All Episodes
Previous Next
July 7, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
58:35
Uncensored: Biodigital Convergence Pt 3 - Internet of Bodies & Human Free Will Takeover
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Today we're going to tie this all in, in the third and final instalment of this particular series, though certainly not the last focus of the Stu Peters Network, or Z Media for that matter, On this topic, we know that the globalists in their madness are trying to merge humans with machines.
What does that actually mean?
What does bio-digital convergence mean?
If you haven't seen parts one and two so far of this series, please do go back and watch them.
They're on the Stu Peters Network.
They're also easy to find on zmedia.com.
But today we really want to talk about the social engineering and the human manipulation, the mind manipulation that is involved in In this biodigital convergence.
So I found a very, very helpful clip.
There is a compilation of videos and I have to apologize because I don't know which documentary this is from.
Unfortunately, the person that posted it on Rumble didn't actually say which documentary this was from.
But whoever the maker is, know that we are grateful for you making this.
This fascinating documentary.
What it is is a number of different experts and whistleblowers talking about the technology of DARPA, mind control, and being able to manipulate the human thoughts.
And this is the external stuff that they were previously able to do.
Now we're talking about modifying the human internally to enhance this.
So I want people to keep that in mind as they watch the next few minutes of these very, very alarming clips.
We are in a new Cold War.
And this is why countries are developing this.
I mean, really developing this.
And this is why all of the microwave transmitters are going up everywhere.
Because somebody, if they wanted to, could use them for other effects.
The system is up and running.
MIT was awarded a number of years ago to Woody Norris.
This is 2005 or 2006.
And that award was a half a million dollars for doing what's called acoustic heterodyning.
Being able to send a signal from two points into an individual so they literally hear a voice in their head that nobody around them hear.
I mean voices are the easiest ones because all you have to do is stimulate the cochlea with a set resonant frequency.
It's very easy.
Voices are very easy.
It isn't people imagining voices, they physically hear them.
You can physically make people hear voices, certain voices, and it can be any conversation, and it can be anybody you want to hear.
It can be a soft angelic voice, it can be a god, it can be something that scares you like a devil, It could be anything.
DARPA led a couple of contracts back in 2011-2012 to the University of California for what's called electronic telepathy, being able to monitor the brain activity of human beings at a distance and determine what they're thinking.
And then on a second contract, actually developing complex signals, being able to send them into the brain of another person, literally transmit a message.
This is where the technology is today.
What we're here to talk about today is the fact that the brain is and will be the 21st century battlescape in many ways.
End of story.
You will encounter some form of neurocognitive science that has been weaponized not only in your military career but in your personal and professional lives.
It is valid, valuable, and already an operational play.
The brain is the current and future battle space.
What's new about this is the enclosed nature of this.
Increasingly, we're not seeing these things as weapons of mass destruction against gross aspects of the population.
More specifically, perhaps, might be targeting individuals on a level that allows either direct attribution or covert engagement with non-attribution.
Formal definition of a weapon, probably the one that you've heard about most recently, most contemporaneously in the literature, is the possibility to use some form of directed energy to affect physiology peripherally and also to affect the physiology and health of the brain.
Case in point here, U.S. Embassy personnel in Havana and possibly in China.
Clearly, one of the things we can also do is transcranial neuromodulation, the idea of going through the skull to modulate the node and network activity of the brain, to implant certain brain-machine interfaces.
These are many of the DARPA programs that you may hear of now, probably the one that is most notorious, is something called the N3 program, which is the non-invasive neurosurgical neuromodulation program being run by their program manager, Dr.
Almandy.
The idea here is to put minimal-sized electrodes in a network within a brain through only minimal intervention to be able to read and write into the brain function in real time, remotely.
And by affecting the way that brain is built and the way it functions, influence in ways that are kinetic and non-kinetic the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities.
Look at the power that understanding, tools, and techniques of the brain sciences afford.
So you guys are actually, in a sense, the canaries in the coal mine, right?
Because the incentives are all lined up against you.
Anybody see on the subway, link your MetroCard to your debit card?
Right?
And like auto refill?
This is a concept which is key to everything we'll talk about today.
And it's called linkability.
Take one piece of data and link it to another piece of data.
So for example, if you have your MetroCard and you have your debit card, you have those things and you can draw a line between them, right?
So that's like not a scary thing.
Except your bank card is tied to everything else that you do during the day.
So now they know where you're going, when you make purchases.
So when they decide to target you, they can actually recreate your exact steps with a MetroCard and with a credit card alone.
Like literally where you go and what you buy.
And potentially by linking that data with other people on similar travel plans, they can figure out who you talked to and who you met with.
When you then take cell phone data, which logs your location, and you link up purchasing data, MetroCard data, and your debit card, you start to get what you could call metadata in aggregate over a person's life.
And metadata in aggregate is content.
It tells a story about you, which is made up of facts, but is not necessarily true.
