Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: UK BANS Trans Term 'CHESTFEEDING', Pastor Almost Shot To Death!
|
Time
Text
The rainbow Gestapo in the good-stepping gay lobby.
All of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
I lose track of time, so I might be past my pride.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, it feels just like I don't try.
I'm so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Curl down, sway into my own sound.
Flashes in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody, everybody, everybody.
Everybody. .
Hey folks, welcome to the program.
Happy Monday.
Happy Monday to everybody out there.
It's been a doozy.
It's been a doozy so far, but we're through it and you're almost through it.
Welcome to the program.
We've got a great show for you.
Oh my goodness.
Couldn't believe this.
Could not believe this.
But before we get to specifically that, we have to remember something.
We have to remember that back at the end of March...
Back at the end of March, we told you some good news.
We told you that the United Kingdom's National Health Service, or NHS, decided to ban chemical castration drugs for minor children.
We're not going to prescribe that anymore.
Now, even though kids could still get the drugs from physicians who are in private practice, which is a thing I didn't even know still existed over across the pond, we still thought this was great news because it showed that the trans tyranny that has been unleashed against our children is being recognized for what it is.
It's child abuse.
And everyone with the slightest sense of morality knows this to be true.
So the question is why?
Or you could kind of stretch that out.
Also, you have to consider the purveyors of this, okay?
So here's the question.
Do the purveyors of this woke sex religion also have some fear here?
Are they afraid that they may have gone too far?
Are they afraid that they've awoken a sleeping giant?
Are they afraid of the Christian swing back that may go even further and put this modern liberal libertarianism in the dustbin of history?
I suspect some are.
I also think another reason for this is that England has a Muslim population, and this Muslim population, they want nothing to do with the LGBTQ RSTLNE, which I like to buy a vowel agenda.
But I have more good news, as you see on your screen there, from England.
Last week, we missed this story.
The NHS announced that they would no longer be using certain trans terms and phrases designed to ignore basic biology.
The UK's Telegraph reports, quote, chest feeding to be banned in NHS crackdown.
The health service is to limit trans ideology with the new constitution, end quote.
So they've got this new constitution they're working on.
You think it'd be a great time to solidify the trans tyranny, but no, they're doing the opposite.
This is amazing.
Now the NHS is going to ban chest feeding, the term.
This is a huge reversal and a giant blow to trans ideology.
Chest feeding is a made-up term designed to force the perverted notion, and disgusting picture in your mind, by the way, that if a man gets hopped up on enough drugs, he can lactate and feed an innocent child and use him or her as a prop to pretend that the trans lifestyle is normal, wholesome, and good.
When it's not, it's disgusting.
It's perverted, and it's really, again, it's on the path to normalizing pedophilia, which is what this is really all about.
The article goes on to read, quote, Victoria Adkins, the health secretary, will this week announce a series of changes to the NHS constitution, which sets out patients' rights, referring to people who have ovaries rather than women, will also be prohibited.
Referring to people who have ovaries, quote, oh, well, we've got people who have ovaries.
They're not going to do that anymore.
They're saying, no, you're going to use the word woman.
So you will no longer be able to use people with ovaries.
That is prohibited under the plans to ensure hospitals.
It goes on.
They want to ensure hospitals use clear language based on biological sex.
The new constitution will ban transgender women from being treated on single-sex female hospital wards to ensure women and girls receive privacy and protection.
A complete stark contrast to the Title IX amendments that the Biden administration is forcing on schools.
Right?
They're trying to protect female spaces and hospitals in the UK, but over here, they're trying to let your little girl be the next transgender rape statistic.
The article goes on.
Parents will also be given the right to request that intimate care is carried out by someone of the same biological sex, which would mean if there are any trans physicians or doctors, they've been cut out of the loop.
No pun intended.
The article goes on.
The article goes on.
The article goes on to say somebody named Maya Forstater, the chief executive of the campaign group Sex Matters, said the changes represent a major step toward reversing NHS, England's capitulation to the demands of gender extremists.
Which has damaged policies and practices, created widespread confusion, and harmed patient care.
She added, These much-needed changes to the NHS constitution will help secure essential sex-based rights in healthcare across England.
Clear language, single-sex wards, and access to intimate care provided by a health professional of the same sex are crucial to the well-being and safety of female patients.
They should never have been compromised." That's a huge story from the Telegraph.
Huge news last week out of NHS. So it's not just they're banning the term chest feeding.
They're rejecting presuppositions.
They're rejecting lies.
Complete lies from the sex religion in England.
So this is truly great news.
And again, I'm not exactly sure why it could be the large Muslim population.
It could be they're afraid their post-World War II liberalism is going to go away as Christian nationalism continues to advance and people are like, wait a second, we're going to start reexamining.
If this is where we get as a society, we're going to go back up the slippery slope and we're going to start, I don't know, accepting the definition of, the real definition of marriage, what God says it is.
Because if you don't have gay marriage, you don't trans kids.
It's clear.
You got a problem with transing kids, you should have a problem with gay marriage.
It's just a fact.
Because we would not be here if it wasn't for accepting that.
So again, I'm not exactly sure why, but I'll take this good news nonetheless.
