All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 12, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
51:33
Uncensored: Katherine Watt - Are They Planning Marburg in 2024? US Government Raises Alarm
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening, everyone.
The United States government has just extended the notice of declaration under the PREP Act for countermeasures against Ebola and Marburg, and I'm asking the questions.
What on earth are they planning?
Is this something that we actually need to be prepared for?
Well, Catherine Watt's written a very interesting substack on the patterns that she's noticed In terms of the PCR and how this was used with masking and other conditioning tools.
In fact, she's really summarized it into four steps of how they usually run these propaganda campaigns and whether Marburg is something that we need to consider.
In fact, she has said, based on some of their actions in the extension of this declaration, Perhaps it is something that we need to prepare for.
So we're going to speak to her in a moment.
Then I'm going to go through this document in a little bit more detail with everyone at the end of the broadcast, as well as look at some really strange stuff, which a lot of people may know of by now, the CDC zombie preparedness plan, as well as an exercise that the US military did some time ago to prepare for a zombie apocalypse.
And so...
I don't know, guys, 2024 is going to be a wild ride, but don't you worry, I will be here for the entirety of it.
I want to encourage everyone to visit the sponsors of today's broadcast at the Satellite Phone Store, bringing you safe, encrypted communication by the Satellite Phone Store, who we trust completely to keep your communication safe, and they have really, really great offers on satellite phones, family packs, A range of different satellite phones.
These are military grade.
They're used by multiple military servicemen worldwide.
They also have the Bivy Stick, which is a fantastic device where you don't even need cell service to be able to text a loved one.
You can connect it to your phone and text a loved one using the Bivy via the satellite network, which again is encrypted by the satellite phone store.
And they have a range of other really fantastic products.
So visit sat123.com forward slash Maria today or call 1-941-841-0844 and let them know you've come from Maria Z and I promise you they'll look after you.
Here's Catherine now.
Catherine Watt, thank you so much for joining us today.
We very much appreciate your time and all of your research.
Thanks for inviting me.
It's great to see you again.
Yes, absolutely.
It's been some time since our last discussion, so I've very much been looking forward to this.
There is a particular article on your substack that piqued my interest, which was the PCR test viewed from the legal kill box perspective.
And then I noted that you mentioned this extension on the Federal Register.
Notice of declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for countermeasures against Ebola virus and or Ebola disease and Marburg virus and or Marburg disease.
So we want to talk about all of this today.
Where do you want to start?
Anywhere you want to start, just go for it.
Sure.
Well, I mean, in terms of...
Last time I had you on, we spoke about the COVID kill box.
Let's talk about the PCR test viewed from the legal kill box perspective.
So I, yeah, I put that in...
I did that post because...
I think that COVID has been good for teaching the world what the sequence of events is that the governments are using to build the false narrative.
And chronologically, the very first EUA declaration covered in vitro diagnostics for detection and or diagnosis.
Because that was the first thing they needed.
They needed a statistical data set of data that they could put up on the dashboards and get people to associate whatever the result of that PCR test was with whatever symptoms they were or were not having.
And then move forward to the next EUA products.
So step one was the in vitro tests.
Step two was the personal respiratory devices, which was the masks.
And so the thing we can learn from that is how they really want a visual, social element to the false story that they're telling.
So we know that masks do absolutely nothing to Protect people or stop transmission or anything, but what they do do is make it so that when you're out in public, you see a visual cue all the time that other people are scared, that you should be scared, that something is happening.
So that was the second one.
The third one was the medical devices, including alternative products used as medical devices, and that was for the ventilators.
So that was how they got the The liability coverage for all of the nurses and technicians in the hospitals and nursing homes who were killing people with ventilators.
And then the fourth one was drugs and biological products, which eventually included the COVID-19 vaccines, but also included things like remdesivir and the monoclonal antibodies.
And so it's a package thing, and because of the new Federal Register Announcement or update to the Ebola and Marburg virus declarations.
I am anticipating that there's going to be another sequence.
I don't know what the elements will not be identical to what they did in COVID because people have seen how that works, but they will be similar structurally.
