Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 20, 2023 - Stew Peters Show

01:01:32

WRONGTHINK: History Is Written by the People We Allow To Censor Us

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	of desperation because I don't have anything else to read, you know.
	You read the whole encyclopedia?
	Yeah, pretty much.
	I'd get something I'm not that interested in and I'd skip past it.
	But yeah, pretty much.
	That's desperation.
	It was desperation.
	I was just like I ran out of books.
	But I think it was probably a better encyclopedia than the one you, you know, These digital encyclopedias today, which are, unfortunately, are edited in ways that are not, you know, that don't necessarily bring out, you know, the balanced views of things.
	Yeah, I mean, the funny thing about, say, like Wikipedia is, you know, like there's an old saying, like, history is written by the victors.
	It's like, well, yes, but not if your enemies are still alive and have a lot of time on their hands to edit Wikipedia.
	History is written by the people who can harness the most editors.
	Yeah, I mean, you know, the loser's just got a lot of time on their hands.
	What are they going to do?
	Edit Wikipedia.
	Literally.
	There's so much irony in that conversation and we're going to be talking about that today because as I stated in the title, history is written by the people we allow to censor us.
	And the irony of that conversation that I'm referring to is that Netanyahu is exactly the editor, the type of editor that he's referring to when he was talking to Elon right there.
	And Elon is allowing him to edit history.
	Yeah.
	What I mean by that is we often assume that, you know, the worst part about the communist agenda is the fact that they'd like to have this revisionist agenda.
	They like to rewrite history.
	And that is a very bad part of it.
	And we're going to be bringing up examples of that today because there are two examples of that that just happened in the news pretty bad.
	New York City, of course, trying to erase our history, calling George Washington racist, tearing down all the statues.
	That's their plan of George Washington because, well, He was so racist.
	Well, barring the fact that that's completely untrue, rather, he was one of the more radical figures of that time, as were the other founders and the framers of our Constitution.
	But barring all of that, that's not even the point.
	Even if you were a raging racist in the 1700s or the 1800s, you're still a part of our history.
	And that's important to keep that history.
	But what they do is they try to erase it because they want to convince you that everybody and everything in American history is racist so that you'll hate America, you'll hate yourself because presumably if you're white, well then you caused it, and if you're black, well then you're a victim of America's hatred.
	We're going to be breaking down more of that today and what's going on, but they're not just erasing history that was 100, 200, 300 years ago, no.
	They're erasing history that happened pretty recently.
	And we're going to be talking about a story that just came out about the FBI and how they're trying to erase the truth about January 6th.
	Yeah, that soon.
	And we're also going to be talking about, like I said, because that's not even the worst part.
	Believe it or not, the worst part is not that they're trying to change history, that they're trying to convince us of something different about our past, right?
	The worst part is the fact that when they are actively writing our history, they are doing so by censoring us.
	And who are they, exactly?
	Well, the elites.
	We're going to be talking about who those people are, pointing them out.
	Soros just did something very interesting we're going to be talking about.
	And of course, as I pointed out at the top of the show, Elon Musk met with Netanyahu.
	Now, what in the world would a prime minister of Israel have to do With an American businessman, particularly a businessman who is the owner of one of the most successful social media companies in the world.
	Huh.
	I wonder what he could possibly want with Elon Musk.
	Oh, that's right.
	He wants to shape the narrative for years to come.
	He wants to actively edit history in the making.
	And that is the scariest part.
	That is what we are going to be breaking down today because that is the ultimate worst thing you can do because they're trying to censor us so that they...
	Can have the final say.
	And sadly, people like Elon fall for it over and over again.
	We're going to be talking about all of that on today's episode of Wrong Think Primetime.
	So stay tuned guys.
	And welcome to Wrong Think Primetime.
	I'm Anna Perez.
	Thank you so much for being here on this Wednesday night.
	Really excited for the third show of Wrong Think Primetime.
	Don't worry, I'm not going to number every single show.
	It's just that it's still pretty early on in the debut week, and I'm really excited to be here.
	It's been kind of a success so far, so I'm really grateful to all of you who have been watching the show.
	If you are just joining now, this is the first episode of Wrong Think Primetime that you are joining in on.
	Welcome, guys.
	Welcome if you are joining the chat now.
	If you are watching on Rumble in the chat, please go ahead and rumble the show.
	Or even if you're not in the chat, if you're just watching on Rumble, hit that thumbs up.
	That helps this show grow here, guys.
	It helps it climb the Rumble leaderboard.
	And also make sure you're doing that for all of the Stu Peters Network shows because that is how this network is going to grow today.
	We get more eyes on the show.
	You know how it works.
	So we definitely want to try and make it on that Rumble leaderboard.
	That really helps us out.
	Also, please go ahead and share the link on your social media.
	Send it to your family, your friends.
	Get the word out about this brand new show that I'm really excited to bring to you guys and that I've been working really hard on.
	Because we need to bring forth the truth.
	Not a lot of people are covering these stories and certainly not the way that we're doing it here at the Stu Peters Network, which is why I'm so excited to be a part of this network.
	I want to jump right in and see who is here.
	We have libs of Reddit.
	Great to see you.
	Silver77 back.
	Cass S Rumble, 29.
	Tone Man, 514.
	Dan the Drummer, 234.
	Emmy, 007.
	Dan Dreher.
	Let's see, who else?
	Hawkeye, 7.
	No, he says two hours tonight.
	No, I'm not doing two hours tonight.
	What happened earlier is Rumble was having issues.
	It happens.
	You know, Rumble's a newer platform, so sometimes there are glitches and, you know, it kind of interrupted my show at LFA. So during the live show, a lot of people were having issues with it, sadly.
	It always sucks when something like that happens because as the host and producer of the show, you put so much work into it.
	And then to have it just kind of not work and it's out of your control, there's kind of nothing worse than that.
	But the good thing is you can still watch it.
	If you kind of were having too many issues with it during my earlier show, you can go back and watch it now.
	I do believe that it is there.
	So certainly check that out.
	Let's see.
	Craig Colbert, great to see you.
	TexasBaldhead, that's my friend Carlos.
	Great to see you, Carlos.
	John Smith, Anna was taken down by the CCP. Well, maybe I was.
	Great to see you, John Smith.
	Dextro, great to see you.
	Alright, so many great, great people in the chat.
	Let's see, did I miss anyone else?
	SaltyDebbie, did I say hi to you?
	Argath357.
	Aw, that was really sweet.
