All Episodes
Previous Next
April 28, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
54:56
UNCENSORED: Dr. Stephanie Seneff Can mRNA Bypass Our Stomach Acid If They Put It In Our Food?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
I reached out to Dr.
Stephanie Seneff, who has a particular interest in exosomes, which are crucial to this delivery system.
And she has some amazing insight to offer.
She's a senior researcher at MIT and really just a wealth of knowledge.
So she'll be on with us just after this short break and a word from our sponsors.
Don't go anywhere.
We'll be right back.
If you'd like a shortcut to better sleep, more energy, a calmer, more stable mood, then you should make sure that you're supplementing with magnesium daily.
I'm going to tell you why.
About 75% of people are magnesium deficient.
This deficiency can lead to higher levels of anxiety, irritability, trouble sleeping, low energy, and can even contribute to foot and leg cramps while you sleep.
I mean, the results are really devastating.
And most of us are magnesium deficient.
Now you might be wondering, does magnesium really affect all these things?
Well, the answer is yes.
In fact, magnesium is involved in more than 300 chemical processes inside your body.
So a lot of different things can start to go wrong if you're deficient.
The good news is that you can experience a number of positive health benefits from just getting enough magnesium, including better sleep, more energy, stronger bones, healthy blood pressure, less irritability, calmer mood, reduced muscle cramping, and fewer migraines.
But to experience these health benefits, you have to get the right kind of magnesium.
There are actually seven unique forms of magnesium, and you must get all of them if you want to experience its calming, health-enhancing effects.
That's why I recommend Magnesium Breakthrough by Bioptimizers.
It's the only organic full-spectrum magnesium supplement that includes all seven unique forms of magnesium for stress relief and better sleep all in one bottle.
Visit MagnesiumBreakthrough.com forward slash Maria and order now.
And in addition to the discount you get by using promo code Maria, there are always amazing promos and gifts with your purchases.
Go now to MagBreakthrough.com forward slash Maria to get your Magnesium Breakthrough and find out this month's surprise promo.
We're joined now by Dr.
Stephanie Seneff.
It's been quite some time since we've had her on the broadcast, but we're really, really grateful for her time and for her coming back on today.
We have a lot to discuss.
Dr.
Seneff, thank you for your time.
Very happy to be here.
Thank you for having me.
It's great to see you again.
Well, I sent you a couple of articles last week, I think it was, or the week before, which was very, very interesting, discussing exosome carrier effects, resistance to digestion in phag...
Forgive me, I don't know how to pronounce this word.
Fergolosomes may assist transfers to targeted cells.
Transfers of miRNAs are better analyzed via systems approaches.
They do not fit conventional reductionist stoichiometric concepts.
Please break this down for us, Dr.
Seneff, because I think it's very interesting, particularly in light of all of the Discussions that are happening around the gut now, following the injections or following infection.
So you let me know where you'd like to start.
Yes, this is very exciting and you sent it to me at a good time because I'm really into exosomes as a mechanism of spread of the vaccine.
I really think exosomes play a crucial role and I've gotten very, very concerned about exosomes traveling along nerve fibers and I have more to say about that and we'll get back to that in a moment.
But that paper was very timely for me because it was so Amazing to me how sturdy these exosomes are.
I was aware that exosomes are able to protect their content from degradation and they can carry RNA and keep it safe, which is really pretty remarkable.
They're very fancy things, these exosomes, and actually there's a lot of papers.
It's really been a growing interest In the role of exosomes in the biocommunication system of the body, in recent years among researchers, a lot of interesting papers are coming out and there's increasing awareness of just how powerful exosomes are and what a crucial role they play in supplying nutrition, you know, and in passing around toxins.
I mean, it's just incredible.
And they're very, very sophisticated.
So when a cell gets exposed to some kind of toxic, you know, thing, Typically, it starts spitting out exosomes, and it puts that toxin into those exosomes to get rid of it.
You know, it's just basically saying, I don't want this stuff.
I'm going to get rid of it.
And I'm sure that happens with the cells that get transfected with the vaccine, because there they are busy making the spike protein, which is extremely toxic.
They've got way too much of it.
I mean, they shouldn't have any, but they've got way more than they can handle without killing themselves.
And so they have to let it go.
And they even let go of the RNA itself.
And so I found some amazing papers.
But this particular paper, what it showed was that plants make exosomes.
And when you eat plants, you eat those exosomes.
And those exosomes contain something called microRNAs.
These are short chains of RNA that are signaling.
They're very powerful regulatory agents.
That's also a very fascinating thing.
And microRNAs and exosomes go together.
They go together as a way for cells to instruct other cells what to do.
So the X-osome is created by one cell, and it puts all kinds of interesting things in there, including, for example, the spike protein, the spike message RNA, in the case of being transfected with the vaccine, but also microRNAs, certain microRNAs that are going to have different effects on the recipient cell in terms of its metabolism.
And then also some proteins that can allow it to get into cells through receptor-based uptake.
Exosomes can get into cells in three different ways.
They can just be taken in through endocytosis, it's called, just swept in.
And they can get onto a signaling molecule.
And actually, I'm forgetting what the third way is, but I remember there were three ways that they could get in.
