All Episodes
Previous Next
June 2, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
01:08:36
Uncensored: WARNING - GRAPHIC! UN/WHO Pedophile Agenda Exposed - Dr. Rima Laibow
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We all agree that this is absolutely criminal, disturbing, to just name a few.
Things that are wrong with this and should not be happening, but perhaps we haven't fully considered or perhaps we don't fully understand the long-term effects that this will really have on children and society as a whole.
Dr.
Rima Labo is not only an expert in exposing the New World Order, but she's also a child and adolescent psychiatrist who's able to really expose this agenda in full from a clinical perspective as well as a New World Order researcher perspective.
I want to warn viewers today that they may find some of the content of this broadcast highly disturbing and viewer discretion is advised.
Here's Dr.
Reema Labo now.
We're joined now by regular guest of this broadcast, Dr.
Reema Labo.
You'd all be familiar with her because she's been at the forefront of exposing the agenda for many, many years and she is dead on the money when it comes to exposing the globalists.
But one thing a lot of people may not be aware of about Dr.
Labo is that she's also a child and adolescent psychiatrist.
So she is very, very much qualified to speak on these issues, both from a clinical understanding and an understanding of the agenda at play here when it comes to the sexualization of children.
Dr.
Labo, we are so grateful to have you here today.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you, Maria.
It is always a pleasure to be here.
Well, we're seeing now that there is this insane rise of the desire to sexualise children.
Many, many viewers of this broadcast would be familiar with the United Nations endorsed 8 March principles published with the International Commission of Jurists that calls for the age of consent or decriminalising sex with minors with no limit to how young that sexual activity can be.
That was released recently, and they're saying that everyone's interpreting that document wrong, but no, we're not.
So, Dr.
Labor, if you want to talk us through this United Nations agenda and where this all really started...
It started with John D. Rockefeller Sr.
about 140 years ago.
He was the world's first billionaire and he said, I can use my money to change and control the entire world.
I can use my money in what we now would refer to as pathological philanthropy.
I can use my money to destabilize the family.
I can use my money to destabilize and trivialize education and make sure that people are not good at rational thought so they are controllable.
I can use my money to bring about depopulation because John D. Rockefeller Jr.
He was a senior and his son John D. Rockefeller Jr.
and all of the scions that have continued in that lineage since then were committed eugenicists.
They indeed, as we've said before, were the people who introduced eugenics to Germany by supporting the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, by supporting About 3,500 German eugenic,
quote, scientists, including an up-and-coming young guy whose name you may know, Dr Mengele, who actually worked for them, worked for the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes before World War II gave him concentration camps to work with.
Now, fast-forwarding, Quite a number of years.
What we see is that the people who are performing surgery on children to remove healthy body parts, breasts and penises, to create artificial penises, to invert penises and create make-believe vaginas, these people I regard as essentially Dr.
Mengele in private practice.
So this is a long, continuing strand of distorting medicine and society for some sort of purpose.
Now, the purpose and the purpose of sexualizing our children, which we'll talk about in a moment, It's very simple.
It's the complete destruction of a strong, central sense of self, which means the complete destruction of the ability to love, to nurture, and to care for another human being and to trust another human being.
The complete destruction of the willingness to procreate and bring into the world someone whom you have Absolute responsibility for and responsibility toward and whom you create, hopefully, out of love.
But if people can't love, as Frederick Rutgers, the creator of the Rutgers Institute, which is very much a part of this sexualization agenda that is being applied to every child in the world, if the globalists have their way,
Frederick Rutgers, who was a major voice for legalizing pedophilia throughout the world, Frederick Rutgers was a Dutch pedophile who believed that marriage was a vicious and criminal institution and children were prisoners in their families and that if children could be hyper-sexualized and taught to have sex with pedophiles early on,
Then they would be unlikely to ever bond to someone else and form a marriage relationship, and they would be unlikely to breed, to reproduce.
Now, the Rutgers Foundation is one of the central, guiding, luminary thought leaders of the general agenda called the Comprehensive Sexualization Agenda Education Curriculum,
the Comprehensive Sexuality Education Curriculum, and that is now an official WHO, UNESCO, United Nations program, and it has some very, very Profound belief systems based on utter nonsense science.
This is based on make-believe science of the same kind that the COVID testing is based upon and the COVID, quote, vaccines are based upon.
A complete distortion of scientific method and testing and reality.
And it says children are sexual from birth now.
Children have sexual experiences in the womb.
Little baby boys in the mother's uterus have erections.
It doesn't mean they're ready for sexual activity.
It means that the tissue of the penis is engorged, and of course there are sensations that go along with that.
And children need to Be able to find pleasure in their own bodies, but they need to do it on their own timeline, in their own way, following their own psychosexual developmental guides that are the ones that cause children to ask questions and only be able to absorb answers at the level of understanding that they have.
The ones that teach children to start exploring their own bodies and then their parents teach them, if things go well, That's a lovely thing to do, but it's a private activity.
And so they begin to learn public and private that way.
I'm sorry, go ahead.
Well, no, that's okay.
The point is that society has always understood that there's a point where a child matures enough To explore sexual activity.
