All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 2, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
46:11
Uncensored: Susan Swift - The Abortion Agenda & Link to Transhumanism
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
She currently serves as the Vice President of Legal Affairs at a prominent pro-life organization called Right to Life League.
She's joining us today to discuss new laws that are coming down the pipeline that are really aiming at educating children in school about how they should be having abortions, aka promoting sex and murder to minors.
She also discusses how this all ties into the transgender agenda and what people need to be aware of.
And even though she's focusing specifically on US laws, this is applying to the whole world because this is very much abortion, transgenderism.
These are all globalist goals.
And how does it actually tie in with the artificial womb agenda?
There's a key there.
So before Susan joins us, I want to tell people about Heaven's Harvest for the United States.
If you're in the US, please go to HeavensHarvest.com.
They have very, very high quality emergency survival food helping you and your family prepare.
They have organic buckets, breakfast buckets, buckets for every budget.
And they also have gardening resources, water and filtration and storage.
Really, really great people.
And we encourage people to support them.
Here's Susan now.
Susan Swift is back again on Uncensored.
Susan, it is wonderful to have you again.
Thank you for joining us.
Thanks for having me back, Maria.
It's always a pleasure.
Well, we have a number of different things we need to talk about.
Again, new bills that are very, very alarming.
We have this stuff that they're pushing in schools.
And now this expansion of transgender people being able to do, you know, people being able to decide what bodies they want, decide what kids they want.
It's getting really murky.
But Susan's here to clear it up for us.
So where would you like to start today, Susan?
Well, I think there is a little bit of good news coming out of California.
The first thing is, you know, the Right to Life League is based in California.
We are America's first pro-life organization founded in 1967.
And what we do is we educate on the truth of abortion.
We counter these bad bills that are coming through.
We educate.
We do what we can to help these pro-life clinics and centers network and get the supplies that they need because they're really the first line of defense in California.
And as you probably know, California is where it all begins.
This is, I don't know what it is about California, But they like to push the envelope in so many different social-cultural ways.
They started with the abortion bill, the Bielinson bill, in 1967.
And that's when we were started because basically a group of doctors and lawyers and concerned citizens went up to lobby then-Governor Ronald Reagan And explained to him what abortion really is.
It's the intentional killing of a baby in the womb for the purpose of killing the baby in the womb, because abortion is never necessary to save the life of the mother.
You might have to deliver the baby prematurely, but that's different from killing it.
So once he understood what abortion was, he made a promise to the league.
He said, look, I've already promised I'm going to sign this bad bill, the Beelinson bill.
I promised the Democrats that don't go back on my ward, but I promise you, the Right to Life League, that I will never again sign another piece of And he kept his word.
So that's how we got started in 1967, long before Roe vs.
Wade.
And we continue to kind of shine the light on these stupid bad bills that are coming through.
And we thought in 2022, certainly they would have gotten everything they wanted in California because Dobbs had overturned Roe vs.
Wade.
The pro-aborts in California used that as leverage to claim that somehow all of the abortion rights in California were going to have poof Go away, which is not the case because all Dobbs did was say the states decided on a state-by-state basis.
And that means everything in California is completely status quo.
You can abort your baby all the way up to delivery and beyond.
And last year they made sure of that with AB 2223.
I think we talked about it.
That's the infanticide bill so that even a baby born alive And dies after birth, that's called a perinatal death.
Not prenatal, not before birth, but perinatal, after birth.
If that baby dies within the perinatal period, which is the first month of life, and that matches with the mother's desired pregnancy outcome, No one can investigate the cause of that baby's death because to investigate the cause of the perinatal death will allow the mother and anyone who assisted her in obtaining her preferred pregnancy outcome, i.e.
the abortion, the botched abortion, it'll give those people the right to sue anyone for $25,000 plus attorney's fees and fines.
So that's the state of law in California.
You can get an abortion pretty much anytime you want.
We thought that certainly they would be happy now.
They would finally have all of the abortion access that they need.
But no, they've come back for more this legislative session.
They even tried to push a bill through the schools that would have Basically forced seventh grade and up to learn all about abortion.
Basically teach kids how to obtain an abortion if they wanted to, find out where to go and everything like that, starting in seventh grade.
So that fortunately has died.
I don't know if it'll come back next year.