So the exosomes are a very efficient mechanism for cells to share.
Information and to share content and even nutritional content.
So anyway, these exosomes that have these microRNAs from the plants, when they get eaten, they go through the stomach intact.
It's absolutely amazing because the stomach is very acidic and, you know, it breaks down lots and lots of things.
It'll break down proteins because of that acid.
But the microRNA, which is microRNA is very fragile.
Usually it breaks down very easily, but the exosome somehow is able to package it up inside this lipid body And keep it safe all the way through the stomach.
And then it goes on to get picked up by some human cell, and those microRNAs have an effect.
So this is actually plants communicating across species to animals to instruct those cells about what to do in the context of whatever else that plant is giving you.
So the microRNAs are control elements in biology.
And then the cells put different ones in there depending upon their situation.
So it's really, really interesting science.
Does this mean, because Dr.
Senna, some people think that, let me see how I can phrase this.
If they put mRNA into our food, for example, you know, I know that there was a university doing this with lettuce.
Now they're talking about they want it in the beef.
And then people were saying, well, no, the stomach will break this down and it won't actually get into the body through this.
That means that According to this study, they are able to package it in a way that bypasses that stomach acid.
Yes, if they put it inside exosomes, it can survive.
And in fact, so I read a paper quite some time ago when I was first looking into the vaccines.
I was really impressed with this paper.
And the paper was published, I think, in 2019.
So it was before COVID. But it was talking about the mRNA technology.
And what they did was they transfected these cells with the RNA technology.
It's the same technology with those lipid nanoparticles and the cationic lipids.
And then they had mRNA inside these lipid nanoparticles.
And the messenger RNA coded for a protein called erythropoietin.
So it's not SARS-CoV-2.
It's not spike.
It's a different protein.
But what they showed, which was amazing, is that those cells that took up those nanoparticles, they took the nanoparticles apart, and then they reassembled the contents into new exosome You know, little lipid bodies of exosomes.
And they put in their other stuff, but they also put in the messenger RNA one to one.
So in the messenger RNA, you have all these nucleotides.
They put in exactly as many cationic lipids as there were nucleotides.
It was amazing that the cells released these exosomes that had the entire intact messenger RNA for the erythropoietin code.
Along with a number of cationic lipids, these cationic lipid particles are very toxic.
These are what they add to the vaccine in order to induce an immune response, in order to help to open it up so that the mRNA can make protein.
They have reasons why they put this in there, but that synthetic cationic lipid is very toxic.
They've shown that in studies.
That gets packaged up inside the exosomes as well.
So now you've got these exosomes which are smaller than the nanoparticles.
It's just the cell has basically repackaged up the contents of the nanoparticles into something that's actually far more potent, it seems to me, because it can have the spike protein as well, because they put the spike protein into the nanoparticles.
They make it and they put it in, but then they take the messenger RNA itself and put it in.
So they've got spike protein, messenger RNA, microRNAs that can influence policy, in fact, can cause inflammation, because that's another study that I read that showed specifically with the spike protein.
And this was a group in India.
When these cells were exposed to the spike protein, they made exosomes containing the spike protein, but also containing specific microRNAs that cause inflammation and suppress type 1 interferon.
So we wrote a whole paper around that topic.
Myself and Peter McCullough and Dr.
Greg Nye and Dr.
Anthony Kiriakopoulos, the four of us, published a paper, Native Immune Suppression.
It has a long, complicated title, but it talks about exosomes and microRNAs.
Really, really interesting what's going on.
But this is how it doesn't stay with the muscle.
So the vaccine you inject into the deltoid muscle, the muscle cells take it up.
They start making spike protein.
And then they spit out these exosomes containing all this stuff.
The microRNAs on top of the cationic lipid, the RNA, the spike protein, all of that inside these exosomes.
The spike protein gets displayed on the surface of the exosome.
And that spike protein then can be chewed off by enzymes like furin, releasing the S1 piece, which is extremely toxic all by itself.
So that starts floating around free in the vasculature.
The S1 part of the spike protein, which contains the receptor binding domain, that guy can hook onto H2 receptors and disable them, and that can cause high blood pressure.
So it can really start to cause trouble with the heart.
So, I mean, it's quite a cascade when you think about what would be going on with all of that and all the possible consequences of it.
It's not surprising that there are so many adverse effects showing up with these vaccines.
The other alarming thing, Dr Seneff, I mean, everything that you're telling us is negative effects of this technology.
They want to put this in our food supply.
The people that are working on this technology, do they not understand that this is causing harm?
I mean, I'm talking about, you know, the people in the universities that are bragging about mRNA letters.
Do they not understand that mRNA is dangerous?
Well, I know.
I mean, this is what's so incredible because you have people like me who are thinking, oh my God, this is so...
how many different ways?
This is terrible.
And then you have these kind of what I would call mad scientists who somehow think that what they're doing is good and has no downside.
I mean, I don't know how they can think that these vaccines are safe and effective.
I mean, they keep saying safe and effective, and I just don't know how they see that.
It's really quite incredible.
Yeah, and then so the mRNA, you know, if you have an mRNA vaccine that contains a different protein, not the spike protein, then that's a different story.
