May 27, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
59:01
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| People say we need to, you know, make America great again. | |
| I completely agree. | |
| We may need to make Gallows great again. | |
| Oh my, it feels just like I don't try. | |
| I look so good I might die. | |
| All I know is everybody loves me. | |
| Cut down, sway into my own sound. | |
| Flashes in my face now. | |
| All I know is everybody loves me. | |
| Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea. | |
| Hey folks, welcome to the show. | |
| Welcome to the program. - It's the Millstone Report. | |
| My name is Paul Harrell. | |
| Tonight we're going to talk a little bit about how we've been duped. | |
| We've been totally duped, but we've got a great show for you and you certainly don't want to miss it. | |
| I was going to talk about internet censorship coming up as well. | |
| You don't want to miss that. | |
| Very fascinating little mini-documentary snippet we're going to listen to that was sent to me by one of our listeners, one of our viewers, that kind of answers a question that we started to ask yesterday concerning Brexit and the 2016 election of Donald Trump and what all that meant. | |
| But before we do all that, you've heard about it, the proverbial slow boil of the frog in the pot of water. | |
| I mean, it's a good analogy, even if it's been said that the frog would actually jump out to avoid the death. | |
| People have actually tried this. | |
| But at its core is the idea of something called incrementalism. | |
| Now we've talked about incrementalism here on this program in the last couple of weeks as it relates to ending abortion. | |
| What's an acceptable balance between incremental victories or abolition of abortion altogether? | |
| But that kind of incrementalism has to do with an effort to climb or crawl our way back up the slippery slope of wicked depravity to save our children and our nation from shore destruction. | |
| I'm not talking about that kind of incrementalism today. | |
| There's a different kind, or maybe call it the reverse incrementalism, if that makes sense. | |
| I'm talking about the incrementalist tactics the pagans have used against us to slowly alter societal norms that got us where we are today. | |
| So think transing kids, drag shows for kids, wouldn't be a thing if it weren't for incrementalism, if it weren't for normalizing gays, normalizing sodomy, and normalizing gay marriage. | |
| In fact, recently, former lesbian and now Christian, Rosaria Butterfield, wrote an essay for World entitled, The Long Game, 20 Years of Same-Sex Marriage and the Moral Revolution That Made It Possible. | |
| Now, in her piece, she talks about how we got here and the intentional strategy that was deployed against the American people to get us to accept the gays. | |
| They wanted to be accepted just like everyone else, and they picked marriage as the vehicle to achieve that end. | |
| So, back in the day, the question the gay enclave had to answer was, how do we get normal Americans to go soft on sodomy? | |
| Believe it or not, there was a time when the vast majority of Americans thought of being gay as disgusting, quite frankly. | |
| I mean, there's no other way to say it. | |
| That was the reality. | |
| There was an ick factor to all of it. | |
| Talk about incrementalism. | |
| I mean, Americans went from being disgusted at the idea of sodomy to network television shows showing two men on screen kissing. | |
| Today, the idea that being gay is gross or disgusting or something, that idea is something that's not shared with most of the young people today. | |
| I would venture to guess even the young people today who want to go back to traditional norms because of the programming, they don't find it as wicked as previous generations of Americans once did. | |
| So think back with me to when America had laws against sodomy. | |
| We talked about before that America had laws against blasphemy, but let's talk about the sodomy laws that withstood court challenges until very recently. | |
| So you can go back, way back, and this may be way back to some younger viewers, but not to me. | |
| Way back in 2003, the United States Supreme Court declared anti-sodomy laws were unconstitutional. | |
| Think about that. | |
| That's incredible. | |
| That's not that long ago. | |
| The case was Lawrence v. | |
| Texas. | |
| The summary of the case reads, quote, The majority opinion in this case was written by Justice Anthony Kennedy | |
| and it overturned the previous ruling of the Supreme Court on the same issue in Bowers v. | |
| Hardwick 1986 where it upheld a challenged Georgia statute and did not find a constitutional protection of sexual privacy. | |
| We'll come back to that in a minute. | |
| The court in Lawrence v. Texas explicitly held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by the substantive due process under the 14th Amendment. | |
| The decision in this case, okay, this is from Cornell, was a breakthrough for gay rights for End quote. | |
| That's incredible to me. | |
| That is nuts to think how far we've fallen since 2003. | |
| That's a 2003 decision. | |
| That's a 21st century decision. | |
| I know they might not have been enforcing the sodomy laws, but in the 21st century, it was still illegal to be gay in America. | |
| What's even more interesting is that clearly, based on the fact that that decision had to be rendered at all, clearly our founding fathers and framers of the Constitution were not sitting around writing a document they believed would give men the right to sodomy so long as the sin was consensual and committed in the privacy of their own home. | |
| The post-World War II consensus that produced modern-day liberal thought was something our forefathers clearly rejected. | |
| Consequently, we're not living in the same America they designed. | |
| And as I said last week, we're not the same moral and religious people the document was designed for. | |
| But back to the left's successful history of incrementalism. | |
| In Rosaria Butterfield's World Essay, which again she mentions, we're going to post that in the description of this video, but she mentions a little-known book, or at least it was little-known to me, and I would venture a little-known book to most normies. | |
| The book was written in 1989, and it laid the groundwork and strategy to get the American people to go soft on sodomy. | |
| Here's part of her article. | |
| Quote, The gay rights movement. | |
| I understood the moral advantage of full marriage over domestic partnerships. | |
| But this would require a radical change in how the movement presented itself. | |
| Neuropsychologist Mark Marshall Kirk and advertising executive Hunter Madsen became the unlikely image consultants to make gay look normal even as the AIDS epidemic in the early 80s called GRID, Gay Related Infectious Deficiency, Solidified the idea that gay equaled deadly plague. | |
| The duo published a handbook of gay etiquette called After the Ball. | |
