All Episodes
Previous Next
April 2, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
55:47
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: YES...They REALLY Do Want To Put Christians In Box Cars
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the good-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
I lose track of time, so I might be past my pride.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, I feel just like I don't shine.
I look so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Come down, swing into my own sound.
Glasses in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody loves me.
Hello ladies and gentlemen, my name is Paul Harrell and this is the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much.
Yes, Virginia, they do.
They really do.
They do want to put Christians in boxcars.
We got a great show for you, and you don't want to miss it.
We're going to talk, kind of recap a little bit.
Yesterday was an interesting day.
We had an interview.
I got to kind of miss over, gloss over, because we had the interview with Ryan Samsel about everything that happened with Easter, Resurrection Sunday, Christ is King, all of that stuff.
So that's where we're going to begin tonight.
If we've learned anything from this past weekend, in my opinion, it should be this.
They really do want to put Christians in boxcars.
I have been saying it ad nauseum.
I'm sure many people out there may, in fact, be sick of it.
But as of yet, I don't think there is a better data point that more clearly foreshadows the anti-Christian goals of our communist overlords.
They mean to stamp out Christianity from America altogether.
So last week, while regime evangelicals were virtue signaling, nuancing, and wildly speculating about the supposed anti-Semitic phrase, Christ is king, he is, And why it was trending on X, the Biden White House was plotting to intentionally ruin America's celebration, or try to, intentionally ruin America's celebration of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
While some Christians were consumed with calling other Christians anti-Semites, the God-hating puppet masters controlling Joe Biden picked their favorite political issue in In an act of overt devil worship to claim that transgenders need to be acknowledged and recognized instead of Jesus Christ.
They need to be made visible.
They need to be seen.
So again, while the good guys were fighting amongst themselves like elves, dwarves and men, Mordor decided to remind all of us who the real enemy is And that enemy is not Christians who are proclaiming Christ as king because you told them not to.
The enemy is real and it's coming for all of us.
It's coming for all who acknowledge Jesus as Lord and it's time to start acting like servants of the king ready for the opportunity to plunge a broadsword into the heart of darkness.
And if they are planning on putting Christians in boxcars, and they are, then one would think, for the sake of our children, it's time to stop the infighting.
Stop the virtue signaling like it's 2020 and George Floyd just died, or Kyle Rittenhouse just defended himself.
All of this reactionary rushing to judgment to call fellow Christians anti-Semites because there's a war on in the Middle East And Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire have their panties in a wad because Candace Owens doesn't support genocide and made two rabbis look like the fools they are is no reason to adopt the tactics of the woke left and begin to come up with new speech codes for those of us on the right who have begun to question if Israel really is our greatest ally.
I mean, the fact that triggers some Christians employed by the con inks of the world, like Steve Dace, Ellie Beth Stuckey, or Jenna Ellis, says a whole lot more about them and their sacred cows than it does to the people who are asking honest, albeit uncomfortable questions.
This is the tone police 2.0.
You see, in recent years, Big Eva regime evangelicals like to criticize Christians for pointing out the evils of the left or those in their own ranks who were drifting from Christian norms and capitulating to the secular culture by doing what is known as concern trolling.
Concern trolling about the words they use to express their criticisms.
This was done as a way to deflect from the very real points and charges being leveled against Christian leaders.
And what do you know, that's the same thing happening today.
Whether they are concerned trolling over Christians advocating for Christian nationalism or creating straw men to claim the right is worshipping Donald Trump and Christians need to stay out of politics.
It's obviously a waste of time at this point and it's emboldening the godless enemies surrounding us.
Last week, the concern trolley reached a fever pitch when some Christians felt the need to redefine Christ is King as anti-Semitic hate speech.
And a few days later, many of these same voices took to Twitter to express their outrage at Joe Biden's Trans Day of Visibility with zero self-awareness that they just spent the last week criticizing their brothers and sisters over saying Christ is King.
What a binary choice.
A Christ is King nation that worships the one true God or a LGBT transgender genital hacking government that worships Satan on Resurrection Sunday.
Here's another binary choice for you.
A president whose daughter accused him of inappropriate showers with her as a child and a president who allows men dressed up as women to expose their fake breasts on the White House lawn.
Or a president in exile King James Version Bible salesman who says every American household needs to have a Bible in their home.
Hmm. .
Which way, Christian man?
Here's David French on MSNBC assailing Christians over Easter.
David, but yet on this day after Easter, we're looking at a whole weekend of these types of upside-down realities where Trump takes reality, twists it, and throws it against his people.
I have to ask, though, about the people who have the means, whether it be leadership positions, financial means, educational means, who could, if they were invited or if they donated, go to Mar-a-Lago on a Saturday night if they were invited or if they donated, go to Mar-a-Lago on a Saturday night and then go to church and celebrate Jesus' Well, you know, what we saw on Easter Sunday was a...
Just so you know, David French, he's a columnist for the New York Times, and he, you know, he's the Christian journalist in the New York Times, right?
So he really just exists to take regime propaganda and somehow get Christians to think that it's perfectly fine and consistent with the Christian faith, right?
