All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 29, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
33:47
Uncensored: NY Court Rules to BRING BACK Quarantine Camps, Forced Medical Procedures!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Governor Kathy Hochul is a psychopath.
She wants to lock people up in quarantine camps or facilities with no evidence that they're sick, no ability to prove that they're not sick, no due process, no court hearings allowed for that person to escape this camp.
to experiment on people inside those camps with whatever medication or whatever measures the government sees fit at the time including restricting their ability to communicate with the outside world There's no age limit.
Anyone can go.
Babies, grandparents, a mother that's just given birth.
It really doesn't matter.
This is how serious this law is.
And it really is a shadow of something similar that they brought into Australia, in Western Australia.
I've spoken about this law many times.
I'll discuss it with Bobbi Ann Cox when she joins us in a moment again.
On that list could include experimental drugs.
It could include anything really, any measures that the government wants to implement while they have you locked up with no proof that you're actually sick.
So, Bobbie Ann Cox, last time she was on, defeated Hochul in her efforts.
And at that stage, earlier this year, when I interviewed Bobbie Ann, Hochul was going to appeal.
Well, now a federal court has ruled in favour of Hochul and her government, and basically thrown the case out of court.
So that rule now, which is Rule 213, is officially in place in New York.
This is absolutely...
Devastating, very, very serious for the people of New York.
And I mentioned this last time I had Bobbie Ann on, but I want to bring it up again for anyone who missed it or who needs a reminder.
Earlier this year, Hochul also legalized composting human remains in New York.
This is a law that she passed, signing legislation on Saturday that legalizes human composting.
This was the sixth state in the nation that had legalized the practice.
We've also got California, as of October 2022, California will soon be able to turn their remains into soil with human composting.
We've had, you know, discussions about this in Australia as well.
This is the new daily.com.au as of January this year, push for human composting gains ground.
As environment concerns grow, and of course they've, you know, shown what they deem to be a dignified version of turning you into food for humans, Soylent Green.
You've also got here, as of May 2023, Nine News talking about composting, water cremation and shrouds.
Why sustainable burials are on the rise.
I don't know one human being who said, gosh, I really want to be turned into human compost where I'm fed back into the water supply.
Not one person that I know about talking about that, really.
Another one, CBR City News.
Human compost, the eco-friendly way to go.
Committed Canberra-based environmentalist is championing human composting as an eco-friendly way of dealing with human remains.
This person is advocating a sustainable alternative to burials and cremations, and her preferred method is human composting, a process in which remains are turned into soil.
Apparently, it means you have an environmentally sustainable option that can be regenerative.
Human composting is considerably cheaper than burials and offers a cleaner alternative to cremation.
With burials, land is finite and it's obscenely expensive, which is why people choose cremation.
But cremations are a third of the cost, but they give off emissions.
They are a pollutant.
So not only are you the carbon they want to reduce while you're alive, they say that you dying is also polluting the planet, so we're going to turn you into soil and feed you back into the food supply.
That's essentially what they're saying here.
It's absolutely putrid.
It's disgusting.
And, you know...
The reason I'm bringing this up as part of this conversation is it is absolutely terrifying to see someone like Hochul bringing in this legislation into New York.
The fact that she even conceived it in her mind should terrify people, but it's not the only case.
As I mentioned, we have that also here in Western Australia, a similar legislation.
And where does it really come from?
It comes from, ultimately, what the WHO want to do, because they have made it very clear, according to Dr. Tess Laurie, who was in a World Health Assembly meeting in February of 2022, where they said forced injections and punishment for anyone who doesn't comply in future.
We saw a recent clip of Tony Blair talking about how we need digital ID and digital infrastructure because there will be many vaccinations in future, many, and we need to know who's injected and who isn't and who's complying and who's not.
And so you really do have to look at all of these different things, laws that are being implemented and conversations that are being had in the community, and see how do they all relate?
Why is it that we're fighting so hard for these camps and to lock people in them and do whatever is...
Whatever we want to them inside these facilities with no proof that they're actually sick.