I think there will be some sort of diagnostic Something to persuade people that they have something or that everybody around them could have something.
And there will be some kind of visual thing, possibly like way more visual photos and video of nurses and doctors in like full hazmat suits.
Because they need to ramp up the fear more this time, I think.
Well, let's look at some of what they've told us.
They've told us that another pandemic is coming.
They've told us that it will disproportionately affect children.
They've said that it will be of a respiratory nature, but my assertion has been, Catherine, that they're not going to get away with another invisible pandemic.
And when I say invisible, I mean, you know, telling people that they could be asymptomatic.
It's just, it's not, they're not going to get away with that again.
Too many people are no longer afraid of COVID. And so...
My view is that they could potentially, and I've been saying this for some time, they could potentially release or cause something far more dramatic, and this notice of declaration under the Federal Register and this extension of Of this Marburg, which, by the way, it's not a problem in the US. The US does not have a problem with Marburg.
So why is it that they've continued to extend this?
In your substack, you've linked this previous Federal Register notice.
This is December 9th, 2020, regarding Marburg.
And so what do you understand the history to be of them continuing this?
Well, I think it relates to how prominently hemorrhagic fevers have played a role in the predictive programming, like films, especially, and television shows, because they have gotten it into the plot lines of things for decades, that people are walking around and then suddenly start bleeding out of their orifices, and it turns out this terrible thing has come.
They can build on that by, if they have a way of mimicking or inducing those types of symptoms, they can elicit the behavioral responses that they've tried to predictively get people ready to do.
On the respiratory thing, I think that's the RSV stuff that's happening now.
Not that there is a new, especially Deadly or especially communicable RSV strain, but that because of the way one of the main mechanisms of action for the COVID shots is to damage your immune system,
babies and children are susceptible, more susceptible now to more poor outcomes from things that in the past they would have been able to shake off because Their immune system is damaged, not because the pathogen itself is anymore.
So I think they're getting a lot of mileage already out of scaring people, old people, young people, parents, about go get RSV shots.
And the RSV shots are apparently the next manufactured line of the mRNA LNP products.
Do you say that as in...
You know about a concerted effort to really invest in this, or are we just presuming that?
Well, I'm just saying from the news reports and the way that the health authorities are saying, RSV is a very terrible thing this year.
There are many more babies getting it.
There are many more children getting it.
Therefore, you should go and get these shots.
Yes.
Just from narrative management, not from the corporate side.
I think there are people who have looked at the contracts and things like that, but I'm not one of them.
Yeah, sure.
I agree with you.
I've seen a myriad of these articles, particularly in the UK. They seem to be driving this very, very hard.
We also have the threats of sort of white lung syndrome and it's coming after kids a lot.
And of course, you know, it came out that this is one of the adverse events from the shots.
I am obviously very concerned about children being adversely affected in any way.
I mean, anyone, but especially children because, you know, it's not their choice and they're not fully informed and we should be protecting the innocents rather than putting them in harm's way.
But you mentioned this.
Predictive programming and this cycle.
I want to go back to this because it's a very, very important thing that you've highlighted here on your Substack.
The steps of this cycle and that this seems to be the model that they're following.
So very quickly, I want to say that the NIH published some time ago that the most effective way to control populations is through a health scare.
More so even than an economic scare.
The NIH knows this.
And in Australia, we're already saying that two states are on high alert, recommended masking, new strain of COVID, all of this sort of stuff.
What do you think this jumbling of the narratives in light of this cycle is about?
Because we're hearing, you know, new strain of COVID, RSV, white lung, this, that, the other.
How does that fit into this model?
Um...
I think just in the general, keep people as unbalanced and frightened and unable to think clearly as you possibly can by throwing as many things at them at one time as you possibly can.
I don't think it's more complicated than that.
I think And it doesn't need to be.
It helps them the more difficult it is to unravel and the more different things people have to worry about because then they have less focus and less emotional stability to be able to sort through things and get on with their lives and defy openly what the government is saying and understand it.
Understand what the reasons are That make what the government is saying false.
Yeah, that's a great point.