| How America will conquer its fear and hatred of gays in the 90s. | |
| Kirk and Madston's rules are straightforward. | |
| Now listen to these rules. | |
| This is incredible. | |
| There's a few of them. | |
| Keep the message focused on the normalization of homosexuality. | |
| The authors declared it in plain English, no public sex and no gay disturbances until gay marriage is the law of the land and Christians see us as victims. | |
| Another piece of advice, find easy to manipulate churches, especially mainline Presbyterians, to get on board, which they did, by the way, to get on board and help promote the idea that gays are victims. | |
| Give potential protectors a just cause by reassuring Americans that the issue is anti-discrimination, not gay rights. | |
| And the list goes on. | |
| Make gays look good by reclaiming or inventing a noble history. | |
| Anyone single, over 40, and dead could be marshaled to the cause as a gay forebearer. | |
| Make victimizers look bad. | |
| Create a media link, for example, between Nazis and hysterical backwoods preachers and distinguish this from open-minded pluralists and liberal-loving pastors. | |
| And then she goes on. | |
| She says, By the time of the 1993 march, Kirk and Madsen's book was considered seminal reading for gay activists. | |
| So they basically got this to all of the gay activists. | |
| She goes on. | |
| It was the roadmap. | |
| It was the game plan. | |
| With the march and mass marriage both stunning successes, we returned home with a team and a cause. | |
| We could practically taste our respectable freedom and moral inclusion." The article's fantastic. | |
| Again, we're going to post it here in this video's description. | |
| But it goes on to note, because it's a very lengthy essay. | |
| It's an essay, really, not an article. | |
| Soon after those events, this was a big blow to their hopeful attitudes, but of course they doubled down. | |
| Democrat President Bill Clinton signed a federal law, not soon after that, called the Defense of Marriage Act. | |
| In 1996. | |
| Which barred gay marriage. | |
| In 96. | |
| These are important data points. | |
| 96. | |
| Defensive Marriage Act. | |
| 2003. | |
| You know, Supreme Court reverses sodomy laws or anti-sodomy laws. | |
| Can you believe that? | |
| I mean, I wish I could show you the video because I know it's there. | |
| I've seen it before. | |
| I've reported on it at previous gigs. | |
| I can't find it. | |
| That would be a great task for this audience, by the way, if you guys can go and find the 1996 signing. | |
| They did it outside. | |
| It was an outside ceremony, I remember. | |
| Al Gore was there. | |
| Obviously, Bill Clinton was there. | |
| There were some speeches made about it, about the Defense of Marriage Act. | |
| It was a bipartisan effort in 96 to say, no, no, we're not going to do this. | |
| We're going to protect the idea as a country that marriage is between one man and one woman. | |
| And then 2003 rolls along. | |
| The Supreme Court says anti-sodomy laws are unconstitutional. | |
| Then you have Barack Obama in 2008, who runs as somebody who's against gay marriage, but then by 2012, he evolves, right? | |
| He evolves, you know, and he becomes a supporter of gay marriage in 2012. | |
| Of course, it didn't matter. | |
| He, you know, gets re-elected. | |
| And then in 2015, you have Obergefell. | |
| And they find this right to marriage somewhere in the Constitution. | |
| Everyone's got a right to marriage. | |
| But it is incredible to think about the fact that our founding fathers, when they were writing the Constitution, they didn't think that it was going to allow somebody to have the legal right to sodomy as long as it's between consenting adults. | |
| What a joke. | |
| What a joke. | |
| This first one here is fascinating to me, though. | |
| I know it's the second one, the rules here. | |
| Keep the message, just to revisit this real quick, keep the message focused on the normalization of homosexuality, the authors declared. | |
| No public sex, no gay disturbances until gay marriage is the law and Christians see us as victims. | |
| Now that is, they've accomplished that. | |
| They certainly accomplished that. | |
| But now, do we have any gay disturbances today? | |
| No public sex, they say. | |
| Like, what? | |
| What was going on in the mind? | |
| There was literally a self-awareness. | |
| Gays had a self-awareness of how absolutely promiscuous is kind of an understatement that they were. | |
| I see the little monkeypox outbreak and the confessions of men who are gay and the lifestyles they just openly admit. | |
| Just an infinite amount of partners, it seems like. | |
| But they were saying, we've got to tone all that down. | |
| We have to tone all that down. | |
| And that's one of the ways they eliminated the ick factor of it all. | |
| They went into civil rights mode and they tried to equate the plight of black Americans coming out of slavery and even the civil rights era. | |
| They tried to equate the plight of black Americans to gays. | |
| And they did it. | |
| They successfully did it. | |
| The Democrats went along with it. | |
| Many black Americans went along with it. | |
| Here we are. | |
| Here we are. | |
| This is part of that article You can check this out right here. | |
| I found this really interesting. | |
| So this is like a Candyland parody here. | |
| You guys have played the board game Candyland before, I'm sure. | |
| As you can see, you start way down here. | |
| Wholesome. | |
| Look at that. | |
| Wholesome. | |
| That's, I guess, a man and a little boy and a little girl. | |
| Although those faces look... | |
| Did an AI do this? | |
| I think an AI must have done this. | |
| No, no, it says the illustration's by somebody named Craig Berry. | |
| Anyway, you start here, and you've got to go by The Darkened Hearts. | |
| So, I don't know if you can see that. | |
| Can we get it better? | |
| Let's see if we can get that better, because I can see it great, but I don't know if you guys can see it very well. | |
| Let's see if this is better for you. | |
| I don't know if that's any better at all. | |
| You'll have to take my word for it. | |
| Yeah, darkened hearts. | |
| So you go by the darkened hearts, so you darken your hearts to sin. | |
| And this is around 1970, as you see. | |
| And then you come up the Pride Promenade. | |
| Gay is good. | |
| You can take a shortcut here in 1989. | |
| This is the book she's talking about. | |
| After the ball. | |
| You can take a pass there if you roll your dice right. | |
| You've got to come around here. | |
| This is the infiltration of Christian churches that are no longer Christian because you cherry pick your theology and move ahead four spaces. | |
| You've got another shortcut. | |
| You can go to the Primrose Path, Rainbow Road here. | |
| That's not to throw Mario Kart under the bus. | |
| Then you've got backward old Bible churches. | |
| We want to paint them with a broad brush. | |
| They're against progress. | |
| And then in 96, you kind of have a big problem. | |