You've still got the toxic cationic lipid, and you've got these cells being overwhelmed with this thing they have to keep making, this RNA that lasts a long time.
All of that's not normal.
But then whatever protein they make, whatever that does is going to cause whatever problem.
So maybe if it's making a protein that's not really very toxic, it's a much better vaccine, I would say.
One way they're hoping to use this technology is to provide RNA That can code for proteins that are deficient in somebody who has a genetic mutation.
So if you have a genetic mutation that makes your version of some really essential protein non-functional, this is potentially a way to provide those people with working versions of that protein, which on the face of it sounds pretty good.
I mean, that sounds a lot More benign than what's going on with these vaccines.
So I don't know.
On the face it sounds good, but the injection sounded pretty good on the face as well, safe and effective.
And look what happened there.
So, you know, I think...
I know.
So the thing, what I'm trying to say is that there is this vaccine, which I think is terrible.
There's no question about it.
But a lot of what makes it terrible is the spike protein, which is very, very toxic.
So if you had the same technology...
For something else, how bad would that be?
I don't know.
But at least it would have a different protein.
And if that different protein is harmless, then that changes the equation.
That's all I'm trying to say, with respect to the RNA technology.
Yes, I appreciate and respect that.
I sent you this other paper that I found which was talking about the biology, function and biomedical applications of exosomes and this was talking about very similar things which said depending on the cell of origin EVs including exosomes can contain many constituents of a cell including DNA, RNA, lipids, metabolites.
Yes.
So this sort of...
That's a lots of thing.
So when you use...
So they are certainly working in areas of ideas of using exosomes that are produced naturally by plants, by animals.
And somehow, in fact, I imagine they could come up with some way to put something in the exosomes, you know, get that.
They do a lot of genetic engineering with the E. coli.
It's kind of amazing with the insert the gene.
They do that with this vaccine.
Actually, this is another big issue that I should bring up.
Because my friend, Kevin McKernan, have you heard about his work?
No.
Yeah, well, that's going to be something.
I'm going to actually attend a Zoom meeting right after this where he's going to talk about his work because it's quite amazing.
He has a preprint paper that's been published and he's been coming up with astonishing things about what contaminants in the vaccines are.
And if he's right, it's a whole other part of the problem that's going to be horrific, which is DNA contaminants, even DNA from the host E. coli.
If I get this right, and I'll know more after I hear this talk, but as I understand it, When they did the studying the vaccine, they had the DNA made in a very special way that didn't involve living forms.
But when they needed to make tons of it for the shot, they did a more mass production method, which involved big vats growing E. coli bacteria and inserting into the genome of the E. coli the sequence for the spike protein.
With a promoter, they make sure the E. coli will make lots and lots of it.
So the E. coli is going to make lots and lots of spike DNA, because the E. coli grows and it makes spike DNA. I think I leave out the promoter part.
I'm not sure what else is attached to it, but it does have that DNA in the E. coli.
They inserted it into the genome of the E. coli so that when the E. coli grow, they make DNA and they make copies of that spike protein DNA. And then they have to purify that DNA and get rid of all the E. coli DNA that goes with it.
And that step can be a problem.
That's what Kevin is finding.
They claim tiny amounts of this contaminant DNA, but he's finding, experimentally, he's finding there's a lot more, a lot more than what they said.
So if he's right, this is going to be a very exciting piece of news to add to the huge list of problems, because now you're being injected with foreign DNA from an E. coli.
DNA is incredibly allergenic.
I mean, it can cause nasty things as far as the immune system is concerned.
I was just about to say, what are the potential Risks to people with this DNA damage.
Yeah, it's just that they're going to get injected is segments of DNA from E. coli and even small amounts of foreign DNA are something the immune cells are very aware of and very upset about when they see it.
So it causes an immune reaction, inflammation, you know, this kind of damage to the tissues type of thing.
Could cause the cells to kill the cells.
I mean, really, because of the immune cell response to this foreign DNA that's not supposed to be there.
That's kind of happening already with the RNA, but they've designed the RNA to be somewhat invisible to the immune system.
That's part of their technology.
It's weird RNA that's not natural with all these methyl pseudouridines.
Intentionally put into the vaccine, both to keep it from being broken down.
Well, to keep it from being able to be attacked by the enzymes that the cell naturally produces to try to break it down.
And then also to make it invisible to the, they humanize it to make it invisible to the immune system.
It doesn't look like a viral RNA molecule to the immune system.
And as a consequence, it sticks around for months when it's supposed to only survive for a few, most RNA only survives for a few hours.
So they've got this RNA sitting there And also unable to turn it off, so it keeps making protein for days on end.
And that's, I think, a huge part of the problem with the vaccines.
Very poor control over how much spike protein is being made.
You know, it's probably highly variable from one person to another.
But if you make a lot of spike protein, you're going to be in very serious trouble with its toxicity.
What I know about CRISPR is different to what CRISPR is presented to us as on the surface.
My question is, does what you're talking about, this E. coli DNA, does that actually change the human's DNA? I know that Lund University out of Sweden did a study on this and found that it was affecting the human DNA. Well, I mean, it's interesting because there's interesting studies that look at the evolution of biology and they're finding that some of the big breakthroughs...