Various countries have different laws, but the reason there is a minimum age of consent exists because society has always understood that it takes some time before you are able to be mature enough to understand sex.
This is such an important point.
Society always understands that Children have a gradual development into full-blown sexual beings who are capable of making Sensible, helpful, useful choices about what they're going to do with their bodies, what they're going to do to other people's bodies, how they're going to relate to people.
Societies have systems for controlling or helping that to grow in a way that the society thinks is correct.
Now, you may or may not agree with what a particular family, church, society feels about sexuality.
You may want it to be looser or tighter or whatever.
But the fact remains that in human culture, parents, Communities, religions, societies have the right to set their own parameters about how children are treated, about the age of consent, about what adulthood means and when it is conferred upon people, and what their protected status is when they are children.
But WHO, UNESCO and the United Nations say, oh no, we know better.
We have belief systems that leave the parents out, that leave the community out, that leave the churches out because we have decided what is normal for children.
Let me read you some of the things, and these are quotes from their programs, which are now being implemented in the United States.
In Europe, every one of the 27 countries in Europe, which are being implemented in New Zealand, which are being implemented in Australia, which are being implemented generally without the knowledge or permission of the parents of the children.
Teach children, young children, lust.
That's a requirement.
To teach young children lust.
And to teach young children between the ages of zero and four How to masturbate.
Children don't need to be taught how to masturbate.
They find out pretty quickly.
And it's a fine thing.
But teaching children to masturbate means that you are now involved in your child's personal sexual development.
Sexual development.
That's disgusting.
It's disgusting.
It's asking perhaps the parents to be pedophiles.
Every child...
And I'll pause you, Dr.
Rima, here, because in Australia we had an MP last year in uproar in Parliament, and rightly so, because the child was given homework to go home and ask his dad, her dad, sorry, a 10-year-old girl, to go home and ask her dad about his erections and ejaculation.
Precisely.
That is this curriculum.
This is having, what you said, teaching the parents to be pedophiles.
That's what this is.
Ultimately, skipping ahead a bit, Maria, Part of the goal is everybody has sex with everybody indiscriminately.
Parents with children, siblings with siblings, neighbors with children.
Everybody is having sex all the time.
Now on March 8th, as you alluded to, the United Nations report suggested the legalization of pedophilia.
That is to say, people who are attracted to children as sexual objects should be seen as just people with a different sexual orientation because And I quote, sexual activity should begin as early as possible.
What sexual activity?
That means since, quote, every child should have a sexual partner, That any child is allegedly capable of giving consent at any time to anything with anyone, which means you walk up to a three-year-old and you say, touch me here and I'll give you a piece of candy.
And the child says, Okay, that's called consent.
Consent requires people in equivalent levels of power and authority and agency over their own lives coming to an agreement to do something.
You have a car.
You want to sell it to me.
I want to buy it from you.
We consent to that contractual or personal relationship.
This is not consent.
This is coercion.
But they say if a child says yes, that's fine.
Well, what should a child say yes to?
Well, children between the ages of six and nine are supposed to be taught to use online pornography.
Really?
A six-year-old should be using pornography?
That's so they can learn what to consent to.
Teachers should show children their own genitalia.
Teachers should tell children, we're talking about young children, kindergarteners, first and second grade children, should hear about the personal preferences of their teachers.
Now, what about children who have diseases?
What about, for instance, as tragically happens in places like Africa all too commonly, what about HIV-positive children who are sexually active?
Remember, all children are supposed to be sexually active from the very earliest possible moment.
Well, in one of their books, specifically designed, it's a cartoon book, and it's specifically designed for children with HIV who are sexually active.
HIV positive children do not have to disclose their HIV status to their sexual partner.
That's a matter of discretion on the part of the HIV positive child.
And use of protection is at the discretion of the HIV positive sexually active child.
Really?
How does that work?
What is that about?
Why is that something that they're committed to?
What they just want everyone to have AIDS? This is a depopulation program.
So if people get sick and die, well, what's wrong with that?
That seems like a good thing to these monstrous beings.
But let's go forward.
Children, as we have said, according to these people, officially can consent to sex at any age.
Let me tell you about the science, Maria, quote unquote, that that is based upon.
Kinsey was a sex researcher who was supported by the Rockefeller predatory philanthropy.
He published a report on the sexuality of men and then another on the sexuality of women, which said basically everything is okay.
Everything is normal.
There are no abnormals.
Now Kinsey was a pedophile.
He was a homosexual.
He was many things.
And he was, by the way, a PhD in entomology.
His specialty was gall wasps.
But he wound up being an internationally celebrated expert in sexuality.
Now, he wanted to find out about the sexuality of children.
So he had, this is documented factual information, Maria.
He had a network of pedophiles, many of whom had been Nazi hoobahs during the Second World War, and after the war they were looking for something to do.
Many of them had been in prison.
They got out of prison.
And they started raping children.
But because this was done for the purpose of science, they were raping children as young as five months and keeping notes on it.
And we have their notes.
So they said children were capable of having orgasms.
How do you tell if a child is having an orgasm?
The child can't say, ooh, ooh, ooh, that feels so good, do it again, Daddy.