Actually, it was the same author, Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks, who had put forth what I was calling the Baby Slayer Bill, AB 2223.
Same woman as the one who had advanced this bill of 598, To try to teach abortion to kids, to school-age kids.
I've got here that, Susan, Bill 598, it says a child of any age, even below the age of sexual consent, can obtain birth control and undergo abortions without even informing their parents.
And now teachers were going to be forced to speak affirmatively about abortion with these children.
Right.
Yeah, the state of the law is already, I mean, a child can go and get an abortion at any age without parental consent or knowledge.
Or knowledge!
You don't have to even inform your mother that, yeah, I'm going to go get an abortion.
You may bleed out in your bed later, but she'll never know why.
So that's the state of law in California.
This bill was trying to make sure that teachers kind of affirmatively sell the idea of abortion.
One of the original versions of this bill was that they were supposed to speak of it positively and kind of in a happy, great way.
And that part was stricken.
And then finally, this bill was pulled by the author, thanks be to God.
So at least it's not going to come through.
This year, but, you know, you never know.
They may rework it and bring it about next year.
That's usually how it happens.
That's usually, they rework it, they reword a few things, water it down a little bit with the provision to amend it later, and then it passes.
And they call it education.
They call it reproductive health and education instead of what it really is.
It's indoctrination and it's basically trying to teach kids about...
It's basically to separate kids from their parents, confuse them sexually, encourage them to be promiscuous.
There's another bill that's going to be providing condoms to children for free in high schools.
That's already passed.
That's coming through.
So what we're doing is, at younger and younger ages, we're encouraging children through our public schools to become sexually active and also to have the access to abortion at any time they want.
That's the ultimate goal.
And we're using public money to do it because that's what Californians keep voting for.
It's astounding to me that people would want this, that people I think that this is a good thing.
I've seen videos of, if I'm not mistaken, it was Savannah Hernandez asking women about whether they'd had an abortion and whether they would do it again.
And some of these women are saying, yeah, hell yeah, I've had abortions.
I'll go do them again.
I just can't understand.
It's like celebrated, Susan.
They celebrate that they've gone and killed their children and they'll do it again.
That's because we've gone through, what, 50 years?
50 years of indoctrination by whether it's media, whether it's pro-aborts, but basically this cabal, the abortion cartel, if you will, basically advocating for women saying, you have a right to kill someone and we're gonna make it okay.
We're gonna put a fig leaf over it because we're not gonna call it human.
We're not gonna recognize that this is a human being, that your unique DNA starts at the moment of conception.
No, this is pregnancy tissue.
Or a product of conception, right?
A clump of cells.
And I have news for you.
You are a clump of cells, and so am I. So is everyone on this planet.
In fact, 150 years ago, former slaves in America, they could have been considered clumps of cells.
They were not considered human.
We fought a war over that.
But this is continuing today.
And that is why the abortion cartel and these pro-aborts, they consider these innocent little human beings as property or objects or things.
And that is the goal, is to dehumanize them and then use fear-mongering and other means to get these women to say, well, it's no big deal.
It doesn't really matter.
And or, you know what, if you don't get an abortion, it'll change your life.
Well, yes, children change your life, usually for the better.
But even if it does change your life in a negative fashion, what in the world gives you the right to kill another person?
Because they're inconvenient.
I mean, that's the slavery argument is, oh, well, I can kill this human being because I own them or they're inconvenient, they're doing a bad job.
That's the same kind of mentality.
This is the silent slavery that we're facing in the 21st century is really the slavery of these children, these unborn children.
It's actually a form of human trafficking, if you think about it.
Because we know that the abortion industry harvests these dead or dying babies and then uses their organs for research.
We know that the vaccine industry partners with the abortion cartel to obtain fetal tissue to be used in developing vaccines, like the chickenpox vaccines, like the rubella vaccine, and like one of the The three COVID vaccines.
We know fetal tissue is in that.
That's not debated.
That is known.
Well, where do they get it?
And the myth has always been, well, it was from two or three babies in the 1970s, a long time ago.
Well, that's not true.
We actually, at our website, if you want to go there and you can find it, it's right2lifeleague.org, right2lifeleague.org.
You can see the research that we did.
I mean, there's a woman named Dr.
