All Episodes
Previous Next
June 24, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
56:50
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: U.S. Weapons KILL Civilians INSIDE Of Russia, How Will Putin React?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
People say we need to make America great again.
I completely agree.
agree we may need to make Gallows great again.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody, everybody, everybody.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen.
Hello, America.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Again, my name is Paul Harrell.
This is the Millstone Report.
Hope everybody had a blessed Lord's Day, a great weekend.
But a lot happened over the weekend.
Over the weekend, the world was brought one step closer to World War III and the possibility of nuclear war.
It's been several weeks since the Biden administration gave Zelensky permission to use NATO weapons technology and attack inside of Russia.
The Ukrainians took advantage of this permission and immediately attacked one of Russia's radar stations meant to detect long-range nuclear missile strikes and attacks.
In response, Russian President Vladimir Putin retaliated by sending battleships to Cuba and Venezuela along with submarines and presumably leaving behind hypersonic missile technology pointed right at the United States.
Then last week Putin traveled to Asia and he met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and they announced a historic partnership which creates the possibility of Russia supplying North Korea with weapons as well.
Putin even warned the South Koreans against sending any weapons to Ukraine and what that would mean for the security of South Korea and South Koreans.
Next, Putin was given a royal welcome in Vietnam, showing that there are more and more countries who just don't care about the West as United States power and influence is crumbling right before our eyes.
However, in another act of escalation, or another attempt at poking the Russian bear, more on that in a minute, Ukraine launched a TACAMS cluster missiles in Crimea against a civilian population on the beach trying to relax and soak up the sun.
According to reports, Russia was attacked by five TACAMS cluster missiles, and four of them were shot down, and the fifth was shot down as well, but not before parts of the destroyed missile or cluster munitions themselves landed on the beach, killing Russians, including children, and wounding at least killing Russians, including children, and wounding at least 100 people.
Shortly after that Muslim terrorists attacked Christians in Dagestan, Russia where according to reports at least one priest was murdered and several police officers.
The Muslims also set fire to a Jewish synagogue as well.
Now this latest terrorist attack in Russia comes on the heels of the deadly attack against Russian shoppers and theatergoers a few months ago.
The perpetrators of that attack were paid with monies linked back to Western or NATO operatives.
This is why some believe this latest terror attack in Dagestan will, after an investigation, it'll turn out to be, again, yet another CIA or NATO operation.
All of this news was flooding in yesterday, on Sunday, and if you only watch mainstream sources, this is probably the first you're hearing about it.
The informed world is left now wondering, what will the Russian Federation do to retaliate?
A man by the name of Scott Ritter is a former United Nations weapons inspector, and he took time out of his Sunday, took time away from his family to To comment on these dangerous times, and I think his opinion is worth something.
Watch.
It's Sunday, and normally this is a day I like to take off and dedicate it to my family, but the events unfolding in Russia I think require at least some brief commentary.
I'm referring to two events, actually.
One, a Ukrainian attack on Sevastopol using U.S. supplied ATAKMS missiles.
And the second, a terrorist attack in Dagestan that appears to have all the hallmarks of Western involvement.
Let there be no doubt these are two direct attacks against Russia by proxies of the United States and of NATO. And it's more than just a proxy engagement given the necessity of Preparation, intelligence support, etc.
This is a direct attack on Russia by the United States, by NATO, and by non-NATO European entities.
All of the parties that have made a decision in the last several days and weeks to expand the scope and scale of their participation in the Ukrainian-Russian conflict.
Now, some people are saying that the Ukrainians deliberately attacked a beach in Sevastopol.
The evidence shows that this most likely is not the case, that five attack missiles were fired, four were shot down, a fifth one being shot down, dispersed either cluster bombs or fragments from The destroyed missile onto the beach, killing a number of Russians, wounding many others.
But it doesn't matter.
The Ukrainians made a decision to use attack missiles equipped with cluster munitions against a city, a civilian city.
This is an act of terrorism.
This is in keeping with the Ukrainian actions that have transpired over the course of the past years, where Ukraine, since 2014, has been bombarding Russian civilian sites, cities, villages, towns, for the sole purpose of inflicting death and destruction on Russian civilians.
This is an act of terrorism.
And given that the attack of his missile cannot be deployed by the Ukrainians without extensive intelligence support by the United States, this is an act of terrorism by the United States against Russia.
The same can be said about the attacks in Dagestan.
These are deliberately designed to disrupt the civil life of the Russian Federation.
Dagestan is part of the Russian Federation.
And it's also designed to engender a split between the Muslim and non-Muslim segments of Russian society.
This is a tactic that goes back to the first Chechen war and the second Chechen war where the CIA and other European intelligence agencies sought to split Chechnya away from the Russian Federation.
That effort failed and the effort in Dagestan will fail too, but it doesn't absolve The parties involved of their guilt in launching what is a direct assault on the Russian Federation.
Now the question is, what will Russia do?
Historically speaking, the Russian Federation has shown an ability to absorb provocations of this nature.
And remain focused on the task at hand, which of course is achieving the goals of the Special Military Operation, the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.
But at some point in time, there will have to be a response.
And what is an appropriate response?
