All Episodes
Previous Next
May 9, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
57:16
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Is Constitution Meaningless? Lawlessness & Wickedness Infect Land
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the good stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody, did you know who you are?
Everybody, everybody, everybody, everybody.
Why? .
Hey folks, welcome to the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for being with us.
My name is Paul Harrell.
As normal, happy Thursday to everybody out there.
I hope you had a great day.
It's the Constitution, a meaningless document.
That's what we're going to be talking about today.
But before we get into that, we have to talk about what some of the former presidents said, or at least one did.
President John Adams quoted as saying, our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people.
It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other Morality and virtue are the public foundation of a republic and necessary for society to be free.
Interesting quote.
So, the question that I have this evening for you is, what happens when the people are no longer moral, and for the most part, generally speaking, no longer religious?
Does the Constitution still work?
More importantly, does the Constitution have any kind of enforcement mechanism when the document isn't being followed?
If you have a moral and religious people, then you're not going to need the enforcement mechanism as much as you would think you would.
These are the questions being asked by critical thinkers all over America.
And the reason that we are asking those questions is that our leaders in the judiciary, in the legislative, and in the executive branches of our government are scofflaws.
They're operating outside the constitutional structure all while there is a complete absence of accountability.
Jurisprudence A term that progressives love to use and big government Republicans as well.
Jurisprudence has reinterpreted the Constitution to allow for the advancement of all kinds of wickedness from the distribution of pornography in the name of free speech to the imprisonment of J6 protesters who were exercising their right to protest.
A stolen election.
Congress is no different, though.
Congress is full of corrupt politicians who take money to pass bills their donors want, which is illegal.
They go into Congress worth very little and they come out and they become millionaires while they're in office because they use secret information gleaned from closed-door committee hearings to place bets in the stock market.
Constitutionally speaking, Congress for the last 100 years has been repeatedly violating the non-delegation clause of Article I, Section 1 by giving their lawmaking authority, delegating that authority, to the executive branch where executive agencies like the EPA or FCC or SEC make laws they call rules made by faceless bureaucrats no one ever has to elect.
And all of that is before we even mention the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA who are operating with impunity blackmailing every public figure they possibly can.
I say all of this to say that we're living in an occupied land.
And the Constitution is not the law of the land and hasn't been the law of the land for a very, very long time.
Americans are gripped by this lawlessness, which is immoral.
And as immorality increases, so does the lawlessness.
And as lawlessness increases, so does immorality.
And it's all one and the same.
It's all sin.
It's a sin problem.
As the Constitution diminishes, the more wicked we as a people become, and that goes from the top of society all the way down to the bum on the side of the road.
Character flaws and sin do not discriminate based on socioeconomic status, contrary to popular belief.
So what's the way forward?
Well, when I started my radio career back in 2009, I was enamored by the idea, and I'm sure many of you were too, that we had to educate the people about the constitutional freedoms we were losing and find a way to restore it.
I advocated for this through a secular framework, even though I was and still am a professing Christian.
I bought into the lie of Republican secularism and tended to ignore social issues, which is really just code for issues that revealed America's immorality and wickedness, like put it on display.
So I ignored that to focus on restoring America.
Now, if that sentence or idea doesn't make any sense, it's because it doesn't.
We already established at the top of this show that the idea that our Constitution was written for a moral and religious people, that's the claim that John Adams was making, and it's the true one.
And that religion that he's talking about isn't Islam.
It isn't Buddha.
It isn't New Age paganism.
It's Christianity.
That's the religion he's talking about.
And we have rejected the God of the Bible.
And ever since then, this nation has been in steep decline.
So there is no point...
Seriously, think about this.
There is no point in talking about how to curb the national debt.
We'll talk about that more later in the show.
Or get better tax policy.
Or get a better economy, which is code for love of money.
There's no point in talking about that if we have to negotiate with people on the one side who think they have the moral high ground and that men can become women.
And on the other side, trust Republican politicians who are too scared to mention the name of Jesus Christ.
and who are terrified of even tipping their hat to heaven in recognition of God's created order as a matter of public policy because to them that would be a sin against their God of secularism.
Recently, a pastor by the name of Joel Webin interviewed Aaron McIntyre on his podcast called Theology Applied.
And he talked about how constitutioning harder is not going to get America out of the muck we currently find ourselves in.
And this was triggering for people, and especially the people over at Right Wing Watch.
Watch.
We're degenerates.
We're not even close to, we're degenerates.
The Constitution is not suited for governing degenerates.
For governing degenerates, and I'm curious your thoughts on this, if you agree, disagree, but I think for our population, That is degraded morally and culturally and religiously as far as we have, you need power.
Men must be governed.
You need a Caesar type, you know.
Now, if you're asking me my preference, that would probably be my preference, would be a constitutional republic.
But I think the conditions for that is A moral people.