	Argath said, Anna, you're a perfect addition to SPN. Love your show.
	Thank you, I appreciate that very much.
	You guys are the best.
	Alright, so if you're just joining now, guys, welcome.
	Please rumble the show.
	And now time to jump right in because we have a lot of news to discuss, as I pointed out at the top of the show.
	So first on the list of things I want to get to, guys, this is pretty, pretty bad.
	But again, it's not the first time we've seen this, but that is what I'm talking about.
	New York City is removing George, or they plan to remove George Washington statues.
	Take a look at this story.
	This was, of course, from the post-millennial.
	NYC may remove George Washington statues as part of new reparations plan.
	Oh, okay.
	Wow.
	While New York city continues to grapple with a crisis of illegal immigrants flooding the city, as well as a consequential need for budget cuts.
	Members of its city council have been plotting some new changes and seek to, among other things, delete monuments dedicated to important American figures such as George Washington.
	Great.
	So now they're deleting our very first president.
	Fantastic.
	Anyways, I'll go on.
	Also on the agenda for New York City's council is to launch a reparations task force.
	Great, just what we need when we're struggling to pay rent, when we're struggling to put groceries on the table.
	Just what we need, our tax money to be going to a reparations task force, as if black people don't get enough help from the state.
	Anyways, that's according to Fox News.
	Former President Trump famously predicted that leftists would go after the monuments of America's first president back in 2017.
	And I'll go ahead and say that I actually got to interview President Trump in 2022.
	We talked about this very issue.
	And this is what he said.
	He loves Robert E. Lee.
	And we talked about Robert E. Lee on the show.
	It was actually a great segment.
	I should have played it, honestly.
	Anyways, he said, At the time.
	And once again, Trump was right.
	He was totally right.
	I mean, it was pretty clear by the trend at the trajectory we were on that soon enough it was going to be our very first president of the United States of America, George Washington, the man who is responsible for essentially winning the revolution against the British.
	And here we are.
	Here we are, guys, in 2023, literally removing statues of him, I guess because he's simply not woke enough.
	He's just too racist.
	Well, that's what they want you to think.
	And they're exploiting the fact that, you know, most Americans don't know American history, even when it comes to the very first president of the United States.
	Like I said, if they knew better, they'd know that George Washington was actually one of the more radical figures of his time, was quite progressive.
	The entire founding of this country was progressive in nature.
	It was radical in nature.
	The idea that you could vote without being a property owner, the idea that you could...
	Basically, you know, achieve whatever you want in this country, provided you work hard enough.
	The idea that you don't have to pay any sort of income tax to the government, because that's how it was at first, remember?
	It was a radical, progressive idea.
	There was nothing really status quo about the founding of America, and that goes both culturally and fiscally, really.
	Well, I should say they weren't progressive fiscally in the sense that they wanted to give away their money to the government.
	I'm saying quite the opposite.
	They didn't want to give away their money to the government.
	They knew how corrupt that could be.
	The point is, none of that is true.
	None of those allegations towards George Washington is true.
	But they spread that lie.
	They convince you that he was racist, that he was this big, bad racist, oh, slave owner, blah, blah, blah, this.
	Yeah, first of all, don't even get me started on the whole slave owner narrative because not as many people own slaves as you think.
	And second of all, second of all, There's a lot more nuance to the conversation.
	I'm not saying slavery was good.
	Obviously it's bad, okay?
	But they want you to associate slavery with specifically African American slavery here in the United States.
	Slavery is not a uniquely American problem.
	Slavery has existed since the dawn of human existence.
	And I've done entire shows on that on my LFA show if you're interested in checking out older episodes.
	And I'll probably do it at some point on this show too.
	But just to briefly summarize it, that is not a uniquely American problem.
	But they want you to believe it is that you hate this country.
	And so that you're all on board with the plans they have to destroy it.
	So that you'll be more malleable politically when it comes to their agenda.
	That's what they do.
	That's what they do.
	They get you to hate this country, hate yourself if you're white, because presumably you're the one who was responsible for it, even though you don't even know the people, you know, if it was obviously generations ago, how do you have any sort of connection to them?
	But no, because you're white, because you share the same skin color, you must be responsible for the same things they did.
	Oh, and also, if you're black, you hate this country too because you're such a victim.
	Same goes for Hispanic, and same thing goes for everybody else who isn't a white male, basically.
	So that's what they're trying to do.
	They want you to hate this country.
	They want you to be on board with their destruction of America.
	Most of you probably understand that already, okay?
	So I'm not going to harp on that one too much.
	But what's interesting is it extends beyond just our history, you know, 200 years ago, 250 years ago.
	It's actually way more recent than that, because here's another event that they're trying to change the history of, and that would be January 6.
	Yeah, take a look at this story that just dropped, guys.
	FBI lost count of how many undercover informants it had at the Capitol on January 6.
	Well, that's convenient.
	We suddenly don't know how many people, or the FBI suddenly, quote, doesn't know, I'm laughing because our government is such a joke.
	Okay?
	It's such an effing joke.
	I mean, and obviously they're lying, okay?
	They're not incompetent.
	They know what they're doing.
	But even if they weren't, it would be bad enough that they ruined this.
	So there's no way you can look at this and be like, yep, I trust our FBI. Look, you have to be so retarded to think that way.
	Anyways, I'll go on.
	to find out how many confidential human sources run by different field offices were there that day, according to the bombshell new report.
	Miranda Devine of the New York Post reported on Tuesday that Steve Dantano, formerly in charge of the Bureau's Washington field office, told lawmakers behind closed doors at a House Judiciary Committee hearing that at least one informant was communicating with his FBI handler as he entered the Capitol. told lawmakers behind closed doors at a House Judiciary Committee
	Dantano's report testified that his office was aware before the January 6th riot that some of their informants would be at the stop, the steel rally in D.C.'s ellipse, where President Donald Trump spoke.
	However, Don Tano claimed that he only learned afterwards that informants run by other field offices were also at the Capitol.
	He added that as a result, the Washington field office asked FBI headquarters to do a poll or put out something to people saying...
	Were any CHSs involved?
	So they could find out how large the FBI's surveillance operations were at the Capitol on January 6, according to Dantano.
	Responses from the FBI headquarters revealed which field offices had planted confidential informants into the crowd, which included at least one paid informant from the Kansas City field office who was in communication with his FBI handler while the crowd surged into the Capitol, saying that they were going in, they were trying to stop some of the action happening, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan described Dantano's testimony as extremely concerning.