So we have to imagine that we understand how a child signals an orgasm.
What is listed as the ways that the pedophile could tell that the child was having an orgasm when they were raped was that the child had a convulsion, the child fainted, the child screamed, The child became unresponsive.
In other words, the more trauma they induced, the more response they got from the child indicating that it was being hurt and overwhelmed and damaged, the more they interpreted that as signs of orgasm.
And on the basis of this kind of pseudoscience from these kinds of monsters, Kinsey was able to say, Babies have orgasms, and after all, now, WHO, the United Nations, UNESCO, the teachers that the Rockefeller Institute and their friends, Predatory Philanthropy, have trained in the teachers' colleges that they've been funding for 140 years.
Indoctrinated boobies are saying, well, we have to make sure that children's sexual life is brought to the fore because we know that babies can have orgasms, so it must be okay.
So they should be having orgasms, which means seizures and feigning and trauma.
And so all of this imposes trauma by hyper-sexualizing children.
Now let me say, I am opposed to drag queens reading stories to toddlers.
Why?
Because men caricaturing women and confusing children about what is real and what is sexual and what is not and so on is very, very confusing and overwhelming to the psychological development.
I am in no way opposed to men who want to dress up as hypersexualized, caricatured females dancing around in nightclubs if they want to.
I don't care.
But I really do care when they are traumatizing children and making it More and more difficult for them to carry out their own psychosexual development.
That's right.
So just on that, because a lot of people on the left will say, why are you against this?
You're bigoted.
You're this, you're that.
No, no, no.
If you want to go and do this in a nightclub with adults that are already able to form their mind, like for me, for example, I would say, no, I don't want to be in that nightclub.
I don't want to see that.
But if you as an adult think that that's good and fun and you want to be there, sure, you can go and do that.
I am developed enough to make that decision as to what is right and wrong for me.
A child cannot do that.
Furthermore, if you want to have your breasts removed, Maria, which would be quite a sad thing to do, but if you wanted to have your breasts removed, you are an adult.
You can say, I can understand the consequences of mutilating surgery.
I can understand the hormonal changes that it will bring to my body, psychological changes, etc., etc., so I choose to do that.
But if you are 8 years old, if a child can consent to anything, as in Washington State at this point, an 11-year-old child can consent to mutilating surgery and gender, quote, reassignment.
Let's talk about gender for a moment.
There are two.
There are not three.
There are not 27.
There are not 86.
There are two.
One is XX, two X chromosomes, you're a female.
The other is XY, one X, one Y chromosome, you're a male.
Now, whom you choose to love, That's another issue.
You can love anybody.
And, you know, if you and the donkey are happy, as long as the donkey's over the age of consent, and so are you, God bless you.
Can I oppose bestiality there, Dr.
Reba?
I don't know.
Well, then you would be in direct opposition to the Comprehensive sexuality education curriculum.
Of course, I don't endorse bestiality either.
But they say in one of their textbooks for children at about the age of 10, they say that if you are sexually aroused and you don't have a partner available, you can satisfy your sexual arousal with an inanimate object.
Really?
No, you can't.
I mean, that's not exactly normal.
With an animal, no.
Not really.
With an unwilling or willing partner whom you can make available to yourself and they don't specify how.
Unwilling partner.
Unwilling.
Inanimate object, animal, unwilling.
They're telling ten-year-olds to rape someone to satisfy their sexual desires or something.
Yes, and we know that according to these crazy people, every part of the curriculum, everything children are taught, history, mathematics, home economics, shop, anything that they're taught.
should be taught through the lens of this comprehensive sexual education.
So, in addition to putting Mal-information, damaging, traumatic, overwhelming, confusing, incorrect information into children's minds and bodies as they touch one another and probe one another and mutilate one another.
There is a video of a classroom teacher of six-year-olds In this curriculum who is instructing a little girl on the fine points of oral sex with the little boy while the six-year-olds all stand around and watch and the little girl is instructed on becoming a better philatelist with the little boy.
Now, adults, as far as I'm concerned, can certainly perform oral sex if that is pleasing to them, to both of them.
Children Who are hypersexualized suffer physical damage because their neurotransmitters change permanently.
They suffer emotional damage.
They suffer Damage in terms of the process of figuring out who they are, whom they can trust.
When you are violated as a child by someone who is in a position of authority and trust, a neighbor, an uncle, an aunt, a teacher, a pastor, a priest, etc., part of the damage is the ability to trust.
Which is a growing part of human experience.
The ability to trust is truncated and is stunted.
And what does that mean?
This is so important, Dr.
Rehmer.
We, as a society, and forgive me, I know I'm pulling a lot of faces here.
This is probably one of the most difficult interviews I've had to do because I don't...
I would rather not...
I would rather this type of behaviour never exist in society.
But people must know what sort of things are being promoted in schools and just how desperately they need to get their kids out of these systems.
And we need to get out of the organisations that are promoting this.
We as a society are in absolute outrage and uproar and calling for the harshest possible form of justice when someone like a priest, for example, Abuses a child and rightly so.
It has happened.
You know, there have been many religious leaders from various religious groups that have abused their position.
