All Episodes
Previous Next
March 26, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
01:00:14
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Baltimore Bridge DESTROYED, Voddie Baucham Neutrality Not An Option
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All I know is everybody loves me.
Now swing into my own sound.
Glasses in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody loves me.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much for being with us.
As always, can't do this show without you.
Tragedy struck the nation of Russia on Friday, the 22nd of March.
I'm sure you've heard about it.
We didn't cover it yesterday because we had the whole Christ is King trending story to cover.
They were attacked by terrorists who went into the Crocus City Hall complex and gunned down 100 people.
Over 100 Russians were killed and 100 or so more are wounded.
We're going to watch a little bit of it, but viewer discretion is advised.
Thank you.
It's horrifying and you can find a lot more out there on the internet if you're so inclined.
I wanted to play that for you because I wanted you to try to put yourself in a Russian's shoes, in a human being's shoes.
We're of course not seeing the Russian flags posted in social media profile pics the way you would any other tragedy like this where the mainstream media would be Urging everybody to stand in solidarity with the Russians and the Russian people.
That's not happening because Putin is bad, we're told.
Vladimir Putin, speaking of Vladimir Putin, he is now blaming the West and he is not buying the NATO narrative that this was somehow the resurgence of ISIS. ISIS, of course, is a terrorist group that is reportedly, was reportedly, is reportedly, because I say was because they were supposed to be destroyed.
They were created by the American CIA under the direction of Barack Obama.
Curiously, last week we reported that Obama was in the United Kingdom, rubbing elbows with England's government elites, including Prime Minister Roushi Sunak.
Remember this from last week?
President Obama, are you worried that Putin will rule forever?
Do you want to see him on the TVB stage, Mr Obama?
Are you worried?
That's a curious question, isn't it?
Are you worried that Vladimir Putin is going to rule forever, they say?
Curious question that was asked there by a gang of planted reporters centered around Putin and whether or not he will rule forever.
At the same time, many speculated that Obama was there before the terrorist attack in Russia.
Many speculated that Obama was there to get his story straight with UK intelligence officials because of a United States congressional inquiry requesting documents that reportedly directly implicate Obama in the spying on Trump campaign allies.
As a matter of fact, last week when I guest-hosted for Stu Peters, guest George Papadopoulos, who's very familiar with being framed for treason, concluded that this was the likely reason Obama was in the UK, to cover up his involvement in illegal spying against a rival political opponent's to cover up his involvement in illegal spying against a rival
However, only a few days later, the Russian people were plunged into a bloody terror attack and now the White House insists it was ISIS. So the question being asked now is this.
Was Obama really in the UK to secure plans?
To shore up plans?
To make Putin pay?
To make the Russian people pay for strategically embarrassing NATO and the West and effectively winning the war against Ukraine?
Was this terrorist attack really backed by the West to make Putin pay?
The reporter that you just heard outside of 10 Downing Street seemed to think Putin was a relevant point of their discussion.
It was the first question he asked when Obama came out of 10 Downing Street.
Now, we don't know anything for sure.
But this morning, Americans awoke to the news that the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore has been totally or partially destroyed, but it's collapsed.
Overnight, after a ship lost control, lost power at least twice, and crashed into a vital support column.
Now, how did this happen exactly?
Well, according to popular posts on X, the bridge collapsing that you see in front of you, many are rushing to blame diversity, equity, and inclusion hiring practices as the reason why the bridge collapsed.
And we'll detail why that's not the case here in a minute.
And while I agree that diversity, equity, and inclusion hiring practices is a very serious problem and will result, if it hasn't already, in the loss of American lives, this explanation just seems way too simple to me.
The Russian Federation is under the assumption that Ukraine, the West, NATO, and the United States of America just sent Tajik terrorists, which, by the way, Tajiks have been known to be recruited by Ukraine to fight Russians, Tajiks have been known to be recruited by Ukraine to fight Russians, Putin thinks that we sent Tajiks deep into their country with the sole goal to kill and murder
A few days later, a ship loses power twice and then appears to accelerate, although some say they were trying to throw the ship in reverse.
Nevertheless, the bridge is completely gone.
The bridge has collapsed.
America, depends on who you talk to.
America has been under attack for a very long time.
We've seen cyber attacks.
It's basically a monthly occurrence now.
Last month, pharmacies across the country could not fill prescriptions because their software had been hacked.
That affected me directly, by the way.
pharmacists was blaming Russia which I thought was interesting food plants across the country have been catching fire left and right this has been happening for years now we have fertilizer plants that'll explode and major train derailments are now commonplace in American life we all remember East Palestine or East Palestine rather uh Ohio
I don't have any evidence that this, what you're seeing on your screen here, is the Russians retaliating against us.
But the idea that this ship was targeted via cyber attack and steered into the bridge must be investigated.
And of course our government lies to us all the time.
So good luck getting any actual answers that you can rely on.
And of course, it's also possible that this is a big false flag to get the U.S. into a direct confrontation with Russia.
But I would say if that were the case, you would think we would have politicians clamoring for war all day today.
So far, calls to send American troops into the Russian meat grinder.
I haven't heard them anywhere.
Now, General Michael Flynn tweeted that this, what you're seeing on your screen, is actually a black swan event, which reminded me of what Katherine Herridge said right before she was fired from CBS at the end of last year.
Remember this?
Well, mine's a little dark.
