All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 4, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
55:10
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Epstein Docs LIMITED HANGOUT, US BOMBS Iraq, BRICS Abandons Dollar
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Rainbow Gestapo, the good-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
Stare at the sun just for kicks all by myself.
I lose track of time so I might be past my pride.
People say we need to, you know, make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Oh my, I feel just like I don't try.
I look so good I might die.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Curl down, sway into my own sound.
Flashes in my face now.
All I know is everybody loves me.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Everybody loves me.
I've had this story for three years.
I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts.
We would not put it on the air.
First of all, I was told, who's Jeffrey Epstein?
No one knows who that is.
This is a stupid story.
Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways.
We were so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview Kate and Will.
That also quashed the story.
And then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in it because of the planes.
She told me everything.
She had pictures.
She had everything.
She was in hiding for 12 years.
We convinced her to come out.
We convinced her to talk to us.
It was unbelievable what we had.
Clinton.
We had everything.
I tried for three years to get it on to no avail and now it's all coming out and it's like these new revelations and I freaking had all of it.
I'm so pissed right now.
Every day I get more and more pissed because I'm just like, oh my god.
What we had was unreal.
Other women backing it up.
Hey.
Yep.
Brad Edwards, the attorney, three years ago saying, like, there will come a day when we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known.
I had it all three years ago.
So do I think he was killed?
A hundred percent.
Yes, I do.
Because he made his whole living blackmailing people.
Yeah. .
There were a lot of men in those plains, a lot of men who visited that island, a lot of powerful men who came into that apartment.
Good evening and welcome to the Millstone Report.
I'm your host, Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much for being with us.
So the world was waiting for the Epstein files to be released.
And last night it finally happened, and already there is a flurry of mixed reviews and dashed expectations, quite frankly.
Several of the names that were in court documents pertaining to Virginia Guthrie's case against Epstein were already known Epstein associates, names like Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clinton.
There are also new names like Oprah Winfrey, who already was known to rub elbows with the likes of Harvey Weinstein, so it's not that much of a shock that she's also a degenerate.
Several online have noticed the irony that way back in the day Oprah made a documentary about Michael Jackson being a pedophile and have noted the hypocrisy.
Another name in the documents that is extremely puzzling is the late theoretical physicist and quadriplegic Stephen Hawking.
The documents allege Hawking participated in Epstein-facilitated underage orgies.
This raises questions that honestly should probably just be pushed out of our minds forever.
However, one observation, bear with me.
In his recent Netflix comedy special, comedian Dave Chappelle poked fun at former Congressman Madison Cawthorn for being in a wheelchair.
Now, this really isn't that much of a surprise because for the most part, Dave Chappelle makes fun of everybody.
In his world, nothing is out of bounds, which is why the left hates Chappelle so much.
He is known for constantly ripping on the rainbow brown shirts and trans people specifically.
But back to Cawthorn.
Here on the Millstone Report, I've covered Cawthorn's comments about his claims that he was invited to sex orgies and drug-fueled parties.
Sound familiar?
His comments were one of the reasons former Speaker McCarthy targeted him for electoral defeat and was successful in unseating the congressman from North Carolina.
But in his recent comedy special, Dave Chappelle not only made fun of Cawthorne for being disabled and confined to a wheelchair, he also scoffed at Cawthorne's claims of being invited to sex parties.
Chappelle said he thought Cawthorn was lying and even compared him to race hoaxer Jussie Smollett.
So the idea that anyone would invite a man in a wheelchair to a sex party was not believable, according to Dave Chappelle.
However...
With the new information that quadriplegic Stephen Hawking participated in Epstein-level depravity, well, maybe Dave Chappelle should update his material.
Recently, Cawthorn responded to Dave Chappelle's jokes at his expense over at TMZ in an interview there.
Watch this.
If we're living in a free society, especially if you're a public figure, people are going to make fun of your flaws and things that you do that are unique to you.
And obviously, the fact that I'm in a wheelchair is a very unique fact about who I am.
I'm not going to get upset if when someone's imitating me, they sit down and act like they're rolling their wheels.
That's just what I do every single day.
So would you say that you like being roasted by Dave?
Oh, I love being roasted by Dave.
Are you kidding?
That's my favorite comic.
And I mean, that's it was phenomenal.
I thought it was great.
You know, obviously, you know, it's more fun if you can go back and forth.
But I mean, he's a hysterical comic.
And I mean, Yeah, what was the main gist there?
He's like, why would somebody invite a guy in a wheelchair to a sex party?
And then, you know, you kind of build that out.
Like, that's a completely understandable question to ask.
I mean, a completely understandable question to ask, right?
But again, now with Stephen Hawking.
You know what I think we should just say is Madison Cawthorn was right, especially in light of the sodomite Senate sex tape video that we all had to watch.
Well, I don't know.
It'll burn your eyes out if you watch it.
So it's clear that if you go look at the documents, there are still plenty of redactions, though.
Plenty of information.
Powerful people want to keep hidden.
Now, some have posed the question, how much money did it take for Bill Gates to keep his name out of these new revelations, these new disclosures from the court?
