All Episodes
Previous Next
July 19, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
01:17:20
Uncensored: Karen Kingston - BOMBSHELL! We Are Coming for the Bioweapon Pushers!!! Documents & Action
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
This is huge, huge news.
We went from let's just stop the mandates to these may be causing adverse events to, okay, now we are in a situation where we have proof that this is a biological and technological weapon.
And of course, I'm referencing the COVID injections, as you would all know, as regular viewers of this broadcast.
And you would also know the immense amount of work that people like Karen Kingston, Dr. Mahajah, many people, Dr. Nixon, around the world have done to prove this to the population.
And now Karen Kingston has published a very, very comprehensive letter that she's been working with law enforcement, local law enforcement in the United States to get them to open a criminal investigation.
And she details all of this shortly when she'll come on and join us.
But basically, this letter can be adopted for every single country.
And I referenced this throughout the interview, but I want to do this call out right now.
If you're in Australia specifically, I'm asking you to watch this.
And then if you have experience in the legal system in our country, adopt it for our country and then contact us via the contact form on zmedia.com.
We want people that actually are experienced and can, you know, adapt this in legal language that is relevant to our country.
Very, very important because this is potentially, and the same goes for anywhere else.
If you're in Canada, the UK, contact a large platform in your country If you have the legal expertise and adopt this, this is literally...
Where we've been told that there's indemnity for Pfizer, it's not true.
And the reason is because we have proof that this is a biological weapon that was unleashed on humanity.
People did not know that this is what was being told to them as a safe and effective drug.
It is actually a bioweapon.
So now that we have that finally breaking through the barrier of people who did not want to consider that before...
I mean, this is going to spread worldwide.
And think about some of the ramifications of this.
The World Health Organization, who was involved in approving and pushing this bioweapon, is also implicated in the sense that public trust will be completely lost.
Once you have the words bioweapon in the media, we're working in a very different space right now.
The ballgame has changed.
Although it's always been the same for us.
So we're really at the pointy end.
This is probably one of the most important broadcasts we've ever done because of the fact that we are on the precipice of holding these criminals accountable.
And that also comes with many, many attacks.
So people need to prepare for that.
Before Karen comes on with us, I want to talk about the sponsors of this show, this broadcast and this network at Heaven's Harvest.
Very, very high quality emergency survival food, heirloom seeds.
Make sure you're growing your own stuff.
Not only is this nanotechnology inside these injections, but it's in the air, it's in the food.
So very, very important to be growing our own food right now.
They have gardening and survival resources, emergency buckets for all budgets.
So we really encourage people if you're in the US to head there, use promo code Z for 5% off your order and support the businesses that support us.
Here's Karen now with this breaking, breaking info.
Karen Kingston, thank you so much for joining us today.
We, as always, appreciate your time.
Thanks for having me, Maria.
There's been a lot of progress going on in the state, specifically in Florida.
I'm sure your viewers, many of them may have heard that Broward County is now the eighth county in Florida that the Republican committee passed the ban the jab.
And what's different about when it passed in Broward County is that the local Florida news stations actually covered it, right?
So originally when Lee County passed the ban the jab, They couldn't get any PR coverage.
Nobody would touch it.
So now the Florida media is covering it and they're even saying The request of Broward County, which I believe is the 10th largest county in Florida, is a direct letter to Governor DeSantis to ban the job, to ban the shots, because there is clear evidence that the COVID-19 injections are biological and technological weapons.
And this is being covered by U.S. local news stations, so that's a big deal.
I just think the fact that the words biological and technological weapon are in the media is, we are leaps and bounds from, you know, just end the mandates to getting that out there.
And that is hugely, hugely because of you, Karen, and your uncompromising presentations about this information coming forward with the evidence that these injections are actually compromised.
Classified as a bioweapon I've had a look at the legal definition even in Australia they are classed as a bioweapon so this whole indemnity that people think Pfizer has is absolutely out the window when you know that this is a bioweapon and we can hold the people accountable for it.
You absolutely can hold the manufacturers accountable for it and even in the contract Pfizer, I mean, they forfeited their immunity.
But talking about the term bioweapon, I did an interview last week with Jeff Dornick, and we talked about this.
So I was strongly coached to stop using that term, let's just say.
And I've had some conversations with medical freedom movement leaders saying, we can't use the term bioweapon because it's too scary, it's too alarming.
And here's the challenge, Maria, is that the reason why I can't agree to that, and I'm a person who works in marketing.
I've worked in nomenclature, the science of making up words or changing the definition of words for big pharma.
So I'm actually a fan of that, unless It's for purposes of deception and it's criminal.
And the problem with not using the term bioweapon is that it has a legal definition.
It defines the weapon and it defines the crime.
So it would be like telling, you know, I can't think of another example, but a rape victim, she can't use the term rape.
Well, how is she supposed to describe what happened to her, right?
And our words influence our thoughts.
The challenge is that people who are injured from the COVID-19 injections and the mRNA injections, well, they're not outraged because they don't have the information or the term to say, wait, this is a weapon.
I'm a victim of attempted battery assault and or murder because that's what a weapon is under U.S. laws, under international laws, and under Florida State Law 790.166.
And in a minute, I'll show your viewers the demand letter that I put together.
So now in Florida, the tone is being set.
People are using the term bioweapon.
Joe Sansoni was the leader of the Ban the Jab initiative.
It was also passed by the GOP in the counties in Idaho.
But Florida, the tone is really set.
Governor DeSantis started a criminal grand jury investigation into Pfizer and Moderna, and we don't know what's going on with that.
But Surgeon General Latipo, who is the top, you know, medical advisor to the governor in the state of Florida, Surgeon General Joseph Latipo, first he said these increase the risk for heart disease, you know, in young adults, young men under the age of 39.
And then he also said children shouldn't get it.
He has recently come out and said, I don't think anyone should get these injections, right?
They see their weapons.
It's the sheriffs.
It's law enforcement.
So I put together this demand where I go through six pages.
It's concise, believe it or not, you know it's six pages, of government documents, Pfizer documents, the DOD contracts, NIH peer review publications, government database information, you know, the FDA and Pfizer saying themselves that they know that these cause this unprecedented amount of disease.
And they lack vaccine effectiveness.
All this information, the fact that fires in the FDA and the NIH all state that these are gene editing technologies, right?
And that patent that these nanoparticle gene editing technologies are patented as weapons of bioworkers.
So I put the whole thing together and law enforcement, some of which I've met in the past, and the dialogue is there.
They're not turning us away.
They said, this is what we need from you next.
So they had some very specific clinical questions that I'm working on getting the answers to.
And they said, bring us victims.
Have the victims come in and file a complaint for attempted battery assault or attempted murder.