| You maybe think that you're not ever going to get what you want because you have this Bill Clinton signed defensive marriage act. | |
| Again, and I will say this, if you guys can find that video, all of you out there listening, if you guys can find the video of... | |
| of Bill Clinton signing this Defensive Marriage Act. | |
| It's something YouTube doesn't want you to see. | |
| I mean, YouTube search is awful now. | |
| YouTube search doesn't work. | |
| We all know that, but I thought I'd give it a shot. | |
| Just to say, I mean, it's just a historical event, right? | |
| It shouldn't be that big of a deal. | |
| Oh, it is. | |
| It is. | |
| It's a huge deal. | |
| Because they don't want you to see how fast the depravity has happened. | |
| How quickly you go from one event to another as we are careening. | |
| They don't want you to understand how What used to be normal, it's just a very short amount of time, normalcy, what used to be considered acceptable, what used to be considered normal, is now considered anathema, is now considered a sin against their woke sex religion and their dogma and their sexual orthodoxy. | |
| And it hasn't been that very long. | |
| And so they don't want you to see that because they also don't want you to realize that, you know, just like this board, we could go in reverse. | |
| We could go back and we could take some shortcuts to get back there. | |
| And I think that's what the plan is. | |
| So then we have, so you go from backward old churches, the 1996 Gay Marriage, Defensive Marriage Act, rather, barring gay marriage, but then you get these cherry new affirming churches, which is linking with the cherry picking of the theology. | |
| Let me get my face out of there so you can see what I'm talking about. | |
| Over here, this church here with the rainbow flag. | |
| Then you come up to 2012 and we've got the Cake Shop Follies. | |
| You could also put some flowers in there, right? | |
| We've got some florist issues. | |
| Florist issues. | |
| And again, this is just normality land instead of candy land. | |
| And then we're coming down here. | |
| We come around and you've got the waiting pool. | |
| Wait here until your rights are granted. | |
| And then finally they get to Obergefell. | |
| They get the wedding rings. | |
| 2015. | |
| Boom. | |
| Normalcy. | |
| Rainbows on the White House. | |
| Everybody's happy. | |
| Candy canes and unicorns, and that's where the story ended. | |
| But we all know that's not true. | |
| That's not where the story ended. | |
| That's not where the story ended. | |
| The story is still going. | |
| The story is still being written. | |
| The story is getting sicker and sicker and sicker. | |
| It's more and more evil, more and more wicked, more and more depraved, because it wasn't just about two people wanting to get married. | |
| It was about... | |
| Also preserving their way of life by taking young children and sexualizing them and telling them that because everything about a person, everything about me as an adult has to do with my sexuality and my sexuality defines me. | |
| So because my sexuality defines me, We need kids to start claiming sexual identities as early as they possibly can. | |
| Unless that sexual identity is a male, normal male, heterosexual, cis, whatever they call it. | |
| And especially if you're white, we don't need you to do any of that. | |
| This is not where it ended. | |
| And case in point, Smash Bails. | |
| I saw this. | |
| I hadn't heard this story yet. | |
| Last night, I guess, right before bed. | |
| Why do they always buy baby boys? | |
| This is a headline. | |
| The Daily Mail. | |
| Chicago Vet. | |
| Veterinarian. | |
| Excuse me. | |
| And dog show judge charged with distributing child porn as depraved dating app messages detailed his plans to rape the infant he and husband are expecting via surrogate, via surrogacy. | |
| Yeah, I know. | |
| It's horrible. | |
| So I pointed out, we'll get to this story at a refresher. | |
| I pointed out there's definitely a pattern we leaked to the gay couple charged with molesting their adopted sons who also pimped them out. | |
| Just a few hot takes here. | |
| A guy by the name of Jacob Lovelace says, Millstone. | |
| I certainly hearted that one. | |
| Only married straight couples should be legally allowed to adopt children. | |
| Another hot take from Lewis. | |
| I agree. | |
| Um... | |
| Somebody wants to make the disgusting for every... | |
| Somebody wants to make this... | |
| They have to. | |
| Look, this person says, and for every one of these, there are at least 100 religious leaders and conservative politicians doing the same depraved, sickening thing. | |
| I'm not discounting the molestations that have happened in the church. | |
| I'm not discounting that. | |
| But it's funny that that's the knee-jerk reaction, and people do that because they don't want... | |
| It's the same reason why when I posted Definitely a Pattern, I get this comment from somebody that says, and what of the straight couples that harm children? | |
| Is that a pattern too? | |
| Somebody named Nico just couldn't handle that I was saying, look, if you're gay and you're going to adopt kids, especially if they're boys, this is now becoming a pattern. | |
| This is not the only two stories here. | |
| You can find more, right? | |
| And then on the guy who wants to talk the religious angle, look at what Billboard Chris found. | |
| Billboard Chris found, you've got these two gay clergies, if you can call them that, they've adopted a baby now. | |
| Huge red flag. | |
| These are two Episcopal priests who married in 2016, and they're now expecting a baby boy in June. | |
| Their advice for others who are considering this journey is to always expect the unexpected. | |
| Our first match months before meeting our surrogate, Julie, was unsuccessful since that first surrogate had family issues that she needed to take care of and was disqualified on the day of the contract signing. | |
| It was very discouraging because it meant that we had to restart the search. | |
| And yet, you know, here they are now. | |
| Now they have a family. | |
| They have a fake family is what they say. | |
| I know you guys can't see this. | |
| I'm going to read it for you. | |
| We hope our family can be a reminder that protect children from priests is just as harmful as protect children from drag queens. | |
| Both are unfair, unnecessary, and dangerous. | |
| Mocking any group of people, even if the cause is righteous, has no place here. | |
| Not all Christians are the same. | |
| Well... | |
| That's certainly an understatement. | |
| Yeah, not all, not all, quote, Christians, end quote, are the same. | |
| Back to this story. | |
| I'm going to read this for you. | |
| In viewer discretion is advised. | |
| This guy's name is Adam Stafford King. | |
| He unknowingly spoke to an undercover FBI agent for months. | |
| He discussed sedating child relatives with Benadryl and bragged about his collection of child pornography. | |
