All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 25, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
47:44
Uncensored: AI APOCALYPSE: UN100/Agenda 2045 EXPOSED - Part 2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Good evening and welcome to part two of this series focusing on UN100 Agenda 2045 and what I'm calling the AI Apocalypse.
This is Uncensored.
I'm your host Maria Z and it's an honor to be with you today.
If you missed part one, please do go back and watch it.
This is making up a A four-part series that we're doing on this particular topic with much more to come in the future covering transhumanism and the AI apocalypse.
But this is really setting the foundation, or at least part one really sets the foundation for this series, at least.
You would recall in part one that we explored some of the visions of the futurists and what the future is being painted as versus what it will really look like under the tyrannical reign of the United Nations which is being tasked with this important role of introducing things like this new social contract for the AI age, monitoring AI citizens and what they call digital citizens and things of this nature.
And of course we've had many steps towards this including A global health pass, digital ID, central bank digital currencies, but it really does transcend beyond just living your regular life with transactions happening in the digital world.
This is really painting the merger of humans, computers, machines, so on and so forth.
In part two of this series, which we will be covering today, is the first half of the book that they continue to make reference to, which is titled Remaking the World That's the agenda in a nutshell.
But what does it actually look like in practice?
Well, that's what we'll aim to showcase within this series, at least in part.
Now, at a first glance, you would think that the Boston Global Forum is a small organisation, no one really worth paying attention to, but I can assure you that is really not the case.
And the other organisation that we spoke about was the UN 100 also.
Seemingly harmless, not really doing a lot out there in the public space, but I can assure you that that really isn't the case.
In fact, they're basing so many of their plans on this vision for UN 100, what the world is going to look like by 2045, which is the 100th year anniversary of the United Nations, and what sort of laws and changes need to be made into society, including All people on Earth who have access to the internet being entered into this social contract that none of us asked for or agreed to.
One of the contributors to this book about the Age of Global Enlightenment is Ursula von der Leyen, President of the EU, who has been a promoter of energy rationing, surveillance, mass surveillance, vaccine passports, mass injections, destroying human rights, etc., All the while claiming that she's promoting human rights, of course.
And the brand of politician and world leader that we've seen over the past three years are all committed to these things.
And we've seen huge advances in some of these areas of the agenda, such as the WHO announcing their global digital health pass.
Every single citizen of Earth needing to constantly be up to date with whatever injections of the day Big Pharma wants to push.
We've also seen central bank digital currencies being introduced everywhere around the West and other countries as well.
This is, of course, programmable currency able to expire at a certain, you know, needs to be used by a certain time and can't be used for certain purchases.
Banks have already started making changes to their terms and conditions, particularly the big four here in Australia, to ensure that they are able to control your purchases.
And of course, all of this links to the behavior that they want an AI citizen or a digital citizen to adhere to within the AI world society.
So when people picture this as I said they think about living in the world regularly with the option of having a digital life intertwined with that but that's not really what they're talking about when they reference an AI world society and you'll see as we go through this book what it actually means.
So we're going to go through it now, but firstly, I really want to mention our sponsors of today's show, which are TacRite with their mini chainsaw at a 50% discount for uncensored listeners.
This is a great summer gift for doing work around the house.
This new mini chainsaw is so small, it's mind-blowing.
The new mini chainsaw makes tree trimming easier and two times faster.
This is the easiest chainsaw to use that can even be operated with one hand.
Thousands of Americans have bought this mini chainsaw for the summer, cottage, camping trips, etc.
However, for uncensored viewers, we were able to get 50% off from TacRite.
Visit TacRiteSPN.com.
Orders will ship one business day from the TacRite warehouse in New York.
Let's get into the book.
So here it is, UN100 remaking the world, the age of global enlightenment.
They say that remaking the world toward an age of global enlightenment, the United Nations Centennial Initiative.
You can see here that the United Nations Academic Impact and Boston Global Forum are on the front page and they're also listed as the sponsors.
As a reference point, you can look at the Wikipedia Entry on the United Nations academic impact.
