little reality check to X the other day, writing, quote, The Trump ruling was not only a narrow, but a codification of an unwritten law dating all the way back to the founders.
	Presidents must be immune from criminal prosecution for their acts as president, or they may not take actions necessary as president in the face of uncertainty and risk.
	However, this ruling does not render them immune from murder, theft, etc. as a private citizen external to their role as president, murdering your wife, raping an intern, or embezzling funds, for example.
	And it does not render them immune from impeachment.
	The left has no respect for reciprocity, sovereignty, rule of law, and only power, so the codification of the customary law has been a long time coming.
	Nothing new here.
	I expected this ruling.
	End quote.
	So, really, in this case, the Supreme Court did exactly what it's designed to do.
	And although this was far from a unanimous ruling being split down what you could term as partisan lines, the court managed to make the right decision.
	Kurt Doolittle is with us now for more on this.
	Kurt, really, in this case, the Supreme Court did exactly what it's designed to do.
	Is that right?
	Yeah, no, no.
	You know, you sound like a constitutional expert on the matter with that soliloquy there, so I'm kind of impressed with what you covered.
	Yes, they did the right thing.
	They did the right thing in this case.
	They just codified what was already in stand.
	It wasn't a big reach for them, and it was something most of us who are, you know, fairly skilled in these matters predicted.
	There's just, there was no way that we're going to let that stand.
	It's unfortunate for Trump that it takes so long to work up through the process, but it was, in my opinion, deterministic.
	Although you did see the fruitcakes on the court continue their little tirades, but the court did come to the right decision.
	So in America, some fake or installed president like the guy in the skin suit pretending to be Joe Biden They just can't come in with some staff full of Stalinists and start throwing people in jail because they don't like the policy decisions they made four years ago, etc.
	So, I mean, I think this is an obvious rule.
	Why was it split down the middle?
	How could this not be unanimous?
	Because those people that voted against it were, if you read their opinions, which is kind of Intellectually insulting.
	They're actually in favor of being able to take someone down through the court system.
	And I think it's, from my opinion, is they just don't understand, which is a common criticism, they don't understand the history of this matter and why it's so important in that presidents have a difficult position and that there is already remedy through the matter of impeachment.
	And impeachment provides the remedy to get rid of someone, but what they don't want it to do is turn the court into the fight nightclub where the court's asked to resolve disputes over things that are really just political assassinations or attempts at hyperbole and other nonsense.
	I mean, the example would be flipping the case around.
	Do we really care that Clinton had oral sex with an intern?
	In the Oval Office.
	I mean, he's not exactly the first guy to, I mean, first president to philander in the White House.
	Well, I mean, as a Christian, I care.
	I don't want that happening in the White House.
	But that's a moral problem, right?
	And that's a matter for us to say about him in a voting cycle.
	But it's not a matter for us to say, okay, well, This is, does this, was this an abuse of power in the office that affects the public and, you know, public and private matters being what they are?
	I don't like, I didn't, I'm not, I mean, my advocate, my position on Clinton was, well, let's just vote him out of office, but I don't think what he did is criminal in the sense that it's, it has an, the specific act had a specific act.
	Or acts or whatever they were, had a long, an impact on policy.
	I think what the Christian argument would be, which is the one I would support, is that a person who makes moral, questionable moral judgments like that is not someone who wants to, in the position of making grander moral judgments about policy.
	Yeah.
	You know, when you look around at these courts and you look at some of these prosecutors, Kurt, and you look at how this, these very obvious rulings were split down the middle.
	It almost seems like it's not hyperbolic to say that we just absolutely have the absence of the rule of law in this country.
	Do you agree with that?
	I mean, this is like a banana republic.
	It was a systemic attack on our system, especially in the post-war era, but culminating with the ethnic group that most practiced lawfare in the post-war period was extremely successful.
	And using the momentum of the Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War and the time period's collision of classes, so to speak, that resulted from the post-war area.
	They made a very good use of that to push the court in the direction of legal activism.
	What our court is intentionally doing, and we have a group of people, believe it or not, from Yale and Chicago, who created a thing called the Federalist Society back in the 80s.
	And they're the people that said, they were my generation, said, this cannot happen anymore.
	We have to build a lesion of academic Jurists who are capable of restoring the rule of law and ending and reversing lawfare because it bypassed the people, right?
	I mean, the people are sovereign.
	And so our government is set up to require a thing called concurrency, which means that the classes and the regions must agree for legislation to pass.
	So what they did was they made up rights that were poorly codified and they conducted a systematic and intentional design To use race as the means by which to circumvent the people in the legislature and use the court to cause legislation from the bench.
	And the court's basically saying, wow, we really screwed up.
	Abortion was a screw up.
	The marriage thing was a screw up.
	It turns out in retrospect that nobody will like this, but the evidence is inconvertible that most of the race-based nonsense was also harmful.
	Because if you look at the progress of creating a black middle class, a black upper middle class, and a black elite prior to the civil rights movement, they were making more progress faster than they have made since.
	Before this ruling, do you know of any presidents or can you think of any specific action or inaction that a president may not have taken at any given time because they were afraid of this prosecution and not having immunity as the president in their official duties?
