All Episodes
Previous Next
April 22, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
51:00
LIVE: Uncensored: RECEIPTS: Kamala, Garland, Walensky Operating ILLEGALLY, Not Under Constitution
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
That means these people are operating illegally within these roles.
Now, we know this intuitively, but Attorney Todd Callender, Attorney Ken Ferguson and researcher Lisa McGee are the first in the world to prove it.
That's right, they have the receipts and they are doing something about it.
The implications of this discovery are huge!
Who are these people actually working for?
We show the proof and discuss the implications shortly with Todd, Ken and Lisa after a quick word from the sponsors of this bombshell show.
Don't go anywhere, we'll be right back.
If you'd like a shortcut to better sleep, more energy, a calmer, more stable mood, then you should make sure that you're supplementing with magnesium daily.
I'm going to tell you why.
About 75% of people are magnesium deficient.
This deficiency can lead to higher levels of anxiety, irritability, trouble sleeping, low energy, and can even contribute to foot and leg cramps while you sleep.
I mean, the results are really devastating.
And most of us are magnesium deficient.
Now you might be wondering, does magnesium really affect all these things?
Well, the answer is yes.
In fact, magnesium is involved in more than 300 chemical processes inside your body.
So a lot of different things can start to go wrong if you're deficient.
The good news is that you can experience a number of positive health benefits from just getting enough magnesium including better sleep, more energy, stronger bones, healthy blood pressure, less irritability, calmer mood, reduced muscle cramping and fewer migraines.
But to experience these health benefits, you have to get the right kind of magnesium.
There are actually seven unique forms of magnesium, and you must get all of them if you want to experience its calming, health-enhancing effects.
That's why I recommend Magnesium Breakthrough by Bioptimizers.
It's the only organic full-spectrum magnesium supplement that includes all seven unique forms of magnesium for stress relief and better sleep all in one bottle.
Visit MagnesiumBreakthrough.com forward slash Maria and order now.
And in addition to the discount you get by using promo code Maria, there are always amazing promos and gifts with your purchases.
Go now to MagBreakthrough.com forward slash Maria to get your Magnesium Breakthrough and find out this month's surprise promo.
We're joined now by Attorney Todd Callender, Attorney Ken Ferguson, who's also a former state prosecutor and researcher, Lisa McGee.
Todd and Lisa have been on with us before, and they've been doing a phenomenal job.
Vax Choice is really leading the way in exposing so much, but not only exposing, but holding people accountable.
And that's what this conversation is about today.
So the audience would be familiar with you, Todd and Lisa, but Ken, just give us a brief intro so that people can get to know you a little bit.
Sure.
Well, Todd and I were collaborating before on some legal work, and Lisa is our, like you said, an all-star researcher, and she started about two years ago.
She's going to be able to tell you more about this than obviously I would, but she started two years ago a FOIA, Freedom of Information Act request, to figure out whether or not these people are legitimately holding office.
And comes to find out, and we'll get into it in more detail, when Lisa was getting these oaths of affidavit back that were not properly signed, or frankly, a lot of these officials were just saying, we don't have them, that started raising suspicions.
And so she contacted Todd, and Todd and I had worked together.
And so we've collaborated in order to basically come up with a legal plan of action in order to find out whether these officials in office are legitimate or not.
Yeah, that's wonderful.
I mean, we're just having a chat offline before you all came on about the fact that this seems to be a problem that has spread like a cancer through every country.
Illegitimate politicians, illegitimate government, you know, the country, Australia, has its own ABN registered in Washington.
So, you know, this is something that Professor Dolores Cahill has been speaking about for years, about these illegal corporations acting as governments.
And it's a dangerous conversation to be having.
But the point is that there is action that is coming and Todd and these wonderful people here are doing something about it.
So you tell me, Todd, where do you want to start on this?
Well, I think it starts with nine months ago or so, Lisa had sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the U.S. Department of Defense in reference to Lloyd Austin and whether or not he has an oath of office, and she started getting the runaround.
Just strange things.
These Freedom of Information Act requests are pretty straightforward.
There's even mediators that are available.
And if you don't get what you want, then you can actually sue.
But the way that they moved her around was very suspicious.
And so while she's going through this process with the DOD, She starts requesting the oaths of office from all of the cabinet.
And about the time we were gearing up to sue the DOD, they all started coming in, which was just a week or two ago.
