LIVE - WRONGTHINK: Diversity Is Destroying America & The Uniparty Knows It
|
Time
Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Diversity is our greatest dream.
Thank you.
The idea that diversity of language, of culture, of race, is a strength for a country is so obviously wrong, so obviously stupid, that only very, very intelligent people could persuade themselves that it's true.
Diversity of this kind is always a source of tension.
It's a source of conflict.
If you look around the world, It's precisely because populations that are diverse along these lines are trying to share the same territory.
Whenever that happens, there is not only conflict, often there is large-scale killing because people prefer people like themselves.
Diversity is a source of tension.
It is not a source of strength.
Now we're always being told to celebrate diversity.
Celebrate it!
Celebrate it!
There are people for whom diversity is a celebration.
And why is that?
It's because in the United States diversity means only one thing.
It means fewer whites and more of everyone else.
So, if you are more of everyone else, you may not practice diversity in your own life.
You may stick with your own kind when you have that chance, but you certainly want more diversity for the country because diversity for America means more of your kind More of your ideas.
That means the country will reflect your history, your culture, your aspirations.
And less and less will it reflect the history, culture and aspirations of the founding stock, the Europeans, the Whites who settled this country.
So for them it makes sense.
Of course they celebrate diversity.
They celebrate their growing numbers.
They celebrate their increasing influence.
Of course.
Now, think about whites celebrating diversity.
If you ask white people to celebrate diversity, you're asking them to be happy, to rejoice at their dwindling numbers, their declining influence.
Whites are supposed to believe that dispossession is an exciting, a wonderful prospect.
Yippee!
We're going to become another!
Look, he brings up a good point.
A lot of good points, actually.
First of all, I want to address the first one, which is the whole point of this show, which is that diversity is not our greatest strength.
Now, they'll call you racist, okay, until they're blue in the face when you say that.
But the reality is what you're really saying when you bring up the fact that diversity is not our greatest strength is you are bringing up a fact, okay?
The more unity you have within a country, the more cohesive people will be, the more likely they are to want to work together.
The more likely they are to be fighting for the same interests, the less tension there will be.
That is just a fact and that's not wrong to point out, okay?
And so that's why it becomes increasingly more worrisome That not only are we just allowing people in, but rather we are encouraging random people from around the world to come to this country.
We don't know who they are.
We don't know what they're bringing with them.
We don't know what kind of cultural mindset they have.
But we do know that it's not of, you know, the same that we have here in America.
And we know that because We've seen what goes on when you do let in millions of people in droves.
Not just let them in, but encourage them to come in.
Now here's the thing.
They're aware.
The Uniparty is aware of what they're doing when they encourage this.
It's not about them being inclusive, right?
We are past the point of, oh, you want to come to this country?
Well, you're going to have to work hard.
You're going to have to prove that you can provide for yourself and your family.
You're going to have to assimilate to our values, right?
No, no, no.
That's not what they're doing right now.
What they're doing is they're saying, well, we know that there are all sorts of cultures around the country that are not exactly able to assimilate to American culture, but we're going to encourage these people to come in.
Now, one thing you need to understand that is absolutely crucial for you to understand about this whole equation here is that they're not sending their best and their brightest.
And I'm not being facetious when I say that.
If you speak to anybody that's from These countries where these migrants are coming in, really just illegals, invaders, if you will.
Mainly Mexico, actually.
If you speak to, say, a Mexican, right, that lives near the border in Mexico, they'll tell you, and I've spoken to them, they will tell you that it's not the people who are doing well that are good, you know, functional members of society that are breaking into the United States.
No.
These are the murderers, the rapists, the human traffickers, the drug traffickers, Those are the people who are breaking into our country.
People who are doing good things for society, they don't want to leave their home country.
No, it's not the best and the brightest.
It's not people who are looking to establish themselves and their family and build a better life.
No, these are literally the worst of the worst coming to this country.
And so when you think of it that way and you start to realize what's really going on, you have to you have to know that the people who are greenlighting this operation at the top, the uniparty and the elites that control them, they're fully aware of this.
They're not stupid people.
They're fully aware that it's murderers, rapists, human traffickers, drug traffickers that are coming through our southern border.
It's not actually people who want to establish themselves and have a better life.
Okay.
And so then you have to ask yourselves, well, why would they encourage these people to come Well, clearly, this diversifying of America is meant to destroy us in many different ways.
Culturally, economically, we have to carry the burden of taking care of them, giving them free cell phones and whatnot.
They do horrible things, which we're going to be discussing today.
And...
They're doing this all under the guise of diversity so that if you criticize the operation, they can then call you racist.
Oh, you're racist.
You just don't want, you're just scared of diversifying this country.
Yeah, I am.
But why have we, why is that associated, why is that thought associated with a bad thing?
Why does that have a bad connotation?
To be scared that this country will no longer be majority white.
Why is that a bad thing to bring up that you are concerned that it's no longer going to be majority white?
Why?
Why is that a bad thing?
Well, they've trained you to think it's a bad thing, that you're a terrible person.
It's not like they can understand.
They're pretending to not understand the nuances of the argument.
The way that they look at you is you're either Mother Teresa and you want everybody who wants to come here to come in because they all want a better life, even though that's not why they're coming here.
Or you're, you know, a Ku Klux Klan leader for not wanting people to come here because you hate brown people, you hate black people.
No, there is absolutely no hate involved whatsoever in the analysis that I'm bringing to the table here.
I'm simply pointing out that America was very successful, has been very successful with a majority white population.
It's only been in recent years where that population, that majority is sort of dwindling in numbers.
That we have actually declined.
Why?
Because we've had more tension.
We've had more crime.
We've had more issues in this country.
We've been economically strained.
There are so many reasons why diversity is not our greatest strength.
And we're going to be discussing that on today's episode because I just sat through a 10 minute long interview on MSNBC with a woman who wrote a book about how racist everybody is.