	This is getting out of control.
	Our government is sinking a trillion dollars in debt every 100 days.
	That's right, a trillion dollars every 100 days.
	Do you want to bail the government out of debt?
	Yeah, no, I don't think so.
	You see, when people worry about the national debt, they often turn to safe haven assets.
	That's why thousands of people have called GoldCo, the number one rated gold company, so that they can diversify their money with time-tested safe haven assets, physical gold and silver.
	Today, Gold Co.
	is offering fans of this show up to 10% instant match in bonus silver with a qualified account.
	Just call them.
	855-706-GOLD. Again, 855-706-GOLD. Free bonus silver, a half-ounce silver coin, free gold and silver information kit.
	What are you waiting for?
	Safeguard your money with physical gold and silver, just like I did with Gold Co.
	Call 855-706-GOLD. Again, 855-706-GOLD. Or just visit them online at StuLikesGold.com.
	Again, that's StuLikesGold.com.
	Friends, I would like to reserve this book in your name.
	It's called A Navy Seal's Bug-In Guide.
	Inside of this book, Joe Lambert reveals everything that you need to do to ensure that you never have to leave your home during dark times, creating a self-sufficient fortress that will sustain you and your family for however long it takes, even years until things get back to normal.
	You'll discover exactly what to do, what to stockpile inside, and how much of it.
	Long-lasting foods, water, communication devices, a survival generator, and many other items that you'll need to successfully bug in for months or even years.
	The immediate payoff of having these projects is that they make you independent, self-sufficient on your own property.
	You don't want to depend on anyone, especially the government, for your basic needs.
	Go to BugInGuide.com to take advantage of a surprise gift that can help you out a lot in the next crisis.
	This book offer won't be available for long.
	Go to BugInGuide.com.
	slash stew that's bugginguide.com slash stew I mean pick a I mean I'll take the big outstanding What if the Cuban Missile Crisis had blown up?
	You want the president prosecuted over that?
	Conversely, do you want him to not make the right decision because he's afraid of being prosecuted?
	Or even in this case, you know, I'm of the camp because I was going to go.
	The January 6th was just another, you know, political event and that the narrative made up about it is ridiculous.
	In comparison to the bombings that the Democrats and the left did when I was a kid in the 60s and 70s.
	I mean, Congress, they bombed Congress, you know?
	I mean, so this is nothing.
	And we were living under the tyranny, the urban tyranny of the left for two summers.
	So I don't understand why you would look at this thing that way other than It had more direct political coercive power than the left's activities did.
	Have you ever looked into what may have happened had Trump decided, hey, I'm just not leaving?
	Of course.
	But I understand Trump very well.
	I mean, I hate to say that I think like him, but it's more that He wrote the book, The Art of the Deal.
	And if you understand that book, you understand how clearly he thinks about the world and why he talks as he does.
	And so, from my understanding, he's trying to build a heroic legacy.
	And all he wanted was, if he was delegitimized, that was not helping him achieve his goals.
	And so what he wants to be known is the guy who saved America from the left prior to its fall.
	And certainly in foreign policy, he's already done it.
	In domestic policy, he couldn't get it done because the Congress was too much of an obstacle.
	But if he had actually said that, he'd done that.
	It would have been counter to his objectives.
	He knew, because I'm only one degree separated, he knew that what he would need to say if he wanted those people to actually revolt.
	He knew the words he needed to say, and so did enough of the key people in the world know what he had to say, and he could have had that thing turn into something.
	He didn't.
	All he was looking for was he honestly, like many conservatives, believed this was not an honest election.
	And despite the arguments of the left, that's still an open question, no matter how many times they try to create reality by chanting that this case has been solved.
	In the minds of the American people, That was a question and he felt it needed to be asked and the people that were coming to protest were protesting because they thought the matter needed at least in the inquiry and I agreed with that and so I still agree with it but would he have done anything?
	I don't know.
	He knew exactly what to do if he wanted to create a civil conflict and he didn't do it and he didn't do it because He has a very moral goal in mind.
	I mean, I can take the other position.
	It's not like I'm a little fanboy here.
	I can take the opposite position, but I just happen to understand how Trump thinks.
	It's like women can't understand men, but men can understand women sometimes.
	The right can understand the left, but the left can't understand the right.
	Trump's not complicated.
	He's actually profoundly moral.
	He just will use the left against themselves, and they hate it.
	And so if you understand what he's doing, and if he had a press secretary more like me than the ones he's chosen, it would be easy for him to make his hyperbolic statements, which is intentional on his part, and then the media would outrage, and then the press secretary would be able to stand up and say, well, here's what's really going on.
	And that would actually be an incredibly powerful thing for President Trump to bring about.
	But for some reason, his selection process for his public representatives appears to be too sentimental and not strategic enough.
	It's an interesting take.
	Is this a double-edged sword?
	So, I mean, I know that this ruling doesn't allow for a president to take inappropriate or, you know, sexually inappropriate showers with your daughter, as Ashley Biden has written in her diary.
	It doesn't allow for you to...
	Oh, my God!
	Jesus!
	Yeah, and I think that Trump should have taken that diary right up on that debate stage and just read directly from it.
