All Episodes
Previous Next
April 29, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
58:07
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Trump ATTACKS RFK Over DEATH SHOT Criticism, AZ GOP Bans The JAB!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Rainbow Gestapo, the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
I lose track of time, so I might be past my prime.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, I feel just like I don't try.
I look so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Head down, swaying to my own sound.
Glasses in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody wants you know you want.
Everybody, everybody, everybody, everybody.
Wooo! .
Hey folks, welcome.
Happy Monday.
Hope everybody had a great weekend.
Hope everybody has had a great start to their day so far.
Really appreciate you being with us.
As always, we can't do this program without you watching every single day.
So this is one of those shows, I'm going to be perfectly honest with you.
This is one of those shows where I just want to turn the lights on and start talking.
Because over the weekend, Donald Trump decided to attack independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
over his stance on vaccines.
Trump wrote this on his Truth Social, quote,"...I lived with RFK in New York and watched him convince Governor Cuomo to make environmental moves that were outright nasty.
Upstate New York was not allowed to drill or frack as Ohio, Pennsylvania and others ripped off New York energy." Because of this, prices have skyrocketed all over that part of the country, but especially upstate New York and New England.
Their energy costs are the highest in the U.S., with the exception of California, run by Gavin Newsom, the worst governor in the state's history.
Then he says this, I'd even take Biden over RFK Jr.
because our country would last a year or two longer prior to collapse, but it would be dead either way.
His views on vaccines are fake, as is everything else about his candidacy.
Let the Democrats have RFK Jr.
They deserve him, end quote.
So most people would have been fine with the front half of that criticism, the environmental criticisms.
Kennedy has always been more of a tree-hugging hippie.
But it was the last swipe over the vaccines that sent many of his supporters into a tailspin.
Trump is once again doubling down on the vaccine bioweapon.
This sent the internet into a frenzy of people who were demoralized that Trump would criticize one of the lone voices in the wilderness on the dangers of vaccines.
Not just the COVID vaccine but all vaccines.
So now, RFK, I mean, he's not one of those voices, just to be clear, who will tell the whole truth about the COVID vaccine, like Stu Peters will or Karen Kingston has on this very network.
Calling it a bioweapon is obviously true.
If you know anything about the pegylated lipid nanoparticle and all of the great research that you've seen, On this network.
So Kennedy won't go that far to call it a bioweapon and others won't either.
For reasons unknown, we could speculate it's probably because he wants to protect the federal government and the Department of Defense who are directly responsible for COVID's development and the accompanying vaccine that go together like two peas in a pod.
Calling it a bioweapon, though, means there is no liability protections for big pharma.
Anyway, we could speculate about that until the cows come home.
Trump's truth social post attacking RFK. Why did he do it?
Why did he attack RFK over the vaccine?
I think it was likely in response to RFK's recent appearance on liberal Bill Maher's show.
Watch this.
But your vice presidential pick wants to recall the Moderna vaccine.
That's the one I got.
Do you agree with that?
Recall it.
I think...
You know, I think those vaccines need to, we need to have, again, true double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on that.
There's 25% of Americans who believe that they know somebody who was killed by a COVID vaccine.
Killed?
Killed.
25% of Americans.
52% of Americans believe that the vaccines are causing injuries, including death.
52%.
Oh, if you look at the clinical trial studies, the actual studies that were done, that were released, of the Pfizer vaccine.
Moderna has not released it.
If you look at the Pfizer vaccine, there were 22,000 people in the placebo group, 22,000 people who got the actual vaccine.
And the people who got the vaccine had a 23% higher death rate.
From all causes at the end of that study.
But that could not be the disease itself?
No, well...
Because we know that...
If it is, then the vaccine doesn't work, does it?
Well, it's certainly...
Interesting.
If it is, then the vaccine doesn't work now, does it?
Now, so that right there, what you just saw, that is likely what triggered Donald Trump to make that post.
And that last part, too.
You know, Trump's bragged about how the vaccine saved millions of lives when, in fact...
It's killed millions of people.
I mean, what do you think triggered Donald Trump more there?
Was it the idea that the vaccines harmed and killed Americans?
Or the idea that the vaccine simply just doesn't work at all?
Probably doesn't matter, but I don't know why.
I just really would love to know the answer to that question.
Regardless what we saw from Trump in this attack against RFK... What's just as demoralizing to his supporters is what Trump did to the anti-abortion movement a couple of weeks ago.
Now, if you'll remember, Trump came out and talked about the exceptions that he's always held, but he did it right before the Arizona Supreme Court decision banning abortion came down.
What was that all about?
Well, if you'll remember, it was about winning elections.
Trump said, and I'm paraphrasing, that in order to win elections, we have to allow pink and purple-haired women to murder their babies in blue states.
Basically, allow human sacrifice and maybe the old gods will bless you with an electoral victory.
And Trump's attack against RFK on the clot shot probably has to do with the same thing, winning elections.
Historian Larry Schweikart tweeted this in the wake of Trump's remarks, quote, It's irrelevant.
VAX equals single digits in most important issues and 82% of Americans took the VAX. He says it's totally old news to most people, end quote.
Interesting.
Interesting.
Totally old news.
Do you agree with that?
I'm sure many people would love for it to go away and never be mentioned again.
After all, it was a genocide.
An ongoing one.
But what Larry Schweikart may be missing there is that if 82% did take it, how many of them are attributing their chronic suffering or new medical conditions to the shot?