So I think you can work towards that in the future, but I don't think constitutioning even harder is going to get us out of our current mess.
I don't see us getting out of this apart from things getting worse and worse, and then eventually, like a Caesar type rising through the ranks of populist figure and the people The political will,
the people are desperate, and they're like, yes, do it, so-and-so, and then so-and-so, Constitution be damned, just rules with an iron fist, like a Cromwell type, and then you hopefully don't get his son.
Maybe it's just a one-generation, one-guy kind of thing, and then you have to move back to aristocracy or some other form.
So that clip also triggered some Christians who, I mean, they've never even had an idea like that presented to them.
And again, that's not necessarily what he's prescribing, it's just what he's saying may be permissible.
So some Christians who revere the Constitution, revere it, and have not yet come to terms with the idea that currently the document is not being followed at all, and barring a miracle, it's probably not coming back.
More on that, more on the triggered Christians in a moment later in the broadcast.
But on a different note, this is one of those days where the stories seem to intertwine.
They intertwine so well, and a picture's worth a thousand words, a video's worth more, Instead of telling you about how an immoral and wicked people make the Constitution meaningless or our leaders make the Constitution meaningless, as we've come to understand it in the context of post-World War II liberalism, why don't I just show you exactly what I mean?
Watch.
- I'm gonna put it back on her. - I know, I'm gonna put her in her mouth, that's all.
- Ah!
- Oh, he went there.
- Ah!
oh there you go oh yeah so cool this is mad
oh yeah If you ever wondered why men and women are looking and considering different options for governing ourselves, there's your answer.
Some people's response to that video is appropriate.
Here's one of them.
The blessings of liberty make this illegal.
It's disgusting.
If you've been living under a rock and suddenly find yourself wondering why people are suddenly obsessed with historic Protestant political thought about the role of government in relation to the church, that video is your answer.
And regardless of what you think about America's founding fathers, the quote attributed to John Adams about a moral and religious people is spot on.
We are literally watching.
It's self-evident at this point.
We're literally watching what happens when a people becomes immoral before our very eyes.
The Constitution becomes meaningless because the wicked people abuse their freedoms and through their sins subconsciously cry out to be governed.
How are they going to be governed?
Obviously this isn't sustainable.
Are we going to be conquered by a third world barbarian horde from Venezuela?
Countries that are as wicked as America, they tend to just get conquered, historically speaking.
Invaded.
That's exactly what's happening right now.
Could we become dominated by a rogue government of pedophiles and intel agencies that blackmail politicians who sell their souls to foreign governments?
That's happening right now.
I want to be clear.
This is not a black pill, though.
I take a black pill every now and then.
This is not it.
This is the truth.
It's reality.
And the sooner we accept it, the sooner we can find a new solution for our current problems.
One of those being men renting women's wombs so they can traffic babies and pretend to be normal.
There's been a lot of reaction to that video clip you just saw.
Of that man holding that infant, that newborn baby who has no idea what he's doing.
It's clear that guy has no idea what he's doing.
It's also clear he doesn't love that baby at all.
That man doesn't love that baby at all.
That man loves the idea of being normal.
And he's willing to destroy another human being's life in order to tell himself he's normal.
There's no love in his eyes.
He doesn't have the slightest clue what he's doing.
And this is not going to be, I'm just telling you, it's not going to be allowed to continue.
Period.
It's not going to happen.
So, here is...
This is Joshua Hames.
We featured his tweets on this program before.
And we've been mentioned the last few weeks.
And it just makes me so frustrated and disgusted.
The pinnacle of selfishness is that video.
We'll watch it one more time.
Hang on one second.
All right, so...
Joshua Hames, this is what the wrath of God looks like on a nation.
Consider this.
Romans 1, 22 through 25.
We've been talking about Romans the last couple of weeks.
Referencing it here and there.
Claiming to be wise.
They became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal god for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
Therefore God gave them up to the lusts of their hearts, to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and they worshipped and served the creature rather than the creator who is blessed forever.
Amen.
May God grant us repentance before we are completely undone.
I don't know, guys.
If this isn't completely undone.
And maybe I don't need to say that because I don't want to know.
I don't want to know.
I don't want to think about what's next.
That's unbelievable.
And yeah, we've seen it before.
We've seen this ridiculous skin-on-skin contact.
We've seen these men trying to pretend they're women.
They're never going to be.
But this is...
That right there...
Wars have been fought over much less than that.
Here's Allie Beth Stuckey, and this is her reaction.
All this baby wants is her mom.
That's what she instinctively longs for and needs.
But she'll never have that because this man and his husband bought the eggs of one woman and rented the womb of his sister to obtain twin babies who will never get to know the love of their mother.
Evil.
burn this industry to the ground.
Megan Basham, "This quivering baby who wants her mother" is about the most heartbreaking video I've ever seen.