That's up for the Russian Federation to decide, but let there be no doubt that if and when the time comes for the Russian Federation to respond, To those, all of those responsible for this horrific series of attacks that the perpetrators held to account will not just be the Ukrainians, but those who have provided the Ukrainians with the weapons and the intelligence and the training to carry out these dastardly, cowardly attacks.
We live in very dangerous times.
We live in a time when Russia, the United States, and NATO have all been beating the nuclear drum.
We don't need a nuclear war.
But that's the direction we're heading if we don't stop this insanity.
And by stopping this insanity, this means stopping the United States, stopping NATO, stopping Europe from continuing to facilitate these terrorist attacks by Ukraine against Russia.
Again, that was Scott Ritter.
He's a former United Nations weapons inspector.
Pretty knowledgeable guy.
Matter of fact, he's a great follow on X, at Real Scott Ritter, if you want to check that out.
Why are we doing this?
What in the world is going on?
Is this really all about Ukraine and keeping the American Uniparty money laundering depot alive and well?
Are we really risking nuclear war over that?
Maybe.
Partly.
Part of that, I guess.
But I think there's something more going on here.
I think they want a direct confrontation.
They want war for the sake of war.
Whether that war with Russia goes into a nuclear war or not, whether it's just conventional warfare and a lot of Russians and a lot of Europeans or even Americans die with missiles now in Cuba and Venezuela, I don't know.
I do know that our financial system is about to collapse.
I do know that our entire government is based on essentially unsound market One thing is
clear, though.
One thing is clear.
The people running the United States of America, they want a war.
They want Russia to do something that justifies, something they can sell to the CNN, Fox News, MSNBC zombies, something that they can sell saying, look, Russia did X. Now, you're not hearing about what U.S.-backed weapons systems did in Ukraine.
I'm sorry, in Russia, against the civilian population, if you're watching traditional mainstream media, you're not hearing about it because they don't want you to know that this is a tit-for-tat and we continue to escalate, just like we escalated when we continued to expand NATO, even though Russia was given an assurance by NATO. The State Department, that NATO would not expand one inch towards the east, and yet that happened over the decades, and we'll see that here in a minute.
So the question is, why do they want this?
Specifically, why do they want this confrontation?
Why do they want war?
Why do they want World War III? Why are they willing to risk nuclear war?
Does it have to do with the election?
It's June 24th.
The election's really just a few months away when you think about it.
I mean, do they cancel the...
I mean, if we break out in a hot war with Russia, and you have conflicts now, now that Vladimir Putin has made clear what South Korea...
You now potentially have conflicts.
We know the Ukraine war, and we know Russia.
We've got that conflict.
We now have the Israeli conflict in the Middle East.
We know they're now threatening...
Israel is now threatening to nuke Lebanon.
To just wipe out Hezbollah, because conventionally Hezbollah can inflict a massive amount of damage to Israel, where they are geographically.
So we have that, those two wars.
And we have people who say, oh yeah, we can fight both Russia and we can fight both Iran, no problem.
Well, that doesn't take into account China and Taiwan.
They still haven't invaded, but there's still reports saying that they may.
And now we have North and South Korea.
So you're talking about a world war where there could be four theaters.
There could be four places of battle across.
And in America, we just think that we can win these things.
We can win these engagements when we can't even win in Ukraine because the Russian forces are outgunning and outmanning and have been since they invaded.
But what do we hear back in the United States?
We hear how the Russians are inept and how their equipment doesn't work.
And all of that is lies.
All of that is lies.
It is evidenced by their hypersonic missile technology, which apparently, unless we're going to roll out some Area 51 weapons or something that nobody knows about, I mean, it's not looking good is what I'm trying to say.
It's not looking good at all.
U.S. weapons were used against a Russian civilian population.
And we are just, do you think Russia is just going to let that happen?
I was talking to a buddy today, and he was like, somebody needs to tell Russia, you know, hold on for nine months, assuming that Trump would end the war.
I don't know, but that also assumes that they're not going to just rig the election like they did the last time.
And if you're Vladimir Putin, you certainly cannot leave the security of your country up to a corrupt American domestic politics.
You certainly can't leave it up to an election, a free and fair election.
So no, um...
Absolutely not.
Matter of fact, if you're Vladimir Putin and you do think there's a possibility that Trump would get in there and, I don't know, do things differently, I have no idea if that would happen or not, you just go by his record last time on not starting any new wars, you would even think that whatever Putin's going to do, like whatever thing he wants to do that's provocative, he would need to do before January of next year.
Or certainly the election.
Let's say if he wants to roll tanks into Kiev and just end this whole thing with Ukraine once and for all.
And totally militarize Ukraine.
It's going to be a rough couple of months.
There's no doubt about it.
This is the Twitter thread or the Twitter feed of Scott Ritter.
Again, you can follow him.
That's where the video came from.
He posted it yesterday.
I thought it was interesting as I was just being flooded with all this news coming out of Russia, trying to figure out what's real, what's not real.
Colonel Douglas McGregor saying that Russia is now blaming the United States for the deadly missile attack on Crimea.
Russia on Sunday said the United States had responsibility for a Ukrainian missile attack on Russia annexed Crimea.
Which it said killed five people, including three children, and wounded over 100, according to inside paper.
Clandestine.
World War III alert.
