All Episodes
Previous Next
March 21, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
56:05
Millstone Report: Activist Calls School Board PERVERTS! Tucker SLAMS Abbott Over Border At GOP Event
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
People say we need to make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Hey folks, welcome.
Welcome, welcome to the Post-On Report.
My name is Paul Carroll.
It's always great to be with you.
We're going to talk a little bit about obscenity laws today.
Where we've been, where we're going.
Let's start with where we've been.
In 1957, the Supreme Court of the United States took up a case having to do with a man named Samuel Roth.
Roth lived in New York and he was charged with violating obscenity laws.
You see, he operated a book-selling business and was convicted of mailing obscene circulars and an obscene book in violation of a federal obscenity statute, right?
Obscenity laws were good back then.
The case was called Roth v.
the United States, and it was combined with another case, Alberts v.
California, in which a California obscenity law was challenged by Alberts after his similar conviction for selling lewd and obscene books.
In a 6-3 decision written by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., the court held that obscenity was not, quote, within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press, end quote.
The court noted that the First Amendment was not intended to protect every utterance or form of expression, such as materials that were utterly without redeeming social importance.
Wow, how refreshing that is.
The court held that...
The test to determine obscenity was whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to the purient interest.
The court held that such a definition of obscenity gave sufficient fair warning and satisfied the demands of due process.
So, I mean, that's great news, right?
But we've got to fast forward on this slippery slope to depravity, where obscenity is now celebrated.
Fast forward to 1964.
The Supreme Court of the United States took up a case, Jacob Bayless v.
Ohio, and the state of Ohio ruled that a film called The Lovers by French director Louis Maule We're good to
And perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so, but I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.
End quote.
No doubt this was a blow to the limits, the First Amendment.
This was a blow to the limits of the First Amendment that the founding fathers intended.
The idea that the founders were sitting around crafting the First Amendment with the goal that it would allow perverts like Larry Flint to distribute naked pictures of women across the country is ridiculous.
But here we are.
And then in 1969, in Stanley v.
Georgia, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a state cannot prohibit citizens from possessing obscene material for their own personal use.
And then, in 1973, in Miller v.
California, the court totally changed the definition of obscenity that saw the conviction of Samuel Roth upheld in 1957.
A PBS article puts it this way, quote, In this landmark case, the court reexamined and discarded the obscenity standard set by Justice Brennan in the Roth case 16 years previously and established a new definition of obscenity, which remains the current standard.
This was the first time since the publication of the Roth opinion that a majority of the court agreed on an obscenity standard.
The case involved California's obscenity law, once again California, which criminalized the mailing of obscene material.
Defendant Marvin Miller was convicted under the law after conducting a mass mailing of sexually explicit advertisements for adult books and films he had for sale.
The Supreme Court vacated the appellate court's ruling upholding the conviction and sent the case back to the appellate court to reconsider in light of the new First Amendment standards set out in the opinion.
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Warren Berger laid out the new three-part test.
The basic guidelines for the tier of fact must be A, whether the average person applying contemporary community standards would find that the work taken as a whole appeals to the purient interest.
B, whether the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law.
And C, and this is the kicker, Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Did you catch that last part?
The moral rot of this country can be blamed on perverts who hide behind art as an excuse for peddling their smut and debased ideas.
And it's not just art, it's literature as well.
And that is why many Americans have become numb to the so-called freedoms people think perverts have to be perverts and force it into every corner of the United States.
The Supreme Court changing obscenity laws by legislating from the bench over decades has helped destroy this country.
And let's be honest, the reason these judges over time loosened obscenity laws is because they themselves were sympathetic to perverts or were perverts themselves.
Didn't want their own personal beliefs to be at odds with the legal definition of obscenity.
That or they bought into the fake idea, the lie, that these rulings are good and just because they preserve the neutrality of the public square.
Maybe a little bit of both.
And what's the result of this pornographic jurisprudence?
Books aimed at sexualizing and grooming our children.
That's why.
In the name of literary freedom and literary expression, that's where we are.
You see, no longer are our obscenity laws just about two consenting adults.
Or, you know, an adult consenting to have obscene material in their house.
No.
No.
Now, in the name of art and literature, school libraries are giving kids access to the most disgusting and grotesque books imaginable, designed to rot their brain and convert them into sexual deviance, ready to line up for chemical castration shots or genital mutilation barbarism.
And it's happening every single day.
Just the other day, a preacher and activist who works for Turning Point USA by the name of John K. Amichukwu spoke in front of the Midland School Board in Midland, Texas.
Right?
Red state of Texas.
And he made them aware that their kids have access to one of the sickest books I've ever heard of.
These quotations are disgusting.
And he quoted from this book freely, available to children at the Midland School Board there in Texas.
The book is called Push.
After reading from the book, his mic was cut off.
He was escorted out by several police officers.
And I have the video.
We're going to play this for you.
But before I do, if you have any young children in the room, please turn this video off now.