And that legislation just so happens to coincide with a timing where a legislation has been signed in for human composting.
You really do need to ask that question.
So, as I said, ladies and gentlemen, we're really living in a time of soylent green and this is absolutely terrifying and every single person should be interested in what's happening in New York because it doesn't end there.
It doesn't end in Western Australia and it doesn't end in New York.
In fact, I dare say every single country that is part of the World Health Organization will see similar laws enacted very, very soon.
As part of the international health regulations, they are calling on countries to bring in things like misinformation laws, to bring in things like mandatory medical procedures.
They haven't expressly said that, but that's what the IHR amendments require, ultimately.
And, of course, as the World Health Assembly said in February of 2022, dissenters will be punished, forcefully injected and punished for not complying.
These are the plans that these maniacs have for you.
So, Bobbi Ann Cox is going to join us in a moment to discuss the battle now, the next steps, and how she's planning on defeating this.
And she is hopeful, and that is good news to all of us.
But everyone really should be aware of this case.
And as I said, get behind it.
Get public pressure happening to make sure that this is overturned and that no government is ever able, again, to implement a legislation like this, no matter what the World Health Organization wants to do.
It's because of sponsors, I should say, that sponsor this broadcast and other broadcasts on this network that we're able to continue getting the truth out to people, this very, very important, crucial news.
So I want everyone to be aware of Heaven's Harvest.
They're a fantastic partner of ours, very, very committed to high-quality emergency and survival food, heirloom seeds.
They have kits for every single budget, you know, breakfast kits, one-week kits, three-week kits.
Their heirloom seeds are fantastic.
They have kits which you can do.
A mix of vegetable seed kits, starter seed kits, teas and herb seed kits, and superfoods.
I mean, really, really fantastic.
And, you know, I presume that they're not using...
I can almost guarantee they're not using human remains in the soil From the produce that they're sourcing, it's very, very high quality organic survival food.
They also have gardening and survival resources.
So head to the link in the description below, use promo code Z with three E's for 5% off your order and support businesses that support us today while preparing your household for a worst case scenario.
Here's Bobbi Ann Cox.
We're joined now by Bobbie-Ann Cox from Cox Lawyers.
She's an attorney who's been doing a phenomenal job for as long as I've known about her and probably before then as well.
Bobbie-Ann, the last time that you joined us, you defeated Kathy Hochul and her insane quarantine desires.
But as of our last interview, Hochul appealed and now we have an update.
So first and foremost, thank you for everything that you're doing and thank you for your time today.
Yes, thank you for having me on again.
It's great to be here.
Yeah, absolutely.
Well, albeit under terrible circumstances as far as I'm concerned.
So again, last interview that we had, you were saying that Hochul was planning on appealing.
It looks like that's now gone through and the court ruled in favour of Hochul.
What has gone wrong here?
Yeah, so as you said, Governor Hochul actually appealed the decision we won last year.
You know, last July of 2022, a New York State Supreme Court judge in Cattaraugus County struck down this quarantine regulation that Governor Hochul and her Department of Health had created.
The regulation, for any of your viewers who are not familiar with this regulation, it's absolutely horrendous.
It gives the Department of Health, unelected bureaucrats in the Department of Health, the power to pick and choose which New Yorkers they can lock up or lock down.
They don't have to prove you're sick.
They don't have to prove you were exposed to a communicable disease.
They don't have to prove that you pose a public health threat of any kind.
They can lock you up in your home or they can remove you from your home with the force of police and put you into a facility of their choosing.
You have no say where you go.
They, the Department of Health, would decide how long you stay there.
It could be days, could be weeks, could be months, and there's no procedure for you to get out of quarantine once you're in there.
So what I mean by that is last year when we were arguing this case in front of the trial court judge, the judge asked the attorney general's office, point blank, let's say you take a family, let's say you put them into quarantine somewhere in a facility, a hospital, let's say.
Once they're in there, how do they get out?
And, you know, there was a pregnant pause.