Theresa Dyscher, who is a Stanford PhD and very, very familiar with the vaccine industry.
And she's given an interview that we linked to that explains how they harvest these babies' organs.
And she says that they are still alive when it happens because the tissue has to be so very fresh.
It has to be within moments of taking the baby out of the womb.
And they help us the heart and the kidney and the skin and the pituitary gland and those organs for fetal research.
We also have another person on there.
Her name is Pamela Acker.
She's got a master's degree.
And she did an hour-long interview with, I believe it was LifeSite News, with John Henry Weston.
And she goes through and she explains how this is occurring, and it's circumstantial evidence to be sure, because who's going to admit on camera?
What abortionist is going to admit on camera?
Hi, yes, I take the baby out alive and living, and then before the baby's heart starts beating, We start harvesting the kidneys and things like that.
They won't admit that, so it's very hard to pin down.
That's one of the issues of the David Daleiden series of undercover videos that he went in and he exposed this procurement system and how they were selling fetal tissues.
That's all tied up in litigation.
He's not allowed to have those videos out there because this is still an ongoing issue in the United States.
He was shut down by Kamala Harris, who was then in California, We have two other sources that are not David Daleiden.
Dr.
Theresa Deicher and we have Pamela Acker who are explaining that the matter-of-fact is circumstantial evidence, but to get the freshness that is necessary of these tissues, they must be still full of blood and viable in order to make these stem cell lines work.
You have to harvest them within moments of the abortion, so while they're still alive.
And I find it tragic that the only thing that we're debating Is whether or not they're already dead or not when they harvest the baby.
We're all shocked by that.
We're all clutching our pearls.
Oh, the baby's still alive.
The baby was still alive four minutes beforehand when you went in to take it out of the womb.
That's what an abortion is.
You're killing the baby and taking it out.
You're depriving it of life at that moment.
But nobody seems to be concerned about that.
It is horrific to me.
But that is the industry of abortion and vaccine.
And there's profit that's going to be made.
And you can also see the site at our research that I found from UCSF, which is the University of California, San Francisco.
They're the preeminent trainer for all of these abortion techniques to be able to harvest these babies and remove them.
So it's out there for anybody to see.
It's just it makes us all uncomfortable when we realize that little unborn babies are a product, much like medicine is a product or a vaccine or drugs are a product, just like we've seen from Sound of Freedom, which is I think it's scheduled to break a hundred million dollars at the box office by Wednesday, which is that's phenomenal if it does that.
That exposes human sex trafficking.
And again, human beings, little children, are being used for profit.
How is that any different from the abortion industry?
I have to agree with you, Susan.
It's different types of abuse, but you're talking about murder here.
I agree with everything that you say about this topic.
There's moral arguments that people can have.
You mentioned the safety of the mother and all of these sorts of things.
Ultimately, that's not the main reason why people are having Murdering so many children.
It's not because of the safety of the mother.
I've looked at the studies that talk about the fact that it's mostly convenience or they think they can't afford it.
And this is where your organization is doing such a fantastic job where they're actually educating expectant mothers, putting them in touch with resources and other organizations that can actually help them and educate them through that process.
So that's what we need to be doing.
The solution is not kill more children.
The solution is educate these people.
And support them with what they need.
I mean, if it's a matter of rent, I don't have enough rent, there are organizations that can help you get the rent.
Well, I need a car seat.
Okay, we can do that.
I need food.
And that's one of the knocks on pro-life.
The pro-aborts always say, well, you're only pro-life in the womb, and you're not pro-birth, which is a complete and total lie, because these pro-life clinics and centers that are in California, actually nationwide, They walk alongside, they big sister, they partner with these women.
All the way through for years, they have parenting classes and all kinds of different support systems for these women so that they're not abandoned.
Because that's the one thing that these women do not receive from Planned Parenthood and these other abortion institutes.
They don't receive hope.
They're told, oh, well, first of all, you know, it's just like taking a Tylenol if it's a chemical abortion.
Or, you know, this will be over just sooner.
You just need to do this because it'll change your life if you don't.
They're never given hope.
They're never told that it'll be all right and that there's going to be somebody there at the other side to help them.
They're just not given that.
That's what these pro-life clinics and centers do for these women.
And that is the message.
And we have to be much more...
We have, as Christians, we must provide...