Russian military declared terrorist United States responsible for deaths of Russian civilians in Crimea.
The Russian military reports that U.S. made ATACAMS cluster missiles assisted by U.S. satellite reconnaissance.
More on that in a moment.
the satellite reconnaissance or the plane that they used.
They were fired by Ukraine into Sevastopol, which is in Crimea.
Russia claims that they intercepted the missiles, but fragments of one of them broke off, detonated, and the explosion killed five civilians, including three children, and injuring 124-plus more.
Russian military claim that such actions are not going to be left unanswered, regardless of who or what you believe.
The reality is we are closer to nuclear war than we've been since 1962.
The West, led by the corrupt and warmongering Biden regime, Obama, continue to provoke Putin in the hopes that he will escalate.
The deep state is trying to initiate World War III, but need to make it look like it's Russia's fault.
So you also, based on that speculation there from Clandestine, you also can't rule out a false flag scenario and them trying to detonate a nuke and then blame it on Russia and say that it was Russia that did it.
I don't know.
At this point, we have to question everything.
Yeah, we are closer to war than ever before.
Do they want to cancel the elections?
Again, that's one of the questions I can't get out of my mind.
Is that what they would use this for?
I don't know.
More from Clandestine.
Let's just say that Cuba launched Russian-supplied missiles into Florida, which could happen.
I mean, they've left them there, according to reports or some reports.
The satellite assistance from Russian reconnaissance aircraft was also used to guide the missiles, killing civilians and children.
What would our response be?
Because that's exactly what Ukraine just did to Russia, and that's exactly what we did to Russia.
Kim.com.
Imagine the outrage if a Russian missile with cluster munitions guided by a Russian satellite would kill Americans on Miami Beach.
That's what Biden just did to Russia.
Every American must understand that Joe Biden is gambling with American lives.
Russia is a nuclear power.
Another one from Kim.com.
Now, here's the details here.
You see this on this FlightAware chart.
This was a U.S. Air Force RQ-4B Global Hawk high-altitude reconnaissance drone provided the Ukrainian armed forces with GPS targeting information and coordinated today's ATAKAMS missile strike,
which used cluster munitions on residential areas We're good to go.
Will Russia retaliate in the way that you would expect him to?
Or will he do something the way he did the last several weeks?
As I mentioned in the monologue, many people thought that what Putin did in retaliation from the direct attacks against Russia, against their radar capabilities...
Many people thought what Russia did by sending warships to Cuba, sending submarines, making them more visible, submarines have always been there, promising missile technology, that sort of thing.
Many people saw that as more of a really genius geopolitical move to de-escalate things.
To de-escalate things.
Well, things have not de-escalated.
It's like the U.S. and NATO in the West.
We're not going to get the message.
We refuse to take the L. We refuse to negotiate.
We refuse to talk peace.
So we're now, the Ukrainians, getting the nod, just like the Nord Stream pipeline.
I mean, are we going to believe, really and truly, are we going to believe that Russia used the TACAMS missiles against themselves because that would be the same logic that they tried to buy that they still to this day they put out that Russia blew up their own pipeline that gave them energy superiority in Europe, specifically against Germany.
That's insane, but that's the kind of nonsense that they peddle here.
But here you see the map out of Bulgaria and this giant airplane that was circling, and that right there, Sevastopol, that's the Crimea on this beach.
That's exactly where the attacks went.
So the idea is, and I think we've got a tweet on this here in a minute, the idea is that Russia is able to successfully jam the targeting systems of Ukraine's weapons.
Unless they have this kind of help from the United States or from some Western-friendly United States.
So yeah, right here, background.
The Russian military is using GPS jamming to prevent drone and missile strikes from Ukrainian territory.
That's why the U.S. Air Force Global Hawk provided targeting data and remote control for the Atakums attack.
An act of war by the U.S. government against Russia.
Well, so was the Nord Stream pipeline, right?
So was the Nord Stream pipeline.
My goodness.
I mean, if Vladimir Putin wanted to make a list of grievances against the West, against the United States for why he should have done way more at this point, and I don't want that Don't misunderstand me.
I mean, I'm very worried about an attack on our power grid right now.
I'm very worried about what happens in the middle of July, middle of June, middle of July.
When millions of Americans potentially don't have energy to turn on their air conditionings and what that will do.
How many people, how many old people and even young people that will die because they don't have power and they're not able to cool their homes when we have these insane temperatures coming our way?
I don't think I haven't thought about it.
I don't want Russia to respond, right?
But I would like for our leaders to stop behaving Like, my family's life is some commodity that can just be bargained with in this war, and if we live or if we die, we can be used to further some ridiculous geopolitical strategy that just is anti-human, anti-God, satanic, and just all about promoting sodomy, honestly.
But that's a good post from Kim.com.
They're kind of laying all that out there.
Another one.
U.S. taxpayer money killed two children on a beach in Crimea today.
American Atacum's missiles were used by Ukraine with permission from Joe Biden and with the targeting assistance of U.S. military personnel to murder Russian civilians.
Joe Biden is taking humanity to the abyss.
There's no question he is.
He's taking humanity to the abyss.
I mentioned my family.
He's taking your family to the abyss.
He's taking all of us to the brink.
