All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 16, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
55:53
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Pro-Lifers Support ABORTION, Criminals Willis & Wade BOMB On Stand
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Rainbow Gestapo, the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
I lose track of time so I might be past my prime.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, feels just like I don't try.
I look so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Curl down, sway into my own sound.
Flashes in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody, but you know you want it.
Everybody, everybody, everybody.
You want it.
All right, welcome.
Thank you so much for being with us.
This is the millstone.
I am your host, Paul Herald.
Thank you so much for getting to the show without you.
Happy Friday to everybody out there.
Glad to be with you.
So before the genocidal decision of Roe vs.
Wade in 1973, states across this country were having a debate.
Is abortion a good thing or a bad thing?
Is it murder?
Or is it simply the power of modern science to destroy a clump of cells with no inherent value?
Many states had laws on the books preventing abortion.
Others, like the state of New York, legalized abortion three years before the Roe decision in 1970.
Once that happened, if a mother wanted to kill her baby, New York became a hub for baby murder and human sacrifice, not unlike the tops of ancient Aztec ziggurats.
But then in 1973, the state-by-state hodgepodge of abortion laws were all swept away and transformed into a singular centralized national policy of prenatal genocide.
It was another blow to the original idea behind the United States of America that emphasized and protected local sovereign states, their governments, and the right to govern themselves.
The tyrannical Supreme Court further stripped that right away from the people, and because of the centralized power structure that emerged after the Civil War, we all just accepted this murderous new reality as a way of American life.
That all changed, though.
During the month of June 2022, we all remember, we were deep into the celebration of the sodomite pride.
Corporations were rife with LGBTQ rainbow propaganda, and during the height of this celebration of one of the seven deadly sins, the left got the news that their reign of absolute human sacrifice was coming to an end.
And in some states, the effect was immediate.
You see, diligent Christian state legislators, who for years had prayed the impossible that Roe would once one day be overturned, had worked to pass laws that would immediately trigger or cause the state to revert back to the old laws on the books in the event that Roe v.
Wade be stricken.
Because of the hard work of these Christian legislators this meant that abortion clinics in these states that had those types of laws had to shut down almost immediately.
It was a moment reminiscent of King Josiah's rediscovery of the law when he then demolished all of the pagan temples and executed their wicked priests.
Maybe not the execution part so much.
However Abortion is murder, and murder is something that you execute people for, and it is something that can be prosecuted by the state.
Enter the abortion abolitionist movement.
Yesterday on the Millstone Report, we played for you a video of abolitionist Russell Hunter confronting an Oklahoma state representative called Marcus McIntyre.
The video is riveting, and we're going to play the rest of it for you here in just a moment.
The video reveals just how out of touch some of these Republican legislators are when it comes to abortion.
You see, Christian Nationalist State Senator Dusty Deavers has filed a bill in Oklahoma that would criminalize abortion, meaning women who murder their babies would be charged for murder.
Imagine that.
This is an incredibly consistent step if you think about it.
It serves to strike down the idol of feminism.
The idol of feminism that America has been seduced into worshiping for the last 70 years.
That's right, and that idol has failed us, by the way, as we've told you many times.
All of the gains of feminism are now being wiped away by the trans rainbow brownshirts who don't know what a woman is.
So, what we are witnessing is two-fold.
Number one, the pro-life movement is now resisting the criminalization of abortion and in effect is becoming the new pro-choice movement.
It's pretty wild when you think about it.
Many of those, number two, many of those over the years who have made their living raising money to end abortion, they don't really want to end abortion.
If abortion was criminalized, then there would be no need for these lobbyists.
They would be out of a job.
It would be naive to think that the love of money is not involved here, especially with politics.
It always is.
And this whole situation is not unlike the National Rifle Association.
Let me explain.
For those of you who don't know, the NRA has for years now taken the hard-earned money from naive patriots and used it to fight against grassroots pro-Second Amendment activists at the state level who want to abolish concealed carry permit laws in favor of permitless carry, both open and concealed.
This journalist has personally witnessed all of this play out firsthand in real time.
You see, if laws granting permits go away, and Second Amendment constitutional carry becomes the law of the land, like it should be, then what do we need the National Rifle Association for?
In fact, Kyle Rittenhouse recently told Tucker Carlson that the NRA was of no help to him at all while he was being persecuted by the Marxist BLM-friendly justice system.
But true grassroots organizations like Gun Owners of America, they were the good guys.
So I say all of that to say this.
These same motivations are now capturing the pro-life movement who apparently are content to take a knee at the one-yard line while we're, you know, down three points with one second on the clock and no timeouts left.
It's obvious they don't want to end abortion.
No, they want to regulate it a tad stricter than the partial birth Democrat skull crushers.
Some of the political class are taking their cues from Donald Trump, who says, as a national issue, this is an electoral loser.
Well, if so, I don't know about you, but I'm going to stand against murder regardless of what Donald Trump says.
And this is all the more reason, if it's a big failure nationally, it's all the more reason to criminalize abortion at the state level.
Let's pick up with the rest of this video, shall we?
From yesterday, to further illustrate my point, we are watching the pro-life movement become the pro-choice movement.