I just feel a lot of concern that 2024 may be the year of a black swan event.
This is a national security event with high impact that's very hard to predict.
There are a number of concerns that I have that factor into that.
Not only this sort of enduring heightened threat level that we're facing, the wars in Israel, also Ukraine.
And we're so divided in this country in ways that we haven't seen before.
And I think that just creates fertile ground for our adversaries like North Korea, China and Iran.
And again, this made news on a lot of dissident platforms.
People saying, what does she know?
and then you have other people speculating that that's what's happening And I think a lot of people are speculating this because they remember what happened the last election year.
We remember what happened in 2020.
We remember the pandemic.
We remember everything that they did.
And here it is.
You know, we're almost April.
It's almost April and things are just seem to be getting worse and worse, accelerating, especially when it comes to the rhetoric from the West.
There is literally, I mean, we have NATO now that is in complete denial of the situation on the ground.
They just refuse to admit, but Putin has essentially humiliated them.
And a lot of people are waiting for, you know, what's next?
What's the next shoe that's going to drop?
Now, General Michael Flynn has been talking about a Black Swan event as well.
This is what he tweeted.
Quote, this is a Black Swan event.
What you're seeing on your screen, Flynn says, is a Black Swan event.
And he says, black swans normally come out of the world of finance, not military.
The standard operating procedures for all U.S. ports, harbors, and bays that transit commerce and military activities are supposed to maintain an incredible level of discipline, rigor, and awareness for these very type of events not to occur ever, he says.
So a black swan event, the idea that something will happen that people just have never thought of will happen.
He says, yet here we are, there are harbormasters for every single one of these transit points in America that are in charge of assuring the safety of navigation start there, meaning in an investigation start there.
So we're going to go to the screen here.
We're going to analyze a few things.
But first off, here's a tweet from somebody named I mean, therefore I am.
They highlight that our supposed friends from Ukraine are enjoying the news of 20 Americans missing after the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore.
They're claiming it's punishment for not sending them more billions of our tax dollars.
So, you know, there's legislation in Congress right now that's not...
It's sending more money to Ukraine.
It is sending it to Israel, but not to Ukraine.
And so we have a tweet right here that you see on your screen here.
It says, Well done.
Instead of giving Ukraine missiles and F-16s to destroy the Crimean Bridge, they destroyed their own.
This is solidarity.
We hope this victim is in memory of the terrorist attack in Kroka City.
Then we have this one.
Punishment for Pindos for chewing snot and leaving Ukraine to its mercy.
And again, interpret those the way you want to interpret those, but I find it extremely interesting.
We have people putting out the idea that if you're going to quit sending Ukraine money, then you deserve to have your bridges blown up.
Who knows?
Maybe this is Ukraine.
This could be Ukraine doing this to America or the intelligence forces that back Ukraine in order to blame it on Russia.
Who knows at this point?
And again, it could just be a simple user error.
It could just be that the ship was old and it lost control and it, you know, took out an entire bridge.
What an interesting place.
It's like the exact...
I didn't realize...
Are all bridges that fragile?
I mean, if one column gets hit, the whole thing goes down.
Honest question.
I don't know.
I'm not a structural engineer.
But it just seems like this thing hit exactly where it needed to to come crashing down.
But Nick says World War III is actually the entire world versus the American people.
Something to think about.
Really not that hard to think about.
If the rest of the world comes to the conclusion that COVID-19, for example, wasn't just from a lab leak in China, and they say that if they realize it was actually developed by gain-of-function scientists like Ralph Baric in the United States with the Department of Defense's backing, yeah, you and they say that if they realize it was actually developed by gain-of-function scientists like Ralph Baric in the United States with the Department of lists.
Just in, officials stopped cars.
Now this is good news.
Colin Rugg said that officials began to stop cars from crossing the Francis Scott Key Bridge just moments before the cargo ship collided, saving lots of lives.
According to Maryland Governor Wes Moore, the ship used a mayday call before colliding.
The workers on the bridge jumped into action, halted traffic, saving many lives.
Quote, this ship issued a mayday loss of power.
The workers on the bridge halted traffic right before impact.
They saved a lot of lives.
Six people remain missing.
Two have been rescued and sent to the hospital.
Again, we're talking about this bridge collapsing.
Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, the president of Judicial Watch, saying the video seems to show a repeated power loss on the ship just before it was destroyed, or just before it destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge.
This is obviously sped up.
You can look at the speed of the cars going across the bridge.
There's power loss one.
Okay.
And now we have...
Let's see here.
You know what's interesting?
Here's the recovery.
Their lights come back on.
And then it seems to steer into the bridge.
And then thick smoke.
Now some people are saying that that thick smoke...
We're going to get a better...
Let's get a better look at this.
Let's get a better look at this.
I've got several angles of this as we analyze exactly what happened.
Let's see.
Which one is this one?
This is more of a close-up.
And here's more of a longer cut, I think.
Yeah, we can back that up a little bit.
And I don't know.
I know nothing about shipping.
I know nothing if it takes a long time for it to turn.
Actually, this is the real-time speed.
It's not sped up.
Is this one the one that's a little bit more sped up, I think?
Let's see here.
Yeah, this might be a little bit clearer.
So it loses power.
Again, it's sped up, but it loses power there.
And then at some point, the power is up.
And now we see the black smoke coming up.