Various family members that have abused their position of trust.
Why are we not in the same uproar calling for the arrest of these teachers who are just doing their job telling kids how to have oral sex?
Well, it's the teachers.
It is the principals.
It is the department heads.
It is the minister of education in each province or state.
It is the minister of education at the federal government.
It is the head of the government who is saying, yep, we're going to stay in the World Health Organization.
We're going to promulgate their programs.
We're going to move to 15-minute cities.
Why are they doing this?
Well, one piece of it is to make sure that fewer people reproduce for those people who still can reproduce.
Another part of it, and it's very important, is to damage the ability to trust.
These children are taught, or children in schools are taught not to tell their parents what their gender is.
Your parents know what your gender is.
If you're confused about it, that's a problem that we have to deal with, but they're taught to keep these things secret from their parents.
They're taught that they can change their clothes in school from male to female or female to male, that they can have special secret pronouns that nobody at home has to know.
They're taught to distrust their parents While they are being deceived by their trusted teachers.
So they're taught to misalign their trust and their suspicion.
And that means that as they come to understand that they've been lied to, and as they come to understand that they don't know the first thing about themselves, as psychosexual people, let alone how to have relationships with anybody else, because hedonism and relationships are two different things.
Physical pleasure, rubbing tissue against tissue, inserting things into holes, is not the same as a relationship.
And yet, what they're being taught from the earliest moment, because parents are supposed to teach their children how to be sexual from birth, what they're being taught from the earliest moment Is that affection has nothing to do with sex and sex has nothing to do with bonding.
What do I mean by that?
There are checklists for very young children for them to determine whether they're ready to have sex.
No, they're not ready to have sex.
Six year olds.
For instance, you're ready to have sex if you can check yes to the box that says that you want to be near someone.
For a six-year-old, six-year-olds hold hands, they put their arms around each other, they kiss each other, they say, I love you.
So one of the things in the six-year-old checklist is, do you feel like you love that person?
If you do, then you should have sex with them, male or female, doesn't matter.
Yes, just to clarify, that's the globalist view, not the actual correct view.
No, no, this is crazy.
This is terrible, awful, crazy stuff.
On the checklist, it says, this is for a six-year-old child to determine whether they're ready to have sex.
Sex, we're talking about.
We're not talking about just being curious and playing doctor.
One of the things is, would you like to have anal sex?
Another is, would you like to have oral sex?
We're talking about asking six-year-olds if they want to have anal sex with another person and saying, that's perfectly okay because, remember, sexual activity should begin as early as possible.
And sexual activity is absolutely everything and absolutely anything.
And they are taught.
Children are taught.
In a picture book for preschoolers, quote, doctors are only guessing when they say a baby is either a boy or a girl.
Maria, let me tell you a secret as a doctor.
We're not guessing.
We know whether a baby is a boy or a girl.
If it has a penis, it's a boy.
If it doesn't, if it has a vagina, it's a girl.
Very, very, very rarely somebody is born hermaphroditically with both internal sexual organs and external sexual organs that do not correspond This is incredibly rare.
This is not the normal human condition.
We could say people are bipedal.
People have two legs, even though once in a while somebody is born with one leg or no legs.
But humans are still basically bipedal, two-legged creatures.
People are either boys or they are girls.
And telling children that they can change their gender is a way of confusing them In a deep way about who and what they are.
Now I believe that little boys can play with dolls and little girls can play with trucks.
That has nothing to do with gender.
But I do believe that lying to children and teaching them that psychotic fantasy is real and reality is Not part of their life.
It's a way of damaging their ability to discern, to think, and to make choices for themselves.
And what comes out of psychosocial development?
The ability to be a balanced thinking, reasoning, feeling, compassionate, loving human being.
All of that.
is on the chopping block.
All of that is being damaged so that people will be controllable and people will not care about each other.
Yes, that makes perfect sense.
And you can already see that starting to happen in society, Dr.
Rima, particularly with those that are on the left.
I just, you know, spoke about this new study that was published about how people on the left People who left authoritarian thinking or support those types of causes are actually displaying narcissism and psychopathy.
Now, I, you know, sort of tongue-in-cheek said on Zero Time, our weekly Aussie news broadcast, that this was, you know...
You know, we have evidence now that they're in serious need of psychological help, but these people are.
Do you think that...
And what it said was that they'll join these social causes for the sake of, you know, making themselves feel good, which we've been saying, this has been our analysis, any rational thinkers' analysis for...
You know, years now.
But now there's a study to sort of back it up.
Anyway, do you think that this is a result of the indoctrination system through the education system?
Is that what's creating this narcissism?
No.
No?
No.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I thought you were asking is that what's creating this distortion of reality around the comprehensive sexuality education?
I... Anticipated your question.
What's creating the narcissism?
What is narcissism, after all?
Fundamentally, if you remember the legend, narcissists turned down somebody and was cursed by with being unable to love anyone except Narcissus, right?
That's the legend from which we take the word Narcissism.
A narcissist can only attach to, can only care about himself.
A narcissist is...
I mean, we think about narcissism having to do with focus, excessive focus on beauty and appearance and so on, but that isn't really what narcissism is.