You can watch this later.
And I'm warning you, seriously warning you.
The book Aman Chukwu is reading here is about a girl being molested in the most graphic ways possible.
Now, I haven't censored any of these words.
I'm not going to censor these words because this is the kind of debauchery I feel like we have to face head-on if we're going to make obscenity laws great again and start prosecuting these librarians.
I think we should even be prosecuting these school boards.
You know, there's some people that think that even the current obscenity standards that we have You know, make all of this stuff illegal right now, okay?
But you just don't have any prosecutors or sheriffs that are willing to throw people in jail for sexualizing kids.
I mean, you just, they're not willing to do that.
We have men with no chests leading us.
So, here's the video from the other day.
Again, viewer discretion is advised.
You've been warned.
Page 127.
My clit swell up, thanks daddy.
Daddy sick me, disgust me, but still he sex me up.
I nauseous in my stomach, but hot tight in my twat, and I think I want it back.
The smell of the bedroom, the hurt he slapped my face till it stings.
Will I get my time back?
Yes or no?
All 45 seconds now.
My 30 seconds back?
I want my 45 seconds back.
You're taking my time.
Is this book that you're referencing in one of our libraries?
It is.
It's in Legacy High School.
Push.
Sapphire.
I want it back.
The smell of the bedroom, the hurt.
He slapped my face till it stings and my ears sing separate songs from each other.
Call me names.
Pump my pussy.
In, out, in, out.
Oh, I came.
He bite me hard.
A hump, a hump.
He slams his hips into me hard.
I scream pain.
He come.
He slaps my thighs like cowboys do horses on TV. Shiver orgasm in me his body shaking grabbed me called me fat mama big hole you love it Say you love it.
I want to say I don't I want to say I'm a child But my pussy popping grease and frying pan he's slamming me again his dick soft He starts sucking my titties.
This is a father talking about his daughter Here it is.
Page 25.
I've been knowing a man put his dick in you, gush white stuff in your booty, you could get pregnant.
I'm 12 now.
I've been knowing about that since I was five or six.
Page 32.
Daddy put his pee pee smelling thing in my mouth, my pussy, but never hold me.
I see me, first grade, pink dress, dirty sperm stuffs on it.
No one even combs my hair, but he puts his sperm in his daughter.
Page 35.
I feel mama's hand between my legs moving up my thigh.
Her hand stops.
She getting ready to pinch me if I move.
I just lay still keeping my eyes closed.
I can tell mama's other hand between her legs now.
So mama is rubbing the daughter while she's rubbing herself.
Because the smell fills the room.
In other words, mama might have a yeast infection.
And the odor is rather odiferous and pungent, and it puts an aroma in the room.
Can you smell it, board members?
Page 50, I go splash some water on my ASS, which means I wash cirrus between my legs and underarm.
Page 53, my peepee open hot, stinky down my thighs, splatter, splatter.
I'm seven!
Seven, she said.
He owned me almost every night.
First it's just in my mouth, then it's more and more.
He is intercourse in me.
Say I can take it.
Look you, look you, don't even bleed.
Virgin girls, bleed.
You're not virgin, you're seven.
This needs to be removed tonight.
We have six men on this board.
And I want to say to these men that's on this board, if you don't remove this book, you're either a punk or a pervert.
Pick, choose your medicine.
No, you got your...
I got a gavel too.
Here is the gavel.
That's my gavel.
The gavel is the truth.
You're either a punk or a pervert.
Now, this is the part where they cut his microphone.
When he starts saying that he's got a gavel too, they have cut his mic because he called out the board and he said that they're either punks or they're perverts, which is exactly true.
And again...
What struck me, aside from just absolute wicked, evil, demonic state, I mean, this book is totally evil and wicked, but I mean, it's not even, I mean, it's just, at some points, as he's quoting it, it's just saying dirty words, just saying sexually explicit words that are not even grouped together in proper sentences.
How is this of any literary value at all?
It's just, and yet, it's available to minor children at a high school in Texas.
If you don't remove this book, you're either a punk or a pervert.
Choose your medicine.
No, you got your...
I got a gavel too.
Here is the gavel.
That's my gavel.
The gavel is the truth.
You're either a punk or a pervert.
A punk or a pervert if you don't remove this book.
That's what you are.
All six men on this board, you're a punk or a pervert if you don't remove it.
That's the truth.
If you leave it in here, you're a punk or a pervert.
Remove the trash.
Take it out tonight.
These students deserve better.
You're either a punk or a pervert if you leave it in here.
Every last one of you men.
Get it rude tonight.
Tonight.
It goes out tonight.
Tonight.
It goes out tonight!
Not tomorrow!
Not next week, but tonight!
Remove it tonight!
Thank you, sir.
If you don't, you're either a punk or a pervert.
All right, so obviously, look, I mean, you know.
You know, this is the type of stuff.
And this is not the only book that's like this.