I was just looking at a paper.
I didn't read it.
I just kind of glanced at it.
But the story was quite astonishing because they don't understand how the eyes develop.
They have so many complex changes that couldn't possibly all happen at once.
And it turns out it looks like that the microbes can kind of perfect a certain technology, a certain skill.
With their own genome and kind of get the DNA assembled that's appropriate for coding for proteins that do really interesting things.
And then they can hand over the entire solution to the host cell.
So I think there's a vast interchange of genomic material among all the species of life.
And I think viruses are probably absolutely essential for evolution.
This is what I'm coming to believe.
The viruses are super, super interesting, and many of them are benign.
We have viruses all over our body, and most of them don't really cause us any trouble.
But I think they are the primary, perhaps even, mechanism of evolution.
And so we depend upon them to provide us with raw materials for new skills.
I mean, there's certainly this whole thing about syncytia and the placenta and how there's certain proteins that clearly came from viruses a long, long time ago that have become integrated into our genome.
So you've got integration from bacteria, from viruses.
I think life evolved in that way.
You start with these single-cellular animals and these very simple species that are able to acquire skills of living in an environment, and then they can sort of perfect those skills and then hand them over to the host ready-made.
You see, it's sort of a more convenient way to evolve that skill is by the practice of these small animals to figure it out first.
And then to hand over the solution to the host.
So I think that may be a whole process of evolution.
It's quite fascinating.
But that spike protein is an amazing protein because it looks like it's been designed to be a bioweapon and it has so many toxic aspects to it that it's just really, really disturbing to think of having your muscles spewing out tons of spike protein, throwing it into exosomes and distributing it throughout your body.
And I want to get into this whole issue of distributing it along the nerve pathways because that's what I've come to believe.
This is a whole other topic that I think I've finally gotten it right.
We've written about it in that innate immune suppression paper.
We talked about the possibility.
There we pictured the story as being that the The immune cells came to the muscle in response to its crying for help.
And the immune cells actually took up the nanoparticles as well.
And then they went into the lymph system to go and form the B cells and T cells so you can make the antibodies.
And eventually they settle in the spleen.
And the germinal centers in the spleen are where a lot of the action takes place to produce the antibodies, which is the whole goal of the vaccine.
That works very, very well.
It produces a very strong antibody response, which was their goal, their single-minded goal.
And I would say they succeeded.
It's not necessarily a good thing to be doing that, but that's what they succeeded in doing.
And part of that success involved exosomes because the whole process of producing antibodies depends upon exosomes communicating between the cell that's presenting the spike protein and then the immune cells, the B cells and T cells that are responding to that presentation to perfect antibodies that match.
That whole process involves exosomes.
So we were picturing, I was picturing exosomes being released from the spleen And then exosomes travel along nerve fibers, which is something I'm aware of.
So I was picturing the exosomes traveling from the spleen along the splenic nerve and then picking up a new pathway along the vagus nerve and traveling that way up to the brain and causing all the different brain-based symptoms that we see in association with vaccine injury.
I wasn't entirely happy with that idea because I felt like most of the spike protein was going to be in the deltoid muscle.
And the spleen has the highest amount among the organs that were looked at.
It had the highest amount in a tracer study that tracked where it went.
The spleen had the highest amount.
But that was still much, much smaller than what was still hanging out in the deltoid muscle.
So if I could get a direct path from the deltoid muscle via neurons to the brain, I would be more satisfied with the idea of these symptoms that are characteristic of inflammation of nerves in the brain.
Happened pretty quickly.
Within the first day, within the first few hours even sometimes, people get these symptoms that are characteristic of inflammation in the brain.
So how did it get there so fast?
I can't imagine that this whole process of getting to the spleen and making the antibodies, that's not gonna be quick.
That's gonna be too slow.
So I was writing that, but I wasn't altogether comfortable with it.
But now I think I have a better answer, which is even more terrifying.
Because I've been tracing, I've been reading about exosomes with respect to muscles and with respect to nerves.
And I found something quite surprising and disturbing, which is, but also very interesting, which is how the...
So what I want, what I'm thinking about is how does the exosome...
Vaccine delivered to the deltoid muscle, how does that material, and in fact the spike protein and the spike message RNA, make its way to the brain so quickly?
And there's a way that it could do it, and I suspect that's what's happening.
So here's the story.
The muscle cells take up the nanoparticles.
They look like LDL particles.
The muscle cells have LDL receptors, so they take up the nanoparticles.
They open it up, they start making spike protein.
They're overwhelmed with spike protein.
They're spitting it out in exosomes.
And they spit out those exosomes into the synapse.
So now, in the synapse, the muscles are innervated by motor neurons whose bodies are in the spinal cord.
So there's a motor neuron in the spider cord that has this super-long thread, which is its axon, a single axon that goes to a particular muscle fiber in the deltoid muscle from the spinal cord.
And so that axon is at the synapse, where it's going to release signals that are going to cause muscles to contract, right?
That's how the muscle movement works.
So in that synapse, you've got all these exosomes being released with spike protein, with spike-missage RNA. The synapse The axon can take up those exosomes.
