Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: US BOMBS Yemen Igniting Possible World War 3 & Neocon BLOOD LUST
|
Time
Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
People say we need to make America great again.
I completely agree.
agree we may need to make gallows great again.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Hello, happy Friday to everybody out there, especially everybody out there who hates war and wants peace and prays for peace.
Welcome to the Millstone Report.
So yesterday on this program, I told you that the bloodthirsty neocons' motivations for stealing the 2020 and coming 2024 elections were I was right.
Last night I told you that the election of Donald Trump in 2020 and the prospect of his re-election in 2024 would thwart their plans for World War III. This is all by design to try to save the corrupt financial system of Western finance.
Well, last night news broke that moves all of us one step closer to World War III and the suspension of the 2024 elections altogether.
The United States and the United Kingdom launched airstrikes against the nation of Yemen.
So it's important to know that most of the mainstream coverage on this attack We'll try to downplay the attack against the sovereign nation of Yemen by claiming the attack was only against the Houthi rebels.
But this reporting is counting on the ignorance of the American people.
The Houthis are well organized, of large number, have the support of the people in Yemen, and are essentially in control of the country of Yemen.
But back to elections.
If they cannot successfully remove Trump from ballots or put him in jail before the election, then a global war might give them the excuse they need to cancel the elections altogether.
Just like the fake COVID pandemic gave them the pretense to create the mail-in ballot scheme.
The media and cabal need a new kind of fear to scare the people into compliance for the next crisis.
Will we be told that we need to cancel the elections in order to save democracy?
I can just hear it now.
Our borders have been wide open for years.
Millions of militant men have streamed across the border and right on cue.
Talking heads over at Neocon Sean Hannity Show are warning of terrorist attacks on American soil.
Because the U.S. and U.K. attack on Yemen last night, specifically connecting those two.
Watch.
This is a very sophisticated terror organization, Sean.
It's been reported that there are sleeper cell agents from Hezbollah in the United States.
They have proxies around Latin America.
We'll remember their attacks in Argentina and other places for many years.
And of course, we can't forget the Beirut attacks.
So Hezbollah, it's a terror group that has long roots and long capability to attack and kill Americans.
So there you go, right?
So two things.
If Americans die because of terrorist attacks, it will be because, one, the border has been left open on purpose by our leaders, and two, because last night we attacked Yemen, which is backed by Iran.
That is to say, if Americans die, and they will, it will be our own fault.
It will be the Democrats' fault, and it will be the Republicans' fault.
In fact, I blame Republicans more.
I blame the Republicans in D.C., especially the ones from Christian red states, who should know better.
You know, Republicans from states like Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and Georgia, who time and time again refuse to listen to their constituents and buck speakers like John Boehner, Paul Ryan, or Kevin McCarthy.
The same ones who will have a new list of excuses for the new speaker, Mike Johnson.
Our country is on fire and burning.
On fire.
To the ground, right before our eyes.
And they want us to support and cheer on another war?
It's disgusting.
The Republicans had plenty of opportunity to secure our border over the years, but they refused to listen to us, we the people, and instead listened to the Koch brothers, who, by the way, sent me a nice flashy mailer yesterday telling me how great neocon Nimarata Haley is.
If our streets run with spilled American blood, it will be the Republicans to blame because we sent them there to stop this madness and all they had for us.
We're excuses for why this couldn't be done.
After the U.S. attack on Yemen, the nation has now been prepped for the Black Swan event.
CIA reporter Catherine Herridge said we would be facing this election year.
Back in December, she said this.
Well, mine's a little dark.
I just feel a lot of concern that 2024 may be the year of a black swan event.
This is a national security event with high impact that's very hard to predict.
There are a number of concerns that I have that factor into that.
Not only this sort of enduring heightened threat level that we're facing, the wars in Israel, also Ukraine.
And we're so divided in this country in ways that we haven't seen before.
And I think that just creates fertile ground for our adversaries like North Korea, China, and Iran.
And that's what concerns me most.
A black swan.
The irony.
What a lie.
The irony is that is a lie.
The actual definition is an unforeseen event, something that we didn't expect or an event that comes out of nowhere and we had no idea.
Wink, wink.
Anyway, the country is now prepped to explain the terrorist attacks that are coming to America.
And once again, the reason will be it's the Muslims' fault.
Joining me now to talk more about this is political commentator J.D. Sharp.
J.D., we had you on a little earlier in the week.
But considering the circumstances, I figured we needed to talk about this.
It is Friday and weekend, so we've got basically a couple of days off.
So are we in the middle of World War III, J.D. Sharp?
Yeah, I mean, we're not there yet, but that's clearly the goal.
I think that the cabal, the deep state, the two are kind of correlated.
I think they're fully aware that the general public is not going to buy COVID-19 this time around.
Enough people are dying from T-cell exhaustion related to the vaccine.
People are getting sick from T-cell exhaustion relating to the vaccine.
The narrative has been completely shut down, partially because Elon Musk purchased Twitter, as I've said many, many times.