Narcissism says there's only one person Who is worthy of love.
And that person is myself.
Now, when the only person worthy of love...
By the way, I have to tell you, my bent as a psychiatrist and a psychoanalyst is around the whole concept of attachment.
Attachment theory.
When a baby is born, it is already attached to, chemically, emotionally, psychologically, physiologically, the mother that has carried it for the nine months of its physical existence.
And if the bonding between the mother and the baby goes well, the baby learns to differentiate and become more and more and more an independent person, making more and more independent choices and knowing more and more about themselves and capable of empathy, of sympathy, of harmonious interaction with another human being, capable eventually of love.
And that is, after all, the basic human condition out of which everything good comes.
Everything that we do to care about other people in society is a kind of love.
Everything we do to connect with a spiritual reality is a kind of love.
Everything that we do that nurtures and cares for another person is a kind of love.
Now, it may be particular Individualized couple love, or it may be a teacher loving the potential of the students and serving their needs and growth in that way.
But everything good in society, including science, the love of truth, the love of exploration, problem solving, these are all aspects of the capability of love that is at the very deepest core in my understanding of what makes us human.
Our arms and legs don't make us human.
Dogs have arms and legs.
Vols have arms and legs.
It's our ability to love and our ability to connect with the wider way of loving that is the fuller world outside of our own brains and consciousness.
That's my understanding.
Every single one of those features and factors Is damaged by the current educational system, by the current sexualization agenda, by the pride nonsense, by the gender fluidity.
Every single one of those things is designed.
I mean, I don't believe the globalists care what your sexual preference is.
They couldn't care less.
As long as you don't have a natural life, As long as they get as many people not having a relationship between a man and a woman that will enable them to procreate in a way that is natural they want to eliminate anything created by God.
That's what they want.
Yes.
If you remember, at the very end of 1984, and if you are aware of George Orwell, he was one of the Fabian socialists, one of the people who was telling us how he thought it ought to be.
He was not saying, watch out, because otherwise you'll live in a 1984 world.
He was saying, this is what you're going to get.
This is what we're bringing you.
So, at the very end of 1984, the hero, Winston, is tortured in a particularly horrendous way, and he is broken.
And he says at the very end, before they kill him, he had won.
He loved Big Brother.
The only love That these products of this indoctrination and this agenda, the only love that is permitted, that will be permitted, is the love of being controlled, the love of the controlling agent, the love of the propagandizing control system, the oligarchs.
And we will live.
These children are being programmed to live in 10-minute cities.
They go nowhere.
They do nothing other than what they're told to go to and told to do.
They eat nothing that they're not given to eat.
They wear nothing that they're not given to wear.
And they think nothing that they're not intended to think.
These are the children who are being programmed For the slavery of the future.
Three days ago, the Fraud and Death Administration of the United States government, the FDA, gave Elon Musk's company its first permit to insert a chip in the brain of a living human being so that they could be the forerunner of the ultimately neurologically and genetically controlled slave class.
These children are being educated.
for that slave class because they are being educated out of the capacity to know who and what they are as divine beings.
And to know who and what they are as loving beings, which is the human reflection of whatever divinity they believe in, or you believe in, or I believe in, whatever spiritual connection there is.
It's only about love when it is positive, and it's only about control the rest of the time.
And these children are being separated from their own innate emotions.
Depth of humanity by being separated from their own innate depth of love.
That's what this agenda is about.
It's not about penises.
It's not about vaginas.
It's not about clitorises.
It's about the death of love, if we permit it.
Wow.
I've never heard it articulated so well, Dr.
Riemer.
I mean...
It makes perfect sense.
The transhumanism agenda is the dehumanization of every person, everything that really makes us human down to our biology, really.
But the thing that's stronger than all of that is the force of love.
I mean, this is the strongest force in the world.
And so if you kill love, You kill the remaining factor of what it means to be human.
There's another corollary to exactly what you said, which I believe is the fundamental truth that we have to deal with here.
What's being attacked is our most basic elemental and crucial ability as humans, and that is the ability to attach.
Well, When you love something, when you love an idea, when you want something, because wanting is part of this attachment, and wanting can be pathological or it can be very, very positive.
I want you to be well.
So I will provide you with good food.
I will provide you with wonderful experiences.
I will nurture you.
I will take care of you because I want your well-being.
That's one of the ways that wanting is very positive and it's part of loving.
It's called intentionality.
Spiritual teachers forever and ever and ever, all across the world, in every religion, have said in one language or another, thought, feeling, intentionality changes reality.
And indeed it does.
And there is a metric to intentionality.
That is why countries and religions and movements and cults use propaganda to create A mass of people who have the same intentionality, which is generally manufactured for not such good purposes.
But intentionality creates reality.
We make decisions collectively on the basis of our collective will and intentionality, for better or worse.
But what if Your ability to have a sustained intentional focus is truncated by sexual trauma.
Well, yes, indeed, that's what happens to people who have post-traumatic stress disorder.
They can't sustain a focus on anything, on the next minute, on life, on being alive, on having pleasure, on having a relationship.