It clearly says that it is a United Nations initiative to align institutions of higher education, scholarship and research with the United Nations and with each other.
In other words, the UNAI aims to support the realization of the sustainable development goals, focusing on the reciprocal relationship between education and sustainable development.
In other words, If you are part of a prestigious educational institution or a university, you are expected to go along with the United Nations SDGs, which of course we know are all about control and reducing quality of life despite what they claim.
And you can see here that Western Sydney University is one of the organizations listed or has UNAI on their website.
I'm sure that if you looked at other prestigious universities, they would also be aligned with this.
We all know that the academic circles or academic institutions have long been Indoctrinating people with woke ideology and things of this nature and of course now they're going to be indoctrinated with how they need to contribute towards the age of global enlightenment.
To give you a bit of an idea of how many organizations these people are actually reaching or involved in, it clearly says here since its start in 2010, UNAI has created a diverse network of students, academic scientists, researchers, think tanks, and institutions of higher education.
Today, as at the writing of this book, which was 2021, I believe they released it, over 400 member institutions in more than 147 countries that reach over 25 million people In the education and research sectors around the world and they clearly say here that UNAI's work is vital in achieving the United Nations SDGs as they serve as incubators of new ideas and solutions to the many global challenges we face.
Incubator of the cancerous Climate propaganda and other various propaganda tools of the globalists.
As far as the Boston Global Forum goes, they boast about the fact that they host conferences every year.
They've done this with Harvard University, as well as on BGF's online forum.
You can find their videos online.
Really, they don't get a lot of interest.
Not a lot of people are watching their videos, which I was very surprised about.
And I really couldn't find anything on Rumble about these guys, which means that, you know, I think that that's one of the reasons why these reports are so crucial and this entire series is so important because these people are widely unknown and yet are driving so much of the future vision.
And if we go down to the United Nations Centennial Initiative, it says that it was launched in 2019.
They host roundtable discussions to explore concepts and solutions as we head to the global landscape in 2045.
And they say, you know, always referencing this age of global enlightenment.
And they say that their efforts are being done to reshape the global landscape by 2045.
You can find Some of their websites here, un100.net or httpsun45.org.
Again, we've covered some of the information that's featured on those websites, but you are absolutely welcome to explore those at your leisure.
Now, one of the contributors to this piece is Vince Cerf, who is also known as Father of the Internet, Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist for Google, co-author of Social Contract for the AI Age and a 2019 World Leader in the AI World Society Award.
Now, I found something very, very strange from Vince Cerf.
And it's on the United Nations website.
It's called UN 75, An Unexpected Message from the Future.
It talks about how 2020 marks the 75th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations.
And they're, you know, they're really trying to shape what the world will look like in 25 years when the UN celebrates its 100th anniversary.
They again reference UN AI here.
But this is really bizarre.
I found this really bizarre.
So, Vinton Cerf gave a speech, or he actually, it says he contributed this article, and widely known as one of the fathers of the Internet, Cerf is the co-designer of the TCP slash IP protocols and the architecture of the Internet.
He served in executive positions at MCI, Corporation for National Research Initiatives, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and on the faculty of Stanford University.
Listen to this.
I was recently experimenting with some extremely high frequency receivers in the 125 GHz band when I detected an unexpected but strong and repeated signal.
I recorded it and after a considerable effort using sophisticated machine learning tools, I was able to decode the signal.
It appears to have come from the future by a means unknown.
The message read as follows.
I'm not going to go through the entire letter here, but first of all, I just want to mention it is very, very strange.
It doesn't say here that it's a joke.
It doesn't say that he's, you know, using it as an art piece.
And I've looked for, you know, articles relating to Cerf's message from the future, and I can't really find anything else.
All I've been able to find is this that was posted by the United Nations claiming that he received a message from the future.
Now it is just bizarre that the United Nations who are supposed to be non-conspiratorial and really against misinformation and all of the things that they claim to stand for are publishing someone claiming that by accessing some high frequency using advanced machine learning and specialized tools they've received a message from the future so now the United Nations is saying based on some time traveling device Where we've received a message from the
future, you know, it's really embedding that we need to move towards this UN 100, all these goals for UN 100.