There's all kinds of books out there.
They have flooded American libraries.
They've flooded public libraries, county libraries, public schools, and they all have to be destroyed.
They all have to be destroyed.
We are in the midst of a situation where...
There are people that are fighting back, local groups.
They're trying to fight back against the pervert books that are available for kids, even put in the kids section.
And they're coming about this in an incremental way, and they're saying, well, we don't want them banned.
Some of them are.
We just want to move to a different section.
And the truth of the matter is, while that may certainly save kids from being corrupted, the books themselves need to be burned.
I mean, they need to be removed and totally destroyed.
That's where I'm at with all of this, because I just refuse to give quarter to these people that think that they have some sort of intellectual grounding, especially, It's like that you have a firm platform to stand on when this is your perspective.
Your perspective is in the demonic realm.
Your perspective is that you are trying to give evil a legitimate foothold to where it is something that we as society can just sit back and we can...
Scratch our chin and try to consider some sort of choice.
Like, this is a legitimate option.
This is a legitimate path that we can go down in society and we can have these debates.
No, this is not intellectual debate.
This is barbarism.
This is demonic.
This is evil.
This is wicked.
This is coming for our kids.
This is It's destroying our society as we know it, all the way, as I charted in the monologue, from the 50s to now, the weakening of obscenity laws, and it's just this gradual incrementalism that gets us to the point where, by the way, that book was written in 1996.
This is not a new book.
This book, Push, is not a new book that he's reading from.
But it just goes to show you how these ideas have been creeping ever so slightly, and now they've come completely mask off, right?
The mask is off, and now, of course, they have pedophile books for kids and grooming books for kids.
Larry has two daddies or whatever the book is.
And it gets worse and worse with each generation.
With each year, it gets worse and worse.
More and more people are getting these books and you have these leftist corporations that are going to pay for them to put them out there to flood our country.
We've come a long way from nudie magazines meant for consenting adults that want to have the material in the privacy of their own home.
We're way beyond that now.
So, I think it's appropriate to consider, again, crawling back up the slippery slope and embracing obscenity laws and what the First Amendment was meant to do.
It was meant to give people freedom of speech.
It was not meant to give people the freedom to be evil and wicked.
Compared to what?
Well, compared to the character of God that we find revealed to us in the Holy Bible.
That's our standard.
That's our standard.
And, uh, for those of you out there and, you know, probably nobody in this audience that are uncomfortable with that, well, you need to, you need to get comfortable with it because, you know, it's the same thing.
It's the same thing with transgenderism or transing kids.
There's a lot of people that have a huge problem with transing children, but they don't want to say, hey, if, if gay marriage had not been normalized, transing kids would not be a thing right now.
Wouldn't be a thing.
So if you were to just go back up the slippery slope and embrace God's definition of marriage, what we find in Scripture, then you don't have transient kids.
You don't have parents saying, I have a right to take my kid to a drag show so that they can be ogled by pedophiles.
You don't have any of that.
Again, the guy that you just saw there, he works for Turning Point USA, John Amonchukwu.
I believe I'm pronouncing his name right.
He is a pastor.
Again, he works for Turning Point USA. This is his Twitter, and that's the guy that you see there.
Now, after the event, a couple of nights ago there in Midland, Texas, one of the school board members did not like being called a pervert, apparently.
And this was the exchange.
Huh?
So are you going to ruin the book?
I will get that book out, but I'm letting you know right now.
Thank you.
I'm no punk and I'm no pervert.
Is the book coming out tonight?
I will try to get it out tonight.
I can't make that call, but I promise you that I will do my best.
I need you to do everything you possibly can to get it out tonight.
And call me a punk or a pervert.
Listen, did you hear what I said?
I said, if the book stays, you're either a punk or a pervert.
I'm no punk and I'm no pervert.
And so you're going to get it out, right?
Thank you.
Give this man a hand.
Give this man a hand.
That's what we need.
That's exactly what we need.
We need just that right there.
A man spoke up and he took it to the heart and he got angry, he got upset, and he wants to come out and shake my hand.
Yeah, but the thing is, here's the deal with that.
He's more upset that he was called a punk or a pervert.
To me, that's...
Oh my goodness.
Like, I can't imagine, and I can't imagine being on a school board.
I really can't.
And having that information placed in front of me, and being called a punk or a pervert, if I don't get it out tonight, and instead of going out to the guy, and again, you're going out to the guy telling him you're going to get it removed, but who cares about your own, whether or not this guy thinks that you're a punk or a pervert?
Who cares about your name or your image or anything like that?
How are you not going to stop what you're doing right now and drive to the library yourself, find the book, and take it?
Take it.
And take every copy you can.
I just find that so interesting to me.
I mean, you know, kudos for the guy saying, well, we're going to remove the book.
And I still don't know if it has been removed or not.
I don't see any updates.
But, you know, the first reaction, the first reaction to say, oh, I've got to go out there and make sure this guy knows that I'm not, you know, he seems offended by being called a pervert.