And that's kind of what inspired this episode, because I had just learned from this interview, actually, that the United States spent eight billion dollars on diversity, equity and inclusion hires.
And essentially what that is, what this whole phenomenon of of hiring people based off of race and sex and sexual orientation, what this has done, this has had drastically terrible effects on America, terrible effects.
Terrible effects.
And we're going to be talking about those effects today.
Not just in the business world, but it has trickled down into every aspect of society.
When you start hiring to fill quotas, that's when you start to destroy your country.
In every way possible, that's when you start to fall behind economically, culturally, And I'm not saying that it couldn't possibly be the case that a black person is the best for the job.
I'm just saying that when you base it off of who is black and only who is black or only who is Hispanic, you're losing out on a slew of people that are probably going to be more qualified for the job, more talented.
Why?
Why?
Because you can only see through the lens of, well, it has to be a black person.
It has to be a Hispanic person.
Not only is that morally wrong, but But you're destroying your own country.
You're shooting yourself in the foot.
So we have a lot to discuss.
As you might imagine, I have a lot to say on this topic, which is why I've ranted for so long in the beginning of this show.
We haven't even gotten started yet, and I've already started ranting my arse off.
So stay tuned for this very racist episode of Wrong Thing Primetime.
And welcome to Wrong Thing Primetime, everyone. everyone.
I'm Anna Perez.
Thank you so much for being here on this Monday night.
Really exciting show to bring to you guys today.
We're going to be talking all about the Ku Klux Klan and how great they are.
Just kidding.
That's not the topic.
I'm just trolling.
What we are going to be talking about, however, is how much diversity has actually destroyed this country despite the fact that they want you to think that they're bringing their best and their brightest.
And not only has it destroyed this country, but the Uniparty is well aware of it because they want this destruction.
And that sounds quite simple when you look at what's going on at the border, but it's beyond that.
So we have a lot, a lot to get into today.
Before we do that, though, I want to go ahead and ask you to please rumble this show.
Hit that thumbs up button.
And share the link on your social media.
Send it to your family and friends if you think they would be interested in the truth.
We're going to be talking about a lot of news here.
Some interesting stuff especially towards the end as well.
I have a really sad story.
An American citizen who is now suffering at the hands of the law because...
The country decided to let in random, I guess, Mexican people.
I don't know what gang they're from.
MS-13 perhaps.
Maybe South American.
I'm not exactly sure.
I forget.
But the story is really sad because he's paying the price for something that he should not be paying the price for because our country refuses to actually protect American citizens.
So we're going to be talking about that.
But before we do all of that, I do want to say hello to who is here in the chat.
We have Freethinker26, ModTrend, SaltyDebbie, ToneMan514, PPMF, InfoWarrior, CassSRumble, KeithDay777, Bronco1983, William Hoogstaden, PureThought, I said hi to Bronco.
Tackleberry, 1187.
Who else?
Carol, 126.
Debra, 335.
Debra's awesome.
Let's see who else we have.
Murphy's Law, 1.
Haven't seen you in a while, Murphy.
Or at least I don't think.
And Edge 001.
Okay, so, as promised, I do want to go ahead.
Someone's complimented me on my lip gloss, but it's a little too much, I think.
It makes me look crazy.
A little bit.
That's okay, I don't really care.
Alright, so I do want to go ahead and jump right in.
Let's see.
America 180 says, Hi Anna, thanks for sacrificing so much in your quest for the truth.
Thank you, Brody.
I know that it doesn't always make you popular to speak about the truth, but at least you're speaking the truth and that's what matters to me.
So yeah, thank you.
Thank you.
I appreciate that.
Carlos Nohair says Texas Baldad.
Great to see you, Carlos.
You guys know Carlos.
He is awesome.
Anyway, okay, let's get started because you're gonna love this interview.
I actually, I might speak over it.
I don't know.
I'm not gonna do like a live react.
I was gonna do that.
But I don't think I'm going to play the whole thing.
I was going to play the whole thing.
It's about 10 minutes long.
But you guys are going to get bored of it and then you're going to get mad at me that I'm playing the whole thing.
So I think I'm only going to play about 5 minutes of it halfway through.
But just to kind of give you the context of this.
So this is a writer who wrote a book about how racist everybody is.
Classic leftists, their whole premise and thinking is that literally everybody's racist.
Every white person is racist and they want to kill all the black people.
They hate trannies.
They hate everyone.
Which is like, okay, I'm not a big fan of trannies, but I don't want to physically harm anyone.
That's not, unless obviously they're harming kids, that's different than wood chipper, right?
Obviously.
But as far as like me just, you know, hating people randomly, like that's not at all the premise of our argument.
Our argument is just that diversity is not our greatest strength.
And that is a very, very valid point to make.
A very logical analysis.
But of course, these people will take any opportunity to skew your arguments a certain way.
And that's exactly what this person did.
She's very well known and she went on MSNBC for this interview.
Total cuck interviewed her.
This guy is such a loser.
I see his stuff all the time on MSNBC, you know, on Twitter and just, you know, just classic conversation of everybody's racist and I need to protect myself because the whites are against me and I have to protect myself.
Like, dude, blacks and browns have life better than ever before in America, better than anybody else here.
And I'll tell you, speaking as somebody who's, you know, last name Perez, even though I'm technically white, but I benefited simply because my last name is Perez from this system that I don't really support, you know?
And I don't support it because I don't think it's fair.
And, you know, as somebody who has value to offer society, I'm more than capable of getting, you know, going along on my own without these programs.
But again, These programs are offered no matter what to browns and blacks because, well, they're suffering so much in society.
Like, what the hell?
I mean, it's such a false narrative.
But here is that interview.
Like I said, I'm going to skip around probably because I don't really think you need to hear the whole thing.
So here it is.
Robin DiAngelo, thanks so much for joining me on the show tonight.
Your big bestseller was White Fragility, why it's so hard for white people to talk about racism.