And then it eventually crashes into the pillar.
Then it loses power again there.
And does it regain power at the last second?
And then we have the imminent collapse...
Let's see if we can get a better angle here.
Yeah, there it goes.
And then here comes the bridge.
You know, what's fascinating to me about this, because I really don't...
You know, a lot of people are saying that the loss of power could mean that it's a cyber attack.
What I would like to know is, is it possible that they were shutting the power off because...
I mean, if it was a cyber attack...
And again, I'm just spitballing here.
I don't know.
But is it possible that they were intentionally killing the power so that they could try to re-control the system?
Let's say it was some cyber attack.
We just have to consider all possibilities.
Let's say that it was potentially a cyber attack.
And they knew they didn't have control of the ship, and so they were trying to power it down to restart it to get control of the ship again.
That's a possibility as well.
And, you know, when you see the black smoke, though, you've got to wonder...
If we go over here...
Let's see if I can't...
You know, what I would like to know is if the...
Let's do that right there.
Again, this is the Tom Fitton one.
When you see that black smoke go up, is that acceleration right there?
Is that acceleration?
Or is that them trying to throw the ship in reverse?
Again, we just simply don't know.
There's so much speculation on this right now that we don't know what is what.
Then we have this tweet over here.
This is Joel Webin who's from Right Response Ministries.
And he says that World War III has been underway for a while now.
People just don't notice it.
This is because it's not a war being fought in the traditional sense.
Instead of soldiers and tanks, it's hackers infiltrating systems.
But recognize both methods have the destructive power to take out a bridge.
Technological, psychological warfare.
And he's specifically referring to that.
So, what does it say about the state of our country?
Whether this was a cyber attack, a retaliation, let's just say it was intentional.
Whether this was an intentional attack against American infrastructure or not, and the American citizens, because, you know, people are missing, presumed dead.
What does it say that the American people, because this is all over X, and I know X isn't just like, I know whatever's on X doesn't mean that's what the majority believe, but it just seems to me there are so many people that just have this intuition.
That this is an attack against our country.
That this is potentially a retaliation for what's going on in other parts of the world.
What does that say about us?
It seems like there are so many Americans, I think, that believe that we are in the midst.
We're an occupied government.
We're being governed by tyrants.
And I think the rest of the world, I think the idea is that we kind of know the rest of the world knows.
It's like an unspoken secret at this point.
It's like an unspoken secret at this point.
And it's just absolutely, you know, World War III, we talk about it all the time.
You hear about it all the time.
You wonder, is it going to go hot at some point?
And maybe this is the beginning of that.
I honestly don't know.
I don't know.
But then you get, you know, we get stuff like this where we have to, you know, Well, mine's a little dark.
I just feel a lot of concern.
We have people talking.
A lot of people think Catherine Herridge.
I don't know Catherine Herridge.
A lot of people think Catherine Herridge is a great reporter.
A lot of people think Catherine Herridge is intelligent, just like every other reporter, meaning like every other one or all of them.
They think that she's intelligence.
And so you hear this.
The year of a black swan event.
Yeah.
This is a national security event with high impact that's very hard to predict.
There are a number of concerns that I have that factor into that.
Not only this sort of enduring heightened threat level that we're facing, the wars in Israel, also Ukraine.
And we're so divided in this country in ways that we haven't seen before.
And I think that just creates fertile ground for our adversaries like North Korea, China and Iran.
President Obama, why should we care about democracy in Russia?
Will you speak to us?
Come and have a chat with us for a minute.
How did it go?
What did you talk about?
President Obama, are you worried that Putin will rule forever?
Do you want to give him a moment to the BBC, Mr Obama?
President Obama, why should we care about democracy in Russia?
Okay, are you worried that Putin will rule forever?
Why should we care about democracy in Russia?
This was a week ago.
A few days later, on the 22nd, this happens in Russia.
So that happens in Russia, and in the United States, they blame ISIS, and in the United States, they blame ISIS, which we thought ISIS was gone.
We thought ISIS was over with.
Right.
And, look, everybody, like, if you're on, if you are a thinking person and you remember, if you're in the media and you remember, like I do, I remember covering the Obama administration ad nauseum, and I remember the Middle East, I remember the conflict in Syria, I remember Iraq, I remember ISIS. We all remember ISIS. And we all remember how that was the new focus of, we've got to defeat ISIS, Obama said.
But, I mean, the reports came out that ISIS was a creation, that we were arming ISIS. We liked ISIS better than the Syrian forces that were loyal to Bashar al-Assad.
I mean, this has so much context.
You could go down this rabbit hole for a very long time if you remember the conflict, you remember the hatred they had.
For Bashar al-Assad, similar now to the hatred they have for Vladimir Putin.
Of course, back then it was more like we're just going to keep this to a proxy war.
We know the Russians are supporting Assad.
And yet, this was one of the first times when my eyes were actually opened.
My eyes actually were opened during this ISIS situation from a Christian standpoint.
When I realized, and at the time I didn't know this, because you just don't hear a lot about the Middle East or...
This was back in the days before Drudge Report was completely co-opted and turned into what they were.
Everybody got their news from Drudge.
Drudge essentially curated talk radio for years, for a decade or more.
Just for decades.
That's what the Drudge Report did.
What it did was it made talk radio hosts like myself at the time just basically...
Let's just say it made it easier to do our jobs on a daily basis.