I'm no pervert.
Huh?
So are you going to remove the book?
I will get that book out, but I'm letting you know right now.
Thank you!
I'm no punk, and I'm...
Yeah, I mean, that's the whole point.
He said, if you don't remove it, then you're a punk or a pervert.
So...
No pervert.
Is the book coming out tonight?
I will try to get it out tonight.
I can't make that call, but I promise you that I will do my...
I can't make that call.
Yeah, you see, this is the thing.
Like, all of these processes, all of these institutions, these American, our great American institutions, they just, they fail us time and time again.
You know, I don't know if I can make that call tonight.
Why?
I'll try to get it out tonight.
I can't make that call, but I promise I'll do everything I can to get it removed.
It's just so pathetic.
We have this process, this system that we set up, and for a long time it was good.
You have checks and balances, or at least we used to have checks and balances, and there was a way, there was a process, you've got to sign it, you've got to minute it, you've got to make sure we go through this process.
And yet, our own institutions and our processes are being now used against us to slow walk us trying to defeat evil that is infiltrated.
And many of these institutions are occupied by people who are, first of all, they're totally brainwashed by the left, by this idea of neutrality in the public square, and And they're so brainwashed by it, it's almost like they're committed to this fake idea of neutrality as if it's a religion in and of itself.
I talk a lot about the woke sex religion that has emerged, that is clearly dogmatic, clearly has very, very strict orthodoxy and rules, and if you break one of them, then they'll cast you out.
I talk a lot about that sex religion, or that religion, but I don't talk about, I never really have, the religious fervor with which they are committed to preserving what they believe is neutrality in the public square And so many of these people,
they believe, even if they claim to be Christians, they believe that once they become a school board member, once they become a dog catcher or a state rep or a state senator, that they have to take their faith and their moral compass, their own moral compass that they know has got to be set aside because it's a Christian moral compass, because it's a biblical worldview, because it's based on the God of the Bible, and they have to just put it aside and try to manage government in some...
Weird, neutral space.
And it's not neutral.
Everything you do has meaning.
Every single thing you do has meaning.
I used to get so frustrated, speaking of the secular world, this is just kind of a little bit of a parallel comparison, and it wasn't just Barack Obama, but there was all kinds of people who would come out anytime the Tea Party was getting this close to actually being effective, back when the budget...
The national debt, $12 trillion, what a joke that was.
Barack Obama would come out and he would say, you know, we've just got to do the basic functions of government.
We've got to do the business of the American people, and we've got to keep the government open.
The idea was that it's nonpartisan.
The idea was that there are some things that the federal government can do that have nothing to do with politics, but it's just a function of the government.
And that's nonsense.
Every single thing the government does has an agenda behind it.
Every single thing the government does is political.
Every single thing.
There is no bipartisan thing.
I mean, the Uniparty's real, right?
And they're all marching in the same direction.
But you get my point.
They try to advance this idea to try to lull Americans.
Yeah, there's just some things that, you know, we have to do.
We've got to, you know, pass the continuing resolution and keep the government open.
It's just a basic...
No, there's politics behind that.
And the same thing goes for this fake idea of neutrality.
It's totally fake.
It's a binary choice.
You're either going to promote good or you're going to promote evil.
Good versus evil.
That's what it is.
Whether we're talking in the spiritual warfares that we all go through, or whether we're talking right here in the corporeal good versus evil, every decision we make, whether it's a decision you make with your family, whether it's a decision you make in your city, your county, your state, or your national government, it's all framed.
It's a good or an evil.
It's a binary choice.
Christian or non-Christian, paganism, barbarism, or Christianity.
Those are your two options in the grand scheme of things.
Sheep or goats, right?
You're Peter or you're Judas.
It's binary.
We have to make obscenity laws great again.
We have to realize that it is okay.
It doesn't matter what the LGBTQRSTLNE. It doesn't matter what some literary artist, some writer who's trying to hide behind.
Well, it's art.
Yes, I mean, you know, and it pushes society's norms and limits, but it's art.
It doesn't matter what they say or how much they cry or how much they moan.
The fact of the matter is, Specifically still at our local levels, local governments, it is perfectly okay for us to hold up a standard, for us to hold up a practice, for us to hold up a problem and call it evil and ban it!
And absolutely ban it!
There's nothing wrong with that!
And that's what we have to do.
We have to ban pedophile books for kids.
We have to ban books like this that are designed to push the limit.
It's just wicked and evil.
I'm not going to play that video again of...
Of him saying that.
Because it's just too...
I don't know.
I didn't even like it actually playing for you as it was going because it's just so disgusting.
But again, we needed to hear the words because we have to face it.
Again, that's Pastor John Amonchukwu.
I think that's how you say it.
And obviously, you know, he was there.
The Talking Point or the Turning Point USA camera was right there, you know, following around, getting this shot.
