All Episodes
Previous Next
May 13, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
57:08
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Witches Gather For RAGE Fests, Trans Man Wins Girl's 400M Race
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the good-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Hey folks, welcome to the program today.
Thanks so much for being with us.
It is the Milstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell and we can't do the program without you watching every single day.
We've got a great show for you.
It's another week.
It's another Monday.
It's another show about the idol of feminism and how it's a cancer.
Based on envy, which requires, hear me now, feminism now requires a war against masculinity and manhood in order for it to achieve its goals.
You see, the envious want the person or group or whoever is the target of their envy to lose something so they can gain it.
Women gained the right to murder in 1973 but cannot be prosecuted for it.
For all the talk in the West about toxic masculinity and male privilege, the privilege to murder without any state-sanctioned repercussions is pretty incredible when you think about it, but nobody ever seems to make that connection.
Recently, lawyers for the government argued before the United States Supreme Court that former President Obama could not be prosecuted for drone strikes that kill American citizens.
People are understandably outraged at that, or at the very least concerned, because shocker, getting away with murder is something we want to avoid as a society, which is why we prosecute suspected murderers.
But not women who kill their babies.
No, no, no, no, we can't.
We can't do that.
It's been characterized as a gynocracy.
See.
you.
We live in a gynocracy.
This is what gynocracy looks like.
USA Today has been covering what they call rage rituals.
You say, what's a rage ritual?
Well, it's when a gaggle of girls whose parents likely spared the rod to spoil their child, they get to throw these group temper tantrums.
You see, for all of their feministic successes over the years, it seems they are still very, very unhappy.
*Screaming* I hurt you!
*Screaming* I hurt you!
*Screaming* That's more terrifying than the hell scene from the movie Event Horizon.
*Screaming* I just can't believe it.
I have here written interesting.
Is it really?
Is it really interesting?
Call me a square, call me an L7 wiener, whatever you want to say, but that doesn't seem very healthy to me.
That seems sad.
What I see are a bunch of women who are absolutely lost and are in need of deliverance.
That borders on the demonic and it goes to show what happens to moderate women when they reject the created order that God has set forth.
Those ladies seem absolutely miserable, even worse, even more miserable to be around.
Can you imagine how they make other people feel?
In fact, and this is in all seriousness, they're enslaved by their own emotions, depravity, and ultimately they're enslaved by their sin.
And that's just a visible representation of it.
For all the talk about Karens, that may be the most Karen-ist Karen thing I've ever seen.
But honestly, what exactly do all those women who are participating in this new phenomenon, what do they really have to be mad about?
I mean, why are they so enraged?
Why are they participating in these rage rituals?
Now, the video that we just saw, I don't know if you were reading the captions there, and we'll maybe revisit it later in the broadcast, but the video claims that they are expressing pent-up emotions that they're not allowed to normally express, probably because of the patriarchy or something.
That's clearly non-existent.
Are we willing to believe that, generally speaking, though, the feminization of our society and the war against masculinity is not affording feminist women exactly what they've been demanding all these years?
The truth is that the feminist movement has given women everything they want, and they're still not happy about it.
And from a theological standpoint, from a spiritual standpoint, that's because they're running from God to worship themselves.
In the end of that video where the woman had some mud smear on her face, it looked a lot more like some sort of witchcraft ceremony than it did having anything to do with female empowerment.
And these pagan practices are spreading across the West, The late theologian and pastor R.C. Sproul, he once said something about pagans and about their tendency to run from God.
Watch.
It says that natural man does not seek after God.
So where did he get the idea that all these unbelieving pagans are seeking after God?
I hear it all the time.
They'll say, well, my neighbor's not a Christian, but he's seeking.
Thomas Aquinas was asked this question in the Middle Ages, he said, the reason people assume that the pagan is seeking after God is because we look at that person and we see that they're seeking after the benefits that only God can give them.
They're looking for peace of mind, for purpose, for relief from guilt and all the rest.
And so we assume that therefore they're seeking after God.
They're not seeking after God.
They want the benefits of God without Him.
They're seeking after the benefits that only God can give them all the while they're running as fast as they can away from God.
Running as fast as they can away from God.
Have any of you ever fallen in that trap, by the way?
Well, the trap...
I mean, I know we've all fallen short of the glory of God, but I'm talking about the trap of assuming that people that you know, you know they're not Christians, believers, You assume that they're seeking God when, in fact, they're really running from Him.
I mean, I know I've believed that before, and it's a lie, right?
The truth of the matter is, a lot of times we just don't say anything, right?
Oh, they're seeking.
They'll find it.
The truth of the matter is, maybe they need someone to tell them they're running in the wrong direction.
Maybe they need somebody to tell them that they're running blindfolded into a fiery pit.
And as we've mentioned before, the entire gynocracy thing that feminists were promised, it was really also a lie.
I mean, as much as we can see the progress that they've made in the war against men and masculinity, in particular white men, it really is all a lie.