Your new book is called Nice Racism, How Progressive White People Perpetuate Racial Harm.
In the new book, you write, quote, I'm often asked why white people should listen to a white person on racism.
So let's start there.
What is your answer to that question?
Why should they?
Well, let me start by being very clear that I do not believe white people will ever understand what we need to understand about racism if we're not listening to black people and other people of color.
From a very early age, they have to understand my reality.
And unfortunately, I have not had to understand theirs.
And as an insider, I do have a take, an understanding of it that they can't have.
And we need all pieces of this puzzle at the table.
So early on in the book, you relate a self-critical anecdote about how you once behaved at a dinner party with a black couple, I believe, where afterwards you'd realized you'd spent much of the evening talking about awful racist things some other people you knew had done.
Is it your view that what you call such racialized moves or covers in the book by quote-unquote woke or progressive white people, that that is a common thing?
And is it witting or unwitting in your view?
I think it's definitely a common theme.
I've certainly gotten feedback across my life about my enactments.
I have observed countless other enactments.
Many, many, many black people and other people of color have written exhaustively about their frustration with this kind of well-meaning, implicit kinds of racism.
And through observation, those forms, and that is what I focus on.
They're harder to see, easier to deny, and therefore we need some help.
You're right about the kind of harder to see and easier to know.
I mean, I as a brown immigrant definitely would say it can be more frustrating dealing with the kind of implicit racism from well-intentioned people who don't realise it than from your explicit Trump-like figure who kind of I take for granted.
That's a very fair point.
Consider this.
Something that strikes me about the book Nice Racism is that conservatives might actually agree with a lot of your critique.
I wonder whether you see the weird overlap that I saw.
They see a lot of white progressives, for example, out on the streets protesting and they say they're virtue signaling.
They're trying to be woke.
They're trying to outwoke each other.
They're trying to romanticize minority cultures.
And you kind of call that out too, don't you, in the book.
Isn't that a lot of what you're critiquing too?
Yes, but the agendas are different.
And what I would say is that the agenda from the right is to protect the status quo.
The agenda on the left, hopefully, is to challenge the status quo.
And systemic racism is the status quo.
You know, within that work, we want to get this as right as we can.
That's not completely possible.
But we could do better.
We don't want to inadvertently reinforce the problem as we seek to challenge it.
One of the fiercest criticisms of your work, and it's not just from conservators, but some liberals too, and to be fair, you discuss it in the book, is the idea that you're perpetuating a quote-unquote race essentialism.
That in your view of the world, we can't escape our racial groups.
We're locked into them.
We are black, white, Asian, and that group identity trumps whatever individual non-race-related characteristics we may have, which some would say is a pretty depressing view of the world.
Well, I don't think that racism is going to end in my lifetime, and I think in some ways the kinds of hopefulness that led to the complacency we saw following the civil rights movement has led us to this moment, which looks in a lot of ways pre-civil rights.
But a lot of people of colour even, forget white people for a second, a lot of people of colour might say, I want to be able to have relationships with people around me, colleagues, students, friends, without always having to worry about which racial group I'm in.
And if you read your stuff, some people come away thinking you can only see the world, according to Robin DiAngelo, in racial groups.
I'm just wondering, is that how you see it or no?
I think we could use much more awareness of the reality of our racial positions.
They shape the way we see the world.
They shape our experience in the world.
Some objective universal experience that we're all having.
We could literally predict whether my mother and I were going to survive my birth based on the fact that my mother and I are white.
It is significant.
And we don't want to hold absolutely everything at all times, but I think we need to embrace it a little more than we have been.
You spend a lot of the book relating some really dispiriting experiences from racial sensitivity workshops that you run or attend.
I wonder, is there any evidence out there about those workshops and the value that they deliver?
Because there is an argument on the left that facilitating those kind of workshops, especially for corporations, for government organizations, you're giving them a racism get-out-of-jail-free card almost.
They can say, well, we paid for all this stuff.
Look what great employers we are.
And I should point out for our viewers that last year, a study found that US companies spent $8 billion on diversity and inclusion and diversity consultants earn somewhere in total, cumulatively around a billion, half a billion a year.
So I'm wondering, where's the evidence or data that you have, because you're the expert on this, I wonder, on those workshops, on diversity training, because a lot of people are cynical about that stuff.
So I'm just wondering, how do we know it works?
Well, I don't think it does work if it's not sustained and consistent.
So if it's a one-time thing, a check-the-box kind of approach, it's not going to keep going.
It has to be sustained.
And I really would have us question why we think there would be a simple answer or solution.
We could take this workshop, or we should be able to take this workshop, and figure out something as parentally It's complex and deep and enduring and highly adaptive as racism.
It is highly adaptive.
It responds to challenges and it keeps on keeping on.
Look where we are right now.
Look at voter suppression.
Look at actual laws enacted that say you can't acknowledge that racism exists.
Or laws that say you can't teach the history of the civil rights movement.
Literally nobody ever said that you can't teach the history of the civil rights movement.
I don't know what this lady's talking about, but she doesn't really either, to be fair.
She's just selling a lie to the left that is a popular lie, just like we have grifters on the right who make calendars that are supposedly conservative, full of half-naked women.
We also have grifters on the left who take an idea that is popular among, you know, the white upper middle class to make themselves feel good.
And they sell a book to them and say, hey, read this so you can have white guilt and you can spread that guilt among everybody else.
And you could feel like Mother Teresa when you attempt to solve that white guilt, when you attempt to solve racism towards browns and blacks, which, let me be completely clear, does not exist, at least in the sense of how things are acted out.
Now, if anything, I would argue that internally it's just making us more racist when we see these government programs and we see these, you know, DEI hiring strategies that ultimately just end up in a situation where blacks and brown people look worse than ever before because they're incompetent and they weren't the best person for the job.
But hey, they were the right skin color, so that's why they hired them.