Fascinating.
Again, from abolitionists or abolitionism...
Rising, excuse me, Russell Hunter from yesterday confronting Marcus McIntyre, state representative from Oklahoma.
We've already got through half of the video, but actually the last part of this video I think is better than the first.
Watch.
It's a historical nuance that's as old as our country.
I just think it's just a situation that I don't envy anyone for being in, and it's a decision that they made.
Well, we've all been in it.
I actually haven't been.
Well, no, you've been in the womb.
You've been a little human in the womb.
Of course.
Of course.
And your mother didn't choose to abort you, but we have all collectively been in that same situation.
And so the bill or a potential law would be just extend the laws against murder to apply to all humans.
So an abolitionist says, just whatever we say about murder, let's put it on all humans.
Because there are some human beings that murder other born human beings, and they were coerced to do it.
So like if a gang member is coerced to kill another gang member, and he gets caught, he's still liable for murder, but he was coerced.
But we don't go, man, you know what?
He was in a terrible situation.
He was either...
Murder or get kicked out of the gang.
And if you get kicked out of the gang, you may not eat or whatever.
He's in a terrible situation.
You know what?
The best thing to do is just make murder legal.
You know, when you look at these arguments, or any time you try to attack this from the most basic black-and-white moral issue, it makes people like Marcus McIntyre frustrated.
Now, he doesn't really lash out.
He does kind of end the conversation at the end of the video.
But this is not untypical, I guess.
I've had many conversations with people who are pro-life, if you will, And I never even imagined we'd get to the...
So here's the deal.
Many of us are now realizing for the first time that, you know, the goal is within reach.
Many of us were engaged in the legislative movements with basically, you know, some form of triage where we're just trying to save the savable, right?
So if they want to go incrementally and say, hey, you know, studies show that at 18 weeks a baby feels pain, do it, right?
Like, you can't abort after 18 weeks.
You know, then you get the heartbeat.
You know, there's a heartbeat at five weeks.
Okay, do it, you know.
And I've always supported that because of Roe versus Wade.
You know what I mean?
Because Roe versus Wade was essentially the law of the land, people were having to work within that framework.
Well, now it's not.
Now it's not that framework.
So these ideas are saying, well, what about the very, very, very, very, very, very, very small percentages of people who are raped and then conceive a child?
Well, from a Christian standpoint, and this makes people so mad, but it's the truth, and the truth will make them mad, that baby is now an image bearer of God.
That baby is now an image-bearer of God, and it is not okay just because somebody is raped.
It's not okay to say, well, a murder will make it okay.
Even though the consequences of that, I can't even fathom or imagine, and I know it's terrible.
But when you confront people with that, like Russell Hunter is doing, they really don't have a way out.
They don't have a way out.
Unless just to say, well, I think murder, they're just going to have to come out and say it.
And actually hearing, they're going to have to say, well, murder's okay sometimes.
It's okay sometimes.
And when people are confronted with this, I think a lot of people, especially in Christian red states, are going to have a gut check and they're going to say, okay, we've got to vote this guy out of office.
And Russell Hunter, at the end of this video, which we'll see, he makes a great point.
He says, okay, you know, this is pretty cool.
We now know if you convert the pro-life movement into abolitionists, then...
Then we win.
And pretty soon you're going to have a lot of people upset at this term abolitionist if they're not already, especially as it gains steam, because the abolitionists in American history were the ones who were trying to abolish slavery.
And the connection is not lost on me that the Dred Scott decision, which basically said, yeah, the color of your skin determines your rights.
If you have black skin, then you don't have rights under the Constitution, and Well, the exact same thing is happening.
It's just a different form of arbitrary lines.
It's just man saying, well...
You're in the womb, so you don't have rights.
It's the same thing as slavery.
It's way worse than Civil War slavery, in fact.
It's a lot more deadly.
Anyway, back to this video.
That's just preposterous.
It is preposterous.
It's a reductio ad absurdum.
Yeah, exactly.
And so the thing is, what if we did it the other way and said, why don't we make murder illegal in all instances?
Like, give no particular group of people special murder rights.
Which is what we have now.
Unless you don't think abortion is barbaric.
We definitely do.
Why is it barbaric?
I think so.
I mean, for the reasons you stated.
Because it's murder?
Yes.
I don't like it, dude.
I agree.
And I know you don't, but I'm trying to get you to see if the government doesn't exist to stop murder, then what does the government exist to do?
I represent my district.
I represent the...
I'm not Cody Devers.
I'm not...
I don't...
When I got elected, I didn't say, look, I'm going to do whatever my heart and conscience tells me today.
I'm not going to...
I'm going to vote the way this district...
Yeah.
Bearing that they ask you to do something reprehensible like legalized murder for born people.
Yeah.
You know what I'm saying?
It is consistent.
Like, if your people said, you know what, we've been really thinking about it and what we want is legalized meth and child molestation, you'd be like, no, I'm not voting for that.
Everything in this world is black and white.
It's very easy.
And you know what?
Well, you said it was murder.
It's comforting.
I'm not comforted.
I'm saying you said abortion is murder.
I'm just suggesting treat it that way.
I know you want this for your camera.