I mean, feminism, as we mentioned earlier, it requires a war on men to be waged.
But then to the last minute, right before the Amazons get to the finish line, the rules are changed.
Ah, just kidding.
Gender and sex is a construct.
We don't even know what a woman is.
Who cares?
Let's let Billy Bob run track as a fake girl so he can blow away the competition.
It must be truly exhausting.
That was a man who calls himself Sadie Schreiner.
Anti-trans activist Riley Gaines, in response to this, had this to say over on X. Let's go to the screen.
Sadie Schreiner, a male competing with women, Won the women's 200 and 400 meter today at the Liberty League Championship meet.
He broke the 400 meter women's record in the process.
And then she says he would have finished last among the other boys by a full two seconds.
One Mississippi, two Mississippi.
That's a long time.
In the track world or the swimming world.
And then she says, this is exactly why we are suing the NCAA. And then, I mean, this is, you've already seen the video.
We just played that for you.
But, I mean, there he is, atop of the...
Atop of the, I don't know what you would call this, the platform.
Here he is, number one.
And you can clearly see that he's a he.
I mean, you just take one look.
You can see in that video that he's a he.
As he came running by.
I mean, as he comes running by here, he's clearly like a Cro-Magnon man.
Look, compared to the other actual girls, and look at this man.
Look.
It's a man running.
You can clearly tell by the gate.
You can clearly tell by all of it that that is a man.
And there he is.
You know, it's just really amazing.
And we played a clip several weeks ago at this point of Vody Bauckham, Pastor Vody Bauckham, saying, look, this is one of those things where Christians are, you know, you're not going to be able to remain neutral.
You no longer can remain neutral as a Christian because of stuff like this.
When it's your daughter, you know, and she lines up on the block next to a man, you're going to have to say, no, we're not going to do this, right?
No, we are not going to...
Sure, my daughter may not be able to participate in this sporting event, but that's a sacrifice we're going to make because we're not going to affirm lies.
We're not going to affirm lies.
We're not going to allow her to...
That's not even to mention the locker room thing.
There's plenty of dads.
We talked about this last week.
Plenty of dads in this audience, I'm sure, that if a man goes into a bathroom or a locker room with your daughter, you're probably going to end up on the 6 o'clock news.
But yeah, this is what's ironic here, right?
This is what gynocracy looks like.
This is where it eventually ends.
I've been trying to make this point for a long time.
It's just so demonic.
Whatever deal was made to try to thwart God's order when it comes to male and female, that was never the goal.
The goal was to blur the lines between the sexes to where we don't even know what the image of God is in the two distinct men versus women, male versus female.
The fine print of whatever soul-selling contract That was signed by the feminist movement to get us to this point.
In the fine print, it said, oh, and by the way, just kidding, at some point, the definition of what a woman is is debatable, and we reserve the right to redefine what that definition is at any moment.
Thereby erasing all of your progress.
Because feminism depended, the whole point of feminism depended on the different sexes.
It depended on men being men and women being women.
That's the whole reason they were pitted against each other.
So that women could claim discrimination, wage gap, whatever, sexual harassment, you name it.
Feminism depended on that.
Well, now we've erased all of that.
Because we have a Supreme Court justice that says, I don't even know what a woman is.
And so this is ultimately really what gynocracy looks like.
When women, you know, get control of things, this is what we end up having.
And how many of these women here, look, they're smiling.
They're participating in this facade.
They're participating in this sham of an athletic event.
They are going along with the lie itself.
And so this is a really, it's really awful.
We don't have mass protests going on when it comes to stuff like this.
And people pulling their kids out of these woke, now demonic sporting events.
and saying we're not going to participate but they won't do it because there's so many people that are still so scared there's so many people that are still just waiting for permission to say out loud what they believe in their heads and there really is no better example of that I would say than just well maybe no there's better examples but a recent example of that has got to be the massive crowds that turned out this past weekend in New Jersey for Donald Trump we're talking about New Jersey here Massive.
Say what you want to about the election.
It doesn't matter.
The amount of people that turned out at that New Jersey rally was gargantuan.
It was humongous.
It was massive.
And some people in New Jersey may be ready to say out loud what they've been thinking in their heads this entire time.
The author of The Case for Christian Nationalism, Stephen Wolf, the gynocratic contradiction is when the inevitable untethered empathy of gynocracy leads to self-destruction, i.e.
harming women.
This is what Stephen can say, what I have spent entire...
Long segments and entire episodes on this program trying to say, and he can say it in a sentence.
It's incredibly humbling.
The author of The Case for Christian Nationalism, Stephen Wolf, this is exactly right.
It is a gynocratic contradiction.
And it comes from this idea, again, we're going to alter the fine print of the contract, and now we can just redefine what a woman is.
And so now, I mean, feminism is pointless and useless.
And yet we still worship women in our society in varying degrees in a way that they shouldn't be worshipped or revered.
They should be protected.