And that's what we're doing.
So we're moving forward.
And I'm actually hopeful about this because this false narrative that there's nothing you can do Pfizer has immunity.
None of that's true.
Pfizer can't claim immunity under the US laws or international laws for developing a safe biologic.
When they ignored all those laws and developed a harmful biological weapon that also uses advanced technologies, by the way, those technologies, either they're class three devices that were not disclosed to us that we know are used as weapons, or Even at a minimal, just calling them nanotechnology, there's no law in the United States that protects them from using nanotechnology on consumers.
The actual way the law is written is that if you use nanotechnology on consumers in the United States and you don't disclose it, you have that right as a manufacturer.
But if you harm a consumer, then the liability falls on you, the manufacturer.
And I think in Europe, and the laws are stringent, right?
That if they did use these nanotechnologies, which we know they did, which are the inorganic materials, trace amounts of things like gold, silver, titanium oxide, graphene oxide, all these things, but we know that they're devices too.
Again, they can go after the manufacturer.
And then I saw in Australia, They properly talk about mRNA as modified ribonucleic acid lipid nanoparticles, which are new multi-species organisms that are capable of genetically editing cells within an animal or a human.
Under Australian law, Pfizer had no business at all releasing these.
The regulatory body for genetically modified organisms in Australia made a statement saying that they would have never authorized or allowed the use of Pfizer's mod RNA engineered nanoparticles on civilians in Australia.
So I think things are happening.
And I'm working personally with law enforcement I know they're never happy to see me, but I'm showing up until we find You know, a brave, heroic sheriff or deputy chief who will honor their oath to protect the members of their community.
And under Florida state law, 790.166, it's a weapons law, so it's no different if there was a bomb in a building.
They have the responsibility to go get it.
My letter talks about, you know, in Chicago in 1982 when seven people died from cyanide contamination and the Tylenol.
A mother called the deputy chief of the police and said, you need to get the Tylenol off the shelves.
He goes, I don't have the authority to do that.
It's a Johnson& Johnson product.
She said, oh, yes, you do.
And it was a deputy chief in a police department in Chicago that first removed the Tylenol.
And then Johnson& Johnson and the U.S. government went, oh, we better do something about this.
So, that's our plan.
The legal system or this model through the local law enforcement that exists in the United States, unfortunately, isn't something that we have here.
But I really think, and we've been saying for a very long time, because of that system, even, you know, people like Todd Callender, Dr.
Pete Chambers have said to me, this is the way to do it here in the United States.
If it gets out that this has happened in the US, the whole world, that news will spread to the whole world and then people can adopt that for their local, you know, whatever their laws are on their land.
But don't wait for the US. Everyone needs to be doing their part.
So I really want to have a look at this letter, Karen.
We'll bring that up right now.
And then we can talk about how people can adopt this for them.
So this is a demand letter.
It's quite literally thousands of hours of research and analysis that I put together.
And it goes through the evidence that the COVID-19 injections were never proven to...
They weren't even set up.
The studies weren't even set up to prove that they could prevent infection prevent hospitalization or disease or death and they were not done under bona fide research and there's a number of reasons why the research was not legitimate but the most basic explanation is no one was given informed consent about the The harmful outcomes that they knew were going to happen regarding these injections, as well as the ingredients of the vials.
And it's very important to note that Pfizer put into writing to the FDA that the formulations of the lots varied.
They told them that In August of 2021, and as you know, that was recently verified by a study out of Denmark across 10 million doses, where they believe about one-third of the lots seemed harmless and could potentially just have been a placebo, where less than 5% of the lots caused the most devastating, harmful, adverse events, diseases, disabilities, or death.
So again, very similar, I would say, to the Tylenol scare in that if If we know that there's variations in these lots and we know some of them are toxic enough to potentially kill a child or a young adult or disable, you know, someone and you don't know the difference between the lots and we don't, we have to just, you know, local law enforcement has to pull all of them.
So this is the name of it.
It's this weapon.
So again, I believe the truth is a weapon.
I believe articulating facts and evidence in adherence to law and citing law properly is a way to defeat evil.
And I do believe that that will eventually prevail.
And we're getting a lot of momentum here, like I said, in the United States and specifically in Florida.
It's very encouraging.
Very, very encouraging.
And one of the things I point out, too, is we want to seize the shots right away because we also want law enforcement to order forensics.
And then, you know, ask that question, where else is this nanotechnology being used that it wasn't disclosed to us?
Because under U.S. law, they don't have to disclose the fact that they're using nanotechnology.
And as we know, this is being used in food supply, aerosol, and whatnot.
So we really want to get the ball rolling.
One of the things I point out here is if we don't, as global citizens, do everything we can to educate people and stop the use of mRNA-engineered nanoparticles now, our family lineage is going to end with those who are alive today or in the next five years because these are gene-editing molecules.
They're new organisms that actually Change the human genome and they can be passed on to future generations.
And there's some lawsuit in Australia that goes into a lot of detail regarding that.
Yes, that's someone that we will also be speaking with very, very soon on that particular topic, you know, the genetically modified aspect of this.
So it's going to be interesting to see what comes out of that.
I think it's, again, very encouraging to see people trying that angle as opposed to just stop the mandates or, you know, we need to actually present how dangerous these products are.
Yeah, exactly.
The legal team that's in Australia has done a very good job in putting together concise and, in my opinion, easily understandable documents that how dangerous these genetically modified organisms are, which are MRNA, ModRNA lipid nanoparticles.
Again, U.S. government James Clapper called them, identified them as bioweapons, and they're patented as such in the U.S. as well, because once you change the genetic makeup of a species permanently, it's the extinction of that species.
So the demand letter is to be addressed to law enforcement, specifically the leaders of law enforcement, so a sheriff or a deputy chief.
But I'm getting messages from around the globe to say, can we modify this to send it to European Parliament?
So facts and evidence and truth, it stands no matter where you are in the world, I believe.
It's important to set up first that the FDA trials for the nanoparticle injections, they were never designed to clinically and statistically show that these were effective in any way.
And it's also important to know that the injections are now known, like there is direct causation, not just correlation, There's direct causation that it causes mild to moderate disease.
Now to the point that we know with each additional booster you get, the more likely you're going to get what they're calling COVID-19 for the Cleveland Clinic and Pfizer's own documents.
We know that it causes serious disease, disabilities, hospitalizations, and death within weeks, months, or Days, weeks, or months of receiving the shots.
And I have 82 references verifying all of this information.
So you can see the citations here for this statement.
There's about 12 references for the harmful effects that it has on formerly healthy infants, children, and adults.
And we'll go through it real quick.