And is there really any active polling on how angry that makes some people?
Schweikart's tweet was in response to Rand Paul's chief strategist over the weekends and his reaction to the news of Trump's RFK attack on the vaccine when he wrote, quote, Yeah, I don't think it's a very good idea either.
But Trump or his strategists, and really you can't differentiate the two at this point, if he wants to surround himself with swamp creatures, that's a reflection on him at this point.
Remember when Trump put RFK on a panel to study vaccines and then removed him after Trump took a big donation from Big Pharma?
Well, while many of our Fox News watching normie neighbors haven't quite come to the conclusion the vaccine was a bioweapon, is a bioweapon, they remember Fauci And they remember how Trump let his own regulatory deep state make a fool of him during the fake pandemic.
He got rolled on COVID and he never wants to admit it.
Speaking of Rand Paul, though, longtime reporter John Stossel recently did a refresher report on Rand Paul's war against Fauci.
And I take issue with some of this report because there's still this problem of attributing deaths to COVID-19.
You know, versus the reality that many people died of Fauci's remdesivir.
Nevertheless, in the scope of all this, Americans have gotten over it.
Have we really gotten over it?
Watch this.
Gain-of-function research was going on in that lab and NIH funded it.
Remember when Senator Rand Paul accused Anthony Fauci of funding China's Wuhan virus lab?
I totally resent the lie that you are now propagating.
The media immediately criticized Senator Paul.
Rand Paul, stop it.
You look like an idiot.
Dr.
Anthony Fauci blasting Senator Rand Paul.
Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about.
Anthony Fauci once again forced to call Rand Paul a sniveling moron.
But some now have changed.
Major shifts.
NIH admits funding risky research in Wuhan.
Paul might have been on to something.
To me, it's not so much about them admitting or apologizing.
It's really about trying to prevent this from happening again in the future.
Paul also pushed the then-controversial idea that COVID began with a lab leak.
All the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab and there will be responsibility for those who funded the lab, including yourself.
Did COVID leak from this lab, which did experiments funded by the U.S. government?
The media told us, no, COVID came from an animal.
The working theory is someone butchered a bat, came into contact with its blood or urine, and then touched his or her nose or mouth.
Everybody was saying, came from animals, from bats.
I initially was there too.
In the beginning, reports of 80,000 animals being tested, no animals with it.
No animals with COVID. But we know that three people in the Wuhan lab got sick with the virus of unknown origin in November of 2019.
I can't, I've got to at least stop and start here a little bit with this report again.
This is John Stossel's Stossel TV. The lab leak, while true, is also a red herring because it ignores the DOD. It ignores Ralph Baric.
Now, there has been some...
I mean, Rand Paul is very much aware of who Ralph Baric is, Fort Detrick, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, because there's actually now been, in his letters, he did an op-ed for Fox News where he mentioned...
Ralph Baric, which was, I feel like, a positive sign to try to maybe, you know, maybe this is a path, a good step on the path to, you know, actual accountability.
But nevertheless, a normie, you know, a normie con is like, yeah, I mean, they said the lab leak was a conspiracy theory.
It's just another example, sure, of the media line, but we don't want to just stop at the Chinese lab.
We just don't want to stop at Wuhan.
Just to be clear.
That was more than a thousand kilometers away from where bats live.
Exactly.
Not only that, lab leaks are common.
Accidents do happen.
Labs in Singapore, Taiwan, and China accidentally infected themselves with SARS. SARS escaped from labs.
So did smallpox, anthrax, and flu.
Now the FBI and others agree with Senator Paul.
The Department of Energy has concluded COVID-19 likely came from a lab leak in China.
Again, they concluded that because they would rather admit that than admit that COVID and the research was done right here.
Here in the United States.
And then it was taken over there.
So evil Chinese scientists in a lab funded by America?
America funded it.
And I think it was maybe not done with evil intentions.
It was done with misguided notion that gain of function research was safe.
Gain of function research?
That can mean making viruses stronger.
They sometimes create viruses that don't exist in nature that are now more infectious.
They've gained the function of lethality.
You think Rand Paul really believes that?
That they didn't...
They did all this, but they didn't have evil intentions?
Because I don't believe that for a second, and I don't think Rand Paul believes that.
I mean, I'm not saying I don't...
Look, Rand Paul could be protecting...
But I'm sorry.
I think these politicians, they calculate what they say, and they will obscure what they really think because it's like some way to still get a seat at the table, right?
Of course, they don't...
I don't know.
Tell me what you think about that.
At this point, they of course did all of this on purpose with malicious intent.
I mean, the whole point of doing this is to create weapons of biowarfare.
Infectiousness by being combined in a lab.
They're trying to find ways to stop.
Right.
Diseases.
But many scientists have now looked at this and said, we've been doing this gain-of-function research for quite a while.
The likelihood that you create something that creates a vaccine that's going to help anybody is pretty slim to none.
The media is weirdly on curious about this.
We have a disease that killed maybe 16 million people worldwide, about a million.
But see, here's the deal.
This was why I clarified it again.
Remdesivir killed a lot of those 16 million people in hospitals.
A million people in America, and they're not curious as to how we got it.
You're trying to obscure responsibility for 4 million people dying around the world from a pandemic.
Senator Paul details his arguments in this new book, Deception, the Great COVID Cover-Up.
It points out that Fauci once justified the risks of gain-of-function research.