Although we already know, again, we already know that Bill Gates hung around with scum like Jeffrey Epstein.
So the question is, is this release really just a giant distraction and what the Intel community calls a limited hangout?
Look at this tweet from our friends over at the National File.
So National File tweeting this, The client list is meant to placate us into sitting down and shutting up.
We won't do it.
And Frankie Stocks basically saying, look, the Epstein client list release is a limited hangout.
The really juicy info looks like this.
I mean, it's no question that there are redactions there.
No question at all.
So, the really juicy info is all blacked out.
And it is meant to play Cadiz.
It is meant so that we just basically sit down and shut up.
So, you know, we're going to see this more and more in the news as our nation leaps into decline and collapse.
And that's my fear about this.
Is this a distraction keeping us from realizing a complete financial collapse is imminent?
And honestly, anytime stories like these grab our national conscience the way the Epstein disclosures have, we would do well to ask ourselves, what else is going on that the powers that be do not want us to notice?
Currently, the USA lives inside a financial iron curtain.
I've been saying this specific phrase for a while now.
We are in the midst of a financial iron curtain.
The dollar is facing collapse as countries have begun to abandon it.
A couple of weeks before Christmas, Saudi Arabia stopped using the dollar.
And I wonder if anybody even recognized that.
Did you hear about that?
They stopped using the dollar in their trade with other countries.
The BRICS nations are rising and they make up a massive amount of the world's GDP. The power structure and dominance of corrupt Western financial institutions is being seriously threatened and you haven't heard about it, most likely.
And if you're a student of recent history, and any student of recent history knows this, they know what tends to happen when countries threaten the USA's dollar dominance.
War.
That's what happens.
The proxy war in Ukraine has failed, for the most part.
The neocons could still try and escalate things with another version of the Nord Stream pipeline bombing.
But right now, most of the lying media has shifted to the Middle East propaganda in an attempt to start a war to save the Western financial system, which currently benefits the secular nation-state of Israel.
According to reports last week, Israel attacked Syria and an Iranian military advisor was killed there.
This week, Israel attacked Lebanon and Iran.
Now, this just came out that ISIS is now claiming responsibility for the attack in Iran, but who created ISIS? The West did.
Yeah, you guessed it.
The Iran attack reportedly killed hundreds of people gathered at a memorial for the anniversary of the assassination of Iran's Qasem Soleimani.
And this morning, news broke that the United States government bombed Iraq.
Have you heard about this?
Not just Iraq, not just some country road somewhere.
Baghdad, in fact.
Reuters reports, quote, the U.S. carried out a strike in Baghdad against a militia leader.
The U.S. military has carried out a strike in Baghdad against an Iraqi militia leader it blames for attacks against U.S. forces in the country, killing him and another person.
A U.S. official told Reuters on Thursday, end quote.
So like many of you, I... I'm not one to just buy anything the mainstream media is selling, so I did a little research because the Middle East seems like a powder keg ready to explode.
Again, remember my premise.
Anytime the U.S. dollar is threatened, war seems to be the solution.
It's the solution used to preserve those in power.
So, did you know?
I didn't know this.
Did you know that effective January 1st, ExxonMobil handed over control of the West Kerna 1 oil field to PetroChina?
That's exactly what happened.
And again, I quote from a Reuters article, quote, End quote.
So, are we to believe this is just a coincidence?
Western oil interests change hands in Iraq, goes to China, they're handed over to the Chinese, and now the U.S. government and Israel are back to bombing Iraq?
I mean, what year is this?
2004?
So I kept digging some more, and I found another Reuters article that claims effective January 1st, 2024, Iraqi banks...
We'll ban the U.S. dollar in their country.
According to reports, Iraqi institutions will or already have abandoned trade with the U.S. dollar inside the country.
Let's go to the screen if you don't believe me, because I do want to back all of this up.
So here we go.
This is the first story that you need to do.
Again, a Reuters article.
We have this here.
U.S. carries out strike in Baghdad against militia leader.
There you go.
You see it right there.
And then we have this story here.
Again, ExxonMobil hands over operations.
There's that story.
Again, this Reuters piece, exclusive Iraq to end all dollar cash withdrawals by January 1st, 2024, Central Bank officials.
Now, again, this piece here was October 5th, so keep that in mind.
I can't find anything at the moment that says it actually has happened.
And, you know, bombings from the U.S. government may tend to change their mind.
And then we have this.
This is a Twitter over on X. A spokesman for the Commander-in-Chief of the Iraqi Armed Forces in a blatant attack in violation of the sovereignty and security of Iraq.
A drone carried out an act no different from terrorist acts targeting one of the security headquarters in the capital of Baghdad today.
Now, have you heard this?
What are we going to do?
Are we going to invade Afghanistan again, too?
Might as well.
The U.S. government is now back to bombing Iraq.
In the midst of all of the tensions that are escalating in the Middle East surrounding Israel.
Somebody else, just as I predicted or warned, the U.S. is now bombing Iraq.
How many countries in the U.S. or in the United States of Israel, how many countries is the United States of Israel going to bomb?
Palestine, Yemen, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran.