	Everybody knows its legitimacy at this point.
	Yeah.
	Those are her words written as an adult.
	He's really German aristocracy.
	He thinks like old German aristocracy.
	For him to make an off-the-cup comment about it would probably be one thing, but he would view that as beneath him.
	I think, to really get up there and delve into it.
	Well, the media is not reporting it, and I think that it's unfair for the American people to not know about it.
	Trump has sway and an influence over hundreds of millions of people.
	I agree.
	No, Stu, I agree.
	But, you know, you have a job, and you're exceptional in your job.
	I have a job, right?
	We have jobs to inform the public that wants to hear in the frame that they can understand.
	He's got his own frame and his own agenda.
	And by and large, it works.
	If we were to ask him to do everything we do, like we do, how would that affect the rest of what he does?
	And I'm not sure that's a good idea.
	I think it's better that we divide the labor so that he does what he does.
	You do what you do.
	I do what I do.
	The other guys do what they do.
	And we move the needle that way, rather than wanting to take all the burden off of us, because it is a burden, right?
	I mean, you work hard.
	Your team is amazing.
	I work hard.
	I'm very proud of my team.
	And, you know, there's a lot of guys out there who are working toward this, maybe not as good as you are, but they're working out there toward this.
	And if we ask Trump to be the lone man, what would happen?
	If we ask any leader to be the lone iconography of it, If that guy goes, what happens?
	We're ended.
	But if we all keep converging, which we are, it's taking us a long time as the right to converge.
	But if we keep converging, we're going to win.
	And so I probably have a different sentiment to a lot of people on the right, and that's that the right likes to solve a clear problem, hard, fast, and now and have it over with.
	This is a very right-wing disposition.
	The left does it the other way.
	They say we're going to incrementally undermine everything until we get to where we're there.
	We're never going to tell anybody what we're doing.
	So we have polar opposites.
	I'm not exactly in the middle, but I'm in the classical liberal sense of I understand how slowly things move and how complicated they are to get people's minds to change.
	And so I don't expect our leaders to do More than what they're able to do, while still preserving their ability to act in the capacity we've asked them to.
	So, I mean, although Biden can't do these things, and no president can do these things personally, molest your daughter, etc., make deals with Burisma, take bribes from foreign countries, extort leaders, all of that is.
	However, do you fear that this ruling is a double-edged sword in the sense that Now Biden could use the authority of executive powers to become more brazen in his quest to damage the country, or whoever's pulling his strings, whether it be Valerie Jarrett, Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu.
	I don't think so, because it's the kind of money and power and interest it takes to do this stuff in New York City.
	It's very easy to do in New York City against Trump.
	But when you bring it outside of New York City in a narrow focus of a rich guy like that, what are you going to go after someone like him for?
	That's pretty hard.
	I'm trying to answer your question, and I feel like from your reaction, I'm being too vague about it.
	But what I'm really saying is that in the case of Biden, there needs to be some...
	I hate to do this.
	Let's just say in general, if you found out that a guy was doing something clearly untoward, not questionable, but untoward.
	To me, showering with your daughter is pretty off the charts, combined with his sniffing babies and other weird behaviors he's got.
	I mean, he's clearly got some issue there.
	But when you get into, is he doing anything that is criminalizable Outside of his role as the president, and in particular, in the case of, let's say, the child molestation or something like that, that's a high crime.
	That's not a minor thing.
	We could get someone out of office like that, though I expect it to be something on the order of, we would do it through impeachment instead of In other words, the courts is the wrong place to dismantle a president.
	If he were impeached, obviously the Senate would never move to convict and he would never be removed.
	So, in the case of Alejandro Mayorkas, it's all just kind of a show, isn't it?
	When was the last time that an impeachment actually did something positive for Americans?
	It doesn't work.
	I mean, that was my college thesis on the presidency in college.
	It says that impeachment doesn't work.
	The impeachment doesn't work in the sense of it's too hard to get someone actually impeached.
	So what does work?
	I mean, I believe that there's absolutely a political solution.
	A lot of people, when I say that we're running out of time, We have to do something.
	We have to rise up.
	When I say militia is not a bad word, oftentimes people put me in this narrow box where they believe that I'm saying, well, we need to violently overthrow the government or pick up arms against our government.
	I don't think that the American citizenry is really going to go to battle with the United States military.
	I just don't.
	I mean, I don't see that as being a winnable battle.
	We would win.
	Fast, actually.
	Yeah.
	And they know that.
	Yeah.
	Well...
	People don't want to do it, but I'm just...
	The reality is that there's not a There are only two cities in the United States that the police force is large enough to do anything meaningful.
	And the United States government, if you look at the fieldable personnel, it's too small to do.
	You can't even hold a foreign country, more or less a domestic...
	But I think that this needs to be a very decentralized effort, because I think that once you start to identify...
	I was trying to counter that issue.
	Sorry, I don't want to interrupt you, but I want to clarify.
	I was just saying that I have an issue that I want to take off the table that If we wanted to, it could happen.
	But our goal needs to be to not need to make that happen.
	Right.
	That's my point.
	Yeah.
	And I think that it's certainly winnable.
	So, I mean, what do you do?
