All Episodes
Previous Next
May 7, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
57:22
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: America Under Judgment From God? RFK FAILS On Trans Kids Question
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Bo Gestapo, the good-stepping gay lobby.
All of that stops right now.
People say we need to make America great again.
I completely agree.
agree we may need to make Gallows great again.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Hey folks, welcome to the Millstone Report Podcast.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Thanks so much for being with us.
We're going to address this question tonight.
Is America under judgment from God?
We've got a great show for you.
We've said it before many times.
I've said it many times.
If you've been watching the program for any length of time, you really can't even get...
You can't watch a single program without hearing the phrase slippery slope.
I've said it many times that the slippery slope is real.
And oftentimes when our society is in the midst of a hot political topic, a debate, just think about anything from the past.
The person who stands up and warns where all of this will eventually lead, where all this will lead next, if we don't stop and turn back, is derided as a regressive, religious nut who's stuck in the past and who's against progress, which I've recently come to learn is really just code for post-World War II liberalism, where anything goes.
A few examples of this.
Who thought that the moms in the 50s and the 60s warning us about the satanic danger of rock and roll music were crazy?
Well, they were right.
I mean, instead of popular music about fornication and sex or drugs, the industry has moved on to sing about sex with fallen angels and the open worship of the devil at their satanic Grammy award shows.
But back in the day, anyone who was calling the current trends and behaviors evil was ignored or brushed aside.
Obviously the next example that we could go to is gay marriage or gay mirage.
Those stalwart saints who worked to pass state amendments barring gay marriage would also warn that if we lost this fight, it would mean the entirety of our society would be flipped upside down.
And now, with polyamory and transgenderism surging, those Christian activists, many of them who have gone home to glory, were right.
God bless them for their fight, even though we didn't listen.
But the conservative movement kept losing these battles, and with each loss, the secular, Christless republicanism would come up with new and different ways to cope with these losses.
One of those coping mechanisms, in the wake of the legalization of Gay Mirage by the Supreme Court, was to downplay the importance of state governments to regulate marriage in the first place.
The argument was something like this, well, Christians don't need the government to validate their marriage.
That happens before God.
If the pagans have the need to let government legitimize their marriage, then let them have it.
This was the lame coping mechanism to ignore the obvious connections between the church and the state that this country was based on.
A coping mechanism to downplay that this country was meant for a Christian people.
Our Constitution was meant for a Christian people.
And that's why this country is failing.
That's why the Constitution is meaningless and is ignored because we're not a nation full of Christians anymore.
And the document fundamentally just doesn't work because we're not a moral people.
That libertarian argument on marriage, by the way, I must confess to you, is something I once believed and parroted many times.
And I'm sorry for the part that I played in excusing evil and pacifying people with arguments that further diminished our American Christian heritage.
But back to the heated political arguments of our day.
You know, one of the tactics here is that many talking heads like to use hyperbole in the midst of an argument to assure those on the other side that if they get their way, they won't go overboard.
They're not crazy.
They're not totalitarian freaks.
A great example of this is a clip White House correspondent Simon Atiba recently found of Tucker Carlson interviewing Rachel Maddow, yes that Rachel Maddow, from way back in 2006.
I want you to listen to this and I want you to listen how Maddow uses extreme examples to reassure the audience that the Democrat Party is not a bunch of crazy power-hungry tyrants who want to ban the Bible.
Watch this.
Welcome back to our special coverage of Decision 2006, Battleground America.
Okay, let's assume the Democrats will control Congress in November, and it certainly looks that way now.
Now, let's imagine a world where people like Nancy Pelosi and John Conyers hold the future of our nation in their hands.
Here to help us ponder that terrifying probability, our old pal from Air America Radio, Rachel Maddow, joining us from New York.
Hi, Tucker.
Nice to see you.
Great to see you.
What's the first thing, apart from nationalizing the railroads and passing the transgender amendment, Democrats are going to do when they take power?
Well, I mean, there's a lot to get to right away.
We have to make everybody get gay married, and we have to ban the Bible, and we have to send you to Guantanamo.
But after we, you know, get rid of the first-tier order of business...
Fascinating.
You see what I mean?
Of course, we now know the truth, right?
They do want to ban the Bible.
I mean, the Uniparty just last week passed a bill they say is about curbing anti-Semitism, but really it makes quoting passages of the Bible anti-Semitic.
Also, did you hear Tucker mention the part in that clip about a transgender amendment?
Passing the transgender amendment?
The idea back in 2006 sounded absolutely nuts.
Just as nuts as an anti-sodomite marriage activist who warned of bestiality as the next step if gay marriage is allowed.
You know, I both know.
You and I both know that there are now people who have married animals and even inanimate objects, for that matter.
Oh, live and let live.
You gotta have the freedom to live and let live.
You do you.
It's just as crazy as saying that the transgender movement will lead to the legalization of pedophilia, which it will.
That's where this is all going.
And people, even to this day, are being shunned if they say that.
They're being brushed aside.
So I say all of this to say that the slippery slope is real.
Bruce Jenner is not a woman, regardless of what Kimberly Guilfoyle, Fox News, Sean Hannity, The Law Cabin, Republicans, what have you, believe.
And this madness is going to stop.
And it's going to end one way or the other.
Let me explain what I mean by that.
We're in the middle of civilizational collapse.
And I don't know how all of this shakes out specifically.
Again, our prayers could be answered and the Tower of Babel 2.0 could come crashing down.