They won't take up the nanoparticles, so they don't have the LDL receptors, but they will take up the exosomes.
So now they're taking up those exosomes, and then there's actually active transport proteins.
There's a molecular motor called Dynine, which is in the axon.
And it specializes in shipping stuff up the axon to the soma of the cell, which is in the spinal cord.
Shipping stuff.
I just like the way you word it.
Yes.
So actually, it turns out there's also Schwann cells that wrap around the axon and even at the synapse.
And the Schwann cells are also very interesting.
And they can also...
They release exosomes when they're stressed.
So they can get stressed by the spike protein.
And then they release exosomes packaged up with various microRNAs and whatnot.
And those can get taken up as well.
So the axon can be picking up exosomes both from the Schwann cells and from the muscle cells.
At the synapse.
And then they take them up into these things called endosomes.
So the exosomes are little lipid particles hiding inside the endosomes at this point, after they're taken up.
Exo meaning sort of exported, right?
And endo is sort of taking it up.
So the exosomes get swept up inside a lipid particle that becomes an endosome containing little exosomes inside it.
And the endosome is very good at protecting the exosomes.
So the exosomes survive.
Inside the endosome.
And the whole package gets shipped up to the core of the nerve cell that's controlling muscle movement.
So the axon, it's like an elevator ride.
The dyline just pushes the spike protein and the spike messenger RNA right up to the spinal cord.
And then from there, a secondary path will release exosomes into the synapse at the spinal cord, which then synapses with a nerve which is centered in the brainstem.
So this is how you get a two-way system, two cells.
One is in the spinal cord and one is in the brainstem.
And they can just ship the exosomes up inside, inside the axon.
I was picturing they were traveling on the outside of the axon, but I think they're being transported It's not a passive transport.
It's not just passively moving along, which would be a much slower process.
It's an active transport process.
Some time ago when you and I last spoke, we spoke about the neurodegenerative diseases that were becoming prevalent in those who'd had the injections and we were speaking about whether the vagus nerve had something to do with that and what you're describing now There's even more reason to believe that that's the reason for things like this.
I mean, just this week I interviewed Robert Fasara, a wonderful man who's injured from the injections, just his second shot.
Really, you know, now he's got...
Yeah, he can't walk properly.
His legs are so sore all the time.
He's got neuropathy, more than one type of neuropathy.
He's not the only one I know that is suffering from neuropathy.
Is this process that you're describing potentially the reason for all of that?
I think so.
I absolutely think so.
And it's even more interesting than that.
And I can't remember if I talked to you about the prion protein.
Did I talk to you about that?
Yes.
Yeah, and the YQAGS, the sequence, YQAGS. I don't remember that, but I remember the prion protein.
Because that's another part that, oh my God, it's so incredible if it's true.
To be fair, the things you talk about it are quite complex.
And so I may have forgotten Dr.
Seneff, but please do go on.
Yeah, I don't know whether I did or not, because I had an interest in the prion protein, the prion-like characteristics of this spike protein.
And then I went further with that.
And I don't think I talked to you after I went further with it, because this is really disturbing.
And I think it might be going on.
I mean, I'm seeing all these really bizarre symptoms that we're seeing with the vaccine.
And I can list a set of symptoms, which I think I can explain by one thing, if it's true.
And they're a pretty interesting set.
One of them is polyneuropathy, which is what you were just mentioning, polyneuropathy.
And then another one is ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease, which is a horrible muscle degenerative disease.
Another one is Critzfeldt-Jakob disease, CJD, which is the human mad cow.
These are all really, really horrible diseases.
And then you have alopecia, where your hair is falling out.
So those four symptoms, very, very different.
And then, of course, you also have the heart problems, which I think is also connected.
So that's five different characteristic types of symptoms that we see.
And I've looked at the VAERS database.
All of those are strongly indicated in the VAERS database, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
Polyneuropathy, ALS, CJD, which is mad cow, basically, prion disease.
Alopecia and heart problems.
And I think I can explain all of those by this one mechanism, which is very, very specific and quite fascinating.
And this, again, was sort of a deep dive into the research literature, starting with, and I'm not sure how I got started with it.
I don't know quite.
It was almost like God speaking to me because I somehow noticed, and I can't remember exactly what inspired me to notice that, That there was a sequence in the spike protein, YQAGS. That's a sequence of amino acids.
Each of those letters stands for a particular amino acid.
And I think it's tyrosine, glutamine, alanine, glycine, and serine.
I think that's the corresponding amino acids to those codes.
That particular sequence shows up in the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein.
And there's a sequence YQRGS with an R instead of the A. And that's arginine.
That sequence is in the C-terminal domain of this prion protein.
So those two sequences are similar.
And when you have two sequences that are similar and you develop antibodies to one of them, Those antibodies can get confused and attack the other one instead.
That's a classic case of molecular mimicry.
It's a process that's well known and that people believe is associated with many autoimmune diseases because of antibodies.
And that's why it's dangerous to have too many antibodies.
When you get such a fantastic antibody response, To the spike protein from the vaccine, you run the risk of getting autoimmune attack on different proteins that match.
