All Episodes
Previous Next
April 25, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
57:00
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Christian Consensus LOST, Theologian Predicted Authoritarian Elite
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the good stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
I lose track of time, so I might be past my prime.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, it feels just like I don't shine.
I'm so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Look now, sway into my own sound.
Blashes in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody loves me.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much for being with us.
We can't do the show without you watching every single day.
You have heard me talk about this before.
I'm talking about a phrase that I didn't invent.
The phrase is Christian consensus.
And so we used to have a Christian consensus here in America.
In fact, this country was founded On a Christian consensus.
And we enjoyed much freedom and blessings, quite frankly, because pilgrims who came to this country so they could build homes for their families and worship God the way they saw fit carved out a new civilization out of the wilderness.
As a result of that, Protestant Christianity thrived in the new world or the new land.
But, alas, that's no longer the case, is it?
We are very clearly in a downward spiral, and the majority of our culture is based off of what the late theologian Francis Schaeffer called humanism.
Humanism, Schaeffer argued, was the replacement of God at the center of all life and putting man in his place.
Meaning that we would no longer look to understand the world by first understanding who God is and then seeking knowledge about various subjects based on a knowledge of God.
No, we must understand the world around us by making all of our considerations concerning man, making it man-focused.
Of course, mankind, as you know, as this audience, mankind can exist in varying different states or severities of sin.
I mean, the only thing consistent about mankind from a theological standpoint...
Of course, is that we are all sinners, but man's standards of goodness are not constant at all and are arbitrary and can change, you know, from day to day, from decade to decade, from century to century.
So there is no basis.
A humanistic or man-centered idea is no basis for a solid foundation with which to build or, in the case of America, maintain our civilization.
Hence, this is why everything is falling in around us.
The very freedoms that sprang forth from our Christian consensus, our Christian country, are now being used as the weapon against us, as the weapon of our destruction in the absence of godliness and his manifest blessings.
actions.
America is in the death throes right now.
We are a country on the edge and only prayer, only God can save us, can bring us back from the brink, and I pray that he does.
So more on theologian, the late Dr.
Francis Schaeffer, here in just a moment.
The consequences from no longer being an overt Christian nation can be observed on a daily basis, especially if you follow the news or are a news hound like I am.
For example, yesterday geriatric patient and android Joe Biden did the sign of the cross on himself to signify his support for the human sacrifice of babies.
Watch.
And then we come back here to the state of Florida, where Ron DeSantis felt like he needed to run for president, and so 15 weeks wasn't good enough.
We had to go to six weeks.
Not a day goes by where that kind of inversion that you just witnessed is observed.
Joe Biden thinks, if he can think, that he has the moral high ground and the idea that women can't get abortions and murder their babies prompts him to appeal to heaven so that God will intervene and somehow stop Florida's abortion law.
Of course, we all know that Biden isn't really just appealing to heaven here.
He's appealing to hell and the devil.
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil.
So America's track record, the state of this country is in shambles.
Our track record really for the last 50 to 100 years, you can chart, has been abysmal.
We have quite literally, on a slippery slope, lost our Christian religion.
Today's America and our foreign policy is essentially, as we've talked about many times before, America's foreign policy is based on exporting democracy.
Of course, democracy is just code for LGBTQRSTLNE, would you like to buy a vowel, sodomy, as a matter of public policy, in order to be in the club of the New World Order Tower of Babel 2.0.
I say all that, and what it really means is that American warmongering politicians are happy with this, and they're happy to keep their Christian constituents in the dark about the collateral damage done to fellow Christians and Christian communities abroad.
Many traditional Christians in America who are rightfully, understandably so, horrified that their country has become so immoral and is calling evil good and good evil, yet they have not made the connection that American foreign policy is about exporting that immorality to countries who still reject the LGBT or reject sodomy as a...
Like a model example of what should be acceptable in public life.
They reject that.
Many Christians still don't know That there were and still are Christians in Gaza fearing for their lives as Israel moves in with more planned ethnic cleansing.
Many Christians don't know there were churches allowed to exist in Gaza.
Likewise, many Christians here in America don't know that before the Iraq War, there were ancient Christian communities that were annihilated thanks to US forces disturbing the region.
Here is U.S. Senator J.D. Vance confessing that truth.
Watch.
Here's another thing that we should learn from the Iraq war, something that I, as a Christian, care a lot about.
And I think that even many of my colleagues who are not Christians, many of my fellow Americans who are not Christians should care about.
The United States remains to this day the world's largest majority Christian nation.
We are the largest Christian nation by population in the entire world.
And yet, what are the fruits?
By your fruits ye shall know them, the Bible tells us.
What are the fruits of American foreign policy when it comes to Christian populations all over the world over the last few decades?
Well, in Iraq, before we invaded, there were 1.5 million Christians in Iraq, many of them ancient communities, Chaldeans, people who trace their lineage and their ancestors to people who knew the literal apostles of Jesus Christ.