I have been speaking about one particular document for years now, and it's the Preparing Australia for the Next Pandemic, Australia's Pandemic Preparedness Report, essentially.
You know, CSIRO, who was suspected of having something to do with Wuhan, has, you know, published this.
And in that report, they've identified five potential future pandemics.
And, you know, Australia's got the Global Pandemic Centre running out of our country.
And they say there, Catherine, that human encroachment into natural habitats is going to be the thing that sort of affects future pandemics, perhaps causes them.
And so we need to limit, essentially, humans going into nature.
The reason I bring that report up is because it's clear that they made this provision through the climate narrative.
They made this provision that pandemics are just fluid.
You know, they're fluid and they'll change all the time and it really just depends on human behavior and going into nature and things of this.
So have you seen from your perspective in the ways that they're prepping the public something like this narrative?
Have you noticed that You know, really, they're trying to paint it as though it's fluid now.
We're just constantly in this cycle of sickness.
Yes.
I think that's part of the overarching sort of long-term effort to make people think that being human is a criminal sort of endeavor and doing human things like farming or fishing or getting married and having children or spending time with your friends.
All of that has become...
A dangerous, bad thing to do because there's too many of us and we're too, like you said, encroaching on nature.
The construct is entirely false.
I mean, humans have been doing all of those things for thousands and thousands of years and Nothing has actually changed about the physical biological relationships between human people and animal populations and plant populations and forests and things like that.
What's changed is the coming into power of these Globalist death merchants, I don't know, you can call them anything you want, but they want the world to believe that there's something wrong with being human, there's something wrong with people being on the planet, and it's a good idea to get rid of as many as possible.
And they're doing that for financial reasons, and they're doing it for power reasons, and they're doing it for spiritual reasons, but the basic story is just false.
Yes.
I want to talk a little bit later about the heads, if you will, who are driving this.
But if we can, go through this Federal Register and look at what they've said.
And I'll do a bit of reading here, if it's okay, Catherine.
It says that the Secretary issues this amendment pursuant to Section 319 of the Public Health Service Act to amend the Declaration of Countermeasures And
this amendment is effective...
As of January 1, 2024.
Have you been able to find any reason for them to actually extend this, Catherine?
Any reason?
Yeah.
Any actual...
What's their official reason for extending this?
I think their official reason for extending this is sort of bureaucratic.
They have a whole bunch of past ones that they've issued from 2013-14 updates, and on separate, like some of them are for Marburg virus, some of them are for Ebola virus, and they wanted to bring them all into like a single package to To extend it and to make it clear to the manufacturers, I suppose, that they have the coverage for liability that they want.
Everything that they manufacture and send to the Strategic National Stockpile is going to be covered, and they want to signal to the practitioners who would be administering these also that they are covered.
I don't know of any event in the real world That makes it especially timely for them to do this.
I think it's just part of the theatrical production that this is coming on top of the coronavirus, on top of the way that they did an amendment a few months ago saying that not only is coronavirus a threat or a potential threat,
but influenza and other seasonal coronaviruses Present a threat just because of the aggregate of pressure on healthcare workers.
So that's how they're going to bring in and have already brought in all of the other lines of vaccines and countermeasures into the same PrEP Act liability exemptions.
So yeah, I'll say again, I don't see anything, haven't seen anything specific to why they would do this now.
Other than the package.
I want to ask you about that word countermeasures because there may be people watching that didn't catch our first interview.
Talk to us about that word countermeasures and what it actually means when they use it.
Well, when they use it, it actually means weapons or poisons because it means completely unregulated, unmonitored weapons.
Chemical and biological products that are inserted into interstate commerce that don't have to have any valid clinical trial data supporting their safety or efficacy, don't have to have any compliance with good manufacturing practices, don't have to comply with any normal pharmaceutical labeling.
They aren't subjected to any kind of monitoring or Quality testing for purity and non-adulteration.
It's really a catch-all category of products meant to make things that are weapons appear to be medicinal products so that people will take them without questioning what they're being given.
And yes, I agree with you.
And I know that you've focused a lot on the US government and their, you know, key responsibility in this.
From your view, are these people the main ones that need to be held accountable?
US government people?