He said in 2012, even if a pandemic occurs, if a scientist becomes infected and the community becomes infected, the knowledge is worth it.
Well, that's a judgment call, and I would say there's probably 16 million families around the world who might disagree with that now.
Dr.
Fauci didn't give your money directly to the Chinese lab.
He gave it to a non-profit called EcoHealth.
EcoHealth Alliance is working on the ground to stem between you and the next pandemic.
EcoHealth Alliance.
Most Americans haven't heard of it.
They were able to accumulate maybe over a hundred million dollars in U.S. taxpayer dollars and a lot of it was funneled to Wuhan.
EcoHealth is run by zoologist Peter Dezak.
Set our sights on the next pandemic.
We can stop it emerging.
We can save lives.
Before the pandemic, Dezak bragged about combining coronaviruses in Wuhan in hopes of creating a vaccine.
My colleagues in China did the work.
You create pseudoparticles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells.
And each step of this, you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people.
The spread of a new deadly disease.
Once COVID broke out, Dezak was less eager to talk about the experiments he funded.
Peter Daszak has refused to reveal his communications with the Wuhan lab, and I do think that ultimately there is a great deal of culpability on his part.
In addition, Daszak and Fauci got other scientists to sign this letter, published in a prestigious medical journal, saying they strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.
They squelched all dissent and said you're a conspiracy theorist if you're saying this.
But they didn't reveal that they had a monetary self-incentive to cover this up.
We asked Dezak to answer the claims in this video.
He didn't respond.
To give you an example of who he is and how the money changes hand, this is a guy who has $15,000 cocktail parties at the Cosmo Club in D.C., invites Anthony Fauci and others there for cocktails.
They're really criticizing science because I represent science.
I think he is the defender of the funding of science, the business of science.
And what about the NIH, run by our government?
They are still funding gain-of-function research.
Yeah, absolutely.
This is a risk to civilization because we could wind up with a virus that's 50% lethal, that leaks out of a lab and kills half of the planet.
So again, what this was, the reason I played this is because this is what This is what is on the minds of a lot of normies.
So is it going away, the whole Fauci-Ran-Paul debate, right?
And this ties in, I think, directly with the vaccine discussion and the obvious harm and the millions of dead because of the vaccine.
And Donald Trump has triggered that RFK Jr., and again, I'm not an RFK Jr.
fan.
I thought his book, The Real Anthony Fauci, was very interesting.
When he came out with this liberal vice presidential nomination, or this vice presidential pick, this woman, I was like, well...
You know, you just, you thought, and I think a lot of us know this is not the case now, but you know, you kind of assumed back in the day that RFK being in the race would kind of give, maybe we would have to talk about the elephant in the room, the vaccine.
Trump is talking about it, but he is essentially doubling down like he always does.
Here's Stu's take.
Stu Peters over on Twitter over the weekend.
Trump is a vaccine salesman.
He's responsible for the deaths of millions of people, including children.
There's no other way to look at it at this point.
Again, this is the tweet that kind of sent everybody over the edge over the weekend.
I'd even take Biden over Jr.
because the country would last for a year or two prior to collapse, but it would be dead either way.
His views on vaccines are fake, as is everything else about his candidacy.
Again, the views on the vaccines, he was recently on Bill Maher saying, hey, a lot of people think that they know somebody.
25% think they know somebody who died because of the vaccine.
52% of the people think, according to the polling, that they know somebody who was injured because of the vaccine.
Donald Trump doesn't want to come out, doesn't want to admit at all what we are.
It's like denying chemtrails at this point, right?
That's certainly not a good example to convince your normie friends, but we on this program have talked about that before.
You just believe your own eyes.
You look up, you see what's going on, and it's like, no, unless the TV tells me, I don't want anything to do with it.
A lot of people are upset by this.
Vigilant Fox.
Robert Kennedy Jr.
dropped COVID vaccine truth bombs on Bill Maher.
Those are those numbers that I just shared with you.
Then we have this.
Stop the Shots 321.
Which views of vaccines are fake?
I sincerely hope Kennedy brings this up.
Debate him on this.
I think this might actually backfire on Trump.
But then Larry Schweikart is like, no, it's not, because he says, according to polling, that the vaccine is irrelevant.
So there's still a lot of Americans in the dark, probably a lot of Americans that took the shot are sick from it and don't want to believe that they voluntarily injected themselves with a bioweapon.
But he says that this is an irrelevant thing.
This is, again, in response to Doug Stafford.
This is Rand Paul's chief strategist.
Again, we just watched an entire video of Rand Paul.
Saying that this is not a good idea for Trump to do.
Rand Paul's chief strategist.
Not a good idea for Trump to do this.
And then Christian Movic saying that the chief strategist Doug Stafford says not a good idea.
Listen to this.
This is interesting.
Trump reversed his decision to make RFK Jr.
the chair of a vaccine safety panel in 2017 after he received $1 million in donations from Pfizer and has still bragged about his role in getting COVID vaccines pushed out to this day.
Yeah, that's true.
And then you have Luke Rudgowski who says, what do you think happened to Donald Trump that made him flip-flop on the issue now being a major proponent of COVID-19 vaccine being double-jabbed and boosted himself?
Back on March 28th of 2014, Donald Trump said, healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good, and changes autism.
Many such cases.
So what changed?
Is it just that Pfizer donation?
Is it just the money?
In this case, is it just the unwillingness to admit what you did in 2020?
And, you know, I hear Trump supporters on here say, yeah, you know what?