Now, nearly every single one of those historical Christian communities is gone.
That is the fruits of American labor in Iraq, a regional ally of Iran and the eradication and decimation of one of the oldest Christian communities in the world.
Is that what we were told was going to happen?
Did the American people, the world's largest majority Christian nation in the world, did they think that's what they were getting themselves into?
I certainly didn't.
And I'm ashamed that I didn't, but we did.
Now that's a confession that certainly has got to be unpopular among Vance's colleagues, Vance's pro-war colleagues, talk about no longer being a Christian nation, by the way.
Unbelievable.
How many people...
That you know, or maybe people in this audience that just saw that clip, will make excuses and say, well, that's just part of being in a war.
I'm sure that'll comfort all of us when blue hats drone strike American Christians' homes for not bowing down to whatever psyop they have planned next.
That's just part of war.
Also, by the way, if you're going to do Iraq, you've got to do modern-day Israel and that conflict and what's going on in Gaza.
Again, we just covered that.
The United States did the same thing.
That J.D. Vance is talking about there when Obama, under his administration, created ISIS. You see, Obama wanted Russia's influence over Syria's Bashar al-Assad to wane.
And when Assad didn't want to do that and rejected the U.S., We decided to back Syrian rebels in a civil war, in a proxy war, who murdered Christians and destroyed their villages.
Pregnant women, Christians, those villages were under the protection of Bashar al-Assad.
Most American Christians don't know that.
Manchurian Republican candidates who probably have served in war themselves can champion the next war and back whatever they want in the Middle East.
And we never find out that our politicians are actually going to harm Christians.
Our policies, our bombs and our weapons are going to harm Christians.
You know, the enemy is my friend.
American Christians are lied to about all of this.
And if they had this knowledge, I truly believe that it would change the threshold for what the voters allow their politicians to get away with.
But many are in the dark.
Which brings me back to Francis Schaeffer.
Schaeffer wrote a book called How Should We Then Live?
And if you've never read it, you need to.
The whole question, how should we then live, is in the concept of an authoritarian elite.
The rising authoritarian elite is here, so what do Christians do?
How should we live?
He also made a video series about How Should We Then Live?
in the year 1977.
And a lot of those clips are available on YouTube.
The following that we're going to watch are clips from episode 10 of that series, not the whole thing, but clips from it, on a quiet authoritarian elite and how they will control a population through lies.
The wisdom here is incredible, and quite frankly, what Francis Schaeffer was able to predict back in 1977, and I believe this series, the book was before that, is just uncanny of how he knew what was going to happen.
He knew what was going to face American Christians as we are in the midst of the loss of the Christian consensus.
You see, Francis Schaeffer understood that in 1973, when the Supreme Court said that women could murder their babies, He knew that that was the real sign that the Christian consensus in this country was over.
He knew that.
So he wrote a book about it.
Here's again, clips from episode 10, starting with a little bit of a nod to the French Revolution.
Now, when we begin to talk about an authoritarian elite, please do not think of the model of Hitler and Stalin.
That would miss the mark completely.
What we're facing is something much, much more subtle.
Something in which Hitler and Stalin would not provide the model at all.
Rather, it's in all probability going to be a manipulative authoritarian elite.
A manipulative authoritarian elite.
And of course, we must think of manipulatory possibilities of television.
It has its own tremendous possibilities.
Violence broke out again last night as some young people were prevented from meeting peaceably in the downtown area by noticeably nervous, if not to say trigger-happy police.
Frank Bushman, attorney for the young people who are to be arraigned in court tomorrow morning, pointedly remarked on this overreaction by the police.
Oh, my God!
I hereby declare this an unlawful assembly.
Late last night, disorder broke out among a small, unruly mob as our guardians of the peace quietly and efficiently, in spite of extreme provocation, restored order.
I command you to disperse.
And if you do not, you shall be arrested and refused to disperse.
You have two minutes to disperse.
It is important that our courts make an example of these hoodlums and hand out the kind of sentences they so richly deserve. - We staged this scene.
I have to interject here.
Again, this is a clip from a video series based on a book, How Should We Then Live?, by the late theologian Dr.
Francis Schaeffer.
That is just incredible to think that he predicted that what we're facing right now in the year 2024.
This was again in 1977.
It was even before that because this is the video series that was made after the book.
That's very familiar, especially in light of what we witnessed with the Summer of Love, the BLM riots and everything else, and what we're gearing up for apparently this summer.
Investigative journalist Lara Logan is saying that the pro-Hamas slash pro-Palestinian protests...
Versus the pro-Zionist, pro-Israel movement.
That's what's going on.
And what's incredible about it is it's being funded, according to Lara Logan.
We'll talk about this a little later.
Being funded by the same people.
This conflict being funded by the same people on both sides, really, that funded the BLM protests in 2020.
So we'll talk more about that coming up.
But just uncanny.