On a Monday, I'll take it.
There's no black pill bulimia this time.
I'm not taking the black pill.
Maybe I will later in the show.
In the meantime, while the UK starts to signal it's had enough of the trans LGBTQ debauchery, what is America doing?
What are we doing?
What are our political leaders doing?
I mean, we do have states that are passing laws to protect kids from the perverts.
Christian red states, I call them.
But we also have states passing laws making their lands transgender sanctuary states.
And as we will see here in a minute, the secular Republicans keep trying to get the LGBTQ vote.
And they're even working to normalize transgenderism when they put Bruce Jenner on the news as a contributor.
Unbelievable.
Let's go to the screen, shall we?
Happy Monday, by the way, again to everybody out there listening.
We really do appreciate it.
More blue states declare themselves sanctuary states.
Just a few.
This, again, was last year.
This was a year ago.
Democratic governors, lawmakers across the country mobilizing against the surge of Republican restrictions.
You've got California.
They became the first state.
California was the first state to declare itself a sanctuary.
So the Southeast, basically the Southeastern Conference, is saying, nope, we're not going And many of these states are passing laws against.
But you just kind of see, it's just all of the states with major, giant, humongous cities, for the most part.
There's a few exceptions there.
Obviously, Texas and Georgia, but...
This is where we are.
And this is where it's going to, I mean, look, we need a national ban on this stuff, right?
We need a national ban.
These states don't need to be allowed to do this.
Abuse children?
These are the states that are for child abuse, right here, that are labeled in blue.
And, you know, we've already got the Republicans to let us down and say, well, we don't want a national abortion ban.
We're going to let the states decide.
You know, it's better than the way it was, okay?
But the idea that in order to win elections, we've got to let pink-haired, purple-haired women in blue states murder their babies is offensive to me.
And it's just something I don't think I'm ever going to get over.
I'm never going to get over it.
I'm going to continue to speak about it because it's infuriating to me.
Sacrifice your baby to Moloch so we can win elections.
Sacrifice your baby to Moloch so the crops will grow.
Yeah.
Just kind of had it with that.
That whole idea.
But this is the good news, though.
Back to the good news.
Here it is.
Let's see.
Let's get the actual telegraph.
We'll see.
This is not the telegraph article.
This is...
Trans terms like chest feeding to be banned.
That's not even it either.
There's the telegraph.
And they want me to pay for it, and I say, no, I'm not going to pay for it.
But this is the telegraph article, chest feeding to be banned, and NHS crackdown, the health services to limit trans ideology with new constitution.
Again, huge stuff.
Huge stuff.
So in the meantime, though, what are we doing?
What are the Republicans doing?
I mean, I've got all kinds of...
All kinds of articles.
So I looked up, trying to understand the Republican fascination with the LG. Like, who's advising them that this, you know, that we've got to get the law, that you've got these groups, the law cabin Republicans?
Led by Rick Grinnell, who's, you know, the former ambassador.
And he's gay and he's a Republican.
And you've got, you know, President Trump.
You've got Melania Trump.
They're attending these law cabin galas.
You've got Kimberly Guilfoyle, who was at one of these events in a sheer dress, shocking to everybody.
And I only say that because she was recently on Twitter, she was in a Twitter video riding in a car with a biological man pretending to be a woman.
And I saw the tweet originally from National File.
National File put it out there and they were making a joke like, you know, which one's the dude here?
But I don't even want to talk about that.
I want to talk about the fact that we have Republicans or Republican operatives who are normalizing transgenderism.
I got the tweet from...
Hang on, let me see something here.
No, we're going to get to that here in a minute.
You'll have to excuse me, just because I'm a little bit...
What we have here is a situation...
I guess hosted for Stu.
Here we go, right here.
This is it.
I guess hosted for Stu earlier, and so my tabs are just a little bit out of order, but it's just because we had to get this show going.
Sophia Hutchins.
So this is somebody named Terry Green.
Sophia Hutchins, formerly Scott Hutchins, and you're going to be able to tell here in a minute because of the voice, the timbre of the voice, thanks Kimberly Guilfoyle for being a Log Cabin Republican board member.
And of course, yeah, remember she was married to Gavin Newsom.
Here's the audio for you.
Take a listen.
KG is literally the most amazing woman on the face of the planet.
I don't know how you do it all.
KG, how do you do it all?
She does it all just like that.
It's all from the heart.
Love you.
Love you more.
So, KG, Kimberly Guilfoyle is literally, is literally, I don't know how she does it, So yeah, this is Terry Green here posting this on Twitter.
And it's just, it's like, are they trying to give Christians more reason to stay home in November?
It's an honest question.
So we've got Republicans normalizing transgenderism.
You've got the UK. They're rejecting the term chest feeding.
I mean, they're not even talking about for minors.
Now they're talking about trans people who are adulting.
Who are adults, excuse me.
And...
They are, you know, essentially saying, hey, look, the trans lifestyle may be something we don't want.
We're going to have separate spaces.
We're going to respect what a female is.
And then you've got the Republicans and Republican operatives like Kimberly Guilfoyle who are riding around the car with transgender activists.
Yeah.