We're in the election of our lifetimes.
We're in the election of our lifetimes.
We can't think about that.
We have to move forward because Trump is the lesser of two evils.
While I don't disagree about the lesser of two evils part, I certainly disagree that we just get to ignore this.
Because it happened.
To bury your head in the sand is just not healthy.
It's not healthy at all.
And it just leads to more delusions.
And a lack of truth that, you know, ignoring the truth means that you don't recognize the truth in the present.
You don't want to recognize the truth of the past.
Well, that's going to obscure how you interpret and make decisions in the present.
And what does that do?
Affects your future.
And we just have a whole system that's just based on so many lies.
And it's really sad.
It's sad.
I mean, look, I thought I knew as an observer of politics in 2020...
I thought I knew what Trump was doing.
Oh, he was being very delicate with the deep state.
You know, he was giving Deborah Birx the platform.
He was giving Anthony Fauci the platform and letting Mike Pence and, you know, he was 2020 election year.
And I'm going to run this government and we're going to be organized and we're going to do all this.
And look at all these great people I have around me that legitimize me.
And they were all trying to run him out of town.
We know that they did all this, at the very least, for the rigged election, the vote by mail and everything else.
They used COVID to do the vote by mail.
And Trump was up there enabling them to do it.
I mean, he was.
He was up there acting like he was leading the parade, but the parade was running him out of town.
And he was like, well, I'll get out in front of it and make it look like I'm part of this team.
And all he has to do is admit it, and the fact that he won't admit it means that the benefit of the doubt on this issue is just gone.
I mean, of course, who wants to admit, hey, yeah, that vaccine that I've touted actually killed people?
Who wants to admit that?
I'm sure there's plenty of people that could be blamed.
You were lied to about it.
And this is why it's so frustrating.
We have this going on.
You know, this truth social post.
And...
People are still finding out stuff about this vaccine.
You know, Arizona Republican Party declared COVID-19 injections biological and technological weapons, passes a ban the jab resolution.
We've seen this out of Florida as well.
The Arizona Republican Party is now the second state Republican Party.
This is not a county Republican Party.
This is the state Republican Party to pass a ban the jab resolution and declare COVID-19 injections, biological and technological weapons.
So can we expect a statement from Trump saying, hey guys, we don't need to do that.
We're not going to win elections.
We don't need to call the jabs bioweapons.
We won't be able to win elections if we do that.
Are we going to expect a statement like that?
Just like we got on abortion?
Patriot Dan Schultz from PrecinctStrategy.com submitted the ban of the jab resolution that the Republican Party of Arizona, the Arizona GOP, voted today and passed the resolution with approximately 96% of the vote.
The resolution declares the COVID-19 injections.
To be biological and technological weapons and calls on the governor to prohibit their distribution and the attorney general to confiscate the vials and conduct a forensic analysis of their contents.
In addition to being an attorney, Dan Schultz is a former West Point graduate and former U.S. Army counterintelligence and human intelligence officer.
Mr.
Schultz advocates the precinct strategy which seeks to wrestle control of the Republican Party back to the people.
Previously, Dan Schultz submitted the ban-the-jab resolution to the Maricopa County GOP. On Saturday, January 13th, the Maricopa County GOP passed the resolution with 87.4% of the vote.
A total of 1,494 votes were cast, 1,306 in favor, 188 against.
Those 188 are jab enthusiasts.
Maricopa County is the largest Republican county in the nation.
The first ban the jab resolution was authored by psychotherapist Dr.
Joseph Sansone in February of 2023.
The Gateway Pundit recently reported that Sansone currently has a lawsuit that seeks to ban the jab in Florida.
The case was dismissed and is on its way to the appellate court.
To date, approximately 10 Florida Republican County parties have passed ban the jab resolutions, declaring COVID-19 injections, biological and technological weapons, also calling on the governor to prohibit their distribution of Anyway, this article goes on.
And the stolen election.
Just an observation.
What else on this side?
Okay, then you have Steve Kirsch, who was featured in Stu Peter's documentary, Died Suddenly.
This is, again, talking just about autism.
You know, 4.6588, you see the number.
Know the number.
This is the number, the probability that I'm wrong about vaccines causing autism, he writes.
A medical practice with 5,000 fully unvaccinated kids over 25 years has zero cases of autism.
The only possible explanation...
Vaccines cause autism, Steve Kerr says.
Again, this is another Democrat, like RFK Jr., who goes against the narrative on vaccines.
Trump used to go against the narrative on vaccines.
Now Trump mocks RFK Jr.
because, I mean, look, the idea that there's any sort of consistent standards when it's running a political campaign, I get that.
That very rarely, if ever, happens, right?
But I'm assuming that Donald Trump sees RFK Jr.
as a threat to pull votes away from him or he would not be targeting him over this issue.
But, I mean, you want to talk about demoralizing.
Donald Trump has demoralized his base over the abortion issue.
He's now demoralizing the people who believe that the vaccine...
Of course, there's a lot of people that believe that the vaccine...
You know, a lot of people who believe the vaccine's a bioweapon are not going to vote for him or vote for anybody.
So there's that.
I mean, maybe there is some credence to, just, you know, from an election standpoint, election coverage standpoint, maybe there is something to Larry Schweikart saying, look, this vax issue is just not, it's just polling in the bottom of important issues right now in this election cycle, and so this is a safe thing for him to do.
I don't know.
It's still frustrating.
Sound off in the comments.