Every one of us.
All because these feckless leaders at the top are evil.
I mean, they're wicked.
And they see what's happening on the other side.
They see what's happening.
There are competing financial systems emerging.
The BRICS nations are done.
The more and more sanctions we put on Russia, the stronger their economy becomes.
How is that even possible?
People are talking about what's going on with North Korea, and they're saying, yeah, I mean, this idea that Russia could put weapons in North Korea now, now they've done this agreement, but this is more of an economic agreement as well.
North Korea is going to benefit tremendously, according to reports, from this new agreement with Russia.
They're going to benefit tremendously from it.
Somebody said, and I can't remember who it was, and it was another program, but forgive me.
They said, we love to dunk on North Korea, and I've done this before as well.
You look at the Korean Peninsula as a whole, and there's always that photo of the Korean Peninsula at night.
And South Korea and Seoul are just lit up like a Christmas tree, and there's one little tiny dim light on in Pyongyang, North Korea.
And they're saying, now that this Russian deal has happened, of course, North Korea doesn't care anything about U.S. sanctions, and obviously neither does Russia.
That you're going to see a lot more lights on in the North Korean part of the Korean Peninsula here real soon in the next few years.
Look, I've said before, what are we going to go die in Ukraine for?
What are we going to go die for?
What are we dying for?
Are we dying for the International Monetary Fund?
Are we dying to preserve the SWIFT banking system?
Why exactly are they doing this?
I mean, obviously to preserve their own power.
They don't want to answer for any of what they've done.
And there's just so much.
There's just too much to even list.
The U.S. Air Force RQ-4B Global Hawk High Altitude Reconnaissance Drone provided the Ukrainian Armed Forces with information and coordinated today's attack was missile strike, which used cluster munitions.
As a result of the attack, three people were killed and more than 100 were injured.
Now, according to this, these are just the reports coming in.
And then somebody says, if an attack said you'd have 100 said, not 3.
Yeah, well, the idea was, again...
Five missiles were fired, the Russians shot four of them down, and the last one was partially hit, and the fragments of the missile or some cluster munitions are what killed the civilians there on the beach.
Now, this is where we go to Nigel Farage.
Nigel Farage, this clip's been making the rounds back, you know, of course, this guy predicted Brexit as well.
I mean, one of his best speeches ever is when he said, you know, the morning after the Brexit vote where the UK successfully leaves the European Union, Nigel Varanja's speech is one of the greatest speeches I think of all time just in terms of taking a victory lap, if you will.
But here he is in 2014.
He warned everybody about what was going to happen.
Of course, you set it up here.
In 2014, what did you have?
You had the U.S.-backed coup, color revolution.
We overthrew a duly elected president of Ukraine that we didn't like.
America didn't like him because he was more diplomatic with Vladimir Putin.
They didn't want a Putin loyalist in there, so we overthrew their government.
We overthrew their government to either continue the uniparty money laundering depot or begin.
And it was all over energy.
It was all over gas wells and things like that.
And, of course, that's why Hunter Biden was sitting on the board of a gas company doing absolutely nothing, just making money for his family, for the Biden crime family.
Here's Nigel Farage of 2014 warning about what would happen, basically what we're living right now, what we're living through today.
This EU empire, ever seeking to expand, stated its territorial claim on the Ukraine some years ago.
Just to make that worse, of course, some NATO members said they too would like the Ukraine to join NATO. We directly encouraged the uprising in the Ukraine that led to the toppling of the President Yanukovych, And that led, of course, in turn to Vladimir Putin reacting.
And the moral of the story is if you poke the Russian bear with a stick, don't be surprised when he reacts.
Now, just to continue with that, today we are rushing through An association agreement at undue speed with the Ukraine.
And as we speak, there are NATO soldiers engaged in military exercises in the Ukraine.
Have we taken leave of our senses?
Do we actually want to have a war with Putin?
Because if we do, we're certainly going about it the right way.
Perhaps we ought to recognise that the West now faces the biggest threat and crisis to our way of life that we have seen for over 70 years.
And he was exactly right.
And again, look at the headline here.
They want a war so bad, we're now allowing Ukraine to use U.S. weapons along with support from the U.S. Air Force or its assets to attack Russian civilians on a beach.
Not to mention, who knows what intel operations the terrorist attacks are funded by.
Somebody said that the terrorist attack in Dagestan is meant to distract from the fact that the Russians were directly attacked.
attack here's just a quick uh clip of kind of what it was like when the munitions or pieces of the missile started breaking off and hitting the beach there in crimea and then of course uh here's a little clip of the terrorist attack that happened a short time later uh in a in an area that is admittedly 80 muslim
but still you have christians uh attacked christian a church attacked One priest, I think, according to one report I said, had his throat slit.
Another one said that they beheaded him.
him.
Also, they set fire to a synagogue.
Yeah, so that's the scene from Russia.
There They're civilian.
And again, this is a way to provoke Putin even further because they know that the Russian civilians want to go to war.
Many of them really.
I mean, they're ready.
They're done.
They're done with this whole system and they're ready.
They want Putin to be more.
They want Putin to do more.
They want Putin to just take the gloves off and let's just do this.
Many of them do.
McGregor confirmed Ukraine kills civilians in Crimea with U.S. supplied missiles.