Terry Green then says, I couldn't watch her on Fox News.
Never liked The Five.
They're giving evangelicals every reason to stay home.
And so someone named Carol says, so wait, the blonde is a man who's in a relationship with Bruce Jenner?
Caitlyn, who is a man, but both are transvestites slash women.
Did I get that right?
So Bruce Jenner is now gay, or this is confusing.
Terry says, it's very confusing.
If you Google the person's name, it will tell you all about it.
Yeah.
So that blonde man is Scott Hutchins, who was or is in a relationship with Caitlyn or Bruce Jenner.
Okay.
Yeah.
And look at that.
That's an interesting comment.
Kimberly G. looks like she's a dark spirit.
She definitely...
I don't know about maybe...
I don't know about that.
Possibly.
She certainly maybe doesn't look quite sober right there, does she?
Yeah.
Yeah.
And in keeping with that look, what is up with Republican women like this?
And this is a good time to bring in Christy Noem.
She has had a no good, very, very bad couple of weeks.
Of course, you know, the whole dog situation brought out the obvious idea that we care more about animals than we do babies.
And everything else.
And we played for you a pastor that was like, hey, curacy gnome, hold my beer.
When he pulled out a fish and let it flop.
A fish out of a bowl and let it flop around to try to get the point about the gospel.
And he basically tortured a fish in a sermon to prove to everybody that we need to be saved from our sins.
I don't know if you remember that episode, but it's here on the channel if you want to go back and look.
Christy Noem, though, interviewed on Face the Nation for her new book where, you know, she said she killed her dog.
Apparently, though, I mean, maybe she can use this as an out to say, I didn't write any of it and I didn't kill my dog.
But keeping in the same face, you know, this older woman, this older way to look at things, older women, this kind of, this right here, right?
Like, this kind of look, right?
It's kind of a common makeup choice these days, I think.
Here's Kristi Noem over the weekend.
You talk about meeting some world leaders and one specific one.
Quote, I remember when I met with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.
I'm sure he underestimated me having no clue about my experience staring down little tyrants.
I've been a children's pastor after all.
Did you meet Kim Jong-un?
Well, you know, as soon as this was brought to my attention, I certainly made some changes.
I mean, she kind of looks like Kimberly Guilfoyle here, right?
Right?
You see, it's kind of the same thing, right?
I don't know how old Kristi Noem is.
I don't know how old Kimberly Guilfoyle is.
She says she met Kim Jong-un in her book and she didn't meet him.
I've looked at this passage, and I've met with many, many world leaders.
I've traveled around the world.
As soon as it was brought to my attention, we went forward and have made some edits.
So I'm glad that this book is being released in a couple of days and that those edits will be in place and that people will have the updated version.
So you did not meet with Kim Jong-un?
That's what you're saying?
I've met with many, many world leaders.
Many world leaders.
I've traveled around the world.
I think I've talked extensively in this book about my time serving in Congress.
That is the kind of stuff that just will drive the average voter.
I don't care what party you're on, what party you're in, or wherever you are in the political spectrum.
That's the kind of stuff that just makes people.
She doesn't want to say no, so she says no.
I've met many world leaders.
It's really sad.
It's really sad.
As governor, before governor, some of the travels that I've had.
I'm not going to talk about my specific meetings with world leaders.
I'm just not going to do that.
This anecdote shouldn't have been in the book.
And as soon as it was brought to my attention, I made sure that that was adjusted.
So the book is not released until Tuesday.
And so we're doing all that we can to make sure that those changes are made.
And I'm going to continue to focus on what this book is and the blueprint that it lays out for the American citizen.
on all of the things in the background and stories of my life and then how fake some elected politicians are.
Every single person in this country wants someone in elected office.
Wait a second.
How fake some of these politicians...
Wow.
How fake these politicians are.
We're going to roll that back.
Those changes are made and I'm going to continue to focus on what this book is and the blueprint that it lays out for the American citizen on all of the things in the background and stories of my life and then how fake some elected politicians are.
Every single person in this country wants someone in elected office that's a human being that doesn't say they're perfect.
I take responsibility for that being in the book and as soon as it was brought to my attention I asked for it to be changed, so I'm glad that the release date is in a couple of days, and we're excited to talk to America about my new book, No Going Back.
Oh, wow.
Yeah, that's just incredible.
Did she write a single word of this book?
A single letter?
A single jot?
A single tittle?
Did she write any of this book?
Right now, it would be a great opportunity to say, I didn't kill my dog.
Oh, by the way, I also didn't kill my dog, like I said I did.
Oh man, that's awful.
So anyway, the UK banning the term chest feeding.
They're banning trans doctors from being able to look at patients that are not, you know, when you're not the same sex, you know, sexual procedures or whatever that are sexually sensitive.
So they're banning that.
And over here, we've got Kimberly Guilfoyle running around with a man who's dressed up like a woman and being the log cabin Republicans.
I don't know.
It's a strange world that we're living in here.
And then, of course, Christy Noem wearing a similar style makeup.
Similar style hair as well.
Anyway.
Fascinating stuff.
We're going to regroup here and we're going to take a break.
So I got to sit down.