And then finally, the attorney for the governor said, well, you know, I guess they could hire a lawyer and they could sue us.
So, you know, clearly no due process protections were built into that regulation.
And so it got struck down last year.
My plaintiffs and I won the case.
My plaintiffs are a group of New York state legislators, Senator Borrello, Assemblyman Taig.
And Congressman Lawler, together with a citizens group called Uniting New York State, and we won.
The judge struck it down, said, you can't do this.
The governor does not have the power.
The Department of Health does not have the power.
Wrong branch of government.
And they appealed.
And now we have the appellate court in New York State saying, oh, sorry, they didn't dismiss it on the merits.
They said, well, your plaintiffs don't have standing.
They don't have the right to bring this lawsuit.
And therefore, we're going to reverse the lower court's decision and throw out the case.
So this is where we are right now.
It is astonishing.
Um, because I, you know, I think it's very clear that my clients have standing.
Plaintiffs That in the United States, to have the ability to bring a lawsuit, plaintiffs have to have some sort of an injury that they suffered.
And in this case, it was very clear.
My plaintiffs are New York state legislators.
Their power was usurped by the governor and her Department of Health when they made this regulation, which they call a regulation, but really it's a law.
And the governor can't make law.
The Department of Health can't make law.
Only the legislature can make law.
So we think it's a terrible decision and we are planning to appeal it.
Yeah, for anyone that's not familiar, we're talking about Rule 213, isolation and quarantine procedures.
And again, if you missed my last interview with Bobbie-Ann, I recommend everyone goes back and watches it because at that time, you know, it was a huge victory.
There was a genuine defeat of Hochul there with good reason.
And at that point, we knew that she was going to appeal.
Bobbie-Ann, just to expand on some of what you spoke about and how this would affect people, Yes, we said, you know, there is no due process, no court hearings.
My understanding is that there's also no age restriction.
It could be a newborn baby or a grandparent or someone who just gave birth that they just come and basically take with no reason whatsoever and take them to an isolation facility, whatever that is.
Is that correct?
That is correct.
There are no age restrictions in that regulation.
There's also no provision requiring no notice.
So they could just show up at your door.
I mean, you could get a knock at the door from the police or the sheriff and they could hand you an isolation or quarantine order and say, sorry, you need to come with me or your child needs to come with me.
I mean, there's no provision for notice.
There's no provision of any way that you can negotiate your way out of this.
It is a very totalitarian rule.
And it is astonishing.
Again, the court, the appellate court, didn't even talk about the merits at all.
They simply said, no, you don't have the right to bring the lawsuit.
There's no injury here.
You don't have standing.
And they reversed it and threw it out.
So it's actually pretty dangerous on a couple different levels.
It's dangerous because now the governor and her Department of Health have free reign.
They can reissue that regulation whenever they want.
And the other thing that's pretty dangerous is this court is limiting the standing provision.
They're limiting who can go into a court of law in New York State and sue over what is clearly a violation of our Constitution.
So it really is.
Obviously, my plaintiffs and I feel it's an erroneous decision, but I think it's also a dangerous decision because you should be doing the opposite.
You should be opening up the courts when people are having their constitutional rights violated.
You should be opening up the courts and allowing those people to have Justice.
But instead, this decision is closing the courts off and saying, no, no, legislators, you can't do that.
You can't sue the governor or her Department of Health if you think they stole your power.
No, no, no.
You don't have standing.
It really is.
It's astonishing.
And it's bad case law.
Very bad.
We've seen similar situations in Australia where there's a very strong case, you know, government data provided, for example, showing from our own Therapeutic Goods Administration that children have died as a result of the COVID injections.
Therefore, really, there should be an injunction, immediate injunction on the injections, at least for children, until further investigation is done.
And then, you know, months and months go over arguing about standing when really, you know...
I understand that the court feels like this person doesn't have standing, but they do.
And really, the matter before you is that children, by the government's own admission, are dying from something the government has recommended they get.
I mean, that to me...