	In a letter written to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Tuesday, Jordan wrote that the testimony suggests that the FBI cannot adequately track the activities and operations of its informants, and that it lost control of its CHS's president at the Capitol on January 6th.
	Oh, how convenient!
	We just don't have track of what we did to you people on January 6th, so you can never really trace it back to us.
	That's basically what's happening here.
	These revelations reinforced existing concerns identified by special counsel John Durham about the FBI's use of and payments to CHSs who have fabricated evidence and misrepresented information.
	Jordan added the Justice Department Inspector General also identified critical problems in the FBI's CHS program, including the FBI's failure to fully vet CHSs and the FBI's willingness to ignore red flags that would call into question an informant's reliability.
	Jordan requested that Ray provide a substantive briefing on how the FBI used paid informants on January 6th, 2021, as well as any specific guidelines or admonishments that were provided to the FBI CHSs prior to deploying, along with debriefing documents from January 6th riot informants. along with debriefing documents from January 6th riot informants.
	According to the Post, former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steve Sund has previously said that the FBI also had at least 18 undercover agents in the crowd, plus another 20 from the Department of Homeland Security.
	Yeah, we already know there was obviously more than one informant, contrary to what this report was able to confirm.
	There was more than one.
	We're not stupid.
	We know that.
	We've known that information for quite some time now.
	So the fact that they're acting like they have no idea how many people they sent that day.
	The fact that they're acting like they have no idea how to find this.
	Oh, they have to run an audit.
	Oh, no.
	How convenient.
	This is what they do.
	This is what the elites do.
	They take history, they shred it to pieces, and then they rewrite it.
	Oh, you're not allowed to believe that George Washington was a brave man who founded this country, who did great things to make sure that we could fight tyranny and help frame this Constitution.
	No, you can't believe that.
	No, no, because you must believe America is a racist hellhole.
	And when it comes to January 6th, you must believe That it was merely a violent protest from Trump supporters who wanted to destroy our democracy.
	It couldn't possibly be that it was an FBI setup.
	It couldn't possibly be that the deep state was drawing us there, that they were opening the door for people to get in.
	That's why they had the police involved.
	You couldn't possibly believe in any of that, even though we know already like 90% of that truth.
	It's too late for them to lie to our faces.
	It's too late.
	And yet they're still trying to rewrite it.
	And because it comes from the FBI, which is supposed to be an official part of the government, they're supposed to be nonpartisan, they're supposed to be the ones who give it to us straight, who don't lie to us about crucial information like I don't know how many FBI informants there were at an event like January 6th.
	That has to be the narrative that they're pushing.
	Because we can't question it.
	Because who knows if they're going to go after you.
	We did a whole show on that yesterday.
	How convenient.
	And that's how they rewrite history.
	And they do it all the time.
	It doesn't matter if it was 200 years ago or two years ago.
	They will rewrite whatever history they can get their hands on that is inconvenient to the agenda that they want to push.
	The deep state will stop at nothing.
	And like I said, believe it or not, that's not even the worst part of what the elites do.
	Yeah.
	In the second part of the show, guys, we're going to get into all that they do to actively control the narrative.
	How do they write our history?
	Well, they censor it in real time.
	So that whatever narrative is created is not inconvenient to their agenda.
	So they're going to scream racism, they're going to scream sexism, and more importantly, most commonly, they're going to scream anti-Semitism, which we're going to be getting into in the second part of the show, guys.
	But before we do that, I want to go ahead and take a look at the chat and see who is in it.
	Let's see, we have Ron Green says, the FBI are liars.
	We trust the ABI and a Bureau of Investigation.
	Oh my goodness, believe me, you don't want me investigating that.
	I have ADHD. I'm going to just be all over the place.
	That's why I'm actually good in this industry, because you don't really need to be focused for long periods of time.
	You just have to be a curious person.
	These are my genuine interests, so it's easier for me to stay focused for these things.
	But there are some things I'd be not good at, you know?
	CassassRumble29 says, Anna, question, wrong think.
	Why the name for the show?
	I love it.
	Just curious.
	Anyone know?
	Oh, great question.
	So I sort of answered...
	Someone said the corner of one eye looks red.
	Is it irritated?
	I don't know.
	I didn't know that it looks red.
	Maybe you're looking at my makeup.
	Sorry, I read two questions and I didn't even answer the first.
	Okay.
	CassassRumble29, to answer your question, wrong think.
	So it is a reference to George Orwell's novel 1984...
	Which they use the term thought criminal.
	So when you're a thought criminal, you're, you know, you're a criminal for having the wrong thoughts.
	Wrong think, that is a direct reference to that because you're all wrong thinkers, I'm a wrong thinker, because here's the thing that they're not going to tell you.
	The goal of the government isn't just to censor your speech.
	It's to censor your thoughts.
	And what I mean by that is, I don't necessarily mean trying to get into your brain to change physically the way it is, although maybe one day they will be able to do that, and some would argue that there are ways in which they're already doing that.
	But what I mean is they brainwash you.
	They force you to believe that certain things are okay to think and certain things are not, to a point where you actually start to feel guilt for it.
	It's like they think they're God.
	And so that's the way they censor your speech.
	The reality is you actually do a whole lot of self-censoring more than you realize.
	Think about it.
	Whenever they tell you you can't say a word, like I say the word retarded, I say faggot all the time.
	And the reason why I say those words is because I've untrained myself to think the way that they want me to think.
	Some would say that's non-PC, but what does that even mean?
	Who decides what's PC? Well, I reject the idea that somebody gets to decide what's PC and what's not, and then they get to force that agenda on me.
	I won't succumb to that, and I don't recommend that you guys do it either.
	And so if you have a problem with that word because you genuinely have a problem with it, that's a different story.
	No one should force you to say or not say something.
	But the reason why you don't like it is because you have a visceral reaction to that they enforced in you that they wanted you to have.
	They meaning people that you probably don't even know.
	Because if you ask yourself, why does that word really bother me?
	Is it because I was told that I should be bothered by it?
	Or because I genuinely am bothered by it?
	Well, I would guess...
	That it's the former.
	They told you to have a certain reaction to it.
	That's what wrong think is all about.
	It's kind of a complex explanation in a sense, but ultimately, I could have named it like anything that had to do with free speech, but at the end of the day, it's all about censoring your thoughts, not your speech.
	It's actually a lot worse than what they let on.
	Let's see.
	I'm here, Anna.
	Bman6262, finally off work.
	Great to see you, Bman.
	Great that you're here.