They should be cherished in a proper context.
Don't misunderstand me.
When I looked at those, when I look at these women, these USA Today women, you know, absolutely throwing a temper tantrum.
Just to refresh, if you're just joining us, USA Today has now been covering these gaggles of ladies getting together to beat sticks on the ground and scream.
They're calling them rage rituals because they believe, and again, this is also the inversion of good and evil, that they believe that doing this, getting out these negative emotions will make them more receptive for joy, make them more receptive for happy thoughts, When in reality they're opening themselves up to all kinds of dark influence.
But just to refresh your memory, here it is.
Oh my gosh, this is what guidocracy looks this is what guidocracy looks like to me.
This is what feminism has done to these women?
This is what feminism has done to this?
Oh, it's literally into witching.
Yeah, I mean, so this...
They are witchcraft rituals.
Because it literally says, Mia Banducci, when people do this, it gives themselves permission to release their anger, their capacity for joy actually expands.
And this is the author of a book called Into Witching.
Yeah, okay, so...
My intuition was right before I even knew, you have to forgive me, my journalistic ignorance here, that this witch essentially was quoted.
Unbelievable.
It's just so patently obvious, right?
I'm talking just a disgusting...
I mean, can you imagine that this type of...
The force, the spiritual darkness you're opening yourself up to to just get in a bunch, just get in a gaggle of women and just start screaming and rage screaming and beating sticks on the ground like that is in any way healthy.
But it is certainly not new under the sun.
It is certainly something that pagans and witches have been doing for a very, very long time in various degrees, various ways throughout all of human history.
Those who are Not seeking God.
They're seeking themselves.
They're actually, as R.C. Sproul said, running as fast as they can away from God.
Running as fast as they can.
Now, here's a little bit of a white pill.
Not to be just a black pill, right?
We on this program, I think all of us, and I don't mean to speak for you guys, but I myself am very much a black pill bulimic, as I've said on the program a few times now.
Where we'll take a black pill but then we regurgitate it up because there is hope and God is real and he sees all of this and rules over this entire world and is sovereign over this entire world.
There are women who Become feminists and then they figure out that it's a total lie and they are redeemed and they figure this out that this is not at all how they need to lead their lives.
Here's one of these women who's at least figured out that feminism is a scam where she said this.
Feminism is a scam.
A few years ago, I was an angry, blue-haired feminist.
I once believed that male privilege was real and that I was a victim of the wage gap.
Now that I understand the true motives of feminism, I know that this could not be further from the truth and that modern-day feminism is a war on true masculinity.
Before women had the right to vote, most were stay-at-home wives, which meant they weren't working jobs and couldn't be taxed.
Our overlords didn't like it.
Hang on one second.
I love this part of this photo here.
Let's back it up.
Can we see the blonde massaging?
So, you've got this wife, I'm assuming, massaging her husband here, and you've got that versus what we just saw, that USA Today coverage of these women just losing their minds.
As a man myself, I just think, man, I know the Bible says that women are the weaker sex, right?
And women need the protection of a man.
They need good Christian men in positions of power so that they can be protected from a lot of the other non-Christian pagan men that would exploit them.
And it's the exact exploitation that we're seeing right now, you know, where women have been sold this lie that they need to dress, you know, they need to dress scantily clad, right?
They need to be scantily clad.
They need to reveal as much skin.
We see it all over social media apps and everything else.
It's women just selling themselves.
And it's absolutely, you know, if you're a wicked man, or, you know, if you're not...
A Christian man that can look at something like that and say, that's wrong.
I want to flee from that.
But if you want to encourage it, say, hey, it's actually empowerment.
They think the patriarchy in many ways is being diminished, but it's actually still there.
It's like, oh, look at me.
I'm half naked and I'm empowered.
The fleshly guy is going to be like, whatever you need to tell yourself, sweetheart, let's go to the club.
You know?
Whatever.
I don't care.
Anyway, it's just such a contrast, right?
Women then versus women today.
Alright, let's finish this up.
Which meant they weren't working jobs and couldn't be taxed.
Our overlords didn't like that.
Rockefeller started funding feminist campaigns in media.
And as a consequence of the movement, women started entering the workforce and leaving the home.
Children would then be separated from their parents.
And sent to Rockefeller-funded schools to be indoctrinated by the state.
All of this ultimately disrupting the family unit at its core.
Feminism is defined as the belief in social, economic, and political equality of the sexes.
But in the West, I must ask, what rights do men have that women don't?
Modern feminists are convincing women that hook up culture, using hormonal birth control, and not shaving is liberation.
That toxic masculinity is prevalent and the patriarchy must be dismantled.
Through movies and media, we're taught that working for the man, climbing the corporate ladder, and paying tax is more empowering and valuable than raising the next generation.
Women have lost touch with our natural loving instincts and birth rates are plummeting.
Men and women are not the same.
And by protesting for equality of outcome rather than opportunity, feminists are demonizing and emasculating men.