When a newborn cannot have what it naturally wants most because of death or medical emergency, it's tragic.
Here, it's just evil.
Yes.
Evil is real.
Billboard Chris is right.
Evil is real.
But, you know, good is real as well.
Good exists.
God exists.
And if this, again, if that is the blessings of liberty, count me out.
I want no part of it.
I want no part in your live and let live world.
I don't want it.
I'm not going to accept it.
It may have sounded great for a time, but again, we are an immoral and wicked people and we continue to careen down this slippery slope.
And that must be made illegal.
That is child abuse.
That is disgusting.
It is evil.
and it's got to be stopped apparently there's a fad out there I'm not aware of about about About aborting...
About the gay guys not really...
So in that particular case, the gay guys wanted a girl.
And they got a girl.
But apparently there is an abortion...
There's a lot of the surrogacy game where they abort in order to get a boy.
After aborting 10 girls from our surrogate, we finally have a boy.
Only one more thing to do.
Meet our one-hour-old trans newborn.
And then they trans the kid.
Yeah, you just never know with this nonsense what they're going to do.
Because of the woke sex.
I mean, they're literally converts.
They're believers in a woke sex religion.
And then you see the mother feeling bad there after she took the money.
Yeah, I'm sure that's got to happen.
Coming back to our original question, though, is the Constitution a meaningless document?
Is the Constitution a meaningless document?
It's a great question.
We're degenerates.
We're not even close to...
We're degenerates.
The Constitution is not suited for governing degenerates.
For governing degenerates, and I'm curious your thoughts on this, if you agree, disagree, but I think for our population that is degraded morally and culturally and religiously as far as we have You need power.
Men must be governed.
You need a Caesar type, you know.
Now, if you're asking me my preference, that would probably be my preference, would be a constitutional republic.
Keep in mind that he said that, because there's people, you know, some people melted down in Christian circles when this video went around last night, saying, I can't believe that a pastor would advocate for lawlessness!
And I was just like, wow, these people just don't get it.
They don't understand that lawlessness, that's what we have now.
We have lawlessness.
And say what you want about a constitutional republic or a monarchy or a dictator or whatever, there are different kinds of governments that when they get into power can be more lawful than the current lawlessness that we have now, which is a free-for-all.
And again, my preference would be a constitutional republic as well, right?
Because, well, I don't know anything else.
That's what I've grown up with.
But I just saw a video where it's somebody's constitutional right to rip a baby from its mother's arm so they can pretend that gay guys can have babies when gay guys can have babies.
You know, this is the problem.
This is the problem.
We were created as a Christian nation.
We're no longer that Christian nation anymore.
And so the document that best reflected a Christian society and gave people the benefit of the doubt to have, you know, a reasonable amount of freedom guaranteed, that's been completely...
Abused.
And it's abused to the detriment of God's creation.
It's abused to the detriment of those created in the image of God.
As we just saw.
What we're doing to each other.
What are we doing to each other?
We're disregarding what it means to be created in the image of God.
And we're treating each other They're treating that baby like it's a piece of silver.
Like it's some kind of commodity.
It's disgusting.
Treating that baby like it's a piece of jewelry.
Oh, now I can wear this.
See?
I'm now a normal, we're a normal family.
See our statue?
See our baby?
It's gross.
But I think the conditions for that is a moral people.
So I think you can work towards that in the future, but I don't think constitutioning even harder is going to get us out of our current mess.
I don't see us getting out of this apart from things getting worse and worse And then eventually, like a Caesar-type, rising through the ranks of populist, you know, figure in the people, you know, the political will, the people are desperate, and they're like, yes, do it, so-and-so, and then so-and-so, Constitution be damned, just rules with an iron fist.
What he is saying is not at all outside the realm of possibility, right?
And again, he's talking about permissibility versus what might be the prescription, like if you were the emperor and could describe it like a benevolent dictator, and you could prescribe the exact government and do what needed to be done in terms of getting rid of a lot of this lawlessness and stuff like that.
Think mass deportations, for example.
And a bunch of other stuff.
What would your preference be?
What he's describing here is something that is...
Obviously, we've seen this in governments all across the world.
This is what happens.
There's just a lot of us that are so...
And we literally have this America-centric idea for the world, and we can't imagine a world where something like that, something like an uprising or a totally different form of government would materialize like we see in the third world all the time.
We can't imagine something like that happening here.
And, I mean, that's to the criminals running our government.
That's to their advantage.
Quite honestly, because it's a mechanism to just lull a population into sleep.
Anyway, we'll finish this clip up.
Like a Cromwell type, and then you hopefully don't get his son.
Maybe it's just a one-generation, one-guy kind of thing.
Notice he said Cromwell.
We've talked about Oliver Cromwell before.
He's a guy that you do need to get to know in history.
You probably haven't heard of him if you're kind of my age and older because the history books make sure to not tell you.