Again, that's the huge story here.
And then all of that, I mean, so when, if and when, I guess at this point you just have to say, when they actually strike us back, this is what you can thank.
You can thank these...
These politicians waving the Ukrainian flag inside the halls of Congress, inside the House of Representatives.
Remember when your representatives waving Ukrainian flags in Congress when Russia retaliates for U.S. missile strikes that killed Russian kids on a beach in Crimea today.
Now, you're not going to hear this in the mainstream media because they don't want you to know...
That in a war, it goes tit for tat.
But they don't want you to know about the dead kid or the dead kids on a beach in Crimea.
Because when the Russians attack or when there's a false flag that gets blamed on the Russians or whatever may happen, they want you to think, oh my gosh, Vladimir Putin is just a genocidal madman.
That's what they want you to think.
And then, of course, the...
Here's the official, or at least one of the official reports on the terrorist attack.
I just want to make sure we cover this because we spent more time on the Atakums missiles than we did on the Islamist terrorist attack.
I know the least about it, but Dagestan, Russia, they attacked a church and a synagogue.
Five police officers, at least five killed.
One priest beheaded.
The bearded terrorists are all dressed in black and are shouting al-Akbar.
I saw some police officers with beards that looked Muslim as well.
It's a pretty graphic images of them dead.
So anyway, I don't know.
I know they killed at least two of the terrorists, or what were described as the terrorists.
Again, there's less about this out there than there is about what's going on.
But this Scott Ritter piece, I think, kind of sums it up.
We're going to have to wait and see what's going to go on.
This is a big deal.
We're one step closer to World War III. We're going to take a break.
Don't go anywhere.
This is the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell, and we'll be back here in just a moment.
Don't go anywhere.
This is getting dangerous.
The Biden administration has driven chaos, inflation, staggering amounts of debt, and now the potential for World War III. This could wreak havoc on your savings, investment, and even worse, your IRA or 401k.
I bought gold and silver as a way to diversify my money against the stock market, inflation, and other economic threats, no matter who ends up in the White House.
That's why I urge you to join me and the thousands of Americans who turn to gold and silver to protect our life savings with GoldCo.
I did my research and found the only gold company with over 6,000 five-star customer reviews.
GoldCo treats every customer with white glove service and special care.
And today, they're offering you up to 10% instant match in bonus silver with a qualified account.
You can't get a better deal than this.
Visit paulforgold.com today to learn how you can diversify your savings with gold and silver before it's too late.
That's paulforgold.com or call 844-904-GOLD. Welcome to another episode of Is This Christian Nationalism?
The show where a bunch of lunatics argue about a concept that has absolutely no functional definition whatsoever.
I'm your host, Kip Sweatervest.
Let's meet our contestants.
First up is Maisie, a woman who is, I don't know, like 19 or 56, and from the hair, I'm assuming, is either a West Virginia bartender or somehow connected to an Ivy League university.
And my pronouns are she, her.
And we're sick of you already.
Next up is Jerry Berry, the churchy fruit.
Jerry recently traveled the cornball legalist to smug antinomian pipeline, which means he used to be kind of cute, but now he talks like a Methodist lady pastor attending a Mitt Romney prayer breakfast.
Welcome to the show, Thank you, Kip.
It's just such an honor to be a part of this pivotal faith conversation.
See what I mean?
He's gross.
Next up is an angry, disaffected, father-wounded young man desperately longing for community after being crushed by a world that taught him to despise his race, his sex, and his culture.
And I was very close to feeling sorry for him until he chose to play the game under the cover of his anonymous social media avatar, which for some reason is this.
Don't dox me, you gay coward.
Hey, you might be worse than Maisie.
Well, he is a white male.
And now you're tied.
Okay, let's play the stupid game now.
Contestants, for the purposes of this show, let's say that Christian nationalism is a social and governmental system in which Christianity is the driving force that shapes a nation's laws, people, and culture.
Can we all agree to stick to that definition for the next three minutes?
Sure.
Yes.
I don't believe you.
Nevertheless, I'm going to show you a bunch of things that don't fit that definition at all.
Then I'm going to ask you, is this Christian nationalism?
All you have to do is say no and you'll win the game.
Let's play.
Hey guys, is this Christian nationalism?
Maisie.
Yes.
Ooh, incorrect.
But I see prayers and a flag.
That's Christian nationalism.
And the definition of Christian nationalism is?
Christians vaguely existing in public.
I hate this job.
That is not Christian nationalism.
Very good, young man.
Ten points for...
That's Christian suicide.
And here we go.
Because race mixing is always a precursor to the destruction of Christian empires.
Guys, please, this is just a regular Christian couple praying that God would forgive them for using the power of the state to control other people's lives instead of focusing on their own self-wounds of brokenness.
I hate that answer.
Let's tame those ovaries, dude.
You're worse than scabies.
Alright, let's move on to round two before I lobotomize myself with a pool cue.
Contestants, the man on the left is a secular liberal voting for a Democrat because their shared metaphysical presuppositions cause them to share political beliefs.
That's called democracy.
The man on the right is a conservative Christian voting for a Republican because their shared metaphysical presuppositions cause them to share political beliefs.
That's called...