So this is just Then the other thing I just talked about without the informed consent, and I think this is something that resonates, again, with all global civilians, that no one was told about the compensation of the vials.
Nobody was told about the gene editing mechanism of action, you know, and that's what's being used in Australia.
And they weren't told about the harmful, permanently disabling and deadly clinical outcomes.
These are not side effects.
These are the effects.
In this letter, I don't take it to the next step, but I will once this goes into a court of law.
I'm talking about Pfizer specifically because they're most vulnerable, but Pfizer knew this was going to cause myocarditis, right?
Well, Pfizer has a treatment called Vindicil, four formulations, $200,000 of treatment for myocarditis, and they have no competitors in that space for myocarditis caused by proteins.
Amelioid wild-type proteins, which is what their shot does.
They have mefembry for irregular menstrual bleeding.
They have a product for demyelinating diseases, which is what they knew their shots would cause, deterioration of the nerve cells throughout your central nervous system and in your brain.
And Pfizer has these treatments.
Pfizer knew they were going to cause disease disabilities and some deaths in order to create new markets For their entire pipeline.
So even if we figured out the shots were harming people and they had to get pulled, Pfizer still created numerous multi-billion dollar markets that were formerly rare diseases.
Now they're fairly common, where you've got 1% to maybe 25% of the population having a disease that formerly 0.00001% of the population had.
And it's very odd that Pfizer invested in these rare diseases.
I did work for Pfizer.
I consulted with them.
They were very clear they never invested in orphan drugs.
They would never do a product that was going to do less than at least a billion dollars.
And that was decades ago, you know, or a decade ago.
And now I'm sure it's in the billions.
So they created these markets on purpose, knowing they were going to cause the diseases and knowing people would die.
But that's not really important for the seizing of the assets.
But I have that evidence from their investor reports.
So again, I think it's just important we let the sheriffs and county law enforcement know That these contain engineered nanoparticle technologies, right?
These are technologies.
And nobody was really told that they have these technologies, these electromagnetic technologies that were injected into them, even though it's in their labeling, even though it's in the FDA submission, even though it's in the military contracts, peer-reviewed publications, patents, and manufacturers' website, people were told this is basically a biological vaccine, right?
They didn't know it contained technologies.
Again, what I said is Pfizer violated the Food and Drug Consumer Protection Act and 21 USC, and that includes the Childhood Protection Act.
So if they violated and ignored those laws, they can't ask to be Protected under them.
And one example is when they put in writing to the FDA in their August 23rd approval of their application that the lots vary by number.
The formulations vary by number.
So that's criminal.
And, you know, I think it's important that I hear this is the the data from Denmark that I pointed out that 52 different lots From Pfizer that was administered to 4 million people, sorry, with over 10 million doses, they basically showed that these all vary in formulation and some appear to be placebo, right?
So that is criminal human experimentation.
And that means if they put placebo out there, that means they know that the ones that have their formulations in them were toxic.
Karen, is it criminal human experimentation when you've had health officials, for example, Greg Hunt here in Australia say, this is the largest clinical trial ever in history, and people have still gone ahead?
If they've said that in the media, is it still criminal experimentation when the people have said, oh, okay, this is the largest clinical experiment, I'm going to go participate?
Yeah, because people weren't given informed consent.
The manufacturers did disclose that these were experimental products, but people all thought they were getting the same product.
They didn't know that there could be, you know, 10 or 20 different formulations.
They didn't know that when they went in to get a shot that, you know, their brother or sister or their co-worker might have gotten a different formulation from the same company.
They thought it was just like, okay, it's like when I go and get a prescription for An antibiotic.
You know, if it's a certain brand name and manufacturer, you assume that there's consistency in that product across everything.
Yes.
And so under U.S. law...
And you're also made aware of possible side effects of the product.
You're also, you know, made aware of contents of the product.
You're not even allowed to see the ingredients list of this product.
So there is no informed consent, of course.
Yeah, and under US law, you have to make sure that the product's consistent that you're given to the subject matters, right?
It's called GLP law, good lab practices.
So it's not like, well, it was experimental, therefore they could do different formulations.
No, that's not the law.
The laws that had to be consistent and they had to do informed consent.
I'm sure that would be the case for every country, but just something that I considered.
Because, you know, our Prime Minister's come out and said, well, no one was forced to get the shots.
And, you know, our former Prime Minister, and to be honest, he's not lying.
No one forced you.
No one held you down and injected you.
You went and did it, albeit under pressure, but you went and did it.
So you weren't actually forced.
And so I wonder whether they'll use that sort of, you know, they would try to use that excuse of, oh, we told people they were participating in an experiment, you know, but no, you also told them that it's safe and effective, that, you know, it's a scientific miracle how quickly these were developed and there's no safety concerns and, you know, you lied about all of it.
Even like Maddie DeGuerre, her mother, she's a 12-year-old that became disabled.
In the actual clinical trials, those were also criminal.
They did not tell Maddie's mother.
They just said, oh, you get fever, chills, headache, that kind of thing, muscle aches, that's it.
They didn't tell Maddie's mother that these were shown to cause neurological disorders and destroy the lining of nerve cells.
These were shown to cause fertility issues, heart inflammation.
Her mother was never told that, right?
And they knew that, you know, it's in writing in October 22nd of 2020, but they've known that all along because they know that the nanoparticle technology crosses the cell membrane of every major organ system in the body, causing damage and also causing mitochondrial damage at the DNA level.
So this has been known for 20 years and nobody was told.
Right?
So that's the big problem.
And then another...
So again, this is just all the evidence.
So Pfizer, under that data dump, they had through October...
Oh, so no, this is the October 22nd, 2020.
And there's all slides and stuff and citations that go with this.
The October 22nd, 2020 meeting the FDA had with Pfizer, right?
Again, this is what they were supposed to tell every person around the globe And also, again, Maddie de Grey's mom in the clinical trials, that they knew these could cause nervous system diseases, convulsion, seizure, paralysis, swelling of the brain, right?
They knew all this.
They knew it could cause cardiac diseases, heart attacks, heart inflammation, blood and circulatory diseases, blood clotting throughout the body, annihilation of your red blood cells at the same time.
And we know that the American Heart Association In 2021, came up with vaccine-induced thrombosis thrombocytopenia, which is a very bizarre disease where you have blood clotting and your red blood cells also disintegrating at the same time.
They asked the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services for a reimbursement code to treat it and diagnose it, right?
So clearly, that's direct causation.
So this stuff should have all been disclosed.
They also knew about the pregnancy disorders, so spontaneous abortions, fertility issues, menstrual bleeding, etc.
All of this was known and never disclosed.
And then, sure enough, Pfizer has a document from June of 2022 where they collected after they got authorization and they started using the product on American civilians.