And here's a photo from one of the drone strikes.
This happened today.
This happened today on January the 4th.
And then we have some video from it that you see there, and there's more tweets about it.
So it's just absolutely incredible to me that this is where we are, and you're not hearing anything about it.
Nothing about it.
And you also have, real quick, let's go back to the screen, because you've got to see this article as well.
Saudi Arabia, this happened first of the year, officially joins BRICS. Okay?
That's also a key indicator here when we talk about the dollar being rejected.
As you saw, Saudi Arabia now officially has joined BRICS, something that we were told was never going to happen.
I've talked to BRICS naysayers who say, oh, no, no.
You wouldn't have to worry about BRICS. One of the guys I talked to said, well, if Saudi Arabia joins, we should take it seriously.
Well, here we are.
So it's not a coincidence that we are itching for a new full-out war now.
Do you understand?
In the Middle East.
Because, I mean, it's like the global power, whoever the global power, the number one power in the world is, they always want to control everything that goes on in the Middle East.
Anytime a nation, particularly a third-world nation, tries to push away from the U.S. dollar, war is visited on that country.
This is a historical fact.
However, this time, things may be different.
What happens when it's not just Iraq trying to move away from the petrodollar?
It's Russia.
I mean, we're told Russia's the pinnacle of evil in the modern world, right?
This 1980s aversion to Soviet communism, Rocky IV, and Red Dawn.
You also have countries like China in BRICS now, which owns U.S. politicians.
And again, Saudi Arabia, which is a powerhouse in the Middle East.
All of these larger countries moving against the dollar all at the same time?
From where I sit is unprecedented.
So the real question is how desperate?
How far will these moral degenerates that hold the keys of Western finance go to keep so many other countries in the world in line, to get them to toe the line?
The phrase caged animal comes to mind.
So, that is my feeble attempt that I submit to you.
It is an attempt to show you that while we may be missing the bigger picture here, while we all geek out on redacted Epstein court documents, While it may be intriguing, the United States dollar is on the verge of collapse and our wicked leaders want to spill our blood to make war so they can continue to live with no accountability and promote evil of every kind, all while not caring at all about the average American.
It's no secret that what Western finance has become is a tyranny, not just to other countries, where we print as much money as we want and we require they have our dollars in their bank accounts in their vaults in order for their currency to be worth anything.
But just think about the inflation that we're facing here, just the inflation alone in our country.
And they don't care that the middle class is shrinking at record rates because of this inflation and everything else they do.
So yeah, the world is rejecting the dollar dominance, and it is something that we must take note of in light of all of this.
We've got a great show for the rest of the show for you.
Coming up here, when we take a break, we're going to be listening to Stu Peters' interview, Jeff Younger from the other day, one of his shows.
We've got a great Stu Peters' show coming up for you at the top of the hour, where Stu is going to be sitting down, and he is going to be interviewing Clint Russell, going to be talking about Donald Trump.
Getting kicked off this ballot in Maine, in Colorado, and just what lengths will the Democrats go to to stop Trump from being on the ballot?
And there's other interesting things afoot here.
You have people who not just want to get rid of Trump off the ballot, Or get Trump off the ballot.
They also want just Republicans in general.
They don't even want you to have the option.
They want that completely gone as well.
And so we will talk about that when we come back.
We're not ready for break yet because Chris Christie's in the news.
I don't know if you know this.
And he's hard to miss, Chris Christie, from being in the news.
This is what Chris Christie said concerning sodomy.
Well, sodomite mirage.
You may know the term as sodomite marriage or gay marriage or homosexual marriage, but he was asked a question about his previous support for normal marriage.
Believe it or not, Chris Christie, the governor of New Jersey, just like Obama before he was elected in 08, used to support the idea that marriage is between a man and a woman, and it shouldn't be between two dudes or two women.
Here's Chris Christie at a campaign event.
Watch.
My name is Camden.
I'm a high schooler from Maine.
So you've said that you believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, yet many young Americans from my generation believe strongly in support of gay marriage.
I was wondering if, as president, your viewpoint on that would change, knowing that many young Americans do not believe in the same thing that you believe in.
It already has changed.
I mean, look, I think this is generational.
I think you put your finger on it, right?
When I was governor and I was taking that position, I took a lot of heat from my kids because my kids were older at the time.
And they were giving me a hard time about it.
And I told them, I'm governor, you're not.
So I get to take the positions I want to take.
And I don't regret doing that.
But what I know is that society has changed.
And what people are accepting in our country now is different than when I was growing up, certainly than when I was your age.
And, you know, I don't have any objection to it any longer.
In the end, I think I've been convinced.
And, you know, that's part of being a thinking, breathing human being, I hope.
Let's stop for a second.
And I've been convinced.
What have you been convinced of, exactly?
I mean, to put it in honest terms, Chris Christie has been convinced that...
Sodomy in a relationship that's based on sodomy is just fine.
And they need to be treated exactly like people who, a man and a woman are together, who have the possibility of creating life.
Two women, two men don't have that possibility.
I mean, just think about it exactly.
He's been convinced.