Let me know what you think.
Here's Erin Elizabeth, Health Nut News.
No, I'm not blaming it on the pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturer.
This is headline news, Yahoo News, and it's on CNN and CBS, and they today in court admitted in documents that AstraZeneca vaccine has side effect, which is severe brain damage and death.
Again, you think this is going anywhere?
How can it not grow when we don't know, we have no idea how many boosters it takes?
You know, how many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Roll Pop?
Like, how many boosters does it take before, and then what's the average timeline that you see before you start seeing mass death?
I mean, we are seeing the people drop dead, die suddenly, and everything else, but like, Does it get worse five years from now?
Does it get even worse ten years from now?
How are you just going to keep people from noticing their loved ones and family members dropping dead?
So AstraZeneca now admits for the first time in court documents that their vaccine causes death.
And then again, the truth about Fauci and criminal Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance.
Why 16 million people died.
Millions blame these two.
Again, 16 million people.
A lot of that was Fauci and remdesivir.
And the hospitals that turned into death prisons, essentially.
That was certainly part of it.
And then you have this.
Pfizer knew what happened to newborns.
I mean, it's just...
I pulled all of these clips...
Because when Trump says this, and he says, you know, his views on vaccines are fake, and yet there is just so much out there.
Here's Dr.
Naomi Wolf on this very thing.
They're coming back because there's an air pocket between their tiny lungs and their chest walls.
Now let's restart that.
There's a section of Pfizer documents where there's an 80% miscarriage rate.
Of the women whom they're following to term.
And they happen to lose 230.
So there's a part of the document, speaking of court documents, Pfizer, 80% miscarriage rate.
I mean, you don't think that there's OBGYNs and nurses and everything that are noticing higher miscarriages across this country?
6 out of the 270 records of pregnant women that they have, but the ones that they keep, 80% lose their babies.
And then later on, and this is report 69, and Dr.
Walensky says, Resigned five days after we posted report 69.
It shows that Pfizer knew that babies in utero were being exposed to the vaccine.
In their words, the babies were dying through transplacental exposure.
They knew that and they knew that they were poisoning breast milk and that the lipid nanoparticles, the mRNA, And presumably the spike was getting into the breast milk and causing convulsions and deaths.
And apropos of what Dr.
Thorpe has found and what you brought up about problems with newborns, I interviewed a midwife named Ellen Jasmer, who's finding what is in the Pfizer documents from two years before.
They knew that newborns would have, some of them, air sacs between their tiny lungs and their tiny chest walls, and this would cause respiratory distress.
They knew it.
It's in the Pfizer.
They all knew it.
And who is guaranteeing their immunity?
The U.S. government, because that's where the research took place in the first place.
You know, I mean, you've got the Pfizer guy on tape admitting, yeah, we do gain-of-functional research.
We go ahead and get the vaccine ready, and then we create the disease.
We're going to take a break.
On Friday, Stu Peters got to sit down with Matt Wallace on Harvey Weinstein's back in the news.
Yeah, his conviction was overturned.
I was talking to, over the weekend, people brought that up to me.
Can you believe that they've overturned?
It's just like, yeah, powerful people.
They don't want somebody like Harvey Weinstein.
Harvey Weinstein knows a lot about a lot of people and his convictions of return, and he's probably now likely, more likely, to be freed and walk around after he survives the Me Too movement.
We're going to take a break.
My name's Paul Harrell.
This is the Millstone Report.
We're going to watch the little portion of that interview during break.
Don't go anywhere.
back in just a minute You find it very odd yourself, don't you, that this guy is just being let out?
Yeah, I mean, there's no doubt in my mind that this is 100% the work of the Israeli government.
In 2017, Harvey Weinstein hired Mossad agents to go after and track some of these women.
He has been working with the Israeli government to not only silence his victims, but also to act as a scapegoat.
When they need him to call in a favor, that's what happens.
He can continue to get off just like many other abusers in Hollywood.
This reminds me a lot of what happened with Brian Peck and Drake Bell.
This was more than 20 years ago, but this has been happening in Hollywood for decades now, and all of these powerful figures with ties to the Israeli government always find some way to slither out of accountability for their crimes.
In that case with Brian Peck, he had dozens of high-profile celebrities, many of which did in fact have ties to the Israeli government and were told to do so.
He had all of them writing letters saying he's a good man, saying this, saying that, and the judge only was able to, quote, give him approximately six or so months in prison before being let out, and that's after being convicted of sexually abusing Drake Bell as a child.
He was 15 at the time, even 14 when some of this started.
Not only that, but they took him to Disneyland with a number of other pedophiles, many of which are, of course, homosexual, and they wanted to prey on him in that way and take advantage of him at Disneyland.
So all of this is tied together.
It's so obvious when you look at the Harvey Weinstein case that this was inevitably coming.
He was not going to be held accountable for too long.
And I wouldn't be surprised if we see more examples like this.
The 4-3 of it, the vote, tells you everything you need to know.
In any other sane place, or in any sane place at all, this man would have a 7-2-0.
It's the most shut and dry case you can ever possibly find.
Every single witness, all of the evidence, everything can pile together.
It's not even a debate.
This guy is so overwhelmingly guilty, I guess we can't legally say that now, he's legitimately so guilty, that you could literally throw a rock and hit one of his victims if you throw it anywhere in Hollywood, probably.
I mean, that's how guilty this guy is, and yet somehow we're sitting here in this position.