The history books are certainly biased towards the royalists, towards the monarchy of Great Britain, and so they don't like to tell you about Cromwell unless they're going to tell you he's some religious extremist, which I guess that's what they would say these days when he was actually quite normal.
But, you know, comparatively to the people who were alive during that time, Cromwell and Colonel Douglas McGregor recently said about two months ago, he said America will have a revolution.
The question is, will it be a French-style revolution or a Cromwellian-style revolution?
Of those two, I know which one I would rather have, and that would be the Cromwellian one for sure.
The nation's coming apart at the seams.
I mean, we're in the midst of an election year, but people are planning on voting, but you know how many people think that their vote's not going to count when it comes to the presidential election because they know that it was stolen last time?
Constitution harder.
Vote harder.
And people are yawning and they're thinking, wait a second, we're doing all this and yet you got gay guy with a skin-on-skin contact and a baby that clearly needs its mom.
Clearly needs its mother.
She needs her mom.
And yet that's going to be...
Those are her parents for the rest of her life.
What are we thinking?
What are we doing?
If you're just joining us, we're talking about the outrageous video.
We're talking about this right here.
I know.
I know.
He's going to hurt my fault.
Oh, he went there.
Oh, really?
Oh, he's going to hurt.
You know what's wild?
The lower third in this segment says, is the Constitution a meaningless document?
You see it right here.
Maybe a more appropriate headline would be, is the Constitution now a document that just gives people a license to do whatever kind of wickedness or evil they want, except maybe murder?
That's certainly what it feels like.
Here is this clip.
I'm sorry.
You have to forgive me for some of the awkward pauses here.
I'm very worked up by this, and I knew it.
In preparation for this particular show, as I was doing the research for it, I watched that clip with the baby actually only once, and I didn't want to see it again because of what it did to me the first time.
I can only imagine what it's doing to you guys, and I'm not trying to be sensational.
I'm not trying to get everybody all emotionally worked up, but at the same time, At some point, you have to look evil in the face and it enrages you to want to do good things, to want to advance good things, to want to call out evil, to want to stop evil, to want to end this type of evil and stand up for those who can't stand up for themselves.
Like a baby who's basically, her life is, well, we need to pray for that child.
That somehow the Lord would prevent her from growing up and having a debased mind just like her captor.
Right?
Her captor.
So Right Wing Watch hated that clip, not the baby clip.
I'm sure they love that one.
They hated this clip of Joel Webin, Christian nationalist pastor.
Joel Webin says, Americans are degenerates.
This has been making the rounds.
Again, the full, you need to go, I've seen the full podcast.
Go watch the full podcast.
Or rather, I'll amend that.
I actually think I still have about 10 minutes left.
I've seen the vast majority of it, and it was excellent.
Really good conversation on this.
They were interviewing a Blaze.com contributor, again, McIntyre.
And this is just a fascinating conversation that needs to be had, and it's one being had by a man of the cloth, and it's very enlightening and refreshing, so definitely check it out.
The podcast is called Theology Applied, and he interviewed Aaron McIntyre.
But then here we go.
We have some guy.
I've never interacted with this guy before.
He's a Christian.
And he was triggered by this.
And I engaged him on Twitter.
And, you know, I probably shouldn't have because you're never really going to win.
You're not going to...
It's like...
Has anybody really ever been convinced that they were wrong in a social media dispute?
I don't think they have.
I actually think it's probable that it does happen.
But, man, it just seems like you're...
He says, Gotta love those who claim to believe in the absolute sovereignty of God and that civil magistrate has a responsibility to God.
Floating out that a complete disregard for laws is fine because people are degenerate, which has always been the case.
Webin certainly has no reformed underpinning to his argument, not true, or biblical application, simply his own ideas of how to change things.
Also good to remember that pastors are sometimes too close to philosophers in that they have very limited knowledge of the real world and how to address or fix problems outside their circle.
Okay.
Well, I don't know if I could disagree with the post more.
I mean, I do think some pastors need to focus on the church and the distinct role it does have in society.
I mean, I would maybe agree with that aspect of it.
But the whole tenor of this is something that I totally disagree with.
I don't think that's what he was saying at all, by the way.
I don't think he was advocating to disregard the law.
I think, again, this is just somebody, in my opinion, who doesn't understand the reality of the situation on the ground right now and what is actually coming.
And here's a guy trying to say this is probably what's going to happen.
A Caesar comes up to get us out of the mess we're in.
And you say, well, what do you mean?
Are you advocating for a Caesar?
And I was like, well, I mean, I prefer a constitutional republic, but we're in such a mess that, you know, it's likely you have a populism guy that'll just...
And the people will say yes.
Do you know why the people will say yes?
Because of the video of the woman or the man and the baby.
That's why people are going to say yes, because they're just like, make it stop.
Make it stop.
And...