And lo and behold, we come to find that they're all defective.
And what I want to say is this.
Everybody holding an oath of office, it isn't good enough to raise your hand and swear it.
You got to write it down and you got to notarize it.
So when you look at the evidence that we presented this, what you will find is that they are defective of those that came in.
Ken is right.
There were some where the agencies just said, yeah, we don't have them.
You know, they just don't care.
And I think that's the point here.
They don't care.
This is a facade and it's almost a joke on us.
Yes, absolutely.
I know that just where Ritz are concerned, you know, there was a huge problem with our federal elections because the seal, it was missing the Commonwealth seal.
It wasn't even an official document.
That is required for the election to take place.
And yet, you know, anyone that dares do anything about it was just sort of silenced and swept under the rug.
And, you know, there hasn't been real action other than, you know, former Senator Rodney Culleton here in Australia, who's been blasting the horn on this forever.
But there hasn't been real concrete action taken against these people.
So should we start with these documents?
Do you want to talk us through them?
Yeah, I think so.
So, you know, the writ itself is great.
It's self-explanatory.
It details how and why, you know, these are either non-existent or defective.
I would take you to, for instance, if you went to page 25, I want to show you an example when we say that they're defective.
And I want people to see what the oath actually requires.
So this one in particular is Rochelle Walensky, and she's a senior advisor.
Am I on the right page, sorry?
Todd?
Yeah, that's right.
You're on the right page.
That's perfect.
So on its face, you would think this looks fine, right?
But the statute itself, the operative statute is 5 U.S. Code 3332, requires that it be both written and notarized.
And there is no notarial attestation to this.
So it is facially defective.
They're all like that, wherever they actually received them.
But what I wanted to point out is the reasoning, therefore, if you look at this oath, aside from promising to serve the interests of our country, take note specifically to item C. And I think that this is where the motive for this happens to reside.
I have not, nor has anyone acting on my behalf, given, transferred, promised, or paid any consideration for or in expectation of hope of receiving What does that mean?
I think that means that the office isn't for sale and you can't be hired to run it for somebody else.
And yet, what do we see in our governments?
You know, rampant corruption.
Very clearly, you know, our politicians aren't in charge.
Somebody's pulling the strings.
And it's my supposition, I know Ken and Lisa share this, that these are defective on purpose.
It's a statistical impossibility that the entire cabinet has defective or nonexistent notes of office which are required for them to actually serve in these roles.
Unbelievable.
Maria, if you can scroll up just a hair.
Yes.
I also want to point out, look where it says position to which appointed.
It just says senior advisor.
I think it's important to note that Rochelle Walensky is actually the Director of Center of Disease Control and Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
That's her official title, so to speak, and yet they just have this general vague term of senior advisor.
Again, also not sworn to, as Todd mentioned, or sworn either under oath or alternatively, what would be typical would be an affidavit with a notary.
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
I mean, why do you think no one has uncovered this until now?
That's a Lisa question.
Well, it's also a Lisa answer.
It's people like Lisa.
Go ahead, Lisa.
I mean, it's rock stars like Lisa who are making this happen.
You know, Maria, I think it's...
Thank you for that, Ken.
It is...
I was in a position to be able to do this, you know, with being on Todd's team.
This is, but FOIA, the Freedom of Information Act, is set up for people to inquire, you know, to ask questions of our government, of agencies, of departments, of individuals, and that is what it's for.
And again, this whole process has been such a learning experience of if you would, if people who are running your government would be proud of that, And taking these oaths seriously and properly, there's an allegiance to that role.
And it's an allegiance to those people who they've made that oath to.
And also self-integrity and self-moral and a moral compass that's aligned properly.
This shines a light on that, if anything.
These people don't have that.
There is no alliance to that position and there's no alliance at all to the people.
And so they, you know, you submit a FOIA and they have to respond.
But in my experience, there was immediate pushback.
There was an immediate, oh, You know, we've got to send it here.
We've got to send it there.
We've got to send it here.
You know, every place else except the department to where this person is the secretary.
Secretary of Defense, we've got to send it to 15 other places, you know, before we can find it.
A common phrase, a common subject matter was that they were all unusual circumstances.
Asking for an oath of office of a current person in position, you know, an appointee, that it was unusual circumstances.
It's like, what's unusual, you know, about this?
You know, they set up obstacles for people, my opinion, for people to just finally say, I don't have time to continue to do this.