	Thank you so much for joining.
	Also, guys, please rumble the show if you haven't already.
	Would really appreciate that.
	Because of you guys, the viewership has been absolutely insane these past two days.
	I've only done two shows, and it's been pretty good, and I'm just...
	I'm blown away.
	I'm really blown away.
	So I'm so blessed to have such an amazing audience here.
	You guys are great.
	And I'm so grateful to have met a lot of you that are, you know...
	Regular stew viewers and other hosts on this amazing network.
	So really glad that you like the show enough to tune in.
	So really excited about that.
	Glenn Dean says mass information psychosis was played upon the German people in the 1930s.
	Absolutely it was.
	We could do a whole show on that.
	Colty86 says, I agree with you, Anna.
	If somebody doesn't like it, they can change the effing station and they don't have to watch your shit if they are triggered by it.
	I agree.
	It doesn't It doesn't upset me to have to say to someone, don't watch my show.
	I remember in the beginning I was getting messages when I first kind of started doing my own thing.
	I started to create my own brand outside of a media corporation because I was cancelled from corporate media pretty early on in my career.
	I'm only 26 and it's very difficult to find truly free speech networks to work with.
	Stu Peters Network and LFA are two of the only ones I've actually found that are truly free speech.
	And The thing with that is a lot of conservatives claim to be free speech, but usually they're not.
	A lot of times they're free speech to a point.
	And they might have a couple issues that they're just not fully free speech on.
	Here's the thing about free speech.
	There is no such thing as free speech absolutism.
	You either are or you aren't.
	The concept of free speech is not that you agree with everything that people say or that you like it.
	It's that you support their right to say it.
	It's a very simple concept.
	But yet so many people don't seem to understand it.
	Conservatives, actually, a lot of the time don't.
	And they would get mad at me for saying certain things.
	I don't want to watch this show because you said a mean word.
	Okay, I don't care.
	Like, what did you expect my response to be?
	That I'm going to change it?
	I know who I am, and I know where my heart is, and I know the information I'm bringing you is good information, and yes, it's supposed to challenge you.
	I want to host a show where you think to yourself, oh, I wonder why that word bothers me, or I wonder why that thought bothers me.
	Is it because I was told to be bothered by it, or is it because I'm genuinely bothered by it?
	Like I said, nine times out of ten, it's going to be because you were told to be bothered by it.
	And that's where I want people to start thinking.
	Start thinking critically about everything.
	That's the only way we're going to break this mass psychosis because that is exactly where we're at in society.
	Be a critical thinker because that is the complete opposite of what they want you to be.
	When you're not a critical thinker, when you're one of those conservatives that come out and say, well, I don't think you should have said that women don't belong in the workforce because I'm a woman and I had to be blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	I don't care about your anecdotal evidence.
	I don't care.
	I'm speaking generally and I would never say something that, or I'd never be in favor of something that doesn't support the general population.
	That's the whole problem.
	I think I've said this before.
	I think I said it yesterday.
	But the problem with American society today is that we cater to the minority.
	Meaning, I don't mean minorities like black, white, Hispanic.
	I mean just minority populations.
	When in reality we should be doing things that are better for the greater good of society.
	Salty Debbie said, you are exactly correct, Anna, thank you.
	Nima June 62 says, just give yourself to God, stay strapped and vigilant, protect your family, Second Amendment rights, ain't just for show.
	Nima June, couldn't have said it better myself, absolutely.
	TPH 14 says, I have no filter and say what I want.
	Good, good.
	Beautiful show, Angel.
	Thank you, Ashen.
	Dnice113 says, Corporations are the driving force of this creeping globalism.
	Glad you got out of the corporate world.
	Yeah, I have no desire to go back into it.
	I never will.
	I mean, the only thing that I'll be doing from here on out is, you know, doing things with smaller networks like Stu's network or independent, you know, free speech networks.
	I don't want to say small because I want it to grow and I think one day it really could be a bigger network.
	Same with, you know, Jeremy Harrell's network, LFA TV, Other than that, I have no desire to be on Fox News or any of these other networks.
	And then other than podcasting and, you know, reporting and stuff, I want to be a mom.
	That's what I want to do.
	And that is exactly what I should want to do.
	And that, for some reason, is a bad goal to have in today's society.
	Deplorable 767 says, Anna has a beautiful glow.
	She must be a pureblood.
	Thank you.
	I am a pureblood.
	I'm not vaccinated.
	John Smith says, Anna Perez, network incoming.
	No, I don't think I want to do that.
	I don't want to run a network.
	It's a lot of work.
	It really is a lot of work.
	And I don't think I'm a very organized person.
	I feel like you have to be extremely organized or you have to have people handling that for you.
	And I just, I don't have that in me.
	Let's see.
	I think it's extremely intelligent to question everything, says Salty Debbie.
	Yeah, and when you think back on how the education system works, which is actually run by the elites, the whole Rockefeller system, I could do a whole show on that.
	When you think back to how schooling, modern day schooling, works in public schools, it is the complete opposite of that.
	They don't want you to think critically.
	You have to raise your hand before you do everything.
	You'll actually get bad grades if it's not in line with what the teacher says when it comes to more subjective grading systems or classes, topics like English class or social studies.
	You know, even if they're not necessarily a woke School district, there's still a certain amount of brainwashing that teachers have so they don't support critical thinking.
	Everybody has succumbed to mass psychosis to some degree, including myself.
	The work we have to do is to undo it in ourselves and in other people.
	So you can't really escape it, right?
	You know, we don't live in a perfect Christian world anymore.
	That was destroyed, of course, by original sin.
	So because of that, we're subject to a lot of evils in this world that, you know, man is responsible for.
	And I think a large part of it, I know for a fact a large part of it is the fact that they want us to worship man.
	They want us to be influenced by man.
	And we are influenced by man in ways that we're not even consciously aware of.
	And if we truly were a Christian society, that wouldn't be as effective as it is.
	Let's see.
	If I haven't done it myself firsthand or seen it done right in front of my face firsthand, I don't trust anything that I'm told, says Colty86.
	I think that's a really good point.
	City people are the modern-day Jethro's.
	They don't know the difference between a man or a woman or a three-legged cat.
	Look at a cat, says deplorable 767.
	Yeah, but I did a whole show on this the other day.
	I think all of this city hate that they're breeding among the right...
	Is, in a sense, a psyop.
	And the reason why I believe that is because cities are the heartbeat of culture.
	And whether or not you like it, it's the truth, right?