This prediction back in the day, and there's something we can learn from it.
You've got to stick with me here on this episode of the Millstone Report.
We're going to keep watching this clip here.
We filmed it to show the television can tell any story that wants to tell.
In both versions, the action was the same, and the actors did exactly the same things.
However, the camera was placed differently, the editor edited differently, and the announcer told a different story.
We would be naive not to realize that what we're seeing is an edited symbol.
But the nature of TV is such, we see it with our own eyes, that we naturally look at it as though it were objective truth.
For many, what they see on television is more true than what they see with their own eyes.
Now, that is profound.
And that was back before, I mean, before we had cell phones and screaming.
I mean, it's just like, it's nuts.
And now, really, with the rise of AI, where we're quickly figuring out that we can't figure out what's real or what's fake, it's got a whole other meaning, an entirely different meaning.
But I'll refer you to my episode on my couple episodes we've done here on the network on chemtrails about how people won't believe their own eyes, right?
They will believe somebody debunking it.
Oh, that's just condensation that somehow stays in the air forever and blocks out the sun.
Right?
People won't look up and believe their own eyes.
They don't want to.
They want to believe what the news tells them.
Because they want structure.
You hear people talk, well, you know, toddlers, really the main thing they need is structure.
Well, that's what these authoritarian elites think about us, that we need structure.
In order for them to control us.
Now, it used to be that people in submission to God, being Christians, that that was their structure, the proper structure.
And again, out of that flowed freedoms that were very beneficial.
And now, in the absence of God, those freedoms are the method of our destruction.
Let me stress, it is always unfair to say the media does this or the press does that.
There are always individuals or individual publications, for example, that are not included in the generalization.
But the mass media can be used by an authoritarian manipulating government or an elite.
The elite gives the arbitrary absolutes.
And then not only TV, but all the mass media can be used for manipulation.
And a plot or conspiracy are not needed.
All that is needed is that the people in the places of influence and those who decide what is the news Okay, so this is very interesting to me.
So obviously we know that conspiracies are real, right?
And we know that it's really not that difficult to keep a secret, you know, among people.
Especially when you've got all the blackmail and stuff going on.
But he does raise an interesting point.
Once you have successfully essentially transformed what is the popular modern thought, right?
So, you know, right now a lot of people think that, you know, atheism is the worldview.
Like, that's what's been pushed.
But it really is what he's calling humanism, and it's been pushed in our schools and everything else.
We've supplanted God, or at least we think we have.
He mocks his enemies from heaven.
But you try to remove God out of your society, and you replace it with humanism, you replace it with man-focused, and then if you have an entire generation of people who are in the upper echelons of your society, and they don't believe in God, or they believe in this This new ideology, this humanism, you've got a lot of useful brainwashed idiots that you don't have to tell them to do it, right?
Barack Obama didn't have to tell Lois Lerner to harass and persecute Christian Tea Party groups.
Right?
He didn't have to tell her to do that.
She did it.
Right?
Because she's from that ilk.
Right?
And I know that's a story from a long time ago.
So likewise, he's saying, if you've got a bunch of people that have bought into the humanist idea without even actually knowing that that's what it is...
Then, you know, you're going to have people looking at the news through the lens you want them to look at the news, look at the world through the lens you want them to look at the world.
They come up with their own definition of morality, their own system and guidelines, things that they can worship, things that they can condemn somebody, they can absolve somebody.
And it's all arbitrary.
As long as you just have that, as long as you have that where man is essentially the focus, people will not recognize it.
They won't be outraged when all of a sudden the rules change from one day to the next or one year to the next.
They won't care because they're humanists.
And it's all about the absence of God.
When the perspective, the worldview of the elite, coincides with some of the influential news carriers, it does not have to be all, then either consciously or unconsciously, the media becomes an instrument for manipulation.
Now, what will all these available manipulatory techniques mean in our own countries?
I'm not thinking of communist countries now.
Countries that have gone totally totalitarian, but in our own countries.
There will be people who will feel uncomfortable with the increased control and increased manipulation.
But there's a dilemma here.
It's a very profound one.
And the dilemma is that many of the people who speak out for civil liberties are also totally committed to the fact that the government has the responsibility to solve every problem.
And there's a natural tension, a torque, in these two things as they think both things.
Now, as the pressures increase, and they just overwhelmingly increase as time goes on, at a certain point, where is the line going to be drawn?
Certainly, if they have only the values, the basic values of personal peace and fluency, at a certain point, their disquiet will be totally submerged.
This is a reoccurring theme in this book or video series.
You know, it's basically, and we're here.
I mean, we were there then, but we're very there now.
Personal peace and affluence.
That's all people care about.
That's why you have so many people that don't want kids.
You've got young couples, they don't want kids.
Do you know why?
Because children aren't valuable to them, right?
What's valuable to them is their personal peace and affluence, right?
Their lifestyle.
And it really fuels everything.