They recorded nearly 700,000 nervous system disorders, right?
And what is COVID? Long COVID, which now they have vax-long COVID. It's primarily neurological disorders.
It's chronic fatigue, brain fog, things like that.
So they knew that their technologies were going to cross the blood-brain barrier and cause nervous system disorders, emotional, mental disorders, ADHD. This is probably going to accelerate Alzheimer's and things like that.
Anxiety, all that stuff.
So Pfizer recorded all of this stuff, 539,000 musculoskeletal, 225,000 skin and hair, over 300,000 GI problems.
They had nearly 170,000 bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections, including 25,000 herpes outbreaks, right?
This is interesting, 78,000 psychiatric disorders, 100,000 blood disorders.
Is that 24,000 herpetic infections or 249,000?
24,000.
Oh, that's a typo.
It's 24,000.
So out of 168 or 67,000 bacterial viral or parasitic infections, 24,000 or 25,000 were herpetic.
Now, so I want to explain to people what this is.
Like, yes, some of this came from VAERS, right?
Pfizer did pull some of this from VAERS, but not all of it.
So I worked at Pfizer.
And when I was a consultant for them, I was in headquarters pretty much daily, okay?
And I worked on a product, you've probably heard of Viagra, and When people have a serious reaction to a manufacturer's product or their loved one does, a lot of people don't, because VAERS is usually used for vaccines,
they don't know about VAERS. And many times, believe it or not, maybe they reach out to their physician and the physician says, no, I don't think it was that product because that's what the physicians always say.
They'll call the manufacturer directly, right?
So keep in mind that Pfizer had to like hire, I think Naomi Wolf said like an extra 2000 people to handle the phone calls that were coming in for people that were calling Pfizer directly saying, I got your shot.
This happened.
What is going on?
Right?
So this is internal documentation that they got directly from the victims.
A lot of it.
Yeah.
So I just wanted to people go, where does that information come from?
Victims called them directly and they recorded it.
And they just released it, but the document goes through June of 2022.
And then this is the VAERS data, which has 17,000 deaths in the United States.
So I just pulled the U.S. data for this.
And we know from an analysis that was commissioned by Health and Human Services, With the Harvard Pilgrim Group, that this is, you know, likely underreported by 100 times, and Steve Kirsch did an analysis believing that it's underreported by 40 times.
Either way, it's clear, you know, if this product, we know it was never designed to prevent infection or protect against disease, And it was not done in a legitimate research.
This is what it was intended to do.
It was intended to cause these disease.
So that's why it's a weapon.
I mean, and people need to understand that.
Like, if you look at the trial design, if you look at the calculations that they used, if you looked at their exclusion criteria, again, And Pfizer admitted, I think, in front of the European military parliament, they were never designed to prove that they were effective in preventing infection.
So it's like, well, then what were they for?
And this is your answer.
And, you know, they said it was going to happen.
And of course, it is happening, it did happen, and it's continuing to happen until we actually see the shots.
What I cite, I cite the DMED data in here, and the reference I use is Senator Ron Johnson's letter to Lloyd Austin, okay?
And he states that there was a 2,000, 2100% increase in hypertension, 1000% increase in nervous system disorders, 900% increase in neoplasm.
So those are tumor-like growths, okay, in the esophagus.
And the list goes on and on.
A 500% increase in pulmonary embolism.
And that's what you're seeing from this hydrogel in people's bodies, right?
Keep in mind, that's what Diamond died from.
She was not vaccinated, but somehow or another developed this strange clot that caused a pulmonary embolism.
So, yeah.
So this, again, so this is in formerly healthy people.
How do I know that they were formerly healthy?
They were in the U.S. military.
They were healthy.
In Pfizer's clinical trials, keep in mind, the title of the trial is In Healthy Individuals, and they are between the ages of 12 and about 70.
And there was a 0.1% death rate in them.
That's not normal for healthy individuals, and certainly not for children and young adults, right?
That's the average death rate across the United States, with the majority of deaths occurring in people over the ages, over the age of 85 or 80 and older.
The Joint Artificial Intelligence Center, it was available online.
I have a copy of the full report, but the DOD reported that this was in August of 2021.
So, you know, less than a year in after they rolled this out, beginning in the elderly nursing homes, and they showed that 71% of people who were fully vaccinated We've had COVID, and 60% of the hospitalizations were.
So they, you know, our US government knew this early on, this data.
So again, it's causing the hospitalizations.
The CDC just recently published an article where they stated that people who were vaccinated or fully vaccinated and boosted, who were formerly immunocompetent, meaning they were healthy, had an increased risk for hospitalization due to COVID. So that whole story that this decreased risk for severe disease and COVID, there was never anything to substantiate that.
And the CDC has finally confessed that as well in writing.
I mean, again, these are U.S. government documents, Pfizer documents.
Correct.
I mean, that's right.
We're not looking at, you know, mainstream media reports or hearsay.
This is actually published now.
It's out there by the official, the big pharma company and the government.
And the government, yeah.
So V-safe is the CDC program called VaxSafe that the CDC rolled out in December of 2020.
It was an app, right?
So their database showed that out of 10 million people that downloaded the app, Four million reported a grade three adverse event, meaning they couldn't perform their daily functions.
I point out, because this is tailored to Florida, I point out that 400,000 Floridians received it and 41% couldn't perform their daily functions and 2% had to go to the emergency room or hospital after getting a shot.
So again, these are clearly weapons.
I mean, if you take a product and then you have to go to the hospital or emergency room, Right after taking the product, that's a toxin, that's a poison.
In the state of Florida, that's a weapon.
Latipo did an analysis using the Florida government databases and diagnostic codes.
He found 16,000 people who died within 25 weeks or six months of getting a shot, and they couldn't attribute from sudden cardiac death, and they couldn't attribute the death to having COVID or to having any history of heart disease.
So he was saying this is indicative that it's from the shot.
And then he found 3,400 people, again, died from sudden cardiac death within less than four weeks of getting a shot.
And they didn't have a history of heart disease, and they didn't have a diagnosis with COVID. And, you know, his analysis after this was saying, you know, I'm not sure why he just, you know, I guess he had to hedge it, but men under the age of 40 shouldn't get the shots.
And now he's saying, I don't think anyone should.
And then to support the heart inflammation, cardiac sudden death, I think this was published in JAMA. There was a meta-analysis of 100 studies regarding cardiac complications, specifically myocarditis, which used to be rare.
So they went through 100 studies of myocarditis after receiving mRNA injections.
And they found that there was a 1.62% incidence of myocarditis.
That's not correlation.
That is causation.
They're saying, if you get the shot, you got a 2% chance now of getting myocarditis.