	Where do all these terrible cultural ideas from the left come from?
	Well, they're born in cities.
	L.A., New York City, D.C. That's where most of the corruption comes from.
	So if Christians still had influence in these places, it wouldn't be corrupt culture we were dealing with.
	It would be a much better culture we were dealing with.
	So we have to figure out a way to not run away from cities, but rather change them from within.
	And I did a whole show on that.
	I won't get into it.
	It's kind of a deeper topic, but I got a lot of hate for it because, and look, if you want to live, like, the country's beautiful.
	I would never say to not live there, that it's not a better quality of life.
	I'm just saying that, generally speaking, or I would say a long-term goal of the conservative movement shouldn't be to flight, but rather to fight.
	And what that looks like, I explained in the show, so you can watch that.
	That was, I believe, from a couple weeks ago in my LFA show.
	But maybe I'll cover it again here because it is a really important topic.
	I think we're kind of psyoped into running away from things, running away from our problems on the right, and we don't even realize it.
	So I think we also have to be aware of the fact that they're going to get us to hate cities rather than to fix cities.
	And there was once a time.
	You can even look at art.
	Art is a great indicator of this.
	If you look at art in New York City, you look at modern art right now versus older art or older architecture, it was way more beautiful when America was a mostly Christian nation.
	Now it's literal shit.
	I mean, it looks like it.
	It looks awful.
	Like, there was this one statue that was unveiled, I think, in Boston a couple years ago, maybe it was a year ago, of MLK, and it literally looked like a pile of crap, okay?
	So that was a disaster.
	Toneman514 said, too many progressive Democrats in Philly.
	I totally agree.
	I just think that we need to find a way to fix the problem rather than run away from it.
	Not to say you don't have the right to Move wherever you want.
	I'm all for that.
	I just don't think that...
	I think we have to be careful of this messaging of, well, we have to live off the grid, and we can't come back to...
	Like, we have to just move away from there.
	Well, what's going to happen, unless we plan on seceding from cities, what's going to happen is the left is still going to maintain control of our culture, and we're going to become a more and more demonic society.
	So we need to find a way to get Christians back in control of this country, and the only way we're going to do that is by...
	You know, taking over and turning those demonic parts of our country into good, into Christian parts of this country.
	That's all I'm saying.
	Agree, Anna, leaving your city versus fixing it won't solve much.
	Granted, I'm in northern Minnesota.
	Deal with all the Floyd BS cities will never be the same.
	Take a stand.
	I know, I agree, I agree.
	I understand why you wouldn't want to live here too.
	But yeah, for sure.
	Alright, guys, so I went on enough rants in the chat for a while, so I want to move on to the second part of the show, which is very important to get to.
	Please go ahead and rumble the show if you haven't already.
	Hit that thumbs up button, guys, and share the show on your social media.
	I do want to move on to the second part of this show because...
	I want to answer the question that I sort of left you guys off with.
	How are they censoring us, you might ask?
	Because I did say, you know, what's worse than rewriting history, what's worse than rewriting things that already happened 200 or even two years ago, is actively censoring what's going on in real time to make sure that the truth never gets out, so that they don't have to even rewrite it because it was never written correctly to begin with.
	And how are they doing that?
	Well, there's a few different ways, and we're going to be discussing that today.
	They exploit people like Elon Musk.
	Elon Musk is a weak person.
	He gives in.
	But we're going to get to that in a moment.
	First, I want to show you this interesting story that just came out, because I think this is the perfect example, the poster child, for how they're able to censor us and therefore control the narrative for years to come.
	Take a look at this.
	Soros Foundation buys up 23 Maine newspapers.
	I mean, what does this guy need 23 Maine newspapers with?
	Oh, whoa, I know.
	A number of Maine's weekly and daily papers have been bought up by George Soros' Open Society Foundation.
	According to Semaphore, Soros and medical device billionaire philanthropist Hanjorg Weiss played a central role in this purchase, giving millions to the National Trust for Local News.
	In July, it was announced that the National Trust for Local News bought all five of Masthead Maine's daily newspapers, including the Portland Press Herald and the Sun Journal, along with 17 weekly papers in partnership with the Maine Journalism Foundation.
	So just great.
	Great.
	And this is exactly what I mean by they try and...
	Censor us in real time to control the narratives.
	They don't even have to rewrite history.
	They've already written it falsely and censored the truth.
	Because that's what's going to go on here.
	You don't think Soros bought those 23 newspapers in Maine merely because he wanted to own 23 newspapers and report news correctly.
	You think he would allow what I'm saying in those newspapers or what Stu says in those papers?
	No, obviously not.
	This is an attempt to have more control over the narrative.
	This is an attempt to censor people because that's what they do best in media.
	That's what people like Soros do best.
	He bought out those 23 newspapers so that he can continue to censor all dissenting voices.
	That's what's going on here.
	I mean, think about it.
	Think about all of the outlets that, you know, CNN, MSNBC, anything with elitist control, which they all have, Who do they censor the most?
	Oh, that's right.
	People who are pointing out what they're doing.
	So obviously this is an attempt to continue to control the narrative.
	Perfect example right now.
	They'll tell you it's a conspiracy theory, but then when you see stories like that, George Soros buying up 23 newspapers at like whatever age he's at.
	He's a fossil.
	Okay?
	His grandson has to take over now.
	I think either his son or his grandson.
	I don't know.
	Alex Soros.
	I don't know if it's his son or his grandson.
	The guy's like dying, okay?
	So why does he need to own more newspapers?
	It's not like he needs more money.
	Oh, obviously, to contribute, to controlling, to censoring the truth.
	He wants to make sure he can control whatever history is to come.
	And he's not the only one.
	No.
	Now we know about the ADL. We know how bad they are.
	We know how terrible the foundations of that organization really are.
	We've covered stories.
	I was on Stu's show talking about how bad the story was behind the founding of the ADL and how corrupt it is and how they really only use it To accuse literally anyone who thinks differently of anti-Semitism, anybody who dares to criticize a Jew merely, you know, for doing something wrong, that they just happen to be a Jew.
	Oh, you're an anti-Semite.
	The ADL does that all the time.
	They're a horrible organization.
	They accuse everybody of anti-Semitism.
	Doesn't even make sense.
	It's one of those organizations, and there are plenty of them, ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center.
	ADL does that thing where they try and basically ruin your life over a false allegation.
	But I mean, their entire organization is founded on false ideas, false principles.
	The idea that Leo Frank was innocent.
	Yeah, right.