And, you know, these people, they say all this, you know, with a suit and tie on, and they're running for office, and it's somehow like...
It's so hilarious to me.
What he's actually been convinced of is something really disgusting.
And yet, I've been convinced of it.
I'm a thinking, breathing person.
I'm civilized.
And it's laughable.
Because everything really around him is a facade.
And it's just so crazy to me how...
They are so detached from reality.
And look, I know we may be in a bubble ourselves, a conservative bubble ourselves, but that is crazy talk.
That is absolutely crazy talk to people who understand that reality.
The norms of society are under assault, and we are okaying and excusing every kind of evil, every kind of wickedness, every kind of moral degeneracy.
We are excusing it because we're in a suit and tie.
And I referenced this quote the other day on the show, on the Millstone Report.
And it's a quote from Charles Dickens.
Well, no, it's actually quotes from C.S. Lewis who references Charles Dickens when he says, you know, the greatest evils are not done in those sore dens that Dickens loved to paint, meaning Charles Dickens, but they are signed, minuted, moved, carried in well-lit, well-carpeted rooms by men, you know, with suits on and smooth, shaven cheeks who do not have to raise their voice.
That's when the greatest evil is done.
And that's a quote from C.S. Lewis' Screwtape Letters.
And if you've never read the Screwtape Letters, I encourage you to read the Screwtape Letters because it gives you such an insight into the enemy, meaning the devil, Satan, and his minions, and how our souls are the object of and the debate of a cosmic war going on.
And it's absolutely fascinating if you've never read it.
Back to Chris Christie.
He's come around to the idea of sodomy.
I get to take the positions I want to take, and I don't regret doing that.
But what I know is that society has changed.
And what people are accepting in our country now is different than when I was growing up, certainly than when I was your age.
And, you know, I don't have any objection to it any longer.
In the end, I think I've been convinced.
And, you know, that's part of being a thinking, breathing human being, I hope, is that you can hold certain opinions at one time and hold them genuinely.
And I did.
And I felt there were other ways to be able to deal with same-sex relationships other than just marriage.
And that was the argument I made at the time, was that we can accommodate this in other ways.
But you know what?
I was wrong.
You know what?
I was wrong.
Sodomite marriage is actually a good thing.
It's good for you, and it's good for society.
For me, it's still...
It was a process I had to go through to change the way I've been raised.
Yeah, because you've been raised saying, you know, here's two gay guys, they want to get married.
Ooh!
That's how he's been raised.
But we're civilized now.
I mean, we're...
You know, we're evolved now, right?
I mean, we're not like the pagan nations used to be, right?
We're not like the Aztecs that sacrificed and pulled people's hearts out at the top of ziggurats.
I mean, we just do it quietly in an abortion clinic now, right?
And so, you know, the pagan societies of the past, like Sodom and Gomorrah, that embraced, you know, just this rampant homosexuality, and go read the account of Lot and how just absolutely animalistic those people are described as, how they're literally wanting to rape anything, including the angels sent to protect Lot.
I wouldn't do that anymore.
Instead, we will sign it, we will minute it, we will put it in a law.
We'll let that behavior continue, but we'll pass a law, a piece of paper that says it's okay, or we'll have nine Supreme Court justices make up a right that's nowhere in the Constitution, but...
We've come around to it.
We're logical thinkers now, right?
We're beyond our carnal instincts of the past.
We've got it figured out where other civilizations Failed.
Both from a family perspective and what my mother and father taught me and felt, and also from a religious perspective and what I'm a Catholic and what my church taught me to believe.
Here it is.
But over time, look, this past week or two, Pope Francis is now allowing blessings of same-sex couples.
There you go.
Even the church is changing.
A millstone for the Pope.
A millstone for the Pope.
We have a wicked leader here, Christy, essentially saying, look, sodomite marriage is great.
It's good for us.
It's something we need to do.
Because he's for it, right?
Obviously, you wouldn't be for it if it wasn't something you thought was good.
And he's citing the Pope and his recent declaration that I'll bless sodomite couples.
That's not marriage, though, but for all intents and purposes, that's exactly what it is.
He is now using the Pope's authority.
He's citing the Pope's ecclesiastical authority, whatever authority that has.
I know different people don't think it has any authority.
I'm a Protestant myself.
But he's citing that within his church hierarchy as reason why.
As a supporting argument as to why he's right.
And society has changed.
And we've got to change with the time.
You know, I think this is part of...
Just being honest with people.
You can hold certain beliefs firmly.
But then, as you watch more and more evidence come in, and you meet more and more people, and you listen to them and get to know them.
So he met more and more people that are gay, that, you know, participate in this act of sodomy.
And he met them and said, you know what?
I've got to let you guys, you know, we need the state to recognize what you're doing is perfectly fine.
Your opinion can change, and mine has changed over time on this.
And so I don't look back and have regret because I know that I didn't do what I did out of any sense of prejudice or bias.
It was just what I believed could be done and should be done.
And even back then, I used to say, look, my argument with the legislature was that we shouldn't decide this.
Put it on the ballot.
Let people decide.