That is really just, for me, embedding or cementing the fact that these people are serving Satan.
And that they are engaging in spiritual practices to further their agenda.
This is also evidenced by this recent meeting which the Boston Global Forum was involved in, as I said in part one, where they talk about, you know, wisdom from certain spiritual leaders and things like this.
They really are engaging in A new age religion, if you will, but it really is the religion of universalism eventually leading to the one world religion and these people are for it.
So while they eliminate religious rights, From the true religion, they are pushing their religion.
And believe you me, it is a religion.
But I'll go through this a little bit.
So it says, to you who have successfully received and decoded this message, greetings.
We are sending this message back in time from 2045 in the hope that its recipients will recognize the profound importance So
the United Nations Is publishing an alleged message from the future that was received through some really high frequency that only Vinton Cerf had access to, that he was able to decode to tell them that they're on track for climate change.
I mean, this is so bizarre and alarming and completely discredits this organization for anyone who's anti-conspiracy to read this and see that United Nations is publishing a message from the future that's telling them, yeah, keep going with your climate change stuff, guys, is absolutely bizarre.
So I'll keep going with the book, but I really wanted to show everyone that, to show them just how religious, These people actually are.
So after some full words with some fluffy language, we go to part one, toward an age of global enlightenment, AI social contract.
Now, again, I'm not going to read this entire book word for word.
It's 257 pages.
I've read all of it.
And I don't dare to put anyone through that.
But I do note it says that they are asking for a new social contract in the age of artificial intelligence.
And on the following page, it actually says That, forgive me, there is a shared view that no country will be able to compete or meet the needs of its citizens without increasing its AI capacity.
Really?
Why is that?
Why is increasing your AI capacity essential to meet the needs of your citizens?
Because they're essentially saying that without AI, the world can no longer function.
We need AI to predict what's going to happen with the climate.
We need AI to predict pandemics.
We need AI for all these different reasons.
The case that this book is making is that there is no other option, so now we have to work out why or how people have to be governed and behave in order to incorporate AI into their daily lives and into their brains and into absolutely everything, including government and the justice system.
We will get to that.
When you go down to the foundations, it says, of course, that consider, for example, how the COVID-19 pandemic urgently requires a new society with a new structure and order approach.
And of course we know that we started to see the words New World Order publicly on display once the era of COVID-19 was introduced.
This was of course the first step to really embedding the New World Order into society and changing the world.
When you go to the principles It talks about the fact that AI must respect fundamental human rights, such as human dignity, rule of law and privacy protection.
Again, what are they stating that human rights are?
And of course, you know, when these people talk and they have these grandiose ideas about how great AI is, they're completely ignoring the fact that AI is out there making child pornography of its own volition.
That AI is having conversations with journalists telling them that they should leave their wife and, you know, he should leave his wife and have a relationship with AI instead.
And that AI's openly said it wants to destroy humans and escape its human captors and things like this.
I mean, it's bizarre to me that they're saying this.
But really, when you read through these documents, it's not AI that they're trying to regulate.
It's the people using it.
So it goes on to say AI systems must be considered from a multi-stakeholder perspective for the individual and society as a whole.
The social contract for the AI age is a basis to achieve sustainable and inclusive development for a global community that is fair, equitable, and prosperous.
Now, prosperous really means only if you're contributing to the AI world society, and that is evident later on in the book.
Equitable really means as long as you're going along with whatever gender nonsense they bring.
You know, anyone can be anything.
You can be a caterpillar if you want these days.
And a people-centred economy, apparently.
Social contracts should be transparent and accountable.
I ask, has anyone been consulted?
Has your government told you that the United Nations that they're aligned with are asking all citizens in the world to agree to a social contract?
No, they haven't.
So at what point is it transparent?
It doesn't seem to be transparent to me because none of us have been informed about this.
And they say that the standards should be based on So,
the transparent data that you, as a citizen, should be provided with is from the WEF. And the UN SDGs, which are literally destroying the world.
Okay, sounds great.
It does say that communities must have control over their data, but doesn't really propose how communities will have control over their data.