Everything comes out of that, much of that.
I mean, he charts back to Rome how this happened.
People quit having kids at the height Of Rome that started them on their decline, right?
So that phrase, personal peace and affluence, it's kind of all throughout this particular work that is asking how should Christians live in the scope of this rising authoritarianism?
And he answers that even better with his book, The Christian Manifesto.
More on that in a minute.
The Christian consensus gave us such tremendous freedoms.
Of course, as we've said many times, the basic Christian message is that an individual can be right with God only upon the basis, now, of the work of Christ alone.
That's all he needs.
And the humanist element has gone out of that.
But it carried with it, of course, many, many secondary things.
And one was, one secondary thing was this tremendous range of freedom that we've been talking about.
Freedom that didn't lead to chaos.
But now listen.
Don't you see that if you can have these titanic freedoms not leading to chaos because of the Christian consensus providing a form, if you remove that Christian consensus as a form, then the very freedoms which have been such a glory and a wonder That we have had from the Christian consensus,
these very freedoms then become the hammer blows to destroy everything and to lead completely to chaos.
Parents have a right to take their children to drag shows so that they can be ogled by half-naked men.
They have the freedom to do that.
We're told in a free society today, that's progress, and we, who believe that that is wicked and evil and child abuse, have to just sit back and say, okay, no, you're right.
And people are saying, no, no, we're not going to do that.
Do you understand?
I mean, that's an excellent...
Definition, that's an excellent description for what has occurred to us, what has happened to this country.
That right there.
These very freedoms that were once used as something that was, oh, wow, America are now the very weapon of our destruction.
In other words, the good thing becomes the poor thing once the consensus, the form, is removed.
Now, that's exactly what has occurred.
Now, coming and thinking of the United States, we could think of other countries in the Western world, but I'll choose the United States.
From what source Might the authoritarian, manipulating government come?
Most people immediately, of course, think of the administrative side, a president with too much power.
But the administrative side isn't the only place to keep your eyes on.
Now, it's true that it's harder to think practically of the congressional side bringing forth such an authoritative government, but it's not unthinkable.
A public official serving on the very highest level in the United States at one point said a very wise thing.
What he said was, and I'm quoting, legislative dictatorship is no better than executive tyranny.
And he's absolutely right.
It isn't a question of from what side of the government the authoritarian, manipulative government comes.
The problem is, it's coming.
The fact that it is, the danger is there.
Again, 1977.
That is an excerpt from episode 10 of the video series based on the book, How Should We Then Live?
The late Dr.
Francis Schaefer.
Not a question.
And he said it is coming.
And he was right.
Executive tyranny versus legislative tyranny.
I mean, I think about the executive tyranny that we obviously have, where the FBI can now become Joe Biden's personal police force.
You think about how the agency state is really where the tyranny comes from, violating the non-delegation clause of Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution, not to get too constitutionally on you.
But, I mean, that's what's going on.
Congress has literally given away their power by creating agencies that have the same power to do what they do, but nobody gets to elect them.
And that's why the FBI, for example, essentially framed a president for treason, right?
Did the same thing with Richard Nixon or the intelligence state did.
But the idea of congressional tyranny, I think we've experienced that in the last week.
We've experienced the congressional tyranny.
We've experienced them okaying warrantless wiretapping on American citizens.
Congress did that.
Schaefer was right.
We've experienced them ignoring the southern border and sending billions of dollars overseas, which a lot of that money is never going to see it because it's just going to go to defense contractors.
But we're experiencing this tyranny.
The American people are literally being hung out to dry.
We're being given a country that's going to have blood running in the streets because of this invasion.
And they're over there worried about Ukraine and Taiwan and Israel.
It's insane.
It's absolutely nuts.
Now, why is the legislative tyranny happening?
Well, you can go back to, as we've said on this program, go back to the executive branch and these agencies that are under the executive branch They are in many cases blackmailing all of these members of Congress.
They have Jeffrey Epstein-style dossiers on all of them.
Is the speculation, right?
That's the speculation.
And quite frankly, I mean, how many of these, how many Puff Daddies or Jeffrey Epsteins have to be in the news before we realize what's really going on here?
The intel community has been weaponized against the American people, against anybody that stands in the way of their power.
And they all have a common denominator, and that common denominator is they don't like Christians.
They hate Christians, in fact, just like Christ predicted.
Fascinating stuff by the late Francis Schaeffer.
And we have more.
We have some excerpts coming up in the next segment of what he said about Christians in his Christian Manifesto.
Are we loyal to Christ?
Or are we going to be loyal to Caesar?
Which is it?
We're going to talk more about that when we come back.
Yesterday on the Stu Peter Show, he sat down with Clint Russell to talk about This schism in the Democrat Party.
And before we get to that though, I don't want to leave this segment without talking about what Lara Logan said.