You know, it's just insane what the entire judicial system in every country, really, Bobby Ann, has turned into.
I just want to clarify a couple of other things with you.
This could be...
They could come in the day, middle of the night...
During your time at work, I also understand that it includes whatever medicine or injection they tell you to take once you're in this facility.
And on that list also includes experimental drugs.
Is that correct?
Well, so the regulation doesn't specifically say anything about drugs.
The regulation does say that the Department of Health can determine what you can and cannot do While you are in isolation or in quarantine.
So that language is very broad.
And that means they could control, you know, your every move if they want to, according to that language.
You know, they could tell you when you could sleep or how long you could sleep or what you could eat or when you could eat or if you could eat or, you know, they could cut you off from your cell phone, from your Any sort of internet access at all.
I mean, it's very broad language.
And it does say they can control what you do while you're in quarantine.
It's very scary language.
You know, there's also a provision in there that says that doctors are required to report If they have a patient that they feel might have a communicable disease, it requires doctors to report that to the local health authorities.
Part of the reason this got struck down last year, this rule, was because it conflicts, very obviously, with a long-standing law that we have in New York State.
We already have a quarantine law.
We've had one since 1953.
And our quarantine law, which is 70 years old, has a lot of due process protections built into it so that the government doesn't abuse its power and doesn't overstep and doesn't injure its citizens.
But this rule that the governor and the Department of Health made conflicts very clearly with that law.
It has no due process protections.
It gives the Department of Health a power that it's not supposed to have.
And it literally is trying to rewrite the law that we've had for 70 years.
Agencies don't have that power.
The governor doesn't have that power.
The governor cannot rewrite a law.
She can't write a rule to conflict with a law.
Only thing that governors can do are enforce laws that are passed by the legislature.
That's the basis of our separation of powers.
So, you know, clear breach of separation of powers.
And, you know, it's astonishing.
New Yorkers should be outraged that the governor and the Department of Health, you know, they're using the Attorney General, they're using your tax dollars to fight this case.
You know, they should have given up from day one.
First of all, they should never have even issued this regulation.
It's horrific.
But then when they lost last summer, they should have let it go.
No, they had to use all your tax dollars to file an appeal, and now they're going to fight another appeal, because now I'm going to appeal this case, this ruling, to the highest court in New York State.
So, you know, New Yorkers should be outraged, really.
It's unbelievable.
Well, I was about to ask about further action.
So you are still going to fight this?
This is, I understand, the last step.
Is that correct?
Right.
So there's one more court in New York State, because we are...
We have filed this lawsuit in the state courts, not the federal courts.
So we have one more court in New York State, which is our highest court.
It's called the Court of Appeals, and it sits in Albany.
It's a panel of judges, seven judges.
And we are making application to the court to hear this case.
It is such a crucial case.
And, you know, if we get before these seven justices at the Court of Appeals, I do have confidence that they're going to uphold the Constitution and they're not going to allow this case to be thrown out on a supposed technicality.
But, you know, the People need to know what's going on.
I mean, this is outrageous.
And if they can get away with this kind of a thing in New York, obviously it's going to spread.
Because, you know, the other states will look at New York and say, well, hold on a second.
You know, New York can do this?
Well, we can do this too.
So, you know, it's really not good precedence.
And so, yeah, we are definitely appealing this case to the next court.
It's...
It's got to be appealed.
It's got to be overturned.
It's a terrible decision.
It is widespread.
And I think I mentioned to you last time what we have in Australia, the laws that we have in Australia, but for anyone who's not aware, in the state of Western Australia, they brought in a new legislation at the end of COVID, which of course can be amended.
It's a COVID legislation, but can be amended for future pandemics or conditions, right?
Where an authorized COVID officer can come into your home, so this is after mandates, after lockdowns they bring this in, can come into your home, strip you naked, take you, take your children, take you to a camp or facility of their choosing against your will, after they've stripped you naked of course,
inject you with whatever they want, as much as they want, use whatever drugs they want, similar to the New York legislation, Bobby Ann, which is, you know, they can do, they can instruct you to do whatever, keep you there as long as they want, with no proof that you're sick, no warrant needed, no reason needed to come and do this to you.