But we're going to be talking about that in the next part of the show.
We're going to be talking about the consequences of this mentality of, oh, well, diversity is our greatest strength.
So therefore, not only do we have to spend $8 billion on DEI hires, which once again are diversity, equity, and inclusion hires, people that you hire based off of their race, based off of their sex or sexual orientation, Doesn't matter if they're not qualified for the job, right?
As long as we hire based off of their race.
Many would argue that that is literally the definition of racism.
So you're being racist towards white people when you disqualify them for a job position because all you can see is, well, we must hire black.
We must hire black lesbian, which is exactly what they did in the White House when they hired, of course, Corrine Jean-Pierre, who might be the worst press secretary we've ever seen in the White House.
But She fits the quota, so that's why she is there.
And probably makes Americans more racist, if anything, because we're sick and tired of watching black and brown people get away scot-free with being retarded or being incompetent, but yet still getting the job because, oh, well, they have the right skin color for it.
So excuse me for being upset that people who aren't actually competent and qualified for the job aren't getting it because they're white, you know?
Sorry that that pisses me off.
Just kidding.
Not sorry at all.
But that's exactly what you're witnessing there.
And it's bizarre that this is something that is being pushed in the mainstream.
In fact, this idea of hiring based off of race has gone so mainstream, so mainstream, that it's something that, well, Republicans are pushing as well.
You can't say the sorts of stuff that I say about race On other networks, on other conservative networks, okay?
Let's be completely clear.
That's why I'm here on the Stu Peters Network.
Now, you can't say a lot of the things I say on these other corporate networks, but specifically as it pertains to race, because I point out the obvious truths about how diversity is destroying this country.
It is not making it better at all.
Your country does not flourish when there is more You know diversity when there is more when there are more differences among your people I thought that that was an obvious one but apparently it's not you can't even say it in the mainstream world to a point where once again this is something that quote unquote Republicans are fighting for now I use that term loosely that's why I put it in quotes because one might argue that Nikki Haley is actually not Republican at all and she's obviously not just a rhino but actually a liberal Trojan horse
now we've talked about that before I have a hair on my mouth.
How did that get there?
Oh my goodness.
Oh my gosh.
Sorry, unprofessional.
It was bothering me.
It was stuck in my lip gloss.
I think it's still there.
But what I was getting to is that...
This is something that clearly has struck a chord with a lot of fake Republicans, including Nikki Haley, like I said, because she is one of those people that actually not only allows this to go on, but she promotes it herself.
Take a look at this.
This was exposed by libs of TikTok.
They do some great work a lot of the time.
Nikki Haley's Foundation has a program called My First Library, which offers kindergartners DEI-themed books in South Carolina schools.
Now...
My guess is that most South Carolina parents probably don't want their children being taught that only blacks and browns should be hired for jobs.
But that doesn't matter to Nikki Haley's foundation because they're going to indoctrinate your child anyway.
Do voters in New Hampshire want DEI pushed onto their kids in schools?
Nikki Haley is not a Republican.
Don't be fooled.
No, she is not.
She's just part of the mainstream.
There's no greater gift to a child than teaching him or her to read.
There's also no more important academic skill.
That's why my first library, our foundational literacy program, is a vital component of our work in school, supporting children whose families often do not have the resources to properly nurture a proficiency in and love of writing.
Sorry, reading.
Through my first library, kindergarten students are invited to choose 10 high-quality grade-level summer reading books.
Yeah, high-quality, my art.
So you'll take a look at those books in just a moment.
At an end-of-the-year book fair, the program is distinct from other reading programs in these ways, starting early.
Most summer reading programs begin in the first grade, while my first library starts the summer before.
Oh, yippee!
you get to get a jump start on learning uh why we need to hire blacks and browns instead of white people uh student choice blah blah blah blah studies show 92 percent of kids say they're more likely to finish a book when picked up themselves no one cares greatest need a stable whatever best of all these young readers get to build their own at-home libraries filled with books of their choosing and love of reading that will last a lifetime literally don't care and Anyway, let's go on.
This is the part I really wanted to show you.
All are welcome.
So this is, I guess, a table of the different books that they have here.
This is called All Are Welcome.
The book is about a school where diversity and inclusion are celebrated.
Categorized by Amazon under children's books on prejudice and racism.
Oh, great, Nikki Haley.
Exactly what we need to teach our kids that white people are bad and only black people deserve jobs because we need to help them so much.
Oh, and it gets better.
Prejudice and racist parents and parents have complained about the racial diversity and LGBT affirming book, which reportedly depicts diverse families of various racial, ethnic, and religious identities, as well as families with disabilities and features a same-sex parent unit with a child.
So that's disgusting.
That's all are welcome.
One of the books on the chart.
I'm not going to read all of them probably, but then we have The Colors of Us, which you can see featured right here on the right, an actual picture of it, described as a...
Positive and affirming look at skin color from an artist's perspective.
That's weird.
Hair love.
Tender and empowering hair love is an ode to loving your natural hair and a celebration of daddies and daughters everywhere.
So this whole thing, I just want to briefly comment on this, this whole idea that like you can't comment on a black person's hair is hilarious to me because they want you to think that they're beautiful and Their hair is beautiful, which it's not.
I'm not a fan of, like, frizzy, gross, you know, hair that, you know, like, looks like an afro.
Sorry, I'm not, on women.
I just don't like that look, and I think if I had that hair type, if I was black, I probably would straighten it, I'll be honest.
I'm not, I'm just not lying, and I think most people probably would agree with me.
They're just, they won't be honest, right?
But it doesn't matter.
My whole point is that, so then they will wear their hair like that, and then people might compliment them, and then they'll be like, actually, that's racist!
Actually, I don't want you to compliment me on my hair.
Which is like fine.
Everybody has different tastes.
Maybe there are people that genuinely like that look.
And that's fine, right?
But like, you can't be mad.