And it's higher for younger people, and it seems to be higher for And the first sign of myocarditis in 10% of healthy men is sudden cardiac death, right?
So these are all, this is what I put together.
Again, I have numerous references that we know the mRNA produces a spike protein or delivers a payload.
And then that's defined as a bioweapon by peer reviewed and government documents.
We know that there's excess death around the world.
In the state of Florida, it was 200 percent once Biden put his mandates in in July of 2021.
I went to the Organization and Cooperation of Economic Development And they have the CDC data on excess deaths.
The United States isn't reporting this.
It's being reported by an independent third world organization, but they link to the CDC database.
CDC recorded 500,000 excess deaths in 2022, Maria.
And we have already 65,000 the first quarter of this year.
I'm curious, do you have the percentage that that translates to?
Because in Australia, we're now, I believe, if I'm not mistaken, over 17% excess deaths as of 2023.
On average, I think the number of US deaths is...
I thought it was 0.1%.
Maybe I'm wrong.
No, it's got to be more than that, certainly, because I remember...
I know Ed Dowd's got...
Then it's 1%.
So then the average deaths in America are 1% before the shots.
Right?
So that would be 3.3 million deaths.
It's not, I'll try and find the exact data, the exact number.
I know that Ed Dowd's done that, the look in into this.
But in Australia, I know it's sitting at over 17% excess deaths so far.
So it's absolutely, yeah, it's not normal.
Yeah, well, one-sixth is, so one-fifth is 20%.
So one-sixth is around 17%.
That would be the excess deaths.
Could it be 500,000 more than 3.3 million?
Here we go.
I'm looking at, okay, United States for the age group, age group 25 to 44, excess deaths as of 2022 was 19.84%.
Yeah, that was for the younger group.
Yeah, so one sixth I think is around 16 or 17% across all age groups.
So all age groups, I've just looked at total country USA for 2022, 10.23% excess deaths as of last year.
No, because they fudged those numbers.
I was tracking the deaths starting in March of 2020, and you can see where they front-loaded.
We don't know where a bunch of numbers came in in 2020.
So like on November 20th or 30th of 2020, We were behind in our deaths by like 20%, and then all of a sudden at the end of the year we were above, and then that was the end value that they used for the future years.
Yeah, so it's a bit of a mess, but yeah.
Anyway, it's an epic failure.
Absolutely.
From Ed's particular data, they've actually used...
They've described their methodology in their papers, but basically this is...
We're talking about insurance companies, you know, that are reporting this working population just...
Absolutely exploding in death and disability.
The healthiest people that we have in the population.
So this is really good data as well for people to refer back to.
And they can find it on financetechnologies.com with a PH. Anyway, sorry, Karen.
I think it's a good data.
And I cite Edward Dow's work in here, specifically in the state of Florida.
And the references go to, actually, the reference goes to the SGOA report, which is the Society of Actuators, group of actuators, so the life insurance claims.
So I go directly to that report.
But I've written some stacks, you know, obviously attributing Edward Dow to that analysis.
This is also important.
Pfizer put in writing on November 20th that the risk-benefit ratio for their injections is not favorable.
So it's for children aged 12 to 15.
So that's criminal.
So if they're saying, we do more harm than good, and they just told the FDA, ignore the data, We're going to figure out new calculations to make this look favorable.
Well, they engaged in criminal experimentation on children with a weapon.
That's what they did.
And they put it in writing.
That to me is what's so alarming.
The reason why this letter is so powerful, Karen, is because so much has happened.
As you're reading through all of it, it's not information I don't know, but it's a lot of information that I've forgotten.
And it's because so much has come out over the past three years.
So much has been uncovered and it's happened so quickly that we forget so much of this.
And so if someone was to put, I don't think, I don't know if people are realising how much effort it takes.
To put something like this together, what Karen's done, you know, truly it's astounding because for me to go and recall everything that they've done that's wrong and criminal and all the different data points or resources to refer back to to prove it, this would take me, you know, a month, Karen, minimum of like 24 hours a day work.
Well, as I was saying, it's actually thousands of hours of research.
Some of the documents I cite in here, like the phase three trial, I've read it, I've highlighted it, I've presented it more than three dozen times.
I know the DOD contract.
I know the initial news.
I have it burned in my mind, right?
And so that's what I'm saying.
I know what pages to go to.
And so there's about 300 you know citations not there's 82 citations there's probably about 85 when I'm done because it allows me to add stuff where I'll show you it's page 99 of the IND where they put this formulation yeah so it'll all be there.
A month is probably not enough time I should probably have said a year sorry that's okay no no no no it's not no it's just it's just no I'm just saying like You'd have to go through, read the documents, and then know where the stuff was.
I also say, Maria, this was not me.
When I delivered this to my team in Florida, I said, I don't know how.
Again, I don't know how I did this.
I just prayed to God.
Normally, 10 or 12 PhDs would have worked on this, and one or two attorneys, JDs.
I know it's very powerful, and I just feel that I was being obedient to what God asked me to do, and he did the rest.
When I did this, it was one of those things where I was like, I can't do this, and I sat down and did it because I was being obedient.
Everyone thinks you think...
I don't always do with a joyful heart.
I just get it done.
But anyway, I know I got to be better.
This is important.
So the Vaccine and Biological Products Advisory Committee of the FDA, they put this in writing, June 10th.
They said it's not possible to conduct a clinical trial that would prove a vaccine is statistically and clinically capable of preventing infection from SARS-CoV-2 because children don't get the virus.
They don't get infected.
They don't get sick from it.
They put that in writing.
And we still inoculated children with these weapons?
I mean, it's truly, I think it's very damning evidence.
This was some new information that here I do link to an article That links to the UK government database.
The reason why I don't link to the UK government database is I don't know how to use that database system.
I'm not familiar with it the same way I'm familiar with many of the US systems.
But I'm confident in this.
But the UK said that children who received two injections were 15 times more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children.
And children that got three injections were 45 times more likely to die.
So that's horrifying.
I mean, I don't know how people understand how damning those numbers are, you know, and children are under the, you know, 17 and younger.
This, again, this is from reading the baby study, six months to four years of age.
And page after page after page in that study, it's hard to read if you have a heart.
Many babies developed fevers over 104 and went into seizures from those fevers.
Those babies had EEGs done that showed that they had permanent brain damage.
Many of them had status epilepticus, which means now they're going to have seizures 12 or more times a day for the rest of their lives.
Some of the babies developed herpes fevers.
Some of the babies developed a smoothing over of their brain.
They're permanently brain damaged.
I don't know exactly what the ramifications of that is, but I don't think they're functioning.
And some babies developed, they called it hypotnea, which is Lifelike baby syndrome.