That's his job.
That's what he does.
That's who David French is.
Remarkable display of venom and hatred.
I mean, really to the point, Miko, where you're right to wonder, is he okay?
And we know the answer is no, he's not okay.
But what's even more disturbing than that venom and hatred on Easter Sunday itself was the buildup of Holy Week.
It featured Trump sharing posts where he compared himself, calling a post where his supporter compared him to Jesus and the trials he faces in court in New York to the trials Jesus faced.
It's a beautiful post.
He's selling Bibles.
You know, the sad thing is this isn't just confined to Trump anymore.
We used to be able to say or used to try to comfort ourselves by saying, well, Donald Trump is the bad guy.
And then there's just so many good people who are fooled.
And there are still good people who are fooled by him.
But it's become increasingly clear that Trumpism and that Trump ethic is really leaking into American Christianity itself, as we saw when...
During Holy Week, Christians all over Twitter were posting Christ as King, specifically aimed at Jewish Americans, specifically aimed to assert religious dominance in a very gross and ugly way.
And we're seeing this just leak out, Mika, and it is very distressing, but even more than that, it is very dangerous.
Yeah, very dangerous.
You see what I'm talking about with these straw men?
By the way, people like David French, who, you know, he's essentially saying, you know, Trump is leaking into the American church.
And, you know, what they want, and people like Russell Moore.
Russell Moore, David French, the two starred in Rob Reiner's Hollywood movie, you know, bashing Christians.
God and country was the name of it.
they're some of the most outspoken, quote, Christians, and they're involved in every facet of left-wing politics virtually, but they want us, people like you and me, to stay out of politics.
Most of the time, the people that are calling for Christians to get out of politics are they themselves, in fact, in politics, saturated in politics, and that's David French.
More on David French here in a minute, but for more on this, we're going to go to this story that popped out at me this morning, And I think it's very interesting.
We are witnessing, you know, America become a pagan nation.
There's really no way getting around that.
This is from thefederalist.com by Casey Chalk.
It's reviewing a book by John Daniel Davidson called Pagan America, The Decline of Christianity in the Dark Age to Come.
Now, you see the burning church there.
So, this is kind of one of the theses of this show, the Millstone Report.
We're trying to prevent this reality from happening.
Because I just feel like that's what we're called to do.
And if it does happen, and there's a whole process, like if it does happen, then it'll be willed to happen, and the American Christians, the church in and of itself is still going to be fine.
It may be under persecution, it may go underground, but the gospel's still going to go forth.
So don't...
But I still think, you know, for the sake of our children, look, I don't want my child.
I'm not willing to just say, well, it's coming.
There's nothing we can do.
I don't want my child to grow up to where, you know, she has to memorize Scripture because, you know, the Bible is now illegal.
Now, we need to be memorizing Scripture in case that happens.
But you see what I'm saying?
Like, I don't want it to get to this point.
I don't want to go into the boxcar, right?
Matter of fact, I'm not going to go into the boxcar if I can help it.
But she writes that the Federalist senior editor John Daniel Davidson's new book, Pagan America, The Decline of Christianity in the Dark Age to Come, offers a sobering assessment of the threats to the American way of life as religiosity declines.
I'm sorry, Casey Chalk is a man, not a woman.
Forgive me.
Pronouns are important these days.
In 2010, sociologist James Davidson Hunter, famous for, among other things, popularizing the term culture war, And to change the world, the irony, tragedy, and possibility of Christianity in the late modern world, that conservative Christian attempts to restore Christian values on American society were misguided, if not harmful.
Okay, so the guy, James Davison, or Davison Hunter, basically, at least back in 2010, would disagree with the very concept of Christian nationalism or the very concept of this program, the Millstone Report.
He says such efforts to redeem America, argued Hunter, not only hadn't worked out, but would never work out, both because they represented an erroneous gap of how cultures change and because they distracted the faithful from their real task as Christians.
Instead, he says Christians should pursue what Hunter termed faithful presence by focusing on living authentically, Christian lives in our families, communities, and spheres of influence rather than programmatic political or cultural solutions.
I mean, I don't necessarily disagree with that.
I mean, I think we should live authentic, faithful Christian lives.
I think we should have Christian families, Christian communities.
But here's this thing here.
The sphere of influence...
I mean, I agree with that.
Like, right?
I mean, in your sphere of influence, you out there listening...
Be a Christian and influence your community and your friends in a Christian way.
Same thing goes for me.
Whatever your sphere of influence is.
Whether you're a talk show host or whether you're a truck driver or whether you're in retail or whatever.
You see what I'm saying?
But the same thing goes for politicians and this is where the rub is.
That's all really Christian nationalism is.
The politicians need to realize that you don't have to park your Christianity at the door after you take your oath of office.
Also, the Constitution has been totally perverted, and the Founding Fathers weren't sitting around writing the First Amendment saying, this will give Larry Flint the legal right to distribute pornography wherever they want.
They weren't sitting there thinking like, excuse me, I'm still a little under the weather.
They weren't thinking, hey, the First Amendment, freedom of speech, that's just giving anybody the right to basically blaspheme God, right?