	Take a generational approach to this where, you know, over the generations, we just start to restore the rule of law in this country?
	Or do you think that there's just not enough time for that?
	What is the political solution?
	There's not enough time.
	The political solution is Is to make the government capable of funding by what you would say, I would say, it takes two million people in Washington to see for 90 days.
	That's what it's going to take to have it happen.
	And I think you already know that if I understand your thinking correctly.
	That's what it's going to take.
	It's going to take the- I've said three to five.
	I've said three to five million.
	Right, but the reason I say that is I've done a million one.
	In Ukraine, so I've done one.
	I know what happens with a million.
	So what happens when you get a million is you get two million.
	What happens when you get two million, you get five.
	If we had five million people in DC for 90 days, it'd be over.
	What would they be there doing?
	The purpose of getting there is to be able to state a message for the redress of grievances, a set of demands.
	And those demands have to be reasonable and moral.
	In other words, we don't have to get everything at that meeting.
	We have to get enough to fix the institution so that we bring about the correction.
	I've done most of this work.
	I mean, it's something I've worked on for a very long time.
	But you're right, it's going to take two, three, five, I just don't want to see like uniforms, official signups, information sharing.
	I don't want to see that kind of organization because that kind of an entity becomes really easy to smash.
	I think that it needs to be very decentralized where people shut up, don't really talk about what it is that they're doing, but that they are very well organized internally.
	That they keep it a secret until they affect the change that they need to affect by way of action that's discussed behind closed doors.
	The way my organization looks at it is that you have to have a plan ready, but the event will be an opportunity seized, not a plan brought to fruition.
	In other words, you need a solution to the problem, and you need to make people aware of the conflict.
	In essence, I'm agreeing with you.
	We have to seize an opportunity that the government does something or brings about some crisis that is so agitating that those 5 million people will show.
	But we can't engineer it.
	I know because I've had the FBI in my kitchen too often to tell me not to do that.
	It's absolutely possible, both ways, but the way to make it The way to survive that conflict is to make sure it's spontaneous.
	You have a plan, but the opportunity is spontaneous.
	Kurt Doolittle, I can't wait to sit down with you in person and talk more about the specifics of that type of action.
	Thank you so much for coming.
	You have a thing, I guess.
	It's coming soon, don't you?
	You know, we're going to be talking about that upcoming with this extreme accountability stuff.
	I had kind of an epiphany.
	I had a revelation over this past holiday weekend about that.
	And so I'm going to be addressing that publicly here very soon.
	But in any event, we will get together privately, personally, and discuss this in greater detail.
	Thanks for all your work.
	Yeah.
	Thank you so much for being here.
	We appreciate you.
	There's a whole bunch of stories that have to be dug into, rethought, reconsidered, and in some cases completely discarded.
	As modern Americans, we've been spoon-fed this dumbed-down, cartoonish, simplified version of history.
	It's all fake.
	It's all bullshit.
	Everything that we have been taught is part of a self-serving narrative written by the people who will say and do anything to keep us on a leash.
	Now, this version of history, some big-name corrupt families like the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds and their many associates are credited over and over and over again with propelling human development.
	Throughout the late 18 and early 1900s, almost every major American city was burnt to the ground.
	What if we really are quite literally living atop the ashes of an advanced civilization that's been hidden from us for our entire lives?
	I'm going to ask you for your undivided attention because I'm going to tell you about what could possibly be the most important life-saving supplement that I have ever talked about in It's called Cardio Miracle.
	Each serving of Cardio Miracle has a combination of over 50 high quality ingredients, including a huge variety of fruits, vegetables, amino acids, and herbs, all of which come together to promote your body's ability to produce nitric oxide.
	Nitric oxide is so important for heart health.
	It helps to relax and dilate your blood vessels, which supports blood flow and circulation.
	And I love that you don't have to take this giant pill to get all of this nutrition.
	No.
	Cardio Miracle comes in a powder formula, so it's really easy to mix all day throughout the day into juice or water and take it at any time.
	That also helps to support mood regulation because it's a neurotransmitter.
	It's a neuromodulator in the brain, so it can support the release of serotonin and dopamine, both of which are really important and involved in mood regulation.
	Cardio Miracle also supports mental clarity, sleep quality, energy levels.
	It can even help with recovery after exercise.
	Nitric oxide is essential for so many functions in the body, and Cardio Miracle supports the production of nitric oxide, so you get many benefits from just one supplement.
	Please go to highpowerheart.com.
	Again, highpowerheart.com.
	I'm telling you, this could quite possibly be the most important supplement that I will ever talk about, Cardio Miracle.
	Go to highpowerheart.com.
	If there is one mineral that you should be worried about not getting enough of, it's magnesium.
	Magnesium is the body's master mineral.
	600 critical reactions, hormone balance, stress management, sleep quality, even digestion is influenced by the presence of magnesium.
	Well, there's two big problems with what I just said.
	Number one, magnesium has been largely missing from U.S. soil since the 1950s.
	I wonder if that's intentional.
	It certainly does explain why up to 75% of the population may be deficient in magnesium.
	Number two, most supplements contain only one or two forms of magnesium, when in reality your body needs seven.