You can't first of all say, you have to think my hair is beautiful.
First of all, I don't have to think anything is beautiful.
We're all entitled to our own opinion.
But secondly...
But then you can't then say, well, you're not allowed to compliment me on my hair.
Like, which one is it?
Do you want us to think your hair is ugly and never compliment it?
Or do you want us to think it's beautiful?
Because right now you're not exactly making it easy on people.
So that would be...
People are saying, Anna with a fro?
No, my hair's actually pretty straight, so I don't really have that problem.
But, point is, point is, you know, it's just very bizarre the way they treat it.
And then, of course, they have beautiful, beautiful girls are empowered, smart, and really, really, really strong.
Beautiful breaks barriers by showing girls free to be themselves, splashing in mud.
Why would they show that conducting science experiments and reading books under a flashlight with friends?
I don't understand the point of that.
Like what is the assumption that women didn't think that they were going to be able to splash in mud?
I don't understand.
Like what?
That only white people could splash in mud, but that actually it's beautiful for everybody.
What the hell is that?
Like, I don't, I really don't understand the concept of that because obviously these books are all written to, you know, presumably break down some sort of narrative that they believe is out there and that is harmful and racist, right?
So it's like, I don't even know what the beautiful one was based off of.
Anyway, there's a list of all the DEI teachings that Nikki Haley wants kindergarten kids to be exposed to.
So that is how much this trash has infiltrated the mainstream.
It's infiltrated the right in many ways.
ways you have no idea how many people told me when I entered this industry well you know you're you're gonna do great because conservatives are always looking for more Hispanics they're always looking for more black people more more uh to prove that they're not racist they're always looking for more women to prove that they're not sexist and I was like what the hell I I guess that's true that is true in corporate media that's true in like the mainstream conservative way but it's like well why
how in what way would diversifying the party would diversifying the movement help anybody you you should have ideas values that are cohesive with the movement not a race or a sex that is that is you know like it should the focus should be on diversifying we No, the focus should be on, hey, we have these ideals we want to conserve in this country.
We don't want to, you know, allow in all of these crazy progressive ideas.
That's the whole point, right?
Conserving traditionalism, conserving Christianity in this country.
I don't see how diversifying the party can help with that.
Like, I don't understand the value in that.
I'm not saying that we don't want, you know, we're going to say, nope, no black people, no Hispanics because they're not allowed.
That's not what I'm saying.
I'm just saying that that shouldn't be the priority.
Obviously, that's retarded.
Oh, well, we're going to let them in because we need more.
Or we're going to hire Anna Perez because she's Hispanic.
What?
I don't want you to hire me at that point.
If you're hiring me because of my race, I actually don't want you to hire me.
I want to be hired because I know that I'm the best person for the job and I'm talented and I have the right skill set for it.
But not because my last name is Perez and you would think that other people would have, you know, dignity and they would want the same thing.
But no, somehow there's this belief out there that we owe brown and black people free jobs, you know, just just because of their skin color or their sexual orientation.
Ridiculous, ridiculous.
But that's what we're dealing with here in America.
And the question then becomes, why is this so bad?
Why is this mentality?
Why are these diversity and inclusion hires so bad?
Well, the mentality that is the umbrella mentality here that is causing us to do all of this is the idea that diversity is our greatest strength.
And so the question then becomes, is it really our greatest strength?
Well, no, it is not.
We already answered that.
But how do we know that?
Well, we have plenty of examples to prove that.
And we have some recent ones that I want to discuss because it seems every day we hear a new story about what happens when you leave our border wide open, which, of course, our borders wide open due to the belief that it's racist to actually close it.
It's racist to not let everyone and anyone who wants to be here get into this country.
Like I said, it's not like successful people want to break into this country.
No, the people who are breaking into America are rapists, murderers, drug dealers, human traffickers, and anybody.
Any like Mexican person who is like a normal human being will tell you that.
Like if you speak to a family in Mexico or you speak to the residents of Mexico who are You know, normal people who are living their lives following the law, they'll tell you like, no, the people breaking into your country, they're the worst of the worst, not the best and the brightest.
So we were lied to about all of that, obviously, as well.
And so it tells you that this destruction...
The diversification of America is meant to destroy.
It is not meant to contribute to the betterment of America.
In fact, quite the opposite.
So we're going to be talking about that coming up next.
So...
Stay tuned for that.
Before we move on, though, I want to go ahead and ask you to please rumble the show if you haven't already.
That just means hitting the thumbs up button.
That helps this show grow.
That helps this network grow.
Also, please do subscribe to the Stu Peters Network as well.
I'll be back to read some of your comments, but first I want to go to a quick break and I will be right back.
So guys, very important message from one of our amazing sponsors, Gold Co.
Right now, it looks like the government's pushing for a digital dollar, which could mean every penny you spend could be tracked and controlled by the government, the last thing we need.
Okay, if that's true, then your entire life could depend on people you don't know, like, or even trust, okay?
That's why smart Americans are opting out and putting some of their savings into So to help, you can go to goldco.com forward slash wrong thing or call 855-771-0184 to get a free 2023 gold IRA kit from my new partners at Goldco.
Guys, I'm telling you, every smart person I know is doing this.
They are investing in gold.
Goldco is the perfect place to go to help, okay?
It shows how to protect your hard-earned money with physical gold and silver, even if it's still in a retirement account.
And as an American citizen, you could score up to $10,000 in free silver just for safeguarding your savings.
So it's a no-brainer, okay?
At the very least, arm yourself with knowledge about your options here.
Do not be a sheep, okay?
That's just plain embarrassing, alright?
Go to goldco.com forward slash wrongthink or call 855-771-0184 now to get your free 2023 gold IRA kit.
Go check it out, guys.
Highly recommend it.
Alright, we are back, guys.
I want to go ahead and jump into the second part of all of this, but before we do that, let's read some comments.