And I think there were probably 75 emails, maybe not quite that many, of exchanges, you know, trying to keep organized with the 13 that we FOIA'd.
You know, coming back this day or this day, but keeping track of that, you know, it becomes a part-time job of, okay, who responded?
What do I need to say?
Who all was on that?
You know, several different people on various different emails.
It is set up to stonewall you, to stonewall their responsibility.
Yes.
And I noticed that early on.
And again, by the grace of God and Todd, I was able to make this With Todd's blessing and support and the teams, it became part of my day.
I was able to do this and we started keeping track and saying, oh my gosh.
After the second or third, fourth response, it's like I came to Todd and a couple of other on the team and said, they don't have them.
I don't think that they have their oaths of office.
And it's really...
Like a shocking discovery.
And I didn't give up.
And I started to get a little, I got a little fire in my belly because of it.
And I was like, you know what?
You owe me this.
You owe the American people that you need to answer.
And if you don't, that's a whole other topic that we'll address.
But This is a legal constitutional, it's a law.
It's a requirement.
It's a paragraph.
It is an oath of the language.
But incoming, as Todd said, started coming links, you know, they would send back official letters of, and they even actually asked me a question, is this what you're looking for?
You know, here are these people from this department saying, is this what you're looking for?
It's like, no, I don't want a YouTube video of this person saying the oath.
I want the copy of their oath that is supposed to be registered at the Federal Register within 30 days of their appointment.
That is what I want.
You know, so it was three people that we were given links.
The three people who sent us links, Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen, Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, and Secretary of Treasury Peter Buttigieg.
They do not have written oaths of office.
They sent links saying that In place of, to be, you know, a substitute for that.
That is not an oath of office, a signed and dated oath of office.
So what's their justification for those substitutes?
Are they saying that they didn't give one?
You know, I have to correct myself.
Jennifer Granholm sent a link and they were still, as of the last that we got contact from them, they were searching feverishly for this, you know, a copy of the oath, but they did send a link saying that this verbal swearing in was sufficient enough.
And I need to add that We also FOIAed for President Biden, and that's a lowercase p, and Vice President Kamala Harris.
And I sent it to the Department of Justice and to the Inspector General's office.
Have not heard back from anything or from them.
And Harris sworn in all of these people.
So if she isn't, you know, duly oathed in or doesn't have a signed affidavit and an oath that's registered with the Federal Register, None of this is legit.
None of this is constitutionally legal.
Their positions, their decisions that they've made, and I'm angry about it.
And my message is just that I mean, Todd and Ken, they crafted this divinely beautiful, powerful, a story of kind of just what happened.
Like, you people owe this to the American people.
You owe it.
It's your job.
It's as simple as that, and you don't have it.
You know, and several of you have actually admitted it.
Right?
I mean, you are telling me.
You have stated, we don't have it.
Todd and Ken, is there anything else in particular from that one document that I need to bring up on the screen so that the people can really see what Lisa's talking about?
Well, I think it's...
Go ahead, Ken.
Sorry.
I was going to say, if you go to page 5, there's no ambiguity here.
It's under 5 U.S. Code 3332, Officer Affidavit.
We write out the statute.
It says an officer within 30 days shall, after the effective date of his appointment, his or her appointment, shall file with the oath of office required by Section 331 of this title an affidavit.
There's no ambiguity there, nor is there any excuse.
So they should have it, and for whatever reason, they don't.
And some of them are that bold enough to admit that they don't.
And I think that's something that Todd's brought up, just how brazen and how arrogant these officials have been, and just saying, no, we're not going to give it to you, or no, we don't have it.
What are you going to do about it?
Maria, on this note, we had a chuckle.
If you go to page 86, Ken and I were trying to figure out, okay, so the statute says you can serve it on the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General.
We originally were thinking the Attorney General is a Department of Justice matter.
But if you go to his oath of office, which is on page 86, I believe it's Exhibit L, what you come to find is that Mr.
Garland has no date of appointment, nor is it notarized.
So, in effect, we couldn't serve him.
We had to serve the U.S. Attorney on the hopes that he was actually validly appointed.
We're not entirely sure, but I don't think it's by coincidence that the January Sixers, the people that are locked up in Washington, D.C., are apparently done so under the U.S. Attorney and not the Attorney General.
Wow.
Wow.
This is huge.
This is absolutely huge.