| On one instance, King shared a photo of baby clothes while expressing his interest in assaulting his soon-to-be born son. | |
| A Chicago vet and dog breeder was busted in an FBI sting for sharing child pornography and making disturbing comments about his soon-to-be-born son. | |
| Adam Stafford King, he's a vet ophthalmologist, so he's an eye surgeon for dogs, or for all animals, I guess. | |
| The Elbert man has a history of viewing explicit images of children dating back to at least 2017. | |
| According to documents, the charges stem from an incident beginning in September of 23 when King began communicating with a New York man through the gay dating app Scruff. | |
| He and the man spoke interchangeably on the app and encrypted messaging service Telegram with King using the handle PervChaiDude. | |
| So these people actively call themselves perverts. | |
| And child molesters. | |
| Now, I mean, would you think that that guy was a pedophile? | |
| It's just an honest question. | |
| I mean, some people think that there's like an actual... | |
| You can just tell some... | |
| I don't know, what do you call this? | |
| I don't know, facial scientists or whatever. | |
| Some people claim there's some science behind it. | |
| Excuse me. | |
| In the communication with the FBI, King indicated that both men identified as pervs, according to the FBI. King discussed his interest in underage children on several occasions. | |
| In one message, he professed that single digits, meaning children under 10 years of age, were his fave, were his favorite. | |
| The vet clarified that he had a liking for boys and girls aged 0 to 9, but preferred boys. | |
| The FBI discovered the New Yorker's messages with King in October 23 after executing a search warrant on his electronic devices. | |
| The agency was ultimately given control over the counts with a covert agent assuming the role of the New York man. | |
| King wrote extensively about his experience abusing children. | |
| In November of 23, a message he described himself as an uncle, adding, I play with nephews and nieces. | |
| I've done almost everything. | |
| He described how he would sedate the children before abusing them, writing, I generally use Benadryl, noting that it provides a wide safety margin and I usually double an adult dose. | |
| King also gave several clues about his identity, including that he and his husband were expecting a child in the spring through a surrogate. | |
| He claimed and clarified that his husband, Lucas, was a non-perv or not sexually attracted to children. | |
| So they are out there. | |
| laughter laughter Oh, thank goodness. | |
| In some of the most shocking messages, King expressed interest in sexually assaulting his son. | |
| Now, this is the kicker here. | |
| I do love the idea of inviting a buddy over when I have my boy. | |
| Just has to be someone I can trust, obviously. | |
| I plan on getting my male appendage in him ASAP. Now, would you believe that this man has pled not guilty? | |
| CBS reporting, Chicago vet, dog show judge pleads not guilty to child porn charge. | |
| A Chicago-area veterinarian who has judged national dog shows pleaded not guilty to a charge of child pornography. | |
| Adam Stafford King, a vet, ophthalmologist, in a statement, King's lawyer, Jonathan S. Beattie of Beattie& Singer said... | |
| The press nor the public should jump to any conclusions. | |
| Mr. | |
| King pled not guilty because he is in fact not guilty. | |
| He is committed to fighting these charges until his name is cleared. | |
| We look forward to a swift trial where the facts will demonstrate Mr. | |
| King's innocence and that he's been wrongfully accused. | |
| What could possibly be your defense? | |
| Unless you've got some technicality like they've mishandled the evidence or something, which I don't even know. | |
| It's happened before. | |
| I had a child porn case. | |
| But I had a friend of mine who was on a jury where the guy was clearly intoxicated and clearly, you know, had killed somebody and left, you know, a single mom and a child. | |
| Child's no longer without a mother. | |
| But as a member of the jury, they had no blood alcohol test. | |
| They had no blood alcohol test. | |
| And, of course, one was given, and then as soon as this jury service was over, he goes and looks up the case, right? | |
| He was trying to be a good juror. | |
| Following the instructions of the judge, he goes and looks up the case, and there's clearly a blood alcohol level, but somehow through some sort of chicanery, some sort of mishandling, the defense got the blood alcohol test was not admissible in court. | |
| So they could only give the guy like a year in jail for doing this, because they could not prove that he was in fact intoxicated. | |
| I don't know. | |
| I don't know what your defense is for something like this, though. | |
| They've literally got messages of you planning, premeditating your rape of your adopted son. | |
| And pimping him out to other people. | |
| And again, this is what's so weird. | |
| It's commonplace. | |
| There is a pattern here. | |
| This guy is planning on inviting a friend over to molest his son. | |
| And then you have this story from last year. | |
| This should have been one of the top stories of the year, but of course it wasn't. | |
| Gay couple charged with molesting their adoptive sons also pimped them out to pedophile ring. | |
| This is just what happens. | |
| A gay couple from Georgia charged with molesting their two adopted sons and using them to record child porn also allegedly pimped them out to members of a local pedophile ring. | |
| A months-long investigation by Town Hall revealed that William Dale Zulock, 33, and Zachary Jacoby Zulock, 35, allegedly used social media to prostitute their elementary-age sons. | |
| There they are. | |
| They're the two victims with these two gay dads who say they love their family, which we know what that means. | |
| We know what they're really normalizing. | |
| So when you go back to the strategy, when you go back to what we said, this is, again, Rosaria Butterfield's article, when it says, quoting this 1989 book, After the Ball. | |
| Which gave them their blueprint to become normalized and acceptance. | |
| And they said, keep the message focused on the normalization of homosexuality. | |
| The authors declared it in plain English, no public sex or no gay disturbances. | |
| Is this a gay disturbance? | |
| Would you consider something like this a gay disturbance? | |
| It certainly didn't stop at the Obergefell Supreme Court case, did it? | |
| No, it hasn't stopped there at all. | |
| It's gotten worse and worse and worse. | |
| And honestly, I don't know what it's going to take to wake us up. | |
| Because it's not stopping. | |
| It's getting worse and worse and worse and worse. | |
| We're going to take a break. | |
| This is the Millstone Report. | |
| Don't go anywhere. | |
| anywhere we'll be back here in just a moment war Inflation. | |
| Rate hikes. | |
| Banks crashing. | |
| To call it shocking isn't even scratching the surface. | |
| Many of us expect a financial crisis to happen, but how suddenly it could happen is frightening. | |