The hope.
We must provide the alternative so that people who are desperate, who are facing an unplanned pregnancy and are scared and think that their education is over, we can come alongside them and say, no, your life is not over.
It's about to get much better.
And if you really don't feel like you can parent, that's okay.
There's adoption.
We will walk you through.
We will help you every step of the way so that you can have your baby and there's no reason to kill your baby.
And you're absolutely right, Maria.
From all of the data that is available, and the abortion industry hides quite a bit of it, but what we know is that it's about 98% of pregnancies that are terminated are really for convenience.
They're not for the life of the mother, they're not rape, and they're not incest.
They're just not.
And so you're talking about less than 2% of all of the abortions are done for some justifiable reason.
I don't think it's justified to kill a baby simply because it was conceived in rape.
Or for any other reason.
But even if you take those 2% out, the rest of them, the rest, 98%, is just because it's for convenience.
The babies are healthy.
There's not a genetic anomaly.
There's nothing that has to save the mother's life.
And frankly, delivery saves the mother's life.
It can be done in mere moments with a C-section or other methods that can happen in moments, whereas...
An abortion that's in second or third trimester, that can take days because they have to use laminaria to open up the cervix to allow the weapons of destruction into the womb to tear up the baby or suck the baby because it can't fit through.
The little curette that they use in the first trimester.
That's just the dirty secret of it.
So it actually takes longer to have something like an emergency second or third trimester abortion for any reason.
It takes longer than going ahead and having a C-section and simply delivering that baby to save the mother's life if it is something like a preeclampsia or other genetic anomaly where the baby may not survive.
But at least with a C-section, with an immediate delivery, you're saving the life of the mother.
And you're actually honoring and respecting the life of that child and giving it a chance at life.
Someday I hope we can get viability all the way back down to conception.
Wouldn't that be great?
But the lie of this is that it's rare, and the lie of it is that it's for the health of the mother.
They just always go there, and they find one or two stories where something tragic is happening, and they use that to justify the continuing slaughter of babies in the womb.
And it's wrong.
It is the slavery of our generation and it is a form of human trafficking.
Abortion basically makes human trafficking available.
That's what it does.
That reminds me of another bill that's coming through that you and I talked about briefly off air.
Yes, let's get into that.
So there's a couple of different...
This is now what we're facing now.
So the victory in California is fantastic, but there's other things coming down the pipeline, potentially even worse.
So let's get into that and what people need to do about it.
Well, there's a bill called SB 345.
It was almost a placeholder bill that grew and it kind of took over language from another bill that was very bad that had failed.
And what it's going to do is it's really effectively going to protect abortionists and human traffickers who flee to California to escape prosecution in other states.
What it's going to do is it's going to bar California judges and bail bondsmen from issuing warrants and subpoenas that are based on other states.
So let's say there's been a final judgment in Texas based on the heartbeat bill, and this abortion has violated a law in Texas, and there's been a final judgment.
And so Texas has now said, all right, you've got to pay this $10,000 fine, and so here's a judgment.
Well, to obtain money from a judgment, you have to execute the judgment.
You have to attach it to his property or something.
Well, what if he doesn't have property in Texas?
What if he's, you know, if he flees to California, if he has property in California, maybe a yacht, maybe a house, whatever it is, what you do is you take the judgment, the final judgment, you walk it into California courts and you say, here's a final judgment.
We need you to recognize it under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution.
Because we're all 50 states.
We all recognize each other's laws.
This is a valid law.
Final judgment.
It's still being appealed.
There's nothing to debate over here.
But now this bill, 345, SB 345, is going to prevent the California judges and the courts from recognizing that judgment, from issuing subpoenas and other enforcement mechanisms, so that only if it concerns abortion or transgender surgeries,
anything that is deemed to be an essential reproductive freedom in California, So what California is doing with this bill is trying to subvert all of the other laws in the rest of the states and basically declare its laws to be the law of the land.
It violates the Constitution, the full faith and credit clause.
Somebody's probably going to challenge it, and it's going to probably fall.
But in the meantime, the California taxpayer is going to be on the hook for having to fight this.
This law should not exist the way it is, because it presumes that California law The most alarming thing is that people are creating these bills.