And I mean, I want to talk about what the repercussions for this information are.
But, you know, guide me, Todd, as to whether there's anything else on this particular document you want to bring up before we talk about the repercussions and what people can do to get involved.
I think it's important for people to look at subsection A. It's the same on all of them, because it's really important for people to understand that what this does is create a duty.
That's the whole point of this.
They're giving notice to the world.
It's published in the Federal Register because that's where we give legal notice to the world that this person is fulfilling these roles and obligations pursuant to a lawful duty.
And I think it's that defect that these people are relying on that goes to your next point, which is, why did they do this?
Is it to mitigate charges of treason, perhaps?
Because we know that their official acts now must be undone, assuming that we're correct, that it voids them to the point where they were taking this position.
Everything they've done in between is void.
But do they have that legal duty If this is done improperly, defectively.
I don't know the answer to that.
Maybe Ken does.
He was a former prosecutor.
Well, I mean, Todd, going off that, I had mentioned this before, but interestingly, treason is the only crime that's actually defined in the Constitution under Article 3, Section 3.
And one of the elements of treason is that the defendant owes an allegiance to the government.
So, Todd and I, I mean, all we can do is speculate here, but maybe one reason that they don't want to have their oaths of office is because then that actually gives them the mens rea, or the conscience, rather, to know that they could be found guilty of treason.
If they had signed the oath of office.
So maybe that's, in their mind, a scapegoat or an outlet to say, well, since we didn't sign the oath, we didn't owe allegiance.
But you're basically having to pick your poison here because it's also illegal to impersonate a federal officer.
That's right.
So I was about to say, okay, whether it's an escape plan, you can't go and impersonate a member of the government.
You cannot do that.
No, pretending to be a federal officer is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. 912.
And it's a crime to falsely represent oneself as an agent or employee to intimidate or deceive another person.
And here we are with incredibly powerful people.
We're talking Janet Yellen.
We're talking the Vice President of the United States, particularly, potentially deceiving an entire country here.
I mean, the magnitude of this can't be as to what's happening.
The world, exactly.
I just wanted to add to that.
Really simply, I think one of the ways to look at the calculus on this, in the case of treason, the penalty is death.
In the case of impersonating a federal officer, it's prison time.
I bet that figured into this whole analysis and calculus.
Absolutely.
What...
What does this mean?
I mean, obviously you haven't looked at every single official, but how do you know or does it matter who they're actually employed by?
Does it matter who they're actually serving?
Is it a matter then of foreign influence?
I think so.
I think all of those things count.
The three parts to the affidavit kind of speak to that.
Somebody else isn't pulling the strings.
And then secondarily, who do you work for?
And this is the part, Maria, that we're trying to get out to the public.
Look, your government, our government, Canadian government, all of them seem to have this.
They share this, that their people aren't serving.
Their people in these positions aren't serving their people.
So who do they work for?
And more importantly, The folks in uniform, ones also carrying guns and badges.
Who do you work for?
Because if you're taking orders from these guys, right, then that makes you a mercenary.
That's my concern.
And what we want people to understand is that the Constitution, in the case of the United States, is the supreme law of the land.
Your duty, if you're in uniform, you work for government, you're carrying a badge and a gun, your duty is to the Constitution and the people of the United States of America.
And we really want people to understand that we're proving what appears to be a fraud in progress, the greatest fraud perhaps in the history of man, second only to the COVID fraud, the kill shot fraud.
But maybe it's all part of the same criminal enterprise.
I think you've got a hunch there, Todd, that many of us share.
Sorry, Ken, do go on.
No, I was going to say, Todd, just to add to that, there's no accomplice liability to treason.
You're a principal.
So adding off to Todd's point, you're either for us or you're against us.
You can't be on both sides of the fence.
You either pledge your allegiance to the Constitution, and that's who you owe your oath of office to and to the people, Do you believe that that will come through discovery?
That's a good question.
It's a great question.
It's either going to come through discovery or the court of public opinion.
And I think that's why we get on these shows, because I think that our First Amendment is something that, you know, that's the reason why the Founding Fathers had it there, was so that we could speak up, so that we could voice our opinions and have people like Lisa stand up and say, hey, wait, something's wrong here.
And that's why it's so important to have the media like yourself Maria and all these outlets, frankly, so that we can get the word out and that something can be done about it.
Because we can't just sit back and wait for somebody else to do something.