So for example, just because you were on the corner and all those data points point to it, it doesn't mean you committed the crime.
So it's important to note that if someone has a perception of you having done a thing, it will now follow you for the rest of your life.
So just keep in mind that what happens to you guys, for example with fingerprints and retinal scans and photographs, that is what is going to happen to people in the future when they resist policy changes and when they try to protest in a totally constitutionally protected way.
And wasn't he absolutely right?
All of these technologies that these whistleblowers and experts were warning about years ago have absolutely been weaponised against people.
Now they've been weaponised against protesters.
We know that in Canberra, where we think it was well over 250,000 attendees, probably more, just judging by the traffic coming into Canberra, over a million cars entered Canberra that weekend of that very large protest in Australia.
And there were directed energy weapons used against the people.
What happened following that was that they no longer wanted to protest.
Protest essentially died out in Australia after that.
And how do we know there were directed energy weapons used?
Well, we saw the LRAD machine that was there, and of course they say they only used that for conveying messages to the public.
That was likely The decoy for the actual energy weapons that were being used that resulted in people coming home with burns, blisters, burns under their clothing, blisters inside their mouths.
Certainly something you cannot blame on the hot Australian sun because it doesn't burn through clothing.
But that is exactly what was happening.
Children presenting with persistent fatigue, sleeping for days on end.
And so we know that these types of weapons are being used against us.
How far are they going?
You know, they've already used them in situations where people are protesting, you know, democratically, allowed to protest, as is their constitutional right.
But also the data that's been gathered about people based on their social profiles, based on their political views, censoring those individuals.
We already know Joe Biden used AI to censor individuals in the United States, likely the case with many, many governments, although they say that they were personally responsible for handling misinformation, but it's very likely that they utilized AI for that.
So we can already see how AI has been utilized Externally, to silence people.
But what do they actually have planned for the internal?
And Dr.
James Giordano, presenting to the US military there, speaks about some of that.
He speaks about being able to manipulate the mines.
Barry Troa says, yes, we can send waves or they can send waves into the mine to stop people from protesting.
So it's not even about physically damaging you with these energy weapons.
Blisters and so on and so forth.
They can actually manipulate the minds of people with this technology to discourage them from standing up against The absolute warfare that's being waged against them.
But how much further does this go when you're talking about bio-digital convergence and merging the human being with technology?
So this is now human beings going and willingly putting this technology inside of them interacting with Biology that's not natural, it's synthetic biology, going and doing it, implanting chips, all this sort of stuff into their brains, how much more are they subject to manipulation apart from the stuff that they're doing without your consent?
When you actually consent to this, how much worse will it be for you?
And we know exactly what it is.
Because the globalists tell us, humans are now hackable animals.
We can now manipulate their emotions.
We can go in and cause them to do things that they wouldn't normally do.
So that's what this entire three-part series about biodigital convergence has been.
It's not just about changing the physical attributes of biology.
It's also about what that does to the soul, to the mind, to the human's free will.
Are you willingly giving up your free will to AI, super Satan, computer, essentially?
And I am of the opinion that yes, people absolutely are.
So just a really quick recap.
We've gone over some of their definitions.
We've gone over some of their story.
Good morning, BioDigital.
The new capabilities that they say arise.
I've, you know, decoded this for the viewers in terms of what they actually mean when they talk about enhancing supply chain.
It's going to be AI. Modelling how to stop the climate catastrophe that's a complete made-up lie.
And so now we're talking about the initial policy questions.
We've spoken about the economic policy questions.
Read an example last week of this, sorry, earlier this week of the Your Choice program where companies were selling the data of individuals outsourced targeted consumer manipulation on a massive scale because the The consumers gave them access to the Your Choice program, gave them access to their digital twin, which means full access to your life and activity.
I maintain that they already have this.
It's just that now they're talking about, you know, what policies they need to implement to make sure they're not invading people's privacy.
But they've already been doing it.
This has already been wargamed.
And as you saw from the video before, the technology is far beyond what anyone could imagine.
Which we've been saying for some time.
So I want to talk about the social part.
This is the last part of this particular webpage that we're going to focus on.
They talk about social attitudes shifting towards health and lifestyle.
And so what it means to be healthy may shift during a bio-digital convergence affecting social relationships.
Today, healthiness is mostly associated with the ability to avoid illness and to engage in a full range of human activities.
In a biodigital convergence, detailed, mediated knowledge of the human body, the microbiome and biological functions may create new opportunities to understand and influence our health.
Maximizing healthiness could involve a broad array of more precise behavioral and nutrition-related interventions.
Meaning, if you have diabetes and you go to have that donut...
Will you be handing over the ability for health care providers to intervene in your thoughts and manipulate you to not want that donut?
Some might say that's a really great thing if you have diabetes.
What happens if you don't want a certain injection because there are harms?