I think he goes across the country to confront school boards about their books, from what I can tell.
I'd never heard of this guy up until I saw this story.
But it got me thinking, how did we get here?
How did we get here?
Because we've talked about it before.
We used to have blasphemy laws on the books.
There were blasphemy laws.
You could not blaspheme the triune God.
There were things we considered holy in that you're not supposed to go against it.
And they survived court challenges all the way into the 1930s.
And so when it comes to obscenity laws, how did we get here?
How did we get here?
We're a society that's consumed with pornography.
It is literally everywhere.
And it's not just pornography.
Well, you know, I can do what I want in my own home.
It's gone beyond that.
I mean, the free range of pornography has corrupted American minds to the fact now people make excuses for porno books for kids.
Or literary smut for kids describing, in this case, this book Push, describing the continued rape and molestation of a seven-year-old by her father.
In what world can you make an argument that that book needs to be in a high school library?
I would make the argument, in what world does that book need to exist at all?
At all!
It's absolutely disgusting.
So, huge news as we transition here.
Yesterday on the Stu Peters Show, Stu Peters had a guest on, a former Pfizer scientist by the name of Justin Leslie.
And if you miss this, you have to go back and watch it.
We're going to play a portion from it here.
But Justin Leslie was working at Pfizer as a Pfizer scientist, and he was working undercover for Project Veritas.
He got damning evidence that the vaccines kill, that the vaccines have side effects, and that the scientists were admitting it.
Other scientists were openly admitting it.
He turned it all over to Project Veritas.
They then hired him and spiked the story.
This was in 2021.
So Project Veritas, this is James O'Keefe's old organization, and I have no idea, you know, how much...
But anyway, the bottom line is, James O'Keefe's organization, by sitting on this story, helped Pfizer genocide millions of people.
Helped Pfizer give myocarditis to millions of people.
And the question is, why?
Why would Project Veritas squash the story?
And it was too much for Justin Leslie, and he decided he had to come forward, and he came onto the Stu Peter Show yesterday, and he made huge news.
This is huge news.
So as we take a break, we're going to listen to what I think is the most news-breaking or newsworthy part of that interview.
Don't go anywhere.
This is the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harreld.
at all.
So you and I are conscious that these vaccines were not safe and effective regardless of the formulation, but they didn't even do the actual clinical data to make sure that it was safe and effective.
So it has to do with this bait and switch and it's quite literally, it is so bombshell and the fact that this information came out of a vice president's mouth and I got it on camera and I corroborated that it exists and it's on a terabyte drive.
That Project Veritas and or James O'Keefe or Matt Tiermond or somebody connected to Project Veritas is supposed to still have this terabyte drive.
And you don't have a copy of it.
No.
So that's how, Stu, I became a double agent in the sense of I was offered employment by James and Project Veritas.
And so I set out and made a pact with God after, you know, working at Pfizer for more than a year.
I knew how powerful this information was.
And so I made a pact with God.
I made a promise to somehow go get my Pfizer story back.
And I did.
And that's where the Ramin recordings and the Conwell recordings come from.
And so I was not able to obtain the information regarding Nick Warren, but it's publicly available actually on On YouTube, where you can see Nick Warren and this guy, Dr.
Bill Gruber explaining, and it's all in the documentary.
So, you know, please go to justintegrity.net, check out Project Whistleblower, where they explained that they did not need to do the clinical trials on this childhood vaccine approval for five to 11 year olds.
So to this day, Project Veritas has this information and has yet to release it to the general public.
Yes.
When did they start obtaining this footage from you?
Early October of 2021.
About the same time that Carrie Madej was on the program.
Yes.
Several weeks after is when we did the chain of custody.
So it's full circle talking to you about all of this.
The chain of custody that she explained, to my recollection, I think that she explained in the video that she was unable to verify chain of custody at that point.
Or did she say that she was able to verify chain of custody?
I mean, she can't verify herself.
She knows who I am.
So she knew that these vials were secured And that they had not been tampered with and that she was examining the true contents of what was going and being injected into the arms of men, women, and children all over the planet.
Yes.
So if you remember, she was showing the Johnson& Johnson vials on your show as well as Moderna and Pfizer.
And I was there for all of that, sir.
All of it.
And I, dude, I went to bed basically crying that night.
It was nightmarish.
I was like, this should not be going into people's arms.
And I can't believe that this is real.
You know, like, how is this?
You thought that you were doing the right thing and that James O'Keefe and Project Veritas would expose this to the world and thereby could help to stop this genocide from happening.
Yes, absolutely.
And so one thing that's really interesting in the middle of all of this is that there was an FBI raid that happened about a week and a half after Carrie Madej went on your show talking about Project Veritas and Pfizer whistleblower.
And so when this FBI raid occurred, There was no mention of anything regarding, you know, Pfizer vials or a Pfizer whistleblower and obtaining that information.
It was all strictly Ashley Biden's diary.