People have to take action and do things themselves.
And we can't just wait for somebody to save us.
This is not just unique to the United States.
This is the world.
Everyone needs to stand up and do something about it.
And, you know, I truly thank God for people like Lisa who are willing to put in the work.
All the exhibits are hers.
I mean, she's worked her tail off to get those things.
And, you know, Todd and I saw her work and tried to make it into a legal vehicle in order to make things happen.
So, you know, to that end, that's what this is all about.
It's about trying to shake things up and find out the truth and unearth what's really going on here.
Lisa, have you looked at senators as well?
No.
No, not yet.
I mean, I think that that's something that needs to start to do.
And again, you know, this motivation of most states have the equivalent to an interstate FOIA. In Colorado, it's a Cora.
So I participated early on with some parents.
This is what got me interested in the oaths and really understanding what they were and the magnitude of them and the importance.
You know, on a legal and again, that moral level, that is, you know, they go together and they are meant to go together.
And we found out, we started sending in requests for school board members, oaths of office, these school board members who were making these choices in our kids' schools to set up, you know, jab clinics for my, at the time he was 14, to get a COVID shot without my permission.
I mean, these schools were doing that.
And it was like, no, no, no, you know, back off.
And so that I got, I got involved and I learned what I needed to learn.
And I got together with, you know, and a wonderful group of parents included me and, you know, gave me the tools to do it.
This is about sharing information, you know, and helping each other with and passing the tools along, you know, and saying, this is what you can do.
I mean, Todd and Ken, Like they said, they wrote this, and my name is the petitioner on this, but it can be anybody's name.
Yes, absolutely.
The reason I'm asking specifically about the other senators, Lisa, is I think that it would be interesting to see whether people that are on side, or seemingly on side, We're good to go.
So, you know, it'd be interesting to see their response if they're, because, you know, they're seemingly the honest ones.
I'm talking about, you know, some of the senators that you have there, seemingly honest, seemingly for the people, you know, from the Republican Party or whatnot.
Do they actually know about this?
And if they come to know about this, would they do anything about it?
That's an interesting thing.
They know now.
I know now, Maria, thanks to you and a few other really good people.
I wanted to actually add to that, to what Lisa and both of you were saying.
First and foremost, Ken, thank you.
He did the heavy lifting on this.
But secondarily, how do we raise up an army of people that did exactly what it was that Lisa did?
In every country, we have to know who's working for who here.
This is an educational process, and albeit we're headed towards court with this one way or another.
What I want to impart is it's up to us, right?
We might get a judge who doesn't care, who awards them these jobs, non pro talk, meaning back to the beginning.
Either way, this is a violation of our rights.
This is a violation of our countries.
The countries are made of us, the people.
So I think everybody has to take an interest and figure this out.
Everybody that you think that you owe a duty to, or who owes a duty to you, I should say, let's all find out.
Everybody asks, right?
And then we'll let them know who's in charge.
Yeah, I mean, even, sorry, Lisa, if I can just interject here, even if one person took one task on board and another person took another task on board, you know, I'm happy to broadcast whatever people are doing in that regard because, you know, sometimes people look at it and they think, well, the mountain's too big, I don't know where to start.
But it really is just starting and dedicating whatever spare time you have to that because we won't have time If these people succeed with their plans, we won't have these quality moments.
You know, every moment that we spend fighting right now is for the future to be able to have that.
Do go on, Lisa.
Well, you're exactly right.
And that's, you know, that is another thing that is, we've got to think about that.
We've got to fight for our freedoms if we just sit back.
I mean, they're being taken.
And I had been, I thought about this and I, you know, we don't know for sure, so I can't accuse these people of being We don't know 100% that they are guilty of these, of what we've found out.
But, you know, who are they working for?
And clearly, it's being shown globally.
But in the United States, none of the decisions that are being made with these people at the helm of a lot of these, you know, overseeing, they aren't in the interest, clearly, blatantly, arrogantly.
There is no There is no care.
Let's take away the allegiance.
They are destroying our country.
They are causing such suffering and pain on humanity.
Who would do that?
If you had your oath, you would be proud of your oath.
You would have it like a badge of honor.
You know, you would be fighting and protecting the people who you took that oath for, not throwing them under the bus, literally, and jabbing them up with poisons and toxins.
They're working for somebody else.