	The only full-spectrum magnesium supplement, the only magnesium supplement on the market that has all seven critical forms is called Magnesium Breakthrough by Bioptimizers.
	And that's why I'm so excited to tell you that I was able to arrange a killer deal for you.
	You won't find this deal on Amazon.
	You won't find this deal on the company's own website.
	This deal is exclusively for you, my audience, and it's for a limited time while supplies last.
	So right now, you can get a bottle of Magnesium Breakthrough for free.
	Just go to magbreakthrough.com slash stewfree.
	Again, that's magbreakthrough.com slash stewfree.
	And get your bottle of Magnesium Breakthrough for free right now today.
	Again, that's magbreakthrough.com slash stewfree.
	Everybody knows that we live under the empire of lies.
	And so, of course, Jerome Powell is no exception.
	This guy is coming out here saying that our economy and the market is strong.
	Do you feel that when you walk out of your front door?
	Do you feel that when you look at your retirement account balances continuing to decline?
	You look at that when you can't afford to go on vacation.
	Do you say, hey, yeah, it's really strong out here.
	I've never been in a better economic position.
	My retirement is safe and secure.
	Well, it could be.
	If you talk to this guy, Carlos Cortez is with us for the Money Minute.
	Cortez Wealth Management has been a sponsor on this program for three years now.
	You're coming on the show more frequently and that's because we want to do a service to people.
	We want to protect people's retirements.
	You're showing people how to do it.
	The government can't touch what you're doing and this actually compounds.
	It makes it safe.
	It's not a scam.
	It's not a hoax.
	You've been doing this for a long time.
	You're an independent fiduciary.
	Most of these people that view our program here, Their financial advisor probably has no idea where their investments lie.
	They're probably investing in Disney and all the pedophile enablers and BlackRock and Vanguard and State Street, all located on Rothschild Boulevard in Tel Aviv.
	And Pfizer, let's not forget our friends at Pfizer.
	Yeah, the murderers.
	Yeah.
	So, I mean, people, to make an appointment with you is really easy, right?
	You just go to CortezWM.com.
	Again, CortezWM.com for Cortez Wealth Management.
	Or you're taking phone calls.
	You're taking a lot of phone calls.
	So sorry about that.
	But I'm not going to apologize to all the people who are helping and who you are helping with your American First Retirement Plan.
	Just make a little pitch here for people to, shameless plug, because you should have no shame.
	You're doing a great service for people.
	Yeah, I appreciate that, Stu.
	Now, we've been doing this for like three or four years now, and it's been an amazing ride.
	Yeah, Jerome Powell.
	I podcast this on this, on Scriptures and Wall Street, on SPN. And basically, I really feel that not only is Joe Biden just like he can't even put sentences together, but I really feel like the Fed is going to try to control this whole I mean, we all know that it's going to be rigged somehow.
	We saw that Joe Biden posted just today that he's going to veto the bill from Mike Johnson saying that the illegals, the undocumented 9 million people that are here illegally can still vote.
	Yeah.
	It's terrible.
	And you add in that with Jerome Powell of...
	Him trying to hold off on the rate cuts.
	Why are you holding off on rate cuts when we need the rate cuts so that our economy can grow?
	So what they're doing is they're just waiting for an election and then all of a sudden we're going to see inflation cool down.
	All of a sudden we're going to see rate cuts and banks are stronger and the economy is stronger, consumer, job reports, everything.
	These criminal banksters are just going to keep on lying is what they're going to do and they're playing with your entire future.
	And they're playing a very dangerous game with your money because they don't care about your money.
	They don't care about your children.
	They would rather that you and your children die or just go away and go sit down and shut up.
	And so the way that they can achieve that is by financially incapacitating you, financially decapitating you, cutting it off, taking everything out of your retirement accounts, taxing the ever-loving hell out of you, making sure that you can't afford to feed your family.
	All of these things are being done very intentionally so they can set up a rigged system that makes you dependent on the government to usher in this one-world governance.
	Be independent of that.
	Contact Carlos Cortez.
	Call him today, 813-448-3446.
	Again, 813-448-3446 or visit him online worldwide at CortezWM.com.
	More of the Stu Peter Show next.
	So as this year's presidential race has shaped up, we're hearing a lot of talk about who President Trump might pick to be his running mate.
	So every month or few weeks, we're presented with another trendy pick who the corporate media just loves talking about, who gets all the FaceTime and the Zionist-controlled press, and who we're told, this person is definitely going to be on the GOP ticket alongside the 45th, hopefully 47th president, I guess.
	So early in the race, we were being told that Trump would certainly pick Ron DeSantis as his next vice president.
	And while it sounds kind of comical when you think about it now, back then at the time, people were saying, hey, this is the only way to heal the divisions within the GOP and bring the Desantoids back into Trump's corner.
	And once all of that cleared up and it was realized, Desantis is going nowhere.
	We were told that Nikki Haley was the one to pick and that Trump would be joined on the ticket, not just by a woman, but by an Indian woman.
	Dot, not feather.
	And would get the chance to show the whole world how progressive he really is.
	Now, Haley wasn't the only Indian, dot, not feather, or the only woman tapped to be as the potential Trump running mate.