And if they vote to have same-sex marriage, then I'll enforce the law like I'll enforce every other law.
But you're absolutely correct in my personal opinion.
You stated correctly.
I thought that marriage should just be between a man and a woman.
That's the way I was taught.
That's the way I was brought up.
And that's what I believed.
But your generation has changed my mind.
And I'm sure that there were lots of things that my parents Tried to push on me that I didn't like.
I can't remember it at the moment.
Chris Christie, your parents were right, and you are wrong.
But I'm sure there were, because my dad's watching too, so I don't want to make this a tough night for him.
I'm sure your dad's really, really, really proud.
And we changed their minds on certain things, right?
So I think that's part of the role of the next generation, is to craft the world in the way they think.
The arrogance and the pride.
Wow.
We are a prideful, prideful country.
And we think that we know better.
Man, that is just incredible to me.
Do you know what that is, though?
That is the fruit of rotten secularism.
I posted this.
I first saw this from Ben Zizeloft over on Twitter.
Chris Christie says he was wrong to oppose same-sex marriage while he was governor of New Jersey, citing his Roman Catholicism and recent moves from Pope Francis.
This is the rotten fruits of neutral Republican secularism.
Here you go.
You want more of this?
You know, I mean, five years, ten years, you'll have a similar situation happen.
I mean, I don't know what Chris Christie thinks about trans people and transing kids.
But if we lose the transing kids argument, let's say, you'll have politicians like Chris Christie or Mitt Romney or the late John McCain or let's just go with Eyepatch McCain, Dan Crenshaw, who will be against the transing of children.
But you know what?
When we continue to lose the cultural battles over and over again because we're following people like a Dan Crenshaw, 20 years from now, they'll be running for president.
They'll get the same answer from a purple-haired trans kid that's somehow happy with their life, an adult that was trans.
And they'll say, you know, you used to be against trans people.
Well, you know, your generation has taught me that, you know, kids...
We used to think this backward notion that kids couldn't have a sexual identity up until some arbitrary age.
But now we know that kids can have sexual identities and those must be respected.
And regardless of what their parents think, unless the parents actually want it to take place and they want to facilitate your transition and then everything is fine...
That's where this is headed, folks.
That's exactly what we're going to get the more this continues.
The more this continues.
So, we could maybe do something different.
Maybe reject this idea that you're not supposed to talk about religion.
In politics, because it's taboo, maybe we should embrace a philosophy that says if you're talking about politics, you must talk about God and theology and religion, specifically Christianity, from the Bible, from a biblical worldview.
I think so.
I think so.
I think we should look to the Bible to see what God thinks about things and order our civic life around that.
That's what I think.
And that's not a controversial thought up until about 80 years ago.
Unbelievable that this is where we are.
We've got to take a break.
Coming up, we're going to listen to...
This is Stu Peters interviewing Jeff Younger from the broadcast the other day on the Stu Peters Show.
And there is a great new Stu Peters Show coming up at the top of this hour that you don't want to miss.
We'll be back here in just a moment.
Inclusion is a national security imperative.
We fight today and we are going to fight in the future using brain power.
And if that brain, who's going to revolutionize the way we fight in space, we fight in cyber, just happens to be in a trans body, you should want them all serving alongside me.
And for your organizations, it's the same way.
Those perspectives that we get from a diverse set of individuals, it's been talked about on stage a lot regarding the science behind high-performing teams.
We need those perspectives.
But it's inclusion that actually drives that.
Because you can bring people in and if they don't feel safe to speak up, if they don't feel safe to bring their full selves to work, You're not going to get the value of the diversity.
So for us, it is absolutely critical to drive our future success as an organization and potentially on the battlefield.
And I think it's the same way for all of you because we can't leave that talent that is going to revolutionize the way we do business behind.
So that's what a trillion dollars a year in taxpayer funding buys you.
It gets you mentally ill, tranny freak shows declaring that inclusion is the core value of the military.
Whenever you read about the US military failing in Iraq or failing in Afghanistan or whatever dumb war our Zionist leaders rope us into next, remember that mentally ill man's face.
That's the face of our current war-losing military.
Mentally ill men in a dress parading around pretending to be soldiers.
It's ridiculous.
Instead of war winners, our military is led by lunatics who want to hire and promote other lunatics who will indulge their depraved fetishes.
Jeff Younger is the father of James Younger.
He's become a major figure working against the trans child health care abomination in Texas, and he joins us now.
Jeff, I mean, wherever you look, This tranny freak show, transgender indoctrination, just incessant push is everywhere.
It's infiltrated everywhere in our society, and now our military is being run by these freaks.
I mean, to what end?
Well, I think there's a goal to completely break down social cohesion and social mores in Western societies.
And it includes breakdown of the family, breakdown of religious belief, but also to literally demoralize a society.
That is, remove morals.
From the society, because it turns out that in order to understand reality and to understand what's actually happening in the world requires a moral system.
And by removing any moral system, it allows them to propagandize people in ways that were just not possible in the past.
Why are people so easily susceptible to this?
I mean, they're just influenced by it.
They're just like, yep, this is okay.