It made it easier to fill content for a three-hour radio show or whatever have you.
And I remember with Obama and ISIS and Bashar al-Assad specifically, the knowledge, when I found out that there were Christians, Christian villages in Syria, and Christian villages in Syria, and you can look this up, that Bashar al-Assad, this guy we were told was a total dictator, horrible, barbarian, gassed his own people, although that came later, or the false allegation that he gasses on people came later, that there
or the false allegation that he gases on people came later, that there was this civil war in Syria, and the United States decided to back the faction that was going in to Christian villages and murdering pregnant Christians, murdering and the United States decided to back the faction that was going in to Christian murdering Christian households.
When I found that out, and the evidence was there that we were—that's who we were supporting as a Christian, that's where it just couldn't do it anymore.
You know what I mean?
That's when I started kind of down this path, I really do feel like, of just not accepting the neocon lines and everything else and realizing, hey, there's something much more insidious at work here.
Because the United States of America is supporting people who are murdering Christians, supporting people who are murdering those of us who claim Christ.
And this really kind of dovetails into everything that we've seen happen over the last seven days concerning Candace Owens and everything else.
Somebody being outspoken for their faith and then getting fired for it.
And we're going to actually have an update on that story coming up here in just a moment.
So yeah, it's very interesting that you have Obama in the UK, and then Obama doesn't say anything, but the reporters say, hey, Russia, Vladimir Putin, is he going to be a dictator forever?
And then a few days later, this terrorist attack happens against the Russians.
And now Americans, again, wake up this morning to this.
We wake up this morning to the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.
And, you know, one of the things that we haven't talked about is the name Francis Scott Key.
Francis Scott Key, of course, is the writer and the composer.
Was he the composer and the writer?
I mean, I know he wrote the lyrics.
Now, I don't think he wrote the actual notes, but he wrote the words, right?
Oh, say can you see by the dawn's early light, right?
He wrote our national anthem.
He wrote the words to our national anthem.
That's the other thing.
That's why this seems to have a lot more significance than some random bridge that's been...
We're supposed to believe that this was just an accident and it just happened to be a bridge named after the author of our national anthem.
It's just you're asking people to suspend disbelief.
That's why Americans across the country, the intuition that we have is that this was somehow deliberate.
Who did it?
I don't know.
Could it be a false flag?
Yeah.
Could it be retaliation?
Yeah.
And my gut feeling has been that it's been like this soft...
It's like a Cold War, but it's just like...
It's not really cold because it has gone hot in some places, but it's just like we're not willing to ratchet everything up to full nuclear war.
It's just kind of a tit-for-tat, this incursion, this little battle, this little battle.
I don't know.
You tell me what you think.
Maybe I'm nuts.
But when I woke up to this, you just think...
And remember Nord Stream.
That's the other thing we have to forget.
The idea that Russia, whether we did it or not, which I think we did...
Russia believes that we sent Tajik terrorists, who are known to be recruited by Ukraine, to fight against Russia.
They believe that we, the NATO West, the United States, the CIA, whatever, that we're responsible for killing Russian civilians.
That's what Putin believes.
And then you look at the Nord Stream Pipeline.
What we did by not only destroying the Nord Stream Pipeline, but then having the audacity to blame Russia for it.
And, you know, you think that somebody like Vladimir Putin is just going to forever just say, oh, okay, yeah, we're not going to do anything about that.
We're not going to retaliate about that.
You can do all of this stuff.
You can murder our own people, but we can't murder yours.
That's just not how the world works.
That's not how war works.
So, you know, tell me what you think.
Sound off in the comments.
What do you think?
What was your first thought when you saw the Francis Scott Keybridge, when you saw this video of this boat?
It looks like it accelerates.
Some people think, no, it was trying to decelerate.
I don't know, but it loses power twice.
Is it as simple?
Maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe it is diversity, equity, and inclusion hiring practices.
Although, and I told you I was going to debunk that, so let me debunk that right now.
If you go to Frankie Stocks and his X account.
Let me do that real quick.
I want to do that before we go.
Here we go, yeah.
So Frankie got the breakdown of the...
Let me see here.
He actually got the breakdown of the ship.
It's called the Dolly.
Yeah.
Matter of fact, we're going to do it when we come back because we're up against hardback.
So when we come back, we're going to get this tweet.
Over, I guess yesterday, there's a great segment between Stu Peters on this very issue with Peter Quinones.
And they were talking about this terrorist attack in Russia.
That's what we're going to listen to when we go to break.
Peter Quinones on the Stu Peters show from yesterday.
It's a great segment.
We're going to take a break.
Don't go anywhere.
We'll be back here in just a moment.
For knowledge of this latest attack.
Yeah, earlier this month, the State Department actually put out a notice warning Americans in Russia to stay away from concert halls, telling them there might be a terrorist attack at a concert hall.
And what do you know?
That's exactly what happened.
Peter Arquinones joins us now to share more on this.
Peter, I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist here, but it's looking less and less like ISIS carried this out, and more and more like the CIA did this in the name of ISIS, using them as a scapegoat.
What say you?
History tells us that this is just a game plan.
If you look at pre-9-11, 2001, reporters who were there said that they saw CIA training Uyghurs to send them back to China to disrupt China.
So this is just in the history.
This could be MI6. This could be Mossad.
This could be a bunch of different groups who work together to pull off things like this.