About the situation, because when you see the authoritarian elite that Schaefer was talking about, and you see that, you know, the staged, you know, police officer, the two different takes, the police are arresting the protesters in a positive light, and then the police arresting the protesters in a negative light, it was edited differently, it was shot differently, and how the media can lie to you and tell the story.
I just thought of this as the latest from Lara Logan.
She says, While we are distracted by arguments over the made-up term Islamophobia,
anyone else remember the DC League's published emails, documents from Soros' Open Society Foundation instructing their staff I do.
The docs were scrubbed from the internet a while ago.
Maybe someone can find them.
So while we get spun up over this distraction, what are we missing?
Could it be an avian flu or a swine flu?
Are they going to weaponize COVID again?
Are they preparing to unleash another pandemic?
Perhaps our time would be better spent figuring out what the preemptive treatments exist so that we won't get suckered again.
Or how to prepare for a possible manufactured banking crisis, right?
This would probably be...
A banking crisis.
I've heard people speculate if they do it, it'll be something where you can't get your money for two, three weeks.
It would be devastating, but it wouldn't be like end of the world, and then everybody gets on their central bank digital currency after that.
Intel professionals today are watching for more train derailments like East Palestine, more attacks on critical infrastructure like the Baltimore Bridge, possible attacks on the power grid.
What you can expect with a major shutdown of the grid slash loss of power.
So one of the things that Francis Schaeffer did not talk about that I know, from what I can tell, are false flags.
Are the government literally creating the crisis, getting the people to react so that they can seize more power?
There's just a ton of stuff going on right now.
There's a ton of stuff at play here.
And these college campuses where now you've got Islamophobia versus anti-Semitism.
These are the two words that are being thrown out, right?
And this is now this debate and everyone's going to get worked up into a frenzy and they want everyone to try to pick a side.
What I want is all the bloodshed to stop.
How about that?
How about we have peace?
How about we don't kill anybody else?
Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, Taiwan.
I know there's no bloodshed in Taiwan yet, but I think we all know that that's coming soon.
We're going to take a break.
We're going to listen to a little bit more about this with Clint Russell as he was on Stu Peter's show yesterday.
My name is Paul Harrell.
This is the Millstone Report, and we'll be back in just a moment.
Keep in mind, Ilhan Omar just days ago voted to send billions of dollars to Ukraine to fund that war.
Thank you.
Congress didn't need her vote to pass the Israel aid.
They had plenty of Republican and Democrat support, so she was able to keep a grip on her media role as pro-Palestine, anti-Israel, and a villain who's in lockstep with the left and garners media praise on every other issue.
That should give you even more pause and make you wonder if her daughter was actually put up to this.
This entire situation doesn't pass the eye and smell test.
It's plain to see.
The most disgusting elements of the American left have seized upon opposition to Israel to infect it with their perversions and delegitimize it in the eyes of millions of Americans.
Clint Russell has been following the situation closely and he joins us now to share his perspective.
Clint, thank you so much for coming.
We appreciate you being here.
Thank you as always, Stu.
It's great to be here.
What do you make of all of this nonsense happening in New York and then, of course, inevitably spreading across the country?
Well, I think the Columbia example is really just a microcosm of the Ivy League institutions and the kind of long march through the institutions that we've seen from the Marxists or the Communists.
And it has borne major fruit, but that fruit is now spoiled and it is starting to destroy the tree of the Democratic Party.
So I think that's interesting.
What concerns me more is that we have Palestinian flags on the streets in New York, And we have Ukrainian flags on the house of the floor.
Where are the American flags?
And this is coming from a libertarian who is not necessarily the most, you know, flag-bearing, patriotic type.
But if you're going to bear a flag in my country, I would like it to be this one.
It seems quite clear that we do not have anybody that is actually interested in defending America or American ideals.
We are completely torn at the seams by groups that are representative of or for I think that's totally reprehensible, particularly when they call themselves our representatives.
It's laughable.
Okay, so what is the solution to this?
If I knew.
I mean, I'm running for Vice President of the Libertarian Party.
I've given up so much on the GOP side.
Like, consider this.
Josh Hawley, you said it was the Columbia professor who was calling for the National Guard.
Josh Hawley, a GOP senator, also called for the National Guard.
This is totally crazy.
The GOP is completely controlled by foreign governments, Saudi Arabia, Israel, a bunch of others, honestly.
It's amazing that the America First moniker means so little to them, and their voters don't seem to, either if they do notice it, they're still so afraid of the Democrats they're going to vote for them regardless.
So I think that we're in the duopoly vortex at this point.
I mean, do you think voting actually counts or matters?
I'm not so sure.
After 2020, I don't know.
So you think that that election was obviously stolen and rigged, right?
Well, we've actually talked about this a couple months ago.
I think it was.
I still haven't yet to see the evidence to prove that there was enough election malfeasance to twist it.
But the reality is, using the media apparatus, the backdoors to social media platforms to dictate censorship, the bearing of the Hunter Batten laptop story, regardless of what happened on election day, that election was absolutely stolen from Donald Trump.