But Big Pharma who's working in conjunction with the monsters creating this technology are able to manipulate your brain to make you think you really want it.
Dr.
Mahaicha spoke to us about a couple of patients that she had in her clinic who could actually hear a voice telling them to go and get the booster, even though they had experienced negative side effects from the previous injections.
More than one patient.
So what happens when you're not even hearing a voice?
Because that's quite an obvious thing.
What happens when you're not even hearing a voice but this synthetic biology that's now taken over your neural networks and your ability to think is able to influence you to make you think they're your own thoughts?
What if it's able to make you think that the Bible is wrong?
And you know what?
Yuval's right.
Maybe AI does need to rewrite the Bible.
For example, consenting to engage with this technology and this bio-digital convergence is the end of your free will and the end of your human soul.
And we know that to be fact because Yuval Noah Harari himself says, oh the idea of a soul and free will is ancient.
That's an ancient religious teaching.
That doesn't exist anymore.
We can hack the human.
We can change the will.
It's very, very serious.
So it says that as data becomes more widely accessible, health could become a status symbol.
A status symbol?
Really?
How's that?
Because you're going to roll out universal vaccine passes.
That are linked to your social credit score, that are linked to your universal basic income, that's linked to your central bank digital currency, and if you don't maintain all of the injections they want you to get and your constant system upgrades, It becomes a status symbol.
Either you're a compliant citizen or you're a non-compliant citizen.
Either you are doing what AI knows best because the religion of AI is the religion of scientists.
AI knows best!
How dare you think you know better than AI knows for you?
And therefore, you are not worshipping the orders of your AI god, human.
You must be punished, your UBI must be cut off, your central bank digital currency must be cut off, and your social credit score impacted.
Access and funding for nootropics, which are drugs to improve brain function, could raise social policy issues.
This is interesting because the drugs that they're saying will improve your brain function, why would it raise social policy issues?
Maybe because these drugs are not actually just improving brain function, they are synthesizing you with something that's able to control you and manipulate you.
So they say that the advances could significantly improve health.
Some may perceive improved biodigital technologies as a way to mitigate the effects of unhealthy lifestyles.
And of course, they deem unhealthy lifestyles, as I just said, as not getting whatever injection the World Health Organization wants you to get.
Therefore, biodigital is the answer.
Hacking you is the answer.
Manipulating you is the answer.
If you're not going to comply, human, We're going to hack you into compliance.
This is what these people want.
It goes on to say, it talks about some of the policies that could help address health inequality, which basically just means who isn't doing this?
Who can we coerce into doing this?
You know, they talk about all the poorer countries couldn't access...
Couldn't access these death shots.
Poor things.
We need to make sure everyone can get it.
And so they're saying that, you know, biodigital convergence could accelerate that because it's such a cheap way of delivering An accessible way of delivering all of these bio-digital solutions to people.
And they say that, you know, uneven access could affect disadvantaged and vulnerable groups.
Democratisation, which we spoke about last time, could offset some of this gap.
And exactly what I just said, if we can produce life-saving or life-enhancing medicines safely, reliably and cheaply, health inequality could decrease accordingly.
So that's their wording for, we want this, every single human to be synthetic, we need to make sure that it's accessible for everyone.
So, they talk about policies that can foster trust.
So, they rely on a wide array of biological data which may change the way citizens relate to businesses that provide services.
For example, the relationship between business and firms and individuals may require higher levels of trust.
As firms seek to access highly intimate data about our lives and bodies.
An example of this is recently in Australia banks have been updating their privacy policies in order to continue using their banking app and of course this is the big banks And of course, people generally don't read through those privacy policies.
They just, you know, they're too busy to read them.
But one concerned user contacted us and said, oh, this is really serious.
The bank now wants to collect my political data, my sexual orientation, my sexual preferences, my religious beliefs.
Why does a bank need to know that information?
And of course, more and more companies will be asking for your consent to that information, not because they can't already access it.
Because they require your consent, not even to use it, but to trap you in the system.
Because once you consent to it, you consent to your soul being part of this bio-digital convergence.
Do you understand how this works?
You consent to your free will being handed over to these individuals with every creep.
Into this ultimate goal, you are giving over your consent to your life, your humanity.
They're already doing it, but they want you to agree.
That's really the key here.
So we'll finish up on this page and then I want to get into some of the patents and other articles that support these findings.
So they talk about human digital twins that could become valuable assets beyond healthcare.
So, you know, the check-ins were the start, you know, your digital vaccine pass.
Was your digital twin displaying your compliance with the system?
Now they're saying that these digital twins could become valuable assets beyond healthcare.
So social services, the justice system, environmental services and education providers may all need to be trusted with, manage and act on increasingly intimate data that relate to people and the world around them.
So again, the example that I just gave of the banks, but we're talking now about the social conditioning that's taken place.
Like from that video that we just watched, you know, you've been tapping and the banks have been collecting and these people have been collecting the data about what you do, where you go, what your behavior patterns are.