I don't think that's any kind of psy-op.
Because sin is sin.
I think that is literally just the courses that governments take.
It's just the cycle of things in a lot of ways when you decide to essentially push God out of public life.
I just said, hey, no, you should listen to the whole podcast.
And then he says, yes, I'm sure it clarifies why he disregards God's authority in order to do what he thinks is best.
It's someone who adopts leftist political ideology and disregards the word of God in the whole of the civil magistrate.
Again, I don't even think that's what that clip is saying.
At all.
But some people are super sensitive to it.
And so this is what I said.
I said, look, I'm old enough to remember when pastors warned against equating God's kingdom with America.
This was a big warning back in the day.
Hey, God's kingdom!
God's kingdom in America is not the same!
And it was just this, like, overcorrection that was made.
So then you had a whole slew of pastors coming out of seminary that just got to stick their head in the sand and not have a political opinion, not have an informed political opinion about anything, because they were afraid of the right wing that was equating, you know, the Iraq War under George W. Bush with the kingdom of God.
And while that should certainly have been something that had been corrected, the overcorrection was essentially...
Hey, let's always punch right and hug left, and let's bludgeon those on the right, and then let's excuse those who are Democrats on the left and are essentially advocating against every one of the Ten Commandments and killing babies.
And that's what that got.
Anyway, I remember when that happened, right?
I'm old enough to remember.
Now we kind of have maybe a little bit of a different issue that needs to be corrected, and maybe that's the idolatrous worship of the U.S. Constitution, right?
I mean, don't get me wrong.
I'm a fan of the Constitution.
I've got these, well, I'm certainly a fan of the Declaration of Independence.
Anyway.
Don't get me wrong.
Yeah, I'm a fan of it, but I'm not naive enough to think that that's the only system of government out there that's acceptable as a Christian, right?
We're supposed to be content in all things, which is the whole point of the Philippians verse, I can do all things that strengthens me.
It's not a verse so you can hit a baseball over a center field fence.
It's a verse saying, in all these situations I can be content, right?
And so that's why the church survives and governments come and go.
So I said, I'm old enough to remember when pastors warned against equating God's kingdom with America.
Maybe listen to the whole thing before believing right-wing watch.
He's talking about permissibility, not prescription.
Trying to reason with this guy.
And he says, right-wing watch is garbage, but unless they dubbed over words, he hasn't said.
Webman is speaking out of his belief on the topic of permissibility.
No one is seeking Christ honored in the civil realm would say it's permissible to ignore laws.
And that's when I said, look, no, no!
And I had a typo here.
I said, Webin realizes the Constitution is not the law of the land.
Jurisprudence has made sure to destroy it.
So, functionally, it's a meaningless document.
It's meaningless because, generally speaking, we are an immoral people and our leaders don't obey the laws and the people are growing increasingly lawless.
And then I have a few more.
And eventually...
I said something else, but I don't see it here.
Eventually I asked them.
I said, hey guys, look.
Look.
In all seriousness.
Like, what would the government have to do?
In the Bible, there's a book of Romans.
We talk a lot about Romans 1 in the last couple of weeks, as I mentioned earlier.
There's another chapter in Romans called Romans chapter 13, and it talks about Christians submitting to the government, Christians submitting to the leaders.
And this is a verse that gets abused time and time again.
It's a verse that now gets applied and says the American Revolution should have never been fought.
But what it misses is the fact that the colonists were not in violation of not submitting to the government.
It was the king.
King George was in violation of Romans 13 because he was breaking laws.
So when Governor so-and-so in 2020 was like, I'm going to force you to wear a mask in public, or I'm going to force you to close down your business, they did not have the authority to do those things.
Those were illegal.
Those were outside of the Constitution.
So if you decided to not wear a mask, you were not in violation of Romans 13.
Your governor is in violation of Romans 13.
Because in this particular American context, what's the law of the land?
What's the authority?
The authority isn't, aren't people, the authority is supposed to be the Constitution, right?
Which, of course, we've decided is meaningless.
We didn't even talk about how COVID rendered the document even more meaningless than it already is.
So my question to them is, at what point would you consider the modern-day government That we have now in violation of Romans 13.
At the top of the show, I went over all of the different ways they're already in violation of the Constitution, thereby they are in violation.
Of biblical principles.
And quite frankly, we're not, in that sense, we're not, you know, especially when it binds your conscience.
But, I mean, if they're not following the laws, and again, I know, like, I mean, if we break a law, right, see January 6th, like, you know, you get thrown in a gulag.
I get that.
I'm not advocating for people to go out there and be scoff laws like our members of Congress are.
I'm simply having a discussion about the reality of the situation and what to do moving forward.
And in order to move forward, I think we've got to have honest conversations with each other about what's really going on, what's really happening.
And like Joel Webbin said, to constitution harder...
We tried that.