I don't know if the babies died.
So this is again, and this is whether the encephaly, which is genetic induced brain malformations, right?
The baby wasn't born with that genetic disease.
How did they all of a sudden spontaneously develop it?
This data is really horrifying.
I mean, it's something that you would think on your worst nightmares, maybe this was done in those German Nazi experimentation camps.
It's really horrifying.
Again, I just want to point out that there were 344 babies between ages of six months and less than two years of age, and they were given three injections, or they were to be given three injections over eight weeks, and only three of the babies made it to the end of the trial.
We don't know what happened to them.
We know reasons for withdrawal are adverse events, admission to the hospital, and death.
So we just don't know what happened to them.
And I don't know why more attorneys and media outlets aren't demanding to know what happened to these babies.
They're babies.
They were innocent babies.
What happened to them?
And Pfizer shouldn't have, you know, 75 years, five years or five months to get back to us.
They have this data.
They should get it back to us in five days.
Yes, absolutely.
So again, and now I'm getting too, I can't talk about babies, but this to me is, you know, if you do get to sit down with someone, how can you not feel emotion around this, you know?
Absolutely.
The other thing is the engineered nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier causing demyelinating diseases, right?
Which Pfizer and the FDA talked about in their October 22nd meeting, and that was then manifested in Pfizer recording 700,000 neurological disorders.
These references here not only include the FDA documents, but it includes peer-reviewed publications that you can find on the NIH website where they talk about how nanoparticles cross the blood-brain barrier And cause my leading diseases and cause other neurological dysfunction.
So it's not just Pfizer's documents.
It's not just the FDA documents.
It's also the expert opinions of people who work in neurological disorders and in nanotech.
So I think that's what makes my document different, too, is that I pull in a lot of peer-reviewed publications from the nanotech industry where they openly talk about doing this harm, right?
But nobody talks about the nanotech industry.
So that's another powerful agent where you're going to say, okay, you're telling me that the experts in nanotech, they say this is what can happen if you can have serious neurological dysfunction and permanent brain damage is some of the terms that they use.
Right.
Pfizer and the FDA talk about this.
They put it in writing.
Pfizer documents 700,000 cases.
And now you're telling me that this wasn't intended to cause neurological damage as a neural weapon?
You can't say that.
You know and when when if a sheriff or someone was to say to you well when you read Pfizer's study they said oh well the the 19 deaths the 0.1 percent they didn't attribute it to their shots and they didn't attribute the neurological dysfunctions to their shots right and this study in JAMA with myocarditis said they don't think it's from the shots and to that I say did you ever meet a criminal that lied to you Absolutely.
Yeah, they're gonna say, oh, we're killing people?
They're gonna say, no, it wasn't us, right?
Of course.
Yeah, so that to me is not a strong argument in defense of the criminals, that the criminals said they didn't do it, so it must not be true, right?
I don't think that's a strong defense.
So that's really important, because they put it in writing, And then they say, but it's not from the shot.
And when you look at the baby data, I'm sorry, if 341 babies, if they died, there's no explanation for that.
None.
Other than this is, yeah, it's murder.
Again, the other thing is Pfizer documents that there was nearly 180,000 female and male reproductive system disorders.
In this case, I focus on the male reproductive disorders.
And talking about how the nanoparticles specifically affect the male reproductive system.
So I reference Pfizer's documents, and then I reference, you know, I think the title is How Nanoparticles Damage the Male and Female Reproductive System.
I think that's one of the peer-reviewed publications that I published.
So it's very, very well cited and referenced.
Then the next part, again, I go talk about the female, you know, reproductive issues.
And then I talk about how the nanoparticles have been shown to do that.
I also cite Pfizer's data that was released under FOIA through Japan that shows that the nanoparticles went straight to the testes and straight to the ovaries in the Winster hamster study.
So that's also in here.
There's so much hard evidence here that you can't throw this out.
You know what I mean?
You can't just say there's just one document.
It's like, well, no.
Pfizer said it.
This expert said it.
And then Pfizer recorded it.
And so the CDC recorded these clinical harmful outcomes.
So it's very, I think, very well referenced.
And when people go, well, what's the mechanism, action of the harm?
I provide that with the peer-review publications on the nanoparticle technology, how they explain exactly how they damage all the major organs and systems in the human body, right?
Now, when you ask what's the mechanism of action to protect against SARS-CoV-2, if you look in Pfizer's document, they say, we don't know.
But we do know how this causes disease, disabilities, and death across all the major systems of a human.
So...
Karen, can I ask, and I mean, what I really would love as the outcome of this interview is for everyone to go to your Substack, download this letter, and adopt it for their own countries.
Like, this is essentially what we want.
Are all the references included there as well?
I don't mean to make you jump ahead, but ultimately we want everyone...
So all the references are here, right?
You can see them.
What I didn't do...
Because people criticize me for being too long, is I didn't do the screenshots for every statement I said there, right?
Because some of the statements have 15 screenshots, some have two or three.
But no, this is everything, you know, right here.
And yeah, it's all cited with all the links.
Now, there's two references that don't have a link because Pfizer took down their initial new drug application from the internet.
I have a hard copy of it.
I just, I got to find a place to put it up.
And there was another reference.
Same thing.
It was like a Pfizer document that was taken down from the internet.
So people can go and print every single one of these things and take it to their local law enforcement.
Does it, and forgive me, you may have mentioned this at the start.
I know that it's something, you know, the sheriffs can go and seize these products essentially.
Is the aim of this to prove to law enforcement that This is a bioweapon, a crime has been committed and here's the evidence of the crime.
So essentially people need to adopt that for their respective countries.
Yeah, that's the exact point.
And then as you go through it, it gets more complicated.
Like here, I start going into that they are engineered nanoparticle technologies.
I cite some of the references that Australia cited.
I need to add one more.
But the cation glyposome, right, which we know Pfizer talks about on their website, all those references, the original patent for it was to deliver non-human DNA into the cells of human beings.
And that non-human DNA was from insects and reptiles.
Yuck.
So, yeah, it's disgusting.
I mean, so the engineered nanoparticles are, this is where I cite some of the Australian study.
There are known and unknown risks for integrating non-human DNA into the human genome.
We know the spike protein is made of reptilian, insect, rodent DNA, right?
It's been sequenced.
That's what's being integrated into human cells.
I'm sorry to make this horrible face.
And we don't know if that's going to then integrate that non-human DNA into the germline.
So is it being passed on from parent to child through the egg and the sperm or through embryonic development if the mother was pregnant?
So that's, again, this is all here.
Which is why you said, I was curious about that timeline that you gave, the five-year timeline of, you know, essentially extinction of human beings.