I got to guest host for Stu Peters on Friday.
Got to sit down with Leonardo Joni.
And we're going to listen to that during the break.
This is the Millstone Report.
Don't go anywhere.
back here in just a moment.
One of those people is Leonardo Joni.
She's a white comedian, and she joins us now on the Stu Peter Show to talk more about this.
Leonarda, welcome to the Stu Peter Show.
Thank you so much for your time.
Thanks for having me.
Just so you know, it's debatable if I'm white, according to the internet, because I'm Albanian.
And we don't know yet if we've issued them an acceptance into the membership of white people.
Well, I thought you might bring that up.
I watched a lot of your stuff last night in preparing for this interview.
I'm pretty sure that the black guy that got up in the clip we played at the very beginning of this, I think he probably thinks you can't say those jokes because you're white.
Yes.
Well, so you know what's so funny?
Is that joke was done in a predominantly black room.
And most of the black people in there will crack up.
But then you had like, you know, one or two people who were like, I'm going to be the morally superior one and stand for this and get out, you know?
And it's like, you know, how many times do we see black comedians poking fun at white people?
Nobody gets mad because it's funny and a lot of it's true.
You know, they're like, you don't have any rhythm.
We're like, yes.
They're like, you pay your taxes.
We're like, yes.
You're exactly right.
Tell us a little bit about, I know you have faced a lot of criticism.
I know you're on the comedy scene there, this emerging comedy scene in Austin, Texas, but I know that some of your jokes have gotten you kind of blacklisted.
Tell us about that.
Sure.
Well, I mean, you know, I've been pushing the envelope since I started stand-up, and I made a conscious decision, but I knew that in doing so, it was going to be harder for me to work.
I knew that if I had just gone with the tide and parroted the narrative, especially being a female comedian, They would have foisted me up to the forefront because I'm actually funny.
And they would have been like, look, this is ours!
But because I refused to do that, because I called out Me Too for being bullsh**, because I called out the trans movement for erasing women and being a lie, because I'm making racial jokes, which aren't hateful, by the way.
I don't really have hate.
I have a lot of friends from all different cultures.
This is one of the funny memes that goes around on the internet.
It'll be like, I'm not racist and it's a woman and her friends are all exactly like her.
And then it'll be a guy being like, I am racist and all his friends are from different cultures.
And that's kind of me because I grew up in New York.
You grow up in New York, you're going to be exposed to all different kinds of people.
So once you interact with people from different cultures, you realize we're a lot more similar.
But there are funny differences that when we laugh at them, it's pretty funny.
You know, there's funny stuff about Albanians that I make fun of.
Yeah, I mean, I saw one of your sketches on YouTube where you had, I think, the Trump supporter and the Biden supporter.
That was really funny.
Yeah, you know, comedy brings people together, and we're more divided than ever.
I think that's why there's this attack on laughter and comedy, because if an entire room with different, varying political beliefs...
But they're all laughing.
They all are laughing because they have a common understanding of something, right?
So it brings people together.
Matter of fact, I believe C.S. Lewis even wrote in his book, The Screwtape Letters, that demons hate laughter because they can't understand it.
They don't understand the concept of that That kind of joy.
So it's fundamentally, it's just awful, you know, what's going on in our culture when the left is now against comedy.
They're against having a good time.
And it's because, I mean, really, I think they have created basically a new religion.
I call it kind of a woke sex religion.
What are your thoughts?
Yeah, I 100% believe that.
I mean, listen, I'm a little bit radical, and I think that this is all demons who've taken over.
I do think I believe in that.
I believe in evil because I've seen it.
You know, I've experienced it firsthand, not on a massive scale.
I've experienced it on an individual basis.
And it is a rude wake-up call because I think a lot of these people, especially the people on the left, especially young women who've gone through college, cannot fathom That evil is real and that certain people are actually evil and there are monsters and you do need protection from that.
And in my opinion, everything we're seeing is evil.
I know because evil always comes disguised as good.
So these people presented as, oh, this is the way of compassion.
This is the way of goodness.
And, oh, look, we want to bring equality to all people.
So it sounds really good.
And then you look under the surface, and it is an actual treacherous and murderous ideology that seeks to totally erase any valuable differences between people.
And is pretty much murderous, I think, because if you don't go with the tide, what do they do?
They try to kill you, they silence you, they cut you off financially.
So that's a very oppressive, tyrannical thing that you would find in demons and Satan and all this stuff, right?
Because God is the one who gives you the freedom to choose.
And the devil presents it as, no, you have to make this choice because this is what's good.
Yeah, I mean, he's certainly the father of all lies.
I mean, there's no doubt about that.
And so you never quite get, whatever the deal is, the fine print, you're never actually going to get what you were promised, right?
I mean, Eve was literally promised, surely you're not going to die if you take a bite of the apple.
And she died.
She died spiritually and physically eventually at the end of her life.
Right, but technically she didn't die right in that moment, right?
That's right.
So there's always that silver lining.
So I do believe that they're trying to erase laughter because laughter actually releases tension and it releases violence, you know, violent tendencies.