The construction could cease.
God could save us from these consequences that we all see are coming, right?
We see that the bridge is out.
The road is out.
Does the United States stay intact?
I don't know.
But one thing is clear to me.
When any society...
This is just biblical, it's historical.
When any society descends into this level of wickedness, there is a default reset that will naturally occur eventually.
Go read Romans chapter 1.
And if you read Romans 1, and then you come away from that thinking...
That a people who God gives over to the consequences of their sins and gives them over to debased minds, if you think those people will also somehow be able to maintain the ability to govern themselves, then I have some beachfront property I would like to sell you in the Arkansas Ozarks.
So it can't happen.
It won't happen.
It just can't maintain itself.
So, you know, there's a lot of talk right now about the invasion at our southern border.
I've talked about it.
You hear it everywhere.
Especially if you're listening to, you know, conservative right-wing media.
Our leaders who have been given over to this dishonorable passion.
They've been given over to dishonorable passions.
They've been given over to debased minds.
Our leaders have sold the good people left here in America.
They've sold us out.
And we're being invaded by a third world barbarian horde.
And while there are still good, God-fearing Christians in this country bracing for the impact of this treasonous invasion and the bloodshed in the streets that is likely to follow, it needs to be said that while these invaders are from third world violent countries, their violent tendencies are going to fit in very well here in America.
We're a nation that murders babies.
We're a nation that allows the chemical and surgical castration of kids.
The slippery slope is real, and I see it crystal clear.
For example, we gave women the right to murder their babies free and clear without the state being able to prosecute these women as murderers.
So to me it's fitting that if we generally as a nation don't have a problem with mass murder, then why would God give us a secure border to keep violent marauders out of America?
This is what happens when the blessings of God are removed from a nation.
And can we vote our way out of this mess at this point?
Trump has talked about a national ban on transing kids.
Call me skeptical.
Last month, he said that we have to let the purple hairs murder their babies so we won't lose elections.
We know Joe Biden's stance on transing kids, though I don't actually know if he knows what his stance is.
And then there's RFK Jr.
who recently told Patrick Bette David that he thinks parents should be able to trans their kids if they want to.
What will you do as a president to get this nonsense out to prevent kids under the age of 18 with or without the consent of the father to transition?
You may even say that is an okay policy you're a part of that many families disagree with.
One, what's your position on this and what will you do as a president?
I mean, my position is that people should not be able to have access to those procedures, the minor shouldn't, without parental permission.
And, you know, I don't know enough about it, Patrick, to say that it should be completely illegal.
Under 18?
I'm going to get back to that clip in a minute.
This is incredible to me, though.
And I don't buy it.
I don't believe it.
I'm sorry, I don't buy it.
I don't buy that RFK Jr., Has not been read in on what is one of the most disturbing and common trends.
I don't believe it for a second.
That the rise of transgenderism and the moral questions, the ethical questions, the parental freedom questions, that he doesn't have an opinion on this.
I don't know.
I don't know.
But then to come out and say, but if the parents want to do it, You know, they've got to have parental consent.
Parental consent to abuse your children?
And this goes right along with the mainstream Republicans who really, according to their, what they, you know, versus what they said back before Roe was overturned versus now, it's obvious that, you know, there's just a lot of mainstream Republicans that do not believe that abortion is murder.
They really don't believe that.
They don't believe abortion is murder.
And so, do the same uniparty, they don't believe transient kids is child abuse.
You know?
That's what this fundamentally comes down to, is...
I think...
Now, RFK is going to get into the minutiae here in a minute.
Well, you know, it could save somebody's life.
But the fact...
I mean, look, it's child abuse.
It doesn't matter if a kid...
It's to take a kid to a drag show.
That's child abuse, okay?
Literally, you're sexualizing a kid.
You're exposing them to other people who are half-naked.
Many of these people are pedophiles, in my opinion.
So, I mean, but it's just unacceptable for a leading presidential candidate, you know, to not have an opinion, to be able to say, I'm just not really well, I'm not read in on this as that I need to be.
I haven't researched it.
I'm sure you have researched it, Patrick.
Oh, yeah, I just don't know enough.
What I'm going to tell you, because I don't know.
Well, Robert, I mean, you're...
You know what?
I don't know enough.
I need to look at data before I make a decision.
Bye.
You're running for president of the United States.
You have looked at the data.
Come on, man.
My inclination is that it's not good for anybody.
There may be some rare cases where it saves somebody's life.
Okay, so we're watching the rape, incest, and life of the mother.
Well, I'm for transing kids, with exceptions, with protections.
That's what we're watching this issue become the rape, incest, life of the mother.
Oh, my goodness.
This is ridiculous.
I don't know that.
I'm not going to tell you that I have an answer to a question.
But, Robert, there's a big difference.
Let me just tell you this.
I just want to say that there's a big difference between those two things.
One, saving somebody's life to transition and cut the dangling off.
How are you saving that person's life?
Some of these things, logically, they make no sense to parents.
You can have to answer this for both parents on both sides.
There's conflicting values here.
And one of the values is freedom.
To do what you want with your own body and have the government tell you you can or you can't do that.
Freedom to do what you want with your kids is also the issue here.
Oh yeah, I have the freedom to, you know, I have the freedom to lock my kid in a box and, you know, feed him an M&M every once in a while if I feel like it.
But, hey, he's my kid, you know, I've got the freedom to do it.
Protecting kids under the age of 18, though.
That's the other, right?