You know, I mean, at minimum, they're like, well, you know, I don't really approve of that, but, you know, that's their business.
You know, I mean, what happened to, you know, God-fearing, brave Christians?
Is everyone just a coward now?
Well, I mean, and this is not going to be a popular view, perhaps, with many of your listeners, but I actually blame the Reformation for the rise of a lot of these liberal ideas.
The fragmentation and pietism, the idea that one could be an individual practicing Christianity rather than in a community with moral standards, That people are being held accountable with.
The breakdown of that really started with the idea that Christianity was something that obtained to individuals rather than to communities.
I make this comment often.
Christ did not found a religion.
He founded a community of believers.
It was a community that he founded.
And the breakdown of that community is an essential aspect of social control.
Really, if you look in the world, it's the American middle class is the last place in the world that believes in free speech, gun rights, believes in individual liberties, all the things that we support.
Really, the elites in the West don't believe it.
The people in the lower classes who are in government welfare don't believe any of this.
It's only the middle classes.
And that's who they really targeted.
All right, welcome back to the Milstow Report today.
Thanks so much for being with us.
My name is Paul Harrell.
So yeah, that was a very interesting clip there about the infiltration of our military.
And you know, you've got to wonder, there are these rumors out there that they're going to start recruiting these illegal immigrants.
And they're going to allow this mass influx of military-aged men coming across the border to invading this country.
They're going to give them guns and give them authority over you and me.
Right?
So you may have, you know, you may be getting put in a boxcar by, you know, Eduardo and being supervised by some purple-haired, you know, transgeneral.
I don't know.
Who knows?
That could easily be the situation.
I will say I'll push back on what Jeff Younger said there during the break that he kind of faults the Reformation for.
He doesn't know he's going to say kind of.
He says he faults the Reformation for this pushback.
Yeah.
I respectfully would disagree with that.
Obviously, if it wasn't for the Reformation, the United States of America would not have existed, wouldn't have been founded at all.
There would be no people here, right, who were seeking religious freedom and being able to worship the way they wanted to worship in a community, by the way.
Anyway, so that is fascinating stuff.
If you want to see the rest of that video, you need to go and go to this Rumble channel that you're on right now, and it's available.
In a standalone clip, as well as the full show from yesterday over at Stu Peter.
Stu Peter's coming up here at the top of the hour, so you don't want to miss that.
He's going to be sitting down with Clint Russell talking about Trump being removed from the ballot in Maine.
That Democrat Secretary of State, Sheena Bellows is her name.
And, you know, the Democrats are essentially trying to rig the 2024 election.
I mean, there's no doubt about that.
We already knew they...
We did it in 2020, obviously, but they're just out in the open, essentially trying to rig the election right in front of our faces, and so that's very, very sad.
So we were playing for you earlier.
We were playing for you earlier this Chris Christie clip, and...
I think this is good to couch it this way.
Chris Christie is essentially bowing to wokeism.
And I've got a comparison clip, but I'm just going to play a little bit of this.
I know we heard it on the other side of the break, but just a little bit more of Chris Christie.
My name is Camden.
I'm a high schooler from Maine.
So you've said that you believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Yet many young Americans from my generation believe strongly in support of gay marriage.
I was wondering if, as president, your viewpoint on that would change, knowing that many young Americans do not believe in the same thing that you believe in.
Yeah, it already has changed.
I mean, look, I think this is...
So I want you to understand, real quick, listen to a few more seconds.
Chris Christie is bowing to the religion of It's generational.
I think you put your finger on it, right?
When I was governor and I was taking that position, I took a lot of heat from my kids because my kids were older at the time and they were giving me a hard time about it.
I told them I'm governor.
You're not.
So I get to take the positions I want to take.
And I don't regret doing that.
But what I know is that society has changed.
Yeah.
And what people...
All right.
There you go.
So society has changed, he says.
Society is different.
It's changed.
It's different.
We've got to accept sodomy now.
And I was wrong about all that.
I took that position.
It was probably politically popular.
You know, obviously, you remember when Chris Christie had a national profile that was positive among Con Inc.
and conservatives and talk radio?
He was the Republican New Jersey governor that told it like it was, right?
I mean, you know, he's essentially like a...
A walking, breathing Luca Brazzi from the Godfather movies, right?
Like, that's who Chris Christie is.
And now that things have changed, and again, fast forward 20 years, and you'll have people like Dan Crenshaw saying the same thing, but it'll be about transing kids.
I promise you, it'll be about transing kids.
Well, I used to think that transing kids was wrong, but now, you know, I was just stupid back then.
Now compare that to what Vivek Ramaswamy has said.
Vivek Ramaswamy was asked to denounce white supremacy and he said this.
I'm not going to recite some catechism for you.
I'm against vicious racial discrimination in this country, so I'm not pledging allegiance to your new religion of modern wokeism, which absolutely fits the test.
I'm not going to bend the knee to your religion.
I'm sorry.
I'm not asking you to bend the knee to mine, and I'm not going to bend the knee to yours.
But do I condemn vicious racial discrimination?
Yes, I do.
Am I going to play your silly game of gotcha?