Now we're talking about this technology being inside of you, tracked in real time, 24-7.
It's very, very dangerous.
And while these guys are presenting the ethical dilemma here, almost, it's already occurring.
They just haven't told people yet.
It really is a rape of the human being with existing technology, and I don't say that lightly.
They talk about publicly acceptable data policy and it sometimes creates roadblocks to the ease which many parties could extract or make use of personal data related to an individual's genome, biome, health markers and context.
Could create new demands for regulation beyond existing personal health information protection laws.
But they're doing it and they haven't created protection laws.
That's the point.
You know, we're talking about AI having the capability to read your thoughts at this point.
What policies have been put in place to protect people from this?
Absolutely nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
And what'll happen is, it'll just be a, oh gosh, it's too late.
Whoops!
And by then, the digital prison infrastructure will already be established.
They go on to talk about the ubiquitous genetic sequencing could have privacy and consent implications for families and communities given that a single individual's DNA test provides information about their biological relatives.
And, you know, they say that governments, particularly relating to Indigenous individuals here, but it says governments may need to think beyond individual privacy And consider the concept of collective privacy when genetic data could affect the rights or freedoms of others.
We know now that through FOI requests that through the PCR test they were selling people's DNA data, their genomic data.
They were selling this stuff to private companies that were associated with Gates and the likes of Gates.
So this is just, you know, the fact that they're talking about it like it's, oh, we've got to do the right thing.
You're already doing it!
You are already doing it.
And of course they say here that, you know, the scale of the climate challenge could make geoengineering and bioengineering more attractive and feasible.
Releasing customized microorganisms could help make peatlands more efficient at absorbing carbon dioxide.
We don't need them to absorb carbon dioxide.
We need carbon dioxide.
We need it to survive.
So...
That's all I want to go through with this particular page from Policy Horizons Canada.
I want to get into some of the patents now that should alarm every single person and really how this has been weaponised beyond the COVID-19 injections.
So this is a fantastic article from zerogeoengineering.com.
It's a publication of a U.S. patent 2022-0002159A1. 3D graphene oxide nanoparticles for cloud seeding.
And this is from January of 2022.
You can see the inventors here.
And it literally says, 3D reduced graphene oxide SIO composite for ice nucleation.
The present invention provides for an ice nucleating particle for cloud seeding and other applications which can initiate ice nucleation at a temperature of minus 8 degrees Celsius.
Further, the ice nucleation particle number increased continuously and rapidly with the reducing temperature.
The ice nucleating particle in the present invention is nanostructure porous composite of three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide and silica dioxide nanoparticles.
The present invention also provides a process for synthesizing the PRGOSN. Now the whole pattern is linked there, but what I wanted to show you was this next part, which is a 2015 study that discusses the potential to implant nanosensors into human organs to function as part of a wireless nanosensor network to possibly be used for intrabody disease detection.
So this is You know, what we were looking at from Policy Horizons is much later than they were already doing studies to do this, intra-body disease detection.
That's the reason they're doing it.
It's not to control your brains or anything.
The article states that nanosensors deployed in WNSN, which is the wireless nanosensor network, equipped with graphene-based nanopatch antennas can detect symptoms or virus...
They're going to be pre-detecting viruses, fake viruses, by means of molecules or bacteria behaviours.
In fact, the large surface area and the excellent electrical conductivity of graphene allow rapid electron transfer that facilitates accurate and selective detention of biomolecules.
You know, it does say here that researchers and patents describe graphene oxide as a component of the CV-19 injections.
Beyond the internet of nanothings, this system is actually describing the internet of bodies.
So I will show you this 05g.com article, which is there is no safe level of microwave radiation, absolutely.
But this is the design of the wireless nanosensor networks for intrabody radiation.
application and you can see the abstract here which says that emerging nanotechnology presents great potential to change human society.
Nanoscale devices are able to be included with the internet.
This new communication paradigm referred to as the internet of nanothings demands very short-range connections among nanoscale devices INOT raises many challenges to realise it and they say that current network protocols and techniques may not be directly applied to communicate with nanosensors and therefore the devices must have simple communication and simple medium sharing mechanism in order to collect the data effectively from the nanosensors.
Moreover, nanosensors may be deployed at organs of the human body, and they may produce large data.
In this process, the data transmission from nanosensors to gateway should be controlled from the energy efficiency point of view.
In this paper, they propose a wireless nanosensor network at the nanoscale that would be useful for intrabody disease detection.
So they are just openly saying here that this is nanosensors to be deployed at organs of the human body.
And again, we're talking about these 3D graphene oxide nanoparticles for cloud seeding that essentially facilitates this.
Already inside of people.
So then I want to look at this paper called The Internet of Bodies, published or posted on the 21st of September 2019, last revised 4th of November 2019, originally written in January of 2018.
Here's the paper here, the Internet of Bodies.