Well, I also want you to...
If you change, it would be even better than getting it for the camera.
I'm not going to change.
And I appreciate you and I appreciate that you are really into this and you are passionate about it.
And I know where it's coming from, too.
I went to seminary.
I know...
I did not go to seminary.
So, I was you at one point.
Oh my goodness.
I mean, I can't believe that, that last part I got.
I'm sorry, I had two different things of audio played in my ear at once.
I had to stop that.
I went to seminary.
Oh my goodness.
I went to seminary.
Why does he feel the need to say that?
Why does he feel the need to say, I went to seminary in that instance?
If not, because he feels like he's being judged and he's not doing the Christian thing.
He's trying to figure out a way through mental gymnastics to make an excuse for baby murder.
And he wants to assure this guy that he went to the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.
And then what a rebuke on professional ministers.
Well, I did not go to seminary.
Maybe that's the difference.
Oh, man.
Let's back up a little bit.
I appreciate that you are really into this and you are passionate about it.
And I know where it's coming from, too.
I went to seminary.
I know.
I did not go to seminary.
So I was you at one point.
What happened?
Wow.
Okay, so it's not a rebuke on this.
The seminary trained him up right.
I went to seminary at one point, and I was you.
I used to think like you.
This is the classic case of a legislator becoming a part of the system, right?
It's a classic case of those people that have ideals that look at things in a black and white manner, but then they get into elected government and everybody around them tells them, hey, become part of the good old boy system, become part of the team.
And in order to do that, you've got to compromise and you can't be so hard.
You've got to be malleable.
Malleable on things.
And you know what?
I'm not necessarily any more opposed to that on a lot of things, right?
Because it's sausage making, it's messy, but on murder?
Come on.
On murder?
It's nuts.
And on abortion, too.
It just exposes all these people as frauds.
If you see there, and I'm going to remind you, if those of you missed yesterday's episode, the flowers that you see there are from a pro-life organization.
the flowers on the desk there, that's from a pro-life organization that just honored this state representative, Marcus McIntyre from Oklahoma, as a stalwart defender of the unborn.
Right?
But now he's saying that he will not support a bill to abolish abortion because it's a great issue.
And he's, you know, he's come a long way from his seminary days.
I have a constitutional mandate to represent my district.
That's why I ask if the district goes really evil, do you just represent them or do you leave them?
They don't want abortion abolished.
They do not want abortion abolished.
Because they're pro-lifers.
Fine.
Yeah.
And so what the abolitionists are trying to do, and it may get a little fuzzy, is we're trying to get pro-lifers to become abolitionists.
They're not.
I know they're not, but if we can convince pro-lifers to not only think abortion is murder, but also treat it as murder, then we can actually make it murder and stop it.
That's been the philosophy of the pro-life movement from the beginning.
They've always...
Well, then why did they leave their philosophy?
Because they weren't abolitionists.
But you just said that they were from the very beginning.
Okay, this is enough.
This is enough.
You have to do things to do.
Thank you.
Okay.
Well, no, you don't have to handle me out.
I'm not handling you out.
No, I was talking to him.
I was talking to him.
Yeah.
Yeah.
What we say about pro-lifers is true.
And they are themselves, in response to abolition, straight up admitting it.
We are not abolitionists.
I don't do abolitionist things because my people aren't abolitionists.
They're pro-lifers.
But if my people were abolitionists, I would do abolitionist things.
Hence, convert the pro-life movement to abolition.
You get to abolish abortion.
Again, abolitionists rising.
You can follow them on X if you want.
I would highly recommend it.
Also, you can follow Russell Hunter.
Yeah, so this is a big deal.
Again, if you're just joining us, welcome to the program.
Happy Friday.
We really appreciate it.
But pro-life movement becomes pro-choice.
That is what we are witnessing because of the rise of abolitionists, because of the people within the I may be getting these descriptors wrong.
We need to interview Russell Hunter and other people in the abolitionist movement.
I think a lot of people in the pro-life movement have been abolitionists all along, but they have also realized that You know, we need to save as many kids as we can, right?
This massive genocidal depopulation effort, 50-60 million kids since 1973.
It's even millions and millions more if you factor into the babies that the aborted babies would have had in that 60-year, 50-60-year period.
I mean, it's a massive amount of people.
We would have way more people in this country In abortion.
And, you know, the radical Marxists, they actually use that as one of the reasons, well, you Republicans aren't for welfare.
So, I mean, aren't these kids better off dead?
Anyway, it's just absolutely ridiculous.
But let's actually go and listen to, or let's go and read Dusty Deavers.
I mentioned him at the monologue.com.
Dusty Devers here, he's the one that is kind of putting these legislators on the spot.
I would venture among the Republican establishment in Oklahoma, this guy is one of the least popular guys that there is at the moment.
Because he's filed the bill.
And he's going to put a lot of people on the spot.
And I can tell you one thing about abolitionists.
They're going to be very vocal.
And if this bill doesn't get to be heard or it gets struck down by some legislative procedure or legislative sleight of hand, I don't exactly know.
Some states, if you file a bill, every bill gets a hearing.
Other states don't do that.
They mimic what Congress does.