Their ability to have intentionality and have it make sense and meaning in their life is truncated.
And what we're talking about is trauma-based education, from birth onward, if these monsters have their way, so that everybody is constantly in a sexually focused state of PTSD, which would become the new normal.
Now, once that happens, sustained intentionality, like, let's overthrow this system, it's bad, that's an intentionality, It becomes impossible.
And people can't combine because they can't attach.
The only thing they could do is rub their tissues against one another, which is not attachment.
Yes, that makes perfect sense.
If you've ever dealt with people that suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, it really does just consume their entire existence and having goals outside of that is very difficult.
Seeing a positive life or end to what you're suffering through It's hard for a lot of those people until they work through that trauma.
And so it would be a completely disabled society, essentially, mentally, because they've been through this sexual trauma as children up until that point.
I mean, people may think that we're exaggerating here.
No.
Children are being traumatized.
This is actual trauma.
Intentionally.
You know, in a war situation, children are traumatized and then they spend the rest of their lives trying to deal with it.
And their parents know that their precious babies have been traumatized because their building was bombed and they were refugees and they were starving.
I mean, those things happen and people very often never recover fully from them.
But we're talking about the intentional Manipulated, organized, traumatization, normalization of traumatic experience for every child on the planet.
Who's left?
Homeschooled children, maybe.
A few of them.
The Amish, maybe.
A few of them.
But who's left other than that?
How do you fight the globalist tyranny when normalization has occurred for pedophilia, for truncating emotional development, for normalizing and regularizing PTSD? So the only answer is no.
Not happening.
And that means, to me, simple-minded that I am, get the hell out of WHO, the Death Star that's coming over the horizon to kill you, to take away your home, to take away your car, to destroy your child's ability to live a normal life.
How about we get the hell out instead of trying to fight them just at the school board or just at the local level?
No, no, no, no.
Let's leave the party.
I agree.
I agree.
And here's the goal.
We always come back to this, Dr.
Labo, Leave the WHO, leave the UN, and any politicians or anyone in any position associated with the WEF is not fit to serve the public in any way.
They need to disclose their ties with them, and you know what, even within corporations, I mean now we're talking pipe dreams, but even within corporations on your home soil, People need to realize that those who have associations with the WEF are associating with a terrorist organization.
Therefore, if you have a leader, senior leader in your organization that goes to WEF Davos meetings, you have a terrorist within your organization.
That's like having, you know, for the Westerners, that's like having ISIS within your company infiltrating, getting ready to do the worst thing possible to you.
Making your high level decisions.
That's right.
I mean, this is the equivalent of this.
And, you know, it can't be any clearer.
So, you know, while I said it's pipe dreams, getting those kinds of people out of their positions, if people understood that you were dealing with terrorists, I'm pretty sure it would be a very different situation.
But let's at least get this exiting the WHO and UN. Now, the problem will still be there, Dr.
Labo, because the puppet masters are not the UN and the WHO. No, that is correct.
So the problem will still be there, but at least we'll disconnect the main valve.
Let me tell you the model that I understand exactly what you're talking about through.
And it may not be the best model, but it's the best one I know of right now.
You have the WHO coming at you.
Behind that is the United Nations because the WHO is a subsidiary private but servant organization to the United Nations.
Remember the WHO was created by the Rockefellers and their friends by the predatory philanthropists from A previous organization that the Rockefellers set up to do exactly the work that WHO is doing now.
Then behind the United Nations, there is the monetary system, the International Bank of Settlements being one of the visible aspects of the monetary system.
And behind that is the control system that is seeking to disorganize and to destroy and to disassemble Everything that we have and everything that we value and everything that we are.
So the WHO, behind that is the United Nations, behind that is the financial system, and behind that is the control system that's attempting to make all this stuff happen.
Well, the only one that we have access to right now is the WHO. If several important countries, let's say Australia, Canada, the United States and the UK, maybe Chile, if they leave the World Health Organization, the globalists will let it crumble because it's no longer important, then we immediately need to leave the United Nations.
Which would be quite easy at that point.
And then we have all the problems.
We have to deal with the retribution.
We have to deal with cleaning out the nests of agents working for an agenda that is designed to destroy us and everything that we value.
We have to get rid of those people, and some countries will do it better than others.
We have to reaffirm the value of informed consent and personal sovereignty.
We have to define what that means.
And one of the things that we do not need, by the way, is a replacement organization for the WHO. There are a lot of good people who are saying, I know, WHO is bad.
We can do it better.
We'll be the replacement organization for the WHO. No, no, no, no, no.
We don't need any central control systems We need collaborating parallel systems.
And so I believe that there'll be some chaos and there'll be some shuffling of pieces and some countries will do some things better than others.
But I believe that the possibility for a deep...
Why is that hand up?
I don't know that.
I believe the possibility for the development of a deep and true renaissance in which people are genuinely trying to get rid of the old factors that were so dangerous to us and actually come up with new solutions that the possibility of that kind of renaissance is very real but only if we get our countries out of WHO and then the United Nations and that can be done Your
listeners know very well that all it takes to get out of WHO is a single ridiculously easy to write letter by the head of state.
What's hard is getting the letter written.