And so what they're trying to do is build this tension so that it erupts in violence and bloodshed, so that we turn on each other, we stop seeing each other as images of God who have their own You know, holiness to them, their own The preservation of the human.
And you see this mostly with the trans movement, right?
So the trans movement presents itself as the movement of compassion.
And it's so idiotic.
All you have to do is just, you know, ask a few questions and you will see how much of a lie this is.
How can a movement of compassion advocate for the mutilation of a perfectly healthy human body?
You must ask yourself, what is that really about?
And it is about destroying God's creation.
And you cannot have comedy that highlights these absurdities because it helps you to see through them.
We can't have that.
Yeah, I mean, you know, mocking is a useful tool when it comes to that kind of thing.
And you also have, I mean, it's a depopulation agenda as well.
I mean, you're having these, you know, these young kids, these teenagers, they're taking these hormones.
You know, I know they say, oh, it's reversible.
No, it's not, right?
You're going to have, you're avoiding puberty.
You're going to be an adult and have the bone density of, you know, like a Twix or something.
And really, there's a whole other national security side of things.
How do you even field a military when all of your men have been taking these hormones?
But anyway, that's a whole other conversation.
You have them, though, they're giving up the ability in their teens to have children of their own, especially if they go through the surgery, right?
And then you look at the suicide rates post-op, and they're still high.
Well, of course they are.
It is murderous.
You said it was murderous.
I agree with you.
Well, of course you are.
First of all, it's blatant lies.
It's reversible.
Blatant lies.
That's a blatant lie.
Okay?
Telling you that once you cut off your perfectly functional genitalia, you will now be the other gender.
It's like...
Genitalia isn't the thing that makes us a gender.
Sorry, a sex.
Gender's a lie.
Gender's a Marxist lie that was created in order to move in this movement where we can say, we're trying to create some kind of division that isn't true.
Biological...
Alright, thanks for sticking with me during that lengthy break there.
If you want to check out the full clip, I guess this was for Stu on Friday, and that was Leonardo Gioni.
It was a great conversation.
Really impressed with her and her ability to really know the spiritual battles that we're in.
I mean, we're in the midst of spiritual warfare and the manifestations of that in the physical, right?
In the flesh and blood.
My name is Paul.
This is the Millstone Report.
We've got a great rest of the show for you.
We're going to start here.
Everybody is freaking out about this.
Let's restart that real quick there.
there we go yeah so everybody's everybody's really freaking out about that uh The chimp noises at the Lizzo impersonator.
And so now it's 2024 and everything is right back where it was in 2020.
There's not really much about the Palestinians anymore.
There's not really much about the genocide in Gaza anymore.
All that's been co-opted by George Soros-funded groups.
Huh.
And so now, it's back to racism.
Back to racism and anti-Semitism.
Racism and anti-Semitism.
It's basically racism with a side of anti-Semitism now.
That's what the national conversation's about.
It's 2024.
It's an election year, and here we go.
I mean, we're really just one.
You know what we are?
We're one cop shooting a black guy away from being exactly right back where we are.
We're also one terrorist attack away.
False flag or not, one terrorist attack away from this really turning things upside down.
As they construct the Tower of Babel 2.0.
But, we're going to continue to analyze this.
And one guy who has analyzed this is a guy, a YouTuber by the name of A.D. Robles.
You've heard me talk about him before.
You should give him a follow on X. He took to X over the weekend to talk about anti-Semitism and the fake, phony rise in the term anti-Semitism, but he compared it to BLM. And I thought this was so good.
We've got two videos we're going to listen to by him.
But he's comparing it to BLM, and he's specifically talking about in a Christian context.
The Christian context.
There were a lot of Christians who had to fight wokeness in 2020.
Obviously, they had to fight the mask.
They had to fight churches being closed.
They had to wake people up, right?
We had to do a whole re-education, like a national re-education for Christians.
And I'm talking about real Christians on what Romans 13 actually means in the American context, as well as, you know, we need to wear a mask because our governor said so.
Romans 13 says that Christians should submit to authority.
Well, hang on a second.
What's the authority here?
Well, we're a nation of laws.
And we had governors declaring things that were not...
It wasn't a law that was passed.
It was never voted on by any representative of the people.
So you had governors across this country...
They were the ones in violation of Romans 13 because they were doing things blatantly illegal and blatantly unconstitutional.
And yet we had evangelicals and Christians across this country browbeating many people and leaders browbeating the public saying, don't you open your churches!
If the governor says wear a mask, you need to wear a mask.
If he says close your business, you need to close your business when they weren't passing any laws.
No, it was these governors who were in violation of what the Bible says, not Christians who were peacefully resisting.
Anyway.
A.D. Robles called that whole thing with the BLM and George Floyd, he calls it Woke Wars I. And in Woke Wars I, and I'll let him explain it, but in Woke Wars I, you basically had to get comfortable with being called a racist.
That was essentially it.
Because...
Everything's racist.
Like, you know, showing up to work on time is considered racism.
It's considered, you know, part of, you know, white supremacy and everything.
You know, that's how far it went.
And so it's like, okay, you had to convince some people and some Christians who were just terrified, you know, of being raised and just being raised.
The worst thing you could ever be called is a big...