She is exactly right.
and And that's why there are a lot of men who say, I want nothing to do with modern women as well.
It's a real problem.
The birth rate aspect of it is a real problem.
It really goes to show you She does a good job here of talking about the decline of not just population, but the taxes.
That's right.
So she does a great job here of talking about the tax aspect of it, right?
So you have the decline of the family, but it's not just the...
Okay.
The CIA, it's well known.
They funded feminist women's lib magazines.
They did this.
And she's right.
It was a two-prong approach.
Two birds with one stone.
We're going to fund feminism and we're going to double our tax base after the PSYOP works.
We're going to double our tax base.
We've got women in the workforce that's more money that can go to fund these intelligence agencies that are, surprise, surprise, essentially occupying our government and enslaving us.
In the name of protecting us, they've really been weaponized against us.
And then you do have more.
You're going to have kids ripped away from their moms at a younger and younger age, and this goes right along with funding pre-K.
Pre-K used to not be a thing, and people thought they were doing a good thing at the state level.
We need to expand pre-K, expand pre-K.
Well, why do they really have to expand pre-K?
Because mom's got to get back to work.
She's got six weeks of maternity leave, and she's got to, you know, she's got to, you know, and I know there's a daycare thing as well, but you see what I'm saying?
We've got to get the child out from the mom's care and supervision as fast as we can.
Pre-K made that an easier sell.
And what has it really done?
Well, feminism has continued to expand, and now you have women that are growing up and they're having less children.
They're not having any children.
They're not getting married.
The hookup culture is encouraged, but then they're not desirable.
And you have all these 30-something, 35-year-old women, and they're not married.
And they're becoming dog moms.
I saw those memes yesterday.
I hope everybody, by the way, had a great Lord's Day.
I also hope you had a good Mother's Day and celebrated your mom and told your mom that you loved her.
But yeah, I saw the memes out there where you've got these, on Mother's Day, you've got these single women in their 30s that are claiming that they're moms because they own a dog and they're a dog mom.
It's just so ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Coming up here in just a moment, we're going to talk about...
Oh, so we already talked about that.
But we're going to talk about...
Here, this is it.
So Nancy Pelosi...
Let me throw this up there.
Nancy Pelosi went to speak at the Oxford Society.
There's been a lot of really interesting...
Viral clips coming from these debates at the Oxford Society.
And she decides to debate basically that populism is bad.
Nancy Pelosi argues populism is a threat to democracy.
We're going to talk about this because the entire...
And even January 6th comes up here in the gentleman that rebuts her and actually just demolishes her arguments.
But January 6th came up.
We've long talked about how January 6th was basically a fed op to destroy populism.
They wanted all of us to be afraid and never to think that we actually have a say in who our leaders are ever again.
It's amazing what Nancy Pelosi admits to, what she cops to here.
We're going to listen to that clip here when we come back from break.
But this is the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for being with us.
And we are going to take a break.
Be back here in just a moment.
don't go anywhere.
War.
Inflation.
Rate hikes.
Banks crashing.
To call it shocking isn't even scratching the surface.
Many of us expect a financial crisis to happen, but how suddenly it could happen is frightening.
Is this how the next financial crisis begins?
We all don't know.
Which might explain why gold and silver are surging to record levels.
And if the value of the dollar continues to decline?
The demand for gold and silver could continue to rise.
So don't let your hard-earned wealth fall victim to the bad decisions of bankers, regulators and politicians.
I've decided to exercise control over my money by buying precious metals.
Call the precious metals experts at Gold Co. today at 844-905-GOLD or visit paul4gold.com to learn more about how gold and silver could help safeguard your hard-earned savings.
Today, Gold Co. is offering you up to 10% instant match and bonus silver with a qualified account.
Call 844-905-GOLD or visit paul4gold.com.
Some odd 8 billion people on planet Earth.
Everyone has been victimized by these shots in some way, shape or form.
We're We're talking about a novel coronavirus that was whipped up with gain-of-function research right here in the United States.
This whole Wuhan Institute of Virology thing is a big line of Fort Detrick, right here in the United States.
Then, you know, over to the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
You know, the EcoHealth Alliance was in on this.
Peter Daszak.
There's dozens of bioweapons labs in Ukraine.
They wanted to cover all of that.
By the way, strategically targeted by Vladimir Putin throughout this entire war that's happening.
Seemingly the only guy standing between freedom, what's left of it, and whatever this one-world governance is that's rushing our way.
You know, and so I think We're good to go.
Well, absolutely.
I mean, I think we need to do that.
I mean, I don't want to sound blackpilled.
I agree that there are enough people.
I would just say it depends on if you watching this, dear viewer, would like to get out and organise with your fellow countrymen.
There are a lot of places, and I'd love to give a plug for some places that you can land to help lend your way behind that.
Please, yeah.
That support.
So my connection to some of you fellows in the United States is that there's an organisation, a think tank, a legal and a scientific academic project.