I hope so badly he doesn't get out of prison, but the one positive thing I will say about this...
Reopening the can of worms.
There are many, many, many other monsters that are still yet to be held accountable.
And if we can use this as a catalyst to bring in more evidence, to bring in more voices, to use the new culture and the new accountability system that we have as a result of more free speech on social media, then maybe, just maybe, we can find a way to turn this into a positive thing where we bring down even more of these monsters.
That's what my hope is, but I'm not, I'm certainly not going to be optimistic about it considering the way they've gotten off so much in the past.
We have said on this program, I mean, ad nauseum, I'm sure that you've been paying attention at least as much as your schedule will allow you to, that every one of our institutions, every one of our Ivy League schools, every one of our publicly funded universities, every one of our three-letter agencies, all of our bureaucracies, all of the unelected officials, they're all infiltrated and overtaken by people who claim to be Jews.
I mean, you've heard us say that.
Is this just proof that the judiciary is just another extension of that?
I mean, the way I look at it is most of the people who do the most evil things are people who have turned away from God.
Some of them may have a Jewish ancestry, but a lot of these people are not in any way associated with God whatsoever.
It's just simply this evil group of people in Israel government.
That's how I see it.
Of course, there's more ties beyond just that.
But as we look at this more, I think it's going to unfold in one of two ways.
Either we're going to see Harvey Weinstein be able to make a case and get off because the jury is predetermined.
That's what's happening kind of right now with Trump.
Basically, anyone who has any amount of loyalty or connection to Trump whatsoever is getting kicked off of the jury, and somehow they're able to sneak on these people who are going to, of Not only is that not true,
it's so unbelievably false.
If you are a white Christian male, your chances of being found guilty of the same crimes compared to almost any other group are magnitudes higher.
And that right there is that.
And welcome back to the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
If you want to see that full interview about Harvey Weinstein getting his conviction overturned and potentially going free in a new trial, Matt Wallace, Stu Peters, you can check that out.
It's right here on this Rumble channel.
You know, we called the Milstone Report.
We just spent the first half hour going over Donald Trump's comments over the vaccine and saying that RFK Jr.'s vaccine opinions are fake when he's one of the voices, at least in the normie world, that'll actually...
Be skeptical of the vaccine.
You know, as the Millstone report, you know, the Millstone exists to tie around somebody's neck that would cause somebody to stumble, cause one of these little ones to stumble.
If you really think about it, with what the whole COVID thing, gain-of-function research, creating vaccines, the lab leak, or whatever, remdesivir, killing kids and adults...
The vaccine, no one ever had heard of myocarditis.
Now everybody knows about myocarditis.
There's big pharma drugs.
They're running commercials advertising drugs to treat myocarditis.
It's just insanity.
Just a lot of death.
I mean, the shots alone.
Take Rindesivir out of it.
The shots alone have maimed and killed people all across the world.
Will there be any accountability for it?
Will there be any millstones?
It would be better for a millstone.
I mean, we would really need to go into a millstone business, build a factory of millstones.
That's what we need at this point.
It's just awful.
But speaking of millstones, we have to focus a little bit today on the LGBTQ enclave.
Billboard Chris.
Great on Billboard Chris to watch the news.
Bring this to my attention, unfortunately.
This boy's parents belong in prison.
This is a boy.
They've dressed him up like a girl.
In 10 years, he'll be...
An orgasmic 20-year-old with a wound called a neo-vagina and no chance of ever having his own family.
We need to ban this madness worldwide.
Yeah, the level of depravity here and child abuse is absolutely unreal.
Take a listen to this.
This is my daughter Edie, and it's her last day as a nine-year-old, so I've got nine questions to ask her.
What do you know how to do that you can teach others to do?
Slay all day.
If you could be a sound, what would it be?
Yeah!
What is the funniest thing that ever happened to you?
I thought I was a boy.
False.
What do you think your life will be like in ten years?
Well, I've got two things.
So, the first thing is I will be in Netflix movies and the second thing is showing all the haters they were really wrong.
So what was the most wonderful thing about your life?
My parents realised when I was a girl and being supportive about it.
Who's your best friend and why?
Liv, because I've known her since I was two and she's always been my best friend.
What's one word to describe you?
Slicious.
What's the coolest thing you've ever seen?
Marifaction.
If you could change the world, how would you change it?
Every single Olivia Rodrigo concert ticket were free.
Because I really want them.
So this is a tragedy.
Again, Billboard Chris saying her parents need to be put in jail for doing this.
Also, there's a weird...
I'm not really sure about the other...
I'm assuming...
I don't know.
There's a British accent going on here that I think is another part of this mind disease.
The father doesn't seem to be talking in a British accent.
That's something that's just concerning.
Maybe the mother does.
I don't know.
Or maybe this guy's gay.
He kind of seems gay.
So this is a two dads situation.
Yeah.
What's the best thing you've seen?
My reflection.
I mean, it really is about the vanity of, and again, sexualizing young kids, letting them know that they are nothing if they don't have some sort of sexual quirk or sexual identity to worship and to focus on, and that the core of who you are is about your sexual lusts and desires.
It's absolutely disgusting, and...
It's putting kids on a path to hell and a terrible life.
He's exactly right.
In 10 years, this boy is going to have the surgery at some point between now and then and will have a miserable existence and is going to give up the ability to be a father.
He's clearly been allowed to go down this path, encouraged to go down this path, being brainwashed.