I mean, obviously, John Adams didn't necessarily think that the First Amendment meant what we think it means today because he passed the Alien and Sedition Acts because he didn't like what people were saying about it.
Now, you may think that that was wrong or whatever.
That's a debate to be had.
My point is, our understanding of the First Amendment was not the Founding Fathers' understanding of the First Amendment, and people are realizing that.
And they're saying, hey, if this new understanding of the First Amendment means that we have to tolerate all this degeneracy and we can't do anything about it, the government can't say it's wrong and prevent it, then we need to take a look at what was the standard and the norm back in the day.
But it's been 15 years since this book.
Now there's a new book out.
Over almost 15 years removed from Hunter's book, things look quite a bit gloomier for Christianity in America.
Over that period, the number of religiously unaffiliated adults has almost doubled to 28%.
Weekly church attendance rates have dropped from about 40% to 30% and 80% of American adults believe religion's influence on public life is declining.
Dechristianizing trends are particularly salient among younger generations who are less likely than older Americans to believe the government should protect religious liberty.
That's because they don't believe themselves and they think we're making it up.
Especially the transgender, especially the LGBT mafia.
The LGBT mafia, they don't believe in God, a lot of them, and they certainly believe that they think that we are evil.
They have the moral high ground.
And they think that when we say we have a religious conviction, they think we're making it up just to be mean.
They think we're making it up just to oppress them.
Many of them really believe that.
They think it's a total, you know, they're atheists.
They've bought into this lie that atheism is the thing to do.
Almost half of the Gen Zers think the First Amendment should not protect hate speech, which, according to many Americans, includes religious criticism of LGBT identities and behaviors.
We inhabit an America less friendly to Christianity than was the case halfway through Obama's term as president.
Various political, cultural, and demographic trends suggest the antipathy will only grow in the years to come.
Obviously, we're being invaded at the southern border.
That has something to do with this.
It has to have something to do with this.
In Pagan America, the Decline of Christianity and the Dark Age to Come, Federalist Senior Editor John Daniel Davidson offers an even more pessimistic perspective.
He says we're already in a post-Christian society that is paganizing or re-paganizing, to take the long historical view, in ways that will make life increasingly difficult and dangerous for American Christians.
He says, or the review goes on to say, Davidson relates the number of historical anecdotes proving how blinkered this story is.
Whether we are talking about the ancient societies of the Mediterranean, pagan northern Europe, or indigenous America, all demonstrated a profound disregard for, or exploitation of, the weak and vulnerable.
Davidson cites the Vikings, the Aztecs, and the 19th century kingdom of Benin as civilizations engaging in ritual human sacrifice to appease angry, bloodthirsty gods, but there are plenty of others.
So we have come to this point where, obviously, he's saying, look, the education system is the real culprit here.
They've taken over the education system.
Now we've got to essentially bar the gates, bar the doors, because all of these people that have been brainwashed with lies and demonic influence in our education system are now about to become in charge.
They're now about to ascend to positions of power.
And they are not Christians.
They don't like Christians.
And they've been told that the reason our society is where it is, is because of Christians.
That we are the roadblocks to progress.
And I'll give you an example, one example, hypothetical.
If aliens landed tomorrow from outer space, like spaceships came down, There's a significant contingent of Christians that would say those are not aliens from Mars.
They're interdimensional demons, fallen angels, whatever.
And they would have scripture that they could point to that would support their positions.
From the Old and New Testament, by the way.
And so, all that being said, meaning that, you know, demons are real, fallen angels are real, that sort of thing, and so you would have a situation where, and again, this is a hypothetical one, although with the technology, with Bluebeam technology, who knows?
Look, Where you would have Christians reject this, whatever they had, technology or whatever new scam is being put out there, and you could easily see Christians being maligned and said, oh, you're part of the problem.
Get them!
I mean, it could happen in the flash...
It's in a moment's notice.
Also, likewise, maybe a more realistic idea.
You've got the neural leak chip.
You've got all of this transhumanism that's on the horizon, and there's going to be a significant portion of Christians across the world that are going to reject this.
Some won't, because it'll be slow, incremental.
Hey, we'll be able to cure your cancer that we gave you.
But the nanobots are going to hook up to some system and we're going to be able to read your thoughts.
I don't know.
Anyway, it'll be Christians that are going to increasingly be isolated.
It'll be Christians that'll look...
The way you look at an Amish person now in 20 years, most Christians are probably going to be looked at the way we look at an Amish person today.
Oh, they don't use electricity.
That's what's coming down the pike, and it's coming quickly.
And there will be resentment, and there will be an attempt to outlaw the preaching of the gospel, because, again, a lot of these woke pastors have helped this happen.
They've allied with the radical left.
Speech can be violence.
And because speech can be violence, well then the gospel is violent.
Because you're telling people they're sinners and they need to repent.
And they're going to hell if they don't trust in Christ.
Very offensive.
The right to not be offended.
That's what they're creating and that's what it means.
So, let's see, we keep going here more on this book about what's coming down the pike.
when the pro-religion wheels fall off.