It's meant to throw Putin off.
It's meant to, in my opinion, to make Putin attack civilian targets, which he hasn't done now.
His response to this, he's gone after the Dnipro Dam.
He didn't take out the dam itself, but he took out the control towers that allowed the dam to operate, taking out power.
He started reproducing the Fab 3000 bomb again, which has a 900-meter blast radius.
He's not taking this lightly, and he's also used the term, Again, denazification.
When Putin uses the term denazification, what he's talking about is regime change.
His goal now is get Zelensky out of there at all costs.
And that's what he's going to do.
He's launched a couple missiles into Kiev.
They've gone after certain apartment buildings, which I assume that there would be command centers.
But this is a guy who does not go after civilian populations like the CIA does, like the FBI has done in the past in Oklahoma City, and the FBI in Oklahoma City, the CIA everywhere.
And it's just to throw Putin off and to try to get him to do something that will make the world hate him even more than they already do because of the Zionist-controlled media.
So yeah, provoking him to commit war crimes, much like what we see Israel doing right now in Gaza, just bombing kids and taking down entire apartment complexes.
Actually, Vladimir Putin sent transport in to get ethnic Russians out of this conflict and to get them out of harm's way.
What happened to them?
neo-Nazis called the Aesop Battalion, which are under the direct command of Vladimir Zelensky, the homosexual who played the piano with his penis, an actor who allegedly has a multi-million dollar mansion in Miami who travels around like some rock star on a concert tour.
And he ordered them to do this, shoot him in the back.
He ordered these same people to hunt down Russian troops' families.
These people, these Aesop Battalion people, were actually eating Russian soldiers, which We have found child organ harvesting operations in Ukraine.
The Russian soldiers have.
We know that there are at least over two dozen bioweapons labs that are Pentagon-operated, CIA-overseen, U.S. taxpayer-funded bioweapons labs, ostensibly where COVID-19's genetic sequences were mustered up before blaming China and this wet market when a bat and a pangolin had sex.
And this novel coronavirus was born.
I mean, there are a lot of bodies buried in Ukraine and I think Vladimir Putin knows that.
If I were sitting down to interview him, unlike Tucker, these would be the real questions that we would ask him.
What do you think his answers would be?
Well, I think he knows everything that's going on there.
But more than anything, he knows that Zelensky is a Jewish Zionist pawn.
As a teenager, Zelensky wanted to travel to Israel to study in Israel and his dad wouldn't let him.
This is the whole Ukraine project.
This war started in 2014.
It's actually older, but this conflict started in 2014.
It did not start in February of 2022.
The first body started dropping in 2014 due to NGOs going in there, having a color revolution, just like they normally do, just like they do in so many places they want to be.
But this is Zionist-controlled.
We know that Odessa, the city of Odessa, has more synagogues than the state of Israel does.
They're trying to set up a new Kazaria.
They're trying to set up a new Israel in Ukraine.
That was the goal from the start.
They wanted to clean out Ukrainians.
Someone in the State Department right at the beginning said...
We're willing to fight for Ukraine's freedom right down to the last Ukrainian.
This is an ethnic cleansing.
They just want to kill them all so that they can have their new Kazaria because, I mean, look, it's the breadbasket of Europe.
You can grow pretty much anything there.
And what can you grow in Israel?
Not much.
So they want control of this.
this has been the this has been the plan all along hello ladies and gentlemen Welcome back.
Millstone Report.
My name's Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Great segment there.
If you want to check out the rest of that segment from Peter Quinones and Stu Peters from yesterday talking about this terrorist attack in Russia, you can check that out.
It's on this Rumble channel right here.
All you have to do is click out of this video.
I would encourage you to just maybe watch to the end and then go watch.
There's all kinds of videos on here, so if you miss anything, it's right here on the Stu Peters Network Rumble channel.
So, anti-Semitism.
We talked a lot about that yesterday in light of the fact that Christ is King.
Now, this is the week before Easter or Resurrection Sunday or whatever you want to call it.
Millions of Christians across the world are going to celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ this Sunday.
And I've realized something.
In the midst of all of this controversy, a lot of people very, very upset about Very upset that Christ is King is trending.
Some conservative influencers who claim to be Christian are cautioning people.
They're saying, hey, wait a second, Christ is King is good, it's true, but don't use it if you're being anti-Semitic.
Which has got a lot of people now, and that's not to say that there aren't people who are non-Christians.
As I said yesterday, there are people who are non-Christians who are using this to try to, you know, slam dunk on the Jews that they don't like, right?
And I get that, but there's a lot of people who are really, this is what my take was, isn't the term Christ is King Triggering to anybody who's not a Christian, especially Jews?
And doesn't the Bible specifically say?
Wasn't there an entire generation of the church?
That was persecuted by their countrymen who were Jewish because they claimed Christ as Lord and Savior after his death, burial, and resurrection?
Wasn't this the whole context of the struggle?
And isn't it a struggle that has gone on?
You know, in a way, there's even somebody, A.D. Robles, who I want to get on the program soon.
I really like A.D. Robles.
It said that the name of Christ will even provoke envy among people or among Jews who are not Christians.
And considering that this conversation is happening in the wake of the firing of Candace Owens, and again, people are saying, Candace, people are insinuating, just like yesterday, Candace Owens is not a real Christian.
And that's such a scapegoat.