| Is this how the next financial crisis begins? | |
| We all don't know. | |
| Which might explain why gold and silver are surging to record levels. | |
| And if the value of the dollar continues to decline? | |
| The demand for gold and silver could continue to rise. | |
| So don't let your hard-earned wealth fall victim to the bad decisions of bankers, regulators and politicians. | |
| I've decided to exercise control over my money by buying precious metals. | |
| Call the precious metals experts at GoldCo today at 844-905-GOLD or visit paul4gold.com to learn more about how gold and silver could help safeguard your hard-earned savings. | |
| Today, GoldCo is offering you up to 10% instant match and bonus silver with a qualified account. | |
| Call 844-905-GOLD or visit paul4gold.com. | |
| Thank you. | |
| Welcome back to the Millstone Report. | |
| Thanks so much for being with us. | |
| Before we go any further, though, I do want to tell you, just share some more sponsors with you. | |
| We have the Bearded Sergeant Coffee. | |
| If you want a great cup of coffee, you have to consider the Bearded Sergeant. | |
| Fresh roasted coffee, Costa Rican coffee, and a portion of all sales go to the charity Homes for Our Troops, which builds homes for post-9-11 veterans that went overseas and Just try this. | |
| I mean, you're going to love it. | |
| Fresh roasted Costa Rican coffee. | |
| I personally know the guy who's the owner of this company, BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone. | |
| Go to BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone. | |
| And you can save 15% if you use promo code Paul. | |
| You're not going to regret it. | |
| It's delicious tasting coffee. | |
| Again, the Bearded Sergeant. | |
| And I didn't know this, but apparently the concept of a Bearded Sergeant because of facial hair regulations in the military is not really a thing. | |
| So it's kind of a... | |
| I guess it's an ironic thing if you know anything about the military, which I clearly don't. | |
| But anyway, BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone if you want a great... | |
| Also, we've got to talk about my game, which is Left Wing Will and the Red Pill. | |
| Left Wing Will and the Red Pill, this is the game that mocks the left, that laughs at the left, that makes fun of the left, and you need to check it out. | |
| I personally wrote this game, and you're going to love it. | |
| You're going to laugh. | |
| You go to leftwingwill.com, use promo code Paul, again, to save you 15%, and you will not regret this. | |
| I promise you, we spent a lot of time, I spent a lot of time A whole year riding this game, getting the game to market. | |
| We've got plenty of inventory. | |
| And so you get to decide, is Will going to get red-pilled or not? | |
| That's the whole goal of it. | |
| It's really kind of more like whose line is it anyway, though, where the points don't really matter, but you keep score anyway. | |
| You're going to laugh. | |
| Trust me, it's fun. | |
| We're going to play through some of it as the show progresses. | |
| Maybe we'll do that on Friday. | |
| Maybe we'll do a Kim Trails Friday. | |
| We talked about this yesterday. | |
| Every Friday, have a show about Kim Trails or some updates about it. | |
| We could also maybe play some Left Wing Will. | |
| Who knows? | |
| Here's a guy by the name of Mike Benz. | |
| I'm not really familiar with this guy much at all. | |
| He is the Executive Director of FFO Freedom. | |
| If we click on that, that's the Foundation for Freedom Online. | |
| There is a documentary that's been circulating out there. | |
| He says he's a former State Department cyber author of Unpunishable Monstrosity, Weapons of Mass Deletion. | |
| Many of you may know, and again, look, all I know is I watched a snippet of this documentary and it helped me answer a question. | |
| Okay? | |
| It helped me answer a question. | |
| And the question was from yesterday. | |
| We were talking about Brexit. | |
| We were talking about elections and we were talking about Brexit and how Brexit was allowed to happen. | |
| We were talking about Donald Trump in 2016 and how Donald Trump was allowed to happen. | |
| We're not discounting the idea that it's possible... | |
| You know, that elections were totally fair and above board up until 2016, right? | |
| Because there's people that still have a lot of questions about the election between Obama and Romney in 2012. | |
| Not that Romney would have been much better, or any better for that matter. | |
| You can make the argument it might have been worse. | |
| I mean, you can make the argument. | |
| What it would have done... | |
| Well, it just would have meant that... | |
| Republicans wouldn't have fought Obama harder, so whatever, it's all theater. | |
| So we were wondering about this idea of basically open and free elections, but really what it comes down to, this documentary, is censorship. | |
| And so somebody sent this to me. | |
| A listener of this program kind of sent this to me. | |
| It's about seven minutes. | |
| We're going to stop and go here. | |
| We're going to listen to it. | |
| But it's fascinating because it talks about the 2014 coup. | |
| It talks about everything really changed in 2014. | |
| The censorship started in 2014, but originally, this whole idea of the internet, this whole idea of freedom of speech on the internet, was something that the Department of Defense and the intelligence agencies, they wanted. | |
| Why did they want it? | |
| Because they wanted to use it as a tool for dissident organizations and countries under regimes that the United States and the CIA didn't like to have a communication tool to planned revolution, color revolutions, and things like that. | |
| Does that all sound familiar? | |
| Of course it does. | |
| Now, of course, that color revolution... | |
| Strategy has been used against the American people. | |
| And we're all very familiar with that now. | |
| But here is this snippet, again, of this why free speech is under attack on the internet. | |
| And we're going to watch it. | |
| Free speech on the internet was an instrument of statecraft almost from the outset of the privatization of the internet in 1991. | |
| We quickly discovered through the efforts of the Defense Department, the State Department, and our intelligence services that people were using the internet to congregate on blogs and forums. | |
| And free speech was Championed more than anybody by the Pentagon, the State Department, and our CIA cutout NGO blob architecture as a way to support dissident groups around the world in order to help them overthrow authoritarian governments as they were sort of billed. | |
| Essentially, internet free speech allowed insta-regime change operations to be able to facilitate the foreign policy establishment's State Department agenda. | |
| Google is a great example. | |
| This Google began as a DARPA grant by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were Stanford PhDs. | |