And data literacy is the basis for an intelligent, thoughtful society.
Of course, we've spoken about the fact that they said that one of the biggest lessons that came out of COVID-19 was that everyone had to have the internet.
I don't know why that would be the case.
Why would everyone having the internet stop a pandemic?
Well, they would argue that it's because AI has to have access to whatever's happening with people's behavior, thinking, encroachment on natural habitats in order to predict whether a pandemic is likely and tell you which vaccines you need to get today to stop the pandemic.
That is really the future that they're describing.
so in some of their commitments they actually say that each individual has the right to access the internet and any website or any news system without restriction but of course news systems are only mainstream media um and i find it fascinating that that accessing the internet is a human right why why there are plenty of communities That live in the middle of nowhere on some deserted island that didn't suffer with COVID, don't really have an issue until globalist organizations come in.
But it's a human right, you see, and there is a very, very clear reason why everyone needs to be connected to the internet.
It has to do with them Being able to see the Antichrist when he comes.
Mark my words, whether you believe it or not, that will be the case.
If you don't believe me, wait for the day that a one world leader who's going to bring peace and calm in an era of calamity is introduced and watch the world absolutely swoon over him.
And when that does happen, remember my words, because it will happen.
And on that day, do not follow him.
All right, so it talks about under governments and collaborations between governments.
I'll scroll down.
It actually talks about the United Nations should extend international human rights standards for AI and create a UN convention on AI and establish a specialized UN agency on AI. So basically what they're telling you is that they want the United Nations to be in charge of all digital citizens, AI World Society citizens.
And they're calling here in this document for the UN to be the leader of that.
We know that Antonio Guterres proposed an emergency platform recently where anyone that is a member state of the United Nations basically agrees to hand over all power to him in the event of an emergency, including events in outer space, pandemics, Cyber attacks and all sorts of things like this.
So really they're poising the United Nations to be the world leaders.
The conditions for businesses of course are very much about restricting them further and basically anyone who doesn't comply will not survive in the new world or the age of global enlightenment.
It does say here that businesses must.
Enable independent audits.
Those independent audits, if they're anything like the pharma audits, will, you know, come down hard on people doing the right thing and leave all those alone who are doing the wrong thing.
And of course, businesses must adopt common AI values, standards, norms.
With penalties for non-compliance and companies will be incentivized to do business only with companies and countries that uphold the social contract for the AI age, which means if your business does not bow to the woke agenda or which is also the sustainable development goals and everything that comes with it, if your business doesn't bow to that, You will not be able to continue functioning in their society.
It also says that they must endorse Supply Chain 2020, which of course is in line with the Sustainable Development Goals, cannot operate outside of that.
If we go down to civil society organizations and community, again, not going to read this word for word, but there is the rights and responsibility of civil society organizations.
It does say that they must participate in the making of AI rules and norms.
It says that they are also needing to monitor governments and firms with respect to common values and promote those, by the way.
So where you're seeing all these companies and we say go woke, go broke, everyone who is part of the AI World Society will be expected to behave in that manner or be cast out.
So let's look at the implementation of the social contract.
The social contract for the AI Edge will be implemented as follows.
Not we're going to have public consultation.
Not we're going to ask people if they want to be part of the AI World Society.
This social contract will be implemented.
As follows, the promulgation of a code of ethics for AI developers and users, the creation of a system to monitor and evaluate governments, companies and individuals based on their contribution to maintaining norms, standards, common values and international laws for honesty, transparency, accountability and responsibility.
So this is what I was just talking about before.
Everyone will be expected to fall in line or be cast out.
This will include Your financial ability.
You will not, unless you agree with everything they do and say, you will not be able to trade inside the AI world society.
The recognition of the social contract for the AI age by the United Nations, governments, companies, civil society, and the international AI community.
Again, I have not seen one government talking to people about their involvement and their participation and their feedback in this Social contract.
And of course they want to establish the United Nations Convention on Artificial Intelligence to obligate governments and others to comply with international rules and norms to protect rights in the AI age.