Is that the question?
Yes.
I think the top of the hierarchy is the Highest-level administrators in the Department of Health and Human Services, so the HHS secretary, Javier Pechera, and the handful of people Just under him,
the Defense Secretary, Lloyd Austin, and the handful of people in the upper ranks of the military leadership, and also their counterparts at the World Health Organization and the United Nations, because as far as I can tell, it is basically a joint project between the UN World Health Organization and the United States.
Military public health complex that are running the whole program and that know exactly what they are doing, why they're doing it, who they're doing it for, what the goals are, and then they can silo the information so that people lower down know or don't know, depending on what level they're at.
Although, as time goes by, and I think I said this the last time, as time goes by, more and more people who are lower down know exactly what's happening because they know how far outside the norm The procedures are that they've been participating in so far.
I have to agree with you at this point.
If you're not aware, then, I mean, I don't know how you could excuse everything that's going on if you're working within one of these agencies.
You bring up the UN and the WHO viewers of this broadcast now I've been harping on about these organisations from the beginning.
Really, you know, I don't think they're the top of the top of the food chain.
These are the, these, but these are the public fronts And essentially, the ones who are pulling the strings of governments.
This is your shadow government.
And so, you know, I asked you about, you know, what's going on with the IHR and how this all relates.
And I really loved your response, which was, I don't focus too much on the details other than we need to leave them.
But in order to understand why we need to leave them, we need to understand those links.
And so how have you come to the conclusion of the involvement of the WHO and the UN in all of this?
I came to that through the January 2022 podcast with Todd Callender who mentioned the World Health Organization IHR 2005 revisions as being the sort of legal source that drove very important changes in U.S. domestic law that then when those laws have been implemented and we've been able to see them through COVID It
becomes clear that a coup has actually already happened.
It's come in through the public health military structures.
And because it is done so much with the law, with international law and with domestic law, the only way to get out of the kill box is to withdraw from the treaties That transferred power in these ways and repeal the domestic laws that also transferred powers in these ways.
The domestic laws transferred power from our Congress and our President and our courts and our states into the hands of the HHS Secretary and the international laws sort of required those changes in domestic law and As far as I can tell,
placed the HHS secretary sort of as an administrator for the UN who's just working in the United States running the UN programs out of the HHS offices.
Yeah, and it extends beyond health, you know, to education.
If you follow up the food chain, who's actually saying we should sexualise children?
Oh, the WHO, the UN. You know, so it's, all roads lead back to these organisations and I have to agree with you.
I'll bring up for the viewers later, there are two bills at the moment in the United States to exit the UN and consequently the WHO. Very, very important.
Canada has also just had a petition approved by a politician who previously wasn't really on the, you know, the freedom side, saying, yes, we want to exit the UN and the WHO. Iran's rejected the IHR, I just came to know this week, rejected the amendments.
And so countries are really starting to become aware of this, Catherine.
What do you think the likelihood of this global awareness of demanding an exit to the WHO and the UN is?
I don't know what the likelihood is.
It is the area I think we need to work in, in addition to the lower levels of having states in the United States nullify the federal laws so they can protect at least the people within each individual state that can get their legislature, and that's a little bit more likely because of the political Orientations of different states,
like the more Republican-leaning states have a slightly higher probability of understanding what's happening, being angry about it, and taking the steps they need to take to nullify those laws in their states.
I did look at one of the newer get-out-of-the-UN bills.
I don't remember the number, HR something.
And it has a companion Senate bill.
And then I looked at the actual law that they were talking about repealing, and I need to look at this more, but there were two congressional acts in 1945 that got the U.S. into the U.N. One of them was a Senate ratification of the U.N. charter that happened in June or July,
and then the other one was a delegation of power From Congress to the President to actually appoint representatives to the UN. And the only one they mentioned, as far as I can tell, in that bill is the one that delegates the power.
They didn't put in to repeal the original Senate ratification.
And so I'm concerned that that should be added to that bill.
That's very...
That's very important information that I will send along to the people that I know, Catherine.
The two bills in question are HR6645 and S432. They're the two bills and you can find them on preventgenocide2030.org.