And so I'm not affirming that the FBI raid was a cover up.
But when I point out my story, it certainly feels like something that was used to silence me because I knew the truth.
And these people knew that I knew the truth.
Of course, of course.
And Ashley Biden's diary is horrific, and it should have absolutely been exposed.
And that's another case where Project Veritas stonewalled National File, who had come across this diary.
I know that Patrick Howley over at National File was able to verify chain of custody, was able to verify 100 percent by having conversations with Ashley, with Ashley Biden herself, that that diary was indeed her diary and that it was authentic.
But yet Project Veritas still withheld that where she said that she took inappropriate showers with her father, the now so-called president of the United States, Joe Biden, who she accused of molesting her, not on one occasion, but multiple.
That's horrific.
And it's horrific that we have an illegitimate pedophile in the White House.
But what's even more horrific is this story and that Project Veritas would use the diary story to stonewall you and to scare you or to scare themselves or give themselves some sort of a justification after this FBI raid to not release to billions of people what's happening to them and their children.
It's insane.
And so I took the job to go get the information back.
James O'Keefe should be added to the list of those that should face extreme accountability.
You don't have to say it.
I will.
All right.
Welcome back to the Millstone Reports.
Thanks so much for being with us.
I told you that was huge news.
Again, what you just saw there was a highlight from yesterday.
You've got Justin Leslie.
He's a former Pfizer scientist turned whistleblower.
He gets this damning information against Pfizer, the vaccines, the clot shot, gives it to Project Veritas, and they squash the story.
And then he accepts employment to kind of be another mole, to basically be a double agent to try to get To try to get his stuff back, and now he's telling all.
And it's absolutely incredible.
The biggest thing that I took away is we all remember when Project Veritas was raided by the FBI. We all remember the Ashley Biden Diary to take you back to National File.
And I believe NationalFile.com is still the only publication out there that has the full Ashley Biden Diary in digital format for you to view where she admits that Joe Biden is essentially a pedophile.
And so they raid Project Veritas over this Ashley Biden diary, but what Leslie is saying, Justin Leslie here is saying that it's very curious.
Because it came basically right after an interview that Stu had done, or a couple of weeks after an interview that Stu had done with Dr.
Carrie Madej.
Carrie Madej had the contents of the Pfizer vial, the Pfizer vaccine, and they were analyzing what's really in the vaccines.
And from what I can tell, earlier in the interview, and you go watch the whole thing for yourself, it's like a 30-minute interview with Stu from yesterday.
Earlier in the interview, what Justin Leslie says is that when Carrie Madej went on with Stu, she referenced that, you know, Project Veritas, I think she referenced Project Veritas is what he said, and that there is basically a mole, that there's more stuff coming because there's a guy in with Pfizer, working with Pfizer, who's a mole.
And then a few weeks later, boom!
FBI raid.
All about Ashley Biden diary, but you know it was also about what do they know?
What do they know about Pfizer?
What do they know about the vaccine?
Huge development.
Huge story.
Yesterday was one of those days where you just got a ton of additional context into what's all going on.
Because additionally, it raises more questions because you have James O'Keefe, who essentially, the narrative goes that right after he got that big Pfizer story where he had a Pfizer executive on tape, which Justin Leslie was part of filming, It was part of getting that story where you get the Pfizer guy on tape saying, yeah, we do gain-of-function research and basically admitting to a crime.
It was a huge story.
Not too long after that, James O'Keefe gets fired, right?
And so that's the official narrative.
The official narrative is that the Pfizer story was a bridge too far, and that's what led to James O'Keefe's firing.
Now, there's other theories out there that I won't go into, but this is certainly another interesting thread that needs to be pulled at.
That either James O'Keefe or others at Project Veritas or all of them, they're sitting on, even right now, even more damning information about Pfizer, what Pfizer knew, when Pfizer knew it, what the scientists knew, how they were illegally getting around the testing.
They were lying about the testing that had been done, and they were just putting out the bioweapon.
And yet, we still don't have that footage.
It's a crime.
To be some truth-telling organization?
To try to paint yourself as an organization that is for true journalism, that speaks truth to power?
How much more?
And it was over.
They were worried.
Allegedly, they squashed his story because they were worried about Massachusetts recording laws being a two-party consent state.
That's why they sat on it?
Give me a break.
That's preposterous.
That's idiotic.
And it doesn't even matter.
So what if you got hit with a misdemeanor charge?
Even if you got hit with a felony over it, you're literally releasing information that could save millions of lives.
Man, it's absolutely ridiculous.
You know, I've said this before.
Our leaders hate us.
So our leaders absolutely hate us.
They do not love us.
I have been saying this several times if you guys have been watching the show for any period of time because I don't think we talk about that enough.
I don't think we talk about the fact that...
It really comes down to a love-hate relationship when it comes to leaders, when it comes to what's best for the American people.
What is your leader doing at your local city level or your county level or your state level?