So really, we have a test case for that in the Northern Territory in Australia, where a person, Hayley Hodges is one example, was taken due to non-compliance.
She was actually, she had tested negative, but she was taken to a facility for non-compliance.
And so this is, you know, we already have test cases for what these overreaching powers have been used for in the past.
Now add in the layer of the WHO International Health Regulations, where when they officially published those amendments...
They crossed out.
There was a strikethrough through the words dignity, fundamental freedoms and human rights.
They crossed out those words showing that in future they will not consider those things.
And they're calling for countries to change their local legislation in line with what the World Health Organization wants to do.
The picture's looking pretty clear to me, Bobbi-Ann.
It's unbelievable.
You know, what you were just saying reminded me that This regulation that Governor Hochul and her Department of Health created is not COVID-specific, which means there's a laundry list of, you know, supposed highly contagious communicable diseases that the Department of Health has created that they could use this regulation for.
Now, if you look at that list, you know, yes, COVID is on there, and so are some, you know, dangerous diseases like tuberculosis, for example.
There are also diseases that are not highly communicable and are not particularly dangerous on the level of being communicable.
For example, Lyme disease is on that list.
Botulism, which is food poisoning, is on that list.
Toxic shock syndrome is on that list.
You know, it's unbelievable that, you know, and most New Yorkers don't even know about this.
You know, most people, because the mainstream media won't pick it up, they won't cover it.
Most people just going about their daily lives don't even know that this regulation exists.
Don't even know we got it struck down last year.
Don't know that the governor appealed it.
And now the court has thrown out the lawsuit.
You know, nobody knows this is going on.
It's really dangerous.
I find it appalling that a journalist in Australia knows more than the own place, than the own city's residents.
Really, this is appalling.
Everyone should be aware of this.
And so I'm asking everyone that's watching to share it with everyone that you know, particularly New York residents.
I want to ask you about something in terms of the list of diseases, Bobbie Ann, because in Australia we have what's called a document that, sorry, it talks about the future of pandemics and how we need to prepare for future pandemics.
It's a Pandemic Preparedness Report.
And they outline five of the next future pandemics, but they also outline how climate change is going to be a factor in this.
Now, when you look at the World Health Organization and what they say about things that have pandemic potential, and for example, Tedros declaring monkeypox, a public health emergency of international concern, despite 12 advisors telling him, no, we should not do that, but he did it anyway.
He overturned the advisors that are meant to be the sounding board.
No, they get disregarded.
So when something is considered by these organizations, such as the WHO, who receive a lot of kickbacks from pharma, to declare something as having pandemic potential, I can see how this would be weaponized in combination with this bill in New York.
Yeah, you know, it is absolutely unbelievable that, you know, all of this is going on.
And like I said, most people don't know that it's going on.
And what that causes is a very big problem when you wake up one morning and you feel like, oh my goodness, my rights are gone.
They've been taken from me.
How could this have happened?
Because it's happening bit by bit, little by little.
And we need people to know what's going on.
They have got to stand up and say, no, absolutely not.
We are not having forced isolation and quarantine facilities.
You know, when people have to know what's going on, they also have to know what their rights are.
Because it is very clear, at least here in the US, they've stopped teaching the Constitution in schools.
They don't want people to know what their rights are.
Because if you know what your rights are and what the Constitution says, then you're not going to allow the government to trample all over your rights, are you?
So they've stopped teaching the Constitution.
They don't teach civics classes anymore.
It's really dangerous.
And so we need to do as best as we can to wake people up, alert them to what's going on, teach them what their rights are, explain to them what the Constitution says, so that the next time the government comes to trample on their rights, they say, hang on a second.
No, you can't do that.
So it's so important to get the word out.
I can't encourage people enough to help spread the word.
Yeah, I agree with you.
And I've heard people, one particular person I saw on social media saying it's time to get out of New York.