Despite the founders' intentions, Davidson identifies trends that are observable in the 19th century and accelerating in post-World War II America undermine the nation's identity.
Several Supreme Court decisions are emblematic of this shift, Cantwell v. Connecticut in 1940, and it's forbidding of the determination by a state authority as to what is a religious cause.
Now, we did an entire show here on the Millstone Report, Was it last week or the week before when I went through Supreme Court decisions on decency laws and what was, you know, considered decent or indecent and the idea of what a purient interest is, which is a legal term, and how it basically just paved the way for where we are today.
And how, you know, the idea that you can't have decency standards, that you can't have even blasphemy laws.
Of course, we have blasphemy laws today.
It's just called hate speech.
This goes on.
So, the Supreme Court in 1940 said that the state can't determine what a religious cause is, effectively mandating a strict state religious neutrality, imposed national sacralism, and rendered government incapable of defining what is...
And it's not a religion.
Then you have Everson v.
Board of Education, 1947, decreed neither a state nor federal government can openly or secretly participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa.
This was the decision that should have rocked this country.
I know it probably did in some, but there should have been action.
There should have been an immediate...
You had your Catholic schools.
The public schools were essentially functioning as Protestant schools.
These Protestants...
Should have started their own schools.
They should have completely pulled out from the taxpayer-funded system.
All of it.
And it should have been radical to protect all of the educators.
With the exception of the Catholic schools, you had Protestant schools.
They were public schools, but they were essentially Protestant because it was a nation full of Protestants.
And then this decision comes down, and guess what?
You know, 50 years later and everything has gone to hell.
So, this is what awaits us.
This is an interesting piece.
You guys need to check it out.
What is a Christian to do?
Well, for now, the persecution of Christians in America has largely been restricted to ostracism and censorship.
Davidson projects that to change through mandatory re-education, the loss of parental rights, fines and financial penalties, and even imprisonment.
Indeed, there are already signs of this, including government persecution of Christian businesses, leveraging laws to shutter Christian foster care services, FBI targeting of pro-life activists, and federal collaboration with social media companies to restrict freedom of speech.
In light of these trends, Christians must gird themselves for a long persecution and a long fight.
Now, so, here's the deal.
Long persecution and a long fight.
Yeah, I know if that happens...
But we're trying to say that's not going to happen.
We're trying to say, look, you've got Christian red states all across this country that are passing laws outlawing transgenderism.
And yeah, they're daring the Supreme Court to do it.
And at some point, it's possible that we get a Supreme Court that says, no.
They do exactly what they did with Roe v.
Wade and they rob us of this ability.
And then that's going to be a test.
Are we really going to stand idly by it?
Most, I mean, most might say, yeah, I think we will.
You know, because we stood idly by why they murdered 50 million babies for, you know, since 74.
Why wouldn't we stand idly by when they just mutilate child after child after child and call it healthcare, removing genitals and breasts and everything else?
I don't know, we'll see.
But as of right now, Christian red states are saying, no, we're going to govern ourselves.
Local communities are saying, no, we're going to govern ourselves.
We don't care.
And that is really where the rub is going to end up.
Not to mention, we still have the Second Amendment.
Which they do want to take away.
How are they going to do that?
I don't know.
But they're going to try.
And that's the spark that they don't want.
But there's just so many...
There's just so many weapons that law-abiding citizens have in this country.
And so here's a contrast of where we were versus where we are.
Brian of Alexandria says this.
When we talk about positive world versus negative world, this is what we mean.
So positive world, 1956.
We've got Christian crosses on the skyscrapers.
Somebody was saying, hey, you know what?
This doesn't just have to be Easter.
This could be every Sunday in a Christian America.
And then we have, of course, the contrast of this on Resurrection Sunday, Easter Sunday, a transgender day of visibility.
I call upon all Americans to join in lifting up the lives and voices of transgender people when we're supposed to be exalting Christ and his triumph over death.
What a joke.
But what does this mean, positive world versus negative world?
Well, this comes from a piece by Aaron M. Wren back in February of 2022.
So two years ago, Aaron Wren wrote this story, The Three Worlds of Evangelicalism.
But before we get to those three worlds, I want to...
This opening paragraph is fascinating.
You may not agree with it all.
I don't agree with it all.
But just to kind of share you where in 2022, where Aaron M. Wren's head was when he was writing the deeply, the deep divisions in American evangelicalism today.
Says that we're divided.
And he says some evangelicals have embraced the secular turn towards social justice activism, particularly around race and immigration, accusing others of failing to reckon with the church's racist past.
Excuse me.
Others charge evangelical elites with going woke and having failed their flocks.
Some elites are denounced for abandoning historic Christian teachings on sexuality.
Others face claims of hypocrisy for supporting the serial adulterer Donald Trump.
You know, there's a huge difference here.
Last I checked, Donald Trump didn't run a campaign in 2016 and he's not running a campaign now saying, hey, adultery, it's good for everybody.
You should try it.
Actually, right now he's selling Bibles that says that they need to go into America's homes.
But, you know, you contrast that with Biden or Clinton or whatever.
Their campaign now really is abortion.