Are those leaders acting in ways that show that they want the best for the community?
Or are they selling out to really small interests that end up going to be a tyranny on the people?
And it really does come down to if you have a leader that actually loves his people, loves his land, wants the best for them, wants to preserve and protect them from enemies, or you have a guy that actually hates the people or is a coward.
Tucker Carlson was recently in Texas.
He was speaking at a local county GOP dinner.
I don't know how the Texas GOP does it.
It's either going to be a Lincoln Day dinner, or it's a Reagan Day dinner, or it's one of these dinners.
It's designed to fundraise.
Anyway, Tucker Carlson went and he spoke, and he decided to slam Greg Abbott, appropriately so.
And he specifically used this love-hate dichotomy.
And it really resonated with me, and so that's what we're watching.
Here's Tucker Carlson from a few days ago in Texas.
Because there's no reason to do this except to destroy the current system that we have and replace it with another system with different people in charge.
That's exactly what's going on.
And I have to say, I know I'm at the Tarrant County, this is like an actual Republican Party event.
So, I mean, I should just, I don't want to attack the governor who's a Republican whom I know.
Totally charming nice guy and I think a good guy in a lot of ways certainly been governor for a long time I'm sure everyone in this room voted for him I probably would have voted for him too if it was the option was a Democrat but I just have to say I don't understand how you could be governor of a state in 2020 and all of a sudden the border opens up and you get invaded and you don't do anything about it and I Don't I don't understand that I don't understand that as someone
who watches politics for a living, but on a much deeper and more fundamental level, I don't understand that as a man, and I don't understand that as a father.
The leadership model is the patriarchal model.
It's dad.
And the first requirement of being dad is loving your kids and your wife.
In fact, that's the only real requirement.
I know tons of good dads who are kind of dumb and half drunk and they're still pretty good dads.
Why?
Because they sincerely love their wife and children and they would give their lives for their wife and children, their families.
That's the core requirement.
And as long as you meet that requirement, you'll do an okay job.
If you don't meet that requirement, you will be a disaster and your kids will wind up in rehab.
That is just a fact.
And I apply that same model to every sphere of life, from the military to the boardroom and absolutely to the political arena.
If you're governor of the state, you love the people who live in that state, no matter who they voted for, no matter what they look like, no matter what language they speak, if they're residents of your state, you love them, and you make every decision with their best interest in mind.
And allowing millions of people to invade your state is like having home invaders show up at your house and run out the back door and let your wife and kids deal with it.
It is contemptible.
It is a violation of the most basic arrangement in life.
And the most basic arrangement in life is, I'm in charge and I will die for you in exchange for the privilege of being in charge.
And if you won't, you shouldn't be in charge.
So I didn't understand.
Okay, well, we can't send the National Guard.
That's incredible.
When's the last time you thought about this concept?
It may be more of a futile, something from a throwback.
But, I mean, certainly as a dad, you're willing to die for your family.
You're willing to lay your life down.
When's the last time you thought about when it came time for the election, when it came down to a vote for anybody?
Hey, would this guy lay down his life to preserve our city, county, state, or country?
Would he actually lay down his life?
Would he go to war?
And you and I both know that none of these people would actually die for their land in terms of politicians.
None of these people would actually lay down their life And what I mean is, in the Texas situation with Greg Abbott, you're talking about a potential civil war.
You're talking about him potentially being, if he were to really do what he needs to do, the federal government would start calling Greg Abbott a traitor.
The Department of Justice would try to call him a traitor.
And we know what the penalty of treason is in America, right?
He would be literally putting his life on the line.
Greg Abbott won't do that.
And you could say, well, it's because he's world economic form.
Yeah, of course, he's world economic form, all that stuff.
Who cares?
What he is saying is just so much more fundamental.
It's literally about whether your leader actually loves the land that he's in charge of and the people that live there, or whether he's just in it for himself and all his politicians are in it for themselves.
And they always think, you know what, we can just move the ball forward, we can kick the can down the road, we never have to address these problems.
And in the meantime, the people of Texas, and thanks to Governor Greg Abbott, all of the states around Texas, and I'm in one of those states around Texas, all of the states around Texas are getting dirtier and more violent, and people are starting to notice.
People are on edge.
People are carrying weapons.
I mean, they should be carrying anyway, but people are carrying their guns everywhere.
People are on a heightened sense of awareness everywhere they go that one of these third world invaders at any moment could pull out a knife and just start stabbing for no reason.
Or pull out a gun because now a federal court says that the Second Amendment applies to illegal aliens.
No, I mean, honestly, you know, Greg Abbott's a traitor either way.
If he does what he needs to be done, he won't really be a traitor, he'll be a patriot, but he'll be called a traitor either way.
He's going to either keep doing what he's doing and selling out his own people and betraying them and being a traitor in that way, or he'll be labeled a traitor by the illegitimate, occupied government in the intel agencies that are now running the show and have who knows how much blackmail on a guy like Greg Abbott.