I mean, we've tried the Constitution.
I've been trying the Constitution harder since 2009.
And I've watched in the conservative landscape.
I've watched in my own home state trying to get state legislators to Constitution harder without really calling them out on the social issues that they need to be called out on.
I've watched talk radio hosts after talk radio hosts.
Life, Liberty, Levin, Glenn Beck, all of them.
I've watched them Constitution harder or try to get the audience to Constitution harder.
And you know where that has led?
It's led to skin-on-skin contact with a sweet, poor little baby who now has a captor.
She's been given over to a captor, a kidnapper, for the rest of her life until she's 18.
Yeah, and so people are having honest questions about what all that means.
I've gone way over.
I normally try to break at the bottom of the hour, but we're going to break now.
Karen Kingston was on with Stu Peters yesterday talking about the satanic.
Every time you turn on your TV, there's something more and more debauched.
One of those things was the SNL Saturday Night Live sketch that had to do with Molesting babies.
Yeah, and it wasn't funny at all.
We're going to show you that clip of Stu and Karen when we're at break.
Don't go anywhere.
This is the Millstone Report back in...
If you wonder what kind of a society you're living in, just turn on your TV. Listen to people joking about raping kids and eating babies.
The answer is simple.
You're in one that's dominated by people like Lorne Michaels, Dan Schneider, and Brian Peck.
Karen Kingston has been following and investigating the demonic, perverted downfall of America's corporate media and entertainment sector, and she joins us now.
I mean, you know a lot about Saturday Night Live, don't you?
I do, Stu.
Thanks for having me back.
Some people might know I had my own agency for years.
My clients were Johnson& Johnson Advisor.
And when I go to the East Coast, I did meet some of the writers and producers from Saturday Night Live and Broadway Video, which is Lauren Michaels' company that produces SNL, produces movies, produces commercials and whatnot.
So I've been to the studio.
I know how the filming is done.
And I can tell you 100% confident under penalty of perjury that Lauren Michaels specifically approves every single skit.
So this was not a fluke.
This did not get by executive management by accident.
They, you know, they begin writing on Monday.
On Saturday night, they actually run through the skits at 8.30 as if it's a live show in front of a live audience, and they gauge the audience's reactions, and they cut several skits before they go to the live show at 11.30.
So I think if you watch the skit, the Sunny Angel skit, you can see that there's a pause between when they're trying to make a joke and people actually laugh.
And it's because in that audience, which I've sat in many times, is they put up the, okay, laugh now, clap now.
So that's why there was that delayed response.
But I do want people to know that this was very intentional.
And as you have said on your show many times, and I don't know why you're attacked for it, they are normalizing the sexualization of children.
And they're going so far as normalizing having sex with children.
Literally, baby boys.
So, Sunny Angel is an entire franchise of these little toy dolls that are naked baby boys with their genitalia, wearing hats like fruit hats or spicy hats or vegetable hats, so insinuating like you can eat them.
And in this skit, I don't recommend people watch this skit at all, but at one point, Dua Lipa's date It's disgusting.
The message I want people to know is it is time to stop patronizing these media outlets, period.
NBC, what people don't know, this isn't just Saturday Night Live.
Lorne Michaels, he owns Broadway Video.
He's also part of NBC Universal.
Those are the Marvel movies.
That is the news stations that people watch.
They also own social media channels, okay?
They own everything.
And they also have huge offices in China as well.
So a lot of this too is a psychological attack on Americans, right?
So that we, if this skit goes popular and people are like, oh, isn't that funny?
Believe you me, in China, all over the newspapers, they're going to be talking about how perverse Americans are, you know, for normalizing sexualization with young baby boys.
You said you don't know why I'm attacked for pointing that out regularly on this program, and that's because the agenda is actually not complete yet.
They're afraid that I might be getting in the way of that by waking people up to the fact that they're normalizing this.
But the completion of the agenda actually legalizes sex with your kids.
That's the goal here.
They want to make it lawful for these people to have sex with your kids.
Do you agree with that, or is that being extreme?
I do believe that and I think it's even going farther than that because if you watch that other skit with Kenan Thompson, you know, a pregnant mom goes in for her sonogram And he's pretending that he's preparing the baby for a barbecue and then licking his fingers after he gave her an exam saying that the baby tasted good.
This is disgusting.
I think they want to go back to the times of ball where they want the mothers to sacrifice their children.
I know this sounds insane, but watch those sketches.
And why is there this hundred million dollar Sunny Angel line of naked baby boys With hats on that are for fruit and vegetables and sweet treats, I think one of them is called.
They're sexualizing children and they're trying to normalize cooking children.
This stuff should not be tolerated at all.
What do you propose people do about this?
I mean, of course, turn off Saturday Night Live.
Of course, turn off all these major broadcast networks and these cable news networks.
They're becoming irrelevant.
They're crumbling.