	But anyways, I'm not even going to get into the history of it.
	The reason why I bring the ADL up is because, ironically, that is exactly the organization that pushes the most to censor people, or one of the biggest organizations when it comes to censoring people.
	And of course, who's the CEO of that?
	Oh, Jonathan Greenblatt.
	And there was this clip I came across of Jonathan Greenblatt in an interview talking about what a threat Nick Fuentes' words are when it comes to Twitter.
	And he was basically calling on Elon Musk to censor Nick Fuentes even more.
	Now, as far as I'm aware, Nick Fuentes isn't even allowed on the app, but yet what's funny is people are still circulating his videos, and Jonathan Greenblatt doesn't like that very much.
	So this is what he said About Nick Fuentes and how he really wants Elon Musk to censor him even more.
	Take a look at this.
	Let me ask you about that, Jonathan, because this is a core point.
	How do you know?
	I've encountered Nick Fuentes commenting on my work, you know, notorious Holocaust denier anti-Semite on, I'm going to continue to call it Twitter, X is too awkward, and everyone knows what I'm talking about.
	I've seen it.
	How do you know that it is being Amplified.
	I mean, I know that before Musk bought the platform, there was a lot of effort to suppress some of this stuff, not very successful, but there was an effort to do so.
	How do you know that Musk is actually seeking to elevate and give greater reach to precisely those voices?
	Seeking and doing are different things.
	I can't tell you what he's seeking, right?
	I don't know what's in his head, but I know what's happened, right?
	And so I can tell you, based on his reach, if you will, that the number of impressions these tweets have generated, you know, millions and millions of impressions they would have never had before because they might not have ever been noticed.
	But he has expanded them exponentially, Brett.
	So then someone would say, well, how do you know it's anti-Semitic?
	Like, and is that necessarily bad?
	And look, there can be ugly content up there that I dislike and abhor, don't get me wrong.
	But I think the idea of it being effectively amplified And spread instantaneously across the Twitter sphere, which is still so important as shaping the public conversation, I find that deeply disturbing.
	I really, really do.
	I think, again, there's a reason why my 14-year-old can't walk into, in theory, an R-rated movie theater.
	It's not censorship to say my 14-year-old shouldn't walk into the R-rated movie theater.
	There's a place for an R-rated movie, just not for him.
	It is not censorship for you to say, we don't want to publish Nick Fuentes in Sapir.
	You're not censoring his freedom of speech.
	You're making an editorial decision.
	You are.
	And look, if these things are like you said, and then I'll stop after this so James can jump in.
	If they are indeed a utility, really a public square, then they should be regulated and treated like a utility.
	No thanks, you fake Jew communist.
	No!
	That's not at all how it works.
	You're calling for censorship.
	You're calling for a violation of the First Amendment.
	The very thing that Elon Musk said he would be true to.
	Now, we know he hasn't been true to it, and we're going to be continuing that conversation after we discuss this clip, but there's so much that I want to delve into there.
	First of all, the whole analogy with why his daughter can't go to an R-rated movie theater versus a social media platform, that's not in all analogous because that doesn't make any sense.
	Your daughter's not allowed to go to that movie theater because it's inappropriate.
	There are laws surrounding what's okay and what's so not to show to children.
	When it comes to a social media platform, It's understood that it is a platform, not a publisher.
	A publisher would decide whether or not they wanted to publish information.
	That is not what Twitter is.
	And so therefore, you should be allowed, especially considering that if you were on that platform, it's assumed that you are an adult.
	You're not a child.
	And so stop trying to censor everybody else's speech, Jonathan Greenblatt.
	And you know what's also interesting about that?
	If Nick Fuentes were really this crazy person that Jonathan Greenblatt thinks he is, then why would he be so scared of him?
	Obviously, there's something that Nick is saying that Jonathan Greenblatt doesn't want to get out.
	And if it were really as crazy as Jonathan Greenblatt thinks it is or really as unpopular as Jonathan Greenblatt wants us to believe it is, then there would be no need to censor him.
	When somebody says something absolutely crazy about me, I don't even bother blocking the person or debunking it because it's so absurd that I know that there's no way it could even be true.
	I don't feel the need to go out of my way to clear my name or anything because it's just so unreasonable.
	So why is it that you're scared?
	Could there be something truthful that Nick Fuentes is saying?
	And again, mind you, you don't have to like Nick Fuentes to support his right to be on Twitter, to support his right to exist on Twitter.
	First of all, I think he should be allowed on as an active user.
	But the funny part is he's not even allowed on as an active user, so Jonathan Greenblatt is calling for an extra level of censorship.
	I guess you're not allowed to have Nick Fuentes at all on the app.
	No videos of Fuentes at all.
	It doesn't matter which account it came from.
	Do you realize how insane that is?
	If you're gonna take issue with anything on Twitter, it should be porn.
	Not Nick Fuentes videos.
	Like I said, like I said, guys, if you think something's crazy, you're not gonna go out of your way to censor it.
	So obviously he's hitting a nerve Jonathan Greenblatt doesn't want him to hit.
	He's getting frustrated, Jonathan that is, because he wants Elon to shut down any Fuentes material on Twitter because there's something that Jonathan Greenblatt doesn't want to get out there.
	You know, as a Hispanic, If you are hateful of Hispanics for whatever reason, although I've really never come across anybody other than the, you know, schizophrenic trannies in my DMs that are truly racist, okay, whatever.
	It's not really a common concept.
	But even if you were, I wouldn't care to censor you.
	I don't care what you think.
	At the end of the day, racism is a thought.
	It's a belief system.
	Whatever is in your head can't jump out and hurt me.
	So the fact that Jonathan Greenblatt is so frustrated over the fact that there's words that Nick Fuentes said that he doesn't like tells you that these people really want to control the narrative.
	They are trying to edit the truth in real time.
	He doesn't want the takeaway of the people to be that a lot of people appreciated the things that Nick Fuentes had to say.
	He doesn't want the takeaway to be that he actually had somewhat of a cult following or a following in general.
	He wants it to be that Nick Fuentes was this big, meany, terrible person psychopath that nobody liked.
	And that nobody agreed with.
	And that people only liked Jonathan Greenblatt.
	I added that part in.
	But the point is, he wants the narrative to be such that ADL is saving the world, and we know it's not.
	It's a disgusting foundation founded on a murderer-rapist.
	So that's a lie in and of itself.
	Are you really going to believe these people ever since then?
	No.
	But what it is, is he's trying to censor people to control history in real time.