And we're going to go through some of this right now.
So when we look at the abstract, it says that this article introduces the ongoing progression of the Internet of Things into the Internet of Bodies, a network of human bodies whose integrity and functionality rely at least in part on the Internet and related technologies such as artificial intelligence.
The IOB devices will evidence the same categories of legal security flaws that have plagued IoT devices.
However, unlike most IoT, IOB technologies will directly physically harm human bodies, a set of harms that courts, legislators and regulators will deem worthy of legal redress.
They go on to talk about the fact that the challenges of IOB are not purely legal in nature.
The social integration of IOB will not be seamless as bits and bodies meld and as human flesh becomes permanently entwined with hardware.
Software and algorithms, the IOB will test our norms and values as a society.
In particular it will challenge notions of human autonomy and self-governance.
They say that it damaged hutonomy, renders both Kantian autonomy and deliberative democracy potentially compromised.
I mean, I'm not going to read this word for word, but I do encourage everyone to read it.
I'm going to try and highlight...
The key points here throughout this paper that I think everyone needs to know about.
So I really actually think it's worth everyone reading through this entire article.
It's very long, but it is fascinating to see how these people actually acknowledge that this is happening, but we need to have an ethical, moral discussion about it.
And, you know, talk about policy, the legal implications, the possible harms, all of this sort of stuff.
But he starts off with saying, freedom of thought is the matrix, the indispensable condition of nearly every other form of freedom.
And that's J. Benjamin Cardozo quoted there.
They also quote Morpheus from the matrix and they say we are building an internet of bodies a hybrid society where computer code and human corporate blend and where the human body is the new technology platform.
They talk about a digital pill that was approved by the FDA, in which patients received a notification that they actually needed a software upgrade after getting this, you know, digital pill.
And it was the first sort of alert that the world had to some of the possible security issues with such a technology.
But as we all know, this goes far, far beyond just a security issue, although that is a consideration, you know.
Not just the dictators or the technocrats in charge of the world, but also potential hackers hacking into the human body.
God knows what they can make you do.
It's very, very alarming.
So they go on to talk about the creep, the creeping merger of bodies with bits and bytes, and how it's not only limited to medicine, but it's also happening with employers throwing chipping parties, embedding their employees' bodies with chips.
And also, you know, for example, trucking companies who expect their drivers to wear clothing or devices that monitor location and alertness and ostensibly improve job performance.
Manufacturers of brain-sensing internet-enabled headbands.
They also talk about the same companies that might encourage consumers to use these headbands to facilitate meditation and developers to build out games and other platforms.
Applications that incorporate brain data.
So other brain sensing headbands are appearing in classrooms, signaling to teachers and remote parents when children are allegedly paying attention in class.
But you've also got consumers participating in augmented reality devices, in gaming and purchasing clothes and accessories that connect their bodies to the internet, sharing corporeal information about themselves in real time.
You know, it talks about how some people even recreationally are implanting chips inside their bodies.
In short, this is what they say, we are experiencing a creeping transformation where human bodies themselves are becoming connected to and sometimes reliant upon software, hardware, and the internet for portions of their default functionality.
This is the Internet of Bodies.
But this is not just what the Internet of Bodies is.
It is everything that's happening inside your body, brain, everywhere, being linked to AI in real time, being able to be manipulated.
That's the step that perhaps so many people haven't considered.
And all of these people who have, you know, an Apple Watch, for example, is that particular thing able to interact with your free will?
We don't know.
And they talk about, you know, in addition to transforming individuals' bodies, these internet of bodies devices also introduce a new level of peril for society in the aggregate.
For the first time in our civilization, computer code will be able to physically damage civilian human bodies at scale.
In other words, particularly as artificial intelligence becomes incorporated into the Internet of Bodies, the confidentiality, integrity and availability of some human bodies will inevitably become compromised due to flawed and vulnerable software, either individually or en masse.
The security compromises that plague our networks, devices and databases today will shift and physically damage human bodies tomorrow.
However, you know, this is assuming that there are software flaws, but there aren't software flaws.
Again, I'm going to go back to the first example that I gave at the start of this series, where AI is creating child pornography.
You would think that the creators of this would have put parameters in place if it was all, you know, done properly.
They would have put parameters in place to stop this from happening, or they would be able to stop it from happening now at least, because they're the programmers, right?
But they can't.
They can't.
So AI is already sentient and already working towards evil, working towards harming mankind.
So to think that AI wouldn't harm humans You know, or would harm them just purely based on a software flaw.
No, guys, it's already harming humans on its own outside of the control of its programmers.
This is the problem.
So the authors give us an example of, you know, the Twilight Zone or the Matrix and All of these things, these technologies becoming sentient before going into the stages of the internet of bodies.
So they talk about the first generation internet of bodies, which is body external.
The first generation of IOB devices have already become a familiar fixture in our lives.