And there's a whole bunch of proteins that match.
There have been papers written about that.
But no one has singled out this C-terminal domain of the prion protein besides me.
I was the one who just noticed that by actually looking at the sequence.
I'm not aware of anyone else who's talking about that.
But if it's true, it has devastating consequences because they've shown experimentally That when there are antibodies to that C-terminal domain of the prion protein, it causes a prion-like disease that's not the same as the prion disease.
It's not a consequence of the protein misfolding.
It's a consequence of the protein being completely cleared from the cell as a consequence of that antibody.
And when that happens, you get a severe form.
They know that that can cause a severe form of Kurzweil-Jakob disease, which is exactly what we're seeing in those 26 patients that Luc Montagnier wrote about in that paper that got published after he died.
That paper's amazing, and it talks about these 26 cases, and all of them are just really devastating.
All of them first experienced symptoms of this mad cow disease, this CJD, within a month of the second vaccine.
Very, very specific.
That's when they first noticed symptoms.
And I think, as far as I know, only one of them is now still alive.
Like, some of them died within three months.
It was a very, very aggressive form of Chris Fultiakop disease that these patients suffered from.
Can I ask you, just on that, were they all Pfizer, Moderna, Meeks?
Yes, 23 of them were messenger RNA vaccines and three cases were from the AstraZeneca.
This was mostly in Europe.
They had a few people from America.
Most of the patients were from Europe and 23 out of the 26 were messenger RNA vaccines.
I don't know the mix between Pfizer and Moderna.
So that's interesting because I know that, you know, recently in the media they've admitted that AstraZeneca is, you know, has been pulled off the markets because it's unsafe.
So obviously someone's backdoor deal didn't go through there.
But why would that be the case if the mRNA is the problem?
And the AstraZeneca didn't have the mRNA.
How come they still have this?
They both produce the spike protein.
Right.
And the spike protein is going to produce the antibodies to the spike protein.
The antibodies are going to attack the...
So both of them have that problem that spike protein is being produced.
And it's the spike protein that's a toxic element there.
So that makes sense to me that those would both cause it.
But the thing is that this particular sequence...
This YQAGS. I found papers that talked about antibodies binding to different parts of the receptor binding domain.
That's what you want to get good response.
You want antibodies to the RBD of the spike protein because that's what's going to allow the virus to get in.
So if you can block it with those antibodies, the virus won't infect.
So it's good news when you get antibodies to the RBD. And they studied, they actually did an experiment where they found out which antibodies were produced and they identified them and they found two That bind to that particular sequence, that YQAGS, and that were very, very good.
They were very good in terms of protecting you from spike, from infection with the virus.
They were very happy to see those particular antibodies.
Those are the dangerous antibodies that could cause this awful condition.
It seems to me that the same antibodies that are very effective at blocking virus entry are the antibodies that are very dangerous with respect to causing this This nasty condition.
And then it turns out that I've been studying all kinds of papers that talk about different...
They have these mice that they engineer to have a defective version of that prion protein.
Their version doesn't.
It just gets removed before it ever gets able to work.
And so they basically have a prion protein deficiency problem, these mice.
And these mice exhibit these characteristic features that I just mentioned with the problems with the ALS and the CJD and the loss of hair.
There was a study on mice that showed when they gave them antibodies to that C-terminal domain exactly what these antibodies would be in my opinion.
They got hair loss, like a third of the mice developed hair loss.
And that's another side effect that shows up with these vaccines.
So it's quite interesting to me that this polyneuropathy, all of those I have found in association with mice, mouse studies where they showed deficiency in the prion protein causes all these things.
So it's different from it misfolding.
It gets removed, and it becomes deficient.
In fact, there's papers, more and more papers are coming out that are saying perhaps this toxicity of all of these proteins that misfold to cause disease, like the amyloid beta and Alzheimer's disease, and alpha-synuclein, which is associated with Parkinson's disease, I'm finding papers with each of them,
and sometimes people are saying maybe this is true for all of them, that the toxicity is not so much the plaque that gets formed from the misfolded protein as it is the fact that when that plaque forms, the original working form of the protein disappears because it gets brought into the plaque.
The protein gets removed from the cytoplasm and gets brought into the plaque, and the plaque itself may not actually be particularly harmful.
People are starting to realize that.
It's a very different take on all of these neurodegenerative diseases.
You know, with Alzheimer's, they're trying to develop all these drugs that, in fact, some of their drugs are based on antibodies to amyloid beta, which is the protein that misfolds in association with Alzheimer's disease.
And they're finding some very capable drugs that can remove amyloid beta plaque, but they're not finding good results.
They're not getting good results in terms of the patients getting better.
Right.
So they're getting very frustrated with that.
I think they misunderstand exactly how it's causing disease, but I think that the primary factor may be that the normal form of that protein that folds correctly has a very important role to play in biology.
And when it gets removed by being brought into that plaque, it's kind of like a crystal that forms and just sucks it all out of the cell.
But it's probably a slower process than it would be with these antibodies.
It would just remove it right away.
So I think it's an accelerated form.
Of CJD that you see that could be caused by this antibody binding to the C-terminal domain.
So it's pretty interesting as far as connecting all those dots, you know.