And if they don't have them both, and if they're not a senator or a secretary of state or a secretary of energy, then they're like employees of somebody else.
They're like agents of somebody else.
And I probably have to be careful saying that, but that's how I feel.
Well, it certainly appears that way.
And, you know, if it can be disproven by the court, sure.
But, you know, what we're dealing with is illegitimate positions regardless.
Can I just add to that?
Going back to...
Attorney General, I really suffer to actually say those words.
Attorney General Garland, in so much that this is the number one law enforcement official in the United States of America.
All of federal law enforcement falls under the DOJ, including the federal marshals.
So if we're rotten at the top, what does that say about the entirety of law enforcement in the United States of America?
Is it all invalid?
Has it been invalidated all the way back to his assumed appointment date because there's missing an appointment date on here?
Is that guy acting the whole time?
And so I just want people to think through the ramifications of this.
Under whose orders are you acting, especially as we move towards the international health regulations as they are amended?
Where Tedros Adnan will be able to effectively order the Secretary of Defense to go and carry out whatever mission he says in furtherance of a sniffle, because that's the jurisdiction they're granting on themselves.
What are you going to do if you're a federal law enforcement official, if you're in the military, when the order from Tedros Adnan, the WHO, comes to you?
Are you going to fulfill it?
Are you going to point your gun and fix bayonets on American citizens and force them into quarantine camps?
Because that question, that conundrum is coming.
Well, it gets much worse, actually.
I don't know if you're all familiar with this document.
I'll bring it up to the screen.
Strengthening the international response to complex global shocks.
Within this document, it says that for any crisis, anything that they declare a crisis, whether it be a change in the wind or, you know, a bird has lost its feathers, Antonio Guterres becomes the dictator of the world and they can deploy teams.
As per the EU's proposals to the WHO treaty, they talk about these field missions and deploying teams and countries will cooperate.
So if you have a pocket of non-compliance and you as a soldier or a police officer don't want to turn on your people, don't worry, they're going to make sure they send out a field mission to do it for you.
We've already seen that.
Isn't that what we saw in Canada with the truckers?
Four white C-141s showed up when the local police didn't find the protesters doing anything wrong.
They joined them.
And so what did you see?
A bunch of mercenaries got flown in.
They donned police uniforms and beat the tar out of people.
So that's already in progress or it's actually happening at this moment, much less something that they're planning for.
They're just telling us what they've already done.
I wanted to add, too, just what you were talking about.
You know, when you think of, you know, I've done research, extensive research on the vaccines and the ingredients, Maria, we've talked about that a little bit, and with Todd.
And when you think of Jennifer Granholm, she's the Secretary of Energy.
She oversees a database of lethally toxic mutated hybrid parasites and fungus and bacterium and yeast, over 500,000 pathogens that she is, you know, in charge of.
Now, that's an arsenal of weapons.
That if there is not a plan or, you know, if there's no, what are those, what is the purpose of those?
You know, if there is an intent to harm, to continue to harm humanity, there you have it.
I mean, they're all, you know, globally, there's different countries that have those same kind of databases and they all swap and they sell them so everybody's making money.
But, you know, that's real.
That's a very, very real obstacle that we are facing with this.
Yes, absolutely.
The severity of the situation cannot be understated.
But this is why I'm really encouraged by the work that you've all done, because this may well be the way to expose this to the masses.
Now, I want to ask you, Todd, you've sent me another document, which is the Superior Court of the State of California document.
Is that something that we need to go through today?
Yeah, I think only in so much that it's illustrative of where we are.
There's a change in tide.
So this case, there you go, it's the Ortega case, is brand new.
That happened last week.
It's the first time that we've seen a court, and mind you, this is a state court in California, but it's the first time we've seen a court effectively invalidate the immunity provisions of the PrEP Act.
So this is a wrongful death.
It happens as related to what they call COVID countermeasures.
And the judge says, I don't care.
The PREP Act provides immunities for COVID countermeasures.
This is going to trial.
This is important, even though it's not authority for anywhere outside of California.
It's just a trial court.
At some point, this will go up on appeal and it will become law.
But what it shows us right now is there's a change in appetite and a change in the tide.
Even judges are starting to say, are you kidding me?
We're not going to have this anymore.
So we need a whole lot more judges just like that.
And this judge should be congratulated and supported in every way.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
It takes a lot of courage to go against the grain when every single, you know, seemingly every single judge, every single person involved in these corporations that are operating as the government You know, completely against the people, completely against the actual rule of law.
To see one do the right thing is a huge, huge step in the right direction.
So I'll be praying for this judge.
Where to from here with what you guys have discovered?
Well, I think people should start thinking about this as though they are going to be in the same position, whether they're in the United States or elsewhere, and start prioritizing.
If you were to undo, let's assume that this is correct, if you were to undo the official acts of any of these What would those be?
Because it's our power, Maria.
It's us.
Each of us has the ability, when we embrace this, to act personally.
If that means I'm not going to load the airplane today, I'm not going to arrest that guy for protesting.
Whatever that is, we should look at undoing what has been done and prioritize them.
How about this one, starting with Quote-unquote, Secretary Austin, who made all 1.4 million service members or tried to take a poison shot.
So how do we undo that?
And I just want people to start thinking that way.
Yes, absolutely.
Can we expect to see more on what you've discovered?
I mean, from a legal aspect, I mean.
Yeah, Ken, what are the next steps?
Yeah, so basically what happens is we have to serve the U.S. Attorney, and they get roughly 30 days is what's considered a reasonable time to the courts.
But if they come back and say, all right, we're going to investigate it, which we hope they will.
We're not holding our breath, but we hope that they do that, then great.
Then they're going to file the writ on our behalf, and then they're going to go forward.
If they come back and tell us that they're not going to do it, then we get to go file our writ that we presented.
To the court, and then ultimately the courts gets to decide whether or not they're going to issue the writ and enter the order and the relief in which we've sought.
So right now, we're kind of in a holding period of waiting for the U.S. attorney to either tell us yes or no, or if they're not going to give us any answer within 30 days, then we go to the courts.
Well, it's a huge state of huge public interest, particularly after the viewers of this broadcast see this.
What I'm asking right now is for everyone to share it and get as many people aware of this as possible.
And what I'd love to do is stay in touch with all of you, and we do anyway.
But as soon as there's an update for everyone to make them aware of what the next steps are, We need to get it out there.
This is so huge.
And it's the first time that I'm seeing action like this anywhere.
So, I mean, just a huge thank you to you, Lisa, Todd, and Ken.
Is there anything else that people need to be really aware of before we end today's broadcast?
But I'm expecting a lot more is going to come out of this.
Yeah, really quickly.
Do what Lisa did, because there's no one coming to help us.
It's up to us.
If we don't do it, we're abdicating our own demise.
And I mean that in the sense of our species.
Our species is under attack.
They want us extinct.
Lisa made reference to the biological weapons they have waiting for us.
If it isn't this one, it's going to be another one.
It's up to us.
There's no one coming.
Yeah.
And I think what I've...
It re...
It reminded me that these people don't...
They work for us, a public servant.
It's in the name.
You know, there's one job description.
Work for your constituents.
Work for the public.
It isn't the other way around.
Well, officially they don't, Lisa, but my taxes are still paying for them.
Right, right.
But, you know, I mean, that was the initial mindset, was having, you know, the representatives of the people.
These representatives have suddenly become irritated by those who they serve when they're requesting certain things for their freedom and for their children.
We have to take that back.
That isn't how it's supposed to work.
Yes, no.
Do you know what?
I agree with you, Lisa.
I recently questioned something that was happening at the New South Wales elections here in Australia.
And there seemed to be someone who seemingly had a ballot paper and he had an eraser and he looked like he was changing something.
So I just put something out on social media and I said, look...
It appears to be this.
If anyone has more information, please contact us.
I'm media.
I do that.
So does the mainstream all the time, right?
Looks like this.
Not sure.
Let me know if you have more info.
Well, the AP fact checkers came in and, you know, marked it as false information.
I challenged them on it.
They actually came back and apologized and removed the flag.
I said, I'm media.
The mainstream media does this all the time.
I've not made any accusations.
I was simply asking questions.
In the meantime, the Australian Electoral Commission, which is responsible for the federal election, comes into my comments saying the New South Wales election has already debunked these misinformation claims, this, that and the other.
Anyway, the people just responded to the Australian Electoral Commission and said, no, hang on, we have genuine questions here and you have to answer them.
So I came out with a public message for everyone and for these public servants.
The reason that you, Australian Electoral Commission social media worker, were able to put food in your child's mouth tonight at your family dinner table is because of my taxes.
You absolute fool!