	That's what they do.
	And like I said, he was calling on Elon to do that because Elon is in a position of power.
	Elon owns a very successful social media company right now.
	Now it's called X, not Twitter, although I rarely refer to it as X. But he's forcing Elon, he's pressuring Elon to do that.
	And sadly, I think Elon's gonna give in.
	And it's not just Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the ADL who's doing that.
	It's also Prime Minister Netanyahu.
	Yeah, what in the world would a Prime Minister of Israel have to do with an American businessman who simply wants to bring back free speech, or so he says he does?
	Well, anyways, guys, regardless, he was there touring X headquarters the other day.
	Here's their little friend time.
	It was the most bizarre meeting ever, but we'll break down what was really going on.
	There's a pattern here.
	But take a look at this little tour they went on.
	It's so weird and gay.
	Take a look.
	Here we are in a little train, sitting next to each other, talking about how anti-Semitic everything is.
	Like, what is going on here?
	Guys, I told you not to trust Elon.
	I told you not to trust Elon.
	God, he's such a cuck.
	Now we're taking pictures pretending to love SpaceX even though I'm just here to censor you and to censor people in American history.
	What a horrible blazer.
	Why are you wearing that orange color?
	She's like a fake Hillary Clinton.
	The last person I would ever invite to my very successful business to tour it would be the Prime Minister of Israel.
	But obviously there's other reasons, there's other motives behind him going.
	Like, as if Netanyahu is going to give him, like, good recommendations on how to make a car or how to run a company.
	Ridiculous.
	There they are.
	I thought they were holding hands for a second.
	That would have been funny.
	They might as well at this point, to be honest.
	It's like we're at the cleaners now, I guess.
	Some Mexican lady about to clean the car.
	Nope, that's not what we're doing.
	And the fact that this was all televised, like no one else covered this, at least that I'm aware of.
	I guess they didn't want us to know who actually has influence over Elon Musk.
	You'd think it would be his wife, but he doesn't have a wife.
	He just keeps impregnating random women.
	So I guess the woman in his life is Netanyahu and the ADL.
	John Smith says they should embrace their gayness and hold hands.
	I agree.
	Alright, so there's the three of them.
	Getting ready to take a picture.
	So happy.
	Yay!
	We toured the company and we got to talk about anti-Semitism all day.
	What a nightmare that sounds like.
	God, my goodness.
	But that was their day together, and it actually got worse.
	Remember that bit of that clip I showed you at the top of the show that kind of set the stage for the rest of the episode?
	Well, guess what?
	There was a much longer conversation, about 45 minutes long, and the topic of that conversation was how to fight anti-Semitism.
	And what's so funny in the interview, and I'm about to show it to you now, or at least about two minutes of it, It's so funny in the interview is that you can tell Elon looks slightly uncomfortable, but he feels pressured into doing whatever Netanyahu wants him to do.
	You could tell where the pressure is coming from.
	It's a very interesting dynamic if you read their body language and some of the words that Elon's saying.
	He's trying to maintain some sort of autonomy in the conversation, but he realizes that he's losing it as Netanyahu speaks more and pressures him to censor anti-Semitic views.
	Which again, who gets to define what anti-Semitism is?
	Right?
	That's the number one question.
	That's why we're supposed to have free speech in this country because that's dangerous territory.
	But anyways, here's the clip because it was a pretty interesting conversation and it looks very uncomfortable.
	But I also know your opposition to anti-Semitism.
	You've spoken about it, tweeted about it.
	And all I can say is I hope you find within the...
	The confines of the First Amendment, the ability to stop not only anti-Semitism or roll it back as best you can, but any collective hatred of a people that anti-Semitism represents.
	And I know you're committed to that.
	I hope you succeed in it.
	It's not an easy task, but I encourage you and urge you to find a balance.
	It's a tough one.
	I mean, I'm sort of against attacking any group.
	It doesn't matter who it is.
	I'm in favor of that which furthers civilization and which ultimately leads us to become a space-faring civilization and where we understand the nature of the universe.
	Obviously, I'm against antisemitism.
	I'm against anti-really anything that promotes hate and conflict.
	But it's also important to bear in mind that there are 550 million monthly users now going to maybe 600 million monthly users.
	And any given day, there's on the order of 100 to 200 million posts.
	So in amongst the 100 or 200 million, and I'm excluding retweets or reposts, Some of those are going to be bad.
	It's impossible to say, and you can't police it in advance, but you can say after the fact, oh, it's getting reported as hate speech.
	OK, well, we're going to de-amplify We're not going to promote hate speech because we think probably that's not what people want to hear.
	I think the other thing is it doesn't stop you from coming out as you have and as I do on every possible forum and condemn anti-Semitism.
	Collective hatred of a people.
	You say they have to be banished.
	They don't have a right to exist.
	They don't have a right to a state of their own and so on.
	And the vile things that are said, I don't care if they come from the hard left or from the hard right or white supremacists or, I don't know, ultra-progressives.
	For me, that's something that I condemn and I think that it's important to come out.
	And that's quite a separate question.
	The condemnation is quite separate from the question of access.
	See what I mean?
	It was like a slightly uncomfortable interaction there.
	And the best part of all of that is when Netanyahu's like, okay, so I'm really glad you're fighting anti-Semitism.
	And then Elon's like, yeah, well, I don't really hate when it comes from any direction or any sort of race or any group.
	And Netanyahu's like, yeah, yeah, but anti-Semitism, right?
	And he's like, yeah, but I mean, and Netanyahu's like, no, no, anti-Semitism.
	He's like, yeah, yeah, okay, fine, anti-Semitism.
	It's so funny.
	It's so funny.
	You know, that's why he was there.
	What in the world would a Prime Minister of Israel have anything to do with, or what in the world would he have to do with X, really?
	And I've been asking that question for like the last 20 minutes, but it's true.
	The real reason he's there is to make sure that he can be a part of the mission to censor history in real time, because the only thing worse than rewriting history after the fact is censoring it in real time so the truth never has the opportunity to get out.
	Any dissenting opinions will be censored.
	And again, it doesn't matter if you agree with or don't agree with who's being censored.
	It doesn't matter if you agree with or don't agree with Nick Fuentes or whatever it is.
	I would rather live in a society where there's diversity of thought and we get to make up for ourselves what we believe and don't believe.
	What we think is true and what we don't think is true.
	Obviously they're scared of what Nick Fuentes has to say if they feel the need to censor him.
	They're worried it's going to resonate with a significant number of people.