And while I understand that sentiment, what happens is if you don't fight the battle where you are and, you know, sometimes people need to leave locations.
I understand that.
But if you don't fight the battle where you are, this disease will spread because it is a wider agenda.
It's not just isolated to New York.
As I told you, we have a similar thing here in one of the states in Australia.
And they will continue to try this type of thing on because it's what the World Health Organization ultimately wants, compliance or else.
And every country that's signed on to the World Health Organization is going to continue seeing laws like this in place.
That's why we need to exit the WHO. Bobbi Ann, I know we have a very short time with you today.
I want to bring up the Cox Lawyers page.
Please let people know how they can support this case and get the word out and support you.
Yes, thank you.
It would be great to have support.
I am working on this case pro bono the past year and a half or so.
So on my website, I do have a donate button.
That website is coxlawyers.com and that's coxlawyers.com.
So people can certainly donate to the legal fund.
Also, if people can follow me on social media and help spread the word, I have a substack which I write once a week an article on my substack and if you do Go to that page and sign up.
You will automatically get an email from me once a week with my article in the email.
So that is attorneycox.substack.com or you can just go to substack.com and you can just type in my name, Bobby Ann Cox, and then my page will pop up there.
And I'm also on Twitter.
I guess it's called X now.
But I'm on there.
And if people want to follow me on there, it would be great if you would retweet my posts and help spread the word.
My handle there is attorney That's C-O-X. This is how we're going to win this thing is by waking people up, alerting them, teaching them what's going on, and educating them as best we can.
I would love it if your viewers would follow me on X and sign up for my substack.
That would be really helpful.
Yeah, I encourage people to do it because here's the thing.
What I've noticed is when there is huge public pushback and you make enough noise, They pull back.
And so, you know, we just had a referendum in Australia.
The government was defeated, at least with the people's vote, because we made a lot of noise.
And so something like what's happening in New York absolutely needs to be defeated.
We didn't win the battle here in Western Australia, Bobby Ann.
So really at any time, they could do that to Western Australians.
And so we don't want to see the same thing anywhere else.
So yes, please do follow Bobby Ann and share this everywhere.
Thank you so much for your time today.
I know you've got to run.
We appreciate you and thank you for your fight.
Yes, thank you so much for having me on.
I appreciate it.
Of course.
As governments continue to encroach on our privacy in line with timing that they implement these crazy laws and Hochul is someone that's just said we need, you know, we really need to verify people online and spot misinformation.
We also have running candidate Nikki Haley calling for the same thing.
Really a dictator, more than a dictator, a totalitarian approach.
To society, you are being ushered into a zero trust model before your very eyes by running presidential candidates.
In my opinion, that immediately disqualifies them from any form of government, let alone a presidential race.
But more and more people are realizing how crucial it is To have communications that cannot be tracked by the government.
The satellite phone store at sat123.com, Maria.
You can visit that website or give them a call on 1-941-841-0844.
They have fantastic deals.
These ship immediately, the family plans.
These phones, the Immasats were out of stock for some time, but it looks like they're back in stock.
Fantastic plans, very competitive prices.
And the communication is completely encrypted by the satellite phone store.
Partners that we really do trust and we value their service, we use their service.
Also, they have an encrypted smartphone.
They have bivvy sticks.
They have Faraday bags included in these deals.
Their Faraday bags are excellent quality.
They've also got the Iridium phones, which work pretty much on 100% of the Earth.
I think it's 99% of the Earth.
Places you wouldn't even visit where you would need phone coverage.
And they include phone and accessories.
And they have family plans, the large Godok Faraday bags, solar panels, portable power banks.
So I really do encourage people to get their communication sorted because the time is coming where we will not be able to do anything online without our digital ID linked to it.
And so alternative communications are absolutely crucial now, especially in a time of immense, immense tracking of the population.
Thank you so much for tuning in today.
Please, again, share this everywhere.
Get people involved in this fight.
Do not give up on human liberty and freedom.
▲
Export Selection