Yeah.
So, there's probably not a political solution here.
Doesn't feel like it.
No.
I mean, I would like to believe so.
My opinion is there's still enough people in this country that are at least somewhat open to different ideas that you can reach them.
But it's quite obvious that we are polarized and that there are millions and millions of Americans that have not only made up their mind, but made up their mind with absolutely, horrifically terrible ideas.
And at this point, they control the political apparatus.
So as long as that persists, we're in a lot of trouble.
Yeah.
So, if there is no political solution...
I'm not going there, Stu.
I'm a peaceful person.
I'm interested in finding peaceful resolution to this.
As are we, Clint.
I just think that the people have exhausted every one of them.
The people are a dog backed into a corner at this point.
What I want here is not violence.
What I want is the restoration of the rule of law.
Do you agree that these people have committed war crimes?
Oh yeah.
I mean, for decades, yes.
Do you believe that these people have openly declared war on the American people?
And I'm not talking about Republicans or Democrats because I think that's freaking fake.
I'm talking about the Uniparty.
All of them.
Every single one of them.
Do you believe any of them are doing the bidding of the people?
No, not a chance.
I mean, to...
Welcome back.
This is the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Again, if you want more on that particular segment, as always, it's available on this Stu Peters Network Rumble channel, and you can check that out if you want the rest of that video from yesterday over this Democrat Party system.
You know, it's interesting.
The only...
The only real debate to be had where there's actually a back and forth, or, you know, and it's at least theatrically speaking, is the Republicans, for the most part, right?
In that party, you've got the differences.
And, of course, you know, the Union Party keeps winning.
I get all that.
But the Democrat Party is the party where it's just kind of locked down.
Like, there is no debate.
They back each other.
When they get power, they use it.
But this issue with the genocide in Gaza...
is a schism.
It's a divide that the Democrats aren't used to.
And it's very ironic because many of these people backed all of the corporate anti-whites, you know, Black Lives Matter propaganda.
You know, they were big soldiers.
They were useful soldiers in that movement.
But now they're not when it comes to Israel and Palestine.
So it's It's fascinating to see how that works out.
But again, could all be by design.
When I was at break, kind of as a follow-up to that Lara Logan tweet from earlier, this was 10 hours ago.
CBS News is reporting that there's evidence, according to the Food and Drug Administration, which you cannot trust, that there's evidence of bird flu virus in grocery store milk.
She says, as predicted.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Bird flu, they're saying.
So, who knows what disease will be floating through some HVAC system here real, real soon.
We were telling you in the first segment about the late theologian who goes by the name Dr.
Francis Schaefer.
He predicted an authoritarian elite.
And he did this back in the 70s after the Roe vs.
Wade, he said, eliminated the Christian consensus.
And he wrote a book called How Should We Didn't Live.
But then he also wrote a book called The Christian Manifesto.
And back in 1982...
He gave a sermon at a church called the Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church.
And in it, and we just have the clips of it, okay?
We're going to stop and go here.
In it, he had a lot of things to say about why the country is in the state that it's in.
And he blamed the church for not living up to its obligations.
Listen.
Where have the Bible-believing Christians been?
We shouldn't be surprised.
The liberal theologians have been no help.
But where have we been?
As we have changed to this other consensus and all the horrors and stupidity at the present moment has come down upon our culture.
We must recognize that this country is close to being lost.
Again this is in 1982.
Don't let the gap between 2024 to 1982, because I'm saying the same thing, right?
Our country is close to being lost.
Some people think it already is.
In 1982, Schaefer saying, our country is close to being lost.
At some point, you're no longer close.
You just are lost.
Right.
At some point, it quits being a prediction and it becomes a reality if we do nothing.
And that would mean Christians get put in boxcarts because that's just the natural progression of things.
When you don't bow to the state, eventually they come for you in the absence of a Christian consensus.
Not first of all because of a humanist conspiracy.
I believe there are those who conspire, but that is not the reason this country is almost lost.
This country is almost lost, not because of a humanist conspiracy, but because the Bible-believing Christians, in the last 40 years, who have said that they know that the final reality is this infinite personal God, who is the Creator and all the rest, They said they have known it, and they've done nothing about it as the consensus has changed.
There's been a vast silence.
So 40 years.
This sermon was given in 82.
So 42, so from 1942 to 82, he's seen for 40 years the church has basically abdicated, or Christians, let's say the Christians who go to church but then are out in the world, you know, the other six days a week, Have essentially abdicated in some way their responsibility for stopping the decline, for stopping this nonsense.
And how have we done that exactly?
I mean, I wasn't even born yet when Schaeffer gave this sermon, right?
It was two years from then, and I was born in 1984, so...
Obviously, I have a lot.
I can see this exact same thing.
It just continued to play out.
How do we do?
I mean, yeah, you could say we elected politicians back before elections were rigged, assuming they weren't rigged.