If you could find something in her theology that you disagree with and you want to make it an issue that's like a salvific issue, like this is a big deal, then all of a sudden you don't have to confront what happened to her.
You don't have to admit what happened to her.
You don't have to sympathize.
You don't have to wrestle.
If you can somehow say that Candace Owens is just a grifter who's using the name of Christ, which is what a lot of people are doing, Then you can just, oh, okay, I don't have to address this phenomenon of what happened that Candace Owens criticized the wrong people or interviewed a rabbi who humiliated himself or exposed another rabbi who has a sex shop business with...
His daughter, his own daughter.
I don't have to deal with any of that.
I don't have to deal with calling evil good or good evil if I can just say, I don't think Candace Owens is a real believer in Christ.
And that's just a phenomenon that's happening, as I'm going to show you.
So what I have learned is the thing that keeps a lot of people awake at night, or at least I've said this before, there's a lot of people, especially on the left, who are You know, infected with the woke sex religion of the LGBT or the left.
They lay awake at night and their worst fear, the worst fear that they have is that they might be called or thought of as a racist or a bigot or a xenophobe or a homophobe or a transphobe.
But on the right...
It's different.
People, from what I can tell on the right, their greatest fear is to be called an anti-Semite.
That is their greatest fear.
To some people.
Not all.
But some people's greatest fear is to be called an anti-Semite.
So here is a guy named Han Shonady.
He's not for Candace Owens.
And he's saying, look, Candace Owens created her account in June of 2017.
And he says the first time she tweeted Christ as King was in November of 2023.
So how dull do you have to be to not see this as an obvious grift?
So he's saying, look, she didn't start saying Christ was King until after the October 7th attacks.
That's what he's saying.
Oh, yeah, you can't trust her.
She's a grifter.
But then the immediate comment by somebody says, by the center of view says, hey, be honest.
Here's a tweet from December of 2020.
After the long year of COVID and COVID tyranny, Candace Owens tweets that Jesus is king.
So she didn't tweet her devotion or her proclamation of what is, you know, Christianity's bedrock confession that Christ is Lord, Jesus is Lord, Christ is King.
There's a lot of different ways to say it.
She said Jesus is King.
And to this guy, you know what he says?
After being basically...
His whole point has been blown up.
His whole point, Han, Seanity...
I might prefer actually Sean Hannity to this guy.
He says, I'm talking specifically about the phrase Christ is King, which has been co-opted by the Groypers and the anti-Semites.
She used it first, last November...
And has been hooked on it ever since.
Look, see, this is where people, again, they have an agenda.
They clearly are trying to circle the wagons.
And they're clearly trying to obscure the truth.
They want the truth to be obscured.
And they have an agenda.
And they're willing to do anything they can.
They don't want to listen to reason.
This guy has proven wrong.
The insinuation here is that she's a grifter and she's not a real Christian.
That's proven that it was directly tied to October 7th.
This is proven wrong.
We're full of people.
Look, if I'm wrong about Candace Owens, because I actually think she is a Christian.
That's what I think.
As of right now, look, I belong to a denomination, like a specific sect of Protestant Christianity.
I am a Presbyterian.
I'm a confessional, Reformed Presbyterian, right?
But I don't take every issue, and I look at it if it were up to me, I would think that everybody needs to be that because that's obviously what I believe.
Like, I believe that down to the minutia, right?
But I don't take these national issues, I don't take these big controversies where Christians are clearly being persecuted and try to use that as an opportunity to try to convince everyone to become a Presbyterian.
Because I actually believe ecumenically that there are other Christians outside of the Presbyterian world, okay?
And so, yeah, if you put a gun to my head, I would say, yeah, I think Candace Owens is a Christian, even though she tweeted something about Christ's consciousness earlier that people are now pointing to saying, see, that's a New Age phrase.
And while I agree, Christ's consciousness is rising, this phrase...
It's a New Age phrase.
Just because, look, there's all kinds of little minutiae beliefs that people have that are possibly not quite theologically accurate.
Because none of us are perfect and none of us are right about every single thing.
And to think that you are is just total arrogance, right?
And it really creates a sense of pride.
And that's what I really feel.
There's a lot of pride going on out there on Christian Twitter.
It's really frustrating.
So this guy gets proven wrong, and what does he do?
He doubles down.
It's frustrating.
And that brings me to Megan Basham.
Megan Basham works for the Daily Wire.
And she decided to edit a tweet last night after she said something that was obviously not true, and then she tried to explain it by making it broad.
So this is what she said.
This is the edited tweet.
She said...
So Nick Fuentes was on a space last night with Lauren Chen and Daily Wire head Jeremy Boring.
Where Jeremy Boring actually complimented Nick Fuentes.
Now, to be clear, I don't know a lot about Nick Fuentes.
And, you know, you can be mad at me or whatever, but, like, I'm busy, you know, doing my own journalistic work.
And I don't, a lot of times, don't have time to watch every other show.
So I don't know a lot about Nick Fuentes.
I do know one thing is that the establishment can't stand him, and they say that he's anti-Semitic, right?
I do know that, right?
I know he's been on Stu's show at least once, which was very interesting, right?
All these people that want to shut down the dialogue, those are the ones you've got to be...
We don't want to even hear from anybody.
Wait a second.
That's a huge red flag.
Anyway, so Nick was on.
Again, America vs.
Nick was on the space last night.