They're called the Natural Law Institute.
It works very closely, obviously, with Christianity because it is dependent on the idea that there is an order to the world and there is an order to the universe and an order to people.
So they're looking at political reforms and legal reforms, a lot of these things, and they're just about to transition into doing live conferences.
They're going to have a fall, sorry, a summer conference in America.
So, if you are watching this, you'll be able to contact local groups to get there and organize with this sort of thing, because the thing is, these people did act criminally, and they need to be held to account, and that pressure has to come from organization, has to come from you watching this.
And they're going to do it again.
I mean, this isn't over by any means.
They're going to do it again.
Absolutely.
This was a test, I believe, this whole COVID-19 novel coronavirus.
It was a test to see just how programmable the masses are.
Just how much they can use fear tactics to push people to do the unimaginable.
Because fear is the one emotion that will get people to do things that they normally just absolutely wouldn't do.
Absolutely.
But my one takeaway from having a shot at myself in politics and still being semi-active in it is that organisation is the key.
So get in touch with some of these organisations because there are people out there who do want to get together and see something happen and make people pay.
They want to go down legal routes, they want to go down political routes, they want to go down other routes, they want to go down community routes.
There are people out there who can support you.
So it really is dependent.
You know, like you said, there are so many things, one world government, you know, in Australia, people can't even afford houses.
We can't even afford to have children.
I'm not even joking.
All right.
Welcome back.
It's the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
If you want to check out that full segment with Stu Peters and Rob McMullen, you can go ahead and do that on the Stu Peters Network Rumble channel.
Available for you.
You can click out of this video and do that.
But we would say no!
Wait!
And do it later.
Let's finish up here.
Bill Gates!
This came across my feed over the weekend.
Bill Gates essentially...
Starting to reveal what they've already been doing to our skies.
Gates is backing the first high-altitude experiment of one radical climate change solution, creating a massive chemical cloud that could cool the Earth.
It's called solar geoengineering, and it's highly controversial.
How long will it be that countries keep experiencing these climate impacts before someone gets desperate and says, hey, we need to cool the planet with solar geoengineering?
It would look something like this.
Thousands of planes would fly very high and use nozzles to inject millions of tons of light reflecting particles into the stratosphere.
It would create a thin chemical cloud of those particles around the whole planet, blocking some sunlight from reaching the surface.
It would mimic a giant volcanic eruption, which we know cools the Earth.
I mean, they're just having to admit it now.
So I got that video on X from Wall Street Silver, and I saw Lara Logan saying, never elected, no right to make decisions for humanity.
Just say no to all of it.
But the reason this interests me is because we've done, I think, two episodes now.
Coincidentally, they were on Friday.
Maybe, I don't know, maybe we just need to talk about chemtrails every Friday.
We'll just call it, it's Chemtrail Friday.
We've done two episodes now on chemtrails, and specifically the reason we were doing this is because we were following this legislation in Tennessee that banned chemtrails.
They passed it in the House, they passed it in the Senate, and it's going to go into law coming up in July.
And so, I saw this tweet over the weekend, and then this one really right back to back.
Concerned Citizen says, It's been 30 days since Tennessee banned geoengineering.
We used to have stripes all day long.
I know exactly the stripes they're talking about, and I'm sure many of you do too.
The ones that don't go away, they spread out.
They eventually end up blocking out the sun.
They can make a clear, beautiful blue day.
Totally cloudy.
They can also take a blue sky and just...
I don't know it's not quite the blue that it should be.
Anyway, the audio on this is really bad.
So this is another viral video saying, look, it's been 30 days since Tennessee Congress, it was their legislature, banned chemtrails.
Now the law doesn't, community notes is right, it doesn't go into effect until July 1st.
That's a lot of these states, that's what they do.
Unless they put an emergency clause on the piece of legislation that makes it go into effect as soon as it's got the governor's signature or his veto's been overridden.
But this is just, we take it for what it's worth, this is one guy in Tennessee saying, look, since they have passed this, since the Tennessee legislature has signaled, look, we are going to pass this law, this law will become the law of the land, and you can't geoengineer, you can't spray these high-altitude sprayers anymore.
He's saying, in his view, that the skies in Tennessee have cleared up.
He hasn't seen any chemtrails.
He hasn't seen any attempt of geoengineering.
And so, I say all of that to say, that's why now, and I don't know exactly when, I know this was May 11th is when Wall Street Silver put that video out that we opened this segment with, but now they're having to explain it.
Oh, this is how it works.
This is why it's good for you.
This is why it's good for you.
Because these real-life James Bond villains, they want to use airplanes and chemicals to blot out the sun.
And it's good for you because of climate change.
Coincidentally, right after Tennessee, just a coincidence, right?
Right after Tennessee does this last week, they had an unprecedented level of storms and tornadic activity that ripped through their state late last week.
I'm sure it's just a coincidence, though.