Absolutely.
Another thing that I want to discuss with you, we've only got a few minutes left here, Dr.
Seneff, is this bifidobacteria.
Which is another very interesting discussion that people are having right now.
I just spoke to, again, as I said, Robert Fasario earlier this week.
He said this is very, very common in his circles of people who are injection injured.
Dr.
Sabine Hazan has been speaking about this.
I hope to speak with her soon.
I have spoken to her on the phone but haven't booked the interview.
Talk to us about this.
It seems to be prevalent in many, many people who've had the injections or even infection.
Right, yes.
And I've talked to Sabine as well.
She's very interesting and she's very capable.
And I think she's onto something really huge.
And that's a whole other piece of the puzzle because even the idea that perhaps the virus is actually infecting the bifidobacteria little organisms And killing them because she was already testing for bifida because that was kind of her thing.
She's an expert on the gut.
And so she has data on before and after the vaccine for several people.
And those data are showing the bifida are disappearing after the vaccine.
And that's really devastating because bifida bacteria are extremely important microbes.
They're really...
Good bacteria that you want to have a lot of.
And so if they're getting removed, you're going to have trouble with a lot of problems with your gut and other issues as well because the microbes do so much for the host.
And so this is a very serious thing.
And I want to say that it also was interesting to me because I'm aware of the fact that glyphosate, which is the active ingredient in Roundup, also affects both the bifidobacteria and lactobacillus.
And those are two very important Classes of microbes that are in the infant gut.
When the child is born, if it starts taking a breast milk or soy formula that contains glyphosate, that's going to cut down on the supply of those two very, very important species in the gut.
And I've been writing about that, and I think that's part of glyphosate's toxicity as well.
So now you have a compounding effect.
If somebody's being exposed to glyphosate and now they get hit by the virus as well, their bifido can just be completely disappeared.
That can be very serious consequences for gut health.
I have a question, Dr Sen, if you mentioned before that some people are of the opinion this is a bioweapon.
I've spoken to many who think that COVID was a bioweapon and as a bare minimum the injections were a bioweapon because they've done so much harm and there's so little acknowledgement of the harm that they're doing.
You know, we're at the point where Where the establishment is even denying that injection injuries exist.
And just here in Queensland, this is the second time I'm talking about this this week, but in Queensland they're saying, no, no, long COVID is nothing more than the flu in terms of its symptoms.
So you were previously telling people that their heart attacks were due to long COVID. Now you're saying, no, long COVID is no big deal.
It's the biggest gaslighting campaign I've ever seen.
It's so disgusting to treat people that are injured in this manner or people that are sick in this manner.
But if...
My question is, and we've only really got a few minutes here, but I really want your insight.
If you are discovering all of these complexities...
Within the spike and the injections and the mRNA and all of the above.
And so many like you are seeing all of these complexities.
And this was an intentional bioweapon.
How far behind is the general scientific community on the possibilities of these types of technologies and the possibility of something like this occurring again?
I know.
I can remember going through that whole period of COVID showing up and then where did it come from?
Was it lab?
Was it natural?
What was the purpose if it was lab?
What were they doing in that lab?
Was it trying to actually make bioweapons to kill off the enemy?
It was such a stirred up period.
I couldn't stand Not knowing the answer.
And I couldn't find the answer because there were so many conflicting stories.
You know, it's been an interesting time in human history where you can't really know the truth because there's so much being hidden by the mainstream.
And then you have conspiracy theories, you know, so-called conspiracy theories that come out, and some of them are so outrageous you can't possibly believe that.
And so you're really...
I want to know the truth.
I want to at least understand what is the truth.
And I can't really get to that point.
So my...
So I was trying to figure out, so I do think it's lab origin.
I think there's almost no question in my mind at this point.
It has so many specific changes from the original SARS-CoV that look like the sorts of things one might do.
I mean, we have the capability of inserting these particular sequences into the genome.
We have these incredible skills that are very powerful and terrifying, in my opinion, that we can do.
And so if someone's playing around in the lab trying to figure out and curious about what happens if, I mean, they're just playing around with this stuff, it seems to me.
And then what is their goal?
One possibility that I've entertained is that they were trying to develop a vaccine, actually.
And they might have been playing around with multiple vaccines.
For example, a vaccine against AIDS. Because it has some HIV sequences in there.
That's something that Luc Montagnier recognized.
It has some sequences that resemble HIV. And that would be the way you would want to do it.
If you wanted to put together something that could allow your body to develop antibodies that might attack something else, you put in something that's similar, too.
The thing you're trying to attack.
And then you hope they're going to develop antibodies to that.
And then again, it's like molecular mimicry to attack the AIDS virus by virtue of the similarity.
So to put little AIDS pieces in there, but not the whole virus, because then you'll actually get AIDS, you know, it kind of makes sense in a way to do that as a strategy for developing a vaccine.
And then it occurred to me that maybe that was the same thing with the prion protein.
Because there are papers that talk about the idea.
You know, with the amyloid beta, they've successfully developed antibodies that can clear the plaque, but that don't protect from the disease.
But they've been working hard in that space.
Why not do the same thing for the prion disease to say, well, let's just see if we can get something.