And it also has an action item there which is supporting those two bills here.
So that's very concerning.
I'll definitely let people know about that because we want a complete We want nothing to do with these organizations.
Yeah.
Like nothing.
Right.
I haven't gone all the way through.
It may be mentioned in another part of it, but the first thing that I looked at specified the December one and did not say anything about the summer one.
Right.
Part of the piece here is really that, you know, and they've purposely made it incredibly confusing as far as the WHO and the IHR amendments and the Pandemic Accord Treaty.
It's CA2 +, they keep changing the name, which is up in February, and of course we have a deadline of the 27th of January for the submission of the IHR amendments, which they're saying they're not going to meet their deadline, which really does nullify...
This entire proposal, if they don't meet their deadline, it has to be submitted four months before they convene in May.
But as we know, and as you said, they just go ahead and do whatever they want anyway.
The United Nations went ahead and Yep, the emergency political declaration was approved.
Here's the rubber stamp, even though nations didn't agree to it.
They're just usurping every nation's authority as they see fit.
And so, basically, we have this push for this UN, for what the WHO wants to do.
They are, of course, an arm of the UN. We've had the UN going and usurping everyone's authority.
The WHO, Global Health Certification Network, push for digital IDs.
Australia says they want to do it by the middle of this year.
And then we have the US election, which they desperately don't want to happen.
And so when I read these words on this Federal Register notice...
I'm extending PrEP Act coverage for both Ebola viruses and Marburg viruses due to the continued national security threat posed by these viruses.
They have this potential to cause significant morbidity and mortality during outbreaks.
Are you thinking along the same lines as me, Catherine, that they could use this before the 2024 election?
They could, but they could use anything before the 2024 election.
And I'm very interested in what True the Vote is doing to try to get the election process itself put back on firmer footing.
So yeah, there is a huge amount of stuff in play in 2024.
There's also, I think, the end of like a three-year process for something on the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
I know they changed the name of that too, but that also is supposed to culminate in October 2024 with another round of meetings.
So, yeah, I agree in general, but I don't think that the Marburg Declaration is any more or less likely to be a thing that they use to try to derail the elections.
They're going to try anything they think that we'll get away with.
Yes, well, we saw that CBS reporter at the start of the year saying we could be facing a Black Swan event.
I did a live stream earlier this week.
I encourage people to go and watch that.
It's on the Maria Z Rumble channel and zaymedia.com.
And I went through, in the emergency platform that the United Nations published last year in March, They spoke about a range of different threats that we need to be prepared for, which include a UFO event, they include, you know, a Black Swan event, they include communications outages, cyber attacks, all of this sort of stuff.
We know the WEF warned about a cyber attack and so You know, for me, I think it's important to consider a range of these possibilities.
How do you think that preparing for really anything is helpful?
It's helpful to prepare for things.
I mean, let me clarify.
Let me clarify.
Before we started recording, I said to you, I think that if people are aware of what could be coming down the pipeline, they're less afraid.
Yes, I absolutely agree with that.
I think that people have learned a whole lot in the last four years about what the bad guys are up to and how they work and how they work together and how they control information and how they manipulate people through the manipulation of information.
So I think we're in A much better position now to deal with the things that they are about to unroll in front of us and to interpret those properly and to see in real time as they tell you what to attribute different things to, you can attribute it to true things instead of the false things that they're telling you to attribute it to.
And I think that's really helpful.
That's a It's one of the best things to come out of the horrific, horrific last few years.
Yeah, I agree.
I'm actually encouraged by that, despite, you know, everything that humanity's been subjected to.
I'm actually very, I'm grateful for how much stronger it's made us as a whole, if you will.
I mean, if you can word it that way, I'm grateful in some way.
Right.
No, and I think it's important to be grateful.
It's important to be grateful and to also recognize what a horrible, monstrous, premeditated crime has been done, is still going on, and That we can see it in a way that we couldn't see it.
And it was building for decades.
And there were a few people who could see it, and they tried to warn the rest of us, but there wasn't enough corroborating information from people's own experiences.
And now everyone has, not everyone, but many, many more people have their own direct observations of what is being done, why it's being done, who's doing it, and how.
Yeah, I agree with you.
I asked you about this aspect and I want to get this in before we finish up for today because I guess I can at least offer some insight on this.
The element of frequencies where viruses and symptoms are concerned and whether you think that it's a possibility that they could use these.
What's your view on this?
What do you know about it?
And then I suppose I can offer my insight.
I don't know very much about...
I know that there is a hypothesis that something...
chemicals or compounds were put into some of the injections so that they're in people's bodies and EMF or RF radiation...
If put out at certain frequencies, could activate or release or have some other way of making those compounds enter the bloodstream and make people become symptomatic.
I don't know if that's a feasible thing.
I tend to think it's not.
But what I do wonder more is whether just basic radiation sickness kinds of symptoms can be induced by stronger 5G signals or radiation.
And if those basic symptoms that are not a sign of this Infiltrated, like, in your bloodstream kind of thing are just a sign of radiation exposure.
If those will be similar enough to what people are anticipating for hemorrhagic fevers, that they could get people to look at somebody having a nosebleed on the street and say, ah, they're infected, when in fact they just have a nosebleed because they went past a 5G at a time when the 5G was Transmitting at a higher frequency.
I do not understand or know enough about the science.
I have that view mostly because I think the people who are running these programs look for the simplest way to confuse and frighten people.
They're not necessarily looking for very complicated ways to do it, and they, I don't necessarily think, have the technical capacity to make very complicated systems So that's where I am right now on the role of 5G and EMF and RF. Certainly appreciate your insight.
My view is a little bit different.
And, you know, after speaking with Lisa McGee, for example, and everyone would know about that interview with Todd Callender, where he brought the paper that showed that study, where essentially the scientists were almost, you know, disappointed that EMF had been used to cause coronavirus symptoms.
And they were talking about the use of optogenetics, which is that, you know, even light from your phone could cause these symptoms.
So, you know, when we start looking at some of this real, what most people would consider sci-fi, you know, stuff, which is, you know, the Internet of Everything, the WBAN, all of this stuff that a lot of people read and think, well, that's just pipe dreams.
But then you look at what's actually happened to humanity and you think, gosh, have they actually figured this out?
Are they presenting themselves purposely as more incompetent than they really are?
You know, we had this huge telecommunications outage last year, Catherine, in Australia.
50% of the country's phones, internet service was down and entire city's train network stopped.
I mean, this is like catastrophic levels.
It only lasted a few hours.
Had it gone for longer, you know, people would have started to panic.
But the, you know, and their solution was, oh, well, we just need a digital ID. You know, I mean, what?
What?
What?
You know, it makes zero sense.
And so when I see events like that, I think, okay, have they done this on purpose to prepare us for a cyber attack?
Or are they actually just very incompetent, but pretend they're competent?
You know, we have to consider all of those possibilities, which is why I wanted to get your insight on that on air, because we see things a little bit differently in that regard, if you know what I mean.
Right.
Yep.
So tell me, what is it that you really want people to take away from this?
Is there anything else from this Federal Register notice that you want people to know that I haven't covered here?
No, I don't think so.
I think it's just another version of the same informational legal system that they're They're just doing iterations of it over time.
Yeah, yeah.
I'm going to spend a bit of time going through the document after we wrap up, Catherine, just for anyone who wants to delve into it a little bit deeper.
I want to bring up your substack for everyone, which is Bailey Wick News.
I don't know if I'm saying that right with my Aussie accent here.
B-A-I-L-I wicknews.substack.com.
Please follow Catherine on there.
Anywhere else you want people to follow you?
No, that's it.
I'm not on any social media.
Wise decision.
Catherine, thank you so much for your time and for going through this with us.
I really appreciate it and appreciate your insight.
We'll speak to you soon.
You're welcome.
Thank you.
Well, we're very grateful to Catherine and her insight and all of her research.
I wanted to take some time to actually go through this notice of declaration in a little bit more detail from the Federal Register because there is some language in there that would suggest that they are expecting this.
Again, I'm not saying that this is certain.
I also want to explore more of the possibilities of EMF to cause these kinds of symptoms.
As Catherine said, you know, the possibility of radiation, Which we know radiation poisoning causes a variety of symptoms, including those experienced by the Canberra protesters in Australia.
Sickness, nausea, fatigue, burns, all sorts of stuff like that.
And can we also, you know, is EMF or the stuff that's in the injections actually going to be possible to create some sort of Marburg hemorrhagic fever symptoms?
The Federal Register Publication says some interesting things.
So this is the PREP Act, which was introduced in 2005.
It's basically what's included in the supplementary information, which says that it authorises the Secretary of the US Department of Health and HHS to issue a declaration to provide liability immunity...
To certain individuals and entities against any claim of loss caused by arising out of relating to or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration or use of medical countermeasures.
Now that's what Catherine was talking about in terms of that word, medical countermeasures.
It's actually covering them for a weapon and when they say that, they mean A weapon.
And they say that this does exclude claims involving willful misconduct as defined in the PREP Act.
Good luck proving that half the time.
But anyway, it was enacted.
The PREP Act was enacted in December of 2005.
And it added sections regarding liability, immunity, and a compensation program.
They go on to say that the first declaration, the PREP Act Declaration for Countermeasures, again, weapons, against Marburg and or Marburg disease was first issued effective November 25, 2020.
Todd Callender's been speaking about this for a very long time.
And then you can see that they've said here that he's extending the PrEP Act coverage for both Ebola viruses and Marburg viruses due to the continued national security threat.
We read that previously.
And they say here, this is the part I didn't read, Ebola viruses and Marburg viruses is needed.
Sorry, let me go back a bit.
The risk of domestic cases is high.
No, it isn't.
Due to ongoing outbreaks in other countries over the past decade, development of and stockpiling vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics for all species of both Ebola viruses and Marburg viruses is needed for continued US preparedness against the credible threat of a public health emergency due to outbreaks of these viruses."
So I'm gonna continue exploring EMF, Marburg, Marburg and other sort of hemorrhagic fevers but Some time ago I reported on the CDC's zombie preparedness plan.
They've since sort of said this campaign's over and that they were using it as an educational piece at the time to sort of say if you're prepared for a zombie pandemic, you're prepared for absolutely anything.
And it's hilarious because it's Preparedness 101's zombie pandemic and they call it a fun new way of...
Of preparing for a zombie apocalypse.
But here's the interesting thing about it.
You know, I'm going to show you some of that book.
And, you know, I can appreciate that perhaps this was sort of an artistic way of telling people to be prepared for everything.
But I also find it very, very odd that the Centers for Disease Control are telling people that they need to prepare for a zombie pandemic.
They choose zombie as the word.
And, you know, I guess, or as the theme, and I guess we've been pre-programmed through so many films to expect something like a zombie pandemic.
You can see on page one, I'm not going to go through the whole thing, but you can see on this page, I get to pick the next movie.
That one's going to give me nightmares.
Oh, you're such a baby.
It really wasn't that scary.
You know, that kind of stuff would never really happen.
And then on the next page, well, I'm going to try and get some sleep.
Don't stay up too late.
All right, Max, I will be on the lookout for the boogeyman.
Ha ha.
Very funny.
And then they go to the news.
And the news says, in other news, several people have been hospitalized after a strange virus began spreading rapidly throughout the southeast.
The guy's like, huh?
Scientists haven't identified the virus yet, but symptoms include slow movement, slurred speech, and violent tendencies.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is recommending that people distance themselves from anyone displaying these symptoms.
They're also recommending family gather emergency supplies and make plans in case they're asked to evacuate.
And you can get more information, of course, on a government website.
So the guy goes, checks the internet, a zombie virus.
This does not look good.
Let's check the CDC.
Oh, an emergency preparedness kit for zombies.
Let's take a look.
Let's see what we can gather up.
Now, it's interesting, again, that they've chosen a zombie pandemic here.
And particularly because the military have something known as CONOP 8888, also known as the Counter-Zombie Dominants.
which is a US Department of Defense Strategic Command document that describes a plan for the United States and its military defending against zombies.
The April 30th, 2011 document was written as part of a fictional training scenario for junior officers undergoing training in JOPS, the DOD's contingency planning system.
The United States Strategic Command instructors found that a zombie survival plan made for a very useful and effective training tool while avoiding the political risks of using a real country in training scenarios.
You can actually find ConPlan here.
Which, you know, the writing's quite small.
But it does, you know, have a disclaimer here that it was a fictitious plan.
They've got a zombie graphic here.
Counter zombie dominance is what they're calling it.
And they've got the security instructions, the plan summary, Zombie threat summary.
I'm not going to go through all of that.
Again, the writing's really tiny.
But what I found really interesting about this CDC plan was the symptoms that they were talking about in terms of violence.
Where did they have it?
It was here.
Scientists haven't identified the virus yet, but symptoms include slow movement, slurred speech, and violent tendencies.
Now, I want to talk about the fact that Many people have, you know, witnessed very odd behavioral changes in their loved ones, in their friends, Following the COVID-19 injections.
We know now from multiple people that really specialize in things like Alzheimer's, Prions disease, all of that, that these injections are causing neurological disorders.
And so without even, you know, going to extreme lengths to talk about maybe people being programmed remotely or whatever, is the possibility so far away that Well, so far out there that if people are experiencing genuine neurological disorders, that that could translate into something like violent tendencies, slurred speech, and they start behaving really strange.
I mean, we're at the point, guys, where we need to consider these possibilities.
And so when I look at the fact that, you know, for no reason whatsoever, they've gone and extended this Marburg thing, When you look at the pre-programming that's happened in films, as Catherine mentioned, about things like hemorrhagic fevers,
which seems to be, you know, whenever they're talking about a sort of end-of-year, end-of-the-world pandemic, it most of the time has something to do with people bleeding profusely out of their orifices because it's terrifying.
It does beg the question, Whether they would plan something like this and how do we actually, you know, protect ourselves from it.
It's worth noting that as it stands, and this is what I've been told by doctors, Marburg only, doctors that I trust, not the CDC, although they do say, even the World Health Organization, you know, basically says it is fluids that it spreads through.
So it is if you come into contact with the fluids of someone who has One of these, you know, hemorrhagic fever viruses, if they are viruses, that it essentially becomes dangerous for you.
But again, if we're talking about the EMF part, and if they are creating these symptoms, then really it's not transmissible.
It's symptoms that have been created, particularly if this is something that's being activated inside the injections.
So all very, very important things to consider.
As I always say, it's important to be prepared for absolutely any possibility.
There are a number of reasons why they may do something this drastic this year in particular, along with the possibility, like Catherine said, anything, anything really before the 2024 election in the United States.
Including cyber attack, including black swan events, UFOs, you name it.
I mean, they will maybe potentially pull out all stops to make sure that that election does not go ahead.
So something to be very, very mindful of.
As we mentioned at the start of this broadcast, we really recommend people go to sat123.com forward slash Maria.
Or give them a call and let them know you've come from me.
They are very, very good people.
Always look after our audience members and they will give you the best deals possible.
Right now they've got a number of very, very good deals.
And you can also go to prep123.com.
Get yourself a Faraday bag for things like EMFs.
Very, very important to protect your devices so that if communications do go down, at least if you've got your sat phone inside one of these bags, you have a better chance of being able to contact your loved ones and they do have family plans on the website.
So go onto there and have a look today.
Again, you can give them a call.
Their number is 1-941-841-0844 and let them know you've come from me.
Very important considerations, guys.
Again, the main point of all of this is to just be prepared for absolutely any possibility.
And like Catherine said, you know, we have to be grateful because these things that are happening in the world, for the most part, have really been outside of our control.
I think had we been more politically involved and really had our finger on the pulse as much as the world's population does today, had we had that Same energy 10 years ago.
I don't think we would have seen them get away with the crimes that they've gotten away with this time around, but we're not letting them get away with anything else.
And while some of the world's population may still be asleep, we're certainly not.
We are very, very strong people and we're ready for anything.
So knowing any possibility is part of that.
Thank you so much for tuning in today.
▲
Export Selection