All Episodes
Previous Next
April 7, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
46:32
LIVE: Uncensored: The IHR/Treaty DEATH Sentence to Freedom & How To Stop It with James Roguski
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
It's confusing so that people wouldn't know how to approach the public servants whose wages are paid by them.
We're getting reports of politicians replying that Australia's just working on trying to enhance our pandemic preparedness.
Really?
What does that mean, public servant?
What propositions have been made by these people that we don't know that are representing us at the WHO and the World Health Assembly meetings?
No one knows who these people are.
No one asked for them to represent us.
What kind of discussions are they having about pandemic preparedness?
What do you know about pandemic preparedness?
What does it actually mean?
What's being proposed as pandemic preparedness?
Do we agree with what's being proposed as pandemic preparedness?
What is your understanding and your agreement?
Are you in agreement with forced injections?
That's a problem.
That's medical rape.
That's what the WHO wants to do.
So James Rogoski is going to join me in a moment right after this short word from one of our sponsors.
To further clarify this for everyone and help people in the discussions that they're having with their so-called elected representatives, who once again are able to pay their bills because of our taxes, the people really need to remember what power they have.
And this should be the number one topic of discussion in every single politician's office, let me tell you.
We'll be right back after this short break.
If you'd like a shortcut to better sleep, more energy, a calmer, more stable mood, then you should make sure that you're supplementing with magnesium daily.
I'm gonna tell you why.
About 75% of people are magnesium deficient.
This deficiency can lead to higher levels of anxiety, irritability, trouble sleeping, low energy, and can even contribute to foot and leg cramps while you sleep.
I mean, the results are really devastating.
And most of us are magnesium deficient.
Now you might be wondering, does magnesium really affect all these things?
Well, the answer is yes.
In fact, magnesium is involved in more than 300 chemical processes inside your body.
So a lot of different things can start to go wrong if you're deficient.
The good news is that you can experience a number of positive health benefits from just getting enough magnesium, including better sleep, more energy, stronger bones, healthy blood pressure, less irritability, calmer mood, reduced muscle cramping and fewer migraines.
But to experience these health benefits, you have to get the right kind of magnesium.
There are actually seven unique forms of magnesium, and you must get all of them if you want to experience its calming, health-enhancing effects.
That's why I recommend Magnesium Breakthrough by Bioptimizers.
It's the only organic full-spectrum magnesium supplement that includes all seven unique forms of magnesium for stress relief and better sleep all in one bottle.
Visit magnesiumbreakthrough.com forward slash Maria and order now.
And in addition to the discount you get by using promo code Maria, there are always amazing promos and gifts with your purchases.
Go now to magbreakthrough.com forward slash Maria to get your Magnesium Breakthrough and find out this month's surprise promo.
James Roguski joins us now.
James, thank you so much for your time.
It's always a pleasure.
Thank you for having me.
It's wonderful to have you.
So, James, we have a lot of clarification that we need to do out there.
There seems to be confusion.
I'm not sure why there is confusion around these two topics.
I mean, people like you have spent a lot of time clarifying this for the public.
But in the event that some people still don't understand, we really want to make this crystal clear.
We also want to talk about this petition that's exploded in the UK. Other actions, other countries following suit.
I know you're focusing on the US in opposition to the treaty and the IHR. So you tell me, James, where would you like to start with this?
Well, you know, it is confusing because it's meant to be.
You know, we're living in an age of deceit of biblical proportions.
And so almost everything that you hear in the mainstream media is meant to distract you and confuse you.
You know, there's news that is real, but it's overemphasized so that you don't have time to get into the nitty-gritty.
You know, I learned my lesson a long time ago.
I don't deal with news and I don't really do much on social media.
I look for evidence, right?
So just as a start out, go get the evidence on StopTheWho.com.
You can download all of the documents.
The latest thing that is in the news that I have not been talking about as much is the pandemic treaty.
Now, the treaty is only a 32-page document at the moment.
Right now, as we're recording this, they are in the middle of a week of secret negotiations.
So by the time they get to the World Health Assembly in May, they're going to probably transition from the current zero draft of the treaty to what they will then call the first draft.
And they're trying to get that put together in secret.
They met for a half an hour on Monday.