Just because you file a bill at the D.C. level in Congress doesn't mean it actually ever gets heard.
Which, you know, is a whole other can of worms or conversation to have.
Call your legislator in Oklahoma, Deaver says, ask them to support the hearing and committee of SB 1729.
Sounds like they have to have some sort of, they even have to have some sort of political will to even hear the piece of legislation.
Similar to DC, what does SB 1729 do?
Well, it acknowledges the sanctity of human life created in the image of God.
It provides equal protection of the law to all human beings from the moment of fertilization slash conception until natural death.
It protects pregnant mothers from being pressured or coerced to get an abortion.
It protects mothers and doctors in ectopic and emergency pregnancies.
It protects due process and presumption of innocence.
It repeals the exceptions in the homicide code allowing for prenatal homicide, namely abortion.
It criminalizes the act of prenatal homicide.
Now then he says this is what it does not do.
What it does not do is prevent life-saving measures to be taken by a physician for an ectopic pregnancy or any other medical emergency.
It simply requires that doctors Uphold the Hippocratic Oath and treat both the mother and children equally.
We want to do no harm to both the mother and the child, if at all possible.
SB 1729, again in Oklahoma, does not criminalize women.
It simply criminalizes the act of prenatal homicide and applies the homicide code equally.
Now...
So when I saw this, this is what I've been hammering on.
It's exactly right.
This is not criminalizing being a woman.
It's criminalizing.
It's eliminating the special class of women that the Supreme Court created in 1973.
This special class that went right along with the idolatry that I would call feminism, the worshiping of women.
I mean, it's affected everything.
It's emasculated our society.
It's infiltrated churches where now churches are taught.
Speaking of seminaries, people are taught to actually use language that appeals to women.
To basically kind of sanitize everything and feminize the language and feminize worship service and everything.
And this is part of this national idol that we have been seduced into worshiping for the last 60, 70 years.
Because I don't just chart it from 73.
You know, you can go back...
And chart it really from the 60s and the bra burning that yada yada yada has led to Supreme Court Justice Katangi Jackson Brown saying she doesn't know what a woman is because she doesn't want to offend her cult.
She doesn't want to be labeled an apostate in her religion.
This new left-wing global sex religion.
So it does not criminalize women.
It simply makes them liable for murder just like all of the rest of the men in America.
Or, in this case, the state of Oklahoma can be prosecuted for murder.
And then he says that also on the list of things that it does not do, SB 1729 does not criminalize miscarriages.
It simply criminalizes the willful and premeditated act of prenatal homicide.
And there you go.
Prenatal homicide is what we are looking to correct here.
So, he tells everybody they need to call.
So, if you're listening to the state of Oklahoma, feel free to call your legislator and look them up, whoever they are, and help out these folks who are trying to do the work, you know, an extension of...
I guess I see it all as an extension of the pro-life movement, and that's why...
You know, the pro-life movement becoming pro-choice, I mean, it really is, that's what's happened, you know?
They're wanting to just regulate it a little bit stricter than the Democrats, right?
And so it was easy to do this legislative triage for so many years when the courts were stacked against us.
And you would get little legislative victories here and there, whether it's the heartbeat law or whether it's the pain-capable child acts, you know, 18 to 20 weeks or whatever.
And now that we have the ability to end this once and for all, thanks to Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v.
Wade, people are starting to think, well, I'm getting cold feet.
And it's the same reason why.
I mean, I'll give you an example.
There are southern states that used to be ignorant of abortion.
So southern states used to be blue.
And then they slowly turned red.
And then when Barack Obama got into office...
Barack Obama just essentially pushed all of the other local Democrats out.
They either switched parties, which a lot of them did, but Republicans took over southern states when Obama got in.
It was absolute at that point.
Well, and throughout those years, if you talk to people, throughout those years when the Democrats were in control, there were people who were going to church every Sunday.
Not everybody.
A lot of people were awake, but there were still a lot of other people who were just totally naive.
They bought into this lie.
They didn't really understand what an abortion was.
They didn't really understand the science behind fertilization, implantation, conception in general.
And so you just said, well, it's just a clump of cells.
It's not really a baby, right?
And this also comes from, you know, historic laws.
There are other laws on the books, you know, predating the 1800s that talk about the quickening, right?
Well, it's because they didn't have the technology that we have now, but they would basically say, hey, you know, once the quickening happens, which is when a woman can actually feel the baby begin to move, okay, yeah, it's like that is a life, right?
That's...
That's what the standard was.
But it's because there wasn't ultrasounds.
There wasn't the technology.
There wasn't pregnancy tests, right?
There wasn't blood tests.
Those things didn't exist yet.
And now they do.
Now you have the Plan B pill.
So as much as I was celebrating earlier, you know, in June of 2022, in the middle of Pride Month, their, you know, child sacrifice operation comes to a screeching halt.
It really hasn't in a lot of ways.
And a lot of these Christian red states that did the work to outlaw abortion, not criminalize it yet, but outlaw it, just in terms of making it something that is illegal to do, the Plan B pill has come back in huge force.
I mean, the Plan B pill is now the new battleground, really.
And that's why I think the abolitionists are eventually, I think they're going to be successful here.