I spoke about this recently, Susan, where I said For example, in the state of Western Australia, we have a law that passed that says that authorised COVID officers, and this bill can be amended at any time to be any new virus or fake pandemic, authorised COVID officers can come into your home.
These are not even health professionals.
They're whoever is authorised by the chief health officer who used to work with the United Nations.
and they can strip you naked and your children naked and take them to a quarantine facility, inject you as many times as they want with whatever they want for as long as they want, and you don't get a say in how long you're kept there.
This is a law that exists in Australia.
Now, they haven't used it yet, but someone thought of that.
Someone thought it'll be a really great idea to do this to people and then had the brazenness to bring it into parliament, and then people voted yes.
That sounds like a Marxist-Communist move right there, and what you all need is the Second Amendment.
That's what you need.
Just saying, because they will not mess with you when they think that you can defend yourself against this kind of tyranny.
I feel so bad for you.
There is a concerted effort across many, many countries to disarm citizens.
This is happening even in Europe.
You know, there was a series of high school shootings that never happened in the country of Serbia, and then the government said, Everyone come and willingly hand over your guns.
You won't get in trouble if you have any firearms that aren't registered.
Just come and bring them in.
That's what happened in Australia.
So, you know, there is a concerted effort to disarm people, Susan, that is true.
Didn't they do that in Germany?
Didn't they do that in Germany before World War II, before they put all the Jews in trains and shipped them off to Auschwitz?
Don't you disarm people first before you go kill them?
I mean, that's the plan, isn't it?
That's what you do, yes.
So, again, my point is, you know, laws like this, someone actually thinks of them.
There's someone that exists out there that thought, I want to strip kids naked and inject them forever in a quarantine camp.
Like, that was in their mind, you know?
Yes, and it's out of spirit.
Sorry?
It's out of fear, too.
It's the fear-mongering that gets it passed, right?
They think that this is okay, because maybe they have legitimate fears, but they want everybody to have their same fear, and they make it even worse by saying, I have the right to take your child and inject your child.
To save the health of the nation?
Yeah.
That is really brazen to defeat parental rights, to defeat human rights and your own ability to control your own body.
In the name of fear.
And that is the weapon of these Marxist communists.
That's what they do every single time.
They use fear.
And we go along and say, hey, keep us safe, keep us safe.
We'll give you our rights.
We'll give you our rights.
It's wrong.
It's absolutely wrong.
Well, it's not just the fear, Susan.
It's the language that they use, which is inverted and pretending it's for.
Like you mentioned, you know, health care or reproductive care.
There is also a law in the state of Victoria, which says that if your child thinks they might be transgender...
And you dare to pray for your child as their parent, you can go to jail for 10 years.
That child will be stripped from your hands and the school can then, on your behalf, go and take them to butcher their bodies and cut off their genitals and, you know, do whatever.
And you as the parent who's tried to pray for your child or intervene can go to prison for 10 years.
So this is where it kind of leads into the next part of our conversation, which is how this is all affecting transgender people and some of these laws and bills, how are they actually, and these initiatives, what's actually happening with the trans movement?
That sounds very interesting.
SB 107 in California, it sounds like just very similar to what you just explained.
It allows the state of California to take custody of a child away from a parent if that child wants to transition.
You don't even have to tell the parent.
You can just take custody of the child.
So imagine this.
This is a danger to everyone in the United States.
Imagine you've got a couple in, I don't know, Texas, again.
And maybe one parent thinks that the kid should be transgender and the other one says, no, I oppose that.
Maybe they're in a divorce situation.
Who knows?
All that has to happen is that the child must be brought into California somehow.
Also could be trafficked in there.
It doesn't have to be from a parent at all.
Once the child is in California and wants to transition, SB 107 allows the state to take custody of that child, doesn't even have to inform the parents, and can administer the hormones and the surgeries and everything to help complete the transition of the child.
And that's already law.
That's already signed into law, so that exists here in California.
And there's another bill that's coming up that is of concern.
It's very clever because it's good and bad.
It has some interesting good things that everybody would say, oh, I support that.
And then there's going to be the ramifications that nobody's thinking about.
That is another bill called SB. And by the way, SB simply means Senate Bill, where it started.
The other bill is AB, which is Assembly Bill.
So it either starts in the Assembly with an Assemblyman or it starts in the Senate with a Senator.
That's it.