Only to reveal some of the details of the secret meetings they had between these secret meetings and the secret meetings they had at the beginning of March.
They had other secret meetings that they kind of alluded to.
And so now I'm on the quest to get, you know, recordings of those meetings.
But the whole, you know, the story really should be, what's the secret?
What are you hiding?
Why is this all not involving we the people?
So in regards to the treaty, I would like to rewind it and give people a little bit of context.
They started this discussion of the treaty all the way back in November of 2020.
Then at the end of November 2021, they agreed, yes, we want a treaty.
A year ago, in the United Kingdom, somebody put forth a proposal to make it so that no treaty could be adopted unless it went through a referendum.
People got to vote on it.
That was published on May the 3rd, 2022.
It got 100,000 signatures in less than two weeks.
And at that moment in time, the treaty did not even exist.
We were talking about the amendments and that's how confused everybody was.
Well in the UK that type of a petition has a little bit of weight to it because it requires the government to give an official response and it also requires them to debate it in Parliament.
Well here we are 11 months later, and they're finally getting around to having a debate on Monday, April 17th at 4.30 United Kingdom time.
They're finally going to be talking about the pandemic treaty.
Ostensibly because Andrew Bridgen stood up on February 23rd in the House of Commons and they get to ask a question and make a request and he did so.
And it was finally granted 11 months after 100,000 people signed a petition.
So I encourage people around the world to take advantage of these systems.
There is such a system in Australia.
Demand that this be brought out into the public and be discussed.
People will argue even in Australia, for example, we just had a senator.
I don't know if you know about this, James.
Senator Babbitt put forward a motion to investigate the excess deaths in Australia.
Just investigate.
And almost the entire Senate voted against this.
They don't want to know why so many Australians are dying.
We don't want to know.
So, a lot of people may think that it is, you know, what's the point in doing this?
The point is that You are applying pressure onto these people whose wages are paid for by your taxes to do something, and you will continue to apply that pressure.
Sorry, as you continue to apply that pressure, they feel like they have to respond.
That's how it works.
You have to just keep hounding them, essentially.
And I would encourage people to even remind them as you're talking to them.
I pay your wages!
You serve me.
You have to take this seriously.
These public servants should be put back in their place.
I've spoken to some of these politicians who call themselves a servant of the public.
They call themselves responsible to answer the public.
Those who are serving and don't consider themselves that need to be reminded of it.
Well, in any country, and I'll just speak for the United States, I can't speak for other countries, many people have mistakenly started referring to their employees, the people who work for them, as their leaders, right?
We the people have to lead our society because those people who are our public servants, I've taken to calling them public serpents.
Because, you know, they speak with forked tongue.
They say one thing here and they say one thing there, and they don't do what the people actually want them to do.
And so, staying on the concept of the treaty, okay?
Because I want to partition our conversations.
The treaty is one thing, the amendments are a different something.
Everyone has been focused on the process by which a treaty in the United States would be adopted, and many people have read enough of the Constitution to understand that the Senate would weigh in with advice and consent, and it would be expected that they needed to reach two-thirds.
Well, Senator Ron Johnson brought forth an amendment essentially saying if there was any treaty, The Senate must, you know, vote on it.
Now, it's astonishing that that even needed to be said, because that's in the Constitution.
That should be a given.
But yet, a majority of those who were present in the Senate, nearly all of the Republicans and one, I'm sorry, nearly all of the Democrats and one Republican voted against having the Senate even consider And give advice and consent on this treaty.
And you just have to scratch your head and realize that that alone should be enough to boot them out of office.
They're obligated to defend the Constitution.
And one of the things in the Constitution is that the Senate weighs in on foreign entanglements and they're on record as basically abrogating their duty.
Now, okay, great.
That's what they did.
It is up to the people to hold them accountable.
And so when you listen to the WHO propaganda, they for many years have been saying, no one is safe until everyone is safe.
Which is a lie, but they keep repeating it, so people believe it.
In these meetings with the negotiations, they've been saying nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.
Well, I have my own.
No one has been held accountable until everyone has been held accountable.
And that's what needs to happen before any additional money and power and control and legally binding authority is given over to people who've failed absolutely miserably.
Over the last three years.
Where is the post-mortem, and I use that word sadly because so many people died, but where is the, you know, post-mortem after-the-fact analysis of things like, well, you know, people who are paying attention know that the RT-PCR is a process that can be used in a laboratory.
It's really not a test of disease.
Midazolam, Remdesivir, Monupiravir, Paxlovid, you know, did they actually have any benefit?
Or did they contribute to the death and, you know, disability and disease that they caused?
The use of ventilators.
I mean, anybody who is in the know about what that really is and how that process works should be appalled by the fact that that was even a consideration.
And, you know, then you get to the jams, which, you know, very clearly, it just absolutely amazes me.
Long before anybody ever got jabbed, anyone could have gone to clinicaltrials.gov and read the design of the clinical trials.
And they have endpoints that they will be studying.
And they never studied whether it would reduce death.
They had no intention of studying whether it would reduce hospitalizations or transmissibility.
And so, you know, a year and a half after the fact, People are shocked, right, that, you know, the jabs didn't do what they were advertised to do.
Well, my goodness, did you not read the fraudulent design of the study where anybody who got one jab, two jabs, and then waited 14 days in that whole time period, they were considered to be non-vaccinated.
If you want to fraudulently manipulate data, that's sure...
I mean, all you had to do is look at the design of the trial and you go, oh, well, that's fraud right there.
And people are still trying to wake up to it.
Yeah.
The things that you're talking about are helpful when having discussions with politicians, because two things are happening.
They're either completely unaware of the difference between the treaty and the IHR. Some politicians are on board, yes, we need to raise attention about this, and they're going down fighting the treaty.
When...
The IHR is more dangerous because it has a bigger chance of slipping through, unlike the treaty that may require some sort of a formal process, albeit they're trying to skip that too.
But the IHR has a bigger chance of slipping through the cracks.
Okay, you have some that are aware but uninformed or, you know, misunderstanding.
And then the other side is those that say, oh, well, we're collaborating with the WHO because we're trying to improve our pandemic responses and blah, blah, blah.
They're either in on it or they're ignorant, right?
So that's the group that we're talking about here when you're giving these points to, these talking points.
When the people are going back and applying pressure on these politicians that are saying, we're doing our best to prepare for the next pandemic in conjunction with other countries, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Well, hang on a minute.
Okay, why would we do that in conjunction with the who, when, X, Y, Z, give the list that you just gave?
How could we possibly improve our pandemic response involving this body that managed it catastrophically last time?
Well, you know, I like to ask rhetorical questions, okay?
And one of the most simple questions, because the WHO themselves have admitted they don't know the answer.
There are experts back on September 21st of last year, and I think we may have talked about this, they had a meeting and the WHO asked their expert panel, what metrics could we enforce to ensure that nations around the world were properly prepared for whatever, you know, the future might hold?
And so all you have to do is ask someone, could you give me your legal definition of preparedness?
What is your legal definition of prevention?
Now, those words, you know, conjure up ideas in your head, but what they're doing is funneling tens of billions of dollars at a mirage.
They don't know what constitutes preparedness.
They have no idea.
But yet, you've got to realize that the yearly budget of the WHO is under $4 billion.
But they're advocating for up to $30 billion a year for preparedness.
Well, you know, it's just like Alice in Wonderland.
You know, words mean whatever they want them to mean.
What does preparedness mean?
Oh, we spent a lot of money on the pharmaceutical Hospital emergency industrial complex you know we've got this that and the other thing being prepared but their own experts said well you know back in 2020 we were using these metrics and we thought that northern Italy or Spain or Portugal or Germany or the UK or the United States with all their high-tech medical equipment and all their money That they were well prepared, but look at that.
Sixteen times as many people died in the Americas as in Africa who would have been deemed to be ill-prepared.
Well, maybe preparedness means you let ingenious, knowledgeable, experienced doctors Examine the patients who show up and do what is appropriate for them, and what is not preparedness is taking a one-size-fits-all answer from some bureaucrat in Geneva who doesn't know anything about the actual problem on the ground in the clinic with somebody who is taken ill.
Well, this is the other thing, James, and it's something that the public can challenge their So-called representatives with, right?
What you're saying is very, very important.
And I think this is where people don't know how to approach these politicians when they're coming back to them and saying, oh, we're working in conjunction with other countries, so on and so forth.
So, okay, what is, as part of Australia's workings with the other member states and the WHO, what preparedness, what are they proposing we do in terms of preparedness?
They're proposing putting all of the control of the means of production and the distribution of products through a logistics network and a pathogen access and benefits sharing system into the hands of the Director General of the WHO. Now, that's the wording from the treaty.
Yes, but what I'm saying is...
Shifting over to the amendments, they believe that preparedness...
Is making it so that one person can literally tell Nation A that they have to make these products and give them to Nation B. They don't talk about the actual reality of what makes a human being healthier.
And so all of the details that are in all of these documents, I encourage everybody to read it.
But the harder thing to comprehend is what they're not talking about.
They're not inviting doctors into these conversations.
Yes.
So what I'm talking about here is going back.
When you write to a politician or when you call a politician and they come back and they give you the standard response, we're doing what we can to help prevent next pandemic, so on and so forth.
So all these points that you're raising right now are the points that people would need to bring up with them and say, okay, what is your understanding of how exactly they're preparing?
Oh, well, half of them wouldn't know.
Okay, so how can you then in good conscience say that we're working on it without even understanding?
I'm coming to you with the information of what this treaty and these IHR amendments are actually about.
You're coming back and saying, no, no, we're actively working on it, but you don't even know how we're working on it or what's been proposed here.
You don't even know the contents of the IHR or the treaty.
I want you to respond to X, Y, Z. I want you to respond to this, that and the other.
This is why it's so important for people to familiarize themselves with the information so they can challenge these robot responses.
The feedback that I've been getting from people in the UK because they started a petition just a couple of days ago.
It's already gotten thousands of signatures.
They have said to me, many of them, that the members of parliament actually know that they don't have any power.
And when a constituent comes up to them and treats them the way a public servant is supposed to be treated, and you go up to the public servant and you say, this is what I want you to do and I want you to do it now.
And the point is we're not petitioning and begging them to do something.
They're our servants.
A petition is the way you tell them specifically what it is you want.
And so, what happened back in May of last year is the folks in the UK put forth a petition to have a discussion about the treaty, which is finally coming around to happen on April 17th.
Now, what happened last year in the United States is people sent emails to their members of Congress and senators And the initial feedback that they got was clearly, and I shared something with you the other day, and you know exactly what I'm talking about, absolutely unaware of the reality of the situation.
And then people followed up with the congresspeople, and then what came back was clearly a form letter from up above from the leadership, and it was just filled with condescension.
And when people are informed and they know that, first of all, they're smarter and more knowledgeable than the public servant that they're talking to, and then the condescension hits, what you see are people who are really fired up.
Because when you know the details, you can see when someone is lying to you.
And that's what they're doing.
But we, the people, have to be informed.
And what I encourage everybody to do, we did this back in September, we're having a conversation in front of the camera.
We're talking in front of the camera.
You are the media.
Everybody else in the world can be the media.
Learn the details of the information.
Call me up anytime if you have any questions.
My phone number is 310-619-3055.
I'm in the US. Put a plus one on it.
Use Signal or Telegram or WhatsApp or text me or whatever.
If you have any questions about the details, I'll be more than happy to help you comprehend what's going on here.
And so then you can record a video, and when you send an email to your public servant, include your video!
So that whatever it is you want to say to them gets said to them via video, but then you put it up on social media, put it on all the video platforms, and everyone in the world will learn From what you learned and your opinion and your outlook and your perspective on it, because that's what they are not doing.
They're having secret meetings with no public comment.
About a year ago, Maria, I learned with five or six days notice, a year ago in April, The WHO said, oh, we're having a public comment period.
You can send in your written comments.
I remember.
In less than a week, we got 33,884 people to send in their public comments.
99.9% of them was, we don't want a treaty.
Okay?
In September, we got hundreds of people to record a video.
You can go to screwthewho.com and you can watch what people had to say.
They believe That they can do whatever they want, tell you about it sort of by posting it somewhere in the public domain and then essentially saying that your silence must mean that you consent.
So please people, do not be silent.
Learn the details.
Form your own opinion, whatever that may be, and express it because your silence is consent.
And if you say, oh there's nothing you can do, well if you do nothing, that is assumed that you are consenting with what they are doing.
So unless someone shows me that they have spoken out against it, then I have to be left to assume that their silence means that they are for it.
So if you're for it, go lay back down on the couch and don't do anything.
If you're against it, speak up about it.
That is your duty.
You have rights, but you have responsibilities.
And the core responsibility is to express your opinion in the general direction of your public servant.
Put it in written form, put it in audio form, put it in video form, or even better, Print out the document, highlight the parts you don't like, and make an appointment to see them and drop it in front of them and go, look, I want you to respond to this.
These words on these documents are what they're doing in Geneva.
Don't give me any of your, you know, nobody is safe until everybody's safe.
This is what they are doing.
I oppose it.
Unless you tell me that you're going to oppose it also, then you're a traitor to your nation, giving over sovereignty and letting our dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms be given away.
You're either speaking out against it or you are assumed to be in favor of it.
I would even go so far as to respectfully telling that person to their face that this is actually treasonous.
You know, very, very serious to hand over our nation's sovereignty.
And as much as they deny that that's the case, and Tedros tweets saying the WHO's not trying to install a dictatorship.
I don't know if you saw that.
You know, the exchange between him and Elon Musk.
If I may decipher that, okay, if we're talking about the same clip, it started out with Tedros saying very clearly that the international health regulations do not give him the authority to tell nations what to do.
And I say, bravo, sir, you are absolutely correct, but you left out a little something.
You didn't say the proposed amendments also don't because it is in the proposed amendments that the sovereignty would be transferred and the authority would be given.
So the key to what they say is what they do not say.
He said correctly that the current, he didn't say the word current, he said the international health regulations do not give him any authority and I say that's exactly the way we're going to keep it.
The proposed amendments are what would give you authority and those shall not pass.
Absolutely agree with you.
I want to talk really quickly about this petition, James.
So this is the UK petition that I've got up on the screen now for everyone.
If you live in the United Kingdom or know someone who does, please help spread the word about this petition.
You can find it on James's Substack and we'll actually link this one in the description below.
Tess Laurie and co-founder of the World Council for Health has submitted a petition that was accepted by the UK government on the 3rd of April and they want to hold a parliamentary vote on whether to reject the amendments to the IHR. We've had word from some people, again going back to that topic of confusion, that somehow the IHR amendments are no longer being negotiated.
That's not true.
There is another meeting, from my understanding, on April 17th to the 20th for the IHR amendments to continue being negotiated.
And I highly doubt Dr.
Tess Laurie would be wasting her time with something like this if it wasn't still at place.
Correct me if I'm wrong, James, we're looking at similar action for the US as well.
Well, to explain what happened last year is, you know, many people, politicians, people, news media, however this happens, they have just been blind to the fact that amendments to five articles of the International Health Regulations were adopted by the World Health Assembly on May 27, 2022.
There is an 18-month period by which every single nation on the planet could just say, no thank you, we reject them.
Article 61 of the regulations is the right of rejection.
It's just a simple letter from the country to the WHO, no thanks for your amendments.
Well, we've gone 10 months since last May 27, a little bit more than 10 months, All they require is an 18-month period of silence and they assume that you have given your consent.
Well, we've got until about the end of November to raise the issue.
So that's essentially what this petition is doing.
It's saying, hey, could you please wake up?
Last year they changed international law.
And you all keep saying that Parliament is going to weigh in on it.
Well, could you get around to it?
Because time's a waste.
And the same situation would apply to the 307 proposed amendments that would really change everything.
Please don't lie to us and tell us that it's the treaty.
They changed the rules last year, and you all haven't been treating it as if it was a treaty.
You've been ignoring it, which would allow it to pass through your silence being considered consent.
And so it's the same in every nation around the world, Maria.
Every single nation on the planet could very easily just craft a letter, send it to the WHO, say, no thank you.
Those amendments are, you know, very nice, but not for us.
And people just don't understand that that is the process.
It happened last year.
It could happen this year.
They're talking about making it happen next year.
But the process is flawed because the people do not have a say in the process.
194 unelected, unaccountable, unknown people get together in a room in Geneva, Change international law, keep it secret, and it goes into effect.
And that is not acceptable.
I agree with you.
And again, the people that we need to demand, because the politicians are the ones who would have the ability to find out who these people are that are meeting on our behalf.
They would have the ability to communicate with these departments I mean, no one knows who these attendees are from Australia.
I put it out there, no one could recognize them.
So after your post asking for people to let us know who these people were.
So the politicians that you are contacting...
Again, I want to remind people, these people are literally, the reason they can sit and have a meal at night with their families, the reason their child goes to school and has an education, the reason they have a roof over their head to keep them warm and safe from the elements is your taxes.
Your taxes are paying for their mortgage.
Don't forget this.
So when you are going and talking to them, that is the authority that you have over them.
And I would have no problem reminding them of that very respectfully in my conversation with them if they need reminding about what a public servant actually is.
These people need to be flooded in every country.
With nothing other than this.
James, at least, maybe, let's say 40,000 people will see this.
40,000 people can talk to one other person.
That person can talk to one other person.
We're already looking at 120,000 people.
Multiply that by a few other people getting together and causing action.
You're talking about some serious waves with the politicians in every single country.
They need to be hounded.
This is not going to go through.
And if we let it go through, we will simply be sitting there and crying about the fact that goons are at our door to forcefully inject us because that's what they want to do.
So we can't let this happen and we have to educate these either ignorant or in on it politicians on the fact that we are not going to tolerate this and demand that they put a stop to this.
We can't let it happen.
I can't say it enough.
I don't know too many employees who can get away with telling their boss how to run their company.
Now, realize that you are your member of parliament or your congressperson or your senator's boss.
You're derelict in your duty if you're not giving them the instructions to do the job that you demand that they do.
They should be fired if they don't do the job, but you're responsible for telling them exactly what it is you want them to do.
And I've had many people in the UK tell me exactly that.
They go and they speak with their Member of Parliament, and because it's a lot easier, the staff or the Member of Parliament just says, well, what is it you want me to do?
If we don't know what we want, we're going to get what they want.
So very simply, look over the information, decide what it is that you want, and tell them clearly what it is you want, Record it on video.
Send it to them.
If you can get to their office and speak to them or their staff in person, it starts with we the people leading the way.
Our public servants will follow when enough of us are leading in unison.
The problem has been, look in the mirror, we have not been doing our job, and so they've been getting away with not doing theirs.
Once we start doing our job, they will have no choice but to do what we tell them to do.
I agree.
I agree.
The people must Realize the power that they have.
The people must walk in that authority.
You know, when you walk in authority...
How do I say this?
I'm thinking in a spiritual sense, James.
When you know the authority that you have...
It's a very peaceful thing.
Yes, it is a very peaceful thing.
But what I'm talking about is even in a spiritual sense, when you know the authority that you have or that Jesus has, you are more confident in what you're doing in life, right?
This is a similar thing.
You mean no one any harm.
You mean good for everyone, but you understand that no man or woman has authority over you.
There's a higher authority and you're enforcing that higher righteous law.
When you see it being violated, it is your obligation to speak out against it.
If you watch these horrors happening, you're culpable.
There is a higher law upon we the people to demand that our representatives, our members of parliament, whatever they may be called, abide by that higher law and not follow laws made by men that are in violation of that higher law, but with rights come responsibility.
And so each and every one of us has to take the responsibility to at the very least Speak into existence.
You can call it prayer if you want.
You say very clearly what future it is that you want.
And the word will be created.
If you're silent, someone else is going to speak that word into existence, and you're going to live in the world that they want.
And it's probably not going to be very righteous.
So do what your heart tells you to do.
But if you don't do anything, you're complicit in the crimes that have been committed.
I absolutely agree, James.
And again, it really is just about people understanding their authority.
Again, of course, peaceful, you know, loving.
All of that is the approach.
But the approach is perhaps you, public servant, don't understand the nature of what's going on here.
Or perhaps you don't understand that I, as the person that you serve, am demanding that you do something about this.
If you don't change your mind about this, I'm going to change your mind about this.
By educating you as to what this is actually about.
Now that I've told you what they're actually trying to do, you are responsible to do something about it.
This is how this exchange works.
And so I really think every single one of us just needs to constantly flood them with this.
I think it needs to happen in every state, every country, everywhere.
We cannot let this go through.
Time is ticking.
November is the date for our silence, our silent consent ending, and we have to get onto this now.
James Rogoski, thank you so much.
We're linking the UK petition in the description below on James' substack.
Everyone, please go have a look at that.
And we'll play the video from Dr.
Tess Laurie as well in a moment.
Thank you, James.
Thank you so much, Maria.
Mistakes were not made.
An anthem for justice by Margaret Anna Alice.
The Armenian genocide was not a mistake.
Holdemore was not a mistake.
The final solution was not a mistake.
The Great Leap Forward was not a mistake.
The killing fields were not a mistake.
Name your genocide.
It was not a mistake.
That includes the Great Democide of the 2020s.
To imply otherwise is to give them the out they are seeking.
It was not botched.
It was not bungled.
It was not a blunder.
It was not incompetence.
It was not lack of knowledge.
It was not spontaneous mass hysteria.
The planning occurred in plain sight.
The planning is still occurring in plain sight.
The philanthropists bought the science.
The modelers projected the lies.
The testers concocted the crisis.
The NGOs leased the academics.
The scientists fabricated the findings.
The mouthpieces spewed the talking points.
The organizations declared the emergency.
The governments erected the walls.
The departments rewrote the rules.
The governors quashed the rights.
The politicians passed the laws.
The bankers installed the control grid.
The stooges laundered the money.
The DOD placed the orders.
The corporations fulfilled the contracts.
The regulators approved the solution.
The laws shielded the contractors.
The agencies ignored the signals.
The behemoths consolidated the media.
The psychologists crafted the messaging.
The propagandists chanted the slogans.
The fact-chokers smeared the dissidents.
The censors silenced the questioners.
The jackboots stomped the dissenters.
The tyrants summoned.
The puppeteers jerked.
The puppets danced.
The colluders implemented.
The doctors ordered.
The hospitals administered.
The menticiders scripted.
The bamboozles bleated.
The totalitarianized bullied.
The Covidians tattled.
The parents surrendered.
The good citizens believed and forgot.
This was calculated.
This was formulated.
This was focused.
This was articulated.
This was manufactured.
This was falsified.
This was coerced.
This was inflicted.
This was denied.
We were terrorized.
We were isolated.
We were gaslit.
We were dehumanized.
We were wounded.
We were killed.
Don't let them get away with it.
Powerful, powerful words from Dr. Tess.
Tess Laurie there.
We cannot let them get away with this.
As much as they'd like to sweep COVID under the rug, these past three years were the greatest crimes ever committed against humanity and justice must be served.
Peacefully, lawfully, we will continue to fight this.
But in order to do that, we have to be prepared that at any point they could draw their wild card.
They could flick the switch.
And switch off food supply, electricity, communications, all of these things will become very difficult to fight if that happens, and we have to be prepared so that we don't depend on the government.
So if you're in the United States, head to heavensharvest.com, use promo code Z with three E's for 5% off your order.
They have new buckets right now in stock.
Earlier in the week we spoke to Clayton about this.
Organic kits, very, very important for those that have food intolerances.
I'm one of those people, so I really value things like this.
Get yourself an heirloom seed kit.
Grow your own food.
Have control over your own food supply.
It's so crucial in this time to remain sharp and healthy while we battle this peacefully and lawfully.
Survival Supplies Australia, if you're in Australia, for all of your survival needs, including food, first aid, and so much more there, long-term water.
Satellite phones for communications when they ultimately go down, and they will.
These are military-grade phones, and the team at sat123.com Get yourself prepared for the financial collapse.
Head to goldbullionaustralia.com.au if you're in Australia.
These guys are a global leader in bullion and, in my opinion, Which is correct.
They are the best in Australia.
And I say that because we have personal dealings with them and they're amazing.
And if you're in Australia, head to stockmansteaks.com.au forward slash Maria for guaranteed mRNA free.
That's right.
Stockman guarantees mRNA free meat, non-GMO, no antibiotic hormone free.
The meat is a fantastic quality.
I've tried it myself.
It's incredibly tasty.
And the biggest, biggest thing is that we just can't trust the big chains to provide us with mRNA-free meat these days.
They want us all injected or else.
But I won't be putting that crap into my body, and I'm sure that anyone watching this agrees.
Thank you so much for tuning in today.
Hold them accountable.
Their wages are paid by your taxes.
I'll see you next week right here on Uncensored.
▲
Export Selection