And that's what I'd say.
Nobody can do it without their parents' permission.
That's solid.
That's solid.
Nobody can do it.
That's my position.
What?
What a based position.
I'll tell you right now, if I'm president, nobody's going to be able to trans their kid.
No kid will be trans unless their parents agree with it.
Oh yeah, what a solid base position that is.
And then I have to look at the drugs, the safety of the drugs, whether there's permanent damage from the...
I just don't know.
You're rolling your eyes like I shouldn't have...
This is an obvious question.
Yes.
Yes, it is an obvious question.
100%.
This is...
Everybody, the whole world is rolling their eyes right now.
I just don't know.
I have to look at the drugs.
What?
I don't know.
We live in interesting times for sure.
We do.
But to my previous point, this is, you know, you've got three people running for president, right?
And, you know, you could say, well, Trump has mentioned that he's for a national ban on trans and kids.
Yeah, but then at the same time, though, like...
He and his surrogates are trying to secure the gay vote, and they're normalizing the whole transgender thing, right?
I mean, the whole argument that we could have here over minors, which again, I'm for having that argument from an incremental standpoint.
I think we need to save the lives of children, and I think many of these children that buy into the sex cult when they're 12, 13, 14 children, It's very possible by the time they're 18, they've realized, oh, no, I was just confused, and thank goodness I haven't been, you know, nuking my body with hormones that don't belong there, and now I'm going to go on and actually, you know, live a good life, right?
Reproduce, like get married, have kids, which we're taking from these kids, right?
So I'm fine with having the debate here, but if we're serious, and look, Transing yourself, whether you are a kid or whether you are an adult, should not be something that you are allowed to do in America.
There's no goodness advance.
There's none of that.
there's there's it's not there's nothing good for society uh with with this level of behavior of of saying no i i know i was born this way but i i was born in the wrong body and and and that we're going to affirm something that used to be in medical journals as a psychological disorder what's the 14 year old driving a car and Without a driver's license?
Do you trust a 13-year-old voting?
What if a parent consents for a 13-year-old to vote?
Should we be okay with that?
Because a parent said it's okay.
It's legal for a 13-year-old to vote.
I get that, but why should it be legal for somebody at 13 with parent consent to transition?
Well, first of all, the metaphors you gave are not apt, because when you drive a car, you're affecting other people.
Listen, I'm just telling you the truth.
Again, I think in adults, I think it's still harming other people.
Honestly, I think from a decency standpoint.
If you look at how scantily clad some of these men who are pretending to be women walk around and flaunting this stuff, you go look at the Seattle-Washington public defender up in that court.
It's that man dressed up with the giant fake breasts and the big cleavage.
It's just like, no, that's not good.
Everybody sees that for what it is.
Everybody sees that this is a deranged man that's been given standing to be a lawyer and represent other people.
To say that your decisions that you've made here, that everybody knows.
Even in liberal Seattle, they're walking around and they know.
Everybody knows.
They may keep it to themselves, but they know this is nuts.
They know this is crazy.
There is just no way where we as a society need to affirm madness.
We don't need to affirm madness.
We don't need to abandon reason for madness as...
Saruman did abandon reason for madness.
I don't have a position on this because I don't know enough about it.
I believe my values are the same as yours, and you probably know a lot more about this and could explain it to me.
But, you know, I don't know whether there are rare, rare cases.
My inclination is that we shouldn't be giving drugs, you know, we should limit any kind of drug that is dangerous, their availability to young people.
But there may be some rare circumstances that you wouldn't want to criminalize it.
So, you know, I do believe that people who make those kind of decisions as adults should be – that they shouldn't be subject to ridicule or derision or bias in any way.
No thanks.
Again, I mean, that's a very, it's a mainstream argument, right?
It's the live and let live argument.
I wouldn't expect Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
to make any other argument there, but where does that get us?
It gets us, well, I mean, you know, you already have, there's already, just people, we're not a nation of law and order, so...
Not subject to ridicule really just means not subject to arrest when they're in the middle of their parades and they're half naked and there's kids surrounding the parade and the police stand by and just do absolutely nothing when there are already laws on the books against this stuff.
That's what it really means.
Again, that's a presidential candidate saying I don't know.
I'll be clear.
This is the clip from his campaign, or maybe it's a PAC affiliated with his campaign.
Anyway, I got this clip, this particular clip.
This is the lengthy one, because there's a shorter one that's going on online, and I think the RFK camp is like, you need to see this clip in the full context.
So I'm playing it for you in the full context, and it's still just as bad.
And that we should do everything we can to discourage those kind of decisions from young people.
Can I add one other issue?
Please, go for it.
There's a lot of things happening to our children now that we need to look at as a nation.
So I think this will be the recovery.
I think he knows he stepped in it here.
This is the recovery portion of the interview.
...that are being completely ignored.
When my uncle was president, 6% of American children had chronic disease of Americans.
And by chronic disease, I mean categories obesity, neurological injuries like ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, autism.
So I might have believed this guy, and again, I mean, I suppose in some world you could give him the benefit of the doubt.
I just can't.
I'm sorry, I don't.
I might have believed a guy that knows this much about vaccine injuries in kids doesn't know about these chemical castration drugs to children.
I mean, why?
I just, you know, if anything, this guy should be speaking to those Democrats considering to vote for him and waking them up and saying, dude, we cannot abuse children.
Food allergies, peanut allergies, which I never saw in my life.
I have 11 siblings.