No, I'm not.
And frankly, this is why people have lost...
Trust.
And I know you're going to go print the headline tomorrow.
I already know this.
We already know how your game works.
Vikramaswamy refuses to condemn white supremacy because you asked a stupid question.
The reality is, I condemn vicious racial discrimination in this country, but the kind of vicious and systematic racial discrimination we see today is discrimination on the basis of race in a very different direction.
Against white people.
You know what the best way is to end discrimination on the basis of race?
Stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Do that and we're going to move this country forward.
Well, yeah, I mean, what he could say there, and this is Vivek, I think, doing a good job of combating these false presuppositions of the left, lies that they put forward in their questions.
Their questions are based on lies.
And he says it.
He doesn't want to say white people, though.
But instead of saying the general idea, like, we just need to condemn all forms of racism, what's the issue today?
Well, today the issue, as I talked about on the Milstone Report last night, is...
White Christian men.
They believe, the left believes, that reporter believes that white Christian men are the cause of all the world's problems.
So the bias in this country at this point, and I mean, you know, growing up, I never thought that was the case, but it clearly is now because you just have to look at the reports.
You look at the articles about how maybe there'll be a future someday without white men in America.
That's obviously...
And honestly, to think that there's not...
When you have the colleges and the universities which are permeated with this bias, permeated with this racism, you would be crazy not to think that there wasn't going to be some sort of counter-backlash.
And maybe that's all by design because we...
What's the counter-back...
What's the reaction...
Of the federal government, of Joe Biden's personal police force, the FBI, what's their reaction of our taking notice of the anti-whiteism that's all throughout our country?
They start putting out bulletins saying that white supremacy and white terrorism are the greatest threat to national security that we have at the moment, right?
So it's, in a way, very possible it's being used to out people that they want to take out anyway, because, again, they're...
You know, anti-white Christian men are the target here.
And I don't care whether you're black or white or brown or anything in between.
That's how we're going to unite this country.
You people have been responsible for dividing this country to a breaking point, creating a projection of national division.
I meet people from the south side of Chicago to meetings like this one of every shade of melanin, multiple from man to woman, doesn't make a difference, who are hungry for reviving unity in this country.
And you, with your catechism that you try to get politicians to whatever fake headline you're going to print on the basis of this conversation tomorrow, that's what's dividing this country to a breaking point.
Shame on you.
Look people in the eye and tell them what you've actually failed to tell them for the last five years.
Own the accountability for your own failures as the media.
That's how we rebuild trust in this country.
And until then, I don't have a lot of patience to play the games.
That's very good.
I mean, I tell you what, it's refreshing to hear people articulate what we're thinking and confront the media.
Something that Donald Trump was very good at, but he's less and less.
He's running his campaign without engaging in the other primary candidates because he's so far up in the polls.
I don't blame him for that.
It's just...
There is like a, Vivek is, for whatever reason, I don't fully trust Vivek, I don't trust any of them, but he does appear to be filling the MAGA gap right now, you know, as Trump is just kind of waiting to get past the Republican primaries.
That is, if they don't rig it against him.
Okay, there's always that possibility that they are going to do that.
Not just rig the general, but rig the primary and start laying the groundwork for him.
We saw this coming.
We saw this coming that DeSantis could just come in and shock everybody.
Or Nikki Haley could just surprise everybody.
On a different note, I found this very interesting.
We've been talking a lot on this program about almost every show...
You know, I guess a couple of nights ago, we were comparing the empty churches that we have in this country versus the full football stadiums, right?
And if you look up, you know, in the Northeast, many of the mainline denominations, they are now, their church is a beautiful, beautiful mainline denomination churches.
That have slowly allowed women to preach, and now they fully support sodomites and marriage, mirage.
And so those churches now are museums.
Nobody goes to them.
The denominations caved, and they quit holding to the authority of Scripture, and they made excuses for it, and now you have hardly anybody going to church there.
And so people have asked, well, what is the problem?
And the infection is still ongoing.
So the denominations out there, the Christian churches out there, whether it's the Catholic Church or whether it's other denominations like the Southern Baptist Convention...
But they're also dealing with issues trying to fight back the wokeism from infesting their church, right?
And so there are—it just happens to be you have websites, for example, like a website called the Gospel Coalition that used to be a website that Christians would go to and they would trust it, but it got more and more—it's gotten more and more woke— It's not that every article they publish is necessarily woke, but they give platform to a lot of evangelical leaders that are pushing everything left and are actually punching people on the right saying, whoa, whoa, whoa, what are you doing?
We cannot allow the culture to dictate to us what it is we're going to do and preach.
We can't do that.
We cannot compromise.
We cannot sacrifice the purity of the church for some peace that isn't a peace.
And again, it really isn't a peace if you realize that.
That they're never going to appease the pagans because they want to put Christians in boxcars.
I digress.
Stephen Wolf, who is the author of a book called The Case for Christian Nationalism, posted this.
It's a tweet from a guy named Rob Henderson on...
A guy by the name of Isaiah Berlins talking about a certain type of philosophy.
And Stephen Wolf here says, Evangelical elite political theology functions for the same end.