But as I was watching from the West, watching what my neighbors in Tennessee were going through, The fact that they banned Chemtrail certainly was on my mind when I'm just seeing the state get pounded by all of these supercells and creating all of these tornadoes and all this chaos for people.
But I'm sure I'm just crazy.
I'm sure I'm nuts.
Nancy Pelosi ventures over to the Oxford Society to mumble her way through a debate where she was completely destroyed by a guy by the name of Winston Marshall and We're going to have that for you here in a minute.
Let's first talk about the three G's.
God, guns, and gays.
I think I got the order wrong.
Here's Nancy Pelosi from the Oxford Society.
This clip's going viral.
Of these poor souls.
We're looking for some answers.
We've given them to them, but they're blocked by some of their views on guns.
They have the three G's.
Guns, gays, God.
That would be a woman's right to choose.
And the cultural issues cloud some of their reception of an argument that really is in their interest.
So the Democrats are actually for us.
They're for us if we can just get over If we can just get over guns and gays and that really pesky last one, God, if we can just get over him, the Democrats will let us sin all we like as a matter of public policy.
That's what she's really saying.
The Democrats really have some good things that are really in the people's interest.
Really in the people's interest if they'll just get over their obsession with guns, their obsession with gays.
If you'll just embrace the sodomites and not say anything, you can do whatever you want.
We'll let you guys do whatever you want as long as it's not biblical Christianity.
I mean, that's what she's saying.
She's essentially saying the Christians are the problem.
I want you to listen to this again.
Nancy Pelosi is saying that the problem As far as she is concerned, and this debate was over democracy and populism, Nancy Pelosi is telling you that the problem is with Christians who think they have a right to self-defense.
Watch again.
Of these poor souls.
We're looking for some answers.
We've given them to them, but they're blocked by some of their views on guns.
They have the three Gs, guns, gays, God, that would be a woman's right to choose.
And the cultural issues cloud some of their reception of an argument that really is in their interest.
It's in our interest to sin.
It's in our interest, she says, to basically deny God, get over what he says about gays, get over what he says about life in the womb, get over it.
This is about them wanting us to just renounce our faith and join in, just join in the cultural orgy on the path to hell.
That's what she's saying.
And you notice she says, these poor souls...
These poor souls.
I've had many a conversation recently about the moral high ground and how the reason we are careening towards some sort of conflict.
Again, Colonel Douglas McGregor, retired colonel, says a revolution.
He said months ago, either a French-style revolution or a Cromwellian-style revolution.
It's because both sides think they have the moral high ground.
The other side thinks it's moral, good, right, and virtuous to trans kids, to take them to drag shows, to normalize pedophilia, which is where this is leading.
Although that may not be as vocal about that last one, but that's coming.
and then you have the other side we think that we're righteous by protecting kids standing for the tradition the biblical not just traditional the only reason it was traditional is because we are a christian nation but it's the biblical worldview the fact that there is a god The fact that we are accountable to Him, the fact that save Jesus Christ alone to forgive us of our sins, if it weren't for Him, we would be without hope.
We're the Christians saying, look, repent, trust in Jesus, quit running away, as in what R.C. Sproul said.
We played this for you earlier, but one more time because it's that good.
It says that natural man does not seek after God.
So where did he get the idea that all these unbelieving pagans are seeking after God?
I hear it all the time.
They'll say, well, my neighbor's not a Christian, but he's seeking.
Thomas Aquinas was asked this question in the Middle Ages.
He said, the reason people assume that the pagan is seeking after God is because we look at that person and we see that they're seeking after the benefits that only God can give them.
They're looking for peace of mind, for purpose, for relief from guilt and all the rest.
And so we assume that therefore they're seeking after God.
They're not seeking after God.
They want the benefits of God without Him.
They're seeking after the benefits that only God can give them all the while they're running as fast as they can away from God.
Running as fast as they can away from God.
Exactly right.
And so anyway, I just found that incredible that Nancy Pelosi admits it.
Then she goes on to define what democracy is.
And no, she's not going to say democracy is really a gynocracy, as we talked about earlier, which is actually not G-U-Y, but G-Y-N. Let's define democracy.
Democracy is the rule of law.
Democracy is...
Free and fair elections.
Democracy is about the independent judiciary.
It's about freedom of the press, to have transparency and to have accountability of elected officials to the people.
It's about all of that, and that is everything that the populist regime in Washington, D.C. is against.
Populism...
No, thank you.
Populism is about fighting the ethno-nationalistic populism, as is the threat to democracy, is about threatening what they call elites.
A free press.
No, thanks.
Free press.
So, I mean, what she's admitting there is incredible.
Nancy Pelosi, and again, Laura Powell says, Nancy Pelosi defines democracy as a rule of law, fair election, independent judiciary, and a free press for transparent accountability.
But then she says populism is about threatening what they call elites.
In other words, she considers undermining elites' power a threat to democracy.
That's exactly what she said.