I have 70 cousins.
None of them have food allergies.
Why do five of my seven kids have those allergies?
And then autoimmune disease.
Rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, these exotic diseases like Crohn's disease and lupus that we never saw as a kid.
A kid, 6%.
1986, 11.8%.
By 2006, 54%.
This is one of the problems with our military.
They're not eligible for military service.
We don't know what it is today, because after 2006, NIH stopped publishing the data.
It's probably 60% of our kids have autoimmune, allergic, or neurological diseases.
You see EpiPens in every classroom.
You see Albuterol inhalers.
In some classes, 70% of the kids are on Adderall.
They're diagnosed with ADHD. What's happening?
Autism went from 1 in 10,000 in my generation to 1 in every 34 kids today.
And it's not because we're seeing it suddenly, because then you'd see it in my generation.
Aren't there a large number of the kids that believe that they're trans, or I guess I should say, the minors in this country who identify themselves as transgender or any one of the other, I don't know, whatever, the LGBTQ, whatever, however that works, I believe, according to statistics, a vast majority of these people also have been diagnosed with autism.
And I would wonder if...
I don't know.
I would wonder if RFK Jr.
wants to connect those dots.
I don't believe he ever has.
Some people out there are brave enough to say it.
The vaccines are making our kids gay.
It's essentially like...
You could sum it up.
The 10,000 or the 30,000 foot...
We're going to look at the forest.
Instead of being stuck in the trees, we're going to say...
The vaccines are making kids trans and gay...
Because they're making them autistic?
Wow, you talk about a depopulation.
Now, that's just like a total curveball that no one really could have predicted.
You definitely could say, hey, the vaccines are making kids autistic, or hey, the vaccines make it harder to procreate, the vaccines make you sterile, or the stuff in the water makes you sterile, or the stuff in our food makes you sterile, all this other stuff.
But to say that, oh, not only that, it's going to cause autism, and then we're going to put the woke sex religion on them.
They're going to be more easily converted to the woke sex religion, think there's something wrong with them.
Because if they have autism, well, there is something wrong with them.
And then you twist it, well, it's actually the fact you were born in the wrong body.
Which, as I'm just spitballing here thinking out loud, I don't know what autism feels like at all, but if you had somebody telling you that, you could see it could go hand in hand.
I'm autistic and I feel like I've been born in the wrong body, or I feel like I was...
Right?
But if it was the vaccines that caused it the whole time, man, what a scandal that would be.
A few more seconds of this and we'll move on.
I've never seen a 69-year-old man with full-blown autism.
By that I mean non-verbal, non-toilet trained, head-banging, stimming, toe-walking, hand-flapping.
I've never seen that in a 69-year-old man.
But in my kids' generation, it's one in every 34 kids.
EPA, Congress said to EPA, tell us what year it started, the epidemic started.
EPA came back.
EPA is a captive agency, but it's captive by oil, coal, chemical, and big ag.
It's not captive by pharma, because it doesn't regulate pharma.
So they came back with an honest study, and they said it's a red line, 1989.
Well, as it turns out, These diseases, most of them started on that same timeline.
Around 1989, peanut allergies suddenly appear.
Obesity goes crazy.
We go from 6% of having obesity to 45% of kids, 75% overweight.
It's not because they suddenly got lazy.
American kids.
And everybody that was born before 1989 in this audience is like, Yeah, you heard people say the vaccine schedule changed, and the people that I know that vaccinated their kids that were also aware, it's like this fine line, this hybrid of, we want to vaccinate, still want to vaccinate, but we don't want to vaccinate on the schedule today.
We want to go back and vaccinate on the schedule before.
That assumes that the vaccines themselves haven't changed, and that it's just that the cause here is that you're just flooding the child with all of these vaccines, and certainly the number has increased.
But that doesn't take into account what if the vaccine formula has also changed as well, right?
So that's why a lot of parents have just abandoned the vaccines altogether and are just not vaccinating their kids at all now because they don't trust the schedule, they don't trust the amount of vaccines recommended, but they also don't trust what is in them anymore.
And, uh, yeah.
It's crazy.
Yeah, so RFK Jr.
there knows a lot about vaccines, knows a lot about kids, knows a lot about all these mysterious allergies that people have been getting.
But he doesn't know if transing kids, even if a parent consents to having their kid transed, ah, he doesn't know if that should be made illegal.
Because he hasn't looked at enough evidence.
He hasn't looked at enough data.
I don't know, man.
Like, I just...
I don't know.
That's a benefit of the doubt that I just can't give.
Let me know what you guys think out there.
We're going to take a break.
Yesterday, I got to guest host.
Once again, I got to guest host for Stu Peters yesterday.
I got to interview John Lefebvre on this frat boy summer that's going on.
The frat boys and everything that they are doing at the college campuses.
And it's a lot more complicated than the mainstream media would have you believe.
Obviously, they're twisting and they're spinning it, so we talked about that.
We're going to listen to that during the break, and we'll be back here in just a moment.
Don't go anywhere.
Millstone Report back this week.
John Lefevre.
He's been posting about the situation over on X, and he joins us now for more discussion on the frat boy uprising of 2024.
John, welcome back to the Stu Peter Show, sir.
It's great to be here.
Thanks for having me.
What are your thoughts on all this?
Well, I was laughing as you were struggling through that monologue, and of course I've been enjoying most of these videos through the weekend.
I think there are a few things that have kind of stuck with me in observing this and in kind of listening to what you've been saying.