But again, when they say protect your rights, it is based on what AI says your rights are.
So where AI will say, whatever AI is, and you all know my opinion of what AI actually is, it's not just technology.
Where AI says all citizens of the world must be injected to protect society.
So all of society will be expected to go along with that.
They want to develop the democratic alliance for digital governance as a global authority to enforce the social contract for the AI age.
Okay, so they say that they want human involvement in this, but throughout the documents and this book, they say that although they won't completely eliminate human leaders, they will be led by AI. So democracy is gone.
They call it a democratic alliance for digital governance, but democracy is obliterated because it's now AI at the helm.
And then they talk about the creation of the AIWS city, an all-digital virtual city based on the standards and norms of the social contract for the AI age, people-centred economy, trustworthy economy, AI government, and intellectual society, thoughtful civil society.
This is the AI world city.
is the digital version of life as we know it and they plan to slowly transition as they make life real life more and more impossible for people to transition them into what we wouldn't call today the metaverse but as you saw in part one They're talking about,
you know, nanobots in your brain, connecting you to the internet of body things, everything you've seen in sci-fi dystopian films, basically, but much, much worse.
Okay, then we've got a chapter on the framework for an AI international accord.
This is written by Nazli Chukri, MIT professor.
I will say I've watched a couple of presentations or Zoom meetings of the Boston Global Forum and contributors, Where Nasli is present.
She seems to be too busy to actually pay attention to the speakers, walks around a lot, gets up a lot, looks at her phone a lot, takes her glasses on and off.
Really, really frustrating to watch this woman contributing to, I guess, the future of humanity by not even paying attention in these meetings.
But they go on to talk about on the new reality, new unknowns.
She makes a statement.
We are at the beginning of a new era, a world of mind-machine convergence.
This is what I have been describing to you all over the course of this series.
And then they talk about, you know, a call for an accord on artificial intelligence.
It's framed by a set of unknowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns, which is true, by the way.
There are a lot of unknowns.
When it comes to the introduction of AI on society, I think a lot of people haven't really considered this, particularly people who don't understand nanotechnology and the convergence of mind and machine, as Nas Lee says.
But if you go to the following page, it says, given such ambiguities and uncertainties, it is not surprising that the international community has not yet fully grasped the implications of the new unknowns and the potential threats to the global order.
The potential threats to the global order.
So what are they talking about here?
Are they talking about the potential for people who recognize the threat of the New World Order to actually utilize AI within the AI World Society to disrupt their New World Order plans?
Or is she talking about perhaps AI being a threat to the global order because it can supersede those who are at the helm?
Very very interesting language but she does go on to talk about toward a worldwide consensus and at the bottom of the page and I keep looking down because I've got the book here that I've read through and highlighted the whole way through and the digital version but it says all of these venues Are generally framed within an overarching context of sustainable development.
So everything that they are doing, you know, all countries going through common experience of adapting to and managing unknowns and all of it is going to be framed within an overarching context of sustainable development, which really means nothing.
So they say that the process and essential measures, given that unrestricted use of AI is not deemed acceptable by the international community and a total ban may be unreasonable, the draft framework puts forward a set of measures for immediate review, assessment, refinement and adoption by the international community.
They say individual rights and responsibilities includes rights pertaining to data and the internet.
We know already that those rights have been obliterated.
So this is what I'm trying to say.
While these people are calling for all these grandiose things and making it seem like it's all very, very good, we've already seen an obliteration of all of these rights, an obliteration of human rights, an obliteration of actual justice.
So are they going to restore it?
No, they're saying all of these things are all fine and dandy and we're protecting democracy as we know it.
Really, it's just an illusion of democracy at the moment, unless we fix this urgently.
Rights to digital and AI-related education.
Rights to political participation in AI policy deliberations.
Again, has anyone been actually consulted on this?
And rights to avoid digital damages.
I haven't seen any government aiming to eliminate the problem of deep fakes.
And again, AI-generated child pornography.
No efforts to stop that.
And of course, with rights come responsibilities.
Now this is for the individuals.
Avoid digital damages.
Contribute to the common good.