You should try it.
It's good for you.
One abortion a day keeps the doctor away.
That's their policy.
It's just not even the same.
And these squishy people in the middle that can't see this.
You have some of these people that are critical of the idea of Christian nationalism, right?
They're critical of it.
Some people say, oh, you just want a Christian prince.
But it's almost like they really do want a Christian prince because some of these guys want a perfect presidential candidate.
And again, I've got my issues with Trump.
He still won't address the vaccine elephant in the room and all that other stuff, but...
Anyway, I digress.
Put your heads back in 2022.
We're talking about the division of the church today.
Old alliances are dissolving.
Former Southern Baptist Agency head Russell Moore has left his denomination.
Political pundit David French, who we just heard from on MSNBC, Assailing Christians has become a fearsome critic of many religious conservatives who were once his allies.
Baptist Professor Owen Strahan left an establishment seminary to take a leadership position in a startup one, and some people are deconstructing their faith and leaving evangelicalism or even Christianity behind.
Where once there was a culture war between Christianity and the secular society, today there is a culture war within the evangelicalism itself.
Hence why I wrote the opening monologue that the culture war that we're trying to fight, we're getting dragged down by people who are like, did you say Christ is king?
Well, that might offend a Jewish person.
And they're falling all over themselves to try to prove that they're not a racist or they're not a bigot or they're not an anti-Semite.
And it's like, do you realize what's going on in this country?
We're literally like one spark away from the border versus our infrastructure collapsing.
I mean, versus the state of the country with the presidential election and nobody trusting the results of the election, a cascading failure where nobody has confidence in virtually all American institutions.
Our corporations are partnered with the government to disseminate this total propaganda and promote wickedness at every turn.
There's a war on for our children.
They want our children to become trans.
They're trying to depopulate us with the vaccine and with all this other stuff.
They're spraying stuff in disguise.
And we've got Connie Christians running around like, oh!
You can't say that.
You can't say Christ is king.
That may offend a Jewish person, or that is anti-Semitic.
If you say it, you know, we need to figure out, like, when you tweeted that, what was your mindset?
Were you really saying Christ is Lord, or were you saying it to be, you know, to be a troll, right?
And the truth of the matter, no one really knows.
No one can know.
I mean, except God himself.
So...
I don't know.
I don't understand why a Christian felt this knee-jerk reaction to do what they did.
You know, when Kanye West, who we compared Kanye West to the parable of the sower where the seed gets sown in the bad soil and it eventually sprouts up and then it withers away, and Kanye's faith, you know, that seems to be what has happened.
This is just my speculation.
But when Kanye West came out with his album, Jesus is King, is that what it was?
Jesus is King.
I didn't know if Kanye West was a true Christian.
I didn't know if his conversion was real.
I hoped it was.
I know family members that were praying for Kanye West, believe it or not.
But was I happy that millions of people were going and Googling the phrase, Jesus is King as a Christian?
100% I was.
100% I was.
That was a good day.
Christ is King is trending.
At the same time, Candace Owens is fired and Ben Shapiro is upset.
The Daily Wire is upset and there's a war in Israel.
There's two Jewish rabbis that have been made to look like fools.
Oh no!
And it's the week before Easter.
Oh no!
All the while, Mordor was plotting to recognize transgenders on Easter while Christians are taking fire from other Christians.
It's got to stop, man.
It's ridiculous.
As a father who's trying to protect his family from what I see coming, which is basically churches on fire, it's got to stop.
Here is the negative world thing I was telling you about, and then we've got to go to break.
So Aaron M. Wren, he has these three statuses of where we were versus where we are, where we're going.
Positive worlds.
So the definition of positive world is society at large retains a mostly positive view of Christianity.
To be known as a good church-going man remains part of being an upstanding citizen.
Publicly being a Christian is a status enhancer.
Can you imagine?
That used to be a thing.
Christian moral norms are the basic moral norms of society, and violating them can bring negative consequences, even laws against it.
Neutral world.
Society takes a neutral stance toward Christianity.
Christianity no longer has privileged status, but is not disfavored.
Being publicly known as a Christian has neither a positive nor a negative impact on one's social status.
Christianity is a valid option within a pluralistic public square.
Christian moral norms retain some residual effect.
Now this was from 1994 to 2014.
So I'm just thinking...
Somebody that was born in 84.
You know, I had 10 years of positive world.
And I guess basically it ends with Reagan and Clinton.
Reagan-Bush Clinton.
94 to 2014, we're a neutral world.
But in 2014, Aaron M. Wren says it all changed in 2014.
Negative world.
Society has come to have a negative view of Christianity.
Being known as a Christian is a social negative, particularly in the elite domains of society.
Christian morality is expressly repudiated and is seen as a threat to the public good.
And the new public moral order, which is based on the worship of man, not God.
Subscribing to Christian moral views or violating the secular moral order brings negative consequences, which we have seen in censorship, loss of jobs, employment, etc.
This is the Millstone Report.
The other day, Stu Peters sat down with Jeffrey Tucker specifically talking about censorship, talking about Katanji Brown Jackson saying that the First Amendment is really hamstringing the government's ability to police speech.