| They got their funding as part of a joint CIA-NSA program to chart how, quote, birds of a feather flock together online through search engine aggregation. | |
| And then one year later, they launched Google and then became a military contractor quickly. | |
| They got Google Maps by purchasing a CIA satellite software, essentially. | |
| And the ability to use free speech on the Internet as a way to circumvent state control over media all around the world was seen as a way to be able to do what used to be done out of CIA station houses or out of embassies or consulates in a way that was totally turbocharged. | |
| Totally turbocharged to subvert the media narrative in that country. | |
| Now, certainly in America, we have made use of that. | |
| I mean, that's what the dissident right has been using the Internet for for a very, very long time. | |
| You also have your controlled opposition that appears to be using the Internet for those things, right? | |
| And again, it's good to just be healthy. | |
| It's good to have a healthy skepticism of really any voice out there at this point and take everything with a grain of salt. | |
| But it's fascinating, specifically during 2020, or you could even talk in the wake of the election of Donald Trump in 2016, and the Russia, Russia, Russia, and people trying to combat the clear, it was obvious that they were making this whole thing up, and it just took a long time for us to get the hard evidence put out there for normies to realize that they framed Donald Trump for treason. | |
| But specifically with COVID, they shut that down. | |
| They did not allow us to use the internet. | |
| The average person was not allowed to use the internet as a way to leapfrog over the barriers of the mainstream media and their official narrative. | |
| We witnessed the weaponization of these systems that we have come to use, that we have come to know, that we have come to depend on, to get the truth out there, and they were turned against us. | |
| Essentially, the spigots were turned off. | |
| Is everybody out there under this notion that we're in a free society? | |
| No, we're not. | |
| We're essentially monkeys in a cage, and they're controlling certain stimuli and access to certain things, and they want to do it the way we would control our thermostats in our home, to set the social conditions just right for whatever they want to achieve. | |
| Now, given the fact that, I mean, there still was a way to get out there to get over it, but, you know, you have somebody like Rumble. | |
| Now you do have at least some, you know, a little bit more free speech or I guess a lot more free speech on X than you did. | |
| I mean, there's still some things that still some censorship or shadow banning or whatever that's going on. | |
| But my goodness, if you want to know why you've got the Australian government going after Elon Musk for sharing the video of that Christian pastor or a bishop being stabbed by the Muslim, or even Lula's government down there going after Musk and threatening employees, it's because they really need the ability to censor when the next big thing happens. | |
| So we'll all go along with it. | |
| This is a fascinating documentary. | |
| We're going to keep going with it. | |
| There's only a few minutes left, but it's not the full thing. | |
| But it was a snippet that somebody sent me, and I thought it really kind of answered... | |
| They decided to cut it off after Brexit, or no, specifically after Ukraine and the color revolution, the Maidan revolution that the U.S. funded, the U.S. implemented against the democratically elected government of Ukraine. | |
| That's when things got serious, and that was pretty much after Brexit. | |
| All of the internet free speech technology was initially created by our national security state. | |
| VPN, virtual private networks to hide your IP address. | |
| TOR, the dark web to be able to buy and sell goods anonymously. | |
| End-to-end encrypted chats. | |
| All of these things were created initially as DARPA projects or as joint CIA-NSA projects to be able to help intelligence-backed groups to overthrow governments that were causing a problem to the Clinton administration or the Bush administration or the Obama administration. | |
| And this plan worked magically from about 1991 until about 2014, when there began to be an about-face on internet freedom and its utilities. | |
| In 2014, after the coup in Ukraine, there was an unexpected counter-coup where Crimea and the Donbas broke away. | |
| And they broke away with essentially a military backstop that NATO was highly unprepared for at the time. | |
| They had one last Hail Mary chance, which was the Crimea annexation vote. | |
| And when the hearts and minds of the people of Crimea voted to join the Russian Federation, that was the last straw for the concept of free speech on the internet in the eyes of NATO. As they saw it, the fundamental nature of war changed at that moment. | |
| An industry had been created that spanned the Pentagon, the British Ministry of Defense, and Brussels into an organized political warfare outfit, essentially infrastructure that was created initially stationed in Germany and in Central and Eastern Europe, basically to create the ability to have the military work with the social media companies to censor Russian propaganda or to censor domestic right-wing populist groups in Europe who were rising in political power at the time because of the migrant crisis. | |
| When Brexit happened in 2016, that was this crisis moment where suddenly they didn't have to worry just about Central and Eastern Europe anymore. | |
| It was coming westward, this idea of Russian control over hearts and minds. | |
| And so Brexit was due in 2016, the very next month at the Warsaw Conference. | |
| NATO formally amended its charter to expressly commit to hybrid warfare as this new NATO capacity. | |
| So they went from basically 70 years of tanks to this explicit capacity building for censoring tweets that they were deemed to be Russian proxies. | |
| And again, it's not just Russian propaganda. | |
| These were now Brexit groups or groups like Matteo Salvini in Italy or in Greece or in Germany or in Spain with the Vox party. | |
| Now at the time... | |
| So they just went full totalitarian. | |
| They went full censorship. | |
| They went full ministry of truth. | |
| That's what happened. | |
| They couldn't stand it anymore. | |
| People didn't like the cages they were constructing for them. | |
| They didn't like the European Union cage that was being constructed for them that was seeing them have less and less representation in their own countries, less and less sovereignty in their own countries. | |
| And so NATO's been taking... | |
| Man, you know what? | |
| You know what this... | |
| I mean, kind of what it seems like to me is that NATO's been taking L's a lot longer for a long time. | |
| We just didn't know it. | |
| I mean, we know they've taken a giant L when it comes to the Russia-Ukraine war. | |
| And they just refuse to accept the L. And who knows, they may escalate that into something catastrophic. | |