So SB 729 is a bill that is going to shift the cost of any kind of assisted reproductive technology onto private employers And it redefines what the definition of infertility really means.
So that anyone who is infertile can then have the cost of infertility treatment, like artificial reproductive therapy, IVF, anything that is non-experimental, it will be paid for by their private insurance companies.
That kind of sounds good because there are couples who want to conceive a child and they're having difficulty and it's very expensive and can't afford it.
Okay, but SB 729 does something else.
It kind of redefines the definition of fertility I'm sorry, it's infertility, and also says the insurance companies cannot discriminate based on the status, the sexual status of the couples.
So what it means is that a gay couple, a queer couple, can apply for infertility benefits from their private insurance company, and the private insurance company can't look at them and say, uh, you're two dudes.
There is no way you're going to ever conceive a child that way.
You're really not infertile.
You're just choosing, basically, you're barking up the wrong tree here, fella.
But that is no longer a basis for the insurance companies to say, you're not infertile and we can We can refuse to grant you or pay for your fertility service.
So what you're going to start seeing is, and this is again, this is the tip of the spear of the transgender rights in California because they're trying to destroy really the definition of the family.
We don't want a heterosexual male and female creating a family.
We want transgender people creating a family.
They want to fund that.
It's going to drive the cost of insurance up, and so it'll be borne by all of the employers, and of course, your co-pays go up, everything goes up.
But what's going to happen is even someone who is celibate can decide, well, I want to have a child, and I'm infertile, so you need to pay for all of the medical costs for a surrogate procedure.
A queer couple, a lesbian couple, anybody, transgender, maybe it's a, you know, I get confused.
It's a trans man, is that a woman?
But if she's with another trans man, you know what I'm saying.
I don't, I'm not going to try and this is my honest opinion.
I'm not going to try and understand it because it's all lies.
Like this is, I often get, you know, what's a trans man?
What's a trans woman?
It's nothing.
It doesn't exist.
You have gender dysphoria and You cannot transition to another gender.
It's not biologically possible.
And you've been lied to.
That's my answer.
I totally agree with you.
But what they're going to do is, let's say we've got a young man who has transitioned and now has had a bottom surgery and cut off all of his genitalia.
Well, he can go now and apply for fertility treatments and get paid for it.
Well, he doesn't get paid, but all of the medical costs, except for the cost of renting the womb, the surrogate, the feed of the surrogate, But I can imagine just, you know, go down the trail a little bit.
The ACLU or some other radical group is going to come and say, well, it's not fair that these, you know, these people have to pay for the fee for the surrogate.
Maybe it's $50,000.
I don't know.
It's probably expensive to try to find a woman who's willing to bear a child for you when, you know, it's not hers.
So whatever that fee is, that's excluded right now.
We're not going to be under SB 729, but we don't know down the trail if it's going to be through the court system or any modification of this.
It may be, all of it may be paid for.
And so now you're going to have trans, queer, Anyone who wants to utilize private insurance money so that they can create the baby that they want using somebody else.
I just wonder if the state's going to have to supply the surrogate at some point.
Here's why I say that.
Because in California, we passed Proposition 1.
It amended our state constitution to say that the state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom.
Including abortion and use of contraception.
Well, the word individual is already defined.
It means a person without regard to age or ability to consent.
So you're talking even children.
And if a child of eight years old is expressing reproductive freedom rights to, I don't know, to get pregnant or to enter into a pedophile relationship, anything like that, that Proposition 1, theoretically, is going to protect that person's desire, that individual's desire to do all manner of anything, and the state shall not interfere with it.
And this is opening the door to all of these strange questions about, well, what about queer couples who want to conceive or use a surrogate?
Does the state have to provide the surrogate?
We don't know, but that's why they're using SB 729 to force private insurance companies to pay for all of the medical costs right now.
And that bill has gotten through committee.
It will be voted on in the full Senate and Assembly in mid-August.
And if it passes there, then it will go to Governor Newsom, who I'm sure will just be very happy to sign in, probably with a rainbow pen, I'm sure.
That man makes my skin crawl.
The interesting thing, whenever I have these conversations, I see the slide into the government providing more and more.
So the government tells you you're a victim.
The government tells you you have a problem.
The government tells you you're not actually a man.
You're really a woman.