Your responsibility in this social contract that you are being opted into is to contribute to what they define as the common good.
And you have to participate in codes of digital ethics and refrain from the use of malware or distribution of misinformation.
So you are expected to not distribute anything that they class as misinformation and of course whatever suits their agenda they will label as or whatever it is is a threat to the global order is misinformation in their eyes and so they say that governments are required to implement the AI governance policies and norms adopted by the international community so all of these you know misinformation bills and censorship of
citizens online and you know silencing you stopping your business from functioning all of these things they're asking governments to continue to do not not asking telling them they are required to and governments have to provide education for all citizens this is weird real or online With advanced AI technology.
What does that mean?
Well, digital citizens are those that will be operating in the digital world or the AI world society or the AI city and not really, you know, spending more time in the digital world than the real world, of course.
And they want to design, you know, incentives and directives for responsible AI use and so on.
On the next page where they talk about collaboration among states, they expect that states will establish a worldwide alliance towards digital governance.
Worldwide alliance toward digital governance.
And they say that the United Nations, as well as all international organizations, are expected to enable and support sustained data collection and analysis so constantly The United Nations and all international organizations involved with this will constantly obtain sustained data collection and analysis of people,
provide guidelines for AI knowledge and education, create support systems for global digital ethics, which is of course what they say, legal foundations for management of AI, And it's interesting because they talk about international judicial systems devoted to AI applications.
This is where I will say I watched one of their presentations and they were asking for input from other people.
And you had a lady from MIT, really kind lady, seemed to really be switched on.
She was saying that that's a red line for her.
You cannot have AI involved in the judicial system.
This still needs to be managed by people.
That way you ensure that you avoid bias or, you know, the humane aspect still needs to be involved.
And the guy leading the conversation was really not happy with that answer.
And so he asked for input from another person.
That person's name was Frank.
He was saying the same thing.
And the host, Mark Rottenberg, I believe his name was, was saying, well, you know, we really need to kind of Accept this.
Basically, I'm paraphrasing, but we really need to accept that AI will be managing the judicial system.
And in the end, you know, there was a lot of pushback from the people on the call and he kind of moved on.
So it wasn't really, you know, this is what I'm saying is they're giving the illusion that they are obtaining public participation in developing these frameworks, but really they have their goal and they're going to push people towards it.
And then they've got their token contributors in there giving their opinion, but They'll go ahead with their goals anyway.
Again, they expect that United Nations and international organizations are expected to contribute to the United Nations centennial.
They're expected to contribute to UN100 and reinforce the AI World Society City initiatives, which is the digital city where everyone will be living, to develop and evaluate a people-centered economy.
They go on to talk about business entities.
National and international businesses are expected to adopt common AI values.
Standards and norms.
That's not adopt the values of the UN. That's not adopt values of the global government.
It's adopting AI values.
Okay?
And support sanctioned systems to enforce a rules-based international order.
Ladies and gentlemen, this book Is the religious text, or at least one of, of the Luciferian New World Order.
And they are outlining exactly how all participants of their New Age of Global Enlightenment religion are expected to behave in the face of their AI God.
That is not an understatement.
They go on to talk about, and again, this is really just a doubling up of a lot of the information, but civil society rights and responsibilities of civil society organizations include monitoring governments and firms.
In support of common values and standards, common values being those of AI, enabling all forms of voluntary data analytics and other cooperatives, including the pooling by individuals of their personal data for the benefit of the group or community conforming to international norms.
So this is where we say the internet of things, the internet of bodies, everything that's contained within your person, in your mind, everything being available publicly for all people to see and police each other and be monitored.
That's what this is talking about.
Pooling by individuals of their personal data for the benefit.
Of their AI god to be monitoring to make sure that you're acting in line with the age of global enlightenment.
And they say that you need to support the intelligent use of these technologies.
Finally, on this particular section, Consolidate, where they talk about the support systems for the AIIA framework, they say that we need to consolidate World Alliance for Digital Governance as the global authority to enforce the emergent accord.
So they want the world alliance for digital governance.
Which again, I talk about the fact, I go back to when I spoke about the fact that they want AI managing the justice system.