So Stu sat down with Jeffrey Tucker to talk more about that.
We're going to take a break and listen to that.
Don't go anywhere.
back in just a moment.
You see, she's doing well at what she's told, like the rest of D.C.
She's good at following orders to use the Supreme Court to chip away at our founding documents and crush dissent, whether it's online or on programs like this one or elsewhere.
And when she started complaining about the Constitution hamstringing the government and getting in the way of her mission to crush the American people, she let the mask slip.
Not just a little bit, but all the way.
She reminded us all what she and so many others are really doing behind the most powerful levers of American government.
Jeffrey Tucker seems to agree with us and he joins us now.
Jeffrey, this is a Supreme Court justice speaking from the bench saying, yep, nope, the Constitution, it's really getting in the way of this authoritarian dictatorial mandate that I want to usher in.
She doesn't understand the Constitution, but I think that's her job and that's why she was appointed.
That's really important to remember.
Her job on the Supreme Court is to defend the administrative state and the totalitarian state at all costs.
And she was trusted with that job, not because she's a black woman.
I don't believe that that's why she was hired.
I think when Biden said he wanted to appoint a black woman, he was describing And the reason is that in 2018 she was the very first federal district judge in DC who rejected Trump's executive orders that would have done something, at least taken the first steps, towards restraining the civil service.
He issued three executive orders and she sent two of them back and that was a signal that she could be trusted.
And so, you know, Trump administration kept that up and at the end of his term issued that executive order on Schedule F that would have reclassified, it was the most aggressive one, would have reclassified a bunch of administrative state employees as controllable by the elected president.
Biden's first action in office was to get rid of that executive order.
So, when he appointed Jackson, it was a matter of finding somebody that they could really trust.
This is, for them, an existential issue.
You have to have an administrative state with autonomous power separate from the voting public in order to conduct what they want, which is to have a completely censored internet and a completely controlled society on behalf of big tech, big media, big pharma.
And big government.
They can't stand democracy.
She's just doing her job.
When she raised fundamental questions about the First Amendment, acting as if she'd never heard of it before, tell me, what do you mean by this First Amendment?
Wouldn't that be bad?
Wouldn't that be able to restrain the government?
You know, this is all just You know, faux naivety on her part.
Her job is to defend the government and the administrative state and the deep state against the people and against freedom itself.
That's her job, and everybody knows it.
You said faux naivety, so do you believe that it's not that she doesn't understand the Constitution, but more so that she fully understands it, but it's her job to circumvent the Constitution?
I do believe that.
I think she understands that that's her task, and she's wired to do that.
You know, that's how she got the job.
And she's just following through with her job description, which was easily referred into her years, years ago.
I mean, she was rewarded for the job she did as federal district judge in D.C. with a Supreme Court appointment, and nobody could...back down against it because, yeah, because of all the reasons you said.
I mean, she's perceived to be a diversity hire and all this kind of stuff.
But all that was just window dressing.
What's really an issue is the power of the administrative state and the fear that the Trump administration was going to eat into the autonomy of the civil service.
And that's what they want to protect at all costs.
I mean, look at...
Caesar!
Julius Caesar of Rome, the emperor.
I am also a female.
Does anybody here believe that?
That I am Julius Caesar?
Anybody believe that?
No?
Of course not.
It's ridiculous.
I'm not Caesar.
I'm not a woman either.
I'm here as a father who loves his children, who loves his country.
And I'm here to talk about this duty of a school board and the Department of Education.
Your duty is to act in the best interest of children.
It is to teach truth, not lies.
Facts, not fiction.
Biology, not a social agenda.
As taxpayers, we deserve to have our children taught what we pay for.
And it's not anyone's social agenda, whether it be right or left.
It's about the children.
It's about the children.
And that's what we all love.
And these children that are born into our custody, we have a duty to protect them.
And we have a duty to nurture them to their own self-actualization when they can declare whatever sexuality they want to be.
And we will love them.
No matter what it be.
It doesn't matter.
So that's, you know, there's a lot of people that agree with that exact sentiment.
Obviously we agree, hey, yeah, we've got to protect the kids.
So we agree.
Me and Roman Soldier, Dad, we agree.
Got to protect the kids.
But the other half of that, well, you know, once they're of age, then they can decide for themselves.
It's just, you know, you don't have to qualify.
We have to, and I don't even think he really, I mean, I'm sure he believes it.
We will love you.
But look, it's missing the point.
It's missing the point that normalizing these type of degenerate lifestyles, sodomite lifestyles as an adult has led to the sexualization of kids.
And so it's just totally...
This guy doesn't really get it.
The people that subscribe to this live and let live, this type of philosophy, you're not understanding us.
You're not understanding why we are where we are.
You're really trying to take a step, just a small step up the slippery slope when if you really, really want to actually get on level ground, you have to go way back and say, no, no, no.
We're not going to say that.
We're not going to say, oh, you can just decide to be whatever sex you are, whatever you think you want to be.
You can be that, but you've got to be an adult first.
No.
Because it's leading to sicker and sicker things.