And I find this quote fascinating.
Again, it's not specifically addressing the big evangelical leaders, but it is, I think, applicable.
This was so fascinating to me.
It's like one of the first things I read this morning when I got up.
What occurred was a kind of retreat in depth.
It sometimes happens in human history, though parallels may be dangerous, that when the natural road toward human fulfillment is blocked, human beings retreat into themselves.
Now, you could even take this just with anything we do in conservative government or the conservative movement, right?
We constantly move the goalposts when we lose.
This is what Khan Inc.
does as well, not just evangelicals.
I'm going to preface that, woke evangelical leaders, because there are some that are not woke.
Human beings retreat into themselves, become involved in themselves, and try to create inwardly that world which some evil fate has denied them externally.
This is certainly what happened in ancient Greece when Alexander the Great began to destroy the city-states and the Stoics and the Epicureans began to preach a new morality of personal salvation, which took the form of saying that politics was unimportant.
Does this sound familiar to any of you out there in the church today?
That politics isn't important.
Civil life was unimportant.
All the great ideals held up by Pericles...
Plato and Aristotle were trivial as if nothing before the imperative need for personal individual salvation.
This was a very grand form of sour grapes.
If you cannot obtain from the world that which you really desire, you must teach yourself not to want it.
If you cannot get what you want, you must teach yourself to want what you can get.
This is a very frequent form of spiritual retreat in depth into a kind of inner citadel in which you try to lock yourself up against all the fearful ills of the world.
Wow.
Again, I think on at least some level, I certainly have done that.
Have you done that?
I'm not just saying like with the, not necessarily within the church, but with anything, right?
I mean, it's the sicker and sicker and sicker our society gets.
I mean, we do have this tendency to just say, well, whatever, you know, it's nonsense anyway.
The jaded, you know, the jaded boomer, you know, Oh, they're all corrupt.
And they are all corrupt.
But we use the idea that they're all corrupt to say, ah, there's nothing we need to do about it.
There's nothing we can do about it, right?
Obviously, the first thing that you need to do is pray, but...
And pray for a miracle, but my goodness, that's just incredible to me.
And that is, in many ways, I think what Stephen Wolf is saying there is just so spot on.
It's just crazy to me how spot on that was when it comes to...
Specifically what happens with how wokeness is invading the Christian institutions that we have left, right?
There is a war on.
It is a targeted war.
And if you say anything that's truthful, people will say, well, what about your tone?
I don't like your tone.
Okay, so speaking of a tone, way back in the 90s, you guys are going to love this.
We're about to run out of time.
Way back in the 90s, do you guys remember an Atlanta Braves pitcher by the name of John Rocker?
There was an Atlanta Braves pitcher by the name of John Rocker.
He got in an immense amount of trouble because he said he would never be traded to a New York team.
He didn't want to go to the Yankees and he didn't want to go to the Mets.
You know why?
Because it was the 90s version of wokeism and he did not want to take the train and be amongst a bunch of freaks.
And ESPN and everybody at the time, they lost their minds.
So Peter Quinonez He says that sometimes he thinks about the pitcher from Statesboro, Georgia, and how he was asking pertinent questions when few were noticing.
John Rocker certainly noticed what was up.
Let's listen.
Rocker's remarks on our show back in November may have outraged Met fans.
It was the comments he made to Sports Illustrated writer Jeff Perlman that caused a national outcry.
Rocker told SI he would never play for a New York team.
Here's a recap of his most inflammatory remarks.
Quote, imagine having to take the number seven train to the ballpark, looking like you're riding through Beirut next to some kid with purple hair, next to some queer with AIDS, right next to some dude who just got out of jail for the fourth time, right next to some 20-year-old mom with four kids.
It's depressing.
And about New York City itself, Rocker said, the biggest thing I don't like about New York are the foreigners.
I'm not a very big fan of foreigners.
You can walk an entire block in Times Square and not hear anybody speaking English.
Asians and Koreans and Vietnamese and Indians and Russians and Spanish people and everything up there.
How the hell do they get in this country?
Well, you know, I mean...
That was controversial back in the day.
It's still controversial in some circles, but man.
You talk about prophetic.
Things have only gotten worse from there.
Interesting, the purple hair, though.
It was probably slightly different.
I don't know.
Who was dyeing their hair purple?
It wasn't trans people the way it is now, is it?
Honest question.
I don't know.
I guess I've got to go back and look at my 90s.
I guess there needs to be an encyclopedia of different decades of degeneracy.
Somebody's talking about people with purple hair.
But that certainly has only gotten worse.
There's no question about that.
Folks, this has been a great Millstone Report.
I have enjoyed this as well.
Feel free to follow me on Twitter at RealPaulHarrell.
That's H-A-R-R-E-L-L. Coming up on the Stu Peter Show, again, he's going to sit down with Mr.
Clint Russell.
They're going to talk about Trump getting removed from the ballot, how the Democrats are trying to rig the 2020 election, and everything.
All of that and more coming up on the Stu Peter Show.
My name is Paul Herold.
We'll see you tomorrow night.
▲
Export Selection