Alright, we have Jat2022 says, That music reminds me of coast-to-coast AM bumper music.
That's funny.
Yeah, I can kind of see that a little bit.
FoeTripleJabStab7 says, Bill Gates loves mosquitoes since he is a needle dick bug effer.
Yep, that's fair.
I see that.
Natal Jets 317 says, United, we stand divided, we fall.
Evil won't stand a chance.
We know that God's in control.
All the people of the world are joining hand in hand because all of the tyranny brought us back together.
Well, Natal, I do agree that God's in control.
I don't agree that we're joining hand in hand.
Because there are some people that want to destroy us and are using us.
That's why we have to stop giving away our money to Israel and Ukraine.
But yeah, right now we're not exactly hand-in-hand just yet.
Eventually we will be.
But yeah.
Natal Jets317 says, Anna, you sound just like Trump.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
I was thinking about him earlier today as if I don't think about him every day.
But no, I was thinking about him like, I was like, oh, I remember when I met him.
I was thinking about that memory.
He's a great guy.
He really is a sweetheart.
Natal Jets also says, Mike Johnson betrayed us again.
Yes, he did.
Always betraying us.
I called it.
Everybody was like worshipping him when he was appointed to speaker and everyone was like, oh, he's going to be so great.
We finally got McCarthy out of the way.
I was like, Hey retards, did it ever occur to you that they're never going to let McCarthy be replaced with somebody who's actually based?
We all knew, well anybody with an IQ over 90 could tell that they were never going to let that happen, okay?
Obviously, if they had to get rid of McCarthy, which I don't think they wanted to do, nor were they necessarily expecting it, Usually they're pretty good.
The Uniparty is pretty good at expecting what's to come from the opposition, which is, of course, the MAGA operation.
They're pretty good, sadly, at expecting those things.
But I don't think they actually planned it out.
I don't think they had any idea it was coming.
I think that they really thought they were going to be able to keep Kevin McCarthy there.
But that didn't happen.
And so they had to have a similar replacement for him.
Somebody who was going to represent the Uniparty just as well, if not more.
So...
So yeah, absolutely.
What comment am I going to read next?
Oh, Freethinker says, I wonder if Bill Gates' bunker is connected to the Jew tunnels.
Oh, yes, the Jew tunnels.
I was reading about that.
I was going to do a show on it, but it happened too quickly.
I had already planned on doing this show, so I probably will talk about the Jew tunnels tomorrow in my daytime show.
Freethinker26 says, Anna, did you ever give a listen to Rush Limbaugh's show?
I would think you'd agree with most of the things he said.
Yes, I did.
I was a big fan of Rush.
I don't think there's a single person out there that doesn't have a deep respect for Rush, even if they didn't necessarily agree with him.
I mean, everybody, you know, I think everybody had an appreciation for what he did.
He did a lot for the media industry, the conservative media industry.
Let's see.
Fire the entire government and start over, says PPMF. I think we can all agree with that.
Deborah says, I wanted Jim Jordan to get the Speaker of the House.
He would be good at it.
I 100% agree.
Oh, Ron Green says, I'm going to lobby Congress for $1 billion for Anna.
You know what?
Why give your money to Ukraine and Israel when you can give it to Anna?
I agree.
Ron Green, you're a genius.
This is why I've been saying for so long, we need Ron Green for Speaker of the House.
This is exactly what I've been saying for so long.
Ron Green for Speaker.
One billion dollars for Anna.
Anyway, Bonanza Man says, Anna, you're the greatest.
Thank you.
That's really sweet.
You are the greatest, Bonanza Man.
Bronco says, Anna for president.
Wow, this must be my birthday because everyone's being so nice to me.
Anna for president.
I don't believe in women being president, so I actually don't think I want to be president.
Also, that would be a really tough job.
Now, I would be married.
I would be happy to be married to somebody who is the president.
That I think I could do.
I think I'd be a good first lady.
I think what I would do is I would get out of the way.
Like, I don't think I'd want to be, like, a what's-her-name type...
The DeSantis' wife, like, she's always there.
She gives me, like, Hillary Clinton vibes.
So, 100%.
Let's see.
Faux, triple, jab, stab, seven.
I love that username.
Says, part due, two, of course, in French.
A Bill Gates-tied mosquito project is not responsible for recent U.S. malaria cases.
Yeah, right.
Like, we believe that AP headline.
Yeah.
Good point.
Never believe AP, Associated Press.
I do not...
Don't really agree.
I totally am with you on that, was my point.
Sorry.
Really roundabout way of saying that.
Deborah says, Trump for president and MTG for vice president.
No, I don't know about MTG for vice president.
I don't agree with that.
I don't trust her.
I don't know if I'm in the same camp as everybody else where they necessarily hate her, but I don't trust her, and that's enough to make me not want that.
Freethinker says Anna would rival Melania for elegance as first lady.
That's very sweet, but I don't know about that.
Melania is a supermodel after all.
And, uh, I don't know if I could do that.
I don't know.
Uh, thank you.
That's really nice.
Uh, oh, that's sweet.
Tacoberry says there would be a tie between you and Melania as the most beautiful first lady.
Very, very sweet.
All right, so I do want to go ahead and move on because I have a lot to get to.
Um...
I do want to go ahead and get started with the second part of the show which is talking about all of the great consequences of diversity being our greatest strength which obviously I'm being facetious about because there is nothing that has to do with strength when it comes to diversity that is an oxymoron you cannot have a strong nation when there is nothing unifying the nation I'm sorry but the more you diversify the less unification you have that is just a fact And what I mean by
unification is we have a common set of values that we adhere to.
Now, here in America, those values are European Christian values, okay?
Things that stemmed from Westerners that came here to this country, from Europe, to found this great nation.
The more that that population dwindles down, the less we have to...
We have in common, right?
It's pretty logical when you think about it.
It's not actually a hateful analysis at all.
And I'm not saying that we need to like, you know, we need some sort of Holocaust, right?