	We also heard a lot of talk about Vivap, Grandma Lama, Deep State, the Swami guy.
	Yep, he was going to join the ticket.
	We were also told that South Dakota Governor Mattress Ladder Climber Kristi Noem was going to be highly considered.
	Now, if you haven't noticed, there's something that most of these potential VP candidates have in common.
	Every single one of them, all of them, represent special interest groups.
	Yeah, they're either women or they're minorities or they're gay or they're Israeli or all of them, minus Ron DeSantis, who might be Israeli, actually.
	So when it comes to Trump VP speculation and the never-ending attempts to get a special interest candidate on this ticket, we can't forget about Tim Scott.
	You know, the black Republican senator from South Carolina, whom we also believe is a homosexual, many do.
	And who many Chamber of Commerce-style Republicans want to plant on Trump's ticket.
	You know why?
	So they can make sure that they have plenty of White House influence over the next four years.
	But, you know, like all of the others I've just mentioned, Tim Scott has glaring issues.
	National voters don't really like him.
	That's because predominantly we're a heterosexual Christian country.
	And there's a good chance that none of these people will actually get the nod, no matter what the media says.
	As we get closer to the convention, the fact seems to be setting in now.
	We're going to have a whole lot more to hear about a guy called Doug Burgum.
	That's the white male governor of North Dakota, who's the latest alleged VP frontrunner after a brief and unsuccessful campaign for the GOP's presidential nomination.
	Now, while some may breathe a sigh of relief at the idea that Trump could avoid the diversity trap in 2024, Doug Burgum is just as bad as the rest of these people.
	His non-threatening white boomer shell is really just a politically expedient cover.
	This week, our good friend Frankie Stocks reported over at National File that Doug Burgum tried bringing communist Chinese business interests to his home state of North Dakota, and now as he tries to curry favor with the Republicans and Donald Trump, he's just lying about it.
	Frankie reported, quote, Doug Burgum initially supported a communist Chinese company's plan to build a $700 million corn mill in Grand Forks, North Dakota.
	Grand Forks is the state's third largest city, and it's just 16 miles from the Grand Forks Air Force Base where the military formerly stored nuclear weapons.
	Despite his early support of the Fufang Project, as it's come to be known, Burgum flip-flopped on the issue as he ran for the GOP nomination for president, and now as he jockeys for a possible Trump VP slot, he's doubling down.
	He's even claiming that he never supported the Fufang project, which was officially shut down in 2023, thanks to widespread opposition from concerned North Dakotans and public officials.
	In addition to the people of North Dakota, the Fufang project was opposed by the United States Air Force and members of Congress from multiple states who cited national security concerns.
	End quote.
	So obviously, Doug Burgum is bad news, to say the least.
	But that never seems to stop Trump from getting involved.
	In politics, he's always been surrounded by people like this.
	And if 2024 is no different, we stand little to no chance of having a legitimate election because Team Trump will stand down and leave their boss hanging in the wind just like Mike Pence the traitor did.
	For more on this, we're now joined by Frankie Stocks.
	So he's just lying now and saying, nope, I never supported that, even though there's actual written proof that he did support this and that it was largely his idea.
	Hey, Stu, thanks for having me.
	And yeah, that's right.
	Doug Burgum's tried to run from this.
	He's tried to paint himself now as some kind of China hawk.
	But, you know, the local media has documented this going back for years.
	You know, back in 2021, he was calling this a great opportunity, not just for Grand Forks, but for the entire state of North Dakota.
	And he didn't let his foot up off the gas.
	Thanks for having me.
	Until this became a national issue, until Congress was having meetings about this, until the Air Force became involved.
	Until then, it was all good.
	He wanted to go ahead with the project.
	Himself and the mayor were lauding this at every turn.
	They were talking about how many jobs it was going to bring into the area.
	You know, it's always the jobs, jobs, jobs talking point that leads to foreign corporations linked to communist regimes being brought in and seizing control of America's means of production.
	I mean, this is this is what we've been told now for years and years and years as countries like China have come into the United States and have started buying up land in mass.
	So they're bringing jobs.
	You know, there's Republican governors.
	I mean, another one's Brian Kemp, who goes around bragging about how many Chinese jobs he's brought to his state.
	So this is this is really endemic among governors of both parties, but especially these pro business Republicans that we hear so much about.
	And Burgum, this guy is not who he's being painted as in the media.
	There was just an article out the other day in one of the We're good to go.
	Doug Burgum comes out of the software world.
	He sold his software company, Great Plains Software, to Bill Gates back in 2001 for over a billion dollars worth of stock.
	And then he stayed on working for Microsoft until the late 2000s.
	And then a few years down the road when he gets into politics, when he runs for governor of North Dakota, Bill Gates gave him $100,000.
	And then when he runs for president in 2024, Bill Gates and Microsoft, they come back and they give him more money.
	The figures I've seen on Open Secrets, on the FEC, Documents are 500,000.
	There could be more.
	I'll continue looking into it.
	But this guy's been backed by Bill Gates his entire career, both politically and nonpolitically.
	You know, something is not right here.
	You say, you know, he's compared to Mike Pence.
	And that's exactly what this is.
	It's trying to plant someone back in the Trump administration to keep an eye on him and to maintain control.
	And that's what Bill Gates is trying to do here.
	And that's Doug Burgum's his guy.
	He's his man-turning candidate.
	Anybody who's propped up by the corporate media, by the Fox News Channel or any of these other so-called conservative media broadcasting companies, you can pretty much bet on them being some sort of a subversive plant.
	I mean, they have connections to evil like Bill Gates.
	Are there any real selections out there for President Trump?
	You know, there's very few of them.
	We're hearing that regardless of who he selects, we're going to hear in the next few days, maybe this week or next week, they're saying that his family and his inner circle wants him to pick J.D. Vance and that the donors, of course the donors, want him to pick Burgum.
	But no, I don't think that there's any kind of...
	Perfect choice out there, at least to anyone who we're talking about politically here who's in the mix.
	I don't think that any of these people are a perfect choice, and I think that they've all kind of played a part.
	You know, Burgum has been up at the courthouse in New York City speaking in support of Trump and all these things, but then he's out on the campaign trail back during his own run for presidency talking about how he'd never do business with Trump, how he thinks that he would be judged poorly if he were keeping company like Donald Trump.
	See, this is what they all do.
	They all talk Talk about Trump and then they want to be sucking up right next to him.
	Every single one of them does this.
	Yeah, exactly.
	They all try to position themselves on this conservative Republican moral high ground.
	I'm so much better than Donald Trump.
	I'm not going to offend you.
	You know, this, that, and the third.
	I would never hurt someone's feelings.
	And then when they want to get swept into power with the guy, they come in riding on his coattails.
	J.D. Vance, the same thing.
	He was a never-Trumper.
	I stood outside the courthouse in Manhattan in New York City listening to J.D. Vance just give this great speech in support of Trump.
	But then in the back of your mind the whole time, it's this guy was a never Trumper.
	You know, he was part of this group of people that wanted to stop him from becoming president in 2016.
	What what does he have to gain in 2024?
	Same with Bergen.
	Well, you're you're a hell of a journalist.
	And I really admire the work that you do over at National File.
	And when you contribute here on the program.
	I mean, everything is always on the up and up.
	You do a lot of research.
	And so because of that, I hate to ask somebody who's really rooted in fact and evidence to make speculations here.
	But do you have an idea, if you're willing to say so, because I respect your opinion, do you think that you might know who it is inside of Trump world or why it is that they constantly want to surround him with people who actually hate him?
	You know, I think that since the very beginning here, Trump has been surrounded by people like Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, the Shabad Lubavitch Zionist, and his little band of associates.
	These are the people who ran the nationalists out of the first Trump administration.
	And I think that these people, regardless of what they have to say, you know, you do hear a lot of chatter about how Kushner's not going to play a big role here anymore.
	It's going to be Don Jr.
	Well, you know, I don't trust that.
	I don't think that that's true at all.
	And I think that that cast of characters is coming back again in 2024 to really take back control, just like they did in 2016.
	And they were also the people who ran the whole thing off the rails.
	You know, what Trump was elected on in 2016 was a historic, you know, America first message.
	People weren't talking like this.
	When we think back to 2012, the time in between there, people weren't talking like this.
	The Overton window has been moved so much by campaigns like that.
	And then in the meantime, by programs like this one, the Overton window has been shifted so far from where it was.
	We're talking about things we never thought we'd be talking about.
	And, you know, I think that now we can all kind of look and say, hey, look, Trump's administration was infiltrated by a permanent Washington lobbying Zio class.
	Jared Kushner's part of it.
	He's gotten this huge donation from Sheldon Adelson's widow, what is it, $500 million, to promise that he's going to support Israel.
	He was on he was on the radio not long ago.
	I reported on this national file talking about how Congress was actually better when Israel had even more influence than they do now.
	So I think that that that Trump's administration was certainly infiltrated by these people.
	And I think, again, here in 2024, we're seeing the same thing.
	Six of one, half dozen of the other.
	When you look at the people they're naming as VP candidates, because you mentioned Tim Scott and they're also talking about Marco Rubio.
	I mean, come on, you know, this is this is crazy. - Oh wow.
	You've got to wonder, because there's definitely somebody, and as you pointed out, Jared Kushner is a huge concern of mine.
	I know that he's a huge concern for a lot of people who realize what the hell is really going on inside of this occupied government that we have.
	And he and Ivanka were outcast from social groups, these million-dollar-a-plate wine-and-dine cocktail parties.
	They lived this ultra-uber-liberal lifestyle.
	They weren't invited to these things anymore, ostensibly.
	They want nothing more than to have that back.
	So what do they do?
	They subvert a campaign.
	They subvert and put into complete chaos a presidential administration where Trump is surrounded originally by the likes of Reince Priebus and traitors like Trump.
	Mike Pence, who was a complete weak quizling, and now he's got all of these quizlings hanging around again.
	For a guy like Donald Trump, who on The Apprentice just noticed insufficiencies and would be like, yeah, you're fired.
	Why isn't he doing that to these people who continue to surround himself?
	What does that say about the fighter, President Donald Trump, the message of 2015 going into 2016, who said, you know, F everybody, this is what we're going to do.