Christian nationalism.
No, he's doing Christian nationalism.
We talk about this all the time at my school.
Please don't tell me you made the Dean's List, Maisie.
I'm the Dean.
I hunger for death.
Well, I see our anonymous friend got banned again and has now switched to his alternate account, named after an obscure 17th century theologian he's never actually read.
So the gentleman on the right...
Direct election of senators is a Jewish conspiracy!
No, it isn't!
Yes, it is!
Why are you a salamander now?
It's popular with the higher-status manboys of my tribe, and I covet their validation!
Yeah, well, I covet the life of Job.
Jerry Bear.
It's not Christian nationalism.
Because it's not Christian, God gave us the separation of church and state for a reason, and the second we Christians start relying on political power to advance our causes is the second the secular left will start using that power against us.
They're already doing that.
We've been doing that for a while.
I've literally never lived in a world where that wasn't happening.
I make the Christian student groups hold their meetings off campus at a sewage treatment facility.
I got arrested for saying Bible within 300 yards of a Planned Parenthood.
I failed math for assuming Pythagoras' gender.
We boo the Holy Trinity at our lacrosse games.
I bought my niece a Precious Moments Bible and got put on an FBI watchlist.
I skipped a Sam Smith song on Spotify and got charged with a hate crime.
I'm having your bank account frozen right now.
But guys, imagine if they used that power against us.
Why are you the way you are?
It's a mystery.
A puzzle that can never be solved.
A riddle that can never be told.
Is it that you should have gotten a swirly 37 years ago, but didn't?
Yeah, pretty much.
Alright, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the Millstone Report.
That is a fantastic skit called Is It Christian Nationalism?
And I saw it several months ago, or a couple, I don't know if it was several months ago, but I've seen it.
It's been out there for a while, but it kind of showed back up in my feed.
It's from the great folks over at Lutheran Satire.
If you want to give them a follow, you'll learn a lot.
And I don't agree.
I'm not a Lutheran, so I don't agree with everything that they say, but man, that was funny and really, really interesting.
What if they use that power against us?
Well, they're already doing that, so...
I bought my niece a Precious Moments Bible and got put on an FBI watch list.
That was my favorite one.
This is a helpful thing to talk about because we debate this.
What does it mean to be a Christian nationalist?
Obviously, the left uses the broadest terms possible, and they're scared...
Really, what they don't want is Christians in public life doing anything that makes them uncomfortable, right?
Christianity is a worldview in their mind that shouldn't be forced on other people, but all of the paganism, all of the LGBT sodomite ways, all of the atheism, all of the science That's not a worldview that gets forced on Christians.
It's just science.
It's just the truth.
You basically have the other side.
They just think that they're objectively right, and us Christians think that we're objectively right, that there is a God, that Jesus is real, Jesus is God, that Jesus came down to fulfill the plan of salvation, to bring himself glory, and to save for himself a people.
And the other side doesn't like it.
They don't like to hear that they're sinners.
I remember way a long time ago, back before Bill Maher had his current show, he had an old show called Politically Incorrect.
Man, what a title.
That means something completely different now.
Politically Incorrect.
Bill Maher was upset.
He got triggered, had a Christian on, and he hated the song.
He talked about Amazing Grace.
He was like, just this song, Amazing Grace.
You know, Amazing Grace that saved a wretch like me.
That's offensive to me.
I am not a wretch, he said.
You see, this is the rub.
They don't want to be told that they're not perfect just the way they are.
Perfect just the way they are.
Hang on one second.
Yeah, okay, I'm just making sure we've got something that was bothering me technologically, but we're good to go.
Okay, speaking of Christian nationalism...
This is a huge deal.
I have been saying this for the last several weeks.
You've probably heard it a million times.
You're probably tired of hearing about it.
It basically goes like this.
I am optimistic.
I am optimistic for Christian red states that continue to ban the transgender lifestyle to save children.
And I have told you several times that I think this is a path forward, this is happening, and it's a path forward unless the Supreme Court does the equivalent of Roe v.
Wade and takes this debate away from the states.
If they take this debate away from the states, just like they did the abortion issue, and they say, no, abortion is legal, you have to give women the right to murder their children, if they give parents the right to abuse their children and say it's a constitutional right to abuse your children and call it health care,
Then we have a serious problem in this country and any sort of path forward, any sort of patchwork path forward where you end up having little laboratories, if you will, where the Christian red states are allowed to live their lives and not have a government and not have the crazies abuse and castrate their children and call it health care, then we're going to have a huge problem and there's not going to be a way.
I'm just sorry, there's just not going to be a way for any sort of coexistence the way it could be otherwise.
And so, USA Today, this broke earlier this morning, are bans on transgender or gender-affirming care for minors constitutional.
The Supreme Court will now decide.
They have decided to take up this argument.
Maureen Grope, I don't know who she is, but she says the Supreme Court will wade into the controversial topic of puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender people under the age of 18 taking up the case that could be a flashpoint in the fight for LGBTQ rights.
The court agreed Monday to hear the Biden administration's challenge to a Tennessee ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors, an increasingly potent political issue, It's June.
We're not going to get a decision on this until a year from now.
Okay?
So, the Supreme Court will take up this argument in October.