Jeremy Bourne was there, even complimented him and said, hey, you know, you're a really talented guy.
Megan Basham, who is the Christian beat reporter for the Daily Wire, she's a Christian, and to Megan Basham's credit, she's done a really good job combating the liberalism in Big Eva.
Something that I am very much against and this woke church that's been creeping in into all kinds of areas and different denominations.
And I appreciate that, right?
So I'm not one of these people that just totally writes someone off when we have a disagreement, right?
That doesn't mean that we're not going to have those disagreements.
But this is what she says.
She says, I listened to Nick Fuentes tonight, and his modus operandi is pretty much equating normal Christian concerns, like wanting political leaders who support biblical morality, to being mad people don't think it's cool to say the Jews, as a broad religious and ethnic group, killed Jesus.
They didn't.
She says, they didn't.
Now, she edited this tweet, because I saw this tweet, and I bookmarked it, and then I found it was edited.
Luckily, I was able to Figure out what the actual tweet was or the old tweet.
This was the original tweet.
So having listened to Nick Quentes tonight and his modus operandi, it's pretty much equating normal Christian concerns like wanting political leaders who support biblical morality to being mad.
People don't think it's cool to say the Jews killed Jesus.
They didn't.
So you've got to ask yourself, so why did she make that comment?
Well, she made that comment because initially people were quoting Scripture and basically blasting her, saying it's clear that the Jews killed Jesus because Peter and Paul said that the Jews killed Jesus in Scripture.
And so then she confesses.
I'm sorry.
Not like she did anything wrong.
I'm sorry.
I feel like I was going through this in real time.
She tweeted that, the original tweet.
It's like she tweets this original tweet, right?
And I bookmark it because I'm like, I'm definitely talking about that tomorrow.
And then I'm scrolling through Twitter, and then I see this.
I'm like, wait, isn't this the same tweet?
And I'm like, oh my gosh, she edited it.
She edited the post.
Anyway, so that's why I say this is like a confession.
Anyway, so then she eventually says that she edited the post to clarify that Paul and Peter wrote of specific religious leaders and people in the crowd being responsible for the crucifixion.
But then she says they are not laying responsibility for Jesus' death at the feet of an entire ethnic and religious group of people beyond the fact that all who have sinned, so everyone, are responsible for his death.
You know, I've heard this argument before.
It's...
A lot of people think that, and there probably was some crossover, a lot of people think that on Palm Sunday, when Jesus was going through Jerusalem, that the same people that were praising him as a king were the same mobs of people that were saying crucify him a week later.
And while there may be some crossover there, that can really show the deceitfulness, the wickedness of our heart, right?
Because, you know, when we sin, even if you're stuck in a habitual sin and you seek repentance but you do it again, I mean, it's this idea of like, yes, it's this idea of just constantly backstabbing God who died for your sins and loves you, right?
And so I can see why people have this argument, but I think you can also go back and see that actually there were two different, there were those who were followers of Jesus, and then there was the Sanhedrin, made up of Pharisees, made up of the Pharisees, you had the Sadducees,
you had these people, this political order of the day, that falsely accused Jesus of heresy, falsely, they falsely charged him, They brought him up on charges in front of a kangaroo court.
They falsely convicted him, and then they begged Pilate to put him to death.
This is a historical fact.
Now, why do we have Daily Wire reporter?
And again, you say, well, it's because she works for the Daily Wire.
I'm not willing to necessarily go that far.
I really think this is more to do with people's greatest fear being thought of That they don't want to be called anti-Semitic.
It is just ingrained that this is the greatest fear.
Even though we have Rabbi Barclay essentially saying in front of Candace Owens that any disagreement, that any offense, anything that a Jew perceives as an offense is considered anti-Semitic now.
So of course Christ as King would be considered anti-Semitic.
Of course the Bible, when you say, hey look, Look what historically happened.
This is the gospel that the Lord God used a people group to produce.
The bloodline that would give us Jesus Christ, our second Adam, and then those people had hardened hearts and turned on him and crucified him so that God's gospel plan could be For all people, groups, for all nations who would repent and believe, individuals who would repent and believe, you people out there who are so anti-Christian nationalism, you buy into the false straw man argument that when we say Christian nation, we believe that that makes sense that everybody in the nation is going to heaven.
No, we don't believe that.
Sorry, I'm on a tear here.
So she still got kind of ratioed for that as well.
Let's see, do we have...
Let me see here.
Yeah, so 1 Thessalonians 2.5, Elijah Schaefer writes, For some of the Jews killed the prophets, and some even killed the Lord Jesus.
Now they have persecuted us too.
They fail to please God and work against all humanity.
We also have, let's see, A.D. Robles.
A pastor friend of mine texted me an interesting observation that the Bible tells us that our salvation will provoke the Jews to jealousy, yet some will tell us it's actually the church that's envious of the Jews.
I don't know what it means, but it is interesting.
Yeah, it surely is.
Joshua Smith, none of these Judeo-Christian, atheist, right-wing influencers and talking heads have had a single word to say about people excrementing on Christians, but as soon as we speak up and Christ is King trends, they all of a sudden have a problem with it.
It's pretty wild when you think about it.
Yeah, exactly right.
But we've been talking about the anti-Christian bias on this program since its inception, almost on a daily basis, and it never stops, right?
It's anti-Christian bias all the time.