She said, in the previous clip, she said, Christians are really the problem, these poor souls, these poor Christians.
They just won't give up their guns and God, and they won't stop talking about the gays.
And then she's saying that ethno-populism is a threat.
Populism is a threat to the elites, right?
Duh!
But she's saying it out loud.
And then she was taken to task in a lengthy response, which I have the whole thing because I think it's that good.
A guy by the name of Winston Marshall stood up.
And again, this is in the Oxford Society.
These little debates that they have are actually pretty big and extensive.
And it's refreshing in a way that we...
Because we don't get this anymore in America.
There are no real debates anymore in America.
They're not going to allow a presidential debate.
They only allowed one in 2020 because it was so bad for Biden.
But we don't get the spectacle of the debate anymore because everybody's so closed off and compartmentalized.
And it's a powder keg.
So it's refreshing to hear.
Honestly, it's refreshing to hear Nancy Pelosi has to accept the invitation and to sit there and listen to this.
Again, here's a guy by the name of Winston Marshall.
Who didn't have a cock.
Populism has become a word used synonymously with racist.
I'll explain that just briefly.
I was trying to edit that part out, so forgive me of that.
But what he basically was saying is when I was growing up, you know, a woman was somebody who didn't have a, you know, what he said.
Anyway, let's keep going.
We've heard ethno-nationalists with bigot.
With hillbilly, redneck, with deplorables.
Elites use it to show their contempt for ordinary people.
This is a recent change.
Not long ago Barack Obama, while still president at the North America's Leaders Summit in June 2016, he took umbrage with the notion that Trump be called a populist.
How could Trump be called a populist?
He doesn't care about working people.
If anything, Obama argued, he was the populist.
If anything, Obama argued, Bernie was the populist.
It was Bernie who'd spent five decades fighting for working people.
But Trump?
Something curious happens.
If you watch Obama's speeches after that point, more and more recently, he uses the word populist interchangeably with strongman, with authoritarian.
The word changes meaning.
It becomes a negative, a pejorative, a slur.
To me, populism is not a dirty word.
Since the 2008 crash, and specifically the trillion-dollar Wall Street bailout, we are in the populist age.
What he's talking about is exactly right.
It started with a movement really right after that, you know, the Occupy Wall Street movement, which he's going to mention here in a moment.
But fundamentally, and the reason I'm interested in this idea of populism is because I know that I know that they want to crush populism.
They want to absolutely crush it.
You know, for all of the protests on the college campuses about the genocide that Israel's conducting in Gaza and now in Rafah, And for all of the infiltration that's occurred, and all of a sudden you've got the likes of George Soros and others that are bankrolling the protests, essentially playing both sides, which is so, I mean, well, it's predictable, but nobody wants to actually admit it and cover it, that the whole thing is just a giant setup.
There are legitimate concerns, First Amendment concerns about people protesting.
Some of them, before they were infiltrated, they were peaceful.
And yet, there were some blatant First Amendment violations.
There's just no way around it.
That's exactly what happened.
And then you had the whole dichotomy about the right-wing jumping in to save leftist universities that were essentially in the midst of destroying themselves.
Leftists were in the midst of destroying their leftist institutions.
And anyway, that's a whole other can of worms to get into.
But populism...
An actual movement from the people that's grassroots, like the Tea Party in 2010.
You talk about Occupy Wall Street, then the Tea Party in 2010.
What happened to the Tea Party?
It was infiltrated and co-opted.
And co-opted.
And then you finally had, you know, MAGA, America First, Donald Trump, the election that was blatantly stolen, and people showed up on J6 to protest it.
And the feds had a nice little false flag planned, and they now call it an insurrection, and J6ers are in gulags.
Many of them still haven't even had a trial yet.
Are you kidding me?
Why?
To make sure that if they steal it in 2024, which they're going to try, nobody does anything about it because of what happened to the J6ers.
That's certainly one ploy here.
But ultimately, what it was designed to do was, hey, we're going to use the media and we're going to kill populism.
We're going to kill this America First populism and we're going to say no.
Haven't you any decency?
Haven't you seen?
You're not going to respect the transfer of power?
Even though it was blatantly obvious what happened and that the election was stolen.
Back to, again, the Oxford Society.
And for good reason, the elites have failed.
Let me address some common fallacies, some of which have been made tonight.
If the motion was that demagoguery was a threat to democracy, I would be on that side of the House.
If the motion was that political violence was a threat to democracy, I'd be on that side of the House.
January 6th has been mentioned.
A dark day for America indeed.
And I'm sure Congresswoman Pelosi will agree that the entire month of June 2020, when the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon was under siege and under insurrection by radical progressives, those two were dark days for America.
Yes?
There is no equivalence of this.
So you don't agree?
It's fine.
You don't agree.
That's fine.
There is no equivalence.
Oh, can you imagine if she would have stepped in that trap?
The left would have lost their minds.
Now there's no equivalence.