Of course, you know, the frat boys are going to rise up, and I think it's excellent, especially in the context of them being basically It's targeted at all these universities for years or decades.
They've been subjected to secret disciplinary hearings, especially at Columbia or Cornell.
I think now they have anonymous tip lines where people, any person, can lodge a complaint against a fraternity house anonymously.
And that fraternity charter will be suspended pending a shadowy, anonymous investigation of which everything is secret, including the disciplinary result.
So these guys have been targeted for decades.
And so it makes perfect sense that they can only take it for so long.
And I think more than anybody, they see what this is really about.
This isn't necessarily about Israel or Palestine or quote-unquote genocide.
This is about their hatred for white people and white men and America.
And who represents that more than anybody else?
Which demographic?
It's going to be the frat boy.
And so if these so-called protesters and Campers or whatever you want to call them, if they actually thought there was a genocide in, forget what's happening in Sudan and anywhere else in the world, if they actually thought there was a genocide in Palestine that they were so worried about, they wouldn't be sidetracked by some frat boys protecting a flag or calling somebody Lizzo.
They wouldn't care.
They'd be talking about the genocide.
So it inadvertently shows what this is really about, which is a war on white people.
So I think that's the first point.
The second point is, I think it's great that these guys raised half a million bucks to throw a keg party, and I fully support that, but I think there have been other groups, without having an opinion on them, either way, say the Proud Boys, for example, which is a complicated subject, but take the Proud Boys, for example.
These guys have been defending flags and free speech and whether it's, you know, acting as bodyguards for Ann Coulter or whomever else.
They've been taking stands like this for the better part of a decade and they don't get a GoFundMe page.
They get sent to jail and they lose their jobs.
So I'm glad that people are sticking up for these frat boys, but it is interesting that You know, they're not the only ones out there who've been kind of cognizant of the fact that this is really about a war on white people and on Western culture.
We're short on time, but I want to ask you this last question.
Just to be clear, the anti-whiteness, it is clearly on the left, right?
You know, 100%.
But it's also on the right.
And if you go to your average Republican and you say...
Hey man, I think the great replacement theory is a real thing and it's something we need to be worried about.
A lot of the mainstream public's knee-jerk reaction is, no, no, you can't say that, that's racist.
So there's this anti-whitism really on both sides that's been embraced.
Go ahead.
That's a great point, and this has been made.
What we're seeing with this Lizzo thing and the UNC thing and the Ole Miss thing, it's flushing out.
Who are the cowards on the right?
Exactly right.
So you need to pay attention, because what we're seeing, who runs, who hides, who apologize, who doesn't stick up for these people?
I mean, if I see five kids looting an apple store, I'm gonna call them a monkey, no matter what color they are, right?
And people are now distancing themselves from this frat kid.
Every week there's a new video of black kids beating up a white kid in school.
And they're worried about some Ole Miss frat boy and apologizing for him.
So they're cowards on both sides.
And so I think it's a good opportunity, as you say, to pay attention to the people on the right who aren't sticking up for this kid.
John LeFence.
And it's the Millstone Report.
Welcome back.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Really do appreciate all of you out there.
If you're in the market for a new cup of coffee, I've got one that I think you want to check out.
It's called the Bearded Sergeant.
The Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company.
BeardedSargent.com.
If you go to BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone, this is a veteran-owned coffee company.
And they actually allow, I guess, a little bit of every one of their proceeds.
So with each sale, they take a fraction of that and they donate it to Homes for Our Troops.
Homes for Our Troops is an organization that works to build homes for post-9-11 veterans.
So that's certainly a noble cause, especially when you consider...
How some of these people, you know, they come back and they feel lied to as to the real reason they went over there in the first place.
It's BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone.
It's Costa Rican coffee.
You're going to love it.
It's delicious.
And you should check it out if you go to BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone.
And if you use the promo code Paul, you'd say 15%.
There's a lot of coffees out there, a lot of coffees trying to get your business.
But I would recommend this one because I think you're going to love it.
And I know the guy who started this company, and he is, A Christian, a family man, and he would appreciate your business.
BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone.
Go there today.
Alright, we're going to analyze something at the top.
We did this at the top of the show.
It was just a brief clip that was part of the monologue.
And one of the things that we were using this particular clip for, this is Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow from 2006.
I know, yeah, that Rachel Maddow for just joining us.
You can check it out, the full segment.
From earlier.
Well, we were using it from, you know, to kind of demonstrate the hyperbole.
To say that, hey, a lot of times when people are in an argument, an issue of the day, they'll use kind of outlandish language to describe themselves to try to make you think that they're not crazy, right?
So in this case, Rachel Maddow's like, yeah, we don't want to ban the Bible or anything.
And of course, that's exactly what these people want to do.
So take it from the top.
But I've got something else I want to say about this.
Taking it from the top, Tucker Carlson, Rachel Maddow on MSNBC in the year 2006.
Watch.
Welcome back to our special coverage of Decision 2006, Battleground America.
Okay, let's assume the Democrats will control Congress in November, and it certainly looks that way now.
Now let's imagine a world where people like Nancy Pelosi and John Conyers hold the future of our nation in their hands.
Mwahaha!
Here to help us ponder that terrifying probability, our old pal from Air America Radio, Rachel Maddow, joining us from New York.
Hi, Tucker.
Nice to see you.
Great to see you.
What's the first thing, apart from nationalizing the railroads?
Hang on, a couple of things.