If it's a human protein, it cannot be identical.
If it's identical, it'll look human and you won't get the antibodies.
It needs to be a little bit different.
And so this YQAGS, for example, would be a good choice.
If you're thinking, well, I want to get antibodies to the prion protein in order to remove it, in order to protect from prion disease.
But then they find out, oh my god, if you put antibodies to C-terminal domain, you get this horrible problem.
They didn't know that.
I mean, this is sort of things they're discovering.
As they're working in this space.
Here's the thing, though.
They didn't know that, but they do now because of all of the people that are studying this and talking about it, and yet there's no acknowledgement.
You know, we've had Dr John Campbell coming out recently with one of our brave senators here in Australia, Senator Gerard Rennick, talking about the TGA's own documents from 2021, knowing about the biodistribution.
You know, I mean...
They knew.
They knew.
Right.
They knew lots of things that should have scared them away from daring to do this experiment.
It's shocking.
And then to force it down our throats, I was...
All along the way, I kept on saying, well, it can't go that far, right?
And then it's like, oh my God, it's never going to be the case that I'm going to be required to get the vaccine, right?
Wrong, you know?
MIT required it.
I didn't get it.
I almost had to...
You know, stop working because I refused to get it and they granted me a religious exemption, which I'm very grateful for.
And I want to put in a plug for MIT because they have removed their mandates.
As of April, mid-April, they've removed everything, which is really good news.
And I don't think there's many schools that have stepped up so far, but I'm hoping.
I know Stanford and MIT. Have both decided no more mandates.
And no more testing, nothing.
You know, COVID's over.
And I'm hoping the other schools will follow suit.
But it makes me feel a lot better about MIT that they were, I think, one of the first to decide, you know what, we don't want to do this anymore.
So I'm hoping, you know, that makes me feel a lot better.
Because I was really upset with MIT for forcing the students to get this vaccine.
Well, we certainly depend on voices like yours, Dr Senefin, and all of your research into this to keep investigating, prodding, making sure that, you know, we never have a repeat of this again.
We know the WHO is very, very keen on injecting people on an ongoing basis.
They've published this in their own documents.
That they want to introduce 500 new vaccines by 2030, and a lot of this is going to be mRNA.
And so, I mean, we need...
It's very worrisome.
It is extremely worrisome.
So we have to keep speaking, and I'm committed to speaking to diverse voices on this topic, and yours is one I'm certainly so grateful for.
So we thank you so much for your time today.
We really appreciate it.
Yeah, thank you so much for having me.
It's a fascinating topic, but it's so terrifying.
It's very motivating to learn about biology when you have a situation like this.
So for me, it's been helping me to learn more about biology by virtue of all the things that go wrong with these vaccines.
And we learn from you.
Thank you again, Dr.
Senneth.
Thank you.
Very, very soon we may not be able to continue broadcasting this kind of information.
That's not me being pessimistic.
I'm just a realist.
They want to silence us.
But it's the support of the people that want us to keep going, the support of businesses that enable us to keep getting this truth out there.
And really the resolve of the people and the passion to not remain silent, that is guaranteeing that we can keep speaking the truth and it is crucial in these times.
But I want to give everyone the heads up that they've already started cutting internet cables.
If you missed my recent interview with Steve Quayle, please do go and watch that, in an effort to destroy communications.
This is an act of war, which we are at war.
They declared it on us, not the other way around.
And so at any time they can use their drawcard of switching off That's why it's so important to be prepared.
Head to HeavensHarvest.com, use promo code Z for 5% off your order.
These guys have A great range of emergency survival food, including this organic kit, which I was very, very happy to see last time I spoke to Clayton from Heaven's Harvest, and also Heirloom Seed Kits.
Please, please, please get serious about growing your own food.
It is so important.
We cannot trust the food on the shelves.
If you missed last week's episode with Dr.
David Nixon, please go back and watch that because he talks about the fact that You know, he's finding this stuff in grocery, major chain grocery stores, and it's very, very alarming.
Dr.
Anna Mahaita is another one that's finding that.
But the good news that he gave us was that his butcher, the meat from his local butcher, was very, very different.
So if you are in Australia, head to stockmansteaks.com.au forward slash Maria.
Buy yourself 100% pasture-raised, non-GMO, antibiotic-free, and with Stockman Steaks guarantee, mRNA-free meat.
Creating a parallel economy is something that I'm so passionate about and I love the fact that we're able to support Aussie farmers like this and of course sat123.com forward slash Maria for all of your satellite communication needs including off-grid power sources the bivvy stick and sat phones at very very affordable prices these are military grade phones And I personally have two in my household.
My family are very serious about this so I genuinely think everyone should have this.
It's a way of It's a method of insurance just like food is so that you don't have to depend on the EBS and globalist messaging systems when everything does go down.
We know that just this last week in England they were testing the EBS, sending people notifications on their phones and things of this nature to make sure that they control the narrative once the big event like fake alien invasion or whatever it may be occurs.
So really, really important to prepare with this stuff.
Thank you so much for tuning in today.
I'll see you all very, very soon right here on Uncensored.
Share this everywhere.
▲
Export Selection