The worst thing that anyone could ever think of you is that you're a racist and people had to break out of that.
Well, now the same...
He says the same thing is happening.
And the people who were on the right side of Woke Wars 1 are now on the wrong side of Woke Wars 2 because of this anti-Semitism awareness bill and everything else.
So I laid the context there, and now we're going to listen to...
Is this the first video here?
Yeah, here's A.D. Robles.
Take it away.
Good Little League morning to you.
Just wanted to do a quick video here.
You know, Christian nationalism...
Obviously, one of the things that it means is that you don't want non-Christians to have an influence on the nation or much of an influence on the nation.
And so, you know, that could be politically, that could be civic traditions, that could be culturally, all that kind of stuff.
You want Christianity to be the force there, self-consciously.
And so obviously that means that Buddhists, Muslims, you know, Hindus, and even modern Judaism You don't want them to have excessive political influence or traditions and all that kind of stuff.
That's something you're not interested in if you're a Christian nationalist.
Now, as it turns out, one of those groups has an outsized influence on the United States.
And that is just a fact.
It's not a fact that you need to be ashamed of or hide.
It's just a fact.
And so, obviously, Christian nationalists are going to talk about that particular group.
And, you know, the bad influence that it has on the nation, which it does.
Now, if you notice, that has nothing to do with hating Jews.
Absolutely nothing.
But this is the thing.
So if you're wondering why people are talking about the influence that modern Jews have on the United States and how it's negative and how we potentially should plan to reduce that influence as much as we can as Christian nationalists, You shouldn't be surprised that we're not doing the same thing with Muslims or Hindus or Buddhists because those groups do not have the same influence.
It has nothing to do with envy.
It's just a fact.
And so it's easy to call it envy.
It's easy to call it Jew hate, but it's obviously not.
Again, that's, okay, so that's the foundation.
Again, the tweet here, two minutes on fake anti-Semitism.
A couple of more vids to follow.
That's what we're doing.
The same thing, the left has alleged for a long time, they've alleged racism, where it doesn't exist, where it is fake, okay?
Where it's fake.
And now we have the same thing.
And again, it really just goes, it also goes down to what's like poll tested, right?
We've made this point before, but I mean, if you look at Ukraine, COVID was full of lies, the media lied to them, people figured it out, we're mad.
Ukraine war, full of lies, people figured it out and we're mad.
I mean, the Congress doesn't respect what the people think, but yeah, we all know that that was all lies.
The whole Ukraine war, unprovoked narrative, that's all nonsense, right?
But we keep sending the money, and it's the Uniparty's money laundering depot, Ukraine is.
And Israel is too now.
It has been.
Somebody said the other day that Democrats use the Ukraine for money laundering, and Republicans use Israel for money laundering.
I don't know.
I don't know if that's exactly true.
It's probably all of them.
But...
But then, so NATO and the deep state, they had taken a huge loss here.
They were totally embarrassed by Russia.
They still are being embarrassed by Russia.
And so the military-industrial complex, they need another war.
So if they had a poll test at a war where Israel was threatened, the poll testing would have been off the charts.
And so in order to attempt to re-brainwash, re-captivate, recapture the American mind that is now anti-war and becoming more isolationist by the day in the wake of all the lies out of Ukraine and Russia and that whole conflict, Boom!
We get October 7th.
And the most secure border in the world, people come over on hang gliders or whatever and attack Israel and kill people.
And now here we are, right?
And so it's fascinating.
Now you have these protests who are sponsored.
There are protests in genocide, which I do think that is going on over there.
And now all of a sudden, the rise in anti-Semitism is everywhere, and they make the definition as broad as possible if you say...
If you say that, historically speaking, the Jews killed Jesus, or we went through all the verses in a show last week where the Jews were plotting to kill Jesus, and it says it over and over and over again in the Bible that the Jews plotted to kill him from that point forward, that the Jews picked up stones to kill him, the Jews plotted to kill him.
It's all throughout the Bible, and all of that's considered anti-Semitic under the umbrella of this new definition by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
And it's just like AD is saying here in a minute, it's just like Woke Wars 1, except they've just traded racism for anti-Semitism.
Here is the second video that I wanted to show you.
And this is the problem that we're having.
So because, you know, when you say that and people say, oh, you're noticing, that's anti-Semitic noticing, you know, and all that kind of thing.
I mean, it's just completely disconnected from reality.
And so we've got people that were trustworthy and are trustworthy, especially in Woke Wars 1 and all that kind of stuff.
Now they're buying the line That all of these things that have nothing to do with hating Jews or envying Jews Just speaking on the influence that modern Jews have in the United States in negative ways because we're Christian nationalists.
Just speaking on that is enough to get you labeled an anti-Semitic, you know, you're envious, you're a bigot, and all that kind of stuff.
I really do wonder why it is such a problem for people that were good on Woke Wars 1 to not see the exact same thing happening here.
In Woke Wars 1, if you cited...
You know, murder rates in black communities, people said you were racist.
And a lot of our friends would say, well, it's obviously not racist.
You know what I mean?
It's just that's just a fact.
They don't notice the same thing with this with this anti-Semitism stuff.