There are a number of different reasons why that's the case.
Is the inserting of other DNA part of that?
Yeah, that's what it is.
That's the fact that...
The more I'm reading about the nanoparticle technology, and they're putting it into other injectables and medicines as well, and we know they're putting it into food.
It's not what it does.
I hate to say this, but it's not like, okay, if some of my cells got this non-human DNA integrated into it, does that mean I'm no longer a human?
No, it does not.
If I'm of childbearing age or going to become of childbearing age and it's integrated into my reproductive system and then I and another person that was injected or my non-human DNA is now dominant, what we give birth to is not the humanity that God created.
Karen, are you done with the presentation side of this?
Can we go back to, or do you have anything else to show from here?
I would just let people know that the, again, one of the things I do cite in here that's important is that the vaccine nanotechnology, so the mRNA is patented as a bioweapon, as an agent of biowarfare, right?
I think that's important.
So it makes sense that these cause that.
And then this is a demand.
I don't know what they're going to do in other countries, but in America, you make a demand.
And we're gonna negotiate what we want the outcomes to be by a certain deadline.
And there are ramifications that people don't meet that demand, right?
Typically it's civil lawsuits.
So I don't know how you would handle this in other countries, but I think this document itself is very, very powerful as a legal document.
You know, Karen, you recently posted a Policy Horizons Canada document and talking about biodigital convergence.
So we actually did a three-part series going through that entire page and what the thinking of these people is.
And then as part of that series, I found this legal document from some years ago that was discussing the difference between...
First of all, the moral side, the ethical side of owning human beings and being able to manipulate their brains using programmable technology like we have in the COVID injections.
And then the difference between being owned and pwned, who actually now owns that person Or at least the technology inside that person.
So, say for example, you have a pacemaker.
The manufacturer of that pacemaker owns that pacemaker, but they don't own you.
However, when you have something like these very complex technologies that are merging the human with the Internet of Bodies, the Internet of Things, is that human being then owned or are they just considered pwned, which is a gaming term for essentially hacked?
Really, really alarming stuff.
You know, this is the stuff that really goes over the heads of a lot of these law enforcement officials, but I think it's the reason why what you've just presented today is so crucial for people to actually start having these conversations with law enforcement.
Yeah, so I don't go into that level of detail with law enforcement, but I do point out that these are engineered nanoparticles.
Engineered nanoparticles are electromagnetic devices.
Per the FDA. Per the industry, right?
And there's an interesting article that I read the other day from one of the nanotech publications where, you know, they were just saying, you know, discussing the bioethics of nanotechnology is an important discussion to have.
It would be a travesty if 10 years from now we're still not having that discussion.
And that's why it's so important for the medical freedom movement leaders To validate that these injections contain nanotechnology and nanoparticles, right?
So I believe there's some engineers in the industry that realize this industry was all developed in secrecy, and now they're realizing And that was the decision, was if we tell people what we're doing, they're going to say no, right?
So we're just not going to tell them.
So it's important to have that conversation.
And the concept that people can't find the nanotech in the shots is a little bit crazy because you're like, what are you using to detect it?
Because it's smaller than the size of a cell.
And because it's so small, that's what makes it toxic, right?
That's what allows it to Enter into a cell and do the mitochondrial damage at the DNA level.
And then, you know, I didn't go into it in this, this, but, you know, we know CRISPR-Cas9 is being used now too in these injections.
And I just did another substack today on On cultured meat.
Cultured meat uses CRISPR-Cas9 and mRNA lipid nanoparticles.
It's not meat.
They use stem cells and multi-species genetic material and gene editing to create new organisms that are not from one species, but it looks like a piece of chicken and they're calling it chicken.
Who would want to eat that?
Like, it's not meat.
It's a new multi-species organism.
Yuck.
Yeah, and they go, oh, we just give it nutrients.
Those nutrients are things like serum response factor, which is used to grow embryos, or vascular endothelial growth factor, which the body uses naturally for growth of blood and vasculature, as well as cancer tumors, right?
It's not natural.
They're lying to us.
You know, you don't just take a cell from a muscle and they're like, and then we just give it nutrients.
So people think what they're putting vitamin B drops on it.
Exactly.
The word nutrients, that's where their mind goes.
Yeah.
Like, I'm sorry, if I have a filet mignon in my refrigerator and I just put vitamin B and C drops on it every day, it doesn't turn into a second steak in a month.
Correct.
Yes, I mean, like, it's just, they're just lying to us.
And it's so important that medical freedom movement leaders say, yes, there are technologies in here.
They are smaller than the size of the cell, which is why they went undetected.
But because of their size, that's why they are so harmful to human beings and they can actually disrupt And that's why I'm excited that at least Bravard County in Florida, when they wrote to DeSantis, they said that these contain biological and technological weapons.
So we're talking about it.
And the other thing is, again, in the United States, if you use nanotechnology, there's nothing protecting the manufacturer.
And that's what makes me nervous about people saying, Karen Kingston or Dr.
Anna Malhasia are trying to destroy things by talking about nanotech.
And I'm like, literally, it's the way to shatter all of it.
There's nothing for them to hide behind at all, you know, because you can't inject people with nanotech and tell them it's a biologic if it harms them.
So, these are just important things.
I mean, I don't know, Maria, what could happen.
I'm not familiar with the tone in Australia If people are willing to share this information, hold rallies, you know, how if they see that this is like we're on the precipice of the extermination of human beings as God created them.
Oh, Karen, the appetite for accountability Has just increased over time.
The people just need something concrete that they can do something with.
And so that's why I think this letter is so powerful.
I'm going to ask Australians who are watching this, if you are particularly knowledgeable in Australian law, I'm not one of those people, but if you are particularly knowledgeable in our current legal system, Or you know people that are.
Please get together with them or you get together.
Adapt this to Australian.
To an Australian model.
Some of the things that are in there that aren't relevant to us.
And then contact us through zmedia.com on the contact form.
Share a story form.
Get in touch with us.
Let us know that you've adapted the letter and we'll absolutely get it out there and we'll get people doing something with this.
It really is...
And really the same goes for every country.
You know, if you're in the UK and you have a platform there that's...
Very large.
Do the same thing there.
Share this interview with them.
Because, like we said at the very start of this, the words bioweapon are finally being used publicly.
You know, the first time that we had was the Russian Ministry of Defence recognising Karen's work.
You know, I don't know if people realise the magnitude of that, knowing that the DOD worked in conjunction with these maniacs to release this bioweapon.
And so, following that, we've now got...
Certain mainstream media outlets using these words in Florida, local media.
These are huge developments.
You've got RFK Jr.
making some pretty out there statements at the moment relating to the shots.