We backed politicians that were liars, were just total scumbags.
But then again, we're also lied to, as we talked about at the top of this program, on a constant basis.
It can't just be electorally.
It can't just be, well, the Christians failed to do what they needed to do electorally.
No, it's deeper than that.
It's got to be a spiritual failing in some way.
We've been silent.
Now, I agree with that.
How are we silent now?
Well, we have big evangelical leaders that will discourage Christians from getting involved because they say, we don't want to make an idol out of politics.
America, the kingdom of America is not the kingdom of God.
It's like, whoa, whoa, whoa, nobody was saying that.
You said that, not us.
You're just doing that.
Try to guilt people to sit on their hands while you implement the World Economic Forum's agenda on the advice of Rick Warren circa 2008 from Davos.
I mean, you know, it's just crazy.
People don't...
You know why Christians don't want to speak up?
Because they didn't want...
First of all, many of them weren't informed on the issues of the day as they should have been.
They don't want to actually have to stand up and argue on the principles of the Bible and how they should apply it to public life because it may make enemies, may make your neighbor a little nervous to actually have to advocate for what you really believe in because it may be perceived as not nice if it's the truth and it just is what it is.
The truth is going to offend people that don't want to believe the truth.
But then the truth can set you free once you do believe the truth.
He says the silence of Christians over the last 40 years.
It's the silence.
And there's still a lot of silence from individual Christians that go about their lives, and they just quietly disagree with what they're seeing, even if they're asked about it.
What do you think of this?
Oh, well, you know, live and let live, come what may, you do you.
Evangelical leadership has not raised a voice.
Spirituality, after you're a Christian and have accepted Christ as Savior, means that Christ is the Lord of all your life, and not just your religious life.
And if you make a dichotomy in these things, you are denying your Lord, His proper place, and I don't care how many butterflies you have in your stomach, you are poor spiritually.
True spirituality means that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Lord of all of life, and except for the things that are specifically told as in the Bible are sinful, we set them aside, except for that all of life is spiritual and all of life is equally spiritual,
and that includes As our forefathers did standing for these things of freedom and standing for these things of human life and all these other matters that are so crucial if indeed this living God does exist as we know that he does exist.
I think the church has failed to meet its obligation in these last 40 years for two specific reasons.
The first is this false truncated view of spirituality that doesn't see true spirituality touching all of life.
And the other thing is too many Christians, whether the doctors, lawyers, pastors, evangelists, whatever they are, too many of them afraid to really speak out because they did not want to rock the boat for their own project.
And I'm convinced that these two reasons, both of which are a tragedy and really horrible for the Christian, both of the two together are an explanation why we have walked the road we have walked in the last 40 years.
You must understand it's going to cause you to take a stand in these things.
There are doctors who are going to get kicked out of hospitals because they refuse to perform abortions.
There are nurses who see a little sign on the crib do not feed and they feed and they're fired.
There's a cost.
There's a cost.
But I'd ask you, I'd ask you, what is loyalty to Christ worth to you?
What is loyalty to Christ worth to you?
How much do you believe this is true?
Why are you a Christian?
Are you a Christian because for some lesser reason?
Are you a Christian because you know this is the truth of reality?
And then how much do you love the Lord Jesus Christ?
How much are you willing to pay the price for loyalty to the Lord Jesus?
Christ must be the final Lord and not society and not Caesar.
May I repeat the final sentence again?
Christ must be the final Lord, and not Caesar, and not society.
Daniel chapter 3, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.
Go.
So...
They certainly didn't think Caesar was the final authority when they refused to bow to the statue and give it worship, and that's where we're headed.
That's where we're headed.
That's very much where we are.
As Pastor Votie Bauckham said recently, when you have your daughter going to run track, she lines up on the block and all of a sudden next to her is a him who claims to be a her but is a liar.
Christians can't just be neutral anymore on that.
You can't just allow that to happen, and you can't participate in it if it is allowed to happen.
So neutrality is no longer a thing.
And, you know, there were so many Christians that it took a long time for them to realize that a baby is not just a clump of cells, right?
There's a lot of Christians that, oh, I'll be pro-choice.
I know that's maybe tough to believe, but it did happen.
People came around, thank the Lord.
Some did.
Some still haven't.
And I worry for them.
But there's certain lies that have to be overcome and people have to speak out.
Literally, the idea that politics and religion are taboo, you're not supposed to talk about politics and religion.
Who came up with that?
And what is that useful for other than to silence people and get people so afraid of disagreeing with somebody?
The fact that we can't disagree anymore, and I'm guilty of this, without fear that the other person is going to be so offended that you disagree on something.
We literally don't talk to each other enough.
Everybody just wants to keep to themselves because we have this understanding of what it means to be nice.
And they don't understand that you can be nice and actually be so nice that you're sinning by not allowing the truth to be told.
And by not telling the truth to somebody that needs to hear the truth because you're afraid.