Because you can go online and you can see the memes of, you know, people, girls, showing up in the parking lot of Walgreens or showing up in the parking lot of a CVS, you know, kind of doing, I don't know, the modern day walk of shame, if you will, and they've had a night of revelry and now they're going in to take their abortion pill to murder their child.
And that is really the new battleground here.
All right, we're going to take a break, and when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit more, just a little bit more, expand our conversation from yesterday with Stephen Wolfe that we had that's up on this Rumble channel, talking a little bit more about Christian nationalism.
I've got a video I want to play for you, and then we're going to talk Fannie Willis in a hearing.
Fannie Willis and her lover, Mr.
Wade, were in a hearing yesterday.
This is, of course, the DA in Georgia who's gone after President-in-exile Donald Trump.
Well, she was put on the stand yesterday, and boy, was it interesting.
Her wardrobe was also interesting as well.
And if you don't know, stay tuned, and we'll tell you why that was interesting.
Coming up during the break, we're going to listen to Stu Peters.
We didn't cover this yesterday, but you guys all saw the big...
A tragedy up in Kansas City at the Super Bowl parade there where the shooting happened.
So, Stu, last night went live and wanted to say a few words about that.
And he did, and we're going to play that for you during the break.
Don't go in.
We're back in a moment.
Thank you so much for watching.
So yesterday, the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl parade descended into the exact type of chaos that America's inner cities are just now so well known for, as shots were fired, leaving one person dead and another 20, including children, injured.
Now, immediately after the shots rang out, of course, social media started going nuts.
The corporate media started setting up their live commentary streams.
They were all just jumping up and down, wishfully thinking, maybe even praying, which would be a rarity for them, That this gunman would be some white Taylor Swift-hating, NFL-hating psychopath.
Some guy who'd finally broken under FBI conditioning in the steady stream of NFL-backed anti-white propaganda before grabbing his assault weapon, a fictitious class of firearms, and driving down to that parade and trying to blast Travis Kelsey to smithereens.
Sounds about right.
But guess what?
As usual, that isn't what happened.
Instead, law enforcement has arrested at least three black males, surprise, surprise, associated with this shooting.
Now, we don't know that they're black because the police came out and told us, or because they released their mug shots and plastered them on the front page of the paper.
No, because they haven't.
The only reason that we know that they're black is because the live news cameras and people on social media caught the police rounding up the suspects.
After that, of course, the story just disappeared from the headlines, or at least any investigation into them.
All the other stuff, the anti-gun talk, the mass shooting hysteria is still hammering away in the media, but any description of the shooters, any talk of the suspect's motivations has completely disappeared.
Because it's obvious what their motivations were.
This is what's happening every single day in cities across America where the black populations, when left to their own devices, can't help but kill.
Kill each other.
Kill anyone else who gets in the way.
America's cities just can't handle nice things like parades anymore.
No, because they're basically the third world.
The streets are controlled by people with an average IQ of 65.
There is no law and order.
This victory parade is just another version of what we see every year now on Juneteenth.
Parades and celebrations are held in the inner cities and a whole slew of people end up dead.
But there was some encouraging footage that came out of Kansas City yesterday where a group of citizens took matters into their own hands and tackled one of the gunmen, taking him down until the police, who looked like they had no idea what they were doing or who they were looking for, could get to him.
So it's nice to see that even though the NFL is trying to castrate its fans, there are still some men out there that are willing to stand up for something.
Just imagine if the 49ers had won the game and the shooting had been some black thug in San Francisco instead.
Could you imagine a bunch of queers in high heels chasing down a gunman and trying to kick his ass?
This is just a prime example of why we need real men everywhere all the time.
Thank God states like Missouri, like Kansas, still produce guys with testosterone.
*Sounds of music*
*Sounds of music* Excellent stuff.
Let's get serious here for a second.
Even though they can't blame Whitey for firing the shots, this situation in Kansas City, make no mistake, is already being snatched up by gun control nuts to be used as a gigantic stage for calling for gun control.
Confiscation.
Give us your guns.
Law-abiding citizens.
Lawfully able to possess and carry firearms because of the Second Amendment that shall not be infringed, right?
No, they want to disarm the American public and usher in their one-world governance.
And the NFL, desperate to get its social credit score up after being accused of toxic masculinity for years, is more than happy to facilitate this.
It pairs wonderfully with their BLM agenda that's got an anti-white filth slapped all over the fields and their uniforms, on their helmets.
By the time the NFL is done spinning this shooting, I'm going to make a bet.
These black shooters will be the victims, and all of the white people at the parade will be the aggressors.
The presence of whiteness triggered generational trauma, which led to the shooting.
The NFL has been gravitating toward gun control for quite a while.
And this is going to be used to ban guns, especially in an election year.
It's perfect timing for the NFL. They have eyes of liberal Taylor Swift fans on the league, and she's already a known gun hater.
You have her boyfriend, Travis Kelsey, the Pfizer salesman, who's obviously been compromised.
He's all over the media.
He's the darling of Joe Biden and the late night TV shows, and he's already come out over the years calling for gun control, so now he's perfectly positioned to just do it again.
And it's not just the Chiefs.