	That's clearly what's going on here.
	And it's not even about him.
	It's about everything.
	The fact that they're going to Elon Musk.
	ADL is calling on Elon Musk.
	Netanyahu meets with Elon Musk.
	And they're both pressuring him.
	Oh, and Soros buys a 23 newspapers in Maine.
	Obviously, they're pushing a narrative.
	Obviously, something sketchy is going on.
	And you have to be pretty low IQ to not think that that's the case.
	So yeah, I said it before and I'll say it again.
	The only thing worse than rewriting history is censoring it in real time so that the truth doesn't even have an opportunity to be there.
	The real history never gets written at all.
	Alright guys, so I do want to move on to the next part of the show.
	I have one last clip I want to show you.
	It has to do with this drag queen event at a church.
	It was very strange.
	I did read the story a couple days ago, but this was my first time seeing the video.
	I think you guys should see it too.
	But before we get to that, I want to go ahead and see what's going on in the chat.
	Goldenbolt says, Anna, you can do no wrong.
	Thank you.
	It's not true, but thanks.
	Oh, we have a troll back here.
	He must work for the ADL. Anna brings the fire, says Lord Fishy.
	John Smith says there are like three white supremacists in America, two are the feds.
	That's so true.
	Gavin McInnes used to make this joke where he said, if you rounded up all of the white supremacists in this country, you could fit them all in my living room, and they wouldn't even fill up the entire living room.
	So I think that's a good way to sum it up.
	It's not even a real thing.
	Yeah, I'm going to try to see if they can ban the troll, although we only have a few minutes left, so...
	Can y'all ban the troll?
	Let's see.
	What else are you guys saying?
	Anna is fire.
	AB502 says he's got one already.
	You can't convince me he doesn't...
	I don't know what you're talking about, but that's funny.
	All right.
	Bman6262 says Anna could do no wrong in my eyes.
	Aw, thank you, Bman.
	All right, guys.
	Please go ahead and rumble the show if you haven't already.
	Also, share the link so everybody else can see...
	The truth about what's going on here, I don't think anybody else is...
	Oh yeah, let's see, the troll says white supremacy is not a real thing.
	What the hell was Charlottesville?
	Okay, but name me another event that wasn't a fake story other than Charlottesville.
	The only event they have to point to is Charlottesville, as if that accounts for everybody's view in this country.
	Charlottesville happened in 2017.
	So can you come up with a new narrative, please?
	Because Antifa causes violence every single day and says how much they hate white people.
	So, you know what?
	It's not a thing.
	That's not proof of anything.
	SPN attracts trolls always over the target, says Cass has Rumble 29.
	Yeah, I know.
	He's in love with me, this troll.
	Anyways, it's hilarious.
	But I do want to go ahead and move on to the next thing, guys.
	The last story I wanted to talk about, okay?
	Now, the Texas Family Project in Defend Our Kids was on site during a Dallas church's Drag Sunday service.
	And this really upset me.
	As a Christian, this really pissed me off, okay?
	And I'm sure it's going to piss you off, too, because this looked like they were, like, doing some sort of demonic chant.
	I hated seeing this.
	But here they are.
	Here's a drag celebration somehow going on during church.
	Take a look at this.
	...to be people of faith, who stand for justice, who proclaim love...
	We recognize that all people are made in the loving image of God, no matter who they are, how they dress, express themselves, or who they love.
	We celebrate this divine diversity and commit to lifting up the voices of the LGBT people plus community and creating spaces where everyone can thrive.
	Drag queens are often targets of hate and violence.
	But we know that they are powerful and resilient people who show us what it means to be truly authentic and expressive.
	We honor the strength and we pledge to be allies to the direct community.
	Recognizing their full humanity and their incredible contributions to our world.
	We embrace radical inclusivity and work to dismantle systems of oppression.
	We will guide against all forms of hate, prejudice, and intolerance in order to build a world that celebrates every person to be identity and its.
	Now if I didn't know any better, I would think that that was a satanic temple, chanting.
	But no, that was allegedly a church.
	And I don't have much time, but I want to just say, sum it up with this.
	We have successfully taken the word of God out of the house of God.
	There's this weird thing going on with Christians where they've somehow forgotten what the entire book they're supposed to be following says.
	There is nothing in the Bible that supports drag queens or transgenderism.
	None of that.
	In fact, quite the contrary.
	God makes it very clear that there are two genders, and he makes it very clear what our roles are in life.
	You're not supposed to be a man dressing up like a woman.
	That's not part of your role in life.
	You're supposed to be a protector and a provider.
	So, you know what?
	There's something very strange.
	I want to do a whole show on this.
	If you guys are interested, let me know in the comments.
	But I want to dive into what happened to Christianity, when this all went wrong.
	But believe it or not, there's a lot of Christians out there that probably have never read a Bible in their life, and that is the very crux of this issue.
	Nobody actually is living by the Word of God when it comes to Christians.
	Obviously not nobody.
	I'm exaggerating.
	But the point is there are way too many examples of what we just saw there and I'm getting sick of it.
	And the only explanation I have for it is that they haven't actually read the Bible.
	Because that is not Christianity.
	And I'm sorry.
	But Jesus wasn't this peaceful, tolerant guy who always did whatever the government said.
	Not at all.
	Jesus turned tables.
	Jesus was an insurrectionist of his time.
	He caused problems for the government.
	That's why they crucified him.
	And God calls on us to be the same thing, to do the same thing, or to get as close to that as possible.
	Most of us are not nearly, none of us are nearly as brave as Jesus Christ, but the best we can do is try to spread the truth.
	And sometimes you're going to have to ruffle some feathers in order to do that.
	And that really shouldn't be up for debate.
	But I guess some churches haven't read the Bible.
	I guess some people, some Christians haven't read the Bible.
	Unbelievable.
	All right, guys, it is 10.02, so I do have to get going.
	Thank you so much for tuning in today, guys.
	Please go ahead and share the show on your social media.
	Rumble the show on your way out.
	Rumbling just means hitting that thumbs up button.
	And also rumble the other shows on the network.
	Help us climb the Rumble leaderboard.
	You guys are amazing.
	Thank you so much for tuning in.
	I will see you back here tomorrow for another episode here on the Stu Peters Network at 9 p.m. Eastern time and also on my show at LFA at 3 p.m.
	Eastern time, which would just be my regular daytime wrong think episode.
	See you at both of those.
	Hopefully you'll both be there and I'll be doing live shows.
	So I will see you in the chat.

▲