More and more is coming out and the appetite for accountability is growing.
Karen, we want to thank you truly from the bottom of my heart and I'm sure the viewers feel the same.
You are one of the most important people of our time right now.
I know you don't think that about yourself.
I know you.
You're such a humble, humble woman.
But really, everything that you've done is so, so crucial and I don't know where the world would be without you.
Well, that's who you say.
There is one thing I want to emphasize.
Lieutenant General Russian Kiryov had said too.
He ordered countries across Asia and Africa and Europe to nullify and void their contract with Pfizer.
So he was saying, you know, decouple Pfizer from the U.S. Pentagon and DOD. He said, we need to hold them to account.
But he was giving clear instructions.
So I don't want people to think, well, there's nothing you can do.
You can absolutely hold the manufacturer to account.
And that's what I'm encouraging people in the United States to do.
Obviously, what are you going to do if you go in the Australian system to say, well, the U.S. government and the U.S. military is accountable.
There's nothing they can do.
But they can bring civil and criminal charges against Pfizer in their country.
And I want to be clear, too, in the Brooke Johnson case here in America, that federal judge, so Pfizer said, look, judge, there's nothing you can do.
We're protected under emergency use authorization, right?
So you can't even rule on this case.
And the judge said, no, no, no, if you read the DOD contract, like Karen Kingston did, no, he didn't say that, but if you read the DOD contract, he said, It says here that you may be protected under EUA. He goes, so I decided that you're not protected under EUA. And the judge did rule on that case.
So Pfizer, as I've been saying for so long, forfeited their emergency use authorization immunity to be protected behind the US government here in the US. I'm sure the laws in Australia and around the world, because they're using this bioweapon technology, nanotechnology, And their contract with the US government says they're acting independent of them, I'm sure you can go after them in your country.
I'm positive we can as well.
And like I said just yesterday, you know, these maniacs have grossly underestimated The absolute mental fortitude and resilience of people that know that a crime has been committed and are going to prove it.
And I am seeing that people are just...
They're not going to stop, Karen.
They're not going to stop until accountability is seen.
I'm one of those people.
I know you are too.
I know that the viewers of this broadcast are as well.
So I'm asking everyone who's watching this today, share it with everyone that you know.
This is probably one of the most important broadcasts we've ever done.
Because to date I have not seen a document like this that Karen's created.
And again, the call out, if you are in Australia and you do have experience with our legal system, please modify the letter and get in touch with us via zmedia.com.
We will absolutely work with you as much as we can to get this out.
Karen, thank you very, very much.
The link for Karen's substack is in the description below.
You can subscribe to that, support her work for a minimal fee as well every month for someone who's literally serving the entirety of humanity.
Where else can people find you, Karen, apart from your substack?
Substack's the best place.
You can go on Twitter or Getter, but Substack's really the best place to engage with me.
And on the Stu Peters Network, I'm on regularly as well.
Thank you so much, Karen.
We really appreciate it.
Thank you.
Part of the evidence that Karen has been asked to obtain is victims of the mRNA COVID injections in Florida.
That's also on her substack.
So please do, if you are a victim or you know a victim, please get in touch with Karen to help her collate this evidence for law enforcement.
I'm again asking people who are able to support Karen's work through Substack subscription.
She is doing the most, literally some of the most important work in the world today.
So if you are able to support her, please do that.
Consider subscribing to her Substack and giving her that ongoing support.
This document that she's created literally is thousands of hours of work and a legal representative would have charged unimaginable amounts for it and she's putting it out there for the world.
We do appreciate her help.
Now, I want to talk about the fact that, yes, we are at the pointy end, as I said at the start of this broadcast, which means that the globalists will go to extreme efforts to silence us, possible cyber attack, possible blackout.
We just don't know what they're going to do in response to To all of this coming out, it's very, very evident that we're not giving up.
We are going to come after these people the right way.
And that means that when criminals are backed into a corner, they could do really unpredictable things.
So please, please, if you're in Australia, prepare with Survival Supplies Australia, the number one provider in our country for all of your survival needs, including First aid kits, emergency food, 25-year life water.
They are really, really fantastic.
They've got the largest range in the country.
And also, if you're in Australia, we've got a very, very great promotion this month from Stockman Steaks.
This meat is guaranteed non-GMO. It's antibiotic-free.
Grass-fed and they guarantee mRNA-free as well.
For the month of July, if you spend $200, you receive 1kg free of beef mince.
If you spend $300, you receive 2kg free of beef mince.
And if you spend $500, you receive 3kg free of beef mince.
Their meat is delicious.
I eat it exclusively.
And they have a range of different boxes and box types.
You can order a jumbo box as well where you pick different types of meats.
I like to do that.
If you're in the United States, Australia, Canada, UK, doesn't matter where you are, head to the satellite phone store at sat123.com forward slash Maria.
Get yourself some alternative communications.
We did a promo for these guys just last month and they sold out completely online.
Of their Iridium phones, which are still available on back order.
That's those phones here right now.
And they also have encrypted device, all their devices are encrypted by the satellite phone store.
So your communication is safe.
They're good people.
The owner's a Christian lady.
She's a really wonderful lady, and we're very grateful for her.
And if you're in Australia, Head to Gold Bullion Australia Group, the leader in bullion, I've spoken about this a few times, in August, BRICS' meeting, they may very well announce that it's going to be gold-backed.
It'll be a huge, huge problem for the US dollar, and it could really change the financial landscape across the world.
It may not go down like that.
But it is possible that as of August, the price of gold will really shoot up.
So if you've been thinking about it, now is a very good time to look into that option.
Parallel economy while we fight is really the only solution and supporting these businesses that don't agree to the agenda.
I put up a post the other day about one of the mascara products that I've been using for years just used bearded men in their promotion of their products and I said right well that's it I'll never buy this product again and the list of products that I'm using is getting smaller every single day the list of brands I'll never Use again is growing smaller every day.
I will never buy Nike again after the Dylan Mulvaney saga.
I will never buy the North Face despite the fact that I used to love their products.
I'll never buy them again after their last campaign.
And so I think, you know, the answer is to vote with our wallets.
Support those companies that don't subscribe to the ESG nonsense model and help those companies that are for freedom right now while we can Because the economy speaks volumes.
The parallel economy will speak volumes.
And so this is really crucial while we fight to be voting with our wallets at the same time.
Thank you so much for joining today.
Share this everywhere.
This is really, I mean, it should be one of the most important headlines in the world right now.
Everyone needs to know about this.
Everyone needs to have access to this letter.
So thank you.
Thank you for your continued fight.
I know you won't give up.
You can be sure I won't either.
And you can be sure people like Karen won't either.
God bless you all.
▲
Export Selection