Yes, but do you believe that these people should be held responsible for what they're ushering in and the way that they're compromising our children's innocence?
But we're accepting it.
We're not stopping it.
Alright, it's the Millstone Report.
Back from break.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Feel free to check the rest of that segment out for the Stu Peters Network Rumble channel.
And you can check the rest of that segment out with Karen Kingston.
Really good stuff there.
You know, SNL, man.
I remember back when it was funny.
It's not been funny for a very long time.
Anyway, very pathetic and sad.
Stephen Wolfe replied to what we were talking about before the break.
about right-wing watch targeting Joel Webin, the pastor, saying, hey, look, maybe we're a wicked and immoral people and the Constitution, Constitutioning Harder, is not going to get us out of this mess.
So Stephen Wolf, who's the author of The Case for Christian Nationalists, says, the irony is that the return-to-the-founders types, Constitutioning Harder, are dunking on this, but in substance, the American founders would agree with Joel here.
That's a great point.
Go read what the founders wrote.
The ones that literally said that you have a right to alter or abolish the government when it becomes destructive.
Is it destructive to those ends, meaning the right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, endowed by our Creator, those certain things?
Yeah.
That's not the right to trans babies, right?
The blessings of liberty.
The blessings of liberty.
Is that what we celebrate?
Is that what we celebrate on the 4th of July?
Do we light fireworks and fire up the barbecue pit because we're like, yeah, America, you can trans your kids if you want to.
You can take them to drag shows.
This is America.
Woo!
I mean, come on.
No, that's not what we're celebrating.
That's what a lot of people are celebrating these days, which is why, again, the Constitution is, practically speaking, a meaningless document.
Yeah, if this is one of the blessings of liberty, we showed you this tweet earlier.
If this is one of the blessings of liberty, count me out.
I agree.
And then again, of course, this is the pinnacle of selfishness.
It's also disgusting.
But notice I retweeted, and I did this knowing full well what I was doing.
I retweeted libs of TikTok, right?
And then, I mean, I know Libs of TikTok is, well, let's just say the interview with the Libs of TikTok and that, is it the New York Times report?
I mean, it was just a complete disaster, right?
So, somebody points out that Libs of TikTok was a huge fan when Dave Rubin did the same thing with his gay lover.
And somebody brings this up, Annette Jowles.
Hey, this is...
It most certainly is.
It is child abuse.
This is child abuse.
But what about this?
Look, libs of TikTok, congratulations to Dave Rubin.
It's true.
All of it.
They trafficked babies.
They rented a woman's womb so they can appear to be a normal family when the truth of the matter, the two of these men...
I know this may come as a shock to some of you out there, or maybe some of...
Maybe you've got leftist family members that are watching with you.
These two dudes...
They can't, biologically, they can't actually conceive a child.
It's not a thing.
Sodomy is not something that's conducive to childbirth.
As much as they want it to be, and they want it to be so bad, these people so bad want the act of sodomy to actually somehow produce from them a child.
They're willing to pay a woman, rent her womb, and rip the baby from the mother, just like you saw...
Just like you saw, and I'm sorry to keep doing this, but again, we have got to confront evil.
This is what it is.
Just like you saw earlier here on the show.
So cool.
She's mad.
Yeah, so it wasn't lost on me about that.
Yeah, so Libs of TikTok, it continues to be, there's, you know, red flag there.
And that brings me to this.
This is great.
This is a good sign.
The Center for Baptist Leadership.
This is, so the Southern Baptist Convention, they're gearing up for their convention.
We're going to cover it just kind of like we did the United Methodist Convention.
And...
This is a good piece written by David Mittenmacher.
The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act threatens Baptist beliefs about the Bible and religious liberty.
This is essentially a corrective action against the Southern Baptist ERLC, which is their political arm, and they are advocating against religious freedom when they're supposed to be advocating for religious freedom.
Earlier this month, the United States House of Representatives voted past the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.
You guys know about this.
Most of the controversial aspects of the bill is that it outsources the legal definition of anti-Semitism used for enforcing Title XI Civil Rights Act into an intergovernmental organization known as the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
The bill...
Received overwhelming support within the House, passing 320-91.
We talked about that, how it's a travesty.
People talk about, oh, we're scared of Christian nationalism as the boogeyman.
Right We Watch is certainly terrified of it.
But do they not know what happened with the anti-Semitism awareness act that it's a taste of actual Jewish nationalism?
Israel nationalism?
It preferences one religion over another, in my opinion.
The public response, however, has been less favorable than the vote in the House would suggest.
Many concerns have been raised by conservative and liberal advocacy groups alike with many pointing out the severe danger to religious freedom if the bill passes.
The IHRA definition, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, definition of anti-Semitism is extraordinarily vague and unclear, allowing for abuse by those who wish to see the Christian religion erased from the public square.