| It could be used to cancel the 2024 election. | |
| I mean, even with these polls showing that Trump has a lead, they're still inflating Biden to make it seem like he has a chance. | |
| They certainly will try to steal it if they... | |
| They're certainly going to try to steal it again. | |
| Anyway, yeah, NATO's been taking L's for a long time. | |
| And they've been becoming this totalitarian beast for, you know, a decade now. | |
| NATO was publishing white papers saying that the biggest threat NATO faces is not actually a military invasion from Russia. | |
| It's losing domestic elections across Europe to all these right-wing populist groups who, because they were mostly working class movements, were campaigning on cheap Russian energy at a time when the U.S. was pressuring this energy diversification policy. | |
| They made the argument, after Brexit, now the entire rules-based international order would collapse unless the military took control over media. | |
| Because Brexit would give rise to Frexit in France with Marine Le Pen, to Spexit in Spain with the Vox Party, to Italexa in Italy, to Grexit in Germany, to Grexit in Greece. | |
| The EU would come apart so NATO would be killed without a single bullet being fired. | |
| Not only that, now that NATO's gone, Now there's no enforcement arm for the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, or the World Bank. | |
| So now the financial stakeholders who depend on the battering ram of the national security state would basically be helpless against governments around the world. | |
| So from their perspective, if the military did not begin to censor the internet, all of the democratic institutions and infrastructure that gave rise to the modern world after World War... | |
| But all these democratic institutions are now just facades. | |
| They don't actually work for the people. | |
| All they do is... | |
| Keep elites in positions of power and keep them from ever being held accountable, right? | |
| So that's all code for, yeah, we just want to rule forever without having to get the consent of the governed. | |
| That's really what that means. | |
| Who would collapse. | |
| The battle for hearts and minds had been something that we had been giving ourselves a long moral license leash. | |
| Since 1948, one of the godfathers of the CIA, George Kennan, 12 days after we rigged the Italian election in 1948, by stuffing ballot boxes and working with the mob, published a memo called the inauguration of organized political warfare. | |
| Where he said, listen, it's a mean old world out there. | |
| We at the CIA just rigged the Italian election. | |
| We had to do it because if the Communist won, maybe there'd never be another election in Italy again. | |
| But it's really effective, guys. | |
| We need a department of dirty tricks to be able to do this around the world. | |
| And it's essentially a new social contract we're constructing with the American people because this is not the way we've conducted diplomacy before. | |
| But essentially, what ended up happening there is we created this foreign domestic firewall, we said. | |
| That we have a department of dirty tricks to be able to rig elections, to be able to control media, to be able to meddle in the internal affairs of every other plot of dirt in the country. | |
| This sort of sacred dirt in which the American homeland sits, they are not allowed to operate there. | |
| The State Department, the Defense Department, and the CIA are all expressly forbidden from operating on U.S. soil. | |
| Of course, this is so far from the case, it's not even possible. | |
| Funny, but that's because of a number of laundering tricks that they've developed over 70 years of doing this. | |
| But essentially, there was no moral quandary at first with respect to the creation of the censorship industry when it started out in Germany and in Lithuania and Latvia and Estonia and in Sweden and Finland. | |
| There began to be a more diplomatic debate about it after Brexit, and then it became full throttle when Trump was elected. | |
| And what little resistance there was, was washed over by the rise and saturation of Russiagate, which basically allowed them to not have to deal with the moral ambiguities of censoring your own people, because if Trump was a Russian asset, you no longer really had a traditional free speech issue, it was a national security issue. | |
| It was only after Russiagate died in July 2019 when Robert Mueller basically choked on the stand for three hours and revealed he had absolutely nothing after two and a half years of investigation that the foreign to domestic switcheroo took place where they took all of this censorship architecture spanning DHS, | |
| the FBI, the CIA, the DOD, the DOJ and then the thousands of government funded NGO and private sector mercenary firms This is the part that I wanted to pause on. | |
| The private sector mercenary firms, look at all this. | |
| So this is essentially, you know, it's fascism. | |
| I mean, the government basically controls these corporations that disseminate information to us and give us choice architecture. | |
| This is a map I just wanted you guys to see, kind of hang out there for just a second. | |
| You know, Georgia's Coca-Cola, obviously ExxonMobil, Texas, Walmart, Arkansas. | |
| Look, you got, you know, you got Apple is California, Comcast is Pennsylvania. | |
| Yeah, it's just fascinating to see who really is pulling the levers here. | |
| Backing up just a little bit. | |
| The FBI, the CIA, the DOD, the DOJ, and then the thousands of government-funded NGO and private sector mercenary firms were all transited from a foreign predicate, a Russian disinformation predicate, to a democracy predicate by saying that disinformation is not just a threat when it comes from the Russians, it's actually an intrinsic threat to democracy itself. | |
| By that, they were able to launder the entire democracy promotion regime change toolkit just in time for the 2020 election. | |
| Again, that was only like seven minutes. | |
| That documentary, it's a clip from a documentary by at Mike Ben Cyber, and again, we'll throw that up there. | |
| It says he's the Executive Director for FFO Freedom, which is the Foundation for Freedom Online, former State Department cybersecurity, I guess, author of Unpunishable Monstrosity, Weapons of Mass Deletion. | |
| Anyway, that little clip was sent to me, and You know, it got me thinking just about what we were talking about. | |
| Just kind of building on what we talked about, if you watched the show yesterday, it wasn't, you know, it was just a brief kind of moment of speculation between, you know, the idea of fair elections that you can trust versus what happened at Brexit versus what happened in the 2016 election of Trump and how that apparently just totally upset the apple cart. | |
| And how it was allowed to take place. | |
| And then after that, things... | |
| Again, I think elections have been rigged longer than just 2016, but something certainly shifted. | |