They cannot afford to lose that narrative.
They cannot afford to lose the idea that what happened on January 6th was worse or equivalent of 9-11.
But certainly what happened in the protests in these Pop-up communities of lawlessness like CHAZ or burning courthouses.
No, that was the summer of love.
That was the BLM. That was BLM and they had every right to do that because of what happened to George Floyd.
We can get behind that kind of populism.
In reality, we know that it was all astroturfed and funded and the people at the top of BLM got rich and defrauded people.
Back to more of this.
I just think it's funny she speaks up.
She's got to interject.
Not the same.
Not the same.
But she's still got to listen to this guy.
It's not like what happened on January 6th, which was a dissurrection incited by the President of the United States.
Yeah, there we go.
Incited by the President of the United States.
Got to keep this lie going, right?
Because we're trying to, you know, prosecute him in U.S. courts for this lie.
We already tried to frame him for treason, but we now have to keep this lie going across the pond as well.
So you don't agree?
But you'll condemn those days.
My point, though, my point, though, is that all political movements are susceptible to violence and, indeed, insurrection.
And if we were arguing that fascism was a threat...
And all political movements are susceptible to fed-backed false flag attacks.
All political movements are susceptible to federal FBI informants infiltrating your organization and getting negative headlines that have absolutely nothing to do with what your original intentions were when you set out to engage politically on whatever issue it was.
All political movements are subject to potential federal infiltration to run false flag ops and to run psyops on the entire country.
And not just America, but the world.
Because you saw how many people were clapping there.
Yeah, Trump.
To democracy, I'd be on that side of the house.
Indeed, the current populist age is a movement against fascism.
I've got quite a lot to get through.
Populism, as you know, is the politics of the ordinary people against an elite.
Populism is not a threat to democracy.
Populism is democracy.
And why else have universal suffrage if not to keep elites in check?
Ladies and gentlemen, Given the success of Trump and more recently Javier Malay taking a chainsaw to the state behemoth of Argentina's bureaucratic monster, you'd be mistaken for thinking this was a right-wing populist age.
But that would be ignoring Occupy Wall Street.
That would be ignoring Jeremy Corbyn's for the many, not the few.
That would be ignoring Bernie against the billionaires.
JFK, sorry, RFK Jr.
against Big Pharma.
And more recently, George Galloway against his better judgment.
Now, all of them, all of them, including Galloway, Recognize genuine concerns of ordinary people being otherwise ignored by the establishment.
I'm actually rather surprised that our esteemed opposition, Congressman Pelosi, is on that side of the motion.
I thought the left was supposed to be anti-elite.
I thought the left was supposed to be anti-establishment.
Today, particularly in America, the globalist left have become the establishment.
I suppose for Miss Pelosi to have taken this side of the motion, she'd be arguing herself out of a job.
But it's here in Britain where right and left populists united for the supreme act of democracy, Brexit.
Polls have showed the number one reason people voted for Brexit was sovereignty, for more democracy.
Thank you.
What was the response of the Brussels elite?
They did everything in their power to undermine the democratic will of the British people.
And the Westminster elite were just as disgraceful.
As we've heard, David Cameron called the voters fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists.
The Liberal Democrats did everything they could to overturn a democratic vote.
Keir Starmer campaigned for a second referendum.
Yeah, I mean, you know, it occurs to me, and we're running out of time here, but it occurs to me that the Brexit situation that happened before the election in 2016 of Donald Trump, it does occur to me that it was those two events that said, we can't do this anymore.
We cannot just let the people have the right to vote.
Now, that assumes that they weren't I've always felt like 2012 was very suspicious calling Ohio so early.
I think pretty much it was called by 7 o'clock, 7.30 Central, maybe 8.
It was over, done.
Can you imagine if in 2020 it would have been called by 8 o'clock?
Can you imagine in 2016 if it had been called by 8 o'clock?
They didn't know what to do!
But I digress.
Brexit was a huge, huge blow to the elites, and then so was the election of Donald Trump.
And say what you want to, you know, it's...
I mean, they framed him for treason after he won.
They framed him for treason, so clearly there's some...
Some problem.
Somebody somewhere thought they were vulnerable and were really upset about this.
So, yeah, you just wonder if Brexit in 2016, it was just the straw that broke the camel's back.
And it's like, you know, we're going to have to just take our masks off and just...
Just show the world the authoritarian, totalitarian elites we are.
And then 2020 rolls around and they really do it with COVID. And it's just a complete unmasking of just how evil the elites are.
And now the elites.
You've got Nancy Pelosi again earlier saying, essentially, look, populism is a threat to the elites.
And that's why we're against populism.
I mean, finally admitting it.
We know where the clear boundaries are.
That is all the time that we have for this Monday edition of the Millstone Report.
Really do appreciate everybody out there watching.
We're going to be back here tomorrow on Tuesday, so you don't want to miss it.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Follow me on X at RealPaulHarrell, and we'll see you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection