All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 26, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
56:23
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Deep State TRAITORS Caught On Tape Organizing Anti-TRUMP Resistance
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
People say we need to make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, it feels just like I don't shine.
I look so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Curved down, swaying to my own sound.
Flashes in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody, don't you know who you are?
Everybody, everybody, everybody, everybody.
What do you want?
Alright, hello and welcome.
Happy Friday to everybody out there.
Thank you so much for being with us as always.
My name is Paul Harrell.
This is the Millstone Report.
So during Trump's run for president in 2016, we now know the deep state spied on his campaign in an attempt to frame him for treason.
During the four years of his administration, that plot continued, and many Democrats still believe the lie that Donald Trump colluded with Russia and stole the 2016 election.
Now, that's just a coping mechanism because they just can't believe the American people rejected Hillary Clinton, the hag, Additionally, throughout Trump's four years in office, his time in office was stymied all the time, time and time again, by deep state lifers within the federal bureaucracy.
Now, some of this was Trump's fault because he surrounded himself with traitors like Mike Pence and others who never had any intention of draining the swamp in the first place, which it led to the managerial class of godless tyrants who despise Christian red states and the people who live there.
It's no secret these lifelong bureaucratic leeches hated Donald Trump, and that hatred propelled them to coordinate an extra-governmental organized resistance.
Remember the constant leaks from within the government that fueled fake news CNN for four years?
Funny how all of those leaks have dried up in the Biden administration.
Well, we have an amazing bombshell story to share with you tonight.
Recently, reporter and independent journalist Millie Weaver said, has uncovered a story that confirms all of this.
Everything we thought was happening, I mean, it's now all on tape.
Government employees caught on tape during strategy sessions, or maybe rather struggle sessions, on how to thwart Trump during the stolen 2020 election.
Here's a snippet of it.
A couple of notes on your own safety and the safety of the others that you are working with tonight.
Please disclose only as much information about yourself as you're comfortable with.
As I mentioned earlier, feel free to keep your camera muted.
Feel free to change your name when you're introducing yourself and breakout.
Use your name if you want, your agency or department if you want, or talk about what your favorite meal is.
Find a way to introduce yourself that you're comfortable with.
If you're talking about actions that you might take yourself, I encourage folks to speak hypothetically.
If someone were considering doing X, what might the problems be?
That way there's no implication that that's actually something that you've said you're going to do.
Just keep things hypothetical.
And then if there's a discussion emerges, especially in the breakout group, of some very specific actions that you want to take or something that might be higher risk, For people in your group, definitely get each other's contact information and form a signal group to talk about that.
Signal's an app that's very secure, end-to-end encryption.
it's a good way to communicate about anything that you wouldn't want to get out that might get you in trouble with your boss.
So this is just but a taste of what we have in store for you this hour.
Please welcome the host of the Millennial Millie show.
Millie Weaver is here for more on this story.
Millie, thank you so much.
I've been a fan of your work for a very long time.
And thank you for coming on the Millstone Report.
Absolutely.
Thank you so much for having me here today.
You know, this really all started back in the spring of 2019 when I first noticed that Bernie Sanders was really campaigning.
And I noticed this youth-led climate organization called the Sunrise Movement.
And how they kind of appeared to be the classic watermelon party, meaning they are green on the outside, red on the inside, meaning they appear to be a green climate movement, but really and truly they are teaching Marxism and socialism ideologies to these young people.
So I decided to basically kick off a massive investigation into these people and actually I had somebody go in and infiltrate this organization to see what we could find out about what their activities were leading up to the 2020 election.
And so it took some time really and truly to get our infiltrator up throughout these affinity groups.
But what you actually students start to realize is that you think that something like the Sunrise Movement is a standalone, independent, Organization, when in actuality, most of those left-wing protest movements that you see out there, like BLM, Shutdown DC, Sunrise Movement, so on and so forth, they are actually essentially all very connected in that they work together.
And in fact, they have overarching organizations like Momentum, where you have Trainers that come in who specialize in protests and riot tactics, they come in and they train them.
And so you have these overlaps between these organizations and you actually have where they actually engage in Zoom meetings and private discussions with the leaders of these allied groups and organizations.
And so what happens is they actually form what's called affinity groups.
So pockets of like 20 or so people who are closely knit and they engage in more secretive or clandestine actions.
But then what happens is each of those affinity groups, which a member of an affinity group could be BLM and another member could be shut down DC and another member could be another one, right?
And so these affinity groups will form together and form what's called clusters and then those clusters can all form together and form what's called actions.
And so what we ended up doing is working our way up into the main action of the unified effort of many of these left-wing protest organizations As well as the activities that were going on with many of the federal government bureaucrats who were working with these outside left-wing organizations.
Wow.
And so you had, I mean, you attained all this footage because essentially, you know, you had a source on the inside.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, we intentionally put a source on the inside and we infiltrated and we studied them.
We studied their activities.
We made sure that our person was playing the part and the role so that it would be believable.
They would gain trust.
And so sure enough, we got high up high in there and inside of the movement resources, we were able to obtain access to their secret Zoom call meetings and which we all recorded and documented, as well as their internal documents, access to their some of their signals, some of their discord, some of their other access to their some of their signals, some of their discord, some of their other their Slack So we gained a lot of knowledge and information studying these organizations, these affinity groups and how they were operating.
But I think one of the most damning things we really uncovered was a Zoom call that took place just a week prior to the 2020 election.
And that was the Feds for Democracy Zoom call where you had many government employees.
And we're talking people who have national security backgrounds, people who were former Obama, White House people, people who work in Department of Labor, Department of Energy, a lot of USAID people and people with the United Nations, as well as the leaders of protest a lot of USAID people and people with the United Nations, as well as
And so they were coming together in this meeting and they were having these conversations about giving strategies on how to subvert the United States government and the office of the presidency, as well as how they would play a role in the 2020 election and essentially making sure as well as how they would play a role in the 2020 election and essentially making sure that they were going to help the Biden transition team and to kind of stonewall the Trump appointees and Trump's administration
Yeah, I mean, I think this is criminal, this type of organizing.
It's definitely anti-American.
And again, you've got these screenshots here, acts of commission, acts of omission, meaning these are the things that these federal leeches, these bureaucrats, these far leftists, these Marxists, as you rightfully call them, can do to slow everything down.
Maybe even strike and walk out.
We have, again, here's the images of the Zoom calls that you guys were able to obtain days before the 2020 election.
You just talked about that.
We even have names here at its peak.
About 150 participants were on the call.
You guys have got the hosts and the speakers.
I mean, these people should be investigated.
Actually, I mean, if Trump were to win, if somehow Trump wins...
I mean, this is the list.
These guys are gone.
These guys have got to be fired immediately.
You agree?
Oh, absolutely.
These are the people that need to be drained, essentially.
This is the swamp.
We found the swamp.
We've looked the swamp creature right in the eyes, and it's many tentacles.
We can identify it.
And this is where, you know, when Trump gets in in 2024, he needs to make sure that these people all get fired.
They all get drained.
And essentially, we don't have to wait until Trump gets in, though, in 2024.
In fact, we really can't.
We cannot afford to wait.
We need Congress to act now.
We have representatives that can start investigations, okay?
They can start holding hearings.
They can use subpoena power.
They can call many of these people before the House, and they could be interviewed.
They could have to testify.
This is what needs to start happening.
And then they can, of course, forward all of this, their findings to the Department of Justice and get it on the record saying, look, we have these people inside the government that were committing criminal actions against the U.S. government and the office of the presidency.
And we're asking that the DOJ do their job.
Otherwise, the DOJ needs to be looked into to see if maybe they're associating and affiliating with this rogue group of federal bureaucrats.
Yeah, absolutely.
You are exactly right.
So on this particular tweet that's up on the screen, the election is at risk.
Quote, there will likely be disagreements about which ballots should be thrown away and for what reason.
It's almost like they obviously, you know, they just knew.
Here is, I think I have this particular clip.
Let's listen to it.
So, high-level issue.
The election is at risk.
This is due to a number of factors.
Donald Trump has not committed to a peaceful transfer of power.
Instead, there's been significant fear-mongering about risks associated with mail-in ballots, which has been rampant.
The election results are unlikely to be finalized on November 3rd.
Which is perhaps different than what we're used to in previous years.
There will likely be disagreements about which ballots should be thrown away and for what reason.
We've seen lots of court cases happening in many swing states around the country, and there's a chance that certain decisions around the election will take place in the courts.
So there's a lot going on right now, and as we're all aware, the election is now less than a week away.
Yeah, I mean, so that right there, Millie, I mean, it's just so damning.
Again, everything we, and we've already known that this was essentially, you know, a coup to take over the country.
But, I mean, this is just more evidence of it.
I mean, it's just mounting evidence that these people really did do the color revolution.
We all know they did.
Exactly.
And, you know, I really do think that, you know, that video, Acts of Commission and Acts of Omission, it speaks volumes because in it, a woman named Maria Stephan, who formerly worked at the State Department, she pretty much talks about how, you know, what tactics that they can use inside of the federal government what tactics that they can use inside of the federal government in order to pretty much subvert the government, destroy policies that they don't like or that they think are
So this is how they were able to really, really try to stop the Trump administration from accomplishing a lot of the goals that they had and the policies that they wanted to enact, because they would do things like intentionally slow walk things,
gum up the bureaucratic processes, take strategic sick gum up the bureaucratic processes, take strategic sick days in order to make things take longer, overly ask questions, basically make things like overly redundant and excessive, and just really kind of internally sabotage as well as leak documents to their media allies from,
And they specifically say to leak to one of the people in the call actually suggests that people leak to ProPublica and Politico and that they have signal accounts that they can text them and that their identities will be protected.
Yes, and again, you know, we have to charge these leakers, you know, unlike what they did to the person that, whoever leaked the Supreme Court decision.
Okay, so I want to get to Maria Stephan.
I've got her queued up here, but before we do, I've kind of got this in chronological order.
Here is this tweet here, thwarting a coup isn't a coup.
Listen to this.
So speaking of coups, I also want to be upfront that it is a coup to refuse to honor the results of a free and fair election.
It is not a coup to act against a government or officials who are trying to prevent a legitimate transfer of power.
We believe that every vote must count, we must count every vote, and we must take action to protect democracy.
Thwarting a coup is not the same thing as a coup, it's protecting democracy.
There's going to be a lot of narratives around what is happening, what should be happening, what do things mean, and I think it's really important to be centered in what any of us know is right.
I mean, so there you go.
I mean, the narratives, they were already prepared for, and, you know, this is where, you know, you mentioned just a second ago their connection to the media.
I mean, you know, whether it was these bureaucrats informing the media or the media was, it doesn't matter.
We understand what the plan was.
This sheds a whole lot more light on the insurrection narrative, the phony fedsurrection or insurrection narrative that was a fedsurrection, a whole new light on that, in my opinion.
What do you think, Millie?
Absolutely.
I mean, they were preparing their talking points ahead of time.
And this is something very common within their organizations.
There's all kinds of their internal documents where they list out what their talking points are for very specific things.
They're overly organized, overly scripted.
And this was a talking point.
So they were preparing the scenarios where they were mapping out was they were preparing essentially for Trump to contest An election that was going to be wrought with irregularities and that they were ready to call that a coup.
Trump contesting an election with irregularities, they were going to call that a coup.
Unbelievable.
Okay, so now let's get to Maria Steffen on subverting Trump.
We have power and responsibility.
We have power and responsibility as federal workers.
Rules have meaning because we decide they do.
We decide to enforce them.
A person by the name of Maddie Salzman.
Let's take a listen to this audio.
I want to start with this quote by Jean Sharp, who's one of the pioneers in the field of nonviolent action, just to get a little bit on what power you all have as individuals and as federal workers.
So Gene Sharp said in The Politics of Nonviolent Action, by themselves, rulers cannot collect taxes, enforce repressive laws and regulations, keep trains running on time, prepare national budgets, direct traffic, manage ports, print money, repair roads, keep markets supplied with food, make steel, build rockets, train the police and the army, issue postage stamps, or even milk a cow.
People provide these services to the ruler through a variety of organizations and institutions.
If people would stop providing these skills, the ruler could not rule.
And just as an added insight on this, specifically focused on bureaucrats, President Harry S. Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, but when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing.
So the bottom line with this is that...
I'll just stop right there.
So the bottom line is government workers of the world unite to stop Trump, right?
Absolutely.
I mean, that's pretty much what she says if you listen to the rest of it.
I mean, it's glaringly obvious what she's talking about in here.
And she's quoting Gene Sharp, who Gene Sharp is one of the godfathers in nonviolent revolutions, basically overthrowing dictators and rulers and So what she's pretty much getting at is we can undermine the president and remove him by force if we want to, because we're the people, we have the power, we're the federal government.
I mean, that's really what she's kind of getting at here.
Well, and, you know, and she mentions Gene Sharp, and then you tweeted out this video just telling your audience, by the way, at Millie underscore Weaver, at Millie underscore Weaver.
You can watch all these videos.
If we're not playing them in their entirety, we only have an hour show.
So go follow her on Twitter or X.
Who is Gene Sharp?
This is who Gene Sharp is.
This is a technique of combat.
It is a substitute for war.
and other violence.
We don't know quite how it spread, but it certainly did into 30-some languages in different parts of the world on all continents except Antarctica.
We are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California
and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California and we are now at the University of California
Okay, so, I mean, it's excellent work linking to that video because it kind of shows you everything that we need to know about these people and who we're dealing with.
And, you know, in your tweet on the screen here, one important aspect is to think about what are the tactics you could take depending on your role.
There's different types of roles in the federal government, and that means that there's different roles that could be appropriate for you to take.
I mean, this is something out of, you know, a A communist movie or something, but it's really happening.
Absolutely.
And all throughout their Zoom video, they continually used solidarity, camaraderie.
I mean, these were terms they kept using.
And the author of Maria Steffen, who's the author of Why Civil Resistance Works, on the cover of her book, she has a big, giant, red communist fist on that book, hidden inside of a peace sign.
So that really kind of shows you what she's actually talking about here in They acknowledge that nonviolent conflict or nonviolence, when they're using that term, they're not using it as in what we believe to mean when you're saying nonviolence.
That's the name of a specific type of warfare tactic that they use.
Gene Sharp calls it an unconventional warfare tactic.
It is a weapon.
So it's a strategy of controlling public perception, subverting the government from within, and then getting the government to fall on itself and the people to be cheering it on.
Yeah, unbelievable.
And here we have this one.
More secret audio unveiled here, again, by Millie Weaver.
Subverting the pillars of support.
If people in these pillars of support withhold or deny their consent and cooperation, no ruler can say in power.
If you're just joining us, this is essentially...
It's a behind-the-curtain look, folks, at the subversion that was going on by the deep state.
And we're not just talking higher-ups in the deep state.
We're not talking the intelligence apparatus, the intelligence agencies that have basically conquered our country.
We're talking about the useful idiots, really.
In many ways, these foot soldiers that are totally devoted to this religion, this new religion they've created themselves, this wokeism and this Trump derangement syndrome.
The cogs in the machine of the federal bureaucracy having these struggle sessions, these Zoom calls, where they're plotting on intentionally sabotaging the United States government, intentionally saying, I'm not going to do my job, or I'm going to leak this information to the media, or I'm going to make sure that Trump's policies are a total disaster.
Here's the latest clip we want to get to, Subverting the Pillars of Support.
What does that mean?
Take a listen.
So power is actually dispersed across society and concentrated in what we refer to as pillars of support.
So these are organizations and institutions that provide a government or other power holder With the power, with the skills, the knowledge, the labor, the know-how that they need to stay in power.
And these pillars of support are made up of ordinary people like you and me who provide expertise, who provide specific forms of labor, who provide buying power.
So if people in these pillars of support withhold or deny their consent and cooperation, Meaning they stop obeying, they stop cooperating, and they engage in protests, boycotts, strikes, a whole host of other nonviolent tactics.
That if masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power.
Even if they really want to, and even if they use a lot of repression.
And ultimately, this is how civil resistance has removed even dictators from power in places like the Philippines, Serbia, Ukraine, Sudan, other places around the world.
And the other idea is that within these pillars of support, you can think of it as kind of a series of concentric rings.
And, you know, at the center is kind of the power holder, and people who are, you know, in the rings around the power holder have varying degrees of loyalty to the center.
So, you know, those who are maybe closer to the center, and this uses the example of, you know, the military kind of starting with generals and going out colonels, foot soldiers, but you can think about this in terms of the bureaucracy as well, kind of going through the different hierarchy.
That the people who are maybe closest to the center are more likely to obey, less likely to challenge authority.
But as you go out to those outer rings, people are going to have less loyalty to the center, to the power holder.
These people are really key allies and ultimately, you know, the goal in, you know, in effective people power is to bring people over to your side, to get them to shift loyalties, to get them to move from the center to the outside.
And as we know, and as Maddie laid out so nicely, bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar.
And federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process.
They know how to speed things up.
They know how to slow them down.
They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented.
They can participate in internal decision making.
They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those at the top of the bureaucratic totem pole meet.
Okay, I played that whole thing because I'm just sitting here struck by this.
These people have to lose their jobs over this.
Moving forward, there has to be a giant upheaval, a mass firing.
I know you agree with that, Millie.
I'm just struck by this.
This is a huge story, and it's a confirmation of everything we thought.
The judicial part of the government just hasn't been weaponized against the American people.
You know, the bureaucracy's been against us for a very long time.
I don't even know how far you'd have to go back to where there were people in office that, you know, actually tried to do their job and respected, you know, the will of the people based on who they put into office.
Oh, absolutely.
And there was over 150 participants in this Zoom call.
However, many of them actually anonymized their names.
So although I was able to identify a good handful of them, many of them working, confirmed working in our government, even one retired lieutenant colonel of the Air Force, people in national security, former White House, Obama admin people, I mean, some pretty high level individuals just sprinkled across many of our federal governmental departments and agencies.
And yeah, they need to be investigated.
Absolutely.
Much of what they're talking about is criminal, is illegal.
And if these people were enacting these things inside of the federal workplace, we need to find out who they all were and they all need to be fired.
Most people don't realize striking is illegal for government employees.
It is a crime, and it can get them barred from being in the government for life.
So it's a serious matter that they're talking about.
Like, when we think of people striking within companies, we think that's okay, but It's not okay for government employees to do that.
But then also them talking about leaks.
It's pretty self-explanatory.
What they're doing is clandestine.
It is.
It's clandestine.
I'm glad you used that because I was just about to go there.
Obviously, the people that mask their names, or at least some of them, are connected to the intel community.
I mean, this is obviously an intel operation, a PSYOP, if you will, on government workers.
I mean, you know, and it was going on the entire time.
And it was so effective, too, not just in the government, obviously, but I mean, it was just, it was like they flipped a switch.
Trump got elected, and now all of a sudden, out of the woodwork, you know, friends and family who never cared a thing about politics.
All of the sudden, they were enraged because they were hearing that we don't have decency in the White House, as if we ever had decency in the White House, you know?
And it really just kind of goes to show where people's comfort lies.
They liked this idea of going to sleep at night, thinking that, oh, our government is generally good.
And then when somebody came and told them that Donald Trump is evil and really, really bad and it was just 24-7, they couldn't take it.
They really liked the safety, I guess the ignorance of the whole thing.
I want to get to this piece, though.
Acts of commission versus omission.
This is the part about leaking, and this is a big deal.
You want to know where all those leaks came from?
We all know, but now here is concrete proof the leaks came from people that just hate Donald Trump.
We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission.
So acts of commission are things that you do that you either are not expected to do or that are contrary to, you know, what the opponent, in this case the enemies of democracy, Want you to do.
So in this case, you know, an act of commission would be, you know, as federal workers asking very specific questions, exerting your voice in the workplace, joining with colleagues to make the case for why something may be illegal or unethical.
Another act of commission is the wearing of symbols, which seems like a small or a minor thing, but it's actually really powerful when lots of people are showing unity and solidarity by wearing symbols.
Symbols can be nonpartisan.
They can be pro-democracy.
And part of me thinks that symbols may be an important way for feds to show support and solidarity around democracy and the integrity of our election or after November 3rd.
Just real quick, I don't know if you've ever seen the Marvel movies, but it sounds like this is some sort of Hail Hydra operation.
I mean, it really does.
You have uncovered evidence of a cult, Millie.
Well, it's a group of conspirators who are all working together to subvert the government and subvert the office of the presidency.
I mean, that's the only thing you can really call it.
It's unbelievable.
All right, back to this.
Sorry to interrupt there, but let's finish this clip here.
I don't blame you, you know?
Yeah, I know, right?
I mean, it's just, it's unbelievable.
And these people still have jobs today, you know?
Paper trail.
So producing a very clearly written account of the problem in question and the actions that are taken to address it.
And this is really, I think, in this moment where there may be uncertainty, conflicting messaging, potentially illegal orders for civil servants, federal workers to engage in meticulous documentation to challenge the policies or the directives that they deem unethical or unconstitutional, particularly when the orders are given verbally rather than in written form.
And another active commission, albeit highly, you know, risky, and there are a number of great downsides, is leaking.
So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside.
But this, you know, really should be used very judiciously only on truly significant matters Because most disclosures outside of formal internal whistleblowing are at minimum a violation of contractual duty and they may put leakers at significant legal risk.
And of course, if information is classified, employees can be fired or criminally prosecuted, as Sarah may talk a little bit about.
So another act of commission is creating parallel structures or self-organizing units.
So organizing in the office place, in the workplace.
This is particularly important in the event of abuses of power, unethical activity, to be able to self-organize, make decisions, Without obeying or legitimizing certain decisions that are made.
So in terms of acts of omission, meaning things that you don't do, that you're expected to do, or that you're being asked to do, first is, you know, rejecting loyalty oaths, you know, being called upon to Swear a loyalty oath,
you know, around a candidate and individual, particularly when the outcome of the election is still in doubt, a very important thing, and to foster frank internal debate and transparency with outside stakeholders whenever possible.
Another act of omission is going slow or slow down.
So basically people, bureaucrats, federal workers performing their duties At a foot-dragging pace, which is less likely to attract attention than an overt strike, and has been used in a number of different cases.
And then, you know, another higher risk effort would be a labor strike or a walkout would likely be illegal, but it's kind of a high risk, high impact, a nonviolent action that federal workers can take if they deem it necessary.
Alright, I mean, walk us through that, Millie Weaver.
What's your reaction to that?
Well, most of what she's saying are violations of the Hatch Act, first of all.
You cannot be wearing any type of symbolism, especially if it's partisan.
But notice they give tips later on about which type of symbolism to wear that could be construed as nonpartisan.
And they give the example of wearing a Black Lives Matter shirt because they could try to say that and argue that Black Lives Matter somehow isn't partisan, even though we all know That Black Lives Matter is an organization that's almost entirely run by leftists and the ideologies that it pushes and promotes as an organization are all in line with the Democrat Party narratives that they push.
So, I mean, what she's talking about Throughout these many different points here, acts of commission, acts of omission, these are all things that you can do to subvert the government from within.
That's what she's basically teaching people.
And she even mentions leaking.
Throughout their documents, one of their documents that they passed around, Activism Resources for Federal Employees Guide, they list a couple more that aren't even up on that screen.
And one of those was sick out, like taking strategic sick leave, for example.
But they kind of give different tactics to use per your department or agency.
That's just insidious.
You know, government employees wonder why they have such a bad rap.
All of our intuition about that has essentially been confirmed.
Acts of commission, tactics for federal workers, you just mentioned that.
Ask questions.
That right there to me is the one that's just the most frustrating, you know.
Because a lot of times, you know, you hear from these liberals and, you know, they'll say something and you're tempted to just kind of give them the benefit of the doubt, you know.
But in this case, it's just like asking the teacher, you know, questions that are ridiculous to just waste time so you don't ever have to get to the lesson.
Exactly.
I may have been guilty of doing that a time or two when I was growing up.
Here we go.
It feds for BLM wearing symbols.
Again, you can't do that.
Violation of the Hatch Act.
Here we go.
This is a big one.
Leak everything you can.
Let's listen to this part of the secret audio uncovered.
Yeah.
I just recommend everyone who works in the federal government, if you read the mainstream press, like, who is covering your agency?
Who is working for ProPublica?
Who is working for Politico?
They all have signal accounts.
Text them.
Leak everything you can.
Save your emails.
I record these meetings.
I send it over.
And I can't believe I'm showing my face here, but I've been doing this for months.
And if you do have to write something, write something with really crappy, you know, just unintelligible, ungrammatical language to just make them look terrible.
And it will look like something that comes from this administration anyway, but...
And to your first point, I know we talked a little bit about whistleblower protections.
Do you have any sense of like what is and isn't covered when you're kind of like leaking things to a place like ProPublica over Signal or anything like that?
I mean, again, and I sort of prefaced it.
I was like, I don't anticipate keeping my job for too long.
So I'm just taking a risk and I just believe in it and I don't really care about the job anymore, which is terrible because I don't know what I'm going to do without it.
But I just figure I'll get another job.
Yeah, and I think that's definitely an important thing to think about, like, your own risk level.
And if you're in a place where you're like, so be it, and taking that level of risk.
The other thing is, not everyone's in that position like me where I feel confident about, like, going back on the hunt for a new job.
You may have a colleague who has a higher risk threshold than you do.
There's a way that you can pass on that information and that they're willing to be the front for it.
Again, the journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me, meaning to be the source of the leaks.
So just get to find out who those...
And most respectable journalists do that.
They try and shield their sources because that's their bread and butter.
They give them the stories so they don't want to throw you under the bus or screw you.
All right, Millie Weaver, do we know who this guy is?
Do we have a name to this face?
Well, he says his name is Josh.
He's one of the individuals who is kind of harder for me to accurately identify using facial recognition scanning technology.
I don't know why, but for some reason he has a lower profile on the internet.
I did find an individual that I believe may be him, but I'm not 100% certain and I do link that in my article.
But it looks just like him and his name is Josh.
But I just can't be certain at this time if it is him or not.
Give the address to where the article is.
Give the website.
I will make sure it gets in the description of this video.
So, millennialmillie.com and on the very front page right now of my website, you will find the article.
It's giant.
It's, you know, far left government employees subvert.
You know, you'll find it there.
And in there, I put a list of the individuals who I've identified and then I put the list who have yet to be identified or who I have not completely confirmed.
And I do put some possible matches, but some of them it's harder to nail down.
And so I have been calling on the internet sleuths of You know, the world.
Please help.
Please identify these individuals.
They need identifying.
Yeah, I mean, this is incredible.
That guy right there was, you know, talking about the ethical.
The journalists are ethical, as in this guy knows anything about ethics.
But, I mean, it just goes to show you, I mean, he thinks he's some sort of modern-day freedom fighter.
I mean, he thinks, you know, and that's giving him the benefit of the doubt.
I mean, you know, I think he's demonic, quite honestly.
But, you know, he thinks the entire left is what they think.
We have the moral high ground here.
Well, you know, in the full two hour video, which I've obviously watched many times, he actually speaks directly about having worked with Trump's administration as well as with he was going to be working with Biden's administration or transition team.
I guess you would say sorry, it was the transition teams.
So I believe that what he's basically describing is working for GSA. So, yeah.
I mean, I think that, you know, it's pretty clear that these people had access and they were in key positions to be able to cause a lot of damage.
Yeah, there's no doubt.
So, then we have more of this Twitter thread.
Again, viral Twitter thread.
A combination of tactics.
I don't think we have...
Let's see.
Yeah, I think we do have this one.
Is this...
This is the one about the inspector...
I think...
Let's just listen to it and we'll get your reaction on the other side.
To refuse the quote, let the trains run on time for those who aren't able to strike.
What would that look like in practical terms?
What does it look like in practical terms to put, you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another?
At the Department of Labor, it takes the form of...
Several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation and when when the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers a copy of that draft got leaked to the daily labor report and it got published and it got sent to a congressperson and the Office of Inspector General opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers.
So again that's sort of a combination of tactics it's it's It's making a really good paper trail.
It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it.
And then Congress getting the Office of Inspector General involved.
It was really a way to stop that thing just in its tracks.
And it worked really well.
I want to come back to that.
But, I mean, what a formula.
I wonder if that congressman that got involved was Congressman Adam Schiff.
Millie, what do you think?
Can you hear me?
Yes, I can hear you.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Yeah.
So, I mean, I stopped the video briefly because it just seemed like what they were laying out there was quite the formula, you know?
You leak stuff, you get it to a congressman, now the inspector general is involved, and now there's a huge scandal investigation.
I mean, they're literally creating the fake news stories.
Right, and it makes you wonder who put the bad numbers in there in the first place, right?
Right.
But yeah, notice they're giving an example of a time when it was effective in shutting down a policy and stopping something from happening.
So they know how to sabotage policies and things that don't go in line with their political agendas, which is completely illegal, mind you.
It is a violation of the Hatch Act.
Our government employees, our bureaucracy is not supposed to be acting in this way.
They're supposed to be politically blind, right?
They're not supposed to be aligning with political ideologies and then forcing their ideology on the country and subverting ideologies that go against what they believe.
That's not what they're supposed to be doing.
You're exactly right.
Back to this video.
But it was a coordinated effort by a lot of people.
Yeah, absolutely.
And Maria, do you want to add to this?
Yeah, no.
And, you know, the thing about strikes, I completely agree with where Sarah was coming from, that strike is kind of the worst option.
I laid it out as an option just because it's, you know, it's there, it's available if kind of your conscience is, you know, past the point of no return, if you will.
But I, you know, there are definitely a lot of different go slow tactics.
And I think, you know, this is also an area where, you know, folks on the outside, so private citizens, those in groups on the outside, being able to show solidarity with federal workers and, you know, civil servants is particularly important during this moment.
Just to tell them, like, you've got, We've got your back on the outside.
Do the right thing.
Be ethical.
Serve well.
And I think we don't often think about that in the protest category, but like incentivizing folks doing the right thing and having that be loud and clear is, you know, just another option.
Yeah, I'll add on to that some information that, frankly, I've learned from other people who are attending this call.
That, you know, there's obviously a history of air traffic controllers striking in the past and getting fired for that under the Reagan administration.
And I think that has kind of held through as Not just an actual barrier to striking, but also makes federal employees deeply fearful of action they can take.
But also in the most recent government shutdown, I think there was a really strong relationship between the air traffic controllers, even though they did not strike at any point, the issues that they posed to the unions in the airline industry that ended up playing a huge role in helping get the government back open.
So I think having those partnerships with other organizations, powerful unions in the private sector that can have our backs and vice versa will be really important.
Great.
Thank you so much for everyone.
For our three speakers and for folks asking really wonderful questions to express.
You want to be polite while you're subverting the United States government.
I don't know if you noticed, but in the chat there, TY, they, them, Posted a link to the CIA's manual on simple sabotage and was basically offering that as a tool for them to utilize in order to, as a federal government worker, bureaucrat, to do subversion.
I'm going to put it back up on the screen.
There it is right there.
You see it, folks.
To the right there.
It's kind of blurry, but CIA.gov.
That is insane, Millie.
Yeah, so that's declassified CIA manuals on sabotage that they're using to not learn how to detect sabotage in the government, to actually use it as a toolkit for them to be able to effectively sabotage our government.
That's wild.
Why are they so afraid of Trump's Schedule F executive order that's on the screen now?
They're terrified of it because in the executive order, it would make them schedule off employees, which means they could be fired or hired on demand.
So it means that it would be easier to let them go, essentially.
They wouldn't be able to sue and get the unions involved as much.
And also, it would require that every federal employee have loyalty Pledge loyalty to the President of the United States.
They were paranoid about that because they were very disloyal to Trump and their loyalty could definitely be called into question.
Yeah, I mean, he knew it.
They knew this was their shot, and they never thought he would still be politically relevant at this point.
You know, that's for sure.
We have this, let's see, go to the colony of the coup.
Yeah, I mean, we have this video here.
Check it out.
We don't have this particular one.
What if Trump wins?
They kind of have a meltdown, you know, putting my head in the sand on that one.
But then we have another one about a coup, and I wanted to talk about, I wanted to get this one in for sure before we run out of time.
making sure that we're naming what is happening as a coup in every different language and communications with coworkers will be really important.
Yeah.
Totally agreed.
In the shutdown BC conversations that I've been having and that's not on the federal side, we also are often saying, like, call it a coup.
It's a coup.
Don't let anyone tell you it's not.
Because the more you normalize that language, the more, like, it becomes apparent and, like, most centrist folks in the government might start actually accepting that.
Yeah, and I think, you know, I work on a project where I'm interacting on a daily basis with our politicals and starting to call into question if we're in the midst of a coup, should we even be listening to our politicals because they are not here legitimately anymore?
That's a great question to be asking.
That said, I know that if there's a Biden win next week, there's going to be a transition team coming in.
I think I'm gonna be spending a lot of time working with them because I know, and I was around during the last transition, like, we spent a lot of time preparing those briefing books and we are not doing that this time.
That is not a priority.
And so a lot of that work is gonna have to be done sometime.
I mean, the last time we spent about six months preparing a big fat briefing book.
That's gonna all have to start, all that work's gonna probably happen next week.
Not that there was that much achieved policy-wise.
Um, these last four years, but I don't know if it's naive to say, but I'm going to kind of like, look like I'm going to have to shut out the current political appointees and go to the transition team and be like, this is, you know, I'm looking ahead to the future.
This is, this is our work.
So, you know, hate to think that they're going to be our saviors or something, but, um, Can I ask another nitty-gritty question related to that?
So, say you have two narratives happening simultaneously.
There's the existing Trump appointees saying, there is no transition team because there's no transition, it's a continuation.
Then you have Biden side saying, I won and my team is coming to the doors.
Like, what are the responsibilities of the various people in your agency to issue a visitor badge and physically let someone into the building and give them IT access and set up the meeting?
Yeah, I mean, I was going to say, like, yes, they do need computers and stuff, but, like, right now there are no doors.
Like, how do you get them the Zoom logins?
Or how do you start...
We can make those determinations ourselves.
We, you know, they say you're going to use your account and we're going to start and we're like, I don't know, we're like the Lithuanian government in exile or something.
We're going to start working with them.
Yeah, and I think it's almost like definitely a risk factor, but if there's a contested election and it's fairly clear to us who won, We get to choose who the leader is, and I don't know what risk that puts on you, and I'm not a Fed again, so I don't want to put you in a weird situation, but I think that is a point where you and your team and your supervisors and those I'm sorry, what's the term?
Career staff can actually decide like, well, according to our understanding, Biden won and therefore we are listening to his appointees and his transition team.
Millie Weaver, I mean, this is just incredible reporting.
Again, a bombshell story there.
I know I haven't covered everything, and your Twitter thread continues to go on, but what have I missed?
Tell me what I've missed.
I know I haven't gotten everything.
I know we're not going to be able to get into all of it in today's show because there's just so much there.
But, you know, just the activities of this group I want to really kind of lay out for you guys, which you guys go to MillenniumMilly.com, read the full article.
You'll see a lot more information there and kind of a backstory on the investigation.
But the activities of this group of people inside of their movement resources and all kinds of guides and manuals, manuals which literally describe a contingency plan of taking over the Capitol building and On January 6th that specifically says staging protests inside the Capitol in order to make it physically impossible for Congress to meet and have the Electoral College vote happen.
They had videos where they were talking about taking over government buildings.
They had a detailed ArcGIS map which outlined the Capitol as their target.
They were discussing these things all in video Zoom chats way before January 6th ever happened.
Also, You know, these groups were sharing, you know, in their movement resources, documents that actually outline printing of mail-in ballots, making sure drop boxes are put in certain places.
I mean, it goes on and on.
And these documents are on my website.
I know we're probably not going to be able to get to all of them today, but I want to let you know that these documents are there.
They were directing their people to go all volunteer to be poll workers, essentially.
So several of the people in the Zoom call state that they were poll workers or signed up to be poll workers, and the groups, the left-wing organizations themselves, were giving all of these links to these sites, which were basically 501c3 organizations,
nonprofit organizations, almost entirely staffed by leftists, in which they were staffing Swing states with poll workers to make sure that they were going to be the ones counting the ballots and that they were going to be able to have the ability to respond when GOP poll watchers pushed back against them.
It's incredible.
The website, millennialmillie.com, and we have, it's in the description of this video right now, the direct article, so go check it out for yourself.
Millie Weaver, it's been great to meet you.
Like I said again, I've followed your work for a really, really long time, and I respect you, and I appreciate what you're doing because it is literally getting the truth out there, and the truth is what's going to save this country.
So thank you so much for coming on the Millstone Report.
We really do appreciate it.
Thank you so much for having me.
I really appreciate you covering this material because you are doing what needs to happen.
We need every media outlet right now to be covering this, and we need the people to be going on X or Twitter and sharing this thread, sharing this information.
We need to demand that Congress take action and investigate these people and charge these people.
Absolutely.
It'd be great to happen now.
I won't hold my breath, but maybe.
Who knows?
If there is another change in power, we'll see how messy that's going to be.
Millie Weaver, thank you so much.
Thank you.
Alright, folks, that's all the time that we have for today on the Millstone Report.
Coming up next, at the top of this hour, which is in, you know, a few seconds, Stu Peters is going to be on.
And, well, he's not.
I'm filling in for Stu, rather.
Forgive me.
I'm filling in for Stu coming up here in just a minute.
And what you want to make sure to do is stay tuned.
We're going to be talking chaos at the border.
It's a powder keg down there.
We've got several guests that we're going to be talking to.
Dan Lyman of BorderHawk News, among others.
Also, we've got Jim Ferguson coming on, going to talk about the farmers in France and how they have had enough and they're rising up.
You've even got Germany.
German protesters now are attacking or at least mobilizing towards media news stations because they're tired of all of the lies.
All that and more is coming up next on the Stu Peter Show.
My name is Paul Harrell.
This has been the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much, and we'll see you on Monday.
▲
Export Selection