That's when their new session begins.
Sometimes they'll be arguing.
The Biden administration is the one that urged the Supreme Court to rule on this, which is a huge red flag.
And they decided, yeah, we will.
And I just, I gotta tell you, even with the court's makeup as it is now, I don't have a lot of confidence, you know, because you just never know.
They would love, once states, this triggers the authoritarians in the federal government, once the states start to pass laws that are just completely opposite of other states and blue states, they feel the need to step in and just kill it.
Because they don't want independent governments to actually be able to govern themselves.
They don't want the people to be able to govern themselves with the amount of specificity that's going on right now at the local level in these Christian red states.
It's also fundamentally the satanic agenda because they want the depopulation of kids, generally speaking.
They want the depopulation, so they want kids to make these decisions and not be able to reproduce.
If the Supreme Court next year rules on this and decides states cannot ban puberty block errors or chemical castration for kids and that parents have a right to abuse their children, if that's what they rule on...
I don't know what the solution is.
I'll tell you this.
The left has a problem.
They are up against the clock here.
They are up against the clock.
And that clock is lawsuits.
That are starting to come out from girls who are now 18, 19, 20, where a doctor gave them a double mastectomy and called it gender-affirming health care when they were 13 years old.
13 years old this has happened.
This is going to continue to happen.
They've got the detransition movement.
What I'm saying is their entire movement is up against the clock because there's going to be more and more people who deconvert to the woke sex religion the longer it goes on.
The more people that convert to the woke sex religion, the more grooming that goes on in schools, the longer a time period that goes by, you're going to have more and more people It's just basic math.
Who realize that what's going on is evil and wrong and they're going to try to detransition.
And they're going to be victims at this point.
They're going to be victims of a society that said abuse is okay.
And so the left desperately wants to codify it into law and forget about it.
They desperately want to say, just like Roe v.
Wade, no, women can have the right to murder their babies.
They desperately want a law or a precedent, jurisprudence, that says...
Parents can abuse their kids with chemical castration drugs.
It's up to the parents or it's up to the kids.
Or giving these 8, 9, 10, 11-year-olds, some sort of...
And I don't even know how.
If you do something like this, I don't even know how you still have laws banning alcohol consumption until 21 or you can't smoke a cigarette until you're 18.
I think that's even now 20.
I don't know how you have laws that say minors can't do certain things.
And maybe this is all going to allow minors to vote as well.
Who knows in the end?
Well, they need to be able to vote in elections.
But they are up against the clock, I'm telling you, because the longer the abuse goes on and the longer the media claps like SEALs, the longer our entire, like every corporation, every sporting team, every NBA, NHL, MLB, NFL... All of these people promoting the rainbow, brainwashing, telling you it's good.
You've got more and more people that are coming around to it, that are doing it, that say, this is the life I want to live.
I want to be a transgender or whatever.
You're going to have more and more people that are victimized and injured by it, those who survive it, those who survive the programming.
And those people are going to have a voice.
And those people are going to go to court.
And eventually, the entire...
As long as Christian red states continue to be able to pass these laws banning transgenderism, as long as that continues, it will eventually overtake the blue states.
That's my prediction.
Because the people in the blue states are...
It's all about a juxtaposition.
Okay?
Okay.
I mean, if you allow Tennessee, if you allow Arkansas, if you allow Alabama, Louisiana, all of these southern Christian red states to have their laws banning this procedure on kids, and New York and California and others continue to do it, in 20 years you are going to have a giant disparity of outcome and results, and eventually the blue states will realize that this is abuse as well.
Can you imagine if you're a blue state doctor and you're just making gobs of money doing the genital mutilation surgeries, prescribing the hormones?
Do you think that you want public opinion?
Do you think that you want a criminal law passed eventually to go after you to put you in jail?
Trump says if he gets elected he'll do a federal ban.
I don't know.
I have no idea if that'll happen or not.
But do you think some of these people want...
I mean, you don't think that they think that they could be held accountable someday?
Of course they do.
So the Supreme Court now taking this up.
And it's got me fired up.
I don't know if...
I mean, I don't know if you can tell.
I'm pretty fired up about this.
Because one of the...
Again, one of the paths forward that I really thought is true is the Christian red states governing themselves and saying this is child abuse.
Right.
And I don't know.
I have no idea.
If the Supreme Court were to say, no, you can't ban chemical castration drugs.
You can't.
You've got to let these kids destroy themselves.
How many red state governors and legislatures will just say, okay, fine.
How many?
I mean, we let them kill, we let them murder, sacrifice babies to Moloch for 50 years and did nothing.
But yes, the incrementalism eventually worked.
But I mean, look at all the dead babies in the wake.
You know, yeah, we tried to save as many kids as we could.
A heartbeat bill, an 18-week pain-capable child bill.
All of a sudden, we tried to save as many kids as we could work within the system.
In the meantime, though, I mean...
Women were murdering their children without being prosecuted for it and basically just doing it for birth control reasons in many instances.
So, I don't know.
Not to take the black...
Okay, alright.
I'm not trying to take a black pill here.
Let's all be black pill bulimic.
We can regurgitate the black pill.
Okay, there is still hope out there.
And you never know, the Supreme Court might end up ruling in our favor on this.