No, this is league-wide.
Alright, welcome back.
Thank you so much.
Happy Friday to all of you out there.
My name is Paul Harrell and this is the Millstone Report.
Fascinating analysis there by Stu Peters.
Certainly, they'll use anything they can to try to take away our guns.
It's really the last...
It's the last right that we have that is universal.
I mean, America is an armed nation.
It's an armed nation of people that know how to use high-powered rifles.
I mean, just in deer season alone in this country, in this country, you're talking about hundreds.
That's the opening day of modern gun in rural states that have deer hunting.
You're looking at hundreds of thousands of people per state.
Per state.
I don't know how much, but hundreds of thousands of hunters in each state.
I would say, you know, 200, 300,000 per state that are in trees with high-powered rifles ready to kill a deer to feed themselves.
That's still a reality in this country.
And so, you know, a well-armed militia being necessary for the security of a free state, hello?
They want to go after your guns.
100%.
And I'm reminded of how desperate they are.
I mean, if you harken back to 2009, when Barack Obama was running a false flag gun-running operation set up to frame...
Border gun stores so that he could somehow put a Second Amendment-free zone along the southern border, arming the cartels with guns under the guise they were tracking the guns to stop the cartels, and border agent Brian Terry ended up dead.
Do you remember the Fast and Furious scandal?
Very few people do.
Nobody really talks about it.
At the time, CBS reporter Cheryl Atkinson had her computer remotely turned on by the NSA and people were going through the reporting she was doing on it.
She's even now come out and said that her husband was threatened with charges of pedophilia because there were plans to place images on his computer.
Because they were so upset with Sheryl Atkinson discovering their false flag attack, their false flag gun running scheme that was designed to be a pretext to take our guns away.
Anyway, I remember covering that story quite well.
So there's a guy on the internet by the name of Bob of Speaker's Corner.
He is a British fellow or an Irish fellow.
I think he's British, but forgive me for my ignorance.
But, you know, he's from that area.
And he talks a lot.
He's a Christian.
He's a Christian apologist.
And he talks a lot about You know, this idea that if you're going to reject—like, they've been overrun by the Muslims for a very, very long time, right?
They've been over—their whole culture has been essentially dominated by the Muslims for the last 10 years, entire blocks of— Of London have been taken over by Muslims and the police won't even go there.
They let them basically kind of govern themselves and everything else.
And so he's saying, look, if you want to stop that, you can't stop that without retaking your culture and embracing the Christian identity of what our country was.
You can't just say, hey, we don't want Islam.
We've got to.
Because he says that Islam is being used because there was a vacuum that was, as they pushed Christianity, they pushed worship of God out of public life, that was the vacuum that filled it with something else.
And he said, if you're going to push back against it, you're going to have to fill it with something else as well.
Recently, a clip of his has gone viral about his Christianity, meaning The Christians of days past that conquered nations and Christianized nations.
Of course, a lot of big evangelical people are going to watch this video and hate it, but it's making the rounds, and so I thought I would share it.
Watch.
My Christianity is not the cowardly, wimpy Christianity that you want to make it.
My Christianity is the Christianity that defeated Islamic Jihad three times.
My Christianity conquered the Roman Empire.
My Christianity defeated the Pagan Vikings and the Northern Pagan Pride.
My Christianity defeated the Ottoman Empire.
The defeated the Arab invasion of the 7th century.
The Arab invasion in Andalusia, in Spain.
Do you see?
The Ethiopian Christians, who follow my kind of Christianity, deceit to be a Muslim invasion.
My Christianity is the one followed by the Armenians and the Georgians who defeated the Persians or Astrians and the Muslims.
My Christianity is not for women.
You're complaining about it because you are.
That's pretty powerful stuff.
Again, Bob of Speakers Corner.
There's a YouTube channel.
There's also Twitter Builders Bob or Bob the Builder.
So this video that made the rounds caused podcaster and Christian Joshua Hames to say that Christendom 2.0, this idea that we're going to reestablish, you know, Christianity as a cultural norm, not something to be hated, not something to be feared, and, you know, we don't want to put Christians in boxcars, let's put it that way.
He says, Jesus told us to disciple
the nations.
Why do you think Paul was so eager to get in front of Caesar?
because he believed the Great Commission really could be accomplished, and getting the gospel to and converting the most powerful influential man in the world would have a profound gospel implication for the advancement of Christ's kingdom.
Paul wasn't allergic to cultural influence and political power.
He was going after Caesar so that King Jesus would be honored and worshipped by all in the empire, including the emperor himself.
Christendom was built, defended, and expanded such that in conquering the Western world to the point where the phrase European culture actually made sense, worrying pagan tribes and countries eventually found themselves converted and brought into the kingdom of Christ.
Was it perfect?
No.
Was it messy and sinful at times?
Yes, of course, he says.
But Christianity eventually took mushroom-tripping, murderous pagan Vikings and transform them into the kinds of people who produced Bach and Beethoven.
Chris, Christendom was built by men who were not embarrassed by their Christian heritage.
They were not embarrassed by the Word of God, and they had a vision of Christ's kingdom conquering the whole world.