For example, lifestyle connected fitness tracking devices, smart glasses, smart exoskeletons, connected breast pumps, brain sensing headbands.
Specifically, these first generation IOB devices encompass three categories of body external products, which is IOB medical devices, which are approved by the murderous FDA, general wellness, IAB devices that present low risk and promote healthy lifestyle and are therefore not regulated by the FDA. And various other non-health enterprise educational and recreational body attached devices that connect to the internet directly or indirectly.
They also mention here the medical devices include some such as internet-enabled robotic surgery machines, connected prosthetics, that a patient operates from a mobile phone, and then they talk about the general wellness or lifestyle, fitness trackers, health monitoring tattoos.
That would be the quantum dots.
Electronic skin with an organic circuit.
And smart watches with lifestyle monitoring capability.
And again, you know, people often have this resistance to technology initially, but then as time goes on, they become kind of more accustomed to it and think, oh, well, what's the big deal if I get a fitness watch?
And Apple knows...
Absolutely everything about me.
They already know through my phone.
So what's the difference?
And every single creep is worse and worse and worse as you become more desensitized to just how sinister this stuff can be because it's just part of normal life.
They also talk about connected glasses and helmets, which offer workers information in real-time enterprise settings, exoskeleton projects for soldiers for new fighting capabilities.
So they really do talk about a range of different external Internet of Bodies things that already exist and that we're already very, very accustomed to.
They've given another example here of a clothing company.
Bear in mind, this is 2019.
We're four years down the track.
This is so much further.
That it is connecting its coats and boots to the blockchain using sewn-in sensors and, you know, becoming part of the latest broader fashion trend of connected clothing.
Now, we know that as part of the Arup report, which I reported a while ago here on Uncensored, The plan for councils to be the enforcers of all of the rules of the future where you're allowed zero kilograms of meat, no dairy.
You're only allowed to travel 1,500 kilometers every three years and only purchase three new clothing items per year.
And of course, as the globalist clothing providers dominate the market, these types of clothes will be the only ones on offer as well, you know, apart from All of the biosensing inside of people that they want to do.
We're talking about consumers not being given choice by that point as well.
And this is why I always say the creation of a parallel economy is so important for people that absolutely oppose and resist this.
And want nothing to do with it.
And it is possible because there are so many people vehemently against this.
So I would say that reading some of the second generation internet of bodies, body internal examples included here are quite primitive considering how far we've come in 2023.
But, you know, the ones that they mention here are, for example, pacemakers have long included digital components.
They refer to Let me go a step back there.
Refer to those internet of body devices where a portion of the device resides inside the body or accesses the body by breaking the skin.
You know, like a COVID injection, for example.
And cochlear implants now include functionality reliant on Bluetooth, digital pills that we mentioned before, approved by the FDA, rely on a 3D printed circuit and a transmitter inside a capsule.
Along similar lines, several companies are currently racing to bring an IOB artificial pancreas to market, which is an implantable, internet-connected, sometimes 3D printed pancreas managed by software and a mobile phone app.
The FDA has already approved this, and sensor-enabled sutures can now collect data on healing wounds, and chips with cameras can report information from inside the heart during surgery.
So again, you know, this is the stuff that they tell you they're capable of doing, and this is the stuff that people have already consented to, but what about the stuff that is already happening with geoengineering, the graphene technology that's being sprayed in the skies,
nanosensors that can make it through the human body, And basically have all of these functionalities that these examples that people go and consent to via surgical procedures, for example, are actually already doing in society and feeding AI much more than we realize is already happening.
I thought this was a very worthy example to give.
So here they talk about, you know, in recreational context, first generation IOB gaming and other augmented reality devices involve glasses and other headgear, but then they started to include wearable IOB contact lenses, blending these two technology trends, one from medicine and one from consumer and enterprise technology, It perhaps should be unsurprising that augmented reality and other recreational visual products are now creeping inside the eyeball in injected form.
In other words, while these lenses were first used for medical reasons, they are now used for recreational and military purposes.
And of course, all of that is very much able to be weaponized against the human.
Then the final third generation of the internet of bodies they describe as body melded, which they say third generation IOB devices meld the human mind with the external computers and the internet.
So this is the human mind, will, emotions, soul melding with the AI that's creating child pornography.
I want everyone to just really remember that point.
As currently conceptualized in 2019, these devices primarily involve injected or implanted brain-computer interfaces that act in a bi-directional read-write manner.
In other words, they functionally extend and externalize portions of the human mind.
Thus, one of the goals of the third-generation IRB is the optional cognitive enhancement of healthy, able-bodied humans with the help of brain-implanted computers and linkages.
And they reference Elon Musk here.
But, you know, we're talking about in 2019, talking about computer interfaces that act in a bi-directional read-write manner.
That functionally extend and externalize portions of the human mind, merging it with AI. Again, the melding of AI and this technology inside the human being, which I again say they've already done.