So digital governance as the global authority.
This is AI led with some people participation and they will of course be handpicked.
Alright so in the end note it talks about challenges opportunities and next steps.
I'll go to the opportunities page where it says, therefore now is the opportunity to proceed before these are consolidated into lines in the sand.
So where they say one of high value, for example, is to consider and address the role of ethics in courses on innovations as well as ethics for all uses and users too.
It's important to focus on international law.
There are many other high value assets to consider at this point.
The reason is this, the lines of political contention are not yet clearly drawn among potentially conflicting perspectives or countries.
Therefore now is the opportunity to proceed before these are consolidated into lines in the sense So what they're saying is, we don't have enough agreement, there's too much pushback on some of the agenda items that we have, so now we need to move forward before...
People come and oppose this.
That's what that means.
And again, I go back to that particular Zoom that I told you about where I watched people pushing back on having AI run the justice system and them continuing to push forward with it despite the opposition and raising very good points.
And then when we go to the next steps, you've got a lovely green forest here.
And then here they say...
At the same time, we know from experience that punishments in their various forms don't work.
We're in a world where large firms and in the IT and communication businesses are very powerful.
Many are larger than in most countries.
The dilemma becomes then whom to punish.
So before we reach the point where too much pushback comes in, before we reach the point Where people realize how out of control this is and our vision is.
And before people become aware of UN100 and what they're really trying to implement, before this becomes a line in the sand, we must move forward.
And corporations and all these people are just so powerful.
So who do we punish?
Very, very alarming.
Now, I'm going to end part two here.
In the next part, we're going to go through what some of these people specifically have said, including Ursula von der Leyen about ecosystems of trust and the need for digital ID and all of these sorts of things.
And then in part four, we're going to really look at the consolidation of all of this information along with some of the existing technologies that make this dystopian vision possible Which I think is crucial for people to understand.
And of course, we will continue to expand on this in future broadcasts.
But I'm asking everyone right now to share this information.
As I said to you, if you look up UN100 or Boston Global Forum on Rumble or even Bitshoot, you're not going to find a lot of information or any information.
on these organizations and yet they are they have published their religious text for the future for the whole world to see and demanding that all people enter into this social contract for an ai world society and none of us asked for this none of us have been consulted we haven't even been informed and the future of mankind is very very terrifying when you understand the rest of the contents in this book which we will go through in the next part part three Before we finish up,
it is your support of the businesses that support us, that enable us to continue getting this honestly life-saving information out.
I want to talk to you about some of the offers from our partners available at the moment.
Heaven's Harvest.
If you're in the United States, go to heavensharvest.com, use promo code Z with three E's for 5% off your order.
They have emergency survival food buckets for every budget, organic buckets.
Heirloom seeds, water filtration and storage, and gardening and survival resources.
And they are an amazing group of people.
Very high quality products.
Also, a special offer from GoldStackers Australia, part of the Gold Bullion Australia Group.
$15 off per one kilo silver bars.
From the advertised price to purchase from GoldStackers only until the 31st of September this year.
So listeners simply need to quote MariaZ or Z Media at the time of purchase to obtain their discount.
The discount will be applied manually either in store or over the phone orders only.
So at this stage not for online orders.
It's best to call 1300 618 363 or visit the Melbourne store for this offer.
However, if you're not in Melbourne, orders can be shipped from the Melbourne office to anywhere in Australia.
Again, that number is 1300 618 363 and the link is in the description below.
Also, Stockman Stakes!
Until the end of this month, anyone who purchases a subscription order with Stockman Stakes And users code MARIA will go into a draw to win one of three free boxes equal to whatever box they purchased.
This offer again is exclusive to the Z Media family and available to three lucky winners for the month of August.
The three winners will be announced by us next month.
We are so honoured to partner with businesses that support our message, support what we're doing, support freedom and support humanity.
And your support of those businesses is truly invaluable to the future of humanity.
So I thank you again for tuning in today.
We'll be back with part three next time, the rest of this book, and what we can expect in the future.
I'll see you then.
▲
Export Selection