	Why doesn't he pick somebody who's just as strong as he purports to be, or at least as his image is portrayed to us, you know, by the media?
	I mean, the guy's a great counterpuncher.
	He loves to make, you know, very quick and unpredictable jabs at people.
	He says things in very short and blunt terms, like what you said, people were not doing that.
	He's not afraid to offend people, which is a breath of fresh air.
	It's incredibly refreshing for everybody, which is why overwhelmingly the electorate got behind the populist message of President Donald Trump.
	So why isn't he firing these people that are around him?
	What do they hold over him?
	Do you speculate it's blackmail or bribery, or do you think that he's just downright being threatened by his paymasters in Israel?
	I honestly think that he's being threatened by his paymasters in Israel.
	I mean, this same group of people, these international banksters, the people who've been in charge of our government for over 100 years now, I mean, it's pretty accepted at this point that these are the people who killed Kennedy.
	You know, back years and years ago, during Trump's first term, there was some prepo journalist from one of the big financial outlets I think that these people have deep-seated power.
	You know, Trump goes over and puts his hands on the wall.
	He wears the tiny hat.
	He does the whole emotional sob story over there.
	That's the humiliation ritual.
	When you see a guy engaging in that, I think that's really how you know that he's been compromised to some extent by these people, by this international Zio coalition that rules our government, rules our media, at many different levels.
	You know, rules academia, the entertainment sector.
	It all plays into itself, and I think that Trump's a big part of it, unfortunately, you know, at this point.
	I think once you come into power, That it's very, very hard to push these people back, and that in his first administration, when he was sort of surrounded by these freaks, that that's what he failed to do.
	He failed to push them back.
	But you're right, he should have gotten up and just started yelling in all their faces, you're effing fire.
	I mean, that's what it's going to take.
	These people have to be flushed out of our government.
	If this is a real populist movement, if this is a real populist campaign, he's going to have to pick a real fire-breathing populist.
	As vice president, we can't have a bunch of people who are getting pulled out of D.C. or pulled out of state capitals all over the country to come in and weigh this thing down again.
	It's not going to work.
	It's all fake.
	100% of it.
	It's all fake.
	The corporate media props up whoever they want to.
	The real fighter, the real firebrand that you're talking about, he exists.
	There is a white Christian male, a strong patriotic fighting male who loves this country and loves his children and will do anything to protect the lives of millions of children, put the interests of Americans and the interests of America first.
	Screw all of these other foreign and special interests and PACs and lobbies that are infecting and infesting the D.C. beltway and all of the...
	Filthy, filthy, disgusting, parasitic cockroaches that occupy D.C. There is that guy out there.
	There's no question about that.
	But he will never be seen.
	He'll never be seen because he's not putting on that tiny, embarrassingly ridiculous hat and French kissing a wall on Israel.
	He's not going to Israeli soil and signing anti-free speech legislation like Ron DeSantis did for the free sunshine state of Florida.
	So they're not going to get known.
	They're not going to be in the media, period.
	Frankie Stocks, great reporting.
	Always love you being here.
	Welcome back anytime.
	Thank you, Steve.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	The world is becoming more and more unstable by the day.
	First a war on our children, now a war on our money.
	When will it end?
	The government's corruption is even more prevalent today, causing the state of our spiraling economy to be normalized.
	I'm not waiting around to find out how much worse it could get.
	That's why I decided to protect my money with gold and silver.
	Now, you know me.
	I only partner with the best companies who I feel are doing the right thing for the American people.
	GoldCo has helped thousands of Americans place over $2.5 billion in gold and silver.
	They're my top choice.
	And right now, they're offering you up to a 10% match in bonus silver with a qualified account.
	Just for being a supporter of the Stu Peters Network.
	So don't wait.
	Call them today.
	855-706-GOLD. Again, 855-706-GOLD. Or just visit them at StuLikesGold.com.
	Again, StuLikesGold.com.
	Don't let this chaotic world get in the way of your livelihood.
	Protect your money before it's too late.
	Call them.
	855-706-GOLD. Or visit them online at StuLikesGold.com.
	You know, a lot of people think they're ready for what's coming.
	Some world government roaming the streets of the United States, seizing guns from Americans, disarming you.
	A lot of people think, oh, when the deep state comes or the zombie apocalypse happens, I'm totally ready.
	In today's world, you have to be prepared for everything.
	It's not just an option, it's a necessity.
	When it comes to protecting my friends and family and ensuring that we're getting ready for any emergency, I choose American reserves.
	With American Reserves, you're not just buying peace of mind.
	No, you're investing in high-quality, long-shelf life emergency food, top-notch water filtration products, essential survival gear designed to keep you safe and your kids safe no matter what.
	In emergency situations, having these products will keep you and your family alive.
	I'm not overstating this.
	And I know the people at American Reserves.
	I love doing business with them because they're patriots.
	They're Christians.
	They care truly about your family's preparedness.
	So don't wait for the emergency to find you and your family unprepared.
	Visit AmericanReserves.com today.
	If you use the discount code STEW, you'll get 10% off everything.
	Take the first step towards securing your family's safety with American Reserves.
	You're not just ready, you're prepared for anything.

▲