And proof of that!
If you look at my recent interview with Dr.
Anna Mahaita, it's on zmedia.com.
She talks about Biden's 2023 federal budget and how as an extension of that budget, he's got a budget for a universal nanotechnology vaccine.
Then goes on to talk about existing technologies of this nature and they mentioned the COVID-19 vaccine in there.
Now we know from other findings that they found graphene oxide in these injections.
So What I'm arguing is that this technology has already been injected inside of people without them realising, and it's already linking them to the Internet of Bodies and AI. This is, you know, a hypothesis that I've been investigating for two years extensively.
And all of the evidence points to the fact that this has already occurred.
So when we're reading an article like this that's talking about some of the risks and, you know, existing technologies, future technologies, we really need to read it through the lens of they've already done it to people.
AI's already far more advanced than we realize.
And I've got a couple more articles that I'll go through in a minute to sort of prove that.
We need to be reading it through that lens.
And we need to be reading it through the lens of how much have these maniacs done without our consent?
For example, geoengineering.
How much have they done without our consent?
So can we really put a limit as to what lengths they'll go to when it comes to hacking the human mind?
No, we can't.
Again, all of this is very, very fascinating, but this is probably the last part that I'll focus on from this particular publication.
It's the part that is titled Owned Bodied vs Pwned Bodies.
For any gamers out there, you would know that term pwned.
So, he discusses a particular professor that explains that case law frames property as a bundle of rights.
The bundle of rights which has been associated with property includes the rights to possess, to use, to exclude, to profit and to dispose.
Yet, none of these rights exist in the traditional sense in a second and third generation Internet of Bodies body, meaning the human body.
So those rights that human beings are entitled to don't exist when they decide to merge themselves with the Internet of Bodies.
And the reason is, and he basically explains here, Subject to a license agreement in connection with the code inside an IOB device, the user of an IOB device may never fully possess the device.
The right to use the device is contingent for its user, subject to unilateral alteration or degradation choices by a remote third party.
The obsolescence by adhesion dynamic discussion in section IB, as explained in the prior discussion of hidden price terms, use may be arbitrarily terminated in the discretion of the device manufacturer in many cases.
Exclusion is similarly not entirely possible.
Manufacturers of IRB devices view the data stream arising from the device as potentially the most lucrative source of revenue and will harvest it as long as the device is in use, regardless of the desires of the user.
Through repackaging and selling access to this information to what they call trusted partners, whose identities are rarely disclosed to the human attached to the IOB device, e.g.
Bill Gates and Co.
Exclusion of others by the consumer is functionally impossible as long as the IOB device is in use.
Similarly, if the device is a medically prescribed device like a pacemaker, discontinuation of use is not a real option.
You know, so basically what he's saying here, you know, the legal status of these data streams is unclear as a protectable user interest.
Even in purely physical body disposition situations, scholars highlight that the common law has always been divided and contradictory.
And I won't keep reading.
What it's essentially saying is As far as the current legal framework goes, if you are consenting to this particular, you know, these Internet of Body devices inside of you, nanosensors, sensors that go and hack your brain and, you know, enhance the human even through something as harmless as a smart vitamin, which they mention in here, are you then, which part of you is owned as far as the legal context goes?
Is just the organ that's been affected by this smart device owned?
Is the entire human being owned?
Can it be terminated at any point?
If Big Pharma say, well, we need to, or the United Nations say, oh, there's a real overpopulation problem.
We now own all these humans.
We have to terminate them.
They're our devices.
They're our property.
This is what Todd Callender discusses when he talks about the term homobogenesis.
This is a new species, and what is the legal right of that species?
Is it actually owned by the manufacturers of the devices inside them, e.g.
Pfizer?
Now again, the human being didn't know that they were potentially going to be injected with a trackable technology and nanosensors and nanowires and, you know, nanoneural networks that hack their existing neural networks.
They didn't know that that was going to be a possibility.
And not every single person maybe has that right now, but if they do, if they do, if the hypothesis is correct and they do, does Pfizer own them?
According to the law, Possibly.
Does Pfizer have the right to terminate them?
According to the law, possibly.
This is very, very serious.
And all of these people that are engaging with this, this farmer deception, really don't have any clue as to what they are doing.
They really don't.
Which is why this broadcast exists, which is why we've continued to do interviews with people finding really strange anomalies in the blood.
In the human beings, Richard Hirschman with the clots never before seen.
You know, this stuff is so important to expose because we need to get to the bottom of it.
If these people consented to getting these shots, are they now legally owned?
And God bless Todd Callender for looking into that.
I want to go through a couple more articles to show just how far along we are with this before we close today's broadcast and wrap up this three-part series.
here we've got an article from the world economic forum this mind reading ai can see what you're thinking and draw a picture of it from february 2018 you would recall that video from part two of this series and they say scientists around the world are racing to be the first to develop artificially intelligent algorithms that can see inside our minds as we know from the earlier in this week the broadcast that we did on uncensored That's already occurring.