And so, I mean, I don't care.
You can you can say that, you know, I hate Jews all day and I know it's not true.
So it doesn't really bother me.
And it's just like it didn't bother me during woke wars one.
But you're gonna need to come up with something a little better, a little more evidence than, well, it's just envious, see, because you're talking about their power, you're talking about their influence, you're just envious.
We're Christian nationalists, so it should be obvious that we want Christianity and Christians to have the most influence on our cultural traditions, our politics, and we want to limit and reduce all other influence, which just so happens in our situation, That modern Judaism, modern Jews have an outsized influence as opposed to say Buddhists or Hindus.
His name is A.D. Robles.
We're going to do our best to get him on this program to talk to him.
Not just about that, but about a bunch of other stuff.
I know I keep saying that, but my goodness.
It makes an incredible amount of sense if you've got anybody out there in your sphere that you talk to or sphere of influence.
That's, you know, that's uncomfortable with everything, you know, that's uncomfortable with somebody saying, hey, look, I mean, you know, we have this problem with Christian nationalism.
And then you say, but that bill that they just passed last week out of the House is actually a form of Jewish nationalism.
And if somebody says, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, you know, what's going on in these college camps?
Is this a big deal?
You know, it's...
And they try to pull this anti-Semitic thing on him.
You just got to say, hey man, this is...
I think we should adopt this terminology that he's got, that he's using.
Woke Wars 1 versus Woke Wars 2.
I love it.
I think it's fantastic.
It's a great way to kind of characterize and categorize What we've been through.
It's the same tactic, they're just using different terminology this time, right?
And that's the other thing.
When he says there at the end, when somebody says, hey, you're being anti-Semitic, he's like, I know I don't, in my heart, I know I don't hate Jews.
And so they think that, but it doesn't really bother me because I know what they're saying is not true.
And at some point you have to get into that headspace as well, you know.
Fascinating situation.
And it ties directly into this because, again, we're kind of right back where we were in Wolf Wars 1.
So now those boys, those frat boys, those fraternity men, they are now being doxed.
Especially the guy that acted like a monkey.
They're now being doxed and their lives are being ruined.
Somebody's attempting to ruin these guys' lives.
It'll be interesting to see if that actually happens.
We did a whole segment on this earlier in the night, earlier when I was guest hosting for Stu, just about how these people, these 18 to 22-year-olds, just about how these people, these 18 to 22-year-olds, have been raised in a society that is way more
have been raised in a society that is way more overtly anti-white than when I was going through school.
But even when I was going through school, I mean, we learned about Martin Luther King and we learned about...
Unity, unity.
I mean, everything was unity, unity, unity.
Everything was, you know, don't stereotype, don't stereotype.
And, you know, for the most part, I mean, it worked.
Like, I came out of, you know, came out of high school, going to college.
Yeah, I mean, equality, right?
All of those buzzwords, yeah, that's a good thing.
You've got to keep any observations that you have that might confirm stereotypes.
You push those on down.
You just keep those inside and you don't say anything.
You certainly don't make any decisions based on that, although people did anyway.
They just didn't say anything about it.
They just kept quiet to themselves.
And now it's gotten even worse.
And now people have done the very thing that they have been programmed To not do, they're doing.
They've had enough.
And that's when I see that video, that's what I see.
I see people who've had enough.
They realize that they have been raised in an education system that says that because they're men and because they're straight and they also happen to be white, that there's something inherently wrong with them.
And so a movement like this is...
Honestly, it's like, how could you stop something like this from happening?
From people saying, hey, we've had enough, and we're going to stop this nonsense, and we're going to start speaking out, and we're going to be free, we're going to be who we are, and if you don't like us, well, then you don't like us.
And that's where I think we've actually got...
People are now like, well, if I say something that offends somebody, I'm going to be honest, and if it offends somebody, maybe I'll try to explain myself, but past that...
We'll agree to go our separate ways.
The problem is the left doesn't want to go separate ways anymore.
They don't want to live and let live any more than Christian nationalists want to live and let live anymore.
That's kind of a reoccurring theme.
The people who are rejecting the libertarianism that gets kids into drag shows, you know, as a parent's right to take a kid to a drag show...
They don't want to accept a world where there may be people that disagree with them, even silently in their minds, their lifestyles, whether it's sodomy or whether it's transiting their kids.
That's actually one thing that both sides have in common.
They may say live and let live.
The left tried to say that for a while, but they've never really wanted to live and let live.
And people on the right no longer want to live and let live.
They want to start holding behaviors up and prosecuting it.
They want law and order back.
And they want to be able to say, hey, this is wicked and evil, and we should be able to ban it, prevent it.
Whether it's the distribution of pornography, whether it's...
Transient kids, whatever the case may be.
That's what people are sick of.
People are calling this a miracle.
People are saying that this pastor in Pennsylvania should be dead.
We're going to have a whole different kingdom than God.
And God has killed.
Jesus.
Yeah, so when I saw that this morning, I don't know about you, I got sick.
I just got sick to my stomach because I just felt that pastor.
You should look at that pastor's reaction, too.
I had a whole different kingdom than God.
Praise the Lord.