They're dressing her like a girl, but he's a boy.
And forgive me if I... When I do these segments, I never know if I accidentally slip up and call him a she.
So forgive me if I did that.
People in the comments like to call me out when I mess up.
When I misgender somebody, but I do it the real way.
I misgender them the actual way, not the way the left means.
Just disgusting.
And that's why we have this article.
This is what kind of prompted connecting these two stories.
A guy by the name of Freddie McConnell over at The Guardian.
We may have equal marriage, but LGBTQ plus people are still locked out of equal parenthood.
I was having a conversation with my wife the other day about this very thing.
I'm talking about these two gay guys that adopted a little girl.
Obviously not what you just saw, it's something else.
and I said, you know, it's just there is no greater form of, there may be, I don't know, There may be no greater form of selfishness on display in our society today than two men who cannot have children for obvious reasons.
Sodomy can't produce a child.
And those two men want to pretend to be a family.
They want to pass on and be fathers to kids where they cannot have them themselves.
And there's nothing more selfish than wanting to masquerade as a normal family, renting the womb of a woman who is also okay with her baby being ripped from her arms, and then given to gay guys to have skin-on-skin contact where they take the photos in the hospital room.
It's disgusting.
And the idea that two gay guys would rip a child away from their mom, who cares if she's selling it and it's available?
They are okay with denying a child the one thing they need more than anything, and that is their mother, especially right after they're born.
There is no greater...
Find me another example that's more selfish than that.
So that we can pretend.
We can push those thoughts down that this is actually just not normal.
My lifestyle is not normal.
It's not producing normal things.
I'm not fulfilled the way I thought I would be.
So now I need to have a fake family.
I need to mask around and try to create some.
We want to imitate heterosexual families.
This would have been unheard of.
Even among those who were wanting gay rights back in the day.
Oh, it's just they need to come out of the closet.
This was unheard of at a time.
And that's why there are now gay people that are saying we should have never left a tease into our movement.
But what they don't understand, this whole thing goes together.
This is a whole slippery slope in one step.
This is all going according to plan.
The demonic plan.
And the demons will just change the deal on you, right?
Feminism!
Yeah!
Women's rights!
Now we don't know what a woman is.
Women don't matter.
Women's sports don't matter.
Men can compete.
You know what I mean?
It's all about destroying the image of God.
That's what it's about.
It's destroying the image of God and preventing human beings from worshipping the God of the Bible.
Right?
So the Marriage Same-Sex Couples Act is 10 years old in the United Kingdom, and any couple can marry.
Likewise, thanks to the courageous pair, any couple can now get a civil partnership.
On marriage, the law has kept pace with the diversifying society it exists to regulate and protect.
If you reflect on what was updated, the religious institution of marriage, and how long it had been...
The way it was, it hits you afresh how monumental this step forward was.
Yet here we are.
The equality of love has become a cliché.
Young children have only known a world where every auntie and uncle they'll ever have could get married.
It is meticulous and slow, but ultimately, whether through Parliament or the courts, the law moves forward.
So this is a champion.
We've come so far in the Sotomite lifestyle.
Doesn't it?
Well, sure, queers can marry, but what happens?
By the way, it's incredible that we are using the word queers again now.
Queers can marry, but what happens when we want to become parents?
For context, in England and Wales in 2021, 23.9% of lesbian couples had children compared to 39.7% of heterosexual couples.
Despite the steady increase in LGBT plus families over the recent decades, our road to parenthood is riddled with legal potholes for queer parents and And our children, equality is at best a veil to hide a maze of modern, semantic, and ancient ideological hierarchies.
Man, these are freaks.
This is freaks.
And you know what?
The real truth about this story is, the real truth, they can't have children themselves, and their little corrupt, warped ideologies depends on getting new converts.
And they can't have biological children, so they're going to have to take the children of normal people, and I say normal in the context of children that were conceived, From a man and a woman.
And they have to take those kids and grab them.
And take them.
Take them underneath their tutelage.
And teach them to be gay.
Teach them to be perverts.
That's the only way their movement survives.
That's the only way their movement survives.
Seriously.
So, I mean, you know, well, let's say it's the only way their movement flourishes and actually conquers everybody else.
That's what this is about.
So yeah, they're coming for your kids.
They're coming for our families.
That's exactly what they're doing.
In other news, we have over the weekend, Kristi Noem, the governor of South Dakota.
She brings a book out.
Kristi Noem, governor of South Dakota.
She releases a book where she talks about putting down one of her dogs.
And everybody has a strong opinion about it.
Not me, really.
I don't understand.
Look, you've got the people saying, well, Democrats are freaking out about it.
You know, Kristi Noem, she allegedly has this affair with Corey Lewandowski.
She also recently had some dental work done and then did an infomercial for the dental work.
That was weird.
And so now she comes out with this book and she says, hey, you had this dog, 18-month or 14-month-old dog.
I didn't like him.
He wasn't behaving right.
I wasn't able to train him, so I just shot him.
And everybody's losing their minds, and it's just like, well, I mean, I may not have done that.
I may not have done that exact thing.
I may have tried to rehome a dog, but I mean...
The idea...
And look, I'm no fan of Kristi Noem.
I don't trust her.
But the idea that shooting a dog is going to end your political career...
I mean, come on.
Like, we...
Man.
Like, we certainly are a totally sheltered society.
Like, if there really is a power outage, economic collapse, an EMP... You know, the third world invasion by the barbarian hordes flooded into this country and were upset that somebody took their animal, which was theirs, and put it down because it was aggressive or whatnot.