Or we need some like for blacks or Jews or any sort of ethno-religious group, whatever.
I'm not, no one's saying, no one's calling for that.
We're simply pointing out that the less we have in common with each other, the more likely there's going to be tension.
And not just tension in like a, oh, we don't disagree way.
No, I mean crime.
Murder, rape, you know, stealing from people if we don't have the same set of values.
And on a lesser level, just a society that's falling apart.
Speaking of diversity and inclusion hires, remember what happened not long ago when it came to the Silicon Valley Bank.
It was a bank that collapsed and it sent an absolute ripple effect through the economy.
That is undeniable.
We're still dealing with the consequences of it as of yet.
And one of the main parts of the story that really got overlooked when we were hearing about all of that is that the reason why we were dealing with that problem was because, guess what?
We were hiring based off of diversity, not competence.
What do I mean by that?
Well, let's take a look back then.
This is a nice little flashback to what actually happened.
This was a diversity hire.
Jay Arasaf, head of financial risk management and model risk Silicon Valley Bank, UK Limited.
Okay?
Okay.
This is a diversity hire that you're looking at.
Let's see.
Oh, great, because that's exactly what you want to hear from a head of financial risk management at Silicon Valley Bank.
That's exactly what matters, right?
How gay you are.
Anyway, this woman, obviously, I think she spent a whole month planning some gay pride party, which is hilarious to me because I don't know a single gay person that would take a whole month to plan a party.
But that's what happens when you're hiring based off of race or immigration status or LGBTQ, whatever it might be.
When you're not hiring based off of competence and And who would be best for the job?
You're ultimately going to fail the people of society.
Because this is happening on a much greater level than just Silicon Valley.
Silicon Valley Bank is just a, you know, a piece of the problem.
It's a, what's the word I'm looking for?
It's a, it's a, not an example.
What's the, I can't think of the word.
Anyway, sometimes that happens to me.
But what it really is, is it's an indication of where we're at when it comes to the whole, you know, it's a microcosm is what I meant to say, of the much larger picture, which is that the failure of Silicon Valley Bank is happening everywhere.
It's not just Silicon Valley Bank.
That is a microcosm of truly what's going on.
And Silicon Valley Bank itself was a big deal because Silicon Valley Bank had so much money invested into it.
So the fact that it failed, that really sent, again, a ripple effect through the economy.
And it's really ridiculous when you think about the root of the problem being that they were so focused on diversity and inclusion hires.
Again, that is just one example of how this diversifying factor, how our focus of diversity and inclusion blinds us from actually being able to better our country and make sure that we're staying on the right track to actually be successful.
Right.
It feels like we've backtracked many, many years, many decades, simply by this idea that if we don't hire based off of diversity, then we're all terrible people and we're all hateful people.
And it actually gets a lot worse than that because like I promised, guys, I want to talk about the other, some of the actually worst ramifications of believing in this theory that diversity is our greatest strength.
And that would, of course, be mostly related to what's going on at the border because as we can see, there is a deliberate destruction of this country through opening our border.
And it's not like...
You know, this is an organic flow of people that would come here to this country, because I think any reasonable person would say, like, no one's calling for, like, an all-white, all-European, all-Christian country, right?
I mean, I think the majority of the country should be that, let's be completely clear.
But again, that would have remained the case had we had people coming in at an organic rate.
And we actually checked people and we made sure that we were allowing the right people in.
Now we need a straight up moratorium for probably about 10 years if we're even going to have a shot at fixing the problem here.
Because the problem is, the issue is, there was deliberate destruction when...
When the people in charge, the elites, decided to not just allow people in here, but to encourage the flow of the worst people imaginable here.
And now, now we're dealing with the ramifications of that.
What do I mean by that?
Well, perfect example of what just happened in...
In Bloomingdale's recently in New York City where of course a lot of these migrants, these illegals are being housed.
Take a look at this.
Migrant mob makes grab for $5,300 in designer sunglasses from NYC Bloomingdale's.
A mob of sticky fingered migrants.
I love that term.
Stormed into Manhattan's Bloomingdale's and tried to swipe a trove of Versace, Dior, and Prada designer sunglasses, totaling $5,300 before all but one of them escaped, police sources said.
Sunday, about 15 asylum seekers swarmed the high-end Midtown retailer shortly before 6.30 p.m.
Saturday and grabbed more than a dozen pairs of pricey sunglasses before making a run for it, sources said.
An alert cop Unpaid detail at the store was able to grab one of the crooks while the rest ran off, according to sources.
Steven Matos, 23, was charged with robbery, criminal possession of stolen property, possession of burglar tools and resisting arrest in the incident.
Police recovered 10 pairs of Versace specs, two pairs of Prada sunglasses and one Christian Dior pair.
So this is what we are importing into our country, P.
People who think that they are not only entitled to certain items, but they will go out of their way to steal.
And that's on the lesser end of it because they also rape and murder, as we all know.
But that's what recently came out of the news.
Every single day we hear more news about these people who are taking advantage of a system and then treating us like absolute crap, not abiding by the rule of law, because guess what?
That wouldn't have been expected of them in their own shithole country.
And they're bringing that mentality here.
That is why we know this is a deliberate destruction of this country from the Uniparty.
Because you can't possibly make the argument that they're not aware of the people that are coming into this country and destroying it.
If they had the same values of, say, Western Europeans, they probably wouldn't be doing that because those aren't shithole countries.
Sure, they have to deal with mandatory gayness being imparted on them.
But at least they're not, you know, raping and murdering, not at least the, you know, actual, you know, Western Europeans, right?
But no, they're coming from shithole countries where that is totally acceptable.
In fact, nobody really cares.
Nobody bats an eye when you do something like that.
And that is what we are importing here.
They are the worst of the worst, not the best and the brightest.
And those are the ramifications of that.
Diversity is not exactly our greatest strength.