Praise the Lord that gun did not go off.
Now, people are rightfully remarking that this is now the second attack on a Christian minister in the last four weeks.
It's been about four weeks since Pastor Mari Emanuel, Bishop Mari Emanuel over in Australia, Was attacked and beaten, but there was a knife involved there that did not open.
The knife did not open.
And I think he still even lost an eye, or at least he had a patch on it when he came back.
Maybe that's just part of the recovery process.
But then we have this situation here, which is just incredible.
That this pastor didn't die.
The gun jammed.
I can't really tell if there was a click.
I think maybe he had the safety on or something.
I don't know.
But it's part of a related story because they went to this guy's house and they found a dead guy there that he had shot.
According to Mike Darnay, CBS local police investigating deadly shooting at home of suspect accused of pulling a gun on Pennsylvania pastor.
This again is in North Braddock, Pennsylvania.
A man was found shot to death inside the Pennsylvania home where another man accused of trying to shoot a pastor during a church sermon lives.
So this guy clearly had already committed a murder.
I mean, that's what's pretty clear.
Or maybe there's another detail we don't know, but the shooting happened inside the home along Stokes Avenue in North Braddock.
And again, we don't know that for sure, but he certainly didn't look well in the eyes.
He'd killed somebody.
He says, I'm going to go kill Pastor.
Or there could be something else there.
Maybe there was a different reason.
I don't know.
Maybe there's a different reason why there was a dead person in his house.
It says police say that officers from the Eastern Regional Monday Valley Police Department were called out to shoot at 8 p.m.
When they arrived at the scene, they found a man who had been shot to death.
The victim had been identified as Derek Polite.
According to police, Bernard Polite says, The man accused of trying to shoot a pastor during a sermon in North Braddock earlier that day lives at the home.
So it's likely his father is dead, and then he goes and tries to kill a preacher talking about the kingdom of God.
Unbelievable.
Really, really sad stuff.
So, I spent the last week slamming and highlighting The United Methodist Church...
And I'm not going to beat a dead horse here.
I feel like we covered the fall of the United Methodists, O'Cain, sodomy in their church, O'Cain, gay marriage.
And we kind of covered the lunacy of it every day last week.
And it culminated on Friday where we basically devoted most of the show on Friday to the fall of the United Methodist Church, their descent into gayness.
And I told you on Friday that one of the reasons the United Methodists finally fell off the cliff, the sodomite cliff, and they finally fell off into it, was because they allowed 7,600, over 7,600 Methodist churches to leave, according to a Google search, to leave that denomination, which means that the only people that were left were the sodomites.
Those were the only people left in the denomination, so they were finally, they didn't have the opposition that they had For the last, you know, three years.
And so they did exactly what they've been wanting to do.
They wanted their other churches to leave, and now they get to have their woke, gay, rainbow church that will fast become irrelevant and won't thrive and certainly won't grow.
But not all of the churches left.
Not all of the churches that disagree with sodomy left, you know, hence about the 20% that voted against all of this stuff.
They still stayed.
And one of those men is a bishop or a minister, I would say a minister from Alberia.
So the United Methodist Church is a global denomination, so he comes all the way from Alberia.
And he stands up, and I'm glad he did this, just so the sodomites at the United Methodist Church, they are not without excuse.
They at least heard from somebody in that room that knows what they just did is grave, heinous, abominable sin.
Listen.
Bishop Jericula here from Liberia.
Liberia, excuse me.
And this is the word of God.
Why are you speaking against the amendment?
I'm speaking against the amendment because...
What a shame that guy is.
See how they're allergic to it.
They don't want to know.
They don't want to know.
And you know what?
The Lord is going to give them what they want.
He's going to give them over to their debased mind.
He's going to give them over.
And it's a sad, terrifying thought when you really know, when you really understand what waits for what they're doing to little kids, putting them on a path to hell.
And this man gets up and he wants to quote the Bible and he immediately gets cut off by a guy.
And if that had been a white man, they wouldn't have let him finish.
I can guarantee you that.
But because he's from Liberia, did I say Alberta?
He's from Liberia.
Let's run it from the beginning.
Here's a Methodist speaking out against the gay amendment.
Bishop Jericula here from Liberia.
I have my Bible in my hands.
And this is the Word of God.
Why are you speaking against the amendment?
I'm speaking against the amendment because we do not have another Bible apart from this Bible.
So we cannot have the two options that the amendment offers to us.
And so, I vote against the amendment.
That's the reason why I'm trying to explain, yes, that this Bible, 2 Timothy 3.16 says, all scripture is given by inspiration of God.
When it comes to the issue of homosexuality, the Bible is very emphatic.
That we have marriage between a man and a woman.
And that's what our current book of discipline holds.
For the past 52 years, every attempt has been made To alter that biblical truth.
Today, we have a majority general conference characterized by liberals and progressives who are doing everything to change the Bible to something else.
Because of that, I vote against this amendment.
Thank you very much.
They are without excuse.
They are without excuse.
Millstones for the United Methodist Church.
And very appreciative for that guy.
I doubt his church will stick around much longer.
I know, even though the disaffiliation process has ended, I doubt his church will stick around much longer.