But that's where public pressure comes in.
And we can do that.
Yep, I think everyone's focus, and I just keep repeating it, repeating it, we need to exit the WHO, exit the UN. We'll deal with the rest, we'll deal with the fallout, we'll deal with everything later, but we must exit these two.
I think it's worthwhile, and I might spend some time on this, Dr Rima, thinking about the fallout and thinking about, okay, well, you know, here's the proposed plan after we've left the WHO, you know, what happens then with each nation, but...
Like you said, you're not going to get Anthony Albanese from Australia tomorrow going, you know what, we should leave the WHO. It's not going to happen.
But if the public pressure is there, the pressure on the MPs, this should be the only thing they're being hammered about right now.
Literally nothing else.
Because as of next year, You've got forced vaccinations, injections of whatever poison they want, forced quarantine, punishments, and a whole host of other things they have planned for humanity.
If this combination of the treaty and the IHR goes through, and I hear as well that they're planning on combining them to make one sort of super constitution.
Can we talk for a moment about the international health regulations?
I know you've been talking with James Roguski, you've been sharing this with your listeners for quite a while, which is really important.
Now, what was supposed to happen was that 307, and then Russia came along with another one, so 308 amendments were supposed to be Debated.
We know that the fix is always in, but we're supposed to be debated at the World Health Assembly, which just concluded this past Sunday in Geneva.
And these amendments have been negotiated in secret, the international health regulations being used as a control system for the entire world, whether or not they want it, legally binding control system by the WHO director general, that's all been sort of put together and they were going to install it as the new amendments to the international health regulations.
Except they didn't.
They had their entire meeting from the 23rd to the 30th of May in Geneva, and they didn't talk about the amendments.
Now, why is that?
It's because of you, Maria.
It's because of me.
It's because of every one of the, James Roguski, Meryl Nass, all of the people who have been saying, You can't do that.
What they did was use intentionality.
What we did was use intentionality so strongly that the globalists who like to present themselves as in complete control, and of course they're not, the globalists could not bring the agendas to the public forum because there is so much pushback against them.
And countries around the world Would have said no!
And their governments would have been forced into a position in opposition.
There's that hand again.
Would have been forced into a position of opposition to the World Health Organization.
So they tactically backed off And said, oh, we're not going to talk about that.
We've spent all this time and all this energy and all this money and all these other commissions have been created to facilitate it, but we just, shh, don't say anything.
Maybe they'll forget about it.
Meanwhile, Tedros Cabrasis, the head of the World Health Organization, said on, I believe, day two of the World Health Assembly, you know, We're going to need, because of climate change, more surveillance and more control.
We're going to have to take every measure to make sure that we are in absolute control of not only all the information, but all the options, all the behaviors.
Meanwhile, the Saudi Arabian delegates said, because of the emergency, the pandemic that's coming, we must take away everyone's rights and freedoms in order to protect them.
He said that.
So what they're saying is, you know, those amendments, the 308 amendments, how about we just don't mention them?
How about we just do that secretly, even more secretly?
But that's because of us.
That's a partial victory.
If we stop there, we're doomed.
So we have to keep going.
I agree and you know I said it so many times people are sick to death of hearing about this subject.
You'll be more sick to death if this subject goes through and we don't stop it.
So you know there's there really is no option but to keep talking about it.
I know that I've shared this with the viewers before but if you go to prevent Genocide2030.org.
It's up on the screen now for the viewers.
There are a lot of resources there for people to leave the WHO. Dr.
Rima, they go on to take action.
And you've got many, many different countries' actions there as well.
And Australia is coming very soon.
Now, there is a website called Australia Exits The Who.
I believe it's.com.
Australia Exits The Who.
Go there.
Take action.
At the same time, in support of that.
And we are in no competition with them.
The more people who say the same thing, the better.
So we're supportive of every organization and every effort around the world.
That is helping to get their country out of WHO. We are in the process.
We just put up a New Zealand action item, which went up on Saturday, my Saturday.
I have no idea what day it is for you, but whatever day that was for you last week.
Billy TK had James Roguski and me on his show launching this new action item.
And we have hundreds of thousands of emails that have been sent already.
And we also very shortly will have an Australian action item too.
But meanwhile, Australia exits the WHO is doing part of the job.
You need to take as many actions as possible and you need to share it with your friends and neighbors.
Because if you take action, that's great.
If you motivate ten people, that's wonderful.
And if they motivate ten people, that's fantastic.
Because it is a numbers game.
They have the dollars, we have the people.
Yeah.
I think as a bare minimum, and people often ask me, you know, how can we talk to strangers about this even?
I just, I ask strangers all the time, you know, someone at the cash register or whatever, you know, how'd you go with the lockdowns?
I spoke to someone who's self-employed, was your business affected?
She said, I absolutely hated it.
I only went along with all this so that I can keep working.
I'm not going to lose my business now, you know?
And I thought, well, you're going to lose a lot more next time around if you don't comply.
But When I tell people about what the WHO has planned, they all say, well, what can I do about it?
And that's when you direct them to the website for your country.
So for everyone in Australia, AustraliaExitsTheWho.com.