Give us a generation of men like that, and we will build, defend, and expand new Christendom again.
Now, I don't know what you think about that.
But I do find it interesting.
It's a total contrast of what you have heard, what many of us have heard, you know, growing up.
Because, see, there's a lot of people that believe that, as Christians, we have to be somehow political atheists.
Now, I don't think you guys out there believe that.
I don't believe that.
But there is a tendency to be political atheists.
And it comes from an overreaction, honestly.
It really does.
I think the closest one would be, obviously, Trump and MAGA and everything they say about that.
They claim that people who are Christians and vote for Trump are worshipping Trump.
And that's ridiculous, right?
I mean, I just did a monologue where I said I disagreed with Trump on abortion.
Nobody's worshipping Trump.
There are some that might do it, but...
I think I would like to harken back to the Gulf War, or I guess the war in Iraq, right?
Toby Keith, it was after 9-11, which basically got us into the war in the Middle East.
And you had all these George Bush voters that were like, yeah!
You know, they were like, Yeah, America!
And then you had the religious right at the time that was going really in lockstep with it.
And the argument from...
I would say the argument from Christian leaders was, hang on, maybe we need to pump the brakes here a little bit.
Because you see, America's kingdom and God's kingdom are not the same.
And some of these people in the religious right back in 2001, 2002, 2003, they're making us very uncomfortable because they're basically kind of unifying this idea that...
The Kingdom of Heaven and the United States of America's war in Iraq are the same, right?
And I think they were right.
No, they're not the same.
But then the overcorrection of that is, let the left do whatever they want then.
The overcorrection of that has been, let's put our heads in the sand and let's become, as Christians, let's go to worship on Sunday, but then let's become political atheists and not have an opinion about anything, not push back about anything.
There were actual...
You know, ministers, after the Obergefell decision came down, and this is what, it's so rich.
After the Obergefell decision came down, pastors preached to their outraged congregation to try to make them feel guilty for idolizing the American family.
Don't idolize the family.
This is just part of it.
In an attempt to get them to not organize and not make an idol of politics.
And it's preposterous.
And in the meantime, following that advice has led us to accepting transitive kids, boys going to the girls' bathroom, and so on and so forth.
And it's absolutely disgusting.
Case in point, I'll give you this right here.
I tweeted this at Russell Moore earlier because...
Let me see if I can't find it here.
Yeah, right here.
So Russell Moore, this is Mr.
Big Eva Angelical.
He's starring in Rob Reiner's film.
And he wants to...
Sorry about that.
Let me pull myself up.
So Rob Reiner, you know, got this film trying to attack Christian nationalism.
I was just on with Stephen Wolf here on this program yesterday, and what were we talking about?
We were talking about how big evil leaders like Russell Moore, they like to take regime propaganda, and they want to sanitize it to a Christian audience.
Well, you know what's going on right now?
Right now...
Tucker Carlson went and interviewed Vladimir Putin.
And when Tucker Carlson went and interviewed Vladimir Putin, it's been viewed over 200 million times.
And it's been out, what, a week?
And it's been viewed over 200 million times.
There's also now clips of Tucker Carlson going to a Russian grocery store and mall.
And shocker, it's not some, you know, third world mess.
And the prices are really cheap.
And this is making people upset.
They're trying to say, oh, what a bad move, Tucker, because he didn't know he's never been to an Aldi where they have the same type of quarter carts.
Big deal.
He's never been to an Aldi, right?
Who cares?
But Tucker's been very effective.
You want to know how I know Tucker's been very effective?
For the same reason that Rick Warren said at the World Economic Forum in 2008 that the World Economic Forum elites are failing because they're using government and business, but they're not using local pastors and influential ministers whose people trust them to enforce their globalist agenda.
Rick Warren said that.
Rick Warren said that.
was in this pastor, you know, quote, pastor over at Saddleback Church.
He said this in 2008 when he went to Davos in the World Economic Forum before you and I even knew what the World Economic Forum was.
And so because Vladimir Putin and Tucker Carlson's interview has successfully pierced the mainstream mean narrative, actually destroyed decades of propaganda fueled by this idea of, oh, 1980s Soviet Union trying to ignore the fact that we have become the godless communist Soviets.
We're the ones that have become the godless communist Soviets today.
They don't want you to know that.
So they've got to keep you afraid of Russia all the time.
Russia, Russia, Russia.
So Russell Moore, in an attempt to get out ahead of the Christians that may be watching Tucker Carlson and watching Vladimir Putin, and dare say, you know, Putin doesn't come across as a monster, the genocidal maniac.
He comes across as a human being.
God forbid, Vladimir Putin.
I wonder if he gets us, would make an ad with Russell Moore watching the feet of Vladimir Putin in the name of the gospel.
I wonder if they would do that.
Here is Russell Moore.
The Putin regime murders political dissidents, slaughters Ukrainian children, holds hostage Russian orphans, and persecutes religious minorities, including evangelical Christians.
Okay, Russell, now do the Christians in Gaza.
Go.
I'll wait.
I'll wait, Russell.
Do the Christians in Gaza right now.
Are there Christian churches in Gaza?
Go ahead.
Go for it.