People have pointed out that, number one, they say, well, Rachel Maddow kind of looked, she looked more feminine in this photo than she does now.
Okay, but there's also people that point out that these two could be brothers.
Oh, man.
I think that's the funniest thing.
These two people could be brothers.
It's something else that I found interesting.
Okay, back to this.
Passing the transgender amendment.
Ponder that terrifying probability.
Our old pal from Air America Radio, Rachel Maddow, joining us from New York.
Hi, Tucker.
Nice to see you.
Great to see you.
What's the first thing, apart from nationalizing the railroads and passing the transgender amendment, Democrats are going to do when they take power?
Nationalizing railroads, that's the joke.
Of course, they basically have nationalized all these companies anyway.
The Uniparty has, right?
There's really no free market.
All of the corporations are actually controlled.
There's no line between government and corporation anymore, which is something the Democrats ironically used to be against.
I'm old enough to remember when that was the case.
Passing the transgender amendment, which is just crazy that that was even being talked about in 2006, and it was thought of as totally nuts.
Again, Slippery Slope is real, but then Maddow says this.
I mean, there's a lot to get to right away.
We have to make everybody get gay married, and we have to ban the Bible, and we have to send you to Guantanamo.
Yeah, there you go.
We've got J6ers riding in gulags.
They are trying to ban the Bible, and we want to make everybody get gay married.
That's certainly true for kids.
They want all the kids to get gay married these days.
But that's not really...
We've already covered this aspect of this video.
Again, 2006, it was...
I saw this on ex-Simon Atiba, White House correspondent from an African news agency.
I saw this, thought it was interesting.
But this is...
I had additional thoughts, but watch.
After we, you know, get rid of the first-tier order of business.
I mean, you know...
There are going to be some subpoenas headed to the White House, aren't there?
I mean, let's be honest.
Maybe there will be.
I mean, it's possible that Democrats will take both houses.
It's likely, I think, that they'll take one house.
That's not such a crazy situation.
I mean, since Bush has been president, there was a period of time when the Democrats controlled the Senate and the will didn't end.
It's not like the entire country or even our entire political system will change.
I don't think you should expect a dramatic change in governing.
No, I don't, and it'll still be, I mean, look, one thing Republicans have sort of learned and should have learned a long time ago is it's very hard to govern with a small majority, and Democrats have to face the same problem, and everybody knows the drill.
So here's the observation.
Yeah, the news is fake.
Now, this is not necessarily a slam on Tucker, right?
I mean, he's obviously come out and said, essentially, you know, he's ashamed of a lot of his positions he took, but he's also grateful that he now has the freedom to say, hey, I was wrong there, I was wrong here, and that, you know, specifically on the Iraq War, things like that.
He's certainly come out and said, look, I advocated for things very strongly that I was totally wrong about and everything else.
But the theatrics of all of this are what, it's just, if you compare that to maybe what you would hear today, it's just this phony reasonableness.
Oh yeah, you know, governing's tough, and oh yeah, you know, there's just, there's not going to be much difference from one party to the next in how things are governed.
You're not really even going to tell.
It's fine, you know.
And the whole thing just makes me sick, right?
I mean, it makes me sick.
And look, I told you at the top of the show, look, I used to advocate for this as a coping mechanism in the wake of gay marriage being legalized by the Supreme Court and them finding a fake, phony, constitutional right to gay marriage.
As a coping mechanism, I adopted the libertarian argument and I parroted it.
The libertarian argument that, oh, well, As a Christian, we don't need the government to validate our marriage because we do that in a ceremony before God.
And while that's true, it was a coping mechanism to diminish the Christian heritage, to diminish the, you could say it was small, but definitely a link between church and state that everybody was fine with and everybody had accepted.
And I played a part in basically pacifying people for freedom and liberty.
Just sit on your hands.
Just sit on your hands and do nothing because this is normal.
This is a part of our Constitution.
This is the freedom that we have to endure if we want to have our freedoms.
And it was garbage.
I'm telling you right now, it was garbage.
So somebody who I just basically confessed to that at the top of the hour, I guess on a much, much, much, much, much smaller scale than Tucker, I can certainly identify with him being able to change his perspective and everything else.
But the reason that clip makes me sick is because of the...
It's just the shallowness of it all.
And it's the manipulation and it's the trust.
It just comes down to the trust.
I guess, you know, in 2006, I was in college.
You know, you just had a different...
You never assumed that people in the media, yeah, they would get it wrong, yeah, they might lie here and there, but...
With malicious intent.
Lie to win the argument, but no, lie maliciously so that people who listen to you and trust you will go make decisions based on information that's not true, and those decisions that they then make...
They become the instrument of their own demise.
And you see it in little ways, you know, back in 2006, but then you come to today and it's just so much worse.
You know, the late Democrat pollster Pat Cadell said in the wake of the Benghazi situation where Hillary Clinton and, you know, they left those people out to dry.
And who knows if we'll ever know the actual truth of what happened.
But he said that in the wake of covering that up, they blamed it on a video that they clearly had ready for a crisis just like this.
He said that the media, he was the first person that I ever heard say this back in 2012 when Obama was, you know, Obama was running against Mitt Romney, you know.
The king of Republican Christless secularism, Mitt Romney.
But anyway, Pat Goodell says that the mainstream media is the enemy of the American people.
The enemy of the American people.
And they have been for a very, very long time.
And, yeah, I mean, you know, there might be people listening to this show right now that says the same thing, right?