Again, PreventGenocide2030.org.
For all of those countries that are watching today, please do go there.
And Dr.
Marina, please let people know where they can follow you specifically.
I know you've got a weekly podcast.
Tell people about that.
I do.
And let me give you a little secret.
Anybody can take the New Zealand action.
You don't have to live in New Zealand because it's not asking for your address.
If somebody else wants to tell the New Zealand government, that's fine.
Moving right along.
I have a weekly podcast called the Dr.
Rima Truth Reports.
And you can guess what the topic is focused upon.
It's truth.
And that is available at peopleforpeople.ning.com.
If you want to listen live and participate in the chat live, you need to Open a free account, they'll approve you, and then you can go to their platform at any time.
We post that on Rumble under Dr.
Rima Truth Reports and under Natural Solutions, because I am the medical director of the Natural Solutions Foundation.
And we have an aggregation, a news aggregation site called Open Source Truth.
Now, at PreventGenocide2030.org and OpenSourceTruth.com, you can sign up for my newsletter.
Why would you want to do that?
Because there's a lot happening very fast, and it impacts the interest of every single person on the planet.
So please, do sign up for the newsletter.
It's free.
We don't spam.
We don't sell it.
We don't I don't want to share the information with anyone.
Recently, the FDA attacked me and the Natural Solutions Foundation and demanded that we release the emails of our supporters.
No.
And they said, well, you have to.
We're the FDA. And we said, no, we don't have to.
We have a constitution in this country.
And they said, well, we'll take you to court again.
And we said, okay.
And they went away.
But that's how seriously we take not sharing your information.
That's great.
Well, I can say, you know, in the time that I've known Dr.
Labo, this is a brave woman, a woman with really no hidden agenda.
She just wants humanity free.
And she's fought very hard for that over the years.
And so we're so grateful for your efforts, Dr.
Labo.
Thank you so much for your time.
We appreciate it.
Thank you so much.
I love the fact that you are bravely and limitlessly bringing truth to people around the world, Maria.
It is a real joy to be part of the army of truth-tellers that you have marshaled.
Appreciate that.
We'll see you soon.
For those that made it through to the end of this interview, thank you for sticking around.
I can honestly say that I struggled through a lot of what Dr.
Labo was presenting, but it's reality.
She's not making this up.
These people have published this within their...
I mean, these are their goals.
These are their published goals for school curriculums.
These are their published goals for what they want to do to your children.
So I'm urging people, please, Take your children out of the school system and warn fellow parents to do the same.
If you're part of parents groups, if you have a relationship with other parents, regardless of their view on the injections or whatever the case may be, if they're able to understand that this is going to damage their children permanently, that it's not actually good for them, and why, from a psychiatrist, it isn't, Perhaps they will join in on the movement that needs to happen, which is that kids just simply stop going to these indoctrination centres.
They play a key role in creating monsters of the future.
And they are the innocent victims and they shouldn't be subjected to this.
It is the partners of this broadcast that enable us to keep getting this information out there, that's critical for the survival of mankind, that's critical to stop this madness.
And are also providing solutions for people.
We all know that at any time they can flick the switch, cyber attacks, food shortages, whatever crisis they want to manufacture can happen in a moment's notice.
So if you're in the United States, head to heavensharvest.com, use promo code Z with three Es for 5% off your order.
They have a fantastic range of emergency survival food, heirloom seeds, water filtration and storage, Very, very affordable kits and they're coming from good people who actually care about humanity, so I really encourage people to get onto them.
If you're anywhere in the world, head to the Satellite Phone Store via the link sat123.com forward slash Maria.
It's in the description below.
Very, very competitive prices when you are using the promotional offers.
Sometimes we have competitions and things like that.
Well, not competitions, but special promos with the Satellite Phone Store.
Nonetheless, very, very competitive prices.
Military grade style phones.
In fact, these The military use their phones.
They are really good phones.
Very, very high quality.
And the main thing is that the service is encrypted by the satellite phone store.
So you know that it's people that we've chosen to partner with, that we trust with this service.
I have two myself, as well as two bivvy sticks and a range of their other products.
Their Faraday cages are very, very high quality.
Faraday bags, sorry.
So I encourage everyone to visit there.
And if you're in Australia, Gold Bullion Australia Group, everyone that's been there has given us such great feedback about these guys.
And really, it is a key to your financial freedom to diversify your wealth and consider things like gold and silver, especially because we know that they want to collapse the financial system.
So while we fight, while we expose, while we do all of this, we need to be prepared to operate outside of their digital vaccine system because that is literal hell on earth.
Thank you all so much for tuning in today.
I so appreciate everyone's time.
I appreciate all the shares.
I appreciate everyone's perspective, their commentary.
You know, even though I don't respond all the time, especially in Telegram, which, by the way, if you're not in there, get in there, Z Media 3Es.
I really love to see where the mind of the truth is in the world is.
Where their thinking is.
And for the most part, the strongest people you'll find anywhere.
So thank you to all of those who are standing on the right side of history, trying to put an end to this madness.
And the kids are our number one priority.
God bless you all.
Share this everywhere.
▲
Export Selection