You're confused.
Here's what you can do about it.
We're going to help you.
We're going to provide you all this care.
And then you're talking about a possibility of the government then providing the state, also providing the surrogate, which is, again, making these people who are already mentally ill more and more dependent on this state that benefits from them being mentally ill.
They get looped into forever imprisonment, that's Marxism, and they don't even know it.
Yeah, and I'm starting to just think of off of what you're telling me.
I mean, what if the surrogate, I mean, that's a whole business, right?
Young women, what's to stop them from, you know, hyper stimulating and donating all of their eggs?
Or what's to stop a young woman to say, yeah, I want to make $50,000 a pop.
I'll go ahead and carry somebody's baby.
It can become a business.
Yes.
You know, this is the making of babies.
But again, they're just clumps of cells.
That's the disconnect there.
We're going to be paying for this.
And who's going to say, here's the really shocking thing is, what happens if halfway through this process, the surrogate decides, I want an abortion?
Or, more likely, what if either the couple, the queer couple or the straight couple, doesn't matter, what if they decide, well, no, we don't want this baby anymore, we want an abortion?
Whose right is going to be supreme?
How are we going to decide who gets to kill the clump of cells that they were just paying for to bring into being?
This is an unholy mix of law and science to basically create babies that meet the needs of parents.
Instead of looking at the right of the child, the individual Your right to life, that is just thrown out the window.
It's all about your value to someone else, whether it's the parent, whether it's the surrogate, whether it's the state.
In the case of SB 107, somebody else is putting value on that human life, and you don't have the right.
Yourself, as an individual, your right is not protected until you're born, until these other people decide that it's okay for you to live.
So it's very wrongheaded, but that's what the state of California is doing because they pride themselves.
The sanctuary city for abortion.
That was 2022.
Now it's going to be the sanctuary city for transgenderism and transbabyism.
That's what's going to be the new draw.
Because we've already been trying to entice people into our state.
To come and have abortions after the Dobbs decision overturned Roe vs.
Wade.
So we're encouraging women to travel.
We'll reimburse their travel costs.
We'll come and give them a free abortion anytime they want.
Well, what's going to stop the trans Lobbyists from saying, oh, you want to have a designer baby?
You can go to California and then you can have the baby of your dreams.
That's exactly right.
And then you've got the artificial worms, then you've got the gene editing, you've got all of these things that they are now, you know, and you can...
Can you choose the gender of your baby?
Can they maybe pre-program them to be trans?
You know, you have these two mentally ill people that are both suffering terribly with gender dysphoria.
And that's what it is.
If you're trans, you are mentally ill.
Don't, you know, there's no way around this.
And that's okay because there's help for you, but the help is not cutting off your genitals.
And so these two mentally ill people saying, we want a trans baby.
So they'll program the baby to be trans.
I mean, it's just disgusting.
It's disgusting.
And you said it.
You know, this is...
Oh, how did you word it, Susan?
You said this is an unholy alliance between science and law.
I have to agree with you.
That's probably the best way I've heard it put.
I want to bring up the righttolife.org website for all the viewers, the Right to Life League.
And it's really a great resource for people that want to get involved in this, for people who need to know what's going on.
Some of the bills, information about how the abortion industry is profiting, you know, Big Pharma and other big, big organizations around the world.
This is a massive industry and they want it to keep going.
So I really, really do encourage everyone to go to righttolifeleague.org and get involved if this is something that you're passionate about.
What are your sort of final words here, Susan?
What do you want people to know and what can they do?
Well, I think that it is very, very important to be aware and know what's going on.
And toward that end, I would also urge you to go and see The Sound of Freedom.
When you can in Australia, Sound of Freedom exposes the human sex trafficking that is going across our border.
I think America is the number one consumer of sex trafficking of young children.
And I think Mexico is the number one provider.
And this is just one aspect of an industry that was born out of abortion many years ago.
This is the natural conclusion of what Abortion does to a country because people are no longer human.
They are products.
And that continues after birth.
You see, if I can kill a baby in the womb without any consequences, without even the social There's a stigma of saying, that's just tragic, and you shouldn't do that, and we'll help you.
We'll do anything we can to help you.
If you don't even say that, if you're celebrating your abortion, you're shouting your abortion, then what's the problem with trafficking that child?