Because everybody, we are, we have people in our movement, and I think this is a good thing to have a healthy skepticism of everything and say, oh, you know, there may be people in this audience that say, oh, you know.
I don't trust you.
Well, you know what?
Here's the deal.
That's healthy and that's fine.
What I would also say is, at this point, if you're willing to confess your biases and confess your agenda as somebody in the media or somebody in the influencer game or whatever, at least they're willing to admit that they're not unbiased.
That they are, in fact, biased.
And that they're at least trying to be honest with you, or at least the whole thing.
That could be a psyop.
I know, man.
That's why Christians really have the advantage, because they are able to have discernment from the Holy Spirit.
That's actually a huge advantage that Christians have, by the way.
But yeah, I mean, the whole thing is...
Being able to confess your biases and saying, look, this is my agenda.
So for me, to you, my agenda is I am a Christian.
I have no problem with the label Christian nationalist because I look at what's happening to this country and I see, wow, we are a totally debauched, unruly people and we actually need to be governed...
And we've got to stop this nonsense, and we need a government that's going to reward good and punish evil.
Based on what standard?
Well, yeah, based on the Christian standard, based on the morality that can be derived from the pages of Scripture that describe the character of Almighty God who is real, who is in heaven.
Also, hell's a real place where real people go.
Like, that's my agenda.
That's where I'm coming from as somebody who is trying to report the news.
You look at a clip like that, though, and it just, I don't know, I guess it triggered me more than anything of just how fake everything is.
Absolutely fake.
Here is a lady who has totally been deceived by the mainstream media, or at least that's one option.
This is Protestia with this story.
A pregnant woman is explaining.
She's got written on her belly there.
Not human yet.
And she's explaining the reason why her baby is no longer human.
And again, I've got this from Protestia.
Great follow on X. Let's see, we're going to have to, looks like we're going to reload this page because the internet decided to be wonky.
Do we have it?
You have written on your stomach.
Sure, so this is a part of me right now.
I'm Jewish and according to With law and tradition, life begins with the first breath and at birth, and that if anything were to happen up until then, that it is part of me, and it is my decision.
It's part of my body.
It's like a limb.
I mean, it is a significant part of me, but it's my decision.
Okay, so as you have written here, can you...
Can you read it to me?
Yeah, it says, not yet a human.
And why did you write that?
Because everyone is talking about murder and it's just, it's me.
It's not somebody else yet.
I have a child.
This is a person.
This is a person with will.
This is a person who has decision-making power.
And this is me.
What do you think of today's decision?
It's awful.
I mean, it's horrible.
I don't know, you know, what parts this baby is going to have, but if he or she does not have the options that they need to make bodily choices around what they can do with their own life, I don't know how to protect them in the world.
That is sick right there.
So, Um...
Excuse me, so we have this Jewish woman who says, actually, I mean, I'm Jewish, so abortion, she essentially says, I'm Jewish and we believe in abortion.
And she's more, you know, this is all, she's blind, right, first of all.
But she says, how sick is it that she's worried about the unborn baby, when it is born, if it's a girl, not having the right to kill her baby?
How sick?
How sick is that?
That's why Ben Zieseloff said this on Twitter.
It's one of the reasons why.
I found this very helpful.
Now, he says general paganism.
He talks about Islam and just false religions.
But I'm just going to read his statement here because I found it very helpful today.
He says, Today we see Islam, paganism, other false religions competing for dominance over what remains of the formerly Christian West.
If we are viewing these events through a proper biblical lens and reading the book of history as Christians, we must clearly recognize that we are under judgment for our civilization.
Apostasy.
So this goes back really to the very beginning of the show where we ask the question, is America under the judgment from God?
He writes that God is handing the Christian West over to demons because that is what we deserve.
Consider these words from Apocalypse, one popular 7th century document that circulated after the hordes of Islam first overthrew the Christian East as cited in Sword and Shemitar by Raymond Ibrahim.
Quote, listen to this.
This is incredible to me.
Never heard this before in my life.
It's a quote from that book, that work.
Thus, not because he loved them did the Lord give them power to seize the land of the Christians, talking about the Muslims, but because of the lawlessness of the Christians.
The likes of it never had occurred, nor may it occur in the entire generations of the earth.
For why did men put on the clothes of adulterous women and prostitutes, adorn themselves as women, and openly stand in the squares and markets of towns and change their natural practice for an unnatural one?
See our reference earlier in the monologue where we talked about Romans chapter 1.
Likewise, women did the same things as the men had done.
Father, son, and brother had intercourse with one woman who touched every kinsman.
For this reason, God delivered them into the hands of the barbarians.
That is, because of their sin and stench, the women will pollute themselves through the men who are polluted, and the sons of Ishmael will cast lots over them.
As I said at the end of the monologue, we're in the midst of a murderous country.
We are a country that devalues and besmirches the image of God.
And is it no secret that we're now being overrun?
I mean, and you could say...
Our leaders sold us out, and that's true.
We're not securing the border.
We have the ability to secure the border.
We choose not to.
Our leaders, right, they're running a proxy war against the American people using the Mexican drug cartels or any other human trafficking, sex trafficking, drug trafficking forces that are out there.
All of that's true.
I'm not really concerned about the mechanism, although we do need to talk about that.
The observation is...
When countries become wicked to the level that we are, they tend to be conquered and invaded by outside forces.
Look, I know everybody says that Rome collapsed from within, and yes, the United States is collapsing from within, but what happens when you collapse?