More from Tucker.
Three armed men in Texas.
There are quite a few.
I know a lot of them.
What he's saying is, he's saying that, you know, can you imagine?
He is saying that Greg Abbott could basically say, everybody with guns in Texas go to the border.
Our state needs your help.
Can you imagine if he would do that?
If he would make a call to the militias in Texas and say, we need your help?
Are you in exchange for the privilege of being in charge?
And if you won't, you shouldn't be in charge.
So I didn't understand.
Okay, well, we can't send the National Guard.
Well, how about every armed man in Texas?
There are quite a few.
I know a lot of them.
I mean it.
Oh, you're so radical.
You're so radical.
Really?
How many community hospitals have closed in the last three years?
How many schools are so dysfunctional you couldn't even visit them at this point?
The institutions that we and our ancestors, the ancestors of every American, spent 250 years building are now collapsing in front of our eyes because of this.
And it doesn't even matter if every single one of the 10 million people who came here illegally from around the world is like a great person, super smart, super talented.
That doesn't even matter.
What matters is we didn't invite them, they broke the law coming here.
If you wind up in a country by breaking the law, that's not a good start.
If you come to my house and kidnap my daughter, I'm not gonna give you permission to marry her.
That's not a good way to start the relationship, okay?
But even if every single one of them was a NASA engineer, it's too many people for any country to digest in too short a period.
You will cause social chaos.
And so we need to understand that the purpose of this is first political, it's to make Tarrant County blue, and if my experience growing up in the state of California, I'm only 54 by the way, I'm not 104, this just happened.
If my experience is any measure of the future that awaits you, be careful, and I mean it.
And the second objective is not a political objective, it's a spiritual objective, and it's to destroy the good.
It's to bring chaos out of order.
Chaos out of order.
Tucker is exactly right.
It's also meant to demoralize the population.
So much of what we're watching as those in positions of power whether elected legitimately or not so much of what we're watching is meant to demoralize us because those leaders tell us that good things are bad and evil and then they tell us that evil things are good and Sometimes they don't even do that.
Specifically with this border issue, what you hear from the Uniparty is that they don't even try to convince you.
I think when I was guest hosting for Stu, I was talking to Anthony Cumia about this earlier in the week.
They don't even try to convince you anymore that these ridiculous policies that are not good for the American people who actually live here, who were born here, they don't even try to convince you that these new ideas that are making your life worse are somehow, they don't even try to spin it to where actually it's really good for you to have inflation out of control.
You know, they don't even try that anymore.
No, instead what they do is they come up with their own morality about, oh, it's good to suffer for your government or it's good to suffer for the illegal immigrants.
Lay your head down at night on your pillow and go to sleep knowing that you're not a bigot.
You're not a racist.
You're not a xenophobe.
Let them keep coming in, and you're a good person because you're equal to them.
And equality is multiculturalism.
Everybody has their own truth.
Truth is relative.
You rest easy knowing that you're not what you could be, which is the most terrifying thing in the world, and that's a racist.
That's what the government does to sell us on their policies.
It's pathetic.
But not all leaders are sticking around.
We've got this Ireland's Prime Minister for International News has decided to resign.
When I became party leader and Taoiseach back in June 2017, I knew that one part of leadership is knowing when the time has come to pass on the baton to somebody else and then having the courage to do it.
That time is now.
So I am resigning as President and Leader of Fine Gael Effective today, and will resign as Taoiseach as soon as my successor is able to take up that office.
I've asked our Party General Secretary and Executive Council All right, so that is Irish Prime Minister, or I guess former Irish Prime Minister?
I mean, he hasn't resigned quite yet, but that's Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar.
Father Calvin Robinson, who is a based truth teller across the pond, he says this is another win for Ireland.
Varadkar should step down as leader, too.
The people are starting to push back.
So that's the update from Ireland.
Just like here in America, and we've got to push back even harder, but over in Ireland, Father Calvin Robinson says, the people are starting to push back against globalism and woke ideologies.
Hold the line.
So Father Robinson here is directly attributing the Irish Prime Minister's resignation to the nation of Ireland, the people of Ireland, who no doubt want it to be Historically Irish and remain Irish to preserve their own culture.
They've been flooded with immigrants too.
They've been flooded with all this woke nonsense as well.
Matter of fact, I think five, six years ago they made abortion legal in Ireland as really a zenith of depravity.
But yeah, Ireland's pushing back.
They've had enough.
And I know you have too.
I know I have.
I'm sick of this nonsense.
And again...
See the top of the show.
We're going to make obscenity laws great again.
We're going to make a whole lot of other stuff great again as well.
My name is Paul Harrell.
That is all the time that we have for this evening here on the Millstone Report.
We're going to see you back here tomorrow night on Friday.
Thank you so much for being with us.
As always, be safe.
God bless.
We'll see you tomorrow night.
▲
Export Selection