And get ready for more of that the more that they start to replace diversity.
White European Christians.
I'm just saying.
Just stating the obvious here.
Okay?
And that's not the only example.
You know what's worse?
The worst part about all of this is that who suffers at the end of the day as a result of just importing these terrible people?
Oh, that's right.
You.
The American citizen.
The tax paying American citizen.
Although I don't know why you would pay taxes anymore.
Just saying.
Tax paying American citizens are the victims in all of this.
Because if you dare stand up for yourself, because it's not like the government's going to protect you, CBP and National Guard made it clear that if anything, they're just going to help continue to import these people in, right?
They've made that clear and we know that from my coverage of the border at the very least, but plenty of people have covered it.
What we're looking at here, guys, is a situation where you are left to your own devices.
Yep.
And you get punished when you do stand up for your own property, for your own land, for your own family.
And that's exactly what happened to this poor rancher that I'm about to tell you about.
Border rancher charged with murder rejects plea offer after, of course, he defended his land.
Tucson, Arizona.
The Arizona rancher charged with the murder for the shooting death of a border crosser on his property has a new trial date.
George Allen Kelly, who is, by the way, 75 years old, Rejected a plea agreement and his trial will now resume after a court of appeals ruled that prosecutors can make his wife testify against him.
Absolutely awful situation to be in just because he was defending his own property.
George Kelly will likely have three-week murder trial at the Santa Cruz County Superior Court starting in late March after allowing a plea offer to expire.
Yes, I'm here, said George Kelly, who attended his status hearing remotely as he responded to the Honorable Thomas Fink of the Santa Cruz County Superior Court.
thank you it's good to have you with us judge fink responded the 75 year old rancher learned his new trial date which will be march 21st kelly is charged with second degree murder and aggravated assault for the shooting death on for the shooting death on his property of gabriel uh buitamia from nogales sonora last january just so you know i wanted a date that's far enough in advance when the mandate came back from the court of appeals which i think is in mid-december but to provide the parties sufficient time to prepare for trial judge fink said
the trial was set for september 2023 but prosecutors asked an appeals court to decide if kelly's text messages can be admitted as evidence and if his wife wanda can be deposed about events after the shooting absolutely terrible position to be in It's not his fault that our government wants to destroy our country and allow these crazy people into our homes, into our homeland.
This man was clearly defending his property.
He didn't know, probably, who was entering his property.
I'm going to look in to see if there's a GoFundMe for his legal fees because I say we band together behind this man because this is disgusting what's happening to him.
Clearly, clearly, he was well with that's his property.
You're allowed to defend your property against an illegal who's likely a murderer or a potential rapist.
Again, I don't know exactly the full story other than what I just told you, but really disgusting that we have to pay the price as Americans for the destruction of our government.
But that's what diversity is all about, right?
If you don't accept illegals onto your land If you don't accept MS-13 onto your land If you don't make sandwiches for them If you don't let them rape and murder your family Then you're a white supremacist You're awful That is the messaging that we're getting today.
And let me be completely clear.
We don't need any more evidence to prove that diversity is not our greatest strength.
Unity is.
And in addition to that, it's obvious that that's the case.
So the fact that the Uniparty wants to do nothing other than continue this rhetoric, continue this idea that diversity is our greatest strength, it tells us that they are deliberately destroying this country.
They are well aware of it, guys.
That is the America that we live in.
And it's not one that's going to be successful for much longer at the rate we're going at.
Anyways, it is 9.59.
I do want to go ahead and I have to...
Oh no, I don't think I'm gonna have time to get to what I wanted to get to last.
Well, unfortunately, I won't be able to get to that.
But before we go, guys, I do want to tell you, of course, about one of my amazing sponsors here at the Stu Peters Network.
Don't use that URL, actually.
Use the one that is in the description box, guys.
Look, I love hosting a primetime show, but what I don't love is struggling to fall asleep afterwards when just hours prior, I was downing shots of espresso and yelling into a camera about the deep state.
Trying to kill us all.
I tried melatonin and other sleeping supplements, but nothing helped.
I thought this was just going to be my new normal and that I'd have to accept my mornings will just always be less than ideal.
That is, until I tried magnesium breakthrough.
Ever since I started adding magnesium breakthrough to my nightly routine, I've been able to quiet my mind and get the best sleep ever.
No more miserable, groggy mornings.
What I love about it is that unlike other magnesium supplements that might be giving you one to two forms of magnesium, magnesium breakthrough contains all seven forms of magnesium designed to help calm your mind and help you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed.
If you're anything like me and you're busy, evenings keep your brain far too active well into the night or even if you just struggle with waking up in the morning.
Don't miss out on the most relaxing sleep ever with Magnesium Breakthrough.
For an exclusive offer for my listeners, go to buyoptimizers.com forward slash Anna.
But make sure it's all lowercase, guys.
It is case-sensitive.
Go to buyoptimizers.com forward slash Anna.
The link is in the description box below.
And use promo code ANNA10 to All right, guys.
So like I said, I don't have time to get to the last clip I wanted to get to.
It's from last week because I didn't get to it on Friday either.
You know how I am.
I get to talking and I don't shut up.
Oh, somebody said happy birthday, Anna.
Faux triple jab stab gave me $20.
Thank you.
It's not my birthday, just to be clear, but thank you.
Thank you very much.
Still nice of you to donate $20 to the network.
Appreciate that.
But yes, guys, I do have to get going.
It is 10.01.
Really appreciate you being here tonight.
Please make sure you rumble on your way out.
Hit that thumbs up button and also share the link on your social media.
Subscribe to the Stu Peters Network if you don't already.
If you don't, you're missing out on great content, not just from myself.
But from Stu and all the other great hosts here.
So please do consider subscribing as well.
And on that note, I will see you back here tomorrow for another episode of Wrong Thing Primetime right here on the Stu Peters Network and also on my show tomorrow at 3 p.m.