But the only way that a virus is going to work is if it's maybe NEPA, like was the virus that the movie Contagion was based on, who Nathan Wolf from Metabiota, who's actually one of Epstein's Close Confidants was actually a producer on that movie.
And the WEF has made a couple statements about a disease X that should be coming possibly this year.
But again, the only way that that route works this time around is if it's got a mortality rate of 20 to 30%.
And if that's the case, then the cabal themselves will have to be completely insulated to protect themselves.
They're very, very selfish.
And so they're not going to try with a virus that has that large of a fatality rate.
So the mortality rate.
So the other thing that makes the most sense, and I said this probably about a month ago when I came on your show, I said that the goal It's going to be to declare war on Russia, on Iran, and then have all these different Palestinian protesters and anti-genocide in Gaza protesters.
You're seeing that right now.
They're being paid all over the country to disrupt things in New York City.
To disrupt things in Los Angeles.
That's all part of setting the narrative along with mainstream media and Catherine Herridge making statements like that.
And what's going to happen next?
Most likely we're going to see a mass casualty event on U.S. soil that will be completely manufactured by the cabal.
Because that's how it works when you have to operate based on a fake narrative.
You create the narrative.
You plant the seed.
You have things surrounding it that create this plausible thought process of, okay, these people could be responsible for whatever happens next.
You have the media push it through all their channels, and then you have something like, for example, attacking The ships are attacking Yemen based on the Houthis, who have actually been proven to be extremely skillful and talented at what they do.
They have easily taken over several of those vessels in the Red Sea.
And they're saying that it's just a matter of supplying weapons that are being trafficked through the Red Sea to Israel.
I think it's more than that.
I want to get your thoughts on that, but to your point, yesterday before this attack, there were reports coming in that the Yemeni army...
No, they fired missiles here, but there were reports...
Here we go.
...that the Iranian Navy seized an oil tanker, St.
Nicholas, near Oman...
And it's worth noting that the ship's name is actually Suez Rajan, and it's Iranian.
So this happened before the attack.
You have Iran.
Look at that.
They're literally seizing a ship that belongs to the U.S., but according to reports, it used to belong to Iran, and the U.S. had seized it a while ago.
And so this happened yesterday.
And you see it there on your screen.
And then, of course, we get these attacks against the Iran-backed Yemen or the Houthis.
Now, to your point or to your question there, talking about the resourcefulness of the Houthis, in your opinion, J.D. Sharp, this attack, the U.S. is saying it's because...
That Yemen was launching missiles into the Red Sea.
These were shipments supposedly supposed to go to Israel.
And so Israel was no longer getting these shipments.
And so that's the reason that we're told is for the attack.
Do you think something more was going on there?
Well, I think it's two things.
I think that, number one...
Attacking Yemen is going to, we know that there have been, there's absolutely been at least thousands of, you mentioned, military-age men that have been invading the southern border, that have been allowed in through the southern border.
And a lot of those men probably have ties to people that have died in Gaza, have ties to the Houthis, have ties to Yemen itself.
And they're trained, they're probably armed, And they're most likely in a position to carry out some type of terrorist event.
So this serves two purposes.
Number one, it helps complete that narrative of, oh, it makes sense now that because the Houthis have been stopping these ships from going to and from Israel, And trafficking weapons.
And again, I think it's more than weapons.
I think there's probably drugs.
There could be humans.
I think there's a lot more things that are being trafficked, which is why it's such a valuable thing for Israel to depend on than just the weapons.
But it also completes that narrative of, okay, this is now plausible as to why Something might happen on U.S. soil, which allows the cabal to actually manufacture that something.
Without anyone really questioning what's going on.
That's fascinating.
We played for you the standard Hannity take immediately after this attack.
People like Hannity are excited about this.
People like Lindsey Graham are excited about this.
They want more war.
They love it.
McConnell said it was...
Go ahead.
Yeah, Mitch McConnell said that it was a long time coming, that it was a great decision.
Mike Johnson said the exact same thing.
Obviously, we have two major rhinos there who are deeply connected to the wars all over the world.
And one thing about President Trump, former President Trump, that the average person just doesn't seem to really grasp that, he was the most war-averse president in the last hundred years.
He signed three different accords.
He should have won at least one Nobel Peace Prize for what he did and the reason he was war averse and the reason why I believe that every single person who enters public office should have a net worth that puts them out of contention of possibly being bribed or being subjective to being lobbying against is that he was so wealthy already that he was not he he couldn't be purchased he couldn't be bought and so there was no upside for him Starting these wars all
over the world.
In fact, it's the exact opposite.
The upside for him was building his brand, which he had already built with his hotels, because Trump has been making 30 to 50 million dollars a year just off licensing his name to resorts all over the world.
He was more interested in the exact opposite, which was peace, prosperity, and tourism.
which is why he's hated so much by the establishment so back back to the uh the coming terrorist attacks we're told is going to happen i mean it is a fact the border's open it is a fact that we've got these military-aged males streaming across i mean i saw a report the other day and we've got chinese nationals we got chinese nationals that are being tracked and then they're they're purchasing rifles and and and uh you know semi-automatic rifles and so this is this is certainly happening but is it your
Because this is kind of my feeling as well, that now this black swan event can be blamed on the Muslims.
I'm not saying there's not going to be people from Iran or Hezbollah who are in this country that are going to do.
But now it's the perfect opportunity to do a massive, massive false flag attack and essentially get us into another war for the next 20 years.
Absolutely.
Yeah, no.
2 plus 2 plus 2 equals 6.
And that's what people are seeing right now.
Everything has lined up for the narrative to actually make sense.
And once the narrative makes sense, that creates the perfect opportunity to do something like manufacture a massive mass casualty event or possibly assassinate a presidential candidate that is Really liked by a large portion of the country and who represents what the country was before COVID-19 and before Joe Biden became President of the United States.
That opportunity is now there.
And you really aren't going to know who did it because yes, the border has been opened.
We know that at least 10 to 15 million people are here right now.
We don't know who they are.
We don't know if they're armed.
We don't know if they have diseases.
We don't know if they have terrorist affiliations.
We know some do.
We know that what happened in Gaza, the genocide, the 24,000 people that have either been killed or murdered or both, and America clearly has backed that, not just with support from Anthony Blinken, who was dual citizenship with Israel, but also with weapons itself.
And now we're actually attacking I mean, they're not killing people.
The Houthis are not killing people.
They're doing nothing but stopping or attempting to basically form a naval blockade and stopping the supplies, the weapons that are being used to conduct this genocide in Gaza from being given to Israel.
And it's really kind of interesting to me that...
Let me ask you this.
Joe Biden...
again doesn't make his own decisions anthony blinken is the one making the decisions right now he just got back from a 10 country tour made a tweet about last night anthony blinken goes around congress i get there is a congressional war powers act the 48 hours thing by the way we've seen nothing with that he actually bombs yemen the members of congress have spoken out against this and No Republicans, just Democrats, which I find to be very, very interesting.
Here's the deal.
If you speak out against this, they've set up the narrative to where you are pro-Hamas.
It's crazy.
I'm interested to know, honestly, I know Rand Paul had teased Rand Paul had teased some sort of presidential endorsement, and I don't know if he's announced any.
I haven't looked.
But, you know, some people are saying, well, is he going to endorse Trump?
Is he going to endorse DeSantis?
You know, who's he going to be?
And I was like, surely he's not going to endorse DeSantis or any of these other candidates who, because Rand Paul's entire, you know, his main pet peeve is foreign policy and foreign intervention and foreign aid.
So surely...
And then as soon as he teases this announcement, boom!
You know, people like Lindsey Graham get their way.
The neocons get their way.
And if you speak out against it, you are considered a terrorist sympathizer, which is preposterous, right?
I mean, the whole idea of, hey, just because it's Israel doesn't mean that we're going...
To essentially start a world war.
That's insane.
Once again, it has nothing to do with the American people and our best interests.
Not at all.
It actually accomplishes absolutely nothing for us, and it prevents us from being involved in BRICS, which is obviously Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Iran.
It's expanded since.
BRICS is almost 60% of the world's economy.
And if BRICS decides that because of what we're doing in Israel that these countries aren't going to deal with us The dollar is going to have a very hard time staying where it's at.
It's actually going to do the exact opposite of us.
And then also the fact that we have all these illegal immigrants that have entered the country through the southern border, many of which may be terrorists, and we are assisting Israel with what they're doing in Gaza, and most likely those people aren't very happy about it, and we don't really know who they are or what they're capable of.
Yeah, it does the exact opposite of helping our country.
But when someone like Anthony Blinken goes around Congress and essentially bombs yen, which is an act of war, and then you have the dollar basically going to zero, and you don't even have a border at this point at all.
If you had 15 million people that have entered in the last three years, then you really don't have a border.
And if you don't have order to declare war, and if you don't have a solid currency and you don't have a border, you don't have a country.
And I think that that is where things are on their way to.
We're two out of three right now.
The dollar isn't at zero yet.
But as BRICS expands and as we decide not to be a part of BRICS, it's probably going to happen in the next probably five years.
I would say at this rate, with the way that things are going, by 2028 at the latest, America will be completely unrecognized by now.
Square this with me then, because I agree with what you're saying, and I think the rise of RICS is serious.
I've been following, you know, for 10 years or longer, I've been following the rise of this attempt to get out from under the Western finance, you know, the boot.
Saudi Arabia joins BRICS, right?
Huge deal.
They're trading with other countries in currencies.
They're not converting to the dollar.
All right.
And yet, Saudi Arabia helped with the logistics behind yesterday's attack against Yemen.
Right?
So square that with me.
I mean, once again, we could just say, look, no country is truly monolithic in their leadership, right?
I mean, that could be it.
I suppose it could also have to do with the fact that the Saudis just don't like Yemen, right?
But what are your thoughts?
I think it's more so the second than the first.
I mean, Saudi has been kind of conducting their own genocide in Yemen since 2015.
Apparently, they've killed almost 377 through 380,000 people during that.
And I believe that they are actively involved in trade in the Red Sea as well.
However, there's another side to this.
Notice that China and Russia both had this reputation of being public enemy number one, right?
They're these evil, murderous Dictators that have total control over their society.
They are the worst thing to happen to the world.
Well, now China yesterday said, no, United States, let's show some restraint here.
So actually, China and Russia are looking sane and like they're actually pushing for peace.
So not only do you have the fact that Saudi Arabia obviously has ties to it, but they don't like Yemen and everyone knows that.
That's not a surprise that they would supply logistics under those circumstances.
But also, you have Saudi Arabia's other member of BRICS, major member of BRICS, China, who looks like the good guy here.
So I think there's both sides to that.
We also have another little international contradiction, if you will.
Here is, and this is another language, so I'm not going to play it for you, but you have Erdogan.
You have Turkey, the president of Turkey, President Erdogan, who for years I used to just pronounce it Erdogan, but it's, I think, Erdogan.
He says that the U.S. and U.K. strikes in Yemen targeting the Houthis are disproportionate uses of force.
Quote, they are eager to turn the Red Sea into a bloodbath.
We see that the Houthis are making very successful defenses against the airstrikes.
Okay, so J.D. Sharp, Turkey's a NATO ally, okay?
And we've seen this from Turkey the last, you know, we've seen this, they kind of buck the West when they can.
Yes, they're a NATO ally, but they also like to, you know, rub shoulders with the Russians.
They, you know, they have speculative gas and pipeline deals and stuff, you know, from Russia to Turkey, and then that, you know, Turkey wants to be the hub that Germany could have been.
If we hadn't blown up their own pipeline.
So what are your thoughts on that?
I mean, is NATO fractioning here?
I mean, it seems like the entire global order is about to change.
Yeah, maybe a little bit.
The thing about Turkey is, it's a pretty big player.
They've got 90 million people there.
It's not exactly a small country.
They have 10 times the population of Israel and probably five times the surface area.
But it's also very Muslim.
And I think that there's an element of this where if you really look at it logistically, what's happening to the Palestinians, if you're an Arab-speaking Palestinian, you're born in the Middle East, you are technically a Semite.
And so what's technically happening to the Palestinians, the innocent women and children that are being killed by Gaza or by Israel with the help of the United States, It's technically a very large anti-Semitic hate crime, but it also signifies a holy war, especially when Netanyahu uses language like Amalek.
If you actually look at Hebrew scripture, Amalek was the biggest enemy of the Jews, and the goal with Amalek was only one and one thing only.
You have to kill Amalek.
Eliminate him, eliminate all of his family members, and blot their memory from the face of the earth.
And so when Netanyahu used that rhetoric, it kind of sparked the whole holy war conversation.
And I think that the fact that Erdogan and Turkey have kind of gone against the grain a little bit, and the fact that they are tied to Russia, And they are Muslim leads me to believe that that's why Erdogan is saying the things that he's doing.
And they are formidable.
90 million people is not a small amount of people, especially when you're that close to Israel.
Yeah, you know, and it was just, I guess, the last time Turkey, just to be quite honest, I mean, the last time, it was last year, you know, there was these reports about Turkey inking these future deals, pipeline deals with Russia and everything else, and then, I don't know, a couple of months go by, and boom, they get hit with this giant earthquake, this devastating earthquake that...
Still, people are scratching their head with how the ground split the way it did.
Anyway, I'm telling you, man, I feel like there is so much pent-up aggression toward not necessarily the American people, but our leaders.
And this kind of goes to what I was saying in the monologue.
Our leaders have totally betrayed us.
And I mean, even the ones, and I mentioned specifically like Republicans from Christian red states who, you know, they're the establishment and they back the establishment and they come home to the states and they say what the voters want to hear.
But when they go up to Washington, D.C., they don't do anything to try to buck the status They've backed speakers for years like John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Kevin McCarthy, speakers that we can't stand, speakers that promote policies that are the antithesis to what the American people want.
And here we are.
I mean, we are literally about to...
We're a ripe piece of fruit that's about to fall in the hands of evil.
And it's because of things like the border.
It's because of things like the currency, like the spending, like the debt.
At least they're going to blame it on that.
And so when it all comes down, and when these illegal immigrants turn violent, and they're not just here to take your jobs, they're here to take your home and your life and the life of your family in some sort of armed confrontation because they think they have the right to this land, I'm sorry.
I just feel like we have to blame the Republicans more so than the Democrats because I have been doing this for a very long time at the local level.
And I'm telling you, all these guys have our excuses for why they really can't move as fast as we want.
And they never actually reverse course.
They may slow the course down, but it's all...
Case in point.
I'll get your response to that, and then I'll have some receipts to back up what it is I'm saying.
Go ahead.
Perfect.
No, I think that, for example, Republicans like Tom Cotton, who has blamed Hamas for...
Sorry, my daughter just came in.
Do not apologize.
That's precious.
Do not apologize at all.
We must have kids.
Go ahead.
I sincerely apologize.
Like Tom Cotton, Arkansas Republican who says a lot of the right things as it relates to spending and as it relates to immigration.
But he says that Hamas is totally responsible for every single person that has been killed in Gaza by Israel, which is at least 10,000, 20,000 injured, at least 5,000 kids.
We don't know how many are under that rubble.
But the reality is that the conflict between The Palestinians and the Israelis has been going on for 70 years.
Hang on, wait a second.
Can you repeat that?
Because I'm from Arkansas.
Tom Cotton, technically my senator.
I didn't know that.
Tom Cotton, what did he say?
Say it one more time.
He said that every single death in Gaza, anyone that has died as a result of Whether it's in Gaza, or whether it's the ships, or whether it's the Houthis, or anyone in Yemen, or anyone in Hezbollah.
As a response to the October 7th attack.
Is that the context there?
Correct.
It's totally about Hamas.
And I'm saying that that's just simply not true.
What did he say?
He said that anybody that's died, I'm trying to remember, he said that anybody that's died, all of them that have died, all the casualties, meaning it's their fault, meaning every person in Gaza is a human shield.
And because they're a human shield, we should just be able to wipe them off the face of the earth.
That is insane.
That is literally insane.
No, not only that, but it just shows how beholden he is actually to Israel and how beholden Our politicians are to Israel under those circumstances.
But yeah, you can't say that, especially now when you look at what happened on October 7th, there was a seven-hour delay to actually get anyone there.
Members of the IDF have admitted that they bombed people that were at the festival, that they bombed people in kibitzes, that they certainly killed at least a few hundred of the people that died On that day, it wasn't all Hamas.
Israel knew about it for about a year before.
I mean, Israel has this elite level of intelligence.
The Mossad has a budget of $5 billion a year, and they have 10,000 employees at least all over the world.
There is no way that they did not know exactly what was going to happen.
But the thing is, they've weaponized it.
They've weaponized it to victimize with impunity.
And when politicians From the United States of America, like Tom Cotton, who obviously is conservative, but is he an America first Republican?
No, I would say he's more Israel first than America first.
But when you can't look at the situation and say, it's been rumored, and there's been several excerpts that have been created, and there have been a lot of different statements about the members of the IDF randomly grabbing Palestinian women, And having their way with them for the last 30 or 40 years.
The conflict has been going on for 70 years.
The Nakba happened.
The Nakba was a huge part of how Israel came to have the land that they have.
Here's the deal with Tom.
I followed Tom for a while.
I used to exclusively cover Arkansas politics, so I've had my chance to interview him before in person as well as remotely on the radio.
I certainly know where I disagree on Tom.
Certainly my I've evolved a lot in my thinking, just looking at what people say versus what the outcomes are, where the true structure of power is.
I'll never forget my moment on Tom was when you had Obama trying to gear up.
I can't remember the year.
It might have been 2012, 2013.
He was trying to gear up for a war in Damascus.
He wanted to wipe Bashar al-Assad off the map, wanted to kill him, a la Muammar Gaddafi style, and we were going to bomb Syria.
We were going to go to war in Syria.
That was what we were going to do.
And so Obama puts out the red line.
He says, hey, this is the red line.
I mean, we'd have to intervene if Bashar al-Assad decided to, I don't know, gas his own people.
Anybody out there?
If Bashar al-Assad gasses his own people, we'll get involved.
And then lo and behold, he gasses his own people.
And of course, then you've got Russia involved.
And then you've got a UK lab involved, I believe, that says, actually, no, this gas did not come from Syria.
It actually came from Turkey and Erdogan, who wanted the U.S. to get involved for their own benefit.
And people like Tom Cotton just refused to look at the evidence.
Seymour Hersh wrote an article back then called The Red Line and The Rat Line.
And it was a fantastic article.
You guys should go check it out.
And it totally disproved this idea that Bashar al-Assad gassed his own people.
And to this day, even President Trump in interviews has referenced this as a fact, when in fact it didn't happen.
It was a false flag trying to get the U.S. involved in another war.
So this is a perfect segue, JD, to talk about October 7th.
What happened to Israelis was horrible, right?
But it's clear that there was a stand-down order given.
This idea that the most secure border in the world...
Was compromised by people with low IQs on paragliders?
It's ridiculous that they weren't stopped when that happened.
And so, you know, the whole thing is nuts.
And it's all about, like, the United States...
To these people are essentially, you know, to countries like the secular nation state of Israel, are basically just guns for hire.
We just have to put out certain circumstances that will convince, that the media can use, that will convince the people, that will give the politicians the talking points to get us involved in another war.
It almost happened in Syria.
I think it was back in 2012, 2013, or 2014 maybe.
And, you know, but it is happening now because we just bombed Yemen.
Go ahead.
Yeah.
Exactly.
And I do think that they were told to stand down that day.
But I think this was kind of a long time coming.
Israel really becomes the odd man out with BRICS, especially if the United States of America joins BRICS. That leaves Israel basically, that really leaves them nowhere.
I believe that the half a trillion dollars in natural resources that is either on the coast of Gaza or under Gaza that was discovered, About a month, month and a half ago, had something to do with it.
But if you look at just the last decade or so, the last 50 years or so, every 10 years or so, this thing kind of happens.
And I believe there is an element of Israel leveraging the United States to either start a war or join a war that helps to stabilize the region to protect them.
Although this time around, I think that it's It's more of an expansion thing.
Not only are they exhausting the resources in Gaza, and I believe they're going to put a military base there, kind of like Russia would like to have with Crimea, which is why Crimea is so important to Russia.
But I believe that there's a legitimate goal here to expand from Israel to Ukraine and potentially attach the two, take out the countries in between there, And form greater Israel.
Using an event like this, like October 7th, and using it again to victimize en masse.
Let me ask you this.
Why is it that Israel can indiscriminately just murder innocent women and children by the thousands, but when the United States And obviously they're exhausting themselves of resources and weapons in the process.
But when the United States is trying to give them supplies, when Yemen and the Houthis decide that they want to create a blockade, suddenly that is the worst thing in the world.
And then now Israel says, okay, we're going to hire, like you said, our hired guns.
We're going to bring in Big Brother UK. We're going to bring in big brother U.S. and we're going to stop this immediately.
Why is it that Israel just believes that they can do whatever they want to whoever they want with no consequences and anyone who does anything to them in response Is suddenly so much...
Do you see what I'm saying?
I don't understand where this...
I think I do understand where the ideology comes from.
I think it's actually from the Talmud.
But I just...
I don't understand.
Because really, you look at like a double standard.
A double standard means that you believe that you live by different rules than someone else.
And that is a very, very dangerous thing.
And that's kind of what I'm seeing here with Isra.
They believe that they can just do what they want with impunity.
And anyone that responds to them is suddenly the absolute worst person in the world, but they can't be held accountable for their own actions.
That's kind of what I'm seeing, and this is more of a continuation of that.
Yeah, you're exactly right.
JD Sharp, hey, I really appreciate you coming on the program.
You spent a lot of time with us today.
We've got to go to break, but I really appreciate you coming on at the last minute to talk about what's going on in Yemen.
And, you know, we're facing a possible world war in, you know, 2024.
It's only the 12th day of the year.
It's only the 12th day of the year.
And, boy, they've kicked it off fast.
Yes, they most certainly have.
But I believe that the American public is seeing what's going on.
And they most certainly do not support this war, which is why they're going to need a mass casualty event to get support behind the war.
And I sincerely hope it doesn't happen.
Me too.
And we can push back against that and warn against that.
And again, you never know, you know, the good Lord can, again, make this whole Tower of Babel they're building collapse at any moment.
And that needs to be our prayer.
J.D. Sharp, thank you so much, sir.
We'll do it again soon, okay?
Thank you, Paul.
Appreciate it.
Have a good one.
Have a great weekend, sir.
All right, folks, we are up against a break.
We need to go to break.
Yesterday on the program, on the Stu Peter Show, which is coming up here, a new Stu Peter Show coming up here at the top of the hour.
Yesterday on the Stu Peter Show, he was able to interview I had a great interview with a guy by the name of David Corbo about the satanic influence over our culture, specifically with this rapper, this gay sodomite rapper by the name of Lil Nas X. So we're going to listen to that highlight, and we're going to be back here in just a moment.
Don't go anywhere.
Interest in smearing Christianity.
Yeah, I think he's fake.
I mean, I know he's fake, but what I think is that he probably doesn't even really feel this way.
This is his Zionist-controlled Jewish-run record label that is putting this message out, and they're saying, this is what you're going to give us.
You have a contract.
You owe us X amount of number of records, X amount of number of albums, music videos, all this, and we're going to give you all of this recoupable money so that you can go live this big, rich life.
But keep in mind, your houses and your vehicles and all of this cash and all these advances, they belong to us.
And we will come and we will take them back if you don't sell your soul and go and do this.
So, is he headed for the lake of fire if he doesn't repent?
Yes, absolutely.
He's going to hell.
I mean, that's just the truth.
If he doesn't repent, and if he doesn't ask Jesus Christ for forgiveness and accept him as his Lord and Savior, that's where he's going.
That's where everybody's going that doesn't do those things.
But I don't think that this is really something that even he believes.
I mean, how could any person who has any moral compass at all whatsoever Really do this.
I think that what this is, there's a bigger machine behind this.
I agree.
I don't think that this is his own doing.
I think that the industry, it takes advantage of these kids.
It shows them glimmering gold and a lavish lifestyle that they could potentially have.
You know, back in the day when you had like the hair metal bands of the 80s and even the 70s when...
There was this emergence of satanic messaging in music.
It's always been there, Stu, but it wasn't always backed by Nike.
You know what I mean?
That's the thing that's changed dramatically.
And the hip-hop industry is really at the forefront of that operation now where you have corporatized Luciferianism.
And that is, like I said, it's always been in the music industry and you have to wonder to what degree did people ever really...
It used to be a form of rebellion against Christian Catholic values.
Now it is...
Just part of the formula to superstar success.
So yeah, I don't believe it's his own.
I believe it's an industry pushing him.
You talked about Christian extremism coming back, and you think that that's going to happen.
I'm interested to hear more about that.
So, I've been a conspiracy theorist for a long time, much longer than I've been a follower of Christ, but it turns out that all things lead to him, if you're paying attention.
And one of the things that I came to understand as a young man, probably 2006, 2007, was this idea that in the end times there was going to be this persecution of not only white people, but of Christians.
And I thought that was really interesting.
Now, I don't really find it interesting.
I find it kind of the writing is on the wall.
And I can't help but wonder if all of this blatant Satanism is to push God-fearing Christians to a point where they are finally reactive.
Because as we touched on before, I mean, you can't even draw a picture of Muhammad without some severe backlash.
And we've all seen that play out.
And so the Christians are...
Known for their pacifist nature, right?
The idea of turning the other cheek.
And also this idea of being tolerant.
And it turns out, guys, that tolerance is not actually a virtue.
And tolerance actually has a point of diminishing returns.
And we're experiencing those diminishing returns right now.
The very culture that we're immersed in, that we complain about on a daily basis, it was allowed to propagate because of our adhering to tolerance as a virtue.
It never was a virtue.
And I do fear that This whole thing is going to a place where they're trying to push Christians into a corner to finally become reactive, to become the extremist that, honestly, there are entities within the media that would love to paint that picture of Christian extremism.
And they've tried multiple times, but it's always so lackluster and it fails and it's kind of paper thin.
We might be going to a place now where, as I said before, the guy who decapitated, decapitated is even a strong word, the satanic statue in the Iowa State Capitol building received a lot of pushback.
He was on the show yesterday, actually.
A really interesting guy who served our country.
All right, welcome back.
Millstone Report.
Great segment by Stu, that full clip.
If you want to see that full interview with David, his last name escapes me, Corbo.
There it is, David Corbo.
You can check it out.
It's on this Rumble channel.
Interesting topic there about the potential rise of Christian extremism.
The potential rise of Christian extremism.
You know what was going through my head as I was watching that with Stu and David was the fact this country is a Christian country, was founded as a Christian country, and those Christians that came here in the 1600s, You know, the 1500s, the 1600s, you know, that were here in the 1700s, the 18th century.
They have this Christian society, and they have to figure out whether or not they're going to go to war and challenge the most well-fortified, well-armed force in the world at that time, the Redcoats, the British Army.
Um...
And keep in mind, they were Christians.
They believed in the gospel.
They believed in peace.
Their prayer was to hopefully go about life in peace so that the gospel would advance, their families would grow, that they would be able to live the way God intended.
But something happened in them, and they got to a point where they were willing to die than to serve under tyranny.
Specifically, the problem was with King George abdicating his responsibility to the people.
We have been taught a load of goods.
There are some Christians out there that believe...
That the Revolutionary War was unbiblical and that the colonists and the Christians here should have just accepted it and moved on and taken it and Romans 13 says, you know, that you should submit to the authority.
Well, the authority back in the 18th century before the American Revolution was a power-structured agreement.
They had an agreement.
They had a king that was going to guarantee their rights and in exchange They would pledge loyalty to that king.
And so you had sovereign states.
You had 13 sovereign states with sovereign legislators that all served the king.
And the other sovereign state across the Atlantic was Britain.
And they had one parliament that also was under this umbrella of the king.
and the king failed to support the rights of the colonists to have their own laws and their own legislatures by allowing another legislator from a different state, capital S, Great Britain, to rule over them.
Now one of the reasons King George did this, a little history lesson, is because about 100 years earlier, British Parliament chopped the head off of King Charles, which you knew that that was in the back of King George's mind.
But this is why King George was in violation of Romans 13, not the colonists.
Just a little history there that we have forgotten as believers.
And you've got to ask yourself the question, what was going through their mind when they start to say, "You know what?
No, we're going to have to fight this.
We're going to have to stand up against tyranny because we can't live like this anymore." So that's the "Christian extremism" that people are being discussed.
Yeah, that may be a part of the plan.
Let's do this overt Satanism and everything else.
Let's promote this overt Satanic system so that Christians will react in a way.
And that may be the plan.
That may be it, for sure.
However, at what point is their plan a part of God's plan?
Well, it always is.
So their evil plan, what they mean for evil, can be used for good.
And the term waking up a sleeping giant is a real plan.
I was telling, you know, when we were talking with J.D. Sharp most of the program today, I said that I had some receipts about, you know, these people that do one thing or they say one thing or they just have all of this theater to make us think something's getting done.
In the meantime, our country's on fire.
Specifically, we were talking about the border.
The news has broken.
I'm sure you've heard.
It's probably all across BoomerCon television that Governor Greg Abbott's order...
You know, has allowed the National Guard to seize control of Eagle Pass, Texas, and now the National Guard has kicked the Border Patrol out, and now they're policing the border.
Yeah!
Yeah!
Well, that sounds good to me, too.
But let's just check in on BoomerCon TV real quick, and let's see what they're saying about it.
On the Rio Grande River, it served as a landing point for illegals crossing into the U.S. in more than two years.
This means not even the feds can patrol there.
Matt Finn, live in Eagle Pass, to tell us how it's going.
I guess this is day one or day two, Matt.
Good morning.
Essentially, day two, this all started developing yesterday, Bill, and it's a rather remarkable situation.
Behind me right now is Shelby Park, the park that you were referring to.
Our viewers may recognize it.
Our cameras have been here for about two years now, showing you the mass illegal immigration that happens right here in this park.
You might recall even just a few weeks ago, there was that huge surge of migrants who crossed right here.
Well, now, under Governor Abbott's emergency declaration, the Texas National Guard has seized control of this park and some surrounding land along the river, put up fencing and razor wire, and kicked out federal border patrol agents, arguing that it's the Biden administration that has perpetuated illegal crossings.
So Texas is going to control this land from here on out.
Our crews have seen what appears to be Texas National Guard blocking Border Patrol agents from key areas of the operation here, and senior Border Patrol...
Yeah, I'm just going to throw this in.
They should be...
I mean, they should be arresting these people.
That's what they should be doing.
But anyway.
...agents confirmed to Fox News that BP has pooled resources to avoid a confrontation.
Now, it's not quite clear if this unprecedented move by Texas is really going to help or harm illegal migration here, because it appears that ultimately when migrants arrive to this park, Texas National Guard is still going to have to turn them over for processing to Border Patrol, essentially adding an extra step.
Wait, what?
So the Texas National Guard is just a middleman?
I mean, they're just a middleman?
They're just, they're there.
It's all great.
They've kicked him out, but it sounds to me like the Texas National Guard has just moved to the front lines, and now they're just going to be, well, I'll take this trafficked child, I'll take this from you, and I'll hand it over to the Border Patrol, and they're essentially going to keep doing exactly what they're doing.
That's exactly what it sounds like to me.
There's the lead right there.
That's called burying the lead.
The lead is Texas National Guard takes over border.
Nothing changes, though.
Another added layer.
The mayor of Eagle Pass says he was completely caught off guard by this move.
He does not agree with his park being taken over and is looking into his legal options.
This is not something that the city wanted, requested, asked for.
He made it clear that this is the state and that they have the legal authority to do that.
Of course our legal team is looking into the actions taken by the states.
It's all so tiresome.
It's all so tiresome and tiring.
It absolutely is.
After just joining us, we just spent the whole hour essentially covering the attacks, the U.S. government, the United Kingdom, performing on the sovereign nation of Yemen.
Here's what one of those attacks looked like.
One of the bombings.
This was last night when the news started breaking that this was going on.
Alright, so in response to that bombing, allegedly this is the Houthis in Yemen claiming that they launched a missile attack against a ship in response allegedly this is the Houthis in Yemen claiming that they launched a missile attack Allegedly, that's what that is.
But in response to this attack...
We saw demonstrators turn out.
This was earlier today in Yemen.
Earlier today in Yemen, you had this.
You can barely hear that, but this was the protests in Yemen earlier today.
These people turned out in the street.
Look how many people that is.
That is a gargantuan amount of people.
Here's another video of that.
They were chanting something, but I wanted you to hear them chanting.
Just look at all these people.
I know that's obnoxious, but just chill out with me for a second.
I'm sorry about that volume.
Blast.
So according to this Twitter account here, let me find it.
Yeah.
All right.
So you've heard enough of that.
So this is, according to this Twitter account over here, that's where that video is.
Okay, that's the same video.
According to some Arabic Twitter account, so I can't verify this, but this translates to, we do not care, make it a world war.
We do not care, make it a world war.
That's the attitude.
So after the U.S. bombs Yemen, the people turn out in droves.
As you can see, they turn out in droves.
There they are.
And they are.
If that tweet is correct, they're they're saying basically bring it on.
We don't care if it's a world war.
You know, Douglas McGregor, Colonel Douglas McGregor is constantly like, make peace, you fools, specifically on what's going on in Ukraine.
Make peace, you fools.
Make peace.
This is insane.
This is absolute insanity, and it must be stopped.
But, as I said yesterday on the program, the neocons are bloodthirsty for a war.
They want to control the U.S. to make sure that the forever wars continue.
And that's exactly what they're going to do.
Coming up on the Stu Peters Show, I've got a great show for you guys.
I'm going to have Ahmed Soleimani.
On the program, Ahmed, excuse me, Ahmed Suleman, forgive me, and you know what they're going to be talking about?
They're going to be talking about the Yemen Houthi and all of the context surrounding that.
One of the biggest problems the media is going to tell you to try to downplay the fact that we Attacked a sovereign nation last night within their borders is they're going to say that we were just attacking a rebel group, but the Houthis are actually basically controlled.
They are Yemen.
They essentially are Yemen, and they're counting on the ignorance of the American people and reporting that on BoomerCon TV. My name is Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much for being with us.
I hope everybody has a happy and blessed Friday, a great weekend.