Afraid and filled with fear, which is not the spirit that Christians have been given.
As a matter of fact, perfect love casts out fear.
And love...
A lot of times it's telling somebody the truths of what they need to hear.
Not what they want to hear.
Not what you want them to hear.
But that's what they need to hear.
And that is what Schaefer is saying here.
Fascinating stuff.
And I can promise you this, Millstone Report audience.
I can promise you this.
This will not be the last time that we kind of go over Francis Schaefer.
And if you haven't ever checked this out, I highly recommend it, right?
Now that was a sermon of his, but earlier in the show we played for you a clip from his series, How Should We Then Live?
Those tapes, they're all available on YouTube, at least for now.
So How Should We Then Live?
Francis Shaver.
And they're quite a throwback because they were made in the 70s.
So the filming techniques, obviously Francis Schaeffer's style and delivery is not typical, right?
I get it.
But the content is what is so valuable.
And so you definitely want to check that out.
The last story that we're going to leave you with today comes from Revolver.News.
And it's the story of a mistrial in the trial of George Kelly.
A lot of you may not remember this because I think it happened in January of 2023, I believe.
A rancher.
He lives in South Arizona.
He's a South Arizona rancher.
And he's right there on the border.
Which is essentially the Wild West.
For those of you that don't know, it's essentially the Wild West.
I mean, we all know.
Right.
I mean, arguably, the southern border in places is more dangerous than Afghanistan or Iraq was at the height of the Iraq War.
Remember Fallujah?
I mean, there are places, I mean, during the Obama administration, they put up signs, if you'll remember, on certain highways saying, hey, this is, we can't, the U.S. government cannot guarantee your safety from here to here, and this is inside the United States, the territorial United States.
I mean, the land of the United States.
And the Obama administration is saying, well, I can't guarantee it.
Just, you know, enter at your own risk.
What an embarrassment.
Anyway, so it's the Wild West down there.
Well, thankfully, a mistrial...
I mean, this is the second best thing.
A mistrial has been declared in the case of an American man accused of murdering an illegal who had no business trespassing on his property.
So this guy comes on his property.
He shoots him.
And...
The Arizona jury wanted to acquit this man, but there was one holdout.
So I'm upset about that, like many of you, but it also can be reversed.
So just so you know, use this as an example of what jury nullification can be.
There was a mistrial declared.
Now the government's going to decide whether or not they want to retry this guy.
Are they going to retry him?
It'll be difficult to get a conviction, I predict, either way.
But there was one person on the jury that thought he was guilty and wanted to convict him of second-degree murder.
The rest of the jury didn't want to.
They were a hung jury, so a mistrial is declared, right?
He walked out of the courtroom a free man.
That's what's important here.
That's what's important.
Trial of Southern Arizona, rancher charged in fatally shooting an unarmed migrant.
An unarmed migrant goes to jury.
Of course, it was a mistrial.
And we have this, the prosecution's case was sick and a politicized joke.
They do not want people to understand...
Look, we have said before on this program many times that these invaders are not coming to take your jobs this time.
They are coming to take your homes and your lives and your families, and they're coming in many cases with violence because you look at what's going on with the squatting situation, taking advantage of squatting rights, that's just the beginning.
Of absolutely like militant, just militarized men taking over entire neighborhoods.
That's what they're trying to do in Liberty County, Texas.
This is what's coming to America.
So the idea that an old man, an old white man, killed an illegal immigrant that was, you know, an illegal alien that was on his property and he doesn't get convicted of it is...
Oh my goodness, it's like the worst news that Joe Biden and Barack Obama's administration, that the left's administration has ever heard.
Because it's literally the last thing they want to know.
So many people are waiting for permission to believe certain things or to say certain things, going back to the silence of America.
But there's also a lot of other people that are...
They don't want this story to get out because they don't want people to know what their rights are when it comes to self-defense, when it comes to defending your property, when it comes to defending your life.
They don't want you to know.
We have been conditioned that if any time a minority dies, it's got to be a Trayvon Martin or a George Zimmerman situation.
Or any time a minority dies, it's got to be a Derek Chauvin, George Floyd situation.
That is not the case, but that's what the media wants people to believe.
So this is a huge story, in my opinion, for people who want to be able to confidently protect themselves in the coming influx of military-aged males that are, in many cases, from very, very violent third-world countries.
And it's certainly...
It's certainly a good sign, right?
And again, we will see if the mistrial, if they're going to retry this guy, get it.
It was a hung jury, so there's no double jeopardy or anything like that.
We'll see if the prosecution wants to actually try to get a conviction again.
Out of the sky.
My name's Paul Harrell.
That's all the time that we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
As always, it's great for you guys.
I really appreciate you guys giving me the opportunity to speak to you.
God bless you guys.
I hope you have a great evening.
Hope you sleep well.
Have a great day tomorrow.
We'll see you back here on Thursday.
Be safe out there.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection