All Episodes
Previous Next
April 14, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
48:40
LIVE: Uncensored: UN "Emergency Platform" Declares Antonio Guterres As Dictator of the WORLD!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
to deal with new international emergencies.
Earlier this week on Uncensored, we explained how the WHO, UN and other members of the quadripartite response to emergencies would be able to come into a country that is not complying with a pandemic situation, mandate and force other member states of the WHO to enforce their mandates on others.
This will enable foreign New World Order goons to go to any lengths to punish a country or people within that country that don't comply, as revealed to us by Dr.
Tess Laurie more than a year ago when she first sounded the alarm on this.
In a new document published by the UN in March of this year called Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks, an emergency platform, the UN is proposing an automatic trigger for certain protocols.
Now, rather than offering specifics, the policy brief offers broad categories and types of emergencies that might activate said global protocols.
These include climate or environmental events, environmental degradation, pandemics, accidental or deliberate release of biological agents, disruption in the flow of goods, people or finance, disruptions in cyberspace or global digital connectivity, Cyber Polygon, anyone?
Listen to this.
A major event in outer space.
And unforeseen risks.
Whatever they are.
So the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres would decide when to activate said protocols.
He would also identify all participants and oversee their contributions to the response.
Contributions mentioned in the document include everything from providing money to changing government policy.
That's right, changing laws according to the UN. So there's no pushback from the people, there's no bills, there's no referendums.
Change the laws because Guterres said so.
We're going to dissect this document and it's truly shocking after this short break and a word from one of the sponsors of this show.
It is your support of our sponsors that make it possible for us to continue getting the truth out there and we're proud to partner with freedom-loving businesses.
We'll be right back in just a moment.
If you'd like a shortcut to better sleep, more energy, a calmer, more stable mood, then you should make sure that you're supplementing with magnesium daily.
I'm going to tell you why.
About 75% of people are magnesium deficient.
This deficiency can lead to higher levels of anxiety, irritability, trouble sleeping, low energy, and can even contribute to foot and leg cramps while you sleep.
I mean, the results are really devastating.
And most of us are magnesium deficient.
Now you might be wondering, does magnesium really affect all these things?
Well, the answer is yes.
In fact, magnesium is involved in more than 300 chemical processes inside your body.
So a lot of different things can start to go wrong if you're deficient.
The good news is that you can experience a number of positive health benefits from just getting enough magnesium including better sleep, more energy, stronger bones, healthy blood pressure, less irritability, calmer mood, reduced muscle cramping and fewer migraines.
But to experience these health benefits, you have to get the right kind of magnesium.
There are actually seven unique forms of magnesium, and you must get all of them if you want to experience its calming, health-enhancing effects.
That's why I recommend Magnesium Breakthrough by Bioptimizers.
It's the only organic full-spectrum magnesium supplement that includes all seven unique forms of magnesium for stress relief and better sleep all in one bottle.
Visit magnesiumbreakthrough.com forward slash Maria and order now.
And in addition to the discount you get by using promo code Maria, there are always amazing promos and gifts with your purchases.
Go now to magbreakthrough.com forward slash Maria to get your Magnesium Breakthrough and find out this month's surprise promo.
Alright, so the document is called Our Common Agenda Policy Brief 2 Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks, an emergency platform.
It was published in March of this year by the United Nations.
Straight away in the introduction, you see them say that the challenges we face can only be addressed through stronger international cooperation.
I would say the challenges we face could be addressed by completely exiting from any global cooperation with these disgusting organizations like the United Nations.
They're saying that they're calling for a summit of the future in 2024, which just so happens to be the year that the WHO wants to finalize the treaty or the IHR.
And they're saying that it's an opportunity to agree on multilateral solutions for a better tomorrow, strengthening global governance.
For both present and future generations.
Now, they say that the policy brief aims to elaborate on the proposal on the emergency platform, which we're going to discuss, to respond to complex global shocks, incorporating feedback received from member states and other relevant partners.
Now, with those Partners, apologies, with the other relevant partners or the people that are representing us within the member states, we don't even know who they are.
We don't even know who these people are Who put them there?
Why are they representing us?
And it says here that the emergency platform would not be a standing body or entity but a set of protocols that could be activated when needed.
So an automatic triggering of whatever protocols they're saying activated whenever is needed.
We'll keep going.
So it highlights how such shocks have the potential to undermine progress to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and 2030 Agenda, as well as Human Rights and Gender Equality.
So what are those Sustainable Development Goals?
We've been through them in length here, but if you watch the previous report that I did from, say, C40 and Arup, the report was about smart cities and how The Sustainable Development Goals basically are calling for zero meat consumption, limited travel, 1500 kilometers per person every three years, no private vehicle ownership, all of those sorts of things.
So what they're saying is these things are threatening our Sustainable Development Goals, as in if we don't squash The dissent to the things that are going to enable us to achieve you eating no meat, you not moving more than 15 minutes, those are the threats.
And for some reason, the human rights and gender equality, I mean, what sort of human rights are we talking about?
There was a complete violation of our human rights during COVID. We all know that.
So what human rights exactly are at risk here?
You're talking about forcefully injecting people at the WHO. What human rights are at risk here?
What gender equality risks do we have?
I am a woman.
I don't feel like I need more gender equality.
I'm able to do all the things that men can do.
I can stream.
I can have a business.
I can earn an income.
I have a voice.
I have a voice in the public.
What gender equality issues are we actually facing?
I'm not going to get into the various issues Agendas of the feminist movement and what really isn't about feminism right now.
But my point is that I'm sure that many women would agree we're not facing gender equality issues.
This isn't a thing.
More than anything, I think that they're talking about transgenderism as a whole being represented by the gender equality thing.
That's the main thing they want to do and that, of course, is intricately linked with the transhumanist movement.
We'll continue.
Throughout the document you've got themes of, well the whole theme is you know how we would have succeeded so much better with the COVID-19 pandemic if we had a better global response and we would have got so many more people injected had the United Nations just had all the power to do this because there's no other organization like the United Nations with the legitimacy convening power and normative impact.
You know, it's unbelievable.
But the point I'm trying to make here is they keep referencing COVID-19 because this was what they used as the catalyst to call for global government, global power.
You all understand this.
But hopefully there'll be people who don't know about this yet that watch this report.
You know, the ultimate goal, as we've explored so much on Uncensored and on everything that Z Media produces on our end and the Stu Peters Network, the ultimate goal is indefinite injections, just a life of injections and needing to be injected preemptively and so on and so forth.
And I'm sure that'll be clear as we continue going through this.
So who is coming together on this emergency platform and saying it's not a new permanent body, standing body or institution.
It's going to be triggered automatically in crisis or sufficient scale magnitude, regardless of the type or nature of crisis involved.
So anything that they say is a crisis, literally anything.
And it's saying once activated, it'll bring together leaders from the member states, whoever they may be, the United Nations system, key country groupings, international financial institutions, oh BlackRock, Vanguard, regional bodies, civil society, the private sector, Subjects, specific industries or research bodies and other experts.
So essentially anyone that goes along with what they want to achieve has got a seat at the table to make sure that it's achieved.
No one else is invited, just like we saw during COVID. Anyone that dares say, hang on a minute, we're not sure about this.
Yeah, those people aren't represented in this emergency platform.
So the most notable thing on this page, what are complex global shocks, is this part where it talks about current global dynamics such as climate change and rapid biodiversity loss, heightened geopolitical competition and socioeconomic inequalities could all interact to intensify.
The impact of a future global shock.
Such shocks hit the most vulnerable and marginalised people, blah, blah, blah.
Point is, they are the ones that are creating these global shocks, and we all know that, or alleged global shocks.
But here, not every crisis or shock should be classified as complex or global.
But they could be.
It said not every shock should be classified as complex or global.
But they can.
So they've said some emergencies will only require a sector-specific response.
Similarly, local, national or regional shocks that do not have global consequences would not necessarily be categorised as global shocks.
But they might be.
So, you know how when Dan Andrews, the dictator of Victoria, brought in his pandemic legislation, for those watching from countries outside of Australia, it essentially meant that he has the power to declare a pandemic whenever he wants, and it can be based on absolutely anything that he wants, even if no pandemic situation is present.
This was a test For this type of UN power that would enable people, you know, there was a lot of public pushback in that.
You had MPs at the table pushing back against this.
It got through in the end anyway, as all of these things seem to be doing now.
But the point is that what they're calling for here is an automatic change in laws and legislations that would enable their Required or their desired response.
And there would be no public discourse available.
And again, I bring you to these words that say, would not necessarily be categorized as global shocks, even if it's regional, so on and so forth.
But it might.
And that's the same thing that they tested first and foremost in Victoria.
For those who haven't seen my report on the Melbourne experiment, that was a huge report that I did some time ago on Infowars.
Hundreds of thousands of views and it outlines how the United Nations actually boasts about what they did, how they tested on the people of Victoria.
It's absolutely disgusting.
But all of these little test cases that we saw were leading up to this one global control, global government Emergency platform.
We'll keep going.
So I went through some of these at the start, but we'll just highlight them here again.
We must be ready to respond to a range of different global shocks in the future.
So we're talking about large-scale climatic or environmental events that cause major socio-economic disruptions and or environmental degradation.
I don't know.
Will a train wreck in Ohio constitute a global shock?
Future pandemics with cascading secondary impacts.
Again, we know they've changed the definition of pandemics.
And just on these large-scale climatic events, I mean, back to that, they're saying that climate change is the biggest risk to the world right now.
Biden just said it again.
They can create a crisis anytime they want and just call it a crisis, even if it's not so.
High-impact events involving a biological agent deliberate or accidental So they're allowing for the deliberate release of biological agents because they've done it once.
They can do it again.
Events leading to disruptions to global flows of good people or finance.
Could that be a protest in a country that's responsible for supplying something crucial to the world?
And all of a sudden that's a global shock and every single country needs to respond.
I mean, imagine the control that this will put in place if a country like the Netherlands, for example, protests, if the farmers are protesting because it's going to impact the world that they're trying to grab their land.
All of a sudden that's a global shock and every single country goes into lockdown.
Do you know how much this will...
Turn people against each other.
Imagine the division this will cause.
Because all of a sudden, now the whole world is impacted by this global shock, e.g.
the farmers protesting in the Netherlands.
So all the people that don't realise what's going on, You know, just as they turned on the uninjected during the time of COVID and said that, you know, that wished for our death.
Imagine all those people now when another country that has nothing to do with us, but all of a sudden we're one world, one government, one system, one everything.
The people will turn against each other so much more viciously.
And I'm sure that everyone can see that.
Large-scale destructive and or disruptive activity in cyberspace or disruptions to global digital connectivity, which they're going to manufacture.
They've been wargaming this for how long?
Through Cyber Polygon.
They did the test run in Canada.
They're test running a lot in Australia right now with all the various so-called cyber attacks.
You know, when all those customers had their details, apparently, Stolen in a major telco cyber attack.
No one's had their identity stolen or messed with since then.
And that's not to say that they won't do it, you know, or pretend that hackers have done something with that data.
But the point is that I dare say they're the ones coordinating all of these events.
And you go to a major event in outer space that causes severe disruptions to one or several critical systems on Earth.
What?
What event in outer space are they talking about?
I don't know, Project Bluebeam?
Fake UFO invasion?
I don't know.
Seems plausible.
Unforeseen risks, Black Swan events, and we'll get into that.
So these are saying the range of risks that could potentially lead to future complex global shocks is broad and diverse and there are several potential future shocks in which the multilateral response architecture is underdeveloped or non-existent.
Here's a little image that someone who's likely paid far too much spent a lot of time on of these complex global shocks.
And then of course they go on to talk about how these global shocks will severely undermine the progress towards the sustainable development goals which is what I mentioned before.
These are their goals.
These are not goals that we need to be working towards and what they mean is people that don't go along with their plans To further advance the Great Reset Agenda 2030, those are actually the risks.
The risks are things that stop them from advancing their goals.
So one of the things that they identified as an example of how these global shocks impact their agenda is the fact that fewer women and girls across the world have received vaccinations than men and boys, even though most healthcare workers are women and have consequently been more exposed to the virus.
So in other words...
One thing that we've identified is that we want to persistently inject people and we realise that for whatever reason fewer women are getting these injections.
We want to make them all infertile so this is a risk to our agenda.
That's what it really means.
Alright, so I won't read through all of these, but there are some key ones to pay attention to.
They're talking about people living in extreme poverty.
Conflict, COVID-19, climate change and growing inequalities are converging to undermine food security worldwide.
Nothing to do with the purposeful destruction of food manufacturing plants and taking the farmer's land.
No, it's not that.
22.7 million children missed basic vaccines in 2020.
3.7 million more than 2019.
Wonderful.
It is wonderful.
As of mid-2022, 500 million people had been infected by COVID-19, leading to 15 million deaths!
Yes, by remdesivir and your ridiculous protocols and the injections, of course.
They talk about the COVID-19 pandemic.
Again, the biggest catalyst for their plans for the Great Reset.
Cause the first rise between country income inequality in a generation.
With the richest 10% of the world's population owning 76% of international wealth.
That's not by design, guys!
We want everyone to be rich and wealthy and have everything, but you will own nothing and you'll be happy.
Very conflicting statements there.
They talk about during the pandemic, many cities face strained health and transport systems and increased homelessness and other challenges.
At the same time, it was estimated that local governments would yield lower revenues.
So they want to strengthen local governments because, as I mentioned to you before, it's a top-down approach.
It's the world government and then the cities, the mayors and the local councils Enforcing the smart city agenda, which is crucial to their success in Agenda 2030.
They also talk about consumption rates.
So that's something that we covered in that report that was published in conjunction with C40 Cities and Arup, where they want less consumption.
You know, only three articles of clothing, new articles of clothing being purchased every year, so on and so forth.
Ah!
Energy-related CO2 emissions for 2021 rose by 6%.
Listen to this.
Erasing pandemic-related declines.
What does that mean?
Erasing pandemic-related declines.
Remember the Melbourne experiment?
The UN document about the Melbourne experiment?
How this was so great for the climate, having everyone locked up?
So they're talking, they're saying that during the pandemic, CO2 emissions declined.
Therefore, that's been erased and we need to come back to those CO2 levels by locking everyone up and restricting their movement.
You see how this works?
So here's where their justification for global government comes in.
They talk about the two most recent global shocks.
They speak about some history of previous global shocks, but the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 global cost of living crisis, which they created, provide some useful lessons on how we might strengthen the international response to such shocks.
They crap on about the COVID-19 pandemic and how it's touched every part of the globe.
But listen to this.
The result was a global response to COVID that was insufficiently coordinated and not driven by international solidarity.
I've spoken about the ways that they use words because they understand.
The devil knows the power of words very well.
And so they understand that if you use certain words, you actually invert what...
The goal is you present it as something positive and, you know, we need international solidarity instead of worldwide government and global control.
And so they, listen here, the stark inequities in vaccine distribution lighted profound weaknesses in how we share life-saving commodities in a crisis.
And this is why they're building all of these vaccine manufacturing plants all over the place, Australia being one of the main ones.
Although innovative global mechanisms such as the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator, the COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access Facility, and the African Vaccine Acquisition Trust were rapidly launched to ensure that all countries had access to vaccines and other critical tools, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
The point is they want...
Rapid.
Vaccine.
Not vaccine, but that's their word.
Injections in future.
Whatever global crisis we're facing, they want injections deployed rapidly, en masse, all the time.
This is their goal, to constantly be injecting you, to turn you into a walking cyborg.
So how do they want this combated?
Again, rapid, predictable and structured international response.
Maximising the unique convening of the United Nations, catalyzing political leadership through networks of willing member states.
Yes, that's all those people that are representing us that no one wants.
Multisectoral interdisciplinary coordination across the multilateral system, multi-stakeholder engagement, and this one.
Strengthened accountability for delivering against commitments and bringing coherence to the international response.
Do we understand those words?
Strengthened accountability.
Strengthened accountability means do it or else.
And like we highlighted earlier this week on Uncensored, if you haven't seen it, please do go and watch it.
They want to send people from other countries, representatives from other countries, into your country if your people aren't complying.
So the whole, where everyone says, just don't comply, don't comply.
Well, they're trying to develop a system where non-compliance Results in punishment.
It's not like last time where you just don't comply and, you know, we'll get through it and we tightened the belt and tightened our pockets and yes, we lost so much but we got through it.
No, no, this is going to ensure the accountability aspect ensures that no one gets to not comply without punishment in future.
It's very, very dangerous.
I'm not understating this.
So in this long-winded response on how to strengthen the international response to global Do you remember I reported on legislation in Australia that was brought into Victoria that allows the United Nations
to come into concentration camps, quarantine facilities.
And interrogate citizens and refuse them the right to a support person.
I reported on this last year.
Now, what this is calling for is that to be formalized everywhere.
Again, that was a test of what they can get away with in legislation, but what this is calling for is the ability to change those laws and implement them everywhere at the drop of a hat at any time that they call for a crisis.
It is so, so dangerous.
I mean, if we allow this, this is the end of freedom as we know it forever.
And all of these, you know, like Bill S686 in the United States right now, the Trojan horse disguising itself as protecting children from TikTok, but it's actually about silencing speech forever and imprisoning those who disagree with the government, past, present or future.
Those sorts of laws would just be automatically passed as Antonio Guterres sees fit.
So to give you an idea of how far they can actually take this, this section talks about the factors that would be considered as part of the decision to convene an emergency platform.
So it includes the severity of a crisis, which includes the consideration of the acuity of the primary and secondary impacts of a crisis, including metrics such as the number of people adversely affected, the impact on global economic indicators, And or the scale of the environmental damage.
So like they did with COVID where they said, oh, our modelling suggests X amount of millions of people can die.
That's the kind of modelling we would be seeing.
It's based on their predictions, their false data, their fake statistics, again, telling us the scale of such a crisis or global impact.
It's the same made-up nonsense that That they can at any time manufacture a crisis again, like they did with COVID. Reach of a crisis again.
They can just determine the reach at any time they want.
These people make it up as they go.
Complexity, including the consideration of whether the crisis is a multi-dimensional, multi-sectoral and interconnected crisis that requires cooperation across pillars and sectors in national governments, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Point is, they did this with COVID. They told us, oh, this is going to do X, Y, Z, when it really didn't have to do any of that.
You know, if COVID was real, if it was real, everyone could have gotten infected, gotten over it.
It had a 99.99% survival rate and the world would have been normal still to this day.
But because of the ways that they said they're going to manage it, the same people that want complete global control now, it caused absolute carnage and chaos in order to achieve their goals.
And this is exactly what they're proposing now, but for any crisis that they see fit.
They say existing coordination and operational response mechanisms, consideration of whether there could be an adequate response to a shock through an existing sector-specific mechanism, whether they can use existing mechanisms that are already there.
I dare say that this is You know, why they're calling for global vaccine pass, global this, global that.
They want all of these mechanisms in place by 2024 in order to use these existing mechanisms because they keep telling us the mechanisms they have now aren't sufficient.
That's why we need a global vax pass.
That's why we need digital ID. That's why we need digital currency, so on and so forth.
So I'm not going to read all of the detail within this, but basically they want high level political leadership, which means Just the shock callers.
Ensure equity and solidarity in international response, meaning everyone agrees or else.
Coherent multilateral response so that they can all agree upon, advocate and implement these responses.
Inclusive and networked multilateralism.
We all know what that means.
Advocacy in strategic communications.
Making sure that we're silencing anyone that doesn't agree like we did in COVID. And This is the point again.
Ensuring that all participating actors make commitments that can contribute meaningfully to the response and that they are held to account for delivery on those commitments.
So they will be held to account if they don't meet the required response commitments or respond in accordance with the protocols.
So what happens when someone's held to account?
They go to extreme measures to make sure those protocols are adhered to or achieved, the goals achieved.
So the fact that they're talking so much about accountability here, it should alarm everyone.
Because the people that are representing, anyone who agrees with the UN goals or the WHO treaty goals or the IHR amendment goals or whatever, does not have humanity's best interest at heart.
And as we saw during COVID, they will go to extreme measures to violate your human rights, violate your freedoms, violate your body.
Your income, your livelihood, your household.
They will go to extreme lengths to violate those things in order to achieve their goals.
And if they're all held to account, and we don't know what that accountability looks like, but surely it would be the threat of loss of their job or their position within the prestigious UN or whatever it may be.
You know, the virtue signaling that they used last time.
You know, do this to save the planet.
I've spoken about that a lot in great detail, about the psychology behind this wording and how they fooled so many decent people.
You know, you do this in order to achieve this.
You're helping the planet.
You're helping save humanity.
You're helping future generations.
This is what they're using in the climate change rhetoric agenda.
So this is how they're going to achieve this through the participating people who are responsible You know, if they're fooled, they'll be fooled through this language of saving the planet.
And then, of course, we have some of them that just fully understand the agenda and what the final outcome is, which is the mark of the beast, and we've spoken about that in great detail.
But we'll continue.
So the timeframe of the emergency platform, well, that's up to Gutierrez.
At the end of the period of what they...
So initially they want a finite period for the emergency platform.
Like with COVID, emergency declaration, state of emergency, so on and so forth.
And it ends on this date.
Oh, but we'll keep extending it.
Yeah, this is saying the same thing.
At the end of the period of the emergency platform, the Secretary-General could extend the work of an emergency platform if required, but it would not become a standing body or entity again because they are still mindful of the fact that they're saying that, you know, it would fully respect the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of individual states.
Really?
The work of an emergency platform would be based on the principle that each state has primary responsibility for responding to the needs of the persons affected, so on and so forth.
Need I remind you what they did during COVID? Need I remind you that there was a coordinated lockstep approach in every single country that had zero respect for human rights, dignity, freedoms, movement, choices.
So I highly doubt that all of a sudden the United Nations has changed their mind and said, no, this time we're going to respect you.
They had no respect for you.
They treated you as subhuman.
And believe you me, they will do it again.
And here they talk about the, once a decision has been taken to convene and operationalize an emergency platform, multilateral entities with technical expertise relevant to the nature of the complex global shock would be requested to provide staff secondments to support the work of the emergency platform.
In other words, anyone that's aligned with the agenda Any so-called expert, like we had during the time of COVID, you know, the experts say, well, this is the same thing.
So a climate expert, an economic expert, you know, all of these experts that really just are pushing the agenda.
And a roster of the staff with relevant technical expertise would be prepared in advance.
In advance, which tells you that they've already earmarked the people.
That they want responding to these global shocks on this emergency platform.
They've already got their goons for you.
So they talk here a little bit about resourcing, getting resources from different member states like we spoke about earlier in the week in relation to the WHO's or the EU's proposed amendments to the treaty in the IHR where other countries would be called in to provide resources.
An enforcement of the mandates.
And again, we see that word mandate in here, protocols for an emergency platform.
If the General Assembly provides a mandate for the Secretary General and United Nations system to convene and operationalise an emergency platform, detailed internal protocols would need to be developed by the UN system to agree on specific steps that cover a range of scenarios.
Anything that the UN proposes will be detrimental to To the safety of human beings, I can guarantee you that.
So then again, a recap, the recommendation for the Member States, recalling the commitments made, so on and so forth.
But they're talking about improving preparedness, not only for health-related crises, but also for other challenges and crises.
So in other words, not just pandemics, but in every single circumstance, we want the power, we want the control, And that, you know, again, they go on about climate change, gender equality, gender goals, sustainable development goals, so on and so forth.
But here's the part.
He's telling them to agree to decide that the Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, has a standing authority to automatically convene and operationalize, it's a very militant word, an emergency platform in the event of Complex global shocks of significant scale, severity and reach based on Gutierrez determining that something is a global shock of significant scale, severity and reach.
Whatever he says.
So again, like the test run with Dan Andrews in Victoria, the baby test run of I say there's a pandemic just because there is.
Someone sneezed in Croatia and now we have a pandemic.
This is what this is.
Antonio Guterres says, oh, someone threw a plastic bottle in the ocean in India?
We now have a global shock.
I mean, I'm being silly now, but this is how far-reaching this document is.
And again, because all the power is being given to Guterres to determine this, and he's telling people, you must consent to give me standing authority.
And decide that the emergency platform would not be a standing body or institution, but a set of protocols that could be activated in the event of a global crisis.
Again, deciding that he will convene the emergency platform in response to the complex global shock.
Again, what we've been through all of this, providing high-level political leadership, so on and so forth, is really just a recap.
At the end of the day, to say that I'm asking you, all the member states, to agree that I, Antonio Guterres, have the power to determine a global shock or crisis.
And all of the decision making and all of the protocols are done by me.
And if you don't do what I say, you'll be held to account.
Absolutely shocking.
Now, at the same time, the United Nations published this document, which is to think and act for future generations.
Again, March 2023.
And this document outlines basically the same stuff that this one.
It's like an excuse for why we need this.
And I'm not going to go through the whole thing because it is really just a bunch of words excusing why Antonio Guterres wants all the power.
But they've included one graph which I do want to show you.
This is their sort of history of the commitment to future generations.
And they go through all of the times in the past where they've done this from the Charter of the UN in 1945 onwards.
And this is the 2024 summit of the future.
And the reason why that's so important is because it aligns.
That year 2024 really aligns with the WHO wanting to get their treaty IHR amendments through.
It seems to be a very, very key year for these people.
So that's what they're calling it, Summit of the Future.
And we have limited information about this summit thus far, but this is where they want to embed all of this stuff permanently by next year.
Now the one thing that I'm absolutely certain of is that there will be a lot of pushback on this.
People don't want Antonio Guterres to have power over the whole world.
And there will be a lot of uproar in many, many different facets of government.
There's already people that are opposing this in the United States, but how do they overcome that?
Will they just create a new crisis?
And they told us that cyber attacks would be coming over the next two years.
They're talking about it in this document, you know, global connectivity.
What does that mean?
It means the whole grid being shut down.
It means all internet shut down so that they can then bring in their, oh, will you only come back online if you have a digital vaccine, if you remember.
The WEF website that said that in regards to cyber polygons.
So it really is clear that they are fully planning to try this on and it's so important for people to stand up against it and demand an exit out of the WHO, out of the United Nations, you know, with the few people with a soul left in government to do this now.
Otherwise, if the United Nations takes over like this, if the WHO takes over like this, the future is very grim.
And I'm not going to sugarcoat that for people.
It's important that people understand how serious this is.
If I don't tell you the worst possible outcome, you may not think it's so bad, but it is.
It's very, very bad.
And we have to push back against this.
Like I said already, some lawmakers in the United States are pushing back on this and we have to demand an exit out of the UN. We can't go along with this.
No one in their right mind would want to give one single person, who's a lunatic by the way, Power to declare a an emergency platform emergency situation based on absolutely anything that they pluck out of thin air any circumstance it is so far-reaching it is unbelievable but it's also not so unbelievable because we've seen what they're capable of and believe me that was just a taste of what they would do to mankind if
they could if they had the chance and this document this agreement this emergency platform will give them that chance So in the meantime, very important to prepare.
You all know I talk about this often.
I talk about the businesses that support us being carefully selected and I believe in them.
It's things that I do myself.
So if you're in the United States, head to heavensharvest.com, promo code Z with three E's for 5% off your order.
Get some emergency survival food.
Grow your own stuff.
Get some heirloom seeds from them.
Don't delay on this.
Please educate yourself on survival now.
Survival Supplies Australia, all of your survival needs.
Food, water, camping gear, hiking gear, off-grid gear, power sources, everything.
The financial system is so unstable right now.
They are determined to smash the US dollar.
And it's all...
I mean, it's so uncertain right now.
But the one thing that is interesting to me is that BRICS is going to be based on precious metals or other rare earth minerals.
And so I really do believe in precious metals.
I've done this myself.
If you're in Australia, head to goldbullyingaustralia.com.au.
Link in the description below and let them know you've come from Z Media.
Alternative communications for when the grid goes down.
Sat123.com forward slash Maria.
Military grade satellite communications.
Seriously, the best that we have found in the world.
Stockman Steaks, if you're in Australia as well, link in the description below.
Stockmansteaks.com.au forward slash Maria for guaranteed mRNA free meat.
Not only that, they're non-hormone.
They are, you know, these cows are grass-fed, pasture-raised, not just cows, but lamb and chicken as well in their boxes.
You can customize your boxes and you'll be supporting Aussie farmers and creating the parallel economy that we so desperately need.
You know, one thing people don't realize is that your wallet talks.
And if people en masse pull their money out of these globalist organizations that are just feeding on your money, Stop shopping at the major chains.
Move your money to freedom-loving businesses.
Support them.
Create the parallel economy that we so desperately need.
We'll bankrupt these fools quicker than you can say Antonio Guterres.
We saw that with Bud Light.
They've lost billions.
And yes, it is just a dent in the conglomerate, but that dent will continue to grow as long as people commit to not supporting these globalist institutions.
And as the awareness grows of what this new world order is actually about and the fact that they want to bankrupt every single individual, like I said recently, we may not have agreed on lockdowns, we may not have agreed on vaccines, we may not have agreed on all these other things, but the one thing that I do think will unite the people is central bank digital currency and the truth of the Great Reset, you know, not travelling and things like that.
People want to travel.
I recently spoke with someone who has a mild idea of the agenda but doesn't care all that much.
Loves to go on holidays, though.
And when I told that person, do you know that Agenda 2030, as of 2030, you won't be able to travel more than 1,500 kilometres every three years.
Do you know that?
So consider this wonderful trip that you're about to go on potentially your last.
Well, they didn't like that very much.
They paid attention when I said that.
So talk to people.
See what it is that they value most and let them know how this Agenda aims to destroy it.
We need more people involved in this space.
We need them.
So share this interview.
This interview.
It's not an interview.
I'm so used to that.
Share this video everywhere so that people can be educated on what is really going on behind the scenes, what these maniacs are trying to implement.
I mean, I'm usually much, much more outraged when I present this stuff, but I tried to keep my cool here today so that more people would be receptive to it.
But the reality is this is the most dangerous, most dangerous global takeover that could possibly occur in line with what the WHO is currently trying to do with their treaty or IHR amendments.
These two paired, it's game over.
And we cannot and will not let them get away with it.
We are stronger than them.
We are smarter than them.
We have more heart and more courage than them.
They will not win as long as we do not give up.
Thank you to all of the loyal people out there who are loyal, not to me, not to this network, but to the truth.
Thank you for never giving in to this satanic globalist cabal because that's what they are.
Please understand the importance of your faith in these times.
The more perilous it gets, the more we need Jesus.
If you haven't yet spoken to him about where this world is heading, speak to him today.
He's waiting.
He's waiting for every single person on this earth.
He loves them.
He gave his life for them because he knew that times like this would come where we could depend on no one but God.
This is the reason why I speak.
I'm more concerned for your soul than anything else.
And for mine too at that.
So it is a time where we have to keep our faith strong.
And I know that the viewers of this broadcast for the most part know that.
There are a lot of people that don't believe in God that watch this.
I really, really hope that my words will stick in your mind and in your heart when the time comes where you don't have a choice.
And that's okay.
His grace will be there waiting for you.
God bless you all and thank you again for tuning in today.
▲
Export Selection