You behave so arrogantly, yet my taxes, me, me working, you Makes you able to pay your mortgage.
So you better stop being so arrogant about it because I'm actually the reason you're employed.
Well, think about it.
They despise the very people who keep them thriving.
I mean, you know, that's what it is, too.
They despise those that they are expected to, you know, to help them live the lifestyles that they do.
And it's very obvious.
And they're cowards.
You know, that's another thing that we have to Remember, they're weak and they are cowards and they will, there's no, you know, I really think that it is going to crumble because there's no allegiance even within themselves.
Yes.
It's survival.
I mean, they're going to eat each other, literally, probably, because it's...
A house divided against itself will always fall, and that is what these people have.
They are all divided against one another.
Anyone who thinks that they're protected against what is coming is so deceived, and they will see how quickly each of them will turn on one another.
There is no allegiance.
And, you know, whoever it is that they're employed by or serving...
Which ultimately Satan is at the head of these people, but whoever it is officially that they're employed by and serving would turn them over to the lions in the den in a heartbeat.
Yeah, absolutely.
Communists have a habit of eating their own.
Just look at history.
Yeah.
Well, thank you all so...
Sorry.
Do go on.
Well, I just said, I'd like to end on this, you know, for years they have had their, you know, Feet on us, a foot on us, and they've tried to control us, but they have gravely underestimated the power and the resilience of all of God's living beings, and that is what we have to remind people to.
I agree.
I absolutely agree.
You know, this is just one example of what people can do when they have determination and they're not afraid.
And they're not afraid to stand up to these people and remind them, no, actually, my value is much greater than what you're placing on me because I'm a child of God.
I'm a creation of God.
And the natural order of things is as far surpasses the laws that they are just making up as they go.
So I really, really admire all three of you.
And for everyone watching, don't let the authorities walk all over you.
I know that people are becoming stronger in this.
They're saying, no, you can't talk to me like this, or you can't do this, or whatever it may be.
They're putting their foot down, and that's exactly what we need to do to all of these New World Order goons.
Todd, Ken, and Lisa, thank you so much, and we look forward to speaking with you again in the future.
God bless you for your efforts, Maria.
You're making a difference.
There you are.
Well, the implications of this, as you can see, are huge, and it's just proof that the power is still with the people.
The more that we discover, the more that we expose, the more that we push back.
Well, let's just say the rats keep leaving the sinking ship, but we will hold them to account.
Who are you really working for?
Who are you really working for?
Because this certainly isn't The people that you're collecting taxes from for your wages.
This is treasonous.
Now, I always talk about preparation because the more that comes out, the closer we get to the cyber shutdown.
I mean it.
They have this in their sights.
So please, if you're in the United States, head to heavensharvest.com, use promo code Z with three E's for 5% off your order for the very, very high quality emergency survival food, heirloom seed kits, Water infiltration and storage.
Really, really good quality products.
Very affordable.
And I can't emphasize enough how important water, food and heirloom seeds are.
If you're in Australia, head to Survival Supplies Australia.
One-stop shop for all of your survival needs.
Sat123.com forward slash Maria.
Special promotion if you use my link.
For very, very affordable military-grade satellite communications and backup power.
You need this when the grid goes down.
You will need it.
They will limit your communications.
All you'll have is the EBS and the government's messaging.
And who are the government?
Well, they're certainly not working legally within the US Constitution, and I'm sure it's the same in every other country.
Prepare for the economic collapse with Gold Bullion Australia Group.
They have offices spanning all over Australia, Singapore.
Fantastic people.
And they really, really are people that we trust.
So the leading supplier of gold and silver bullion in the country, in my opinion.
And get mRNA guaranteed.
This is a Stockman Steaks guarantee.
mRNA free meat.
100% pasture raised, non-GMO, no hormones.
And make sure that you're getting the nutrition that you deserve.
And your family deserves why we fight the globalists legally, peacefully.
And we do it the right way.
We do it with integrity.
Not like these people operating in treason.
We're doing things the right way because we're people of integrity.
And let me tell you, the truth always wins.
That's why we'll never, ever give up the fight.
God bless you all.
Share this interview everywhere.
Let the people of the world know that these people are operating treasonously.
And we have the proof.
Make this viral.
I'll see you all next week right here on Uncensored.
God bless you.
Don't ever let the tyrants rule your mind and know that we are making a difference.
▲
Export Selection