The illustrations provided in the IHRA are especially concerning as they show that the definition could easily be used to classify certain portions of scripture as anti-Semitic hate speech.
This bill gives...
An intergovernmental agency accountable to the American people.
I'm sorry, unaccountable to the American people.
The authority to define what Americans are permitted to say.
So the ERLC versus the consensus opinion.
So the bottom line is this, is that the bill represents a serious threat to religious liberty.
Thankfully, many serious Christian thinkers and public figures have voiced strong opinions.
Albert Moeller, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary...
I hope that wasn't a Freudian slip.
Believes that the legislation is dangerous and deeply flawed.
And in his recent editorial for World Opinions, Dr.
Mulder warned that orthodox biblical Christianity, even the simple preaching of the gospel, could be directly targeted by this kind of language.
For that matter, by this loose logic, the entire New Testament can be targeted as hate speech.
Just start with the Gospel of John.
It's almost as if the definition has been constructed to serve the ends of liberal theology.
It will be even more dangerous in the hands of modern secularists.
So we, here at the Milsom Report, if you missed that episode, go check it out.
It was the day after the House passed this bill.
What we said was, we decided to say, you know what, let's go through the Bible.
We didn't just go through the parts of the Bible where the Jewish mob was screaming, you know, give us Barabbas and crucify him.
No, we went through that, but we also went through the parts of the Bible that talked about how, you know, Jesus would talk to the Pharisees, he would talk to the Sadducees, he would talk to the religious leaders of the day, and he would absolutely, with his knowledge and his divine knowledge, he's God, he's God in the flesh, he's God incarnate, He would make them look like fools.
Because he is the true source of wisdom.
And they're not.
And he would embarrass them.
And the Bible says frequently, after these encounters, it says the Jews plotted to murder him after that.
And it says it over and over.
From this point on, the Jews devised ways to how they could murder him, how they could kill him.
And it's all throughout the Bible.
It's everywhere throughout the New Testament.
Kristen Wagoneer, the president of Alliance for Defending Freedom, also pointing out that legislation like this has already been weaponized in places like Europe to jail individuals for expressing viewpoints their governments dislike.
Now, hang on.
So the Alliance Defending Freedom here, great on them, good for you guys, but the last time I reported on the Alliance Defending Freedom was when you guys, the Alliance Defending Freedom, according to Jeff Younger, who's trying to keep his son from being transed by his ex-wife in a rogue California court, says that the Alliance Defending Freedom is trying to sabotage the experts he's trying to pay to save his son from being transed.
Okay, so think about that just real quick.
You know, it's interesting, strange, strange...
Well, it's an epidemic of just being unprincipled, I guess.
And it's not just Christians who have voiced opposition to the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.
Many Jews, the very group that this bill claims to protect, have spoken out against the legislation.
I didn't know this, but apparently the editors of Tablet, an influential Jewish magazine, published a scathing critique of the bill titled Not in Our Name that chastised Congress for this clumsy and dangerous attack on religious freedom.
Goes on, given the significant threat to religious freedom that the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act represents, we might expect the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, an entity explicitly charged with defending religious freedom, to join the chorus of opposition.
Instead, the opposite happened.
Almost immediately upon passing through the House, the ERLC issued a press release in which Brent Leatherwood, speaking in official capacity as a spokesman for the Southern Baptist churches, has commended the passage of the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.
And if you're not shocked that the head of the ERLC is celebrating a bill that endangers religious freedom, then your lack of surprise should sadden you.
Well, I mean, I don't think anybody that knows Brent Leatherwood and his track record surrounding the manifesto of the Nashville trans-terrorist, you're not surprised by this.
I'm not surprised by it.
I'm not a Southern Baptist, and I'm not surprised by it, but I do follow these things.
And I will tell you that this is par for the course for Brent Leatherwood and the ERLC, and hopefully the Southern Baptist Convention can get a handle on this.
It is the largest evangelical denomination in the country, and they're trying to stop women from having roles, official church offices, and that's a big battle that they need to win.
To prevent them from eventually doing what the United Methodist Church did in okaying gay marriage.
So, all of that to say, we're out of time.
Let me know what you think.
Is the Constitution a meaningless document?
When John Adams said this, are we not seeing that?
Are we not seeing the fact that as we become sicker and sicker as a people...
The Constitution really just becomes meaningless because it's ignored, but then wouldn't a lawless and moral people ignore their documents?
Wouldn't they ignore the law?
Of course they would.
That's what people do.
That's what immoral people do.
Immoral people break laws.
Let me know what you think about all of this.
Let me know what you think about these conversations that people are beginning to have in the face of evil being celebrated and evil being called good and good being called evil.
My name is Paul Harrell.
God bless each and every one of you.
Appreciate you watching this.
We're going to see you tomorrow and we'll be wishing you a happy Friday.
Until then, God bless.
▲
Export Selection