You get overtaken.
Another culture comes in, right?
The violent marauders, the third world barbarian horde that we say are murderous and violent, and they are, they will fit in very well here in America because we are just as murderous.
There's a natural mechanism that gets worked in here when people reject God and God gives them over, God hardens their hearts, and that's what we're in the midst of right now.
Ben Ziesloft, he goes on to say, do any of these practices sound familiar about men in dresses?
Our men dress like women and our women dress like men.
Our men pass around women and our women debase themselves.
Our men sleep with men and our women sleep with women.
Beyond all these, we murder the children conceived into these depraved messes while they are still in the womb to the tune of more than a million innocents a year.
Then we turn around and call this flood of wickedness empowering and authentic.
As with our Eastern forebearers, the nations of the apostate Christian West are under the heavy hand of God for our brazen sexual immorality and perversion.
This hand will only feel heavier as we increasingly harden our hearts.
We should not be surprised that we are reaping the same rotten fruit every other nation reaps when we engage in these sins.
God shows no partiality.
The way forward is repentance.
We must turn from our apostasy, forsake our sexual perversions, and humble ourselves before God, first individually and then corporately.
Then we must turn toward Jesus Christ in faith, pleading his mercy and living in accordance with his ways.
If you're not a Christian, bow the knee to Jesus who died and rose for sinners and who will return to judge the living and the dead.
If you are a Christian, search your heart before God and ensure that you are taking absolutely no part in our national sins, especially sexual sins.
Ben Ziesloft, he's an editor over at the Republican Sentinel, really good guy, and speaks a lot of truth.
Really good stuff from him.
We're going to ping pong, so that's a good take.
Here's another take.
This is the Millstone Report, so we're going to give a millstone to a guy by the name of Dr.
Kevin M. Young, who claims to be a pastor.
He recently took to Twitter and he's basically saying that same-sex love is biblical and he's saying that Jesus knew that it was biblical.
He is saying that the Roman centurion had a gay lover at home.
It wasn't just a young servant.
They were gay together and Jesus knew this and approved of it.
That's what he's claiming here.
He says this based on the fact that centurions could not marry or have children until retirement.
And that doesn't mean the fact that they might not still have had a kid anyway.
Anyway, he goes on to talk about...
Let's see, where's the worst part?
He's talking about...
He tries to break down the Greek.
All of this to try to excuse...
You know, it's just like, oh, thank goodness.
Thank goodness that the Bible perfectly conforms to this post-World War II pro-Sodomite live-and-let-live libertarianism that has taken over this country.
Oh, phew.
Thank goodness.
Let's see here.
He goes on to say, Jesus says he will come heal the young slave at the centurion's house.
The centurion freaks out.
Why?
This is a huge leap because he knows that Jesus will see that it isn't just a boy or a slave, but a gay lover.
Centurion, no, no, no, no.
Don't go to my house.
Just speak.
This completely turns this whole thing on its head.
And it doesn't make any sense.
Jesus heals them.
Jesus heals the servant because of the centurion's faith.
It would not be faith if he was trying to deceive Jesus and try to keep something from him.
That wouldn't be faith.
Jesus says that a Gentile in a questionable relationship has more faith than all Israel.
Again, he is completely making this up out of whole cloth to justify sodomy between men.
He is literally putting words in our Savior's mouth, in Jesus Christ's mouth, to justify the sin of our age.
Millstone.
The millstones are reserved for a guy like this.
Because he's literally causing young people to stumble that would come to Christ.
He is claiming that he is a pastor, and yet it would be better for a millstone to be tied around his neck and thrown into the sea than to cause one of these little ones to stumble, and that's exactly what he is doing.
And if you know, he says he's a post-evangelical, so he's probably one of these guys that deconstructs his faith.
You hear this a lot of times.
I'm a Christian, but I'm deconstructing.
And you know what that really means?
It's just code for there's a sin in your life that the Bible speaks directly to that you don't want to give up, so I'm deconstructing my faith.
It's ridiculous.
But, not the black pill this audience.
We're going to leave you with what I would consider a white pill.
Joshua Hames, who's got a good podcast, He is the host of the, let's see, what is this?
I want to make sure I get it right.
Reformation Red Pill.
So the Reformation Red Pill podcast.
Joshua Hames, check it out.
He says, fathers, teach your sons to slay the dragon and get the girl.
Why?
Because this is the ultimate story of humanity.
Slay the dragon, get the girl, is a six-word summary of the entire biblical narrative, and thus the meta-narrative of all of human history.
Thus, we should be filling our boys' imaginations with noble, courageous knights, winning beautiful maidens, because that's what Christ has done.
He slayed the great dragon to win a spotless bride made spotless by his loving sacrifice.
Not only should we be filling their imaginations with these stories like St.
George and the dragon, but more importantly, we must be representing the great dragon slayer to our boys.
Fathers, you had better slay the dragon of your lust, envy, pride, anxiety in your life, and you had better love your maiden well.
You can only do it by ever looking to Christ.
So look to Christ, slay some dragons, your boys are watching, You represent Christ, the great dragon slayer, to your boys.
Represent him well.
That's all the time that we have for this evening's edition of the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
We really appreciate all of you guys out there who watch this program, who sound off in the comments.
You can follow me on Twitter or X at RealPaulHarrell.
That's at RealPaulHarrell, H-A-R-R-E-L-L. And we will see you tomorrow evening.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection