All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 9, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
58:58
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Special Guest Ivan Raiklin Reveals TRUTH About J6th False Flag Op
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The rainbow Gestapo, the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
I lose track of time so I might be past my prime.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, I feel just like I don't shy.
I look so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Cut down.
Swing into my own sound.
Flashes in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody wants you know you want it.
Everybody, everybody, everybody, everybody.
All right, welcome.
Welcome.
Good evening.
Thank you so much for being with us.
This is the Millstone Report.
I am your host, Paul Harrell.
So, over the weekend, the nation observed the third anniversary of the Uniparty's version of the Reichstag fire, otherwise known as January 6th.
As Americans brace for a hectic 2024, where anything goes, many patriots who were there on J6 but did not go into the Capitol building are facing the harsh reality that That the government wants to make them political prisoners as well.
The other day, Washington, D.C., U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves said this.
Watch.
And what happened inside of the building?
An important note when it comes to our prosecutions about those who remained outside the building.
We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who entered the building or those who engaged in violent or corrupt conduct on Capitol grounds.
But...
If a person normally entered the restricted area without authorization, they had already committed a federal crime.
Make no mistake, thousands of people occupied an area that they were not authorized to be present in in the first place.
Folks, this is what the weaponization of government looks like.
Anything to support their phony narrative about a violent insurrection on J6 during an election year so they can blame President Trump.
Add this to the growing list of ways the Biden DOJ will interfere in the next election if they don't throw Trump in jail before all of this.
However, tonight on the Milstone Report, we're going to take a deep dive into who is really responsible for the J6 false flag operation.
Throughout the last three years, one man has been actively working to expose the truth about our communistic occupied government.
His name is Ivan Raikland, otherwise known as the Deep State Marauder.
You may have seen him sitting in the background of countless congressional committee rooms.
His very presence reminds corrupt politicians of the truth.
The truth is that we are living under a totally illegitimate government.
Ivan Raikland knows where the bodies are buried and he knows who is really responsible for the J6 false flag operation.
So who is responsible for the coup that took place, the actual coup that took place on January 6, 2021?
Well, tonight, we will name names.
Find out the truth.
From coup to cover-up.
In order to fully understand this operation, we must first familiarize ourselves with something called the Capitol Police Board.
If you take away any phrase from this interview, Capitol Police Board is probably going to be the number one thing you need to.
Retired Army Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raikland joins us now.
Ivan, welcome to the Millstone Report, sir.
Thank you so much for being with us.
Paul, absolutely.
Thanks for having me.
And this is something that no other journalist, you name them, has really done a deep dive into.
I've done a couple of numerous speeches on this subject throughout the country.
But this, I think, is going to be the debut time that I'm putting it out there in a very methodical fashion of those that were involved in the coup and those that were involved in the subsequent cover-up of the coup and how they're continuing it and why they're doing what they're doing.
So where do you want me to start?
All right, well, let's first start with this slideshow.
I've got this.
I'm going to pull it up because this, I think, is where we need to focus.
Here it is, and I appreciate you giving this to me, you providing this to me.
J6, the deep state, a deep dive into the players and the landscape of the relationships here.
Because I think that's also very important here, Ivan, is you have to understand the relationships that these people have with one another.
To understand how all of this is connected.
And they are all connected.
There's a lot of people in bed together.
Here is the Capitol Police Board.
As I said, this is what we really need to memorize and fully.
I'm going to go ahead and get this lower third out of the way because this is really important.
What can you tell us, Ivan, about this first image that we're looking at here on the screen?
Let me first contextualize folks to things that they may already be aware of.
Tucker Carlson in the last couple of days has put out and shared information about different documentaries.
Already out there in the public, we've already addressed that the US Capitol Police at the tactical level, the Metropolitan Police Department specific officers, their criminal conduct.
That was presented very well in the January 6th true timeline.
A documentary movie that came out on January 1st.
Epoch Times has done now two documentary movies outlining some of the egregious acts occurring on that time.
A lot of people have focused also, such as Clay Higgins, Congressman Clay Higgins, and others have exposed that there are over 200 FBI CHSs and affiliates that were on the Capitol grounds that day.
What people miss is that you have to first understand the legal framework under which they were able to do all of this.
Every single actor, whether it's FBI, DHS, Park Police, ATF, as it relates to the pipe bomb that was placed over at the DNC and the RNC, the DNC security, the RNC security, all of those elements and entities On January 6th,
we're subordinate to the command and leadership at the highest levels of the United States Capitol Police, as well as above that, the Capitol Police Board, and above that, the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader.
So, if you're a J6 defendant, if you're a J6 defense attorney, if you are Congressman Troy Nels, Congressman Clay Higgins, Congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene, Congressman Thomas Massey, who's looking at the pipe bomb and ray up stuff, if you're Congressman Barry Loudermont, who chairs the subcommittee on oversight, of the House Admin Committee, who has responsibility over overseeing the Capitol Police and the Capitol Police Board.
Guess what, folks?
All of you are missing the point here.
You must look at Title II of the United States Code, Chapter 29.
That is the creation of a law enforcement entity known as the Capitol Police and the Capitol Police Board.
So what I've got up on the screen right here, is this what you're talking about?
It's 2 U.S. Code of 1979.
Let's keep that up there before...
Bring back the Capitol Police map before we go into this one, Paul.
You got it.
Because I want to set the stage of how they were able to conduct this.
What you're seeing here, this picture, is how the Capitol Police Board is created based on that statue as you read through it.
Okay?
Now let's take a look.
Let's do a deep dive.
So, the Capitol Police Board, which is the governing body that dictates to the Capitol Police Chief, and downstream from him, the Capitol Police General Counsel, who are the ones that decide who gets criminalized and how much they get criminalized for any actions on the Capitol grounds and in the Capitol, they are directed by the Capitol Police Board.
And the Capitol Police Board is directed by?
The individuals up at the top.
So then by statute, who appoints whom?
So the Speaker of the House appoints the Sergeant at Arms.
Let's focus in on the names of the individuals as they apply on January 6th and basically the run up to January 6th of who the Capitol Police Board was.
So Paul Irving, the House Sergeant at Arms on January 6th, had been the Sergeant at Arms prior to being the Sergeant at Arms for Pelosi, but for Paul Ryan and John Boehner before that.
So, it would be a very logical and strong assumption, an accurate assumption to make, that the relations between Paul Irving, the House Sergeant at Arms, and Paul Ryan and Boehner and Pelosi are close, right?
Of course, yes.
So, if I am the chair of the House Admin Committee, Brian Stile, who, by the way, is the replacement for Paul Ryan, In Wisconsin's first congressional district, then Brian Stahl has probably been charged by Paul Ryan to continue the cover-up because those three individuals that Paul Irving served for, just keep that PowerPoint presentation up because this gets very nuanced and this is so important to understand the relationships.
Paul Irving, bottom left, had served for three speakers of the House.
I want the Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, the Chair of the House Admin Committee, Brian Stile, and the Subcommittee Chair on Oversight, Barry Loudermilk, to subpoena Paul Irving his official and private messages, whether it's internal emails, phone calls, text messages, and glean what we can see from his interactions with those three individuals.
My suspicion is that Paul Ryan called Paul Irving or communicated with him and said, Just listen to what Speaker Pelosi has for you to do as it relates to January 6th.
Whatever it takes, and we will provide you top cover from Paul Ryan's purge at Faux News, pronounced Fox News, so that he has never implicated, he being Paul Irving, in any complicity in the coup.
You're going to find that.
But to find that out is we need his communications.
Okay.
All right.
So to summarize real quick what you just said, that's fascinating to me.
Building on the relationship that Paul Ryan already still had with Paul Irving, you're saying he's no longer technically in a position of authority, but he can make the phone calls and he can basically speak On behalf of the Uniparty, on behalf of Pelosi, on behalf of John Banner.
Of Fox News.
Right.
And so that's how they get around it.
Fox News and Nancy Pelosi gets to speak to Paul Irving on behalf of MSDNC and Criminal News Network.
So now we have those two individuals that are providing top cover for Paul Irving for whatever he ends up doing to help facilitate the coup or the pooch, right?
Those mechanisms are in place.
Now, some people can say that that's speculation.
Well, my speculation is a little bit more than speculation.
And I say this, why?
Not only because of the relationships, but more importantly, Well, known as the Select Committee.
Guess what?
In the third hearing, it is shown that Paul Ryan contacted whom?
He contacted Mark Short to discuss Translation for Ivan Raiklin is, hey, do not let Mike Pence do anything that allows for Kevin McCarthy and Mike Pence to vote one state, one vote on the objections, thus guaranteeing a re-election of Trump.
That's my interpretation.
And then he later calls Mike Pence.
This is according to Mark Short's testimony.
Mark Short was the Chief of Staff for Mike Pence, and Paul Ryan is communicating with him, according to sworn testimony by Mark Short.
So it's a little bit more than speculation, I would say, at this point.
And we can prove this beyond a reasonable doubt, actually beyond any doubt, Are there any plans to do that?
Are there any plans to get this Irving guy, Paul Irving, in front of a congressional committee that you know of?
I am communicating with the right individuals and staff to try to make sure that that takes place, okay?
This is only one segment, okay?
We only covered one portion of the Capitol Police Board of the three.
Well, I noticed that in each one of these slides, the members on the board continue to change.
I mean, the slide that we're just looking at here is, you know, January 6th.
Don't get ahead of yourself.
I want to make sure we drill down specifically.
So the House Speaker goes and appoints, if you can continue with that slide, the Speaker of the House appoints the Sergeant at Arms.
The President of the United States appoints what's known as the architect of the Capitol, which you see there in the middle.
And at that time in January 6th, prior to January 6th, it was appointed by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate.
So the United States Senate Majority Leader has an outsized role on the Capitol Police Board in the sense that they not only appoint one of the members, but the Senate Majority Leader leads the body that confirms the president's architect of the Capitol.
So you can give it like a one and a half Kind of favorability rating on influence or one and a quarter versus the one for the Speaker of the House for the Senate Majority Leader you see there.
And then the last one, like I said, there is Senate Majority Leader appoints the Senate Sergeant in arms.
One thing to point out here is that this three person body, when you have two of the three voting for something dictating to the Capitol Police Chief, You pretty much have the necessary votes.
So if you control both the House and Senate Sergeants-at-Arms, you get to control how the United States Capitol Police operates, who they decide to arrest under their discretion.
And basically, the other thing to note is the chairman of the Capitol Police Board Rotates annually from the House Sergeant-at-Arms to the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and back to the House Sergeant-at-Arms and vice versa.
Again, I'm setting the context here that is so important on how they were able to conduct the coup and cover up the coup.
Two more points.
Number one, the joint session takes place in the House.
In the House of Representatives.
So make note of that.
So the House Sergeant at Arms is the senior law enforcement official above the Capitol Police Chief in the chambers upon which the joint session takes place.
So when Mike Pence walks into the House on January 6th, his Secret Service detail is subordinate to the House Sergeant at Arms.
When he's the president of the Senate in the Senate chambers, when they go out and break out for discussion, or when he's just there as the president of the Senate, then the Senate sergeant at arms has primacy over the Secret Service detail because they are guests within that body.
Now, when he's outside of the Congress, whether in his role as the Senate president or the presiding officer on January 6th, he is the vice president.
And the Secret Service has privacy over his law enforcement and protection.
This is almost no one understands this, okay?
So why is that important?
That is important is because when the house sergeant at arms is working at the behest of the Speaker of the House, that is leverage and authority that supersedes any authority that the Secret Service has to protect the Vice President.
And you can extrapolate from there.
Let's think about it this way.
When the Speaker of the House on January 6th says, due to the advice of the sergeants at arms and the attending physician, you can only have 11 members of the Republican Party House members on the House floor, 11 members of the Democrat Party on the House floor, and 11 members of the Senate, 11 members of the Senate Democrats, 11 members of the Senate Republicans to be on the House floor during the joint session.
That's what Nancy Pelosi said on January 6th at the advice of the Sergeants at Arms and the attending physician.
Why is that?
Well, three days earlier on January 3rd, when she was being voted in as Speaker of the House, everybody was there in the House and everyone voted for Speaker.
Well, not everybody, but she got the necessary votes with a quorum to be able to become the Speaker of the House three days prior.
But on January 6th, she coordinated, colluded, and conspired with leadership Meaning Mitch McConnell, Kevin McCarthy, and Chuck Schumer to only allow 22 House members and 22 senators to be on the House floor to be able to control The objections and not even have a quorum to take place for a lawful joint session to occur.
And when Mike Pence gaveled in, after she gaveled in and handed it over to the presiding officer, and Congressman Morgan Griffith basically stood up and said, point of order, Mr.
Vice President or presiding officer.
How do we make a point of order or a parliamentary inquiry if over 90% of us are not even allowed to be on the House 4 to participate in the joint session?
And what did Mikey Pence say?
He called that an objection that is not allowed in the joint session.
And then Congressman Morgan Griffin responded with, I'm not making an objection.
I'm making a parliamentary inquiry And basically requesting to participate in the joint session and to be able to meet the quorum threshold.
Mike Pence, listen to Speaker Pelosi's parliamentarian that whispered in Mike Pence's ear, and Mike Pence said, according to Title III U.S. Code Section 18, that he ruled that that constitutes debate and that Mike Pence's presiding officer will not even allow that.
A lack of quorum, joint session, violating the 12th Amendment right in front of the whole world to hear and see on C-SPAN, uncensored.
You can play that clip and if you want to, I'll send it to you if you want to incorporate that into our discussion.
So you're saying, and this is incredible, because we already had the setup that occurred with the J6 thing and the fake insurrection and everything.
No one's covered the parts that I'm going to talk about.
I know, but I guess what I'm saying is...
The planning was in the summer.
Okay, the planning was in the summer.
What I'm saying is we were all told, those of us on the right, we were all told that, hey, on January 6th, though, We're going to get new information.
There's going to be a process of objecting to these electors.
That's what we were all told.
And then, of course, all of that got blown up because of the events of J6 on that day, right?
And it gave everybody an excuse that was going to question the election.
After the media took the narrative and ran with it, none of them had the cojones to continue to fight and try to make right what happened in November of 2020.
So you're saying that not only did that obviously happen, that there were parliamentary procedures put in place by Pelosi and blaming the Sergeant of Arms, you know, basically using that guy as a scapegoat to say, hey, you know, if they had wanted, are you saying that if they had wanted to actually challenge the election, they wouldn't have been allowed because Mike Pence was essentially going along with what Nancy Pelosi wanted?
Let me back this up.
In the summer of 2020, Jamie Raskin, according to his own book, over the holidays I went through 19 books written by every single member of the J6 Select Committee and every single witness that has published the book, and then everybody in the J6 ecosystem, whether it's Mark Meadows, Cassidy Hutchison, Harry Dunn's book, Jamie Raskin, Eric Swalwell, Adam Schiff, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, the list goes on and on, right?
I read through all of them, and as I studied each one, Jamie Raskin admits that in the summer of 2020, they had wargamed, planned for all the possibilities that could take place for January 6th.
All the possibilities, okay?
And so, they thought through all of that.
And by the way, a side note, who was the first impeachment manager, lead manager?
It was Adam Schiff.
But who was the second impeachment lead manager?
Raskin for what?
To cover up the Fed's direction.
Now, as Jamie Raskin and others, this is according to Jamie's own words, In the run-up to January 6th, I had articulated a concept known as Operation Pence Card, which Trump retweeted.
It was mentioned in the third hearing of the J6 Committee.
It was also mentioned in Jack Smith's indictment on paragraph 88 of Trump's indictment in Washington, DC. But what they don't want to do is mention my name.
Because if they bring me in to discuss, Operation Pence card has nothing to do with January 6th.
It involves Mike Pence's role and duty and obligation to send it back to the states under the authority of the Electoral Count Act for December 23rd for the states to remedy the constitutionally insufficient slates of electors that they submitted.
See, I had always argued from the get-go that none of the slates of electors, whether they were Democrat or Republican from the contested states, were legitimate.
Because the underlying election upon which it was predicated was illegally conducted and it was done not in the manner according to the state's election law.
And non-legislative actors changed the manner in which they conducted election, thus rendering it illegal.
And so the only way to fix that would have been for the states to abstain from transmitting electors, Holding a new election according to the state's election law, transmitting the electors according to that result before January 6th, or for the legislatures to have a joint session to hold a vote on which electors that they would transmit without any federal Coercion.
It would be for the state legislatures to decide to meet the constitutional requirement under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2, that the state legislatures are the ones that decide on the allocation of the presidential and vice presidential electors.
Now, set that aside.
As that discussion was being had, Trump retweets it, all these other people come up with theories, now Pelosi and company are starting to get scared that Mike Pence might do something, right?
Well, what many people fail to understand is that during my run-up to January 6th, I had argued that when December 23rd passed and Pence did nothing, there was a new strategy that should have been considered, which was, I like to call it shorthand, Operation McCarthy-Pence Card 2.
By the way, I conveyed this to Kevin McCarthy directly.
I texted this to him.
I sent this over to Mark Short, Mike Pence's Chief of Staff.
I also socialized it with many members of Congress and said, guess what?
Since Pence did nothing on December 23rd, now it's in your court on January 6th.
And that is when you, on the objections, vote by delegation.
This is how it would sound.
Mike Pence gavels in.
Arizona comes up.
Paul Gosar stands up.
Ted Cruz stands up and objects.
They go into their breakout.
Senate goes into the Senate chambers.
House stays in the House chambers.
And then at the end of the two-hour debate, had there been a quorum, right, discussion, that's when Kevin McCarthy would stand up representing the 27 states that are Republican by delegation and held the vote.
And even if Pelosi did not agree to that style of vote, There's still enough people to maintain the quorum of two-thirds of the states, where 43 states at the time had one Republican member of Congress to vote, and it would have either been, assuming everyone votes by party, either 27 to 20 to 3 to object to the Arizona electors, or 43 to 0 if the Democrats didn't participate.
And then it would have gone back into the joint session.
Pence would have gaveled in.
Pelosi would have stood up or her designate said, no, the objection does not stand.
So we're going to continue to allow Biden electors to make it through.
And then it would have been McCarthy to stand up and say, hey, We voted by state delegation, folks, according to the 12th Amendment contested election framework.
It's because the Electoral Count Act doesn't dictate on the House body on how we vote on the objection, whether one person won vote, where Pelosi would have won in that, or by delegation, which would have been McCarthy winning in that.
When that was being socialized directly to those two individuals that would have had the discretionary authority, because let's face it, it would have been up to Mike Pence to make the tie-break decision on whether or not he was going to allow the state delegation vote on the objection.
The one-person one-vote delegation.
And had McCarthy done this and Mike Pence agreed, guess what?
If everyone votes by party and does this style of voting on Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, or even just three of them and excludes the electoral votes from three of those states because of the objections, that means no one secures For the House to determine who becomes president and for the Senate to determine who becomes the vice president.
Senate votes one person, one vote.
The House, once again, one state, one vote, as per the 12th Amendment, and that guarantees a re-election for Trump.
And as I'm saying this in the run-up to January 6th, on an episode with Praying Medic, He asked me, what do you think Trump means by it's going to be wild on January 6th?
I said, well, using the construct of the Constitution, that means something like this.
I suspect when Pelosi catches wind that McCarthy and Pence are going to do this maneuver, she is going to call on the House Sergeant at Arms, this is where we're coming back to this, and expel the senators from the House so that a vote cannot take place.
And that's exactly what happened.
And in response, I said that the Commander-in-Chief, in his role in defending the 12th Amendment, would deploy assets to ensure that the 12th Amendment was followed, meaning that the vote does take place.
So, with that framework and having Trump retweet me several times, I suspect that Pelosi...
Jamie Raskin, their staff, Jamie Fleet, Terry McCullough, Alexander Pelosi, Michael Voss, son-in-law of Pelosi, Ray Epps, the chief of Capitol Police.
Everyone was probably viewing my tweets because at that point I was being retweeted by Trump.
And so when I'm putting this out, What actually happens in order for her to be able to expel and stop the count from taking place if we would be moving in that direction?
Well, when the objection takes place, Ted Cruz stands up.
You can clearly see that Mikey Pence is making his big sigh of, oh no, we're going to have to execute Reichstag.
Now, how does that look?
Title II of the United States Code I'm going to put that up here in just a minute.
The way you just characterized that is intriguing.
Ted Cruz gets up, Mike Pence gives a long sigh, and you intuit that he thinks we're going to have to institute this Reichstag plan, which is essentially the fake answer.
That's my interpretation of his body expression.
It is, when you look at it and you look at it from that lens, it's like, oh yeah, he's in distress.
He clearly is in a distressed sigh.
Everything that I'm saying, as you match it to watching the movie January 6th, The True Timeline, You're going to look at this from a completely different lens.
I don't care who you are, because I have researched this more than anybody on the planet.
And I know that doesn't sound humble.
I guarantee you that I've looked at more documents than anybody else.
The entire J6 committee, everything, I've looked through all of it, all their books, everything.
So, now, enough of that.
So, if you're going to conduct this, what I call, the intentional facilitated breach into the Capitol in order to stop Kevin McCarthy and Mike Pence implementing the one-state-one-vote option that I just described that I had communicated to them and kind of articulated on my last couple of interviews that I was doing in the run-up of January 6th and explaining to members of Congress,
yes, probably a dozen or so that were on board with this.
Well, you have to look over to your sergeant-at-arms, Paul Irving, right?
And you tell Paul Irving that, hey, we can do this easily through inaction.
Meaning, why don't we just decline Chief Stephen Sons' six requests for additional...
Chief Sons is in the middle, who at the time was the Capitol Police Chief.
He's one of the four members of the Capitol Police Board, but reminder, he's a non-voting member, right?
This is key.
So Chief Sun has to request from the board when he gets any sort of external support.
And on six occasions, he requested additional protection from January 3rd till January 6th to be able to protect the Capitol because he and everyone else knew that there were going to be a lot of people in Washington, D.C. Everyone knew this.
And what was the response by Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving?
And Speaker Pelosi.
And Muriel Bowser.
And Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy.
Yes, Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy.
No relation to Kevin.
All of them said, due to optics, we don't want any branch support to defend and protect the Capitol.
I want all their communications, Congressman Loudermilk, and so does America, because we need to see what those communications were on why they coordinated the messaging of all four of them saying, due to optics, we don't want to have any additional support to protect and defend the Capitol.
I translate that as follows.
As a lawyer looking at the discretionary authority that they have under Title II, as a former Green Beret commander knowing and understanding how to plan tactical operations with strategic impact, right?
This is what I think occurred.
You rely on the people in discretionary positions to be able to run the op.
So when you start to peel the onion and you look at the task organization of the Capitol Police, you have a division called the Intelligence and Interagency Coordination Division, headed up by a woman by the name of Yogananda Pittman, who, according to Tarek Johnson, Capitol Police whistleblower, Lieutenant on that day.
Yogananda Pittman is very close to the Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus.
These are not my words.
These are Tyrick Johnson's words, okay?
Next, if you're Nancy Pelosi, And you want to work with the Capitol Police and your allies in the executive branch, why wouldn't you tap Yogananda Pittman to not allow Chief Sund and Chad Thomas,
the operations chief, to have intel that would be the impetus to then convince the Capitol Police Board to provide and request external support to the She did not provide the intel that would have been the justification aside from, hey, there's a lot of public open source intelligence that's saying that there's going to be a lot of people who need to protect it.
So, Yogananda Pittman, according to Chief Sun, Tariq Johnson, and others, held onto that intelligence and did not provide it to Sun, nor Chad Thomas, who was the, again, operations guy.
So, Yogananda Pittman and her surrogates, Julie Farnham, Mr.
Donahue, Danaa Newell were the ones, I argue, and this is where we find it out for sure, when we subpoena all of her records, was the one responsible, because remember this is the Capitol Police,
For coordinating the 200 plus FBI confidential human sources and officers on behalf of the U.S. Capitol Police that Clay Higgins just disclosed to Laura Logan and Tucker Carlson.
Remember, everybody's been focused on the FBI and the DOJ and what they're doing.
The FBI were subordinates to the Capitol Police Board when they were operating at the Capitol.
Exactly the same way that the Secret Service were subordinate to the Sergeants at Arms as they were protecting Mike Pence and I'm glad you're making that connection.
Yes.
Now, that's starting to make sense now.
So, I mean, if what you're saying is true, and I don't doubt you, Ivan, it really all does come down to who controls the Capitol Police Board.
Obviously, the people on the board that said that.
That is the biggest takeaway.
Yeah, it really does.
It's all about the Capitol Police Board because, like you said, if the Secret Service is subservient while on Capitol grounds to the Capitol Police, if the FBI is subservient, then you could really essentially...
The DHS, HSI agents, the ATF... Yeah, and nobody's really looking there.
They're questioning Christopher Wray, which all needs to be done, but in a lot of ways, that's all red herring stuff.
If what you're saying is right, the Capitol Police.
It's all downstream from the Capitol Police Board.
Wow.
All of it.
Now, we're just getting started here.
Now we're short on time.
Well, we've only looked at one slide, and I've got 13 of these slides.
We're not going to be able to get through all of them.
But yeah, we still got some time.
We'll just do one.
Okay.
We'll just do one.
You don't want to do the second one?
Just the second one?
No.
So check this out.
So this is what happened on January 6th.
I already mentioned the names of the individuals that conducted the op.
Remember, at the very top is the Capitol Police Forum.
The Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader, they direct the Capitol Police Board.
And then downstream from that, they direct the Capitol Police Chief.
Now, let's contextualize this.
On January 6th, Nancy Pelosi and McConnell and Schumer later afterwards, right, on January 20th, when he replaced, I guess you can go to the next slide that shows that, the change in the Capitol Police.
So January 7th, there was a slight change.
Jennifer Hemingway was appointed temporary.
Keep going.
Remember, the general counsel He's the only person in this entire ecosystem that remains from January 6th to this very day.
Everyone else has rotated out.
I just want everyone to know this timeline here.
So look, January 6th, this is the makeup.
And then it changes on the 7th to add Jennifer Hemingway.
And then it changes on the 8th to add Yogananda Pittman.
Yogananda Pittman becomes the acting chief.
She upgraded for conducting a successful coup on January 6th, known as the Fed's Direction.
She is moved from being the head of Intel and Air Agency Coordination Division and elevated to be the acting Capitol Police Chief while Chief Sun is thrown out so that he cannot get to the bottom of what occurred.
Exactly.
So it was, as Tariq Johnson says, it was a coup within a coup.
So the lesser coup was Yogananda Pittman blaming Chief Sun with Pelosi and Schumer That it was Chief Sun's fault for the breach of the Capitol.
Meanwhile, he had requested six times and was trying to protect the Capitol and he was denied on all occasions.
Okay, so this is, it's fascinating, I mean, it really is fascinating that, I mean, when we say this is from, you know, from coup to cover-up, the cover-up was after the, you know, after the job goes down, after the job is done, they clean house, they get rid of son, they start replacing with even more yes-men.
Yeah, and guess when the arrest started?
The very first arrests were January 8th, Derek Evans being one of the first.
On the very first day that acting police chief Yogananda Pittman takes over, and this is what took place.
This is not my words, by the way.
This is a combination of the words of Tariq Johnson, the cases, Steve Baker's exposure, what Epoch Times has been doing, The Blaze, so many people, is that Yogananda Pittman She was working with her surrogates,
Farnham, Donahue, Newell, over at IICD, along with Tad DeBias, Thomas DeBias, the general counsel, to only bring in inculpatory video evidence Coupled with the MAGA target list that they created to go after politically that has the closest proximity to discredit Trump,
and then take only the video footage that they could use to then criminalize them, exclude any exculpatory, and then if there was not sufficient evidence to make it look like there was a Crime of their target, they would then coerce US Capitol Police officers such as Lazarus or Harry Dunn and others to sign a sworn impact statement that lied about what their relationship was with the particular J6 defendant.
Because guess what?
The CCTV footage doesn't have audio.
And if there's a Harry Dunn next to a J6 defendant, then it's whatever Harry Dunn says.
And feels that is the truth that is then provided over to Matt Graves over at the Department of Justice in the US Attorney's Office.
So before it even gets to the US Attorney's Office, before it even gets to the FBI for them to conduct the raid, The General Counsel, Tad Tobias, working with the Chief of Police, Pittman back then from January 8th to August 23rd,
and then since August 23rd of 2021 to this very day, Chief Thomas Manger, who was appointed by Pelosi and Schumer Sergeants-at-Arms, whose wife is close with Jamie Raskin, who ran for school board in Jamie Raskin's Congressional District in Maryland.
That's who the Chief of the Capitol Police is now, and that is the epicenter of who is being used to weaponize and create the criminal prosecution package before it goes over to the DOJ and before it goes over to the jury pool that has already been manipulated and curated by two years of J6 cover-up committee doctored evidence to the American public through the Congress.
That is also manipulating the judges.
So, in essence, step one, the Capitol Police leadership through the Capitol Police Board direction and the Speaker and Senate Majority Leader is already doctoring all the evidence, sending it over to the DOJ for prosecution.
They add their layer of bias before it then goes to the bias jury pool and the bias judge for 100% criminalization.
The only way we unravel this and reverse this Is to educate the entire country that Thomas DeBias at the direction of Pittman, Manger, at the direction of Pelosi, Schumer, are the ones that are dictating who is criminalized.
And if they don't want to criminalize you, then they tell Thomas Manger that when the pro-Hamas protesters in the candidate building do their thing, No one gets arrested at the direction of Pelosi and her capital police chief that she appointed with Chuck Schumer.
And then if you have an insurrection over at the DNC, which happened a few weeks ago, nothing happens to them because they are Promoting the Democrat narrative.
Wow.
Now do you see why certain people are criminalized and others aren't?
It's because the Chief of the Capitol Police and the General Counsel are doing the Gestapo actions at the behest of Pelosi and Schumer.
Yeah, they're doing the targeting of it.
So back to this slide.
Remember, the criminal referral starts with the Capitol Police Chief.
That's right.
So January 7th, we have some changes.
At the advice of the General Counsel.
Yeah, and then January 8th, we get to this slide.
Yep, keep going.
And now we jump to the 11th.
Notice that on the 8th slide, January 8th, we have this vacant spot here, right?
And that gets filled.
Yeah, so basically what happened was Schumer...
Go ahead.
So, McConnell asked the Senate Sergeant at Arms to resign.
Pelosi asked the House Sergeant at Arms to resign.
And let's keep going.
Yeah, don't bring it back to me.
Let's keep on the slide.
Okay, okay, okay.
This is very important.
And so then we have the vacant spot.
The vacant spot is replaced with a guy by the name of William McFarlane, the new Acting House Sergeant of Arms.
And then if we keep going from there...
That is an inaccurate slide.
Unfortunately, I'll have to work on my team to get that fixed.
So let's keep going.
You didn't see that, folks.
Then on January the 20th, Capitol Police.
Bill McFarlane is not the right name, and the picture of Bill McFarlane is not accurate either.
So unfortunately, you got a wrong slide deck.
Okay, well, we can stick with...
Let's see if there's anything else.
Let's keep going.
Basically, we'll get the correct one out.
Bottom line, if you scroll down all the way to the bottom, the last slide.
All the way to the last slide.
Here we go.
Let's see.
Here we go.
Last slide.
Here we go.
What do we got?
Mike Johnson.
This is where we are now.
Fast forwarding to where we are now.
That's where we are today.
Okay.
But before I close with this slide, I want people to understand...
The role of the chair of the Capitol Police Board that we started talking about.
The chair has a little bit more influence, right, on how the board convenes and whether they're going to convene, talk, decide, whatever, right?
What does that look like?
Number one, Kevin McCarthy, actually, we might have to go back a few slides.
Yeah, let's go back a few slides.
So the architect of the Capitol, when Kevin McCarthy came in, one more slide up.
Yes, there you go.
Kevin McCarthy comes in, appoints Bill McFarlane last year to be his Sergeant at Arms, right?
He was acting.
Now, the first thing that happens by the House Admin Committee, which is chaired by Brian Stile, which is a Paul Ryan replacement slash lackey.
He's doing Paul Ryan's bidding within the Congress, okay?
The House Administration Committee calls in Brett Blatton to testify as the architect.
And in there, they exposed that he was using his government vehicle for personal use by giving it to his daughters and his wife to use on vacations, this and that.
Okay.
So they fire him.
They fire him.
Blanton was appointed by Trump and confirmed by McConnell.
Okay.
Charging him with fines, restitution, admonishing them to keep him in place to be one of the voting members, I guess if you want to call it uniparty with an R behind it member,
they ended up firing him They being Kevin McCarthy, was working with Biden and Brian Stile, Paul Reinslake, to fire this guy so that they would lose that voting member in order for the board to be, instead of two to one, meaning Trump-appointed, McConnell-confirmed, And McFarland, a McCarthy confirmed.
So technically, if you just look at it back up and say it would be then a two to one, two Republican, one Democrat appointed board, which would allow us for the full release of the J6 footage, right?
What did Kevin McCarthy do instead, immediately on becoming the speaker?
He promoted the idea to fire this guy Blanton.
So that the Democrats would be in a position of controlling the board.
So in 2020, the chair of the board was Paul Irving.
So hang on, that's a big deal.
I don't mean to cut you off there.
So you're saying, you know, we all knew that McCarthy was a liar.
He didn't really release the full footage.
I mean, he released a little bit to Tucker, but not the full footage.
He was complicit in protecting the footage from being released.
So he goes into the Capitol Police Board.
He fires the guy that would have been...
Uh, potentially for the release, for transparency, for sunlight, uh, and then it gets replaced with somebody who's not for that anymore.
And they trump up some charges.
It was McCarthy working with Brian Stile, Paul Ryan's replacement, with Biden to do so.
Because I suspect that it was, hey, you will get speakership, Kevin, as long as you let us control the Capitol Police Board so that we can continue the cover up to the coup that we committed.
All roads lead back to the control of the Capitol Police Board, as you so mentioned earlier in the show.
Now, in 2020, who was the speaker?
Pelosi, right?
Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving was the Sergeant at Arms Chair of the Capitol Police Board.
2021, who becomes the Chair of the Capitol Police Board?
Primarily, it was Chuck Schumer's Karen Gibson appointed Capitol Police Board Chair.
In 2022, it becomes Speaker Pelosi's Sergeant at Arms as the Chair of the Capitol Police Board to continue the cover-up.
In 2023, it becomes Karen Gibson, which is Senator Schumer's Sergeant-at-Arms as the Chair of the Capitol Police Board, so that they can continue the cover-up.
And then, in 2024, January 3rd, last week, Bill McFarlane, this is the right picture, was appointed by Kevin McCarthy.
Now let's go back down to the last slide.
We'll close with this.
Mike Johnson is still Speaker of the House, but with Kevin McCarthy's Sergeant at Arms.
And when you look at Title II, U.S. Code section 1979, this is where we bring it in, sir.
Read to us paragraph B and tell me what you gleaned from it based on the context I just provided you.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any security information in the possession of the Capitol Police may be released by the Capitol Police to another entity, including an individual only.
If the Capitol Police Board determines in consultation with other appropriate law enforcement officials, experts in security preparedness and appropriate committees of Congress, that the release of the security information will not compromise the security and safety of the Capitol buildings and grounds or any individual whose protection and safety is under the jurisdiction of the Capitol Police.
You want me to translate that?
I would love for you to translate that.
Yes, sir.
So, go back to the words of that statute and we'll parse it.
Any security information, meaning the CCTV footage, in the possession of the Capitol Police may be released by the Capitol Police to another entity, including an individual, only if the Capitol Police Board determines.
That's number one.
So control of the Capitol Police Board allows you to release it to the American public, to the FBI lie, etc., U.S. Attorney's Office, in consultation with other appropriate law enforcement officials.
Who are the other appropriate law enforcement officials according to Nancy Pelosi's and Chuck Schumer's Capitol Police Chief?
How about Christopher Ray Epps and the FBI? How about the ATF? How about the DNC and the RNC heads of security?
How about the Park Police that also has someone?
How about the Metropolitan Police Department?
Just stay on that right there.
Experts in security preparedness and appropriate committees, which include the House Admin Committee, which is Brian Stile providing cover for the coup, and Amy Klobuchar, who heads up the committee in the Senate, Senate Rules and Admin Committee, that has to be consulted for the release of the footage.
So it wasn't until Speaker Johnson came into play that changed the construct and context of that particular section in the code to then be able to gain the necessary political will, courage, and influence to start to allow the House Admin Committee subcommittee on oversight to start releasing it.
But the reason why he can't release all of it all at once is because The rest of the Capitol Police Board and the other law enforcement officials and the Chief of the Capitol Police, whose wife Jackie Manger is besties with Jamie Raskin and because the General Counsel of the U.S. Capitol Police,
Thomas Tobias, who used to work at the U.S. Attorney's Office, are the ones that are trying to stop the release of the footage, laying claim to the fact that Oh, it's going to make the Capitol vulnerable and don't release the footage.
Meanwhile, they're doing that to protect the coup that they committed and the subsequent cover-up that they were and continued to be involved in.
That's it?
Yeah, and it's no wonder there's not a lot of media outlets that have wanted to cover this because it is complicated and it's not necessarily good for clickbait, you know what I mean?
It's very detailed.
This is Insiders, Insiders Baseball.
What I presented to you, Paul...
Marjorie Taylor Greene has no clue.
Troy Nels doesn't understand this.
Clay Higgins doesn't quite grasp the components that were at play to be able to run this out.
I don't think Trump's campaign understands this.
Trump and his legal team does not understand that he was criminalized just like every other J6 defendant, not by Jack Smith, not by the FBI, not by the DOJ. It all started with the Capitol Police Board at the direction of Pelosi and Schumer through the Capitol Police Chief and their General Counsel.
That's where it started.
So if we can laser focus on the culprits here and then have the members of Congress like Loudermilk to expose everything related to the communications of every single person that I've mentioned in this episode, and if we can get Elon Musk to Disclose all the Twitter direct messages of every single person on my Deep State target list that I provided you a copy of that maybe you can put up on the screen.
When we get Elon Musk to release all of their Twitter DMs and we get Loudermilk to subpoena all the records of all the individuals that I mentioned Before on Capitol Police Board Downstream and everyone I mentioned in this episode, we are going to prove to the American public that there was a coup and a cover-up to the coup exactly how I just laid it out.
Yeah, I don't know.
Let me see if I can't get this to where people can...
Yeah, is this what you're talking about here?
I'll tell you by category what this involves.
So the first grouping is the 39 that unmasked General Flynn.
One of those names is, if you can look, Sarah Raskin, the wife of Jamie Raskin.
Who used to be at the Treasury Department.
See that?
Interesting, the link analysis that we do.
And the only reason why I noticed that is because Jamie Raskin mentioned it in his book.
Thank you, good sir, for admitting to your complicity in this.
Let's go to the next category in color.
The 51 named and the 9 unnamed individuals, mostly from the CIA, that provided cover for the Biden criminal syndicate laptop, saying it was Russian disinformation.
Guess who one of those people are on that list?
A guy by the name of David B. Buckley, about 7th down.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8th down.
David Buckley, who later becomes the staff director for the January 6th select committee.
Oh, wow.
You see how this works now?
Yeah.
Is it starting to make sense?
Yeah, yeah.
He was there in order to poison the jury pool with that J6 committee to get 100% conviction rate.
I told you guys we were going to name names.
Yeah, I told the audience at the top in the monologue.
I said, you know, that we were going to name names, but you're the one naming the names.
Yeah, this is incredible.
Let's scroll down.
Sorry, I know we're going over, but we have to hit this.
Yeah, we've got like one minute left.
Yeah, go ahead.
All right, go down, go down, quick, to the next elect.
So then we have those involved in the 2020 election steal in that category, the names.
Keep going next.
And their Twitter accounts.
Next, we have those involved in the Crossfire Hurricane team that illegally spied on Carter Page.
And framed Trump for treason, yep.
The Ukraine whistleblower team, all the individuals in their Twitter accounts.
Impeachment managers, one.
Impeachment managers, two.
Keep going.
Wow.
And then the Capitol Police Board.
There are all the names that I mentioned that need to be looked at.
We need all their communications.
We need all their communications.
Particularly Elon Musk, if you're listening.
The Nobody Guy is the Twitter account of the General Counsel of the U.S. Capitol Police.
I want to see all of it.
Yeah.
Wow.
That's incredible.
Ivan Raiklin, thank you so much.
Where can people find more about this?
What's your Twitter handle?
It's Ivan Raiklin on Twitter, and I'm also on Substack, IvanRaiklin.substack.com if you want more in-depth, detailed analysis of what I just discussed.
Well, we obviously have to have you back on and do this soon, because obviously there's way more out there, way more information.
They don't call you the deep state marauder for nothing.
I really appreciate it, Ivan.
Thanks so much for coming on this report.
Love it.
Thanks for the opportunity, Paul.
Folks, Stu Peter's show is coming up next.
You don't want to miss it.
Karen Kingston back with Stu.
Thank you so much for watching.
▲
Export Selection