| There was certainly a shift in the level, just the brazenness with which they were willing to take the mask off and begin to censor us. | |
| And it's a very interesting dichotomy, Russia, Russia, Russia, but then it switches to, okay, Russia doesn't matter anymore. | |
| Who cares if he didn't collude with the Russians? | |
| This is about our democracy. | |
| And then you heard Nancy Pelosi at the Oxford Institute, the Oxford Society, talking about populism and the dangers of populism and the dangers it poses to elites. | |
| So this whole thing, man, the whole thing in all these different Western countries has all been about populism. | |
| Suppressing the people. | |
| NATO was to protect the Christian Europe and Christian West from the godless Soviet communists. | |
| And we've got to ask ourselves now, who are the godless among us today? | |
| Who are the godless communist Soviets today in now charge? | |
| Things have totally switched. | |
| Totally switched. | |
| Total role reversal here in the West. | |
| So sad. | |
| Unbelievable. | |
| Alright, so, not to end on a black bill, because we're not going to. | |
| How much time do I have? | |
| Okay, yeah, let's go with it. | |
| This is the Millstone Report, after all. | |
| Protestia has this story... | |
| This is ridiculous. | |
| If you're under a female Pastrix, this is just every reason not to be. | |
| The Honesty is Stunning Pastrix Hannah reveals the best part of starting her own church is that she doesn't have to tiptoe around congregants and hide what she really believes from other pastors anymore. | |
| You know, like the Bible just being a simple metaphor. | |
| Yeah, this is why Paul forbid women to preach, by the way. | |
| Take a listen. | |
| Our God of Truth and wisdom will not speak to you with lies or half-truths. | |
| If what you are hearing is telling you to close yourself off, to shut down, to not be authentic, then it is not God. | |
| You know what the best thing about starting different churches? | |
| I get to be free from the entire story of my life of watching what I say, of tiptoeing around certain subjects, of being nervous about people in charge, finding out that I have certain beliefs. | |
| I'm not even talking like, yes, obviously, LGBT inclusion, but like, I'm telling you, Jared, I'm so sorry. | |
| At our previous place, when it was great until it wasn't, when it wasn't, we were going to write a little thing about how we disagreed with him. | |
| And we were like, yeah, I think being queer is fine. | |
| And that was one thing, right? | |
| And then Jared was like, and I think the Bible is a metaphor. | |
| And I was like... | |
| I had written nine pages, single-spaced, mind you. | |
| He wrote two paragraphs. | |
| And I was like, this is so much worse. | |
| You can't say the Bible is a metaphor. | |
| We're going to get fired. | |
| And, I mean, it is. | |
| There's many, not the whole thing, but there's like many parts of the Bible that are metaphor, okay? | |
| I don't know where I'm going with this. | |
| I feel hot. | |
| Certain beliefs such as the Bible is... | |
| I have an idea where she's going. | |
| ...are not allowed, okay? | |
| And I had been careful for years in college and in that stupid degree and then in seminary and then working at a church to phrase everything in the most perfect way possible so that I could say things like, well, some scholars... | |
| I believe that this portion of the Bible is not based in factual reality, but is in fact... | |
| Yes, it was a lot of thinking on my part. | |
| I know I said this was going to be a black pill, but some of those portions are... | |
| I'm assuming that they all have to do with the fact that being a sodomite is a sin. | |
| That's just a metaphor. | |
| That's not real. | |
| I have to be like, how do I phrase this? | |
| So I can't be like, they won't have anything to say to me. | |
| It was hard and honestly horrible to change everything about my life to do this. | |
| But guess what? | |
| I get to be free. | |
| I get to be more open, honest, and authentic, and there is nothing better. | |
| I can stand up here and be like, it is. | |
| And everyone laughs, not looks at me like... | |
| Slippery slope to hell. | |
| Elders meeting, yes. | |
| Immediately. | |
| Well, those are her words, not mine. | |
| The slippery slope to hell. | |
| Again, this is not a black pill, but we did have to assign a millstone. | |
| Pastrix, Hannah here, does need a millstone because she's got probably kids in that congregation that are being led down a very dangerous path. | |
| And we need to pray for them. | |
| Here is, let's see here, a guy named Jeff, Jeff Wright, saying, Obeying the command to love your enemies requires being comfortable identifying someone as your enemy. | |
| So if you're going to love your enemies, you also have to be willing to say they are. | |
| They are enemies, and I'm going to pray for them, and I'm going to love them. | |
| I heard over the weekend at church that Christians are supposed to hate sin. | |
| We're supposed to hate sin, right? | |
| But it's not the hatred of sin, because God hates things. | |
| God hates sin. | |
| But it's not the hatred of sin that fuels us. | |
| Let me say that again. | |
| It's not the hatred of sin that should fuel us. | |
| It can sometimes, and that's a pitfall. | |
| No, what should fuel us is our love of God and our thankful hearts that we have been forgiven in the name of Jesus and his finished work of the cross. | |
| That's what fuels us every day. | |
| That's what should give us joy, is the love of God. | |
| And out of that, yes, we also do hate sin, but we don't need to let the hatred of sin fuel us Be the only source of our fuel in this life. | |
| And that leads me to this last part as we run out of time here. | |
| Somebody named Everyday Dominion said that he was almost murdered, but God! | |
| He said, my parents were 20 and 21. | |
| They were fooling around in Alaska. | |
| Mom got pregnant and Dad put her on a plane to Hawaii where her family was so she could have an abortion. | |
| The night before the abortion in a trailer park in the middle of nowhere, Alaska, God came to a broken man. | |
| That man repented, was filled with the peace of his Creator. | |
| He called my mom and asked her to marry over the phone and said he wanted to have the baby and she said yes. | |
| Turned out to be twins. | |
| Comments like the one below, don't even make me mad. | |
| The devil wanted to kill me too. | |
| But God, but God, he is for me, and if he be for us, who can be against us? | |
| If you're a believer in Christ, take heart. | |
| God brought you into this world, and he is faithful to bring you through it. | |
| Join God and laugh lots, especially at the hate of the world. | |
| And I can't think of a better place to leave you guys than with that message. | |
| If God is for us, then who can be against us? | |
| That's all the time we have for this edition, this Tuesday edition of the Millstone Report. | |
| God bless each and every one of you watching, and we'll see you tomorrow. |
Export Selection