I don't know.
It's just some...
Our priorities are totally out of whack.
But not to be outdone, Christine Ohm, not to be outdone, some of you...
Are more worried about a goldfish.
Here is a preacher.
This is wild to me.
Here is a preacher.
Protestia has this over on Twitter.
Mega Church Pastor Ed Young, to make a point, tortures a goldfish for a sermon illustration.
Let's see.
We may have to reload this page.
One second.
Sometimes that happens.
Here we go.
With the power of God, by the power of God, make the cast.
Make the cast.
Look at our goldfish.
I noticed the messaging.
Hooked is on the background there.
Hooked, we got to hook them.
Obviously, I know we're fishers of men.
I get it.
But anyway, this is megachurch, so put yourself in the megachurch mindset.
We got to have props.
We got to have illustrations to go along with the gospel, to use as an analytical tool.
They're having a good day, aren't they?
Huh.
Oh no, what's he gonna do to the fish?
Just a second.
It's like this guy was like, hey Kristi Noem, hold my beer.
Alright.
Well, a goldfish, goldfish is dying.
Flopping, floundering around.
Oh my gosh.
Sorry buddy.
You were a couple of dollars, but today, It's your last day.
I don't want to be bad, but the thing's dying.
I'll rescue him.
Thank you.
Some of you were more worried about that goldfish out of water and dying than you are people in your lives dying without Jesus.
All they need!
I mean, it's cringe to me, folks.
I don't know about you.
And it's not because I, you know, care anything about a goldfish.
It's just as, I mean, is that...
Do any of you want to go to a church where your pastor or minister or preacher does something like that?
So weird.
But yeah, that's up over at protestia.com.
Take a look at that if you want.
And then we've got one of this other ones.
Okay, this is the last thing I've got for today.
Joel Webin from Right Response Ministries retweeting Pastor Lauren Livingston, actually somebody named Howard Henderson, but it's of another pastor named Lauren Livingston.
Essentially, well, I'll let you be the judge.
Joel Webin from Right Response Ministries says this is precisely why the church is impotent.
Listen to this.
...of the church.
You think that politics is spiritual stuff.
Politics is of this world.
You think it's your duty to be political about this, that, and the other.
No, your duty is to serve the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul, body, and strength and love your neighbor as yourself.
So when I saw this, I was reminded of Rick Warren.
I'm sorry, I was in 2008, you know, going to Davos and the World Economic Forum and saying, we need to use pastors to, you know, essentially help with this globalist business, governments, and we need to use the churches and the trust that people have with their pastors.
And I'm not necessarily, I don't know this Pastor Loren Livingston, I don't know him, but I will know that that's a familiar message to some, and it's used to get Christians to sit on their hands and to not do anything.
That's what a message like that is used to do.
And the idea is like, yeah, I mean, let's just back that up a little bit, because I want to critique what he said.
You bring politics into the church.
Yeah.
You think that politics is spiritual stuff.
Well, I mean, there's a lot of wicked people in high places that advocate for political policies that, yeah, I mean, are political, and they affect Christians.
Politics is of this world!
Yes.
You think it's your duty!
To be political about this, that, and the other.
No, your duty is to serve the Lord your God.
How do we serve the Lord our God with all our heart, mind, soul, and understanding?
Well, there are certain things that we have to do.
So we go to church, and then the other six days of the week, we're all throughout politics.
We're in political spheres.
We're in economic spheres.
We're in all kinds of places.
Educational spheres.
And so, anyway, let's just keep listening here.
Joel Webman is right.
This is precisely why the church, and when I say the church, I say, you know, the people that go to church and their view on what their responsibility is in public life.
With all your heart, mind, soul, body, and strength, and love your neighbor as yourself.
Don't be talking to me about my spiritual responsibility to vote.
I don't have a spiritual responsibility to vote.
I have a civic privilege.
Don't be telling me that voting is spiritual.
That's what happens when you don't read and pray.
Somebody said, the author of the case of Christian nationalism, and that's really what's at stake here, right?
What he is saying would have never been said back in the day.
Historic Protestant political thought, this was not their thing.
This is a modern interpretation.
And, you know, stuff like this, while, and I don't doubt the guy's intentions, because we do need to be focused on God's kingdom and not equate the two, like, right, America and heaven and God's kingdom, and, you know, like, we don't need to, like, but again, I don't think people are doing that.
This is a convenient way to not have to address issues of the day.
This is a All of the world, like everything that's happening to Christians and our world around us, it's all crumbling.
And there are people responsible for it.
There are people in office or positions of power, people who are not in office, that are responsible for it.
And we could do something about it.
And all a sermon like this does is essentially just enable the Christians being put in boxcars reality to materialize sooner rather than later.
And so there's a debate right now on Christian Twitter over Christian nationalism.
What exactly does it mean?
There's several different definitions.
They all basically kind of have the same thing.
That right there is 100% not Christian nationalism, for those of you who were wondering.
You can check the rest of that out over on Twitter.
We're out of time for this evening.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much.
I hope you've had a great weekend.
I hope you had a good Lord's Day yesterday.
I hope you've had a great Monday.
Thank you for ending or winding your Monday down with us here on the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul.
We can't do the show without you, so make sure if you get a chance to go to X and you can follow me at RealPaulHarrell.
That's at RealPaulHarrell.
▲
Export Selection