And what's the problem with creating a child, as you mentioned, with CRISPR technology?
To design exactly the baby you want.
Thanks to Proposition 1, the state shall not interfere or deny an individual's reproductive freedom.
That could include CRISPR technology or Chinese labs that come in and buy eggs and sperm and create an entire generation of children.
You could have the chosen children that are going to be raised in the artificial homes or wherever, the surrogate.
And then we have this other group that are, you know, they're children.
They're fertilized embryos.
They're alive.
We'll just give them to the abortion industry.
Is that really the world that we want to create here?
And that's all because we've adopted the lie that somehow abortion is healthcare and that somehow abortion is moral when it is not.
So if you want to end all of this, if you want to stop the trafficking of children The abuse of dysphoria and trans people and telling them that this is alright.
You have to stop abortion.
That's where it all started, 1967, in California.
And that's where you stop it.
When you stop abortion in America, you'll stop it nationwide.
How do you stop it in America?
You stop it in California.
And that's why the Right to Life League is here.
Well, thank you so much, Susan.
We really appreciate your time.
I think it's so important for people to hear the truth about abortion, what it actually is.
And understand this isn't healthcare.
Just like telling children to cut off their genitals is not healthcare.
It's mutilation.
It's murder.
And this modern-day pseudoscience that they call science is, you know, it's really just destroying mankind and not actually helping it.
We appreciate your time, Susan.
Thank you.
Thank you so much, Maria, for having me on.
While we are supporting all of these initiatives to correct this insane world that we live in and getting involved in whatever way that we can, we also need to be preparing for difficult times ahead.
This is crucial.
We've been told about coming cyber attacks.
We've been told about the fact that Digital currency is the way moving forward.
The digital ID is going to be linked to your bank account.
If you don't, and your Global Vax Pass is going to be linked to your bank account, if you don't comply with the injections, your bank account will not function.
And that is a lifelong, constant gene editing system upgrade.
Where they want to merge you with machine.
And if you refuse to do that, there's no bank account for you.
Yuval Noah Harari has said if you're not injected and you don't have a Vax Pass, you will not be able to participate in society.
So if we don't stop them, that's what's coming down the pipeline.
So I really want people to prepare.
If you're in Australia, Survival Supplies Australia for all of your survival needs, including off-grid living, camping, First aid kits, super important as well for treating minor things at home so you don't have to go to the insane doctors.
I'm not telling people not to go to the doctor.
You need to make your own medical decisions.
But personally, I have quite advanced first aid kits at home for this reason.
If you're in Australia, go to stockmansteaks.com.au forward slash Maria.
This month they have a promo, which I'm going to read out to you right now.
All of their meat is GMO, non-GMO, there's antibiotic-free, hormone-free, everything's grass-fed.
Very, very high quality meat.
I eat from them exclusively now and I eat a lot of meat.
If you spend $200 this month, you receive one kilogram free of beef mince.
If you spend $300 this month, you receive two kilograms free of beef mince.
And if you spend $500, you receive three kilograms of free beef mince.
That is for the month of July only.
So take advantage this month and you can freeze it and keep it past July.
Very, very important for the parallel economy.
So many people are flocking to precious metals, particularly because we don't know what's going to happen with BRICS next month.
Are they going to formally announce this gold backing decision?
This is going to...
I mean, it's going to destroy the US dollar, the economy...
Is it going to happen next month?
We don't know.
But really, the price of gold in particular may shoot up after next month.
So if you've been thinking about precious metals, now is the time.
Give them a call.
Let them know Z Media sent you and they will look after you.
They're great people.
And always, always, I talk a lot about considering satellite communications, alternative communications, satellite phone store encrypts all of their devices.
Their comms are encrypted by the satellite phone store.
They're good people.
The owner is a good Christian woman, very, very passionate about freedom and supporting Freedom platforms as well.
So those are some of the solutions for how we can prepare to function outside of this insane dystopian world that they are building.
I don't want to be caught depending on the government to provide for my needs ever.
Just like we spoke about with Susan, this Marxist system that they're building where you're the victim and you need the government to provide for you.
No, thank you.
I don't need anything from you people.
So this is something that you all know I'm very passionate about and I continue to encourage.
Thank you all so much for tuning in today.
▲
Export Selection