Christians, above all people, ought to recognize how anti-Christ all of that is.
Again, the Ukraine war narrative was a complete lie.
Russell Moore and others like him told you to wear the mask.
He not only told you to wear the mask, he told you to get the jab.
Love your neighbor, get the jab.
Love your neighbor, wear a mask.
People like Russell Moore and Russell Moore himself...
Generally in this ballpark, that's what they did.
They served to sanitize this regime rhetoric to make it palatable for Christians to keep them from doing anything that might result in political power going to Christians to stop this nonsense.
So that's what I said in this post.
Once again, you serve to sanitize official regime propaganda to convince Christians that America has the moral high ground.
Wear a mask, love your neighbor, get the jab, etc.
While the U.S. has become the godless communist Soviets that we used to oppose.
And here it is for all the world to see.
I'm just telling you right now, the fact that Russell Moore has done this, it just tells you everything you need to know.
At the very least, he has seen how popular the Tucker Putin interview is, and he's been triggered by it.
This guy still believes every piece of COVID propaganda, and I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that he's not in on it, and he's not working for the World Economic Forum to do all of this, which that's, you know, I'm just saying, for the sake of argument, give him the benefit of the doubt.
This guy still thinks that the Ukrainians are the good guys and that Zelensky isn't a pervert.
This guy still thinks that Russia invading Ukraine was some unprovoked thing.
He has no idea that the Donbass region has been shelled since 2014.
This guy, again giving him the benefit of the doubt, has no idea that the United States government did a coup in Russia in 2014.
Many people think it was a direct response from Putin's anti-LGBT propaganda laws in 2013.
But no, he wants to reinforce the regime rhetoric here.
Absolutely disgusting.
Turns my stomach.
At the top of the hour, here in about 10 minutes, Stu Peters got a brand new Stu Peters show coming up for you.
We'll preview that here in a minute.
And I'm sorry, I promised we'd get to Fannie Willis.
So some people think Fannie Willis has admitted to a crime yesterday in her hearing over her love affair and the payments and the vacations between Nathan Wade.
Let's watch.
But I always have cash at the house.
That has been, I don't know, all my life.
If you're a woman and you go on a date with a man, you better have $200 in your pocket.
So if that man acts up, you can go where you want to go.
So I keep cash in my house.
And I don't keep cash as good in my purse like I used to.
I don't go on many dates.
But when you go on a date, you should have cash in your pocket.
So my question was, where did that cash originally come from?
If it didn't come out of the bank.
Cash is...
Fungible?
We've had cash for years in my house.
So for me to tell you the source of when it comes from, when you go to Publix and you buy something, you get $50, you throw it in there.
It's been my whole life.
When I took out a large amount of money on my first campaign, I kept some of the cash of that.
Like, to tell you I just have cash in my house.
What did she say again?
Let's take a listen.
Fungible?
We've had cash for years in my house.
So for me to tell you the source of when it comes from, When you go to Publix and you buy something, you get $50, you throw it in there.
It's been my whole life.
When I took out a large amount of money on my first campaign, I kept some of the cash of that.
I took out a large amount of my money for my first campaign and I kept some of that.
Now, a lot of people are now saying, hey, she just admitted to a crime.
What she is going to say is that she took out personal cash.
From herself to fund her personal campaign.
But when she did, she didn't give it all to her campaign.
She just kept some of it because it was her cash to begin with.
So that's what she's going to say.
She may have admitted to a crime there.
I know the internet's going crazy saying she admitted to a crime there.
I'm not so sure.
There's nothing illegal of financing your own campaign with your own money.
But before it gets to the campaign's account, obviously...
However, you never know.
She may have admitted to a crime.
She may have done what a lot of people say that she did.
In summary of all this, Megyn Kelly says that she thinks that they're all toast.
Her former close friend testified that their romantic relationship began well prior to when Fannie hired him, Nathan Wade.
Wade claimed Fannie reimbursed him for all of the expensive trips.
But no record of that.
It was all in cash, OMG. He definitely got caught lying on his earlier court submission and divorce court.
Actually, let's just go to the video for this one.
Nathan Wade.
Let's check in on Nathan Wade.
How did he do during this hearing yesterday about this obvious corruption?
Let's watch.
Did you go to a cabin with Miss Willis ever?
Ever?
Ever.
Ever.
I've been really trying, baby.
Trying to hold back this feeling for so long.
And this you feel like I feel, baby.
No.
You've never found a capital system?
No.
Oh, man.
That's fantastic.
And you know what?
That's exactly where we're going to end it, right there.
Stu Peters has got a great show coming up for you.
You don't want to miss it.
Going to be talking to Michael Yawn about the house impeaching Mayorkas, the traitor, among other things.
Also, Sean McBeardy back on the program talking about Maine.
The state of Maine has...
A high school where they have these sexuality clubs for kids after school with teachers.
It's pedophilic, it's disgusting, and it is grooming.
The next generation of perverts, all of that and more coming up on The Stu Peter Show.
You're going to want to click out of this video, though, and click onto the Stu Peters Network video of his live broadcast that will start here in just a few minutes.
So, folks, have a great weekend.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much.
God bless.
Be safe out there.
▲
Export Selection