And people are not understanding.
That Roman soldier dad does not understand the slippery slope.
I appreciate what he's doing.
He's trying to stand up for kids, but he doesn't understand the slippery slope.
And so we've got to educate folks about that.
Speaking of sodomite lifestyles, we're going to share this screen with you.
I don't know if you guys are following the Puff Daddy, the Puff Diddler.
The Puff did do something.
He did something.
This is Meek Mill.
He's a rapper.
And allegedly that Puff Daddy...
If you have kids in the room, I'm not going to get super graphic, but viewer discretion is advised.
Allegedly, Meek Mill and Puff Daddy basically assaulted Meek Mill, and he allowed it to happen.
There's audio out there, which I will not play for you.
A bodyguard claims that he got the audio of the encounter.
And it's bad.
It's bad.
And then there's video of Meek Mill in a swimming pool, allegedly directly after the incident.
He's clearly in a lot of pain.
And Frankie Stocks over at National File is writing, even gay people don't want to be known as gay because it's so disgusting.
So Meek Mill, the rapper, is repeatedly now insisting that he's not gay.
And this is causing, this is really funny, that it's causing the liberal outlets reporting on this story.
So the liberal outlets are reporting on this story about Puff Daddy and the sex trafficking with kid gloves.
They're more reporting on Meek Mill denying that he's gay.
And they're saying that it's coming across as homophobic.
You know, he's denying that he's gay just a little bit too hard.
He's a little bit too offended that people are calling him gay with Sean Puff, Daddy, Diddler, Combs.
Isn't that interesting?
This whole thing to me does not...
I cannot wrap my head around this, folks.
I can't wrap my head around this.
As somebody who grew up in 90s culture, kind of grew up with this hip-hop, subconsciously I think I knew that there was a war on men, there was a war on masculinity, but the last bastion of acceptable masculinity was the black American man.
You were allowed to be masculine.
You were allowed to, you know, exert yourself in a masculine way over culture, society, women.
And it was the last one, the last acceptable, and turns out all the, not all, but turns out a great deal of the men, the black men leading this movement, hip-hop, rap, whatever, are gay.
I cannot wrap my head around it.
I mean, the word irony just doesn't even begin to describe how wild that is.
I mean, it's not just P. Diddy.
You've got accusations that Will Smith is gay.
It has been for a very long time.
And it's all a giant scam.
And look, I know everything's fake.
I know everything's a lie.
I get it.
But even I'm surprised sometimes.
I just can't wrap my head around this scandal.
I can wrap my head around P. Diddy being the Jeffrey Epstein of the hip-hop being the black Jeffrey Epstein.
I can wrap my head around that.
These are all really just reinventions of the Hugh Hefner playboy mansion where you've got to get sicker and sicker and sicker.
But, I mean, who knew that all the...
I guess that's the blackmail, right?
Like, you know, for a politician, it's like, hey, let's get him with an underage girl or let's get him with an underage boy or let's get him with a child, right?
We've got the blackmail forever.
I guess because the black image was masculine and, you know, womanizer and da-da-da, like the best blackmail you could have on another black man is him engaged in sodomy.
I guess that's the best blackmail for that particular industry.
So if you want to make it, you want to be successful, you've got to give them that blackmail.
And, again, I just can't wrap my head around it.
But, you know, Mike Tyson seemed to be hip to the whole idea.
He was on one of the Wayans Brothers shows, P. Diddy, P. Diddler, and it went something like this.
It truly is about the Benjamin, as we see.
Oh, yes, he's literally.
It truly is about the Benjamin.
Well, now when we come back, we're gonna talk more with Puffy, and if you wanna hang out, more than welcome, stick around, my brother.
Alright?
We'll be right back with more right after this.
It truly is about the Benjamin, as we see.
Oh yes, he's glittering.
Well, now when we come back, we're gonna talk more with Puffy, and if you wanna hang out, more than welcome, stick around, my brother.
Alright?
We'll be right back with more right after this.
It truly is about the Benjamin, as we see.
Oh yes, he's glittering.
Well, now...
Now, I mean, you know, people are saying, look, was he just talking about the diamond rings on his hand or what?
But, I don't know.
You be the judge.
You be the judge on that one.
I just can't.
I can't figure it out.
I just can't wrap my mind around it.
Like, I mean, we shouldn't be surprised.
I mean, maybe this is showing my racial bias that I just...
I don't know.
I mean, it's like, you know, we saw the sodomy, or we saw the blurred version of it in the Senate chambers that was recorded in the Senate, you know, the Senate staffer, and it's like, oh my gosh, yeah, they're all degenerates.
I mean, it's just like Madison Cawthorn said, right?
Right.
All these people who are in positions of power are really just sick, sick, creepy perverts, wicked, evil perverts.
And we know what Hollywood's been doing, too.
We get all of that.
The same thing goes for them.
And it's not that I didn't think that the rap industry, the hip-hop industry, wasn't full of moral degenerates.
But I just never assumed they were gay.
I mean, you know how many...
I don't know.
I don't know.
I was having this conversation with a friend last night.
I was like, I just can't wrap my head around this.