And so you have to—we're getting to a point, and this comes to my final point for this evening.
Neutrality is a myth.
Neutrality is a myth.
We say it over and over again.
And you know what's really happening on Christian Twitter especially?
And people don't like it.
The way is getting narrower and narrower, and people are going to have to choose.
And that's just the way it is.
Are there people that are going to use Christ as king in a way that you might...
Yeah.
Yeah, they are.
But, look, this constant caveating is...
It just shows that we have people that don't really understand what time it is.
Christians in boxcars.
That is the future.
Christians in boxcars.
And there are people out there in the trenches, Christians in the trenches, who are trying to organize and use what rights we have left as Christians to prevent that from happening.
And I consider myself as one of them.
Votie Bauckham recently gave a speech at the ARC Encounter.
The ARC Encounter, Ken Ham's organization...
And Ken Ham, I haven't been yet, but I want to go to this museum so bad.
And again, he comes at it from a biblical worldview, a creationist, built an actual size arc to scale, really want to see it.
Votie Bauckham got to speak, Pastor Votie Bauckham got to give a sermon on Acts chapter 4 about four days ago.
About neutrality and how the time now, basically now is the time for choosing and you're not going to be able to hide.
If you're a Christian and you think you can hide from this, you're not going to be able to hide.
Listen to this.
Neutrality is not an option.
And so many Christians are under the deluded impression That if we just keep our head down, if we just go to church, if we just practice our faith in our home, if we just do that, that they'll leave us alone.
But they won't.
They won't.
I don't know if you've been watching lately, but it's not enough.
For you to just refuse to be hostile.
It is now demanded that you bend the knee and confess Caesar is Lord.
You can't be neutral.
Try to be neutral if you want to.
We're just going to be neutral.
We're just going to go about our life.
Yep.
and then your daughter lines up in the track meet and there's a boy racing her.
What do you do?
you Do you sit there, take the loss, clap when the trophy is given to the biological male?
What do you do?
What do you do when you go to work?
And then they have this new policy at your work where you put your pronouns on everything.
And you say, no, no, I'm not going to play the game.
I'm just not going to put the pronouns on there.
And they say, no, no, no, it's a policy.
Put your pronouns on there.
Fine.
I'll put my pronouns on there.
But my pronouns are the pronouns that God gave me.
Good for you.
Because that's just step one.
You've put your pronouns.
Everybody else has put their pronouns.
And then this is what happens.
They come to you and they say...
You must bear false witness.
Look at that man and call him a woman.
Neutrality is not an option.
Neutrality.
Go get your PhD.
Go be the best student ever, anywhere.
Go try to write a grant proposal.
Try to be a scientist, a biologist, a chemistry, anybody.
Just try today to go and do that and sidestep all the minds.
All of them that say your work must be based on the assumption.
That there is no God, that the world was not created, and that it's billions and billions and billions of years old.
Neutrality is not an option.
you Try as you might.
And it always boggles my mind, right?
You can have one person who says the world is 30 billion years old.
Great.
You get a prize.
And another person who comes and says, no, actually the world is more than 60 billion years old.
No problem.
You get a prize too.
I come and I say the world is actually several thousand years old.
And they say, you're an idiot.
Why?
Why?
The distance between the 60 billion year guy and the 30 billion year guy is 30 billion years.
The distance between the 30 billion guy and me is less than 30 billion years.
How come both of them get to be okay but I don't?
Neutrality is not an option, folks.
When our children go to schools that pump this stuff into them, neutrality is not an option.
In your family, some of you have experienced this.
In your own family, neutrality is not an option.
All the recent stir about, you know, do you go to the gay wedding?
Do you not go to the gay wedding?
All of this recent stir.
Why?
Why are Christians wanting their pastors and leaders to help them think through this?
I'll tell you why.
Because when the family or the extended family comes to you and says, Johnny's marrying another man, they know that you're a Christian.
They're just double-dog daring you to say that there's something wrong with it and you're not going.
Neutrality is not an option.
It's not.
By the way, why is neutrality not an option?
I'm glad you asked.
Because these worldviews are rooted and grounded in atheism.
They're rooted and grounded in the idea that there is no God.
And because there is no God, we are accountable to no one, to nothing except ourselves.
That's why we use phrases like, my truth.
We're accountable to no one.
If there is a God, All of these worldviews fall.
So you cannot go around proclaiming your worldview that is rooted and grounded in the existence of the one true and living God, the God who was and who is and who is to come, without there being this clash.
So neutrality is not an option.
I'm sorry.
If you thought you could get out of this unscathed, I'm here to tell you tonight, you cannot and you will not.
Wake Up Christian!
That was Votie Bauckham a couple of days ago, I think four days ago, at the Answers in Genesis forum.
Again, the Ark Encounter, Ken Ham's organization.
He gave a sermon on, I believe it was Acts chapter 4.
The full thing is available on YouTube, and you should definitely check it out.
That's all the time that we have today on this edition of the Millstone Report.
We're going to be back here tomorrow with Jeremy Sladen.
We're going to talk more about We're going to talk more about, I'm sure, eschatology as we did last time.
And so you certainly don't want to miss that.
I understand he's got a new article coming out really soon.
That's all the time that we have.
We've gone over here on our time here on the Stu Peters Network.
My apologies.
We will see all of you tomorrow.
God bless you.
Be safe out there.
▲
Export Selection