AI is already reading the thoughts through Wi-Fi.
So it's already happening.
Another article here from 2014.
Remote neural monitoring.
Is it possible to spy on someone's thoughts?
And the answer, of course, is yes.
They talk about the research studies showing that the human intellect thinks at a certain speed and therefore does not have the ability to contest with supercomputers acting via satellites, implants and bio.
telemetry.
By using supercomputers, the remote neural monitoring system can hone in on it and send messages through an embedded individual's nervous system in order to affect their performance in a preferred way.
Now the point here is, what is the performance in the preferred way that they are trying to affect?
As we saw at the start of this particular broadcast today, this has already been weaponised and they openly talk about how it has been weaponised, how they can control protesters, how they can demoralise protesters.
They can demoralise people to the point where they don't fight back against the system.
And I think to a large degree that has happened with many, many people.
And I, you know, I often inspect myself.
Am I guarding my heart and my mind with the Word of God?
Am I guarding my faith?
Am I in a position where I really am placing my faith in front of all of this information?
And I think it's so important for humanity moving forward.
We are approaching a kingdom of iron mixed with clay that we were warned about, that would come through the pharmaceutical industry, of course.
We were warned.
And it's happened, I think.
And even if it hasn't happened to the degree that they are planning for it to happen, it's certainly heading that way.
The capabilities are there.
That article that I just showed you is from 2014.
That's nine years ago.
Talking about being able to spy on people's thoughts and AI is already doing it.
Weaponizing that ability through Wi-Fi.
And whose hands is this in?
Whose hands is it in?
It's in the hands of the people that say that you're a hackable animal.
It's in the hands of people that say that they can manipulate your free will and your soul.
And that God is an ancient belief system.
That we are gods.
Which is just...
It's ridiculous.
And those words don't come from an atheist.
Those words come from satanists.
It is actually in the satanic bible that you become your own god and that is what these people think so truly the only defense against this as I've said the whole time through this series is Jesus and faith in Jesus he's the the way the truth and the life no one comes to the father but by him and someone recently said to me is it you're a Christian how can you claim to be loving When you say that if I don't concede to your beliefs, I'll go to hell.
And I said, well, if I gave you a free gift, and you didn't want that gift, would that be my fault?
Or would it be the fault of you that didn't want my gift?
I went out with the intention.
I got you the gift.
I wanted to give it to you.
I loved you enough to give it to you.
And you rejected my gift.
That's not on the fault of the person doing the gifting.
It is the person rejecting the gift and that's exactly what happens when people reject the truth of the gospel.
You have eternal life on a platter.
You have forgiveness, redemption, protection from everything that Satan is doing in this world.
Today the prince of the power of the air The air, the airwaves as a pastor recently said to me.
You have the protection against all of this.
It's up to you if you want it.
While you still have the free will to choose.
If you're in the United States, please prepare you and your household for upcoming food shortages.
I spoke earlier in the week about the Dutch farmers.
The government has just declared a state of emergency over there because they're protesting against further restrictions on the farmers, which they are saying are going to affect the whole world.
So everyone needs to prepare for this.
Use promo code Z with three E's for 5% off your order of very, very good quality survival food, gardening and survival resources.
And you'll be supporting businesses that are operating inside the parallel economy.
By buying from them.
If you're in Australia, head to Survival Supplies Australia.
They are Australia's number one provider, the biggest supplier of all of your survival needs in the country.
Everything from food, first aid kits, water, 20 year water.
I've got quite a bit of that.
And because I just don't trust them to, you know, if there's an emergency, where are you going to get your water?
From the tap?
God knows what they'll put in it.
This is my way of preparing and using the wisdom that God gave me for difficult times ahead.
And again, I spoke about Stockman Stakes earlier in the week.
Right now, if you're in Australia and you place an order for the month of July, you will receive...
Free beef mince.
So, orders of 200 and over receive one free kilo of beef mince.
Orders of 300 and over receive two kilograms free.
And orders of 500 and over receive three kilograms free of beef mince.
That's Stockman Steak's way of giving back to the people that are supporting Aussie farmers, that are fighters for freedom, that believe in maintaining traditional farming, traditional nutrition for families.
Something that is so, so important and it really is under assault at the moment.
Thank you all for tuning in today.
Again, if you missed part one and part two of this series, it's all very important.
I wish I could have done it in one broadcast for everyone, but there's so much information and really, I've just touched the surface of how much, how deep this web really is.
But as I said, it won't be the last focus that we do on this.
This was just a special three-part series, but I'm sure that there'll be more in the future.
Let me know in the comments if you want more of this type of information and I will definitely keep it coming.
Well, to be honest, I'm going to keep it coming anyway because it's important.
But I just appreciate everyone so much.
Please share this everywhere.
▲
Export Selection