That the blacks on top of these industries, that all of these other black people, they consume.
They consume the records.
They consume the culture.
And I don't think the average person that's listening to Meek Mill, I don't think the average black guy that likes him is like, oh, that's my favorite rapper.
I don't think that that guy's gay.
It just goes to show you just how much disdain.
Like, the mask is coming off.
I mean, the same thing went with Barack Obama.
You know, like, the media told a lot of people.
A lot of people, when Trump came into office, they didn't care anything about the presidency until the media told them that Trump wasn't a decent man and we used to have decent men in the White House.
And they were never decent.
Obama was never decent.
They were just faking it all.
Just like these celebrities.
These celebrities can't come out and say that, you know, they're transgender.
And they have been.
These celebrities can't come out and say that they're all really gay and that these arranged Hollywood couples are not heterosexual.
They're not normal at all.
They prefer the opposite sex.
They can't come out and say that.
At least they couldn't because they knew that the American people weren't like them.
But now the mask is off and they're just revealing, yeah, yeah.
Homosexuality used to be something that was kept in the closet.
and now it's not transgenderism likewise used to be kept in the closet how many people have been transgender from birth by their sick twisted parents and we never knew about it honest question because now it's out in the open for all to see speaking of out in the open for all to see This tweet by National
File caught my attention.
This is a tweet of a video.
Well, I'll just read it first.
National File is writing that Warp Speed was actually done by the NSA, the National Security Agency.
And this is because Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
recently went on the Russell Brand podcast.
And while there, detail that the entire thing was an intelligence department of defense operation and that Pfizer and Moderna actually didn't come up with any of the vaccines.
And the reality is that the government created the vaccines and paid the drug companies to say that they were from them.
The subversion of a private corporation that was happy to do it because it was evil anyway.
And then obviously Dr.
Judy Mikevitz, who's been a frequent guest on Stu Peters.
So let's take a look at this video, shall we?
Again, I thought this was pretty interesting stuff.
I mean, a lot of the Stu Peters audience already knows it.
But it was fascinating to see it, these two clips side by side.
The top organization that had managed Warp Speed was not HHS, which is a public health agency.
It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA. It was the NSA, a spy agency.
That was the top agency, the lead agency on Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic.
And the second agency was the Pentagon.
As it turns out, you know, the vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer.
They were developed by NIH. They're their own.
The patents are owned 50% by NIH. Nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or by Moderna.
They were manufactured by military contractors.
And basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry.
Let's look at your thoughts on Operation Warp Speed there, ma'am.
It's not warp speed.
It's been happening since June 10, 1980, when I walked in that military installation called Fort Detrick.
They just turned the sign around with then-President Richard Nixon.
Oh, we're just going to cure cancer.
No, we always just turn the sign around on the bioweapons lab.
They made it a historic landmark right there at Fort Detrick, where they had the gas chamber for the end.
Where we had the beautiful...
They put the plaque up there when we built the new lab.
It's all in plague of corruption.
It's not warp speed.
All of those people are protecting themselves because the government.
And they played the game.
I don't care whether it's Deborah Birx or Robert Redfield.
They injected the military with HIV in the 90s and they know it.
HIV, PNL43. I know the plasmid.
I know the exact one.
I know the people they injected it in.
So when you see all of that...
All of this, I mean, while I think the P. Diddy Combs blackmail sex operation for intelligence agencies is a thing, the intelligence agency, you know, needs to be paid attention to, but when you hear that, it's like, wow, what a distraction that could be compared to what we're really facing, right?
But again, it's all the intelligence agencies.
It all seems to come back to intel agencies, whether it's the NSA, the CIA, Mossad, it all comes back to that.
So we're an occupied country, and we've been occupied.
The intelligence agencies, the apparatus, have been completely exposed.
And they mask us off, and they know that we know, and we know that they know, and what's going to happen?
What will happen?
As we now have the technology to enslave ourselves, and many people think we already are enslaved by that technology that's monitoring everything I say, everything you say, everything we do online, Huh.
Something to think about.
And with all that, and as discouraging as that can be, the truth of the matter is that the enemy, and I'm talking about the enemies of God here in the corporeal flesh, the ones in some other realm, the spiritual forces...
Even they're plotting all of his stuff to worship themselves or worship the devil or take people's focus off of God and who he is, his justice, his morality, his love for sinners, his ability to save sinners.
All of their plans.
are happening under his authority, meaning he is allowing it to happen and he wins in the end.
We win in the end.
And their evil plans will not prosper when everything is all said and done.
That's the encouraging thing that I can leave you with today, is that in spite of all this, in spite of the Christian infighting, which I hope is going to resolve itself, in spite of their plan to put Christians in boxcars, we serve a powerful God who sees all of this and equips his people,
provides for his people, goes before his people in all of these situations to Whether in the fire, through the fire, being delivered from the fire, whatever it is, the forces of evil are actually spinning their wheels.
And they don't know it.
That's all the time we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
I hope that this broadcast finds you well and your family well.
Be safe out there.
God bless you.
And we'll see you tomorrow night.
▲
Export Selection