Isn't it wild, though?
If you think about it...
Kind of like the religious liberty argument.
We talked about how shallow it really is when you think about what we're being asked to.
We're begging the pagans to let us not beg a cake.
Begging the pagans to let us have our religious freedom when the issue itself is just celebrating degeneracy.
And it's how ridiculous it is.
Please let us have a place in your pluralistic society.
It's kind of ridiculous when you think, well, what if the Supreme Court, we've got nine people in black robes, are going to decide.
Now think about this for a second.
This is how the moral depravity really should wake you up.
It really comes down to what is a legitimate authority.
What is a legitimate authority?
And we're going to sit around, we're going to wait for the next year, and we're going to figure out whether or not nine people are going to decide whether or not, and they're going to savor the arguments and really go through the process over whether or not parents can stop puberty,
give their kids estrogen or testosterone, and And destroy and sacrifice who they would become if their DNA were left to unfold the way God intended.
And we're going to say it's a legitimate thing to let the Supreme Court decide what is patently obvious.
It's like...
I mean, it's as simple as women should go into the women's restroom and men should go into the men's restroom, right?
I mean, the idea somebody would ever say, well, no, actually, I don't think that's a good rule for society anymore.
What are you talking about?
It really just comes down to having a country.
We won't have a country.
It's not happening.
We're not going to have a country.
This is not a black pill, actually.
A system like this is not going to be allowed to continue operating.
It's just not.
There's built-in mechanisms.
Whatever happens, out of the ashes, there's no society where parents are allowed to do this.
Not in local communities, anyway.
Whether we get conquered by the third world barbarian horde coming over our border first, I don't know.
Maybe that happens before all of this.
I'm taking the black pill.
I'm sorry.
Megan Basham, speaking of...
We need to talk about this more.
We're running out of time.
But we talk about this more maybe later in the week.
You talk about the anti-Christian bias that has permeated our culture.
Back on April 29th, Megan Basham reports that the Biden administration quietly enacted an HHS rule that designates Christians as unfit to be foster parents.
It requires, quote, supporting, end quote, any foster child in their, quote, gender identity, end quote, and same-sex attraction.
The rule will be devastating to vulnerable kids.
Oh, you know why?
What we said last week, the more Christians you have in society...
The more Christians you have in places of influence, the kinder and better they do their jobs because they want to love their neighbor as themselves and they don't, right?
So the more Christians you have working in hospitals and as doctors and administrators, the less lying, the less genocide, the less remdesivir poisoning, we hope.
Likewise, the more Christians who are in the foster care system, real Christians, the less abuse and human trafficking.
Obviously, we know that the foster care system attracts some of the sickest people that want to abuse kids.
Taking Christians out of the equation does mean vulnerable kids will have less options because there are Christians out there who really do want to protect kids and they want to make sure that they grow up and they are able to have the opportunity to lead productive lives There's also Christian foster parents out there who minister to children.
Tell them about God.
Tell them about their sin.
Tell them about Jesus.
Read them the Bible.
And this is the real rub.
They don't want Christian foster parents to have a Christian influence over these vulnerable kids.
Again, it's a demographic issue.
They want these kids to grow up and be radical leftists.
Again, that's why they infiltrate the schools.
They have a demographic problem when it comes to The LGBT. Leftist parents have less children, and obviously gay parents don't have any unless they can convince somebody to give up their baby via surrogacy.
So their entire movement, again, they've got a ticking clock.
Their entire movement depends on converting young kids so they'll grow up and be perverts just like them.
Likewise, back to the Supreme Court and this whole decision.
They're a borrowed time.
Before, the evidence is, and this is going to happen regardless whether the Supreme Court does this or not, 10, 15 years from now, there's going to be so many bruised and battered and broken kids that have had double mastectomies or had the genital mutilation surgery, and there are going to be lines of them.
There are going to be gobs of them, and they're going to say, why was this allowed to be done to me?
Why was this legal?
Why?
And it's going to happen.
It's going to happen regardless whether the Supreme Court says it's okay to trans kids or not.
And that's the truth of the matter.
That's all the time that we have.
For this edition of the Millstone Report, my name is Paul Harrell.
Pray for this country.
Pray for America.
We've got all this social chaos going on here in this country.
We have World War III on our doorstep.
And with all that being said, though...
There are still families right now that are raising their kids.
There are still husbands right now who are loving their wives.
Wives are loving their husbands.
There are children being had.
They're being raised in the fear and admonition of the Lord.
They're being taught what is good.
They're being taught what is evil and what not to do.
And they're being taught about these important things.
And so that is happening in the midst of all of this.
And that's really why you see the Biden administration going crazy.
That's why they're committed to this genocidal war endeavor.
That's why they want to keep Christians out of foster care.
They want to keep Christians out of every industry if they can.
That's why they're imprisoning grandmas for 10 years or two years, I think, in the case, for protesting abortion outside an abortion clinic.
In the midst of all that, though, there's still good stuff happening.
We're going to end the show.
This is where we end the show.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, which, by the way, I was almost providentially hindered to be able to do the show tonight.
Thank goodness I was able to do it.
We will see you tomorrow night.
I'll be wishing you a happy Tuesday.
God bless you.
▲
Export Selection